Now Arriving: a Changing Delmas Park [Pdf]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Now Arriving: a Changing Delmas Park [Pdf] NOW ARRIVING .... A CHANGING DELMAS PARK “Extremely “Close to “Transit neighborhood everything” rich” friendly” “Peaceful. This “Great place “Gateway to is where my to live” Downtown” mom lived” “Eclectic “In transition” “Diverse” & smart” “Cautiously “Ready for optimistic “Promising” development” about Google” Now arriving: a changing Delmas Park A Community Assessment Report of the Delmas Park Neighborhood By: San Jose State Urban and Regional Planning Department, CommUniverCity, San Jose The Delmas Park Neighborhood Association, and the City of San Jose Urban and Regional Planning Students, Fall 2017 Urban and Regional Planning Students, Spring 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Community Members Pop Up Park Acknowledgements • Local Color • Bert Weaver • Mudai Restaurant • Sarah Springer • iJava Cafe • Elena Lopez and her daughter • San Jose Learning Center • Kathy Sutherland • Volunteer Students from the Urban and Regional Planning • Hagos, Owner of the Mudai Restaurant Department Guest Speakers Other Contributors • Kim Walesh (City of San Jose, Office of Economic Development & • Stanley Wong (City of San Jose, Department of Public Works Special Deputy City Manager) Districts) • Lauren Prevetti (Town of Los Gatos, City Manager) • Chloe Verrey (Property Based Improvement District Operations • Donovan Lazaro (City of San Jose, Office of Economic Development) Manager) • Eric Eidlin (City of San Jose, Department of Transportation) • San Jose Downtown Association • Flo Pucci (San Jose State University, Masters of Urban Planning • CommUniverCity Staff (Nicole Guzman, Sneha Parmar, Justine Graduate) Cuevas) • Shiferaw Jemberie, Student at San Jose State University TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS WITHIN CHAPTER 4: LAND USES IN DELMAS PARK DELMAS PAK 4.1 A look at Delmas Park today--Existing land uses 1.1 The CommUniverCity San Jose Multi-Sector 4.2 Characteristics of built form and natural features Partnership 4.2.1 Figure-Ground Analysis 1.2 The Objectives of a Community Assessment 4.2.2 Existing Land Use 1.3 An Asset-Based Community Development Approach 4.2.3 General Plan Land Use Designations 1.4 Data Collection Approaches 4.2.4 Zoning Designations 4.2.5 Natural Features and Environmental CHAPTER 2: A PORTRAIT OF DELMAS PARK Conditions 2.1 The Assets of Delmas Park 4.2.6 Underutilized parcels 2.2 Critical Partnerships within Delmas Park-The 4.3 Streetscape Community’s greatest asset 4.3.1 Lynch Map of Built Environment Characteristics 2.3 The Diversity of Delmas Park- The Neighborhood’s Demo 4.3.2 Building Conditions graphics 4.3.3. Qualitative Streetscape Assessment 2.4 Key Project Stakeholder interview subjects: Individuals 4.4 Property ownership and groups that live, work and shape Delmas Park 2.5 Results of the 2017 Community Survey CHAPTER 5: GETTING AROUND DELMAS PARK 2.6 Observations from the Delmas Park Documentary 5.1 San Jose’s Vision for Transportation Video 5.2 Automobile Travel, Infrastructure and Safety 5.2.1 Residential Permit Parking Program CHAPTER 3: HOW DELMAS PARK CAME TO BE 5.2.2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel, Infrastructure and 3.1 The Settlement of San Jose Safety 3.2 Historical Context 5.3 Public Transit 3.3 People and Businesses that shaped Delmas Park over time 3.4 Landmarks, Landscapes, and Memories 3.5 Then and Now Photos CHAPTER 6: COMMUNITY ON THE BRINK OF 7.2 Vision of Delmas Park CHANGE 7.2.1 Envisioning future streetscapes in Delmas Park 6.1 Transportation developments in and around Diridon 7.2.2 Yield Streets (Sonoma Street) Station 7.2.3 Downtown Two-Way Streets (Auzerais Avenue, 6.1.1 California High Speed Rail West San Fernando Street) 6.1.2 The Extension of BART into Silicon Valley 7.2.4 Downtown One-Way Streets (South Montgomery 6.2 Planning for Mixed Use Development street) 6.2.1. Diridon Station Area Plan (DSAP) 7.3 Best Practices of Train Station Designs Around the World 6.2.2 Small Scale Future Developments 6.2.3 Large-Scale Future Developments CHAPTER 8: FUTURE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 6.3 Implications of the Future Development OPPORTUNITIES 8.1. Outcomes from December 2017 Community Open CHAPTER 7: COLLABORATIVE NEIGHBORHOOD House PLANNING AND VISIONING 8.2 Outcomes from May 2018 Community Open House and 7.1 Current Delmas Park Neighborhood Priorities Pop-Up Park 7.1.1 Homelessness 8.3 Potential Opportunities to add Green/Open Space 7.1.2 Affordable Housing 8.4. Establishing Improvement Districts 7.1.3 Community Services 8.5 A Long Term Commitment by CommUniverCity 7.1.4 Parks and Open Space for Recreation 8.6 Next Steps for the SJSU Graduate Student Planning Team 7.1.5 Community Cleanliness and Property Maintenance BIBLIOGRAPHY 7.1.6 Safe Pedestrian Access to Neighborhood School and Throughout the Neighborhood APPENDICES 7.1.7 Organized and Dedicated Permit Parking 7.1.8 Crime Prevention 7.1.9 Improve Street Paving and Sidewalk Conditions 7.1.10 Current Priorities: Results from the Open House LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER 1 Figure 3.10: The Whipple House No Figures in this Chapter Figure 3.11: 130 Gifford Ave. Figure 3.12: Lake House Hotel Figure 3.13: San Jose Water Company CHAPTER 2 Figure 3.14: Diridon Station Figure 2.1: The Lakehouse District Figure 3.15: Delmas Church Figure 2.2: Proposed banners to commemorate the Lake House Figure 3.16: Aerial Photo District Figure 3.17: Lake House and silk factory location, present day Figure 2.3: Valle Verde Urban Greenhouse Figure 3.18: Aerial view of neighborhood, 1876 Figure 2.4: School of Visual Philosophy Figure 3.19: Street map of neighborhood, 1921 Figure 2.5: San Jose Learning Center Figure 3.20: Street map of neighborhood, 2017 Figure 2.6: iJava Figure 3.21: San Jose Water Works Figure 2.7: Fire Station 30 Figure 3.22: Then and now photos of San Jose Diridon Station Figure 2.8: Murals in Delmas Park Figure 3.23: Aerial view of Diridon station, 1950 Figure 2.9: Delmas Market Figure 3.24: Aerial view of Diridon station, 2017 Figure 2.10: Habesha Mini Mart Figure 3.25: Aerial photo of Orchard Supply, 1940 Figure 2.11: Mi Rancho Market Figure 3.26: Aerial photo of Orchard Supply, 2017 Figure 2.12: Population Density Map Figure 3.27: Orchard Supply, 1960 Figure 2.13:Map of Location of Garden Elementary School Figure 3.28: Orchard Supply, 2017 Figure 3.29: Then and Now, Downtown San Jose Figure 3.30: Highway interchange under construction in 1970 CHAPTER 3 Figure 3.31: Then and now Interstate 280 Figure 3.1: The Valley of Heart’s Delight Figure 3.32: Interstate 280 Figure 3.2: Photo of Antoine Delmas with his two sons, Delphin Figure 3.33: Interstate 280 and Joseph Figure 3.3: Sanborn Map CHAPTER 4 Figure 3.4: Hawthorn California Packing Corporation Figure 4.1: Figure-ground map Figure 3.5: Factory Site Figure 4.2: Map of the existing land uses Figure 3.6: Lake House Hotel Site Figure 4.3: General Plan land use designations Figure 3.7: Lake House Tract Figure 4.4: Zoning districts map Figure 3.8: The Brohaska-Dalis House Figure 4.5: Natural features in Delmas Park Figure 3.9: Photo of Irene Dalis Figure 4.6: Noise levels in Delmas Park Figure 4.7: Public parking lots and vacant parcels CHAPTER 6 Figure 4.8: Lynch Map Figure 6.1: Rendering of California High Speed Rail entering Diridon Figure 4.9: Qualitative assessment of building Station conditions in Delmas Park Figure 6.2: Proposed Option 1 & 2 Figure 4.10: Condition of properties in Delmas Park Figure 6.3: Extension of BART Figure 4.11: Locations in Delmas Park with excessive graffiti Figure 6.4. The three zones of the Diridon Station Area Plan. and litter, poor lighting, and buildings oriented Figure 6.5: Interactive map that allows users to click on colored away from the street parcels of land that indicate whether the development is Figure 4.12: Street Audit Form under construction, completed, or proposed Figure 4.13: Map of Delmas Park parcels divided into four Figure 6.6: Proposed design of Google Village colored zones Figure 6.7: Map of parcels that are already purchased by Google, Figure 4.14: Delmas Park Parcel: Zone 1 City-owned properties, government-owner properties of Figure 4.15: Crosswalks in Delmas Park interest to Google and outline of proposed Google Village as Figure 4.16: Operational status of Delmas Park street lights of January 2018 Figure 4.17: Property Ownership Figure 6.8: Recent poll given to County of Santa Clara registered voters asks questions regarding the proposed Google CHAPTER 5 development Figure 5.1: Intersection of Bird Avenue and San Carlos Street CHAPTER 7 Figure 5.2: Map of auto collision “hotspots” in Delmas Park Figure 7.1:Interactive map that allows participants to place a sticker by Figure 5.3: Areas for potential traffic improvements in what they feel is a priority Delmas Park Figure 7.2: Collaborative vision of what the community desires within Figure 5.4: Boundaries of the Parkside and Delmas Park their neighborhood and highlights some of the proposed RPP zones developments and common features residents want to improve Figure 5.5: Monthly average collisions in Delmas Park upon Figure 5.6: Ford GoBike station near the San Fernando Figure 7.3: Seven streets that were evaluated and categorized as a VTA light rail station. Downtown Thoroughfare, a Yield Street, a Downtown Figure 5.7: Current and future bicycle infrastructure One-Way Street, and a Downtown Two-Way Street Figure 5.8: Potential pedestrian improvements in Delmas Figure 7.4: Existing conditions of West San Carlos Street Park Figure 7.5: Recommendations for the existing conditions of West San Figure 5.9: Map of bicycle and pedestrian collisions with Carlos Street automobiles (2006-2016)
Recommended publications
  • S Vision, Bike Plan 2020 Identifies Five Goals
    T&E AGENDA: 04-05-10 ITEM: d4 scrf~ OFv ~ jos Memorandum CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: TRANSPORTATION AND FROM: Hans F. Larsen ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE SUBJECT: BIKE PLAN 2020 IMPLEMENTATION DATE: 03-19-10 PROGRESS REPORT RECOMMENDATION Accept status report and presentation on the implementation of Bike Plan 2020 BACKGROUND On November 17, 2009, City Council unanimously approved Bike Plan 2020, the City’s ten-year plan for becoming a world-class bicycling city. Bike Plan 2020 establishes a vision to become a city where bicycling is safe, convenient and cormnonplace. To achieve this vision, Bike Plan 2020 identifies five goals: ¯ Complete a 500-mile bikeway network (an interconnected network of trails and on-street bikeways) ¯ Increase bike mode share to 5% of all trips ¯ Reduce the bike collision rate by 50% ¯ Add 5000 bike parking spaces ¯ Achieve gold-level Bicycle Friendly Community designation ANALYSIS This memo represents the first annual Bike Plan 2020 progress report to the Transportation and Environment Committee. It highlights achievements to date and the status of projects and programs underway. The status of the five Bike Plan 2020 goals listed above is also summarized graphically in Attachment 1. The report is organized and provides updates around the six main topic areas in Bike Plan 2020: policy; bikeway network; bike parking and support facilities; transit cmmections; education, encouragement and enforcement; and best practices. TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Subject: gil~ePla11 2020 Implementation Progress Report 03-19-10 Page 2 Policy Considerations A; part of the General Plan 2040, staff is recommending a number of policy actions to increase bicycle use.
    [Show full text]
  • East San Jose MTIP Draft Public Involvement Plan
    DRAFT PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN Introduction East San José includes six planned Urban Villages, a planned BART station, operating Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), many other operating transit routes, trails, freeways, and bike and pedestrian networks and gaps. The City and project team seek to develop a community-driven transportation plan to synthesize and advance past planning efforts, reflect the priorities of this culturally diverse neighborhood, and define a path forward for implementing multimodal transportation improvements within the study area. A successful East San Jos é Multimodal Transportation Improvement Plan (ESJ MTIP) depends on an inclusive and equitable public outreach process that will solicit input from key individuals and organizations as well as a broad cross-section of East San José’s communities and s takeholder groups. This project will also draw upon outreach and recommendations developed as part of ongoing and previously completed transportation projects in the study area. Close collaboration between city staff, the consultant team, and other current planning efforts will be essential. This Public Involvement Plan (PIP) outlines strategies to involve and engage East San José’s various communities and diverse populations, detailing the ways the project team intends to seek and secure broad participation and the expected outcomes from such participation. This PIP is a living document that will be updated throughout the project to address changing needs. Previous and Concurrent Planning Outreach Efforts Numerous planning
    [Show full text]
  • Verdi Week on Operavore Program Details
    Verdi Week on Operavore Program Details Listen at WQXR.ORG/OPERAVORE Monday, October, 7, 2013 Rigoletto Duke - Luciano Pavarotti, tenor Rigoletto - Leo Nucci, baritone Gilda - June Anderson, soprano Sparafucile - Nicolai Ghiaurov, bass Maddalena – Shirley Verrett, mezzo Giovanna – Vitalba Mosca, mezzo Count of Ceprano – Natale de Carolis, baritone Count of Ceprano – Carlo de Bortoli, bass The Contessa – Anna Caterina Antonacci, mezzo Marullo – Roberto Scaltriti, baritone Borsa – Piero de Palma, tenor Usher - Orazio Mori, bass Page of the duchess – Marilena Laurenza, mezzo Bologna Community Theater Orchestra Bologna Community Theater Chorus Riccardo Chailly, conductor London 425846 Nabucco Nabucco – Tito Gobbi, baritone Ismaele – Bruno Prevedi, tenor Zaccaria – Carlo Cava, bass Abigaille – Elena Souliotis, soprano Fenena – Dora Carral, mezzo Gran Sacerdote – Giovanni Foiani, baritone Abdallo – Walter Krautler, tenor Anna – Anna d’Auria, soprano Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra Vienna State Opera Chorus Lamberto Gardelli, conductor London 001615302 Aida Aida – Leontyne Price, soprano Amneris – Grace Bumbry, mezzo Radames – Placido Domingo, tenor Amonasro – Sherrill Milnes, baritone Ramfis – Ruggero Raimondi, bass-baritone The King of Egypt – Hans Sotin, bass Messenger – Bruce Brewer, tenor High Priestess – Joyce Mathis, soprano London Symphony Orchestra The John Alldis Choir Erich Leinsdorf, conductor RCA Victor Red Seal 39498 Simon Boccanegra Simon Boccanegra – Piero Cappuccilli, baritone Jacopo Fiesco - Paul Plishka, bass Paolo Albiani – Carlos Chausson, bass-baritone Pietro – Alfonso Echevarria, bass Amelia – Anna Tomowa-Sintow, soprano Gabriele Adorno – Jaume Aragall, tenor The Maid – Maria Angels Sarroca, soprano Captain of the Crossbowmen – Antonio Comas Symphony Orchestra of the Gran Teatre del Liceu, Barcelona Chorus of the Gran Teatre del Liceu, Barcelona Uwe Mund, conductor Recorded live on May 31, 1990 Falstaff Sir John Falstaff – Bryn Terfel, baritone Pistola – Anatoli Kotscherga, bass Bardolfo – Anthony Mee, tenor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • JUNTOS Initiative
    7/9/2020 Print/Preview Powered by ZoomGrants™ Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority 2020 Urban Grant Program Deadline: 7/1/2020 Santa Clara County Public Health Department JUNTOS Initiative Jump to: Project Description Documents Upload $ 199,955.00 Requested Santa Clara County Public Health Department Submitted: 6/30/2020 11:43:58 AM Telephone408-817-6881 (Pacific) 1775 Story Road, Suite 120 Fax 408-251-4014 San Jose, CA 95122 Web www.sccphd.org Project Contact EIN 94-6000533 Michelle Wexler Senior Health Care Program [email protected] Manager Tel: 408-817-6881 Bonnie Broderick [email protected] Additional Contacts none entered Project Description top Applicant Type 1. What type of organization is this? ✔ Public Agency School or School District 501(c)3 Nonprofit Eligible organization acting as Fiscal Sponsor for another organization 2. Does the application include a fiscal sponsor? If the project includes a fiscal sponsor, the fiscal sponsor must be the applicant. YES ✔ NO Overview https://www.zoomgrants.com/printprop.asp?rfpidu=EAFEEA1775E740ADA668DE61AB8BC94A&propidu=1827D0E2B10C428BBA75DF3417C12D24 1/13 7/9/2020 Print/Preview 3. Which type of grant are you requesting? Small ($10,000 - $39,999) ✔ Large ($40,000 - $250,000) 4. Grant category (check all that apply) Environmental Stewardship and Restoration Parks, Trails, and Public Access ✔ Environmental Education ✔ Urban Agriculture / Food Systems 5. Type of project (check all that apply) Capital improvement (Large projects only) Planning ✔ Program 6. Project Location: Address / Neighborhood What is the physical location of the project? If there is no physical location, please enter "N/A." If the project will be in multiple locations, please list all.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Filed
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FILED 12/30/19 In the matter of the Application of ABIANO 04:59 PM LIMOUSINE, LLC, for passenger stage authority under Section 1031, et. seq., of A1912014 the California Public Utilities Code, to transport tourists and residents, on an on- call, inter/intra county fare basis, between APPLICATION No.: points in the counties of San Francisco, Santa Clara, Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin County, Napa, Sonoma, Sacramento, on the other hand; and to establish a Zone of Rate Freedom (ZORF) under Section 454.2, et. Seq., of the PU Code. APPLICATION FOR PASSENGER STAGE AUTHORITY PART 2 OF 2 PARTS APPLICANT CONSULTANT ABIANO LIMOUSINE, LLC Ebi Esule, Consultant Attn: Edwin Abiano, Member/CEO dba: TransportationInformation.com 18 SEAMAST PASSAGE 1615 N. Wilcox Ave., #1789 CORTE MADERA, CA 94925 Los Angeles, CA 90028 T-415-250-2650 T-323-498-5070 [email protected] [email protected] ABIANO LIMOUSINE, LLC, PSC Title Page . 1 / 17 EXHIBIT-C Proposed: FARES 2 / 17 PROPOSED SERVICE AREA and FARES (COUNTY-TO-COUNTY) Abiano Limousine, LLC Proposed Service Area and Adult, Round-trip, Fares San Santa Contra Marin COUNTIES Alameda Napa Sonoma Sacramento Francisco Clara Costa County San Francisco 15 50 50 50 50 50 50 70 Santa Clara 50 15 50 50 50 50 50 70 Alameda 50 50 15 50 50 50 50 70 Contra Costa 50 50 50 15 50 50 50 70 Napa 50 50 50 50 15 50 50 70 Sonoma 50 50 50 50 50 15 50 70 Marin 50 50 50 50 50 50 15 70 County Sacramento 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 15 SERVICE TO/FROM
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Bill No. 739 Passed the Senate July 22, 2001 Secretary Of
    Senate Bill No. 739 Passed the Senate July 22, 2001 Secretary of the Senate Passed the Assembly July 16, 2001 Chief Clerk of the Assembly This bill was received by the Governor this day of , 2001, at o’clock M. Private Secretary of the Governor SB 739 — 2 — CHAPTER An act making appropriations for the support of the government of the State of California and for several public purposes in accordance with the provisions of Section 12 of Article IV of the Constitution of the State of California, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST SB 739, Peace. 2001–02 Budget. This bill would make appropriations for support of state government for the 2001–02 fiscal year. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an ur- gency statute. Appropriation: yes. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1.00. This act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Budget Act of 2001.’’ SEC. 1.50. (a) In accordance with Section 13338 of the Govern- ment Code, as added by Chapter 1284, Statutes of 1978, and as amended by Chapter 1286, Statutes of 1984, it is the intent of the Leg- islature that this act utilize a coding scheme compatible with the Gov- ernor’s Budget and the records of the State Controller, and provide for the appropriation of federal funds received by the state and deposited in the State Treasury. (b) Essentially, the format and style are as follows: (1) Appropriation item numbers have a code which is common to all the state’s fiscal systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Section 12 City of Gilroy Annex
    Contents Section 12 City of Gilroy Annex ................................................................................................. 12-3 12.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 12-3 12.2 Internal Planning Process .................................................................................................. 12-9 12.3 Capability Assessment ..................................................................................................... 12-17 12.3.1 Mitigation Progress .................................................................................................. 12-17 12.3.2 Staff and Organizational Capabilities ...................................................................... 12-18 12.3.3 National Flood Insurance Program .......................................................................... 12-36 12.3.4 Resource List: .......................................................................................................... 12-37 12.4 Vulnerability Assessment ................................................................................................ 12-38 12.4.1 Critical Facilities ...................................................................................................... 12-38 12.4.2 Exposure Analysis .................................................................................................... 12-40 12.5 Mitigation Actions ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd
    Developed Council Park Area (in Name Address Park Type District District acres) Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd. Regional Park 4 6 77.5 Kelley Park Regional Park 7 7 47.44 Kelley Park - Happy Hollow Park and Zoo Regional Park 7 7 41.57 Penitencia Creek Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 36.65 Emma Prusch Farm Park Regional Park 5 6 36.41 Cataldi Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 33.97 Overfelt Gardens Regional Park 5 6 32.04 Almaden Lake Park 6099 Winfield Blvd Regional Park 10 1 30.4 Guadalupe Gardens Regional Park 3 5 27.23 Watson Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 22.32 Municipal Baseball Stadium Sports Facility 7 7 19.22 Edenvale Garden Park Regional Park 2 2 18.76 Jeffery Fontana Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 18.05 T.J. Martin Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 15.75 Calabazas Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 15.12 Arcadia Ballpark Regional Park 8 4 15.08 P.A.L. Stadium Park Sports Facility 5 6 14.28 Hillview Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 14.04 Willow Street Frank Bramhall Park Neighborhood Park 6 3 13.63 Roosevelt Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 13.62 Flickinger Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 13.53 La Colina Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 12.58 Houge Park Neighborhood Park 9 3 12.22 Evergreen Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 12.1 Capitol Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 11.91 Los Paseos Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 11.8 Fowler Creek Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.68 Great Oaks Park Neighborhood Park 2 2 11.54 Groesbeck Hill Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.46 John Mise Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 11.45 Backesto Park 13th Street and Empire Street
    [Show full text]
  • Online Feedback Form Results
    San José Diridon Station Area Online Feedback Form Summary Total Responses: 693 Raimi + Associates October 2, 2018 Table of Contents Housing/Displacement ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Q1 General Principles .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Q2 Development of the Diridon Station Area: .............................................................................................................................. 4 Q3 Citywide Impacts and Benefits New resources generated by Google and other companies/developers go to: ....................... 5 Jobs/Education .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Q5 General Principles .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Q6 Development of the Diridon Station Area: .............................................................................................................................. 7 Q7 Citywide Impacts and Benefits ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Land
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Walking
    N Montgomery St Clinton Ct Autumn A B C D E F G H I J d v N Blv Stockton Av A Guadalupe Gardens n Mineta San José Market Center VTA Light Rail Japantown African Aut t North S 1 mile to Mountain View 1.1 miles ame 0.8 miles International Airport ne American u i m a D + Alum Rock 1 n 3.2 miles e Community t r Terr Avaya Stadium St S N Almade N St James Services th Not 2.2 miles Peralta Adobe Arts + Entertainment Whole Park 0.2 miles 5 N Foods Fallon House St James Bike Share Anno Domini Gallery H6 Hackworth IMAX F5 San José Improv I3 Market W St John St Little Italy W St John St 366 S 1st St Dome 201 S Market St 62 S 2nd St Alum Rock Alum Food + Drink | Cafés St James California Theatre H6 Institute of H8 San José G4 Mountain View 345 S 1st St Contemporary Art Museum of Art Winchester Bike Share US Post Santa Teresa 560 S 1st St 110 S Market St Oce Camera 3 Cinema I5 One grid square E St John St 288 S 2nd St KALEID Gallery J3 San José Stage Co. H7 Center for the E5 88 S 4th St 490 S 1st St represents approx. Trinity Performing Arts Episcopal MACLA/Movimiento H8 SAP Center B2 255 Almaden Blvd 3 minutes walk SAP Center n St Cathedral de Arte y Cultura Latino 525 W Santa Clara St San José Sharks | Music m Americana 510 S 1st St tu Children’s D7 Tabard Theatre Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Panoche Valley
    THE Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society Established 1926 AVOCET The Newsletter of the Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society September-October 2017 Panoche Valley: Saving an Important Bird Area (IBA) by Shani Kleinhaus, Environmental Advocate oncluding almost eight years of advocacy and litiga- tion, SCVAS, Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter, and Defenders of Wildlife have signed a settlement agree- Cment that allows a photovoltaic solar farm to be built on about 1,000 acres of Panoche Valley floor, while at the same time preserving 26,000 acres, including 4,000 acres of valley floor grasslands, as habitat for endangered species. Califor- nia Department of Fish and Wildlife and Con Edison have also signed the agreement. We are proud of this achievement! Monterey Audubon Society first alerted SCVAS to the plans to construct a solar farm in Panoche Valley. In 2009, plans for solar arrays and supportive infrastructure encompassed most of the valley floor, as well as Little Panoche Valley. No mitigation was offered for the inevitable loss of habitat for the many endangered species that call the valley home, so we started mobilizing. In early 2010 we organized a work- shop that formed an alliance of farmers and environmental organizations in opposition to the project. This alliance has never faltered. In the years that followed, our advocacy and permit require- ments by state and federal wildlife agencies resulted in changing project ownership as investors came and went. The project footprint shrunk and mitigation lands were added. San Benito County produced additional environmental re- view documents, asserting repeatedly that the construction of a solar project on thousands of acres of valley floor could Ferruginous Hawk by Debra Shearwater cont’d on page 4 Wednesday, September 20, 2017 Cuba - The Isle of Endemics: Birds and Bats! with Dave Johnston Wednesday, October 18, 2017 Understanding California's Whales with Ted Cheeseman The Avocet 1 Please carpool if possible; bring binoculars, field guides, layered September-October Field Trips clothing.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 18 Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Department
    Santa Clara County Community Wildfire Protection Plan Annex 18 – County of Santa Clara Parks and Recreation Department ANNEX 18. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Prepared by: Flint Glines, Seth Hiatt, Don Rocha, John Patterson, and Barry Hill Santa Clara County acquired its first parkland in 1924, purchasing 400 acres near Cupertino, which became Stevens Creek County Park. In 1956, the Department of Parks and Recreation was formed. Currently, the regional parks system has expanded to 29 parks encompassing nearly 48,000 acres. Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Department (County Parks) provides a sustainable system of diverse regional parks, trails, and natural areas that connects people with the natural environment, and supports healthy lifestyles, while balancing recreation opportunities with the protection of natural, cultural, historic, and scenic resources (https://www.sccgov.org/sites/parks/AboutUs/Pages/About-the-County-Regional-Parks.aspx). County Parks are regional parks located close to home, yet away from the pressures of the valley’s urban lifestyle. The parks offer opportunities for recreation in a natural environment to all County residents. Regional parks are larger in size, usually more than 200 acres, than local neighborhood or community parks. Many of the County’s regional parks also feature points of local historic interest. County park locations are shown in Figure 18.1. SWCA Environmental Consultants 1 August 2016 Santa Clara County Community Wildfire Protection Plan Annex 18 – County of Santa Clara Parks and Recreation Department Figure 18.1. County park locations. SWCA Environmental Consultants 2 August 2016 Santa Clara County Community Wildfire Protection Plan Annex 18 – County of Santa Clara Parks and Recreation Department ORGANIZATION AND JURISDICTION Santa Clara County Parks is governed by the Board of Supervisors.
    [Show full text]