DOCSLIB.ORG

Influence of Subdaily Polar Motion Model on Nutation Offsets Estimated by Very Long Baseline Interferometry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Influence of Subdaily Polar Motion Model on Nutation Offsets Estimated by Very Long Baseline Interferometry J Geod (2017) 91:1503–1512 DOI 10.1007/s00190-017-1039-5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Influence of subdaily polar motion model on nutation offsets estimated by very long baseline interferometry Natalia Panafidina1 · Urs Hugentobler2 · Manuela Seitz1 · Hana Krásná3 Received: 18 November 2016 / Accepted: 15 May 2017 / Published online: 29 May 2017 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017 Abstract This paper studies the connection between the Keywords Terrestrial reference frame · Celestial reference subdaily model for polar motion used in the processing of frame · Earth rotation parameters · Subdaily tidal models · very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations and VLBI the estimated nutation offsets. By convention accepted by the International Earth Rotation Service, the subdaily model for polar motion recommended for routine processing of 1 Introduction geodetic observations does not contain any daily retrograde terms due to their one-to-one correlation with the nutation. Very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) is the only space Nevertheless, for a 24-h VLBI solution a part of the signal geodetic technique which provides access to all parame- contained in the polar motion given by the used subdaily ters needed for the transformation between the terrestrial model is numerically mistaken for a retrograde daily side- and the celestial reference systems. In principle, only three real signal. This fictitious retrograde daily signal contributes parameters are needed for such a transformation in a three- to the estimated nutation, leading to systematic differences dimensional space. In space geodesy, five parameters are between the nutation offsets from VLBI solutions computed used traditionally, what implies that these parameters are with different subdaily polar motion models. We demonstrate not fully independent. From these five parameters, two are this effect using solutions for all suitable 24-h VLBI sessions called the polar motion and describe the position of the celes- over a time span of 11 years (2000–2011). By changing the tial intermediate pole (CIP) in the International Terrestrial amplitudes of one tidal term in the underlying subdaily model Reference Frame (ITRF, Petit and Luzum 2010; Altamimi for polar motion and comparing the estimated parameters to et al. 2011). One parameter is needed to locate the Green- the solutions computed with the unchanged subdaily model, wich meridian in the inertial space, it is called the Universal the paper shows and explains theoretically the effects pro- Time (UT1). Two remaining parameters relate the CIP to duced by the individual subdaily terms on the VLBI nutation the pole of the celestial reference frame. They are small estimates. empirical corrections to the nutation offsets given by the precession–nutation model which defines the position of the CIP in the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF, Petit and Luzum 2010; Ma et al. 1998). All five transfor- mation parameters are called Earth orientation parameters B Natalia Panafidina (EOP), and a subset of three parameters containing the polar natalia.panafi[email protected] motion and UT1 is usually referred to as Earth rotation 1 Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut der TUM, parameters (ERP). Afons-Goppel-Str. 11, 80539 Munich, Germany The VLBI observations are coordinated by the Interna- 2 Technische Universität München, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 tional VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry (IVS, Munich, Germany Schuh and Behrend 2012), which maintains a network of 3 Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Technische VLBI stations and organizes regular observation programs Universität Wien, Gußhausstr. 27–29, 1040 Wien, Austria with different objectives. There are daily 1-h intensive ses- 123 1504 N. Panafidina et al. sions scheduled for the Universal Time (UT1) estimation. 2 VLBI data and solutions For all other programs, the observations are normally per- formed in 24-h sessions, and the most regular sessions are The subdaily model for polar motion contains prograde daily devoted specially to the EOP estimation and are held two terms and prograde and retrograde semi-daily terms. The times a week on Monday and Thursday. The 24-h sessions retrograde daily terms correspond to nutation in the iner- with other objectives are usually held several times per year. tial space and thus are conventionally a part of the nutation Together it makes several (at least two) 24-h VLBI sessions model and not a part of the ERP model. This means that per week available for a routine processing by analysis cen- in principle the used subdaily pole model and the estimated ters (ACs) of the IVS. nutation should be fully independent. At the same time, as is The EOP solution for each 24-h session is one of the offi- known from the spectral analysis, over a time span of 24 h cial products of the IVS. The description of the IVS products the prograde and retrograde terms with daily and semi-daily in general and specifically of the EOP time series from VLBI periods cannot be fully separated. For this reason in a 24-h can be found on the IVS web site (http://ivscc.gsfc.nasa.gov). solution, a part of the signal contained in the subdaily polar The quality of the EOP solutions from the individual analy- motion given by a model is numerically mistaken for a ret- sis centers as well as the quality of the combined solutions rograde daily sidereal signal. This fictitious retrograde daily is checked by internal comparisons between the VLBI solu- signal contributes to nutation and will be corrected for by tions and by external comparisons with the combined C04 the estimated nutation offsets. In this way, the nutation cor- EOP time series provided by the International Earth Rotation rections estimated from VLBI observations always contain Service (IERS). a small part induced by the errors of the used subdaily pole Since VLBI is the only space geodetic technique which model. allows the determination of the orientation of the Earth in This effect can be seen if we compare two VLBI solutions inertial space, the interpretation of the VLBI results for nuta- computed with different subdaily polar motion models. If tion is of special interest. Recognizing the effects influencing within the considered solutions the ERP are estimated with a the estimation of nutation offsets can contribute to a better subdaily resolution (e.g., 1 h), the change in the subdaily understanding of the VLBI solutions. In this paper, we focus model would be absorbed by the estimated polar motion on one of such effects demonstrating how the used subdaily parameters, leaving the nutation estimates unaffected. In such model for polar motion affects the estimated nutation offsets. a case, the time series of the nutation offsets from the two The a priori polar motion used in the processing has to include solutions would show no systematic differences. It needs the subdaily variations, since the Earth rotation is noticeably to be shortly mentioned that estimating the subdaily polar influenced on the subdaily timescales by the daily and semi- motion together with nutation is possible only with an addi- daily ocean tides and other tidal phenomena. Neglecting the tional constraint on polar motion to block the retrograde daily subdaily variations leads to systematic errors in the estimated signal. In case of a standard VLBI solution (e.g., the routine parameters (Ray and McCarthy 1996). Acknowledging this, EOP solutions made by the IVS ACs) where the ERP and the IERS recommends to use in the routine processing of their rates are estimated once per 24 h, the subdaily model geodetic observations a model for subdaily variations in the cannot be corrected by the ERP themselves. In this case, the ERP. The standard IERS subdaily model can be found in the estimated nutation offsets absorb a part of the signal from IERS Conventions (2010) (Petit and Luzum 2010). It was the subdaily polar motion model corresponding to the fic- derived from an ocean tide model based on satellite altimetry titious retrograde daily signal. Theoretically, this fictitious and provides the amplitudes of variations in the polar motion retrograde signal could be absorbed also by the radiosource and UT1 for a set of tidal frequencies. The latest IERS sub- positions if the nutation was kept fixed and the coordinates of daily model for the Earth rotation parameters contains 71 the sources estimated freely. However, in practice it is never tidal terms. done this way: If the radiosource positions are estimated, the In this paper, we study a connection between the nuta- nutation is estimated as well and a no-net-rotation condition tion offsets from VLBI solutions and the subdaily model for is applied on the source coordinates preventing them from the polar motion. In Sect. 2 the nature of this connection is absorbing the retrograde daily signal. discussed, and the VLBI data and the solutions computed The celestial pole offsets (CPO) which we will further to demonstrate the effect are described. In Sect. 3 the influ- refer to as the nutation corrections are measured in two ence of changes in the individual tidal terms from a subdaily directions (dX and dY), and the contribution of the ficti- polar motion model on the estimated nutation is shown and tious retrograde daily term is also measured in two directions compared to the theoretically computed effect induced by the as the amplitude of the sine term and the amplitude of the respective tidal terms. Finally, in Sect. 4 we shortly consider cosine term. Different subdaily polar motion models con- the influence of the subdaily models on the estimated daily tain fictitious retrograde daily signals with different sine and polar motion. cosine amplitudes, and the nutation corrections are shifted 123 Influence of subdaily polar motion model on nutation offsets estimated by very long baseline... 1505 respectively differently. As a result, time series of the nutation time. The amplitudes of both sine and cosine for a selected differences between the standard VLBI solutions computed tidal term were changed by 100 μas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Estimation and Validation of Polar Motion Excitation from Different Types of the GRACE and GRACE Follow-On Missions Data
    remote sensing Article Preliminary Estimation and Validation of Polar Motion Excitation from Different Types of the GRACE and GRACE Follow-On Missions Data Justyna Sliwi´ ´nska 1,* , Małgorzata Wi ´nska 2 and Jolanta Nastula 1 1 Space Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-637 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 18 September 2020; Accepted: 22 October 2020; Published: 23 October 2020 Abstract: The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission has provided global observations of temporal variations in the gravity field resulting from mass redistribution at the surface and within the Earth for the period 2002–2017. Although GRACE satellites are not able to realistically detect the second zonal parameter (DC20) of geopotential associated with the flattening of the Earth, they can accurately determine variations in degree-2 order-1 (DC21, DS21) coefficients that are proportional to variations in polar motion. Therefore, GRACE measurements are commonly exploited to interpret polar motion changes due to variations in the global mass redistribution, especially in the continental hydrosphere and cryosphere. Such impacts are usually examined by computing the so-called hydrological polar motion excitation (HAM) and cryospheric polar motion excitation (CAM), often analyzed together as HAM/CAM. The great success of the GRACE mission and the scientific robustness of its data contributed to the launch of its successor, GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO), which began in May 2018 and continues to the present. This study presents the first estimates of HAM/CAM computed from GRACE-FO data provided by three data centers: Center for Space Research (CSR), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ).
    [Show full text]
  • True Polar Wander: Linking Deep and Shallow Geodynamics to Hydro- and Bio-Spheric Hypotheses T
    True Polar Wander: linking Deep and Shallow Geodynamics to Hydro- and Bio-Spheric Hypotheses T. D. Raub, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA J. L. Kirschvink, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA D. A. D. Evans, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA © 2007 Elsevier SV. All rights reserved. 5.14.1 Planetary Moment of Inertia and the Spin-Axis 565 5.14.2 Apparent Polar Wander (APW) = Plate motion +TPW 566 5.14.2.1 Different Information in Different Reference Frames 566 5.14.2.2 Type 0' TPW: Mass Redistribution at Clock to Millenial Timescales, of Inconsistent Sense 567 5.14.2.3 Type I TPW: Slow/Prolonged TPW 567 5.14.2.4 Type II TPW: Fast/Multiple/Oscillatory TPW: A Distinct Flavor of Inertial Interchange 569 5.14.2.5 Hypothesized Rapid or Prolonged TPW: Late Paleozoic-Mesozoic 569 5.14.2.6 Hypothesized Rapid or Prolonged TPW: 'Cryogenian'-Ediacaran-Cambrian-Early Paleozoic 571 5.14.2.7 Hypothesized Rapid or Prolonged TPW: Archean to Mesoproterozoic 572 5.14.3 Geodynamic and Geologic Effects and Inferences 572 5.14.3.1 Precision of TPW Magnitude and Rate Estimation 572 5.14.3.2 Physical Oceanographic Effects: Sea Level and Circulation 574 5.14.3.3 Chemical Oceanographic Effects: Carbon Oxidation and Burial 576 5..14.4 Critical Testing of Cryogenian-Cambrian TPW 579 5.14A1 Ediacaran-Cambrian TPW: 'Spinner Diagrams' in the TPW Reference Frame 579 5.14.4.2 Proof of Concept: Independent Reconstruction of Gondwanaland Using Spinner Diagrams 581 5.14.5 Summary: Major Unresolved Issues and Future Work 585 References 586 5.14.1 Planetary Moment of Inertia location ofEarth's daily rotation axis and/or by fluc­ and the Spin-Axis tuations in the spin rate ('length of day' anomalies).
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Orientation Parameters from VLBI Determined with a Kalman Filter
    Originally published as: Karbon, M., Soja, B., Nilsson, T., Deng, Z., Heinkelmann, R., Schuh, H. (2017): Earth orientation parameters from VLBI determined with a Kalman filter. ‐ Geodesy and Geodynamics, 8, 6, pp. 396— 407. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.05.006 Geodesy and Geodynamics 8 (2017) 396e407 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geodesy and Geodynamics journal homepages: www.keaipublishing.com/en/journals/geog; http://www.jgg09.com/jweb_ddcl_en/EN/volumn/home.shtml Earth orientation parameters from VLBI determined with a Kalman filter * Maria Karbon a, , Benedikt Soja b, Tobias Nilsson a, Zhiguo Deng a, Robert Heinkelmann a, Harald Schuh a, c a GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg A17, Potsdam, Germany b Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA c Technical University of Berlin, Strabe des 17. Juni 135, Berlin, Germany article info abstract Article history: This paper introduces the reader to our Kalman filter developed for geodetic VLBI (very long baseline Received 24 November 2016 interferometry) data analysis. The focus lies on the EOP (Earth Orientation Parameter) determination Received in revised form based on the Continuous VLBI Campaign 2014 (CONT14) data, but also earlier CONT campaigns are 23 May 2017 analyzed. For validation and comparison purposes we use EOP determined with the classical LSM Accepted 24 May 2017 (least squares method) estimated from the same VLBI data set as the Kalman solution with a daily Available online 6 September 2017 resolution. To gain higher resolved EOP from LSM we run solutions which yield hourly estimates for polar motion and dUT1 ¼ Universal Time (UT1) e Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
    [Show full text]
  • Constraining Ceres' Interior from Its Rotational Motion
    A&A 535, A43 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116563 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics Constraining Ceres’ interior from its rotational motion N. Rambaux1,2, J. Castillo-Rogez3, V. Dehant4, and P. Kuchynka2,3 1 Université Pierre et Marie Curie, UPMC–Paris 06, France e-mail: [nicolas.rambaux;kuchynka]@imcce.fr 2 IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS UMR 8028, 77 avenue Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France 3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech, Pasadena, USA e-mail: [email protected] 4 Royal Observatory of Belgium, 3 avenue Circulaire, 1180 Brussels, Belgium Received 24 January 2011 / Accepted 14 July 2011 ABSTRACT Context. Ceres is the most massive body of the asteroid belt and contains about 25 wt.% (weight percent) of water. Understanding its thermal evolution and assessing its current state are major goals of the Dawn mission. Constraints on its internal structure can be inferred from various types of observations. In particular, detailed knowledge of the rotational motion can help constrain the mass distribution inside the body, which in turn can lead to information about its geophysical history. Aims. We investigate the signature of internal processes on Ceres rotational motion and discuss future measurements that can possibly be performed by the spacecraft Dawn and will help to constrain Ceres’ internal structure. Methods. We compute the polar motion, precession-nutation, and length-of-day variations. We estimate the amplitudes of the rigid and non-rigid responses for these various motions for models of Ceres’ interior constrained by shape data and surface properties. Results. As a general result, the amplitudes of oscillations in the rotation appear to be small, and their determination from spaceborne techniques will be challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • Present True Polar Wander in the Frame of the Geotectonic Reference System
    1661-8726/08/030629-8 Swiss J. Geosci. 101 (2008) 629–636 DOI 10.1007/s00015-008-1284-y Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2008 Present true polar wander in the frame of the Geotectonic Reference System NAZARIO PAVONI Key words: Geotectonic Reference System, polar wander, geodynamics, geotectonic bipolarity ABSTRACT The Mesozoic-Cenozoic evolution of the Earth’s lithosphere reveals a funda- mA which are responsible for the two geoid highs results in the long-standing mental hemispherical symmetry inherent in global tectonics. The symmetry stability of location of the geotectonic axis PA. The Earth’s rotation axis is is documented by the concurrent regular growth of the Pacific and African oriented perpendicularly to the PA axis. Owing to the extraordinary stabil- plates over the past 180 million years, and by the antipodal position of the two ity of the geotectonic axis, any change of orientation of the rotation axis, e.g. plates. The plates are centered on the equator, where center P of the Pacific induced by post-glacial rebound, occurs in such a way that the axis remains plate is located at 170° W/0° N, and center A of the African plate at 10° E/0° N. in the equatorial plane of the geotectonic system, i.e. in the 80° W/100° E P and A define a system of spherical coordinates, the Geotectonic Reference meridional plane. Observed present polar wander is directed towards 80° W System GRS, which shows a distinct relation to Cenozoic global tectonics. P (79.2 ± 0.2° W). This indicates that the present true polar wander is directed and A mark the poles of the geotectonic axis PA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ocean Pole Tide: a Review
    Executive Committee Program Committee Fig 1. Attendee Profile by Research Interest Yun-Tai CHEN David HIGGITT, Chair Institute of Geophysics, The University of Nottingham China Earthquake Administration SE 19% Ningbo China AS 23% The Ocean Pole Tide: A ReviewBenjamin Fong CHAO Tetsuo NAKAZAWA, AS Section Institute of Earth Sciences, BG 2% Korea Meteorological Administration Academia Sinica ST 16% HS 12% Wendy WANG, BG Section David HIGGITT College of Global Change and Earth The University of Notthingham, System Science, Beijing Normal University Ningbo China Richard Gross PS 10% IG 8% Kun-Yeun HAN, HS Section Adam SWITZER OS 10% Kyungpook National University Earth Observatory of Singapore Atmospheric Sciences (AS) Biogeosciences (BG) James GOFF, IG Section Hydrological Sciences (HS) Interdisciplinary Geosciences (IG) University of New South Wales Jet Propulsion Laboratory Ocean Sciences (OS) Planetary Sciences (PS) Robin ROBERTSON, OS Section Solar & Terrestrial Sciences (ST) Solid Earth Sciences (SE) University of New South Wales at the Australian Defense Force Academy California Institute of Technology Fig 2. Representation by Country/Region Noriyuki NAMIKI, PS Section National Astronomical Observatory of Pasadena, CA 91109–8099, USA Japan Nanan BALAN, ST Section National Institute for Space Research (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais- Asia Oceania Geosciences Society INPE) th 13 Annual Meeting Hai Thanh TRAN, SE Section Hanoi University of Mining and Geology Partners & Supporters of AOGS July 31 to August 5, 2016 Beijing, China
    [Show full text]
  • Chandler and Annual Wobbles Based on Space-Geodetic Measurements
    ISSN 1610-0956 Joachim Hopfner¨ Chandler and annual wobbles based on space-geodetic measurements Joachim Hopfner¨ Polar motions with a half-Chandler period and less in their temporal variability Scientific Technical Report STR02/13 Publication: Scientific Technical Report No.: STR02/13 Author: J. Hopfner¨ 1 Chandler and annual wobbles based on space-geodetic measurements Joachim Hopfner¨ GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (GFZ), Division Kinematics and Dynamics of the Earth, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In this study, we examine the major components of polar motion, focusing on quantifying their temporal variability. In particular, by using the combined Earth orientation series SPACE99 computed by the Jet Propulsion Labo- ratory (JPL) from 1976 to 2000 at daily intervals, the Chandler and annual wobbles are separated by recursive band-pass ¦¥§£ filtering of the ¢¡¤£ and components. Then, for the trigonometric, exponential, and elliptic forms of representation, the parameters including their uncertainties are computed at epochs using quarterly sampling. The characteristics and temporal evolution of the wobbles are presented, as well as a summary of estimates of different parameters for four epochs. Key words: Polar motion, Chandler wobble, annual wobble, representation (trigonometric, exponential, elliptic), para- meter, variability, uncertainty 1 Introduction Variations in the Earth’s rotation provide fundamental information about the geophysical processes that occur in all components of the Earth. Therefore, the study of the Earth’s rotation is of great importance for understanding the dynamic interactions between the solid Earth, atmosphere, oceans and other geophysical fluids. In the rotating, terrestrial body-fixed reference frame, the variations of Earth rotation are measured by changes in length-of-day (LOD), and polar motion (PM).
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation Between the Celestial and Terrestrial Systems
    IERS Technical Note No. 32 5 Transformation Between the Celestial and Terrestrial Systems The coordinate transformation to be used to transform from the terres- trial reference system (TRS) to the celestial reference system (CRS) at the epoch t of the observation can be written as: [CRS] = Q(t)R(t)W (t) [TRS], (1) where Q(t), R(t) and W (t) are the transformation matrices arising from the motion of the celestial pole in the celestial system, from the rotation of the Earth around the axis of the pole, and from polar motion respec- tively. The frame as realized from the [TRS] by applying the transfor- mations W (t) and then R(t) will be called “the intermediate reference frame of epoch t.” 5.1 The Framework of IAU 2000 Resolutions Several resolutions were adopted by the XXIVth General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union (Manchester, August 2000) that concern the transformation between the celestial and terrestrial reference systems and are therefore to be implemented in the IERS procedures. Such a transformation being also required for computing directions of celestial objects in intermediate systems, the process to transform among these systems consistent with the IAU resolutions is also provided at the end of this chapter. Resolution B1.3 specifies that the systems of space-time coordinates as defined by IAU Resolution A4 (1991) for the solar system and the Earth within the framework of General Relativity are now named the Barycentric Celestial Reference System (BCRS) and the Geocentric Ce- lestial Reference System (GCRS) respectively. It also provides a gen- eral framework for expressing the metric tensor and defining coordinate transformations at the first post-Newtonian level.
    [Show full text]
  • Sidorenkov N.: the Chandler Wobble of the Poles and Its Amplitude Modulation
    THE CHANDLER WOBBLE OF THE POLES AND ITS AMPLITUDE MODULATION N. SIDORENKOV Hydrometcentre of Russian Federation B. Predtechensky pereulok, 11{13, Moscow 123242, Russia e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. It is shown that the period of the Chandler wobble of the poles (CWP) is a combined oscillation caused by three periodic processes experienced by the Earth: (a) lunisolar tides, (b) the precession of the orbit of the Earth's monthly revolution around the barycenter of the Earth - Moon system, and (c) the motion of the perigee of this orbit. The addition of the 1.20 - year Chandler wobble to sidereal, anomalistic, and synodic lunar yearly forcing gives rise slow periodic variations in the CWP amplitude with periods of 32 to 51 years. 1. INTRODUCTION It is well known that the Earth and the Moon revolve around their center of mass (barycenter) with a sidereal period of 27.3 days. The orbit of the Earth's center of mass (geocenter) is geometrically similar to the Moon's orbit, but the orbit size is roughly 1/81 as large as that of the latter. The geocenter is, on average, 4671 km away from the barycenter. In the Earth's rotation around the barycenter, all its constituent particles trace the same nonconcentric orbits and undergo the same centrifugal accelerations as the orbit and acceleration of the geocenter. The Moon attracts di®erent particles of the Earth with a di®erent force. The di®erence between the attractive and centrifugal forces acting on a particle is called the tidal force. The rotation of the Earth-Moon system around the Sun (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Signatures of the Martian Rotation Parameters in the Doppler and Range Observables
    Signatures of the Martian rotation parameters in the Doppler and range observables Marie Yseboodt, V´eronique Dehant, Marie-Julie P´eters Royal Observatory of Belgium, Avenue circulaire 3, Brussels, Belgium, [email protected] Published in Planetary and Space Sciences, 2017 Abstract The position of a Martian lander is affected by different aspects of Mars' rotational motions: the nutations, the precession, the length-of-day variations and the polar motion. These various motions have a different signature in a Doppler observable between the Earth and a lander on Mars' surface. Knowing the correlations between these signatures and the moments when these signatures are not null during one day or on a longer timescale is important to identify strategies that maximize the geophysical return of observations with a geodesy experiment, in particular for the ones on-board the future NASA InSight or ESA-Roscosmos ExoMars2020 missions. We provide first-order formulations of the signature of the rotation parameters in the Doppler and range observables. These expressions are functions of the diurnal rotation of Mars, the lander position, the planet radius and the rotation parameter. Additionally, the nutation signature in the Doppler observable is proportional to the Earth declination with respect to Mars. For a lander on Mars close to the equator, the motions with the largest signature in the Doppler observable are due to the length-of-day variations, the precession rate and the rigid nutations. The polar motion and the liquid core signatures have a much smaller amplitude. For a lander closer to the pole, the polar motion signature is enhanced while the other signatures decrease.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Long-Period Ocean Tides on the Earth's Polar Motion
    Prog. Oceanog. Vol. 40, pp. 385-397, 1997 © 1998 ElsevierScience Ltd. All rights reserved Pergamon Printed in Great Britain PII: S0079-6611(98)00009-3 0079-6611/98 $32.00 Effect of long-period ocean tides on the Earth's polar motion RICHARD S. GROSSl, BEN F. CHAO2 and SHAILEN D. DESA1~ IJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA 2Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA Abstract - The second-degree zonal tide raising potential is symmetric about the polar axis and hence can excite the Earth's polar motion only through its action upon non-axisymmetric features of the Earth such as the oceans. In the long-period tidal band, spectral peaks occur at the fortnightly tidal frequencies in power spectra of polar motion excitation observations from which atmospheric effects have been removed. Different observed polar motion excitation series are studied, and differ- ent methods of removing atmospheric effects from the polar motion excitation observations are explored in order to assess the robustness of the resulting empirical models for the observed effect of long-period ocean tides on polar motion excitation. At fortnightly frequencies, the various observed empirical models are found to agree with each other to within about 1~. However, improved observations of the effect of fortnightly ocean tides on polar motion excitation are required since the observed effects at the Mf and Mf' tidal frequencies are not consistent with the expectation that the oceans should have the same relative response to the tidal potential at these two nearby tidal frequencies. The observations are then compared with predictions of three ocean tide models: two purely hydrodynamic models and one estimated from Topex/Poseidon altimetric sea surface height measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Inversion of Polar Motion Data: Chandler Wobble, Phase Jumps, and Geomagnetic Jerks Dominique Gibert, Jean-Louis Le Mouël
    Inversion of polar motion data: Chandler wobble, phase jumps, and geomagnetic jerks Dominique Gibert, Jean-Louis Le Mouël To cite this version: Dominique Gibert, Jean-Louis Le Mouël. Inversion of polar motion data: Chandler wobble, phase jumps, and geomagnetic jerks. Journal of Geophysical Research : Solid Earth, American Geophysical Union, 2008, 113 (B10), pp.B10405. 10.1029/2008JB005700. insu-00348004 HAL Id: insu-00348004 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-00348004 Submitted on 1 Apr 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113, B10405, doi:10.1029/2008JB005700, 2008 Inversion of polar motion data: Chandler wobble, phase jumps, and geomagnetic jerks Dominique Gibert1 and Jean-Louis Le Moue¨l1 Received 18 March 2008; revised 11 July 2008; accepted 24 July 2008; published 23 October 2008. [1] We reconsider the analysis of the polar motion with a method totally different from the wavelet analysis used in previous papers. The total polar motion is represented as the sum of oscillating annual and Chandler terms whose amplitude and phase perturbations are inverted with a nonlinear simulated annealing method. The phase variations found in previous papers are confirmed with the huge phase change (3p/2) occurring in the 1926–1942 period and another less important one (p/3) in the 1970–1980 epoch.
    [Show full text]