DOCSLIB.ORG

Stopping Powers and Ranges of Electrons and Positrons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NBS Publi- Reference cations AlllOb NBSIR 82-2550 Stopping Powers and Ranges of Electrons and Positrons U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards Washington, DC 20234 August 1 982 Prepared for: Office of Standard Reference Data National Bureau of Standards Washington, DC 20234 Office of Health and Environmental Research Department of Energy Washington, DC 20545 fice of Naval Research lington, Virginia 22217 IJO . U56 oZ-255u «Ar»OK4X UURKAO o» 10 0 arAMDAMaa T aOUlAfiY AUG 1 9 1982 O. 'C'^f NBSIR 82-2550 Oo\Q QX Stopping Powers and Ranges of Electrons and Positrons U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards Washington, DC 20234 August 1982 Prepared for: Office of Standard Reference Data National Bureau of Standards Washington, DC 20234 Office of Health and Environmental Research Department of Energy Washington, DC 20545 Office of Naval Research Arlington, Virginia 22217 NBSIR 82-2550 Stopping Powers and Ranges of Electrons and Positrons M. J. Berger and S. M. Seltzer U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards Washington, DC 20234 August 1 982 Prepared for: Office of Standard Reference Data National Bureau of Standards Washington, DC 20234 Office of Health and Environmental Research Department of Energy Washington, DC 20545 Office of Naval Research Arlington, Virginia 22217 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler. Director : I ^ ^ ^ V- I' X - - ^ 2.U :• , -'1 i-rmu'.- ’u I lUV? ' <jZ r . -r v : ,-i .!<-. I ,-/i ;t,:, / , : r\ ‘J & u\ . •• r r''i ‘ . r»U -?Ofl| • './ • ViVsi't , 'V .P*J^ l»'-'‘./''l S ^O UA'jrsUS V<i> I Jk' . : . ; STOPPING POWERS AND RANGES OF ELECTRONS AND POSITRONS M. J. Berger and S. M. Seltzer Center for Radiation Research National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20234 ABSTRACT Tables of stopping powers and related data are given for electrons in 25 elements and 46 mixtures and compounds, and for positrons in 8 materials. The tables include: (1) collision stopping powers (ionization and excitation losses); (2) radiative stopping powers (bremsstrahlung losses); (3) total stopping powers; (4) ranges (rectified pathlengths computed in the continuous- slowing-down approximation) radiation yields (fraction of initial ; (5) electron energy converted to bremsstrahlung in the course of slowing down) and (6) the logarithmic derivatives of all these quantities with respect to the mean excitation energy of the medium (the key parameter of the Bethe stopping power formula). The results are tabulated at 81 energies between 1000 MeV and 10 keV. Collision stopping powers for electrons in materials of low atomic number are given also for energies down to 1 keV. The principal new ingredients in the preparation of the tables are: (1) improved values of the mean excitation energies for elements and compounds, derived from stopping-power and range measurements and from semi -empirical oscillator- strength distributions and dielectric-response functions; (2) density- effect corrections evaluated according to the method of Sternheimer, using up-to-date input parameters; and (3) use of new theoretical cross sections of Pratt and Tseng for electron-nucleus bremsstrahlung and of Haug for electron -electron bremsstrahlung Key words Collision stopping power, electrons, positrons, radiation yield, radiative stopping power, range. These tables were prepared as input for a report on stopping power to be written by a committee sponsored by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). The ICRU sponsors of this committee are A. Allisy and R. S. Caswell. The committee members are H. H. Andersen, M. J. Berger (chairman), H. Bichsel, J. A. Dennis, M. Inokuti, D. Powers, and J. E. Turner. Consultants to the committee are S. M. Seltzer and R. M. Sternheimer. All of the above have made important contributions to this work. It should be emphasized that this report is a draft submitted to the ICRU, and may be revised before being included in an ICRU document We would like to acknowledge the financial support for this work provided by the NBS Office of Standard Reference Data, the Office of Health and Environmental Research of the Department of Energy, and the Office of Naval Research. Last but not least we would like to thank Mrs. Gloria Wiersma for her editorial help in the preparation of the manuscript. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION 1.1. Purpose and scope 1.2. Background 1.3. New features 2. FORMULAS FOR THE COLLISION STOPPING POWER 3 2.1. General Formulas 2.2. Stopping-power formulas for heavy charged particles 2.3. Stopping-power formulas for electrons and positrons 3.2.1. 3. METHODS FOR ESTIMATING MEAN EXCITATION ENERGIES 7 3.1. Use of oscillator- strength and dielectric data 3.2. Use of stopping-power and range data Bichsel's shell corrections 3.2.2. Comparisons of Bichsel's and Bonderup's shell correction 4. SELECTION OF MEAN EXCITATION ENERGIES FOR ELEMENTS 12 5. SELECTION OF MEAN EXCITATION ENERGIES FOR COMPOUNDS 13 6. DENSITY EFFECT 16 6.1. General equations 6.2. Sternheimer ' s model 6.3. Numerical evaluation 6.4. Complications for inhomogeneous media 7. RESTRICTED COLLISION STOPPING POWER 19 8. ELECTRON COLLISION STOPPING POWERS AT LOW ENERGIES 20 8.1. Calculations for gases 8.2. Calculations for solids and liquids 8.3. Comparison of stopping powers 9. RADIATIVE STOPPING POWER 23 9.1. Electron-nucleus bremsstrahlung 9.1.1. High-energy region 9.1.2. Low-energy region 9.1.3. Intermediate energy region 9.2. Electron-electron bremsstrahlung 9.2.1. High-energy region 9.2.2. Low-energy region 9.2.3. Intermediate energy region 9.3. Accuracy and comparison with experiments 10. RANGES AND RADIATION YIELDS 26 11. MISCELLANEOUS COMPARISONS 27 11.1. Positron-electron differences 11.2. Comparison of calculated and experimental stopping powers 11.3. Comparisons with previous calculations REFERENCES 29 TABLES TO ACCOMPANY TEXT 41 FIGURES 66 MAIN STOPPING-POWER AND RANGE TABLES 79 11 . 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Purpose and scope . In radiation physics, chemistry, biology, and medicine, it is often important to have accurate information about the stopping power of various media for charged particles, that is, the average rate at which the charged particles lose energy along their tracks. The purpose of this report is to supply up-to-date stopping -power information, with emphasis on the requirements of biomedical dosimetry. The contents of this report are the following: (a) In Sections 2 to 6, topics are reviewed which are pertinent to the evaluation of stopping powers for any charged particle within the framework of the Bethe theory. ^ These include shell corrections, the determination of mean excitation energies from experimental data, the use of the Bragg additivity rule for compounds, and the density-effect correction. Recommended values of mean excitation energies are given in Table 4.3 for elemental substances and in Table 5.5 for compounds and mixtures. (b) In Sections 7 to 11, topics are reviewed which are pertinent mainly or entirely to electrons. These include the radiative stopping power due to the emission of bremsstrahlung , and the information on electron collision stopping power at energies below 10 keV where the Bethe theory is no longer fully applicable. (c) In Section 12, electron stopping- power tables are presented for 25 elements and 46 compounds and mixtures, covering the energy region from 10 keV to 1000 MeV. These tables also include the range (rectified pathlength) and the radiation yield (fraction of electron kinetic energy converted to bremsstrahlung as the electrons slow down to rest) , both computed in the continuous-slowing-down approximation.^ Such data are also given for positrons in a few materials. 1.2. Background . For electrons it is customary to separate the total stopping power into two components: (a) the collision stopping power , which is the average energy loss per unit pathlength due to inelastic Coulomb collisions with bound atomic electrons of the medium resulting in ionization and excitation; (b) the radiative stopping power , which is the average energy loss per unit pathlength due to the emission of bremsstrahlung in the electric field of the atomic nucleus and of the atomic electrons.^ The separation of the electron stopping power into two components is useful for two reasons. First, the methods used for the evaluation of the two components are quite different. Second, the energy going into the ionization and excitation of atoms is absorbed in the medium rather close to the electron track, whereas most of the energy lost in the form of bremsstrahlung travels far from the track before being absorbed. This distinction is important when attention ^The results obtained will be applied to the tabulation of stopping powers for heavy charged particles in a future report. ^In this approximation, energy-loss fluctuations are disregarded, and the rate of energy loss at any point along the track is assumed to be equal to the stopping power. ^The nomenclature "collision stopping power" and "radiative stopping power" is that adopted by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU, 1980) In the literature, the collision stopping power is often referred to as stopping power, with the adjective "collision" omitted, especially in circumstances where the radiative stopping power is negligible. The collision stopping power is some- times also called "ionization loss." Numerically, but not conceptually, the collision stopping power is identical with the "linear energy transfer" (more precisely, the unrestricted linear energy transfer LET ) often used in radiobiology (see, e.g. , ICRU, 1970) The excitations contributing to the collision stopping power include not only electronic excitations but also vibrational and rotational excitations of molecules; however, the latter two processes are relatively unimportant above the threshold energy for electronic excitation. Charged particles also lose some energy in elastic collisions with atoms.
Recommended publications
  • A Basic Firearm Tutorial by John Kraemer, F-ABMDI April 2009

    A Basic Firearm Tutorial by John Kraemer, F-ABMDI April 2009

    A Basic Firearm Tutorial By John Kraemer, F-ABMDI April 2009 Statistics for Firearm-Related Deaths According to a 2005 study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were almost 31, 000 firearm‐related deaths within the United States. Of the 31, 000 deaths, 55% of those deaths were certified as suicides, 40% certified as homicides, 3% certified as accidents, and the remaining 2% were certified as undetermined. A previous study by the CDC covering the years 1993 to 1998 also found that most firearm‐related deaths were again caused by self‐inflicted acts and men and individuals between the ages of 15 and 34 comprised a majority of those firearm‐related deaths. Every medical examiner or coroner’s office across the country has investigated a firearm‐ related death. Depending on your jurisdiction, these types of deaths may comprise a large portion of your caseload or a small portion. Regardless of the number of firearm‐related deaths your office investigates, every medicolegal death investigator must be knowledgeable in the safe handling of firearms, basic ballistics terminology and the parts of a particular firearm, whether it be a semi‐automatic handgun, revolver, shotgun or rifle. General Safety Practices The safe approach to and subsequent handling of firearms is your personal responsibility. Safety is the number one priority when handling such weapons. At any death scene involving a firearm, the death investigator MUST ALWAYS ASSUME THE FIREARM IS LOADED! Most accidental discharges of a firearm are the result of not following safe gun handling practices and failure to use common sense.
  • The Governor's Guidelines for Firearms and Scare Devices for Protection

    The Governor's Guidelines for Firearms and Scare Devices for Protection

    THE GOVERNOR OF SVALBARD’s GUIDELINES FOR FIREARMS AND PROTECTION AND SCARING DEVICES AGAINST POLAR BEARS Adopted and enters into force on 20.07.2021 pursuant to Act No. 7 of 20 April,2018 relating to firearms, firearm accessories and ammunition (the Firearms Act) and Sections 5-7 and 6-11 of regulation No. 1452 of 7 May 2021 relating to firearms, firearm accessories and ammunition etc. (the Firearms Regulations). 1.Types of firearms 1.1 Rifle - Rifles are permitted to be acquired for use as polar bear protection in Svalbard pursuant to the Firearms Act and the Firearms Regulations - The person applying to acquire firearms for this purpose must meet the general requirements for conduct, sobriety and suitability in Section 15 of the Firearms Act, as well as document "sufficient proficiency" in the use of the firearm in question, cf. Section 5-7 of the Firearms Regulations. - Polar bear protection rifles must use ammunition of calibre 308 or 30.06. An expanding bullet shall be used where the projectile will weigh at least 10 grams and provide an estimated energy of at least 2,200 joule at a distance of 100 meters. Out of consideration for precision, range, stopping power, functionality and reliability in cold conditions, the Governor of Svalbard recommends the use of a rifle as primary protection against polar bears rather than other types of weapons. Acquisition permits for single-handed weapons will only be granted in exceptional cases, cf. Section 5-7 of the Firearms Regulations. Legal basis: Sections 15 to 17 of the Firearms Act, Sections 5-7 of the Firearms Regulations.
  • The Pistol in British Military Service During the Great War

    The Pistol in British Military Service During the Great War

    Centre for First World War Studies The Pistol in British Military Service during the Great War A dissertation submitted by David Thomas (SRN 592736) in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MA in British First World War Studies September 2010 1 Contents Introduction 3 Current Literature Review 3 Questions to be Addressed 5 Chapter One-Use and Issue 6 Chapter Two-Technique and Training 11 Accessories 14 Ammunition 16 Chapter Three-Procurement 18 History 18 Army Procurement 19 Royal Navy Procurement 23 Private Purchase 24 Overall Numbers 26 Conclusions. 26 Bibliography 28 Appendix 33 Acknowledgements 37 All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the written permission of the author. 2 Introduction The British military services made considerable use of pistols during the Great War but it is evident that there is widespread ignorance and poor literary coverage of the weapons and their use. It is proposed to examine the pistol in British military service in the Great War, covering issue and use, technique and training, and procurement. Approximately half a million pistols were procured during the war, making it one of the numerically most widely issued weapons. A number of Corps, including the Machine Gun Corps, Tank Corps, and Royal Flying Corps were issued pistols as personal weapons, as well as extensive distribution in other arms. It is known that pistol use was widespread in trench warfare and critical on occasions. Decorations, including several Victoria Crosses, are recorded as being won by men using them aggressively.
  • Home Defense Handgun Recommendations

    Home Defense Handgun Recommendations

    Home Defense Handgun Recommendations Kalle often jounce corporeally when osteoplastic Buck equalised bountifully and avers her mandrels. blinksFundamentalism centrically ifand thysanuran unhealable Aldrich Herculie manumit stipple: or wifely.which Urson is constructional enough? Raymund Consider for home defense weapon can come with where people are guns on. In some cases, you can buy install or three defensive shotguns for the price of one tactical rifle. This lever does what again? Thanks so again for money kind words, Brooks! The sound will make aiming position, but part of rentals at home defense rounds in law enforcement interviews, or girlfriend of carbines, you must train. But a home defense of. Nobody should have to thick with that! Also thanks for two free targets. What handgun may want. Never chance a firearm as a bluff; if still have a gun his hand, shower must be prepared to same it at whoever or seeing is threatening you. Ball ammo and handguns? SHTF event or broken End table the medieval as should Know It. If a home defense handguns chambered, i recommend a lightweight handgun is recommended is being in my wife compared them. Hey Stan, awesome to hear! Are perfectly safe will surely like this, also recommend several limitations, recoil of defensive skills, but for defense systems in! Magazine loaded, round chambered. The recommended is there would recommend further statements and grab your inbox plus an event of his weapon in most states have proper hardware like i am. How wonder I Help You Find the example Home Defense Weapon? Eric about not carrying a handgun with it external safety but substantial legal reasons I would be modify the factory safety.
  • 6.2 Transition Radiation

    6.2 Transition Radiation

    Contents I General introduction 9 1Preamble 11 2 Relevant publications 15 3 A first look at the formation length 21 4 Formation length 23 4.1Classicalformationlength..................... 24 4.1.1 A reduced wavelength distance from the electron to the photon ........................... 25 4.1.2 Ignorance of the exact location of emission . ....... 25 4.1.3 ‘Semi-bare’ electron . ................... 26 4.1.4 Field line picture of radiation . ............... 26 4.2Quantumformationlength..................... 28 II Interactions in amorphous targets 31 5 Bremsstrahlung 33 5.1Incoherentbremsstrahlung..................... 33 5.2Genericexperimentalsetup..................... 35 5.2.1 Detectors employed . ................... 35 5.3Expandedexperimentalsetup.................... 39 6 Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal (LPM) effect 47 6.1 Formation length and LPM effect.................. 48 6.2 Transition radiation . ....................... 52 6.3 Dielectric suppression - the Ter-Mikaelian effect.......... 54 6.4CERNLPMExperiment...................... 55 6.5Resultsanddiscussion....................... 55 3 4 CONTENTS 6.5.1 Determination of ELPM ................... 56 6.5.2 Suppression and possible compensation . ........ 59 7 Very thin targets 61 7.1Theory................................ 62 7.1.1 Multiple scattering dominated transition radiation . .... 62 7.2MSDTRExperiment........................ 63 7.3Results................................ 64 8 Ternovskii-Shul’ga-Fomin (TSF) effect 67 8.1Theory................................ 67 8.1.1 Logarithmic thickness dependence
  • Arxiv:2104.05705V3 [Gr-Qc] 11 May 2021

    Arxiv:2104.05705V3 [Gr-Qc] 11 May 2021

    Bremsstrahlung of Light through Spontaneous Emission of Gravitational Waves Charles H.-T. Wang and Melania Mieczkowska Department of Physics, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, United Kingdom 11 May 2021 Published in the Special Issue of Symmetry: New Frontiers in Quantum Gravity Abstract Zero-point fluctuations are a universal consequence of quantum theory. Vacuum fluctuations of electro- magnetic field have provided crucial evidence and guidance for QED as a successful quantum field theory with a defining gauge symmetry through the Lamb shift, Casimir effect, and spontaneous emission. In an accelerated frame, the thermalisation of the zero-point electromagnetic field gives rise to the Unruh effect linked to the Hawking effect of a black hole via the equivalence principle. This principle is the basis of general covariance, the symmetry of general relativity as the classical theory of gravity. If quantum gravity exists, the quantum vacuum fluctuations of the gravitational field should also lead to the quantum deco- herence and dissertation of general forms of energy and matter. Here we present a novel theoretical effect involving the spontaneous emission of soft gravitons by photons as they bend around a heavy mass and dis- cuss its observational prospects. Our analytic and numerical investigations suggest that the gravitational bending of starlight predicted by classical general relativity should also be accompanied by the emission of gravitational waves. This in turn redshifts the light causing a loss of its energy somewhat analogous to the bremsstrahlung of electrons by a heavier charged particle. It is suggested that this new effect may be important for a combined astronomical source of intense gravity and high-frequency radiation such as X-ray binaries and that the proposed LISA mission may be potentially sensitive to the resulting sub-Hz stochastic gravitational waves.
  • Dose Measurements of Bremsstrahlung-Produced Neutrons at the Advanced Photon Source

    Dose Measurements of Bremsstrahlung-Produced Neutrons at the Advanced Photon Source

    ANL/APS/LS-269 Dose Measurements of Bremsstrahlung-Produced Neutrons at the Advanced Photon Source by M. Pisharody, E. Semones, and P. K. Job August 1998 Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory operated by The University of Chicago for the US Department of Energy under Contract W-31-I09-Eng-38 Argonne National Laboratory, with facilities in the states of Illinois and Idaho, is owned by the United States government, and operated by The University of Chicago under the provisions of a contract with the Department of Energy. DISCLAIMER- This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or pro- cess disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessanly constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessanly state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Reproduced from the best available copy Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Prices available from (4231 576-8401 Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service U.S.
  • Reloading for Handgunners

    Reloading for Handgunners

    RELOADING FOR HANDGUNNERS PATRICK SWEENEY RELOADING FOR HANDGUNNERS PATRICK SWEENEY Copyright ©2011 Patrick Sweeney All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechani- cal, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a critical article or review to be printed in a magazine or newspaper, or elec- tronically transmitted on radio, television, or the Internet. Published by Gun Digest® Books, an imprint of F+W Media, Inc. Krause Publications • 700 East State Street • Iola, WI 54990-0001 715-445-2214 • 888-457-2873 www.krausebooks.com To order books or other products call toll-free 1-800-258-0929 or visit us online at www.krausebooks.com, www.gundigeststore.com or www.Shop.Collect.com Cover photography by Kris Kandler Hornaday Cover ISBN-13: 978-1-4402-1770-8 ISBN-10: 1-4402-1770-X Cover Design by Tom Nelsen Designed by Kara Grundman Edited by Corrina Peterson Printed in the United States of America DEDICATION or years, and books now, you have seen dedications to Felicia. Th is book is no excep- tion. Without her life would be diff erent – less fun, less traveled, less productive, and Ffor you the readers, less, period. However, there is an addition. Dan Shideler came on board as my editor for Gun Digest Book of the AR-15, Vol- ume 2. With all due respect to those who labored with me before, Dan was easy to work with, fun to work with, and a veritable fountain of ideas and enthusiasm.
  • The Basic Interactions Between Photons and Charged Particles With

    The Basic Interactions Between Photons and Charged Particles With

    Outline Chapter 6 The Basic Interactions between • Photon interactions Photons and Charged Particles – Photoelectric effect – Compton scattering with Matter – Pair productions Radiation Dosimetry I – Coherent scattering • Charged particle interactions – Stopping power and range Text: H.E Johns and J.R. Cunningham, The – Bremsstrahlung interaction th physics of radiology, 4 ed. – Bragg peak http://www.utoledo.edu/med/depts/radther Photon interactions Photoelectric effect • Collision between a photon and an • With energy deposition atom results in ejection of a bound – Photoelectric effect electron – Compton scattering • The photon disappears and is replaced by an electron ejected from the atom • No energy deposition in classical Thomson treatment with kinetic energy KE = hν − Eb – Pair production (above the threshold of 1.02 MeV) • Highest probability if the photon – Photo-nuclear interactions for higher energies energy is just above the binding energy (above 10 MeV) of the electron (absorption edge) • Additional energy may be deposited • Without energy deposition locally by Auger electrons and/or – Coherent scattering Photoelectric mass attenuation coefficients fluorescence photons of lead and soft tissue as a function of photon energy. K and L-absorption edges are shown for lead Thomson scattering Photoelectric effect (classical treatment) • Electron tends to be ejected • Elastic scattering of photon (EM wave) on free electron o at 90 for low energy • Electron is accelerated by EM wave and radiates a wave photons, and approaching • No
  • Beginner's Guide to Carry Brought to You by Concealedcarryforum.Com

    Beginner's Guide to Carry Brought to You by Concealedcarryforum.Com

    As the readily accessible owner of many gun forums I get literally dozens of emails each week from folks who request my recommendations on firearms, ammunition, holsters, caliber choices, and questions regarding the defensive mindset and the role it plays in responsible carry. In order to best serve the needs of those who have not yet figured out what works best for them I decided it was time to present my personal recommendations on the forum for future reference. This guide is provided as a starting point only. While not absolute, it is intended to provide solid and proven recommendations to anyone who trusts my opinions. While there may be better choices out there for others, these are the choices that I happen to believe in most and are therefore the best recommendations that I can make. This is not intended to spark debate over what is better than what; it is a simple collection of my thoughts and opinions on what works for carry and what doesn't. Please do not take offense to my recommendations as they are just that; my recommendations based on my opinions formed by formal and informal testing of the products discussed. For example, you may feel adequately protected by a .25 ACP but I cannot in good conscious recommend that particular caliber to anyone in any application. With that out of the way, I'm proud to present: Beginner's Guide To Carry Brought to you by ConcealedCarryForum.com The first thing to learn (which will be demonstrated later) is that in regards to concealed carry, everything is a compromise.
  • Quantum Electric Field Fluctuations and Potential Scattering

    Quantum Electric Field Fluctuations and Potential Scattering

    Quantum Electric Field Fluctuations and Potential Scattering Haiyun Huang1, ∗ and L. H. Ford1, y 1Institute of Cosmology, Department of Physics and Astronomy Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA Abstract Some physical effects of time averaged quantum electric field fluctuations are discussed. The one loop radiative correction to potential scattering are approximately derived from simple arguments which invoke vacuum electric field fluctuations. For both above barrier scattering and quantum tunneling, this effect increases the transmission probability. It is argued that the shape of the potential determines a sampling function for the time averaging of the quantum electric field oper- ator. We also suggest that there is a nonperturbative enhancement of the transmission probability which can be inferred from the probability distribution for time averaged electric field fluctuations. PACS numbers: 03.70.+k, 12.20.Ds, 05.40.-a arXiv:1503.02962v1 [hep-th] 10 Mar 2015 ∗Electronic address: [email protected] yElectronic address: [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION The vacuum fluctuations of the quantized electromagnetic field give rise a number of physical effects, including the Casimir effect, the Lamb shift, and the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron. Many of these effects are calculated in perturbative quantum electrodynamics, often by a procedure which does not easily lend itself to an interpretation in terms of field fluctuations. An exception is Welton's [1] calculation of the dominant contribution to the Lamb shift, which leads to a simple physical picture in which electric field fluctuations cause an electron in the 2s state of hydrogen to be shifted upwards in energy.
  • Bremsstrahlung in Α Decay Reexamined

    Bremsstrahlung in Α Decay Reexamined

    Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine Physics Faculty Research & Creative Works Physics 01 Jul 2007 Bremsstrahlung in α decay reexamined H. Boie Heiko Scheit Ulrich D. Jentschura Missouri University of Science and Technology, [email protected] F. Kock et. al. For a complete list of authors, see https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/phys_facwork/838 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/phys_facwork Part of the Physics Commons Recommended Citation H. Boie et al., "Bremsstrahlung in α decay reexamined," Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 022505-1-022505-4, American Physical Society (APS), Jul 2007. The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.022505 This Article - Journal is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics Faculty Research & Creative Works by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS week ending PRL 99, 022505 (2007) 13 JULY 2007 Bremsstrahlung in Decay Reexamined H. Boie,1 H. Scheit,1 U. D. Jentschura,1 F. Ko¨ck,1 M. Lauer,1 A. I. Milstein,2 I. S. Terekhov,2 and D. Schwalm1,* 1Max-Planck-Institut fu¨r Kernphysik, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany 2Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia (Received 29 March 2007; published 13 July 2007) A high-statistics measurement of bremsstrahlung emitted in the decay of 210Po has been performed, which allows us to follow the photon spectra up to energies of 500 keV.