„Identification and Characterization of Interferon Induced Ubiquitinated

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

„Identification and Characterization of Interferon Induced Ubiquitinated Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) im Fach Biologie „Identification and Characterization of Interferon-J Induced Ubiquitinated Newly Synthesized Proteins“ Eingereicht an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von Frau Diplom-Chemikerin Anne Wiemhoefer Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: Prof. Dr. Jan-Hendrik Olbertz Dekan der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I: Prof. Dr. Andreas Herrmann Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Peter-Michael Kloetzel 2. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Lockau 3. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Dubiel Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29.06.2011 Inhaltsverzeichnis Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................ i Abstract ............................................................................................................... iii 1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Ubiquitination ............................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 Ubiquitin ........................................................................................ 3 1.1.2 Process of ubiquitination ............................................................... 4 1.1.3 Endoplasmatic reticulum associated degradation system .............. 8 1.1.4 Ubiquitin chains and functions .................................................... 10 1.2 Process of deubiquitination ..................................................................... 11 1.3 The proteasome and degradation of ubiquitinated proteins .................... 13 1.3.1 Recruitment of ubiquitinated proteins to the proteasome............ 13 1.3.2 Constitutive proteasome 20S core complex ................................ 14 1.3.3 Proteasomal activators ................................................................. 15 1.3.4 Proteasome subtypes ................................................................... 19 1.4 Influence of interferon-J on ubiquitination ............................................. 20 1.4.1 Influence of interferon-Jon the cell ............................................ 20 1.4.2 Influence of interferon-J on ubiquitin proteasome system .......... 20 1.5 Aims of this research study ..................................................................... 23 2 Materials and Methods ................................................................................ 25 2.1 Equipments and materials ....................................................................... 25 2.2 Molecular biological methods ................................................................. 30 2.2.1 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ................................................ 30 2.2.2 Agarose based gel electrophoresis ............................................... 31 2.2.3 Ligation of the PCR products into a TOPO® vector ................... 32 2.2.4 Competent E.coli cells ................................................................. 32 2.2.5 Transformation ............................................................................ 33 2.2.6 Plasmid DNA isolation and sequencing ...................................... 33 2.2.7 Digestion via restriction enzymes ............................................... 34 2.2.8 Ligation into pEGFP-N3 vector .................................................. 34 2.3 Human cell culture methods .................................................................... 34 2.3.1 Cell lines, buffers and media ....................................................... 34 2.3.2 Subcultivation .............................................................................. 36 2.3.3 Transfection and generation of stable transfectants ..................... 36 2.3.4 “Short” stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture . 37 2.3.5 Interferon-Jinduction of HeLa cells and cell harvesting ............. 39 2.3.6 Determination of protein concentration ....................................... 40 2.4 Isolation of ubiquitin conjugates ............................................................. 40 2.4.1 Preparation of isolation matrices ................................................. 40 2.4.2 Immuno precipitation and affinity purification ............................ 41 2.5 Bioanalytical methods ............................................................................. 42 2.5.1 Preparation of the ubiquitin conjugates for mass spectrometry ... 42 2.5.2 Mass spectrometric analysis ........................................................ 44 2.6 Biochemical methods ............................................................................... 45 2.6.1 Sodiumdodecylsulfoxide-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis .... 45 2.6.2 Two dimensional gel electrophoresis ........................................... 46 2.6.3 Staining of polyacrylamide gels ................................................... 47 2.6.4 Semidry Western blotting and immuno detection ....................... 48 3 Results ............................................................................................................ 49 3.1 Isolation of ubiquitin conjugates ............................................................. 50 3.1.1 Evaluation of different isolation methods .................................... 50 3.1.2 Decision on the best enrichment method for ubiquitin conjugates51 3.2 Establishment of the cell culture model ................................................... 53 3.2.1 Analysis of transfection efficiency and expression stability ........ 55 3.2.2 Interferon-J influence on the model system ................................. 56 3.3 Analysis of ubiquitin-conjugates via 2D gel electrophoresis .................. 57 3.4 Optimization of mass spectrometric approach ........................................ 59 3.4.1 Digestion of ubiquitin-conjugate with peptidases ........................ 59 3.4.2 Selection of the sample preparation procedure ............................ 62 3.4.3 “Short” stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture . 63 3.4.4 Final optimized experimental approach ....................................... 64 3.5 Results of mass spectrometric ubiquitin conjugate analysis .................... 67 3.5.1 Evaluation of ubiquitination sites ................................................ 70 3.5.2 Candidates for interferon-J influenced ubiquitination ................. 75 3.5.3 Preferences of ubiquitination for newly synthesized proteins ..... 78 3.5.4 Proteasome ubiquitination ........................................................... 79 3.6 Immuno chemical identification of ubiquitin targets .............................. 86 3.6.1 Sequestosome-1 ........................................................................... 87 3.6.2 Cytoplasmatic tryptophanyl t-RNA synthetase ........................... 88 3.6.3 Tripatite motif 21 ......................................................................... 90 3.6.4 Proteasome ATPase regulatory subunit Rpt5 .............................. 91 4 Discussion ...................................................................................................... 95 4.1 Methodic progress in the isolation of the Ub-conjugates ........................ 96 4.1.1 Optimum isolation strategy for the targeted Ub-conjugates ........ 96 4.1.2 Cell culture model for the tagged ubiquitin based isolation ........ 97 4.2 Gel electrophoretic characteristics of ubiquitin conjugates .................... 98 4.3 Innovations in the preparation for mass spectrometry ............................ 98 4.3.1 Ubiquitin-conjugate sample preparation for analysis .................. 98 4.3.2 Optimal quantitative mass spectrometric approach ................... 100 4.4 Evaluation of ubiquitin conjugate analysis ........................................... 102 4.5 Evidence of the interferon-J induced changes in Ub-chain linkages .... 103 4.6 Identified ubiquitin conjugates .............................................................. 107 4.7 Identified interferon-J induced ubiquitination candidates ..................... 107 4.8 Evaluation of the mass spectrometric data ............................................ 110 4.9 Relevance of interferon-J induced identified ubiquitin conjugates ....... 112 4.10Final conclusion and future perspectives .............................................. 117 5 Appendix ..................................................................................................... 123 5.1 Literature ............................................................................................... 123 5.2 Abbreviations ........................................................................................ 133 5.3 Supplementary data ............................................................................... 137 5.3.1 Expression level of tagged ubiquitin and phenotype of cells .... 137 5.3.2 MS2 fragmentations of Ub-linkage indicator peptides .............. 139 5.3.3 Ub-targets and candidates from SILAC experiments ................ 144 Danksagung .................................................................................................. 167 Erklärung ...................................................................................................... 169 i Zusammenfassung Ein Schlüsselprozess in der Immunantwort ist die durch das proinflammatorische Zytokin Interferon-Jinduziertetransiente Akkumulation von neu synthetisierten defekten Proteinen, die durch Anknüpfen
Recommended publications
  • Accepted Version
    Article Genetic Control of Gonadal Sex Determination and Development STEVANT, Isabelle, NEF, Serge Abstract Sex determination is the process by which the bipotential gonads develop as either testes or ovaries. With two distinct potential outcomes, the gonadal primordium offers a unique model for the study of cell fate specification and how distinct cell populations diverge from multipotent progenitors. This review focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the genetic programs and epigenetic mechanisms that regulate gonadal sex determination and the regulation of cell fate commitment in the bipotential gonads. We rely primarily on mouse data to illuminate the complex and dynamic genetic programs controlling cell fate decision and sex-specific cell differentiation during gonadal formation and gonadal sex determination. Reference STEVANT, Isabelle, NEF, Serge. Genetic Control of Gonadal Sex Determination and Development. Trends in Genetics, 2019 PMID : 30902461 DOI : 10.1016/j.tig.2019.02.004 Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:115790 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 Trends in Genetics Genetic control of sex determination and gonad development --Manuscript Draft-- Manuscript Number: TIGS-D-18-00173R1 Article Type: Review Keywords: sex determination; ovary; testis; lineage specification; gene expression; epigenetic regulation Corresponding Author: Serge Nef geneva, SWITZERLAND First Author: Isabelle Stévant Order of Authors: Isabelle Stévant Serge Nef Abstract: Sex determination is the process by which the bipotential gonads develop as either testes or ovaries. With two distinct potential outomes, the gonadal primordium offers a unique model for the study of cell fate specification and how distinct cell populations diverge from multipotent progenitors.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro Differentiation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Into Endometrial Epithelial Cells in Mouse: a Proteomic Analysis
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014;7(7):3662-3672 www.ijcep.com /ISSN:1936-2625/IJCEP0000322 Original Article In vitro differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into endometrial epithelial cells in mouse: a proteomic analysis Qing Cong1,2, Bin Li1,2, Yisheng Wang1,2, Wenbi Zhang1,2, Mingjun Cheng1,2, Zhiyong Wu1,2, Xiaoyan Zhang1,2, Wei Jiang1,2, Congjian Xu1,2,3,4 1Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 2Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Shanghai Medical School, 4Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China Received March 24, 2014; Accepted June 23, 2014; Epub June 15, 2014; Published July 1, 2014 Abstract: Objective: Mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) have been demonstrated to differenti- ate into female endometrial epithelial cells (EECs) in vivo. Our previous studies demonstrated that BMSCs can differentiate in the direction of EECs when co-cultured with endometrial stromal cells in vitro. Here, we obtain and analyse differential proteins and their relevant pathways in the process of BMSCs differentiating into EECs by iso- baric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) proteomic analysis. Methods: A 0.4-µm pore size indirect co- culture system was established with female mice endometrial stromal cells (EStCs) restricted in the upper Transwell chamber and BMSCs in the lower well plate. After indirect co-culture for several days, the BMSCs were revealed to progressively differentiate towards EECs in vitro. Then, four groups were divided according to different co-culture days with single culture groups of BMSCs as controls.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Table S1
    Entrez Gene Symbol Gene Name Affymetrix EST Glomchip SAGE Stanford Literature HPA confirmed Gene ID Profiling profiling Profiling Profiling array profiling confirmed 1 2 A2M alpha-2-macroglobulin 0 0 0 1 0 2 10347 ABCA7 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 7 1 0 0 0 0 3 10350 ABCA9 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 9 1 0 0 0 0 4 10057 ABCC5 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 5 1 0 0 0 0 5 10060 ABCC9 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 9 1 0 0 0 0 6 79575 ABHD8 abhydrolase domain containing 8 1 0 0 0 0 7 51225 ABI3 ABI gene family, member 3 1 0 1 0 0 8 29 ABR active BCR-related gene 1 0 0 0 0 9 25841 ABTB2 ankyrin repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 2 1 0 1 0 0 10 30 ACAA1 acetyl-Coenzyme A acyltransferase 1 (peroxisomal 3-oxoacyl-Coenzyme A thiol 0 1 0 0 0 11 43 ACHE acetylcholinesterase (Yt blood group) 1 0 0 0 0 12 58 ACTA1 actin, alpha 1, skeletal muscle 0 1 0 0 0 13 60 ACTB actin, beta 01000 1 14 71 ACTG1 actin, gamma 1 0 1 0 0 0 15 81 ACTN4 actinin, alpha 4 0 0 1 1 1 10700177 16 10096 ACTR3 ARP3 actin-related protein 3 homolog (yeast) 0 1 0 0 0 17 94 ACVRL1 activin A receptor type II-like 1 1 0 1 0 0 18 8038 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 1 0 0 0 0 19 8751 ADAM15 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 15 (metargidin) 1 0 0 0 0 20 8728 ADAM19 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 19 (meltrin beta) 1 0 0 0 0 21 81792 ADAMTS12 ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 12 1 0 0 0 0 22 9507 ADAMTS4 ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Molecular Chaperone Prefoldin
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Cell, Vol. 103, 621±632, November 10, 2000, Copyright 2000 by Cell Press Structure of the Molecular Chaperone Prefoldin: Unique Interaction of Multiple Coiled Coil Tentacles with Unfolded Proteins of newly synthesized bacterial %10ف ,Ralf Siegert,² Michel R. Leroux,²³ 1999). In addition Clemens Scheufler, F. Ulrich Hartl,* proteins complete their folding in the sequestered envi- and Ismail Moarefi* ronment provided by GroEL/GroES (Horwich et al., 1993; Max-Planck Institut fuÈ r Biochemie Ewalt et al., 1997; Houry et al., 1999). The eukaryotic Am Klopferspitz 18a Hsp70 chaperone machine also binds nascent chains D82152 Martinsried (Beckmann et al., 1990; Nelson et al., 1992; Eggers et Germany al., 1997; Thulasiraman et al., 1999), and some proteins, including actins and tubulins, depend on the Group II cytosolic chaperonin TRiC (TCP-1 ring Complex; also Summary termed CCT) for folding (Frydman et al., 1992; Gao et al., 1992; Yaffe et al., 1992; Kubota et al., 1995; Siegers Prefoldin (GimC) is a hexameric molecular chaperone et al., 1999). complex built from two related classes of subunits The archaeal Group II chaperonin (thermosome) is and present in all eukaryotes and archaea. Prefoldin closely related to its eukaryotic homologue TRiC (Gutsche et al., 1999). In contrast, Hsp70 proteins and interacts with nascent polypeptide chains and, in vitro, TF are generally missing from the archaeal kingdom can functionally substitute for the Hsp70 chaperone though some archaea have acquired Hsp70, presumably system in stabilizing non-native proteins for subse- by lateral gene transfer (Gribaldo et al., 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials For
    www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/science.1230422/DC1 Supplementary Materials for Genomic Diversity and Evolution of the Head Crest in the Rock Pigeon Michael D. Shapiro,* Zev Kronenberg, Cai Li, Eric T. Domyan, Hailin Pan, Michael Campbell, Hao Tan, Chad D. Huff, Haofu Hu, Anna I. Vickrey, Sandra C. A. Nielsen, Sydney A. Stringham, Hao Hu, Eske Willerslev, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Mark Yandell, Guojie Zhang, Jun Wang* *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] (M.D.S.); [email protected] (J.W.) Published 31 January 2013 on Science Express DOI: 10.1126/science.1230422 This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods Supplementary Text Figs. S1 to S27 Tables S1 to S28 References (26–72) Materials and Methods Genome assembly The DNA sample for sequencing of the reference genome was extracted from blood obtained from a single, male Danish Tumbler, bred by Anders and Hans Ove Christiansen (Danmarks Racedueforeninger, Næstved, Denmark). This breed was chosen because it is an old breed that is believed to have changed little in recent history. Seven paired-end sequencing libraries were constructed, with insert sizes of 170 bp, 500 bp, 800 bp, 2 kb, 5 kb, 10 kb and 20 kb. The libraries were sequenced using Illumina HiSeq2000 platform, yielding a total of 127.17 Gb raw data (Table S1). The raw sequences were filtered for low quality, adapter sequence, paired-end read overlap, and PCR duplicates. We also performed an error correction step on the raw reads before assembling. Filtering and error correction resulted in 81.57 Gb of clean data for genome assembly with the genome with SOAPdenovo (26).
    [Show full text]
  • (12) STANDARD PATENT (11) Application No. AU 2010325179 B2 (19) AUSTRALIAN PATENT OFFICE
    (12) STANDARD PATENT (11) Application No. AU 2010325179 B2 (19) AUSTRALIAN PATENT OFFICE (54) Title Blood transcriptional signature of active versus latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (51) International Patent Classification(s) C12N 15/31 (2006.01) G01N 33/15 (2006.01) C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) C12R 1/32 (2006.01) (21) Application No: 2010325179 (22) Date of Filing: 2010.08.19 (87) WIPONo: WO11/066008 (30) Priority Data (31) Number (32) Date (33) Country 12/628,148 2009.11.30 US (43) Publication Date: 2011.06.03 (44) Accepted Journal Date: 2015.03.12 (71) Applicant(s) Medical Research Council;Baylor Research lnstitute;lmperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (72) Inventor(s) Banchereau, Jacques F.;Chaussabel, Damien;O'Garra, Anne;Berry, Matthew;Kon, Onn Min (74) Agent / Attorney Pizzeys, PO Box 291, WODEN, ACT, 2606 (56) Related Art WO 2004/001070 BERRY, M.P.R. et al., Thorax, 2008, Vol. 63 (Suppl VII), page A63 STERN, J.N. et al., Immunologic Research, 2009, Vol. 45, pages 1-12 MISTRY, R. et al., The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2007, Vol. 195, pages 357-365 (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2011/066008 A3 3 June 2011 (03.06.2011) PCT (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agents: CHALKER, Daniel J. et al.; Chalker Flores, C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) G01N33/15 (2006.01) LLP, 14951 North Dallas Parkway, Suite 400, Dallas, TX C12N15/31 (2006.01) C12R 1/32 (2006.01) 75254 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of the Angiogenic Effect of Poly(Methacrylic Acid-Co-Methyl Methacrylate) Beads
    Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of the Angiogenic Effect of Poly(methacrylic acid-co-methyl methacrylate) Beads by Lindsay Elizabeth Fitzpatrick A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering University of Toronto © Copyright by Lindsay Elizabeth Fitzpatrick 2012 Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of the Angiogenic Effect of Poly(methacrylic acid-co-methyl methacrylate) Beads Lindsay Elizabeth Fitzpatrick Doctorate of Philosophy Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering University of Toronto 2012 Abstract Poly(methacrylic acid -co- methyl methacrylate) beads were previously shown to have a therapeutic effect on wound closure through the promotion of angiogenesis. However, it was unclear how this polymer elicited its beneficial properties. The goal of this thesis was to characterize the host response to MAA beads by identifying molecules of interest involved in MAA-mediated angiogenesis (in comparison to poly(methyl methacrylate) beads, PMMA). Using a model of diabetic wound healing and a macrophage-like cell line (dTHP-1), eight molecules of interest were identified in the host response to MAA beads. Gene and/or protein expression analysis showed that MAA beads increased the expression of Shh, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF- α and Spry2, but decreased the expression of CXCL10 and CXCL12, compared to PMMA and no beads. MAA beads also appeared to modulate the expression of OPN. In vivo, the global gene expression of OPN was increased in wounds treated with MAA beads, compared to PMMA and no beads. In contrast, dTHP-1 decreased OPN gene expression compared to PMMA and no beads, but expressed the same amount of secreted OPN, suggesting that the cells decreased the expression of the intracellular isoform of OPN.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetics Page 1
    Epigenetics esiRNA ID Gene Name Gene Description Ensembl ID HU-13237-1 ACTL6A actin-like 6A ENSG00000136518 HU-13925-1 ACTL6B actin-like 6B ENSG00000077080 HU-14457-1 ACTR1A ARP1 actin-related protein 1 homolog A, centractin alpha (yeast) ENSG00000138107 HU-10579-1 ACTR2 ARP2 actin-related protein 2 homolog (yeast) ENSG00000138071 HU-10837-1 ACTR3 ARP3 actin-related protein 3 homolog (yeast) ENSG00000115091 HU-09776-1 ACTR5 ARP5 actin-related protein 5 homolog (yeast) ENSG00000101442 HU-00773-1 ACTR6 ARP6 actin-related protein 6 homolog (yeast) ENSG00000075089 HU-07176-1 ACTR8 ARP8 actin-related protein 8 homolog (yeast) ENSG00000113812 HU-09411-1 AHCTF1 AT hook containing transcription factor 1 ENSG00000153207 HU-15150-1 AIRE autoimmune regulator ENSG00000160224 HU-12332-1 AKAP1 A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 1 ENSG00000121057 HU-04065-1 ALG13 asparagine-linked glycosylation 13 homolog (S. cerevisiae) ENSG00000101901 HU-13552-1 ALKBH1 alkB, alkylation repair homolog 1 (E. coli) ENSG00000100601 HU-06662-1 ARID1A AT rich interactive domain 1A (SWI-like) ENSG00000117713 HU-12790-1 ARID1B AT rich interactive domain 1B (SWI1-like) ENSG00000049618 HU-09415-1 ARID2 AT rich interactive domain 2 (ARID, RFX-like) ENSG00000189079 HU-03890-1 ARID3A AT rich interactive domain 3A (BRIGHT-like) ENSG00000116017 HU-14677-1 ARID3B AT rich interactive domain 3B (BRIGHT-like) ENSG00000179361 HU-14203-1 ARID3C AT rich interactive domain 3C (BRIGHT-like) ENSG00000205143 HU-09104-1 ARID4A AT rich interactive domain 4A (RBP1-like) ENSG00000032219 HU-12512-1 ARID4B AT rich interactive domain 4B (RBP1-like) ENSG00000054267 HU-12520-1 ARID5A AT rich interactive domain 5A (MRF1-like) ENSG00000196843 HU-06595-1 ARID5B AT rich interactive domain 5B (MRF1-like) ENSG00000150347 HU-00556-1 ASF1A ASF1 anti-silencing function 1 homolog A (S.
    [Show full text]
  • (HMGB1) Deletion Leads to Small Heart and Glycolipid Metabolic
    Yu et al. Cell Death Discovery (2020) 6:106 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-020-00340-9 Cell Death Discovery ARTICLE Open Access Cardiomyocyte-restricted high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) deletion leads to small heart and glycolipid metabolic disorder through GR/PGC-1α signalling Peng Yu 1, Ming Liu2,BaoliZhang3,YingYu2,EnyongSu3,ShiyaoXie3,LeiZhang3,XueYang3,HongJiang 3, Ruizhen Chen3, Yunzeng Zou3 and Junbo Ge3 Abstract Cardiac growth and remodelling are key biological processes influencing the physiological performance of the heart, and a previous study showed a critical role for intracellular HMGB1 in vitro. However, the in vivo study, which used conditional Hmgb1 ablation, did not show a significant effect on cellular or organic function. We have demonstrated the extracellular effect of HMGB1 as a pro-inflammatory molecule on cardiac remodelling. In this study, we found that HMGB1 deletion by cTnT-Cre in mouse hearts altered glucocorticoid receptor (GR) function and glycolipid metabolism, eventually leading to growth retardation, small heart and heart failure. The subcellular morphology did not show a significant change caused by HMGB1 knockout. The heart showed significant elevation of glycolysis, free fatty acid deposition and related enzyme changes. Transcriptomic analysis revealed a list of differentially expressed genes that coincide with glucocorticoid receptor function in neonatal mice and a significant increase in inflammatory genes in 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; adult mice. Cardiac HMGB1 knockout led to a series of changes in PGC-1α, UCP3 and GyK, which were the cause of metabolic changes and further impacted cardiac function. Ckmm-Cre Hmgb1fl/fl mice did not show a specific phenotype, which was consistent with the reported negative result of cardiomyocyte-specific Hmgb1 deletion via MHC-Cre.
    [Show full text]
  • Noelia Díaz Blanco
    Effects of environmental factors on the gonadal transcriptome of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), juvenile growth and sex ratios Noelia Díaz Blanco Ph.D. thesis 2014 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF). This work has been carried out at the Group of Biology of Reproduction (GBR), at the Department of Renewable Marine Resources of the Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC). Thesis supervisor: Dr. Francesc Piferrer Professor d’Investigació Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC) i ii A mis padres A Xavi iii iv Acknowledgements This thesis has been made possible by the support of many people who in one way or another, many times unknowingly, gave me the strength to overcome this "long and winding road". First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Francesc Piferrer, for his patience, guidance and wise advice throughout all this Ph.D. experience. But above all, for the trust he placed on me almost seven years ago when he offered me the opportunity to be part of his team. Thanks also for teaching me how to question always everything, for sharing with me your enthusiasm for science and for giving me the opportunity of learning from you by participating in many projects, collaborations and scientific meetings. I am also thankful to my colleagues (former and present Group of Biology of Reproduction members) for your support and encouragement throughout this journey. To the “exGBRs”, thanks for helping me with my first steps into this world. Working as an undergrad with you Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Investigations Into The
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Investigations into the Role of TAF1-mediated Phosphorylation in Gene Regulation A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Cell, Molecular and Developmental Biology by Brian James Gadd December 2012 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Xuan Liu, Chairperson Dr. Frank Sauer Dr. Frances M. Sladek Copyright by Brian James Gadd 2012 The Dissertation of Brian James Gadd is approved Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgments I am thankful to Dr. Liu for her patience and support over the last eight years. I am deeply indebted to my committee members, Dr. Frank Sauer and Dr. Frances Sladek for the insightful comments on my research and this dissertation. Thanks goes out to CMDB, especially Dr. Bachant, Dr. Springer and Kathy Redd for their support. Thanks to all the members of the Liu lab both past and present. A very special thanks to the members of the Sauer lab, including Silvia, Stephane, David, Matt, Stephen, Ninuo, Toby, Josh, Alice, Alex and Flora. You have made all the years here fly by and made them so enjoyable. From the Sladek lab I want to thank Eugene, John, Linh and Karthi. Special thanks go out to all the friends I’ve made over the years here. Chris, Amber, Stephane and David, thank you so much for feeding me, encouraging me and keeping me sane. Thanks to the brothers for all your encouragement and prayers. To any I haven’t mentioned by name, I promise I haven’t forgotten all you’ve done for me during my graduate years.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Characterization of Genes Essential for Human Brain Development
    Identification and Characterization of Genes Essential for Human Brain Development The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Ganesh, Vijay S. 2012. Identification and Characterization of Genes Essential for Human Brain Development. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9773743 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Copyright © 2012 by Vijay S. Ganesh All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Christopher A. Walsh Author: Vijay S. Ganesh Identification and Characterization of Genes Essential for Human Brain Development Abstract The human brain is a network of ninety billion neurons that allows for many of the behavioral adaptations considered unique to our species. One-fifth of these neurons are layered in an epithelial sheet known as the cerebral cortex, which is exquisitely folded into convolutions called gyri. Defects in neuronal number clinically present with microcephaly (Greek for “small head”), and in inherited cases these defects can be linked to mutations that identify genes essential for neural progenitor proliferation. Most microcephaly genes are characterized to play a role in the centrosome, however rarer presentations of microcephaly have identified different mechanisms. Charged multivesicular body protein/Chromatin modifying protein 1A (CHMP1A) is a member of the ESCRT-III endosomal sorting complex, but is also suggested to localize to the nuclear matrix and regulate chromatin.
    [Show full text]