Chapter 20 Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 20 Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Copyright © 2017 by Roland Stull. Practical Meteorology: An Algebra-based Survey of Atmospheric Science. v1.02b 20 NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION (NWP) Contents Most weather forecasts are made by computer, 20.1. Scientific Basis of Forecasting 746 and some of these forecasts are further enhanced 20.1.1. The Equations of Motion 746 by humans. Computers can keep track of myriad 20.1.2. Approximate Solutions 749 complex nonlinear interactions among winds, tem- 20.1.3. Dynamics, Physics and Numerics 749 20.1.4. Models 751 perature, and moisture at thousands of locations and altitudes around the world — an impossible 20.2. Grid Points 752 task for humans. Also, data observation, collection, 20.2.1. Nested and Variable Grids 752 20.2.2. Staggered Grids 753 analysis, display and dissemination are mostly au- tomated. 20.3. Finite-Difference Equations 754 20.3.1. Notation 754 Fig. 20.1 shows an automated forecast. Produced 20.3.2. Approximations to Spatial Gradients 754 by computer, this meteogram (graph of weather vs. 20.3.3. Grid Computation Rules 756 time for one location) is easier for non-meteorologists 20.3.4. Time Differencing 757 to interpret than weather maps. But to produce such 20.3.5. Discretized Equations of Motion 758 forecasts, the equations describing the atmosphere 20.4. Numerical Errors & Instability 759 must first be solved. 20.4.1. Round-off Error 759 20.4.2. Truncation Error 760 20.4.3. Numerical Instability 760 20.5. The Numerical Forecast Process 762 20.5.1. Balanced Mass and Flow Fields 763 20.5.2. Data Assimilation and Analysis 765 (a) 20.5.3. Forecast 768 20.5.4. Case Study: 22-25 Feb 1994 768 20.5.5. Post-processing 770 (b) 20.6. Nonlinear Dynamics And Chaos 773 20.6.1. Predictability 773 20.6.2. Lorenz Strange Attractor 773 (c) 20.6.3. Ensemble Forecasts 776 20.6.4. Probabilistic Forecasts 777 20.7. Forecast Quality & Verification 777 (d) 20.7.1. Continuous Variables 777 20.7.2. Binary / Categorical Events 780 20.7.3. Probabilistic Forecasts 782 (e) 20.7.4. Cost / Loss Decision Models 785 20.8. Review 786 20.9. Homework Exercises 787 (f) 20.9.1. Broaden Knowledge & Comprehension 787 20.9.2. Apply 788 Local Time 00 06 12 18 00 06 12 20.9.3. Evaluate & Analyze 790 31 Oct | 1 Nov 2015 | 2 Nov 20.9.4. Synthesize 791 Figure 20.1 Two-day weather forecast for Jackson, Mississippi USA, plotted “Practical Meteorology: An Algebra-based Survey as a meteogram (time series), based on initial conditions valid of Atmospheric Science” by Roland Stull is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCom- at 12 UTC on 31 Oct 2015. (a) Temperature & dew-point (°F), mercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. View this license at (b) winds, (c) humidity, precipitation, cloud-cover, (d) rainfall http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ . This work is amounts, (e) thunderstorm likelihood, (f) probability of precipi- available at https://www.eoas.ubc.ca/books/Practical_Meteorology/ tation > 0.25 inch. Produced by US NWS. 745 746 CHAPTER 20 • NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION (NWP) INFO • Alternative Vertical Coordinate 20.1. SCIENTIFIC BASIS OF FORECASTING Eqs. (20.1-20.7) use z as a vertical coordinate, where z is height above mean sea level. But local terrain ele- vations can be higher than sea level. The atmosphere 20.1.1. The Equations of Motion does not exist underground; thus, it makes no sense Numerical weather forecasts are made by solv- to solve the meteorological equations of motion at ing Eulerian equations for U, V, W, T, r , ρ and P. heights below ground level. T From the Forces & Winds chapter are forecast To avoid this problem, define aterrain-follow - ing coordinate σ (sigma). One definition forσ is equations for the three wind components (U, V, W) (modified from eqs. 10.23a & b, and eq. 10.59): based on the hydrostatic pressure Pref(z) at any height z relative to the hydrostatic pressure difference be- ∆U ∆U ∆U ∆U tween the earth’s surface (Pref bottom) and a fixed pres- =− U −V −W (20.1) sure (Pref top) representing the top of the atmosphere: ∆t ∆x ∆y ∆z Pzref ()− Pref top 1 ∆P ∆(FUzturb ) σ= − · ·+ fVc − PPref bottom − ref top ρ ∆x ∆ z Pref bottom varies in the horizontal due to terrain eleva- tion (see Fig. 20.A) and varies in space and time due ∆V ∆V ∆V ∆V =− U −V −W (20.2) to changing surface weather patterns (high- and low- ∆t ∆x ∆y ∆z pressure centers). The new vertical coordinate σ var- 1 ∆P ∆(FVzturb ) ies from 1 at the earth’s surface to 0 at the top of the − · ·− fU − domain. ρ ∆y c ∆ z The figure below shows how thissigma coor- dinate varies over a mountain. Hybrid coordi- ∆W ∆W ∆W ∆W nates (Fig. 20.5) are ones that are terrain following =−U −−V W (20.3) near the ground, but constant pressure aloft. ∆t ∆x ∆y ∆z If σ is used as a vertical coordinate, then (U, V) 1 ∆ P′ θθvp − ve ∆(FWzturb ) are defined as winds along aσ surface. The vertical − + · g − advection term in eq. (20.1) changes from W·∆U/∆ z to ρ ∆ z T ∆ z · ve σ·∆U /∆σ , where σ· ·∆is Uanalogous/∆σ to a vertical veloci- ty, but in sigma coordinates. Similar changes must be made to most of the terms in the equations of motion, From the Heat Budgets chapter is a forecast equa- which can be numerically solved within the domain of tion for temperature T (modified from eq. 3.51): 0 ≤ σ ≤ 1. ∆T ∆T ∆T ∆T σ =− U −V −W + Γ (20.4) Pref top = 1 kPa d 0.0 ∆t ∆x ∆y ∆z * 0.2 1 ∆zzrad L ∆rcondensing ∆(Fzturb θ) − +−v 0.4 ρ·Cp ∆ z Cp ∆t ∆ z 0.6 From the Water Vapor chapter is a forecast equa- z 0.8 tion (4.44) for total-water mixing ratio r in the air: 70 T 85 85 1. 0 ∆rTT∆r ∆rTT∆r (20.5) bottom =− U −V −W P ref ∆t ∆x ∆y ∆z 101 90 kPa x Figure 20.A. ρ ∆ Pr ∆ FFrzturb()T +−L Vertical cross section through the atmosphere (white) and ρ ∆ z ∆ z earth (brown). White numbers represent surface air pres- d sure at the weather stations shown by the grey dots. For From the Forces & Winds chapter is the continu- the equation above, P = 70 kPa at the mountain top, ref bottom ity equation (10.60) to forecast air density ρ: (20.6) which differs from Pref bottom = 90 kPa in the valley. ∆ρρ∆ ∆ρρ∆ ∆U ∆V ∆W =−U − V − W − ρ + + ∆t ∆x ∆y ∆z ∆x ∆y ∆z Although sigma coordinates avoid the problem of coordinates that go underground, they create prob- lems for advection calculations due to small differenc- For pressure P, use the equation of state (ideal gas es between large terms. law) from Chapter 1 (eq. 1.23): PT=ℜρ··dv (20.7) R. STULL • PRACTICAL METEOROLOGY 747 In these seven equations: f is Coriolis parameter; c INFO • Alternative Horizontal Coord. P’ is the deviation of pressure from its hydrostatic value; θvp and θve are virtual potential temperatures Spherical Coordinates of the air parcel and the surrounding environ- For the Cartesian coordinates used in eqs. (20.1- ment;Tve is virtual temperature of the environment; 20.8), the coordinate axes are straight lines. Howev- |g| = 9.8 m s–2 is the magnitude of gravitational ac- er, on Earth we prefer to define x to follow the Earth’s –1 curvature toward the East, and definey to follow the celeration; Γd = 9.8 K km is the dry adiabatic lapse rate; F* is net radiative flux; L ≈ 2.5x106 J kg–1 is Earth’s curvature toward the North. If U and V are de- z rad v fined as velocities along these spherical coordinates, the latent heat of vaporization; C ≈ 1004 J·kg–1·K–1 p then add the following terms (20.1b - 20.3b) to the right is the specific heat of air at constant pressure; r∆ con- sides of momentum eqs. (20.1 - 20.3), respectively: densing is the increase in liquid-water mixing ratio UV··tan(φ)·UW associated with water vapor that is condensing; ρL ≈ +−− []2··Ω W ·cos()φ (20.1b) –3 R R 1000 kg·m and ρd are the densities of liquid water oo and dry air; Pr is precipitation rate (m s–1) of water U2 ·tan()φ VW· accumulation in a rain gauge at any height z; ℜd = −− (20.2b) –1 –1 RooR 287 J·kg ·K is the gas constant for dry air; and Tv is the virtual temperature. For more details, see the UV22+ chapters cited with eqs. (20.1 - 20.7). + + []2···ΩφU cos( ) (20.3b) Ro Notice the similarities in eqs. (20.1 - 20.6). All where R ≈ 6371 km is the average Earth radius, ϕ is lat- have a tendency term (rate of change with time) o itude, and Ω = 0.7292x10–4 s–1 is Earth’s rotation rate. on the left. All have advection as the first 3 terms The terms containing Ro are called the curvature on the right. Eqs. (20.1 - 20.5) include a turbulence terms. The terms in square brackets are small com- flux divergence term on the right. The other terms ponents of Coriolis force (see the INFO Box “Coriolis describe the special forcings that apply to individ- Force in 3-D” from the Forces & Winds chapter).
Recommended publications
  • Climate Models and Their Evaluation
    8 Climate Models and Their Evaluation Coordinating Lead Authors: David A. Randall (USA), Richard A. Wood (UK) Lead Authors: Sandrine Bony (France), Robert Colman (Australia), Thierry Fichefet (Belgium), John Fyfe (Canada), Vladimir Kattsov (Russian Federation), Andrew Pitman (Australia), Jagadish Shukla (USA), Jayaraman Srinivasan (India), Ronald J. Stouffer (USA), Akimasa Sumi (Japan), Karl E. Taylor (USA) Contributing Authors: K. AchutaRao (USA), R. Allan (UK), A. Berger (Belgium), H. Blatter (Switzerland), C. Bonfi ls (USA, France), A. Boone (France, USA), C. Bretherton (USA), A. Broccoli (USA), V. Brovkin (Germany, Russian Federation), W. Cai (Australia), M. Claussen (Germany), P. Dirmeyer (USA), C. Doutriaux (USA, France), H. Drange (Norway), J.-L. Dufresne (France), S. Emori (Japan), P. Forster (UK), A. Frei (USA), A. Ganopolski (Germany), P. Gent (USA), P. Gleckler (USA), H. Goosse (Belgium), R. Graham (UK), J.M. Gregory (UK), R. Gudgel (USA), A. Hall (USA), S. Hallegatte (USA, France), H. Hasumi (Japan), A. Henderson-Sellers (Switzerland), H. Hendon (Australia), K. Hodges (UK), M. Holland (USA), A.A.M. Holtslag (Netherlands), E. Hunke (USA), P. Huybrechts (Belgium), W. Ingram (UK), F. Joos (Switzerland), B. Kirtman (USA), S. Klein (USA), R. Koster (USA), P. Kushner (Canada), J. Lanzante (USA), M. Latif (Germany), N.-C. Lau (USA), M. Meinshausen (Germany), A. Monahan (Canada), J.M. Murphy (UK), T. Osborn (UK), T. Pavlova (Russian Federationi), V. Petoukhov (Germany), T. Phillips (USA), S. Power (Australia), S. Rahmstorf (Germany), S.C.B. Raper (UK), H. Renssen (Netherlands), D. Rind (USA), M. Roberts (UK), A. Rosati (USA), C. Schär (Switzerland), A. Schmittner (USA, Germany), J. Scinocca (Canada), D. Seidov (USA), A.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Results from the Implementation of the Elastic Viscous Plastic Sea Ice Rheology in Hadcm3 W
    Results from the implementation of the Elastic Viscous Plastic sea ice rheology in HadCM3 W. M. Connolley, A. B. Keen, A. J. Mclaren To cite this version: W. M. Connolley, A. B. Keen, A. J. Mclaren. Results from the implementation of the Elastic Viscous Plastic sea ice rheology in HadCM3. Ocean Science, European Geosciences Union, 2006, 2 (2), pp.201- 211. hal-00298295 HAL Id: hal-00298295 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00298295 Submitted on 23 Oct 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ocean Sci., 2, 201–211, 2006 www.ocean-sci.net/2/201/2006/ Ocean Science © Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Results from the implementation of the Elastic Viscous Plastic sea ice rheology in HadCM3 W. M. Connolley1, A. B. Keen2, and A. J. McLaren2 1British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK 2Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK Received: 13 June 2006 – Published in Ocean Sci. Discuss.: 10 July 2006 Revised: 21 September 2006 – Accepted: 16 October 2006 – Published: 23 October 2006 Abstract. We present results of an implementation of the a full dynamical model incorporating wind stresses and in- Elastic Viscous Plastic (EVP) sea ice dynamics scheme into ternal ice stresses leads to errors in the detailed representa- the Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere climate model tion of sea ice and limits our confidence in its future predic- HadCM3.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for the Verification and Intercomparison of Qpfs from Operational NWP Models
    Recommendations for the verification and intercomparison of QPFs from operational NWP models WWRP/WGNE Joint Working Group on Verification December 2004 Recommendations for the verification and intercomparison of QPFs from operational NWP models Contents 1. Introduction 2. Verification strategy 3. Reference data 4. Verification methods 5. Reporting guidelines 6. Summary of recommendations References Appendix 1. Guidelines for computing aggregate statistics Appendix 2. Confidence intervals for verification scores Appendix 3. Examples of graphical verification products Appendix 4. Membership of WWRP/WGNE Joint Working Group on Verification (JWGV) Recommendations for the verification and intercomparison of QPFs from operational NWP models 1. Introduction The Working Group on Numerical Experimentation (WGNE) began verifying quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) in the mid 1990s. The purpose was to assess the ability of operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) models to accurately predict rainfall, which is a quantity of great interest and importance to the community. Many countries have national rain gauge networks that provide observations that can be used to verify the model QPFs. Since rainfall depends strongly on the atmospheric motion, moisture content, and physical processes, the quality of a model's rainfall prediction is often used as an indicator of overall model health. In 1995 the US National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and the German Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) began verifying QPFs from a number of global and regional operational NWP models against data from their national rain gauge networks. The Australian Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre (BMRC) joined in 1997, followed by the UK Meteorological Office in 2000, Meteo- France in 2001, and the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordination of Atmospheric Dispersion Activities for the Real-Time Decision Support System RODOS
    RODOS R-2-1997 RIS0-R-93O (EN) DK9700116 Coordination of Atmospheric Dispersion Activities for the Real-Time Decision Support System RODOS DECISION SUPPORT FOR NUCLEAR EMERGENCIES RODOS R-2-1997 RIS0-R-93O (EN) Coordination of Atmospheric Dispersion Activities for the Real-Time Decision Support System RODOS Torben Mikkelsen RIS0 National Laboratory Denmark July 1997 Secretariat of the RODOS Project: Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Institut fur Neutronenphysik und Reaktortechnik P.O. Box 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany Phone: +49 7247 82 5507, Fax: +49 7247 82 5508 EMail: [email protected], Internet: http://rodos.fzk.de This work has been performed with the support of the European Commission Radiation Protection Research Action (DGXII-F-6) contract FI3P-CT92-0044 This report has been published as Report RIS0-R-93O (EN) (ISSN 0106-2840) (ISBN 87-550-2230-8) in May 1997 by RIS0 National Laboratory P.O. Box 49 DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark Management Summary 1.1 Global Objectives: This projects task has been to coordinate activities among the RODOS Atmospheric Dispersion sub-group A participants (1) - (8), with the overall objective of developing and integrating an atmospheric transport and dispersion module for the joint European Real-time On- line DecisiOn Support system RODOS headed by FZK (formerly KfK), Germany. The projects final goal is the establishment of a fully operational, system-integrated atmospheric transport module for the RODOS system by year 2000, capable of consistent now- and forecasting of radioactive airborne spread over all types of terrain and on all scales of interest, including in particular complex terrain and the different scales of operation, such as the local, the national and the European scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispersion Modeling of Air Pollutants in the Atmosphere: a Review
    Cent. Eur. J. Geosci. • 6(3) • 2014 • 257-278 DOI: 10.2478/s13533-012-0188-6 Central European Journal of Geosciences Dispersion modeling of air pollutants in the atmosphere: a review Research Article Ádám Leelossy˝ 1, Ferenc Molnár Jr.2, Ferenc Izsák3, Ágnes Havasi3, István Lagzi4, Róbert Mészáros1∗ 1 Department of Meteorology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary 2 Department of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA 3 Department of Applied Analysis and Computational Mathematics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary 4 Department of Physics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary Received 22 October 2013; accepted 15 May 2014 Abstract: Modeling of dispersion of air pollutants in the atmosphere is one of the most important and challenging scientific problems. There are several natural and anthropogenic events where passive or chemically active compounds are emitted into the atmosphere. The effect of these chemical species can have serious impacts on our environment and human health. Modeling the dispersion of air pollutants can predict this effect. Therefore, development of various model strategies is a key element for the governmental and scientific communities. We provide here a brief review on the mathematical modeling of the dispersion of air pollutants in the atmosphere. We discuss the advantages and drawbacks of several model tools and strategies, namely Gaussian, Lagrangian, Eulerian and CFD models. We especially focus on several recent advances in this multidisciplinary research field, like parallel computing using graphical processing units, or adaptive mesh refinement. Keywords: air pollution modeling • Lagrangian model • Eulerian model • CFD; accidental release • parallel computing © Versita sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Ozone Recovery and Greenhouse Gas Increases on Southern Hemisphere Circulation Alexey Y
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115, D22117, doi:10.1029/2010JD014423, 2010 Influence of ozone recovery and greenhouse gas increases on Southern Hemisphere circulation Alexey Y. Karpechko,1,2 Nathan P. Gillett,3 Lesley J. Gray,4 and Mauro Dall’Amico5,6 Received 27 April 2010; revised 6 September 2010; accepted 13 September 2010; published 24 November 2010. [1] Stratospheric ozone depletion has significantly influenced the tropospheric circulation and climate of the Southern Hemisphere (SH) over recent decades, the largest trends being detected in summer. These circulation changes include acceleration of the extratropical tropospheric westerly jet on its poleward side and lowered Antarctic sea level pressure. It is therefore expected that ozone changes will continue to influence climate during the 21st century when ozone recovery is expected. Here we use two contrasting future ozone projections from two chemistry‐climate models (CCMs) to force 21st century simulations of the HadGEM1 coupled atmosphere‐ocean model, along with A1B greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations, and study the simulated response in the SH circulation. According to several studies, HadGEM1 simulates present tropospheric climate better than the majority of other available models. When forced by the larger ozone recovery trends, HadGEM1 simulates significant deceleration of the tropospheric jet on its poleward side in the upper troposphere in summer, but the trends in the lower troposphere are not significant. In the simulations with the smaller ozone recovery trends the zonal mean zonal wind trends are not significant throughout the troposphere. The response of the SH circulation to GHG concentration increases in HadGEM1 includes an increase in poleward eddy heat flux in the stratosphere and positive sea level pressure trends in southeastern Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Assessment of General Circulation Model in Simulating Daily Precipitation and Temperature Using Multiple Gridded Datasets
    water Article Performance Assessment of General Circulation Model in Simulating Daily Precipitation and Temperature Using Multiple Gridded Datasets Najeebullah Khan 1,2, Shamsuddin Shahid 1 , Kamal Ahmed 1,2, Tarmizi Ismail 1 , Nadeem Nawaz 2 and Minwoo Son 3,* 1 School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310 Johor Bahru, Malaysia; [email protected] (N.K.); [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (K.A.); [email protected] (T.I.) 2 Faculty of Water Resource Management, Lasbela University of Agriculture Water and Marine Sciences (LUAWMS), 90150 Uthal, Balochistan, Pakistan; [email protected] 3 Department of Civil Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-42-821-5676 Received: 28 September 2018; Accepted: 4 December 2018; Published: 6 December 2018 Abstract: The performance of general circulation models (GCMs) in a region are generally assessed according to their capability to simulate historical temperature and precipitation of the region. The performance of 31 GCMs of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) is evaluated in this study to identify a suitable ensemble for daily maximum, minimum temperature and precipitation for Pakistan using multiple sets of gridded data, namely: Asian Precipitation– Highly-Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation (APHRODITE), Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST), Princeton Global Meteorological Forcing (PGF) and Climate Prediction Centre (CPC) data. An entropy-based robust feature selection approach known as symmetrical uncertainty (SU) is used for the ranking of GCM. It is known from the results of this study that the spatial distribution of best-ranked GCMs varies for different sets of gridded data.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on Verification of Operational Seasonal Climate Forecasts
    Guidance on Verification of Operational Seasonal Climate Forecasts 2018 edition WEATHER CLIMATE WATER CLIMATE WEATHER WMO-No. 1220 Guidance on Verification of Operational Seasonal Climate Forecasts 2018 edition WMO-No. 1220 EDITORIAL NOTE Typefaces employed in this volume do not signify standard or recommended practices, and are used solely for legibility. The word shall is used to denote practices that are required for data representation to work. The word should denotes recommended practices. METEOTERM, the WMO terminology database, may be consulted at http://public.wmo.int/en/ resources/meteoterm. Readers who copy hyperlinks by selecting them in the text should be aware that additional spaces may appear immediately following http://, https://, ftp://, mailto:, and after slashes (/), dashes (-), periods (.) and unbroken sequences of characters (letters and numbers). These spaces should be removed from the pasted URL. The correct URL is displayed when hovering over the link or when clicking on the link and then copying it from the browser. WMO-No. 1220 © World Meteorological Organization, 2018 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chairperson, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 84 03 P.O. Box 2300 Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 81 17 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Email: [email protected] ISBN 978-92-63-11220-0 NOTE The designations employed in WMO publications and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WMO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • General Circulation Models and Their Role in the Climate Modeling Hierarchy
    Solving Problems with GCMs: General Circulation Models and Their Role in the Climate Modeling Hierarchy Michael Ghil and Andrew W. Robertson Department of Atmospheric Sciences & Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1565 Revised version April 28, 1999 In General Circulation Model Development: Past, Present, and Future (Arakawa Festschrift), D. Randall (Ed.), Academic Press, sub judice. Abstract We outline the familiar concept of a hierarchy of models for solving problems in climate dynamics. General circulation models (GCMs) occupy a special position at the apex of this hierarchy, and provide the main link between basic concepts—best captured by very simple, “toy” models—and the incomplete and inaccurate observations of climate variability in space and time. We illustrate this role of GCMs in addressing the problems of climate variability on three time scales: intraseasonal, seasonal-to-interannual, and interdecadal. The problems involved require the use of atmospheric, oceanic, and coupled ocean-atmosphere GCMs. We emphasize the role of dynamical systems theory in communicating between the rungs of the modeling hierarchy—toy models, intermediate ones, and GCMs—and between modeling results and observations. - 2 - Table of Contents Page Nos. I. Introduction: the modeling hierarchy 4 A. Atmospheric modeling 4 B. Ocean and coupled modeling 8 C. Dynamical systems theory 9 II. Intraseasonal oscillations, their theory and simulation 11 A. Extratropical oscillations: observations and theory 12 B. GCM simulations and their validation 14 III. El Niño–Southern Oscillation, from the Devil’s Staircase to prediction 16 A. ENSO's regularity and irregularity 16 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorology and Atmospheric Dispersion
    3.3 Meteorology and atmospheric dispersion A system integrated comprehensive atmospheric dispersion module has been built from models suitable for fast real-time atmospheric dispersion calculations as suggested by [1], cf. Table 1. TABLE 1: THE MET-RODOS MODULE: Associated models and data Near-range flow and dispersion models, including pre-processors: · Meteorological pre-processor (PAD) · Mass Consistent Flow model (MCF) · Linearized flow model (LINCOM) · Puff model with gamma dose (RIMPUFF) · Near-range elongated puff model (ATSTEP) Complex terrain models (stand alone system): · Prognostic flow model (ADREA) and Lagrangian dispersion model (DIPCOT) Mesoscale and Long-range Models: · Hybrid Lagrangian-Eulerian model (MATCH) On-line Weather Forecast data: · Numerical Weather Prediction data (DMI-HIRLAM and SPA -TYPHOON) The module is called MET-RODOS and it consists of models and pre-processors contributed to by Work Group 2 (Atmospheric Dispersion) partners. 3.3.1 The MET-RODOS module A schematic overview of the system integrated MET-RODOS atmospheric dispersion module [2] is presented in Figure 1. Details about the systems „functionality specification“ is described in [3] whereas the systems User’s manual [4] holds references to the systems User’s guides, input/output specifications and test runs. The MET-RODOS dispersion module contains three distinguishable sub-systems: • The Local-Scale Pre-processor LSP, • The Local-Scale Model Chain LSMC, and • The long-range Model Chain LRMC 57 On-site Off-site N So dar ’ s Met- +4 Hr Towers W
    [Show full text]
  • The Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Model EMAC-MPIOM
    Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 771–784, 2011 www.geosci-model-dev.net/4/771/2011/ Geoscientific doi:10.5194/gmd-4-771-2011 Model Development © Author(s) 2011. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Model EMAC-MPIOM A. Pozzer1,2, P. Jockel¨ 2,*, B. Kern2, and H. Haak3 1The Cyprus Institute, Energy, Environment and Water Research Center, Nicosia, Cyprus 2Atmospheric Chemistry Department, Max-Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 3Ocean in the Earth System, Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany *now at: Deutsches Zentrum fur¨ Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut fur¨ Physik der Atmosphare,¨ Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany Received: 8 February 2011 – Published in Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss.: 4 March 2011 Revised: 6 September 2011 – Accepted: 6 September 2011 – Published: 9 September 2011 Abstract. The ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry constituent cycles, such as the carbon, sulfur or nitrogen cy- (EMAC) model is coupled to the ocean general circulation cle are to be studied. Historically, the different model com- model MPIOM using the Modular Earth Submodel System ponents have been mostly developed independently, and at (MESSy) interface. MPIOM is operated as a MESSy sub- a later stage they have been connected to create AO-GCMs model, thus the need of an external coupler is avoided. The (Valcke, 2006; Sausen and Voss, 1996). However, as indi- coupling method is tested for different model configurations, cated by the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovern- proving to be very flexible in terms of parallel decompo- mental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR4), no model sition and very well load balanced. The run-time perfor- used in the AR4 presented a complete and online calcula- mance analysis and the simulation results are compared to tion of atmospheric chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • DUSTRAN 2.0 User's Guide
    PNNL-24049 DUSTRAN 2.0 User’s Guide: A GIS-Based Atmospheric Dust Dispersion Modeling System March 2015 WJ Shaw FC Rutz JP Rishel EG Chapman Prepared for the U.S. Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program under a Related Services Agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 PNNL-24049 DUSTRAN 2.0 User’s Guide: A GIS-Based Atmospheric Dust Dispersion Modeling System WJ Shaw FC Rutz JP Rishel EG Chapman March 2015 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program under a Related Services Agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Summary The U.S. Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) completed a multi-year project to update the DUSTRAN atmospheric dispersion modeling system, which is being used to assist the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) in addressing particulate air quality issues at military training and testing ranges. This version—DUSTRAN V2.0—includes (1) a complete replacement of the geographic information system (GIS) platform to include the utilization of open-source GIS software (MapWindow) (2) user profiles to allow multiple users to run individual simulations using separate sites (3) integration of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) AERMOD air-dispersion model for modeling near- field (less than 50 km) releases, including an option to use a formulation for near-field deposition derived from new work by the Desert Research Institute; and (4) updates to the dust source-term module for military vehicles to include additional vehicle and soil types, as well as enhanced formulations for particle deposition.
    [Show full text]