United States V. Indelicato, 865 F.2D 1370

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United States V. Indelicato, 865 F.2D 1370 Page 1 865 F.2d 1370, 57 USLW 2434, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7113 (Cite as: 865 F.2d 1370) Two acts of racketeering activity, without more, do not suffice to establish RICO “pattern.” United States Court of Appeals, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(1, 5). Second Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, [2] Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- v. tions 319H 28 Anthony INDELICATO, Defendant-Appellant. 319H Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- Nos. 98, 106, Dockets 87-1085, 87-1215 and tions 87-1075 L. 319HI Federal Regulation Argued June 13, 1988. 319HI(A) In General Decided Jan. 13, 1989. 319Hk24 Pattern of Activity 319Hk28 k. Continuity or Relatedness; Defendant was convicted of participating and Ongoing Activity. Most Cited Cases conspiring to participate in affairs of enterprise (Formerly 83k82.70) through pattern of racketeering activity in violation Relatedness and continuity are essential char- of RICO by the United States District Court for the acteristics of RICO activity, rather than of RICO Southern District of New York, Richard Owen, J., enterprise. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(1, 4, 5). and he appealed. The Court of Appeals, Kearse, Circuit Judge, held that nearly simultaneous [3] Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- murders of three individuals to facilitate change in tions 319H 29 leadership of organized crime family satisfied RICO's “pattern” requirement. 319H Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- tions Affirmed. 319HI Federal Regulation 319HI(A) In General Oakes, Circuit Judge, concurred and filed opin- 319Hk24 Pattern of Activity ion in which Feinberg, J., joined. 319Hk29 k. Time and Duration. Most Cited Cases Mahoney, Circuit Judge, concurred and filed (Formerly 83k82.70) opinion. Necessary relatedness between RICO predicate West Headnotes acts may be established by proof of their temporal proximity, common goals, similarity of methods, or [1] Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- repetitions. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(1, 5). tions 319H 26 [4] Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- 319H Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- tions 319H 27 tions 319HI Federal Regulation 319H Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- 319HI(A) In General tions 319Hk24 Pattern of Activity 319HI Federal Regulation 319Hk26 k. Number of Predicate Acts. 319HI(A) In General Most Cited Cases 319Hk24 Pattern of Activity (Formerly 83k82.70) 319Hk27 k. Number of Schemes, Goals, Episodes, or Transactions. Most Cited Cases © 2013 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Page 2 865 F.2d 1370, 57 USLW 2434, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7113 (Cite as: 865 F.2d 1370) (Formerly 83k82.70) 319HI Federal Regulation RICO “pattern” can be established without 319HI(A) In General proof of more than one scheme, episode or transac- 319Hk24 Pattern of Activity tion, and without proof that scheme pursuant to 319Hk28 k. Continuity or Relatedness; which racketeering acts were performed is scheme Ongoing Activity. Most Cited Cases with no apparent termination date. 18 U.S.C.A. § (Formerly 83k82.70) 1961(1, 5). Relatedness and continuity necessary to show RICO “pattern” may, in appropriate cases, be estab- [5] Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- lished through nature of RICO enterprise. 18 tions 319H 27 U.S.C.A. § 1961(1, 4, 5). 319H Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- [8] Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- tions tions 319H 49 319HI Federal Regulation 319HI(A) In General 319H Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- 319Hk24 Pattern of Activity tions 319Hk27 k. Number of Schemes, 319HI Federal Regulation Goals, Episodes, or Transactions. Most Cited Cases 319HI(A) In General (Formerly 83k82.70) 319Hk49 k. Nexus Between Enterprise Multiple acts of racketeering activity are not and Acts. Most Cited Cases excluded from reach of RICO simply because they (Formerly 83k82.70) achieve their objective quickly or because they fur- No RICO violation can be shown unless there ther but a single scheme. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(1, 5). is proof of specified relationship between racketeer- ing acts and RICO enterprise. 18 U.S.C.A. § [6] Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- 1962(a-c). tions 319H 29 [9] Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- 319H Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- tions 319H 28 tions 319HI Federal Regulation 319H Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- 319HI(A) In General tions 319Hk24 Pattern of Activity 319HI Federal Regulation 319Hk29 k. Time and Duration. Most 319HI(A) In General Cited Cases 319Hk24 Pattern of Activity (Formerly 83k82.70) 319Hk28 k. Continuity or Relatedness; RICO “pattern” requirement may be satisfied Ongoing Activity. Most Cited Cases by predicate acts which are nearly simultaneous, as (Formerly 83k82.70) long as there is sufficient similarity between them Evidence of nature of RICO enterprise may be and evidence of a threat of continuation of racket- used to show threat of continuity sufficient to estab- eering activity. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(1, 5). lish RICO pattern. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(1, 4, 5). [7] Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- [10] Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiz- tions 319H 28 ations 319H 28 319H Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- 319H Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- tions tions © 2013 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Page 3 865 F.2d 1370, 57 USLW 2434, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7113 (Cite as: 865 F.2d 1370) 319HI Federal Regulation victing him of participating and conspiring to parti- 319HI(A) In General cipate in the affairs of an enterprise through a pat- 319Hk24 Pattern of Activity tern of racketeering activity, in violation of the 319Hk28 k. Continuity or Relatedness; Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Ongoing Activity. Most Cited Cases Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. (1982 & (Formerly 83k82.73) Supp. IV 1986). He was sentenced to two consecut- Nearly simultaneous murders of three individu- ive 20-year terms of incarceration and a $50,000 als to facilitate change in leadership of organized fine. His appeal and the appeals of his codefendants crime family satisfied RICO's “pattern” require- were heard by a panel of this Court and remain ment, where nature of RICO enterprise made it pending before that panel. We granted this rehear- clear beyond peradventure that there was threat of ing en banc in order to consider the limited ques- continuing racketeering activity. 18 U.S.C.A. § tion of whether Indelicato's participation in three 1961(5). murders as part of a single criminal transaction could constitute a “pattern of racketeering activity” *1371 John F. Savarese, Asst. U.S. Atty., New within the meaning of RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1961(5). York City (Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty. For the reasons below, we answer that question in S.D.N.Y., Aaron Marcu, John Gilmore Childers, the affirmative, and we remand the matter to the Asst. U.S. Attys., Michael Chertoff, Sp. Asst . U.S. panel for further proceedings consistent with this Atty., New York City, on the brief), for appellee. holding. Mark F. Pomerantz, New York City (Ronald P. I. BACKGROUND Fischetti, Warren L. Feldman, David T. Grudberg, Indelicato was charged in two counts of a Fischetti & Pomerantz, New York City, on the 25-count superseding indictment charging him and brief), for defendant-appellant. seven codefendants with various crimes arising out of operations of an organization known as the Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. (Gerald B. Lefcourt, “Commission” of La Cosa Nostra, which was al- Joshua L. Dratel, New York City, Walter P. Lough- leged to be the ruling body of the La Cosa Nostra lin, Newark, N.J., of counsel), for amicus curiae organized crime families throughout the United Marvin Kaplan. States. The Commission was alleged to be a RICO enterprise, and Indelicato was charged with one FN* * Before OAKES, Chief Judge, FEINBERG, count of participating in, and one count of conspir- MESKILL, NEWMAN, KEARSE, CARDAMONE, ing to participate in, the affairs of the Commission PIERCE, WINTER, PRATT, MINER, ALTIMARI, through a pattern of racketeering activity, in viola- and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges. tion of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and (d), respectively. To the extent pertinent to the question con- FN* Judge Oakes succeeded Judge Fein- sidered in this en banc rehearing, the evidence at berg as Chief Judge while this matter was trial, taken in the light most favorable to the gov- sub judice. ernment, revealed the following. The Commission had existed for decades as the governing body of KEARSE, Circuit Judge: the five La Cosa Nostra families in New York City Defendant Anthony Indelicato has appealed and affiliated families in other cities. Each organ- from a judgment entered in the United States Dis- ized crime family included a “boss” or leader, as- trict Court for the Southern District of New York, sisted by an underboss and a counselor; beneath after a jury trial before Richard Owen, Judge, con- this level were “capos” or captains, who supervised © 2013 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Page 4 865 F.2d 1370, 57 USLW 2434, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7113 (Cite as: 865 F.2d 1370) a number of people who had been made “members” On July 12, 1979, Indelicato and two other or “soldiers” of the family. To be made a member men, all wearing ski masks, entered a restaurant in of such a family, one was required *1372 to vow Brooklyn, New York, where Galante, his cousin Gi- obedience to the rules and orders of the Commis- useppe Turano, and Galante's friend and associate sion and to be personally approved by it for admis- Leonard Coppola were having lunch. Using guns of sion. The functions of the Commission included the type earlier amassed at the bar, Indelicato and overseeing interfamily ventures and intrafamily his two companions shot and killed Galante, Tur- leadership disputes.
Recommended publications
  • 1 United States District Court Eastern District of New York ---X United State
    Case 1:03-cr-00929-NGG Document 651 Filed 11/30/06 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEMORANDUM & ORDER v. 03-CR-929 (NGG) 05-CR-060 (NGG) VINCENT BASCIANO, et al., Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------X GARAUFIS, United States District Judge. Defendants Vincent Basciano (“Basciano”) and Anthony Indelicato (“Indelicato”) have moved this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 455(a)(1) to disqualify itself in the above-captioned cases. Specifically, they claim that an alleged death threat made by Basciano against this court has created the appearance of partiality requiring this court’s recusal. Defendant Michael Mancuso (“Mancuso”) has joined in those motions. I. BACKGROUND On August 14, 2003, a grand jury in the Eastern District of New York indicted Basciano on racketeering-related charges stemming from his alleged involvement in the Bonanno crime family. He proceeded to trial, and, in May of 2006, a jury convicted him of racketeering conspiracy and failed to reach a verdict on the remaining racketeering acts. On February 15, 2006, Basciano, Mancuso, Indelicato, Anthony Aiello (“Aiello”), Anthony Donato (“Donato”) and Vincenzo Masi (“Masi”) were charged in a separate indictment with additional racketeering-related crimes. Both cases are currently before this court. Just before or soon after his trial ended, in or about April or May of 2006, Basciano wrote 1 Case 1:03-cr-00929-NGG Document 651 Filed 11/30/06 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: <pageID> a list containing the names of the court, the lead prosecutor, and three cooperating witnesses involved in his trial (“May 2006 list”), and provided the May 2006 list to a fellow inmate.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 United States District Court Eastern District of New
    Case 1:03-cr-00929-NGG Document 660 Filed 12/21/06 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEMORANDUM & ORDER v. 03-CR-929 (NGG) VINCENT BASCIANO, and PATRICK DEFILIPPO, Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------X GARAUFIS, United States District Judge. Defendants Vincent Basciano (“Basciano”) and Patrick DeFilippo (“DeFilippo”) (collectively “Defendants”) have moved this court to grant either an acquittal pursuant to Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or a new trial under Rule 33. Defendants make their challenges on four grounds. First, Defendants contest the jury’s findings with respect to count one of the indictment, which charged a RICO conspiracy. Defendants claim that there was insufficient proof of three of the eight racketeering acts – racketeering acts three, seven, and eleven. (See Memorandum of Law in Support of Vincent Basciano’s Post-Trial Motions (“Basciano Mem.”) at 15-26 (challenging racketeering acts three, seven, and eleven); Post-Trial Memorandum of Law in Support of DeFilippo’s Motions (“DeFilippo Mem.”) at 4-6 (challenging racketeering act three).) Second, Basciano claims that the court’s charge to the jury on the concept of relatedness pertaining to Racketeering Conspiracy was improper. (Basciano Mem. at 35-37.) Third, Basciano contends that venue was not established by a preponderance of the evidence with respect to count two, which charged ownership and supervision of a gambling 1 Case 1:03-cr-00929-NGG Document 660 Filed 12/21/06 Page 2 of 20 PageID #: <pageID> business involving joker-poker machines. (Basciano Mem.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\Grandres\Desktop\Vitale 5K.Submitted.Final.Wpd
    GDA:JB F.#2000R02722 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - against - 02 CR 307 (NGG) SALVATORE VITALE Defendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR DOWNWARD DEPARTURE PURSUANT TO SECTION 5K1.1 and 18 U.S.C. 3553(s) (FILED UNDER SEAL) LORETTA E. LYNCH United States Attorney Eastern District of New York 271 Pierrepont Plaza East Brooklyn, New York 11201 GREG D. ANDRES JOHN BURETTA Assistant United States Attorneys (Of Counsel) Table of Contents PRELIMINARY STATEMENT.....................1 BACKGROUND ......................... 10 I. Education and Employment History ......... 10 II. The Bonanno Organized Crime Family ........ 10 III. Prior Arrests and Prosecution........... 11 A. United States v. Massino & Vitale 81 CR 03 (RWS)(SDNY)............. 12 B. United States v. Vitale, 01 CR 283 (ADS) ............... 12 C. United States v. Massino, et. al, 02 CR 307 (NGG) ............... 13 VITALE’S COOPERATION .................... 17 I. Intelligence & Related Information ........ 17 A. The Murders/Murder Conspiracies And Attempted Murders ............ 18 1. Murder of Vito Borelli (1976)...... 19 2. Murder of Joseph “Doo Doo” Pastore (1976) 19 3. Indelicato, Giaccone and Trinchera Murders (Three Captains Murder) And Bruno Indelicato Murder Conspiracy (1981)... 20 4. Murder of Dominick “Sonny Black” Napolitano (1981)............ 23 5. Murder of Anthony Mirra (1982) ..... 24 6. Giliberti Attempted Murder (1982).... 24 7. Murder of Enrico Mazzeo (1983) ..... 25 8. Murder of Caesar Bonventre (1984).... 25 9. Attempted Murder of David Nunez (1985) . 26 i 10. Murders of Robert Capasio and Joseph Platia (1986) .......... 27 11. Murder of Gabriel Infanti (1987) .... 28 12. Murder of Gerard Guarino (1989)..... 29 13. Murder of Anthony Tomasulo (1992)...
    [Show full text]
  • Salvatore-Vitale.Pdf
    Case 1:02-cr-00307-NGG Document 989 Filed 10/26/10 Page 1 of 128 GDA:JB F.#2000R02722 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - against - 02 CR 307 (NGG) SALVATORE VITALE Defendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR DOWNWARD DEPARTURE PURSUANT TO SECTION 5K1.1 and 18 U.S.C. 3553(s) (FILED UNDER SEAL) LORETTA E. LYNCH United States Attorney Eastern District of New York 271 Pierrepont Plaza East Brooklyn, New York 11201 GREG D. ANDRES JOHN BURETTA Assistant United States Attorneys (Of Counsel) Case 1:02-cr-00307-NGG Document 989 Filed 10/26/10 Page 2 of 128 Table of Contents PRELIMINARY STATEMENT.....................1 BACKGROUND ......................... 10 I. Education and Employment History ......... 10 II. The Bonanno Organized Crime Family ........ 10 III. Prior Arrests and Prosecution........... 11 A. United States v. Massino & Vitale 81 CR 03 (RWS)(SDNY)............. 12 B. United States v. Vitale, 01 CR 283 (ADS) ............... 12 C. United States v. Massino, et. al, 02 CR 307 (NGG) ............... 13 VITALE’S COOPERATION .................... 17 I. Intelligence & Related Information ........ 17 A. The Murders/Murder Conspiracies And Attempted Murders ............ 18 1. Murder of Vito Borelli (1976)...... 19 2. Murder of Joseph “Doo Doo” Pastore (1976) 19 3. Indelicato, Giaccone and Trinchera Murders (Three Captains Murder) And Bruno Indelicato Murder Conspiracy (1981)... 20 4. Murder of Dominick “Sonny Black” Napolitano (1981)............ 23 5. Murder of Anthony Mirra (1982) ..... 24 6. Giliberti Attempted Murder (1982).... 24 7. Murder of Enrico Mazzeo (1983) ..... 25 8. Murder of Caesar Bonventre (1984).... 25 9. Attempted Murder of David Nunez (1985) .
    [Show full text]
  • PDF EPUB} Born to the Mob the True-Life Story of the Only Man to Work for All Five of New York's Mafia Familie Anthony Indelicato
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Born to the Mob The True-Life Story of the Only Man to Work for All Five of New York's Mafia Familie Anthony Indelicato. Anthony "Bruno" Indelicato (born 1947), also known as "Bruno", [1] "Whack-Whack" [2] and "Anthony Indelicato" [3] is a capo with the Bonanno crime family in New York City. Contents. Biography [ edit | edit source ] Anthony Indelicato was the son of Alphonse "Sonny Red" Indelicato, a powerful capo in the Bonanno family. Indelicato is a nephew of Gerard Indelicato, a former Special Assistant to Massachusetts governor Michael Dukakis. Anthony Indelicato's wife is Catherine Burke, a daughter of Lucchese crime family associate Jimmy Burke. Galante murder [ edit | edit source ] In 1979, Anthony Indelicato participated in the murder of Bonanno boss Carmine Galante. With the official Bonanno boss Philip Rastelli in prison, Galante had taken effective control of the family in the early 1970s. His ruthlessness and ambition created many enemies within the Bonanno family and in the other New York families. Galante refused to share any of the profits that he made from heroin trafficking. The Mafia Commission finally allowed several Bonanno capos to plot Galante's assassination. On July 12, 1979, Galante entered the "Joe and Mary Italian-American Restaurant" in Bushwick, Brooklyn for lunch. Later that afternoon, Indelicato and three other men drove up to and entered Joe and Mary's, wearing ski masks. The gunmen murdered Galante at his table as he was eating lunch in the rear outdoor garden of the restaurant; the New York Post headline read: "Godfather Blown Away Alfresco in Brooklyn".
    [Show full text]
  • Eugene Mccarthy, a Call to Prosecute Drug Company Fraud As
    MCCARTHY AUTHOR FINAL DRAFT 9/2/19 12:25 PM A CALL TO PROSECUTE DRUG COMPANY FRAUD AS ORGANIZED CRIME Eugene McCarthy† INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 439 I. THE FRAUD EPIDEMIC IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY ........................................................................................... 443 A. The Legal Framework for Fraud in the Pharmaceutical Industry ....................................................................... 444 B. Case Studies of Pharmaceutical Industry Fraud ....... 452 II. RACKETERRING INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (RICO) ACT AND PROSECUTING ENTERPRISE CRIMINALITY ........................................................................................... 459 A. RICO’s Legal Elements and Criminal Penalties ........ 461 B. Government Applications of RICO Against the Mafia .................................................................................... 467 C. RICO and White-Collar Crime ................................... 471 III. APPLYING RICO TO PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY FRAUD . 475 A. Executives ................................................................... 477 B. Drug Representatives ................................................. 478 C. Doctors ....................................................................... 479 D. Lawyers ...................................................................... 481 E. Politicians ................................................................... 484 CONCLUSION ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States V. Salerno, 868 F.2D 524 (2D Cir 1989)
    Page 1 868 F.2d 524, 27 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 868 (Cite as: 868 F.2d 524) Cases (Formerly 165k25.1, 165k25 Extortion and United States Court of Appeals, Threats) Second Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, Extortion 164T 22 v. Anthony SALERNO, Carmine Persico, Gennaro 164T Extortion Langella, Anthony Corallo, Salvatore Santoro, Ral- 164Tk18 Federal Offenses ph Scopo, Christopher Furnari and Anthony Indel- 164Tk22 k. Threat or duress. Most Cited icato, Defendants–Appellants. Cases (Formerly 165k25.1, 165k25 Extortion and Nos. 91–106, Dockets 87–1075 to 87–1078, Threats) 87–1082 to 87–1085 and 87–1208 to 87–1215. Argued Sept. 9, 1987. Extortion 164T 26 Decided Jan. 31, 1989. 164T Extortion Defendants were convicted in the United States 164Tk26 k. Attempts. Most Cited Cases District Court for the Southern District of New (Formerly 165k25.1, 165k25 Extortion and York, Richard Owen, J., on Racketeer Influenced Threats) and Corrupt Organizations Act violations and other In prosecution for extortion and attempted ex- charges. One defendant appealed and limited appeal tortion, it is not necessary to prove victims' actual to two issues. The Court of Appeals, 865 F.2d fear of retaliation, but only an attempt to instill 1370, entered an en banc opinion and remanded. fear; moreover, Government need not prove attempt Appeal was then taken by all defendants. The Court to instill fear of violence but need only prove at- of Appeals, Mahoney, Circuit Judge, held that: (1) tempt to instill fear of economic harm. 18 U.S.C.A. evidence was sufficient to sustain extortion and at- § 1951(a).
    [Show full text]
  • October 2010 Fall Edition
    Quarterly Newsletter October 2010 Fall Edition Volume 1, Issue 8 Italian American Police Society of New Jersey A social, fraternal organization of more than 4,000 Italian American Law Enforcement officers in the State. William Schievella, President UPCOMING MEETINGS NEWSLETTER Editor: Patrick Minutillo October 13, 2010 October 2010 Executive Secretary The Landmark 26 Route 17 South East Rutherford, NJ (201) 438-3939 November 10, 2010 By the time this be gassed, shined Attilio’s Tavern issue arrives in your and ready to go. 80 E. McFarlan Street mailboxes the prepa- The Polizia di Stato (Route 46 East) NYC PARADE Dover, NJ 07801 (973) 328-1100 MEETING LOCATION Port Authority Administration Building 500 John F. Kennedy Boulevard East, As always, our annual Weehawken, NJ. members Christmas Assemble: 8:30 A.M. Party will be held in lieu Uniform or Business Attire of our regular monthly meeting in December. rations should be will have arrived and Merry Christmas and finalized, the dozens everyone will be anx- Happy New Year. and dozens of motor- ious and ready for cycles, police cars another amazing trip and busses should -continued on page 6- What could make for mium scotch tasting ta- them. A fantastic crowd a better evening? A per- ble, fresh hand rolled of nearly two hundred fectly beautiful night un- cigars, brick oven pizza, members, friends and der the stars with mild, music and great friends. family joined together at comfortable tempera- The IAPSNJ 25th Sil- the Calcada Restaurant tures. Gourmet food, ver Anniversary Celebra- in the New Jersey Per- fine wines, premium liq- tion not only met expec- forming Arts Center in uors, including a pre- tations but exceeded Newark on September Visit us at http://www.iapsnj.org Quarterly Newsletter October 2010 Fall Edition Page 2 Volume 1, Issue 8 William Schievella President Alan J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Call to Prosecute Drug Company Fraud As Organized Crime
    Working Paper – Draft Pending Publication (Do Not Distribute) A CALL TO PROSECUTE DRUG COMPANY FRAUD AS ORGANIZED CRIME EUGENE MCCARTHY* INTRODUCTION In 2011, Merck Pharmaceuticals admitted to illegally misbranding its prescription painkiller Vioxx.1 Researchers and executives concealed evidence that Vioxx caused an alarming number of heart attacks during clinical trials.2 Rather than disclose these results, Merck hired ghostwriters to draft deceptive journal articles touting Vioxx’s safety and efficacy.3 To lend credibility to these articles in the medical community, Merck paid doctors to add their names as article co-authors.4 Despite knowledge that patients taking Vioxx were six times more likely to have heart attacks than patients not taking the drug, Merck executives aggressively marketed Vioxx to the public.5 Company sales representatives persuaded doctors—via material false statements and illegal kickbacks—to prescribe the drug to patients.6 Merck made approximately $11 billion from Vioxx sales before voluntarily pulling the drug from the market.7 Regulators estimate that Vioxx killed more than 60,000 people.8 The government did not charge any Merck executives, employees, researchers, or doctors with a crime. Instead, a Merck subsidiary paid a * Eugene McCarthy is an Assistant Professor of Legal Studies in the University of Illinois system. J.D., UCLA; Ph.D., Berkeley. Thank you to Shara Murphy and Deborah Anthony for their invaluable commentary. 1 Department of Justice, Press Release, U.S. Pharmaceutical Company Merck Sharp & Dohme to Pay Nearly One Billion Dollars Over Promotion of Vioxx® (Nov. 22, 2011), https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/us-pharmaceutical-company-merck- sharp-dohme-pay-nearly-one-billion-dollars-over-promotion.
    [Show full text]