File No. ------18072 Item No.4 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE TASK FORCE AGENDA PACKET CONTENTS LIST

Compliance and Amendments Committee Date: August27,2019

D Petition/Complaint Page:JJ'2. D Memorandum - Deputy City Attorney Page:___j 'J D Petitioner/Complainant Supporting Documents Page: \ ~ D Respondent's Response Page: ~ 0 D Public Correspondence Page:____/ D Order of Determination Page:_9' D Minutes Page:_ D Administrator's Report Page:_ D No Attachments

OTHER D D D D D D D D D

Completed by:_--=C:...:.·-=L=e=g-=-e'-r ______Date 8/21/19

*An asterisked item represents the cover sheet to a document that exceeds 25 pages. The complete document is in the file.

P7 City Hall 1 Dr Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244 SUNSHJNE ORDINANCE , CA 94102-4689 TASKFORCE Tel.No. (415) 554-7724 Fax No. (415) 554-7854 TTD/TTYNo. (415) 554-5227

ORDER OF DETERMINATION June 3, 2019

DATE DECISION ISSUED April 3, 2019

CASE TITLE- Joshua Klipp v. Recreation and Parks Department (File No. 18072)

FACTS OF THE CASE

The following petition/complaint was filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (SOTF):

File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

HEARING ON THE COMPLAINT

On September 25, 2018 the Complaint Committee, acting in its capacity to hear petitions/complaints heard the matter.

Joshua Klipp (Petitioner) provided a summary of his complaint and requested the Committee find a violation. Mr. Klipp stated that that he received a response in a timely manner but the four Clocuments provided by Recreation and Parks were inadequate. Mr. Klipp stated that Recreation and Parks either does not have the requested records and the responses provided were fabricated. Mr. Klipp stated that he does not believe that did not receive any records prior to 2012 the Recreation and Parks' documents were entirely made up and Recreation and Parks did not respond to his request.

Tiffany Lin-Wilson, Recreation and Parks (Respondent) provided a summary of the Department's position. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated that she compiled the information requested and that she does not work on the strategic plan. Ms. Lin­ Wilson stated she collected relevant records from staff and provided them to Mr. Klipp. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated that most of the information requested is available on the Recreation and Parks Capital and Planning Department website. Ms. Lin­ Wilson stated that the reports provided to Mr. Klipp were created by Kelley Cornell which include work force budget, health and diversity of the urban forest and other related information.

PB Chair Wolfe requested that the Kelley Cornell or person knowledgeable of the requested records attend the SOTF hearing and be prepared to answer questions.

Member Hinze, seconded by Member Cate, moved to refer the matter to the SOTF for hearing and requested Kelley Cornell be present to provided information related to the public records request and why records prior to 2012 were not provided.

On April 3, 2019, the SOTF held a hearing to review the recommendation from Complaint Committee and/or to review the merits of the petition/complaint.

Joshua Klipp (Petitioner) provided a summary of the complaint and requested the Committee to find a violation. Mr. Klipp stated that every year the Urban Forestry Council creates a report based on a questionnaire that is sent out to public entities, such as Recreation and Park, and is made publicly available. Mr. Klipp stated that the information provided by Recreation and Park was inadequate in that there was no supporting documentation.

Dennis Kern, Director of Operations (Recreation and Parks), (Respondent), provided a summary of the department's position. Mr. Kern stated that the Complainant requested documents from the previous ten years that do not exist. Mr. Kern stated that the Complainant had been provided all the documents maintain by Recreation and Parks. Mr. Kern stated that the Parks had been in a tree reactive routine (removing more trees than planting). Mr. Kern stated that he supervises 12 arborists, 10 gardeners, 4 laborers but does not have any clerical staff in his urban forestry unit. Mr. Kern stated that Mr. Klipp had been provided the Strategic Plan.

A question and answer period occurred. The Respondent and the Complainant provided rebuttals.

The SOTF opined that records including but not limited to arborist tree plantings, removals, location, source of tree, personal injuries, storm damage should be tracked and provided.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW

Based on the testimony and evidence presented, the SOTF found that the Recreation and Parks Department violated Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21 (b)(e).

pg DECISION AND ORDER OF DETERMINATIONS

On April 3, 2019, Chair Wolfe, seconded by Vice-Chair Hyland, moved to find that the Department of Recreation and Parks viola,ted Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b) and 67.21(e), by failing to make documents available in a timely and complete manner and referred the matter to the Compliance and Amendments Committee to ensure that Recreation and Parks Department provides the requested documents other than those already provided to Joshua Klipp (Urban Forestry Council).

The motion PASSED by the following vote:

Ayes: 8- Hyland, Yankee, B. Wolfe, Hinze, LaHood, Cannata, Tesfai, J. Wolf Noes: 0 - None Absent: 3..: Martin, Chopra, Gate

.r.-~-"J'"'"'·-. lr "~· '•,

'i 1l~1]~1 Brucej ·,.. ~d.!\~ hair Sunsh,jn. JOtiJlnance Task Force \ cc. J'cYshua Klipp (Petitioner/Complainant) . Tiffany Lin-Wilson, Recreation and Parks Department (Respondent)

P10 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE TASK FORCE ·1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco CA 94102 Tel. (415) 554-7724; Fax (415) 554-7854 http://www.sfgov.org/sunshine SUNSIDNE ORDlNANCE COMPLAINT FORM

Complainant Name (Optiona0 Joshua Klipp ------~~------~------~ Date of Request:. August 2, 2018 ----~--~------Please identify the City Official(s) and/or Employee(s) against whom the complaint is being made: unknown ------~------

Please identify the Officials' and/or Employ~:;es' Board, Commission, Task Force, Department or other type of agency. San Francisco Parks & Recreation

Name of the Custodian of. Records tasked with providing the requested information: Tiffany Lin-Wilson

. [X] Alleged violation of public records access [X] 'Alleged failure to provide information in a timely manner in accordance with the provisions of the Sunshine Ordinance D Alleged violation of a public meeting Please indicate date of meeting if known

Sunshine Ordinance Section(s) (If known, please cite specific provision(s) being violated)

Please describe the alleged violation. Use additional paper if needed. Please attach any relevant documentation which supports your complaint. On August 2, 2018, l made a document and information request on the SFRPD pursuant to the Sunshine Act. On August 7, 2018, the agency extended itself 14 days to respond "because of the voluminous n.ature of the request". On August 16, 2018, the agency released 2 publicly available documents. After much back and forth, they released two more documents. My request made clear what information I ;;ought; the agency's response is dismissive. Are ~ca~sr:rtlll!:j(.e~uatili W4iMl:J300caai!:he!Soo9~e Ordinance Task Force? 1 Q yes 0 no.

referred method s of contact:

[X] Phone: 415-265-0901 D Mailing Address:

D Fax:

Q Email: [email protected] D Other: --'----~---~-----

Signatur.e:---2:..,.-?---~---~-~~·,______Date: Sept. 6, 2018

1 NOTICE: PERSONAL INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED WHEN ADDRESSING A PUBLIC POLICY BODY IS SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE UNDER THE PUBLIC RECORDS ACT AND THE SUNSHINE ORDINANCE. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PERSONAL. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION, AND COMPLAINTANTS MAY REMAIN ANONYMOUS. HOWEVER, FOR PROPER NOTICING AND PROCESSING OF A HEARING REQUEST, A RELIABLE MEANS OF CONTACT IS RECOMMENDED. PLEASE NOTE TRAT THE SOTF ADMINISTRATOR WILL NOT REDACT A..NY INFOIUviAT!ON PROVIDED IN THESE SUBMISS!ONS. ll/5/2015 p 11 Sunshine Ordinance Task Force ·. 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco CA 94102 Tel. (415) 554-7724; Fax (415) 554-7854 http://www.sfgov.org/sunsbine ·

Thank you for your interest in the implementation of the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance.

The Sunshine Ordinance adopted by the citizens of the City & County of San Francisco declares that: ·

(a) Government's duty is to serve the publi~, reaching its decisions in full view of the · public. · ·

(b) Commissions, boards, councils and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people's business. This Ordinance will assure that their deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people's rev1ew.

The role of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force is to advise the Board of Supervisors and provide information to other City departments on appropriate ways in which to implementthe Ordinance. The·Task Force is responsible for developing appropriate goals to ensure the practical and timdy implementation of the Ordinance and to report to the Board on practical or policy problems encountered in the administration of the Ordinance.

If you have encountered problems regarding compliance with the Ordinance, the Public Records Act or the Ralph M. Brown (Public Meetings) Act, we ask that you fill dutthe attached complaint form. Please deliver the form to: Administrator of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force,City Hall, Room 244, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, San Francisco, CA 94102- 4689.

We attempt to resolve complaints informally where possible, through the affected departments and the City Attorney's office .. Matters, which cannot be adequately resolved, or matters that involve substantial policy considerations, may be set for a hearing at a Task Force meeting. The Task Force meets the first Wednesday of each month at 4:00p.m. at City Hall, Room 408.

NOTICE: PERSONAL INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED \VBEN ADDRESSING A PUBLIC POLICY BODY IS SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE UNDER THE CALJFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT AND THE SUNSHINE ORDINANCE. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE NOT REQUJRED TO PROVIDE PERSONAL IDENTJFYING INFORMATION, AND COMPLAINTANTS MAY REMAIN ANONYMOUS. HOWEVER, FOR PROPER NOTICING·AND PROCESSING OF A HEARING REQUEST, A RELIABLE.MEANS OF CONTACT IS. RECOMMENDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SOTF ADMINISTRATOR WILL NOT REDACT ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THESE SUBlVIISSIONS. 11/5/2015 .

P12 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY

DENNIS J. HERRERA MARC PRICE WOLF City Attorney Deputy City Attorney

Direct Dial: (415) 554-3901 Email: marc .price .w olf@sfcityatty .org

MEMORANDUM

TO: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force FROM: Marc Price Wolf Deputy City Attorney DATE September 17, 2018 RE: Complaint No. 18072- Joshua Klipp v. San Francisco Recreation and Parks Dept.

COMPLAINT Complainant Joshua Klipp ("Complainant") alleges the San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department ("Department") violated public records laws by failing to timely/adequately respond to his August 2, 2018 request for public records. COMPLAINANT FILES COMPLAINT On September 6, 2018, Complainant filed this complaint with the Task Force alleging that the Department failed to timely/adequately respond to his public records request. JURISDICTION The Department is a City department subject to the provisions of the Sunshine Ordinance governing public records. The Department does not contest jurisdiction to hear this complaint. APPLICABLE STATUTORY SECTION(S) Section 67 of the San Francisco Administrative Code:

e Section 67.21 governs responses to a public records request. APPLICABLE CASE LAW

e none BACKGROUND On August 2, 2018, Complainant sent a message to San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department through the Nextrequest.com system. Complainant requested the following: All documents that show, over the last ten years, how many trees have been removed by San Francisco Parks & Recreation. Please include location of removal, tree species and estimated size and age of the tree. All documents that show, over the last ten years, how many trees have been planted by San Francisco Parks and Recreation. Please include location of the planting, tree species, and approximate date the. tree was planted.

FOX PLAZA · 1390 MARKET STREET, 6TH FLOOR · SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94102-5408 RECEPTION: (415) 554-3800 ·FACSIMILE: (415) 437-4644

P13 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY

MEMORANDUM

TO: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force DATE: September 17, 2018 PAGE: 2 RE: Complaint No. 18072- Joshua Klipp v. San Francisco Recreation and Parks Dept.

All documents that show which trees San Francisco Parks & Recreation intends to remove in the next 5-10 years, including tree location, species, and estimated size and age of those identified trees. The Department invoked a fourteen extension to respond to the request, citing the voluminous nature of the request. After some back and forth communications between the Complainant and the Department in which the Department attempted to better understand the Complainants request and possibly nanow the scope of the request, the Department produced responsive documents. Complainant filed this Complaint asserting that the Department has not produced all responsive records and that the Department's "response is dismis.sive." QUESTIONS THAT MIGHT ASSIST IN DETERMINING FACTS

11 Is Complainant satisfied with the information that was provided?

11 What additional documents does the Complainant think the Department is withholding?

11 Did Complainant eventually receive additional responses from the Department? LEGAL ISSUES/LEGAL DETERMINATIONS • Did the Department violate Administrative Code Section 67.21 (b) by failing to provide Complainant with records responsive to his request in a timely manner?

CONCLUSION THE TASK FORCE FINDS THE FOLLOWING FACTS TO BE TRUE:

THE TASK FORCE FINDS THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS TO BE TRUE OR NOT TRUE.

* * *

CHAPTER 67, SAN FRANCISCO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (SUNSIDNE ORDINANCE) SEC. 67.21. PROCESS FOR GAINING ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS; ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS (a) Every person having custody of any public record or public information, as defined herein, (hereinafter refened to as a custodian of a public record) shall, at normal times and during normal and reasonable hours of operation, without unreasonable delay, and without requiring an appointment, permit the public record, or any segregable portion of a record, to be inspected and examined by any person and shall furnish one copy thereof upon payment of a reasonable copying charge, not to exceed the lesser of the actual cost or ten cents per page.

P14 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM

TO: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force DATE: September 17, 2018 PAGE: 3 RE: Complaint No. 18072- Joshua Klipp v. San Francisco Recreation and Parks Dept.

(b) A custodian of a public record shall, as soon as possible and within ten days following receipt of a request for inspection or copy of a public record, comply with such request. Such request may be delivered to the office of the custodian by the requester orally or in writing by fax, postal delivery, or e-mail. If the custodian believes the record or information requested is not a public record or is exempt, the custodian shall justify withholding any record by demonstrating, in writing as soon as possible and within ten days following receipt of a request, that the record in question is exempt under express provisions of this ordinance. (c) A custodian of a public record shall assist a requester in identifying the existence, form, and nature of any records or information maintained by, available to, or in the custody of the custodian, whether or not the contents of those records are exempt from disclosure and shall, when requested to do so, provide in writing within seven days following receipt of a request, a statement as to the existence, quantity, form and nature of records relating to a particular subject or questions with enough specificity to enable a requester to identify records in order to make a request under (b). A custodian of any public record, when not in possession of the record requested, shall assist a requester in directing a request to the proper office or staff person.

P15 Sunshine Ordinance 'Fask Force Complaint Summary File No. 18072

Joshua Klipp v. Parks and Recreation Department (Park and Rec)

Date filed with SOTF: 9/6/18

Contacts information (Complainant information listed first): Joshua Klipp ([email protected]) (Complainant) Tiffany Lynn Wilson ([email protected]) Eric Pawlowsky (Eric. P awlowsky@sfgov. or g) (Respondents)

File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Parks and Recreation Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.2r, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Administrative Summary if applicable:

Complaint Attached.

Pl6 o. plainant/Petitioners cu ents Sub issi n

.,

P17 Leger, Cheryl (BOS)

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 2:15 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Sunshine Act Complaint// SF Park & Rec Info Request #18-2629 Attachments: Request #18-2629 (JKiipp).pdf; 53444-Complaint Form ()Klipp) .pdf

To Whom It Concerns,

Please see the attached complaint re SF Park & Recreation's dismissive response to my lawfully submitted document and information request per the Sunshine Ordinance. Please note thatwhile my complaint seeks a hearing, I would be more than happy to participate in some form of alternative dispute resolution process in the interest of preserving city resources. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best, Josh Klipp 415.265.0901

p~ 8 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE TASK FORCE 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco CA 94102 Tel. (415) 554-7724; Fax (415) 554-7854 http://www.sfgov.org/sunshine SUNSHINE ORDINANCE COMPLAINT FORM

Complainant Name (Optionaf) Joshua Klipp ------~~------Date of Request: August 2, 2018 ----~--~------Please identify the City Official(s) and/or Employee(s) against whom the complaint is being made: ------unknown Please identify the Officials' and/or Employees' Board, Commission, Task Force, Department or other type of agency. San Francisco Parks & Recreation

Name of the Custodian of Records tasked with providing the requested information: Tiffany Lin-Wilson

IX] Alleged violation of public records access [X] Alleged failure to provide information in a timely manner in accordance with the provisions of the Sunshine Ordinance D Alleged violation of a public meeting Please indicate date of meeting if known

Sunshine Ordinance Section(s) (If known, please cite specific provision(s) being violated)

Please describe the alleged violation. Use additional paper if needed. Please attach any relevant documentation which supports your complaint. On August 2, 2018, I made a document and information request on the SFRPD pursuant to the Sunshine Act. On August 7, 2018, the agency extended itself.14 days to respond "because of the voluminous nature of the request". On August 16, 2018, the agency released 2 publicly available documents. After much back and forth, they released two more documents. My request made clear what information I sought; the agency's response is dismissive. Are lfieat&'jUSe'!lh~eQlJUBt!d i¥4Sif.ilj300caed:hel.t'lllrli3E:irle Ordinance Task Force? 1 Q yes D no

If yes, please provide 1 or more preferred method(s) of contact:

lXJ Phone: 415-265-0901 D Mailing Address:

D Fax:

~ Email: tklipp@ye~hoo.com D Other: ------

Date: Sept. 6, 2018 Signature: ___?::-/1--~---~-~-ff-.·(f-----

1 NOTICE: PERSONAL INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED WHEN ADDRESSING A PUBLIC POLICY BODY IS SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE UNDER Tiffi CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT AND Tiffi SUNSHINE ORDINANCE. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION, AND COMPLAINT ANTS MAY REMAIN ANONYMOUS. HOWEVER, FOR PROPER NOTICING AND PROCESSING OF A HEARING REQUEST, A RELIABLE MEANS OF CONTACT IS RECOMMENDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SOTF ADMINISTRATOR WILL NOT REDACT ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THESE SUBMISSIONS. 11/5/2015 P19 9/6/2018 NextRequest- Modem FOIA & Public Records Request Software

Request #18-2629 0 CLOSED As of September 6, 2018, 1:58pm

Details ------·------·---

All documents that show, over the last ten years, how many trees have been .removed by San Francisco Parks & Recreation. Please include location of removal, tree species and estimated size and age ofthe tree. All documents that show, over the last ten years, how many trees have been planted by San Francisco Parks & Recreation. Please include location of the planting, tree species, and approximate date the tree was planted. All documents that show which trees San Francisco Parks & Recreation intends to remove in the next 5-10 years, including tree location, species, and estimated size and age ofthose identified trees. +Read more

Received August 2, 2018 via web

Departments Recreation and Parks

Requester joshua il!lli [email protected] .J Klipp

Documents

Public (none)

Requester tree count j!J)y2016 to june 2017.P-df Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest.P-df 2018 Annual Urban Forest ReP-ort Survey... P-df https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.corn/requests/18-2629 P20 1/6 9/6/2018 NextRequest- Modem FOIA & Public Records Request Software

Staff

Point of Contact Tiffany Lin-Wilson (REC)

Timeline

Request Published Public September 6, 2018, 1:50pm

Request Closed Public We have conducted a diligent search for records responsive to your request. We have located responsive records, which are attached. This concludes your public records request. September 6, 2018, 1:50pm

External Message Requester+ Staff We have conducted a diligent search for records responsive to your request. We have located responsive records, which is attached. September 6, 2018, 1:48pm by Tiffany Lin-Wilson (REC), Secretary, Recreation and Parks (Staff)

Document(s) Released to Requester Public 2018 Annual Urban Forest Report Survey. pdf September 6, 2018, 1:47pm

External Message Requester+ Staff Hi Tiffany, hope you're well. It's been a week, checking in on this. Thanks! josh September 6, 2018, 12:00pm by the requester

External Message Requester+ Staff Hi Tiffany, Appreciate your response and patience, I know there's a lot to sort through here. The UFC reports contain data from RPD. Where does that data come from? Who maintains that? How do they track it? A few of my other questions: size, species, age, location- does RPD keep no record of that at all for its removals and plantings? Are there any emails between RPD employees regarding what types https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/18-2629 P21 2/6 9/6/2018 NextRequest- Modem FOIA & Public Records Request Software of trees are coming down and where? Also, any documents (e.g. emails, memos, etc.) regarding planned removals, especially given the swaths of eucalyptus, Monterey Cypress and Monterey Pines reaching their estimated end of life. Again, I know there's a lot here. My goal isn't to ask this for the sake of asking, I ask b/C: I care a lot about our city and our world. Thank you! josh August 30, 2018, 10:16am by the requester

External Message Requester+ Staff Hi josh, The UFC annual reports would be the only other responsive document. Would you like me to keep this request open until I can attach the report after which, I could close the request? I appreciate your patience. -Tiffany August 30, 2018, 9:16am by Tiffany Lin-Wilson (REC), Secretary, Recreation and Parks (Staff)

External Message Requester+ Staff Hi Tiffany, Thanks for your message and hope you're feeling better! I'm aware ofthe (publicly available) UFC annual ref;)orts, and these general documents wouldn't be fully responsive to my detailed request. It's entirely possible that RPD doesn't have documentation which is fully responsive, in which case I'd appreciate the department's affirmative acknowledgment of that. Please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions about this. Thank you! josh August 29,2018, 11:15am by the requester

External Message Requester+ Staff Hi josh, My apologies, as I was out sick yesterday. I am still waiting for the Urban Forestry . Council report which should be available to me this week. That will be the only other responsive document. I appreciate your patience. -Tiffany August 28, 2018, 12:59pm by Tiffany Lin-Wilson (REC), Secretary, Recreation and Parks (Staff)

External Message Requester+ Staff Hi Tiffany, hope you're well. Following up on this. When can I expect to receive the responsive documentation? Thank you! josh August 28, 2018, 12:30pm by the requester

External Message Requester+ Staff Hi Tiffany, hope you had a great weekend and look forward to receiving the remaining responsive documents today. Thank you! josh https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/18-2629 P 2 2 3/6 9/6/2018 NextRequest Modem FOIA & Public Records Request Software August 27,2018, 1:14pm by the requester

Document(s) Released to Requester Public tree count july2016 to june 2017.pdf August 20,2018, 2:10pm

External Message Requester+ Staff Hi joshua, This is in response to your questions about Strategic Plan Appendix A. August 20,2018, 2:10pm by Tiffany Lin-Wilson (REC), Secretary Recreation and Parks (Staff)

External Message Requester+ Staff Hi Tiffany, Hope you're having a great Monday:) The SFRPD Strategic Plan Appendix A has data regarding removal to replanting ratios, I'm interested in the documentation for the indicated time period from which that data derives. I think SFRPD also submits this data annually to the Urban Forestry Council's report. Let me know if you have any questions, and thank you so much for your work on this, I appreciate it. josh August 20, 2018, 1:03pm by the requester

External Message Requester+ Staff Hi joshua, As I was told, there is no specific site that these records are maintained on. Some records may be available through a capital project, others may be available elsewhere. If you have a specific location in mind, I could try to track it down. -Tiffany August 20, 2018, 11:26am by Tiffany Lin-Wilson (REC}, Secretary Recreation and Parks (Staff)

External Message Requester+ Staff Hi Tiffany,

What sites do you maintain specific (relevant) information on? Thank you, josh August 16, 2018, 4:54pm by the requester

Document(s) Released to Requester Public Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest.pdf August 16,2018, 3:49pm

https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.comlrequests/18-2629 P23 4/6 9/6/2018 NextRequest- Modern FOIA & Public Records Request Software

External Message Requester+ Staff We have conducted a diligent search for records responsive to your request. We have located responsive records, which is attached.

Additionally, the SFRPD Strategic Plan, is available to you at this link, with special reference to Objective 4: https://view .j oo mag. co m/rpd -strategic-pI a n-rp d-strategi c-pIan-update- 2018/0119151001519865342?short

More information may be available on a site-by-site basis. Is there a particular location you are interested in? August 16, 2018, 3:40pm by Tiffany Lin-Wilson (REC), Secretary, Recreation and Parks (Staff)

Due Date Changed Public August 7, 2018, 11:57am

External Message Requester+ Staff We received your public records request, dated August 2, 2018, on August 2, 2018. You have requested the following records: All documents that show, over the last ten years, how many trees have been removed by San Francisco Parks & Recreation. Please include location of removal, tree species and estimated size and age of the tree. All documents that show, over the last ten years, how many trees have been planted by San Francisco Parks & Recreation. Please include location of the planting, tree species, and approximate date the tree was planted. All documents that show which trees San Francisco Parks & Recreation intends to remove in the next 5-10 years, including tree location, species, and estimated size and age of those identified trees. All documents that show San Francisco Parks & Recreation's reforestation strategy, city-wide. lfthere are no such documents (or no such strategy), please indicate that in the affirmative. Please construe "documents" to include (but not be limited to): emails, memos, websites, text messages, meeting notes, agendas, presentations (both public and internal-facing). Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding this request.

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 6253(c), we are invoking an extension of up to 14 days (until August 27, 2018) because of the voluminous nature of the request. We will endeavor to complete our response before that date.

https :// sanfrancisc ci .nextreques t .corn!requests/18-262 9 P24 5/6 9/6/2018 NextRequest- Modem FOIA & Public Records Request Software August 7, 2018, 11:57am by Tiffany Lin-Wilson (REC), Secretary, Recreation and Parks (Staff)

Department Assignment Public Recreation and Parks August 2, 2018, 10:52am

Request Opened Public Request received via web August 2, 2018, 10:52am

https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.corn!requests/18-2629 P25 6/6 I (BOS)

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 1:47 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: · Re: SOTF- Notice of Appearance Compliance and Amendments Committee; August 27, 2019 4:30p.m.

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Hi Cheryl,

Heads up you originally said this wo,uld be on August 20. Is itthe 20th or 27th? I'm ok with either, just want to make sure I know when to show up.

Thank you, Josh

On Monday, July 29, 2019, 01:17:03 PM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Compliance and Amendments Committee to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; andjor 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: August 27, 2019.

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:30p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuantto Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 18072: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination- Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21(b) and (e),by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/ or complete manner.

File No. 18049: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination. Complaint filed by Robert M. Smith against the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco (FAMSF) for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/ or complete manner.

File No. 18083: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination- Complaint filed by Robert M. Smith against the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco (FAMSF) for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely andjor complete manner.

File No. 18012: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination- Complaint filed by Denta Tadesse against Lori Mazzola, City Hall Building Management, for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.13(a), by failing to allow access to a meeting of a policy body.

File No. 18028: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination- Complaint filed by Denta Tadesse against the Sheriffs Department for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.13 (a), by failing to allow access to a meeting of a policy body.

File No. 19052: Complaint filed by Alex Koskinen against the Department of Public Health for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely andjor complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/ disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00pm, August 20,2019.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 199 8.

Distlosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the Califoniia Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees­ may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy. Leger, Cher I (BOS)

From: SOTF, (BOS) Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 10:34 AM To: Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Subject: SOTF- Compliance and Amendments Committee hearing of August 27, 2019

Dear Patino:

Per our discussion of this morning.

Complaint:

File No. 18072: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination- Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance}, Section 67.21(b) and (e), by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Violation:

4/3/19 Action: Moved by Chair Wolfe, seconded by Vice-Chair Hyland to find that the Department of Recreation and Parks violated Administrative Code, Sections 67.21(b) and 67.21(e), by failing to make documents available in a complete and timely manner and to refer this case to. the Compliance and Amendments Committee to ensure that Recreation and Parks Department provides the requested documents other than those sent already provided to the Urban Forestry Council.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

~ df.if!J, Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation;and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they c~mmunicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All Written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member ofthe·public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy. es onde ts · ocu e t Su ission

P30 . I (BOS)

From: Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 12:35 PM To: [email protected] Cc: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: RE: SOTF File No. 18072: Additional Documents Attachments: FY19 Operations Trees.xlsx; Tree cases (311) Final.xlsx; Tree cases 311 EXplained.txt; Tree Work Orders (TMA).xlsx

Hi Joshua,

Wanted to share a document with all of our TMA's which are the work orders for tree's to be planted or removed that have been documented in our system. I have also included all the other documents I sent to you previously, so it's easier to have them in one place. The FY19 Operation sheet has been updated to correct the error messages. For Capital Improvement projects, visit link.

I'll be out oft he office as I'm going to Burning Man starting Friday 8/23, but let me know if you have any questions before then.

Andres Patino Public Outreach Coordinator Policy and Public Affairs *in the office Tuesdays to Fridays

San Francisco Recreation and Park Department I City & County of San Francisco Mclaren Lodge in I 501 Stanyan Street I San Francisco, CA I 94117 (415) 831-6349- Office

Visit us at sfrecpark.org Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Watch us on sfRecParkTV Sign up for our e-News

From: Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 3:33 PM To: [email protected] Cc: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: RE: SOTF File No. 18072: Additional Documents

Hi Joshua,

Following up. Attaching a 311 spreadsheet that was produced with the help of the 311 Customer Service Center, that might be more helpful to you than the one I had previously sent. Attaching a short read me doc that explains the tabs.

In addition, I'm attaching our brand new report from the nursery's digitalize system that was created and implement last year. This report covers the Fiscal Year 2019, (July 1st, 2018 to June 31st 2019), and is the new process of maintaining inventory for the Nursery. As Denny Kern, mentioned in the SOFT meeting on April 3'd, we do not have any records or documentation of previous years.

I'm waiting on 1 more document that I would like to share with you, but will probably not have it until August 22nd as it's ·being created as we speak. Starting with FY19, our report on Capital Trees will also include tree variety and location!! I will send that to you as soon as we have it.

Best,

Andres Patino Public Outreach Coordinator Policy and Public Affairs *In the office Tuesdays to Fridays

San Francisco Recreation and Park Department I City & County of San Francisco Mclaren Lodge in Golden Gate Park I 501 Stanyan Street I San Francisco, CA I 94117 (415) 831-6349- Office

Visit us at sfrecpark.org Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Watch us on sfRecParkTV Sign up for our e-News

From: Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 3:36PM To: [email protected] Cc: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: SOTF File No. 18072: Additional Documents

Hi Joshua,

. My name is Andres and I've taken over as Custodian of Records for the Department while Tiffany is out in Maternity Leave. I received an email yesterday about an upcoming hearing on August 27th, and wanted to start sharing some of the documents we've accumulated.

The attached Excel sheet is from the 311 data found online regarding trees. This includes removal and maintenance, but not all of them are specific to tree planting or removal. I narrowed it down, but wanted to give you the chance to narrow it further as you see fit. (Didn't want you to lose information due to the category types not always being consistent.)

If you follow this link, it will provide you with the plans for trees removals and trees plantings associated with all capital projects within the last 10 years. ·

I'm still waitingif any additional documents are produced from our Nursery that are responsive to your request, but wanted to start sharing these so you have time to look them over.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Best, P32 Andres Patino Public Outreach Coordinator Policy and Public Affairs *In the office Tuesdays to Fridays

San Francisco Recreation and Park Department I City & County of San Francisco Mclaren Lodge in Golden Gate Park I 501 Stanyan Street I San Francisco, CA I 94117 (415) 831-6349- Office

Visit us at sfrecpark.org Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Watch us on sfRecParkTV Sign up for our e-News

P33 25 PAGES

P34 TYPE CASE_REFERENCE TYPE--1 TITLE OBJECT_DESCRIPTION STATUS

Jefferson Square, SAN RPD Capital Queue 1770275 SSP All RPD Issues Palm clippings FRANCISCO, CA, 94102 Closed Crags Court Garden,, SAN RPD Community Garden 10936628 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed Golden Gate Park,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 9176285 All RPD Issues Limb_on_Ground FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed -a Golden Gate Park, SAN w (.i1 RPD GGP Queue 2643138 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed GGP Mothers Meadow Playground, SAN FRANCISCO, RPD GGP Queue 3044064 All RPD Issues Limb on the ground CA, 94122 Closed GGP North Lake,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 6758827 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed GGP North Lake,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 8022392 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed GGP Handball/Racquetball Courts,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, · RPD GGP Queue 10577578 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree 94122 Closed Golden Gate Park,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 4696049 All RPD Issues Tree Fell Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed GGP Panhandle,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 4493022 All RPD Issues Tree Fell Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94117 Closed Intersection of MARTIN LUTHER KING JR DR and RPD GGP Queue 9362283 All RPD Issues Tree Issue CHAIN OF LAKES DR Closed Golden Gate Park,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 8120812 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed Golden Gate Park, SAN RPD GGP Queue 1327085 All RPD Issues Tree_N eeds_lnspection FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed Golden Gate Park,, SAN RPD GGP Queue .5638727 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed

GGP Golf Course,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 9848683 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed

2001 JOHN F KENNEDY DR, Tree Issue SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94117 Closed "'U RPD GGP Queue 9849607 All RPD Issues w GGP Alvord Lake,, SAN O'l RPD GGP Queue 5266676 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed GGP Rainbow Falls,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 5265259 All RPD Issues Tree Issue FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed Golden Gate Park,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 8028174 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed GGP Beach Chalet Soccer Fields,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, RPD GGP Queue 6925586 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over 94122 Closed Golden Gate Park,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 8475660 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed

GGP Arguello Entrance,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 5575934 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed Golden Gate Park,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 4228050 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed Golden Gate Park,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 10727929 All RPD Issues Broken_Limb FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Open

GGP Dutch Windmill and Wilhelmina Tulip Garden,, RPD GGP Queue 10540840 All RPD Issues Tree Issue SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed GGP Mallard Lake,, SAN RPD GGP Queue 7240393 All RPD Issues Tree Issue FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed Lincoln Park,, SAN RPD Golf Queue 6530280 All RPD Issues Tree Issue FRANCISCO, CA, 94121 Closed Grand View Park,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 10609332 All RPD Issues Tree Issue FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed ,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 4956531 All RPD Issues Tree Fell Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed

-u w Corona Heights,, SAN -.1 RPD Natural Areas Queu 6819608 All RPD Issues Tree Fell Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94114 Closed 44 BONVIEW ST, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 3509294 All RPD Issues Tree_Needs_lnspection FRANCISCO, CA, 94110 Closed Glen Canyon Park,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 8842560 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed Glen Canyon Park,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 8844711 All RPD Issues Tree Issue FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed Glen Canyon Park,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 8854407 All RPD Issues Tree Issue FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed

Dorothy Erskine Park,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 8458860 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed 53 GLENVIEW DR, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 10522463 Tree Maintenance Damage Overgrown Tree FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Open Corona Heights,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 7026910 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree FRANCISCO, CA, 94114 Closed 100 YUKON ST, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 11164067 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree FRANCISCO, CA, 94114 Closed

20 CRESTLINE DR, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 10870857 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed

Fairmont Plaza,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 3660884 SSP All RPD Issues Limb_on_Ground FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed

""'C w 00 Intersection of CLARKSON ST RPD Natural Areas Queu 10639353 All RPD Issues Tree Issue and END (400 BLOCK OF) Closed Grand View Park,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 4368042 All RPD Issues Broken_Limb FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed

Interior Greenbelt,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 5500279 All RPD Issues Tree Fell Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed Bay View Park,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 5489630 All RPD Issues Tree Issue FRANCISCO, CA, 94124 Closed

Twin Peaks,, SAN FRANCISCO, RPD Natural Areas Queu 6722909 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell Over CA, 94131 Closed

Glen Canyon Park,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 6732244 All RPD Issues Limb_on_Ground FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed Glen Canyon Park,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 9994568 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed

Interior Greenbelt,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 4349608 All RPD Issues Tree Fell Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed

Interior Greenbelt,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 4343100 All RPD Issues Tree Fell Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed Mt. Davidson Park,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 4600518 All RPD Issues Limb_on_Ground FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Closed Hawk Hill, SAN FRANCISCO, RPD Natural Areas Queu 2220317 All RPD Issues Tree Fell Over CA,94116 Closed 925 ROCKDALE DR, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 2253006 All RPD Issues Tree Fell Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Closed Glen Canyon Park,, SAN Trail Tree Issue FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed -o RPD Natural Areas Queu 10379837 All RPD Issues w Mt. Davidson Park,, SAN CD RPD Natural Areas Queu 10371634 All RPD Issues Tree Fell Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Closed 256 JUANITA WAY, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 3588197 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Closed

Mt. Davidson Park,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 5884197 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Closed

Grand View Open Space,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 4908026 All RPD Issues Broken_Limb FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed

Glen Canyon Park,, SAN RPD Natural Areas Queu 4102513 All RPD Issues Dead Tree FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed Intersection of EDGEWOOD RPD Natural Areas Queu 3718965 All RPD Issues Tree Fell Over AVE and END Closed I (BOS)

From: Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 3:33 PM To: [email protected] Cc: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: RE: SOTF File No. 18072: Additional Documents Attachments: Tree cases 31 i- Explained.txt; Tree cases (311) Final.xlsx; FY19 Operations Trees.xlsx

Hi Joshua,

Following up. Attaching a 311 spreadsheet that was produced with the help of the 311 Customer Service Center, that might be more helpful to you than the one I had previously sent. Attaching a short read me doc that explains the tabs.

In addition, I'm attaching our brand new report from the nursery's digitalize system that was created and implement last 5 year. This report covers the Fiscal Year 2019, (July 1 \ 2018 to June 31st 2019L and is the new process of maintaining inventory for the Nursery. As Denny Kern, mentioned in the SOFT meeting on April 3rd, we do not have any records or documentation of previous years.

I'm waiting on 1 more document that I would like to share with you, but will probably not have it until August 22nd as it's being created as we speak. Starting with FY19, our report on Capital Trees will also include tree variety and location!! I will send that to you as soon as we have it.

Andres Patino Public Outreach Coordinator Policy and Public Affairs *In the office Tuesdays to Fridays

San Francisco Recreation and Park Department I City & County ofSan Francisco Mclaren Lodge in Golden Gate Park I 501 Stanyan Street I San Francisco, CA I 94117 (415) 831-6349- Office

Visit us at sfrecpark.org Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Watch us on sfRecParkTV Sign up for our e-News

From: Patino, Andre?-Lopez (REC) Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 3:36PM To: [email protected] Cc: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: SOTF File No. 18072: Additional Documents

Hi Joshua,

My name is Andres and I've taken over as Custodian of Records for the Department while Tiffany is out in Maternity P4o Leave. I received an email yesterday about an upcoming hearing on August 27th, and wanted to start sharing some of the documents we've accumulated.

The attached Excel sheet is from the 311 data found online regarding trees. This includes removal and maintenance, but not all ofthem are specific to tree planting or removal. I narrowed it down, but wanted to give you the chance to narrow it further as you see fit. (Didn't want you to lose information due to the category types not always being consistent.)

If you follow this link, it will provide you with the plans for trees removals and trees plantings associated with all capital projects within the last 10 years.

I'm still waiting if any additional documents are produced from our Nursery that are responsive to your request, but wanted to start sharing these so you have time to look them over.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Best,

Andres Patino Public Outreach Coordinator Policy and Public Affairs *In the office Tuesdays to Fridays

San Francisco Recreation and Park Department I City & County of San Francisco Mclaren Lodge in G.olden Gate Park I 501 Stanyan Street I San Francisco, CA I 94117 (415) 831-6349- Office

Visit us at sfrecpark.org Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Watch us on sfRecParkTV Sign up for our e-News DOCUMENTS EXCEED

25 PAGES

P42 ~T~TUS n'PE CASE.:;,REFERENCF..:.-:lYPE_1 TlTLE OBJECT_DESCRIPTION Jefferson Square, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94102 Closed RPD Capital Queue 1770275 SSP All RPD Issues Palm clippings Crags Court Garden,. SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Community Gardens Queue 10935628 All RPD Issues Tree_FeH_Over Closed RPD GGP Queue 9176285 All RPD Issues Limb_on_Ground Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Golden Gate Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD GGP Queue 2643138 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over GGP Mothers Meadow Playground, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD GGP Queue 3044064 All RPD Issues Limb on the ground Closed RPDGGPQueue 6758827 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree GGP North Lake,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 GGP North Lake,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD GGP Queue 8022392 Tree Maintenance Di!mage Damaged Tree Closed RPD GGP Queue 10S77578 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree GGP Handball/Racquetball Courts,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD GGP Queue 4696049 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD GGP Queue 4493022 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over GGP Pi!nhand!e,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94117 Jnter.;ectlon of MARTIN LUTHER KING JR DR and CHAIN OF LAKES DR Closed RPD GGP Queue 9362283 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Closed RPD GGP Queue 8120812 AU RPD Issues Tree_Fell_over Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD GGP Queue 1327085 AI! RPD Issues Tree_Needs_lnspectlon Golden Gate Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD GGP Queue 5638727 All RPD Issues Tree_Fdl_Over Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed ,RPDGGPQueue 9848683 A!l RPD Issues Tree_Fe!I_Over GGP Golf Cour.;e,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD GGP Queue 9849607 All RPD Issues Tree Issue 2001 JOHN F KENNEDY DR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94117 Closed RPD GGP Queue 5266576 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over GGP Alvord Lake,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD GGP Queue 52652S9 All RPD Issues Tree Issue GGP Rainbow Falls,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD GGP Queue 8028174 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 GGP Beach Chalet Soccer Fields,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD GGP Queue 6925586 All RPD Issues Tree_Fei!_Over Closed RPD GGP Queue 8475560 All RPD Issues Tree_Fel!_over Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD GGP Queue 5575934 All RPD Issues Tree_Fe!l_Over GGP Arguello Entrance,. SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPOGGPQueue 4228050 All RPD Issues Tree_FeH_Over Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Open RPD GGP Queue 10727929 All RPD Issues Broken_Umb Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 GGP Dutch Windmill and W!lhe!mlna Tu!lp Garden,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Close C. RPD GGP Queue 10540840 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Closed RPD GGP Queue 7.240393 All RPD Issues Tree Issue GGP Mallard lake,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD Golf Queue 6S30280 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Lincoln Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94121 Closed RPD Natuf"il! Areas Queue 10609332 AI! RPD Issues Tree Issue Grand View Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 9412? Closed RPD Natural Arei!S Queue 4956531 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over Glen Canyon Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natuf"ill Areas Queue 6819608 AU RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over Corona Heights,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94114 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 3509294 AH RPD Issues Tree_Needs_lnspectlon 44 BONVIEW ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94110 Glen Canyon Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natural ~reas Queue 8842560 All RPD Issues Tree_Fel!_Over Closed RPD N<1tural Areas Queue 8844711 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Glen Canyon Park, ,SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Glen Canyon Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natutc~l Areas Queue 8854407 AU RPD Issues Tree l5sue Closed RPDNaturaiAreasQueue 8458850 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree Dorothy Erskine Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Open RPD Natural Areas Queue 10522463. Tree Maintenance Damage Overgrown Tree 53 GLENVIEW DR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed "'1J RPD Natural Areas Queue 7026910 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree Corona Heights,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94114 Closed .,t:::a. RPD Natura! Areas Queue 11164067 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree 100 YUKON ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94114 Closed (A) RPD Natunl Areas Queue 10870857 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree 20 CRESTIINE DR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 3650884 SSP All RPD Issues Umb_on_Ground Fairmont Plaza,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 10539353 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Intersection of CLARKSON STand END (.1100 BLO_CK OF) Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 4368042 All RPD Issues Broken_Umb Grand VIew Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 5500279 AI! RPD Issues Tree_Fe!l_Over Interior Greenbelt, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 5489530 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Bay View Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94124 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 5722909 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over Twin Peaks,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Clo5ed RPD Natural Areas Queue 6732244 All RPD Issues Umb_on_Ground Glen Canyon Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 9994568 AliRPDissues Tree_Feii_Over Glen Canyon Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natura! Areas Queue 4349608 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_over Interior Greenbelt,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 4343100 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over Interior Greenbelt,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPDNaturaiAreasQueue 4500518 All RPD Issues Limb_on_Ground Mt. Davidson Park,, SAN FRANC!SCO, CA, 94127 Closed RPDNaturaiAreasQueue 2220317 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over Hawk HI!!, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94116 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 2253006 AI! RPD Issues Tree_Fe!l_Over 925 ROCKDALE DR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Clo5ed RPD Natural Areas Queue 10379837 All RPD Issues Trai!Treelssue Glen Canyon Park, ,SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 10371634 All RPD Issues Tree_Fe!l_Over Mt. Davidson Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Closed RPDNaturalAreasQueue 3S88197 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over 256JUAN!TA WAY, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 5884197 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over Mt. Davldso11 Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 4908026 All RPD Issues Broken_Limb Grand. VIew Open Space,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 4102513 All RPD Issues Dead_Tree Glen Canyon Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natural Arei!S Queue 3718965 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_over Intersection of EDGEWOOD AVE a11d END Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 8347564 All RPD Issues Tree_Needs_lnspect!on Twin Peaks,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 6853981 All RPD l5sues Tree_Fel!_Over Mt. Di!vldson Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 6853999 All RPD Issues Tree_Fel!_Over Mt. Davidson Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 7560763 A!!RPD Issues Limb_on_Ground Bay View Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94124 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 7057005 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over Glen Canyon Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 4834305 AU RPD Issues Umb_on_Ground Rocky Outcrop,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94116 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 10983454 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_over Edgehi!l Mountain,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Closed RPDNaturaiAreasQueue 7482952 All RPD Issues Broken_Umb ll!l!y Goat H!H,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 747S326 AH RPD Issues 8roken_Umb BayVIew Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94124 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 5617930 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_ over Twin Peaks., SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue 9498599 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Kite Hl!!,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94114 Closed RPD NSA Queue 4799274 All RPD Issues Broken_Umb Sunnyside Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 Closed RPD NSAQueue 4798967 AHRPD Issues Llmb_on_Ground Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD NSA Queue 8199627 Al!RPDJssues Tree_Fei!_Over GGP ,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed. RPD NSA Queue 7614027 All RPD ls5ues Broken_Umb Mountain Li!ke Park, 111TH AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94118 Closed RPD NSA Queue 740D297 All RPD Issues Tree_FeU_Over Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD NSA Queue 83090S2 A!! RPD Issues Tree Issue Bernal Heights Park,. SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94110 RPD NSA Queue 5401935 AI! RPD Issues Tree_Fei!_Over Klt~"c Hi!l,, SAN FRANOSCO, CA, 94114 . Closed RPD NSA QUI'cU!! 54030B3 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over Intersection of CALIFORNIA 5T and PARK PRESIDIO BLVD Closed RPD NSA Queue 6510075 Afl RPD Issues Tree Issue GGP ,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD NSA Queue 6610142 A!l RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD NSA Queue 663261S AI! RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD NSA Queue 7004142 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree 2043 WAWONA 5T, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPDNSAQueuc 8860681 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree Intersection of BRAZIL AVE and MANSELL 5T Closed RPD NSA Queue 6839151 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree . intersection of 16TH AVE and FULTONST Closed RPD NSA Queue 6715731' Tree Maintenance Dainage Damaged Tree 197 PORTOLA DR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD NSA Queue 6714146 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree 150 MIDCREST WAY, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD NSA Queue 67197S5 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree 150 MID CREST WAY, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD N5A Queue 1D332554 Tree M01lntenance Damage Overgrown Tree 58 VERNA ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94127 C!os~d RPD N5A Queue 43S5916 SSP All RPD Issues Tree_Fei!_Over Interior Greenbelt,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD NSA Queue 4493330 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_oVer GGP Panhandle,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94117 Closed RPDNSAQueue 4320893 All RPD Issues Tree_FeiLOver GGP Lincoln Ave Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Close~;! RPD NSA Queue 4306150 All RPD Issues Tree_Fe!I_Over GGP Rainbow Falls,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD NSA Queue 4599463 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Pine Lake Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPD NSA Queue 10808281 All RPD Issues Tree Issue · GGP Panhandle,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94117 Closed RPD NSA Queue 103931S7 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over Intersection of IRVING STand SUNSET BLVO Closed RPD NSA Queue 10367298 All RPD Issues Tree Issue 1479 37TH AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD NSA Queue 6422071 All RPD Issues Tree_Fe!I_Over Intersection of MARTlN LUTHER KING JR DR and 25TH AVE Closed RPD NSA Queue 10493140 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over John Mclaren Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD N5A Queue 10553179 AI! RPD Issues Tree_Fei!_Over Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 . Closed RPDNSAQueue 8394265 All RPD Issues Tree_Fe1l_Over Sue Bierman Park,, SA!'J FRANC!~CO, CA, 94111 Closed RPD NSA Queue 748S619 A!1 RPD Issues Llmb_on_Ground Bay View Park., SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94124 Clos~"cd RPD NSA Queue 749S748 All RPD Issues L!mb_on_Ground Jefferson Square,, SAN FRANCISCO, cA, 94102 Closed RPD Park Patrol Queue . S637570 All RPD Issues Tree_FeiU?ver Lower Great Highway,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD Park Patrol Queue S657805 Al! RPD Issues Tree Issue Golden Gate Heights Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94116 Closed RPD Park Patrol Queue S654482 AU RPD Issues Tree_Fel!_Over John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD ParkPatro!Queue 5658599 A!l RPD Issues Broken_Limb Alamo Square,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94117 Closed RPD Park Patrol Queue 9865697 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over Golden Gate Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD Park Patrol Queue 8023739 All RPD Issues Broken_L!mb Intersection of LAGUNA STand TURKST Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 6815670 All RPD Issues Tree_Needs_to_be_Removed 460 FUNSTON AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94118 Closed_ RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 2996171 A!l RPD Issues Tree_Fe!I_Over Telegraph Hill/Pioneer Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94133 Closed ·RPD Park-Service Area 1 Queue 5n5028 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Wah Hei Yuen, 922 JACKSON ST,SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94133 Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 2104879 ~~~ RPD Issues Umb_on_Ground Park Presidio Blvd, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94118 Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 6632459 All RPD Issues Llmb_on_Ground Lincoln Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94121 Closed ""0 RPD Park5ervlce Area 1 Queue 2393496 All RPD Issues Tree_Fetl_Over Lincoln Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94121 Closed Broken_limb , SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94118 Closed ~ RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 9273623 Al! RPD lsslJes Mountain Lake Park, SAN FRANC!SCO, CA, 94116 Closed .,!::> RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 9266690 AHRPD Issues Tree_Fel!_Over RPD ParkServ!ceArea 1Queue 11094675 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree 386 FUNSTON AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94118 Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 109760D4 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged_Tree -- Fal!en_tree Intersection of FUNSTON AVE and BALBOA 5T Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 5084586 SSP A!! RPD Issues Dead_Tree Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 4859378 SSP All RPD .Issues Dead_Tree Lafayette Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94109 Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 2104957 SSP All RPD Issues Broken_Llmb Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 4654194 All RPD Issues Dead_Tree Moscone Recreation Center, 1800 CHESTNUT ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94123 Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 4B37318 SSP AI! RPD Issues Dead_Tree Sue Blerm01n Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94111 Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 2277141 All RPD Issues Fallen tree branch Joe DIMaggio Playground, 651lOMBARD ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94133 Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 QUI'cUe 45734D1 A!! RPD Issues Tree_Fe!LOver DuPont Tennis Courts, 336 31ST AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94121 Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 4327935 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Telegraph Hill/Pioneer Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94133 Closed RPD Park5erv1ce Area 1 Queue 5438343 AH RPD Issues Tree_Fei!_Over Collins P. Huntington Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94108 Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 1013291 All RPD Issues B~<~.nches Park Presidio Blvd, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94118 Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 9875136 A!! RPD Issues Tree Issue Washington Square,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94133 Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue 68S3650 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Lincoln Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94121 Closed RPD Park service Area 1 Queue 2830399 All RPD Issues Fallen tree PARK PRESIDIO BLVD, Closed RPO Park Service Area 1 Queue 8090679 AI! RPD Issues Tree_Fel!_Over lincoln Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94121 Closed RPD Park Service Area 2Queue 6440190 All RPD Issues Llmb_on_Ground Union Square,, SAN Ffi.ANCISCO, CA, 94108 CloSed RPD Park Service Arl'ca 2 Queue S8S9518 All RPD Issues Tree_Fetl_Over Koshland Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94102 G!osed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue 10345563 All RPD Issues Tree Issue MargaretS.Hayward Playground, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94102 Closed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue 926059 All RPD Issues L!mb_on_Ground Beideman & O'Farrell Mini Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94115 Closed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue 8838893 All RPD Issues Tree_Fel!_Over Bush and Broderick Mini Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94115 Closed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue 5482932 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Potrero Hi!! Recreation Center, 801 ARKANSAS ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94107 Closed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue 9021335 All RPD Issues Broken_L!mb Alamo Square,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94117 Closed RPD P01rkService Area 2 Qu~"cue 8919953 All RPD Issues Tree_Fe!l_Over Jefferson Square, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94102 Closed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue 43191D3 All RPD Issues Tree_Fe!l_Over Alamo Square,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94117 Closed RPD ParkServiceArea 2 Queue ~0805276 A!! RPD !ss.ues Tree Issue Alamo Square,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94117 Closed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue 596898S A!! RPD Issues Tree_FeJ[_Over Page and Laguna Min! Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94102 Closed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue 5908383 All RPD Issues Umb_on_Ground Sgt. John Macaulay Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94109 Closed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue 8345971 All RPD Issues Limb_on_Ground Sgt. John Macaulay Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94109 Closed RPD ParkServlceAr~"ca 2 Queue 6857234 AU RPD Issues Tree Issue Jefferson Square,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94102. Closed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue 8623018 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Esprit Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94'107 Closed RPD ParkServic~"cArea 2 Queul'c 5633230 All RPD Issues Tree_Fe!I_Over Alamo Square,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94117 Closed RPO ParkS!'ci'ViceArea 3 Queue 3429840 All RPD Issues Tree Issue John Mclar~"cn Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 3361909 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed

RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 7097883 All RPD Issues Tree Issue John Mclaren Park, 1 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD ParkServiceArea3 Queue 7098141 All RPD Issues Tree Issue John Mclaren Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed APDParkServkeArea3 Queue 1158512 AI! R.PD Issues Tree_Fe!l_Over John Mclaren Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 4879234 AH RPD Issues Broken_L!mb John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD ParkServ!ceArea 3 Queue 6877189 All RPD Issues Tree Issue John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPDParkServlccArea3 Queue 7585716 A!l RPD Issues Tree Issue Intersection of BURROWS STand GAMBIER ST Closed RPDParkServiceArea3Queue 7391773 All RPD Issues Tree Issue John Mclaren Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 6451363 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Crocker Amazo"n Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Intersection of BURROWS STand PERU AVE Closed RPD Park Service An~a 3 Queue 5474075 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Youngblood-Coleman Playground, 1398 HUDSON ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94124 Closed RPD ParkServ!ccArea 3 Queue 87BS356 AH RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 10487454 All RPD Issues Tree issue Intersection of MANSELL 5T and V!SITAC!ON AVE Closed RPD ParkServ!ceArea3 Queue 5776138 All RPD Issues Tree Issue John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 5758558 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Cayuga Playground, 301 NAGLEE AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94112 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 4300595 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Intersection of COLBY STand MANSEllST Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 4276810 All RPD Issues Tree Issue John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD ParkServ!ce Area 3 Queue 8845961 A!IRPD Issues Tree Issue John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 45S1S17 All RPD Issues Tree Issue John Mclaren Park, ,SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 2389336 All RPD Issues Umb_on_Ground John Mclaren Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park5erviceArea3 Queue 8858370 All RPD Issues Dead_Tree John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 9622102 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree 200 JOHN F SHELLEY DR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 962204S Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree Intersection of OXFORD STand WAYLAND 5T Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 5823955 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree 57 REBECCA LN, SAN FRANQSCO, CA, 94124 Closed RPD ParkSetv!ce Area 3 Queue 5080962 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree Intersection of BURROWS 5T and MADISON ST Closed RPDPark5erviceArea3Queue 6259112 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree Intersection of MANSELLST and Closed RPD ParkServ!ceArea 3. Queue 5664862 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree Intersection of MANSELLST and Closed RPD ParkServ!ceArea 3 Queue 5664877 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree Intersection of MANSEll STand Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 423236S SSP All RPD issues TreeJell~Over John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park5ervlceArea3 Queue 4998184 SSP All RPD Issues Tree_Needs_:_!nspectfon John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 4882878 SSP All RPD ls-sues Tree_Feli_Over John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPDParkServiceArea3Queue 36S3979 All RPD Issues TreeJeH_Over Gilman Playground, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94124 Closed RPDParkServiceArea3Queue 2918793 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over John Mclaren Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD ParkServ!ceArea3 Queue 3311S47 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Bay VIew Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94124 C!osed RPD ParkServ!ceArea 3 Queue 8732836 All RPD Issues Tree Issue John Mdaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, (A, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 8725007 AH RPD issues Tree Issue Cayuga PlaYground, 301 NAGLEE AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94112 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 8722244 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Intersection of MANSELLST and PERSIA AVE Closed RPD Park Serv!ce Area 3 Queue 5494861 All RPD Issues Tree_Fe!I_Over John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 57064SS All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_ Over John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 9142803 All RPD Issues Limb on Ground John Mclaren P<~rk,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 2058521 All RPD Issues ·Tree_:-Fell.over John Mclaren Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 9338595 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Intersection of CAMBRIDGE STand JOHN F SHEllEY DR Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 4071348 All RPD Issues Umb_on_Ground Palau and Phelps Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94124 -o- Closed ~ RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 4310629 All RPD issues Tree_Feii_Over Crocker Amazon Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed (}1 RPD Park Se(VIce Area 3 Queue 5459874 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 2205665 All RPD Issues Tree_Needs_to_be_Remove~ Youngblood·Coleman Playground, 1398 HUDSON ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94124 Closed RPDParkServ!ceArea3Queue 10371561 All RPD Issues Tree Issue 200 JOHN F SHELLEY DR, "SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 3880S87 All RPD.Issues Tree_Needs_lnspection Si!verTerrace Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94124 Closed RPD ParkServlceArea 3 Queue 11154401 All RPD Issues Tree Issue louis Sutter Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Serv!ce An~a 3 Queue 57789S4 All RPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over Allee Chalmers Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94112 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 11133101 All RPD Issues TreeJeii_Over Louis Sutter Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 4599S23 All RPDlssues Broken_Limb John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 1168419 All RPD Issues Tree_Needs_lnspect!on John Mclaren Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 7459321 AU RPD Issues Tree Issue John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPDParkServ!ceArea3Queue S8279SS All RPD Issues Tree Issue louis Sutter Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue 6992871 AI! RPD Issues Tree Issue John Mclaren Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94134 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 3340540 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Pine Lake Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 3407427 AII.RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over Pine lake Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 6687607 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Golden Gate Heights Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94116 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 10516855 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Intersection of 26TH AVE and END (2600 BLOCK OF} Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 68170S9 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over Golden Gate Heights Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94116 Closed · RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 8842466 AI! RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Pine lake Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 5285466 SSP All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 39280S6 SSP All RPD Issues Tree_Felt_Over Pine Lake Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 4682659 AI! RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Midtown Terrace Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD ParkServiceArea4 Queue 5480804 All RPD Issues Tree_Fe!I_Over Pine Lake Park,, SAN FRANCisCo, CA, 94132 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 6704SOS All RPD Issues Llmb_on_Ground Ocean VIew Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94112 Closed RPD Park Servke Area 4 Queue 6703072 All RPD Issues Tree_FeH_Over Pine Lake Park,, SAN FRANCisco, CA, 94132 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 5727270 All RPD Issues Tree_Fel!_bver Pine lake Park, ,SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPD ParkServlceArea4 Queue 6716146 AI! RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over Pine lake Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 4551876 All RPD Issues Tree_Needs_to_be_Removed Midtown Terrace Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 5668138 A!IRPD Issues Tree_Feii_Over Sigmund Stern Recreation Grove,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue S555320 AI! RPD Issues Tree_Fei!_Over Sigmund Stem Recreation Grove,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 RPD ParkServke Area 4 Queue 17S01S8 All RPD Issues Broken_Umb Grand View Park, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94122 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 43S7962 All RPD Issues Llmb_on....:.Groulld Ocean VIew Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94112 Closed Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 4345394 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over Sigmund Stern Recreation Grove,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 RPD Pcuk Servlce Area 4 Queue 4599444 AHRPD!ssues Tree_Needs_to_be_Removed Sigmund Stem Recreation Grove,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 6405223 All RPD Issues Tree Issue Sigmund Stern Recreation Grove,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 3861239 All RPD Issues Limb_on_Ground Sigmund Stern Recreation Grove., SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 8349133 All RPD Issues Umb_on_Ground Merced Heights Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 3703802 All RPD Issues Tree_Feli_Over J.P. Murphy Playground, 1960 9TH AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94116 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 10532824 All RPD Issues Tree Issue 2115 WAWONA ST,SAN"FRANCISCO, CA, 94116 Closed RPD Park Service. Area 4 Queue 6861913 All RPD Issues Tree_Fell_Over Pine Lake Park,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue 6860886 A!! RPD Issues Tree:__Fe!!_Over Sigmund Stem Recreation Grove,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94132 Closed RPD Park Service AreaS Queue 67S8206 All RPD issues Tree Issue ,, SAN FRANQSCO, CA, 94117 Closed RPDParkServiceAreaSQueue 10685703 All RPD Issues Tree issue Intersection of GENEVA AVE and DElANO AVE Closed RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue 6878374 Tree Malnten~nce Damage Damaged Tree 199 PORTOlA DR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94114 Closed RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue 7497992 Tre~ Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree Intersection of 27TH 5T and SAFIRA LN Closed RPD Park service AreaS Queue 4724083 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree Portola Open Space,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94114 Closed RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue 7074408 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree Portola Open Space,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94114 Closed RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue 7042193 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree 181 BEAVER ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94114 Closed RPD ParkServlce Area 5 Queue 4333904 Tree Mainten?nce Damage Damaged Tree Douglass Playground,, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94131 Closed RPD Park Service AreaS Queue 6718041 Tree Maintenance Damage Damaged Tree 199 PORTOlA DR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94114 Closed RPD P

Sunnyside Playground next to the clubhouse, on the ADA roundabout. ···The resident states: There !sa large tree branch that ha.s fallen and is blocking the ADA roundabout. lt is fortunate that no chl!dren where there when it fell as someone may have been seriously hurt, 12 * 1S feet long and feU from the tree atthe nort! 42158.71547 Enter the south side of the park from 25th Ave towards MLK Dr- Large tree branch fallen, taking up most of the left hand lane. 421SB.67359 On edge opposite from 36th Ave of Spreckels lake, -Just happened 5 m!ns ago, a very large 3 story tal! tree has fallen with only lOft stil! standing up. Not sure if anyone got hurt from lt. Please check ASAP. Thank you 43037.39722 On the pathway directly over the porta potties by the bathroom-* Caller states there Is a huge tree b·ranch (several hundred pounds) on this tree and the large br.~nch has snapped but not fallen to the ground yet because it Is being held up by another branch on the tree. Caller states this Is dangerous and !t needs attention 42987.60233 100 feet to left of Malntanance Center building and Nursery at 100 MLK DR. -Tree has fallen and Is blocking bike path inside Golden Gate Park 42936,7755 Treeremovalisnowap[acetosleep? 43064,61684 CornerofYukon St. and 19th St.- A 22fttalltreee hasfal!en and now leaning on the wires. 42362.42934 NWC of Park Presidio & California- caller reports a la.ige eura.lyptus tree has fallen 2ft wide and SOft long partially blocking the street 42352,7035 Fallen tree on road 42713.0S388 Per carter~ Conservatory &John F Kennedy Dr.- Per caller-fallen tree blocking roadway (12 Inches in diamter} 42713.16137 Per caller- by Botanlca.l Garden {bet Linro!n Way & 11th/12th Ave.] (blorking 2lanes)- Per caller- fallen tree 42719.68013 There is a HUGE tree that is blocking the path and has fa !len Into Pine lake in the Grove. It's on the north side of the lake, you can't miss it. People are starting to hike around the downed tree which Is a big problem as someone going to-fall into the crevlce_and hurt themselves. 42828.47789 Tree halfway fallen, completely blocking the paved path para.!lel to Bra:z.l! Street In Mclaren Park about 100 yards south of June Jordan School for Equity. Looks quite dang~rous. 43201.72894 Fallen tree on Fulton and 16th. Forces pedestrians to walk on t~e road. 42779.74829 Fallen 'tree on Portola right before r!ipperst 4274S.9795 The tree ar:ross the stret of 156 Mldrrestway seems to be fa !len and shaken a lot with thi!: recent wind. It concerns me that the tree may fall and damage the house and cars parked on the street. .. 4274S.604 The tree has fallen and only stopped by the tree next to it. Once It falls, It will break my housell 42746,728SS Eucalyptu's tree at end of cui de sarIs about 100ft high, As there have been multiple trees of this type have fallen during rain, tree needs to be checked for health. There are multiple homes surrounding the tree. Off of Teresita street and vema ct. on city land 43473.71667 Tral! blocked by fallen tree,-Tral! at end of Belgrave near Stanyan blorked by fallen tree. This Is a trail commonly used by Midtown Terrace/Twin Peak residents and UCSF students for quick access to Cole Valley but Is currently not accessible. Trail could also use improvement. 42006,62595 Near Fell and Baker on the bicycle path-Tree several feet In diameter has fallen along the bicycle path and can be a hazard 42049.80888 On 19th ave Inside the park somewhere between lincoln way and Crossover drive- !=allen tree 41993.6736 on Kennedy Drive westbound about 100 yards east of 19th Ave Park Presidio overpass -fallen tree blocking west bound Jane po:z.ing a safety ha:z.ard size Is unknown 41988.73295 Enter Vale St parking lot, along the access road leads down to the field house and lake-100ft tall tree has fa1len,tree#1050 42086.60S8 Fallen tree branches, almost hit me as I was walking along the Panhandle pedestrian path. 43S87.55443 Near Sunset entrance of Golden Gate Park-large tree ha!: fallen over 43488.1437S Fallen tree blocked walkway. . 43482.16998 On MKl~ Eastbound traffic- just west of 25th Ave- Very large tree has fallen across the lane of traffic 42657.70802 1. Go to 217 John F Shelly Drive Parking !ot2. Go down the hl!l to the reservoir 3. Look to the souther side of the reservolr-1S feet tal! fallen tree completely blocking a walking path. 4351L43958 on 3:Znd Ave at Fulton, Golden Gate Park- Customer states that the tree located in the Golden Gate park has fallen. It Is not posing a public safety issue but the tree is laying on the sidewalk, almost at the curb. 43S26.3062S Tree down in the park blocking the pathway- Fallen tree 43085.46S28 hiking trail and access road at BayView Park- Fa !len tree branch blocking hiking trall and access road at BayView Park. Road Is used to access radio site- Key ave/Bayview Park RD ~ https://twltter.com/1/weblstatusi89S703060491653121- 429S7.4S77 jefferson park -verY large limbs of trees fallen via. tweet to sf311. 42959.7099 ACROSS froni1546la Playa St /Kirkham St-7~8ft tall tree has fallen on hls car and another car. trunk Is about 2 feet in dia.n'l. 42435.51663 Fallen tree on path. Northwest side of park. 42441.31969 Across from 653 University Ave- Caller reporting approx 25' feet tall by 30' feet Wide tree has fallen from the park onto the power 11ne. 42440.34438 At the Hayes & Pierce Street stairs across from IDA B. We!ls High Schoo!- Cailerstates there are some large tree limbs that have snapped off from the tree, they have not fallen to the ground yet, they are lodged In the tree. Caller states these large limbs are going to come down With the strong winds and she says she is con• 4244LS5362 on lincoln way going west near 11th ave. -.several big tree branches are fallen and blocking the traffic lanes, affecting traffic 43432.99097 NE cornerln the Park Eucalyptus tree laguna and Turk- broken limb hanging about to fall. (some oflt has already fallen and hit a gentleman on the head but they were smaller pieces and did not injure the gentleman) the branch Is quite large 42993.59931 In front of460 Funston -In the past month large tree branches have fallen from huge pine tree. Today another branch has fallen and damaged another car. Total of3 cars have been damaged so far. 42773.47654 Stalwe!l- greenwich steps-Twitter reports "Fallen tree near Co it tower, blocking West stairwell. The Greenwlch steps to the tower. 41575.47725 Fallen tree obstructing stairway 42751.64422 across the street from 518 funston- a huge tree bra rich has fallen from a eucalyptus tree. It Is about the length of three cars. 41341.53553 Jn the Children's Playground at lincoln Park, area of33rd & ClementSt-A large 20 fttree branch has fallen off a tree, Is also rest!ng on a fence next to Freah & Easy 42719.65983 -o lincoln Park, On the side of the 18th Hole, by the stairs near 32nd and Cal!fornla. -One tree has fal!en that Is about 5 stories tall and there Is another tree that looks like It is about to fa!! and it is about the same height. The caller is ca!l!ng form a school and she said that this is dangerous because the school is right there ne' 41415.65835 ~ in the dog run entrance at 8th ave, facing toward the golf course there are 3 benches behind to the left tree the3rd bench there Is a large pine tree- caller reports that there the large pine tree there are several branches apx 1ft that have fa !len and several cones on the ground and there are limbs har:~glng and this Js a. ha:z.an 43297.S1389 CXJ On the tra!lleading into the park~ off West Pacific Ave- near the dog park and tennis court area -large 20-30 ft tree has fallen and blocking the trail 43295.58194 Fallen tree obstructing path. (not obstructing street} 43553.48403 Fallen tree l!mb, blocking the sidewalk. 20ft long about 7ft in width. Large limb. Caller states he could hear other trees crackling. 43625.40625 Associated to Unverified address -inte~ection of and Jackson &amp; Srott San Franclsco, CA- AT the corner of Jackson and Scott there is a group of very old Monterey pines, One is obviously dead- red needles. A group of neighbors Is concerned. In heavy storms, others have fallen over the decades. With El Nino c 42257.SOS97 Top ofth~ hill. Dead Palm Tree- It's a palm tree at the top of the hill, that sadly, has died, Any plans for it's removal or replacement? · 42182.33402 Associated to Unverified address -Intersection of and funston I an:z.a San Francisco, CA- Funston side, south of an:z.a, on walking path- large tree branch fallen, blocking walking path on green belt. 41341.54862 tree between tennis court and the Marina school- there Js a huge tree that is completely dead,a large tree limb has fallen. 42108.S9616 Drumm St between Clay and Washington re: dead trees at sidewalk. -I reported some dead street trees on the east side of Drumm between Clay and Washington Streets In April. As of April28, the trees were tagged w)th a 48 hour emergency notice of removal. The trees are still th~re, almost two months later. 1) These tree 42173.52637 IFO 6S1 Lombard- large 20 Feet tree bra"nch has fallen onto the pl<~yground surface. 41387.23249 On the 30th Ave side ofthe Dupont Tennis Courts -large portion or all of the tree has fa11en, hitting the property of 365 30th Ave. Per GoogleStreet View, the tree roots are inside the tennis court property. 42076.75424 TELEGRAPH HILL/PIONEER PARK- CALLERSTATESTHATTHETREE FROM THE PARK HAS FALLEN ONTO HIS PATIO DECK AT 3SO GREENWICH WHICH IS ON THE BACKSIDE OF THE PARK. 41996.42S23 opposite children's playground-Tree Is unrooted and has fallen over onto thi!: shrubbery. 42375.51288 neilr clement across from 275 14th ave -large and small tree braches have fa Hen down and are on the hillside at this lora.t!on. a couple ofthe trees ar~ dying and caller Is afraid that are tilted and leaning Into the street 40876.67602 Fallen tree branches near the entrance of the park. ' 43434.89861 Several tree branches has fallen into parking spaces on the left side of El Camino Del Mar towards the Lands End trail. 42783.52764 375 Funston Ave -tree fa !len- directly acros:s fiom 376 Funston-tree fallen- Send To: RPD Urban Forestry Queue 41532.584 · On the Trail towards Clement and 38th Ave- 2 Fallen trees. One In the trall the oth~r 5 yards away. Please remove. 43010.53254 On the Post side grass by Powell.- Customer states a large tree branch has fallen and needs to be removed. 42663.22126 BACK FENCE OF 226~228 HAIGHT STREET FALLEN TREE FELL ON HOMEOWNERS FENCE CAUSING rTTO LEAN CAUSING DAMAGE.- CALLER STATES THAT HE HAS BEEN CALLING TO GET THIS REMOVED AND HAS HAD NO ASSISTANCE AND NOW HE HAS DAMAGE TO HIS PROPERTY AS WELL AS HOMELESS SLEEPING UNDER TREE 42502.60315 VERY UNSAFE TREE REMOVAL PRAOlCESI! 43476.56042 BE!DEMAN AND OFARREll MINI PARK-- TREE IS AS!DEWALKTREE, BLITLIMBS HAVE FALLEN ONTO PARK GROUNDS. LIMBS ARE CONSTANnY FALUNG OFF THIS TREE. (LASTTlME FALLEN UMBS HIT A PARKED CAR. 40747.5319 Tree along the Eastside of the park bordering the backyard of2741-274S Bush St -Large branch from a tree In Bush Broderick Min! Park has fallen over the fence in to thi!. backyard of building at 2741-2745 Bush. Crashed on the bbq, t2bles and chairs and the wisteria bush. 43195,64306 Fallen tree~ TMA 42389.36021 In Alamo Square Park near the Tennis Courts and Bathroom-- Very Large Tree branch has fallen onto another tree and may fall from that tree at anytime. 43239.31875 Per caHer- inside park- Per caller~ fallen tree branches (10-12 feet) 43215.74236 Alamo square closest to Pierce and Fulton- Large fallen tree at stated location. Tree desribed as 48 Inches at its base.. Tree fel! on a pipe and the pipe Is gushing water. 41992.8S015 Alamo Square:SE of tennis court: fa !len tree stump: raised soil and deep holes, tripping ha:z.ard. Remove and plant new tree! 43SS6,81319 In the center of the park near Rose St.- Customer states a pine tree has fallen and It took down some lines with it. Customer is not sure if they are power lines or not. Customer would !lk~ to know when the lines are reattched, if they would be able to have them not go across his property located at 260 Rose St. 42532.41177 NW comer of the park. Eucalyptus stand of trees.- A tree in NW comer of the park, in a stand of eucalyptus trees. •• severallarge branches felL She is worried that more will fall and the current fallen branches are blocking a play structure. She believes its potentially unsafe. 42S15.60471 lora. ted at Sgt. John M~caulay Park In the entrance--There [sa tree limb that has fallen, and has trapped a light underneath. 43073.74931 Dead broken tree I bush needs removal as homeless use it to create tent encampments 42785.3568S Tree fallen overln middle of path way 43143.4S208 Directly across from 1100 Fulton inside the park- A very large tree has sp!lt in half. Half of the tree has fallen and the other half Is st!l! erect, it may fa!! at any moment. 42434.92271 Fallen tree on path just outside Jerry Garcia amphitheater There Is also another tree that is very dangerous and about to fall over just SOft up the traiL 41704,54127 At the stairs at the end of Camp hell Ave- tree has fallen and Is blocking the stairs. 41582.529Sl There is a fallen tree wlth e)(posed roots and pipes on a tra!l that are a major tripping hazard, 4285S.65924 There is a fallen tree in a trail In the park 42855.75444 On path just North of Fo)( Creek. Jfyou park !n the farWestJohn F She!ley parking lot and w.ilk east down the trail you will run Into the tree, -70' tree has fallen over and blocks walking trail. 41092.44823 Along the dog.path, near the portable restroom. --Fallen tree limb blocking the path. 42188.66307 Fallen tree across dirt trail that leads fr.om Jerry Garcia Amphitheater parking lot up towards dog run@ Mansell and Shelly 42790.84159 B!gtree fallen on path at Gamb!erp!a:za 42981.33127 Fallen tree on path nearwatercountyhouse 42935.30559 Crocker-Amazon/Mclaren Park Tra!l- Fa !len tree branch totally blocked the walkway trail. 42666.47582. Need to cut fa!lt:!n tree branch on hiking trail {Philosopher Trail) 42672.56082 Adjacent to baseball field-- Tree split In half and feU over. The fallen part is sti!l connected to tree but it appears likely'fall and would block the path in park and possible cause injury. 43184.42639 Bigfa!leri tree branch on the ground. 43510.31806 Fallen tree hanging ever fire road on golf course side. Location is In the middle below watertimks 42762.02373 Back of the park- 3 trees have fallen, medium In size- dement!ons unknown. 42757.58931 Fallen tree In Mclaren park by Wilde tower 41986.67655 Fallen treeblocklngpath at fox creek 41979.64615 Tree with large cracked branch neartrai!.locatlon is where the tree fell on a man on Easter. This branch is on a pine tree across to the !eft if you are facing the recently fallen tree. There is also another tree hanging over the path as you enter the quarry from Manse!!. 43199.38958 Fallen tree next to the ether one that has been blocking the paved path for over a year 42069.50097 Location: this is a bit tricky- there Is an unpaved foot path (left side) that leads from the amphitheater parking lot that follows through a wooded area that eventually leads up tothe dog run @She!ly & Mansell.-- There are several VeJY large and low branches that are encroaching on the path that could eventually break oft 41414.789 !N JOHN MClAREN PARK, DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM 1546 WAYlAND. ABOUT10 FEET INTO FROM THE PARK AWAY FROM THE SIDEWALK. - CUSTOMERSTATESTHATTHERE IS A REALLY HUGE OAKTREETHATIS DEAD.CUSTOMERSTATESTHATTHE BRANCHES ARE CONTINUOUSLY FALLEN OFFTHETREE AND IFTHETREE FALLS 43201.46806 Fatlen large tree branch Check all treesl!Jl Law suits recently filed and won by people In the Bay Area either killed or paralyzed by falling tree branches. 43376,54722 All trees In Mclaren need assessing! Ill For potential branches fall!ng. Two lawsuits were won against two Bay Area cities. One for death by fallen tree beach and the other for paralyzation by fallen tree branch. 43376.S4167 Trees on back side of homes located on Coleman Youngblood Park property are leaning towards our homes. One tree has fallen today on to park property. These trees are on a slope behind our homes. We feel that these trees need to be evaluated asap. Thanks 42775.48035 Dangerous tree limb. Several others have already fallen. 42256.48479 Tree dangerously fal!lng on to trail, some a !ready fallen large branches hanging. Needs immediate attention. On route to/ just behind June Jordan HS. The user entered the address: 1385-1411 Persia Ave, San Francisco, CA 94112, USA to see more details visit: http://seedkkfix.com/issues/2857836 42613.42985 Fallentreebranchonhlkingtrail.lt!sasafetyhazardiMcLarenPark. 42443.74078 Remove fallen tree branches on hiking trail in Mclaren Park. It is a safety ha:z.ard. 42443.74347 unpaved trail that leads from theJerTY Garcia Amphitheater parking lot, passed the theater (on the right) and leads up to the open dog run.- A eucalyptus tree has fallen across this tra!l that is heavily used by ind.ividuals and those walking with their dogs. This area Is also In need of some branch trimming along this trail es~ 41964.80118 Entrance of John Mclaren park from Ina Ct. and Mansfield St, Near Blue Water Tower, near the upper playground. Specifical!y i am talking about the portion of the park that extends out to Ina Ct and Mansfield St.- There are two trees whkh were planted in the park on the sloping hillside right atlna Ct. and Mansfield St. f 42230.45793 Walking path, partly paved that goes from the Group Picnic Area towards the Jerry Garcia Amphitheater ·-large eucalyptus tree has fallen directly across this walking path making It necessaJY for people to climb over Jt. There is nowhere to walk around it. This has been down for a week (week of 7/1) and needs to be rem( 42190.83196 right next to children centers bu!lding on the basketbal! courts and in baseball field -tree fallen over half of the tree snapped and crushed a picnic table to the ground the other half is suspended on a dumpster and is very dangerous each half is about 30 feet there are also other branches down on baseba!l field 41777.5756 On V!sitacion at Hahn (park side)- caller states there Is a fallen tree and that It Is blocking one lane of traffic, Very dark with poorllghting at night. 41554,83368 Bay View Playground/King Pool-· Fallen tree. Further description not avallable. 41666.S9S28 Fallen tree block!ngtrai! on south side ofmclaren park. Easy access. Park at the yellow gate double wAter tanks. Once there you will see 2 trails inn left and one straight ahead anC water tanks on right. Take the trallthatls directly In front. It leads down to middle trail. Stay left, ltls a massive tree. If you can't find I can send 43170.8S Fa !len tree by 280 under Bart tracks. Been like this for a year. No concerns about fa !ling down into the Cayuga playground below?? 43168.44097 Fallen tree blocking trail. Location Is dose to yellow gate by water tanks. Park at the yellow gates, take trail that leads down, where trai! forks, go left, walk down towards next trai! and you will see fallen tree along with another that Is dead and ready to fall 43167.62917 John Shelley Drive near Mclaren Dog Lake.··· Fallen tree blocking the trall and whee! chair ramp leading from the parking lot to the lake 42392.44245 In the park, Shdly drive off of Mansell near the tennis courts. -large cypress tree fell down rates and aU, walkways blocked by fallen trees. 42743.7835 By Bra:z.il La Grande ave. There Is a path that starts there and runs parallel to Brazil. Near where Braz!l ends.-- Large tree limb has fallen and it !s blocking the path. 43266.65069 In John Mclaren Park on the side of Dublin ·--A big tree has fallen over caller says that the tree covering a catch basin ditch Last It flooded call basement. 41330,64851 Treebranchesfallenand broken 43312.30278 ""0' On Palau at Phelps- Large tree branch has fallen and is completely blocking the sidewalk, covering the whole length. People can go around lt. 41915.32346 ~ Above the skatepark, alongside the paved path-There Is a 100 foot Eucalyptus tree thathas fa !len down: 41990.3S966 C.O next to children's playground at Burrows St·-· young tree uprooted. fallen over, not dead. 42382.30211 Entrance to the park from Hudson crossing Keith. Down the steps to the right there are 2 trees that have fallen and broken the chain l!nk fence. In between the 2 trees there Is a 60ft daed pine tree that Is about to fali.Piease remove these trees ASAP. There also lots of other dead trees In the park. Please evaluate them, Thar 41368.46316 Fa !len tree. 43482.69097 large tr.ee by the children's playground- several limbs have fallen from this tree and there Is one.!imb about to fall from this tree. 418S2.75551 Flrehazard,deadjfa!lentree(s) 43666.27847 Unknown location, but Inside the Playground-- Large tree has fa !len, unknown location 42479.59443 Directly across 1350 Wayland St-Several trees have fallen near brush fire risk, 80 feet In length 43661.74028 John Mclaren Park near Art & Tehno/ogy High School.-Tree branch had fa !len down Inside John Mclaren Park City Art & Technology High school not passing hazard, 42121.50861 Mclaren Park- bridge raJ! above McNabb Lake-- The brldil:e rail above McNabb lake is starting to bow from the pressure of leaning tree. Continued pressure wl!l cause ralls to break or pop off causing costly damage to bridge as wei! as possible in)uJY to passersby. Partial removal of tree will relieve pressure and reinforcemen 41106.73399 Fallen tree blocking path to labyrinth In mdaren park 42953.77995 Fallen tree branch ln area by upper tennis courts looking out towards downtown sf 42493.70S Tree fallen on path 42824.61029 on the side 2143 wawona- Tree has fallen and Is on the private property 4i67S.49045 Per caller- Pine Lake Park-- Per ca!ler.,-two eucalyptus trees have fallen & obstructed the road around the lake (no city vehicles can travel In the area) 41697.32949 Across from 202612th Ave-Tree has fallen in the park but not blocking the rlghtof~ay. Might be a hazard. 42738,71704 fallen tree, causing lots of shrubs blocking a l!ttle bit of pathway near the open dog play area. 43542.637S South side of the park-SECcorner· closet to 12th Ave·- HUGE200 ft tall tree has fa !len, lt is leaning and being held up by nearby trees. When itfalls it will cause great damage. 42773.63206 Vale ave and crestlake dr, Next to the parking Jog. blocking a trial, -reporting a fallen tree blocking a tria!. It Is fallen on a bench. fallen tree is about 15 feet long. per caller, it is not causing any safety hazard. 43197.72153 Associated to Unverified address -Intersection of Sloat and 19th San Francisco, CA --located on the western side of the park heading down hi!! near the lake. -There Is a tree stump that has fallen over and Is in a downhill position. Its stump along with debris can create a home for more unwanted wildlife, coyotes. This c 42322.88S07 Southeast comer of Pine Lake, where the dirt path meets the access road to the Day Camp bulld!ng-A tree has part!al!y fallen, leaving large branches oflts trunk (diam. between 4 and 6lnches) blocking path at about4 feet above ground. Effectively blocks path for those not agile enough to duck under. Will require chains 41869,6653 Fallen Large Tree, Tree Roots are Sticking with branches hanging out.-Th!s was reported 3,10.201S and It was closed the same day with the following note," A tree crew already working on it'' but It still Is an Issue and It has been over a month later. 42115.38168 By the off leash dog area. --Large Cypress tree about 2S+ft have fallen & Is blocking the service road, . 42388.62822 South Entrance to the Park on Lobes between Plymouth ·-Caller states there is a giant tree branch that has fallen to the ground and it !s blocking the path. 42743.4240S north of pine lake off of vale neart~e dog a.rea --9ft eucalyptus tree fa !len down 'onto the path 42742.67413 west end near field house-- small tree has fallen and blocking pathway 42748.6S99 West end of pine lake park near the lake -100 foot eudaptus tree. has fallen !n the pathway, not posing any danger as of yet 42746.31809 Midtown Terrace at Galewood and Clarendon on the park side,- Fa !len Large Tree, Tree Roots are Sticking with branches hanging out, 42073.4317S On Crestlake between the parking lot and Pine lake- Mu!tiple{2-3) large eucalyptls trees have fallen over. Not the same as SRU565S320. Tree fell over on to a structure that covers the seating area{trellus) 42444.62889 IN STERN GROVE, BEHIND THE ADDRESS OF 82 CRESTlAKE DRIVE. --CUSTOMER STATES THERE IS A EUCALYPTUS TREE THAT HAS FALLEN OVER ONTO ANOTHER TREE. THE TREE IS ONLY BEING HELD UP BY A CABLE. 42440.4S909 near 748 Noriega st between 14th and 15th In park -·-several broken Hmbs hanging from trees, also some have already fallen and need to be picked up 41246.3697 by the baseball field -fallen tree branch maybe 15 feet long 42007.53324 Toward the entrance at Sloat& Vale·- Huge tree fa !len down by the dog park. 42003.5285 large fal!en Eucalyptus Tree--· Between dog park area and chi!drens pine lake camp lake 42086.50333 A !Ot of fallen tree parts around trails and playground. 42653.95728 On the north & east of ennis court opposite 22nd/Sioat Blvd.- x2 tree limbs, of about Bins In diameter, from the Eucalyptus trees have fallen onto the pathway behind the retaining wall. Thank you 41846.469S6 Merced Heights Playground. Nearest address 158 Monticello-The caller Is reporting the tree branches have fallen In front of their property. They are requesting the tree to be trimmed to avoid any other damage to their property. 43074.S6111 J,P Murphy Playground NearTenn!s Courts- Customer state a Very Large Red wood tree has fa !len at the top of the stair case on the 8th Ave side entrance, It partlca!ly blocking the tennis court area, 41793.S151 Remains of fallen tree originally reported as Incident 10487555 still lle in park with branches in meadow area and large trunk on hillside wa!t!ng removal. 43521.58958 In Pine Lake Park. Northside of the lake. Nearest Wawona. -100Ft Eucalyptus tree has fal!en over Into the lake, blocking public access. 42787.33102 Western side of Stefl). Grove, by Pine Lake Park, across from and south of Wawona and 30th Ave-A large tree, at least<10 fttall, appears to be a Eucalyptus, has fallen and Is blocking a pathway In Stern Grove by Pine lak~ Park. 42785.65<19 FaflentreebrancliatDuboceentranceto Buena Vista Park 42757.49978 Fa !len tree over a fence, The fence is damaged 43559.43819 Updated to request #5718041: large fallen tree !imb Is now marked with caution tape, but still needs to be cleared. 42791.52741 Fallen tree, Please remove as soon as possible, Thank you, Upper Douglass dog park, 42960.57847 Fallen dead branch I tree blocking part of the road, Needs to be trimmed back and cleared. Thanks! 42130.57231 Fa!len tree needs removal 428<18.74302 A city tree has fallen on to the back of my family's property at 181/183 Beaver Street, The tree Is located on Peixotto Playground/lower Corona Heights Park. The branches have fallen onto our. property. If you need access to our property to inspect or remove the Jlmbs, please call Denise at S10.501.6380, 42838.55919 Fallen tree in park 41998,52<132 Broken/Fallen tree branch,+completelydeadtree 42746,51134 South em hl!lside facing States Street south of Corona Heights playground and restrooms, ~-A fallen tree trunk Is on the side of the hill precariously supported by adjacent tree !imbs. When It falls It may cause extreme damage to parked vehicles and/or persons. <12194.46554 cross street is Acme Alley. -large tree fallen Into upper portion of park, BLOCKING residential driveway. . 42388.38457 This Is at appro:{ 51 Havelock, across from 46 Havelock- A tree blew over and Is now leaning on another tree that Is rotted. There Is imminent danger that if it falls, it wHI fa !I Into the power llnes on the street. The caller d!d ca!l this Into 9lllast night. It's among a series of trees that have been designated for removal. As the 427<16.50856 TREE IS RIGHT BY POLICE ACADEMY. MAY HAVE FAlLEN ON THE FENCETHAT5EPARATES ACADEMY FROM THE PARK. END OF FENCE THAT'S ClOSEST TO GLEN CANYON. --ONE FOOT .CIRCUMFERENCE AND MAYBE 20 FEET LONG. ONE END IS STILL IN THE AIR. POSSIBLE DANGER IF IT FALlS ON SOMEONE, CALLER WAS VERY CC 41496.44 29th & Diamond Open Space~ Trees are falllng onto 674 29th St-SR#23622B9 was closed and said complete. Nothing has been done. lnere Is city plum tree that has fallen and city oak tree that IS grown onto the caHer roof. PLEASE cut the trees back ASAP. This Is the second request. Please g!ve him a. call with update and\ 41493,66558 behind the basebaJJ field behind home plate- Fallen tree 42<1<10.71634 a fallen tree against 39 seward st from the seward mini park- the tree Is against the property and patron ls afraid It is causing a Jot of damage to the property the longer the tree is resting agains the property the more damage lt Is going to c"ause, <12440.92385 Across the sidewalk and down the steps going into the dub house-- Tree has fallen 412<14.94766 Right side ofthe entry to the dog park-- 2 Huge trees have fallen Inside of the Douglass dog park entrance. . 42003,71598 Museum way and ROOSEVElTWAY--Atthe Main entrance about75 ft. in on Iefta tree has fa!Jen butit!s notln anyonesway or causing any safety Issues 42003.76718 Tree near the tennis courts inside the tennis court area- Large limbs have fallen out of the top part of the eucalyptus tree. Blocking the roadway near the courts. There Is aslo a large limb on the courts, 41379.68955 At the edge of the park near the corner of Douglass and E!i:z:abeth -large dead tree has fallen over and Js leaning in to the wires. Very ha:z:ardous 43647.47986 !n Glen Park, across from approximately 31 Elk St.-x2 newly planted young trees: one has falfen and one Is lea.nlng, Need to fix them ASAP, Thank you 42891.72693 Entrance to the ba!l park on Diamond between 1Bth and 19th St- Huge tree branch that looks like a tree has fallen at the Diamond entrance to the ball park between 18th and 19th St 424BS.55521 IN DOUGlASS PLAYGROUND, IN THE UPPER DOUGLASS DOG PARK AREA OF THE PARK. -CUSTOMER STATESTHATTHERE 15 A HUGE CYPRESS TREE THAT HAS FALLEN DOWN. 41954.34735 29TH 5T AND DIAMOND OPEN SPACE- CALLER CONTINUES TO SUBMIT SERVICE REQUEST TO 311 STAT!NGTHATTHE REC & PARK TREE HAS FALLEN INTO THE FENCE OF HIS PROPERTY AT 67<1 29TH ST, THE SERVICE REQUEST CONTINUE TO BE ClOSED OUT STATING THAT THE WORK HAS BEEN DONE, NOTHING HAS BEEN 001\ 41596.44442 My backyard ba.cks onto Corona Heights park and another tree has fallen and Is resting on my back fence. This Is the second time this has happened, You recently removed a fallen tree from the same spot. 42831.56<195 Fa !len tree blocking trail staircase inside Buena Vista Park 43532,60972 Buena Vista Park- Caller has putln number!ous requests for trees to be trimmed In the park and nothing Is being done and it!s dangerious. One very large tree ca!!erreported has fa !len. Caller did not have service requests numnbers to provide, Please'ca!l, 41514.78604 Entering on Melrose Ave from the Foerster side, the road curves to the right. Just before the road curves to the left is the fa11en tree.-- Tree has fallen across road toward tennis and basketball courts. Ca!lersays many of the trees In this a. rea appear to be very heavy and should be evaluated to determine If they are at risk fo <13627.775 Near 445 Mangels- fallen tree branch approx 15 feet long and 8 feet wide fell In back yard •. The tree Is ln Sunnyside Park. . 43627.83254 Day Street side of the park, where the dogs run, theresa fence and a slope wf trees and a retalnlng waJJ. -Fa !len J!mb blocking the sidewalk. 42822,83043 by the end of the clubhouse Inside Sunnyside Playground -15-20ft tree branch has fallen and Is blocking the driveway up into the basketball court 42<135,31763 Fallen tree on Sunday afternoon right near the entrance of st Mary's dog park. 42484,77828 Large fallen tree In Saint Mary's park behind houses on Agnon Ave, near the Rec center-- Very large tree has fallen over, Pieces of the tree are caught up In the overhead Unes. Large stump still there, blocked off with Yellow tape. Fal!en tree st1!1 on the ground. ·Tree, stump and branches in the wires have been there for sev 42549.59137 Inside the Park near Folsom a.nd Predta Ave East, on the West end of the park...... : Fa!h:;n tree 4204l.na39 -u Near the eastem enterance of the park- customer called to report a fallen tree that has been down on the ground for the past2 weeks 41996.415<11 01 Fallen tree branch, I moved It to the grass. It almost fell on the playground where kids were playing. 429<17.75896 Fa!lentreehasbeenherefordays <12451.71714 0 Large, dead eucalyptus tree fell overin storm last night. Yucca behind It was also uprooted and needs supports or removal, Dublin@ Crocker Amazon Playground. 43472.6<1028 West side of Bema! Heights Park, bordering Bonview St, approximately across from 20 Bonview- Customer reports that there !s one completely dead tree, and another that Is dy!ng and !s still standing that is dangerous, as we!! as overgrown vegetation a.nd fa !len branches tha.t have been pulled to the edge of slope and nee 43<123.50754 The green spa~e a.t Edgehlll Mounta!n, close to the walkway path through the woods- Caller repo~!ng In SeVeTil! huge trees that has fa!len and !t created a lot of del:iris, Requesting for the trees and debris to be removed for It ls a flre hazard once they all get dried. Added that they are unsightly. Also, requesting forthe !ssu 43531.47986 SLA_TARGET_DT PR_I9RITI:" _5EVERITI

"'U (J1__., ·, .4 4

.4 4 -u .. c.n N

o. PSA Planting Sub Location Type Plant_Type ClimateType Stage NULL NULL Native Tree CA Native One Gallon NULL NULL Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Fifteen Gallon GGP GGP2 Music Concourse Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Five Gallon NULL NULL Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon GGP GGP6 Section 6 Landscaped Areas Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon NULL NULL Native Tree CA Native Five Gallon GGP GGP4 Chinese Pavilion Ornamental Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) Exotic One Gallon NULL NULL Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Five Gallon Five Gallon GGP GGP7 AIDS Memorial Grove Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native PSAl Richmond Rec Ctr Landscaped Areas Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic 24 Box NULL NULL Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon GGP GGP4 MLK Jr. Dr: Section 4 Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native Five Gallon GGP GGP4 MLK Jr. Dr: Section 4 Ornamental Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) Exotic One Gallon GGP GGPl Kezar Picnic Areas Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Five Gallon GGP GGP4 Middle Dr West: Section 4 Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon GGP GGP6 Chain of Lakes Bathroom Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon PSA4 J.P. Murphy Landscaped Areas Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Five Gallon PSA6 Rolph Landscaped Areas Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic One Gallon GGP GGP4 Strawberry Hill Reservoir Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic One Gallon Tree (evergreen) CA Native Five Gallon -u GGP GG P4 Strawberry Hill Reservoir Native U1 PSA6 StMary's Landscape Native Tree (deciduous) CA Native Five Gallon w GGP GGPS 47th Avenue Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon GGP GGP4 Mothers Meadow Playground Native Tree CA Native One Gallon GGP GGP4 Mothers Meadow Playground Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic One Gallon GGP GGPl Camellia Garden Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Fifteen Gallon GGP GGPl Conservatory Drive West Native Tree (deciduous) CA Native Five Gallon NULL NULL Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Five Gallon NULL NULL Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native Five Gallon GGP GGP4 Middle Dr West: Section 4 Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon NULL NULL Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Exotic 20g NULL NULL Ornamental Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) Exotic One Gallon GGP GGP7 Bowling Green Parking Lot Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Five Gallon GGP GGP7 Robin Williams Meadow Restroom Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native Fifteen Gallon GGP . GGP4 Urban Forestry Center Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native Five Gallon GGP GGPl Conservatory Drive West Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon GGP GGPl Conservatory Drive West Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon GGP GGPl Camellia Garden Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Exotic Fifteen Gallon GGP GGP7 Robin Williams Meadow Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Fifteen Gallon GGP GGP7 Robin Williams Meadow Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Fifteen Gallon GGP GGP7 Robin Williams Meadow Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native Five Gallon GGP GGP4 Chinese Pavilion Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Fifteen Gallon NULL NULL Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native Five Gallon PSAl Lincoln Park Golf Course Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Exotic Fifteen Gallon PSAl Lincoln Park Golf Course Ornamen.tal Tree (deciduous) Fifteen Gallon GGP GGP4 Chinese Pavilion Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Fifteen Gallon PSAl Lincoln Park Golf Course Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native Fifteen Gallon PSAl Lincoln Park Golf Course Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native Five Gallon GGP GGP4 Mothers Meadow Bathroom Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Fifteen Gallon PSAS Buena Vista Landscape Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon PSA6 Holly Park Children's Play Areas Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Fifteen Gallon NULL NULL Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native Five Gallon NULL NULL Native Tree (deciduous) CA Native Five Gallon NULL NULL Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native Five Gallon PSAl Lafayette Landscaped Areas Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Fifteen Gallon PSA4 Junipero Serra Clubhouse Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Five Gallon GGP GGP4 Pioneer Log Cabin Ornamental · Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) Exotic One Gallon PSA2 Franklin Square CPA Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Fifteen Gallon PSAl Ina Coolbrith Park Landscaped Areas Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native Five Gallon GGP GGP4 Mallard Lake Native Tree (evergreen) SF Native Tree Tubes PSA6 Holly Park Landscape Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Fifteen Gallon PSAl Lincoln Park Golf Course Clubhouse Ornamental Tree (evergreen) Exotic Five Gallon PSAl Lincoln Park Golf Course Clubhouse Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Exotic Five Gallon GGP GGP2 Rhododendron Dell Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon ""0 tTl PSAl Lincoln Park Golf Course Clubhouse Ornamental Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) Exotic Five Gallon +::- PSAl Lincoln Park Golf Course Clubhouse Tree Fifteen Gallon PSAl Lincoln Park Golf Course Clubhouse Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Fifteen Gallon GGP GGP4 Stow Lake Native Tree (evergreen) SF Native Tree Tubes PSA5 Buena Vista Landscape Native Tree (deciduous) CA Native Fifteen Gallon PSA5 Buena Vista Landscape Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon PSA4 Stern Grove Landscape Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Fifteen Gallon PSA4 Stern Grove Landscape Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Exotic Fifteen Gallon PSA4 Stern Grove Landscape Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Fifteen Gallon PSA4 Stern Grove Landscape Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Fifteen Gallon PSA5 Buena Vista Landscape Native Tree (evergreen) SF Native Fifteen Gallon PSA4 Stern Grove Landscape Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native Fifteen Gallon GGP GGP6 Section 6 Landscaped Areas Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon GGP Golden Gate Park Roadways Native Tree (deciduous) SF Native Five Gallon GGP GGP7 Robin Williams Meadow Ornamental Tree (evergreen) 24 Box GGP GGP4 Pioneer Log Cabin Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Exotic 24 Box GGP GGP4 Pioneer Log Cabin Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Exotic 24 Box GGP GGP7 Bowling Green Clubhouse Ornamental Tree (deciduDus) Exotic Fifteen Gallon GGP GGP4 Rose Garden Ornamental Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) Exotic One Gallon GGP GGP7 Bowling Green Clubhouse Tree (deciduous) Fifteen Gallon GGP GGP6 Archer Meadow Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon GGP GGPl Waller St Skating Area Native Tree (evergreen) SF Native Fifteen Gallon PSAS Buena Vista Greenspace Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon NULL NULL Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon GGP GGP4 Rose Garden Native Tree CA Native Five Gallon GGP GGP4 Rose Garden Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native Five Gallon GGP GGP4 Strawberry Hill Reservoir Native Tree (evergreen) SF Native Tree Tubes PSA4 Lower Great Hwy Landscaped Areas Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon GGP GGP7 AIDS Memorial Grove Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native 24 Box NULL NULL Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native 24 Box· PSA6 StMary's Landscape Native Shrub (evergreen);Tree (evergreen) CA Native One Gallon PSA6 StMary's Landscape Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Fifteen Gallon PSA4 J.P. Murphy Landscaped Areas Native Tree (deciduous) CA Native Five Gallon GGP GGP2 Rhododendron Dell Ornamental Tree (deciduous) Exotic Fifteen Gallon GGP GGP2 Rhododendron Dell Native Tree (evergreen) CA Native Five Gallon

""0 c.n c.n DeliveryDate PlantTypeName TotaiQty 7/25/2018 Hesperocyparis macrocarpa 1 7/26/2018 Agathis robusta 1 8/1/2018 Cordyline australis 'Atropurpurea' 5 8/10/2018 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 4 8/22/2018 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 10 8/23/2018 Hesperocyparis macrocarpa 7 8/24/2018 Phymosia umbellata 3 9/19/2018 Leptospermum laevigatum 5 10/3/2018 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 2 10/9/2018 Magnolia grandiflora 'Little Gem' 1 10/12/2018 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 12 10/24/2018 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 5 10/24/2018 Phymosia umbellata 5 10/31/2018 Abies alba 2 11/7/2018 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 10 11/27/2018 Ceanothus 'FrostyBiue' 10 11/28/2018 Leptospernium laevigatum 1 11/28/2018 Leptospermum laevigatum 4 12/4/2018 Leptospermum laevigatum 6 -u 12/4/2018 Sequoiadendron giganteum 4 (.il 12/5/2018 Cercis occidentalis 2 0') 12/i2/2018 Ceanothus 'Frosty Blue' 3 12/12/2018 Hesperocyparis niacrocarpa 6 12/12/2018 Leptospermum laevigatum 10 12/13/2018 Magnolia x soulangeana 'Aiexandrina' 1 12/19/2018 Acer circinatum 3 12/19/2018 Agathis robusta 1 12/19/2018 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 5 12/19/2018 Ceano.thus 'Frosty Blue' 10 12/26/2018 Acer palmatum 'Green' 1 12/26/2018 Phymosia umbellata 2 1/9/2019 Leptospermum laevigatum 9 1/9/2019 Pinus torreyana ssp. torreyana 6 1/9/2019 Sequoia sempervirens 5 1/16/2019 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 5 1/16/2019 Ceanothus 'Frosty Blue' 5 1/18/2019 Acer palmatum 'Sango Kaku' 2 1/22/2019 Magnolia x soulangeana 'Aiexandrina' 2 1/22/2019 Olea europaea 3 1/22/2019 Thuja plicata 3 1/30/2019 Ginkgo biloba 1 2/4/2019 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 6 2/6/2019 Acer Japanes Maple (Unknown #1) 1 2/6/2019 Ginkgo biloba 3 2/6/2019 Magnolia x soulangeana 'Aiexandrina' 1 2/6/2019 Sequoia sempervirens 2 2/6/2019 Sequoiadendron giganteum 2 2/7/2019 Arbutus x 'Marina' 2 2/8/2019 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 9 2/13/2019 Arbutus x 'Marina' 1 2/13/2019 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 1 2/13/2019 Cercis occidentalis 1 2/13/2019 Lyonothamnus floribundus 1 2/21/2019 Podocarpus henkelii 1 3/4/2019 Agonis flexuosa 3 3/6/2019 Phymosia umbellata 5 3/13/2019 Arbutus x 'Marina' 3 3/26/2019 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 5 3/26/2019 Quercus agrifolia 4 4/4/2019 Maytenus boaria 1 4/10/2019 Araucaria araucana 2 4/10/2019 Casuarina cunninghamiana 4 4/10/2019 Ceanothus 'Ray Hartman' 12 -u CJ1 4/10/2019 Luma apiculata 2 -..J 4/10/2019 Magnolia 1 4/10/2019 Magnolia x soulangeana 'Aiexandrina' 1 4/12/2019 Quercus agrifolia 9 4/17/2019 Acer circinatum 2 4/17/2019 Ceanothus 'Ray Hartman' 6 4/17/2019 Malus 'Prariefire' 2 4/17/2019 Prunus x yedoensis 7 4/17/2019 Prunus x yedoensis 'Akebono' 1 4/17/2019 Pyrus calleryana 'Aristocrat' 3 4/17/2019 Quercus agrifolia 3 4/17/2019 Sequoia sempervirens 6 4/23/2019 Ceanothus 'Ray Hartman' 15 5/1/2019 Aesculus californica 1 5/14/2019 Lagunaria pattersonii 1 5/15/2019 Acer Japanes Maple (Unknown #6) 1 5/15/2019 Acer Japanes Maple (Unknown #7) 1 5/15/2019 Crataegus laevigata 'Paul's Scarlet' 3 5/15/2019 Phymosia umbe.llata 3 5/15/2019 Prunus x yedoensis 1 5/22/2019 Ceanothus 'Frosty Blue' 4 5/22/2019 Quercus agrifolia 4 5/23/2019 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 1 6/5/2019 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 4 6/5/2019 Hesperocyparis macrocarpa 3 6/5/2019 Sequoia sempervirens 4 6/6/2019 Quercus agrifolia 4 6/12/2019 Ceanothus 'Frosty Blue' 2 6/13/2019 ·Pinus torreyana ssp. torreyana 1 6/14/2019 Pinus torreyana ssp. torreyana 3 6/19/2019 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Dr. Hurd' 10 6/19/2019 Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' 3 6/26/2019 Cercis occidentalis 1 6/26/2019 Corn us florida 1 6/26/2019 Sequoia sempervirens 5 372

""'0 c.n co I (BOS)

From: Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 3:36 PM To: [email protected] Cc: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: SOTF File No. 18072: Additional Documents Attachments: 311 Tree Cases.xlsx

Hi Joshua,

My name is Andres and I've taken over as Custodian of Records for the Department while Tiffany is out in Maternity Leave. I received an email yesterday about an upcoming hearing on August 27th, and wanted to start sharing some of the documents we've accumulated.

The attached Excel sheet is from the 311 data found online regarding trees. This includes removal and maintenance, but not all of them are specific to tree planting or removal. I narrowed it down, but wanted to give you the chance to narrow it further as you see fit. (Didn't want you to lose information due to the category types not always being consistent.)

If you follow this link, it will provide you with the plans for trees removals and trees plantings associated with all capital projects within the last 10 years.

I'm still waiting if any additional documents are produced from our Nursery that are responsive to your request, but wanted to start sharing these so you have time to look them over.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Best,

Andres Patino Public Outreach Coordinator Policy and Public Affairs *in the office Tuesdays to Fridays

San Francisco Recreation and Park Department I City & County of San Francisco Mclaren Lodge in Golden Gate Park I 501 Stanyan Street I San Francisco, CA I 94117 (415) 831-6349- Office

Visit us at sfrecpark.org Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Watch us on sfRecParkTV Sign up for our e-News · DOCUME TS: ·EXCEED

25 PAGES

P60 Category Request Type CaseiD Opened Closed Updated Status Status Notes Responsible Agency Rec and Park Requests Park~ UrbanForestry 11196182 7/29/201913:24 7/29/201919:00 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 11190613 7/26/2019 9:26 7/28/2019 9:30 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Parl<- UrbanForestry 11189486 7/27/2019 20:10 7/28/2019 9:35 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 11183118 7/26/201911:18 7/29/2019 10:17 7/29/2019 10:17 Closed Close Note: Vandalized broken tree has been removed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry 11177569 7/25/2019 9:44 7/25/2019.13:03 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Park- UrbanForestry 11172429 7/24/2019 9:42 7/24/201911:14 Open Open RPD Park.. Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 11170792 7/23/2019 20:10 7/24/2019 14:16 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry 11164756 7/22/2019 16:00 7/23/201919:23 7/23/2019 19:23 Closed Tree may not yet be removed as of this time. RPD Natural Areas Queue Trees- Damaged_Tree 11164067 7/22/2019 14:16 7/29/2019 7:34 7/29/2019 7:34 Closed Close Note: Tree removed RPD Natural Areas Queue Tree Maintenance Rec and Park Requests Park~ Urban Forestry 11161119 7/22/2019 7:23 7/22/2019 7:44 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Park~ Urban Forestry 11157009 7/20/2019 18:00 7/26/2019 8:27 7/26/2019 8:27 Closed Close Note: Tree has been removed RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry 11154401 7/20/2019 6:41 7/20/2019 8:55 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Tree Maintenance Trees~ Damaged_Tree 11145894 7/18/2019 10:25 7/21/2019 16:59 7/21/2019 16:59 Closed Close Note: Thanks for the heads up! Urban forestry is RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park~ Urban Forestry 11143176 7/17/2019 16:46 7/23/2019 8:56 7/23/2019 8:56 Closed Close Note: LimP removed RPD Natural Areas Queue Park- Urban Forestry 11138669 7/16/201919:16 7/16/201919:24 Open Open RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Tree Maintenance Trees~ Overgrown_Tree 11135266 7/16/2019 9:26 7/18/2019 10:29 7/18/2019 10:29 Closed Close f\lote: The tree is no longer blocking the sidewalk RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Park- UrbanForestry 11133400 7/15/201918:48 7/15/2019_19:26 Open Open RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Rec and Park Requests Park~ Urban Forestry 11133123 7/15/201917:51 7/15/201919:20 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry 11133120 7/15/2019 17:50 7/16/2019 9:31 7/16/2019 9:31 Closed Close Note: The log was moved out of the path for now. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Park~ UrbanForestry 11133101 7/15/2019 17:46 7/15/201919:19 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park~ UrbanForestry 11129330 7/15/2019 6:29 7/15/2019 8:51 7/15/2019 8:51 Closed RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Tree Maintenance· Trees- Damaged_Tree 11126680 7/14/201911:50 7/14/2019 19:16 Open Open RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban forestry 11120011 7/12/2019 13:52 7/13/2019 7:54 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park~ Urban Forestry 11117541 7/12/2019 7:15 7/13/2019 8:07 Open· Open RPD GGP Queue Trees- Damaged_Tree 11116248 7/11/2019 17:1 a "7/29/2019 21:59 Open sent RPD Natural Areas Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree 11105865 7/9/2019 16:08 7/24/201913:51 7/24/2019 13:51 Closed submit a new request wiih more details reg·a~ding the RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Tree Maintenance Rec and Park Requests Park~ UrbanForestry 11096071 717/2019 18:36 7/22/2019 7:37 7/22/2019 7:37 Closed Close Note: The trees at this location have been pruned. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry 11095805 717/2019 17:00 7/8/2019 8;53 7/8/2019 8:53 Closed RPD NSA Queue Park- Urban Forestry 11095321 7n/2D19 14:43 7/24/;>019 13:52 7/24/2019 13:52 Closed Close Note: Branch was pruned. RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requ~sts Trees~ Damaged_Tree 11094675 717/201911:37 7/10/2019 13:57 7/10/2019 13:57 Closed Close Note: Cleared RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry ""0 11092169 7/6/2019 13:13 7/9/2019 10:51 7/9/2019 10:51 Closed Close Note: The limb was cut off and removed, thank Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 11091646 7/6/2019 10:56 7/9/2019 5:21 7/9/2019 5:21 Closed submit a new request wiih more details reg·a~ding the RPD Pa~k Service Area 1 Queue en Park- UrbanForestry __. 11071968 7/1/2019 14:16 7/3/2019 7:09 7/3/2019 7:09 Ciosed Close Note: Tree crew has schedule the work for second RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Rec and Parl< Requests Park~ Urbanforestry 11070745 7/1/2019 11:31 7/2/2019 14:44 7/2/2019 14:44 Closed Close Note: Tree crew is aware of problem and they RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Trees- Damaged_Tree 11068872 7/1/2019 6:30 7/3/2019 10:57 7/3/2019 10:57 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry 11061669 6/29/2019 9:23 6/29/2019 9:30 Open Open RPD GGP Queue

Park- UrbanForestry 11054956 6/21/2019 15:22 7/3/2019 15:07 Open Open RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Case Resolved Park- Urbanforestry 11054076 6/27/201 9 12:.55 7/1/2019 17:53 7/1/2019 17:53 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests

Park~ UrbanForestry 11050167 6/26/2019 15:45 6/26/2019 18:16 Open Open RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 11045366 -6/25/201915:57 6/25/2019 18:55 Open Open RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Case Resolved Park- UrbanForestry 11040636 6/24/2019 16:37 6/25/2019 11:58 6/25/2019 11:58 Closed Close Note: Limb was moved in blocking access. .RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests

Park~ Urban Forestry 11040169 6/24/2019 15:22 6/24/2019 15:30 Open Open RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests

Park~ Urbanforestry 11035804 6/23/2019 17:29 6/27/2019 10:50 6/27/2019 10:50 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area i Queue Rec and Park Requests The work was performed underwork order#SMY~ 208021. The issue noted in the service request has been addressed.?Piease open a new service request if you Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 11034155 6/23/2019 8:40 6/28/2019 9:00 6/28/201 9 9:00 Closed require further assistance. RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Case Resolved Park- Urban Forestry 11032160 6/22/201913:40 6/25/2019 6:01 6/25/2019 6:01 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Parl< Requests Park- Urban Forestry 11029399 6/21/2019 17:00 6/27/2019 10:50 6/27/2019 10:50 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests

Case Resolved Park- UrbanForestry 11027272 6/21/201910:46 7/1/2019 14:22 7/1/2019 14:22 Closed Close Note: Tree branches have been pruned RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests 11016548 6119/2019 8:54 6/19/2019 9:27 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

11009444 6/17/2019 16:13 7/9/2019 14:15 Open sent RPD Natural Areas Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

11006812 6/17/201 9 1 0:12 6/17/2019 10:54 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Case Resolved Close Note: The tree crew was informed about the tree and they will take care of the situation according to their 11003081 6/16/2019 9:48 6/27/2019 7:49 6/27/2019 7:49 Closed schedule. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue. Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved Close Note: Mowing of areas in process. Please resend 10991127 6/13/2019 10:33 6/18/2019 14:17 6/18/201 9 14:17 Closed 311 with photo of specific site if issue persists RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban forestry

10988991 6/12/201918:15 6/13/2019 7:1 o Open Open RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Par.k.- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10986513 6/12/201 9 11 :03 6/25/2019 11:56 6/25/2019 ·11 :56 Closed Close Note: Tree was pruned RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Case Resolved 10984324 6/11/201919:59. 6/17/2019 6:28 6/17/2019 6:28 Closed Close Note: Duplicate. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry. Case Resolved Close Note: The wind is causing the Dodona shrubs along the fence line to blow in the the-pathway. They have been pruned away from the paths but can not be removed due to their function as screening along park 10984040 6/11/201918:36 6/18/2019 13:01 6/18/201913:01 Closed property. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Tree is resting on the ground and fs not posing a safety concern to park users. Photo of fallen tree - https://spot-sf- res.cl oudin ary .co m/im ag e/u pload/v15 60 37705 0/sa n- 10983454 6/11/2019 16:30 6/27/2019 23:59 6/27/2019 23:59 Closed francisco/production/cja2apfit4jjvnuqoqun.jpg RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10979113 6/10/2019 18:40 6/11/2019 9:29 6/11/2019 9:29 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry -o Q') Case Resolved 10976025 6/10/2019 9:47 6/14/2019 9:07 6/14/2019 9:07 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests N Park- UrbanForestry 10976004 6/10/2019 9:45 6/18/201913:46 6/18/2019 13:46 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Case Resolved 10974039 6/9/2019 18:02 6/26/2019 19:59 6/26/2019 19:59 Closed. Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10972083 6/9/2019 8:32 7/5/201911:29 7/5/201911:29 Closed Close Note: Tree pruned RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Tree?- Tree_Other

Case Resolved 10971169 6/B/201 9 1 9:36 7/5/2019 11:29 7/5/2019 11:29 Closed Close Note: Trees restaked RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_Other Jack Early Park is not part of SF Recreation & Parks 10947266 6/3/2019 13:34 6/3/2019 14:33 6/3/2019 14:33 Closed system RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

Case Resolved 10941338 6/212019 7:42 6/4/201912:16 6/4/201912:16 Closed erose Note: Tree removed off of path RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Wi!! be sending a Ranger to the area to investigate. Again, DO NOT ENGAC3E WITH PERSONS ENCOUNTERED IN THE PARK!. Reporting Party has been repeated advised by Park Patrol Dispatch no to 10938216 6/1/2019 9:21 6/1/201911:53 6/1/201911:53 Closed interact with persons she encounters RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park·- UrbanForestry

10936628· 5/31/2019 17:53 5/31/201919:37 5/31/201919:37 .Closed RPD to resolve this fallen tree situation. RPD Community Gardens Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10926991 5/29/2019 20:38 5/29/2019 21 :DB 5/29/2019 21:08 Closed Reefer to #1 0926928 RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry case Resolved 10926928 5/29/2019 20:07 5/30/2019 13:51 5/30/2019 13:51 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10914260 5/27/2019 10:31 5/27/2019 11:37 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10907156 5/24/2019 17:50 6/26/2019 19:19 6/26/2019 19:19 Closed Close Note: Removed RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_Other Suggestion noted and shrubs will.be inspected for 10905439 5/24/201 9 12:29 5/28/2019 8:58 5/28/2019 8;58 Closed pruning. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10903398 5/24/201 9 6:34 5/28/2019 14:12 5/28/2019 14:12 Closed Close Note: Branch removed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban forestry Case Resolved 10893215 5121/2019 19:02 6/26/201919:17 6/26/201919:17 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10892030 5/21/201914:52 5/21/2019 15:37 5/21/2019 15:37 Closed Tree removed by arborist crew RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10890568 5/21/2019 11:06 5/21/201913:18 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10888024 5/20/201916:59 6/26/2019 19:16 6/26/2019 19:16 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Case Resolved 10885007 5/20/201 9 9:55 5/23/2019 14:10 5/23/201 9 14:10 Closed Close Note: The fallen tree has been cleared. RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10881407 5/19/2019 10:25 6/21/2019 14:58 6121/2019 14:58 Closed This case was closed underwork order.SMY-206993. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10881400 5/1 9/201 9 1 0:24 6/21/2019 14:57 6/21/201914:57 Closed This case was closed underwork order SMY-206993. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban forestry

10881393 5/1912019 10:23 5/19/2019 21:34 5/19/2019 21:34 Closed RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10881389 5/19/2019 10:22 6/21/2019 14:58 6/21/2019 14:58 Closed This case was closed underwork order SMY-206993. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10881384 5/19/2019 10:21 6/21/2019 14:57 6/21/2019 14:57 Closed This case was closed underwork order SMY-206993. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10881375 5/19/2019 10:19 6/21/201 9 14:57 6/21/201914:57 Closed This case was closed underwork order SMY-206993. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry ""'0 0"'1 w 10881369 5/19/2019 10:18 6/21/2019 14:56 6/21/2019 14:56 Closed This case was closeid under work order SMY-206993. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10881364 5/19/201910:17 6/21/2019 14:57 6/21/2019 14:57 Closed This case was closed under work order SMY-206993. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10881359 5/19/2019 10:16 6/21/2019 14:53 6/21/2019 14:53 Closed This was addressed by work order SMY-206993. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10881350 5/19/2019 10:15 6/21/2019 14:56 6/21/2019 14:56 Closed This case was closed under work order SMY-206993. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10881346 5/19/201910:14 6/21/201914:54 6/21/201914:54 Closed This was closed underwork order SMY-206993. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry The work was performed underwork order#SMY- 206993. The issue noted in the service request has been addressed.?Piease open a new service request if you 10881340 5/19!201 9 10:13 6/21/2019 9:00 6/21/2019 9:00 Closed require further assistance. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park~ Urban Forestry Case Resolved 10871273 5116/2019 13:59 6/6/2019 10:11 6/6/2019 10:11 Closed Close Note: Complete RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park.- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10870857 5/16/2019 12:47 7/5/2019 9:31 7/5/2019 9:31 Closed Close Note: Tree was cut back RPD Natural Areas Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

10869297 5/16/2019 8:43 5/17/2019 18:47 5/17/201918:47 Closed The hanging branch has been rerTioved. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10868920 5/16/2019 7:41 6/26/2019 19:15 6/26/2019 19:15 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park~ Urban Forestry

Case Resolved 10868757 5/16/2019 6:53" 5117/2019 14:33 5/17/2019.14:33 Closed Close Note: Limb has been removed. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10866836 5/15/2019 17:43 7/18/201910:28 7/18/2019 10:28 Closed Close Note: This tree has been inspected. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park.- UrbanForestry ·. 10861515 5114/201914:28 5/30/201910:19 Open Open RPD TMA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10858498 5/13/201 9 22:22 5/13/2019 22:42 Open Open RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved 10853976 5/13/2019 9:00 6/6/2019 10:10 6/6/2019 10:10 Closed Close Note: Complete RPD Natural Areas Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaging_Property

Case Resolved 10852547 511212019 18:28 5/29/2019 13:54 5/29/2019 13:54 Closed Close Note: Staff cut the branch in question. RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved Close Note: This is scheduled to be completed in the 10845409 5/10/2019 14:18 6/2612019 19:06 6/26/2019 19:06 Closed next two weeks. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Please provide more information: what is the problem with the tree? Also a perspective photograph or map app 10844342 5/10/2019 11:21 5/15/201911:33 5/15/2019 11:33 Closed pin drop would help. Thanks RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Landscaping Case Resolved Close Note: Tree has been removed, stump wi!! be removed this week. Replacement tree is being decided 10841434 5/9/2019 17:49 6/17/2019 10:17 6/1712019 10:17 Closed ASAP. RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_Olher

10839917 519/2019 13:21 5/10/201 9 19:47 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10827899 517/2019 9:05 5/14/2019 9:09 5/14/2019 9:09 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urb8.nForestry

10810208 5/21201 9 20:31 5/14/201 9 9:43 Open sent RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue . Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree

10808281 51212019 13:18 5/212019 14:13 5/21201 9 14:13 Closed Ranger responding RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved Close Note: Trees have been vandalized in the past. 10806843 5/212019 9:27 512112019 13:41 5/21/2019 13:41 Closed Trees moved to new location RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry ""'0 (j') Case Resolved Close Note: Open holes have been filled until stump can ..J:>. 10805276 5/1/2019 19:31 6/6/201 9 1 9:34 6/6/2019 19:34 Closed be removed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10802863 5/1/201911:21 5/712019 6:30 5n/201 9 6:30 Closed Close Note; RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_ Other Case Resolved 10794359 4/29/2019 15:21 4130/2019 17:18 4/30/201917:18 Closed Close Note: Debris have been removed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10789660 4/28/2019 16:05 6/26/2019 17:53 6/26/2019 17:53 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10785525 4/2712019 i1:23 7/27/2019 9:36 7/27/2019 9:36 Closed Close Note: Tree has been·pruned. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park R~quests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10777429 4/2512019 14:23 4/30/2019 6:47 4/30/2019 6:47 Closed Close Note: Tree limb removed on 4/26/19 RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry Case Resolved 10776280 4/2512019 11:11 4/30/2019 11:37 4/30/2019 11:37 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForeslry

Case Resolved 10775570 4/25/2019 9:27 5/212019 15:04 5/212019 15:04 Clos~d Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved 10775536 4/2512019 9:23 4130/2019 6:46 4/30/2019 6:46 Closed Close Note: Tree limb removed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park~ Urbanforestry

10775204 4/2512019 8:29 4/25/201917:17 Open sent RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees·- Damaged_Tree

RPD PSA manager reports the cracked branch at this 10770316 412412019 8:33 4/29/201 9 21:52 4/29/2019 21:52 Closed location has been removed. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Ca,se Resolved 10769220 4/23/2019 19:50 412612019 12:07 4/26/2019 12:07 Closed Close Note: Tree has been removed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10763873 41221201 9 16:59 7/11/2019 12:27 Open Open RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 10758163 4/21/2019 13:18 4/22/2019 9;00 4/2212019 9:00 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park~ Urban Forestry

10755037 4/20/2019 14:30 4/20/2019 21:05 4/20/2019 21:05 Closed Ranger place caution tape around tree and area RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10755002 4/20/2019 14:23 4/29/2019 14:21 4/29/2019 14:21 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved Close Note: The bushes were trim giving enough room 10749713 4/1 9/2019 9;56 7/16/2019 9:32 7/16/2019 9:32 Closed for sitting. Thank you RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 10739636 4/17/2019 6:46 6/2/2019 18:14 Open sent RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Case Resolved 1073.8869 4/16/2019 18:45 6/26/2019 16:59 6/26/2019 16:59 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_Other

10738326 4/16/2019 16:50 6/24/201 9 6;46 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests . Park- Urban Forestry Case Resolved 10731999 4/15/2019 12:57 5/6/2019 10:07 5/6/2019 10:07 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry

Case Resolved 10728212 4/14/201 9 15:28 5/13i2019 10:40 5/13/201910:40 Closed Close Note: Branch cleared RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10727929 4/14/2019 14:01 4/14/2019 19:34 Open Open RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved Close Note: Maintenance work is scheduled for 4/17 & 10719616 4/12/2019 8:44 4/16/2019 7:15 4/16/2019 7:15 Closed 4/18 in the Greenway. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10711245 4/10/201911:15 7/17/2019 13:42 7/17/201913:42 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry 1070.8193 4/9/2019 16:02 4/9/2019 21:18 4/9/2019 21:18 Closed RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Per park manager of , there is no tree branch down at the intersection of Lake Merced Blvd. and Middlefield Dr., there's no tree blocking the sidewalk 10708099 4/9/2019 15:45 4/11/2019 19:05 4/11/201919:05 Closed or traiL RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

10703702 4/8/2019 16:58 4/8/2019 19:14 Open Open RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10702352 4/B/201913:47 4/26/2019 8:40 4/26/2019 8:40 Closed Close Note: Removed RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

""'0 Case Resolved m 10699525 4/8/2019 7:01 5/1/2019 6;25 5/1/2019 6:25 Closed Close Note: Case resolved RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees~ Damaged_Tree (J1 Case Resolved 10694451 4/6/2019 11 ;41 4/26/2019 8:37 4/26/20"1 9 8:37 Closed Close Note: Limb removed RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Supervisor will assess the situation and schedule the 10692510 4/5/2019 16:49 4/8/2019 8:28 4/8/2019 8:28 Closed pruning of vegetation If necessary. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

This does not seem like an RPD location. Probably DPW. We would need a more specific address or 10685703 4/4/2019 10:31 4/9/201915:57 4/9/2019 15;57 Closed location. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please subrhit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. Close Note: Please resend 311 with picture and detailed 10684781 4/4/2019 8:03 4/5/2019 19:43 4/5/2019 19:43 Closed description to locate the issue RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Da.maged_Tree

10681277 4/3/2019 11:04 4/3/2019 16:51 Open sent RPD Golf Queue Tree Main:enance Trees- Overgrown_Tree

10677316 4/2/2019 13:23 4/2/2019 16:58 4/2/2019 16:58 Closed PG&E handled and removed the tree from their wires. RPD Park Patrol Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry

10675269 4/2/2019 8:13 4/2/2019 10:29 Open Open RPD Park service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry

10673550 4/1/2019 16:17 4/16/2019 8;53 4/16/2019 8:53 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10673548 4/1/2019 16:17 4/1/2019 17:28 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10671573 4/1/2019 11:31 4/1/201911:41 4/1/201911:41 Closed This has already been forwarded to DPW RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry

10660930 3/29/2019 11:07 4/3/2019 19;17 Open sent RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Case Resolved Close Note: Sloughing soil and rock removed, sidewalk 10652437 3/27/2019 11:21 411212019 6:39 4/12/2019 6:39 Closed cleaned RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForeslry Case Resolved Close Note: The patron was contacted via 311 and notified that the tree doesn't present a imminent threat, therefore it will be treated as low priority in the three crew 10650140 3/26/2019 17:17 3/28/2019 13:59 3/28/201913:59 Closed list. And with this we close this case RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10648532 ,3/26/2019 12:42 5/14/2019 15:33 5/14/201 9 15;33 Closed Close Note: Dead tree cut and removed from site. RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10643919 3/25/201 9 12:11 4/3/2019 15:59 4/3/201915:59 Closed Close Note: Tree limb has been removed. RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10639353 3/24/2019 10:35 3/25/2019 12:50 3/25/201912:50 Closed Close Note: Tree was removed RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

Case Resolved Close Note: Complaint is incorrect/wrong identification. There is no poison ivy in this parK. There is a common ma!!ow weed growing around much of the dpa but this is not poisonous. There is a Hedera ivy up in one of the trees. This plant is not poisonous. We do not use 10632436 3/22/2019 8:27 3/25/2019 9:39 3/25/2019 9:39 Closed herbicides or pesticides in the park either. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanFo.restry Case Resolved Close Note: The department does·not have an operable stump grinding unit to manage this item. When a unit 10632253 3/22/201 9 7:36 4/4/2019 22:17 4/4/2019 22:17 Closed comes available, item will be addressed. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

10629601 3/21/2019 12:15 4/16/2019 8:53 4/16/2019 8:53 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Tree is scheduled for examination and possible removaL 10622614 3/19/2019 17:53 3/20/2019 8:41 3/20i2019 8:41 Closed Thank you for letling us know about the situation RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Response from RPD: The information on this service request is incorrect. Photo shown is of a tree on the Potrero Avenue side of the park that died and was cut ""'0 down several years ago. UF has not responded to our 0"'1 request to grind out the stump. The trees that fell during this winter's storms are on the San Bruno side of the park 0"'1 10621105 3/19/201913:20 3/21/2019 17:57 3/21/2019 17:57 Closed and are in the process of replacement. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry RPD PSA manager of this park has determined that the~e simply isn't enough information in this request. Please provide a picture and exact location of the problem, ~r call 415-831-2700 to report this directly to 10619221 3/19/2019 9:13 3/21/2019 18:15 3/21/201 9 18:15 Closed RPD. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree

10616855 3/18/2019 15:18 4/16/2019 8:52 4/16/2019 8:52 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requesls Park- Urban Forestry 10615946 3/18/2019 12:55 3/26/2019 14:28 3/26/2019 14:28 Closed Jssue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Landscaping Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. Close Note: I can see no dead or broken branches 10611748 3/17/201912:55 5/8/2019 11:32 5/8/2819 1·1 :32 Closed ~eeting that description on this tree. RPD GGP Queue Rec and ParK Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10609332 3/16/2019 14:47 3/20/2019 6:36 3/20/2019 6:36 Closed Close Note: Branches were removed RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved Close Note: Vine removal is too large for Operations field staff. Removal project and building repair has been sent 10608343 3/16/2019 10:48 3/26/2019 21:16 3/26/2019 21:16 Closed to Capital for review RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests ParK- UrbanForestry Case Resolved •10594836 3/1212019 20:00 3/25/2019 10:59 3/25/201910:59 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Per RPD PSA manager, all the big trees in the park are creaking. If we cut down all the creaking trees in the 10594611 3/12/201918:33 3/15/2019 16:58 3/15/2019 16:58 Closed park there wouldn't be a tree standing. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Per RPD PSA manager of this area, this tree was actua!!y on DPW property adjacent to Lake Merced, and 10594345 3/1212019 17:26 3/14/2019 17:52 3/14/201917:52 Closed DPW has removed the tree. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry 10594240 3/1212019 17:03 3/12/201918:59 3/12/2019 18:59 Closed RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Case Resolved Close Note: Tree crew was notified and limb was taken 10593999 3/121201916:18 4/1/2019 8:15 4/1/2019 8:15 Closed care of. Thank you. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10589671 3/11/2019 16:37 . 3/15/2019 17:27 3/15/201917:27 Closed The fallen branches have been removed from this site. RPD Park Service Area 4 Qu!;!ue Rec. ai1d Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Tree inspected by Park Services Manager 4/8/19 and no 10588709 3/11/2019 13:57 419/2019 8:44 4/9/2019 8:44 Closed signs of unstable roots or other problems observed. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 10588690 3/11/2019 13:54 7/10/2019 14:44 7/1~/2019 14:44 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Tree inspected by Park Services· Manager 4/8/19 and no signs of unstable roots or other problems observed. The tree is not leaning on adjacent redwoods but appears to have grown at this angle in response to another large 10588662 3/11/201913:49 4/912019 8:47 4/9/2019 8:47 ciosed acacia tree crowding it over time. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10584738 3/10/201 9 13;53 3/10/2019 14:01 Open Open RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10582653 3/9/2019 16:12 3(10/2019 13:40 Open Open RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10581789 3/9/201912:04 7/10/201914:47 Open Open RPD Golf Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

case Resolved Close Note: The branch was removed from the path 10579006 3/8/2019 14:38 3/14/2019 9:16 3/14/2019 9:16 Closed thank you RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

Case Resolved Close Note: Hanging branches removed from site. Tree 10577578 3/8(2019 9;56 3/12/2019 8:58 3/12/2019 8:58 Closed work in progress RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

10573784 3f7/2019 11:31 4/18/2019 14:42 Open Open RPD TMA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10572716 3f7/2019 8;46 4/8/2019 8:57 4/8/2019 8:57 Closed Close Note: Path is cleared RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10572368 3/7/2019 7:32 3/19/2019 20:44 3/19/201 9 20:44 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Case Resolved Close Note: Unable to locate, please resend 311 with 10572136 3/7/2019 5;03 3/8/2019 7:04 3/8/2019 7:04 Clo:5ed detailed location and picture·of surrounding area RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree The branch has been removed from the pathway at this 10570327 3/6/2019 14:20 3/8/2019 17:27 3/8/201917:27 Closed location. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry The big branch that was blocking the pathway has been 10567835 3/6/2019 6:23 3/8/201917:32 3/8/2019 17:32 Closed removed. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry -c O'l -.I 10558817 3/4/2019 8:25 4/16/2019 8:49 4/16/2019 8:49 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

10553179 3/2/2019 7:21 3/2/2019 8:10 3/2/2019 8:10 Closed Ranger dispatched RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10551389 3/1/2019 14:58 3f7/2019 14:59 3/7/2019 14:59 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Same as SR #10540840. Info/photos have been 10546730 2128/2019 15:12 2128/2019 16:41 2128/2019 16:41 Closed forNarded to RPD GGP mgmt RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved Close Note: Unable to locate, please resend 311 with 10544477 2/26/2019 9:14 3/5/2019 12:09 3/5/201 9 12:09 Closed further description RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. 10542611 2/27/2019 16:07 3/6/2019 6:02 3/6/2019 6:02 Closed Close Note: Trees across from this address look healthy RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Case Resolved 10540840 2/27/201911:19 3/6/2019 9:22 3/6/2019 9:22 Closed Close Note: Fallen tree was removed. Thank you. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry According to RPD PSA manager of the Lake Merced area, no tree damage found on RPD property at this 10538612 2/26/2019 18:16 2/26/2019 18:07 2/28/201 9 18:07 Closed location. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved 10535464 2126/2019 9;31 3/2712019 12:30 3/27/2019 12:30 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Per RPD PSA manager, the remains of the fallen tree on the hillside doesn't block the access road and doesn't pose a threat to any pedestrians. This will remain on the. hi!!side unm Heavy Equipment Operators can come in 10532824 2125/2019 14:09 2/27/201917:24 2127/2019 17:24 Closed and remove it without further damaging the turf area. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10532629 2125/2019 13:38 2/27/2019 12:15 2127/201912:15 Closed Close Note; Duplicate RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 10526180 2/23/2019 17:02 4/15/2019 7:55 4/15/2019 7:55 Closed Case Resolved Close Note: Tree removed RPD GGP Queue 311 External Request Trees Case Resolved 10524177 2123/2019 8:36 3/1112019 5:58 3/11/2019 5:58 Closed Close Note: Debris removed by park staff RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry The work was performed underwork order#SMY- 203389. The issue noted in the service request has been addressed.?Please open a new service request if you 10524150 2123/2019 8:31 415/2019 8:30 4J5i2019 8:30 Closed require further assistance. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park.- UrbanForestry

10522463 212212019 15:24 5n/2019 15:54 open sent RPD Natural Areas Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree According to RPD park manager, RPD Urban Forestry has rejected this work order because the location was unclear. Please re-submit another 311 with the exact location of the trees so that RPD Urban Forestry will be 10506799 2119/2019 12:37 2126/201 9 18:32 2/26/2019 18:32 Closed able to locate the exact location. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10505499 2119/2019 9:24 5/22/2019 9:26 Open sent RPD TMA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Case Resolved Close Note: Branch has been removed, picnic table 10502662 2118/201912:22 2121/2019 6:58 2121/2019 6:58 Closed repair pending RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved Close Note: Materials removed by Park Staffthis 10502220 2/18/2019 10:56 211912019 11:21 211 9!201 9 11:21 Closed moming. RPD Park. Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10500611 21171201918:39 2123/201914:05. 2123/201914:05 Closed Close Note: Issue has been resolved RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry This tree root is under the rubber surface in the Children's Play Area and is scheduled' to be repaired' and the tree removed. Possibility of injury on the soft rubber 10500459 2117/201917:25 2126/201 9 7:39 2126/2019 7:39 Closed surface is unlikely until the repairs are made. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved Close Note: Hazardous tree has been cut back to safe size length of trunk by GGG Tree Crew. No limbs 10498038 2116/2019 17:02 4129/2019 7:47 4/29/2019 7:47 Closed remain. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10497671 2116/201914:53 3/13/2019 8:26 3/13/2019 8:26 Closed Close Note: Tree crew has been notified. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry "1J m Case Resolved 00 10496878 2116/2019 11:03 3/1112019 9:25 3/1112019 9:25 Closed Close Note: Tree has been staked RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree 10496723 2116/2019 10:27 2118/2019 14:54 2118/2019 14:54 Closed RPD Park Patrol Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10496214 211612019 7:48 2116/201 9 8;00 2116!201 9 8:00 Closed Ranger sent RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park.- UrbanForestry

10493316 2115/201910:58 2115/201915:00 2115/201915:00 Closed Ranger dispatched and caution tape area RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Dispatch Ranger and was not able to lo.cate fallen tree in 10493140 2115/2019 10:33 211512019 13:09 2115/2019 13:09 Closed area as described RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

Unable to verify the exact location of this issue because conflicting information has been given, therefore RPD Urban Forestry is unable to respond. Please submit another311 service request if the issue still exists and 10489380 2114/2019 12:44 2126/2019 18:51 2126/2019 18:51 Closed provide detailed information about the location. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10489024 21141201 9 11:49 211412019 12:59 2114/2019 12:59 Closed Ranger dispatched to area to survey issue RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree RPD PSA manager reports the tree blocking the access road has been removed and the remaining cut up tree branches will be removed from the !awn area at the 10487565 2/14/201 9 8:00 2127/201917:19 2127/201 9 17:19 Closed appropriate time. RPD Park Service Area 4.Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10487454 2114/2019 7:38 2120/201 9 12:15 2120/2019 12:15 Closed Close Note: branch removed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Pai"k Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10487061 2114/201 9 3:18 21141201912:38 2/14/201912:38 Closed Rangers cleared area RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10485375 2113/201914:26 311912019 20:44 3/19/2019 20:44 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved 10479911 211212019 11:51 2/2312019 14:05 2123/2019 14:05 Closed Close Note: Young trees have been restaked RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry

10478486 211212019 8:17 6/24/2019 6:48 Open Open RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban forestry

Case Resolved 10472482 2110/201917:33 41171201919:18 4/17/2019 19:18 Closed Close Note: Hanger has been removed RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree The tree stump is not leaning or about to fair, it is just the way the tree had grown, there are multiple trees there 10461137 217/2019 12:26 5/6/2019 18:13 5/6/2019 18:13 Closed pointing in a diagonal way RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damag.ed_Tree Case Resolved 10458167 2/6/2019 16:51 211 9/2019 17:42 2/1 912019 17:42 Closed Close Note: Agave flower stalk has been removed. RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10456701 2/6/201 9 13:05 3/15/2019 7:29 3/15/2019 7:29 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaging_Property

Case Resolved 10456681 2/6/2019 13:02 2/27/2019 14:21 2/27/201914:21 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10453000 215/2019 16:02 2/11/2019 9:33 2/11/2019 9:33 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 10445149 21412019 7:41 2/11/2019 9:37 2111/201 9 9;37 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved 10443431 2/3/2019 12:58 4/8/201 9 8:33 4/8/2019 8:33 Closed Close Note: Bucked ~p and cleared from path. RPD Park Patrol Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Case Resolved 10439138 2/2/2019 3:22 2/6/2019 9:40 2/6/2019 9:40 Closed Close Note: Branch removed RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10438489 2/112019 17:44 3/25/2019 10:46 3!25/2019 10:46 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree

Case Resolved 10434860 2/1/2019 7:27 21412019 13:08 2/4/2019 13;08 Closed Close Note: Hazard limb removed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Landscaping

Confirm tree has been removed per ke!ly on call tree 10430294 1131/2019 8:13 1/31/2019 15:12 1/31/2019 15:12 Closed crew RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 10417182 1/28/2019 13;15 2/6/2019 15:31 2/6/2019 15:31 Closed · Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_ Tree

Case Resolved 10414819 1(28/2019 8:21 3/20/201 9 6:39 3/20/2019 6:39 Closed Close Note: Tree has been removed RPD Natural Areas Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree -o en RPD GGP staff unable to verify the location of the CD 10408493 1/26/2019 10:02 2/6/2019 18:07 2/6/2019 18:07 Closed reported issue. RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 10407921 1/26/2019 7:38 2/6/201915:31 2/6/2019 15:31 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved Close Note: Thank you for your sugges.tion. We are working with members of urban forestry to reduce tree 10399447 1/24/201 9 9:48 2/21/2019 13:58 2/21/2019 13:58 Closed obstacles along the Lincoln Avenue currently. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10399398 1/24/2019 9:43 4/22/2019 13:10 4/2212019 13:10 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10393157 1/23/2019 3:27 1123/201 9 4:13 1/23/201 9 4:13 Closed Ranger yellow tape area RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry RPD Arboretum/Conservatory of Flowers

10385264 1/21/2019 13:09 1/21/2019 17:31 Open Open Queue Rec and Park Requests Park w UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10384522 1/2112019 10:52 4129/2019 15:15 4/29/2019 15:15 Closed Close Note: Thank you for noticing this RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_Other

Case Resolved 10382779 1/20/2019 16:15 1/30/2019 13:49 1/30/2019 13:49 Closed Close Note: This hanger is no longer stuck in the tree. RPO GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

Case Resolved 10381423 1/20/201 9 9:36 2125/2019 14:16 2/25/2019 14:16 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

Case Resolved

10379837 1/19/2019 15:24 1/23/2019 6:40 1/23/2019 6:40 Closed Close Note: The tree was removed from the trail. RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park w Urban Forestry Case Resolved 10379762 1/19/2019 15:06 2/20/2019 13;28 2/20/2019 13;28 Closed Close Note: Tree was removed RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10375126 1/18/201913:05 1/19/2019 18:22 1/19/201 9 18;22 Closed no info regarding issue RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Case Resolved Close Note: Natural Resources staff remove tllis tree that 10373274 1/18/2019 8:31 112512019 11:05 1/25/201911;05 Closed was blocking tile path. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_ Tree Case Resolved 10371634 111712019 16:48 1/23/201 9 15:54 1/23/2019 15;54 Closed Close Note: Staff have removed tree from across trail. RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10371561 1/17/201916:35 1/19/2019 5:52 1/19/2019 5:52 Closed Close Note: Tree removed off of path RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10370014- 1/17/201912:36 1/17/201912:47 1/17/2019 12:47 Closed Ranger has been dispatch to area to yellow tape RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForeslry

Case Resolved 10367537 1/1712019 7:29 1/19/2019 5:53 1/19/2019 5:53 Closed Close Note: Tree removed off of path RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10367298 1/17/2019 4:04 1/17/201915:13 1/17/201915:13 Closed RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Case Resolved 10366845 1/16/2019 20:55 2/25/2019 14:16 2/25/201914:16 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10366808 1/16/2019 20:38 1/17/2019 11:40 1/17/201911:40 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

.10366492 1/16/2019 18:58 1/17/201911:38 1/17/201911:38 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry

10366452 1/16/201918:48 1/16/2019 21:14 1/16/2019 21:14 Closed Same as #1 0366386 RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. Close Note: Unable to find damage. Please attach photo. 10366386 1/16/201918:28 2/5/2019 9:44 2/5/2019 9:44 Closed Thank you RPD GGP Queue. Tree Maintenance Trees~ Damaged_Tree Case Resolved Close Not~: This is a 311 for a previous submittaL (151244). The tree is healthy and leaning away from 10365938 1/16/2019 16:48 1/17/201911:47 1/17/201911:47 Closed house. RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Per PSA Manager. the tree limbs on the ground in the 10365054 1/16/201914:25 1/22/201912:58 1/22/201912:58 Closed park have been removed by park staff. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanFo.restry Per PSA Manager: the 50 foot tree that fell near the restroom building has been cut up and removed from this 1036504-6 1/16/201914:23 1/22/2019 12:57 1/22/2019 12:57 Closed site RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10364797 1/16/201913:35 1/17/201911:38 1/17/2019 11:38 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree The large branch has been removed from the pedestrian "'1J 10354230 1/14/2019 9:23 1/29/201918:14 1/29/2019 1 8:14- Closed pathway at this loc:ation. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry -....I Case Resolved Close Note: Contractor was interviewed regarding this 0 safety issue and reported that a licensed arborist was used for these tree removals. Although some of the trees were very large, the site and safety perimeter were secured. No safety related incidents were reported during 10345563 1/11/2019 13:27 3/19/201911:08 3/19/2019 11 :DB Closed tree removals. RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. Close Note: Please resend 311 with picture and 10345445 1/11/2019 13:03 3/18/2019 9:00 3/18/2019 9:00 Closed description of damage and location RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees~ Tree_Other Unable to Locate. lf the problem still exists, please submit a new request with mbre details regarding the location of the issue. Close Note: Please res end 311 with pictures of location 10342008 1/1 0/2019 16:09 1/15/201912:44 1/15/201912:44 Closed and site RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Pari<. Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10340782 1/10/2019 12:54 1111/2019 7:24 1/11/2019 7:24- Closed IsSue addressed by staff. RPD Park. Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees~ Damaged_Tree Case Resolved Close Note: Location of this 311 unclear. Text states Lincoln Way map shows JFK

10338207 1/9/2019 22:48 1/14/2019 10:29 1/14/2019 10:29 Closed !n any case no down tree found RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10332554 1/8/201917:12 1/10/2019 15:00 1/10/2019 15:00 Closed area does demonstrate to be on SF Park. property RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees~ Overgrown_Tree Case Resolved 10330566 1/8/2019 11:37 1/11/201911:37 1/11/201911:37 Closed Close Note: Tree has been removed. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10330134 1/8/2019 10:32 1/9/201915:06 1/9/2019 15:06 Closed Close Note: Trees affected by storm have been repaired RPD Pari<. Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 10329112 1/8/2019 7:56 1/8/2019 10:43 1/8/2019 10:43 Closed Close Note: Hanger removed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park~ UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10327395 117/201916:02 1/31/2019 16:55 1/31/201916:55 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 10327157 1nt201915:22 4/18/2019 14:47 Open Open RPD TMA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10326297 1/7/201913:28 2/9/201915:53 2/9/2019 15:53 Closed RPD Park Patrol Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10326095 1f7/2019 12:57 1/8/2019 12:09 1/8/201912:09 Closed RPD Park Patrol Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Case Reso!~ed 10324653 1nt2019 9:53 1/8/2019 12:44 1/8/201912:44 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved Close Note: Trees affected by recent stonns have been 10324290 1nt2019 9:15 1/9/201915:07 1/9/201915:07 Closed repaired RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10322703 1/6/2019 18:17 1/6/201919:52 1/6/2019 19:52 Closed RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10322539 1/6/2019 17:08 1/6/2019 19:52 1/6/2019 19:52 Closed RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

10322537 1/6/2019 17:08 1/6/2019 19:52 1/6/2019 19:52 Closed RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance ·Trees- Damaged_Tree No Merit. no tree, may have been a X-mas tree in the 10321982 1/6/201913:55 1/6/201915:45 1/6/2019 15:45 Closed bus lane. RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree 10319076 1/5/2019 10:46 4/9/2019 21:42 4/9/2019 21 :42 Closed RPD Park Patrol Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

10305681 1/2/201912:46 1/2/201913:57 1/2/2019 13:57 Closed RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

10305478 1/2/2019 12:19 1/2/201913:59 1/2/2019 13:59 Closed RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests ParK- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 10305453 1/212019 12:16 1/4/2019 8:40 1/4/2019 8:40 Closed Close Note: Tree removed on 1/4/19. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

10301395 1/1/2019 9:38 1/212019 11:00 1/2/201911:00 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Case Resolved 9994568 12131/2018 9:05 1/2/201915:29 1/2/2019 15:29 Closed Close Note: Completed 1/2/2019 RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

9990373 12129/2018 17:23 3/11/2019 8:24 3/11/2019 8:24 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree ""'0 -..1 Case Resolved __. 9985158 12/28/201810:33 1/3/2019 6:46 1/3/2019 6:46 Closed Close Note: Trees inspect it. They are growing properly. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 9980888 12127/201810:03 12/30/2018 9:56 12/30/2018 9:56 Closed Close Note: Sign unobstructed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 9976047 12/26/2018 7:33 1/212019 10:33 1/2/2019 10:33 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry

9974616 12/25/2018 11:10 12125i2018 14:13 12125/201814:13 Closed This is natural tree grm..-1h RPD NSA Queue .Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForeStry RPD Urban Forestry removed the downed tree that was blocking the pathway and hanging over the fence in the 9973217 12/24/201815:48 12126/2018 17:46 12/26/2018 17:46 Closed baseball outfield. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 996~ 212 12120/2018 19:02 12/21/2018 23:34 12121/2018 23:34 eraSed RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

9952523 12118/2018 19:53 12118/2018 22:06 12/18/2018 22;06 Closed Handled by Park Ranger. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9947395 12/17/201816:36 1/3/2019 16:02 1/3/2019 16:02 Closed RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. Close Note: Unable to locate specific tree. Please res end 9938016 12/15/201810;56 12117/2018 6:09 12/17/2018 6:09 Closed 311 with picture of tree and surrounding area RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 9919379 12111/2018 9:50 4/3/2019 19:12 Open sent RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees~ Overgrown_ Tree Please close out 311 request #9912071, this tree is decorated by the community and is a healthy tree so it will not be removed, the decorations come down after the 9912071 1219/2018 16:55 12/1212018 6:10 12/12/2018 6:10 Closed holidays. Please close out this 311 request. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved Close NOte: Gardner checked tree. Tree seems to be 9902345 1217/2018 7:07 12/21/2018 8:12 12/21/2018 8:12 Closed healthy not needing pruning. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Mainteriance Trees- Overgrown_Tree Please redirect to Presidio Trust. This tree is on there 9902131 1217/2018 0:31 12110/201816:59 12/10/201816:59 Closed property not RPD. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Please redirect to Presidio Trust. This tree is on there 9902127 12nt2018 0:29 12/1 0/2018 16:59 12110/201816:59 Closed property not RPD. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

9900192 12/6/201813:50 1216/201816:41 12/6/201816:41 Closed RPD Park Patrol Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Case Resolved 9879843 12/2/201813:05 12/6/2018 10:02 1216/2018 10:02 Closed Close Note: Could not locate. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 9875136 11/30/2018 21:34 1213/2018 10:48 1213/2018'1 0:48 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Re~ and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

3W32 Out on foot between 18th and 2oth and did not find 9866468 11/29/2018 8:41 11/29/201810:36 11/29/2018 10:36 Closed any tree as being described as being hazardous. Code 4 RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree This small branch has been moved out of the way of 9865697 11/28/2018 23:47 11/29/2018 0:14 11/29/2018 0:14 Closed traffic. RPD Park Patrol Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Unable to Locate. lf the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. Close Note: Please give better description of the issue 9857038 11/27/201810:58 4/1/2019 9:47 4/1/2019 9:47 Closed thank you RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance · Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved 9855033 11/26/2018 20:20 3/25/2019 10:46 3/25/2019 10:46 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved 9849607 11/25/2018 20:48 11/30/201810:47 11/30/2018 10:47 Closed Close Note: Removed. Thanks! RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Case Resolved Close Note: Forestry crew worked at this sight and made 9848683 11/25/2018 14:56 1/8/2019 8:57 1/8/2019 8:57 Closed it safe. Thank you. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved . 9848415 11/25/201813:40 1219/2018 8;06 1219/201-8 8:06 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_Other

9845937 11/24/201816:03 11/24/2018 18:11 11/24/201818:11 Closed Ranger moved tree branch to safe area and off path RPD NSA Queue R.ec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 9845875 11/24/201815:43 11/30/201810:46 i 1/30/2018 10:46 Closed Close Note: Tree will be removed. Thanks RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 9845234 11/24/201812:58 11/30/201810:46 11/30/201810:46 Closed Close Note: Tree removed. Thanks! RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 9844336 11/24/2018 9:36 11/26/2018 11:11 11/26/201811:11 Closed Close Note: Tree limbs removed RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry We do not top trees as it creates an unhealthy tree- leading to decay and stressing the tree as it sends energy to the cut area to create new branches. The best -o approach is install gutter guards which atrows the water to -....I run off the roof into the gutter and makes cleaning easier. 9836989 11/21/201814:09 11/21/201814:35 11/21/201814:35 Closed There are many brands available. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgr9wn_Tree N Unable to Locate. lfthe problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. Close Note: Please give better description of the issue 9834801 11/21/2018 8:31 4/1/2019 9:48 4/1/2019 9:48 Closed and location RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

9827203 11/19/201812:11 4/24/2019 13:10 Open Open RPD TMA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Unable to determine what is being reported in this SR since no information was given. Also, the location given 9825550 11/19/2018 9:42 11/19/201814:48 11/19/201814:48 Closed does not seem to be RPD property, RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 9821407 11/17/201816:39 11/2'7/2018 9:36 11/27/2018 9:36 Closed Close Note: Tree trimmed. Branches removed RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. Close Note: Could not find limb that matches the · description or location. Possible branch fell and was 9820632 11/17/2018 12:49 1/17/201911:56 1/17/2019 11 :56 Closed re~oved safely. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9817366 11/16/201813:08 11/20/2018 20:52• 11/20/2018 20:52 Closed RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

9814270 11/15/201816:25 2/11/201914:55 2/11/201914:55 Closed RPD Park Patrol Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- overgrown_Tree Case Resolved 9809544 11/14/201816:13 12121/2018 9:06 12121/2018 8;06 Closed Close Note: Trees trimmed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree Staff is sensitive to removing vegetation for visibility and leaving some for screening of the roadway traffic. A 9803970 11/13/201814:58 12111/2018 7:46 12111/2018 7:46 Closed balance was tried to be achieved by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9801060 11/13/2018 8:44 11/13/201812:20 11/13/2018 12:20 Closed Same as #9800841 RPD GGP Queue ReC; and Park Requests Park- UrbanF.orestry Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the iss'ue. Close Note: Please give better description of the issue 9800841 11/13/2018 8:14 4/1/2019 9:49 4/1/2019 9:49 Closed and location RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tr~e

9790534 11/10/2018 6:09 4/24/2019 13:03 Open Open RPD TMA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 9789466 11/9/201816:32 11/28/2018 6:11 11/28/2018 6:11 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9784307 11/8/2018 14:11 11/21/2018 8:35 Open Open RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Per RPD PSA manager, this tree has been inspected by RPD Urban For~stry staff and poses no threat to the 9783449 11/8/2018 12:03 12/10/2018 1.9:25 12/10/201819:25 Closed public. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

9782216 11/8/2018 8:56 11/13/2018 8:12 11/'13/2018 8:12 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved 9776917 1117/2018 7:41 11/14/2018 13:38 11/14/2018 13:38 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

9767728 11/5/2018 10:27 7/19/2019 7:27 Open Open RPD TMA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 9755501 11/2/2018 9:14 11/21/2018 9:22 11/2"1/2018 9:22 Closed Close Note: Unable to locate damage RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_ Tree

9746307 10/31/201811:38 4/24/201912:52 Open Open RPD TMA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

9731309 10/28/201 8 9:16 4/16/2019 8:48 4/16/2019 8:48 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_ Other

9731288 10/28/2018 9:09 10/28/2018 16:18 10/28/2018 16:18 Closed RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree Please tell the callerthat the exact location of the tree needs to be provided (48th Ave or the Lower Great Highway?). RPD PSA manager did not see any trees on -o the Lower Great Highway that obstructs any driver or -..1 9724456 10/26/2018 10:56 .10/31/2018 15:10 10/31/201815:10 Closed pedestri~n views. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree w Per PSA manager: This area is power washed every 9709046 10/23/2018 9:31 10/28/2018 0:11 10/28/2018 0:11 Closed we~k. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Mai:1tenance Trees- Tree~ Other

9691744 10/18/2018 19:40 10/18/2018 21 :27 10/18/2018 21:27 Closed SFFD, SFPD.& RPD responded RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees~ Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved 9682739 10/17/2018 7:36 10/19/2018 6:44 10/19/201.8 6:44 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_Other Case Resolved Close Note: Service request# 151638 was rejected by 9674276 10/15/2018 11:36 10/24/201 8 8:42 10/24/2018 8:42 Closed RPD Arborist division. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Unable to Locate. If tt'e problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. Close Note: Unable to locate, please· contact park 9669610 10/14/2018 9:33 10/26/2018 6:25 10/26/2018 6:25 Closed supervisor at 415-290-7687. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Case Resolved Close Note: Staff has investigated and have not found 9667964 10/13/201815:34 10/15/2018 17:07 10/15/2018 17:07 Closed any broken limbs. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 9666952 10/13/201811:06 10/16/2018 12:42 10/16/201812:42 Closed Close Note: Plant material was pruned back in 10/15/18. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

Case Resolved Close Note: Thank you for the 311 call. The Recreation 9642672 1018/2018 11 :54 10/11/2018 12:35 10/11/201812:35 Closed and Park Department is monitoring this site. RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 9642546 10/8/201811:31 10/29/2018 9:19 · 10/29/2018 9:19 Closed Close Note: Tree pruned RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Insufficient information was provided-for park staff to identify and/ or locate the problem. Please provide additional information in a new 311 if the issue persists. If you attach a photo, please also describe the problem and exactly where it is located. Description of.the location is 9622102 10/3/201813:08 10/4/2018 12:06 10/4/201812:06 Closed needed. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. 9622090 10/3/201813:07 1 0/5/2018 13:08 10/51201 9 13:08 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Unable to Locate. If the problem sti!! exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. 9622091 10/3/2019 13:06 10/51201813:09 10/5/201813:09 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more detal!s regarding the location ofthe issue. 9622073 10/312019 13:05 10/5/201813:07 10/5/2018 13:07 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. 9622064 10/3/2018 13:04 10/512019 13:09 10/5/2018 13:08 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved Close Note: Thank you for your feedback, your 9622045 10/3/201 9 13:00 1211712019 6;55 12117/2018 6:55 Closed suggestion will be considered. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Per PSA manager: the stump will remain in place while native and drought tolerant plants are being planted around the stump on the slope. The stump actually helps 9618434 10/21201916:16 11119/2018 7:20 11/19/2018 7:20 Closed with erosion control on that slope. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Park Patrol is on scene and tree toppers are on ootice. 9615828 10/212018 9:41 1 0/21201 9 1 0:17 10/2/2018 10:1"? Closed ranger is on scene RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban forestry Case Resolved. 9615806 10/2/2018 9:39 3/2512019 14:15 3/25/201914:15 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

9615652 10/2/2018 9:20 10/3/2018 6:34 10/3/2018 6:34 Closed RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved 9611506 101112019 11:51 3/25/2019 H:14 3/25/2019 14:14 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry 9595991 9/27/201911:13 9/27/2019 11:34 9/27/201811:34 Closed Same as #9595798 RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban_Forestry

9595798 9/27/2019 10:42 10/3/201814:41 10/3/201814:41 Closed trimming performed RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban_Forestry Case Resolved 9595497 9127/201 9 9:50 2121/2019 14:02 2/21/2019 14:02 Closed Close Note: Graffiti removed. Thank you. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry -o Case Resolved -...1 Close Note: Duplicate 311 of# 8858370, W.O. #145247 9587501 9/2512019 13:39 10/11/2019 13:37 10/11/201813:37 Closed submitted. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry ~ Response from RPD park manager: The scale of this park accommodates shrubs in this area that wiJI grow into nice healthy plants that won't have to be .removed later because of overgrowth. We are following the city policy of replacfng trees that are removed for structur~l reasons or that are dead, we are planting trees in other parks in 9574664 9f22/2018 9;50 1 0/5/201 9 9:55 10/5/2018 9:55 Closed the city. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

The location of the issue is not clear. The SR shows two different addresses. Please contact 311 to clarify the ·9572915 9/21/2019 16:49 9/22/2018 1 9_:42 9/22/2018 19:42 Closed location. RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9571936 9121/201813:32 4/23/2019 16:01 Open Open RPD TMA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 9560752 9119/201 9 9;03 10/5/2018 10:58 10/5/2018 10:58 Closed· Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_ Other Case Resolved Close Note: The tree crew came out to assess and 9557173 9119/2019 12:20 111211201911:05 11/21/2018 11:05 Closed determined that the tree is not hazardous. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

Case Resolved 9551869 9/17/2019 11:33 101212018 9:02 10/2/2018 8:02 Closed Close Note: Sprinkler mooved RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9550779 9/17/2019 9:25 9117/2019 9:27 9/17/2018 9:27 Closed RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Landscaping

Case Resolved Close Note: This snag wm be !efl. for wildfire. It's over the 9546071 9/1512019 19:19 7/9/2019 14:03 7/9/2019 14:03 Closed water and open space. RPD Natural Areas Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

9530719 9/121201 9 11 :04 9/1 9/201 9 15:15 9/1 9/201 9 15:15 Closed RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Case Resolved Close Note: Examined trees all seem to be in good 9529121 9/12/2018 7:19 1 0/5/2018 8:28 10/5/2018 6:28 Closed condition. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree Case Resolved 9526199 9/11/201 9 13:09 3/2512019 14:14 3/25/201914:14 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 9520800 9/10/201812:54 10/5/2018 8:48 10/5/2018 8:48 Closed Close Note: Inspected area found no damage trees. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree The tree on the hillside across from 89 States is on private property and belongs to 3809 16th Street. This is 9519162 9/10/2018 9:28 9/24/2018 11 :09 9/24/2018 11 :09 Closed not City Property. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park~ UrbanForestry

9517206 9/9/2018 16:47 9/11/2018 0:46 9/11/2018 0:46 Closed RPD Park Patrol Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Insufficient infonnation was provided for park staff to identify and! or !ocate the problem. Please provide additional infonnation in a new 311 ifthe issue persists. If you attach a photo, please also describe the problem and 9515304 9/9/2018 7:57 11/4/2016 0;55 11/4/2018 0:55 Closed where it is located. RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Landscaping

Case Resolved 9510518 9n/2D18 17:05 10/4/2018 12;07 10/4/201812:07 Closed Close Note: RPD Pari< Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_ Tree Per RPD PSA manager, the stump has been there for a while and helps with erosion control and stabilizes the hillside. The Monterey cypress tree is the wrong species of tree for that spot because it groy.-s 50 to 60 feet high and would become a hazard to home owners in that area. There is currently no irrigation on the stump side· of the 9509897 9n12o15 15:17 9/18/2018 15:21 9/18/2018 15:21 Closed hillside. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park. Requests Park.- UrbanForestry Unable to Locate. If the problem sti!! exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. 9506083 9/6/201 6 16:25 4/9/2019 6;06 4/912019 8:08 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP QUeue Tree Maintenance Trees~ Overgrown_Tree

9505921 9/6/2016 17:47 917!2016 9:22 9n/2018 9:22 Closed Please contact the SF City Attorney's Office. RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park~ Urbanforestry Per PSA manager: 2" diameter tree branch was 9499325 9/5/2016 12:47 9/20/2016 7:16 9/20/2018 7:18 Closed removed on 9/14/18. RPO Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved Close Note: Although the tree is not looking great it is coming back to life. Our hope is that with the coming rains, the tree wiH respond positively. We will continue to 9498599 9/5/2018 10:55 12/6/2016 14:16 1216/201814:18 Closed monitor this through the coming year and beyond. RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9459370 8/27/201813:18 1/14/2019 12:31 111412019 12:31 Closed The large logs have been removed and hauled away RPD Golf Queue Rec and Park Requests Park.- Urbanforestry

9458304 6/27/2016 10:54 10/23/2018 16:47 10/23/201816:47 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Per PSA manager: the piles of green waste have been -a 9458100 8/27/2018 10:27 912/2018 1:50 9/2/2018 1 :SO Closed removed from this site by park. staff RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park.- UrbanForestry -..J Per RPD, the decomposing log on the ground is a part of ()l a natural process, adding diversity of insect and wildlife to our environment while increasing the nutrient levels to 9455152 8/26/2018 14:33 8/29/2018 15:24 8/29/2018 15:24 Closed the neighborin~ plants. RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry Case Resolved 9453329 8/25/2018 22:37 9/17/2018 10:17 9/17/201810:17 Closed Close Note: Limb removed RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Please close this 311. Item addressed. Michelle Pa!!avicini Park Services Manager PSA6 Mission and Bema! Heights Neighborhoods San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department McClaren Lodge 1 Golden Gate Park 9451928 8/2512018 14:20 2/14/2019 15:53 2/14/2019 15:53 Closed 501 Stanyan Street 1 San Francisco, CA 194117-1898 RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees~ Landscaping Case Resolved Close Note: Tree crew Robert Sales inspected

Leaning tree not an immediate haz.ard-no a action at this time

Adjacent cypress with broken branch hanging near 9450914 6/25/2016 10:27 6/31/2016 14:25 8/3112018 14:25 Closed electrical wires will be referred to PF&E RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 9447616 8/24/2018 13:1 9 10/4/2016 13:32 1014/201813:32 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. 9444226 8/23/2018 17:18 9/28!2018 9:45 9128/2018 9:45 Closed Close Note: RPD GGP Queue Tree Mair:tenance Trees- Damaged_ Tree

9415369 8/17/201810:30 8/1712018 20:32 8/17/2018 20:32 Closed RPD NSA Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Per PSA Manager: Tree crew addressed this tree problem Monday morning 9415042 8/17/2018 9:36 8/20/2018 23:19 8/20/2018 23:19 Closed 6-20. RPD Park. Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry

9413667 8116/2018 20:38 8/20/2018 23:32 8/2012018 23:32 Closed RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park~ Urbanforestry

Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. Close Note: !looked at the trees in the area of concem 9413596 8/16/2018 19:55 11_121/201811:02 11/21/201811:02 Closed and did not see anything that looked hazardous RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry 9405329 8/15/2018 9:02 8/16/201818:48 8/16/2018 18:48 Closed Per PSA Manager. branch cleared. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

9404843 8/15/2018 7:42 8/16/2018 5:57 8/16/2018 5:57 Closed Per PSA Manager: This item has been addressed RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park. Requests Park- Urban Forestry Case Resolved 9400633 8/14/2018 10:06 3/19/201917:18 3/19/2019 17:18 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Per PSA Manager: work order#149266 has been submitted to have the hanging branch removed from this 9397619 8/13/2018 14:56 8/16/2018 4:41 8/16/2018 4:41 Closed site. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Insufficient information was provided for park staff to identify and/ or locate the problem. Please provide additional information in a new 311 if the issue persists. If you attach a photo, please also describe the problem and 9395323 8/13/2018 9:27 8/14/2018 1:20 8/14/20181:20 Closed where it is located. RPD Park Patrol Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_ Other Insufficient information was provided for park staff to identify and/ or !ocate the problem. Please provide additional information in a new 311 if the issue persists. If you attach a photo, please also .describe the problem and 9394788 8/13/2018 8:06 8/17/2018 19:51 8/17/201819:51 Closed where it is located. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Per PSA Manager: Tree branch was removed from 9392798 8/12/2018 13:24 8/15/2018 8:04 8/15/2018 8:04 Closed path and work is in progress. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Per PSA manager: resolution of this issue is in process. 9390335 8/11/2018 16:28 8/19/2018 8:21 8/19/2018 8:21 C.!osed Work order# 149384 was submitted on 8/18/18. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree Per PSA Manager: SR149142 was rejected because the arborists evaluated and indicate 'Both trees are healthy. No visual potential 9384874 8/10/2018 10:30 9/13/2018 8:27 9/13/2018 8:27 Closed hazards present.' RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Per PSA Manager: A service request has been 9383467 8/9/2018 23:01 8/20/2018 22:58 8/20/2018 22:58 Closed submitted to urban forestry. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Duplicate of 9371561 which is associated with work 9371561 8/7/201813:00 10/1/2018 1.3:50 10/1/2018 13:50 Closed order UF-3739. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_Other -o -.I 9371342 8/7/2018 12:25 8/20/2018 22:35 8/20/2018 22:35 Closed Per PSA Manager: This item has been addressed RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrovm_Tree en Per PSA Manager: Our arborists left some debris and the gardening crew will schedule the removal within the 9370723 8/7/2018 10:55 8/9/2018 1:52 8/9/2018 1 ;52 Closed next week. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9369024 8/7/2018 0:37 11/1/201815:21 11/1/201815:21 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

Case Resolved Close Note: Treep!anting is being scheduled for this fall. No contact information is available on this request. If you would !ike to discuss this further, please contact the Park 9368487 8/6/2018 19:21 8/30/2018 21:04 8/30/2018 21:04 Closed services manager at 415-831-6358. RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urbanforestry Per PSA Manager: The greenwaste is a collection spot for Glen Park Complex staN. We will ensure it gets picked up 9364237 8/6/2018 8:23 8/20/2018 23:23 8/20/2018 23:23 Closed regularly so it is not dry. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

Case Resolved 9362283 8/5/2018 14:26 8/24/201812:08 8/24/2018 12:08 Closed Close Note: Removed RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Reque~ts Park- UrbanForestry Per PSA Manager: the tree looks !ike that because it has grown near the beach where the wind has caused it to have a permanent lean but the tree is not damaged. The tree wi!! be pruned in early Nov. when ~tis the right 9359870 8/4/2018 16:32 8/20/2018 22:53 8/20/2018 22:53 Closed time to prune that species of tree RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Landscaping

Case Resolved Close Note: The Monterrey Cypress branch is growing in 9358320 8/4/2018 9:49 9/11/2018 12:00 9/11/201812:00 Closed an unusual way. It is not a broken, hanging branch. RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Per RPD PSA manager of this area, the tree at this location is not damaged, but it could use some pruning, however we cannot prune this tree until after bird nesting 9354763 8/3/201811:15 8/9/201811:15 8/9/2018 11:15 Closed season in October. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Landscaping

According to park manager, the tree toppers are· already 9339288 7/31/2018 9:07 7/31/201810:11 7/31/201810:11 Closed at Precita today working on the south side of the park. RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requesls Park- UrbanForestry

9338695 7/31/2018 7:16 7/31/2018 14:40 7/31/201814:40 Closed Tree branch removed on 7/31/18. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry 9328065 7/28/2018 11:56 10/23/2018 16:04 10/23/2018 16:04 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9321375 7/26/2018 16:40 7/27/201814:51 7/27/201814:51 Closed RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9319597 7/26/201811:39 8/20/2018 22:55 8/20/2018 22:55 Closed RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_Tree

lssue.has been resglved or a work order was issued to 9318823 7/26/2018 9:41 8/16/2018 7:00 8/16/2018 7:00 Closed the appropn"ate division. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Issue has been resolved or a work order was issued to 9316490 7/25/201815:57 8/16/2018 7:00 8/16/2018 7:00 Closed the appropriate division. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved Close Note: Tree replacement is being scheduled for this fall. No contact information was discovered in this request. If you would !ike to discuss this further, please 9312296 7/24/2018 19:23 8/30/2018 21:03 8/30/2018 21:03 Closed call the Park services manager at 415-831-6358 RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Case Resolved Close Note: Tree rep·Janting is scheduled for this fall. No contact information was included in this request. If you would like to discuss this further, please contact the Park 9312162 7/24/201818:50 8/30/2018 21:01 8/30/2018 21:01 Closed services manager at 415-831-6358. RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9303290 7/23/2018 10:34 11/1/2018 15:18 11/1/201815:18 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Per PSA Manager: park staff has scheduled the brush clean·ng work behind address 4 Crestlake Dr. for this week, but tree pruning work cannot take place until after 9302462 7/23/2018 9:01 8/20/2018 22:54 8/20/2018 22:54 Closed bird nesting season in the park. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9301281 712212018 20:12 8/2312018 1 :45 8/23/2018 1 :45 Closed RPD Natural-Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park~ UrbanForestry

930~263 7/22/2018 20:08 7/25/201813:49 7/25i2018 13:49 Closed Same as #9293013 RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry IJ -.J Issue has been resolved or a work order was issued to -.J 9298057 7/21/201818;46 8/16/2018 7:00 8/16/2018 7:00 Closed the appropriate division. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved 9293013 7/20/2018 12:03 10/10/201811:38 10/10/2018 11:38 Closed Close Note: The pine tree trunk has been taken down. RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

Case Resolved Close Note: The tree was removed. 9290021 7/19/201816:31 1116/201810:00 11/6/2018 10:00 Closed Thank you RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Tree_ Other

Case Resolved 9288248 7/19/201811:30 10110/2018 13:41 10/10/201813:41 Closed Close Note: Brush removed. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park.- UrbanForestry Case Resolved 9284845 7/18/201815:19 10/10/2018 13:40 10/10/2018 13:40 Closed Close Note: Irrigation repaired. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Pari< Requests Park- UrbanForestry Issue has been resolved or a work order was issued to 9280990 7117/2018 19:17 8/16/2018 7:00 8/16/2018 7:00 Closed the appropriate division. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9280609 7/171201817:18 8/23/2018 1:43 8/23/2018 1:43 Closed RPD Natural Areas Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request wfth more details regarding the location of the issue. Close Note: The failing trees were not able to be located Within Jackson Playground. If the issue persists, please 9273624 7/16/2018 12:20 8/30/2018 20:49 8/30/2018 20:49 Closed submit a new 311 request with specific location of issue. RPD Park Service Area 2 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9273623 7/16/2018 12:20 10/23/2018 11:21 10/23/2018 11:21 Closed Issue addressed by staff. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9270509 7/15/201819:09 7/15/2018 20:37 7/15/2018 20:37 Closed RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park: Requests Park- UrbanForestry Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location of the issue. 9270480 7/15/201818:57 10i10/201813:39 10/10/201813:39 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

9270451 7/15/201818;46 7/18/2018 0:50 7/18/2018 0:50 Closed RPD Pari< Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree 9268585 7/15/2018 9:32 7/16/2018 15:57 7/16/2018 15:57 Closed RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry Unable to Locate. If the problem still exists, please submit a new request with more details regarding the location ofttw issue. 9266690 7/14/201 8 13:58 10/10/201 8 13:39 10/10/2018 13:39 Closed Close Note: RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Issue has. been resolved or a work order was issued to 9266498 7/14/201813:15 8/16/2018 7:00 8/16/2018 7:00 Closed the appropriate division. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

9251608 7/11/2018 8:51 7/23/201813:39 7/23/2018 13:39 Closed Work order was submitted on 7/23/18. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

9247317 7/10/2018 10:14 7/25/2018 14:38 7/25/201814:38 Closed Tree branches have been removed. RPD Natural Areas Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9243555 7/9/2018 13:14 7/25/201 8 14:45 7/25/2018 14:45 Closed Please see #9293013 RPD Natural Areas Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_~ree

9242196 7/9/2018 10:13 7/11/2018 10:17 7/11/2018 10:17 Closed Staff removed debris from pathway. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree Issue has been resolved or a work order was issued to 9241838 7/9/2018 9:24 8/16/2018 7:00 8/16/2018 7:00 Closed the appropriate division. RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree 9240041 7/8/2018 17:47 7/11/2018 10:19 7/111201810:19 Closed Staff removed debris from pathway. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

9239687 7/8/2018 15:55 7/10/2018 14:28 7/10/2018 14:28 Closed RPD park staff reports the tree was removed on 7/9/18. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Ur.banForestry

Per PSA Manager: 9235974 7rrt2018 10:52 9/5/2018 8:19 9/5/2018 8:19 Closed Staff has investigated and addressed. RPD Park Service Area 5 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved Close Note: A planting plan for this area has been 9232026 7/6/2018 10:49 8/31/2018 8:20 8/31/2018 8:20 Closed established. RPD Park Service Are' a 2 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Landscaping Per PSA Manager: PO arborists are working on the 9212953 712/2018 7:44 7/5/2018 0:49 7/5/2018 0;49 Closed removal of this tree. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry ""0 -...... 1 Issue has been resolved or a work order was issued to co 9211447 7/1/201815:29 8/16/2018 7:00 8/16/201 8 7:00 Closed the appropriate division. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park R~quests Park- Urban Forestry 9208294 6/30/2018 15:26 7/15/2018 6:26 7/15/2018 5:26 Closed RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9207061 6/301201 8 10:51 711/2018 18:12 7/1/201 8 1 8:12 Closed RPD NSA Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Per PSA Manager: the gardening staff has removed the low hanging branch on Wawona and 23rd ave at this 9203830 6/29/201 8 13:55 7110/2018 0:52 7/10/2018 0:52 Closed site. RPD Park Service Area 4 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9185525 6/25/2018 19:54 719/2018 1:32 7/9/20181:32 Closed Per PSA Manager: Branch removed. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- Urban Forestry

Our Urban Forestry unit has a request to address this 9181383 6/25/2018 8:46 719/2018 1:38 7/9/20181:38 Closed tree. TMA work order UF-3711 RPD Natura! Areas Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

Case Resolved 9180184 6/24/2018 19:50 10/15/2018 8:37 10/15/2018 8:37 Closed Close Note: Tree removed RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry !ssue has been resolved or a work order was issued' to 9176285 6/23/201 8 16:27 8/16/2018 7'00 8/16/2018 7:00 Closed the appropriate division. RPD GGP Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry

9173158 6/22/2018 17:26 7110/2018 3:27 7/10/2018 3:27 Closed Per PSA Manager: This item has been addressed RPD Park Service Area 6 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park w Urban Forestry Issue has been resolved or a work order was issued to 9169088 6/21/201 8 19:10 8/16/2018 7:00 8/16/2018 7:00 Closed tfle appropriate division. RPD GGP Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Overgrown_ Tree

9165176 6/21/2018 8:00 7/8/2018 6:57. 7/8/2018 5:57 Closed Per PSA Manager: Branch removed on 6/22/18. RPD Park Service Area 3 Queue Rec and Park Requests Park- UrbanForestry Per PSA Manager: Inspected by staff and found no 9157399 6/19/2018 13:28 7/9/2018 1:51 7/9/20181:51 Closed major safety issues. RPD Park Service Area 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree

9148871 6/17/2018 18:10 7/16/201810:22 7/16/2018 10:22 Closed Fallen branch made safe. RPD Park Service Ar'ea 1 Queue Tree Maintenance Trees- Damaged_Tree I (BOS)

From: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 4:00 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: RE: SOTF- Complaint Filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force - Complaint No. 18072 Attachments: Klipp.pdf; tree countju\y2016 to June 2017.pdf; Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest (1).pdf; 2018 Annual Urban Forest Report Survey.pdf; Klipp_SOTF Responsive Letter.pdf; Klipp_ SOTF Timeline.pdf

Good afternoon,

Please find the Recreation and Park Department's response, as well as supporting documentation, attached and below:

1. List all relevant records with descriptions that have been provided pursuant to the Complainant request. (3 attachments, plus one link) tree count july2016 to June2017; Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest; 2018 Annual Urban Forest Report Survey; {{Additionally, the SFRPD Strategic Plan, is available to you at this link, with special reference to Objective 4: https ://view. joomag.com/rpd-strategic-p\a n-rpd-strategic-p\a n-update-2018/0119151001519865342 ?short 11 2. Date the relevant records were provided to the Complainant. (attached) Klipp_SOTF Timeline.docx 3. Description of the method used, along with any relevant search terms used, to search for the relevant records. Email request for responsive documents to appropriate SFRPD staff with original request attached. 4. Statement/declaration that all relevant documents have been provided, does not exist, or has been excluded. (published on NextRequest on 9.6.18) We have conducted a diligent search for records responsive to your request. We have located responsive records, which are attached. This concludes your public records request. 5. Copy ofthe original request for records (if applicable). (attached, also published on NextRequest) Klipp.pdf

Sincerely,

Tiffany Lin-Wilson Secretary

San Francisco Recreation and Park Department I City & County of San Francisco Mclaren Lodge in Golden Gate Park I 501 Stanyan Street I San Francisco, CA I 94117

(415) 831-2701 I Tiffany.Lin-Wi\[email protected]

Visit us at sfrecpark.org Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Watch us on sfRecParkTV Sign up for our e-News

P79 From: SOTF, (BOS) Sent: Friday, September 07, 2018 3:26 PM To: Pawlowsky, Eric (REC) ; Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Cc: [email protected] Subject: SOTF- Complaint Filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force- Complaint No. 18072

Good Afternoon:

You have been named as a Respondent in the attached complaint filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. Please respond to the following complaint/request within five business days.

The Respondent is required to submit a written response to the allegations including any and all supporting documents, recordings, electronic media, etc., to the Task Force within five (5) business days of receipt of this notice. This is your opportunity to provide a full explanation to allow the Task Force to be fully informed in considering your response prior its meeting.

Please include the following information in your response if applicable:

1. List all relevant records with descriptions that have been provided pursuant to the Complainant request. 2. Date the relevant records were provided to the Complainant. 3. Description of the method used, along with any relevant search terms used, to search for the relevant records. 4. Statement/declaration that all relevant documents have been provided, does not exist, or has been excluded. 5. Copy of the original request for records (if applicable).

Please refer to the File Number when submitting any new information and/or supporting documents pertaining to this complaint.

The Complainant alleges: Complaint Attached.

Both parties (Complainant and Respondent) will be contacted once a hearing date is determined. Attached is the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force's complaint procedures.

Thank you.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance, Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written PBO or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that o member of the public elects to submit to the Boord and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy. London N. Breed, Mayor Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager

SUNSHINE ORDINANCE TASK FORCE

c/o: Victor Young, Administrator

Office of the Clerk, Board of Supervisors

1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244

San Francisco, CA 94102-4689

Re: SOTF Complaint No. 18072 {Klipp v. Recreation and Park Department)

Dear Members of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force:

This letter responds to Complaint No.18072, received by our Department on September 7, 2018. His original request, received on August 2, sought various categories of information about the Recreation and Park Department's tree plantings and tree removals over the last 10 years, and its planned removals over the next 10 years, as well as its reforestation strategy city-wide. The complaint acknowledges receipt of the documents but claims that the Recreation and Park Department was "dismissive." We are unclear what that means, as we have been responsive and respectful throughout. In any case, there was no violation of the Sunshine Ordinance, and we urge the Task Force to dismiss the complaint.

We received the original request on August 2. Upon receipt, I immediately emailed the appropriate Department staff who might have relevant information. One of the individuals was on vacation, so I sent Mr. Klipp an initial response on August 7- before the 10-day deadline, which would have been August 13-to invoke a 14-day extension based on volume of the request. Based on the extension, the final response was due 14 days later on August 27.

On August 15, we produced the available information, a document titled "Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest" and a copy of the Department's StrategiC Plan with a reference to the appropriate sections dealing with trees. Although Mr. Klipp had asked for city-wide information, we volunteered that more detailed information may be available on a site-by-site basis, and asked if he was interested in any particular locations, arid even offered to "track it down," but he did not identify a specific site.

On August 20, Mr. Klipp submitted a new request, for documentation supporting the data in Appendix A to the Strategic Plan concerning city-wide removal-to-replanting ratios. He mentioned that

t•1ct..aren Lodge in Golden Gate Park I SD1 Stanyan Street I San Ftcnd~co, CA 94117 I PHONE: {415) 831-2700 I WEB: sfrecpark.org

P82 this data was usually submitted to the Urban Forestry Council. We produced the documentation on the same day, less than one hour after he requested it.

One week later, on August 27, he asked ifthere were any remaining documents. We responded that the only other potentially responsive document would be the annual report to the Urban Forestry Council. At this time, the document did not yet exist. However, instead of closing out the Sunshine Request with "no other responsive documents/' we informed Mr. Klipp that we expected the report would be prepared within the week, and that we would provide it as soon as possible. On August 29, Mr. Klipp wrote that he knew about the annual reports and that "these general documents wouldn't be fully responsive to my detailed request. It's entirely possible that RPD doesn't have documentation which is fully responsive, in which case I'd appreciate the department's affirmative acknowledgment of that."

On August 30th, we informed Mr. Klipp that "the UFC annual reports would be the only other responsive document." He responded with further questions about Department-wide and/or City-wide policies, but we did not have further responsive documents other than the UFC annual report, and so we produced the report and informed him there were no further responsive documents, on September 6. We did not get any further questions or follow-up requests from Mr. Klipp, prior to the filing ofthe complaint.

As the above summary shows, there was no Sunshine Ordinance violation. We timely produced all responsive information following a diligent search, and even left the request open with respect to the UFC report not yet in existence. We therefore urge the Task Force to dismiss the complaint. If Mr. Klipp has further questions about trees he is welcome to just contact us, or submit a different record request for site-specific information.

Sincerely,

Tiffany Lin-Wilson

P83 Edwin M. Lee, Mayor Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Tree count July 2016 to June 2017

Pruned Removed Planted Vandalized or Stolen

22 15 30 2 July 16 35 10 15 0 August 16 21 12 20 2 September 16 40 11 28 3 October 16 11 16 9 0 November 16 28 12 21 1 December 16 55 10 25 0 January17 32 23 13 3 February/7 21 10 12 0 March/7 11 9 25 0 April17 23 15 22 1 May/7 12 4 35 0 June/7

Total- 311 Total- 147 Total- 255 Total-12

1•1c!.Bren Lodge ln Golden Gate Park I 501 Stanyan Street San Francisco, a 94117 I PHONE: (415) 831-2700 WEB: sfrecpark.org

P84 London N. Breed, Mayor Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager

Sept. 14, 2018 To Whom It May Concern:

Please see the below timeline regarding Mr. Klipp's request:

8.2.18 Request Received 8.7.18 14-day extension invoked due to voluminous nature of request, with due date of 8.27.18 8.16.18 Responsive documents produced -Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest -SFRPD Strategic Plan, Objective 4 -Asked requestor ifthere is a particular location he is interested in, as information may be available on a site-by-site basis -Requestor asked for central sites where information relevant to his request is available 8.20.18 Tiffany replied that there is no specific site, but that records may be available with different divisions/individuals. Reiterated to requestor that if he had a particular location in mind, Tiffany could try to locate it · -Requestor asked for documentation for indicated time period from which data in SFRPD Strategic Plan, Appendix A is derived. Requestor also asked for a report that is annually submitted to Urban Forestry Council (at this time, the report did not yet exist) 8.20.18 Responsive document produced (in response to inquiry about Strategic Plan Appendix A) -tree count july2016 to June 2017 8.27.18 Requestor commented he is looking forward to receiving remaining responsive documents (Tiffany was out sick) 8.28.18 Requestor followed up on remaining documents. Tiffany responded that the Department is still waiting f~r the Urban Forestry Council report, which should be available within the week, and that would be the last remaining responsive document. 8.29.18 Requestor commented, "I'm aware of the (publicly available) UFC annual reports, and these general documents wouldn't be fully responsive to my detailed request. It's entirely possible that RPD doesn't have documentation which is fully responsive, in which case I'd appreciate the department's affirmative acknowledgment of that." 8.30.18 Tiffany let requestor know that the UFC annual report would be the only other responsive document, and asked ifthe requestor would like for the request to remain open/active until the report could be attached, at which point the request could be closed out. 8.30.18 Requestor commented, "The UFC reports contain data from RPD. Where does that data come from? Who maintains that? How do they track it? A few of my other questions: size, species, age, location- does RPD keep no record ofthat at all for its removals and plantings? Are there any emails between RPD employees regarding what types of trees are coming down and where? Also, any documents (e.g. emails, memos, etc.) regarding planned removals, especially given the swaths of eucalyptus, Monterey Cypress and Monterey Pines reaching their estimated end of life." 9.6.18 Requestor followed up on UFC Report. 9.6.18 Responsive document produced- 2018 Annual Urban Forest Report 9.6.18 Request closed

l"lclaren Lodge in Golden Gate Park I 501 St:anyan Street I San Fran-cisco, CA 94117 I PHONE: (415) 831-2700 WEB: sfrecpark.org

P85 A!'COM ( FIN CI S N F N IS ~s

THE BENEFITS + lOSTS o'F A COMPREHENSNE MUNICIPAL PARK TREE PROGRAM

February 2014

PREPARED FOR:

SAN FRANCISCO PILANNING o-=:PARTMENT

P86 This page intentionally left blank

P87 EXECUTIVE SU IVII\!1ARY ...... 'I Study Objectives ...... 1 Key Findings ...... 1 Recommendations ...... 1 Benefits of a Healthy Urban Forest...... 3 Challenges Facing Park Trees ... : ...... , ...... : ...... 3 A Sustainable Park Tree Program ...... 4 Study Findings ...... 5 Economic Analysis ...... 6 Financing a Sustainable Program ...... 8 Recommendations ...... 8 1. SUSTAINi~BLE PROGP~IVl COSTS ...... '1·1 Case Study Insights ...... 1 1 Methodology ...... 14 Projected Costs ...... ' ...... 18 2. Flf\IANCING OPTIONS ...... 2·1 Financing Constraints ...... ·...... 21 Most Feasible Financing Options ...... 21 3. FINDII\IGS + RECOIVIIVlENDATIOI\IS ...... 24 Study Findings ...... 25 Recommendations ...... 25 4. REFERENCES ...... 27

Financing San Francisco's Urban Fares!: Park Trees

P88 This page intentionally left blank.

P89 San Francisco's urban forest is comprised of approximately 670,000 trees on both public and private property. 1 These trees provide valuable ecological and economic services ranging from improved air and water quality to energy savings and neighborhood greening. Trees increase San Francisco's desirability as a place to live, work and visit. As part of its long-term sustainability goals, the City and County of San Francisco (City) seeks to maintain and expand its urban forest for generations to come. Park trees are a component of the larger urban forest, and San Francisco is home to approximately 131,000 trees located in parks, with 67,000 trees in developed parks (including 27,000 in Golden Gate Pari<) and 64,000 in natural areas. This study explores various options for expanding resources to better maintain, augment and care for the city's park trees.

STUDY OBJECTJVl:::S The primary objective ofthis study is to evaluate the costs and benefits of a comprehensive, municipally­ operated park tree program in San Francisco, in which the Recreation and Parks Department (RPD)2 is responsible for the planting and maintenance of all trees in public parks. Specifically, this study seeks to:

o Explore the costs of a sustainable municipal park tree program where RPD is able to establish a regular, sustainable maintenance cycle " Assess potential financing strategies to generate revenue for the implementation of a municipally-operated park tree program with a regular maintenance cycle

I{EY FINDINGS

o Routine maintenance is more efficient and cost effective, potentially reducing RPD's per-tree maintenance cost by about 74 percent by leveraging economics of scale from park pruning instead of the current approach of emergency and service request response. o Augmenting RPD staff with contractors- particularly for proactive maintenance- could increase capacity while minimizing costs. Other cities with comprehensive urban forestry programs often rely on contractors to handle a range of activities, such as increased pruning, post­ storm maintenance, and intense bursts of tree planting. Augmenting City staff with contractors could reduce program costs (e.g. staff, equipment purchase and maintenance) by 10 percent, given the efficiencies of private contractors.

RECOMMENDATIONS .. Pursue a program of canopy maintenance, planting 1,000 replacement trees per year to keep pace· with 1.5 percent annual mortality. Average annual costs for the program (including all maintenance work, in addition to planting) would total between $7.5M and $8.7M, with and without contractors. "' Fund capital costs with outside sources, such as General Obligation bonds, state grants, capital improvement program funds, and in-kind contributions. Under the scenario describ~d above, the

1 According to information provided by the United States Forest Service in its 2007 report, Assessing Urban Forest Effects and .f :I Values: San Francisco's Urban Forest, and input from DPW urban forestry personnel. 2 Within RPD, the Urban Forestry division, specific<:lily; is responsible for park tree planting and maintenance in public parks.

Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees

P90 costs of planting and establishment (early tree care and watering) would average $3.3M-$3.8M per year over 20 years, with and without contractors. '" Levy a special assessment or parcel tax, based on frontage, to fund operations and ·maintenance (O&M), A stepped parcel tax would charge the lowest fee to properties with very small frontages (under seven linear feet), and the highest fee to properties with very large frontages (greater than 500 linear feet). For the average San Francisco lot (25 linear feet), the annual fee for park tree O&M under the scenario described above, with the use of contractors, would be $15. This is substantially less than if planting and establishment were included. Limiting the funding required from property owners or residents would increase the likelihood of approval. '" Complete a citywide park tree assessment, using GIS-based technology. RPD has limited information about most of the park trees currently under its responsibility. A comprehensive park tree assessment would ensure that RPD obtains accurate inventory and data for all trees in its maintenance purview. Accurate data yields considerable efficiencies, facilitating pruning and tracking of maintenance history, ultimately helping to manage costs. " Use· technology to improve park forest management. Several GIS-based software tools exist to help manage park trees, including tree tagging and maintenance Jogging. Adopting a technology tool could increase the capacity and efficiency of record-keeping, data ·management, facilitating park tree management. • Plan reactive tree maintenance by geography. Organizing work to leverage geographic efficiencies creates more cost-effective reactive maintenance. Service calls should be organized by geography, with crews dispatched to address all service requests in the same area, reducing travel time. • Develop a Park Tree Management Plan that clearly outlines RPD's planting and maintenance plans over the long term. This would leverage economies of scale and reduce costs by implementing per­ park pruning, while also clearly demonstrating the need for capital and O&M funding to the community and municipal leaders. A San Francisco Park Tree Management Plan should also address so-called 'even-aged tree stands', where trees within a forest grouping of the same age will tend to die off at the same time. .. Undertake a public outreach campaign to elevate awareness of the importance of San Francisco's urban forest. This is a crucial step before launching any campaign to levy additional funds from residents, as it will not only communicate the funding required from the public but also illustrate the benefits to all residents.

2 Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees

P91 BENE!:: ITS OF A I-lEAL THY URBAN FOREST A healthy urban forest provides numerous environmental, social and economic benefits (Figure 1). Trees help purify water, absorb air pollution, sequester atmospheric carbon, reduce wind velocity, control erosion, and provide wildlife habitat, among other environmental benefits. San Francisco's urban forest 3 removes more than 287 to11s of atmospheric pollutants and 5,100 tons of carbon each year. In terms of social benefits, park trees can help create recreation areas, allow interaction with nature in an urban context, provide peace and quiet, and improve public health.4 The economic benefits of parks with park trees include increased property values near parks; reduced heating and cooling costs, and increased tourism.5 Trees are one of the few assets in a city that increase in value over time. Investing in a l1ealthy urban forest can provide greater returns on investment for the City and all San Francisco residents.

Figure 1. Benefits of Street Trees

CHALLENGES FACING PARK TREES As a major component of the urban forest (along with street trees), park trees face serious maintenance and funding challenges in San Francisco. The main park tree-related challenges include inadequate funding, difficult maintenance logistics, and strong public opinion on pari< trees. Fiscal constraints resulting from local, state and national economic conditions have required the City to cut funding for non­ essential services to maintain essential services such as health and safety programs. As long as San Francisco's urban forestry program is a discretionary expenditure, its funding will remain unstable and continue to fluctuate.

Inadequate Funding Successive years of budget cuts and decreases to RPD's urban forestry program have restricted its ability to sustain staffing and desired maintenance levels. The agency's effective park tree rnaintenanc~ budget has decreased for the last five consecutive years, while payroll costs have increased. Declining staff resources -that are not replaced - have further exacerbated the agency's ability to care for park trees. As of FY11-12, San Francisco park trees are anticipated to be on a 100-year pruning cycle. Professional

3 United States Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 2007. Assessing Uiban Forest Effects and Values: San Francisco's Urban Forest. Resource Bulletin NRS-8. Newton Square, PA: USDA Forest Service. 4 For example, studies show that hospital patients with views of park trees, experience faster recoveries with fewer medications and less negativity. Source: Ulrich, R.S. 1985. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape Urban Pian. 13, 29-44. Cited by McPherson, et at. 2011. Million Trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment. Landscape and Urban Plannln[J. 99, 40-50. . 5 Note that the economic benefits of parl

Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees 3

P92 standards recommend that park trees be pruned an average of every fifteen years, depending on the age and species of the tree.

Difficult Maintenance Logistics Park trees, particularly in contrast to street trees, face difficult maintenance logistics. Park trees are rarely accessible from the curb, but rather must be accessed off-road through uneven or steep forest terrain. All maintenance work must be done from uneven or steep terrain. Because maintenance needs vary across tree species, and park trees comprise a wide variety of species, park tree maintenance can be complex work. By contrast, street trees are typically uniform in species, or one of a small pool of possible species. Park trees tend to be tall, with larger crowns, and more branching. Park trees are typically between 80 to 150 feet in size; some trees are well over 150 feet tall with very large trunk diameters. Unlike the compact growth of street trees, park trees have large crowns with diffuse, radiated branching. Pruning and removing trees of this size is more difficult, involved, and time-COflSUming, as well as hazardous when branches or trunks fall.

Strong Public Opinion Regarding Park Trees Public attachment to park trees is particularly ardent, and the public response to removing, pruning, or thinning park trees can be quite aggressive. Tree maintenance, including pruning and/or removal of hazardous trees or branches, is a necessary component of park forest health, but the public sometimes misunderstands maintenance benefits and opposes tree work. RPD staff spend a significant amount of time, energy, and resources on the politics of park tree care.

A SUSTAINABLE PARK TREE PROGRAM RPD is responsible for San Francisco's 131,000 park trees in developed parl

RPD reports severe resource constraints, restricting the amount of planting and tree care it can provide. In FY11-12, RPD planted approximately 950 trees, which is less than the annual mortality rate (1,005 trees); and pruned 650 trees, all of which were responses to emergency or service calls. Given the

4 Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees

P93 benefits of a healthy urban fdrest and the risks associated with poor maintenance, RPD is exploring the potential of a lorig-term sustainable funding stream to support an expanded, comprehensive, municipally· operated program for the care of San Francisco's park trees.

Interviews with cities that have extensive park forests (e.g., Portland, Seattle, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, Toronto) revealed that all cities are attempting to realize proactive park tree care. These cities recognize the benefits that park trees provide, as well as the benefits associated with a comprehensive proactive program for their care. A strategy that increases urban forestry funding in San Francisco would allow RPD to transition from basic, bare-bones reactive care to more thorough proactive care. In this study, a comprehensive municipal park tree program is defined by the following components:

Q All park trees within developed par/(s under RPD's care would receive regular maintenance, with an average fifteen-year pruning cycle, to ensure a high standard of care. e Regular maintenance in unmaintained opeh space would be focused along property lines, hiking trails, and recreational facilities, where tree hazards would threaten people or property. o Tree maintenance work in natural areas is governed by the Significant Natural Resources Area Management Plan (SNRAMP), under the purview of the NAP. Although RPD typically undertakes this work, no regularly-scheduled proactive maintenance would be done in natural areas. Any NAP work done by RPD would fall under reactive maintenance. . o The program would maintain San Francisco's urban park forest over the next 20 years at existing levels.

STUDY FINDINGS Routine maintenance is more efficient and cost effective, potentially reducing RPD's per-tree maintenance cost by about 5 percent RPD is currently responsible for all park tree care, but, given their resource and funding constraints, RPD typically plants at a rate just shy of annual mortality and maintains trees on a hundred-year cycle. The entirety of RPD's current park tree work involves responding to service calls and emergencies. No proactive pruning is currently undertaken. By implementing routine, proactive pruning, a 'swarm crew' could prune an entire park, instead of the current approach of responding to emergencies and service requests, thus providing only spot maintenance. Preventive maintenance also translates into fewer emergencies, which are more labor intensive and therefore more costly than routine pruning. With this type of proactive operation, the City would benefit from economies of scale, as efficiencies associated with geographically organized park tree care would drive costs down. As well, under this program, all park trees would receiv(3 regular assessment and maintenance on a fifteen-year pruning cycle on average. A sustainable park tree program would also guarantee the existing level of park forest, with annual planting matching the annual average mortality rate. Augmenting staff with contractors- particularly for proactive maintenance- could increase capacity while minimizing costs. Other cities with comprehensive urban forestry programs often rely on contractors to handle a range of activities, such as increased pruning, post-storm maintenance, and intense bursts of tree planting. Augn:enting City staff with contractors could reduce program costs (e.g. staff, equipment purchase and maintenance) by 10 percent, given the efficiencies of private contractors.

Financing Sanfrancisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees 5

P94 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Sustainable Program Costs This study considered two scenarios based on San Francisco's goal of maintaining a healthy urban forest: Maintain Canopy and Expand Canopy. Discussions with RPD, as well as analysis of the current maintenance cycle, suggested that an Expand Canopy scenario is too unrealistic to pursue at this time. RPD currently struggles to match replanting to tree mortality; RPD's pruning is currently on a hundred­ year cycle, an order of magnitude off from the desired fifteen-year cycle. In addition, RPD aims to provide both forested parkland and unforested areas such as lawn space, picnic areas, athletic fields, and dog parks. A Maintain Canopy scenario maintains the balance between forested areas and other open space types. An Expand Canopy scenario is currently unsuitable, given RPD's budget and staff constraints, and the diverse types of park and open space provision. This study will focus on a Maintain Canopy scenario. Costs were estimated for the major activities associated with San Francisco's park trees: Planting, Establishment (early tree care and watering), Maintenance, and Litigation Claims. For all activities, the assistance of private contractors for a portion of the work is examined. This study evaluated two different levels of efficiency to present a range of costs for pari< tree activities. Table 1 present's average annual costs for the Maintain Canopy scenario, both with and without the use of private contractors.

Table 1: Average Annual Park Tree Costs

Planting $0.8M-$0.9M $1M Establishment $2.4M-$2.5M $2.7M-$2.9M

Maintenance $4.2M-$4.6M $4.7M

Litigation Claims $0.1M $0.1M

TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS $7.5M-$8.1M $8.5M-$8.7M

Source: AECOM 2013

The Maintain Canopy scenario sets the annual planting rate for developed parks equivalent to the mortality rate (approximately 1.5 percent per year) to ensure a stable park tree canopy. This scenario would require planting approximately 1,000 new trees per year, all of which would be replacement trees.

RPD Only With only RPD staff, the average annual cost for the Maintain Canopy scenario is $8.5M-$8.7M over 20 years. Maintenance is the most costly activity, averaging $4.7M per year, followed by establishment at $2.7M-$2.9M per year. Litigation claims average $0.1M per year. Figure 2 illustrates average costs over 20 years.

RPD and Contractors Augmenting RPD staff with private contractors brings the average annual cost for the Maintain Canopy scenario to $7.5M-$8.1 M. This represents a 10 percent cost savings compared to the RPD-only option.

6 Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees

P95 Maintenance remains the most costly activity, although decreasing by only 7 percent to $4.2M-$4.6M, followed by Establishment, which decreases 13 percent to $2.4M-$2.5M. Planting costs decrease 15 percent to $0.8M-$0.9M. Litigation Claims costs remain unchanged at approximately $0.1 M per year. Figure 3 illustrates average costs over 20 years with a portion of the work contracted privately.

Figure 2: Average Costs for the Maintain Canopy Scenario, RPD Only, FY12-FY32

80,000 $14

$12 60,000

$10 ~ ~ "" ~ {::. SB J!l 0 "":;; 40,000 u"' 0. n; :§ :::! c: 0 $6 c: 1- <>:

20,000 $4

$2

$- FY11-12 FY1p-17 FY19-20 Fv23-24 FY27·2B

( -Planting -Establishment - Maintenante ==i= Utigation Claims • •• • • Total Trees

Source: AECOM 2013

Figure 3: Average Costs for the Maintain Canopy Planting Scenario, With Contractors, FY12-FY32

80,000 514

512 60,000 ------· --···------'------·---··1

S10 .,"' i' 0 e {::. sa ~.,.. 0 ~ 40,000 u 0... .. 0 S6 " 1- " <("

20,000 S4

S2

S- FY11·12 FY16-17 FY19-20 FY2J-24 FY27-28

,_Planting - Eslablishmenl - f,lainlenance 1':;:-rl Litigation Claims •• • "'Total Trees

( Source: AECOM 2013 ·I

Financing San Francisco's Urban Foresl: Park Trees 7

P96 FINANCING A SUSTAINABLE PRQGRANI The companion study (Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Stree_t Trees) evaluated a wide range of potential financing options for municipal tree programs, and determined the most desirable financing mechanisms for San Francisco's urban forest to be a parcel tax for O&M costs, and General Obligation bonds for capital costs. This study will adhere to those financing recommendations.

Operations and Maintenance A Parcel Tax is a special tax levied for the provision of special benefits. Revenues from special taxes must be used for the specific purpose for which they are intended, so a parcel tax would create a dedicated funding stream for park trees. A parcel tax cannot be based on the value of property; however, the amount levied on each parcel need not be directly related to the benefits provided. A parcel tax requires strong public support, as it must be approved by two-thirds of all voters.

Tree Planting and Establishment

General Obligation Bonds are a common resource for lm~al governments to fund construction and improvement projects involving real property (e.g., buildings, infrastructure and parks). GO bonds typically carry low interest rates, making them attractive for capital projects. GO bonds could be a suitable tool to fund tree planting and establishment (capital costs) identified in the scenarios. Ongoing maintenance is ineligible for GO bond funding pursuant to federal tax law. California cities pay debt service from GO bonds through ad valorem property taxes, where assessments are based on property value. As a result, the issuance of GO bonds requires two-thirds voter approval. Sari Francisco voters have approved two GO bonds for RPD and park work in recent years that include funding for park tree planting and park forestry items.6 In addition to GO bonds, other resources are currently available to the City for tree planting, including state grants capital improvement program funds and in-kind contributions.

RECOMMENDATIONS " Pursue a program of canopy maintenance, planting 1,000 replacement trees per year to keep pace with 1.5 percent annual mortality. The Maintain Canopy planting scenario is the most feasible approach, given RPD's current hundred-year maintenance cycle and RPD's obligation to provide both forested parkland and unforested open space. Discussions with RPD confirmed that an ambitious Expand Canopy scenario is unsuitable to pursue at this time given staff, funding, and park space constraints. Average annual costs, with the use of contractors for all program elements (Planting, Establishment, Maintenance, and Litigation Claims) would total $7.5M-$8.1 M over 20 years. " Fund capital costs with outside sources, specifically park tree· planting and establishment. Funding capital costs with outside sources would complement a parcel tax, focused exclusively on O&M, as described below. Under the Maintain Canopy planting scenario, with the use of contractors, capital costs would average $3.3M per year over 20 years. GO bonds, with monies for RPD, could be used to fund park tree capital costs. Although GO bonds are very low interest bonds, they will still result in a cost to the City. Alternatively, capital costs could be funded through grants or in-kind contributions from public and private sources. While properly financing ongoing O&M activity can be difficult, capital sources have historically been more accessible, either through private grants or through state and federal dollars. An assortment of resources is currently available to the City for tree planting, including state grants and capital improvement program funds.

6 Proposition A (February 2008) was a GO bond for $185M, of which $151.5M went to RPD. $4M of bond proceeds were allotted to tree planting and restoring the aging park tree canopy. Proposition B (November 2012) was a GO bond that included another $4M for park forestry initiatives.

8 Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees

P97 0 Levy funds for ongoing maintenance of San Francisco's park trees (Claims are paid out of separate litigation fund). This would fund the O&M of all existing park trees, as well as O&M of new (replacement) trees planted with separate, capital funds. O&M activities average $4.4M per year over 20 years with the use of contractors. This translates into a parcel tax of approximately $0.45-$0.51 per linear foot. This study recommends creating frontage brackets, with corresponding tiered fees based on the per-linear-foot cost, as shown in Table 2. Fees per bracket are roughly proportional to the per-linear-foot cost for the average linear frontage within each bracket, with nominal modifications to ensure that program costs are covered by the estimated revenue. These figures are substantially less than if planting and establishment were included. Limiting the funding requirements from property owners or residents would increase the likelihood of approval.

Table 2: Tiered Parcel Tax Fees, Based on Frontage Brac/(ets, Assuming the Use of Contractors

Apartment 0-7 $5-$7

Average Residential Lot 7-30 $14-$15

Large Residential Loll Corner Lot/ Small Business 30-150 $29-$34

Large Non-Residential Lot 150-500 $94-$104

Ultra-Large Commercial Lot Greater than 500 $299

Note: The fee ranges represent the fee difference between high and low efficiency scenarios. Where there is no range, both scenarios arriV!l at the same fee. The differences in these scenarios reflect different cost assumptions. Source: AECOM 2013

0 Complete a citywide park tree assessment, using GIS-based technology. RPD has limited information about most of the park trees currently under its domain. A comprehensive park tree assessment would provide RPD with a complete park tree inventory, along with accurate data for all trees in its maintenance purview. Accurate data, such as tree size and tree health, yields considerable efficiencies, facilitating pruning and tracking of maintenance history, ultimately helping to manage costs. o Use technology to improve park forest management. Several GIS-based software tools exist to help manage park trees, including tree tagging and maintenance logging. Adopting a technology tool could increase the capacity and efficiency of record-keeping, data management, facilitating park tree management. o Plan reactive tree maintenance by geography. Organizing work to leverage geographic efficiencies creates more cost-effective reactive maintenance. Service calls could be organized by geography, with crews dispatched to address all service requests in the same area, reducing travel time. " Develop a Park Tree Management Plan that clearly outlines RPD's planting and maintenance plants over the long term. This would leverage economies of scale and reduce costs by implementing per­ park pruning, while also clearly demonstrating the need for capital and O&M funding to the community and municipal leaders. A San Francisco Park Tree Management Plan should also address so-called 'even-aged tree stands'. In many of San Francisco's parl

Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees 9

P98 This study recommends that, as part of any Park Tree Management Plan, RPD do further analysis of tree ages in San Francisco, and develop a plan to diversify even-aged tree stands and deal with simultaneous die-offs. .. Undertake a public outreach campaign to elevate awareness of the importance of San Francisco's urban forest. This is a crucial step before launching any campaign to levy additional funds from residents, as it will not only communicate the funding required from the pu,blic but also illustrate the benefits to all residents.

10 Financing San Francisco's Urn an Forest: Park Trees

pgg ,.~~ Elill ..,_,.,::t;•M' [j ~f El L~

CASE: STUDY INSIGHTS As part of this study, employees at the cities of Portland, Seattle, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia and Toronto were interviewed regarding their experiences with their respective urban forestry programs, specifically in parks and natural areas. BecEjuse the previous study of street trees identified the most feasible financing strategies while focusing primarily on California cities to reflect municipal financing constraints, these park tree case studies expanded to cities beyond California. The goal was to speak with representatives from a range of different urban forestry models to glean lessons learned regarding the management of park trees. Although the cities may differ from San Francisco in some respects (e.g., number of park trees, species, budget), all reported limited resources and reactive care for park trees, similar to Sari Francisco. This and other themes are discussed below.

Reactive Pruning All six cities contacted reported reactive management of park trees due to a lack of resources. This includes New York City, which is considered to hCJVe a robust urban forestry program (Barrick, pers. comm., 2013). Most cities also noted that priorities are focused on street trees, because of a greater i perceived need for maintenance in high use areas. All agreed that no industry standard exists for pruning \ park trees, and, as a result, many have looked to the standards set for street trees (i.e., every five years, on average). Seattle has targeted a 1 0-year cycle, Philadelphia a seven-to-ten year cycle, and Toronto a seven-year cycle, although all report falling short of this goal as a result of limited resources (Mead, pers. comm., 2013; Blaustein, pers. comm., 201 ;, Gayle, pers. comm., 2013). New York City recently doubled . its staff of foresters7 with the goal of a seven-year cycle, although the City would consider achieving a 10- year cycle a success (Bmrick, pers. comm., 2013). Chicago notes losing valuable time by responding to citizen complaints and storm damage and is interested in implementing a regular pruning cycle for park trees, with a focus on small, young trees (Scott, pers. comm., 2013).

Seattle and Toronto both report experience with proactive park tree care. For four years, Seattle had additional funding from a parks levy, which enabled a transition from 75 percent reactive I 25 percent proactive care to a 50 I 50 split and as a result, reported fewer hazards, such as limb failures, and consequently, fewer overtime calls. In addition, the City reports that. the ability to .perform preventive tree removals reduced its liability. Seattle also noted that crews accustomed to conducting mostly reactive care may require training and standards if they are to shift to proactive care. Toronto has been transitioning from reactive to proactive care over the last few years, beginning with its street trees, due to an infusion of new funding. The City conducted a proactive park tree pilot several years ago that mapped park locations, high use facilities (e.g., wading pools, playgrounds, splash pads) and tree canopy and within the intersection of these three elements, identified priority areas and proactive work needs or "hot

7 New York City Is In the process of hiring len new foresters, in addition to the existing fourteen (Barrick, pers. comm. 2013). New York City also employs an in-house crew of 100 climbers and pruners for both park and street trees (Barrick, pers. comm. 2013), Note thal Chicago employs 28-31 staff members, with all planting work done by contractors (Scott, pers. comm., 2013}; Philadelphia employs 30 arborists who work primarily (although not exclusively) on park trees (Blaustein, pars. com., 2013}; Portland employs one inspector, 13 arborists, and 5 seasonal grounds people who spend two-thirds of their lime on park tree work (Maginnis, pars. com., 2013); and Seattle has two tree crews of 7 staff plus one supervisor (Mead, pers. com., 2013}.

Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest; Park Trees 11

P100 spots". The City is currently reviewing lessons learned, with plans to streamline the program and roll it out citywide (Gayle, pers. comm., 2013).

Natural Areas Of the six cities interviewed, all reported limited maintenance of trees in natural areas with no interest in implementing routine pruning. The focus is instead on ecosystem-based management that involves vegetation management, such as invasive species removal, and the restoration of native trees and vegetation. Any pruning and removals that do occur focus on reducing hazards where a target exists (i.e., along trails that receive high use). Chicago reports a reluctance to send its crews into natural areas, given how different the work is from pruning trees in developed· parks (i.e., difficulties with access) (Scott, pers. comm., 2013). Portland and Seattle both report pruning trees in natural areas in response to concerns voiced by adjacent property owners, and Seattle has a permit program for removals that improve views (Mead, pers. comm., 2013, Maginnis, pers. comm., 2013). Philadelphia notes that its two largest natural areas abut development, resulting in numerous service calls, which presents.a major challenge for the City (Blaustein, pers. comm., 2013).

A number of the cities interviewed rely heavily on volunteers and grants for work in their natural areas. The Green Seattle Partnership is an eight-year-old program that relies on 150 dedicated regular volunteers, with 65 events and 80,000 total volunteer hours annually. The program leverages investments 2:1 from a range of sources including small grants, non-profit organizati.ons and individual donations. In addition, the City has collaborated with the Seattle Public Utilities Commission to manage wetlands mitigation, which will provide revenue for the natural areas program (Mead, pers. comm., 2013). New York City recently launched a new partnership with a non-profit organization, in recognition that the City's natural area crews cannot handle all of the work (Barrick, pers. comm., 2013). Philadelphia's natural areas program is 100 percent grant-funded (Blaustein, pers. comm., 2013).

Technology Several cities interviewed reported the use of technology to improve the management of their respective urban forests. A main objective of Toronto's pilot of proactive care for park trees was to test the incorporation of GIS-tagging-Arbotag-into its inspections of park trees. The technology allowed the City to build its inventory and help locate trees in need of pruning (Gayle, pers. comm., 2013). New York has created urban forest management plans for several small parks (1 0-12 acres in size) that include GPS inventories of tree species, class and condition (Barrick, pers. comm., 2013). Chicago stated that an ideal scenario would be to inventory each tree and compile the data into a GIS-based software program that would track tree conditions and promptly respond and remove trees that exhibit warning signs (Scott, pers. comm., 2013). Philadelphia relied on UDAR that the US Forest Service used to conduct a canopy study of the city, to identify targeted areas for planting (Blaustein, pers. comm., 2013).

Geographic Efficiencies San Francisco has expressed an interest in a proactive program in which crews perform maintenance . work on all trees in a single park, as a way to increase efficiency and track work progress. Organizing work to leverage geographic efficiencies emerged as a theme in the interviews with other cities. Portland is rolling out a pilot project for two parks, where the City will evaluate all trees and determine maintenance needs with the goal of pruning all trees and addressing all hazards so that the City can move on to other parks (Maginnis, pers. comm., 2013). Chicago had a goal of pruning all trees in a single park but currently lacks the resources to implement such an approach (Scott, pers. comm., 2013). Philadelphia reported efficiencies from travel time and equipment usage (Blaustein, pers. comm., 2013). New York City rolled out proactive street tree blocl< pruning this year and expanded this to small parks and playgrounds in

12 Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees

P101 some areas (Barrick, pers. comm., 2013). Toronto organizes its service calls by geographic area and dispatches crews to conduct both reactive and proactive maintenance in the same area in order to reduce travel time (Gayle, pers. comm., 2013).

Private Contractors All six cities interviewed reported using private contractors for park tree maintenance, at varying levels. Neither Seattle nor Philadelphia has a regular contractor budget for park tree O&M. Seattle has contracted out hazardous tree abatement in the past, because the work is considered beyond the scope ·of its tree crews (Mead, pers. comm., 2013). Philadelphia reports only occasional use of contractors for park tree maintenance, primarily because the City contracts out all street tree pruning. However, Philadelphia does contract out the planting of trees in parks and requires contractors to guarantee survival as an incentive for watering, as well as a cost control measure (Blaustein, pers. comm., 2013). New York City also has performance standards for its contractors, setting pruning productivity requirements, although this applies to street tree block pruning, which the City rolled out this year; in­ house crews handle any pruning of park trees (Barrick, pers. comm~. 2013), Chicago contracts out most of its planting, along with a handful of removals and occasional help with storm damage work each year. Contractors also handle most of the tree work in natural areas. Chicago contracted out pari< tree pruning for the first time this year, focusing on young, small t~ees because of the low cost per tree. However, the City is not sure that using contractors is more efficient or cheaper than using in-house staff, as hiring contractors can be difficult, depending on the fund from which money is allocated (Scott, pers. comm., 2013). Portland plans to contract out its pilot project for park tree pruning (discussed under Geographic Efficiencies) on a cost-per-tree basis. The City reports experiencing greater productivity with private contractors conducting routine pruning but feels strongly that in-house crews should handle reactive ( pruning, as they have the heavy equipment to handle large jobs (Maginnis, pers. comm., 2013). Toronto relies heavily on contractors to meet their planting, pruning and removal needs (Gayle, pers. comm., 2013).

Coordination/Synergy A number of the cities interviewed reported capitalizing on synergies and other creative approaches to improve the management of park trees and control costs. Portland is training its litter-pickers to provide updates on hazardous trees in parks. The City also notes the benefits of a single park inspector who is familiar with all environmental zones and serves as the main point of contact. The inspector selects several parks per year to inspect thoroughly, with a focus on high-use parks (Maginnis, pers. comm., 2013). Toronto recently rolled out a checklist for monthly safety inspections of its playgrounds, and the Urban Forestry Branch is adding a high-level screen of trees to identify obvious hazards (Gayle, pers. comm., 2013). Philadelphia has received a small grant to train entry-level staff to conduct groundwork, including some pruning, mulching and weeding, and knowing when to contact the tree crew when larger trf)e work arises. The City has also engaged its citizens in street tree planting, having them perform cursory surveys of open planting sites and opportunities (Blaustein, pers. comm., 2013). Most park trees pruned in New York City are done so via "separation" pruning, Where bond monies fund pruning in preparation for park construction projects. This approach has allowed the City to manage costs while implementing pruning on a park-by-park basis, depending on planned improvements (Barrick, pers. comm., 2013).

Portland, Toronto, New York City and Philadelphia all manage park and street trees within the same agency. It is unclear whether this results in operational efficiencies-New York City notes that they likely I ,I·, provide less care to park trees than other cities that manage street and park trees separately. However,

Flnandng San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees 13

P102 one benefit of the single agency is the ability to manage the urban forest at a landscape level. For example, New York City develops green infrastructure in addition to planting trees to maximize biodiversity and stormwater benefits (Barrick, pers. comm., 2013).

METHODOLOGY This study estimated the costs of a sustainable park program over 20 years. FY12-FY13 represents Year 1, and FY31-FY32 represents Year 20. Costs were estimated by categories that represent RPD's current and ideal approach to park tree care: Planting, Establishment (early tree care and watering), and Maintenance (reactive and proactive). Although not a programmatic cost, this study also estimated the costs associated with claims paid by the City for park-tree related personal injuries and property losses, to account for the full costs historically associated with the care of pari< trees in San Francisco. Baseline data from FY11-12 provided insights into likely future costs; where applicable, projections within some categories relied on data from prior years as well. Extensive interviews with City staff from RPD informed data inputs and assumptions. In addition, interviews with other cities provided insights into future costs and potential cost savings.

Park Tree Scenarios This study initially created two scenarios: one to examine the costs of sustainably managing San Francisco's park trees over the next 20 years (Maintain Canopy), and one to examine the costs of increasing the size of San Francisco's park tree canopy over the next 20 years (Expand Canopy). The Ex.pand Canopy planting scenario would increase San Francisco's park tree canopy by 15 percent, planting 20,000 new trees over the next 20 years, in addition to replacement trees. Discussions with RPD, as well as analysis of current maintenance cycle, suggested that an Expand Canopy scenario is too unrealistic to pursue at this time. RPD currently struggles to match replanting to tree mortality, and the department's pruning is currently on a hundred-year cycle, an order of magnitude off from the desired fifteen-year cycle. An Expand Canopy scenario is currently too ambitious, given RPD's budget and ,staff constraints. In addition, RPD has an obligation to provide not just forested parkland, but also unforested open space such as lawn space, picnic areas, athletic iields, and dog parks. Maintaining the tree canopy, as opposed to expanding the canopy, preserves other RPD open space programming. Therefore, this report focuses on a Maintain Canopy scenario, which would maintain the park tree canopy at 131,000 trees over 20 years.

While Reactive Pruning and Removals do iQclude some trees in natural areas, Planting, Establishment, and Proactive Pruning focus on trees in developed parks and property-adjacent portions of unmaintained open space, with the goal of implementing a 15-year pruning cycle. Consistent with RPD's current approach, and that of other cities interviewed, trees in natural areas do not receive regular pruning.

The Maintain Canopy scenario sets the annual planting rate for developed parks equivalent to the mortality rate (approximately 1.5 percent per year) to ensure a stable park forest. This scenario would require planting approximately 1,000 new trees per year, all of which would be replacement trees. 8 Table 3 illustrates the level of Planting, Establishment, and Reactive and Proactive Maintenance that would accompany the Maintain Canopy scenario.

0 1.5 percent of the 67,000 park trees in developed pari

14 Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees

P103 Table 3, Park Tree Activities under the Maintain Canopy Scenario,

Trees Planted 955 1,005 1,005

Trees Established 920 955 3,015

Trees Pruned- Reactive 650 650 650

Trees Removed- Reactive 300 300 300

Trees Pruned- Proactive 0 4,000 4,000

Source: AECOM 2013

This scenario represents a significant increase in park tree activities- especially'proactive pruning and establishment- compared to current conditions. In FY11-12, RPD planted 955 park trees and established 920. RPD pruned 650 park trees (all of which were reactive rather than proactive pruning) and removed 300. More information on the level of activity associated with both the Maintain Canopy scenario is provided below under "Assumptions".

Efficiency Gains This study explored the effects of a sustainable park tree program on efficiency and consequently, program costs. For example, proactive maintenance of pari< trees would allow RPD to plan maintenance work for entire parks, rather than visit individual trees across the city in response to service calls, and significantly increase the number of trees pruned within the same period of time by cutting down on the time needed for travel. This study evaluated a range of efficiency gains. To represent the lower end of the range, this study used RPD's existing costs as the basis for Planting, Establishment and Maintenance annual costs. This represents the maximum cost of a municipally operated program. To represent maximum efficiency, this study assumed RPD's existing cost for Planting and Establishment and a decrease in Maintenance costs as a result of coordinated proactive pruning. No baseline data exists for proactive maintenance, as RPD currently conducts only reactive maintenance. Therefore, this study relied on RPD's expected crew performance (trees planted and( pruned per year) for the low end of the range and information regarding typical crew performance from the City of Seattle for maximum efficiency with respect to proactive maintenance. Costs for reactive maintenance reflect RPD's current costs for pruning and removals; no ·efficiencies or cost reductions were assumed for this activity. The sections below provide more detailed assumptions associated with the assumed efficiency gains.

Assumptions This section provides more detail on the assumptions associated with the level of effort and costs of Planting, Establishment, Reactive Maintenance, Proactive Maintenance and Claims under the Maintain Canopy scenario. All costs described below are fully burdened, accounting for overhead, fringe and materials; equipment is accounted for separately, consistent with RPD budgeting practices. An annual escalation rate of 2 percent was applied to all RPD costs to account for cost of Jiving adjustments (COLAs) granted to public employees.

This study explored the use of private contractors for all park tree activities to determine the effect on costs. Costs were estimated for two options: one where private contractors would provide additional capacity for RPD in the areas of Planting, Establishment, and Proactive Pruning; and one where RPD would conduct all work under a sustainable program. This study estimated private contrCJctor costs using

Financing San Francisco's Uruan Forest: Park Trees 15

P104 typical crew performance from the City of Seattle and RPD's labor costs. 9 However, actual rates will depend on negotiations between San Francisco and private contractors, and will be subject to prevailing wage and local business enterprise requirements. For Maintenance, labor was assumed to comprise 80 percent of contractor costs, with equipment accounting for the remaining 20 percent, based on input from Santa Monica, which operates a municipal urban forestry program. A contingency of 10 percent was also added to all private contractor costs, so that estimates are conservative. This study therefore presents reasonable estimates of costs for private contractors in the categories of Planting, Establishment, and Maintenance. The sections below provide more detail on the assumptions applied to determine capacity (e.g., trees planted) and unit costs (e.g., cost per tree planted) for each scenario in the categories of Planting, Establishment, Maintenance, and Claims. All costs were estimated on a per-tree basis. Costs are presented in current year terms (2012). 10 Table 4 presents the range of costs per tree used to estimate costs for a sustainable park tree program.

Table 4. Annual Park Tree Costs by Provider, Per Tree

Planting $802-$842 $680-$715

Establishment $831-$873 $705-$745

Reactive Maintenance $1,900 N/A

Proactive Maintenance $N/A $410-530

Claims $1.14 $1.14

Source: AECOM 2013, RPD 2013

Notes: Maintenance includes pruning and removals

Planting11 In FY11-12, RPD planted 955 trees in developed parks. Under the Maintain Canopy scenario, RPD would ramp up to 1,000 plantings per year in Year-1 and continue this level of planting through Year-20. RPD's planting costs would range from $842 per tree without efficiency gains to $802 per tree with efficiency gains. 12 These costs account for inspections and other small tasks associated with RPD tree planting. Contractor planting costs, which assume approximately 15 percent savings, are estimated to be a high of $715 and a low of $680 per tree (Table 4). 13

Establishment After planting, RPD currently provides early tree care, to ensure that newly planted trees become established. This study assumes that RPD would provide three years of establishment for all of the trees

• Precedent contractor costing was unavailable for RPD park tree work. 10 2012 dollars are used to be consistent with companion report Financing San Fra.ncisco's Urban Forest: Street Trees 11 Note that RPD tracks Reforestation activities, which Includes Planting and Establishment (early tree care). To separate thesE; activities, this report assumed that 50 percent of the annual Reforestation costs could be attributed to Planting, and 50 percent to Establishment. This assumption is consistent with the cost findings in the companion report Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Street Trees, and was confirmed in conversation with RPD. 12 In the absence of labor data from RPD for effiCiency gains (apprentice labor costs, etcetera), this report assumed a marginal Increase iri efficiency in planting (1 :1 replacement) while l

16 Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest Park Trees

P105 that agency personnel plant. Park trees planted by private contractors would follow the same model, receiving three years of watering and early tree care.

In FY11-12, RPD provided establishment for approximately 920 newly planted trees. Under a municipal program, RPD would provide establishment to approximately 955 trees in Year 1, which would steadily increase and stabilize at 3,015 per year in Year 4, based on planting activity. Establishment currently costs RPD $873 per tree per year, which represents the high end of the cost range; this cost would decline to a low of $831 per tree with efficiency gains; contactor costs for establishment would range from $745 to $705 (Table 4).

Maintenance In FY11-12, RPD maintained 950 trees (650 trees pruned and 300 trees removed). All pruning was reactive, as RPO: currently conducts pruning by responding to service calls and emergencies. As a result,· the current maintenance cycle for trees in developed parks is, on average, over 100 years, although trees in Golden Gate Park receive more frequent pruning. Unlike street trees, no industry standard exists for pruning park trees, a fact that many of the cities interviewed noted. This study assumed that both scenarios would involve a 15-year pruning cycle (on average). This represents a dramatic improvement over current practices while acknowledging that park trees do not require the same frequency of maintenance as street trees, which face a harsher environment. Under the Maintain Canopy scenario, proactive pruning levels would vary in Year 1, depending on whether RPD uses contractors to meet capacity. If RPD conducted all proactive pruning, the agency woult:l ramp up from 800 trees in Year 1 and level off at approximately 4,000 in Year 5, assuming a proactive maintenance staff of 13 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. With the use of private contractors, approximately 4,000 trees would receive proactive pruning from Year 1 through Year 20. At the same time, RPD would continue current levels of reactive maintenance (650 trees pruned and 300 trees removed per year), as service calls (e.g., from property owners abutting parks) and emergencies (particularly resulting from deferred maintenance) 9re expected to continue. This is considered to be the minimum level of reactive maintenance that RPD can provide without complaint. RPD would conduct all reactive pruning and removals in-house, with their current staff of twelve FTE.14 Reactive Maintenance currently costs RPD approximately $1,90015 per tree each year. This is an average cost that il;lcludes both pruning and removals, as RPD does not track these activities separately. This cost does not currently realize any efficiencies from pruning entire parks, as would be the case with Proactive Pruning. Reductions in travel time and pruning time, by largely eliminating deferred maintenance, would significantly reduce annual Proactive Pruning costs to approximately $505 per tree. These costs are based on RPD's best estimate of the number of trees maintenance crews could reasonably prune in a year (1 ,000 trees per three-person crew) along with input from the City of Seattle regarding the low-end of industry standards for pruning (1 ,200 trees per three-person crew). Proactive Pruning would not include any removals, which fall under the category of Reactive Pruning. RPD would require approximately $90,000 per year for vehicles and equipment for Reactive and Proactive Pruning, based on a 12-year lifetime. Private contractors were assumed to prune a greater number of trees per year than RPD, resulting in lower costs per tree. According to the City of Seattle, the industry standard for pruning park trees is

14 Current staff of twelve for pruning includes the Golden Gate Park tree crew (1 supervisor, 2 climbers, and 2 laborers), the Parks and Squares tree crew (1 supervisor and 2laborers), the Contact tree crew (1 supervisor and 2 climbers), and 1 additional climber who can assist any crew. 15 This per-tree cost is a conservative number, based on RPD's Urban Forestry staff costs and trees touched in 2012. Some reactive tree maintenance work requires additional RPD staff- such as teamsters or operating engineers- from other RPD divisions. According to Kelly Cornell, Urban Forestry Supervisor, the per-lree cost can rise by approximately $250-$2,000, depending on involvement of other RPD staff. This study focuses primarily on Urban Forestry staff costs. ·

Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees 17

P106 between 1,200 and 2,000 trees per three-person crew per year. Contractors were assumed to prune between 1,400 and 1,800 trees per three-person crew, just above and below the industry average, respectively, for a per tree cost of between $345 and $440. These costs include 20 percent for equipment, according to information on Santa Monica's contracts for street trees. 16 This study assumed that RPD could absorb the costs of overseeing private contractors with one additional supervisory personnel.

Claims San Francisco pays Claims related to park trees under the categories of personal injury and property loss. Claims in both of these categories are minimal, with· an average of less than one personal injury claim and nine property loss claims over the last five years ( Table 5). The incidence of each claims category and the corresponding cost per claim were applied to both scenarios to determine the total claims cost for all park trees over the study's 20-year timeframe.

Table 5. Claims Related to Park Trees, 2008-2012

2008 $695,500 $695,000 N/A N/A

2009 $1,800 $1,800 $87,510 17 $5,148

2010 $0 0 N/A $28,348 14 $2,025

2011 $0 0 N/A $7,869 7 $1,124

2012 $0 0 N/A $17,726 5 $3,545

AVERAGE $139,460 0.4 $139,460 $28,291 B.B $2,368

Source: RPD 2013

NOTES: Total Payment and Payment/Claim figures adjusted to 2012 dollars.

The cost projections described in this report do not make assumptions regarding any reduced incidence of claims that may occur under a sust13inable park tree program, as data is not available to·support such assumptions. Therefore, cost estimates associated with claims are conservative and may decline over time should San Francisco take a more aggressive approach towards preventive park tree maintenance.

PROJECTED COSTS This section discusses the projected costs of a municipally-operated park tree program in San Francisco, based on the assumptions detailed above. Estimated costs are presented for the Maintain Canopy scenario, both with and without contractors. As mentioned previously, costs are presented for Planting, Establishment, Maintenance, and Claims associated with San Francisco's park trees. Table 6 presents the average annual costs for the Maintain Canopy planting scenario. The sections below discuss the specific costs in greater detail.

16 Data was not available for park tree contracts from San Francisco or other cities.

18 Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Parll Trees

P107 Table 6: Average Annual S~reet Tree Costs, Maintain Canopy Scenario

Planting $0.8M·$0.9M $1M

Establishment $2.4M·$2.5M $2.7M-$2.9M

Maintenance $4.2M·$4.6M $4.7M

Litigation Claims $0.1M $0.1M TDTALANNUAL COSTS . $7.5M:$8,1M $8.5M-$B. 7M

Source: AECOM 2013

NOTE: May not sum to totals due lo rounding

RPD and Contractors The average annual cost of the Maintain Canopy scenario with the use of private contractors is approximately $7.5M-$8.1 M. Figure 4 illustrates the average annual costs over 20 years. Maintenance is the most costly activity, averaging $4.2M-$4.6M per year, followed by establishment at $2.4M-$2.5M per year. Litigation claims· average $0.1 M per year.

( RPD Only \ Without private contractors, the average annual cost of"the Maintain Canopy planting scenario is approximately $8.6M (range of $8.5M-$8. 7M). This represents a 10 percent increase in costs, compared to the option discussed above, where contractors conduct a portion of the work. The average cost in Year 1 is about $4.2M, increasing to approximately $11M in Year 20. Figure 5· illustrates average annual costs over 20 years. Maintenance remains the most costly activity, averaging about $4.7M per year, although it experiences the smallest increase- 7 percent higher than with the use of contractors. Establishment, which remains the second most costly activity without contractors, experiences a 13 percent increase, averaging $2.8M per year. Annual planting costs experience the greatest increase- 15 percent­ averaging $1.0M per year. Litigation Claims costs are unchanged at approximately $0.1 M per year.

Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees 19

P108 Figure 4: Average Costs for the Maintain Canopy Scenario, RPD with Contractors, FY12-FY32

80,000 $14

$12 _60,000

S10 :? ~ !;>;. f!; ~ -"' SB ~ 0 40,000 (.)" c.."' 'B :r 0 'S6 '" .... ~"

20,000 $4

$2 .

$- FY11-12 FY16-17 FY19-20 FY23-24 FY27-28

-Planting -Establishment -Maintenance Litigation Claims .. • • •• Total Trees

Source: AECOM 2013

Figure 5: Average Costs for the Maintain Canopy Planting Scenario, RPD Only, FY12-FY32

r--~------·----~-·------·---·---·------··~·---·-·--······-· ·-·- 80,000 S14

$12 60,000

$10 :: :E ~ 12 f.:: $8 1l -"' 0 40,000 (.)" c.."' 'Ei :J 0 '" .... $6 <>:"

20,000 $4

$2

S- FY11-12 FY16-17 FY19-20 FY23-24 FY27-28

-Planting ....., Establishment _,Maintenance ,~··'-"-'"'Litigation Claims • • • • • Total Trees

Source: AECOM 2013

20 Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees

P109 . . iZI ~ ~ N T ~ The companion study, Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Street Trees, includes a detailed discussion of funding options for San Francisco's trees. This chapter summarizes the findings of that report.

FINANCING CONSTRAINTS Local governments in California face considerable constraints when it comes to raising revenue from property owners. Proposition 13, approved by California voters in 1978, limits the ability of local public entities to increase properiy taxes, the main tool typically used to generate municipal revenue. Proposition 13 also requires that two-thirds of voters approve any new property tax levied to fund specific services. Cities, counties and other local entities responded by shifting their focus to assessments, fees and other taxes (e.g., hotel occupancy taxes, business license fees) as mechanisms for generating revenue. In 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, which placed similar limits on the use of these alternative tools to raise revenue for local governments. Proposition 218 requires voter approval for all taxes and the majority of fees and special assessments levied on property owners. In addition, all property-based assessments must fund "special benefits", defined as services that are above and beyond the general benefits that local governments typically provide (e.g., police, fire, transportation) (LAO 1996). Special benefits encompass a wide range of services related to economic development, neighborhood ( improvements, and infrastructure development, such as a higher level of park tree care than that currently \. provided. However, in order to levy an assessment, local governments must calculate the benefit, or nexus, to each property owner and set the assessment amount accordingly, before requiring majority approval from voters (LAO 1996). Proposition 218 also requires voter approval for any increase in special assessments, unless initially approved upon creation of the assessment.

MOST FEASIBLE FINANCING OPTIONS Despite these constraints, a number of options are available to RPD to finance the costs of a park tree program, including parcel taxes, service fees, General Fund expenditures, General Obligation bonds, Cap-and-Trade, and so on. The companion study Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Street Trees p~ovides greater detail on the attributes, processes, opportunities, challenges, and precedents associated with each of these options. The Street Trees report concludes that the most feasible financing option for San Francisco's urban forest is a parcel tax for O&M costs and General Obligation (GO) bonds for capital costs. Refer to Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Street Trees for a discussion of other financing options. 17

Parcel Tax A parcel tax is a special tax levied for the provision of special benefits. Revenues from spedal taxes must be used for the specific purpose for which they are. intended, so a parcel tax would create a dedicated funding stream for park trees. Similar to a special assessment, a parcel tax cannot be based on the value

17 Note that, historically, funding has been more available for park Ires worl<, through bonding, general fund revenue, or other sources, than for street tree work. (

Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees 21

P110 of property; however, the amount levied on each parcel need not be directly related to the benefits provided (ILG 2008). Cities have the flexibility to levy parcel taxes as they see fit, but they are typically based on lot square footage or levied as a flat tax, with the same amount per parcel (CTD 2012a). Parcel taxes are designed to encompass entire cities and therefore, are good candidates for a citywide urban forest program, as opposed to the district~level approach that often occurs under special assessments.

Parcel taxes typically fund more than just park trees. For example, the City of Davis levies an annual Parks Maintenance Tax of $49 per parcel for the maintenance of parks and open space and improvements to recreation facilities, about 15 percent of which funds street tree planting and maintenance (Davis 2012, Cain, pers. comm., 2012). A parcel tax requires strong public support, as it must be approved by two-thirds of all voters. Because a parcel tax must be voted on in a general election, rather than via mail-in ballot, it is likely to receive heightened political attention. However, general elections also capture the votes of renters, who may be more apt to approve a tax borne by property owners.

Requirements for a Sustainable Park Tree Program A parcel tax may be levied as a flat tax, or it may be based on lot size (square footage) or frontage (linear footage). This study evaluated the parcel tax amount that would be required to finance a municipally- . operated park tree program via frontage. San Francisco currently has approximately 190,000 taxable parcels (SF Assessor 2013) 16 and approximately 9.3 million linear feet of (taxable) frontage citywide (Office of the Assessor 2012; San Francisco Planning Department; AECOM). 19 The City would need to levy $0.45-$0.50 per linear foot per year to cover O&M costs under the Maintain Canopy scenario, with contractors. Without contractors, the per-linear-foot annual cost to cover O&M work would be '$0.51. 20 Given the margin of error of the frontage data , this study recommends bracketing frontage ranges, and charging tiered parcel taxes. The frontage brackets are intended to represent typical San Francisco property categories: • 0-7 linear feet of frontage represents a dwelling unit's 'share' of building frontage. This frontage bracket is a proxy for an apartment or condominium. 7-30 linear feet of frontage represents the typical San Francisco lot- the average San Francisco lot has 25 linear feet of frontage. • 30·150 linear feet of frontage represents a typical corner lot or small business. The average San Francisco corner lot has 125 linear feet of frontage. • 150-500 linear feet of frontage is a large lot, or combination of lots, representing a non­ residential property • Greater than 500 linear feet of frontage represents an ultra-large, commercial parcel. The fee amounts vary per frontage bracket, with small frontage parcels (apartments) paying the least, and ultra-large commercial parcels paying the most. Fees per bracket are roughly proportional to the per­ linear-foot cost for the average linear frontage within each bracket, with nominal modifications to ensure that program costs are covered by the estimated revenue. The tiered parcel fees are shown in Table 7.

18 This accounts for approximately 212 parcels that claim the exemption for public property, 3337 parcels that have zero assessed value (and therefore presumably do not pay property tax), and 10,907 parcels for which no frontage data Is available. 19 This figure includes only taxable parcels -I.e. excludes governmental parcels. Ttiis study considers all linear feet (frontage) within the City of San Francisco to represent the cost of a municipal street tree program to all property owners. 2° Frontage data is not rigorously collected by the Assessor's Office. Frontage data for this study was determined· through GIS by the San Francisco Planning Department. The nature of GIS takeoffs includes a certain amount of error. As well, some error exists where multi-unit buildings assume an even division of frontage among all units.

22 Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees

p 111 Table 7: Fee Tiers for Parcel Tax Based on Frontages (Maintain Canopy Scenario)

0-7 $5-$7 $8

7-30 $14-$15 $15

30-150 $29-$34 $35

150-500 $94-$104 $115

Greater than 500. $299 $320

Source: AECOM 2013

Note that the fee amounts represent Year 1 fees, and every year these fees should be inflated by 3 percent to account for a general increase in the cost of goods and services. Aside from inflation adjustment, fee revenue will remain constant over time, while the parlc tree program costs increase (as Establishment ramps up, etcetera). To accommodate this, a portion of the fee revenues in initial years must be saved to create a reserve fund for subsequent years, when fee revenue is effectively lower.

General Obligation Bonds ( Local governments commonly use GO bonds to fund construction and improvement projects involving real property (e.g., buildings, infrastructure and parks). GO bonds typically carry low interest rates, making them attractive for capital projects, which may include tree planting. However, funding is available for discrete projects, often over a limited time rather than an extended period. In addition, ongoing maintenance is ineligible for GO bond funding pursuant to federal tax law. California cities pay debt service from GO bonds through ad valorem property taxes, where assessments are based on property value. As a result, the issuance of GO bonds requires two-thirds voter approval (State Treasurer 2008). GO bonds may be a tool for financing the planting of park trees in San Francisco as part of a larger package of capital improvements, as bonds are typically issued for large amounts. For example, San Francisco voters have approved two GO bonds for RPD and park work in recent years that inelude funding for park tree planting and park forestry items: Proposition A (February 2008) was a GO bond for $185M, of which $151.5M wentto RPD, with $4M of bond proceeds allotted to tree planting and restoring the aging park tree canopy; Proposition B (November 2012) was a GO bond that included another $4M · for park forestry initiatives. A bond specifically focused on a major park tree planting effort may be appropriate.

Requirements for a Sustainable Park Tree Program Because GO bonds can only fund capital costs, they could only be used to finance Planting and Establishment activities under a comprehensive municipally-operated park tree program. Average annual capital costs range from approximately $0.8to $0.9M under the Maintain Canopy planting scenario with contractors and $1. OM for RPD only.

I ! \

Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees 23

P112 This page intentionally left blank.

24 Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees

P113 E~ This chapter presents major findings and recommendations for San Francisco to move forward with a comprehensive municipal park tree program. Recommendations for the most feasible program, cost savings, financing options and additional actions are discussed below, based on this study's findings.

STUDY FINDINGS

Routine maintenance is more efficient and cost effective, potentially reducing RPD's per-tree maintenance cost by about 5 percent. The entirety of RPD's current park tree wqrk involves responding to service calls and emergencies. No proactive pruning is currently undertaken. By implementing routine, proactive pruning, a 'swarm crew' could prune an entire pari<, instead of the current approach of responding to emergencies and service requests, thus providing only spot maintenance. Preventive maintenance also translates into fewer emergencies, which are more labor intensive and therefore more costly than routine pruning.

Augmenting staff with contra<;:tors- particularly for proactive maintenance worl<- could increase capacity while minimizing costs. Other cities with comprehensive urban forestry programs often rely on contractors to handle a range of activities, such as increased pruning, post-storm maintenance, and intense bursts of tree planting. Augmenting City staff with contractors could reduce program costs (e.g. staff, equipment purchase and maint\=lnance) by 10 percent, given the efficiencies of private contractors.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Program Pursue a program of canopy maintenance, planting 1,000 replacement trees per year to keep pace with 1.5 percent annual mortality. The Maintain Canopy planting scenario is the most feasible approach, given RPD's current hundred-year maintenance cycle (an order of magnitude offf~om the desired fifteen­ year cycle), and the balance RPD must maintain between forested parkland and unforested parkland (e.g. athletic fields and lawn space). Discussions withRPD confirmed that an ambitious Expand Canopy scenario is unsuitable to pursue at this time with staff, funding, and park space constraints. Average annual costs for all program elements (Planting, Establishment, Maintenance, and Litigation Claims) would average $7.8M over 20 years with the use of contractors, and $8.6M without the use of contractors.

Financing Fund capital costs with outside sources, specifically park tree planting and establishment. Funding capital costs with outside sources would complement a pC!rcel tax, focused exclusively on O&M, as described below. Under the Maintain Canopy planting scenario, with the use of contractors, capital costs would average $3.3M per year over 20 years. GO bonds, with monies for RPD, could be used to fund park tree capital costs. Alternatively, capital costs would be funded through grants or in-kind contributions from public and private sources. While properly financing ongoing O&M activity can be difficult, capital · sources have historically been more accessible, either through private grants or through state and federal

Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Pari< Trees 25

P114 dollars. An assortment of resources is currently available to the City for tree planting, including state grants and capital improvement program funds. Levy a special assessment or parcel tax, based on frontage, to fund operations and maintenance (O&M) of San Francisco's park trees, specifically for Maintenance. This would fund the O&M of all existing pari< trees, as well as O&M of new trees planted with separate capital funds. O&M activities, with the use of contractors, average $4.4M per year over 20 years under the scenario discussed above. Assuming the use of contractors, a tiered parcel tax, by frontage brackets, would mean annual fees of $5- $7 for typical apartments (0-7 linear feet of frontage); $14-$15 for .typical residential lots (7 -30 linear feet of frontage); $29-$34 for typical corner lots, large residential lots, and small business lots (30-150 linear feet of frontage); $94-$104 for typical large non-residential lots; and $299 for typical very large commercial lots. These parcel taxes are roughly proportional to $0.45-$0.50 per linear foot of frontage, and should be increased annually by 3 percent to account for inflation. These figures are substantially less than if Planting and Establishment were included. Limiting the funding required from property owners or residents would increase the likelihood of approval. To administer this tax, partial fee revenue.from initial years must be saved to create a reserve fund for proceeding years, when program costs are higher due to an increase in the amount of pari< tree work over time.

Additional Actions The supplementary actions included below are recommendations in addition to a comprehensive municipal park tree maintenance program. Costs for these additional actions, including additional staff, are not represented in the maintenance program financing and would need to be assessed independently. Complete a citywide park tree assessment, using GIS-based technology. RPD has limited information about the most of the park trees currently under its domain. A comprehensive pari< tree assessment would ensure that RPD obtains an accurate inventory of all the trees in its maintenance purview, as well as accurate data for all the park trees. Accurate data, such as tree size and tree health, yields considerable efficiencies, facilitating pruning and tracking of maintenance history, ultimately helping to manage costs. Use technology to improve park forest management. Several GIS-based software tools exist to help manage park trees, including tree tagging and maintenance logging. Adopting a technology tool could increase the capacity and efficiency of record-keeping, data management, facilitating pari< tree management. Plan reactive tree maintenance by geography. Organizing work to leverage geographic efficiencies creates more cost-effective reactive maintenance. Service calls could be organized by geography, with crews dispatched to address all service requests in the same area, reducing travel time. Develop a Park Tree Management Plan that clearly outlines RPD's planting and maintenance plants over the long term. This would leverage economies of scale and reduce costs by implementing per-park pruning, while also clearly demonstrating the need for capital and O&M funding to the community and municipal leaders. A San Francisco Park Tree Management Plan should also address the potential for even-aged stands within the city to die off en masse, and actions the City can take to mitigate and prepare for this tree canopy challenge. Undertake a public outreach campaign to elevate awareness of the importance of San Francisco's urban forest. This is a crucial step before launching any campaign to levy additional funds from resident, as it will not only communicate the funding required from the public but also illustrate the benefits to all residents.

26 Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees

P115 Barrick, Jeremy. Deputy Chief of Forestry, Horticulture & Natural Resources. NYC Parks. March 22, 2013-telephone conversation with Sarah Heard of AECOM regarding New York City's management of park trees. Blaustein, Joan. Director, Urban Forestry and Ecosystem Management Division, Philadelphia Parks & Recreation. March 26, 2013-telephone conversation with Sarah Heard of AECOM regarding Philadelphia's management of pari( trees. City and County of San Francisco Office of the Assessor-Recorder. September, 2013. Secured Assessment Ro112013-2014 (data CD).

Gayle, Carol Walker. Acting Manager, Forestry Policy & Planning, Parks, Forestry & Recreation Division, Urban Forestry. City of Toronto. March 14, 2013-telephone conversation with Sarah Heard of AECOM regarding Toronto's management of park trees. Maginnis, Larry. Supervisor, March 11, 2013-telephone conversation with Sarah Heard and Vanessa Lauf of AECOM regarding Portland's management of park trees.

Mead, Marl<. Senior Urban Forester, Parks Division, Seattle Parks and Recreation. February 15, 2013- telephcine conversation with Sarah Heard of AECOM regarding Seattle's management of pari< trees. Scott, Jerome. District Forester, Chicago Park District. March 13, 2013---telephone conversation with I Sarah Heard and Vanessa Lauf of AECOM regarding Chicago's management of pari< trees. \

Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest: Park Trees 27

P116 This page intentionally left blank.

P117 Annual Urban Forest ·Report Survey Fiscal Year 2017-2018 PLEASE RETURN BY 8/24/18

Pursuant to Chapter 12, Section 1209 of the Environment Code, the Department of the Environment is surveying your organization's forestry program work during the last fiscal year. Thank you for your participation in this process.

I. Agency Information: Name of San Francisco Recreation And Parks Department Agency/Department/Organization: Your Name: Kelly Cornell Email: [email protected]

II. Work force: A. How many urban forest-related staff positions does your 12 climbers organization have? 4 Laborers For example, arborists, tree climbers, gardeners who care for trees, or staff who monitor or report on trees. 10 gardeners B. How many full-time equivalent staff positions work only on tree 26 planting, care, and removal? For example, if your organization has 2 staff members who each spend 10 hours per week working on trees, enter 0.5 FTE.

Ill. Budget: A. What is your organization's total budget? 7 B. What is your urban forestry-related budget? 7 C. Does your urban forestry related budget fund anything other than NO tree care {such as education or lawn and shrub care)? If 11yes," please estimate the percentage or amount of funding listed in your urban forestry related budget {above) spent specifically on tree planting and maintenance.

IV. Health and Diversity of the Urban Forest: A. What are the three most common Pine, Cypress, Oak species of trees you planted this fiscal year? B. Are there any species you feel are Pine struggling in San Francisco, or species you have decided to no longer plant? Please explain why. C. Did you experiment with planting any Canker Resistant Pine new or less common species this year? If Thrip resistant Myoporum so, what were they?

Annual Urban Forest Report Survey SF Environment sfenvironment.org/buildings-environments/urban-forestry O!lr home. Our City. Ollr planet.

P118 Annual Urban Forest Report Survey Fiscal Year 2017-2018 PLEASE RETURN BY 8/24/18

A. How many trees were planted, cared for, and removed within your organization's jurisdiction in FY2017- 18? Do not include tree care ed other entities b Planted 281

Cared for (i.e. pruning & hand watering) 347 Removed* 184 *Please describe reasons for tree removals e.g. dead, vandalized, for construction dead, vandalized, for construction purposes, etc.

B. If your organization performed urban forest related work for another entity during the past year, please provide the requested information below. Add more tables if needed/leave blank if not applicable.

1 Entity name Planted Cared for Removed

2 Entity name Planted Cared for Removed

3 Entity name Planted Cared for Removed

4 Entity name Planted Cared for Removed

Annual Urban Forest Report Survey 2 SF Environment sfenvironrnent.org/buildings-environrnents/urban-forestry Our home, Our city. Our planet.

P119 Annual Urban Forest Report Survey Fiscal Year 2017-2018 PLEASE RETURN BY 8/24/18 C. If another entity performed urban forest related work for your organization during the past year, please provide the requested information below. Add more tables if needed/leave blank if not applicable.

1 Entity name Capital Division Planted Cared for Removed

2 Entity name Planted Cared for Removed

3 Entity name Planted Cared for

Removed '

4 Entity name Planted Cared for Removed

VI. Fiscal Year General Liability Claims Please answer the questions below if any general liability claims made against your agency due to issues related to trees. For example, trip and falls on exposed roots or branch failures that damaged persons or personal property. A. Total general liability claims related to trees See City Attorney B. Total number of paid general liability claims related to trees C. Average dollar amount of tree-related claims paid

Annual Urban Forest Report Survey 3 SF Envfronment sfenvironrnent.org/buildings-environments/urban-forestry Our home. Our city. Our planet. P120 Annual Urban Forest Report Survey Fiscal Year 2017-2018 PLEASE RETURN BY 8/24/18 VII. Concerns & Limitations Many organizations have reported similar concerns related to the urban forest and similar limitations when attempting to address these concerns. We are tracking these concerns and limitations over time to identify trends.

A. Concerns: Please rate the following concerns on a 1 to 5 scale: 1- not at all concerned 2- slightly concerned 3- somewhat concerned 4- moderately concerned 5- extremely concerned Inability to provide adequate care to newly planted trees 3 Inability to provide adequate care to established trees 4 Inefficiencies in the way forestry programs operate on a city-wide basis 3 Loss of significant numbers of trees due to age and/or disease 5 Loss of significant numbers of trees due to vandalism, illegal pruning, and/or illegal removal 4 Loss of significant numbers of trees due to development 2

A. Limitations: Please rate the following limitations on a 1 to 5 scale: 1- not at all a limitation 2- minor limitation 3- medium limitation 4- moderate limitation 5- serious limitation Funding constraints 5 Staffing constraints 5

Prioritization of urban forestry programs within your agency/the city at large 3 Lack of coordinated efforts to protect and manage the overall urban forest 4 Lack of tree inventory specific to your agency (if applicable)* 4 Lack of management plan specific to your agency (if applicable)* 3

Annual Urban Forest Report Survey 4 SF Environment sfenvironment.org/buildings-environments/urban-forestry Our home, Our city. Our planet,

P1 21 Annual Urban Forest Report Survey Fiscal Year 2017-2018 PLEASE RETURN BY 8/24/18

What, if any, significant changes or accomplishments have taken place within your organization's urban forest programs in the last fiscal year? For example, staffing or budget changes, new major projects or changes to management or oversight, or an significant achievements. To identify critical areas that need tree work

IX. To of Concern What topics are of greatest concern in your organization this year? For example, concerns about drought conditions affecting tree health, including increased pest or disease pressure, other tree health concerns, jurisdictional issues, or public r n. Staffing, equipment, budget

X. OPTIONAL Do you have any recommendations, comments, or suggestions for us to improve the method of data collection, the annual re rt, or other processes related to the Annual Urban Forest rt?

Thank you for your participation. Please return this form and direct any questions to:

Gordon Matassa

Urban Forestry Coordinator

San Francisco Department of the Environment

·[email protected] P: 415-355-3731 F: 415-554-6393

Annual Urban Forest Report Survey 5 SF Environment sfenvironment.org/buildings-environments/urban-forestry Our home. Our city. Our planet.

P122 Le er, Cheryl (BOS)

From: SOTF, (BOS) Sent: Friday, June 7, 201910:51 AM To: Ellen Tsang; Madjus, Lily (DB I); [email protected]; Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC); Pawlowsky, Eric (REC); Sandra Weese; Putra, Adrian (CPC); [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Melissa Powers; Anmarie Mabbutt Subject: SOTF- Notice of Hearing- Compliance and Amendments Committee; DATE June 18, 2019 4:30 p.m.

Good Morning:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Compliance and Amendments Committee to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: June 18,2019

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:30p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) ofthe Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 18079: Complaint filed by Ellen Tsang against Lily Mad jus and the Department of Building Inspection (DB I) for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine OrdinanceL Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine OrdinanceL Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18095: Complaint filed by Sandra Weese against Kevin Guy and the Office of Short- Term Rentals for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19048: Complaint filed by Justin Barker against the for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19039: Complaint filed by Ann marie Mabbutt against the Fine Arts Museums and Members of Board ofTrustees of for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.5, 67.6, 67.7 (a)(d) by failing to make the meeting open to the public and failing to properly post a meeting agenda; Section 67.13(a) by created barriers to attendance; Section 67.14(b) by failing to create an audio recording ofthe meeting; and Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner. p 1123 Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure} For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00pm, June 11, 2019.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction fortn.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998. ·

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board ofSupervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

PF24 I (BOS)

From: SOTF, (BOS) Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 3:58 PM To: Joshua Klipp Cc: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Subject: SOTF - Order of Determination 18072

Dear Mr. Klipp and Ms. Lin-Wilson:

Please find the link to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force Order of Determination for the above mentioned File.

If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Thank you. https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/SOTF Order 1807ipdf

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervis·ors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar informatipn that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy. From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Friday, April12, 2019 12:14 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: SOTF- Agenda for April 3, 2019 Sunshine Ordinance Task Force hearing

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Hi Cheryl,

Hope you're weil. Question - does the SOTF issued a written version of its motion on my matter? Thank you, Josh

On Thursday, March 28, 2019, 11:43:20 AM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Good Morning:

The agenda packet for the April 3, 2019, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, 4:00 pm hearing is available online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/sotf 040319 agenda.pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

1/1.0• Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998. Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy. Leger, Cheryl (BOS)

From: Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Sent: Friday, June 14,2019 10:52 AM To: SOTF, (BOS); Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: SOTF- Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30 pm

Hi Cheryl,

Thank you for the update. I will let people know.

Andres Patino Public Outreach Coordinator PoliCy and Public Affairs *in the office Tuesdays to Fridays

San Francisco Recreation and Park Department I City & County of San Francisco Mclaren Lodge in Golden Gate Park I 501 Stanyan Street I San Francisco, CA I 94117 (415) 831-6349- Office

Visit us at sfrecpark.org Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Watch us on sfRecParkTV Sign up for our e-News

From: SOTF, (BOS) Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 10:47 AM To: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) ; Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Cc: [email protected] Subject: FW: SOTF- Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30pm

Dear Andres:

Please see Complainant Joshua Klipp's request to postpone the hearing until August. You do not need to appear next Tuesday. Let me know if you have questions.

Frank, this is Mr. Klipp's first request to postpone a hearing.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

@) ~-el Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 2.4-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998. Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in ather public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 10:42 AM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: SOTF- Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30pm

Yes, that works for me. Thank you! Josh

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 14, 2019, at 9:01AM, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Thanks, Joshua. The next Compliance and Amendments Committee hearing is August 20. Can you make that hearing?

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Custo~er Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 2.4-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the. Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in ather public documents that members afthe public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 8:49AM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: SOTF- Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30pm

Hi Cheryl, thank you for your email. My wife and I are on vacation that week, could we look at the next possible date?

Thank you, Josh PV29 Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 14, 2019, at 8:14AM, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Joshua:

We have another meeting of the Compliance and Amendments Committee scheduled for July 3, 2019. Would you be available on that date? The hearing would begin at 4:30 pm. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center prol(ides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under· the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal id~ntifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to a// members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 2:41PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Cc: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) ; Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Subject: Re: SOTF- Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30pm

Hi Cheryl,

My preference is to reschedule - I'm concerned about driving safely and not missing it b/c of traffic. Can you tell me when the next hearing date will be?

Thank you, Josh

On Thursday, June 13, 2019, 2:35:57 PM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Joshua:

P"f30 I can tell the Chair that you will be travelling next Tuesday and to put your item at the end of the calendar if you think you can make it. If you would prefer to have your matter scheduled at another hearing, we can do that, too. Just let me know what would be best for you.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-Including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 2:31 PM ·To: SOTF, (BOS) Cc: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) ; Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Subject: Re: SOTF- Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30pm

Thank you for this clarification. I've got a work meeting in Chowchilla CA next Tuesday afternoon from 1-2pm, 3 hours away, and there's almost zero chance I can get to San Francisco by 430pm. If I'd had more time to plan for this hearing, I could have tried to change my meeting time, but now it is too late.

p 1'B 1 I would respectfully request either: 1) my matter be moved to the end of the agenda to allow enough time for me to drive back from Chowchilla; or 2) that my matter be moved to the next regular calendar with at least a week's notice of the requirement to attend.

Thank you, Josh

On Thursday, June 13,2019, 1:33:21 PM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Parties:

To answer Joshua's question, yes, everyone should attend to provide the Committee with information on the production of records to the Complainant.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to a !I members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone nunibers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

PH32 From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 1:19 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: SOTF- Compliance and. Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30pm

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Thank you Cheryl. Since I'm not familiar with this process- is this hearing something the parties are expected to attend? Josh

On Thursday, June 13, 2019, 10:4 7:50AM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Parties:

The agenda packet for the June 18, 2019, Compliance and Amendments Committee, 4:30 pm hearing is available online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/defau1Ufiles/cac061819 agenda.pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

P1({33 Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

7 P134 I (BOS)

From: SOTF, (BOS) Sent: Friday, June 14,2019 10:47'AM To: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC); Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Cc: [email protected] Subject: FW: SOTF - Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30 pm

Dear Andres:

Please see Complainant Joshua Klipp's request to postpone the hearing until August. You do not need to appear next Tuesday. Let me know if you have questions.

Frank, this is Mr. Klipp's first request to postpone a hearing.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided wiif not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. Ali written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to ail members of the public for inspection and c-opying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 10:42 AM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: son- Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30pm

Yes, that works for me. Thank you! Josh

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 14, 2019, at 9:01AM, son, (BOS) wrote:

Thanks, Joshua. The next Compliance and Amendments Committee hearing is August 20. Can you make that hearing?

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

P"P-35 Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Boord of Supervisors is subject to. disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the Son Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public'a.re not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Boord of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in ·ather public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 8:49AM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: SOTF- Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30pm

Hi Cheryl, thank you for your email. My wife and I are on vacation that week, could we look at the next possible date 7

Thank you, Josh

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 14, 2019, at 8:14AM, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Joshua:

We have another meeting of the Compliance and Amendments Committee scheduled for July 3, 2019. Would you be available on that date? The hearing would begin at 4:30 pm. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-ha·ur access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and arcliived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the Son Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public ore not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any· information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy:

PH36 From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 2:41PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Cc: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) ; Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Subject: Re: SOTF- Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30pm

Hi Cheryl,

My preference is to reschedule- I'm concerned about driving safely and not missing it b/c of traffic. Can you tell me when the next hearing date will be?

Thank you, Josh

On Thursday, June 13, 2019, 2:35:57 PM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Joshua:

I can tell the Chair that you will be travelling next Tuesday and to put your item at the end of the calendar if you think you can make it. If you would prefer to have your matter scheduled at another hearing, we can do that, too. Just let me know what would be best for you.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the PlB7 public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may' appear on the Board of Supe!Visors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, June 13,2019 2:31 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Cc: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) ; Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC) Subject: Re: SOTF- Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30pm

Thank you for this clarification. I've got a work meeting in Chowchilla CA next Tuesday afternoon from 1-2pm, 3 hours away, and there's almost zero chance I can get to San Franci~co by 430pm. lfl'd had more time to plan for this hearing, I could have tried to change my meeting timE;, but now it is too late.

I would respectfully request either: 1) my matter be moved to the end of the agenda to allow enough time for me to drive back from Chowchilla; or 2) that my matter be moved to the next regular calendar with at least a week's notice of the requirement to attend.

Thank you, Josh

On Thursday, June 13,2019, 1:33:21 PM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Parties:

To answer Joshua's question, yes, everyone should attend to provide the Committee with information on the production of records to the Complainant. ·

Cheryl Leger

p 1'{3 8 Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

.Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction fcirm.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, June 13,20191:19 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: SOTF- Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30pm

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Thank you Cheryl. Since I'm not familiar with this process- is this hearing something the parties are expected to attend? Josh

On Thursday, June 13, 2019, 10:47:50 AM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

5 P139 Dear Parties:

The agenda packet for the June 18, 2019, Compliance and Amendments Committee, 4:30 pm hearing is available online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/defau1Vfiles/cac061819 agenda. pdf

The packet material is linked toeach item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted.· Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy. I (BOS)

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 1:19 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: SOTF- Compliance and Amendments Committee; June 18, 2019 hearing; 4:30 pm

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Thank you Cheryl. Since I'm not familiar with this process - is this hearing something the parties are expected to attend? Josh

On Thursday, June 13, 2019, 10:47:50 AM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Parties:

The agenda packet for the June 18, 2019, Compliance and Amendments Committee, 4:30 pm hearing is available online at the following link:

https://sfgov .org/sunshi ne/sites/d efaultlfiles/cac061819 _agenda. pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Iii ~~? Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction.form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

1 P141 Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

P1?42 le er, Cheryl (BOS)

From: SOTF, (80S) Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 1:17PM To: Joshua Klipp; Patino, Andres-Lopez (REC); Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC); Robert M. Smith; Melissa Powers; Denta Tadesse; Mazzola, Lori (ADM); SFSD Civil (SHF); Hennessy, Vicki (SHF); Alex Lewis-Koskinen; Vien, Veronica (DPH) Subject: SOTF Notice of Appearance -Compliance and Amendments Committee; August 27, 2019 4:30 p.m.

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Compliance and Amendments Committee to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider refenals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: August 27, 2019

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:30p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian ofrecords or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.·

Complaints:

File No. 18072: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination- Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21 (b) and (e), by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18049: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination. Complaint filed by Robert M. Smith against the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco (F AMSF) for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No.18083: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination- Complaint filed by Robert M. Smith against the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco (F AMSF) for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67 .21, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18012: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination- Complaint filed by Denta Tadesse against Lori Mazzola, City Hall Building Management, for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.13(a), by failing to allow access to a meeting of a policy body.

1 P143 File No. 18028: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination- Complaint filed by Denta Tadesse against the Sheriffs Department for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.13(a), by failing to allow access to a meeting of a policy body.

File No. 19052: Complaint filed by Alex Koskinen against the Department of Public Health for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must bereceived by 5:00pm, August 20, 2019.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, . and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member ofthepublic elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board ofSupervisorswebsite or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

P1244 le I (BOS)

From: SOTF, (80S) Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 4:20 PM To: 'Joshua Klipp'; Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC); Pawlowsky, Eric (REC); 'David Tucker'; '[email protected]'; Mulligan, Pat (ADM); 'Sandra Weese'; Guy, Kevin (CPC); lonin, Jonas (CPC); '[email protected]'; Patterson, Kate (ART); 'Bill and Bob Clark'; Polovina, Bianca (ADM) Subject: SOTF- Notice of Hearing- Sunshine Ordinance Task Force: DATE April 3, 2019, 4:00 p.m.

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider refenals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: April3, 2018

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:00p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

FileNo. 18081: Complaint filed by David Tucker against Bianca Polovina and the Office of Labor Standards Enforcement for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.24(b)(2), by failing to respond to a request for litigation documents in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18095: Complaint filed by Sandra Weese against Kevin Guy and the Office of Short-Term Rentals for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

SPECIAL ORDER The hearings on File Nos. 18017 and 18058 will not begin earlier than 5:30pm.

File No. 18018: Complaint filed by Randi Sinki against the Arts Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code, Sections 67 .14, by failing to make audio recording available online within 72 hours.

Pl45 File No. 18059: Complaint filed by William J. Clark against the Arts Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67 .16, by failing make meeting minutes available in a timely manner. (June 5, 2018 - Advisory Committee of Street Artists and Crafts Examiners).

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplementaVsupporting documents must be received by 5:00pm, March 27, 2019.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifj;ing information when they communicate with the Board ofSupervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board ofSupervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

P1it6 Leger, Cheryl (BOS)

From: SOTF, (BOS) Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 11 :OS AM To: 'Ellen Tsang'; Madjus, Lily (DB!); SunshineRequests, DB! (DB!); 'Betty Mackey'; Beck, Bob (MYR); Summerville, Peter (ADM); TIDA, (ADM); 'sfneighborhoods.net'; Goldberg, Jonathan (DPW); 'Conan McHugh'; 'Robert M. Smith'; 'Melissa Powers'; 'Joshua Klipp'; Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC); Pawlowsky/ Eric (REC)

Subject: SOTF- Sunshine Ordinance Task force Notice of Hearing/ March 61 2019 Attachments: SOTF- Complaint Procedure 2018-12-05 FINAL.pdf

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: March 6, 2019

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:00p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian ofrecords or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 18079: Complaint filed by Ellen Tsang against Lily Madjus and the Department of Building Inspection (DBI) for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18067: Complaint filed by Betty Mackey against the Treasure Island Development Authority for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18086: Complaint filed by Mark Sullivan against the Mission Dolores Green Benefit District Formation Committee for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.14, by failing to allow video and audio recording filming and still photography of a policy body.

File No. 18049: Complaint filed by Robert M. Smith against the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco (F AMSF) for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18083: Complaint filed by Robert M. Smith against the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco (F AMSF) for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner. SPECIAL ORDER The hearing on File Nos. 18072 will not begin earlier than 6:00pm.

File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure).

For inclusion in the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00pm, February FebruaJy 2 7, 2019.

Che1yl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Boai'd of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members ofthe public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they· comm:unicate with the Board ofSupervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board ofSupervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

P1248 I (BOS)

From: SOTF, (BOS) To: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Subject: SOTF- February 6, 2019, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force Hearing

Dear Tiffany:

I write because the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force would like to hear complaintJ. Klipp v. Recreation and Parks Dept. on February 6, 2019, and we need to confirm that Kelly Cornell will be available for questions regarding the matter on that date. Please let me know as soon as possible if Mr. Cornell is available. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California · Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Cor~\\

p 114 9 I (BOS)

From: SOTF, (BOS) To: Pawlowsky, Eric (REC); Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Cc: [email protected] Subject: SOTF- Complaint Filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force -Complaint No. 18072 Attachments: SOTF- Complaint Procedure 2018-01-16 FINAL.pdf

Good Afternoon:

You have been named as a Respondent in the attached complaint filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. Please respond to the following complaint/request within five business days.

The Respondent is- required to submit a written response to the allegations including any and all supporting documents, recordings, electronic media, etc., to the Task Force within five (5) business days . of receipt of this notice. This is your opportunity to provide a full explanation to allbw the Task Force to be fully informed in considering your response prior its meeting.

Please include the following information in your response if applicable:

1. List all relevant records With descriptions that have been provided pursuant to the Complainant request. . 2. Date the relevant records were provided to the Complainant. 3. Description of the method used; along with any relevant search terms used, to search for the relevant records. 4. Statement/declaration that all relevant documents have been provided; does not exist, or has been excluded. 5. Copy of the original request for records (if applicable).

Please refer to the File Number when submitting any new information and/or supporting documents - pertaining to this complaint.

The ·Complainant alleges: Complaint Attached.

. . . . Both parties (Complainant and Respondent) will be contacted o~ce a hearing date is determined. Attached is the Slinshine Ordinance Task Force's complaint procedures. ·

Thank you.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors . Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form. · The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived mattecs since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is providecf in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public ore not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available . to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-'-including n·ames, phone numbers, addresses and simi/or information that o member of the public elects to submit to the Boord and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

P1 S1 Leger, Cheryl (BOS)

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 4:25 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: Sunshine Act Complaint// SF Park & Rec Info Request #18-2629

Hi Cheryl,

Thanks for your message. The original request was attached as a pdf (printout of the request) to my original email, and the request (per record #) itself with all correspondence and attachments is available as a public record. If there's another method I need to provide for the original request, please let me know what that is and I'll look into it.

Thank you! Josh 415.265.0901

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 6, 2018, at 4:12PM, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Mr. Klipp:

Thank you for your email. We need a copy of your original request and supporting documentslemails in order to process your file. Please feel free to call me if you have questions.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 2:15 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Sunshine Act Complaint I I SF Park & Rec Info Request #18-2629

To Whom It Concerns,

1 P152 Please see the attached complaint re SF Park & Recreation's dismissive response to my lawfully submitted document and information request per the Sunshine Ordinance. Please note that while my complaint seeks a hearing, I would be more than happy to participate in some form of alternative dispute resolution process in the interest of preserving city resources. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best, Josh Klipp 415.265.0901

P1;s3 I (BOS)

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 2:15 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Sunshine Act Complaint// SF Park & Rec Info Request #18-2629 Attachments: Request #18-2629 (JKiipp).pdf; 53444-Complaint Form (JKiipp) .pdf

To Whom It Concerns,

Please see the attached complaint re SF Park & Recreation's dismissive response to my lawfully submitted document and information request per the Sunshine Ordinance. Please note that while my complaint seeks a hearing, I would be more than happy to participate in some form of alternative dispute resolution process in the interest of preserving city resources, Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best, Josh Klipp 415.265.0901

P11S4 Leger, Cheryl (BOS)

From: SOTF, (BOS) Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 4:20 PM To: 'Joshua Klipp'; Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC); Pawlowsky, Eric (REC); 'David Tucker'; '[email protected]'; Mulligan, Pat (ADM); 'Sandra Weese'; Guy, Kevin (CPC); lonin, Jonas (CPC); '[email protected]'; Patterson, Kate (ART); 'Bill and Bob Clark'; Polovina, Bianca (ADM) Subject: SOTF- Notice of Hearing - Sunshine Ordinance Task Force: DATE April 3, 2019, 4:00 p.m.

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: April 3, 2018

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:00p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian ofrecords or a representative of yolir department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18081: Complaint filed by David Tucker against Bianca Polovina and the Office of Labor Standards Enforcement for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67 .24(b )(2), by failing to respond to a request for litigation documents in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18095: Complaint filed by Sandra Weese against Kevin Guy and the Office of Short-Term Rentals for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

SPECIAL ORDER The hearings on File Nos. 18017 and 18058 will not begin earlier than 5:30 pm.

File No. 18018: Complaint filed by Randi Sinki against the Arts Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code, Sections 67 .14, by failing to make audio recording available online within 72 hours.

p 1155 File No. 18059: Complaint filed by William J. Clark against the Arts Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67 .16, by failing make meeting minutes available in a timely manner. (June 5, 2018- Advisory Committee of Street Artists and Crafts Examiners).

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agel1da packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00pm, March 27, 2019.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal iriformation that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members ofthe public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board ofSupervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members ofthe public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any infonnation from these submissions. This means that personal iriformation-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board ofSupervisors website or in other public documents that members ofthe public may inspect or copy.

Pl56 I (BOS)

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 11:21 AM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: SOTF- April 3, 2019 Sunshine Ordinance Task Force Hearing

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Hi Cheryl,

I'm available on that date. Best, Josh

On Tuesday, March 12, 2019, 10:16:34 AM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Ms. Lin-Wilson and Mr. Klipp:

Please see below the excerpt from the Minutes for File No. 18072 (J. Klipp v. Dept. of Recreation and Parks). I have already spoken with Ms. Lin-Wilson to confirm that Mr. Dennis Kerr will be available for the April 3, 2019, hearing before the Sunshine Task Force. I also ask that Mr. Klipp be available on that same day. Please confirm that you will be able to attend the SOTF April 3rd the hearing by or before March 18, 2019.

File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for . allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Member Hinze, seconded by Member Gate, moved to find jurisdiction that the requested records are public.

Public Comment:

None.

The Motion PASSED by the following vote:

Pf57 Ayes: 3- Hinze, Cate, B. Wolfe

Noes: 0- None

Absent: 1- Tesfai

Member Hinze, seconded by Member Cate, moved to accept the final version ofthe letter submitted by Tiffany Lin-Wilson, Recreation and Parks Department.

Public Comment:

None.

The Motion PASSED by the following vote:

Ayes: 3- Hinze, Cate, Chair B. Wolfe

Noes: 0- None

Absent: 1 - Chair Tesfai

Joshua Klipp (Petitioner) provided a summary of his complaint and requested the Committee find a violation. Mr. Klipp stated that that he received a response in a timely manner but the four documents provided by Recreation and Parks were inadequate. Mr. Klipp stated that Recreation and Parks either does not have the requested records and the responses provided were fabricated. Mr. Klipp stated that he does not believe that did not receive any records prior to 2012 the Recreation and Parks' documents were entirely made up and Recreation and Parks did not respond to his request.

Tiffany Lin-Wilson, Recreation and Parks (Respondent) provided a summary of the Department's position. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated that she compiled the information requested and that she does not work on the strategic plan. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated she collected relevant records from staff and provided them to Mr. Klipp. Ms. Lin­ Wilson stated that most of the information requested is available on the Recreation and Parks Capital and Planning Department website. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated that the reports provided to Mr. Klipp were created by Kelley Cornell which include work force budget, health and diversity of the urban forest and other related information.

p 1258 Chair Wolfe requested that the Kelley Cornell or person knowledgeable of the requested records attend the SOTF hearing and be prepared to answer questions.

Member Hinze, seconded by Member Cate, moved to refer the matter to the SOTF for hearing and requested Kelley Cornell be present to provided information related to the public records request and why records prior to 2012 were not provided.

Public Comment:

None.

The Motion PASSED by the following vote:

Ayes: 3- Hinze, Cate, Chair B. Wolfe

Noes: 0- None

Absent: 1 - Chair Tesfai

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members P1:fi9 of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees­ may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

P1430 I (BOS)

From: SOTF, (BOS) To: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC); Joshua Klipp Subject: SOTF -April 3, 2019 Sunshine Ordinance Task Force Hearing

Dear Ms. Lin-Wilson and Mr. Klipp:

Please see below the excerpt from the Minutes for File No. 18072 (J. Klipp v. Dept. of Recreation and Parks). I have already spoken with Ms. Lin-Wilson to confirm that Mr. Dennis Ken will be available for the April3, 2019, hearing before the Sunshine Task Force. I also ask that Mr. Klipp be available on that same day. Please let me know as soon as possible if one or both of you cannot make it to the hearing.

File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Member Hinze, seconded by Member Cate, moved to find jurisdiction that the requested records are public.

Public Comment: None.

The Motion PASSED by the following vote:

Ayes: 3- Hinze,.Cate, B. Wolfe Noes: 0-None Absent: 1 Tesfai

Member Hinze, seconded by Member Cate, moved to accept the final version of the letter submitted by Tiffany Lin-Wilson, Recreation and Parks Department.

Public Comment: None.

The Motion PAS SED by the following vote:

Ayes: 3 Hinze, Cate, Chair B. Wolfe Noes: 0- None Absent: 1- Chair Tesfai

Joshua Klipp (Petitioner) provided a summary of his complaint and requested the Committee find a violation. Mr. Klipp stated that that he received a response in a timely manner but the four documents provided by Recreation and Parks were inadequate. Mr. Klipp stated that Recreation and Parks either does not have the requested records and the responses provided were fabricated. Mr. Klipp stated that he does not believe that did not receive any records prior to 2012 the Recreation and Parks' documents were entirely made up and Recreation and Parks did not respond to his request. Tiffany Lin-Wilson, Recreatioi1 and Parks (Respondent) provided a summary of the Department's position. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated that she compiled the infmmation requested and that she does not work on the strategic plan. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated she collected relevant records from staff and provided them to Mr. Klipp. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated that most ofthe information requested is available on the Recreation and Parks Capital and Planning Department website. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated that the reports provided to Mr. Klipp were created by Kelley Cornell which include work force budget, health and diversity of the urban forest and other related information.

Chair Wolfe requested that the Kelley Cornell or person knowledgeable of the requested records attend the SOTF hearing and be prepared to answer questions. Member Hinze, seconded by Member Cate, moved to refer the matter to the SOTF for hearing and requested Kelley Cornell be present to provided information related to the public records request and why records prior to 2012 were not provided.

Public Comment: None.

The Motion PAS SED by the following vote:

Ayes: 3 Hinze, Cate, Chair B. Wolfe Noes: 0-None Absent: 1- Chair Tesfai

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided v,Jill not be redacted Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board ofSupervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not r,edact any information fj-om these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors -website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

3 P163 I (BOS)

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Tuesday, March 12,2019 11:21 AM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: SOTF -April 3, 2019 Sunshine Ordinance Task Force Hearing

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Hi Cheryl,

I'm available on that date. Best, Josh

On Tuesday, March 12,2019, 10:16:34 AM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Ms. Lin-Wilson and Mr. Klipp:

Please see below the excerpt from the Minutes for File No. 18072 (J. Klipp v. Dept. of Recreation and Parks). I have already spoken with Ms. Lin-Wilson to confirm that Mr. Dennis Kerr will be available for the April3, 2019, hearing before the Sunshine Task Force. I also ask that Mr. Klipp be available on that same day. Please confirm that you will be able to attend the SOTF April 3rd the hearing by or before March 18, 2019.

File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely andjor complete manner.

Member Hinze, seconded by Member Cate, moved to find jurisdiction that the requested records are public.

Public Comment:

None.

The Motion PASSED by the following vote:

Ph64 Ayes: 3- Hinze, Cate, B. Wolfe

Noes: 0- None

Absent: 1 - Tesfai

Member Hinze, seconded by Member Cate, moved to accept the final version of the letter submitted by Tiffany Lin-Wilson, Recreation and Parks Department.

Public Comment:

None.

The Motion PASSED by the following vote:

Ayes: 3- Hinze, Cate, Chair B. Wolfe

Noes: 0- None

Absent: 1 - Chair Tesfai

Joshua Klipp (Petitioner) provided a summary of his complaint and requested the Committee find a violation. Mr. Klipp stated that that he received a response in a timely manner but the four documents provided by Recreation and Parks were inadequate. Mr. Klipp stated that Recreation and Parks either does not have the requested records and the responses provided were fabricated. Mr. Klipp stated that he does not believe that did not receive any records prior to 2012 the Recreation and Parks' documents were entirely made up and Recreation and Parks did not respond to his request.

Tiffany Lin-Wilson, Recreation and Parks (Respondent) provided a summary of the Department's position. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated that she compiled the information requested and that she does not work on the strategic plan. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated she collected relevant records from staff and provided them to Mr. Klipp. Ms. Lin­ Wilson stated that most of the information requested is available on the Recreation and Parks Capital and Planning Department website. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated that the reports provided to Mr. Klipp were created by Kelley Cornell which include work force budget, health and diversity of the urban forest and other related information.

P1£5 Chair Wolfe requested that the Kelley Cornell or person knowledgeable of the requested records attend the SOTF hearing and be prepared to answer questions.

Member Hinze} seconded by Member Cate1 moved to refer the matter to the SOTF for hearing and requested Kelley Cornell be present to provided information related to the public records request and why records prior to 2012 were not provided.

Public Comment:

None.

The Motion PASSED by the following vote:

Ayes: 3- Hinze, Cate, Chair B. Wolfe

Noes: 0- None

Absent: 1 - Chair Tesfai

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members p 1:£6 of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerkls Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and c;opying. The Clerk Is Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees­ may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

P14)7 Youn

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2019 1:57 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force- March 6; 2019

Hi Cheryl,

Thanks for the call the other day. I think you were going to reach out and confirm RPD availability, and also confirm that the Task Force will be notified that this matter has been continued due to RPD's unavailability. Can you let me know that this is all set?

Thank you, Josh

On Thursday, February 28, 2019, 4:49:54 PM PST, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Mr. Klipp:

Can you please give me a call tomorrow to discuss? Thank you.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

illfcO• Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board ofSupervisors is subfectto disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public ani not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board ofSupervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any iriformation fi'om these submissions. This means that · personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Pl68 From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, February 28,2019 4:27PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Cc: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Subject: Re: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force- March 6, 2019

Hi Cheryl,

\Vhen will the RPD representative be available?

Best, Josh

On Thursday, February 28,2019, 4:04:51 PM PST, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Mr. Klipp:

Thank you for your quick response. It really is up to you regarding whether or not you wish to go forward on March 6. We cannot advise you on what to do. I just want to be clear that there will not be a representative from the Recrc;ation and Parks Department. If you choose to appear the Task Force will be made aware that the Respondent will not be there.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

ill 1/l/J Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board ofSupervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that P1S9 personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board ofSupervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, February 28,2019 3:39PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Cc: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Subject: Re: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force- March 6, 2019

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Hi Cheryl,

Thank you for your email. What is the consequence or possible outcome ifi appear on March 6? This matter has been ongoing for more than half a year, and I changed my schedule to make sure I was available on this date. I'm not inclined to agree to a continuance with no end in sight, but also am unclear if appearing will be of any use since RPD's designated representative has not made himself available.

Please advise at your earliest convenience, thank you. Best, Josh

On Thursday, February 28,2019, 12:35:19 PM PST, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Mr. Klipp:

Please see the email below from Tiffany Lin-Wilson regarding the Mr. Kern's unavailability for the March 6, 2019, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force hearing. Since Mr. Kern is unavailable we would lilce to know if you still wish to appear on March 6 or request a continuance. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger P1370 Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction fom1.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifYing information when they communicate with the Board ofSupervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information ji-om these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board ofSupervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Sent: Wednesday, February 27,2019 3:47PM To: Leger, Cheryl (BOS) Subject: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force- March 6, 2019

Good afternoon, Cheryl,

Our department would like to send our Director of Operations, Dennis Kern, to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force hearing on March 6th. However, he will be unavailable to attend, as he is out. Would it be possible to postpone the hearing until Denny is available at your next meeting?

Best,

Tiffany Lin-Wilson

Secretary

p 1471 San Francisco Recreation and Park Department I City & County of San Francisco

McLaren Lodge in Golden Gate Park 1501 Stanyan Street I San Francisco, CA I 94117

(415) 831-2701 I [email protected]

Visit us at sfrecparkorg

Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Watch us on sfRecP arkTV

Sign up for our e-News

P1S72 Leger, Cheryl (BOS)

From: SOTF, (BOS) Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 4:05 PM To: 'Joshua Klipp' Cc: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Subject: RE: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force- March 6, 2019

Dear Mr. Klipp:

Thank youfor your quick response. It really is up to you regarding whether or not you wish to go forward on March 6. We cannot advise you on what to do. I just want to be clear that there will not be a representative from the Recreation and Parks Department. If you choose to appear the Task Force will be made aware that the Respondent will not be there.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required ta provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does nat redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including na(Tles, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear an the Board of Supervisors website ar in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:39 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Cc: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Subject: Re: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force- March 6, 2019

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Hi Cheryl,

Thank you for your email. What is the consequence or possible outcome if I appear on March 6? This matter has been ongoing for more than half a year, and I changed my schedule to make sure I was available on this date. I'm not inclined to agree to a continuance with no end in sight, but also am unclear if appearing will be of any use since RPD's designated representative has not made himself available.

Please advise at your earliest convenience, thank you. Best, Josh Ph73 On Thursday, February 28, 2019, 12:35:19 PM PST, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Mr. Klipp:

Please see the email below from Tiffany Lin-Wilson regarding the Mr. Kern's unavailability for the March 6, 2019, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force hearing. Since Mr. Kern is unavailable we would like to know if you still wish to appear on March 6 or request a continuance. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board· of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members ofthe public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 3:47PM To: Leger, Cheryl (BOS) Subject: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force- March 6, 2019

Good afternoon, Cheryl,

P1274 Our department would like to send our Director of Operations, Dennis Kern, to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force hearing on March 61h. However, he will be unavailable to atte[)d, as he is out. Would it be possible to postpone the hearing until Denny is available at your next meeting?

Best,

Tiffany Lin-Wilson

Secretary

San Francisco Recreation and Park Department I City & County of San Francisco

Mclaren Lodge in Golden Gate Park I 501 Stanyan Street I San Francisco, CA I 94117

(415) 831-2701 I [email protected]

Visit us at sfrecpark.org

Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Watch us on sfRecParkTV

Sign up for our e-News

Pb75 I (BOS)

From: SOTF/ (BOS) Sent: Tuesday/ February 19, 2019 11:05 AM To: 'Ellen Tsang'; Madjus, Lily (DBI); SunshineRequests/ DBI (DBI); 'Betty Mackey'; Beck, Bob (MYR); Summerville, Peter (ADM); TIDA, (ADM); 'sfneighborhoods.net'; Goldberg/ Jonathan (DPW); 'Conan McHugh'; 'Robert M. Smith'; 'Melissa Powers'; 'Joshua Klipp'; Lin-Wilson/ Tiffany (REC); Pawlowsky/ Eric (REC) Subject: SOTF- Sunshine Ordinance Task force Notice of Hearing, March 6/ 2019 Attachments: SOTF- Complaint Procedure 2018-12-05 FINAL.pdf

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: March 6, 2019

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:00p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 18079: Complaint filed by Ellen Tsang against Lily Madjus and the Department of Building Inspection (DBI) for allegedly violatingAdministrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18067: Complaint filed by Betty Mackey against the Treasure Island Development Authority for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18086: Complaint filed by Mark Sullivan against the Mission Dolores Green Benefit District Formation Committee for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.14, by failing to allow video and audio recording filming and still photography of a policy body.

File No. 18049: Complaint filed by Robeli M. Smith against the Fine Alis Museums of San Francisco (FAMSF) for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18083: Complaint filed by Robert M. Smith against the Fine Alis Museums of San Francisco (FAMSF) for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner. Ph76 SPECIAL ORDER The hearing on File Nos. 18072 will not begin earlier than 6:00pm.

File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure).

For inclusion in the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00pm, Februmy February 27, 2019.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate ·with the Board ofSupervisors and its committees. All written or oral .communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. TheClerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone nwnbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the I Board ofSupervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

p 127 7 I (BOS)

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 9:04 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Cc: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC); Cornelt Kelly (REC) Subject: Re: SOTF Sunshine Ordinance Task Force

Dear Ms. Leger,

Please note that I had a matter before the Board of Appeals on January 30, and the Board continued it to March 6. I think the hearing begins at Sp, and that the matter will be taken at the beginning of the Board's calendar. I don't know what time the SOTF hearing would begin on March 6, but would respectfully request that it be heard no earlier than 545pm. Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions.

Best, Josh

On Wednesday, January 23, 2019, 11:55:44 AM PST, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Mr. Klipp:

Thank you for your email and for wanting to stay current on your matter. At this time we hope schedule your case for March 6, 2019, before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force pending the availability of Mr. Kelly Cornell to speak on the issues on that date. We will keep you informed as decisions are made.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August ~· 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone p 117 8 numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 10:23 AM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: Complaint Committee hearing of September 25, 2018 at 5:30pm, City Hall, Room 408

Hi Cheryl,

Hope you had a good holiday and New Year. Are there ariy updates on this? Thank you, Josh

OnWednesday, October 17, 2018, 9:25:37 AM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Joshua:

There are no next steps for you to complete at this time. As for a December hearing, I need to check with my colleague Victor Young. I will be in touch.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Te1:.415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998. Ph79 Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying infoimation when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 12:26 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: Complaint Committee hearing of September 25, 2018 at 5:30 pm, City Hall, Room 408

This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Hi Cheryl,

Hope you're well! Wanted to follow up on this and see what are· the next steps. The Committee Chairperson mentioned something happening before the full Task Force in December possibly (I think). Please let me know when you have a moment, thank you!

Best, Josh

415.265.0901

On Monday, September 24, 2018, 11:37:16 AM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Joshua,

P1:BO Don't worry about looking like you are skipping out. If you are unable to make it to the hearing, I can ask my colleague returns tomorrow, if you would like to reschedule. I cannot make that decision and need to consult with Victor Young. Have a nice day.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 10:32 AM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: RE: FW: Complaint Committee hearing of September 25, 2018 at 5:30pm, City Hall, Room 408

Hi Cheryl,

Appreciate your email, I'm glad it got straightened out and didn't end up looking like I just skipped out on the hearing! I think the materials pretty much are what they are, I assume the rest will be oral/discussion at the hearing itself. Is there a link to somewhere that explains the hearing process?

Thank you, Josh p 1431 On Monday, September 24, 2018, 8:39:37 AM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) «[email protected]> wrote:

I am so sorry for any confusion I may have caused. If you have other materials that you feel you need to include that are not in your packet, please forward and I will asked if they can be admitted to your file.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the pUblic for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 4:42PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: FW: Complaint Committee hearing of September 25, 2018 at 5:30 pm, City Hall, Room 408

Hi Cheryl,

PH32 Thank you for following up, and I've received your email. It looks like you originally sent out this email to the wrong address on Sept. 10th. Receiving it only now, Sept. 21 the Friday before the 9/25 Tuesday hearing, has put me in a tough scheduling position. I've spent time today scrambling to move a bunch of things around and hopefully can make it work.

Best, Josh

On Friday, September 21, 2018, 1:25:32 PM PDT, SOTF, (80S) wrote:

Dear Joshua:

Just making sure you received my email of this morning. Thanks.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to compiete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of SupeNisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

P1S3 From: Leger, Cheryl (BOS) Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 11:52 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: Complaint Committee hearing of September 25, 2018 at 5:30 pm, City Hall, Room 408

Good Afternoon:

Sorry for the inconvenience and that you had not received the materials. I thought your email address was [email protected]. On September 25, 2018, there is a Complaint Committee hearing and your case will be heard. The agenda packet for the Complaint Committee of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force September 25, 2018, 5:30p.m. meeting is available online at the following link:

https:/ /sfgov.org/sunsh ine/sites/defau1Ufiles/complainto92518 agenda. pdf

The packet materials are linked to each item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction fonn.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the · California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Pl;84 P1£5 Leger, Cher I (BOS)

From: Joshua Klipp Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 12:02 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: RE: RE: FW: Complaint Committee hearing of September 25, 2018 at 5:30 pm, City Hall, Room 408

No worries, I've done some schedule juggling and will be there, thank you! Josh

On Monday, September 24, 2018, 11:37:16 AM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Joshua,

Don't worry about looking like you are skipping out. If you are unable to make it to the hearing, I can ask my colleague returns tomorrow, if you would like to reschedule. I cannot make that decision and need to consult with Victor Young. Have a nice day.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

P1:86 From: Joshua Klipp [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 10:32 AM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: RE: FW: Complaint Committee hearing of September 25, 2018 at 5:30 pm, City Hall, Room 408

Hi Cheryl,

Appreciate your email, I'm glad it got straightened out and didn't end up looking like I just skipped out on the hearing! I think the materials pretty much are what they are, I assume the rest will be oral/discussion at the hearing itself. Is there a link to somewhere that explains the hearing process?

Thank you, Josh

On Monday, September 24, 2018, 8:39:37 AM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

I am so sorry for any confusion I may have caused. If you have other materials that you feel you need to include that are not in your packet, please forward and I will asked if they can be admitted to your file.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be P1£7 redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications·that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Joshua Klipp [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 4:42 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: FW: Complaint Committee hearing of September 25, 2018 at 5:30 pm, City Hall, Room 408

Hi Cheryl,

. Thank you for following up, and I've received your email. It looks like you originally sent out this email to the wrong address on Sept. 10th. Receiving it only now, Sept. 21 the Friday before the 9/25 Tuesday hearing, has put me in a tough scheduling position. I've spent time today scrambling to move a bunch of things around and hopefully can make it work.

Best, Josh

On Friday, September 21, 2018, 1:25:32 PM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Joshua:

Just making sure you received my email of this morning. Thanks.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

PH38 Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to a/1 members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Leger, Cheryl (80S) Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 11 :52 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: Complaint Committee hearing of September 25, 2018 at 5:30 pm, City Hall, Room 408

Good Afternoon:

Sorry for the inconvenience and that you had not received the materials. I thought your email address was [email protected]. On September 25, 2018, there is a Complaint Committee hearing and your case will be heard. The agenda packet for the Complaint Committee of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force September 25, 2018, 5:30 p.m. meeting is available online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/defau1Vfiles/complainto92518 agenda.pdf

The packet materials are linked to each item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

PH39 Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the ·California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

P1s90 I (BOS)

From: Joshua Klipp sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 10:32 AM To: SOTF, (80S) Subject: Re: RE: FW: Complaint Committee hearing of September 25, 2018 at 5:30 pm, City Hall, Room 408

Hi Cheryl,

Appreciate your email, I'm glad it got straightened out and didn't end up looking like I just skipped out on the hearing! I think the materials pretty much are what they are, I assume the rest will be oral/discussion at the hearing itself. Is there a link to somewhere that explains the hearing process?

Thank you, Josh

On Monday, September 24, 2018, 8:39:37 AM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

I am so sorry for any confusion I may have caused. If you have other materials that you feel you need to include that are not in your packet, please forward and I will asked if they can be admitted to your file.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of SupeNisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of SupeNisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to a// members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of SupeNisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

P1:91 From: Joshua Klipp [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 4:42 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: Re: FW: Complaint Committee hearing of September 25, 2018 at 5:30pm, City Hall, Room 408

Hi Cheryl,

Thank you for following up, and I've received your email. It looks like you originally sent out this email to the wrong address on Sept. 1Oth. Receiving it only now, Sept. 21 the Friday before the 9/25 Tuesday hearing, has put me in a tough scheduling position. I've spent time today scrambling to move a bunch of things around and hopefully can make it work.

Best, Josh

On Friday, September 21,2018, 1:25:32 PM PDT, SOTF, (BOS) wrote:

Dear Joshua:

Just making sure you received my email of this morning. Thanks.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Ph92 Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit.to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Leger, Cheryl (BOS) Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 11:52 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: Complaint Committee hearing of September 25, 2018 at 5:30pm, City Hall, Room 408

Good Afternoon:

Sorry for the inconvenience and that you had not received the materials. I thought your email address was [email protected]. On September 25, 2018, there is a Complaint Committee hearing and your case will be heard. The agenda packet for the Complaint Committee of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force September 25, 2018, 5:30p.m. meeting is available online at the following link:

https://sfgov. org/sunshine/sites/defau1Vfiles/complaint092518 agenda. pdf

The packet materials are linked to each item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form. Pb93 The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

P1434 I (BOS)

From: SOTF, (BOS) To: [email protected] Subject: FW: SOTF - Complaint Filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force - Complaint No. 18072 Attachments: Klipp.pdf; treecountjuly2016 to June 2017.pdf; Financing San Francisco's Urban Forest (1).pdf; 2018 Annual Urban Forest Report Survey.pdf; Klipp_SOTF Responsive Letter.pdf; Klipp_ SOTF Timeline.pdf

Dear Mr. Klipp:

Please see the email below and attachments submitted as the Recreation and Park Department's response to your complaint.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subjei:t to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members af the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in ather public documents that members of the public may inspect ar copy.

From: Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 4:00 PM To: SOTF, (BOS) Subject: RE: SOTF- Complaint Filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force- Complaint No. 18072

Good afternoon,

Please find the Recreation arid Park Department's response, as well as supporting documentation, attached and below:

1. List all relevant records with descriptions that have been provided pursuant to the Complainant request. (3 attachments, plus one link) tree count july2016 to June2017; FinancingSan Francisco's Urban Forest; 2018 Annua\Urban Forest Report Survey; 11 Additionally, the SFRPD Strategic Plan, is available to you at this link, with special reference to Objective 4: https://view. joomag.co m/rpd-strategic-pla n-rpd-strategic-p\a n-u pdate-2018/0119151001519865342 ?short 11 2. Date the relevant records were provided to the Complainant. (attached) Klipp_SOTF Timeline.docx

P1195 3. Description ofthe method used, along with any relevant search terms used, to search for the relevant records. Email request for respohsive documents to appropriate SFRPD staff with original request attached .. 4. Statement/declaration that all relevant documents have been provided, does not exist, or has been excluded. (published on NextRequest on 9.6.18) We have conducted a diligent search for records responsive to your request. We have located responsive records, which are attached. This concludes your public records request. 5. Copy of the original request for records (if applicable). (attached, also published on NextRequest) Klipp. pdf

Sincerely,

Tiffany Lin-Wilson Secretary

San Francisco Recreation and Park Department I City & County of San Francisco Mclaren Lodge in Golden Gate Park I 501 Stanyan Street I San Francisco, CA I 94117

(415) 831-2701 I [email protected]

Visit us at sfrecpark.org Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Watch us on sfRecParkTV Sign up for our e-News

From: SOTF, (BOS) Sent: Friday, September 07, 2018 3:26PM To: Pawlowsky, Eric (REC) ; Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC) Cc: [email protected] · Subject: SOTF- Complaint Filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force- Complaint No. 18072

Good Afternoon:

You have been named as a Respondent in the attached complaint filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. Please respond to the following complaint/request within five business days.

The Respondent is required to submit a written response to the allegations including any and all supporting documents, recordings, electronic media, etc., to the Task Force within five (5) business days of receipt of this notice. This is your opportunity to provide a full explanation to allow the Task Force to be fully informed in considering your r~sponse prior its meeting.

Please include the following information in your response if applicable:

1. List all relevant records with descriptions that have been provided pursuant to the Complainant request. 2. Date the relevant records were provided to the Complainant. 3. Description of the method used, along with any relevant search terrns used, to search for the relevant records.

P129 6 4. Statement/declaration that all relevant documents have been provided, does not exist, or has been excluded. 5. Copy of the original request for records (if applicable).

Please refer to the File Number when submitting any new information and/or supporting documents pertaining to this complaint.

The Complainant alleges: Complaint Attached.

Both parties (Complainant and Respondent) will be contacted once a hearing date is determined. Attached is the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force's complaint procedures.

Thank you.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Boord of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

PP97 le er, Cheryl (BOS)

From: SOTF, (BOS) Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 11:22 AM To: 'RMS'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Kwon, Ike (PUC); Peters, Michelle (PUC); 'Mike.b\[email protected]'; Kelly, Naomi (ADM); Barnes, Bill (ADM); [email protected]'; Lin-Wilson, Tiffany (REC); Paw\owsky, Eric (REC) Subject: SOTF- Notice of Hearing - Complaint Committee: September 25, 5:30 p.m., City Hall, Room 408

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Complaint Committee to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: September 25, 2018

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 5:30p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 18049 (1-5): Complaint filed by Robert M. Smith against the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco (F AMSF) for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18062: Complaint filed by I. Walker against the San Francisco Public Utilities Commissioner Vince Courtney and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.24, by redacting records in an inappropriaty manner.

File No._18068: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Shireen McSpadden, Department of Aging and Adult Services, for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18069: Complaint filed by Mike Black against City Administrator Naomi Kelly, and the Office of the City Administrator for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner. Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure).

For inclusion in the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00pm, September 18, 2018, Date.

Cheryl Leger Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors Tel: 415-554-7724

Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written ar oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website ar in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

PF99 City Hall 1 Dr Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 TASKFORCE Tel. No. (415) 554-7724 Fax No. (415) 554-7854 TTD/TTY No. (415) 554-5227

ORDER OF DETERMINATION

DATE DECISION ISSUED April 3, 2019

CASE TITLE- Joshua Klipp v. Recreation and Parks Department (File No. 18072) ·

FACTS OF THE CASE

The following petition/complaint was. filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (SOTF):

File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

HEARING ON THE COMPLAINT

On September 25, 2018 the Complaint Committee, acting in its capacity to hear petitions/complaints heard the matter.

Joshua Klipp (Petitioner) provided a summary of his complaint and requested the Committee find a violation .. Mr. Klipp stated that that he received a response in a timely manner but the four documents provided by Recreation and Parks were inadequate. Mr. Klipp stated that Recreation and Parks either does not have the requested records and the responses provided were fabricated. Mr. Klipp stated that he does not believe that did not receive any records prior to 2012 the Recreation and Parks' documents were entirely made up and Recreation and Parks did not respond to his request.

Tiffany Lin-Wilson, Recreation and Parks (Respondent) provided a summary of the Department's position. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated t~at she compiled the information requested and that she does not work on the strategic plan. Ms. Lin­ Wilson stated she collected relevant records from staff and provided them to Mr. Klipp. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated that most of the information requested is available on the Recreation and Parks Capital and Planning Department website. Ms. Lin­ Wilson stated that the reports provided to Mr. Klipp were created by Kelley Cornell which include work force budget, health and diversity of the urban forest and other related information.

P200 Chair Wolfe requested that the Kelley Cornell or person knowledgeable of the requested records attend the SOTF hearing and be prepared to answer questions.

Member Hinze, seconded by Member Cate, moved to refer the matter to the SOTF for hearing and requested Kelley Cornell be present to provided information related to the public records request and why records prior to 2012 were not provided.

On April 3, 2019, the SOTF held a hearing to review the recommendation from Complaint Committee and/or to review the merits of the petition/complaint.

Joshua Klipp (Petitioner) provided a summary of the complaint and requested the Committee to find a violation. Mr. Klipp stated that every year the Urban Forestry Council creates a report based on a questionnaire that is sent out to public entities, such as Recreation and Park, and is made publicly available. Mr. Klipp stated that the information provided by Recreation and Park was inadequate in that there was no supporting documentation.

Dennis Kern, Director of Operations (Recreation and Parks), (Respondent), provided .a summary of the department's position. Mr. Kern stated that the Complainant requested documents from the previous ten years that do not exist. Mr. Kern stated that the Complainant had been provided all the documents maintain by Recreation and Parks. Mr. Kern stated that the Parks had .been in a tree reactive routine (removing more trees than planting). Mr. Kern stated that he supervises 12 arborists, 10 gardeners, 4 laborers but does not have any clerical staff in his urban forestry unit. Mr. Kern stated that Mr. Klipp had been provided the Strategic Plan.

A question and answer period occurred. The Respondent and the Complainant provided rebuttals.

The SOTF opined that records including but not limited to arborist tree plantings, . removals, location, source of tree, personal injuries, storm damage should be tracked and provided.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW

Based on the testimony and evidence presented, the SOTF found that the Recreation and Parks Department violated Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21(b)(e).

DECISION AND ORDER OF DETERMINATIONS

P201 On April 3, 2019, Chair Wolfe, seconded by Vice-Chair Hylarid, moved to find that the Department of Recreation and Parks violated Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 (b) and 67.21 (e), by failing to make documents available in a timely and complete manner and referred the matter to the Compliance and Amendments Committee to ensure that Recreation and Parks Department provides the requested ,documents other than those already provided to Joshua Klipp (Urban Forestry Council).

The motion PASSED by the following vote:

Ayes: 8- Hyland, Yankee, B. Wolfe, Hinze, LaHood, Cannata, Tesfai, J. Wolf Noes: 0 - None Absent: 3- Martin, Chopra, Cate

<·u~.\

'\ :~t1U'I . ~,. Bruce 1 hair Sunsnjn 0~ inance Task Force cc. ~sh'ua Klipp (Petitioner/Complainant) Tiffany Lin-Wilson, Recreation and Parks Department (Respondent)

P202