Multicasting Streaming Media to Mobile Users

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Multicasting Streaming Media to Mobile Users TOPICS IN INTERNET TECHNOLOGY Multicasting Streaming Media to Mobile Users Ashutosh Dutta, Jasmine Chennikara, and Wai Chen, Telcordia Technologies Inc. Onur Altintas, Toyota InfoTechnology Center Henning Schulzrinne, Columbia University ABSTRACT over a wide area network, such as Protocol Inde- pendent Multicast (PIM), Multicast over Open Content distribution in general, and multicas- Shortest Path First (MOSPF), Distance Vector ting in particular, over a wired network to static Multicast Routing Protocol (DVMRP), Core hosts can be realized by placing proxies and Based Tree (CBT), and Border Gateway Multi- gateways at several parts of the network. Howev- cast Protocol (BGMP). There can be several er, if the end hosts are mobile over heteroge- types of multicast models, such as one-to-many, neous wireless access networks, one needs to many-to-many, and many-to-one. Examples of consider many operational issues such as net- one-to-many applications include scheduled work detection, handoff, join and leave latency, audio/video distribution, push media, file distri- and desired level of quality of service, as well as bution, caching, and monitoring of stock prices. caching and load balancing. This article surveys Multimedia conferencing, synchronized a set of protocols and technologies that offer resources, concurrent processing, collaboration, multicast-based services for streaming multime- distance learning, chat groups, distributed inter- dia in a mobile environment. It also brings forth active simulations, multiplayer games, and jam some of the issues related to mobile content dis- sessions fall into the many-to-many category. tribution in the wireless Internet that may be Some of the many-to-one applications include helpful during its deployment by application ser- resource discovery, data collection, auctions, vice providers. polling, and accounting. Currently multicast is not widely deployed since there are many issues INTRODUCTION such as pricing, security, QoS, and maintenance of the router states in the core of the network Lately, streaming real-time multimedia content (for a detailed discussion of these issues peculiar over the Internet is gaining momentum in the to wide area networking see [2]). On the other communications, entertainment, music, automo- hand, local multicasting within a subnet becomes tive, and interactive game industries. Streaming more attractive for mobile users experiencing applications include broadcasting multimedia intradomain handoffs because of its ease of content, multiparty conferences, collaborations, deployment and ability to provide more flexible and multiplayer games. All of these applications services such as localized advertisements, news also find use in a military context, including broadcast, and location specific information. coordination, education, situation awareness, This article is organized as follows. We pro- distributed simulation, and battlefield communi- vide some alternate proposals based on network cation. Real-time streaming content (audio and and application layers that can build a multicast- video) is mostly an Real-Time Transport Proto- ing content distribution network for both non- col (RTP) [1] based application that has strin- mobile and mobile users. We discuss some gent delay and loss requirements. Mobility, on mobility components and highlight various issues the other hand, affects the delay and transient involved in multicasting content distribution in loss for multimedia stream delivery to a great mobile networks. We then conclude the article. extent because of associated repeated handoffs. Thus, it becomes more challenging to maintain session continuity and provide proper quality of MULTICASTING STREAMING service (QoS). ONTENT OVER THE In order to make efficient use of network C bandwidth within the core of the network, IP MOBILE INTERNET multicasting is used in wide area networking. There are several proposed network layer Content distribution from a single source follows schemes that provide native IP multicast routing the one-to-many model. Most broadcasting 2 0163-6804/03/$17.00 © 2003 IEEE IEEE Communications Magazine • October 2003 By virtue of IP Global IAL multicasting, IP Inter- content Global satellite providers/ station Internet packets are links radio/TV in the sky Broadband LEOs IP I/F delivered from a single source to a Uplink Uplink group of receivers that are part Downlink IP I/F with of the same Terrestrial spot beam multicast group. Internet Individual broadcaster Joining and Access network advertisement of Local Local Local server A server B server C multicast groups Local ad Local ad server Local ad server server is handled Local subnet Local subnet Local subnet through IGMP Access network Access network and SAP, respectively I Figure 1. A typical mobile content distribution network. sources such as radio and TV networks follow membership in each group is small, unlike tradi- this kind of model. Multicasting streaming con- tional multicast that supports a limited number tent to end users over the Internet may include of large multicast sessions. In Xcast, the sending both mobile and nonmobile clients over wired node includes the IP addresses of all the mem- and wireless media. Figure 1 illustrates a content bers of the multicast group in the packet header. distribution network, with multiple proxy servers, Intermediate routers use the header information different kinds of sources, and several types of to create unicast packets, encapsulating the mul- core and access networks, that offers flexible ser- ticast packet and forwarding it to the group vices to mobile users. members who are at the next hop. The routers The subsections below discuss some of the then modify the packet header of the original related work applicable to both mobile and non- multicast packet and remove the members who mobile users. have been sent a copy of the multicast packet before relaying it to the next router. Implemen- MULTICASTING TO NONMOBILE USERS tation of this scheme requires modification to By virtue of IP multicasting, IP packets are the sending and receiving nodes as well as to the delivered from a single source to a group of intermediate routers. receivers that are part of the same multicast An IETF developed protocol, Source Specific group. Joining and advertisement of multicast Multicast (SSM), addresses issues such as multi- groups is handled through Internet Group Man- cast address allocation, destination unawareness, agement Protocol (IGMP) and Session interdomain routing, source advertisement, and Announcement Protocol (SAP), respectively, connection state that creates a huge multicast although some alternative application layer tech- forwarding table. In the SSM model, each multi- niques are described in [3]. Multicast packets are cast group is not only defined by a multicast generally routed along a single shared tree or address, but also by a sending or source node IP multiple source-based spanning trees for effi- address. SSM does not require IP multicast cient distribution. To support IP multicast, the address management since it does not need a network must maintain knowledge of its routing unique multicast address for each group. There- tables for the multicast routes as well as for the fore, SSM is ideal for Internet broadcast applica- unicast routes. Traditional multicasting tech- tions, allowing content providers to support niques do not handle large numbers of distinct services without requiring a unique IP multicast multicast groups and do not provide a means to address. However, this approach requires router handle multicast when some routers may not be modifications to handle multicast group identifi- multicast-capable. cation based on both the source IP address and Explicit multicast (Xcast) being developed multicast group address. within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) supports multicast groups when the IEEE Communications Magazine • October 2003 3 There have been some advances in research with Internet Multicast Home agent respect to source supporting mobility for Border router multicast users, specifically through Mobile Access Access router Enterprise DFA router IP. One such domain Multicast method is the stream bi-directional tunneling solution, which puts the multicasting Mobile host burden on the home agent. I Figure 2. Mobility support for multicast in Mobicast. MULTICASTING TO MOBILE USERS updates due to mobility. Figure 2 shows a practi- cal application of how Mobicast can be used to There have been some advances in research on distribute content to mobile users using the supporting mobility for multicast users, specifi- DFA approach. cally through Mobile IP. One such method is the Mobile Multicast (MOM) [5] provides a bidirectional tunneling solution, which puts the mobility scheme for multicast multimedia ses- multicasting burden on the home agent (HA). In sions for wide area networking and adopts a this case, a user wanting to join a certain multi- Mobile IP-based approach. It proposes to reduce cast group joins the group through the user’s the problem in bidirectional tunneling of deliver- HA using IGMP. When the user moves to a for- ing multiple copies of the same multicast packet eign network, the HA is responsible for tunnel- to a foreign network. In this solution, one HA ing multicast packets to the user. However, when will be elected to tunnel multicast packets to a a single HA or multiple HAs have users in the foreign network. Range-based MOM [6] takes same multicast group visiting the same foreign
Recommended publications
  • 15-744: Computer Networking Multicast Routing Example Applications Overview
    Multicast Routing • Unicast: one source to one destination • Multicast: one source to many destinations 15-744: Computer Networking • Two main functions: • Efficient data distribution • Logical naming of a group L-20 Multicast 2 Example Applications Overview • Broadcast audio/video • IP Multicast Service Basics • Push-based systems • Software distribution • Multicast Routing Basics • Web-cache updates • Teleconferencing (audio, video, shared • Overlay Multicast whiteboard, text editor) • Multi-player games • Reliability • Server/service location • Other distributed applications • Congestion Control 3 4 1 IP Multicast Architecture Multicast – Efficient Data Distribution Src Src Service model Hosts Host-to-router protocol (IGMP) Routers Multicast routing protocols (various) 5 6 Multicast Router Responsibilities IP Multicast Service Model (rfc1112) • Learn of the existence of multicast groups • Each group identified by a single IP address (through advertisement) • Groups may be of any size • Identify links with group members • Members of groups may be located anywhere in the Internet • Establish state to route packets • Members of groups can join and leave at will • Replicate packets on appropriate interfaces • Senders need not be members • Routing entry: • Group membership not known explicitly • Analogy: Src, incoming interface List of outgoing interfaces • Each multicast address is like a radio frequency, on which anyone can transmit, and to which anyone can tune-in. 7 8 2 IP Multicast Addresses Multicast Scope Control – Small TTLs • Class
    [Show full text]
  • IP Multicast Routing Technology Overview
    IP Multicast Routing Technology Overview • Information About IP Multicast Technology, on page 1 • Additional References for IP Multicast, on page 15 Information About IP Multicast Technology This section provides information about IP multicast technology. About IP Multicast Controlling the transmission rate to a multicast group is not supported. At one end of the IP communication spectrum is IP unicast, where a source IP host sends packets to a specific destination IP host. In IP unicast, the destination address in the IP packet is the address of a single, unique host in the IP network. These IP packets are forwarded across the network from the source to the destination host by devices. At each point on the path between source and destination, a device uses a unicast routing table to make unicast forwarding decisions, based on the IP destination address in the packet. At the other end of the IP communication spectrum is an IP broadcast, where a source host sends packets to all hosts on a network segment. The destination address of an IP broadcast packet has the host portion of the destination IP address set to all ones and the network portion set to the address of the subnet. IP hosts, including devices, understand that packets, which contain an IP broadcast address as the destination address, are addressed to all IP hosts on the subnet. Unless specifically configured otherwise, devices do not forward IP broadcast packets, so IP broadcast communication is normally limited to a local subnet. IP multicasting falls between IP unicast and IP broadcast communication. IP multicast communication enables a host to send IP packets to a group of hosts anywhere within the IP network.
    [Show full text]
  • WAN-LAN PIM Multicast Routing and LAN IGMP FEATURE OVERVIEW and CONFIGURATION GUIDE
    Technical Guide WAN-LAN PIM Multicast Routing and LAN IGMP FEATURE OVERVIEW AND CONFIGURATION GUIDE Introduction This guide describes WAN-LAN PIM Multicast Routing and IGMP on the LAN and how to configure WAN-LAN PIM multicast routing and LAN IGMP snooping. The AlliedTelesis Next Generation Firewalls (NGFWs) can perform routing of IPv4 and IPv6 multicast, using PIM-SM and PIM-DM. Also, switching interfaces of the NGFWs are IGMP aware, and will only forward multicast steams to these switch ports that have received reports. IGMP snooping allows a device to only forward multicast streams to the links on which they have been requested. PIM Sparse mode requires specific designated routers to receive notification of all streams destined to specific ranges of multicast addresses. When a router needs to get hold of a given group, it sends a request to the designated Rendezvous Point for that group. If there is a source in the network that is transmitting a stream to this group, then the Rendezvous Point will be receiving it, and will forward it to the requesting router. C613-22042-00 REV A alliedtelesis.com x Products and software version that apply to this guide Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................................1 Products and software version that apply to this guide .......................................................................2 Configuring WAN-LAN PIM Multicast Routing and LAN IGMP Snooping........................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Routing Review Autonomous System Concept
    Routing Review Autonomous System Concept • Term Autonomous System (AS) to specify groups of routers • One can think of an AS as a contiguous set of networks and routers all under control of one administrative authority – For example, an AS can correspond to an ISP, an entire corporation, or a university – Alternatively, a large organization with multiple sites may choose to define one AS for each site – In particular, each ISP is usually a single AS, but it is possible for a large ISP to divide itself into multiple ASs • The choice of AS size can be made for – economic, technical, or administrative reasons The Two Types of Internet Routing Protocols • All Internet routing protocols are divided into two major categories: – Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs) – Exterior Gateway Protocols (EGPs) • After defining the two categories – we will examine a set of example routing protocols that illustrate each category • Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs) • Exterior Gateway Protocols (EGPs) The Two Types of Internet Routing Protocols Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs) • Routers within an AS use an IGP exchange routing information • Several IGPs are available – each AS is free to choose its own IGP • Usually, an IGP is easy to install and operate • IGP may limit the size or routing complexity of an AS The Two Types of Internet Routing Protocols Exterior Gateway Protocols (EGPs) • A router in one AS uses an EGP to exchange routing information with a router in another AS • EGPs are more complex to install and operate than IGPs – but EGPs offer more flexibility
    [Show full text]
  • Unicast Multicast IP Multicast Introduction
    Outline 11: ❒ IP Multicast ❒ Multicast routing IP Multicast ❍ Design choices ❍ Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol (DVMRP) Last Modified: ❍ Core Based Trees (CBT) ❍ Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) 4/9/2003 1:15:00 PM ❍ Border Gateway Multicast Protocol (BGMP) ❒ Issues in IP Multicast Deplyment Based on slides by Gordon Chaffee Berkeley Multimedia Research Center URL: http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/people/chaffee 4: Network Layer 4a-1 4: Network Layer 4a-2 What is multicast? Unicast ❒ ❒ 1 to N communication Problem Sender ❍ ❒ Nandwidth-conserving technology that Sending same data to reduces traffic by simultaneously many receivers via unicast is inefficient delivering a single stream of information to R multiple recipients ❒ Example ❒ Examples of Multicast ❍ Popular WWW sites ❍ Network hardware efficiently supports become serious multicast transport bottlenecks • Example: Ethernet allows one packet to be received by many hosts ❍ Many different protocols and service models • Examples: IETF IP Multicast, ATM Multipoint 4: Network Layer 4a-3 4: Network Layer 4a-4 Multicast IP Multicast Introduction ❒ Efficient one to many Sender ❒ Efficient one to many data distribution data distribution ❍ Tree style data distribution ❍ Packets traverse network links only once R ❒ Location independent addressing ❍ IP address per multicast group ❒ Receiver oriented service model ❍ Applications can join and leave multicast groups ❍ Senders do not know who is listening ❍ Similar to television model ❍ Contrasts with telephone network, ATM 4: Network Layer
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast and Multicast Routing
    Broadcast and Multicast Routing Daniel Zappala CS 460 Computer Networking Brigham Young University Broadcast Multicast Service Model DVMRP CBT PIM Status Group Communication • How can the Internet provide efficient group communication? • send the same copy of a data stream (e.g. TV show, teleconference) to a group of users • need to find where everyone is located (routing) • need to avoid sending a separate copy to everyone 2/34 Broadcast Multicast Service Model DVMRP CBT PIM Status Choices • unicast: send a separate copy of each packet to each host • broadcast: send one copy of each packet, the network will replicate it and deliver it to all hosts • broadcast provides efficient network flooding • multicast: send one copy of each packet, the network will replicate it and deliver it to only those hosts that want it • multicast provides efficient group communication 3/34 Broadcast Broadcast Multicast Service Model DVMRP CBT PIM Status Broadcast • send a copy of each packet to all your neighbors • need to eliminate duplicates • sequence numbers: drop a sequence number previously seen • reverse path forwarding: accept the packet only on the incoming interface used to send packets to the source 5/34 Broadcast Multicast Service Model DVMRP CBT PIM Status Spanning and Steiner Trees • spanning tree • connect all routers in the entire Internet • easy to build a minimum cost tree • Steiner Tree • connect only those routers with multicast members for a particular group • NP-complete (one of the original 21!) • many different heuristics, but often centralized
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to IP Multicast Routing
    Introduction to IP Multicast Routing by Chuck Semeria and Tom Maufer Abstract The first part of this paper describes the benefits of multicasting, the Multicast Backbone (MBONE), Class D addressing, and the operation of the Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP). The second section explores a number of different algorithms that may potentially be employed by multicast routing protocols: - Flooding - Spanning Trees - Reverse Path Broadcasting (RPB) - Truncated Reverse Path Broadcasting (TRPB) - Reverse Path Multicasting (RPM) - Core-Based Trees The third part contains the main body of the paper. It describes how the previous algorithms are implemented in multicast routing protocols available today. - Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol (DVMRP) - Multicast OSPF (MOSPF) - Protocol-Independent Multicast (PIM) Introduction There are three fundamental types of IPv4 addresses: unicast, broadcast, and multicast. A unicast address is designed to transmit a packet to a single destination. A broadcast address is used to send a datagram to an entire subnetwork. A multicast address is designed to enable the delivery of datagrams to a set of hosts that have been configured as members of a multicast group in various scattered subnetworks. Multicasting is not connection oriented. A multicast datagram is delivered to destination group members with the same “best-effort” reliability as a standard unicast IP datagram. This means that a multicast datagram is not guaranteed to reach all members of the group, or arrive in the same order relative to the transmission of other packets. The only difference between a multicast IP packet and a unicast IP packet is the presence of a “group address” in the Destination Address field of the IP header.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Network Training Multicast Larry Mathews Systems Engineer [email protected] Training Objectives
    Division of Brocade Advanced Network Training Multicast Larry Mathews Systems Engineer [email protected] Training Objectives ‒ Session will concentrate on Multicast with emphasis on Protocol Independent Multicast Protocol (PIM) ‒ Multicast in a ITS environment will be emphasized ‒ Attendees will have a good understanding on how multicast works ‒ Primary focus is on technology not vendor specifics 2 Agenda ‒ Multicast Overview • What is a multicast • Why use it • Multicast elements • Multicast IPv4 addressing ‒ Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) Overview • Where and why is IGMP used • IGMP packet structure • IGMPv2 vs. IGMPv3 • How does IGMP work ‒ Protocol Independent Multicast Protocol Overview • Layer 2 vs Layer 3 protocols • Where does PIM function • PIM-Dense Mode (DM) vs PIM-Sparse Mode (SM) • PIM-Source Specific Multicast (SSM) overview 3 Agenda Continued ‒ Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) Protocol Operation • PIM components • Reverse Path Forwarding (RPF) – Multicast vs Unicast routing • PIM packet formats ‒ Demonstration of Router configuration and operation • Best practice • Configuration requirements • Demonstration of successful PIM operation ‒ Diagnostics and Troubleshooting • Multicast packet capture • Using command line to identify issues 4 Multicast Overview 5 What is a Multicast ‒ In computer networking, multicast is a one-to-many or many-to-many distribution ‒ M/C is group communication where information is addressed to a group of destination computers simultaneously. ‒ IP multicast is a technique for one-to-many
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Network Layer
    Chapter 4 Network Layer A note on the use of these ppt slides: We’re making these slides freely available to all (faculty, students, readers). Computer They’re in PowerPoint form so you see the animations; and can add, modify, and delete slides (including this one) and slide content to suit your needs. Networking: A Top They obviously represent a lot of work on our part. In return for use, we only ask the following: Down Approach v If you use these slides (e.g., in a class) that you mention their source th (after all, we’d like people to use our book!) 6 edition v If you post any slides on a www site, that you note that they are adapted Jim Kurose, Keith Ross from (or perhaps identical to) our slides, and note our copyright of this Addison-Wesley material. March 2012 Thanks and enjoy! JFK/KWR All material copyright 1996-2012 J.F Kurose and K.W. Ross, All Rights Reserved Network Layer 4-1 Chapter 4: outline 4.1 introduction 4.5 routing algorithms 4.2 virtual circuit and § link state datagram networks § distance vector 4.3 what’s inside a router § hierarchical routing 4.4 IP: Internet Protocol 4.6 routing in the Internet § datagram format § RIP § IPv4 addressing § OSPF § BGP § ICMP § IPv6 4.7 broadcast and multicast routing Network Layer 4-2 Interplay between routing, forwarding routing algorithm determines routing algorithm end-end-path through network forwarding table determines local forwarding table local forwarding at this router dest address output link address-range 1 3 address-range 2 2 address-range 3 2 address-range 4 1 IP destination
    [Show full text]
  • Junos Multicast Routing (JMR)
    Junos Multicast Routing (JMR) Junos Multicast Routing (JMR) Engineering Simplicity COURSE LEVEL COURSE OVERVIEW Junos Multicast Routing (JMR) is an advanced-level This two-day course is designed to provide students with detailed coverage of multicast course. protocols including Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP), Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode (PIM-DM), Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM- SM), Bidirectional PIM, and Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP). AUDIENCE Through demonstrations and hands-on labs, students will gain experience in configuring and monitoring the Junos OS and monitoring device and protocol This course benefits individuals responsible for implementing, monitoring, and troubleshooting operations. This course utilizes Juniper Networks vMX Series devices for the hands-on multicast components in a service provider’s component, but the lab environment does not preclude the course from being applicable to other Juniper hardware platforms running the Junos OS. The Juniper Networks vMX network. Series devices run Junos OS Release 16.2R1.6. PREREQUISITES Students should have basic networking knowledge OBJECTIVES and an understanding of the Open Systems • Describe IP multicast traffic flow. Interconnection (OSI) model and the TCP/IP • Identify the components of IP multicast. protocol suite. Students should also have working knowledge of security policies. • Explain how IP multicast addressing works. • Describe the need for reverse path forwarding (RPF) in multicast. Students should also attend the Introduction to the • Explain the role of IGMP and describe the available IGMP versions. Junos Operating System (IJOS) and Junos • Configure and monitor IGMP. Intermediate Routing (JIR) courses prior to • Identify common multicast routing protocols. attending this class. • Explain the differences between dense-mode and sparse-mode protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast Routing Broadcasting: Sending a Packet to All N Receivers
    Broadcast Routing Broadcasting: sending a packet to all N receivers . routing updates in LS routing . service/request advertisement in application layer (e.g., Novell) Broadcast algorithm 1: N point-to-point sends . send packet to every destination, point-to-point . wasteful of bandwidth . requires knowledge of all destinations Broadcast algorithm 2: flooding . when node receives a broadcast packet, send it out on every link . node may receive many copies of broadcast packet, hence must be able to detect duplicates Broadcast Routing: Reverse Path Forwarding Goal: avoid flooding duplicates Assumptions: . A wants to broadcast . all nodes know predecessor node on shortest path back to A Reverse path forwarding: if node receives a broadcast packet . if packet arrived on predecessor on shortest path to A, then flood to all neighbors . otherwise ignore broadcast packet - either already arrived, or will arrive from predecessor 1 Reverse Path Forwarding . flood if packet arrives from source on link that router would use to send packets to source . otherwise discard . rule avoids flooding loops . uses shortest path tree from destinations to source (reverse tree) routing table to use S y x S to group w y z 2 Distributing routing information Q: is broadcast algorithm like reverse path forwarding good for distributing Link State updates (in LS routing)? A: First try (at LS broadcast distribution): . each router keeps a copy of most recent LS packet (LSP) received from every other node . upon receiving LSP(R) from router R: ◆ if LSP(R) not identical to stored copy then store LSP(R), update LS info for R, and flood LSP(R) else ignore duplicate How can this protocol fail? 2nd Try (at LS Broadcast Distribution) Each router puts a sequence number on its LSP's .
    [Show full text]
  • Vmware Virtual SAN Layer 2 and Layer 3 Network Topologies Deployments
    VMware Virtual SAN Layer 2 and Layer 3 Network Topologies Deployments Multicast Groups on the Layer 3 segment where the receiver is connected. This allows the switch to keep a table of the individual receivers that need a copy of the Multicast Group traffic. The participating hosts in a Virtual SAN cluster will negotiate for IGMP version 3. If the network does not support IGMP version 3, the hosts will fall back to IGMP version 2. VMware recommends that the same version of IGMP be used in all Layer 3 segments. Protocol-Independent Multicast (PIM) Protocol-Independent Multicast (PIM) is a family of Layer 3 multicast routing protocols that provide different communication techniques for IP Multicast traffic to reach receivers that are in different Layer 3 segments from the Multicast Groups sources. There are different versions of PIM, each of which is best suited for different IP Multicast topologies. The main four versions of PIM are these: • PIM Dense Mode (PIM-DM) – Dense Mode works by building a unidirectional shortest-path tree from each Multicast Groups source to the Multicast Groups receivers, by flooding multicast traffic over the entire Layer 3 Network and then pruning back branches of the tree where no receivers are present. Dense Mode is straightforward to implement and it is best suited for small Multicast deployments of one-to-many. • PIM Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) – Sparse Mode avoids the flooding issues of Dense Mode by assigning a root entity for the unidirectional Multicast Groups shortest-path tree called a rendezvous point (RP). The rendezvous point is selected in a per Multicast Group basis.
    [Show full text]