Appendix Two: Baseline Data

APPENDIX TWO: BASELINE DATA (ALSO PART OF THE EVIDENCE BASE FOR THE AMBER VALLEY LOCAL PLAN) Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topic Constraints BIODIVERSITY, GEODIVERSITY, FAUNA AND FLORA SO1 To safeguard and enhance biodiversity (including BAP Habitats and Species) and geodiversity and improve connectivity between, and access to green spaces and functional habitats.

Change in Priority BAP Habitat Priority Habitat (area in Brackets) Change over period Lowland meadow (93.6ha) 0.8ha Lowland dry acid grassland (70.87 ha) 1.27ha Lowland calcareous grassland (4.22 ha) 0 ha Purple moor-grass and rush pasture (12.73ha) 0 ha Calaminarian grassland (0.012ha) 0 ha This indicator is currently Change in areas and populations of Open mosaic habitats on previously reported through the developed land (49.8 ha) -6.44ha ha Annual Monitoring Report. Biodiversity biodiversity importance including: Trend: No trend 1.1 Reedbeds (0ha) 0 ha None Identified This data is based on the Fauna Lowland Heathland (3.1ha) 0 ha identified change in priority habitats and period April 2014 – March Flora Lowland Wood Pasture and Parkland species (by type) (819ha) 0 ha 2015 received by the Ancient and species rich hedgerow (No Authority in January 2016. data) 0ha Fens (58.13ha) +0.33ha Lowland deciduous woodland (2,122 a) 0ha Wet woodland (Not known) 0ha Eutrophic Water ponds and Lakes (664 ponds and 67.5 ha of lakes) Slight increase Source: Derbyshire Wildlife Trust 2016

This information is currently Biodiversity Broad location of BAP Priority Trend: No trend held by the Lowland Fauna 1.2 identified Derbyshire Biodiversity Habitats in Amber Valley Flora Action Plan Coordinator.

Source: LDBAP Coordinator. Reproduced by AVBC. Crown Copyright 100021321, 2016

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topic Constraints Amber Valley Derbyshire (outside Peak District National Park No of Area % of No Designation Designatio Area % of sites (ha) area of n (ha) area Changes in areas designated for their SPA 0 0 0 sites Trend: Negative: a relatively low proportion intrinsic environmental value SAC* 0 0 0 SPA (1) (127) (0.08) Biodiversity SSSI** 7 358.9ha 1.36% SAC* (5) (351) (0.21) of Amber Valley is None Identified Flora 1.3 including international, national, 925.34 SSSI 58 1,368 0.78 designated as either Wildlife sites 174 3.6% regional, sub regional or local ha Wildlife Fauna 1144 9523 5.40 statutory or non statutory 1,283.8 sites significance TOTAL 181 4.96% wildlife sites ha TOTAL 1202 10891 6.18 Source: Derbyshire Wildlife Trust 2016, Natural Source: Derbyshire Wildlife Trust 2014, Natural England 2016 England 2016 2013 results 2012 Results The overall figure was calculated as follows:- The overall figure was calculated as 397 sites have received positive management follows:- in the last 5 years. 396 sites have received positive Trend: Positive: Slight There are 1113 LWS (excluding Derby City) management in the last 5 years. improvement recorded 397/1113 x 100 = 35.6% . There are 1115 LWS (excluding Derby City) over the period. A Monitored annually by Proportion of local sites where Biodiversity In terms of area around 5290 ha is in positive 396/1115 x 100 = 35.5%. greater number of sites in Derbyshire Wildlife Trust on Flora 1.4 positive conservation management management which is just over 55% of the In terms of area, 5356 ha is in positive Amber Valley receive behalf of the Derbyshire Fauna has been or is being implemented area covered by LWS in Derbyshire excluding management which is 52.8% of the area positive management Authorities. Derby City. covered by all LWS excluding Derby City. than the average across Derbyshire In AVBC, 63 out of 174 (36.2%) sites were in positive management. This is higher than average

Area Ambergate and Ridgeway 1.01*ha Trend: Negative: Less Quarry than 1.5% of Amber Kedleston Park 93.50ha Valley is designated as Mount Pleasant 2.97ha Derbyshire SSSIs. Around a fifth of Biodiversity Cromford Canal Area Number and area of Sites of Special 10.17ha Derbyshire as a whole is Flora Total 98 51,495.6ha 1.5 Mercaston Marsh/ None Identified Scientific Interest 14.31ha designated, although this Fauna Muggington Bottoms Source: Natural England 2016 does include a number of Soil, Water and Air Shining Cliff 119.34ha very large designations on Crich Chase 118.195ha the Peak Fringe including Total (7) 358.9ha the White Peak. *0.6ha reported destroyed in 2013 Source: Natural England Website July 2016

Amber Valley Derbyshire Condition % Condition % Trend: Positive: Despite only a small number of % Area favourable 30.8% % Area favourable 17.52% Biodiversity % Area unfavourable recovering 66.1% SSSIs being located in the Condition of Sites of Special Scientific % Area unfavourable recovering 80.31% Flora % Area unfavourable no change 1.7% % area unfavourable no change 1.47% Borough, the sites are None Identified 1.6 Fauna Interest % Area unfavourable declining 0.7% % Area unfavourable declining 0.68% generally in better % Area destroyed part destroyed 0.2% % Area destroyed part Soil, Water and Air 0.01% condition than across Source: Natural England Website July 2016 destroyed Derbyshire as a whole. Source: Natural England Website July 2016

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topic Constraints

Area (ha) per Name Area (ha) 1000 people Belper Parks 15.53ha Carr Wood 4.13ha Trend: Negative: The Cromford Canal 10.17ha Duffield Borough performs poorly Area (in hectares) of Local Nature Millennium 5.72ha Natural England Target: against the Natural Biodiversity 1.7 Meadow Minimum 1 ha per thousand population. England suggested None Identified Flora Reserve per 1000 people Hammersmith 0.41ha 4.76ha (Suggested Target = 123.9ha) standards for LNR Fauna Meadow provision per 1000 Oakerthorpe 2.66ha Pennytown people. 5.45ha Pond Red River 2.01ha TOTAL 50.43ha Source: Magic GIS, 2016.

1.8 Location of ancient woodland

Location of Key wildlife and natural 1.9 environment constraints in Amber Valley.

Source: AVBC: Crown Copyright Reserved: Amber Valley Borough Council OS Licence No. 100021321, 2016

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topic Constraints The woodland estimates (a) are calculated based on Amber Valley Proportion of

Borough the area of non-coniferous woodland mapped by the Ordnance Survey on 1300ha (a) – Woodland 4.9% - 8% MasterMap and (b) on the 2122ha (b) area identified in the Biodiversity No trend identified 1.10 Tree coverage in the Borough Lowland Derbyshire BAP. Flora The area of ancient semi- Ancient semi-natural 526ha 1.98% natural woodland woodland identified in the Derbyshire Ancient

Woodland Inventory (1992).

Population and Human Health SO2 To ensure everyone has access to sustainable housing, which is affordable, and meets the needs of all residents including the elderly and other vulnerable groups

Trend: Negative: Affordable dwellings as a percentage of all new Affordable housing housing. remains significantly The affordable housing (Total Amber Valley lower than the long completions are likely to Affordable dwellings: as a Completions) Target 25% of all dwellings delivered term need identified further increase going Population 2.1 2015/16 20.1% 258 between 2011-28 to be affordable through the Council’s forward as a number of Human Health percentage of all new housing. 2014/15 13.4% 262 2013/14 12.2% 278 Strategic Housing large consented schemes 2012/13 40.0% 293 Market Assessment in are built out. 2011/12 27.5% 453 most of the past 5 years Source: AVBC 2016

Amber Valley Trend: Negative: 2015/16 95 The affordable housing affordable housing completions are expected 2014/15 35 delivery has been Affordable dwellings: total Target 144 houses per annum (based on to significantly increase substantially lower Population 2.2 number of properties 2013/14 34 housing delivery requirement of 575 going forward as recently than the average Human Health homes per annum) consented large housing completed annual requirement, 2012/13 89 schemes will contribute to although has increased delivery. 2011/12 71 in recent years.

Source: AVBC 2016

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 1 Bed House -- 0.50% 0.40% 1% 1.00% Trend: Unclear: The 1 Bed Flat 5% 2% 2% -- 1% mix of homes tends to 2 Bed House 38% 28% 14% 15% 15% be skewed towards 3 Data is for new build only 2 Bed Flat 2% 4% 10% 21% -- Population 2.3 New housing types and 4 bed homes and does not include 3 Bed House -- 32% 24% 27% 33% Human Health which typically make conversions. 4 Bed House 27% 23% 22% 15% 23% up around half of 5+ Bed annual supply. House 6% 6% 6% 6% 3%

Source AVBC 2016 Trend: No trend identified: Levels of owner occupation are higher than the Data is based on 2011 Population 2.4 Housing tenure Derbyshire and census. Human Health England averages Source: ONS Census 2011 whilst rental are lower. Trend: No trend identified: The number of detached and semi-detached is Data is based on 2011 Population higher than the 2.5 Type of accommodation census. Human Health England average, whilst the number of terrace and flats is Source: ONS Census 2011 lower

Housing Land Requirement1 2011-28 and Supply as at April 1st 2016.

A Minimum Target 2011-28 9,770 (575 per annum) B Net Completions 1,394 C Net Planning Permissions as at 1 April 2016 (3,979) Minus those 3,661 on Small Brownfield Sites (318)) Adoption of the Plan will Housing land requirement and D Net resolutions to grant planning permission as at April 1st 2016 388 Trend: No trend ensure that sufficient sites 2.6 st E Windfall allowance 2016-28 (based on annual rate of Population supply as at 1 April 2016 744 identified are bought forward to completions on small brownfield sites 2011-16 – 62 per annum) meet the Borough’s OAN. F Neighbourhood plan allocation 20 (Ripley Neighbourhood Plan) G Remaining housing requirement (A minus B+C+D+E+F) 3,563 Source: Amber Valley Borough Council 2016 Note based on March 2014 Sensitivity Testing and apportionment of unmet need from Derby City at a rate previously considered in a joint examination with South Derbyshire in 2015. Other requirements will need to be tested through SA process.

100

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Amber Valley Trend: Negative: 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 Total Housing completions Population 2.7 Recent housing completions Completions 258 262 278 293 453 1544 within the Borough None identified Human Health remain below the Material Assets Source: Amber Valley Borough Council 2016 annual requirement.

Trend: Negative: Mean house prices in the Borough have Average property price since increased significantly Population 2.8 None identified quarter April 2011 since April 2011 and, Material Assets at December 2015, were in excess of £180,000.

Source: Mean house price, quarterly rolling year, Q2-2011 to Q4-2015, Amber Valley. Based on date from Table 2a HPSSA Dataset 12. Mean house price for national and subnational geographies, quarterly rolling year

101

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

A Methodology for collecting Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Trend: Positive: data changed in 2013. District 2012 2013 2014 2015 Housing affordability The new version of Tables Amber Valley 5.18 5.40 5.32 5.71 is better than the 576-578 is created using a England average and different source of House Erewash 5.29 5.47 5.57 6.02 is better than most Price data which leads to Population South Derbyshire 5.79 5.74 6.5 6.64 2.09 Housing affordability similar districts/ slight differences in the Material Assets Derby City 4.39 4.51 4.58 4.73 boroughs, although distribution of affordability England 6.45 6.92 7.25 7.63 homes are less ratios which should be

Source: Ratio of lower quartile house price to lower quartile earnings by Local Authority, 2013 to affordable than in noted if both sets are used 2015 DCLG July 2016 Derby City. in conjunction. More information here National rank Rank within Number of Rate of Region/ local out of 325 (by region by rate mortgage and possession authority rate of of possession landlord claims - possession claims possession 1 in x claims) claims, 2013/14 households Trend: Positive: East Midlands 16,174 1 in 117 Repossession claims are lower than the Population Amber Valley 246 28 292 1 in 180 None identified 2.10 Repossession claims and orders regional average and Material Assets Erewash 202 23 308 1 in 158 surrounding districts/ South Derbyshire 230 26 231 1 in 169 boroughs. Derby City 72 6 1107 1 in 88 Based on Data from Shelter. 2013/14 Repossession and eviction Hotspots available at https://england.shelter.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/825176/Eviction_and_Repossession_Hotspots_201 314_Data.pdf

Number Housing Type 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Long term vacancy rates Trend: Positive: There 727 780 644 724 706 676 has been a general The information for 2016 (all) Population 2.11 Vacancy rates Local Authority owned long term trend in will not be available until 16 12 0 0 2 0 Material Assets vacancy rates respect of vacancy October 2016. Other Public Sector rates. 7 9 7 9 7 6 Vacants

Source:https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/.../LT_615.xls

102

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints S03 To improve local accessibility to healthcare, education, employment, retail facilities and recreational resources (including open spaces and sports facilities) and enhance wellbeing and promote healthy and sustainable lifestyles

Accessibility statistics provide a local-level measure of the availability of transport to key services (covering food stores, education Average minimum travel (primary and secondary), health care (hospital and Population time to reach the nearest Trend: No trend GP), town centres and Material Assets 3.1 identified. key services by walking or employment centres). Human Health public transport Data exists for AVBC and all other Districts since 2007 although a change in the methodology as data collection means that prior to 2011 data may not be comparable.

Source: Journey times to key services by local authority (JTS04) (selected data December 2015)

Amber Valley England Trend: Positive: A Households without a Car Households without a 5,691,251 relatively small 19.2% or Van Car or Van (25.8%) proportion of the Data is only published on Population Households with one car Households with one 9,301,776 Borough’s households do a decennial basis within 3.2 Private car/van ownership 42.2% Material assets or van car or van (42.2%) not have access to a car the ONS Census. Households with two or Households with two or 7,070,341 38.6% or van compared to the more cars or van more cars or van (32.1%) England average. Source: Census 2011 KS404EW Cars or Vans Source: Census 2011 KS404EW

103

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

area of workplace : local authority: district / unitary Amber Valley Amber Valley %

Derby 8,364 32.0 Travel to Work: Erewash 2,533 9.7 Outflow by Local Authority Trend: No trend Population Nottingham 2,163 8.3 None identified 3.4 identified Material assets (Amber Valley)* Key Derbyshire Dales 1,986 7.6 Destinations Bolsover 1,677 6.4 Ashfield 1,633 6.3 Broxtowe 1,414 5.4 Source: ONS Census 2011, taken from Derbyshire Observatory, 2016

area of residence local authority: district / unitary Amber Valley Amber Valley %

Derby 3,692 16.9 Travel to Work: Ashfield 2,568 11.8 Inflow by Local Authority Trend: No trend Population Bolsover 2,513 11.5 None identified 3.5 Identified Material assets (Amber Valley)* Key Erewash 2,170 10.0 Destinations Broxtowe 1,733 7.9 North East Derbyshire 1,605 7.4 Derbyshire Dales 1,247 5.7 Source: ONS Census 2011, taken from Derbyshire Observatory, 2016

local authority Inflow Outflow Net Change Travel to Work: Amber Valley 21,805 26,124 -4,319 Trend: Positive: inflows Population Derby City 41,765 30,161 11,604 and outflows are None identified 3.6 inflows and outflows Material assets (totals) South Derbyshire 14,322 28,253 -13,931 relatively balanced, Erewash 16,627 28,536 -11,909 Source: ONS, Census WU01UK - Location of usual residence and place of work

* Also Sustainable Travel Indicator ** Also Sustainable Travel Indicator 104

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Proportion of residents living and work in same District/Borough Proportion of employed Amber Valley 56.1% Trend: Positive: Derby City 73.3% Containment is higher Population None Identified 3.7 residents that work in the South Derbyshire 48.1% than most surrounding Material assets area where they live Erewash 41.1% districts/ boroughs. Source: 2011 Census - Table WU01UK UK Travel Flows (Local Authority): Data taken from analysis of commuter patterns in Derbyshire. See Derbyshire Observatory

2005-06 2009-11 Trend: Positive: There Adult participation in sport Amber Valley 21.6% 24.3% was small improvement Unclear whether this Derby City 21.0 22.9% in the number of people data will continue to be Population 3.8 and recreation (3x30 South Derbyshire 21.3% 23.4% undertaking 3x30 mins monitored in the Human Health minutes) a week Erewash 21.7% 22.1% exercise between future. Source: Active People Survey 6: June 2012 DCMS 2012 2005/06 and 2010/2011.

Amber Valley England Trend: Mixed: The male Life Life Life Life population is expected to Year Expectancy Expectancy Year Expectancy Expectancy live on average 0.2 years Life expectancy at birth for Male Female Male Female less than the national Population 3.9 None identified male and females residents 79.2 83.6 79.4 83.1 average. The female Human Health population is forecast to Source: Neighbourhood Statistics, life expectancy Source: Neighbourhood Statistics, life expectancy live 0.5 years longer than at birth, data published 2014 at birth, data published 2014 the national average.

Trend: Mixed: The proportion of the Forecast Number and proportion of population aged over 65 at 2028 population over 65 in Percentage of Amber Valley will grow Authority Number population significantly from around Amber Valley 33,000 26.41% 21.9% in 2016 to almost Population 3.10 Population aged over 65 None identified South Derbyshire 23,000 22.40% 26.5% in 2028. This is Human Health Derby City 50,800 18.26% amongst the highest in Erewash 29,400 23.94% Derbyshire and could have significant Source: ONS 2012-based Sub national population projections ONS 2012 implications for public service provision.

105

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints Trend: Negative: The Number and percent of total population with limiting long-term illness (Selected Districts) This information is Borough has a higher District Number Percentage taken from census data number of residents with Residents with one or Amber Valley Borough Council 24,809 20.2% which is updated every limiting long-term Population 3.11 more limiting long-term Derby (Unitary Authority) 46,456 18.6% 10 years. As such, this Derbyshire Dales District Council 13,186 18.5% illnesses compared to Human Health data is presented to illness. Erewash Borough Council 21,636 19.3% surrounding districts (as establish a baseline South Derbyshire District Council 16,536 17.5% a percentage of only. Source: ONS Census Data 2011 population). Trend: Mixed: The proportion of residents Percentage of District’s residents providing unpaid care caring for family or This information is No of Hours 2001 2011 others has fallen taken from census data between 2001 and 2011 which is updated every 0 88.4% 88.1% Population 1-19 8.2% 7.8% although the number of 10 years. As such, this 3.12 Unpaid care Human Health 20-49 1.3% 1.5% people caring has data is presented to 50+ 2.1% 2.7% increased slightly due to establish a baseline Source: ONS Census Data 2011 the overall increase in only. population size in the Borough. Trend: Mixed. A lower This information is than average number of taken from census data residents consider Amber Valley Derbyshire England which is updated every themselves to be in very Very Good 44.0% 44.4% 45.3% 10 years. As such, this good health compared to How residents consider Good 35.0% 34.5% 35.1% data is presented to Population Fair 15.0% 14.9% 14.0% national averages, 3.13 establish a baseline Human Health their own health Bad 4.8% 4.8% 4.3% although those residents only. It is not intended Very Bad 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% that consider they have to be used as an good or fair health is indicator to measure Source: ONS Census 2011 KS301EW higher than the national plan performance. average

Trend: Positive: Early Early death rates (in death rates from all Population sources have fallen since None identified 3.14 people under 75) from all Human Health courses –Men 2003 and are lower than the England average.

Source: Amber Valley Health Profile 2015 106

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Trend: Positive: Early Early death rates (in death rates from all sources have generally Population None identified 3.15 people under 75) from all fallen since 2003 and are Human Health courses -Women lower than the England average.

Source: Amber Valley Health Profile 2015

Trend: Mixed: Obesity in Amber Valley England childhood is lower than Obesity in children and the England average, Population 3.16 Children (year 6) 17.3 18.9 None identified adults Adults 28.0 23.0 although obesity in the Human Health adult population is Source: Amber Valley Health Profile 2015 higher.

SO4 To create safe and attractive places which contribute towards quality of life and community cohesion

Trend: Positive: The South Amber Valley Derby City England number of people killed Killed and seriously injured Derbyshire and seriously injured has Population 4.1 None identified on roads 2004-2006 57.9 65.8 46.9 56.3 fallen over recent years Human Health 2010-12 36.5 48.5 35.3 40.5 and is lower than the National average. Source: Amber Valley, Derby City, South Derbyshire Health Profile 2008, and 2014

Trend: Positive: The Recorded violence against number of violent crimes Population recorded in Amber Valley None identified 4.2 the person crimes, crude Human Health rate per 1,000 population is notably lower than the England average. Source: Amber Valley Health Profile 2015

107

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Data for the Borough Trend: Negative: Crime Community safety: Crime can be based on very Population rates increased small samples. Care Human Health 4.3 rates compared to compared to the should be taken when Material Assets previous quarter previous quarter using this information.

Source: LG Inform: http://lginform.local.gov.uk/

Data for the Borough Community safety: Crime Trend: Mixed: Rates are can be based on very Population rates in Amber Valley lower than Erewash, but small samples. Care Human Health 4.4 higher than South (quarterly per 1000 should be taken when Material Assets Derbyshire. people) using this information.

Source: LG Inform: http://lginform.local.gov.uk/ 108

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Derbyshire Dales

Amber Valley

Data for the Borough Community safety: Crime Trend: Mixed: Rates are can be based on very Population rates in Amber Valley lower than Erewash, but small samples. Care Human Health 4.5 higher than South (quarterly per 1000 Erewash should be taken when Material Assets Derby Derbyshire. people) using this information. City

South Derbyshire

Source: LG Inform: http://lginform.local.gov.uk/ ONS Crown Copyright 100021321, 2016

Very Worried Fairly Worried Not very Not at all worried worried Trend: Positive: The 2015 3.7% 26.6% 61.8% 7.9% proportion of Derbyshire Proportion of Derbyshire 2014 3.5% 28.7% 57.9% 9.9% residents very worried or Population 4.6 None identified residents worried by crime 2013 3.6% 28.7% 58.5% 9.2% fairly worried about Human Health 2012 3.6% 31.1% 58.9% 6.4% crime has generally fallen 2011 3.8% 32.3% 57.2 6.0% since 2011. Source: Survey 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015

A lot A little Not at all Not worried about crime The extent to which 2015 3.5% 39.8% 43.2% 13.5% Trend: Positive: Generally, the proportion worrying about crime 2014 ------Population 4.7 of people worrying about None identified 2013 4.6% 44.0% 40.5% 10.9% Human Health impact on the quality of crime fell over the life of residents. 2012 4.6% 47.7% 38.3% 9.5% monitored period. 2011 4.4% 51.9% 37.7% 6.0% Source: Derbyshire Citizens Panel Survey 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015

109

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints S05 To reduce inequalities associated with deprivation across the Borough

Other District Rankings Data is updated Average Amber Valley Rank periodically at Score undefined intervals. Its Average Trend: Positive: Amber Rank Derbyshire Dales 12.56 232 inclusion in this matrix Score North West Valley has lower levels of Population Index of multiple 15.22 194 is predominantly to 5.1 Amber Valley 17.89 159 Leicestershire deprivation compared to Material Assets provide context against deprivation South Derbyshire 13.64% 221 most other local Human Health A rank of 1 is the most deprived and a rank of 354 the relative levels of Erewash 19.19 150 authority districts. is the least deprived deprivation in Derby 24.58 108 Source: ONS 2011 Bolsover 27.24 43 neighbouring authorities. Source: ONS, 2011

Trend: Mixed: Higher levels of deprivation are Index of multiple clustered around Data is updated Alfreton, Ripley and periodically at deprivation by ward and Heanor, whilst Belper undefined intervals. Its super output area and and the rural west of the inclusion in this matrix Population 5.2 percentage of the Borough tend to have is predominantly to Material Assets population who live in lower levels of provide context against Human Health deprivation. Overall, the relative levels of areas at each level of around 85% of all deprivation spatially deprivation. residents are living in within the Borough. areas in the 3 least deprived quintiles.

110

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints Unemployment by Ward (Amber Valley)

Rate Long term Male Female Total (1 year+) Alfreton 2.0 1.8 2.0 23.5 Alport 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 Belper Central 1.5 0.3 0.9 20.0 Belper East 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 Belper North 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 Belper South 0.5 1.1 0.8 16.7 Codnor and Waingroves 0.7 1.0 1.2 20.0 Crich 1.4 0.0 1.4 50.0 Duffield 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 Heage and Ambergate 1.0 0.0 0.5 33.3 Trend: Mixed: Heanor and Loscoe 2.1 1.3 1.8 33.3 Unemployment rates Heanor East 3.0 1.3 2.1 33.3 remain low (less than 2.5% Figures are based on Unemployment rate across all wards, although small sample sizes and Population 5.3 Heanor West 2.4 0.9 2.0 22.2 (by ward)* Ironville and Riddings 1.9 2.4 2.5 26.7 unemployment rates can should be treated with Material Assets Kilburn, Denby and be ten times higher in the caution. 1.3 0.6 1.1 14.3 Holbrook worst performing wards Langley Mill and Aldercar 2.7 1.3 2.3 23.1 than the best). Ripley 2.5 1.6 2.1 25.0 Ripley and Marehay 1.8 0.8 1.3 14.3 Shipley Park, Horsley and 0.8 0.3 0.6 25.0 Horsley Woodhouse Woodhouse 3.8 1.6 2.5 23.5 Somercotes 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 South West Parishes 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.0 Swanwick 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.0 Wingfield 2.0 1.8 2.0 23.5

Adapted from Derbyshire County Councils Monthly Unemployment Statistics Bulletin. Figures are for April 2016 (Long- term figures show the percentage of all unemployed people out of work for over 1 year). Data available at Derbyshire Observatory Source: ONS (NOMIS). Figures are not seasonally adjusted.

* Also Indicator for Employment Opportunities Objective - See section 7.3

111

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints Unemployment statistics up to and including August 2014 are based on

2003 Ward 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 geographies. From Trend: Positive: Unemployment rates Amber Valley 3.4% 3.5% 2.8% 1.9% 1.3% September 2014 Unemployment rates have 5.4 Borough-wide rate for Source: Office for National Statistics (Nomis); onwards, these Population Census, Census Area Statistics © Crown declined markedly in data were created April since 2011 Copyright recent years. using the new 2011 Data taken from Derbyshire Observatory 2016. Ward geographies

and for the majority of areas are not comparable.

Amber Valley Amber Valley East Midlands Great Britain

(numbers) (%) (%) (%)

Total claimants 8,440 11.0 11.4 11.8

By statistical group

Job seekers 820 1.1 1.4 1.5 Trend: Positive: With the ESA and incapacity benefits 4,600 6.0 6.0 6.2 exception of carers, Amber Valley typically has less 5.5 Main working age benefit Lone parents 710 0.9 1.0 1.1 working age residents on None identified Population claimants (February 2016) benefits compared to Carers 1,350 1.8 1.7 1.6 regional and England Others on income related benefits 160 0.2 0.2 0.2 average.

Disabled 680 0.9 0.9 1.0

Bereaved 130 0.2 0.2 0.2

Main out-of-work benefits† 6,290 8.2 8.6 9.0

Source: DWP benefit claimants - working age client group. Data taken from NOMIS, August 2016

112

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints S06 To deliver growth in key employment sectors and support the creation of new and retention of existing businesses in urban and rural areas

Birth Rate Count Derbyshire England (%) Trend: Negative: Business Amber Valley 510 11.7 births are lower (as a Enterprise birth rate (% of South Derbyshire 435 12.8 percentage of existing 11.9% 14.0% businesses) compared to None identified Population 6.1 Derby City 1100 14.7 total enterprises) neighbouring Districts and Erewash 455 12.4 County and England Source: Business Demography 2015, Office for National Statistics, Crown Copyright average.

Birth Rate Count Derbyshire England Trend: Negative: Business (%) survival rates at 1 year are Amber Valley 235 92.2 lower (as a percentage of South Derbyshire 400 95.2 existing businesses) None identified Population 6.2 Enterprises surviving 1 Year 95.4% 93.5% Derby City 400 93.0 compared to neighbouring Erewash 1050 93.8 Districts and County and Source: Business Demography 2014, Office for National Statistics, Crown Copyright England average.

Birth Rate Trend: Positive: By 2 Count Derbyshire England (%) years business survival Amber Valley 76.8 315 rates are starting to edge 6.3 Enterprises surviving 2 Years South Derbyshire 78.1 250 higher than most None identified Population 75.5% 73.7% Derby City 74.9 625 surrounding Districts, the Erewash 75.4 260 County average and the Source: Business Demography 2014, Office for National Statistics, Crown Copyright England average.

Amber Valley Amber Valley East Midlands East Midlands

(numbers) (%) (numbers) %) Trend: Unclear: Small and Micro (0 to 9) 3,765 87.4 145,200 88.2 medium size enterprises 6.4 Business count Small (10 to 49) 435 10.1 16,110 9.8 numbers are higher than None identified Population Medium (50 to 249) 90 2.1 2,755 1.7 the County and England Large (250+) 20 0.5 625 0.4 average. Total 4,310 - 164,690 - Source: Inter Departmental Business Register (ONS) 2016

113

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Business count. Size of Trend: No trend 6.5 None identified Population business (%) identified

Source: Inter Departmental Business Register (ONS) 2016

Trend: Mixed: Professional occupations are underrepresented Employment by occupation locally, although 6.6 managers, directors and None identified Population (%) senior officials, associate and professional and technical and skilled trade are over represented.

114

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 Trend: Negative: Delivery rates appear to have fallen Annual employment land 6.7 Area 0.761ha 0.834ha 0.799ha 0.219ha 0.003ha in the previous two None identified Population delivery monitoring periods from Source: Amber Valley Borough Council 2016 already low levels.

SO7 To create greater employment opportunities and higher value jobs across the whole Borough

Earnings by residence (2015) Amber Valley East Midlands Great Britain (pounds) (pounds) (pounds) Trend: Positive: Earnings Gross weekly pay are higher than the East Midlands average and Median earnings in pounds Earnings by residence (gross Full-time broadly in line with nation- 520.1 492 529.6 for employees living in the Population 7.1 workers wide averages, although weekly) area. Male full-time female full time workers 572.6 540.6 570.4 workers underperform the national average. Female full- 427.5 423.3 471.6 time workers

Source: ONS annual survey of hours and earnings - resident analysis Earnings by residence (2015) Amber Valley East Midlands Great Britain

(pounds) (pounds) (pounds) Hourly pay- excluding overtime Trend: Mixed: Hourly pay is Full-time Median earnings in pounds Earnings by Residence 12.75 12.26 13.33 higher than the East 7.2 workers for employees living in the Population (hourly) Midlands average but lower Male full-time area 13.49 12.81 13.93 than the national average. workers Female full- 11.55 11.19 12.57 time workers Source: ONS annual survey of hours and earnings - resident analysis

115

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints Unemployment by Ward (Amber Valley)

Rate Long term Male Female Total (1 year+) Alfreton 2.0 1.8 2.0 23.5 Alport 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 Belper Central 1.5 0.3 0.9 20.0 Belper East 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 Belper North 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 Belper South 0.5 1.1 0.8 16.7 Codnor and Waingroves 0.7 1.0 1.2 20.0 Crich 1.4 0.0 1.4 50.0 Duffield 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 Heage and Ambergate 1.0 0.0 0.5 33.3 Trend: Mixed: Heanor and Loscoe 2.1 1.3 1.8 33.3 Unemployment rates remain low (less than 2.5%) Heanor East 3.0 1.3 2.1 33.3 Figures are based on small Unemployment rate across all wards, although Population Heanor West 2.4 0.9 2.0 22.2 sample sizes and should be 7.3 unemployment rates can be Material Assets (By ward)* Ironville and Riddings 1.9 2.4 2.5 26.7 treated with caution. Kilburn, Denby and ten times higher in the 1.3 0.6 1.1 14.3 Holbrook worst performing wards Langley Mill and Aldercar 2.7 1.3 2.3 23.1 than the best. Ripley 2.5 1.6 2.1 25.0 Ripley and Marehay 1.8 0.8 1.3 14.3 Shipley Park, Horsley and 0.8 0.3 0.6 25.0 Horsley Woodhouse Woodhouse 3.8 1.6 2.5 23.5 Somercotes 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 South West Parishes 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.0 Swanwick 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.0 Wingfield 2.0 1.8 2.0 23.5

Adapted from Derbyshire County Councils Monthly Unemployment Statistics Bulletin. Figures are for April 2016 (in Long-term figures show the percentage of all unemployed people out of work for over 1 year Data available at Derbyshire Observatory Source: ONS (NOMIS). Figures are not seasonally adjusted.

Trend: Negative; Even Count (%) Derbyshire England stripping out the high Amber Valley 100 0.3 number of high tech High tech manufacturing (% South Derbyshire 400 1.4 employees employed in 7.4 0.6 3.6 None identified Population of total employees) Derby City 12,900 10.5 Derby City, there are less Erewash 100 0.3 high tech manufacturing Source: Business Register and Employment Survey (2015), Office for National Statistics, Crown jobs in the Borough than Copyright most surrounding districts.

116

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Shows the number of residents employed in upper occupational groups as a percentage of all residents in employment- 'Upper occupational Trend: Positive: Amber groups' are defined as Valley has a relatively high Standard Occupational Percentage of working age proportion of its workforce Classification (SOC) 2010 population (16-64 years) employed in upper major groups 1 (managers, 7.5 Population who are employed in upper occupations (47.9%). This is directors and senior occupations higher than all authorities in officials), 2 (professional Derbyshire except for occupations) and 3 Derbyshire Dales. (associate professional and technical occupations). The figures are taken from the Annual Population Survey (APS) and are a rolling average of the results for

the previous four quarters. Source: Annual Population Survey (2016), Office for National Statistics, Crown Copyright

MATERIAL ASSETS

SO8 To deliver improved infrastructure to support growth and economic competitiveness of urban and rural businesses.

Site Locations: ID27361 A610 A6 A609 A608 A38 B6441 Nottingham Rd to A6007 ID6166 ID27361 ID6166 ID77219 ID27358 ID81013 Trend: Negative: There A610 to A5012 2011 17938 10166 7522 14443 45615 have been modest increases Traffic counts on selected ID77219 in traffic volumes on most Material Assets 8.1 2012 17752 10009 7403 12671 49235 A609 (Nottm Rd) Over Lane local roads local routes reviewed since 2013 17783 9966 7383 12566 48508 Belper 2011. 2014 18366 10190 7569 12838 47569 ID27358 Brickkiln Lane A609 2015 18768 10204 7599 12832 50103 ID81013 A61 to A38 (T)

117

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Trend: Negative: There is a greater reliance on the car Population to travel to work compared None identified 8.2 Mode of transport to work Material assets with England and Derbyshire averages.

Shops in another Local shop locality Walk 45.30% 1.20% Cycle 0.90% 0.60% Trend: Negative: Almost Use own private transport 47.10% 80.30% half of visits to local shops are by private transport, Mode of Transport to Population Rely on relative's/neighbour's private whilst more than 4 out of 5 None identified 8.3 1.00% 2.20% Material assets shops transport visits to shops in other Use public transport 4.30% 14.20% localities are made using Use community transport 0.10% 0.50% private transport. Use taxi 0.50% 0.30% Rely on others to go shopping for me 0.70% 0.80% Source: Derbyshire Citizens Panel Survey 2014

Trend: Mixed: A number of WWTWs are exceeding or close to exceeding their

Capacity at waste water consented dry weather flow (DWF). However early Population None identified 8.4 treatment works in Amber discussions with Severn Material assets Valley Trent could allow for increases in capacity to be delivered in a timely fashion.

Source: Derby HMA water Cyclle Study 2010

118

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints Trend: Positive: Most areas already have access to superfast broadband. In those areas which do not currently have superfast Mapping indicating commerical roll out of Broad band is available to view on the Digital Derbyshire Superfast broadband roll broadband this is likely to be Population website. None identified 8.5 rolled out commercially or Material Assets out http://www.digitalderbyshire.org.uk/where-and-when/maps/default.asp will be delivered under the digital Derbyshire scheme and is in progress. A small number of areas are still under review. SO9 To promote sustainable travel habits including walking, cycling and public transport (bus and rail) usage.

area of workplace : local authority: district / unitary Amber Valley Amber Valley %

Derby 8,364 32.0 Travel to work Erewash 2,533 9.7 Population Trend: No trend identified None identified 9.1 outflow by Local Authority Nottingham 2,163 8.3 Material assets (Amber Valley)* Derbyshire Dales 1,986 7.6 Bolsover 1,677 6.4 Ashfield 1,633 6.3 Broxtowe 1,414 5.4 Source: Derbyshire Observatory, 2016

area of residence local authority: district / unitary Amber Valley Amber Valley %

Derby 3,692 16.9 Travel to work Ashfield 2,568 11.8 Population Trend: No trend identified None identified 9.2 inflow by Local Authority Bolsover 2,513 11.5 Material assets (Amber Valley)* Erewash 2,170 10.0 Broxtowe 1,733 7.9 North East Derbyshire 1,605 7.4 Derbyshire Dales 1,247 5.7 Source: Derbyshire Observatory, 2016

119

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Trend: Negative. There is a greater reliance on the car Population to travel to work compared None identified 9.3* Mode of transport to work Material assets with England and Derbyshire averages

Working population (age Trend: Positive: With the exception of Erewash, 16+) in employment Population residents in Amber Valley None identified 9.4 Material assets travelling 20km or more to travel the least distance to work (%) (2011) work in the County.

Trend: Mixed: The proportion of people Percentage of home working from home workers as a percentage of increased between 2001 and Population 9.5 None identified work-day resident 2011, although still remains Material assets population (2011) lower than many surrounding districts/ boroughs.

120

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

SO10 To ensure that town and village centres are vibrant and viable.

Number Percent Number Percent UK Percent

Trend: Positive: Vacancy 2009 2011 2011 Data is not easily Vacancy rates in the rates were lower in 2011 updateable and unlikely Population Alfreton 18 11.25% 16 10% than the national average 10.1 Borough’s main town to be updated in the Material Assets Belper 19 10.22% 22 11.83% with the exception of centres 12.66% near future. Heanor 18 15.3% 17 14.41% Heanor. Ripley 12 7.27 11 6.67% Source: Amber Valley Retail Study 2011

Fashion Change Change Location Mar 2008 2003/04 2000/01 1998/99 1995/96 market 2003- 1995- Centre grade ket Rank Rank Rank Rank Rank position 2008 2008 posit Town Centres in Amberio nValley Minor Alfreto Trend: Negative: Most of the District Middle Value 612 452 438 402 415 -160 -197 n Boroughs Minor Retail Rank of Minor Districts * Districts fell down the UK Population Minor rankings indicating that the None Identified 10.2 centres (town centres) in Belper Middle Lower 641 589 602 559 698 -52 +57 Material Assets Amber Valley District town centres lost ground on Minor other similar sized centres Heanor Middle Lower 659 538 644 659 620 -121 -39 District between 1995 and 2008. Minor Ripley Value Value 1,095 743 614 659 890 -352 -205 District Source: Amber Valley Retail Study 2011

2014 Shops in Local Shops another locality Almost every day 36.8% 5.8% Al least once a week 53.7% 63.7% About once a month 5.9% 21.9% Population 10.3 Visiting local shops Less frequently but visited Trend: No trend identified None Identified 1.6% 5.8% Material Assets within the last 6 months Less frequently but visited 0.6% 1.1% 6-12 months ago more than 12 months ago 0.4% 0.8% Never 0.9% 0.9%

Source: Derbyshire County Council, Citizens Panel Survey 2014

121

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints SOIL, WATER AND AIR

S011 To minimise waste and ensure the sustainable use and protection of natural resources including greenfield land, soil and mineral resources.

Percentage England Rank recycled Amber Valley 32.9% 276 Trend: Negative: Amber Valley has one of the lowest Recycling rates in Amber Derby City 32.9% 274 recycling rates in the region South Derbyshire 49.0% 87 None identified Soil, Water and Air 11.1 Valley and neighbouring and is in the lowest 50 local Erewash 38.9% 215 authorities authorities in England (There Derbyshire Dales 55.2% 31 are 326 Authorities) UK average 44.8% -- Source: DEFRA Waste Data Flows 2015

Trend: Negative: the proportion of homes built on previously developed land Proportion of new housing has generally fallen over the delivered on brownfield past 5 years and is likely to 11.2 None identified Soil, Water and Air (previously developed continue to do so given local sites). housing requirements and the relative lack of brownfield land to accommodate housing.

122

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Ripley

Belper Heanor Agricultural land 11.3 Trend: No trend identified None identified Soil, Water and Air classification data Ilkeston

Derby City

Source: Magic, 2016. Crown Copyright All rights reserved. Amber Valley Borough Council OS Licence No. 100021321, S012 To minimise water, air and noise pollution and ensure that future growth does not lead to the deterioration of environmental conditions

Air quality management Soil, Water and Air 12.1 Trend: No trend identified None identified Population and Human areas in Derby City Health

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Number of air quality 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Number of AQMAs 0 0 0 0 0 Soil, Water, Air management areas Trend: Positive: There are Homes within None identified Population and Human 12.2 no AQMAs in the Borough. (AQMAs) within the AQMA 0 0 0 0 0 Health Borough. Source: Amber Valley Borough Council

Name Overall Ecological Chemical Objective

Derwent Middle – Derbyshire Overall 2009 2015 2009 2015 2009 2015 water body Amber from Moderate Alfreton Brook to Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Good Good by 2015 Derwent Blackbrook Not Good by Catchment (trib Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Good Assessed 2027 of Derwent) Bottle Brook Not Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Good Catchment Assessed by 2015 Derwent from Not Moderate Amber to Bottle Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Fail Assessed by 2015 Brook Ecclesborne Not Good by Poor Moderate Poor Moderate Good Catchment assessed 2027 Westwood Brook Moderate form Westwood Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Good Good by 2015 Brook to Amber Water quality in key Trend: Negative: Water Derwent Lower- Derbyshire quality is generally below 12.3 waterbodies in Amber None identified Soil, Water, Air Kedleston Hall Not Good by levels required within the Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Good Valley Lower Lake Assessed 2027 Water Framework Directive. Mackworth Brook (trib of Not Good By Poor Poor Poor Poor Good Markeaton Assessed 2027 Brook) Markeaton Brook (from Source to Not Good By Good Moderate Good Moderate Good Mackworth Assessed 2027 Brook

Lower Trent and Erewash

Bailey Brook (trib Not Good by Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Good of Erewash) Assessed 2027 Erewash from Nethergreen Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Good Good Brook to Gilt By 2015 Brook Nut Brook Catchment Moderat Good by Good Good Moderate Good Good (trib of e 2027 Erewash) Source: Environment Agency 2016

124

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Trend: No trend identified: Soil, Water Air 12.4 Tranquillity data Information to inform None Identified Population and Human baseline only. Health

Amber Valley

Map Courtesy of DCC Environmental Services. Reproduced under OS Licence No. LA100019461. 2014 125

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints CLIMATIC FACTORS SO13 To reduce the Borough’s contribution towards the emission of climate change gases and reduce and manage the effects of climate change including flood risk and reduced water availability

Accessibility statistics provide a local-level measure of the availability of transport Trend: Positive: Amber to key services (covering Valley performs well in food stores, education respect of public transport, (primary and Average travel time by walking and cycling travel secondary), health care Climatic Factors public transport/ walking, times to key services. (hospital and GP), town Population and 13.1 cycling and car to 8 key Average travel times are 18.9 centres and Human Health features mins for public transport or employment centres). Material Assets walking, 12.6 mins for cycle Data exists for SDDC and and 11.4mins for car all other Districts since journeys. 2007 although a change in the methodology as data collection means that prior to 2011 data may not be comparable. Source: Journey times to key services by local authority (JTS04) (selected data December 2015)

Accessibility statistics provide a local-level measure of the availability of transport to key services (covering food stores, education (primary and Average minimum travel secondary), health care time to reach the nearest (hospital and GP), town Population 13.2 Trend: No trend identified Material Assets key services by Walking or centres and Human Health Public Transport employment centres). Data exists for SDDC and all other Districts since 2007 although a change in the methodology as data collection means that prior to 2011 data Source: Journey times to key services by local authority (JTS04) may not be comparable. (selected data December 2015) 126

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Trend: Positive: Water usage Population and Human is lower within the Severn Severn Trent Region 126 litres per person per day Based on data available Health Trent Water Resource Zone 13.3 Water usage per person England 147 litres per person per day on STWs website Soil, Water and Air compared to the national Source: Severn Trent Water 2013 Climatic Factors average.

Population and Human Health Trend: No trend identified None Identified 13.4 Flood risk areas (fluvial) Soil, Water and Air Climatic Factors

08 127

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Population and Human Health Trend: No trend identified None identified 13.5 Flood risk areas (pluvial) Soil, Water and Air Climatic Factors

Great Britain Amber Valley Great Year Amber Valley Year Britain Trend: Positive: Annual Average annual 2014 3,995kWh 2014 4,039kWh 2013 4,025 kWh consumption of electricity is Population 13.6 consumption of electricity 2013 4,099kWh None identified 2012 3,953 kWh lower in the Borough than at Climatic Factors 2012 4035kWh in kWh the national level. Source: Department of Energy & Climate Change, National Source: Audit Commission (Data supplied by DTI Archives website Energy Trends)

128

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Amber Valley England Year Amber Valley Year National Average Trend: Negative: Average Average annual 2014 13,000 kWh 2014 11,870kWh Population and Human annual consumption of gas is 2013 13,410 kWh 2013 12,297 kWh None identified Health 13.7 consumption of Gas in higher within Amber Valley 2012 14,830 kWh 2012 14,043 kWh Climatic Factors kWh Source: DECC 2016 Sub-national gas sales and Source: DECC 2016 Sub-national gas sales and than at the National level. numbers of customers numbers of customers

Industry and Year Domestic Transport Total Commerce Per capita C02 emissions Population and Human 2011 2.5 2.2 1.8 6.6 Health 13.8 for Amber Valley (by Trend: No trend identified None identified 2012 2.7 2.4 1.8 6.9 Soil, water and Air sector) Climatic Factors 2013 2.6 2.4 1.7 6.8 Source DECC: Per capita Local CO2 emission estimates; industry, domestic and transport sectors

Region/Local Authority 2016 q2 2016 q1 2015 q4 2015 q3 2015 q2

Amber Valley 84 75 65 62 49 Trend: Positive: the number of electric vehicles continues Population and Human Derbyshire Dales 61 53 49 44 35 to increase quarter on Electric Vehicles within the Health quarter although remains at None identified 13.9 Derby UA 306 255 182 151 123 Soil, water and Air Borough a low level both within the Climatic Factors Erewash 85 71 56 48 38 Borough and in neighbouring Districts South Derbyshire 69 58 47 40 33 Source: Plug-in cars, vans and quadricycles licensed at the end of quarter, UK, by local authority of registered keeper from Q2 2015; available at DFT Table VEH0131

Application Location Status No. Street Lane Denby Ripley Derbyshire AVA/2012/1026 Application Refused Trend Negative: There have Large scale Renewable Population and Human Park Hall Road Denby Ripley Derbyshire DE5 been no large scale energy capacity as AVA/2012/0946 Application Refused Health 8PX renewable energy schemes None identified 13:10 Soil, water and Air recorded on Planning consented in the Borough Street Lane Ripley Derbyshire DE5 8HT AVA/2012/1010 Application Refused Climatic Factors Database since 2012. Morley Park Road Belper Derbyshire DE56 AVA/2012/0989 Application Refused 0HQ Home Farm, Street Lane, Denby, Ripley AVA/2015/0628 Application Refused The Renewable Energy Planning Database, BEIS October 2016. 129

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Trend: Positive: Energy performance in new dwellings has improved markedly with almost all new Number of New Dwelling homes having an EPC rating of B or C. There is an Energy Performance Population and Human indication that the number None identified Health 13.11 Certificates lodged on the of homes achieving a rating Climatic Factors Register in England & of B has increased in 2015 Wales by Local Authority compared to previous years. This is likely to be as a result of recent changes to Building regulations in respect of energy efficiency.

SO14 To conserve and enhance the townscape historic environment, heritage assets (including known and unknown archaeological sites) and their settings and where appropriate improve the quality of the built environment and maintain and enhance access to the cultural heritage of the Borough for enjoyment and educational purposes CULTURAL HERITAGE

Amber Valley East Midlands Grade 1 16 Grade 1 1,015 Material Assets Number of listed buildings Grade 2* 48 Grade 2* 1,920 14.1 Trend: No trend identified None identified Cultural Heritage within Amber Valley Grade 2 711 Grade 2 26,918 Total 775 Total 29,853

Source: Historic England, 2016 Source: East Heritage Website 2014. Amber Valley East Midlands Heritage at risk Number Heritage at risk Number Buildings and Buildings and 71 129 Structures Structures Listed buildings/structures Places of Worship 12 Places of Worship 104 Further information is available on the Historic Material Assets 14.2 and sites at risk Archaeology 0 Archaeology 102 Trend: No trend identified Parks and Gardens 0 Parks and Gardens 6 England ‘Heritage at Cultural Heritage (Grade 1 and 2*) Battlefields 0 Battlefields 0 Risk’ register Wreck Sites 0 Wreck Sites 0 Conservation areas 0 Conservation areas 61 Total 8 (1.03%) Total 402 (1.18%)

Source: English Heritage Website 2016 ource: English Heritage Website Feb 2015

1 Road archway and footbridge (including offices), Bridge Foot, Belper, North Mill, Bridge Foot, Belper, Codnor Castle remains, Castle Lane, Aldercar and Langley Mill. Remains of Horsley Castle, Horsley, South Wingfield Manor Farmhouse, South Wingfield, Horseshoe Weir, Bridge Foot, Belper, South Wingfield Station Building, Holm Lane, South Wingfield 2 Church of the Holy Trinity, Derby Road, Belper 130

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Map is difficult to interpret at scale provided but indicates a 14.3 Location of listed buildings Trend: Negative concentration of Cultural Heritage building along the Derwent Corrido and in particular in Belper.

131

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Location of Scheduled 14.4 Trend: No trend identified None identified Cultural Heritage Ancient Monuments

132

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Trend: Positive: There are Location of Conservation 11 conservation area at risk 14.5 in Derby and Derbyshire. None identified Cultural Heritage Areas None of which are located in Amber Valley

133

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Trend: Positive: There is 1 historic Park and Garden which is on the at risk Location of Historic Park register in Derbyshire 14.6 None identified Cultural Heritage and Gardens located in South Derbyshire. There are no Historic Parks or gardens in Amber Valley on the at Risk Register.

134

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Location Derwent Valley Material Assets Trend: No trend identified None identified 14.7 Mills World Heritage Site Cultural Heritage and its buffer

135

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints LANDSCAPE

SO15 To conserve and enhance the Borough’s landscape character

National Character Areas Cultural Heritage Trend: No trend identified None identified 15.1 with landscape character Landscape types

136

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Areas of Multiple Cultural Heritage Trend: No trend identified None identified 15.2 Environmental Sensitivity Landscape (AMES)

137

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Special Landscape Cultural Heritage 15.3 Trend: No trend identified None identified Character Areas Landscape

138

Issues/ Indicator Data Comparator and Target Trend SEA Topics Constraints

Cultural Heritage Trend: No trend identified None identified 15.4 Location of Green Belt Landscape

139

Page left intentionally blank

140