DOCSLIB.ORG

Yuba River Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yuba River Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan CHAPTER 3 – INTRINSIC QUALITIES Intrinsic qualities are defined as inherent, essential, unique or irreplaceable features representative of, or distinctly characteristic to, an area. These qualities may be natural or historic features and create a sense of place unique to an area. The six intrinsic qualities that are evaluated are scenic, natural, historic, cultural, archaeological and recreational. Workshop participants developed the intrinsic qualities discussed in this corridor management plan. Intrinsic qualities can be listed under multiple categories. Rock formation resembling a bear, locally known as the “Bear of the Buttes” Scenic Environment From the west, Highway 49 winds down Depot Hill into the Yuba River Canyon where it begins to parallel the Yuba River, providing an intimate scenic experience. Several special places along the byway are known for their scenic qualities. Cannon Point overlooks Downieville, the canyon and the surrounding mountains. This view has been appreciated by photographers, artists and tourists for 150 years. View from Cannon Point 21 Yuba River Corridor Management Plan Durgan Bridge, in Downieville, overlooks a pool that is usually full with large fish. People love to view the fish through the clear water of the Yuba River. Visible from the byway between Sierra City and Loganville, Keystone Gap, was identified during public meetings as a scenic stop along the route. Other scenic gems accessible from the byway include Loves Falls (on the Pacific Crest Trail), Mountain House and Pauly Creek Falls. North of the byway, near Downieville, Saddleback Lookout overlooks the entire Yuba River canyon. The Rocky Rest and Downie River Trail traverse magnificent old growth forests. Aspen provide visually pleasing fall colors that are rare in a conifer-dominated landscape. Stands are scattered along Highway 49, but historically they likely dominated much of the corridor between Bassetts to Yuba Pass. Montane meadows at Yuba Pass are a spring favorite. Physical Features and Landforms The most well known landform along the byways is the 8,700-foot Sierra Buttes mountain range. These year-round picturesque mountains are visible on the drive from Yuba Pass to Sierra City, but the best viewpoint is from Bassetts Station. Looking to the Sierra Buttes from Gold Lake Road at the turn out just north of Bassetts Station, observant byway visitors can distinguish a bear shaped rock formation locals refer to as the “Bear of the Buttes.” In Downieville, the North Yuba and Downie River meet and create the Downieville Forks at a spot known as Tin Cup Diggins. Sierra Buttes Scenic Vista Points and Turnouts Along the byway, there are several places to stop and enjoy the scenery. Vista points allow visitors to view magnificent views, historic landmarks and wildlife. They are also excellent locations for interpretive materials. Chapter 9, Interpretive Plan and Appendix C include vista points and turnouts accessible along the byway. Natural Environment Visitors can experience the natural environment – diverse vegetation, wildlife, flowing water (Yuba and Downie Rivers, including many tributary creeks and waterfalls) and wildflowers – from the byway or the many trails accessed from Highway 49. Visitors drive the byway in the fall to view the changing fall leaves. Vegetation The byway transects several Sierra Nevada bioregion vegetative communities – mixed conifers, hardwood, red fir, montane riparian and montane meadows. A longer section of 22 Chapter 3 – Intrinsic Qualities Highway 49, through Nevada, Yuba and Sierra County (east of Yuba Pass) provides a unique cross-section of the Sierra Nevada that can be interpreted in a one-day drive. This would include lower elevation foothill vegetation to high elevation red fir and across the Sierra Valley (the largest valley in the Sierra Nevada). Downieville is an old community rich with heritage plants, including rose, butternut, chestnut, hops, walnut, dogwood, Canadian maple and big leaf maple. Wildlife The Yuba River Scenic Byway corridor is home to many wildlife species. Bald eagles forage along the North Yuba River and are a common sight from the byway. Kokanee Salmon from Bullards Bar Reservoir spawn in North Yuba River, especially in the vicinity of Indian Valley/Lower Carleton Campgrounds. The story could be told here of historic bald eagle use and native salmon runs along the North Yuba River, which has been replaced by land-locked Kokanee, planted in a local reservoir. A maternity colony of Townsend’s big-eared bats can be observed at Kentucky Mine Museum. The Townsend’s big-eared bat is a California species of concern and is sensitive to human disturbance. Visitors can observe this unique colony at the mine without detriment to the species. The Rocky Rest Trail, a relatively easy hiking experience through mixed-conifer forest, provides excellent birding opportunities. San Francisco State University Sierra Nevada Field Campus The Field Campus, located 5 miles west of Yuba Pass, “provides a mountain forest setting for instruction and research in the environmental sciences and other creative disciplines. Facilities include two cabins and a dining hall on nine mostly forested acres within the Tahoe National Forest. Presently the facility supports a summer and weekend course and research program, which utilizes a variety of vegetation types, landforms and aquatic habitats near the field station. Other unique sites occur within two hours drive, including Sierra Buttes, Sierra Valley, Gold Lakes Country, Mt. Lassen, Lake Tahoe, Pyramid Lake, Eagle Lake and Mono Lake (http://www.sfsu.edu/~bulletin/current/rnlfac.htm ).” Historical Resources The Maidu and Washoe Indians are the first known residents of the Sierra Nevada. In the summers, they came into the mountains to hunt and fish. During the fall and winter, they returned to the foothills and valley below. The Nisenan people of the Maidu Tribe occupied the drainages of the Yuba River. They had a rich culture, were skilled basket makers and traded with the Coastal Tribes to the west and the Wahoe to the east. When 23 Yuba River Corridor Management Plan gold was discovered, emigration from around the world brought a new cultural era to the region. Mining camps and towns sprang up in Sierra County with each gold discovery. Some, like Downieville and Sierra City remain, but many faded into history as the gold was worked out. The Yuba River Scenic Byway is rich with the history of indigenous and emigrant residents. Gold was found in 1852 in Camptonville, which quickly developed to large-scale gravel mining by 1857. Sierra County produced $150,000,000 worth of gold between 1848 and 1965. Digging and tailing piles are still visible at Union Flat campground and many other places along the byway. Chinese labor was used to get bedrock from Union Flat and China Flat. China Flat is an historic town site with historic buildings and foundations in a large meadow. It was likely a gold rush era settlement and placer mining area, developing later to a town with a U.S. Post Office in the 1930s. A resident of Camptonville, Lester Pelton, developed a split bucket water wheel, named the Pelton Wheel in 1879. Still in use today, this invention powered stamp mills, pumps and machines and was used in the development of hydroelectricity. A Pelton Wheel is on display at the Kentucky Mine, located on the byway. Hydraulic mining was used at Joubert’s Diggings until 1941. Old settling ponds provide habitat for wildlife. In 1849, Indian Valley was an isolated community of miners, loggers, ranchers and shop owners until the highway was completed in 1921. Established in 1849, was an Goodyears Bar Joubert's Diggings early mining camp inhabited by as many as 400 people from China. The Goodyears Bar cemetery and school are some of the few remaining historic structures. Forest City is on the National Register of Historic Places. Old Mountain House was a lodge at the top of a mountain along the road Goodyears Bar and Forest City. It originally operated as a stage stop and later as an auto stopover for traffic traveling north to Downieville. It was abandoned soon after Highway 49 opened. Parts of Old Mountain House survive today as part of the St. Charles Hotel in Goodyears Bar. Cannon Point, overlooking Downieville, houses a cannon last fired to celebrate the victory of the North at Vicksburg at the end of the Civil War. It was brought to Downieville July 1, 1862. Local tradition says it was situated as it was to protect Downieville gold from being taken by the South. 24 Chapter 3 – Intrinsic Qualities Downieville What is now Downieville began in 1848 as three flats divided by the confluence of the Downie River and the North Yuba River. The area that is now downtown Downieville was “The Forks,” the area on the east side of the Downie River was “Jersey Flat,” and the area on the south side of the North Yuba River was “Durgan Flat.” Miners originally worked their way up the North Yuba River along what is now Highway 49. By May 1850, Downieville had 15 hotels and gambling houses, four bakeries and four butcher shops. As the population of the area grew, Downieville served as a trading center for the northern mines. By the mid-1850s, Downieville was California’s fifth-largest town. Visiting this wonderful community of approximately 325 residents has been described as “stepping back in time” with comforts of modern amenities. Within the village of Downieville, there are numerous historic buildings located on the byway itself, including Downieville Grocery, Craycroft Building, I.O.O.F. Hall (organized in 1888), the Methodist Church (oldest Protestant Church in use in the State), Catholic Church and the Elmwood Cottage. Near the courthouse, two Mountain Howitzers are on display, one of which was used in the “Paiute War,” in the 1860s. “Construction of the Methodist Church of Downieville also began in 1853, the same year as the First Catholic Church.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SWFSC Archive
    Historical Population Structure of Central Valley Steelhead and its Alteration by Dams STEVEN T. LINDLEY1, ROBERT S. SCHICK1, ADITYA AGRAWAL2, MATTHEW GOSLIN2, THOMAS E. PEARSON2, ETHAN MORA2, JAMES J. ANDERSON3, BERNARD MAY4, SHEILA GREENE5, CHARLES HANSON6, ALICE LOW7, DENNIS MCEWAN7, R. BRUCE MACFARLANE1, CHRISTINA SWANSON8 AND JOHN G. WILLIAMS9 ABSTRACT Effective conservation and recovery planning for Central Valley steelhead requires an understanding of historical population structure. We describe the historical structure of the Central Valley steelhead evolutionarily significant unit using a multi-phase modeling approach. In the first phase, we identify stream reaches possibly suitable for steelhead spawning and rearing using a habitat model based on environmental envelopes (stream discharge, gradient, and temperature) that takes a digital elevation model and climate data as inputs. We identified 151 patches of potentially suitable habitat with more than 10 km of stream habitat, with a total of 25,500 km of suitable habitat. We then measured the dis- tances among habitat patches, and clustered together patches within 35 km of each other into 81 dis- tinct habitat patches. Groups of fish using these 81 patches are hypothesized to be (or to have been) independent populations for recovery planning purposes. Consideration of climate and elevation differ- ences among the 81 habitat areas suggests that there are at least four major subdivisions within the Central Valley steelhead ESU that correspond to geographic regions defined by the Sacramento River basin, Suisun Bay area tributaries, San Joaquin tributaries draining the Sierra Nevada, and lower-ele- vation streams draining to the Buena Vista and Tulare basins, upstream of the San Joaquin River.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan
    Draft Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan for Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon Central Valley spring-run Chinook Salmon Central Valley Steelhead National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Region November 2009 1 Themes of the CV Recovery Plan • This is a long-term plan that will take several decades to fully implement • The recovery plan is intended to be a “living document” that is periodically updated to include the best available information regarding the status or needs of the species • Implementation will be challenging and will require the help of many stakeholders • The plan is intended to have realistic and attainable recovery criteria (i.e, de-listing criteria) 2 What are Recovery Plans? • Purpose of the Endangered Species Act: To conserve (recover) listed species and their ecosystems • Required under section 4(f) of the ESA for all Federally listed species • Provide the road map to species recovery • Must contain objective, measurable criteria for delisting a species • Guidance documents, not regulations 3 Winter-run Chinook salmon (Endangered) 4 Status of Species – Winter-run Chinook 5 Central Valley Spring-run Chinook salmon (Threatened) 6 Status of Species – Spring-run Chinook Declining abundance across range: Extinction risk is increasing Central Valley Spring-run Chinook Salmon Adult Summer Holding Escapement Rivers/Creeks 25,000 Sacramento Battle 20,000 Clear Beegum 15,000 Antelope Mill 10,000 Deer Big Chico 5,000 Butte 0 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 7 Central Valley steelhead (Threatened) 8 Key
    [Show full text]
  • Diverse Metamorphic Trajectories, Imbricated Ocean Plate Stratigraphy, and Fault Rocks, Yuba River Area, Feather River Ultramafic Belt, California
    ABSTRACT DIVERSE METAMORPHIC TRAJECTORIES, IMBRICATED OCEAN PLATE STRATIGRAPHY, AND FAULT ROCKS, YUBA RIVER AREA, FEATHER RIVER ULTRAMAFIC BELT, CALIFORNIA The Feather River Belt (FRB), the most extensive of the ultramafic belts in the Sierra Nevada, is a north–south trending 150-km-long by 1-8 km wide ultramafic belt and includes related rocks that form the basement of the northern Sierra Nevada of California. These rocks have been long interpreted as a Paleozoic to early Mesozoic "suture" zone (position of former subduction zone) and provide a good opportunity to more closely investigate the details of the rock record associated with subduction processes. Conventional tectonic models cannot explain the spatial-temporal distribution of the metamorphic grade of the FRB. Geologic mapping, petrographic, and electron microprobe analyses reveal a complex spatial and relative time relationships between different lithologies and units of different metamorphic grade. In the greater Middle and North Yuba River area, ultramafic rocks structurally overlie amphibolite, composed of primarily metamafic rocks, that structurally overlies the blueschist facies Red Ant schist (RAS). These tectonic contacts have been isoclinally folded at scales of hundreds of meters to a km. In the North Yuba River area, amphibolite records low- pressure, high-temperature metamorphism with redbrown (high Ti, low Al) amphibole and ilmenite. In the Forest City and Alleghany areas on the North Fork-Middle Fork divide, amphibolite grade rocks comprise imbricates of ocean plate stratigraphy, represented by repeated sheets of metabasites, metacherts, and metaclastics. These rocks include zones of cataclasites with pseudotachylites (frictional melts generated by fault movement). The Alleghany amphibolites ii appear to comprise two slabs with contrasting metamorphic history.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3 Existing Environment
    Yuba County Water Agency Narrows Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 1403 SECTION 3 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT In addition to this introductory information, this section is divided into two subsections. Section 3.1 provides a general description of the river basin in which the Project occurs. Section 3.2 provides existing, relevant and reasonably available information regarding the resources. 3.1 General Description of the River Basin 3.1.1 Existing Water Projects in the Yuba River Basin Sixteen existing water projects occur in the Yuba River Basin. Eight of the water projects are licensed or exempt from licensing by FERC. Together, these eight projects have a combined FERC-authorized capacity of 782.1 MW, of which the Narrows Hydroelectric Project has approximately 1.5 percent of the total capacity. The remaining eight non-FERC-licensed projects do not contain generating facilities. Each of these water projects is described briefly below. 3.1.1.1 Narrows Hydroelectric Project The existing Narrows Hydroelectric Project is described in detail in Section 2 of this PAD. 3.1.1.2 Upstream of the Narrows Hydroelectric Project 3.1.1.2.1 South Feather Power Project The 117.5-MW South Feather Power Project, FERC Project No. 2088, is a water supply/power project constructed in the late 1950s/early 1960s and is owned and operated by the South Feather Water and Power Agency (SFWPA). None of the project facilities or features is located in the Yuba River watershed except for the Slate Creek Diversion Dam, which is located on a tributary to the North Yuba River.
    [Show full text]
  • Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Comments
    The Center for Biological Diversity submits the following information for the status review of the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) (Docket #FWS-R8-ES-2015-0050), including substantial new information regarding the species' biology, population structure (including potential Distinct Population Segments of the species), historical and recent distribution and status, population trends, documented range contraction, habitat requirements, threats to the species and its habitat, disease, and the potential effects of climate change on the species and its habitat. The foothill yellow-legged frog has experienced extensive population declines throughout its range and a significant range contraction. Multiple threats continue unabated throughout much of the species’ remaining range, including impacts from dams, water development, water diversions, timber harvest, mining, marijuana cultivation, livestock grazing, roads and urbanization, recreation, climate change and UV-radiation, pollution, invasive species and disease. The species warrants listing as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Contact: Jeff Miller, [email protected] Contents: NATURAL HISTORY, BIOLOGY AND STATUS . .. 2 Biology. .2 Habitat . .. .4 Range and Documented Range Contraction . 4 Taxonomy . 9 Population Structure . 9 Historical and Recent Distribution and Status . 15 Central Oregon . .15 Southern Oregon . 18 Coastal Oregon . .20 Northern Coastal California . 25 Upper Sacramento River . 40 Marin/Sonoma . 45 Northern/Central Sierra Nevada . .47 Southern Sierra Nevada . .67 Central Coast/Bay Area . 77 South Coast. 91 Southern California . .. 94 Baja California, Mexico . .98 Unknown Population Affiliation. .99 Population Trends . .. .103 THREATS. .108 Habitat Alteration and Destruction . .. 108 Dams, Water Development and Diversions . .. .109 Logging . .. .111 Marijuana Cultivation . .. .112 Livestock Grazing . .. .112 Mining . .. .. .113 Roads and Urbanization .
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Investments for the California Bay-Delta Region
    Federal Investments For The California Bay-Delta Region Federal Investments: California Bay-Delta Region February 2014 Contents I. Introduction II. Bay Delta-Big Picture: A Holistic Approach State and Federal Integrated Water Management Reducing Water Demand Increasing Water Reliability and Supply Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers/Exchanges Potential Federal Water and Ecosystem Management Actions III. Role of the Federal agencies Department of the Interior o Bureau of Reclamation o U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Environmental Protection Agency Department of Commerce o National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Army Corps of Engineers Department of Agriculture o Natural Resource Conservation Service o U.S. Forest Service o Rural Development o Farm Services Agency o Agriculture Research Service IV. Conclusion 2 Federal Investments: California Bay-Delta Region February 2014 I. Introduction The San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Bay-Delta) region of California is an ecosystem of national significance. It is also the hub of the nation’s largest water delivery system—infrastructure that is the foundation for economic activity in the agricultural, industrial, and recreational sectors of the economy, and provides drinking water to a population of over 25 million Californians. This document is intended to provide an overview of the federal land and water programs in and around the Bay-Delta region, their purpose, options for future programs or actions, and an overview of the actions in which agencies are engaged already. Successful long term management of water resources and the environment to achieve the co-equal goals of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) and overall Delta sustainability requires continued improvement in managing California’s finite water supply.
    [Show full text]
  • North Yuba Forest Partnership
    North Yuba Forest Partnership FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: DeDe Cordell, Yuba Water Agency’s Communications Manager [email protected] (530) 329-9563 Innovative partnership to reduce wildfire risk and secure healthier, more resilient forests throughout the North Yuba River watershed MARYSVILLE, Calif. (November 7, 2019) – A diverse group of nine organizations announced today their commitment to prioritize, plan, and execute forest restoration on an unprecedented scale in the North Yuba River watershed, covering 275,000 acres of the northern Sierra Nevada. The memorandum of understanding spells out the group’s commitment to work together to increase the pace and scale of ecologically-based restoration within the North Yuba River watershed and to prioritize community safety, forest health, and resilience through landscape- scale restoration. The North Yuba Forest Partnership includes Blue Forest Conservation, Camptonville Community Partnership, National Forest Foundation, The Nature Conservancy, Nevada City Rancheria, Sierra County, South Yuba River Citizens League, The United States Forest Service - Tahoe National Forest, and Yuba Water Agency. “Many forests in the North Yuba River watershed are critically unhealthy, overcrowded with small trees and brush,” said Eli Ilano, Tahoe National Forest Supervisor. “Unhealthy forests are at a greater risk of high-severity wildfire due to fire suppression and historic timber harvesting practices, a risk that is exacerbated by a changing climate.” The North Yuba River watershed runs through multiple Northern California counties and two national forests, from Yuba Pass to New Bullards Bar Reservoir. The area includes thousands of acres of forest habitat, is an important source of water for downstream users, supports high biodiversity, is home to many rural communities, and offers excellent opportunities for recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Yuba River Accord from Controversy to Consensus the Yuba River
    The Lower Yuba River Accord From Controversy To Consensus The Yuba River 2 • The Lower Yuba River Accord Contents Introduction 4 Background 5 From Controversy to Consensus 10 The Lower Yuba River Accord: From Controversy To Consensus The Fisheries Agreement 13 was prepared and published by the Water Education Foundation The Water Purchase Agreement 17 as a public information tool. The Conjunctive Use Agreements 22 Summary 23 Credits President: William R. Mills Executive Director: Rita Schmidt Sudman Authors: Susan Lauer and Sue McClurg The mission of the Water Education Editorial Assistance: Robin Richie Foundation, an impartial, nonprofit Design: Curtis Leipold organization, is to create a better Photography: Kathy Bishop understanding of water issues and Peter Grigsby, Office of the Governor help resolve water resource problems Jones and Stokes through educational programs. Dale Kolke, California Department of Water Resources MWH Gary W. Rose ISBN: 1-893246-88-4 Thomas Taylor Three Rivers Levee Improvement U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Published 2009 Yuba County Library Yuba County Water Agency ©Water Education Foundation Graphics: Courtesy of Yuba County Water Agency The Lower Yuba River Accord • 3 Introduction Cutting through the Sierra Nevada had reached a unique agreement on throughout the state. And on an Gold Rush countryside, the Yuba River managing the river. The State Water annual basis, 60,000 acre-feet will be has played a vital role in the state’s Resources Control Board (State Water dedicated to environmental flows for history. How its water should be used Board) adopted the Lower Yuba River the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. has been a focal point of controversy.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Flows for Fish Below Dams
    ASSESSING FLOWS FOR FISH BELOW DAMS A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME CODE 5937 THEODORE E. GRANTHAM PETER B. MOYLE CENTER FOR WATERSHED SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS ONE SHIELDS AVENUE DAVIS, CA 95616 OCTOBER 22, 2014 This report was prepared by: Theodore E. Grantham and Peter B. Moyle Center for Watershed Sciences University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 Corresponding author: Theodore (Ted) Grantham [email protected] Copyright ©2014 The Regents of the University of California All rights reserved The University of California prohibits discrimination or harassment of any person on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, pregnancy (including childbirth, and medical conditions related to pregnancy or childbirth), physical or mental disability, medical condition (cancer-related or genetic characteristics), ancestry, marital status, age, sexual orientation, citizenship, or service in the uniformed services (as defined by the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994: service in the uniformed services includes membership, application for membership, performance of service, application for service, or obligation for service in the uniformed services) in any of its programs or activities. University policy also prohibits reprisal or retaliation against any person in any of its programs or activities for making a complaint of discrimination or sexual harassment or for using or participating in the investigation or resolution process of any such complaint. University policy is intended to be consistent with the provisions of applicable State and Federal laws. Please cite this report as: Grantham, T. E. and P. B. Moyle. 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild and Scenic Rivers: Status of Evaluations and Comprehensive River Management Plans C-1
    National Forests in the Sierra Nevada: A Conservation Strategy Appendix C: Wild and Scenic Rivers: Status of Evaluations and Comprehensive River Management Plans C-1 APPENDIX C WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS: STATUS OF EVALUATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE RIVER MANAGEMENT PLANS Eldorado National Forest The planning record shows that a comprehensive eligibility evaluation was part of the 1988 Eldorado Forest Plan, although suitability studies and recommendations were not completed for several eligible streams. The Plan/ROD recommended a segment of the Rubicon River for designation, found eligible but did not recommend the North and Middle Forks of the Cosumnes River, and deferred the suitability determination of the eligible segments of the North Fork Mokelumne upstream of Salt Springs Reservoir to the Stanislaus Forest Plan (which subsequently recommended the upper segment). The North Fork Mokelumne below Salt Springs was studied in a separate EIS. This separate study/EIS was published in 1994, recommending 6.5 miles of the North Fork for designation, but not recommending another 10.5 miles further downstream due to a perceived conflict with the potential Devil’s Nose dam project. In response to appeals (see decision for appeals #89-13-00-0008 and 0016, dated 7/16/91), the Forest Service agreed to consider eligibility of additional rivers. In a letter dated 3/3/98, the Forest found 11 additional streams to be eligible. In addition, the appeals decision remanded the Forest Plan decision not to recommend segments of the North and Middle Forks of the Cosumnes River and the Forest was directed to reevaluate the suitability of the river segments in either a plan amendment or project level NEPA analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Long-Term Operation of the Central
    Chapter 10: Terrestrial Biological Resources Chapter 10 1 Terrestrial Biological Resources 2 10.1 Introduction 3 This chapter describes terrestrial biological resources in the Study Area; and 4 potential changes that could occur as a result of implementing the alternatives 5 evaluated in this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Implementation of the 6 alternatives could affect terrestrial biological resources through potential changes 7 in operation of the Central Valley Project (CVP) and State Water Project (SWP) 8 and ecosystem restoration. 9 10.2 Regulatory Environment and Compliance 10 Requirements 11 Potential actions that could be implemented under the alternatives evaluated in 12 this EIS could affect terrestrial biological resources in areas: along the shorelines 13 and in the waters of reservoirs that store CVP and SWP water supplies, along 14 rivers and waterways (including bypasses) impacted by changes in the operations 15 of CVP or SWP reservoirs, within agricultural areas served by CVP and SWP 16 water supplies, and modified to provide wetland habitat. Actions located on 17 public agency lands; or implemented, funded, or approved by Federal and state 18 agencies would need to be compliant with appropriate Federal and state agency 19 policies and regulations, as summarized in Chapter 4, Approach to 20 Environmental Analyses. 21 10.3 Affected Environment 22 This section describes terrestrial biological resources that could potentially be 23 affected by implementing the alternatives considered in this EIS. Changes in 24 terrestrial biological resources due to changes in CVP and SWP operations may 25 occur in the Trinity River, Central Valley, San Francisco Bay Area, Central Coast, 26 and Southern California regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Population Structure of Central Valley Steelhead and Its Alteration by Dams
    UC Davis San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science Title Historical Population Structure of Central Valley Steelhead and Its Alteration by Dams Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1ss794fc Journal San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 4(1) ISSN 1546-2366 Authors Lindley, Steven T. Schick, Robert S. Agrawal, Aditya et al. Publication Date 2006 DOI 10.15447/sfews.2006v4iss1art3 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Historical Population Structure of Central Valley Steelhead and its Alteration by Dams STEVEN T. LINDLEY1, ROBERT S. SCHICK1, ADITYA AGRAWAL2, MATTHEW GOSLIN2, THOMAS E. PEARSON2, ETHAN MORA2, JAMES J. ANDERSON3, BERNARD MAY4, SHEILA GREENE5, CHARLES HANSON6, ALICE LOW7, DENNIS MCEWAN7, R. BRUCE MACFARLANE1, CHRISTINA SWANSON8 AND JOHN G. WILLIAMS9 ABSTRACT Effective conservation and recovery planning for Central Valley steelhead requires an understanding of historical population structure. We describe the historical structure of the Central Valley steelhead evolutionarily significant unit using a multi-phase modeling approach. In the first phase, we identify stream reaches possibly suitable for steelhead spawning and rearing using a habitat model based on environmental envelopes (stream discharge, gradient, and temperature) that takes a digital elevation model and climate data as inputs. We identified 151 patches of potentially suitable habitat with more than 10 km of stream habitat, with a total of 25,500 km of suitable habitat. We then measured the dis- tances among habitat patches, and clustered together patches within 35 km of each other into 81 dis- tinct habitat patches. Groups of fish using these 81 patches are hypothesized to be (or to have been) independent populations for recovery planning purposes.
    [Show full text]