Boethius and Epic Truth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Boethius and Epic Truth Boethius and Epic Truth The opening lines of Boethius' prosi­ metric Consolation place it firmlyin the epic tradition as a rich series of Stoic and Neoplatonic writings had contextualized it. Echoing at once both the epilogue to Virgil's Georgics (4.564-565) and the pseudo-Virgilian prologue to the Aeneid, 1 the weeping prisoner re­ calls the tranquil writings of his youth, even as he sounds the initial theme of a more serious work: "sad songs must I begin" (l.m1 ,2: "maestos cogor inire modos"). 2 Identifyinghims elf with a composite epic hero defined as Everyman, Boethius assumes the posture of an Aeneas (Cf. Aen. 6.6gg) who, in the underworld of afflictive earthly struggle, weeps as he speaks: "ueris elegi fletibus ora rigant" (l.m 1 ,4). At the same time he plays the part of an Odysseus assailed by the pathetic, self-pityingst rains and seductive blanishments of the poeti­ cal Muses, who accompany him, weeping, on his joumey, and whom Lady Philosophy denounces and dismisses as sweetly destructive 1. For Boethius' sources I am indebted to the references in Joachim Gruber, Kommentar zu Boethius De Consolatione Philosophiae (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1978), and Helga Scheible, Die Gedichte in der Consolatio Philosophiae desBoethius (Heid elberg: Carl Winter, 1972). For a treatment of the pseudo-Virgilian prologue, see P. A. Hansen, "ILLE EGO QUI QUONDAM ...Once Again," Classical Quarterly n.s. 22 (1972): 139-49· 2. For the Latin text of Boethius I use L. Bieler, ed., De consolatione philosophiae, CCSL 94 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1957). The literal English translations given for pas­ sages indented in my text are from The Consolation of Philosophy, trans. S. J. Te ster, Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1918, 1978). 42 Jo b, Boethius, and Epic Truth Sirens: "Sirenes usque in exitium dulces" (I. p 1,1 1 ) . Finally, in his offended sense of justice and passionate despair, the prisoner ac­ costed by a Philosophia with blazing eyes (l.p1,1: "oculis arden­ tibus") resembles the wrathful Achilles at Iliad 1.200 confronted by a towering Athena. 3 Even as Athena, goddess of wisdom, directs Achilles and protects Odysseus, Philo sophia fulfillsthe tutelaryfu nc­ tion of a Sibyl as she reminds Boethius of his final goaland reiterates the Delphic oracle that recalls Boethius to self-knowledge. Although these parallels at the outset readily liken the prisoner in our eyes to an epic hero, he is initially blind to any analogybet ween himself and Homer's and Virgil's protagonists. He sees himself as a victim, not a victor. He can liken his situation only to that of other persecuted philosophers. Philosophia herself begins with that an­ alogy, comparing Boethius' fate to that of Socrates, Zeno, Canius, Seneca, and Soranus, all of them philosophers put to death for opposing wickedness with wisdom (l.p3,g). The prisoner confirms the comparison in his autobiographical complaint when he calls himself one of Philosophia's ill-rewarded, obedient servants (l.p4,4). Later references to Nero and Seneca (ITI.ps,1o-11; ITI.m4) under­ score the close historical comparison between Boethius' fate in the court of Theodoric the Ostrogoth and that of Seneca in Nero's.4 Boethius only begins to see himself as an epic hero and thus become one when his understanding of his own situation changes from a literal to a figurativeone. At the same time, as we shall see, his philosophical quest advances from a consideration of extemal causes (material and efficient) in Books I and IT to the internal causes of idea and intention in Books III and IV. In both cases Boethius leams to prove into the deeper meaning of things. By the end of Book III the prisoner is able to read the story of his own life allegorically as a heroic descent to the underworld comparable to that of Orpheus (III.m1 2); as a mental victoryover the body and its passions, similar 3· See Robert Lamberton, Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Read­ ing and the Growth of the Epic Tradition (Berkeley: University of Califomia Press, 1986), P· 276. 4· For a discussion of Boethius and Seneca see Seth Lerer, Boethius and Dialogue: Literary Method in "The Consolation of Philosophy" (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985), pp. 245-47. For an excellent introduction to Boethius' life and times, see Henry Chadwick, Boethius: The Consolations of Music, Logic, Theology, and Philoso­ phy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981, repr. 1983), pp. 1-68. Boethius and Epic Truth 43 to Ulysses' (IV.m3); and even as a victorious ascent to the stars like Hercules' (IV.m7). As Seth Lerer phrases it, "he leams to see himself through the texts he has read."5 When Boethius discovers that his own struggle with misfortune is mirrored in the paradigmatic agon of epic heroes like Ulysses and Hercules, he reads the myths much as Seneca and Lucretius did. In De rerum natura 5.22-54, for instance, Lucretius exalts the Epi­ curean philosopher, who conquers the monstrous fear of death, over Hercules, who triumphed in his labors over terrible beasts. The ostensible contrast, however, turns into a metaphor, and Hercules becomes for Lucretius an image of the heroic philosopher. Seneca, like Lucretius, assigns the myths of monster-killers to a primitive past ("excussa iam antique credulitate") while at the same time using them to represent the greatness of a man like Cato , who struggled against ambition and the greed for power and stood alone against the hydra-like vices of a degenerate state.6 For Seneca, as Villy S0renson observes, "Cato is the Hercules of his day."7 For Boethius, as we shall see, everyman is called to be a Hercules. In the prose section immediately preceding the Hercules-metrum, Philosophia makes the epic comparison explicit. Not only does a true hero combine in himself the classical, martial virtues of prudence and courage; his wisdom actually is his strength. The vir sapiens, she reminds Boethius, enters into his battle with fortune as fearlessly as a strong man (vir fo rtis) aroused by battle-cry. As she explains it, the word virtus derives from vis, meaning force or strength, because the virtuous man, relying on his own powers (IV.p7, 19: "suis viribus nitens"), is not overcome by adversities. Boethius' thrice-repeated glance into the mythic mirror which represents the self archetypally in the form of an epic hero brings to a climax the educational process Lady Philosophy begins when she asks Boethius whether he remembers who he is: "hominemne te esse 5· Lerer, Boethius and Dialogue, p. 168. Lerer's pioneering work, to which I am indebted, focuses particularly on Boethius' pedagogical use of dialogue as a literary form and his revision of selected Senecan sources. 6. Seneca, "De constantia sapientis," in Moral Essays, vol. 1, trans. John W. Basore, Loeb Classical Library {Cambridge: Harvard University Press), ll.i-iii, pp. 50-53· 7. Villy S0rensen, Seneca: The Humanist at the Court of Nero, trans. W. Glyn Jones (Edinburgh: Canongate; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1 g84), p. 203. 44 Jo b, Boethius, and Epic Truth meministi?" (l.p6, 14). As we have noted, there are only three mytho­ logical metra among the thirty-nine in Boethius' Consolation. Al­ though few in number, these poems, as Gerard O'Daly insists, have a "significance" that "must not be underestimated."8 Not merely "in­ terludes in the argument or decorative embellishments of it,"9 the metra featuring Orpheus (lll.m 1 2 ), Ulysses and Circe (IV.m3), and Agamemnon, Ulysses, and Hercules (IV.m 7) are placed "at important junctures in the work" 10 to summarize and advance its themes by relating them to the allegorical exegesis of heroic myth practised in the Hellenistic and N eo platonic philosophical schools. While Lerer, O'Daly, and others have related the mythological metra in general terms to the pedagogical progression of the Consolation, no one has drawn a direct correlation between the three metra and the threefold definition of human nature that Philosophia helps her pupil, Bo­ ethius, to recall. Even as the allegorical reading of ancient myth, deeply grounded in moral philosophy, had defined a threefold self­ knowledge as epic truth, Lady Philosophy assesses Boethius' condi­ tion and effects his cure according to a tripartite definition of human nature. When Philosophia cross-examines the prisoner to determine his mental state, she asks him, first of all, about his belief in divine providence. When he avers that the course of the world is directed not by mere chance but by God, she applauds his answer but presses him more closely to discover the cause of his obvious despair. Further questioning reveals that although he remembers the origin of every­ thing, he has forgotten the final cause of the universe, the end at which the whole of creation aims and moves. He has similarly lost sight of his own telos as a human being. He confesses himself to be a man ("homo"), definedin Aristotelian terms as a rational and mor­ tal animal (l.p6, 15: "rationale animal atque mortale") and nothing more (l.p6, 16: "nihil"). He has, in short, forgotten the third part of the hominal definition, according to which a human being possesses an immortal soul and a divine destiny. As Philo sophia pointedly tells him, he no longer knows what he is: "quid ipse sis, nosse desisti" (l.p6, 1 7). 8. Gerard O'Daly, The Po etry of Boethius (Chapel Hill: Universityof North Caro­ lina Press, 1991), p. 178. g. Ibid., p. vii. 1 o. Ibid., p. 1 78. Boethius andEpic Truth 45 As we shall see, the three mythological metra, as fables teaching truth, constitute a step-by-step unfolding of the three essential fea­ tures of human nature.
Recommended publications
  • The Darkness of Man: a Study of Light and Dark Imagery in Seneca's
    The Darkness of Man: A Study of Light and Dark Imagery in Seneca’s Thyestes and Agamemnon A Senior Thesis in Classics The Colorado College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts By Emily Kohut May 2016 Kohut 1 Acknowledgments I would like to give my deepest and heartfelt thanks to Colorado College’s Classics department. Thank you Owen Cramer, Sanjaya Thakur, Marcia Dobson, and Richard Buxton for all of your help, edits, and advice throughout the course of my time here at CC and especially while working on this project. Thank you to my family and friends for supporting me through this whole process and to the many others who have been involved in my time here at CC. This has been an amazing experience and I could not have done it without all of you. Thank you very much. Kohut 2 The Darkness of Man: A Study of Light and Dark Imagery in Seneca’s Thyestes and Agamemnon Seneca’s Thyestes and Agamemnon are texts in which light rarely presents itself, instead it is dark that is present from start to finish. Throughout the course of these texts, I take note of the use and presence, or lack, of light. There appear to be two specific uses of light that serve specific purposes in Thyestes and Agamemnon: natural light (generally indicated with primarily die- or luc-1 based words), and artificial light (referenced by words related to/derived from flamma or ardeo2). Natural light is prominently used only when discussing its being consumed by darkness, while artificial light appears in passages saturated with destruction and chaos.
    [Show full text]
  • CLAS 4000 Seminar in Classics on Seneca's Thyestes and LATN 4002 Roman Drama
    CLAS 4000 Seminar in Classics on Seneca’s Thyestes and LATN 4002 Roman Drama http://myweb.ecu.edu/stevensj/CLAS4000/2016syllabus.pdf Prof. John A. Stevens Spring 2016 Office: Ragsdale 133 [email protected] Office Hours: TTh 11-1:30 and by appt. (252) 328-6056 Objectives. Upon completion of this course, you will be able to: • Situate Senecan tragedy in the contexts of Roman literature, history and political philosophy • Analyze the elements of Roman Stoicism present in Seneca’s Thyestes • Characterize contemporary literary approaches to the play • Evaluate the play’s literary and philosophical elements as an integral whole Writing Intensive (WI) CLAS 4000 is a writing intensive course in the Writing Across the Curriculum Program at East Carolina University. With committee approval, this course contributes to the twelve-hour WI requirement for students at ECU. Additional information is available at: http://www.ecu.edu/writing/wac/. WI Course goals: • Use writing to investigate complex, relevant topics and address significant questions through engagement with and effective use of credible sources; • Produce writing that reflects an awareness of context, purpose, and audience, particularly within the written genres (including genres that integrate writing with visuals, audio or other multi-modal components) of their major disciplines and/or career fields; • Understand that writing as a process made more effective through drafts and revision; • Produce writing that is proofread and edited to avoid grammatical and mechanical errors; • Ability to assess and explain the major choices made in the writing process. • Students are responsible for uploading the following to iWebfolio (via Courses/Student Portfolio in OneStop): 1) A final draft of a major writing project from the WI course, 2) A description of the assignment for which the project was written, and 3) A writing self-analysis document (a component of our QEP).
    [Show full text]
  • Senecan Tragedy and Virgil's Aeneid: Repetition and Reversal
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 Senecan Tragedy and Virgil's Aeneid: Repetition and Reversal Timothy Hanford Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/427 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] SENECAN TRAGEDY AND VIRGIL’S AENEID: REPETITION AND REVERSAL by TIMOTHY HANFORD A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Classics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2014 ©2014 TIMOTHY HANFORD All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation has been read and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in Classics in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Ronnie Ancona ________________ _______________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee Dee L. Clayman ________________ _______________________________ Date Executive Officer James Ker Joel Lidov Craig Williams Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract SENECAN TRAGEDY AND VIRGIL’S AENEID: REPETITION AND REVERSAL by Timothy Hanford Advisor: Professor Ronnie Ancona This dissertation explores the relationship between Senecan tragedy and Virgil’s Aeneid, both on close linguistic as well as larger thematic levels. Senecan tragic characters and choruses often echo the language of Virgil’s epic in provocative ways; these constitute a contrastive reworking of the original Virgilian contents and context, one that has not to date been fully considered by scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Teknophagy and Tragicomedy: the Mythic Burlesques of Tereus and Thyestes
    This is a repository copy of Teknophagy and Tragicomedy: The Mythic Burlesques of Tereus and Thyestes. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/126374/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Haley, M orcid.org/0000-0002-7697-3568 (2018) Teknophagy and Tragicomedy: The Mythic Burlesques of Tereus and Thyestes. Ramus, 47 (2). pp. 152-173. ISSN 0048-671X https://doi.org/10.1017/rmu.2018.12 © Ramus 2019. This article has been published in a revised form in Ramus: https://doi.org/10.1017/rmu.2018.12. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Ramus Submission 2017 Teknophagy and Tragicomedy: The Mythic Burlesques of Tereus and Thyestes Teknophagy (τεκνοφαγία), or child-eating, is an apt subject for tragedy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Medea of Euripides and Seneca: a Comparison
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1941 The Medea of Euripides and Seneca: A Comparison Mary Enrico Frisch Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Frisch, Mary Enrico, "The Medea of Euripides and Seneca: A Comparison" (1941). Master's Theses. 180. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/180 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1941 Mary Enrico Frisch -If.. THE MEDEA OF EURIPIDES AND SENECA: A COMPARISON by Sister Mary Enrico Frisch, S.S.N.D. A Thesis submitted 1n partial ~ul~illment o~ the requirements ~or the degree o~ Master o~ Arts Loyola University August, 1941 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I Introduction: Survey o~ Opinion. 1 II Broad Similarities in Moti~ and 6 Sentiment. III Broad Similarities in the Plot 30 o~ the Medea o~ Euripides and the Medea o~ Seneca. IV Parallels in Phraseology. 51 v Characters and Their Attitude 73 to the Gods. Bibliography a. Re~erences ~or the Medea 91 o~ Euripides. b. Re~erences ~or the Medea 95 o~ Seneca. c. General Works. 98 THE MEDEA OF EURIPIDES AND SENECA: A COMPARISON Chapter I INTRODUCTION: SURVEY OF OPINION It is not a new theory that Seneca used the plays o~ Eurip­ ides as models for his Latin tragedies, particularly his Medea, Hippolytus, Hercules Furens, Troades and the Phoenissae.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Medea in Greece and Rome
    INTRODUCTION: MEDEA IN GREECE AND ROME A J. Boyle maiusque mari Medea malum. Seneca Medea 362 And Medea, evil greater than the sea. Few mythic narratives of the ancient world are more famous than the story of the Colchian princess/sorceress who betrayed her father and family for love of a foreign adventurer and who, when abandoned for another woman, killed in revenge both her rival and her children. Many critics have observed the com­ plexities and contradictions of the Medea figure—naive princess, knowing witch, faithless and devoted daughter, frightened exile, marginalised alien, dis­ placed traitor to family and state, helper-màiden, abandoned wife, vengeful lover, caring and filicidal mother, loving and fratricidal sister, oriental 'other', barbarian saviour of Greece, rejuvenator of the bodies of animals and men, killer of kings and princesses, destroyer and restorer of kingdoms, poisonous stepmother, paradigm of beauty and horror, demi-goddess, subhuman monster, priestess of Hecate and granddaughter of the sun, bride of dead Achilles and ancestor of the Medes, rider of a serpent-drawn chariot in the sky—complex­ ities reflected in her story's fragmented and fragmenting history. That history has been much examined, but, though there are distinguished recent exceptions, comparatively little attention has been devoted to the specifically 'Roman' Medea—the Medea of the Republican tragedians, of Cicero, Varro Atacinus, Ovid, the younger Seneca, Valerius Flaccus, Hosidius Geta and Dracontius, and, beyond the literary field, the Medea of Roman painting and Roman sculp­ ture. Hence the present volume of Ramus, which aims to draw attention to the complex and fascinating use and abuse of this transcultural heroine in the Ro­ man intellectual and visual world.
    [Show full text]
  • Magis Rythmus Quam Metron: the Structure of Seneca's Anapaests
    Magis rythmus quam metron: the structure of Seneca’s anapaests, and the oral/aural nature of Latin poetry Lieven Danckaert To cite this version: Lieven Danckaert. Magis rythmus quam metron: the structure of Seneca’s anapaests, and the oral/aural nature of Latin poetry. Symbolae Osloenses, Taylor & Francis (Routledge): SSH Titles, 2013, 87 (1), pp.148-217. 10.1080/00397679.2013.842310. halshs-01527668 HAL Id: halshs-01527668 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01527668 Submitted on 24 May 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Magis rythmus quam metron : the structure of Seneca's anapaests, and the oral/aural nature of Latin poetry 1 Lieven Danckaert, Ghent University Abstract The aim of this contribution is twofold. The empirical focus is the metrical structure of Seneca's anapaestic odes. On the basis of a detailed formal analysis, in which special attention is paid to the delimitation and internal structure of metrical periods, I argue against the dimeter colometry traditionally assumed. This conclusion in turn is based on a second, more methodological claim, namely that in establishing the colometry of an ancient piece of poetry, the modern metrician is only allowed to set apart a given string of metrical elements as a separate metron, colon or period, if this postulated metrical entity could 'aurally' be distinguished as such by the hearer.
    [Show full text]
  • Incest, Cannibalism, Filicide: Elements of the Thyestes Myth in Ovid’S Stories of Tereus and Myrrha
    INCEST, CANNIBALISM, FILICIDE: ELEMENTS OF THE THYESTES MYTH IN OVID’S STORIES OF TEREUS AND MYRRHA Hannah Sorscher A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial ful- fillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Classics. Chapel Hill 2017 Approved by: Sharon L. James James J. O’Hara Emily Baragwanath © 2017 Hannah Sorscher ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Hannah Sorscher: Incest, Cannibalism, Filicide: Elements of the Thyestes Myth in Ovid’s Stories of Tereus and Myrrha (Under the direction of Sharon L. James) This thesis analyzes key stories in Books 6–10 of Ovid’s Metamorphoses through a focus on the pair of stories that bookend the central section of the poem, the narratives of Tereus and Myrrha. These two stories exemplify the mythic types of the family-centered stories in Books 6– 10: Tereus’ is a tale of filicide (specifically, filial cannibalism), while Myrrha’s features incest. Ovid links these stories through themes and plot elements that are shared with the tragedy of Thyestes, a paradigmatic tragic myth encompassing both filial cannibalism and incest, otherwise untold in the Metamorphoses. Through allusions to Thyestes’ myth, Ovid binds together the se- quence of human dramas in the poem, beginning and ending with the Tereus and Myrrha stories. Furthermore, the poet reinforces and signals the connections between the stories through textual echoes, lexical formulations, and shared narrative elements. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..1 Thyestes…………………………………………………………………………………………...2 Lexical Connections……………………………………………………………………………...13 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………….....34 Works Cited…………………………………………………………………………………...…3 iv Introduction In the central books of Ovid’s Metamorphoses, six episodes share a dark but very Ovidi- an theme: the destruction of human families.
    [Show full text]
  • Night (Thyestes 2.0)
    This script was freely downloaded from the (re)making project, (charlesmee.org). We hope you'll consider supporting the project by making a donation so that we can keep it free. Please click here to make a donation. Night (Thyestes 2.0) by C H A R L E S L . M E E A companion piece to Day (Daphnis and Chloe 2.0). This, Thyestes 2.0 is night, Daphnis and Chloe 2.0 is day. The pieces can be done individually—or together, under the title Night and Day. A woman in a full length black evening dress comes out to a microphone that stands downstage center. She speaks into the microphone. THE WOMAN Act one, scene one. Tantalus, a mortal friend of the gods, decides to test their omniscience. He kills his own son, Pelops, chops him up and boils him, and plans to feed him to the gods as animal meat. Scene two. The gods realize the truth and are horrified; they put the pieces of the boy back together- and send Tantalus to Hades. Scene three. Tortured by thirst, Tantalus stands in water that reaches only to his chin. Food just out of his reach. Tantalized forever. Act two, scene one. Pelops grows up and falls in love with Hippodamia. But the father of Hippodamia, in order to test potential suitors, has declared that anyone who wants to marry his daughter must first beat him in a chariot race. Scene two. The crafty Pelops strikes a secret bargain with the father's personal charioteer: if the charioteer will sabotage the father's chariot, Pelops will let the charioteer sleep with Hippodamia on the wedding night.
    [Show full text]
  • Seneca and Psychoanalysis1 Mairéad Mcauley University College, London and University of Johannesburg
    Breaking Apart Like the World: Seneca and Psychoanalysis1 Mairéad McAuley University College, London and University of Johannesburg I am breaking apart like the world. 71 -Sylvia Plath, Three Women In a famous section of The Interpretation of Dreams, Freud outlines his theories of the Oedipus complex and the unconscious through a reading of Sophocles’ tragedy, followed by a lengthy footnote on the same motifs-repressed-in Shakespeare: Another of the great creations of tragic poetry, Shakespeare’s Hamlet has its roots in the same soil as Oedipus Rex. But the changed treatment of the same material reveals the whole difference in the mental life of these two widely separated epochs of civilization. In the Oedipus the child’s wishful phantasy that underlies it is brought into the open and realized as it would be in a dream. In Hamlet it remains repressed; and-just as in the case of neurosis-we only learn of its existence from its inhibiting consequences.... Hamlet is able to do anything-except take vengeance on the man who did away with his father and took that father’s place with his mother, the man who shows him the repressed wishes of his own childhood realized. (SE 4:264-5) If Freud presents Sophocles as a proto-Freudian, Seneca’s Oedipus, at the begin- ning of his play already beleaguered by proleptic guilt for the plague infecting the city, seems almost to have read not just Sophocles’ play but also Freud’s reading of Sophocles (and Shakespeare): I am ashamed to utter my fate. Phoebus threatens the son with his parent’s bed.…When you dread some great evil, you must fear even what you think impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Portrayals of Procne and Medea in Ovid's
    Philomathes The Duality of Infanticide: An Analysis of The Portrayals of Procne and Medea in Ovid’s Metamorphoses n his epic, the Metamorphoses, Ovid arranges the myth of I Jason and Medea to follow the myth of Procne and Philomela almost immediately. Because both myths end in a mother killing her children to exact revenge on her husband, the positioning of the two stories back-to-back encourages the reader to compare the narratives concerning the two mothers. In the story of Procne and Philomela, Ovid offers the reader cause to sympathize with the actions of the mother, Procne, whose sister is brutally raped and disfigured by her husband. In the story of Medea, however, Ovid portrays Medea in an exclusively callous fashion and contrasts his description of her and her actions with those of Procne. Additionally, Ovid transposes the characterization assigned typically to Medea, most notably in Euripides’ Medea, onto Procne, thus both demonstrating his command of Greek literature and presenting his version as a deliberate challenge to that of Euripides. Moreover, he actively participates in “othering” Medea, a foreigner, while he treats Procne more generously as a result of her identity as a Greek, and thus a predecessor to the Romans. Ovid most overtly manipulates the reader’s sympathies toward Procne and Medea by narrative means. In the case of Procne, Ovid spends the majority of the section describing the crime committed by Tereus against Philomela. The poet intentionally plays up the brutality of the crime writing, 1 Philomathes “he [Tereus] subdued her [Philomela] with violence, a virgin and alone, as she repeatedly cried out in vain for her father, repeatedly for her sister, to the powerful gods above all.”1 He also states, Illa tremit velut agna pavens, quae saucia cani / ore excussa lupi … (“She trembled just as a frightened lamb, which has been cast out from the jaws of a grey wolf, wounded”).2 In describing Philomela’s isolation and emphasizing her desperation to be saved by her father and sister, Ovid establishes Tereus as a horrifically cruel villain.
    [Show full text]
  • Medea & Phaedra
    Medea & Phaedra: Tragedies of Passion, Betrayal, and Revenge Theater of War creator Bryan Doerries returns to BAM to lead discussion surrounding mental health through readings from Euripides’ Medea and Seneca’s Phaedra Medea & Phaedra: Tragedies of Passion, Betrayal, and Revenge Led by Bryan Doerries With Elizabeth Marvel, Amy Ryan, Donnetta Lavinia Grays, and Bill Camp Mon, Jun 20 at 7pm BAM Fisher (Fishman Space), 321 Ashland Pl Free with RSVP Brooklyn, NY/May 19, 2016—BAM Humanities presents Medea & Phaedra: Tragedies of Passion, Betrayal, and Revenge—an evening of performance and dialogue featuring dramatic readings of scenes from Euripides’ Medea and Seneca’s Phaedra, followed by discussion about the relevance of these myths to contemporary society. The evening will be led by Theater of War founder Bryan Doerries, using his translation of Medea and a translation of Phaedra by Laura Weber, with performances by Elizabeth Marvel, Amy Ryan, Donnetta Lavinia Grays, and Bill Camp. Medea and Phaedra—both of which timelessly explore how scorned passion can lead to revenge and unthinkable violence—will serve as the gateway to a discussion surrounding mental illness. These plays pose the question as to whether the irreversible actions of the titular characters are driven by mental illness. From there, Doerries will facilitate a conversation that will address under-discussed mental health issues—such as post-partum depression and psychosis—and will extend to recent incidents that seem uncannily similar to the plots of these ancient plays. For press information contact Christina Norris at [email protected] or 718.636.4129 x8. About the artists Writer, director, and translator Bryan Doerries is the founder of Theater of War, a project that presents readings of ancient Greek plays to military and civilian communities to initiate conversations about the wounds of war.
    [Show full text]