DOCSLIB.ORG

Niels Bohr's Atom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Niels Bohr's Atom MODERNMODERN SCIENCESCIENCE 1896–1945 Ray Spangenburg Diane Kit Moser Modern Science: 1896–1945 Copyright © 2004, 1994 by Ray Spangenburg and Diane Kit Moser This is a revised edition of THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE FROM 1895 TO 1945 Copyright © 1994 by Ray Spangenburg and Diane Kit Moser All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. For information contact: Facts On File, Inc. 132 West 31st Street New York NY 10001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Spangenburg, Ray, 1939– Modern science, 1896–1945 / Ray Spangenburg and Diane Kit Moser.—Rev. ed. p. cm. — (History of science) Rev. ed. of: History of science from 1895 to 1945, c1994. Summary: Discusses major scientists and scientific issues and discoveries of the first half of the twentieth century. ISBN 0-8160-4854-1 1. Science—History—Juvenile literature. 2. Life sciences—History—Juvenile liter- ature. [1. Science—History.] I. Moser, Diane, 1944– II. Spangenburg, Ray, 1939– History of science from 1895 to 1945. III. Title. Q126.4.S64 2004 509′.04—dc22 2003022974 Facts On File books are available at special discounts when purchased in bulk quantities for businesses, associations, institutions, or sales promotions. Please call our Special Sales Department in New York at (212) 967-8800 or (800) 322-8755. You can find Facts On File on the World Wide Web at http://www.factsonfile.com Text design by Erika K. Arroyo Cover design by Kelly Parr Illustrations by Sholto Ainslie Printed in the United States of America MP Hermitage 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This book is printed on acid-free paper. In Memory of Morgan Sherwood and his love of the ever-human struggle to become rational n CONTENTS Preface viii Acknowledgments xiv Introduction xv PART I The Physical Sciences, 1896–1945 1 1 The New Atom: From X-Rays to the Nucleus 3 The Beginning of Modern Physics 4 The New Ray 6 Uranium’s Strange Gift 7 The Curies’ Quest 8 Amazing Electrons 13 Margaret Eliza Maltby and the Changing Face of Science 14 Plum Pudding 17 The Crocodile from New Zealand 17 2 The New Universe, Part One: Einstein and Relativity 21 The Ether Problem 21 The Quantum Mystery 24 Einstein and the Photoelectric Effect 28 Brownian Motion 32 The Special Theory 33 The General Theory 35 3 The New Universe, Part Two: The Quantum Surprise 40 Niels Bohr’s Atom 40 Pauli’s Exclusion Principle 45 Particle and Wave 47 Amalie Emmy Noether: Symmetry in Modern Physics 50 The Role of Uncertainty 52 4 New Observations of the Universe 54 Cosmic Rays 54 Understanding the Universe 57 Making Sense of Stars 57 Looking Inside Stars 59 Measuring the Universe 60 Classifying Stellar Spectra: Annie Jump Cannon 61 The Shape of the Home Galaxy 62 Hubble’s Better Yardstick 64 A Telescope Named Hubble 65 De Sitter’s Expanding Universe 66 5 The Atom Split Asunder: Science and the Bomb 68 A Walk in the Snow: Lise Meitner and Otto Frisch 68 Race against Hitler 74 Fermi’s Nuclear Reactor 75 The Path to Atom Smashing 78 The Manhattan Project 81 Hiroshima and Nagasaki 83 Aftermath 85 PART II The Life Sciences, 1896–1945 87 6 The Growth of Microbiology and Chemistry 89 A Question of Nerves 90 Buchner’s Brew 92 Body Chemistry 94 A Small World 97 Paul Ehrlich and the “Magic Bullet” 99 Sulfa, the “Wonder Drug,” and Penicillin 105 A Matter of Diet 108 New Focus on the Very Small: The Electron Microscope 112 7 Pursuing the Trails of Genetics and Heredity 115 Gregor Mendel 115 Mendel Rediscovered 120 Bateson and Gene Linkage 121 Morgan’s Fruit Flies 121 The Paths to DNA 124 Darwin and Mendel Combined 127 8 In Search of Ancient Humans 130 The Neandertals 132 Homo erectus 136 The Piltdown Hoax 141 African Bonanza 145 PART III Science and Society, 1896–1945 153 9 Medicine and the Machine Mongers 155 A Long Legacy 156 Crum’s Cure 158 A Healing Heel 159 10 A Growing Resource: Women in Science 163 The Curie Dynasty 165 Family and Science 166 Working Alone 168 Conclusion 172 Chronology 175 Glossary 187 Further Reading and Web Sites 191 Index 199 PREFACE What I see in Nature is a magnificent structure that we can com- prehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking per- son with a feeling of “humility.” —Albert Einstein SCIENCE, OF ALL HUMAN ENDEAVORS, is one of the greatest adventures: Its job is to explore that “magnificent structure” we call nature and its awesome unknown regions. It probes the great mys- teries of the universe such as black holes, star nurseries, and quasars, as well as the perplexities of miniscule subatomic parti- cles, such as quarks and antiquarks. Science seeks to understand the secrets of the human body and the redwood tree and the retrovirus. The realms of its inquiry embrace the entire universe and everything in it, from the smallest speck of dust on a tiny asteroid to the fleck of color in a girl’s eye, and from the vast structure of a far-off galaxy millions of light years away to the complex dynamics that keep the rings of Saturn suspended in space. Some people tend to think that science is a musty, dusty set of facts and statistics to be memorized and soon forgotten. Others con- tend that science is the antithesis of poetry, magic, and all things human. Both groups have it wrong—nothing could be more growth- oriented or more filled with wonder or more human. Science is con- stantly evolving, undergoing revolutions, always producing “new words set to the old music,” and constantly refocusing what has gone before into fresh, new understanding. Asking questions and trying to understand how things work are among the most fundamental of human characteristics, and the history of science is the story of how a varied array of individuals, viii Preface ix Looks can be deceiving. These two lines are the same length. teams, and groups have gone about finding answers to some of the most fundamental questions. When, for example, did people begin wondering what Earth is made of and what its shape might be? How could they find answers? What methods did they devise for coming to conclusions and how good were those methods? At what point did their inquiries become scientific—and what does that mean? Science is so much more than the strange test tubes and odd apparatus we see in movies. It goes far beyond frog dissections or the names of plant species that we learn in biology classes. Science is actually a way of thinking, a vital, ever-growing way of looking at the world. It is a way of discovering how the world works—a very particular way that uses a set of rules devised by scientists to help them also discover their own mistakes because it is so easy to mis- construe what one sees or hears or perceives in other ways. If you find that hard to believe, look at the two horizontal lines in the figure above. One looks like a two-way arrow; the other has inverted arrowheads. Which one do you think is longer (not includ- ing the “arrowheads”)? Now measure them both. Right, they are exactly the same length. Because it is so easy to go wrong in mak- ing observations and drawing conclusions, people developed a sys- tem, a “scientific method,” for asking “How can I be sure?” If you actually took the time to measure the two lines in our example, instead of just taking our word that both lines are the same length, then you were thinking like a scientist. You were testing your own observation. You were testing the information that both lines “are exactly the same length.” And you were employing one of the x Modern Science strongest tools of science to perform your test: You were quantify- ing, or measuring, the lines. More than 2,300 years ago, Aristotle, a Greek philosopher, told the world that when two objects of different weights were dropped from a height, the heaviest would hit the ground first. It was a com- monsense argument. After all, anyone who wanted to try a test could make an “observation” and see that if you dropped a leaf and a stone together that the stone would land first. Try it yourself with a sheet of notebook paper and a paperweight in your living room. (There is something wrong with this test. Do you know what it is?) However, not many Greek thinkers tried any sort of test. Why bother when the answer was already known? And, since they were philosophers who believed in the power of the human mind to simply “reason” such things out without having to resort to “tests,” they considered obser- vation and experiments intellectually and socially beneath them. Centuries later, though, Galileo Galilei came along, a brilliant Italian pioneer in physics and telescopic astronomy. Galileo liked to figure things out for himself, and he did run some tests, even though he had to work around some limitations. Like today’s scientists, Galileo was never content just to watch. He used two balls of differ- ent weights, a time-keeping device, and an inclined plane, or ramp. Accurate clocks and watches were not yet invented, but he worked around that problem by rigging his own device.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Intelligent Design, Abiogenesis, and Learning from History: Dennis R
    Author Exchange Intelligent Design, Abiogenesis, and Learning from History: Dennis R. Venema A Reply to Meyer Dennis R. Venema Weizsäcker’s book The World View of Physics is still keeping me very busy. It has again brought home to me quite clearly how wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know; God wants us to realize his presence, not in unsolved problems but in those that are solved. Dietrich Bonhoeffer1 am thankful for this opportunity to nature, is the result of intelligence. More- reply to Stephen Meyer’s criticisms over, this assertion is proffered as the I 2 of my review of his book Signature logical basis for inferring design for the in the Cell (hereafter Signature). Meyer’s origin of biological information: if infor- critiques of my review fall into two gen- mation only ever arises from intelli- eral categories. First, he claims I mistook gence, then the mere presence of Signature for an argument against bio- information demonstrates design. A few logical evolution, rendering several of examples from Signature make the point my arguments superfluous. Secondly, easily: Meyer asserts that I have failed to refute … historical scientists can show that his thesis by not providing a “causally a presently acting cause must have adequate alternative explanation” for the been present in the past because the origin of life in that the few relevant cri- proposed candidate is the only known tiques I do provide are “deeply flawed.” cause of the effect in question.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Prof. Dr. John Howard Northrop
    Curriculum Vitae Prof. Dr. John Howard Northrop Name: John Howard Northrop Lebensdaten: 5. Juli 1891 ‐ 27. Mai 1987 John Howard Northrop war ein US‐amerikanischer Biochemiker, Biophysiker und Bakteriologe. Er lieferte Arbeiten zur Charakterisierung von Proteinen. Darüber hinaus listete er Grundsätze auf, die bei der Isolierung und Reindarstellung von Enzymen generell beobachtet werden können. Außerdem entwickelte er experimentelle Methoden, mit denen nachgewiesen werden konnte, dass kristallisierte Proteine reine Verbindungen sind, die volle Enzymaktivität besitzen. Für die Darstellung von Enzymen und Virusproteinen in reiner Form wurde er 1946 gemeinsam mit seinem Landsmann, dem Biochemiker Wendell Meredith Stanley, mit dem Nobelpreis für Chemie ausgezeichnet. Akademischer und beruflicher Werdegang John Howard Northrop studierte ab 1908 Chemie und Zoologie an der Columbia University in New York. Die Ausbildung schloss er 1912 mit einem Bachelor of Science ab. Ein Jahr später erhielt er den Master of Arts. 1915 wurde er im Fach Chemie promoviert. Im Anschluss war er mit einem Stipendium am Jacques Loeb Laboratory tätig, das zum Rockefeller Institute gehört. 1916 nahm man ihn in den Mitarbeiterstab des Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research auf, 1924 wurde er Vollmitglied. Northrop blieb dort bis zu seiner Emeritierung im Jahr 1961. Während des Ersten Weltkriegs verpflichtete sich Northrop für den Kriegsdienst. Er war im Rang eines Hauptmanns tätig. Nach Kriegsende wandte er sich wieder seiner Forschungsarbeit am Rockefeller Institute in New York zu. 1939 war Northrop Gastprofessor an der University of California; ein Jahr später Lektor an der John Hopkins University. 1942 wurde er in die National Defense Research Commission berufen, ein Gremium, über das die amerikanische Forschung während des Zweiten Weltkriegs koordiniert Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina www.leopoldina.org 1 wurde.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Viruses
    Western Plant Diagnostic Network1 First Detector News A Quarterly Pest Update for WPDN First Detectors Spring 2015 edition, volume 8, number 2 In this Issue Page 1: Editor’s Note Dear First Detectors, Pages 2 – 3: Intro to Plant Plant viruses cause many important plant diseases and are Viruses responsible for huge losses in crop production and quality in Page 4: Virus nomenclature all parts of the world. Plant viruses can spread very quickly because many are vectored by insects such as aphids and Page 5 – Most Serious World Plant Viruses & Symptoms whitefly. They are a major pest of crop production as well as major pests of home gardens. By mid-summer many fields, Pages 6 – 7: Plant Virus vineyards, orchards, and gardens will see the effects of plant Vectors viruses. The focus of this edition is the origin, discovery, taxonomy, vectors, and the effects of virus infection in Pages 7 - 10: Grapevine plants. There is also a feature article on grapevine viruses. Viruses And, as usual, there are some pest updates from the West. Page 10: Pest Alerts On June 16 – 18, the WPDN is sponsoring the second Invasive Snail and Slug workshop at UC Davis. The workshop Contact us at the WPDN Regional will be recorded and will be posted on the WPDN and NPDN Center at UC Davis: home pages. Have a great summer and here’s hoping for Phone: 530 754 2255 rain! Email: rwhoenisch@ucdavis.edu Web: https://wpdn.org Please find the NPDN family of newsletters at: Editor: Richard W. Hoenisch @Copyright Regents of the Newsletters University of California All Rights Reserved Western Plant Diagnostic Network News Plant Viruses 2 Ag, Manitoba Photo courtesy Photo Food, and Rural Initiatives and Food, of APS Photo by Giovanni Martelli, U of byBari Giovanni Photo Grapevine Fanleaf Virus Peanut leaf with Squash Mosaic Virus tomato spotted wilt virus Viruses are infectious pathogens that are too small to be seen with a light microscope, but despite their small size they can cause chaos.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Interlude in Denmark (PDF)
    10 Interlude in Denmark In my early student days -- as I have mentioned in chapter 3 -- my friend Christiansen-Weniger and I won an election as German student representatives on the ticket by striking a mathematical funny bone: Christiansen-Weniger - von Hippel [Christiansen minus von Hippel]. In the meantime, "Krischan" had become a professor of agriculture and had been called to Ankara in that capacity. He was an "unblemished Aryan," still a German citizen, and his lovely wife, Luise, alias "Körnchen," also a youth-movement friend, came to visit us. She intended to fly to Warsaw, and I wanted to fly to Copenhagen via Danzig, in order to visit Olga, who was directing a training school for agricultural helpers in that neighborhood. We therefore decided to fly together from Istanbul. In those early years of aviation, this was a major undertaking. Istanbul did not yet have a real airport and our six-passenger plane, with semi-open cockpit, took off from a meadow at night with the headlights of carefully stationed cars outlining a runway. Before our departure, we received the reassuring news that the plane flying the reverse route had crashed in the Albanian mountains. Our flight proved glorious, however. We passed over the Balkans in semi-darkness. No light shone from the ground there because practically all of its settlements had then been wiped out in the Balkan Wars and World War I. At sunrise we reached the Carpathian mountains and flew along that stunning semi-circle separating Hungary from Poland. The air became turbulent and we had to throw up "par la fenêtre [out the window]." At noon we landed in Warsaw, where Luise left me.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations of Nuclear Decay Half-Lives Relevant to Nuclear Astrophysics
    DE TTK 1949 Investigations of nuclear decay half-lives relevant to nuclear astrophysics PhD Thesis Egyetemi doktori (PhD) ´ertekez´es J´anos Farkas Supervisor / T´emavezet˝o Dr. Zsolt F¨ul¨op University of Debrecen PhD School in Physics Debreceni Egyetem Term´eszettudom´anyi Doktori Tan´acs Fizikai Tudom´anyok Doktori Iskol´aja Debrecen 2011 Prepared at the University of Debrecen PhD School in Physics and the Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (ATOMKI) K´esz¨ult a Debreceni Egyetem Fizikai Tudom´anyok Doktori Iskol´aj´anak magfizikai programja keret´eben a Magyar Tudom´anyos Akad´emia Atommagkutat´o Int´ezet´eben (ATOMKI) Ezen ´ertekez´est a Debreceni Egyetem Term´eszettudom´anyi Doktori Tan´acs Fizikai Tudom´anyok Doktori Iskol´aja magfizika programja keret´eben k´esz´ıtettem a Debreceni Egyetem term´eszettudom´anyi doktori (PhD) fokozat´anak elnyer´ese c´elj´ab´ol. Debrecen, 2011. Farkas J´anos Tan´us´ıtom, hogy Farkas J´anos doktorjel¨olt a 2010/11-es tan´evben a fent megnevezett doktori iskola magfizika programj´anak keret´eben ir´any´ıt´asommal v´egezte munk´aj´at. Az ´ertekez´esben foglalt eredm´e- nyekhez a jel¨olt ¨on´all´oalkot´otev´ekenys´eg´evel meghat´aroz´oan hozz´a- j´arult. Az ´ertekez´es elfogad´as´at javaslom. Debrecen, 2011. Dr. F¨ul¨op Zsolt t´emavezet˝o Investigations of nuclear decay half-lives relevant to nuclear astrophysics Ertekez´es´ a doktori (PhD) fokozat megszerz´ese ´erdek´eben a fizika tudom´any´agban ´Irta: Farkas J´anos, okleveles fizikus ´es programtervez˝omatematikus K´esz¨ult a Debreceni Egyetem Fizikai Tudom´anyok Doktori Iskol´aja magfizika programja keret´eben T´emavezet˝o: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    E3S Web of Conferences 258, 07027 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125807027 UESF-2021 Family institute and environmental responsibility in the view of Russian youth Marina Rosenova1,*, Irina Sokolovskaya2, and Elena Tkach3 1Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, 127051, 29 Sretenka Str., Moscow, Russia 2State University of Management, 109542, 99 Ryazan Ave., Moscow, Russia 3Pacific National University, 68000, 68 Karl Marx srt., Khabarovsk, Russia Abstract. Modern studies of ideas about the family reflect a contradiction: on the one hand, young people are guided by the values of individualism, freedom, and self-development, and on the other, they maintain the high value and desirability of the family. The use of methods of psychosemantics and metaphorical images in the study revealed the peculiarities of young people's ideas about the family and revealed the "zones of psychological tension" in the sphere of family and family relations. In the semantics of ideas about the family, schoolchildren and students alike identified the priorities of boundaries and the understanding of the family as a closed location. In the minds of students, the cognitive and emotional aspects of ideas are more clearly differentiated, and the willingness to actively create their own family is reflected. Among young people with higher education and experience of marriage or cohabitation, negative connotations of family assessment prevail. The area of psychological stress in the family sphere: schoolchildren have a weak orientation in family relations, students have idealistic expectations, and older youth have numerous problems related to personality characteristics. 1 Introduction Since the second half of the 20th century, in science and social practice, active discussions and debates have been conducted about role and value of family in the life of a modern person, liberated in his individuality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Copenhagen Interpretation: Exploring Science on Stage
    The Copenhagen Interpretation: Exploring Science on Stage Michael Frayn’s play Copenhagen, which opened and was known for his experimental, as well as in London in 1998, in New York in 2000, and theoretical, work; Diana Barkan Buchwald, finally made it to Los Angeles in late 2001, ex- associate professor of history, and general editor plores what might have been said during a 1941 and director of the Einstein Papers Project; Hank meeting of Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg at Stratton, who plays Werner Heisenberg in the Los Bohr’s home in the German-occupied capital city Angeles production of the play; Marge Leighton, a of Denmark. Although in the end all the ambigu- close friend of the Bohr family (and widow twice- ities and “uncertainties” remain, the three charac- over of Caltech physics professors Tommy Laurit- ters (including Bohr’s wife, Margrethe), with the sen and Bob Leighton); and Jay Labinger, admin- knowledge of hindsight “when all are dead and istrator of the Beckman Institute, who often writes gone,” reenact various drafts of the purpose of on the historical, cultural, social, and literary Heisenberg’s visit—and the ultimate question of aspects of science (see his review of two other why Heisenberg did not build an atomic bomb for science plays in E&S, 2001, no. 1). the Nazis. After Hank Stratton described the play briefly Caltech interest in the play naturally ran quite (but told the audience they’d have to “spend 55 high, and on December 10, in a packed Beckman bucks” to get the rest of it), Diana Barkan Auditorium, Caltech hosted a panel, “The Copen- Buchwald, a historian of science, outlined what hagen Interpretation,” convened “to consider the was going on in physics at the time: fission had broader scientific, historical, philosophical, and been discovered in Berlin in 1938 by Lise Meitner, artistic dimensions of this encounter and its Otto Hahn, and Fritz Strassmann.
    [Show full text]
  • Release of Documents Relating to 1941 Bohr-Heisenberg Meeting
    Release of documents relating to 1941 Bohr-Heisenberg meeting DOCUMENTS RELEASED 6 FEBRUARY 2002 The family of Niels Bohr has decided to release all documents deposited at the Niels Bohr Archive, either written or dictated by Niels Bohr, pertaining specifically to the meeting between Bohr and Heisenberg in September 1941. There are in all eleven documents. The decision has been made in order to avoid possible misunderstandings regarding the contents of the documents. The documents supplement and confirm previously published statements of Bohr's recollections of the meeting, especially those of his son, Aage Bohr. The documents have now been organised, transcribed and translated into English at the Niels Bohr Archive. Because of the overwhelming interest in the material, it has been decided that the material should be published in full instead of being made available to scholars upon individual application, as is normal practice at the Niels Bohr Archive. This has been done by placing facsimiles, transcriptions and translations on this website here. An illustrated edition of the transcriptions and translations is published in the journal Naturens Verden, Vol. 84, No. 8 - 9. Reprints can be obtained from the Niels Bohr Archive for USD8/EUR8/DKK50 (prepaid). Release of documents relating to 1941 Bohr-Heisenberg meeting. Document 1. Draft of letter from Bohr to Heisenberg, never sent. In the handwriting of Niels Bohr's assistant, Aage Petersen. Undated, but written after the first publication, in 1957, of the Danish translation of Robert Jungk, Heller als Tausend Sonnen, the first edition of Jungk's book to contain Heisenberg's letter.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Genomics (1901–1950)*
    Research Resource Timeline of Genomics (1901{1950)* Year Event and Theoretical Implication/Extension Reference 1901 Hugo de Vries adopts the term MUTATION to de Vries, H. 1901. Die Mutationstheorie. describe sudden, spontaneous, drastic alterations in Veit, Leipzig, Germany. the hereditary material of Oenothera. Thomas Harrison Montgomery studies sper- 1. Montgomery, T.H. 1898. The spermato- matogenesis in various species of Hemiptera and ¯nds genesis in Pentatoma up to the formation that maternal chromosomes only pair with paternal of the spermatid. Zool. Jahrb. 12: 1-88. chromosomes during meiosis. 2. Montgomery, T.H. 1901. A study of the chromosomes of the germ cells of the Metazoa. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. 20: 154-236. Clarence Ervin McClung postulates that the so- McClung, C.E. 1901. Notes on the acces- called accessory chromosome (now known as the \X" sory chromosome. Anat. Anz. 20: 220- chromosome) is male determining. 226. Hermann Emil Fischer(1902 Nobel Prize Laure- 1. Fischer, E. and Fourneau, E. 1901. UberÄ ate for Chemistry) and Ernest Fourneau report einige Derivate des Glykocolls. Ber. the synthesis of the ¯rst dipeptide, glycylglycine. In Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 34: 2868-2877. 1902 Fischer introduces the term PEPTIDES. 2. Fischer, E. 1907. Syntheses of polypep- tides. XVII. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 40: 1754-1767. 1902 Theodor Boveri and Walter Stanborough Sut- 1. Boveri, T. 1902. UberÄ mehrpolige Mi- ton found the chromosome theory of heredity inde- tosen als Mittel zur Analyse des Zellkerns. pendently. Verh. Phys -med. Ges. WÄurzberg NF 35: 67-90. 2. Boveri, T. 1903. UberÄ die Konstitution der chromatischen Kernsubstanz. Verh. Zool.
    [Show full text]
  • Federation Member Society Nobel Laureates
    FEDERATION MEMBER SOCIETY NOBEL LAUREATES For achievements in Chemistry, Physiology/Medicine, and PHysics. Award Winners announced annually in October. Awards presented on December 10th, the anniversary of Nobel’s death. (-H represents Honorary member, -R represents Retired member) # YEAR AWARD NAME AND SOCIETY DOB DECEASED 1 1904 PM Ivan Petrovich Pavlov (APS-H) 09/14/1849 02/27/1936 for work on the physiology of digestion, through which knowledge on vital aspects of the subject has been transformed and enlarged. 2 1912 PM Alexis Carrel (APS/ASIP) 06/28/1873 01/05/1944 for work on vascular suture and the transplantation of blood vessels and organs 3 1919 PM Jules Bordet (AAI-H) 06/13/1870 04/06/1961 for discoveries relating to immunity 4 1920 PM August Krogh (APS-H) 11/15/1874 09/13/1949 (Schack August Steenberger Krogh) for discovery of the capillary motor regulating mechanism 5 1922 PM A. V. Hill (APS-H) 09/26/1886 06/03/1977 Sir Archibald Vivial Hill for discovery relating to the production of heat in the muscle 6 1922 PM Otto Meyerhof (ASBMB) 04/12/1884 10/07/1951 (Otto Fritz Meyerhof) for discovery of the fixed relationship between the consumption of oxygen and the metabolism of lactic acid in the muscle 7 1923 PM Frederick Grant Banting (ASPET) 11/14/1891 02/21/1941 for the discovery of insulin 8 1923 PM John J.R. Macleod (APS) 09/08/1876 03/16/1935 (John James Richard Macleod) for the discovery of insulin 9 1926 C Theodor Svedberg (ASBMB-H) 08/30/1884 02/26/1971 for work on disperse systems 10 1930 PM Karl Landsteiner (ASIP/AAI) 06/14/1868 06/26/1943 for discovery of human blood groups 11 1931 PM Otto Heinrich Warburg (ASBMB-H) 10/08/1883 08/03/1970 for discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme 12 1932 PM Lord Edgar D.
    [Show full text]
  • States of Origin: Influences on Research Into the Origins of Life
    COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Director of Copyright Services sydney.edu.au/copyright Influences on Research into the Origins of Life. Idan Ben-Barak Unit for the History and Philosophy of Science Faculty of Science The University of Sydney A thesis submitted to the University of Sydney as fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2014 Declaration I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person, nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a University or other institute of higher learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Radioactivity and Our Well-Being 27 Is Carried out with Gamma Rays, X-Rays, and Fast Neutrons, in Addition to Chemical Mutagens
    Introduction: Radioactivity and Our Well-Being 27 is carried out with gamma rays, x-rays, and fast neutrons, in addition to chemical mutagens. As reported in the IAEA Nuclear Technology Review (2006) other nuclear techniques used are the radioisotope labeling of nucleic acids used as probes for genetic fingerprinting, map- ping and marker-assisted selection, and mutagenesis for the analysis of gene function. The Joint FAO/IAEA Division in Vienna, Austria carries out extensive coordinated research programs with member states utilizing nuclear and conventional techniques in mutation plant breeding. The induced mutations created by nuclear radiation and chemicals have led to major advances in plant breeding for crop improvement. The beneficial mutants have been selected and used by plant breeders for over 50 years. The Nuclear Technology Review (2006) reports that, to date, approximately 2500 officially registered mutant varieties of more than 160 plant species worldwide are listed in the FAO/IAEA Mutant Variety Database. An example cited is a mutant rice cultivar with high quality and tolerance to salinity, which has been released in Vietnam. It is one of the top five export rice varieties, which occupies 280,000 ha of the export rice area of the Mekong Delta. The target area for the salt tolerant rice cultivar for Bangladesh, India, Philippines, and Vietnam encompass an estimated area of 4.3 million ha. The IAEA Nuclear Technology Review (2005) reports that mutation induction coupled to selection remains the most "clean" and inexpensive way to create varieties by changing single characteristics without touching the general phenotype. Major successes are reported for mutagenesis-enhanced breeding in the USA (rice, barley, sunflower, grapefruit, pep- permint), Pakistan (cotton), India (blackgram), Australia and Canada (linseed), Japan (pear), and China and Australia (rice).
    [Show full text]