DOCSLIB.ORG

Modeling of Dynamic Systems: Notes on Bond Graphs Version 1.0 Copyright 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modeling of Dynamic Systems: Notes on Bond Graphs Version 1.0 Copyright 2015 Modeling of Dynamic Systems: Notes on Bond Graphs Version 1.0 Copyright 2015 Diane L. Peters, Ph.D., P.E. Spring 2015 2 Contents 1 Overview of Dynamic Modeling 5 2 Bond Graph Basics 7 2.1 Causality . 9 2.2 Inertance . 10 2.3 Compliance . 11 2.4 Resistance . 12 2.5 Source of Effort . 13 2.6 Source of Flow . 13 2.7 Transformer . 14 2.8 Gyrator . 15 2.9 Common Effort Junction . 15 2.10 Common Flow Junction . 16 2.11 Simplification of Bond Graphs . 17 2.12 Assigning Causality . 21 3 Mechanical Systems 23 3.1 Mechanical Translation . 23 3.2 Mechanical Rotation . 26 4 Electrical Systems 27 5 Hydraulic Systems 29 6 Multi-Domain Systems 31 7 Deriving State-Space Equations from Bond Graphs 33 8 Practice Problems 37 3 4 CONTENTS Chapter 1 Overview of Dynamic Modeling There are a variety of different methods for modeling dynamic systems; some of these methods work within a single domain, or field, while others are more general. In previous courses, you may have used Newton's Laws or the Lagrangian to derive equations for a system; for a purely mechanical system, these methods will yield a dynamic model of the system. You may have also seen Kirchoff's voltage and current laws used to derive equations for an electrical circuit; these equations are the dynamic model of the given electrical system. Within the hydraulic domain, you may have been exposed to Bernoulli's equation or the Navier-Stokes equation in a fluids class; these principles also allow you to derive a dynamic model for a system, if it's in the fluid domain. We use a method called bond graphs to develop dynamic models of sys- tems. Construction of a bond graph is one of several methods which allow models to be developed for multi-domain systems. They may seem rather abstract, but this abstract nature allows them to be used to effectively de- scribe mechanical, electrical, and hydraulic components, and to unite them in a single framework. There are many different books and academic papers on bond graphs, so this is just a brief overview of the basics. 5 6 CHAPTER 1. OVERVIEW OF DYNAMIC MODELING Chapter 2 Bond Graph Basics The bond graph technique for dynamic systems modeling is based on energy as a \common currency" between different domains, such as mechanical, electrical, fluid, thermal, acoustic, etc. For each domain, an effort and a flow are defined. Every bond, or connection between two elements in a bond graph, is associated with an effort and a flow, and the product of these two quantities is the power transmitted on that bond. 7 8 CHAPTER 2. BOND GRAPH BASICS Figure 2.1: Tetrahedron of State The state of a system is described by generalized coordinates, where these coordinates are generalized momentums, p and generalized displacements, q. In the linear mechanical domain, these are simply the momentum and displacement; in other domains, they are different, as detailed in Table 2.1. These are shown in Figure 2.1, with the relationship between e, f, q, and p shown. This figure is known as the Tetrahedron of State. 2.1. CAUSALITY 9 Table 2.1: Key Quantities in Various Domains Domain Effort Flow Momentum Displacement Mechanical Force Velocity Linear Linear Translation Momentum Displacement Mechanical Moment Angular Angular Angular Rotation Velocity Momentum Displacement Electrical Electric Current Flux Linkage Charge Potential (Voltage) Hydraulic Pressure Volumetric Pressure Volume Flow Momentum Bond graphs are constructed of energy storage elements, energy dissi- pation elements, junctions, transformers and gyrators, and sources. These elements are described below. The various energy storage and dissipation element in the different domains are listed in Table 2.2. Table 2.2: Key Quantities in Various Domains Element Type Domain ICR Mechanical Translation Mass Linear Spring Damper Mechanical Rotation Mass Moment Torsional Spring Rotary Damper Electrical Inductor Capacitor Resistor Hydraulic Fluid Tank Pipe Resistance Inertia or Orifice 2.1 Causality Bonds connected to an element in a bond graph have causal strokes to indicate whether effort is being imposed on the element, or imposed by it. If the causal stroke is near the element, then effort is being imposed on it, and it responds with a flow; if the causal stroke is away from the element, then it is imposing an effort on the system, and the system responds to that effort with a flow. Sources have a required causality, based on what type of source they are, as noted below; junctions, transformers, and gyrators have rules governing what possible combinations of causal strokes are valid; and other 10 CHAPTER 2. BOND GRAPH BASICS elements have a preferred causality. Details on the rules for each element, and the preferred causal strokes, are given in the sections below. 2.2 Inertance The energy storage element known as inertance exhibits a relationship be- tween flow and generalized momentum. This relation may be non-linear, as shown in Figure 2.2. In many cases, the relationship is linear, and the 1 inertance element is characterized by the relation f = p, where I is the I parameter characterizing the inertance. This leads, through conservation of energy, to the relation e =p _. Figure 2.2: Relation Between Flow and Momentum for Inertance Element When the inertance element is in integral causality, with the causal stroke at the end of the bond nearest to the element as shown in Figure 2.3, the momentum associated with it will be an independent state of the system. Inertances store energy in the form of kinetic energy, or energy of motion. 2.3. COMPLIANCE 11 Figure 2.3: Integral and Derivative Causality for Inertance Element 2.3 Compliance The energy storage element known as compliance exhibits a relationship be- tween effort and displacement. This relation may be non-linear, as shown in Figure 2.4. In many cases, the relationship is linear, and the compliance 1 element is characterized by the relation e = q, where C is the parameter C characterizing the compliance. This element also exhibits the relation f =q _. Figure 2.4: Relation Between Effort and Displacement for Compliance Ele- ment When the compliance element is in integral causality, with the causal stroke at the end of the bond farthest from the element as shown in Figure 12 CHAPTER 2. BOND GRAPH BASICS 2.5, the displacement associated with it will be an independent state of the system. Compliances store energy in the form of potential energy, or energy of position. Figure 2.5: Integral and Derivative Causality for Compliance Element 2.4 Resistance The element known as resistance does not store energy; it dissipates it. This energy is not destroyed, since total energy is conserved, but it is converted into a form where it cannot be easily recovered. Resistance elements may be either non-linear or linear, as shown in Figure 2.6. Figure 2.6: Relation Between Effort and Flow for Resistance Element 2.5. SOURCE OF EFFORT 13 For a linear resistance element, the effort and flow are related by the equation e = Rf. The concepts of integral and derivative causality do not apply to resistance elements, and either of the causalities shown in Figure 2.7 is equally valid. The way the causal strokes are placed does have an influence on the structure of the equations - there is a concept called an algebraic loop - but this is beyond the scope of this course. If you're interested, it is covered in the book by Karnopp, Margolis, and Rosenberg which is listed in the bibliography for these notes. Figure 2.7: Causality Options for Resistance Element 2.5 Source of Effort A source of effort is a source which imposes an effort on a system, and the system responds with a particular flow. Sources of effort may be forces, torques, pressures, or electric potential (voltage), as shown in Table 2.1. By definition, since an effort is being imposed on the system, the causal stroke for a source of effort /bf must be located away from the element, as shown in Figure 2.8. Figure 2.8: Causality Required for Effort Source 2.6 Source of Flow A source of flow is a source which imposes a flow on a system, and the system responds with an effort. Sources of flow may be linear or angular 14 CHAPTER 2. BOND GRAPH BASICS velocities, volumetric flow of fluid, or electric current, as shown in Table 2.1. By definition, since an effort is being imposed on the source by the system, the causal stroke for a source of flow must be located at the element, as shown in Figure 2.9. Figure 2.9: Causality Required for Flow Source 2.7 Transformer A transformer is an idealized energy conserving element that relates an out- put effort to an input effort, and an output flow to an input flow. Transform- ers can join different domains, or they may operate within the same domain. The transformer is characterized by the equations 1 e = e (2.1) 2 m 1 f2 = mf1 (2.2) where m is the modulus of the transformer. There are two valid possibilities for causality on a transformer, as shown in Figure 2.10. In both cases, one causal stroke is located at the element, and the other is located away from it. Examples of transformers in the mechanical domain are given in Table 2.10. Another example of a transformer is a piston driven by a fluid, where the output force (an effort) is related through the area to the input pressure (an effort).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 3: Bond Graph Synthesis & Equation
    9/4/2019 CHAPTER 3: BOND GRAPH Samantha SYNTHESIS Ramirez & EQUATION DERIVATION What type of mathematical equations are needed? How are these equations systematically derived? How are the individual constitutive relations of the components connected to generate a mathematical model? 1 9/4/2019 Objectives: To effectively use bond To understand the flow To be able to graphs to formulate of information within a systematically derive models that facilitate system dynamics mathematical deriving mathematical model and its relation representations using representations of to mathematical bond graphs, and dynamic systems, representations. OBJECTIVES & OUTCOMES Outcomes: Upon completion, you should be able to derive mathematical synthesize bond graph annotate bond graphs models in the form of models of mechanical, to indicate appropriate differential and electrical, and power flow and algebraic equations hydraulic systems, causality, and using bond graph representations. e e ▪ Power bond labels e f e f f f ▪ R-Elements ▪ Dissipate Energy e e ▪ Direct algebraic relationship between e & f f f ▪ C-Elements ▪ Store Potential Energy ▪ Derivative Causality ▪ I-Elements ▪ Store Kinetic Energy ▪ Derivative Causality 2 9/4/2019 ▪ Sources ▪ Supply energy ▪ Transformers ▪ Convert energy ▪ Power through ▪ Gyrators ▪ Convert energy 푒 = 푛푒 푒 = 푟푓 ▪ Power through 1 2 1 2 푛푓1 = 푓2 푟푓1 = 푒2 ▪ 1-Junction ▪ Common flow ▪ Summation of efforts ▪ 0-Junction ▪ Common effort ▪ Summation of flows 3 9/4/2019 • Power goes from the system to R-, C-, and I-elements • Sources generally assumed to supply power to the system • Effort sources specify effort into the system • Flow sources specify flow into the system • 2-ports have a power through convention Adjacent junctions of Junctions with two the same type are bonds (power in, power actually the same out) can be simplified junction and can be into a single bond collapsed What if power is not showing a power in, power out convention? 4 9/4/2019 BOND GRAPH 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Machine Modelling and Control
    HYBRID MACHINE MODELLING AND CONTROL by Lale Canan Tokuz This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Council for Xational Academic A wards. Mechanisms and Machines Group Liverpool Polytechnic February 1992 CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. (5i) Abstract ............................................................................................................................. {6i) In trod uction Non- Uniform mechanism motion .................................................................................. 1 Two degrees of freedom mechanisms ............................................................................. 7 Thesis Structure .......................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1 The Hybrid Arrangement 1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 13 1.~. The General Description of the Experimental Set-Up .................................................... 13 1.2.1. The Drive Motors .............................................................................................. 15 1.2.2. The Differential Gear-Unit ................................................................................ 15 1.2.3. The Design of Slider-Crank Mechanism ............................................................. 16 1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Pneumatic Test Bed
    Pneumatic Test Bed A Major Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By __________________ Richard MacKendrick [email protected] ___________________ Syed Kazim Naqvi [email protected] ___________________ Brendan White [email protected] Date of Submission: 22nd April 2010 Approved: Professor Eben C. Cobb [email protected] Abstract To enhance the learning experience of students in WPI’s mechatronics class, a pneumatic piston-spring assembly was designed and fabricated. Mathematical and bond graph analysis was performed to obtain theoretical metrics for the device’s operation. These theoretical metrics were compared with experimental results using sensors and data acquisition methods. The theoretical and experimental values were determined to have an acceptable deviation and can be reproduced by future students for the purpose of demonstrating the limits of theoretical metrics. ii Table of Contents ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................................................II TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................................III TABLE OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    [Show full text]
  • The Stripline Circulator Theory and Practice
    The Stripline Circulator Theory and Practice By J. HELSZAJN The Stripline Circulator The Stripline Circulator Theory and Practice By J. HELSZAJN Copyright # 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http:// www.wiley.com/go/permission. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Multibody Systems with Bond Graphs
    Ogeâpkec"Eqorwvcekqpcn"Xqn"ZZXK."rr02943-2958 Ugtikq"C0"Gncumct."Gnxkq"C0"Rknqvvc."Igtoâp"C0"Vqttgu"*Gfu0+ Eôtfqdc."Ctigpvkpc."Qevwdtg"4229 DYNAMICS OF MULTIBODY SYSTEMS WITH BOND GRAPHS Germán Filippini, Diego Delarmelina, Jorge Pagano, Juan Pablo Alianak, Sergio Junco and Norberto Nigro Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Ingeniería y Agrimensura Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Av. Pellegrini 250, S2000EKE Rosario, Argentina. Keywords : Bond Graphs, Multibody systems. Abstract . In this work a general multibody system theory is implemented within a bond graph modeling framework. In classical mechanics several procedures exist by which differential equations can be derived of a system of rigid bodies. In the case of large systems these procedures are labor-intensive and consequently error-prone, unless they are computerized. The bond graphs formalism allows for a unified modeling of multidisciplinary physical systems. It is well-suited for a modular modeling approach based on physical principles. The theory of multibody system dynamics in terms of bond graphs modeling is revisited with the purpose of designing a multibond graph library for such systems. Several mechanical systems undergoing large 3-dimensional rotations are numerically solved in order to validate this software library written in 20-sim software. Eqr{tkijv"B"4229"Cuqekcekôp"Ctigpvkpc"fg"Ogeâpkec"Eqorwvcekqpcn" jvvr<11yyy0coecqpnkpg0qti0ct 2943 1 INTRODUCTION Modeling and simulation has an increasing importance in the development of complex, large mechanical systems. In areas like road vehicles (Bos (1986); Filippini (2004); Filippini et al. (2007)), rail vehicles, high speed mechanisms, industrial robots and machine tools (Ersal (2004)), simulation is an inexpensive way to experiment with the system and to design an appropriate control system.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Bond-Graph Technique for Modelling and Simulating Railway Drive Systems
    2010 12th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation Using Bond-Graph technique for modelling and simulating railway drive systems. J. Lozano, J. Felez, J:M. Mera, J.D. Sanz ETSI Engineering, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract— This work presents the application of Bond- a) Resistances to the rolling of the wheels on the rails. Graph Technique to modelling and simulating the behaviour b) Passive resistances due to the relative movement of railway transport as a tool for studying its dynamic between the mechanical elements in contact with one another behaviour, consumption and energy efficiency, and used to make the train function. environmental impact. The basic aim of this study is to make a c) Aerodynamic resistances, due to the movement of contribution to the research and innovation into new the train within the air surrounding it. technologies that will lead to the discovery of ever more d) Resistances to the train’s forward motion on efficient environmentally-friendly transport. gradients and curves. We begin with an introduction to the study of longitudinal train dynamics as well as a description of the most currently used railway drive systems. Bond-Graph technique enables this modelling to be done systematically taking into account all the fields of science and technology involved while bringing together all the mechanical, electrical, electromagnetic, thermal, dynamic and regulatory aspects. Once the models have been developed, the behaviour of the drive systems is Figure 1. Longitudinal train dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Doppler-Based Acoustic Gyrator
    applied sciences Article Doppler-Based Acoustic Gyrator Farzad Zangeneh-Nejad and Romain Fleury * ID Laboratory of Wave Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; farzad.zangenehnejad@epfl.ch * Correspondence: romain.fleury@epfl.ch; Tel.: +41-412-1693-5688 Received: 30 May 2018; Accepted: 2 July 2018; Published: 3 July 2018 Abstract: Non-reciprocal phase shifters have been attracting a great deal of attention due to their important applications in filtering, isolation, modulation, and mode locking. Here, we demonstrate a non-reciprocal acoustic phase shifter using a simple acoustic waveguide. We show, both analytically and numerically, that when the fluid within the waveguide is biased by a time-independent velocity, the sound waves travelling in forward and backward directions experience different amounts of phase shifts. We further show that the differential phase shift between the forward and backward waves can be conveniently adjusted by changing the imparted bias velocity. Setting the corresponding differential phase shift to 180 degrees, we then realize an acoustic gyrator, which is of paramount importance not only for the network realization of two port components, but also as the building block for the construction of different non-reciprocal devices like isolators and circulators. Keywords: non-reciprocal acoustics; gyrators; phase shifters; Doppler effect 1. Introduction Microwave phase shifters are two-port components that provide an arbitrary and variable transmission phase angle with low insertion loss [1–3]. Since their discovery in the 19th century, such phase shifters have found important applications in devices such as phased array antennas and receivers [4,5], beam forming and steering networks [6,7], measurement and testing systems [8,9], filters [10,11], modulators [12,13], frequency up-convertors [14], power flow controllers [15], interferometers [16], and mode lockers [17].
    [Show full text]
  • Bond Graph for Modelling, Analysis, Control Design, Fault Diagnosis
    Bond Graph for Modelling, Analysis, Control Design, Fault Diagnosis Geneviève Dauphin-Tanguy Christophe Sueur Laboratoire d’Automatique et d’Informatique Industrielle de Lille Bond Graph Research Group Laboratoire d’Automatique et d’Informatique Industrielle de Lille Ecole Centrale de Lille • 6 academics (2 Profs, 2 associate profs, 2 assistant profs) • 10 PhD students Application areas : power systems (electrical machines, photovoltaic systems, fuel cells), thermofluid process, car industry Studies performed in collaboration with Peugeot -Citroën • Mechatronic design of an automatic gear box • Clutch management and drive comfort • Mechatronic design of an active hydraulic suspension • Thermal comfort regulation in a car interior • Modelling and simulation of a fuel cell system • Analysis of structural properties of bond graph models • Robustness of control laws for systems with parametric uncertainties • ….. Rosario - 22/11/02 LAIL - Ecole Centrale de Lille 3 Why a bond graph approach ? • Multidisciplinary systems à need for a communication language between people from different physical domains • Need for models with physical insight (virtual testing facility) • Unified modelling methodology for knowledge storage in model libraries • Integrated (« mechatronic ») design of controlled systems Rosario - 22/11/02 LAIL - Ecole Centrale de Lille 4 Mechatronic design Objectives Identification Simplification Analysis Modelling Control Actuators Validation Sensors Simulation Maintaining Faulty mode Diagnosis Fault Detection and Isolation Rosario
    [Show full text]
  • Snippe Msc Report
    On the Application of Extreme Interaction Torque with an Underactuated UAV M.J.W. (Max) Snippe Sc Report M Committee: Prof.dr.ir. S. Stramigioli Dr.ir. J.B.C. Engelen H. Wopereis, MSc Dr.ir. R.G.K.M. Aarts Dr.ir. A. Yenehun Mersha August 2018 033RAM2018 Robotics and Mechatronics EE-Math-CS University of Twente P.O. Box 217 7500 AE Enschede The Netherlands 1 On the Application of Extreme Interaction Torque with an Underactuated UAV Marcus J.W. Snippe Abstract—This paper aims at setting the initial steps towards as opening doors, pick-and-placing, and even building rope the application of extreme interaction torque using an underac- bridge-like structures [1]–[4]. tuated Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Extreme torques are Although aerial manipulation has been a subject of research considered torques significantly larger than what UAVs can intrinsically generate. for several years, the manner of manipulation is limited to An optimization algorithm is designed that uses predetermined fairly low interaction wrenches. The main reason for this constraints, a desired application torque, and UAV parameters to is the fact that UAVs are free floating bodies, contrary to derive an optimal manipulator and input force and torques for for example a stationary robotic arm with a fixed base. the UAV. The optimization minimizes a nonlinearly constrained Therefore they are unable to close the force cycle with the cost function and returns an optimal homogeneous transforma- tion matrix and input covector. During optimization, the resulting environment and thus must intrinsically deliver the reaction torques and forces are scaled using a weighting function, which forces, which considerably limits the maximum interaction allows to assign priority to certain force or torque elements in forces and torques for UAVs.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Synthesis of Mechanism Systems 3.1 Synthesis Methods for Mechanism Design
    Abstract The aim of this thesis is to provide a basis for efficient modelling and software use in simulation driven product development. The capabilities of modern commercial computer software for design are analysed experimentally and qualitatively. An integrated simulation model for design of mechanical systems, based on four different ”simulation views” is proposed: An integrated CAE (Computer Aided Engineering) model using Solid Geometry (CAD), Finite Element Modelling (FEM), Multi Body Systems Modelling (MBS) and Dynamic System Simulation utilising Block System Modelling tools is presented. A theoretical design process model for simulation driven design based on the theory of product chromosome is introduced. This thesis comprises a summary and six papers. Paper A presents the general framework and a distributed model for simulation based on CAD, FEM, MBS and Block Systems modelling. Paper B outlines a framework to integrate all these models into MBS simulation for performance prediction and optimisation of mechanical systems, using a modular approach. This methodology has been applied to design of industrial robots of parallel robot type. During the development process, from concept design to detail design, models have been refined from kinematic to dynamic and to elastodynamic models, finally including joint backlash. A method for analysing the kinematic Jacobian by using MBS simulation is presented. Motor torque requirements are studied by varying major robot geometry parameters, in dimensionless form for generality. The robot TCP (Tool Center Point) path in time space, predicted from elastodynamic model simulations, has been transformed to the frequency space by Fourier analysis. By comparison of this result with linear (modal) eigen frequency analysis from the elastodynamic MBS model, internal model validation is obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling & Simulation 2019 Lecture 8. Bond Graphs
    Modeling & Simulation 2019 Lecture 8. Bond graphs Claudio Altafini Automatic Control, ISY Linköping University, Sweden 1 / 45 Summary of lecture 7 • General modeling principles • Physical modeling: dimension, dimensionless quantities, scaling • Models from physical laws across different domains • Analogies among physical domains 2 / 45 Lecture 8. Bond graphs Summary of today • Analogies among physical domains • Bond graphs • Causality In the book: Chapter 5 & 6 3 / 45 Basic physics laws: a survey Electrical circuits Hydraulics Mechanics – translational Thermal systems Mechanics – rotational 4 / 45 Electrical circuits Basic quantities: • Current i(t) (ampere) • Voltage u(t) (volt) • Power P (t) = u(t) · i(t) 5 / 45 Electrical circuits Basic laws relating i(t) and u(t) • inductance d 1 Z t L i(t) = u(t) () i(t) = u(s)ds dt L 0 • capacitance d 1 Z t C u(t) = i(t) () u(t) = i(s)ds dt C 0 • resistance (linear case) u(t) = Ri(t) 6 / 45 Electrical circuits Energy storage laws for i(t) and u(t) • electromagnetic energy 1 T (t) = Li2(t) 2 • electric field energy 1 T (t) = Cu2(t) 2 • energy loss in a resistance Z t Z t Z t 1 Z t T (t) = P (s)ds = u(s)i(s)ds = R i2(s)ds = u2(s)ds 0 0 0 R 0 7 / 45 Electrical circuits Interconnection laws for i(t) and u(t) • Kirchhoff law for voltages On a loop: ( X +1; σk aligned with loop direction σkuk(t) = 0; σk = −1; σ against loop direction k k • Kirchhoff law for currents On a node: ( X +1; σk inward σkik(t) = 0; σk = −1; σ outward k k 8 / 45 Electrical circuits Transformations laws for u(t) and i(t) • transformer u1 = ru2 1 i = i 1 r 2 u1i1 = u2i2 ) no power loss • gyrator u1 = ri2 1 i = u 1 r 2 u1i1 = u2i2 ) no power loss 9 / 45 Electrical circuits Example State space model: d 1 i = (u − Ri − u ) dt L s C d 1 u = i dt C C 10 / 45 Mechanical – translational Basic quantities: • Velocity v(t) (meters per second) • Force F (t) (newton) • Power P (t) = F (t) · v(t) 11 / 45 Mechanical – translational Basic laws relating F (t) and v(t) • Newton second law d 1 Z t m v(t) = F (t) () v(t) = F (s)ds dt m 0 • Hook’s law (elastic bodies, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Bond Graph Methodology
    Bond Graph Methodology • An abstract representation of a system where a collection of components interact with each other through energy ports and are placed in a system where energy is exchanged. • A domain-independent graphical description of dynamic behavior o physical systems • System models will be constructed using a uniform notations for al types of physical system based on energy flow • Powerful tool for modeling engineering systems, especially when different physical domains are involved • A form of object-oriented physical system modeling Bond Graphs Use analogous power and energy variables in all domains, but allow the special features of the separate fields to be represented. The only physical variables required to represent all energetic systems are power variables [effort (e) & flow (f)] and energy variables [momentum p (t) and displacement q (t)]. Dynamics of physical systems are derived by the application of instant-by-instant energy conservation. Actual inputs are exposed. Linear and non-linear elements are represented with the same symbols; non-linear kinematics equations can also be shown. Provision for active bonds . Physical information involving information transfer, accompanied by negligible amounts of energy transfer are modeled as active bonds . A Bond Graph’s Reach Mechanical Rotation Mechanical Hydraulic/Pneumatic Translation Thermal Chemical/Process Electrical Engineering Magnetic Figure 2. Multi-Energy Systems Modeling using Bond Graphs • Introductory Examples • Electrical Domain Power Variables : Electrical Voltage (u) & Electrical Current (i) Power in the system: P = u * i Fig 3. A series RLC circuit Constitutive Laws: uR = i * R uC = 1/C * ( ∫i dt) uL = L * (d i/dt); or i = 1/L * ( ∫uL dt) Represent different elements with visible ports (figure 4 ) To these ports, connect power bonds denoting energy exchange The voltage over the elements are different The current through the elements is the same Fig.
    [Show full text]