FY 2021 OIA Budget Justifications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FY 2021 OIA Budget Justifications The United States BUDGET Department of the Interior JUSTIFICATIONS and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2021 OFFICE OF INSULAR AFFAIRS NOTICE: These budget justifications are prepared for the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittees. Approval for release of the justifications prior to their printing in the public record of the Subcommittee hearings may be obtained through the Office of Budget of the Department of the Interior. Printed on Recycled Paper Office of Insular Affairs FY 2021 Budget Justification Table of Contents General Statement 1 Budget Highlights 3 2021 Budget at a Glance 5 2019 Funding by Activity and Insular Area 6 Organization Chart 7 Goal Performance Table 8 Summary of Requirements Assistance to Territories 9 Compact of Free Association – Current Appropriation 10 Compact of Free Association – Permanent Appropriation 11 Fixed Costs and Related Changes 12 Appropriations Language 13 Authorizations 14 American Samoa Operations 17 CIP Grants 21 Territorial Assistance 31 Office of Insular Affairs 33 Technical Assistance 37 Maintenance Assistance 46 Brown Tree Snake Control 48 Coral Reef Initiative & Natural Resources 52 Energizing Insular Communities 61 Compact Impact – Discretionary 65 Compacts of Free Association Federal Services Assistance 67 Enewetak 69 Marshall Islands Tax and Trade 71 Economic Assistance Overview for FSM and RMI 72 Compact Impact 82 Miscellaneous Schedules 85 Appendix: Economic Update 93 Table of Contents General Statement Office of Insular Affairs FY 2021 Budget Justification General Statement The Assistant Secretary - Insular and International Affairs and the Office of Insular Affairs (OIA) carry out the Secretary’s responsibilities for U.S.-affiliated insular areas. These include the territories of American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI). Residents of these U.S. territories are U.S. citizens or U.S. nationals. Additionally, OIA administers and oversees Federal assistance to three freely associated states (FAS): the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), and the Republic of Palau (Palau). The 2021 budget request achieves the Department’s mission of Fulfilling Our Trust and Insular Responsibilities by supporting the Office of Insular Affairs’ efforts to strengthen economic and health capacities in the U.S. territories while fulfilling obligations to the freely associated states under the Compacts of Free Association. The territories are an integral part of the fabric of America, and the freely associated states, while independent countries, are uniquely interwoven with the United States in terms of a shared history, ongoing partnership, and a shared vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific. The territories and freely associated states are each unique, yet all of their economies are small, isolated, and dependent on one or two main sources of income. The Office of Insular Affairs has an important role to play in understanding the nuances of the Federal government’s interrelationship with each of the insular areas. OIA facilitates coordination of Federal polices and programs to best serve the insular areas and utilizes its own assistance programs to fill gaps not fulfilled by other Federal programs to meet the needs of the insular areas. OIA programs are purposely designed to offer the flexibility needed to respond to urgent, immediate needs in the insular areas. In 2021, technical assistance will be provided to address pressing issues and priorities and develop action plans to mitigate any challenges the insular areas are facing. Direct grants, reimbursable agreements, and contracts with technical assistance providers, both within and outside the Federal government, support these efforts. As an example, in response to a measles outbreak in the Pacific, a $490,000 grant was awarded to American Samoa in October 2019 to prevent the spread of measles and to help bolster efforts to vaccinate the entire population with the Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) vaccination. In addition, Capital Improvement Project (CIP) funds not only address a variety of infrastructure needs in the U.S. territories, including critical infrastructure such as hospitals, schools, wastewater, and solid waste systems to promote economic development; but, can also be leveraged as local matching funds for other Federal grant programs to assist in disaster recovery as is being done in the wake of typhoons Mangkhut and Yutu, which hit the CNMI in 2018. Most of OIA’s annual budget consists of mandatory funding, including an estimated $228.0 million for 2021, to fulfill U.S. obligations under the Compacts of Free Association. Financial assistance under the Compacts of Free Association is scheduled to end after 2023 for the Federated States of Micronesia and the Republic of the Marshall Islands and in 2024 for Palau. On August 5, 2019, U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo made an historic visit to Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia, to meet with the leaders of the freely associated states. During his visit, Secretary of State Pompeo announced the United 1 General Statement Office of Insular Affairs FY 2021 Budget Justification States’ intent to begin negotiations on expiring provisions of the Compact of Free Association with the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau, underscoring the importance of each of the bilateral relationships. The Assistant Secretary – Insular and International Affairs and the Office of Insular Affairs are actively working to ensure that the U.S. relationship with each of the freely associate states remains robust and mutually beneficial. The 2021 Office of Insular Affairs’ budget request strengthens insular economies through strategic investments in infrastructure, public services, and technical assistance, which attracts private sector investment. The Office will also promote policies and work to improve Federal coordination on issues impacting insular economies while restoring trust with territorial communities and ensuring sovereignty means something in supporting and working with the freely associated states. Modernizing Government President Trump signed an Executive Order to modernize and reform the executive branch and Interior is leading the way, developing and executing a program that will streamline processes and better serve the American people. To build a better and more efficient executive branch we must foster a culture of ethics and respect amongst colleagues. The 2021 budget supports needed reforms to strengthen the culture of ethics within Interior. Over the last two years, Interior has taken several steps to enhance the emphasis on ethics in the Department, including increasing the number of ethics officers and vigilance regarding the obligation of the Department’s leaders and employees to hold themselves and their colleagues accountable for ethical conduct. Ethics is a top priority in all decision making and operations. This past summer, Secretary Bernhardt advanced his commitment to transform Interior’s ethics program by signing Secretarial Order 3375, which restructures the ethics program by unifying disparate bureau ethics programs into a centrally-managed office under the Solicitor. The Order streamlines the reporting structure for ethics personnel, establishes the Departmental Ethics Office, and clarifies roles and responsibilities for the Department’s employees. The FY 2021 budget implements this reorganization to restructure the ethics program by transferring bureau ethics funding and FTEs to the Departmental Ethics Office in the Office of the Solicitor budget. The budget request supports the President’s Management Agenda Workforce Cross-Agency Priority Goal #3, Developing a Workforce for the 21st Century. The Department will support strategic recognition throughout the year, address workforce challenges, and recognize high performing employees and those employees with talent critical to mission achievement. The budget assumes agency pay for performance efforts increase one percentage point for non-Senior Executive Service (SES)/Senior Leader (SL)/Scientific or Professional (ST) salary spending. The budget request supports the allocated share of operating costs for the GrantSolutions enterprise system to improve the processing and transparency of grants and cooperative agreements across Interior. Cost allocations are based on an algorithm of use factors. The Good Accounting Obligation in Government Act (GAO-IG Act, P.L. 115-414) enacted January 3, 2019, requires that Agencies report the status of each open audit recommendation issued more than one 2 General Statement Office of Insular Affairs FY 2021 Budget Justification year prior to the submission of the Agency’s annual budget justification to Congress. The Act requires Agencies to include the current target completion date, implementation status, and any discrepancies on closure determinations. The Department of the Interior leadership takes audit follow-up very seriously and considers our external auditors, to include the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and Office of the Inspector General, valued partners in not only improving the Department’s management and compliance obligations but also enhancing its programmatic and administrative operations. As stewards of taxpayer resources, the Department applies cost-benefit analysis and enterprise risk management principles in recommendation implementation decisions.
Recommended publications
  • OGC-98-5 U.S. Insular Areas: Application of the U.S. Constitution
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on GAO Resources, House of Representatives November 1997 U.S. INSULAR AREAS Application of the U.S. Constitution GAO/OGC-98-5 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of the General Counsel B-271897 November 7, 1997 The Honorable Don Young Chairman Committee on Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: More than 4 million U.S. citizens and nationals live in insular areas1 under the jurisdiction of the United States. The Territorial Clause of the Constitution authorizes the Congress to “make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property” of the United States.2 Relying on the Territorial Clause, the Congress has enacted legislation making some provisions of the Constitution explicitly applicable in the insular areas. In addition to this congressional action, courts from time to time have ruled on the application of constitutional provisions to one or more of the insular areas. You asked us to update our 1991 report to you on the applicability of provisions of the Constitution to five insular areas: Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (the CNMI), American Samoa, and Guam. You asked specifically about significant judicial and legislative developments concerning the political or tax status of these areas, as well as court decisions since our earlier report involving the applicability of constitutional provisions to these areas. We have included this information in appendix I. 1As we did in our 1991 report on this issue, Applicability of Relevant Provisions of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinarian Shortage Situation Nomination Form
    Shortage ID VMLRP USE ONLY NIFA Veterinary Medicine National Institute of Food and Agriculture Loan Repayment Program (VMLRP) US Department of Agriculture Form NIFA 2009‐0001 OMB Control No. 0524‐0050 Veterinarian Shortage Situation Expiration Date: 9/30/2019 Nomination Form To be submitted under the authority of the chief State or Insular Area Animal Health Official Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment Program (VMLRP) This form must be used for Nomination of Veterinarian Shortage Situations to the Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment Program (VMLRP), Authorized Under the National Veterinary Medical Service Act (NVMSA) Note: Please submit one separate nomination form for each shortage situation. See the State Animal Health Official (SAHO) section of the VMLRP web site (www.nifa.usda.gov/vmlrp) for the number of nominations permitted for your state or insular area. Location of Veterinary Shortage Area for this Nomination Location of Veterinary Shortage: (e.g., County, State/Insular Area; must be a logistically feasible veterinary practice service area) Approximate Center of Shortage Area (or Location of Position if Type III): (e.g., Address or Cross Street, Town/City, and Zip Code) Overall Priority of Shortage: ______________ Type of Veterinary Practice Area/Discipline/Specialty (select one) : ________________________________________________________________________________ For Type I or II Private Practice: Must cover(check at least one) May cover Beef Cattle Beef Cattle Dairy Cattle Dairy Cattle Swine Swine Poultry Poultry Small
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinarian Shortage Situation Nomination Form
    4IPSUBHF*% AK163 7.-3164&0/-: NIFAVeterinaryMedicine NationalInstituteofFoodandAgriculture LoanRepaymentProgram(VMLRP) USDepartmentofAgriculture FormNIFA2009Ͳ0001 OMBControlNo.0524Ͳ0046 VeterinarianShortageSituation ExpirationDate:11/30/2016 NominationForm Tobesubmitted undertheauthorityofthechiefStateorInsularAreaAnimalHealthOfficial VeterinaryMedicineLoanRepaymentProgram(VMLRP) ThisformmustbeusedforNominationofVeterinarianShortageSituationstotheVeterinaryMedicineLoanRepaymentProgram (VMLRP),AuthorizedUndertheNationalVeterinaryMedicalServiceAct(NVMSA) Note:Pleasesubmitoneseparatenominationformforeachshortagesituation.SeetheStateAnimalHealthOfficial(SAHO)sectionof theVMLRPwebsite(www.nifa.usda.gov/vmlrp)forthenumberofnominationspermittedforyourstateorinsulararea. LocationofVeterinaryShortageAreaforthisNomination Kenai Peninsula, Alaska LocationofVeterinaryShortage: (e.g.,County,State/InsularArea;mustbealogisticallyfeasibleveterinarypracticeservicearea) ApproximateCenterofShortageArea Kenai or Soldotna: area extends from Portage (just south of Anchorage down to (orLocationofPositionifTypeIII): Homer at the tip of the Kenai Peninsula) (e.g.,AddressorCrossStreet,Town/City,andZipCode) OverallPriorityofShortage: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@Critical Priority TypeofVeterinaryPracticeArea/Discipline/Specialty;ƐĞůĞĐƚŽŶĞͿ͗ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@Type II: Private Practice - Rural Area, Food Animal Medicine (awardee obligation: at least 30%@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ FTE or 12hr/week) &ŽƌdLJƉĞ/Žƌ//WƌŝǀĂƚĞWƌĂĐƚŝĐĞ͗ Musƚcover(checkĂtleastone)
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal and Insular Area Grants: Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA) Request for Applications
    &EPA United States Office of Transportation and Air Quality Environmental Protection March 2021 Agency Coming Soon: Tribal and Insular Area Grants: Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA) Request for Applications Request for Application (RFA) opens late April 2021 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is excited to announce plans to request applications for projects that achieve significant reductions in diesel emissions. EPA anticipates awarding approximately $5 million in total DERA funding and plans to have no mandatory cost share requirement for projects. Eligible Organizations Eligible entities include tribal governments (or intertribal consortia) and Alaska Native villages, or insular area government agencies which have jurisdiction over transportation or air quality. Insular areas include the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 2021 Tribal and Insular Area RFA Highlights TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS (OR INTERTRIBAL INSULAR AREA GOVERNMENTS CONSORTIA) AND ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGES • Approximately $4.5 Million • Approximately $500,000 • Funding Limit per Application: $800,000 • Funding Limit per Application: $250,000 • Two Applications per Applicant • Two Applications per Applicant Although funding for both tribes and insular areas is planned under this single RFA, the applications will be competed separately. Tribal and insular area applications will be reviewed, ranked, and selected by separate review panels. Anticipated Timeline and Dates Description Date* RFA Opens Late April, 2021 Informational Webinars EPA will host three webinars to accommodate the different time zones and schedules RFA Closes – Applications Due Early July, 2021 Anticipated Notification of Selection Mid August, 2021 Anticipated Award October-December 2021 *Finalized dates will be posted online at www.epa.gov/dera when the RFA officially opens.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinarian Shortage Situation Nomination Form
    4IPSUBHF*% TX175 7.-3164&0/-: NIFAVeterinaryMedicine NationalInstituteofFoodandAgriculture LoanRepaymentProgram(VMLRP) USDepartmentofAgriculture FormNIFA2009Ͳ0001 OMBControlNo.0524ͲϬϬϱϬ VeterinarianShortageSituation ExpirationDate:ϵͬϯϬͬϮϬϭϵ NominationForm Tobesubmitted undertheauthorityofthechiefStateorInsularAreaAnimalHealthOfficial VeterinaryMedicineLoanRepaymentProgram(VMLRP) ThisformmustbeusedforNominationofVeterinarianShortageSituationstotheVeterinaryMedicineLoanRepaymentProgram (VMLRP),AuthorizedUndertheNationalVeterinaryMedicalServiceAct(NVMSA) Note:Pleasesubmitoneseparatenominationformforeachshortagesituation.SeetheStateAnimalHealthOfficial(SAHO)sectionof theVMLRPwebsite(www.nifa.usda.gov/vmlrp)forthenumberofnominationspermittedforyourstateorinsulararea. LocationofVeterinaryShortageAreaforthisNomination Coke, Crockett, Glasscock, Mitchell, Reagan, Sterling, Upton, TX LocationofVeterinaryShortage: (e.g.,County,State/InsularArea;mustbealogisticallyfeasibleveterinarypracticeservicearea) ApproximateCenterofShortageArea Sterling City, 76951 (orLocationofPositionifTypeIII): (e.g.,AddressorCrossStreet,Town/City,andZipCode) OverallPriorityofShortage: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@High Priority TypeofVeterinaryPracticeArea/Discipline/Specialty;ƐĞůĞĐƚŽŶĞͿ͗ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@Type II: Private Practice - Rural Area, Food Animal Medicine (awardee obligation: at least 30%@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ FTE or 12hr/week) &ŽƌdLJƉĞ/Žƌ//WƌŝǀĂƚĞWƌĂĐƚŝĐĞ͗ Musƚcover(checkĂtleastone) Maycover ■ BeefCattle BeefCattle DairyCattle DairyCattle
    [Show full text]
  • A Stability Pact for the Caucasus in Theory and Practice
    CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES WORKING DOCUMENT NO. 152 SEPTEMBER 2000 A STABILITY PACT FOR THE CAUCASUS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE - A SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE MICHAEL EMERSON NATHALIE TOCCI AND ELENA PROKHOROVA CEPS Working Documents are published to give an early indication of the work in progress within CEPS research programmes and to stimulate reactions from other experts in the field. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the authors in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which they are associated. ISBN 92-9079-309-0 © Copyright 2000, Michael Emerson, Nathalie Tocci and Elena Prokhorova A Stability Pact for the Caucasus in Theory and Practice - A Supplementary Note CEPS Working Document No. 152, November 2000 Michael Emerson, Nathalie Tocci & Elena Prokhorova* Abstract In response to appeals of the leaders of the South Caucasus for a Stability Pact for the region, CEPS published in May 2000 a consultative document with a comprehensive proposal (available on www.ceps.be). Subsequently the authors have held extensive consultations with the leaders in all three states of the South Caucasus, and in four of the key autonomies (Nagorno Karabakh, Abkhazia, Adjaria, Ossetia). The present paper draws together the information and ideas collected during these consultations, although the conclusions are only attributable to the authors. The main argument of the original document is maintained, and strengthened with more precise views on how the conflicts might be solved within the framework of a Stability Pact. However the proposed Stability Pact process could be more than just an approach to conflict resolution. It has systemic or even constitutional aspects, with elements to overcome the transitional problems of the weak state and ease the confrontations of traditional notions such as independence versus territorial integrity, or the choice between federation and confederation, which are part of the present impasse.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts Attributable to FY 2015 Federal Grants and Payments to Seven Insular Areas
    February 2016 Economic Impacts Attributable to FY 2015 Federal Grants and Payments to Seven Insular Areas Final Report Prepared for Office of Insular Affairs U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 Prepared by Ryan J. Callihan Alan C. O’Connor Carson Moss RTI International 3040 E. Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 RTI Project Number 0215158 RTI Project Number 0215158 Economic Impacts Attributable to FY 2015 Federal Grants and Payments to Seven Insular Areas Final Report February 2016 Prepared for Office of Insular Affairs U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 Prepared by Ryan J. Callihan Alan C. O’Connor Carson Moss RTI International 3040 E. Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 _________________________________ RTI International is a registered trademark and a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Contents Section Page Executive Summary ES-1 1. Introduction 1-1 1.1 FY 2015 OIA Payments to Insular Areas .................................................... 1-2 1.2 Study Objectives .................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Overview of Study Methodology ............................................................... 1-3 1.4 Methodological Limitations ....................................................................... 1-6 1.5 Data Limitations ..................................................................................... 1-7 1.6 Report Organization ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Country Coding Units
    INSTITUTE Country Coding Units v11.1 - March 2021 Copyright © University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute All rights reserved Suggested citation: Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, and Lisa Gastaldi. 2021. ”V-Dem Country Coding Units v11.1” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Funders: We are very grateful for our funders’ support over the years, which has made this ven- ture possible. To learn more about our funders, please visit: https://www.v-dem.net/en/about/ funders/ For questions: [email protected] 1 Contents Suggested citation: . .1 1 Notes 7 1.1 ”Country” . .7 2 Africa 9 2.1 Central Africa . .9 2.1.1 Cameroon (108) . .9 2.1.2 Central African Republic (71) . .9 2.1.3 Chad (109) . .9 2.1.4 Democratic Republic of the Congo (111) . .9 2.1.5 Equatorial Guinea (160) . .9 2.1.6 Gabon (116) . .9 2.1.7 Republic of the Congo (112) . 10 2.1.8 Sao Tome and Principe (196) . 10 2.2 East/Horn of Africa . 10 2.2.1 Burundi (69) . 10 2.2.2 Comoros (153) . 10 2.2.3 Djibouti (113) . 10 2.2.4 Eritrea (115) . 10 2.2.5 Ethiopia (38) . 10 2.2.6 Kenya (40) . 11 2.2.7 Malawi (87) . 11 2.2.8 Mauritius (180) . 11 2.2.9 Rwanda (129) . 11 2.2.10 Seychelles (199) . 11 2.2.11 Somalia (130) . 11 2.2.12 Somaliland (139) . 11 2.2.13 South Sudan (32) . 11 2.2.14 Sudan (33) .
    [Show full text]
  • Political Status of Puerto Rico: Brief Background and Recent Developments for Congress
    Political Status of Puerto Rico: Brief Background and Recent Developments for Congress R. Sam Garrett Specialist in American National Government June 12, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44721 Political Status of Puerto Rico: Brief Background and Recent Developments for Congress Summary Puerto Rico lies approximately 1,000 miles southeast of Miami and 1,500 miles from Washington, DC. Despite being far outside the continental United States, the island has played a significant role in American politics and policy since the United States acquired Puerto Rico from Spain in 1898. Puerto Rico’s political status—referring to the relationship between the federal government and a territorial one—is an undercurrent in virtually every policy matter on the island. In a June 11, 2017, plebiscite (popular vote), 97.2% of voters chose statehood when presented with three options on the ballot. Turnout for the plebiscite was 23.0% of eligible voters. Some parties and other groups opposing the plebiscite had urged their bases to boycott the vote. (These data are based on 99.5% of precincts reporting results.) After initially including only statehood and free association/independence options, an amended territorial law ultimately permitted three options on the plebiscite ballot: statehood, free association/independence, or current territorial status. Before the latest plebiscite, Puerto Ricans most recently reconsidered their status through a 2012 plebiscite. On that occasion, voters were asked two questions: whether to maintain the status quo, and if a change were selected, whether to pursue statehood, independence, or status as a “sovereign free associated state.” Majorities chose a change in the status quo in answering the first question, and statehood in answering the second.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico's Legal Status Reconsidered, 50 Boston College Law Review (2009)
    Boston University School of Law Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2009 The onsC titutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico's Legal Status Reconsidered Robert Sloane Boston Univeristy School of Law Gary Lawson Boston University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert Sloane & Gary Lawson, The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico's Legal Status Reconsidered, 50 Boston College Law Review (2009). Available at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/581 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DECOLONIZATION BY ASSOCIATED STATEHOOD: PUERTO RICO’S LEGAL STATUS RECONSIDERED Boston University School of Law Working Paper No. 09-19 (March 5, 2009; Rev. September 14, 2009) Gary Lawson Robert D. Sloane This paper can be downloaded without charge at: http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/scholarship/workingpapers/2009.html THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DECOLONIZATION BY ASSOCIATED STATEHOOD: PUERTO RICO’S LEGAL STATUS RECONSIDERED Gary Lawson* Robert D. Sloane** Abstract: International and constitutional law arguably collide in the le- gal arrangement between the United States and Puerto Rico. As a matter of international law, it is unclear that this arrangement conforms to cus- tomary international and treaty obligations. As a matter of national law, it is unclear that the Constitution permits an arrangement between Puerto Rico and the United States—short of separation (independence as a State) or integration (admission to the Union as a state)—that could con- form to these international obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Index
    SUBJECT INDEX Al V'- Page Page A Commodity Distribution Reform Act and WIC Amendments of 1987 1733 Abortion: Competitive Equality Banking Act of Continuing appropriations, fiscal year 1987 552 1988 1329 Continuing appropriations, fiscal year Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 1988 1329 Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 1331 Dairy policy and conservation report 291 Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. See Diseases. Farm Disaster Assistance Act of Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships, 1987 318 amendments 1460-1464 Rural Crisis Recovery Program Act of Adjustments to Lawful Resident 1987 .' 1456 Status of Certain Nationals of Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Countries for Which Extended Assistance Act 482 Voluntary Departure Has Been Surface Transportation and Uniform Made Available 1329-43 Relocation Assistance Act of Adoption Assistance and Child 1987 132 Welfare Act of 1989, Uniform Cotton Classing Fees Act of amendments 1330-313 1987 728 Adult Education Act, amendments 524 Water Quality Act of 1987 7 Afghanistan, Foreign Relations Agriculture and Food Act of 1981, Authorization Act, Fiscal Years amendments 1740 1988 and 1989 1331 AIDS. See Diseases. Africa, Foreign Relations Air Pollution. See Pollution. Authorization Act, Fiscal Years Aircraft and Air Carriers: 1988 and 1989 1331 Airport and Airway Safety and Aged Persons: Capacity Expansion Act of 1987 1486 Housing and Community Alaska, nonpriority-mail flight Development Act of 1987 1815 schedules 1744 Older Americans Act Amendments of Continuing appropriations, fiscal year 1987 926 1988 1329 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 1987 1330 Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 1331 Public Health Service Amendments of National Defense Authorization Act 1987 986 for Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 1019 Stewart B.
    [Show full text]
  • Geografia, Etnografia, Historia
    ESTUDIOS SüB.^B GASOLINAS LA ISLA DE PONAPÉ GEOGRAFIA, ETNOGRAFIA, HISTORIA POR A, Cabeza Pereiro Médico de la Columna ie operaciones en 1890 CON UN PRÓLOGO DEL Exorno. Sr. Teniente general D. Valeriano Weyler Obra premiada por la Junta Superior Consultiva de guerra MANILA TlPO-LíTOGRAFÍA DE CHOFRÉ Y COMP.1 Kscolta núm. 33 1895 Es propiedad. Queda hecho el depósito que marea la ley. SR. D. A. CABEZA PEREIRO Medico'de la Columna de operaciones en 1890 e 1 Su paisano y amigo. INDICE Página Dedicatoria ... III Prólogo V Mi objeto XI PRIMERA PARTE GEOGRAFIA CAPÍTULO 1..0 —Descubrimientos hechos en la Micronesia por navegantes españoles.—Situación de las Carolinas; nuestros límites.—Descripción somera de los grupos más importantes; Palaos, Yap, Uluthi, Ulie, Namo- nuito, Ruk ú Hogoleu, Mortlok y Ualan—Cuadro sinóptico de las Carolinas 3 CAP. 2.0--Grupo de Seniavin.— Descripción general de la isla. de Ponapé; sus puertos, islotes que lo rodean.— Clima.—Fauna y Flora de Ponapé ... ... 19 CAP. 3."—Estructura, crecimiento y cimentación de las is• las en el Oceano Pacífico ... ... 65 SEGUNDA PARTE ETNOGRAFIA CAP.'TULO I.0—Caractéres físicos y cualidades morales de los habitantes de Ponapé: razas oceánicas.—Descrip• ción y medidas de una serie de cinco cráneos de mícronesios.—Población y división de la isla.— Organización política de los reinos.?— Moneda, in• dustria y comercio , ... ... ... ... 77 CAP. 2,0--Género de vida, usos y costumbres, trajes y ador• nos, matrimonio; los hijos, adulterio, divorcio, ali• mentación ... ... ... ..; 111 CAP. 3.0—Habitaciones. — Instrumentos musicales. —Bailes. —Armas. — Embarcaciones. — Mutilaciones étnicas, epilación, tatuaje, castración, cicatrices.
    [Show full text]