DOCSLIB.ORG

Resource Stewardship Strategy Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resource Stewardship Strategy Summary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP STRATEGY SUMMARY ROCK CREEK PARK DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SEPTEMBER 2018 CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction and Overview .................................................................................................................. 1 Rock Creek Park .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Legislated Park Unit Managed by Rock Creek Park ............................................................................................................... 1 Associated Park Sites Managed by Rock Creek Park ............................................................................................................. 1 Brief Description of Rock Creek Park and Associated Sites .................................................................................................... 2 Park Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Park Significance .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Resource Stewardship Strategy Overview ......................................................................................................... 8 Relationship with Other Park Plans ................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2: Resource Stewardship Strategy Process ............................................................................................. 11 Purpose and Intent of the Summary ............................................................................................................... 11 Resource Stewardship Strategy Process ......................................................................................................... 11 Development of this Resource Stewardship Strategy ...................................................................................... 13 Assembling the RSS Team and Gathering Information ........................................................................................................ 13 Conducting the Workshop ................................................................................................................................................. 13 Scholarly and Technical Information Used to Inform the RSS Process .................................................................................. 14 Preparing Annual Work Plans ......................................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 3: Key Park Stressors and Issues ............................................................................................................. 19 Stressors ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 Impacts of Key Stressors ................................................................................................................................................... 19 Chapter 4: Priority Resources and Identified Components ................................................................................. 23 Park Priority Resources .................................................................................................................................. 23 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................................ 23 Cultural Landscapes .......................................................................................................................................................... 24 Historic Structures ............................................................................................................................................................. 24 Archeological Resources .................................................................................................................................................... 25 Museum Collections .......................................................................................................................................................... 25 Ethnographic Resources .................................................................................................................................................... 26 Natural Resources .......................................................................................................................................... 27 Aquatic System ................................................................................................................................................................. 28 Terrestrial Communities ..................................................................................................................................................... 29 Night Skies and Natural Sounds ......................................................................................................................................... 30 Chapter 5: Stewardship Goals and High-Priority Activities ................................................................................ 31 Chapter 6: Other Identified Stewardship Activities ............................................................................................ 41 Chapter 7: Ongoing Implementation of the Resource Stewardship Strategy ................................................... 51 Resource Stewardship Strategy Summary | Rock Creek Park | District of Columbia | i Appendixes ............................................................................................................................................................ 53 Appendix A: Resource Stewardship Strategy Glossary ..................................................................................... 53 Appendix B: Bibliography ............................................................................................................................... 55 Authored Texts .................................................................................................................................................................. 55 Appendix C: Reference Documents Organized by Priority Resources .............................................................. 57 Cultural Landscapes .......................................................................................................................................................... 57 Historic Structures ............................................................................................................................................................ 57 National Register of Historic Places ................................................................................................................................... 58 Archeological Resources .................................................................................................................................................... 59 Museum Collections .......................................................................................................................................................... 59 Ethnographic Resources .................................................................................................................................................... 59 Natural Resources ............................................................................................................................................................. 59 Appendix D: Additional Stewardship Activities ................................................................................................ 61 Appendix E: Participants and Contributors ...................................................................................................... 73 Rock Creek Park ................................................................................................................................................................ 73 National Capital Region .................................................................................................................................................... 73 Other NPS Programs .......................................................................................................................................................... 73 Denver Service Center ....................................................................................................................................................... 73 TABLES Table 1. Select Resource Planning Efforts Used in Developing the Resource Stewardship Strategy ................ 9 Table 2. Future Plans Identified in the 2017 Resource Stewardship Strategy ..................................................... 9 Table 3a. Long-Term Goals, Short-Term Goals, and High-Priority Stewardship Activities for Priority Resource—Park Resources (Overall) .................................................................................................................... 31 Table 3b. Long-Term Goals, Short-Term Goals, and High-Priority Stewardship Activities for Priority Resource—Cultural Landscapes ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: __Kalorama Park____________________________________________ Other names/site number: Little, John, Estate of; Kalorama Park Archaeological Site, 51NW061 Name of related multiple property listing: __N/A_________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __1875 Columbia Road, NW City or town: ___Washington_________ State: _DC___________ County: ____________ Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Creek and Potomac Parkway Near P Street, Ca
    ROCK CREEK AND ROCK CREEK'S BRIDGES Dumbarton Bridge William Howard Taft Bridge (8) Duke Ellington Bridge (9) POTOMAC PARKWAY Washington, D.C. The monumental bridges arching over Rock Creek contribute Dumbarton Bridge, at Q Street, is one of the parkway's most The William Howard Taft Bridge, built 1897-1907, is probably The current bridge at Calvert Street replaced a dramatic iron greatly to the parkway's appearance. Partially concealed by the endearing structures. It was designed by the noted architect the most notable span on the parkway. The elegant arched truss bridge built in 1891 to carry streetcars on the Rock Creek surrounding vegetation, they evoke the aqueducts and ruins Glenn Brown and completed in 1915. Its curving form structure carrying Connecticut Avenue over Rock Creek valley Railway line. When the parkway was built, it was determined m&EWAIl2 UN IIA^M1GN¥ found in romantic landscape paintings. In addition to framing compensates for the difference in alignment between the was Washington's first monumental masonry bridge. Its high that the existing bridge was unable to accommodate the rise in vistas and providing striking contrasts to the parkway's natural Washington and Georgetown segments of Q Street. cost and elaborate ornamentation earned it the nickname "The automobile traffic. The utilitarian steel structure was also features, they serve as convenient platforms for viewing the Million Dollar Bridge." In 1931 it was officially named after considered detrimental to the parkway setting. verdant parkway landscape. They also perform the utilitarian The overhanging pedestrian walkways and tall, deep arches former president William Howard Taft, who had lived nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites Street Address Index
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES STREET ADDRESS INDEX UPDATED TO OCTOBER 31, 2014 NUMBERED STREETS Half Street, SW 1360 ........................................................................................ Syphax School 1st Street, NE between East Capitol Street and Maryland Avenue ................ Supreme Court 100 block ................................................................................. Capitol Hill HD between Constitution Avenue and C Street, west side ............ Senate Office Building and M Street, southeast corner ................................................ Woodward & Lothrop Warehouse 1st Street, NW 320 .......................................................................................... Federal Home Loan Bank Board 2122 ........................................................................................ Samuel Gompers House 2400 ........................................................................................ Fire Alarm Headquarters between Bryant Street and Michigan Avenue ......................... McMillan Park Reservoir 1st Street, SE between East Capitol Street and Independence Avenue .......... Library of Congress between Independence Avenue and C Street, west side .......... House Office Building 300 block, even numbers ......................................................... Capitol Hill HD 400 through 500 blocks ........................................................... Capitol Hill HD 1st Street, SW 734 .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View the 2010 Conference Program
    The seventh biennial conference on historic roads September 9 – 12, 2010 in Washington, DC Table of Contents Conference Proceedings Sponsored by Parsons Brinckerhoff Schedule-at-a-Glance, see centerfold We are pleased to offer our most comprehen- sive conference proceedings ever. Papers and Welcome 2 authors are identified for each session. The conference proceedings include all papers Conference Schedule, Sessions submitted by the deadline for inclusion. and Special Events 4 Conference Bookstore Conference Biographies 22 Sponsored by Steven Schuyler, Bookseller, Boston, MA Conference Sponsors 56 Visit the conference bookstore for a large selection of titles on historic roads and related Glossary 63 historic resources. Flying? No worries. Ask about having your books shipped. Downtown Washington, F and 12th Streets, NW, R 1939. Credit: US Library of Congress Our main Preserving the Historic Road confer- All conference events, tours, and meetings are subject to change or cancellation. Refunds for any and all ence meeting venues are fully accessible. cancelled events, tours, and meetings will be made at the discretion of Preserving the Historic Road. By Please check with the conference information registering, you acknowledge that Preserving the Historic Road, its partners, and sponsors assume no liability for the use of any meeting space or facility associated with the conference or in the transportation to, or and registration desk if you have any ques- on-site conditions or facilities associated with any conference event. tions regarding accessibility or accommodation for any of the field tours or special events. 1 WELCOME TO PRESERVING THE HISTORIC ROAD 2010! Welcome to Washington, DC and the Seventh Biennial Preserving the Historic Road conference! We are pleased to host this event in the nation’s capital, where a variety of federal agencies, and other national transportation, safety and preservation or ganizations, are becoming increasingly engaged with issues related to historic roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Directors of the NPS: a Legacy of Leadership & Foresight Letters •LETTERS What You Missed
    RANGThe Journal of the Association of ENational Par Rk Rangers ANPR ~6£SL Stewards for parks, visitors and each other The Association for All National Park Employees Vol. 21, No. 3 • Summer 2005 Directors of the NPS: A Legacy of Leadership & Foresight Letters •LETTERS What you missed ... I unfortunately did not attend the Rapid City Ranger Rendezvous (November 2004) and re­ Stay in touch! cently read about it in Ranger. There I found the Signed letters to the editor of 100 words or less may be published, space permitting. Please text of the keynote speech by ranger Alden Board of Directors Miller. If for no other reason, reading his include address and daytime phone. Ranger speech made me for the first time truly regret reserves the right to edit letters for grammar or Officers not attending. What a perfect synthesis of length. Send to Editor, 26 S. Mt. Vernon Club President Lee Werst, TICA Secretary Melanie Berg, BADI. history and vision in simple, powerful words! Road, Golden, CO 80401; [email protected]. Treasurer Wendy Lauritzen, WABA It is a great tribute that he has chosen to work with the NPS (and, hopefully, become an Board Members YES! You are welcome to join ANPR ANPR member!). If members haven't read Education 6V; Training Kendell Thompson, ARHO even ifyou don't work for the National Park Fund Raising Sean McGuinness, WASO this, they should, either in the Winter 2004/05 Sen/ice. All friends of the national parks are Interna! Communic. Bill Supernaugh, BADE Ranger (page 8), or at the excellent and infor­ eligible for membership.
    [Show full text]
  • The District of Columbia Water Quality Assessment
    THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT 2008 INTEGRATED REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND U.S. CONGRESS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 305(b) AND 303(d) CLEAN WATER ACT (P.L. 97-117) District Department of the Environment Natural Resources Administration Water Quality Division Government of the District of Columbia Adrian M. Fenty, Mayor PREFACE PREFACE The Water Quality Division of the District of Columbia's District Department of the Environment, Natural Resources Administration, prepared this report to satisfy the listing requirements of §303(d) and the reporting requirements of §305(b) of the federal Clean Water Act (P.L. 97-117). This report provides water quality information on the District of Columbia’s surface and ground waters that were assessed during 2008 and updates the water quality information required by law. Various programs in the Natural Resources Administration contributed to this report including the Fisheries and Wildlife Division and the Watershed Protection Division. Questions or comments regarding this report or requests for copies should be forwarded to the address below. The District of Columbia Government District Department of the Environment Natural Resources Administration Water Quality Division 51 N St., NE Washington, D.C. 20002-3323 Attention: N. Shulterbrandt ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................iii LIST OF TABLES...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • West Heating Plant Disposal FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ SECTION 106 REVIEW
    U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION West Heating Plant Disposal FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ SECTION 106 REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT December 2012 Section 508 Accessibility Elements Included in this Document The PDF version of this report includes features that address applicable accessibility standards in the 1998 amendment to Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. These features include tagged text, which is available to assistive technologies such as screen readers; alternative text (alt text), which complements graphic materials; and bookmarks and hyperlinks, which allow efficient navigation of the report. If you require an alternative format of this report, or interpretive services, please contact Suzanne Hill, U.S. General Services Administration, at 202-205-5821. Final Environmental Assessment West Heating Plant Disposal Washington, DC December 2012 U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Service, National Capital Region 301 7th Street, SW Washington, DC 20407 Abstract The United States (U.S.) General Services Administration (GSA), National Capital Region, has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed disposal of the West Heating Plant parcel (approximately 2.08 acres), located in the west Georgetown area of Washington, District of Columbia (DC or District). The parcel contains a decommissioned heating plant that was previously used to produce steam to heat Federal buildings in the District, as well as associated infrastructure. While the proposed action is the disposal of the property, this EA also analyzes the indirect impacts from a reasonably foreseeable development scenario on the parcel once GSA disposes of the property. For the purposes of impacts analysis in the EA, it is assumed that any redevelopment would be consistent with surrounding land use zoning, W-2 Waterfront District, Medium Density (Mixed Use).
    [Show full text]
  • Final DC TMDL for Organics and Metals in Potomac Tributaries
    D.C. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH E nvironmental Health Administration B ureau of Environmental Quality Water Quality Division DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FINAL TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS FOR ORGANICS AND METALS IN BATTERY KEMBLE CREEK, FOUNDRY BRANCH, AND DALECARLIA TRIBUTARY AUGUST 2004 Doreen Thompson Senior Deputy Director for Environmental Health Administration DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FINAL TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS FOR ORGANICS AND METALS IN BATTERY KEMBLE CREEK, FOUNDRY BRANCH, AND DALECARLIA TRIBUTARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER QUALITY DIVISION AUGUST 2004 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. TMDL Definition and Regulatory Information 1 1.2. Impairment Listing 1 2. Chemicals of Concern, Beneficial Uses and Applicable Water Quality Standards 3 2.1. Chemicals of Concern 3 2.2. Designated Beneficial Uses 5 2.3. Applicable Water Quality Standards 5 2.3.1. Narrative Criteria 5 2.3.2. Numerical Criteria 5 2.4. TMDL Endpoint 7 3. Watershed Characterization 7 3.1. Potomac River Small Tributaries 7 3.1.1 Battery Kemble Creek/Fletchers Run 7 3.1.2 Foundry Branch 7 3.1.3 Dalecarlia Tributary 7 4. Source Assessment 8 4.1. Assessment of Nonpoint Sources 8 5. Technical Approach 8 5.1. Seasonal Variations and Critical Conditions 8 5.2. Small Tributaries Models 9 5.3. Scenario and Model Runs 10 6. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Allocations and Margins of Safety 11 6.1. Battery Kemble Creek Loads and TMDL 11 6.2. Foundry Branch Loads and TMDL 11 6.3. Dalecarlia Tributary Loads and TMDL 12 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Carl Colby Speaks About the Man Nobody Knew: in Search of My Father, CIA Spymaster William Colby
    Georgetown CITIZENS V OLUME X X V I / I SSUE 4 / A PRIL 2 0 1 2 WWW . CAGTOWN . ORG Carl Colby Speaks about The Man Nobody Knew: In Search of My Father, CIA Spymaster William Colby arl Colby will be our became a major force in featured speaker at American history, paving Cthe CAG meeting on the way for today’s Tuesday April 17. He will tell provocative questions the fascinating back stories about security and secre- behind the film he made cy versus liberty and about his father, Georgetown morality. The film forges resident and former Director a fascinating mix of rare of the CIA, William E. archival footage, never- Colby: The Man Nobody before-seen photos, and Knew: In Search of My Father, Filmmaker Carl Colby interviews with the CIA Spymaster William “who’s who” of Colby. He recently produced American intelligence, including former and directed this feature- National Security Advisers Brent Scowcroft length documentary film on and Zbigniew Brzezinski, former Secretary of his late father, William E. Defense Donald Rumsfeld, former Secretary Colby, former Director of the of Defense and Director of the CIA James CIA, as well as the evolution Schlesinger, as well Pulitzer Prize journalists of the CIA from OSS in Bob Woodward, Seymour Hersh and Tim WWII to today. The story is Weiner. Through it all, Carl Colby searches a probing history of the CIA as well as a personal mem- for an authentic portrait of the man who remained oir of a family living in clandestine shadows. masked even to those who loved him.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletterjanuary 2017
    NewsletterJANUARY 2017 VOLUME XLII | ISSUE 1 | WWW.CAGTOWN.ORG CROSSING THE POTOMAC TUESDAY, JANUARY 24 RECEPTION AT 7PM, PROGRAM AT 7:30PM MALMAISON – 3401 WATER STREET ith so few access points to George- town, we have to make the most of Wwhat we have. Come to Malmai- son, at the foot of Key Bridge, on January 24th to hear what is going on with the bridge renovations, the gondola project, the Metro and even bus lanes. Joe Sternlieb from the Georgetown Business Improvement District (BID) will present the thinks. If there is consensus to move forward, it is being renovated. We will get an update findings from a recent exploratory study on an environmental impact study would take a from the Key Bridge Renovation team – Sean a gondola that would take riders from the few years to complete, and then construction Moore and Joyce Tsepas will tell us where the Rosslyn Metro to Georgetown. The experts would probably take another few years, putting construction stands and how it will impact determined in their report that the gondola the completion of the gondola in the Georgetowners’ daily lives (both on land and was "feasible." The gondola "would provide early to mid-2020’s. water) and what we have to look forward to. improved transit for workers, residents, the Joe will also tell us the latest on plans for Metro – The Popal family has graciously agreed to university and tourists." It anticipates the the current 2040 plan shows a possible crossing minimum daily ridership to be 6,500. The host us at the swank Malmaison locat- under the Potomac and a Georgetown Metro ed right next to Key Bridge at 3401 cost would be about $80 to $90 million to station at the cost of about $2 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE National Capital Region Rock Creek Park 3545 Williamsburg Lane, N.W. Washington, DC 20008-1207 l .A.2 (NCR-ROCR) FEB 27 2020 Mr. David Maloney State Historic Preservation Officer Attn: Mr. Andrew Lewis DC Historic Preservation Office Office ofPlanning 1100-4th Street, SW, Suite E650 Washington, DC 20024 RE: Rock Creek Park - Unified Signage Plan - Seeking Review and Concurrence to Finding of No Adverse Effect Dear Mr. Maloney: The National Park Service (NPS) is continuing the planning for a proposal to develop a unified plan for signage for U.S. Reservation 339 and other properties administered by Rock Creek Park in Washington, DC, including units ofthe Civil War Defenses ofWashington. As such, we seek your review and comment on the proposed undertaking. Existing signage within Rock Creek Park and its administered sites is inconsistent with modem standards, having been installed incrementally over the last 20 years. Further, many areas are lacking identification and visitor wayfinding. This plan represents a sign palette or system that can be used and implemented in the future and provides a consistent and unified look. Signs being designed under this project include park identity signs, roadway signs, and trail signs. The proposed system is based on a modem Uni Guide system and standards, and is being developed by Hunt Designs, which developed the sign system for the National Mall and Memorial Parks. Please find enclosed the final sign plan and renderings for your review. Please note, the signs will not all be replaced at once. Instead, replacement and installation of new signs will occur in phases when funding is available, or when an existing sign is at the end of its useable life.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments Received
    PARKS & OPEN SPACE ELEMENT (DRAFT RELEASE) LIST OF COMMENTS RECEIVED Notes on List of Comments: ⁃ This document lists all comments received on the Draft 2018 Parks & Open Space Element update during the public comment period. ⁃ Comments are listed in the following order o Comments from Federal Agencies & Institutions o Comments from Local & Regional Agencies o Comments from Interest Groups o Comments from Interested Individuals Comments from Federal Agencies & Institutions United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE National Capital Region 1100 Ohio Drive, S.W. IN REPLY REFER TO: Washington, D.C. 20242 May 14, 2018 Ms. Surina Singh National Capital Planning Commission 401 9th Street, NW, Suite 500N Washington, DC 20004 RE: Comprehensive Plan - Parks and Open Space Element Comments Dear Ms. Singh: Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the draft update of the Parks and Open Space Element of the Comprehensive Plan for the National Capital: Federal Elements. The National Park Service (NPS) understands that the Element establishes policies to protect and enhance the many federal parks and open spaces within the National Capital Region and that the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) uses these policies to guide agency actions, including review of projects and preparation of long-range plans. Preservation and management of parks and open space are key to the NPS mission. The National Capital Region of the NPS consists of 40 park units and encompasses approximately 63,000 acres within the District of Columbia (DC), Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia. Our region includes a wide variety of park spaces that range from urban sites, such as the National Mall with all its monuments and Rock Creek Park to vast natural sites like Prince William Forest Park as well as a number of cultural sites like Antietam National Battlefield and Manassas National Battlefield Park.
    [Show full text]