DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1408.1391V1 [Cs.IT] 7 Aug 2014 the Universality of Different Structure Matrices Are Compared

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1408.1391V1 [Cs.IT] 7 Aug 2014 the Universality of Different Structure Matrices Are Compared FrontREVIEW:Comput ARTICLE:Sci: DOI State of the Art and Prospects of Structured Sensing Matrices in Compressed Sensing Kezhi Li 1, Shuang Cong 2;∗ 1ACCESS Center, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, 10044, Sweden 2Dept. of Automation, University of Science and Technology of China Hefei, 230027, China c Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 201X Abstract Compressed sensing (CS) enables people to ac- least twice the highest frequency present in a signal (so-called quire the compressed measurements directly and recover Nyquist rate) to retain signal information intact [1, 2]. The sparse or compressible signals faithfully even when the sam- Shannon’s theorem solves the problem in theory perfectly, yet pling rate is much lower than the Nyquist rate. However, the unfortunately it is not omnipotent. In many applications such pure random sensing matrices usually require huge memory as remote surveillance or spectroscopy, sampling in the result for storage and high computational cost for signal reconstruc- with Nyquist rate is expensive, or even physically impossible. tion. Many structured sensing matrices have been proposed So as long as the recovery performance achieves an accept- recently to simplify the sensing scheme and the hardware im- able level, people want to build devices which are capable plementation in practice. Based on the restricted isometry of acquiring samples at a necessary rate as low as possible. property and coherence, couples of existing structured sens- In some other applications, such as imaging system or video ing matrices are reviewed in this paper, which have special processing, sampling a large number of measurements seems structures, high recovery performance, and many advantages feasible. However, because of the limited storage space and such as the simple construction, fast calculation and easy using of advanced compression techniques, people often dis- hardware implementation. The number of measurements and card the most received data, and just save a small amount of arXiv:1408.1391v1 [cs.IT] 7 Aug 2014 the universality of different structure matrices are compared. the compressed data (e.g., JEPG). Apparently it will waste Keywords Compressed sensing, structured sensing matri- lots of valuable sensing resources since the entire data are ces, RIP, coherence; sampled at first. Aiming at solving above problems, the compressed sens- ing (short for CS) theory [3–7] has become one of the hottest 1 Introduction research areas in signal processing since 2006. The research of CS has been growing very fast and it focuses on acquiring In the digital revolution, people are now employing various and reconstructing sparse or compressible signals. By using signal processing techniques and new sensing systems in gen- CS, compressed measurements can be acquired directly and eral electronic products with ever-increasing resolution and one may recover the original sparse or compressible signal fidelity. The conventional manners of sampling signals, im- faithfully even when the sampling rate is much lower than the ages, videos, or other data obey the celebrated Shannon’s the- Nyquist rate. An N-length signal x is regarded as sparse if x orem, that requires to sample a signal at a sampling rate at has K nonzero values and K N. Compressible x means that x can be well-approximated by another sparse signal f Received month dd, yyyy; accepted month dd, yyyy in certain domain Ψ by using only K nonzero coefficients: E-mail: scong@ustc:edu:cn x = Ψf; jfj0 = K. Normally the traditional compression tech- Kezhi LI et al. State of the Art and Prospects of Structured Sensing Matrices in Compressed Sensing niques2 preserve the values and locations of the largest co- in the construction, calculation or hardware implementation. efficients, such as JPEG, JPEG2000, MPEG. While CS has For many of them, corresponding fast recovery algorithms more efficient sensing or sampling protocols that capture the have been developed by exploiting their specific structures. essential information content embedded in the original sig- Here we put our emphasis on how the structured matrices are nal and obtain the condensed data straightforwardly. More generated and what are their recovery performances. Based precisely, these protocols are nonadaptive linear transforms, on these, the number of measurements and the universality which can be represented by well-designed matrices, called of different structure matrices are compared. The paper will sensing matrices Φ. These matrices should be incoherent to help readers to understand the characteristics of popular sens- the sparsifying matrix Ψ of the compressible signal. With ing matrices well and may inspire them to explore or pursuit the measurements and the sensing matrix, the process of ex- more efficient sensing schemes in the CS area. act reconstructing signals from a subset of measurements can The remaining paper is organized as follows. In Section be implemented by solving a nonlinear optimization prob- 2, we describe the core concepts of this paper: sensing ma- lem. The approaches to solving the nonlinear problems are trices, and introduce two prevalent criteria that examine the named reconstruction/recovery algorithms. From a mathe- effectiveness of sensing matrices: restricted isometry prop- matical point of view, compressed sensing is also deemed as erty and coherence. In Section 3, couples of structured sens- a technique of finding sparse solutions to underdetermined ing matrices are analyzed. The overview of applications is linear systems. discussed in Section 4. Finally, the prospects of structured The CS theory is a revolution in both the theory of reliable sensing matrices are discussed in Section 5 followed by the signal sampling and physical design of sensors. Since the conclusions in Section 6. original signal can be sensed from fewer linear projections rather than acquired in its initial domain, the sensing matri- ces play an important role in the CS framework. The prop- 2 Sensing Matrices erty of the sensing matrices affects the number of necessary In our real world, normally the useful signals are not random. measurements and the recovery performance directly. Early Images, videos or voices often contain specific structures and researchers proved that a random projection is one of the best strong correlation among pixels, frames or samples. These solutions [5, 8]. The projection matrices are generated by or- structures and correlations are the assumptions behind the thogonalizing measured vectors uniformly and independently sparse representation theory. Given an N-dimensional sig- on a unit sphere. In addition, sensing matrices consisting of nal x, Ψ denotes the sparsifying transform basis for x, where independent and identically distributed (i.i.d) entries drawn throughout this paper we assume that Ψ is an N × N normal- from a Gaussian or Bernoulli distribution also perform well ized unitary matrix satisfying Ψ∗Ψ = NI . So x can easily in both theory and practice [3, 4]. Though the problem has N be decomposed by means of a linear superposition of K ele- been solved in mathematics, there still exist many obstacles mentary components: to overcome. One main drawback of the pure random sensing matrices is that they require huge storage-memory, namely XK M × N entries to recover a length-N signal, and high com- x = fk k: (1) k=1 putational cost for signal reconstruction. Moreover, the diffi- culty of hardware implementation also makes them expensive which can be rewritten in the form of matrix multiplication in practice. as To simplify the sensing scheme, many structured sensing x = Ψf; (2) matrices have been proposed in recent years. In this paper, where f is a length N sparse vertical vector with K nonzero after explaining some terminologies such as restricted isom- values, K N. Typical transforms Ψ include discrete etry property and coherence, we give an introduction to cou- Fourier transform (DFT), discrete cosine transform (DCT) ples of existing structured sensing matrices, including sub- and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT). Sometimes the sampled incoherent bases, random Toeplitz matrices, random number of nonzero values in f is larger than K. In this case demodulator matrices, random convolution matrices, struc- people usually encode the most significant K non-zero entries turally random matrices, convolutional matrices using se- of f and disregard the rest, which is also the core principle quences and some other structured sensing matrices. These of the image compression standard JPEG (using DCT) and matrices have special structures which equip them efficiency JPEG2000 (using DWT). Front. Comput. Sci. 2014, X(X): XXXXX Now assuming a length-N signal x as defined in (1), the satisfy the RIP with parameters (K; δ) (δ 2 (0; 1)) if 3 data acquisition process can be described as (1 − δ)kfk2 ≤ kΘfk2 ≤ (1 + δ)kfk2; for all f 2 Γ; (4) y = Φx = ΦΨf = Θf; (3) where Γ represents the set of all length-N vectors with K non- where the measurement y represents an M × 1 sampled vec- zero coefficients. tor, Φ is an M × N measurement/sensing matrix, Θ = ΦΨ. (3) is the kernel equation of the sensing process. The sens- Generally speaking, RIP requires the sensing matrix to act ing process with a random Gaussian measurement matrix Φ as a near isometry on the set of all K-sparse signals. It is con- and a DCT matrix Ψ is illustrated in Figure 1, in which there sistent with the thought of spreading energy behind random are four columns of Ψ that correspond to nonzero fi coeffi- sensing matrices. So measurement y preserves the energy cients; the measurement vector y is a linear combination of that does not shrink or expand too much comparing with the these columns. The CS theory considers problems based on original signal x. If Θ satisfies the RIP, many reconstruction the fundamental equation (3). These problems can be sum- algorithms can be used to recover any K-sparse signal f from marized as how to design efficient sensing matrix Φ, and how M measurements Θf, such as Basis Pursuit (BP) or Matching to recover x given y and Φ.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:2105.00793V3 [Math.NA] 14 Jun 2021 Tubal Matrices
    Tubal Matrices Liqun Qi∗ and ZiyanLuo† June 15, 2021 Abstract It was shown recently that the f-diagonal tensor in the T-SVD factorization must satisfy some special properties. Such f-diagonal tensors are called s-diagonal tensors. In this paper, we show that such a discussion can be extended to any real invertible linear transformation. We show that two Eckart-Young like theo- rems hold for a third order real tensor, under any doubly real-preserving unitary transformation. The normalized Discrete Fourier Transformation (DFT) matrix, an arbitrary orthogonal matrix, the product of the normalized DFT matrix and an arbitrary orthogonal matrix are examples of doubly real-preserving unitary transformations. We use tubal matrices as a tool for our study. We feel that the tubal matrix language makes this approach more natural. Key words. Tubal matrix, tensor, T-SVD factorization, tubal rank, B-rank, Eckart-Young like theorems AMS subject classifications. 15A69, 15A18 1 Introduction arXiv:2105.00793v3 [math.NA] 14 Jun 2021 Tensor decompositions have wide applications in engineering and data science [11]. The most popular tensor decompositions include CP decomposition and Tucker decompo- sition as well as tensor train decomposition [11, 3, 17]. The tensor-tensor product (t-product) approach, developed by Kilmer, Martin, Bra- man and others [10, 1, 9, 8], is somewhat different. They defined T-product opera- tion such that a third order tensor can be regarded as a linear operator applied on ∗Department of Applied Mathematics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China; ([email protected]). †Department of Mathematics, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourier Transform, Convolution Theorem, and Linear Dynamical Systems April 28, 2016
    Mathematical Tools for Neuroscience (NEU 314) Princeton University, Spring 2016 Jonathan Pillow Lecture 23: Fourier Transform, Convolution Theorem, and Linear Dynamical Systems April 28, 2016. Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) We will focus on the discrete Fourier transform, which applies to discretely sampled signals (i.e., vectors). Linear algebra provides a simple way to think about the Fourier transform: it is simply a change of basis, specifically a mapping from the time domain to a representation in terms of a weighted combination of sinusoids of different frequencies. The discrete Fourier transform is therefore equiv- alent to multiplying by an orthogonal (or \unitary", which is the same concept when the entries are complex-valued) matrix1. For a vector of length N, the matrix that performs the DFT (i.e., that maps it to a basis of sinusoids) is an N × N matrix. The k'th row of this matrix is given by exp(−2πikt), for k 2 [0; :::; N − 1] (where we assume indexing starts at 0 instead of 1), and t is a row vector t=0:N-1;. Recall that exp(iθ) = cos(θ) + i sin(θ), so this gives us a compact way to represent the signal with a linear superposition of sines and cosines. The first row of the DFT matrix is all ones (since exp(0) = 1), and so the first element of the DFT corresponds to the sum of the elements of the signal. It is often known as the \DC component". The next row is a complex sinusoid that completes one cycle over the length of the signal, and each subsequent row has a frequency that is an integer multiple of this \fundamental" frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discrete Fourier Transform
    Tutorial 2 - Learning about the Discrete Fourier Transform This tutorial will be about the Discrete Fourier Transform basis, or the DFT basis in short. What is a basis? If we google define `basis', we get: \the underlying support or foundation for an idea, argument, or process". In mathematics, a basis is similar. It is an underlying structure of how we look at something. It is similar to a coordinate system, where we can choose to describe a sphere in either the Cartesian system, the cylindrical system, or the spherical system. They will all describe the same thing, but in different ways. And the reason why we have different systems is because doing things in specific basis is easier than in others. For exam- ple, calculating the volume of a sphere is very hard in the Cartesian system, but easy in the spherical system. When working with discrete signals, we can treat each consecutive element of the vector of values as a consecutive measurement. This is the most obvious basis to look at a signal. Where if we have the vector [1, 2, 3, 4], then at time 0 the value was 1, at the next sampling time the value was 2, and so on, giving us a ramp signal. This is called a time series vector. However, there are also other basis for representing discrete signals, and one of the most useful of these is to use the DFT of the original vector, and to express our data not by the individual values of the data, but by the summation of different frequencies of sinusoids, which make up the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Fourier Transform Revisited
    Quantum Fourier Transform Revisited Daan Camps1,∗, Roel Van Beeumen1, Chao Yang1, 1Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, CA, United States Abstract The fast Fourier transform (FFT) is one of the most successful numerical algorithms of the 20th century and has found numerous applications in many branches of computational science and engineering. The FFT algorithm can be derived from a particular matrix decomposition of the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) matrix. In this paper, we show that the quantum Fourier transform (QFT) can be derived by further decomposing the diagonal factors of the FFT matrix decomposition into products of matrices with Kronecker product structure. We analyze the implication of this Kronecker product structure on the discrete Fourier transform of rank-1 tensors on a classical computer. We also explain why such a structure can take advantage of an important quantum computer feature that enables the QFT algorithm to attain an exponential speedup on a quantum computer over the FFT algorithm on a classical computer. Further, the connection between the matrix decomposition of the DFT matrix and a quantum circuit is made. We also discuss a natural extension of a radix-2 QFT decomposition to a radix-d QFT decomposition. No prior knowledge of quantum computing is required to understand what is presented in this paper. Yet, we believe this paper may help readers to gain some rudimentary understanding of the nature of quantum computing from a matrix computation point of view. 1 Introduction The fast Fourier transform (FFT) [3] is a widely celebrated algorithmic innovation of the 20th century [19]. The algorithm allows us to perform a discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of a vector of size N in (N log N) O operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Circulant Matrix Constructed by the Elements of One of the Signals and a Vector Constructed by the Elements of the Other Signal
    Digital Image Processing Filtering in the Frequency Domain (Circulant Matrices and Convolution) Christophoros Nikou [email protected] University of Ioannina - Department of Computer Science and Engineering 2 Toeplitz matrices • Elements with constant value along the main diagonal and sub-diagonals. • For a NxN matrix, its elements are determined by a (2N-1)-length sequence tn | (N 1) n N 1 T(,)m n t mn t0 t 1 t 2 t(N 1) t t t 1 0 1 T tt22 t1 t t t t N 1 2 1 0 NN C. Nikou – Digital Image Processing (E12) 3 Toeplitz matrices (cont.) • Each row (column) is generated by a shift of the previous row (column). − The last element disappears. − A new element appears. T(,)m n t mn t0 t 1 t 2 t(N 1) t t t 1 0 1 T tt22 t1 t t t t N 1 2 1 0 NN C. Nikou – Digital Image Processing (E12) 4 Circulant matrices • Elements with constant value along the main diagonal and sub-diagonals. • For a NxN matrix, its elements are determined by a N-length sequence cn | 01nN C(,)m n c(m n )mod N c0 cNN 1 c 2 c1 c c c 1 01N C c21 c c02 cN cN 1 c c c c NN1 21 0 NN C. Nikou – Digital Image Processing (E12) 5 Circulant matrices (cont.) • Special case of a Toeplitz matrix. • Each row (column) is generated by a circular shift (modulo N) of the previous row (column). C(,)m n c(m n )mod N c0 cNN 1 c 2 c1 c c c 1 01N C c21 c c02 cN cN 1 c c c c NN1 21 0 NN C.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre- and Post-Processing for Optimal Noise Reduction in Cyclic Prefix
    Pre- and Post-Processing for Optimal Noise Reduction in Cyclic Prefix Based Channel Equalizers Bojan Vrcelj and P. P. Vaidyanathan Dept. of Electrical Engineering 136-93 California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91125-0001 Abstract— Cyclic prefix based equalizers are widely used for It is preceded (followed) by the optimal precoder (equalizer) high-speed data transmission over frequency selective channels. for the given input and noise statistics. These blocks are real- Their use in conjunction with DFT filterbanks is especially attrac- ized by constant matrix multiplication, so that the overall com- tive, given the low complexity of implementation. Some examples munications system remains of low complexity. include the DFT-based DMT systems. In this paper we consider In the following we first give a brief overview of the cyclic a general cyclic prefix based system for communication and show prefix system with DFT matrices used as the basic ISI can- that the equalization performance can be improved by simple pre- celer. Then, we introduce a way to deal with noise suppres- and post-processing aimed at reducing the noise at the receiver. This processing is done independently of the ISI cancellation per- sion separately and derive the optimal constrained pair pre- formed by the frequency domain equalizer.1 coder/equalizer for this purpose. The constraint is that in the absence of noise the overall system is still ISI-free. The per- formance of the proposed method is evaluated through com- I. INTRODUCTION puter simulations and a significant improvement with respect to There has been considerable interest in applying the eq– the original system without pre- and post-processing is demon- ualization techniques based on cyclic prefix to high speed data strated.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectral Analysis of the Adjacency Matrix of Random Geometric Graphs
    Spectral Analysis of the Adjacency Matrix of Random Geometric Graphs Mounia Hamidouche?, Laura Cottatellucciy, Konstantin Avrachenkov ? Departement of Communication Systems, EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech, 06410 Biot, France y Department of Electrical, Electronics, and Communication Engineering, FAU, 51098 Erlangen, Germany Inria, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Valbonne, France [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Abstract—In this article, we analyze the limiting eigen- multivariate statistics of high-dimensional data. In this case, value distribution (LED) of random geometric graphs the coordinates of the nodes can represent the attributes of (RGGs). The RGG is constructed by uniformly distribut- the data. Then, the metric imposed by the RGG depicts the ing n nodes on the d-dimensional torus Td ≡ [0; 1]d and similarity between the data. connecting two nodes if their `p-distance, p 2 [1; 1] is at In this work, the RGG is constructed by considering a most rn. In particular, we study the LED of the adjacency finite set Xn of n nodes, x1; :::; xn; distributed uniformly and matrix of RGGs in the connectivity regime, in which independently on the d-dimensional torus Td ≡ [0; 1]d. We the average vertex degree scales as log (n) or faster, i.e., choose a torus instead of a cube in order to avoid boundary Ω (log(n)). In the connectivity regime and under some effects. Given a geographical distance, rn > 0, we form conditions on the radius rn, we show that the LED of a graph by connecting two nodes xi; xj 2 Xn if their `p- the adjacency matrix of RGGs converges to the LED of distance, p 2 [1; 1] is at most rn, i.e., kxi − xjkp ≤ rn, the adjacency matrix of a deterministic geometric graph where k:kp is the `p-metric defined as (DGG) with nodes in a grid as n goes to infinity.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1.1. the DFT Matrix
    FFT January 20, 2016 1 1.1. The DFT matrix. The DFT matrix. By definition, the sequence f(τ)(τ = 0; 1; 2;:::;N − 1), posesses a discrete Fourier transform F (ν)(ν = 0; 1; 2;:::;N − 1), given by − 1 NX1 F (ν) = f(τ)e−i2π(ν=N)τ : (1.1) N τ=0 Of course, this definition can be immediately rewritten in the matrix form as follows 2 3 2 3 F (1) f(1) 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 F (2) 7 1 6 f(2) 7 6 . 7 = p F 6 . 7 ; (1.2) 4 . 5 N 4 . 5 F (N − 1) f(N − 1) where the DFT (i.e., the discrete Fourier transform) matrix is defined by 2 3 1 1 1 1 · 1 6 − 7 6 1 w w2 w3 ··· wN 1 7 6 7 h i 6 1 w2 w4 w6 ··· w2(N−1) 7 1 − − 1 6 7 F = p w(k 1)(j 1) = p 6 3 6 9 ··· 3(N−1) 7 N 1≤k;j≤N N 6 1 w w w w 7 6 . 7 4 . 5 1 wN−1 w2(N−1) w3(N−1) ··· w(N−1)(N−1) (1.3) 2πi with w = e N being the primitive N-th root of unity. 1.2. The IDFT matrix. To recover N values of the function from its discrete Fourier transform we simply have to invert the DFT matrix to obtain 2 3 2 3 f(1) F (1) 6 7 6 7 6 f(2) 7 p 6 F (2) 7 6 7 −1 6 7 6 .
    [Show full text]
  • Exact Recovery of Tensor Robust Principal Component Analysis Under Linear Transforms
    1 Exact Recovery of Tensor Robust Principal Component Analysis under Linear Transforms Canyi Lu and Pan Zhou This work studies the Tensor Robust Principal Component low-rank and sparse tensors decomposition from their sum. Analysis (TRPCA) problem, which aims to exactly recover More specifically, assume that a tensor X can be decomposed the low-rank and sparse components from their sum. Our as X = L + E where L is a low-rank tensor and E is model is motivated by the recently proposed linear transforms 0 0 0 0 based tensor-tensor product and tensor SVD. We define a new a sparse tensor. TRPCA aims to recover L0 and E0 from X . transforms depended tensor rank and the corresponding tensor We focus on the convex model which can be solved exactly nuclear norm. Then we solve the TRPCA problem by convex and efficiently, and the solutions own the theoretical guarantee. optimization whose objective is a weighted combination of the TRPCA extends the well known Robust PCA [1] model, i.e., new tensor nuclear norm and the `1-norm. In theory, we show that under certain incoherence conditions, the convex program min kLk∗ + λkEk1; s.t. X = L + E; (1) exactly recovers the underlying low-rank and sparse components. L;E It is of great interest that our new TRPCA model generalizes existing works. In particular, if the studied tensor reduces to where kLk∗ denotes the matrix nuclear norm, kEk1 denotes a matrix, our TRPCA model reduces to the known matrix the `1-norm and λ > 0. Under certain incoherence conditions, RPCA [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Vector Space Methods in Signal and Systems Theory
    Basic Vector Space Methods in Signal and Systems Theory By: C. Sidney Burrus Basic Vector Space Methods in Signal and Systems Theory By: C. Sidney Burrus Online: < http://cnx.org/content/col10636/1.5/ > CONNEXIONS Rice University, Houston, Texas This selection and arrangement of content as a collection is copyrighted by C. Sidney Burrus. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). Collection structure revised: December 19, 2012 PDF generated: January 10, 2013 For copyright and attribution information for the modules contained in this collection, see p. 35. Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................1 2 A Matrix Times a Vector ..................................................... ...................3 3 General Solutions of Simultaneous Equations .................................................11 4 Approximation with Other Norms and Error Measures ......................................19 5 Constructing the Operator (Design) ...........................................................27 Bibliography ........................................................................................29 Index ................................................................................................34 Attributions .........................................................................................35 iv Available for free at Connexions <http://cnx.org/content/col10636/1.5> Chapter 1 Introduction1 1.1
    [Show full text]
  • Cayley Graphs and the Discrete Fourier Transform
    Cayley Graphs and the Discrete Fourier Transform Alan Mackey Advisor: Klaus Lux May 15, 2008 Abstract Given a group G, we can construct a graph relating the elements of G to each other, called the Cayley graph. Using Fourier analysis on a group allows us to apply our knowledge of the group to gain insight into problems about various properties of the graph. Ideas from representation theory are powerful tools for analysis of groups and their Cayley graphs, but we start with some simpler theory to motivate the use of group representations. 1 Z/nZ and L2(Z=nZ) Before we can define what the discrete Fourier transform (or DFT) is, we have to know what exactly it transforms. To introduce the ideas behind the use of the DFT, we will use G = Z/nZ as an example. The DFT doesn't actually operate on the elements of Z/nZ themselves, but rather on certain functions with Z/nZ as their domain. Definition. The set ff : G ! Cg of all functions from a finite group G to the complex numbers is denoted L2(G). Let's start with an example. The group (Z/nZ; +n) has n elements, and so any function from Z/nZ to C is determined exactly by the finite set of values ff(a): a 2 Z/nZg. Thus, we can define a vector space isomorphism φ : L2(Z/nZ) ! Cn by 1 φ(f) = (f(0); f(1); : : : ; f(n − 1)): From here, it isn't hard to see that L2(Z=nZ)) is an n-dimensional vector space over C.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPARISON on DIFFERENT DISCRETE FRACTIONAL FOURIER TRANSFORM (DFRFT) APPROACHES Ishwor Bhatta
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Electrical and Computer Engineering ETDs Engineering ETDs 1-28-2015 COMPARISON ON DIFFERENT DISCRETE FRACTIONAL FOURIER TRANSFORM (DFRFT) APPROACHES Ishwor Bhatta Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ece_etds Recommended Citation Bhatta, Ishwor. "COMPARISON ON DIFFERENT DISCRETE FRACTIONAL FOURIER TRANSFORM (DFRFT) APPROACHES." (2015). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ece_etds/32 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Engineering ETDs at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electrical and Computer Engineering ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Candidate Department This thesis is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Thesis Committee: , Chairperson by THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico Dedication I dedicate this work to my parents for their support and encouragement. ’I am a slow walker, but I never walk back’ – Abraham Lincoln iii Acknowledgments First of all, I heartily appreciate Dr. Balu Santhanam, my advisor and thesis chair, for continuing to encourage me through the years of classroom teachings and the long number of months writing and rewriting these chapters. I hope to emmulate his professional style as I continue my career. I also want to thank the members of my thesis committee, Dr. Maria Cristina Pereyra and Dr. Majeed Hayat. I want to thank Dr. Mark Gilmore, Ex-director of the ECE Graduate Program and Dr. Sudharman Jayaweera, Director of the ECE Graduate Program, for ap- pointing me as a Project Assistant at the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department for several semesters.
    [Show full text]