DOCSLIB.ORG

Massachusetts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Massachusetts NUMBER OF INHABITANTS Massachusetts LIST OF TABLES [Pago numbers listed here omit the Stato prefix number whioh appears as part of tho page number for each page. The prefix for this State is 21] Tnh,e Pnge !.-Population of Massachusetts, urban and rural: 1790 to lll50 _____________ .. ____ .. __ ...... _ ..... __ _ 5 2.-Population in groups of places according to size: 1950 ________________________ ····-··-· -··-··--- 5 3.-Population in groups of places according to size: l\lOO to HJ50 ________________________ . __ _ __ 6 '!.-Population of urban places of 10,000 or more from earliest census to 1950 .• ______ .. _ ..... _. _.. _ __ 7 5.-Arca and population of counties, urban and mral: Hl30 to 1950_____________________________ 9 0.-Population of counties by minor civil divisions: 1930 to Hl5Q ___________________________ .. _____ 10 7.-Population of all cities and Qf unincorporated places of 1,000 or moro: Hl50 an<l lll40 ______ .. _____ ~ 12 8.-Population of cities of 5,000 or moro, by wards: lll50 _________________________ .. ___________ 13 0.-Populntion of urbanized areas: Hl50 ____________________________ • ____________ .. _______ .. __ 14 21-1 972218-52--2 MASSACHUSETTS-SECTION 1, WESTERN PART ........N> MINOR CIVIL DIVISIONS-CITIES AND TOWNS &> 2 3 4 5 c!:> B Bl ~ G; >en er:0 enc: t:r.! 1--j 1--j I en c r:,---- ! SfOO:Ul.. ~K j ":",,... :~C.C. l ""VJ"' ! .~~~!:·..I_ ~-a_-:_·~J J ----L.-....-1 b" L.-·1 c . Lr-· .......... \...-·, ll.\Hrll'IST(~;,.gi i MA~L80ROUGJ-I \ TOLl."ND ,,..... 0 i D ....... , D SCALE 2.10 2 <4 6 a 10 lZ 14 tl5 18 20MIL£S CJRCLES INDlCATE 1HCORPOAATED PLACES HAVING LESS TH.AH 2S:JO t~ANTS UNINCORPORATED PLACE NAM£S ARE .SHOWN IH ITALICS 2 3 4 5 Large-scale copies Of this m&p may be purchased from l'uperintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, W1111hington 25, D. o. MASSACHUSETTS-SECTION 2, NORTH CENTRAL PART MINOR CIVIL DIVISIONS-CITIES AND TOWNS 5 6 7 8 9 10 A A. • WORCESTER CO. ........... \ ;~-'¥ WfttC~.i~:O" z ([l.. c ( ~=··· B \,/ B I {/ ~ \ z to~ c c i-1~ en c!:1 D S'"..ALE D 2 1 0 2' ... 10 lZ. l4 16 18 20 K1U:S _, e+='"3 ~ Cl~ INDICATE UNINCORPORATED Pt.ACES HAVING USS THAN 2':XI lNHABITAHTS Uffl~TED PLACE NAMi:S ARE SHOWN IH JTAUCS ~ 8 9 10 I 5 6 7 """'"co MASSACHUSETTS-SECTION 3, SOUTHEASTERN PART ......Nl I MINOR CIVIL DIVISIONS-CITIES AND TOWNS ~ 8 10 11 12 ~~:-~l.&1.::;:. ~Coli......r ~·on.t~ ~cCeattr ii. \-,>; ~~HIHG.HAk\v:C:lfU.ll;:rI ~·-· 1-" i ~cz:?J ·~ D 0 ~a:i E E ~c ~ t-3 ~ F F SCALE % I 0 2. 4 6 ClRCL£S JNOJCA.TE UNJNCORPCR:AT£D PLACES HAVING LESS TliAN 2:Sl:O 11.HlNCORPORATm Pl.AC£ NAM.ES ARE SHOWN 1N ITALIC$ ..// ---·- NA.;:F.Ta.:-- ~. G G ~. "'\s-....1.~ ~ Q 8 9 10 11 12 NUMBER OF INHABITANTS 21-5 Table 1.-POPULATION OF MASSACHUSETTS, URBAN AND RURAL: 1790 TO 1950 [llor description or now nnd old urban doflnltions, see text. Minus sign (-) denotes docrcnso] ---~-----· •c--·--- TIJo Stiito Urban territory Rural territory Percent of total ,~IJRUS dnto Incl'mSo over pre- Increase over pro- Increase over pre- ceding census Number ceding census ceding census Populutlrm of urban Population Population places 1 Urban Rural Number l'orcont Number Percent Number Percent --- Newurbnndotlnltlon, 1050 (A11r. 1). 4, 000, 514 37:!, 703 8. 7 84 2 3, 050, 230 ------------ _,. -- --- --- -- 731, 275 ------------ ------------ 84.4 15. 6 Old urhi111 do finltlo11: • 1) .................... Hl&l ~Apr •J,000,51'! :173, 703 a. 7 122 4, 122, 138 202, 062 0.8 508, 370 111, 131 24.3 87.9 12. 1 l!l-10 A11r .1) ••••••••.••••••••.•. •I, :llll, 721 07, 107 1.0 122 3, 850, 476 28, 060 7 Apr o. 457, 2•15 30, 057 0.3 89.4 10.6 10ao . ll---·-----·-···-····· 4, 24\l, 014 307, 258 10.3 122 3, 831, •120 302, 510 10.fi 418, 188 34, 748 0.1 00.2 9.8 Hl~O (Jnn • !) ................... ' :J, H52, 356 485, 040 1•1.4 116 a, ·ms, om •173, 177 15. 8 383, 4•10 12, 703 llllO 3.4 00.0 10. 0 (Alli' . lli) ....•.............. 3, 300, 116 5()1, 070 20.0 llli 2, 005, 730 583, 862 24.2 370, 677 -22, 702 -5.8 80,0 11. 0 0 !) ••. ________________ 1000 (Jun 2, 805, 346 500, 300 25,3 105 2, 411, 877 570, oso 31.4 303, 400 -10. 500 -2.0 80.0 14. 0 1800 (.Jun 2, 238,IH7 4115, 862 25. 0 07 1, 834, 888 503, 308 37.8 404, 059 -47, 440 -10.5 82.0 18. {) JH80 (Jun~ B::::::::::::::::::: I, 783, 085 325, 734 22,4 80 1, 331, li80 350, 400 37.0 451, 005 -33, 705 -7.0 74.7 25. 3 1870 (Jun0 !) ....••••••.•••••... 1, •157, 351 220, 285 1s ..1 05 072, 081 238, 872 32. 0 485, 270 -12, 587 -2.5 60. 7 33.3 1800 (Jun 0 !) •••••.•••.•••.•...• I, 231, 000 230, 5fi2 23.8 fi7 733, 200 220, 348 45.5 •107, 857 7, 204 1. 5 50.6 40.4 l!lliO .run 004, 514 250, 816 34.8 43 503, 801 22•1, 107 80.3 400, 653 32, 408 7, 1 00.7 49. 3 18·10 Jun ~ B::::::::::::::::::: 137, oou 127, 201 20. 0 2•1 27U, 451 80, 707 47.3 458, 245 37, 404 8.0 37. 0 62.1 18;!0 .Tun 0 !) ................... 010, 108 87, 121 16. 0 22 180, 057 10,.110 50, I 420, 71il 10, 651 4, 1 31.1 68.9 lRllO Aug • 7) •••• ••••••••••••••• 52:J, 2K7 51, 247 10.0 H 110, 187 18, 570 18. 5 404, 100 32, 677 8.8 22.8 77. 2 1810 Aug" (I).···-····.,, ..... ,, .. 3472,lHO •10, 105 11. 0 12 100, 017 35, 317 54, 1 371, 423 13, 878 3. 9 21,3 78. 7 1800 Ang • ·1). ···--······ •••••• ., 3 422, 8•Jfi 4•J, 058 !l. 0 8 65, 300 14, 008 27. 5 357, 645 20, 060 0.1 15.4 84, 6 1700 Aug • 2) •••••••••• .,,,,, ..... 3 378, 787 ......................... ................ -.. 7 51, 202 --- .................. ........................ 327, 585 ........................ ......................... 13. 5 86. 5 ···--· ·-··-~"-'"'"~ .... _.. -~----··---·-· 1 Accol'(lh1g to tho 1rnw mbm1 clollnltlon, tho 111·\Jlln po1ml11tlon comprises persons residing Jn urbnn territory but not necossnrlly 1n nn urbnn pince, which ls deftnecl as a.n l11cor­ r•omtl11i 1Jil>co of 2,500 or nuu·n, or till unlnao11l0mtml 11l11co of 21500 01· moro locutod outside 1m urbnulzed arc!\. Uuclor tho old definition, Incorporated pluccs of 2,500 or more and places urbfln unc\m· sp1wh1J rule 11rn clnssUlo<l ns ur Hill ph\CPS. 2 lnchtdos 110•1,MU fl(ll'Huus In mhnn trrrltury outslllo of lll'bnn pJac~s. a l~xclnclcs po1m111tlo1t or M11lno, ndmlttcd tu tho Union ns I\ sopnmto Btnto In Ml\l'Cll 1820, 'l'!Hl population of Maino wns 228,705 In 1810, 151,710 in 1800, 00,540 In 1700. Table 2.--·POPULATION IN GROUPS OF PLACES ACCORDING TO SIZE: 1950 ==·::."".=;::;."""" :===========::;::===;:::::::===;:===7i============;===o:;====r===p:= l'crcont Percent Numbot• , ll of total Percent Number p ti of total Percent 'l'ype ot m·cn and size or pluco of 11Inccs 1 opu1 11 (Ill populn- of total 'l'ypo of area and slzo of place of places opu 1a on popula- of total tion tlon -·~-------·--------- -----------·1----1 __________________, ____ ---------- Tho Stnto ........................... ·-·-···-·- 4, 090, 51-1 100. 0 Urban, tolnl-Oon. ----1~----:-------- Outside urb1mi1.ed areas .••.•.••••••••••.•• 55 563, 540 12.0 14. 2 Urban, totnl. •••• ---·····--··-··-·---· __t_ii. __ __3_, o_s_u,_2_s_o_ ___8_4._•I 100. o l'lncos or 110,000 or moro .•.••..•...•••••••• 1 63, 348 1.1 l. 3 1 1 Plnces of 25,000 to 50,000 ...•..•••.•••..••. 4 155, 24;7 3.3 3. 0 Within ur1im11zc1!1t•rc11s ••••••••••., ••••••••••••••••• •• s ,3 9~ • a 9 9 i~·~ ~~·.~ Places or 10,000 to 25,000 •••••••••••••••••• 12 187,929 4.0 4. 7 Oontra1 ct1 1 oo, tn n1 ......................... 0 1 , 68',1 787 '· ·• Pincas or 5,000 to 10.000 .•.••...••••••••••• 11 72, 578 1,5 1. 8 Cities or ll00,000 to 1,000,000..... .... ••• ••• 1 801, 444 17. l 20. 2 Plnoos ol 2,600 to 6,000 •••••••••••••••.•.•. 27 04, 438 2.0 2. 4 Cltlos of 250,000 to 000,000 ................... ., ........ --···-··-·-· -·-·-····· ......... CltlcsofJOO,OOOto250,(lOO............... 4 587,037 12.s 14.8 Rural, total. ......•......•..•....•.... .:..::.:.:.:.:._731,275 -~~ Cltlos o! 50,000 to 100,000,,................ 4 206, 300 6. 3 7. 5 Cities under li0,000 ••••••••••.•••.••••••• -··-·-···· --···------- ··--··---· ---······- Plnoos under 2,500.......................... 00 104, 758 2. 2 H. 3 l'lacos of 2,000 to 2,500.................... 7 15, 037 o. 3 2. 2 Urlmn frlnp;os, totnl •••••••.••••••••••••••• -··--····· 1,711,012 30.5 43.2 l'lnces ol l,500 to 2,000.................... 23 39, 682 O. 8 ~ i Incorporated plncos or 2,600 or more.... 20 l, 047, 353 22. 3 20, 5 Places of 1,000 to 1,500.................... 30 40, 130 I, 0 Incorporntod plncos or 100,000 to Plnoes under 1,000 ................................... --·-·····-·- ······--·· --·····-·- 200,000.............................. 2 223,0Dl 4.8 5.6 Other rural territory................................. 620,517 13.4 85. 7 lnoor1mrntod plnoos of 50,000to100,000. 5 301, 484 8. 3 ll. 9 Tncor[lora!ccl 1olnces or 25,000 to 50,000. 0 344, 870 7. 4 8. 7 Urbanized areas, tol.nl.. •••••••••••••• 3, 395, 699 72.4 100. 0 Incorporatotl plncos of 10,000 to 25,(}00. 4 87, llOS 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposed Revisions to 314 CMR 4.00 (Tables and Figures, Clean)
    Please see the 314 CMR 4.00 Summary and Notice to Reviewers document, as well as the Fact Sheets on particular topics for additional information and explanatory detail associated with these proposed regulatory changes. These documents are available on the MassDEP Website. 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 4.06: continued LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES* TABLE & TABLE AND CORRESPONDING FIGURE TITLE Page # FIGURE # A (Figure only) River Basins and Coastal Drainage Areas TF-2 1 Blackstone River Basin TF-3 2 Boston Harbor Drainage Area (formerly Boston Harbor Drainage System and Mystic, Neponset and Weymouth & Weir River Basins) TF-8 3 Buzzards Bay Coastal Drainage Area TF-17 4 Cape Cod Coastal Drainage Area TF-22 5 Charles River Basin TF-30 6 Chicopee River Basin TF-34 7 Connecticut River Basin TF-40 8 Deerfield River Basin TF-49 9 Farmington River Basin TF-58 10 French River Basin TF-60 11 Housatonic River Basin TF-62 12 Hudson River Basin (formerly Hoosic, Kinderhook and Bashbish) TF-70 13 Ipswich River Basin TF-76 14 Islands Coastal Drainage Area (formerly Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket) TF-79 15 Merrimack River Basin TF-81 16 Millers River Basin TF-86 17 Narragansett Bay and Mount Hope Bay Drainage Area TF-90 18 Nashua River Basin TF-93 19 North Coastal Drainage Area TF-103 20 Parker River Basin TF-109 21 Quinebaug River Basin TF-113 22 Shawsheen River Basin TF-116 23 South Coastal Drainage Area TF-118 24 Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord (SuAsCo) River Basin (formerly Concord) TF-123 25 Taunton River Basin TF-128 26 Ten Mile River Basin TF-132 27 Westfield River Basin TF-134 28 (Table only) Site-Specific Criteria TF-144 29 (Table only) GenerallyApplicable Criteria: 29a.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Harbor South Watersheds 2004 Assessment Report
    Boston Harbor South Watersheds 2004 Assessment Report June 30, 2004 Prepared for: Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Prepared by: Neponset River Watershed Association University of Massachusetts, Urban Harbors Institute Boston Harbor Association Fore River Watershed Association Weir River Watershed Association Contents How rapidly is open space being lost?.......................................................35 Introduction ix What % of the shoreline is publicly accessible?........................................35 References for Boston Inner Harbor Watershed........................................37 Common Assessment for All Watersheds 1 Does bacterial pollution limit fishing or recreation? ...................................1 Neponset River Watershed 41 Does nutrient pollution pose a threat to aquatic life? ..................................1 Does bacterial pollution limit fishing or recreational use? ......................46 Do dissolved oxygen levels support aquatic life?........................................5 Does nutrient pollution pose a threat to aquatic life or other uses?...........48 Are there other water quality problems? ....................................................6 Do dissolved oxygen (DO) levels support aquatic life? ..........................51 Do water supply or wastewater management impact instream flows?........7 Are there other indicators that limit use of the watershed? .....................53 Roughly what percentage of the watersheds is impervious? .....................8 Do water supply,
    [Show full text]
  • Armstrong Dam Removal Feasibility Study Final Report
    Armstrong Dam Removal FEASIBILITY STUDY Monatiquot River - Braintree, Massachusetts Prepared for: In partnership with: Prepared by: FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2016 This page intentionally left blank. Executive Summary Armstrong Dam Removal FEASIBILITY STUDY – DRAFT REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Purpose The purpose of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of restoring access for diadromous1 fish to historically native habitats in the Upper Fore River Basin including its tributaries, the Monatiquot, Farm and Cochato Rivers by removing the Armstrong Dam, also known as Hollingsworth Dam, in Braintree, MA. The ultimate goal is restoring river herring access to the 180-acre Great Pond Reservoir in the Farm River basin headwaters. Great Pond serves as a water supply source for the towns of Braintree, Holbrook and Randolph (Tri-Town Water Board). A recent river herring and spawning nursery habitat assessment (Chase et al. 2015) was conducted that demonstrated Great Pond provides suitable river herring spawning habitat. Imagery Credit: Duane Raver/USFWS Species targeted for restoration include both species of river herring (blueback herring and alewife), American eel, and sea lamprey, all of which are diadromous fish that depend upon passage between marine and freshwater habitats to complete their life cycle. Reasons for pursuing fish passage restoration in the Upper Fore River Basin include the importance and historical presence of the target species, the connectivity of and significant potential habitat within the watershed, and active public input and support. F.X. Messina Enterprises, the Armstrong Dam owner, is interested in removing the dam to The impact of diadromous fish species extends eliminate maintenance costs and liability and far beyond the scope of a single restoration potentially developing the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Data of the Neponset and Weymouth River Basins, Massachusetts
    Ui\:ITED STATES DEPARTf\lENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY l\1ASSACHUSETTS HYDROLOGIC- DATA REPORT No. 14 HYDROLOGIC DATA OF THE NEPONSET AND WEYMOUTH RIVER BASINS, MASSACHUSETTS BY R. A . BRACKLEY, WILLIAM B. FLECK AND RICH A RD E. WILLEY "'!00 'J 00 '1' JO /)(,)() ~ NEPONSET AND WEYMOUTH RIVER BASINS I SIJI-.X MAl' 01-' MA S...;A \. Ht '~ l-:-rn-; :.:'IJ l lt 0 21J ¥ J III II• PR F PAR EO I~ COOPERAT IO!'\ WIT H THE CO ~l\10N\VEAL TH OF MASSACHUSETTS \VATER RESOURCES COM f\1ISSION 1973 ill~ITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC DATA OF THE NEPONSET AND WEYMOUTH RIVER BASINS, MASSACHUSETTS By R. A. Brackley, William B. Fleck, and Richard E. Willey Massachusetts Hydrologic-Data Report No. 14 Records of surface-water discharges, selected wells and borings, and chemical analyses of water in the Neponset and Weymouth River basins, Massachusetts Prepared in cooperation with THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION Boston, Massachusetts 1973 OPEN-FILE REPORT CONTENTS Page Introduction-------------------~----------~--------------------- 1 Sources of information-----------------------------------------­ 2 Definition of terms--------------------------------------------­ 2 Selected equivalents-------------------------------------------­ 4 Selected references--------------------------------------------- 5 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate is in pocket Plate 1. Map of the Neponset and Weymouth River basins, showing sites of hydrologic data. Page Figure 1. Monthly mean discharge at stream-gaging stations and monthend water level in selected wells in the Neponset and Weymouth River basins, 1965-68--------- 6 TABLES Page Table 1. Description of selected wells and borings------------- 10 2. Logs of selected wells and borings-------------------- 19 3. Chemical analyses of ground water--------------------- 30 4. Stream sites and discharge measurements--------------- 33 5.
    [Show full text]
  • A Logistic Regression Equation for Estimating the Probability of a Stream Flowing Perennially in Massachusetts
    A Logistic Regression Equation for Estimating the Probability of a Stream Flowing Perennially in Massachusetts By GARDNER C. BENT and STACEY A. ARCHFIELD Abstract (CMR) 10.58(2)(a) were not considered when des- ignating the perennial or intermittent status of a A logistic regression equation was stream site. The database used to develop the developed for estimating the probability of a equation included a total of 305 stream sites (84 stream flowing perennially at a specific site in intermittent- and 89 perennial-stream sites in the Massachusetts. The equation provides city and State, and 50 intermittent- and 82 perennial-stream town conservation commissions and the sites in the South Coastal Basin). Stream sites Massachusetts Department of Environmental included in the database had drainage areas that Protection with an additional method for assessing ranged from 0.14 to 8.94 square miles in the State whether streams are perennial or intermittent and from 0.02 to 7.00 square miles in the South at a specific site in Massachusetts. This informa- Coastal Basin. tion is needed to assist these environmental agen- cies, who administer the Commonwealth of Results of the logistic regression analysis Massachusetts Rivers Protection Act of 1996, indicate that the probability of a stream flowing which establishes a 200-foot-wide protected river- perennially at a specific site in Massachusetts can front area extending along the length of each side be estimated as a function of (1) drainage area of the stream from the mean annual high-water (cube root), (2) drainage density, (3) areal percent- line along each side of perennial streams, with age of stratified-drift deposits (square root), exceptions in some urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts FY2008-2012 Five-Year Capital
    Commonwealth of Massachusetts FY2008-2012 Five-Year Capital Investment Plan August 2007 Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lt. Governor Leslie A. Kirwan, Secretary of Administration & Finance TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................1 VISION........................................................................................................................................................1 CHALLENGES..............................................................................................................................................2 ADDRESSING THE CHALLENGES AND PURSUING THE VISION .........................................................................3 Job Creation and Economic Growth ................................................................................................5 World-Class Education ......................................................................................................................6 Environmental Protection and Clean Energy ..................................................................................6 Partnering with Cities and Towns.....................................................................................................7 Safe Communities ..............................................................................................................................7 Quality, Affordable Health Care for All.............................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • "Attachment 4 June 2013 Massdot Impaired Waters Program"
    Massachusetts Department of Transportation Semi Annual Submittal under MassDOT’s Impaired Water Program Attachment 4: No Discharges from MassDOT Outfalls Assessments MA35029 Hilchey Pond, TMDL is Phosphorus MA36-40 Abbey Brook including Bemis Pond MA42015 Dutton Pond, TMDL is Phosphorus MA51105 Mill Pond, TMDL is Phosphorus MA71047 Winter Pond MA71-09 Winn Brook MA72-33 Charles River, TMDL is Pathogen MA74-06 Cochato River MA83-08 Shawsheen River MA83009 Hussey Pond MA83015 Rabbit Pond MA83-11 Long Meadow Brook MA83-13 Sandy Brook MA93011 Cape Pond MA95166 White Island Pond, TMDL is Phosphorus MA95173 White Island Pond, TMDL is Phosphorus MA95-35 Mattapoisett Harbor MA95-64 Little Bay 6/08/2013 Impaired Waters Assessment for Hilchey Pond (MA35029) Impaired Water Body Name: Hilchey Pond Location: Gardner, Massachusetts Water Body ID: MA35029 Impairments Hilchey Pond (MA35029) is listed under Category 4a, “TMDL is Completed”, on MassDEP’s final Massachusetts Year 2012 Integrated List of Waters (MassDEP, 2013). Hilchey Pond is impaired due to the following: turbidity According to MassDEP’s Millers River Watershed 2000 Water Quality Assessment Report (MassDEP, 2004), the primary and secondary contact recreational, fish consumption, aquatic life, and aesthetic uses of Hilchey Pond have not been assessed. Hilchey Pond (MA35029) also falls under the jurisdiction of MassDEP’s TMDLs of Phosphorus for Selected Millers Basin Lakes, which addresses the turbidity impairment (MassDEP, 2003). Relevant Water Quality Standards Water Body Classification: Class B Applicable State Regulations: 314 CMR 4.05 (3) (b) 6 Color and Turbidity. These waters shall be free from color and turbidity in concentrations or combinations that are aesthetically objectionable or would impair any use assigned to this Class.
    [Show full text]
  • Body of Report
    Streamflow Measurements, Basin Characteristics, and Streamflow Statistics for Low-Flow Partial-Record Stations Operated in Massachusetts from 1989 Through 1996 By Kernell G. Ries, III Abstract length; mean basin slope; area of surficial stratified drift; area of wetlands; area of water bodies; and A network of 148 low-flow partial-record mean, maximum, and minimum basin elevation. stations was operated on streams in Massachusetts Station descriptions and calculated streamflow during the summers of 1989 through 1996. statistics are also included in the report for the 50 Streamflow measurements (including historical continuous gaging stations used in correlations measurements), measured basin characteristics, with the low-flow partial-record stations. and estimated streamflow statistics are provided in the report for each low-flow partial-record station. Also included for each station are location infor- INTRODUCTION mation, streamflow-gaging stations for which flows were correlated to those at the low-flow Streamflow statistics are useful for design and operation of reservoirs for water supply and partial-record station, years of operation, and hydroelectric generation, sewage-treatment facilities, remarks indicating human influences of stream- commercial and industrial facilities, agriculture, flows at the station. Three or four streamflow mea- maintenance of streamflows for fisheries and wildlife, surements were made each year for three years and recreational users. These statistics provide during times of low flow to obtain nine or ten mea- indications of reliability of water resources, especially surements for each station. Measured flows at the during times when water conservation practices are low-flow partial-record stations were correlated most likely to be needed to protect instream flow and with same-day mean flows at a nearby gaging other uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Plan MA MS4 General Permit Requirements
    FOR COMMENT Stormwater Management Plan MA MS4 General Permit Requirements EPA NPDES Permit Number: MAR041039 Prepared for: Holbrook, Massachusetts October 2019 Helen Gordon, P.E., BCEE Senior Program Manager FOR COMMENT Quincy, MA • Woburn, MA • Middletown, CT • Hyannis, MA www.envpartners.com TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATION ..................................................................................................................................... II SMALL MS4 AUTHORIZATION ............................................................................................................. III LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. IV LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................. V LIST OF APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................... VI 1. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Stormwater Regulation .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Permit Program Background ...................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 38, No
    BULLETIN OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOL. 38 NO.4 OCTOBER 1977 CONTENts lNDE X" TO VOLUMES 1- TIIROUGl 38 Page USERS' GUIDE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS •••••••.••••• 1 AU11IOR INDEX ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.• 2 TITLE INDEX •••••.••••••••••••••••••.••••••••. 12 SUBJECT INDEX•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 25 LIST OF INSTITUTIONAL SUBSCRIBERS •••••••••••• 31 PUBLISHED BY THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, Inc. 8RONSON MUSEUM - 8 NORTH MAIN STREET, ATTLE80RO, MASSACHUSETTS - 02703 MEMBER OF THE EASTERN STATES, ARCHEOLOGICAL FEDERATION 1r MASSAOIUSETIS AROIAEOLOGI CAL SOCIETY OFFICERS President Carol Barnes .....•••...72 Radcliffe Ave., Providence, RI 02908 First Viae President George Horner••.....••.525 Liberty Street, Braintree, MA 02814 Seaond Viae President Richard J. Riley•..•••••.•.•106 Faxon Rd., No.Quincy, MA 02171 Corresponding SearetaPY Ralph Bates ••.••..•... 42 Leonard Street, Bridgewater, MA 02324 Reaording Seareta:ry Joseph Marshall......•..•..28 Bank Street, Attleboro, MA 02703 Financial SearetapY Mabel A. Robbins ••..•.... 23 Steere Street, Attleboro, MA 02703 Treasurer Harold F. Nye •••••.•........... Converse Road, Marion, MA 02738 Editor Dena F. Dincauze •..•..UMAS, Dept. of Anth., Amherst, MA 01002 Museum Direator Maurice Robbins 23 Steere Street, Attleboro, MA 02703 Tr>ustees Thomas Athearn, Paul ~ll, Janice Weeks .•.....Expire Oct. 1977 Elaine Kimball, David Cohen, Thomas Lux, Mary Hyde •.....•••• Expire Oct. 1978 Editorial Staff Barbara Luedtke .•....Dept. of Anth. ,II. liMAS, Boston, MA 02125 Thomas Lux..•.•••...•..•. 300 Hope Street, Providence, RI 02906 Duncan Ritchie 244 Goodman Hill Rd., Sudbury, MA 01776 MASSAOIUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY BULLETIN Published in four Numbers of one Volume each year, commencing in October. Note: Address all requests concerning membership to the Secre­ tary; all orders for back Bulletin numbers to the Museum: mail Society dues to the Financial Secretary. BRONSON MUSEUM Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • TMDL Report for Boston Harbor, Weymouth-Weir, and Mystic
    Final Pathogen TMDL for the Boston Harbor, Weymouth-Weir, and Mystic Watersheds October 2018 (Control Number CN 157.1) Boston Harbor Watershed Prepared as a cooperative effort by: Massachusetts DEP USEPA New England Region 1 1 Winter Street 1 Congress Street, Suite 1100 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Boston, Massachusetts 02114 ENSR International (now AECOM) 2 Technology Park Drive, Westford, MA 01886 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Limited copies of this report are available at no cost by written request to: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) Division of Watershed Management 8 New Bond Street Worcester, Massachusetts 01606 This report is also available on MassDEP’s web page http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/watersheds/total-maximum-daily-loads- tmdls.html. A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This list, titled “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management (DWM) – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by contacting Robin Murphy at [email protected] or by writing to the DWM at the address above. DISCLAIMER References to trade names, commercial products, manufacturers, or distributors in this report constituted neither endorsement nor recommendations by the Division of Watershed Management for use. Acknowledgement This report was developed by ENSR through a partnership with Resource Triangle Institute (RTI) contracting with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Agency under the National Watershed Protection Program. The report follows the same format and methodology for previously approved bacteria TMDLs (Charles, Cape Cod, Buzzards Bay, North Coastal, and South Coastal).
    [Show full text]
  • Methods for Estimating Low-Flow Statistics for Massachusetts Streams
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Methods for Estimating Low-Flow Statistics for Massachusetts Streams By KERNELL G. RIES, III and PAUL J. FRIESZ Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4135 Prepared in cooperation with the MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES Northborough, Massachusetts 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of trade or product names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Chief, Massachusetts–Rhode Island District U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286 10 Bearfoot Road Denver, CO 80225-0286 Northborough, MA 01532 or through our web site at http://ma.water.usgs.gov Methods for Estimating Low-Flow Statistics for Massachusetts Streams By Kernell G. Ries, III, and Paul J. Friesz Abstract Regression equations were developed to estimate the natural, long-term 99-, 98-, 95-, 90-, 85-, 80-, Methods and computer software are 75-, 70-, 60-, and 50-percent duration flows; the described in this report for determining flow- 7-day, 2-year and the 7-day, 10-year low flows; duration, low-flow frequency statistics, and August and the August median flow for ungaged sites in median flows. These low-flow statistics can be Massachusetts. Streamflow statistics and basin estimated for unregulated streams in Mass- characteristics for 87 to 133 streamgaging achusetts using different methods depending on stations and low-flow partial-record stations whether the location of interest is at a stream- were used to develop the equations.
    [Show full text]