KV 2/24 KV 2/25 KV 2/26 Jakobs (Jacobs) Josef (Joseph) This File Series Starts a Bit Dull, but in the Course of Development, I
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
KV 2/24 KV 2/25 KV 2/26 Jakobs (Jacobs) Josef (Joseph) This file series starts a bit dull, but in the course of development, it becomes more and more intriguing. One thing becomes clear: that this case becomes increasingly interesting, and matters are not entirely as it first looked. A German was dropped in the night of 31st February 1941 over South East England, and was immediately immobilised owing to a broken ankle. Which Jacobs (Jakobs), already explained, but which was not believed by the British that it actually was caused within the procedure of leaving the aircraft. We may consider, that he possessed no parachute springing at all! Towards the end of this file secrets enfold in a way unexpectedly, by the interrogation in 1946 of Major Ritter, of former I L of Ast-X, in Hamburg. This puts me in: the necessity of reconsidering Ritter’s files again, but now concentrating on the Drueke – Vera and Waelti’s cases again. As Major Ritter alias Dr. Rantzau - played a decisive role in the latter affairs! What is of some interest, is, that exceptionally Jacobs (Jakobs) was in contrast to many others considered being a military person and therefore did not went to a criminal Court but went through Court Martial. He was convicted to death, but not hung, though he was executed at the Tower on 15 August 1941. As always, the text passages selections are my choices; comments of all sort are recognisable due to the blue, red and seldom green colours used. Its purpose is for studying only, therefore please do not multiply its content, as some still obeys to Crown Copyright. By Arthur O. Bauer KV 2/24 Jakobs Josef PF 55039 KV 2/24-1, page 8 It is possible that one or more enemy parachutist may have landed within the following areas between 1900 hrs and 2000 hours on 31.1.41 Mablethorpe inland to Scampton thence to Newark, then Bottesford, Wittering, Huntingdon, to Duxford, back to the North Weald. Special Areas. South to Dungeness excludes to Kent east of line Whitstable to Sandgate, (1) Lincoln suburban area east of the town least probable. (2) triangle Sleaford, Digby, Grantham, (3) Stowmarket to Newmarket to Braintree (4) St. Albans, Hatfield, North Weald. Police informed through Home Security. B.2a. 1.2.41 ↓ KV 2/24-1, page 9 I was rung up this morning by Mr. Hughes of the Cambridge Regional Office, who told me that Major Dixon was just leaving for Ramsey, Hunts, to pick up a parachutist who, it was subsequently learnt, had been dropped on the night of 31.1.41 at 9 p.m., roughly the position where he was dropped is two miles S.E. of Ramsey at Dogs Farm, … He had on him £500 and a wireless transmitting set. Unfortunately the prisoner’s ankle is broken. Arrangements have been made with Major Steins at Ham, to receive the prisoner, and it was arranged that Major Dixon should have him sent to Canon Raw, according to the normal procedure. In view of the fact that the prisoner’s ankle is broken, he cannot be taken into Ham before being looked at by a medical officer and before his ankle has been put in Plaster of Paris. I accordingly, got into touch with Special Branch Inspector Tansley, and asked them to warm Cannon Row that this man would be arriving at ??Police Surgeon to be present. I have also ??? the Ministry of Information through Mr. Shepherd, to ?? to stop notice of the press. Art the same time, I have asked Mr. Hughes of Cambridge, to warm the local Ministry of Information – representative to keep an eye on the local press. Unfortunately, it appears that a great number of people already know about this. T.A. Robertson (TAR) B.2.a. (M.I.5) 1.2.41 KV 2-24/1, page 19 D.D.G.S.S. This is a rather curious query demanding an urgent answer. The parachutist Josef Jakobs has been in hospital for about eight weeks+ at the end of this time he was taken to Ham, but immediately had a relapse and had to be taken back to hospital again. During his stay in hospital he has had several operations. Are we to bear the cost of these, together with his general hospital expenses at the rate quoting. It seems rather hard that we should. On the other hand, it seems still harder that the Metropolitan Police should, It almost seems to me something for the Ministry of Health. May I have instructions, please. B.2. (M.I.5.) D.G White 7.4.41 ↓ KV 2/24-1, page 20 PF 55039/B.2 10th April, 1941. Dear Sir, Your letter, reference Assessment-B.R.E.R. 136222, dated 29.3.41, to the Commissioner of Police, Special Branch, concerning the case of Josef Jakobs has been referred to this Department as the expenses herein referred to will be borne by us. I shall be grateful, therefore, if you will kindly render your account to me at the above address for the full cost of Jakobs´ treatment, which I note is at the rate of £4 Is. 2d. per week. Yours faithfully, (D.G. White) The local Social Welfare Officer, London County Council, Area Office, 29 Peckham Road, S.E. 5. ↓ KV 2/24-1, page 34 Please digest the content yourself Dulwich Hospital (9037) East Dulwich Grove S.E. 22 ↓ KV 2/24-1, page 51 Major Stephens (Camp 020) spoke to me and said that this alien, who had landed in Cambridge by parachute and had broken his ankle, had been sent to Ham, but had been transferred from there to Dulwich Hospital. Jakobs had been re-transferred from there to ham about 3 days ago. He had now started to run a temperature and it appeared important that his foot which was still in plaster of paris should be attended to by a surgeon. Major Stephens accordingly suggested that he should be transferred to Brixton Prison. I spoke to Brigadier Harker who agreed that the best course would appear to be to have him transferred to Brixton Prison. So far as the actual transfer to the prison was concerned, Ham Common said that they would see to this. I spoke to the Governor of Brixton Prison and explained the position and he agreed that, under the circumstances, he would be prepared to take Jakobs in at the Prison Hospital. B.8. 1.4.41 R.K.D. Renton ↓ KV 2/24-1, page 80 ↓ Interrogation of Josef Jakobs at Dulwhich Hospital By Wing Commander Felkin Lieut Sampson In German. Date: 12.3.41 Jakobs said that the aeroplane in which he was brought to England was a specially constructed Junkers with two motors. The officer in charge of the plane was Oberleutnant Marke and the pilot was a young man called Leutnant Müller. There was also a Feldwebel, whose name Jakobs did not hear. He had never seen these men until he arrived at the aerodrome of Schiphol. He was conducted there by Major Malten. The aeroplane flew at 10,000 meters. The engines were then shut off and the plane glided down to 3,000 m from which height Jakobs was dropped. He was dropped through a trapdoor, which was extremely narrow. He had one leg hanging out for a minute or two before he could get through the trapdoor and the wind hurled his foot against the plane and it was on this occasion that it was broken. He did not know what route was followed and saw nothing after entering in the plane. In the plane he seated in a cramped space with the parachute on his back and the wireless apparatus attached in front, so that he was unable to move. Ten minutes after the start he began to use oxygen and continued to do so until he was dropped. The plane was electrically heated, as was also the crew’s clothing. His own clothing was not heated. It was extremely cold in the plane. He waited at the Hague for three weeks for suitable weather. Weather reports apparently came in between 5 and 6 o’clock in the evening, as he was obliged to stay at his hotel at this time of the day. At 6 o’clock Major Malten informed him each day that he could not start and was free for the evening until the last day, when he was told that he would start the same evening. On the night when he started there was no wind and it was raining. Before starting, he was given a choice of coming by aeroplane, cutter or submarine and chose the aeroplane, because he was attacked by the adventure. It was the first time he had been in an aeroplane, so that he had not previously had the opportunity of using a parachute. He was told that this was usual, as the first descent by parachute always succeeded and any trial descent would likely to cause nervousness. He was told that the same aeroplane had dropped two or three persons previously. He was also told that there had been previous occasion where the same plane had taken parachutists as many as three times without dropping them, because the conditions were found to be unfavourable. B.L.(a). 12.3.41 G. Simpson GS (G Simpson)/ RS (R Shepherd) /FHL ↓ KV 2/24-1, page 82 ↓ CX/12…./99, dated 12.3.41. (CX points at M.I.6) VB7 My dear White (M.I.5), Reference B.L.