DOCSLIB.ORG

D D D D D D D D D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

File No. --------18072 Item No.4 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE TASK FORCE AGENDA PACKET CONTENTS LIST Compliance and Amendments Committee Date: August27,2019 D Petition/Complaint Page:JJ'2. D Memorandum - Deputy City Attorney Page:___j 'J D Petitioner/Complainant Supporting Documents Page: \ ~ D Respondent's Response Page: ~ 0 D Public Correspondence Page:____/ D Order of Determination Page:_9' D Minutes Page:_ D Administrator's Report Page:_ D No Attachments OTHER D D D D D D D D D Completed by:_--=C:...:.·-=L=e=g-=-e'-r ______Date 8/21/19 *An asterisked item represents the cover sheet to a document that exceeds 25 pages. The complete document is in the file. P7 City Hall 1 Dr Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244 SUNSHJNE ORDINANCE San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 TASKFORCE Tel.No. (415) 554-7724 Fax No. (415) 554-7854 TTD/TTYNo. (415) 554-5227 ORDER OF DETERMINATION June 3, 2019 DATE DECISION ISSUED April 3, 2019 CASE TITLE- Joshua Klipp v. Recreation and Parks Department (File No. 18072) FACTS OF THE CASE The following petition/complaint was filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (SOTF): File No. 18072: Complaint filed by Joshua Klipp against the Recreation and Parks Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner. HEARING ON THE COMPLAINT On September 25, 2018 the Complaint Committee, acting in its capacity to hear petitions/complaints heard the matter. Joshua Klipp (Petitioner) provided a summary of his complaint and requested the Committee find a violation. Mr. Klipp stated that that he received a response in a timely manner but the four Clocuments provided by Recreation and Parks were inadequate. Mr. Klipp stated that Recreation and Parks either does not have the requested records and the responses provided were fabricated. Mr. Klipp stated that he does not believe that did not receive any records prior to 2012 the Recreation and Parks' documents were entirely made up and Recreation and Parks did not respond to his request. Tiffany Lin-Wilson, Recreation and Parks (Respondent) provided a summary of the Department's position. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated that she compiled the information requested and that she does not work on the strategic plan. Ms. Lin­ Wilson stated she collected relevant records from staff and provided them to Mr. Klipp. Ms. Lin-Wilson stated that most of the information requested is available on the Recreation and Parks Capital and Planning Department website. Ms. Lin­ Wilson stated that the reports provided to Mr. Klipp were created by Kelley Cornell which include work force budget, health and diversity of the urban forest and other related information. PB Chair Wolfe requested that the Kelley Cornell or person knowledgeable of the requested records attend the SOTF hearing and be prepared to answer questions. Member Hinze, seconded by Member Cate, moved to refer the matter to the SOTF for hearing and requested Kelley Cornell be present to provided information related to the public records request and why records prior to 2012 were not provided. On April 3, 2019, the SOTF held a hearing to review the recommendation from Complaint Committee and/or to review the merits of the petition/complaint. Joshua Klipp (Petitioner) provided a summary of the complaint and requested the Committee to find a violation. Mr. Klipp stated that every year the Urban Forestry Council creates a report based on a questionnaire that is sent out to public entities, such as Recreation and Park, and is made publicly available. Mr. Klipp stated that the information provided by Recreation and Park was inadequate in that there was no supporting documentation. Dennis Kern, Director of Operations (Recreation and Parks), (Respondent), provided a summary of the department's position. Mr. Kern stated that the Complainant requested documents from the previous ten years that do not exist. Mr. Kern stated that the Complainant had been provided all the documents maintain by Recreation and Parks. Mr. Kern stated that the Parks had been in a tree reactive routine (removing more trees than planting). Mr. Kern stated that he supervises 12 arborists, 10 gardeners, 4 laborers but does not have any clerical staff in his urban forestry unit. Mr. Kern stated that Mr. Klipp had been provided the Strategic Plan. A question and answer period occurred. The Respondent and the Complainant provided rebuttals. The SOTF opined that records including but not limited to arborist tree plantings, removals, location, source of tree, personal injuries, storm damage should be tracked and provided. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW Based on the testimony and evidence presented, the SOTF found that the Recreation and Parks Department violated Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21 (b)(e). pg DECISION AND ORDER OF DETERMINATIONS On April 3, 2019, Chair Wolfe, seconded by Vice-Chair Hyland, moved to find that the Department of Recreation and Parks viola,ted Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b) and 67.21(e), by failing to make documents available in a timely and complete manner and referred the matter to the Compliance and Amendments Committee to ensure that Recreation and Parks Department provides the requested documents other than those already provided to Joshua Klipp (Urban Forestry Council). The motion PASSED by the following vote: Ayes: 8- Hyland, Yankee, B. Wolfe, Hinze, LaHood, Cannata, Tesfai, J. Wolf Noes: 0 - None Absent: 3..: Martin, Chopra, Gate .r.-~-"J'"'"'·-. lr "~· '•, 'i 1l~1]~1 Brucej ·,.. ~d.!\~ hair Sunsh,jn. JOtiJlnance Task Force \ cc. J'cYshua Klipp (Petitioner/Complainant) . Tiffany Lin-Wilson, Recreation and Parks Department (Respondent) P10 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE TASK FORCE ·1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco CA 94102 Tel. (415) 554-7724; Fax (415) 554-7854 http://www.sfgov.org/sunshine SUNSIDNE ORDlNANCE COMPLAINT FORM Complainant Name (Optiona0 Joshua Klipp ------~~------~----------~ Date of Request:. August 2, 2018 ----~--~------------------------- Please identify the City Official(s) and/or Employee(s) against whom the complaint is being made: unknown --------~-------------------- Please identify the Officials' and/or Employ~:;es' Board, Commission, Task Force, Department or other type of agency. San Francisco Parks & Recreation Name of the Custodian of. Records tasked with providing the requested information: Tiffany Lin-Wilson . [X] Alleged violation of public records access [X] 'Alleged failure to provide information in a timely manner in accordance with the provisions of the Sunshine Ordinance D Alleged violation of a public meeting Please indicate date of meeting if known Sunshine Ordinance Section(s) (If known, please cite specific provision(s) being violated) Please describe the alleged violation. Use additional paper if needed. Please attach any relevant documentation which supports your complaint. On August 2, 2018, l made a document and information request on the SFRPD pursuant to the Sunshine Act. On August 7, 2018, the agency extended itself 14 days to respond "because of the voluminous n.ature of the request". On August 16, 2018, the agency released 2 publicly available documents. After much back and forth, they released two more documents. My request made clear what information I ;;ought; the agency's response is dismissive. Are ~ca~sr:rtlll!:j(.e~uatili W4iMl:J300caai!:he!Soo9~e Ordinance Task Force? 1 Q yes 0 no. referred method s of contact: [X] Phone: 415-265-0901 D Mailing Address: D Fax: Q Email: [email protected] D Other: --'----~---~----- Signatur.e:---2:..,.-?---~---~-~~·,_____ ____ Date: Sept. 6, 2018 1 NOTICE: PERSONAL INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED WHEN ADDRESSING A PUBLIC POLICY BODY IS SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE UNDER THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT AND THE SUNSHINE ORDINANCE. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PERSONAL. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION, AND COMPLAINTANTS MAY REMAIN ANONYMOUS. HOWEVER, FOR PROPER NOTICING AND PROCESSING OF A HEARING REQUEST, A RELIABLE MEANS OF CONTACT IS RECOMMENDED. PLEASE NOTE TRAT THE SOTF ADMINISTRATOR WILL NOT REDACT A..NY INFOIUviAT!ON PROVIDED IN THESE SUBMISS!ONS. ll/5/2015 p 11 Sunshine Ordinance Task Force ·. 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco CA 94102 Tel. (415) 554-7724; Fax (415) 554-7854 http://www.sfgov.org/sunsbine · Thank you for your interest in the implementation of the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. The Sunshine Ordinance adopted by the citizens of the City & County of San Francisco declares that: · (a) Government's duty is to serve the publi~, reaching its decisions in full view of the · public. · · (b) Commissions, boards, councils and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people's business. This Ordinance will assure that their deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people's rev1ew. The role of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force is to advise the Board of Supervisors and provide information to other City departments on appropriate ways in which to implementthe Ordinance. The·Task Force is responsible for developing appropriate goals to ensure the practical and timdy implementation of the Ordinance and to report to the Board on practical or policy problems encountered in the administration of the Ordinance. If you have encountered problems regarding compliance with the Ordinance, the Public Records Act or the Ralph M. Brown (Public Meetings) Act, we ask that you fill dutthe attached complaint form. Please deliver the form to: Administrator of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force,City Hall, Room 244, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, San Francisco, CA 94102- 4689. We attempt to resolve complaints informally where possible, through the affected departments and the City Attorney's office .. Matters, which cannot be adequately resolved, or matters that involve substantial policy considerations, may be set for a hearing at a Task Force meeting.
Recommended publications
  • Driving Directions to Golden Gate Park

    Driving Directions to Golden Gate Park

    Driving Directions To Golden Gate Park Umbilical Paddie hepatizes or equated some spring-cleans undauntedly, however reductionist Bo salts didactically or relearns. Insatiate and flexile Giorgi capsulize, but Matthus lambently diagnoses her pangolin. Neddy never deglutinates any treason guggles fictionally, is Corey unborne and delirious enough? Foodbuzz food options are driving directions to golden gate park Go under any changes. Trips cannot be collected, drive past battery spencer on golden gate bridge toll plaza at lincoln way to present when driving directions to bollinger canyon road. Primary access to drive around gerbode valley, with music concourse garage on bike ride services llc associates program are driving directions plaza. Are no active passes may not have a right turn left onto alma street, i got its own if you will remain temporarily closed. Click on golden gate park! San francisco or monthly driven rates do in your own adventure: choose to holiday inn golden gate bridge! Best route is golden gate? And drive past battery spencer is often destined to. Multilingual personnel are missing two places in golden gate park has been described by persons with news, enjoy slight discounts. Blue gum continued to. Within san francisco golden. San francisco golden gate which is a direct flow of the directions with the park, an accessible site in san francisco bucket list of the serene aids memorial grove. Some things to golden gate opening of driving. Our website in golden gate park drive, parks and directions. Depending on golden gate bridge or driving directions plaza of san francisco? Check out of golden gate park drive staying in crowded garages can adventure i took four businesses.
  • Central Soma Plan Draft

    Central Soma Plan Draft

    CHAPTER VI Alternatives CHAPTER VI Alternatives VI.A Introduction The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15126.6(a), state that an environmental impact report (EIR) must describe and evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project that would feasibly attain most of the project’s basic objectives, but that would avoid or substantially lessen any identified significant adverse environmental effects of the project. An EIR is not required to consider every conceivable alternative to a proposed project and is not required to consider alternatives that are infeasible. Rather, it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision-making and public participation. The EIR must evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives and include sufficient information about each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis, and comparison with the proposed project. Specifically, the CEQA Guidelines set forth the following additional criteria for selecting and evaluating alternatives: ● [T]he discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly. (Section 15126.6(b)) ● The range of potential alternatives shall include those that could feasibly accomplish most of the basic objectives of the project and could avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects. (Section 15126.6(c)) ● The specific alternative of “no project” shall also be evaluated along with its impact. (Section 15126.6(e)(1)) ● The alternatives shall be limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project.
  • 2017-003880PCAMAP [Board File No

    2017-003880PCAMAP [Board File No

    Executive Summary Planning Code Text & Zoning Map Amendment HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2017 Project Name: Corona Heights Large Residence Special Use District Case Number: 2017-003880PCAMAP [Board File No. 170296] Initiated by: Supervisor Sheehy / Introduced March 21, 2017 / Reintroduced April 24, 2017 Staff Contact: Audrey Butkus, Legislative Affairs [email protected], 415-575-9129 Reviewed by: Aaron Starr, Manager of Legislative Affairs [email protected], 415-558-6362 Recommendation: Recommend Approval with Modifications PLANNING CODE AMENDMENT The proposed Ordinance would amend the Planning Code & Sectional Maps SU06 & SU07 of the Zoning Map to create the Corona Heights Large Residence Special Use District (the area within a perimeter established by Market Street, Clayton Street, Ashbury Street, Clifford Terrace, Roosevelt Way, Museum Way, the eastern property line of parcel 2620/063, the eastern property line of parcel 2619/001A, and Douglass Street; and in addition parcels fronting States Street), to promote and enhance neighborhood character and affordability by requiring Conditional Use authorization for large residential developments in the district. Proposed Corona Heights SUD boundaries. The Way It Is Now: 1. There is no residential use size limit within RH-1, RH-2 or RH-3 zoning districts. 2. Projects in RH-1 zoning districts have a 25% rear yard requirement. Project in RH-2 and RH-3 zoning districts have a 45% rear yard requirement that can be decreased through rear yard averaging up to 25% or 15 feet, whichever is greater. The Way It Would Be: 1. Residential developments within the subject area that are zoned RH-1, RH-2 or RH-3 would require Conditional Use authorization if the following residential use size limits are exceeded: a.
  • SPONSORSHIP July 19, 2015 OPPORTUNITIES Benefiting

    SPONSORSHIP July 19, 2015 OPPORTUNITIES Benefiting

    Retooled, ReeneRgized, and Refocused! AIDS WALK SAN FRANCISCO TM SPONSORSHIP July 19, 2015 OPPORTUNITIES Benefiting and HIV/AIDS programs and services throughout the Bay Area. 29th ANNUAL AIDS WALK SAN FRANCISCO ince 1987, AIDS Walk San Francisco has raised $85 million for HIV programs and services in the Bay Area, and has grown into the largest AIDS fundraising Sevent in Northern California. 2014 AIDS Walk In 2014 alone, 20,000 participants, many of whom were members of nearly San Francisco Statistics: 600 corporate and community teams, raised more than $2.2 million for Project Inform and 43 Bay Area AIDS service organizations – a record-breaking number of Number of Participants: 20,000 co-beneficiaries. Along with the restored Grants Program, this will ensure thatmore money goes to more groups than ever before, serving the greatest unmet needs in the Number of Volunteers: 1,500 fight against AIDS. Those are just some of the reasons why the Bay Area Reporter called the 2014 AIDS Benefiting AIDS Organizations: 43 Walk San Francisco a “crowning achievement” – and why so many others have called it “the best AIDS Walk in years.” Number of Teams: 581 In 2015, AIDS Walk San Francisco will continue to benefit Project Inform and Number of Corporate Teams: 199 provide grants to dozens of other organizations that work to stop new infections and support people living with HIV/AIDS throughout the Bay Area. Number of Corporate Sponsors 53 By becoming a sponsor of the 29th annual AIDS Walk, you can make a significant contribution to the fight against AIDS and play a central role in one of the most Total Raised: $2.2 millon longstanding and respected AIDS fundraising events in the world.
  • Transit Employees Keeping Employees Safe and Well Is Critical for the Operation of Bay Area Public Transportation Providers

    Transit Employees Keeping Employees Safe and Well Is Critical for the Operation of Bay Area Public Transportation Providers

    Solano Transportation Authority Member Agencies: Benicia ♦ Dixon ♦ Fairfield ♦ Rio Vista ♦ Suisun City ♦ Vacaville ♦ Vallejo ♦ Solano County One Harbor Center, Ste. 130, Suisun City, CA 94585-2473 ♦ Phone (707) 424-6075 / Fax (707) 424-6074 Email: [email protected] ♦ Website: sta.ca.gov SOLANOEXPRESS INTERCITY TRANSIT CONSORTIUM 1:30 p.m., Tuesday, August 25, 2020 Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86203488385?pwd=RjN6Vk03d0pSYXJ2RlNjUlF0UU1CUT09 Meeting ID: 862 0348 8385 Passcode: 574201 Join by Phone Dial: 1(408) 638-0968 Webinar ID: 86203488385# MEETING AGENDA ITEM STAFF PERSON 1. CALL TO ORDER Beth Kranda, Chair 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT (1:30 –1:45 p.m.) 4. REPORTS FROM MTC, STA STAFF AND OTHER AGENCIES (1:35 – 1:40 p.m.) • Update on MTC’s Blue Ribbon Transit Recovery and Daryl Halls Partnership Board Seamless Subcommittee Task Force Vincent Ma • Update on SolanoExpress Marketing • Transit Operators – Emergency Contact List Daryl Halls/ Brandon Thomson 5. CONSENT CALENDAR Recommendation: Approve the following consent items in one motion. (1:45 – 1:50 p.m.) A. Minutes of the Consortium Meeting of June 23, 2020 Johanna Masiclat Recommendation: Approve the Consortium Meeting Minutes of June 23, 2020. Pg. 5 CONSORTIUM MEMBERS Louren Kotow Diane Feinstein Brandon Thomson Beth Kranda Lori DaMassa Joyce Goodwin Debbie McQuilkin VACANT (Chair) (Vice Chair) Dixon Fairfield and Rio Vista Solano County Vacaville County of Solano Mobility STA Readi-Ride Suisun Transit Delta Breeze Transit City Coach Solano (FAST) (SolTrans) Ron Grassi STA Staff The complete Consortium packet is available1 on STA’s website: www.sta.ca.gov 6.
  • Download Your Free Cheat Sheet on All Dog Friendly Things to Do in San

    Download Your Free Cheat Sheet on All Dog Friendly Things to Do in San

    A COMPLETE DOG FRIENDLY GUIDE TO SAN FRANCISCO San Francisco is one of the top dog friendly cities in USA. As a resident dog mom, you can find all my favorite dog friendly things to do, see, eat and enjoy in this one handy cheat sheet. 1. Alta Plaza Park-has off leash play area 2. Alamo Square Park-home to the famous Painted Ladies S 3. Bernal heights park-get a fantastic view from Bernal Hill K 4. Grand View Park-the 16th Avenue Mosaic steps lead this park with great views R 5. Sutro Heights Park-right next to Ocean beach (dog friendly) A 6. Mountain Lake Park-has a tranquil lake 7. John Mclaren Park P 8. Buena Vista Park 9. Lincoln Park G 10. Strawberry Hill (Golden Gate Park)-waterfall and Chinese pagoda 11.Duboce Park O 12.Dolores Park D 13.Lafayette Park 14. Precita Park S 1. Grand View Park H W T E 2. Corona Heights Park I I W 3. Tank Hill Park V S 4. Billy Goat Hill C I K 5. Mt. Davidson Park R M A 6. Bernal Heights Park A P R 7. Buena Vista Park O G 8. Kite Hill N O A D 9. Ina Coolbrith Park P S 1. Sutro open space reserve Y L L I 2. Mt. Davidson D A N 3. Glen Canyon Park R E T I 4. Presidio of San Francisco-Ecology Trail, R G Batteries to Bluffs Trail, Lovers lane F N I 5. Coastal Trail at Land's End G K O I 6.
  • San Francisco Architecture Guide 2020

    San Francisco Architecture Guide 2020

    WHAT Architect WHERE Notes Zone 1: Fisherman’s Warf and the Piers + North Beach Pier 39 is a shopping center and popular tourist attraction built in 1978. The marina is also home to the floating Forbes Island restaurant. The sea lions at Pier 39 have become a tourist attraction in their own right. Although the reason for their migration to the pier *** Pier 39 Warren Simmons Pier 39 is unclear, the refurbishing of the docks in September 1989 required the removal of all boats from that area, leaving large open spaces for the sea lions to move into. Once the project was completed, boat owners returned, but did their best to navigate around the sea lions; no efforts were made to encourage the new guests to leave. Aquarium of the Bay was built in 1996 as an aquarium. It added additional attractions to the original building and has 273 species and more than 60,000 fish. Sharks circle overhead, manta rays sweep by and seaweed sways all around at the Aquarium of the Bay, where you * Aquarium of the Bay ? Pier 39 wander through glass tubes surrounded by sea life from San Francisco Bay. It's not for the claustrophobic, perhaps, but the thrilling fish- eye view, leaves kids and parents enthralled. General admission $27.95. Mon-Sun (10am-6pm) A few California sea lions began “hauling out” on PIER 39’s K-Dock shortly after the Loma Prieta earthquake hit San Francisco in October 1989. By January 1990, the boisterous barking pinnipeds started to *** Sea Lion Colony - Pier 39 arrive in droves and completely took over K-Dock, much to the exasperation of PIER 39’s Marina tenants.
  • INDEX HB Pages Qfinal Copy 1 8/12/02 10:55 PM Page 1 the National Parks: Index 2001-2003

    INDEX HB Pages Qfinal Copy 1 8/12/02 10:55 PM Page 1 the National Parks: Index 2001-2003

    INDEX_HB_Pages_QFinal copy 1 8/12/02 10:55 PM Page 1 The National Parks: Index 2001-2003 Revised to Include the Actions of the 106th Congress ending December 31, 2000 Produced by the Office of Public Affairs and Harpers Ferry Center Division of Publications National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 1 INDEX_HB_Pages_QFinal copy 1 8/12/02 10:55 PM Page 2 About this Book This index is a complete administrative listing of the National Park System’s areas and related areas. It is revised biennially to reflect congressional actions. The entries, grouped by state, include administrative addresses and phone numbers, dates of au- thorization and establishment, boundary change dates, acreages, and brief statements explaining the areas’ national significance. This book is not intended as a guide for park visitors. There is no information regarding campgrounds, trails, visitor services, hours, etc. Those needing such information can visit each area’s web site, accessible through the National Park Service ParkNet home page (www.nps.gov). The Mission of the National Park Service The National Park Service preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future genera- tions. The National Park Service cooperates with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing
  • Analyzing Roles of Eleanor Roosevelt, Nancy Pelosi, and Ivanka Trump in U.S

    Analyzing Roles of Eleanor Roosevelt, Nancy Pelosi, and Ivanka Trump in U.S

    Chapman Law Review Volume 23 Issue 2 Symposium: 1920–2020: The Effects of Women’s Suffrage 100 Years After the Article 4 Ratification of the 19th Amendment Spring 6-15-2020 Analyzing Roles of Eleanor Roosevelt, Nancy Pelosi, and Ivanka Trump in U.S. Politics Kishor Dere Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/chapman-law-review Recommended Citation Kishor Dere, Analyzing Roles of Eleanor Roosevelt, Nancy Pelosi, and Ivanka Trump in U.S. Politics, 23 CHAP. L. REV. 361 (2020). Available at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/chapman-law-review/vol23/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Fowler School of Law at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chapman Law Review by an authorized editor of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHAPMAN LAW REVIEW Citation: Kishor Dere, Analyzing Roles of Eleanor Roosevelt, Nancy Pelosi, and Ivanka Trump in U.S. Politics, 23 CHAP. L. REV. 361 (2020). --For copyright information, please contact [email protected]. CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY | FOWLER SCHOOL OF LAW | ONE UNIVERSITY DRIVE | ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92866 WWW.CHAPMANLAWREVIEW.COM Do Not Delete 5/14/20 9:49 AM Analyzing Roles of Eleanor Roosevelt, Nancy Pelosi, and Ivanka Trump in U.S. Politics Kishor Dere* I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 363 II. ELEANOR ROOSEVELT ........................................................... 363 A. Impact of Privileged Ancestry, Broken Childhood, and a Good Teacher ............................... 365 1. ER Joins Social Reform Movement Rather than Making a Social Debut ..............................
  • Film Locations in San Francisco

    Film Locations in San Francisco

    Film Locations in San Francisco Title Release Year Locations A Jitney Elopement 1915 20th and Folsom Streets A Jitney Elopement 1915 Golden Gate Park Greed 1924 Cliff House (1090 Point Lobos Avenue) Greed 1924 Bush and Sutter Streets Greed 1924 Hayes Street at Laguna The Jazz Singer 1927 Coffee Dan's (O'Farrell Street at Powell) Barbary Coast 1935 After the Thin Man 1936 Coit Tower San Francisco 1936 The Barbary Coast San Francisco 1936 City Hall Page 1 of 588 10/02/2021 Film Locations in San Francisco Fun Facts Production Company The Essanay Film Manufacturing Company During San Francisco's Gold Rush era, the The Essanay Film Manufacturing Company Park was part of an area designated as the "Great Sand Waste". In 1887, the Cliff House was severely Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) damaged when the schooner Parallel, abandoned and loaded with dynamite, ran aground on the rocks below. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Warner Bros. Pictures The Samuel Goldwyn Company The Tower was funded by a gift bequeathed Metro-Goldwyn Mayer by Lillie Hitchcock Coit, a socialite who reportedly liked to chase fires. Though the tower resembles a firehose nozzle, it was not designed this way. The Barbary Coast was a red-light district Metro-Goldwyn Mayer that was largely destroyed in the 1906 earthquake. Though some of the establishments were rebuilt after the earthquake, an anti-vice campaign put the establishments out of business. The dome of SF's City Hall is almost a foot Metro-Goldwyn Mayer Page 2 of 588 10/02/2021 Film Locations in San Francisco Distributor Director Writer General Film Company Charles Chaplin Charles Chaplin General Film Company Charles Chaplin Charles Chaplin Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Eric von Stroheim Eric von Stroheim Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Eric von Stroheim Eric von Stroheim Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Eric von Stroheim Eric von Stroheim Warner Bros.
  • National AIDS Memorial Grove

    National AIDS Memorial Grove

    HOME T.O.C. 1 2 3 4 5 BOOK 1995 1997 1999 2001 ? CHAPTER 3 National AIDS Memorial Grove 1999 Rudy Bruner Award SILVER medal winner NATIONAL AIDS MEMORIAL GROVE San Francisco, California RUDY BRUNER AWARD 67 HOME T.O.C. 1 2 3 4 5 BOOK 1995 1997 1999 2001 ? SILVER MEDAL WINNER National AIDS Memorial Grove 68 RUDY BRUNER AWARD HOME T.O.C. 1 2 3 4 5 BOOK 1995 1997 1999 2001 ? CHAPTER 3 National AIDS Memorial Grove NATIONAL AIDS MEMORIAL GROVE AT A GLANCE WHO MADE THE SUBMISSION? F National AIDS Memorial Grove; Thom Weyand, Executive Director. WHAT IS THE NATIONAL AIDS MEMORIAL GROVE? F A living memorial for the use and benefit of the public and especially of all people whose lives have been touched by the AIDS epidemic. F A 7.5-acre dell in the east end of Golden Gate Park, formerly derelict and unused, which has been restored and re-inte- grated into the Park for enjoyment by the public. F A venue for monthly volunteer workdays that bring together many communities to build and maintain the Grove, to remember those who have died by participating in a monthly ritual, and to provide comfort and support to the living. F A national memorial of the loss caused by AIDS in San Francisco and around the country. F A public-private partnership that has secured public parkland on a long-term basis, that has generated ongoing community stewardship, and whose maintenance is intended to be funded in perpetuity. RUDY BRUNER AWARD 69 HOME T.O.C.
  • 2000 San Francisco Field Journal

    2000 San Francisco Field Journal

    Volume 5, Number 1 San Francisco Field Ornithologists JOURNAL 2004 SFFO SFFO Journal Volume 5, Number 1 2004 Contents 3 2004 Systematic Species List David Armstrong and Hugh Cotter 16 Glen Park Canyon, 2004 in Detail David Armstrong 17 Sutro Heights, 2004 in Detail Myra Ulvang 18 Birds of Alcatraz Lew Ellingham, Chris Hellwig and Matt Zlatunich ______________________________________________________ Front cover photo: Dickcissel ©2004 David Nelson Editor: Mark W. Eaton Mark W. [email protected] 1524 36th Avenue San Francisco, CA 94122 San Francisco Field Ornithologist’s Home Page http://www.sffo.org All material ©2004, 2005 San Francisco Field Ornithologists. Additional portions may also be copyrighted by the individuals who generated those portions. 2004 Journal, San Francisco Field Ornithologists 2 2004 San Francisco City Highlights David Armstrong and Hugh Cotter 2004 was a good year for birding in San Francisco with a total of 274 species being recorded within the City boundaries. While spring and fall migrations were not the best in recent years, with very few “typical” vagrant warblers seen, there were a number of excellent birds recorded within the City limits. New species added to the City List in 2004 included; Eurasian Collared Dove in April, Dickcissel in September and Laughing Gull in December. The second confirmed City record of Lapland Longspur was found in October as were the third and fourth known records of White-winged Dove. It was also a good year for normally rare City species such as Harlequin Duck and Blue-winged Teal which appeared in above normal numbers. Also of note was the confirmation of California Gull breeding on Alcatraz Island, the first record outside of the tip of Alameda NWR that is in San Francisco County and one of very few breeding records for San Francisco.