Crossopriza Lyoni New to Germany (Araneae: Pholcidae)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity. -
Southern African Pholcid Spiders
Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2003? 2003 1394 477527 Original Article B. A. HUBERSOUTHERN AFRICAN PHOLCID SPIDERS Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 139, 477–527. With 264 figures Southern African pholcid spiders: revision and cladistic analysis of Quamtana gen. nov. and Spermophora Hentz (Araneae: Pholcidae), with notes on male-female covariation BERNHARD A. HUBER* Zoological Research Institute and Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany Received November 2002; accepted for publication May 2003 The southern African pholcid spiders previously assigned to Pholcus and Spermophora are revised and their phy- logenetic position within Pholcidae is analysed cladistically. Two distinct groups are recognized: the first is restricted to the Cape region and probably correctly placed in Spermophora; it includes Spermophora peninsulae Lawrence and four new species. The second is more widely distributed in southern and eastern South Africa, and reaches as far north as Cameroon, Congo (Democratic Republic) and Uganda; it is assigned generic status (Quamtana gen. nov.), and includes two species transferred from Pholcus [Q. leptopholcica (Strand), Q. ciliata (Lawrence)] as well as 23 new species. A key to the pholcid spiders of South Africa is presented. A close correlation between a male character (distance between cheliceral apophyses) and a female character (distance between pockets on epigynum) is docu- mented in Quamtana.© 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 139, 477-527. ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: biodiversity – Pholcus - South Africa INTRODUCTION ilar or even higher levels of endemism at both the generic and specific levels (e.g. -
Antimicrobial Activity of Purified Toxins from Crossopriza Lyoni (Spider) Against Certain Bacteria and Fungi
Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 2016, 4, 1-9 Published Online August 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jbm http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2016.48001 Antimicrobial Activity of Purified Toxins from Crossopriza lyoni (Spider) against Certain Bacteria and Fungi Ravi Kumar Gupta, Ravi Kant Upadhyay Department of Zoology, DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India Received 30 May 2016; accepted 22 July 2016; published 25 July 2016 Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Toxins from spider venom Crossopriza lyoni were subjected to purify on a Sepharose CL-6B 200 column. These were investigated for its antibacterial and antifungal activity against 13 infectious microbial pathogenic strains. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by using paper disc diffu- sion and serial micro-dilution assays. Triton X-100 (0.1%) proved to be a good solubilizing agent for toxin/proteins. Higher protein solubilization was observed in the supernatant than in the residue, except TCA. The elution pattern of purified and homogenized sting poison glands displayed two ma- jor peaks at 280 nm. First one was eluted in fraction No. 43 - 51 while second one after fraction no. 61 - 90. From gel filtration chromatography total yield of protein obtained was 67.3%. From com- parison of gel chromatographs eluted toxins peptide molecular weight was ranging from 6.2 - 64 kD. Toxin peptides have shown lower MIC values i.e. 7.5 - 15 µg/ml against K. pneumoniae, E. coli, L. -
Short Term Somatic Cell Culture Approach for Cytogenetic Analysis of Crossopriza Lyoni (Spider: Pholcidae)
International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR) ISSN: 2321-0869, Volume-2, Issue-8, August 2014 Short term somatic cell culture approach for cytogenetic analysis of Crossopriza lyoni (Spider: Pholcidae) Anjali, Sant Prakash successfully harvest metaphase plates for Cytogenetical Abstract— Crossopriza lyoni (Daddy long leg) a typical analysis of C. lyoni from Agra. representative of the family Pholcidae is a spider commonly found in Agra region. The diploid chromosome number of C.lyoni (2n=24) with meta and sub-metacentric groups of II. MATERIAL AND METHODS chromosome were recorded. Two exceptionally large XX is found in female while the males have single X type. The male A. Spider collection: chromosome was further confirmed through NOR-Ag staining by presence of single Interphasic nuclei in male. The Somatic Pholcids were collected from the agriculture fields of Agra Cell Culture approach in the current study on C. lyoni spider by regular visual searching and Hand collection method9 cytogenetic is a convenient technique over the existing practice of repeated sacrifices of spiders and may have various other B. Spider Identification:- applications in the field of biotechnology. The present data is Pholcids were identified first through keys and catalogues also being reported for the first time on C. lyoni of Agra region. and confirmed by book records of Indian Spider10-11and also through personal communication with Arachnologists. Index Terms— Spider, Pholcidae, Cytogenetic, C. Cell Culture Protocol:- Chromosomes, Somatic cell culture, Agra. The protocol was inspired from the existing protocol on water mites as proposed by12 and little modification on the protocol gave good cell growth. -
Zootaxa, a Review of the Cellar Spider Genus Psilochorus Simon 1893 In
Zootaxa 2144: 1–53 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A review of the cellar spider genus Psilochorus Simon 1893 in America north of Mexico (Araneae: Pholcidae) JOZEF SLOWIK University of Alaska Museum of the North, Department of Entomology, 907 Yukon Drive, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775 USA. E-mail: [email protected] Table of contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Materials and methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Taxonomy ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Pholcidae C. L. Koch, 1851 ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Psilochorus Simon, 1893 .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Key to Psilochorus species in America -
A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature. -
Biodiversity and Community Structure of Spiders in Saran, Part of Indo-Gangetic Plain, India
Asian Journal of Conservation Biology, December 2015. Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 121-129 AJCB: FP0062 ISSN 2278-7666 ©TCRP 2015 Biodiversity and Community structure of spiders in Saran, part of Indo-Gangetic Plain, India N Priyadarshini1*, R Kumari1, R N Pathak1, A K Pandey2 1Department of Zoology, D. A. V. College, J. P. University, Chhapra, India 2School of Environmental Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India (Accepted November 21, 2015) ABSTRACT Present study was conducted to reveals the community structure and diversity of spider species in different habitat types (gardens, crop fields and houses) of Saran; a part of Indo – Gangetic Plain, India. This area has very rich diversity of flora and fauna due to its climatic conditions, high soil fer- tility and plenty of water availability. The spiders were sampled using two semi-quantitative methods and pitfall traps. A total of 1400 individual adult spiders belonging to 50 species, 29 genera and 15 families were recorded during 1st December 2013 to 28th February 2014. Spider species of houses were distinctive from other habitats it showed low spider species richness. The dominant spider fami- lies were also differs with habitat types. Araneidae, Pholcidae and Salticidae were the dominant spi- der families in gardens, houses and crop fields respectively. Comparison of beta diversity showed higher dissimilarity in spider communities of gardens and houses and higher similarity between spi- der communities of crop fields and gardens. We find that spiders are likely to be more abundant and species rich in gardens than in other habitat types. Habitat structural component had great impact on spider species richness and abundance in studied habitats. -
Common Kansas Spiders
A Pocket Guide to Common Kansas Spiders By Hank Guarisco Photos by Hank Guarisco Funded by Westar Energy Green Team, American Arachnological Society and the Chickadee Checkoff Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center i Table of Contents Introduction • 2 Arachnophobia • 3 Spider Anatomy • 4 House Spiders • 5 Hunting Spiders • 5 Venomous Spiders • 6-7 Spider Webs • 8-9 Other Arachnids • 9-12 Species accounts • 13 Texas Brown Tarantula • 14 Brown Recluse • 15 Northern Black Widow • 16 Southern & Western Black Widows • 17-18 Woodlouse Spider • 19 Truncated Cellar Spider • 20 Elongated Cellar Spider • 21 Common Cellar Spider • 22 Checkered Cobweb Weaver • 23 Quasi-social Cobweb Spider • 24 Carolina Wolf Spider • 25 Striped Wolf Spider • 26 Dotted Wolf Spider • 27 Western Lance Spider • 28 Common Nurseryweb Spider • 29 Tufted Nurseryweb Spider • 30 Giant Fishing Spider • 31 Six-spotted Fishing Spider • 32 Garden Ghost Spider Cover Photo: Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweaver ii Eastern Funnelweb Spider • 33 Eastern and Western Parson Spiders • 34 Garden Ghost Spider • 35 Bark Crab Spider • 36 Prairie Crab Spider • 37 Texas Crab Spider • 38 Black-banded Crab Spider • 39 Ridge-faced Flower Spider • 40 Striped Lynx Spider • 41 Black-banded Common and Convict Zebra Spiders • 42 Crab Spider Dimorphic Jumping Spider • 43 Bold Jumping Spider • 44 Apache Jumping Spider • 45 Prairie Jumping Spider • 46 Emerald Jumping Spider • 47 Bark Jumping Spider • 48 Puritan Pirate Spider • 49 Eastern and Four-lined Pirate Spiders • 50 Orchard Spider • 51 Castleback Orbweaver • 52 Triangulate Orbweaver • 53 Common & Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweavers • 54 Black & Yellow Garden Spider • 55 Banded Garden Spider • 56 Marbled Orbweaver • 57 Eastern Arboreal Orbweaver • 58 Western Arboreal Orbweaver • 59 Furrow Orbweaver • 60 Eastern Labyrinth Orbweaver • 61 Giant Long-jawed Orbweaver • 62 Silver Long-jawed Orbweaver • 63 Bowl and Doily Spider • 64 Filmy Dome Spider • 66 References • 67 Pocket Guides • 68-69 1 Introduction This is a guide to the most common spiders found in Kansas. -
MOSQUITO EVOLUTION: a STORY with a BITE Strickman D
Ðîçä³ë 1. Á³îáåçïåêà òà á³îçàõèñò ó âåòåðèíàðí³é ìåäèöèí³, åìåðäæåíòí³ òðàíñì³ñèâí³ òà òðàíñêîðäîíí³ õâîðîáè òâàðèí MOSQUITO EVOLUTION: A STORY WITH A BITE Strickman D. United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, USA Abstract: Mosquitoes (Culicidae) are one of many families of insects that are not only important to humans, but have actually shaped the direction of human development. As vectors of pathogens that cause diseases like malaria, yellow fever, and dengue, mosquitoes are very damaging to human health and economy. Because of their importance, mosquitoes have been studied extensively, possibly more extensively than any other family of insects. The nomenclature of mosquitoes is a refl ection of their taxonomy, which is a refl ection of systematics studies based on evolutionary phylogeny. Much of the current debate over genus names is a result of disagreement between those who want a practical system to identify groups of mosquitoes and those who want a more precise correspondence to phylogenetic studies. The evolutionary history of mosquitoes is a single reality and our measurements of morphology, genetics, biogeography, and molecular biology are all attempts to understand that history. Studies to date have produced some consensus on the higher level evolution that has a lot of general interest, for example that the family Culicidae shared a common ancestor with Chaoboridae (fairy midges) and Corethrellidae (biting fairy midges). This trio of families, in turn, shared a common ancestor with Dixidae (dixid midges). Mosquitoes may have emerged with recognizable characteristics in the middle of the Paleozoic, though the oldest fossil is from the late Cretaceous (90 million years ago). -
Checklist of the Spider Fauna of Bangladesh (Araneae : Arachnida)
Bangladesh J. Zool. 47(2): 185-227, 2019 ISSN: 0304-9027 (print) 2408-8455 (online) CHECKLIST OF THE SPIDER FAUNA OF BANGLADESH (ARANEAE : ARACHNIDA) Vivekanand Biswas* Department of Zoology, Khulna Government Womens’ College, Khulna-9000, Bangladesh Abstract: Spiders are one of the important predatory arthropods that comprise the largest order Araneae of the class Arachnida. In Bangladesh, very few contributions are available on the taxonomic study on these arachnids. The present paper contains an updated checklist of the spider fauna of Bangladesh based on the published records of different workers and the identified collections of the recent studies by the author. It includes a total of 334 species of spiders belong to the infraorders Mygalomorphae and Araneomorphae under 21 families and 100 genera. A brief diagnosis of different families and their domination together with the distribution throughout the country are provided herewith. Key words: Checklist, spiders, Araneae, Arachnida, Bangladesh INTRODUCTION Bangladesh is basically a riverine agricultural country. It lies between 20.35ºN and 26.75ºN latitude and 88.03ºE and 92.75ºE longitude, covering an area of 1,47,570 sq. km (55,126 sq. miles). The country as such offers varied climatic situations viz., temperature, rainfall, humidity, fogmist, dew and Haor- frost, winds etc. (Rashid 1977). With the vast agricultural lands, also there are different kinds of evergreen, deciduous and mangrove forests staying different areas of the country viz., the southern Sunderbans, northern Bhawal and Madhupur forests and eastern Chittagong and Chittagong Hill-Tracts forest. Along with the agricultural lands, each of the forest ecosystems is composed of numerous species of spider fauna of the country. -
SA Spider Checklist
REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region. -
Bonn Zoological Bulletin Volume 58 Pp
0 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zoologicalbulletin.de; www.biologiezentrum.at Bonn zoological Bulletin Volume 58 pp. 217-226 Bonn, November 20 1 Non-insect arthropod types in the ZFMK collection, Bonn (Acari, Araneae, Scorpiones, Pantopoda, Am phi pod a) Bernhard A. Huber & Stefanie Lankhorst Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 1 60, D-53 1 1 3 Bonn, Germany; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The type specimens of Acari, Araneae, Scorpiones, Pantopoda, and Amphipoda housed in the Alexander Koenig Zoological Research Museum, Bonn, are listed. 183 names are recorded; of these, 64 (35%) are represented by name bearing (i.e., primary) types. Specific and subspecific names are listed alphabetically, followed by the original genus name, bibliographic citation, present combination (as far as known to the authors), and emended label data. Key Words. Type specimens, Acari, Araneae, Scorpiones, Pantopoda, Amphipoda, Bonn. INTRODUCTION The ZFMK in Bonn has a relatively small collection of Abbreviations. HT: holotype, PT: paratype, ST: syntype, non-insect arthropods, with an emphasis on arachnids LT: lectotype, PLT: paralectotype; n, pn, dn, tn: (proto-, (mostly mites, spiders, and scorpions), sea spiders (Pan- deuto-, trito-) nymph, hy: hypopus, L: larva topoda) and amphipods. Other arachnid and crustacean or- ders are represented, but not by type material. A small part of the material goes back to the founder of the museum, ACARI Alexander Koenig, and was collected around 1910. Most Acari were deposited at the museum by F. S. Lukoschus aequatorialis [Orycteroxemis] Lukoschus, Gerrits & (mostly Astigmata: Glyciphagidae, Atopomelidae, etc.), Fain, 1977b. PT,' 2 slides.