DOCSLIB.ORG

Canadian Election Analysis 2015: Communication, Strategy, and Democracy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ALEX MARLAND AND THIERRY GIASSON, EDS CANADIAN ELECTION ANALYSIS Communication, Strategy, and Democracy POINTS DE VUE SUR 2015 L’ÉLECTION CANADIENNE Communication, stratégie et démocratie About UBC Press The University of British Columbia Press is Canada’s leading social sciences publisher. With an international reputation for publishing high-quality works of original scholarship, our books draw on and reflect cutting-edge research, pushing the boundaries of academic discourse in innovative directions. Each year UBC Press publishes seventy new titles in a number of fields, including Aboriginal studies, Asian studies, Canadian history, environmental studies, gender and women’s studies, geography, health and food studies, law, media and communications, military and security studies, planning and urban studies, and political science. UBC Press | thought that counts About Samara Samara Canada is dedicated to reconnecting citizens to politics. Established as a charity in 2009, Samara has become Canada’s most trusted, non-partisan champion of increased civic engagement and a more positive public life. Samara’s research and educational programming shines new light on Canada’s democratic system and encourages greater political participation across the country to build better politics and a better Canada for everyone. About the Editors Alex Marland is an associate professor of political science and associate dean of arts at Memorial University of Newfoundland. His area of research concerns the use of communication and marketing in Canadian politics, government, and public policy. Alex is the author of Brand Command: Canadian Politics and Democracy in the Age of Message Control, to be published by UBC Press in early 2016. Thierry Giasson is an associate professor of political science at Université Laval, in Québec City. Thierry is the director of the Groupe de recherche en communication politique (GRCP). He is also the current president of the Société québécoise de science politique. His research focuses on political communication, online politique, as well as the effects political marketing practices on political participation and civic engagement. He is co-editor with Alex Marland of the series Communication, Strategy and Politics at UBC Press. Want to Read More? Communication, Strategy, and Politics is a ground-breaking series from UBC Press that examines elite decision making and political communication in today’s hyper-mediated and highly competitive environment. Publications in this series look at the intricate relations between marketing strategy, the media, and political actors and explain how this affects Canadian democracy. They also investigate such interconnected themes as strategic communication, mediatization, opinion research, electioneering, political management, public policy, and e-politics in a Canadian context and in comparison to other countries. Designed as a coherent and consolidated space for diffusion of research about Canadian political communication, the series promotes an interdisciplinary, multi-method, and theoretically pluralistic approach. Series editors: Thierry Giasson and Alex Marland To cite an article for Canadian Election Analysis 2015, please use the following wording: <author name>. 2015. <article title>, in Canadian Election Analysis 2015: Communication, Strategy, and Democracy. Accessed from http://www.ubcpress.ca/CanadianElectionAnalysis2015. CONTENTS ELECTION 2015: REFLECTIONS ON THIS PROJECT AND ON THE CAMPAIGN 1 | Editors’ Remarks: Recapping The 2015 Canadian Election 1 Anna Esselment, Thierry Giasson, Andrea Lawlor, Alex Marland, and Tamara A. Small 4 | Election 2015: Overview Chris Waddell, Carleton University 6 | Election 42: What Happened? Warren Kinsella, Daisy Group 8 | The End of the Harper Dynasty Lawrence LeDuc, University of Toronto THE RULES, REGULATIONS, AND REGIME OF THE CAMPAIGN 10 | Democratic Reform: From Campaign Promise to Policy Change 2 Maxwell A. Cameron, University of British Columbia 12 | Partisans and Elections: Electoral Reform is for Parliament to Address Robert P. Shepherd, Carleton University 14 | Data-Driven Microtargeting in the 2015 General Election Steve Patten, University of Alberta 16 | Political Parties, Campaigns, Data, and Privacy Paul G. Thomas, University of Manitoba 18 | The Permanent Campaign Meets the 78-Day Campaign, and Falls Apart Mark Burgess, The Hill Times 20 | The Long March to the Ballot Box 2015: Voter Fatigue or Enhanced Engagement? Fred Fletcher, York University THE PLAYERS AND THEIR STRATEGIES 3 3.1 POLITICAL PARTIES 22 | The 2015 Election and the Canadian Party System Richard Johnston, University of British Columbia CONTENTS 24 | La campagne du Bloc québécois : Quand on n’a rien à perdre… Thierry Giasson, Université Laval 26 | The Conservative Campaign Tom Flanagan, University of Calgary 28 | Greens by the Numbers Susan Harada, Carleton University 30 | The Liberals’ Campaign for the Ages Brooke Jeffrey, Concordia University 32 | The NDP’s “Government in Waiting” Strategy David McGrane, St. Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan 3.2 LEADERS, MINISTERS, AND THEIR STAFF 34 | Leading the Party Troops on a Long Campaign: How the Party Leaders Managed the Message Cristine de Clercy, Western University 36 | Political Staff R. Paul Wilson, Carleton University 38 | The Presidentialization of Executive Leadership in Canada Jamie Gillies, St. Thomas University 40 | Ministerial (dis)Advantage in the 2015 Canadian Federal Election Matthew Kerby, Australian National University 3.3 CANDIDATES AND LOCAL CAMPAIGNS 42 | Constituency Campaigning in the 2015 Federal Election Royce Koop, University of Manitoba 44 | All Politics Is Not Local: Local Candidate Tweeting in the 2015 Election Julie Killin, University of Calgary, and Tamara A. Small, University of Guelph 46 | Gender and Election 2015: Continuity with No Real Change Melanee Thomas, University of Calgary 48 | LGBT Activism in the 2015 Federal Election Joanna Everitt, University of New Brunswick—Saint John CONTENTS 50 | Visible Minority and Indigenous Members of Parliament Erin Tolley, University of Toronto 3.4. THIRD PARTIES AND ORGANIZED INTERESTS 52 | Third Parties in the 2015 Federal Election: Partying like It’s 1988? Andrea Lawlor, King’s University College, Western University, and Erin Crandall, Acadia University 54 | Organized Interests Strike Back! Rachel Laforest, Queen’s University 56 | Les syndicats en campagne contre Harper Thomas Collombat, Université du Québec en Outaouais 58 | Public Servants, Political Activity, and “Harperman” Jonathan Craft, University of Toronto 60 | All About Strong Alliances: First Nations Engagement in the Federal Election Pamela Palmater, Ryerson University 62 | Struggles and Opportunities for Issues Advocacy: The Case of the Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions Georgina Grosenick, Carleton University THE MEDIA AND POLITICAL COMMUNICATION 64 | Mobile News: The 2015 Election via News Apps 4 Mary Francoli, Carleton University 66 | Thinking Outside the Box: TV News Broadcasting during the 2015 General Election Jennifer Ditchburn, The Canadian Press 68 | Leaders’ Debates in a Post-Broadcast Democracy Frédérick Bastien, Université de Montréal 70 | The “New Normal” of Mediatization and Narrowcasting Shannon Sampert, Winnipeg Free Press, and Linda Trimble, University of Alberta 72 | Shopping for Votes: A Sequel? Susan Delacourt, The Toronto Star CONTENTS 74 | Letting the Press Decide? Party Coverage, Media Tone, and Issue Salience in the 2015 Canadian Federal Election Newsprint Denver McNeney, McGill University 76 | The Political Science Professor and the Media Anna Esselment, University of Waterloo 78 | The Party Leader’s Image and Brand Management: Party Branding and Negative Ads in the 2015 Canadian Federal Election Jeff MacLeod, Mount Saint Vincent University 80 | Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail: Political Advertising in the 2015 Election Jonathan Rose, Queen’s University 82 | Trudeau as Celebrity Politician: Winning by More than a Hair Patricia Cormack, St. Francis Xavier University, and Mireille Lalancette, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières 84 | The Blog Is Dead, Long Live the (Micro)Blog! Unpacking Dynamics in Political Blogging during #elxn42 Vincent Raynauld, Emerson College THE CAMPAIGN (NON)ISSUES 86 | Did Election 2015 Prove Kim Campbell Wrong? 5 Jennifer Robson, Carleton University 88 | Missing in Action: Disability Policy and Persons with Disabilities Mario Levesque, Mount Allison University 90 | The Syrian Refugee Crisis and the Salience of International Issues Sean Fleming, University of Cambridge 92 | We’ve Got Some Catching Up to Do: The Public Service and the 2015 Federal Election Amanda Clarke, Carleton University 94 | Constitutional Issues in the 2015 Federal Election Thomas M.J. Bateman, St. Thomas University, and Andrea Lawlor, King’s University College, Western University 96 | Election 2015 and Canada’s Public Services Bryan Evans, Ryerson University CONTENTS THE PROVINCES AND REGIONALISM 98 | Regional Sensibilities and Regional Voting 6 Nelson Wiseman, University of Toronto 100 | Le NPD au Québec : doublé sur sa gauche Eric Montigny et François Gélineau, Université Laval 102 | Provincial Premiers and the 2015 Federal Election Campaign J.P. Lewis, University of New Brunswick 104 | All Politics is Local: The Campaign to Put Urban Issues on the Election Agenda Angelia Wagner, McGill University PUBLIC OPINION POLLS AND VOTER BEHAVIOUR 106 | Horserace Journalism under Stress? 7 J. Scott Matthews, Memorial University 108
Recommended publications
  • Dealing with Crisis

    Dealing with Crisis

    Briefing on the New Parliament December 12, 2019 CONFIDENTIAL – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Regional Seat 8 6 ON largely Flip from NDP to Distribution static 33 36 Bloc Liberals pushed out 10 32 Minor changes in Battleground B.C. 16 Liberals lose the Maritimes Goodale 1 12 1 1 2 80 10 1 1 79 1 14 11 3 1 5 4 10 17 40 35 29 33 32 15 21 26 17 11 4 8 4 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 BC AB MB/SK ON QC AC Other 2 Seats in the House Other *As of December 5, 2019 3 Challenges & opportunities of minority government 4 Minority Parliament In a minority government, Trudeau and the Liberals face a unique set of challenges • Stable, for now • Campaign driven by consumer issues continues 5 Minority Parliament • Volatile and highly partisan • Scaled back agenda • The budget is key • Regulation instead of legislation • Advocacy more complicated • House committee wild cards • “Weaponized” Private Members’ Bills (PMBs) 6 Kitchen Table Issues and Other Priorities • Taxes • Affordability • Cost of Living • Healthcare Costs • Deficits • Climate Change • Indigenous Issues • Gender Equality 7 National Unity Prairies and the West Québéc 8 Federal Fiscal Outlook • Parliamentary Budget Officer’s most recent forecast has downgraded predicted growth for the economy • The Liberal platform costing projected adding $31.5 billion in new debt over the next four years 9 The Conservatives • Campaigned on cutting regulatory burden, review of “corporate welfare” • Mr. Scheer called a special caucus meeting on December 12 where he announced he was stepping
  • The Political Culture of Canada

    The Political Culture of Canada

    CHAPTER 2 The Political Culture of Canada LEARNING OBJECTIVES By the end of this chapter you should be able to • Define the terms political culture, ideology, and cleavages. • Describe the main principles of each of the major ideologies in Canada. • Describe the ideological orientation of the main political parties in Canada. • Describe the major cleavages in Canadian politics. Introduction Canadian politics, like politics in other societies, is a public conflict over different conceptions of the good life. Canadians agree on some important matters (e.g., Canadians are overwhelmingly committed to the rule of law, democracy, equality, individual rights, and respect for minorities) and disagree on others. That Canadians share certain values represents a substantial consensus about how the political system should work. While Canadians generally agree on the rules of the game, they dis- agree—sometimes very strongly—on what laws and policies the government should adopt. Should governments spend more or less? Should taxes be lower or higher? Should governments build more prisons or more hospitals? Should we build more pipelines or fight climate change? Fortunately for students of politics, different conceptions of the good life are not random. The different views on what laws and policies are appropriate to realize the ideologies Specific bundles of good life coalesce into a few distinct groupings of ideas known as ideologies. These ideas about politics and the good ideologies have names that are familiar to you, such as liberalism, conservatism, and life, such as liberalism, conserva- (democratic) socialism, which are the principal ideologies in Canadian politics. More tism, and socialism. Ideologies radical ideologies, such as Marxism, communism, and fascism, are at best only mar- help people explain political ginally present in Canada.
  • The Annotated Accessible Canada Act - Complete Text

    The Annotated Accessible Canada Act - Complete Text

    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Law Publications Faculty of Law 5-13-2021 The Annotated Accessible Canada Act - Complete Text Laverne Jacobs University of Windsor, Faculty of Law Martin Anderson Rachel Rohr Tom Perry Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/lawpub Part of the Disability Law Commons Recommended Citation Jacobs, Laverne; Anderson, Martin; Rohr, Rachel; and Perry, Tom. (2021). The Annotated Accessible Canada Act - Complete Text. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/lawpub/126 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty of Law at Scholarship at UWindsor. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship at UWindsor. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Annotated Accessible Canada Act 2020 1 The Annotated Accessible Canada Act 2020 The Annotated Accessible Canada Act (S.C. 2019, c. 10) Laverne Jacobs, Martin Anderson, Rachel Rohr and Tom Perry The Law Disability & Social Change Project https://lawdisabilitysocialchange.com/ This document is available in MS Word via the Law, Disability & Social Change website. 2 The Annotated Accessible Canada Act 2020 The Law, Disability & Social Change Project The Law, Disability & Social Change (LDSC) Project team conducts research into current legal and policy issues to help empower people with disabilities to fully achieve their rights and, more generally, to foster and develop inclusive communities. The Project aims to further the motto “nothing about us without us”. The LDSC Project team undertakes a variety of projects that feed grounded research and theory into policy development and legal decision-making.
  • Feminine Style in the Pursuit of Political Power

    Feminine Style in the Pursuit of Political Power

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Talk “Like a Man”: Feminine Style in the Pursuit of Political Power DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Political Science by Jennifer J. Jones Dissertation Committee: Professor Kristen Monroe, Chair Professor Marty Wattenberg Professor Michael Tesler 2017 Chapter 4 c 2016 American Political Science Association and Cambridge University Press. Reprinted with permission. All other materials c 2017 Jennifer J. Jones TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii CURRICULUM VITAE viii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION xi 1 Introduction 1 2 Theoretical Framework and Literature Review 5 2.1 Social Identity and Its Effect on Social Cognition . 6 2.1.1 Stereotypes and Expectations . 9 2.1.2 Conceptualizing Gender in US Politics . 13 2.2 Gender and Self-Presentation in US Politics . 16 2.2.1 Masculine Norms of Interaction in Institutional Settings . 16 2.2.2 Political Stereotypes and Leadership Prototypes . 18 2.3 The Impact of Political Communication in Electoral Politics . 22 2.4 Do Women Have to Talk Like Men to Be Considered Viable Leaders? . 27 3 Methods: Words are Data 29 3.1 Approaches to Studying Language . 30 3.2 Analyzing Linguistic Style . 34 3.2.1 Gendered Communication and the Feminine/Masculine Ratio . 37 3.2.2 Comparison with Other Coding Schemes . 39 3.3 Approaches to Studying Social Perception and Attitudes . 40 3.3.1 The Link Between Linguistic Style and Implicit Associations . 42 4 The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013 45 4.1 The Case of Hillary Clinton .
  • Fall Cover 2003A

    Fall Cover 2003A

    Home Economics A Century of Scholarship Frames the Future Washington State 1903– University 2003 HOME ECONOMICS CELEBRATES 100 YEARS! pages 16–23 COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE & HOME ECONOMICS ALUMNI & FRIENDS C ONNECTIONS — F alL 2003 Meet Bob Scholes DATES TO REMEMBER August 30 Idaho vs. WSU—Seahawks obert Scholes began duties as as my prior Stadium interim Development Coordinator jobs.” R September for the College of Agriculture and While 6 Notre Dame vs. WSU in Home Economics on March 3. He Scholes South Bend, IN will oversee the college’s annual giving may be 13 Colorado vs. WSU— program, including Call-A-Coug tele- new to Colorado marketing and direct mail fundraising. the job, 20 New Mexico vs. WSU— He will also be responsible for Presi- he knows Pullman dents Associates (gifts of $1000 and exactly 20 Second Annual Alumni more) as well as alumni relations and how chal- Weekend—Agricultural production of the college’s magazine lenging and Resource Economics Connections. fundraising 25–27 WSU Home Economics Bob, who has a Bachelor of Science can be. He Robert Scholes Centennial Celebration degree from Washington State Univer- participated 27 Oregon vs. WSU—Oregon sity in physical science, is continuing in the Trans-America Bicycle Trek to October his education by pursuing a second help benefit the American Lung Asso- 4 Arizona vs. WSU— degree in civil engineering. ciation. To participate in the trek each Homecoming, Pullman Prior to joining the College of Agri- rider was required to raise a minimum 18 Stanford vs. WSU— culture and Home Economics Alumni of $5000.
  • Read the Fall 2015 CUPE

    Read the Fall 2015 CUPE

    NEW EXECUTIVE | LIBRARY SAFETY | FIGHTING BLINDNESS | PARAMEDICS WIN GOLD PUBLIC FALL 2015 EMPLOYEE OUR TIME HAS COME TOGETHER, WE CAN HELP ELECT CANADA’S FIRST NDP GOVERNMENT LEADINGUS MARK HANCOCK, PRESIDENT “Getting more people to exercise their right to vote is the first step to defeating the Conservatives and electing a truly progressive, NDP government for the first time in Canadian history." Voter turnout will make the difference OCTOBER 19: YOUR DATE WITH A BALLOT BOX — AND HISTORY I’m going to start this column with some math. Maybe not my strongest suit — anymore — but these numbers pretty much speak for themselves. 14 / 6,201 / 9.4 million / 1 OK, maybe these numbers need a little help speaking for ACTIVIST CHAMPION The right-wing government of themselves. Stephen Harper can be defeated if we all work together, 14: That’s how many seats Stephen Harper and the says retiring NDP MP Libby Davies (Vancouver East). Davies, seen here at Convention with Mark Hancock, Conservatives needed to gain in the 2011 election to win a received a standing ovation from delegates after a stirring majority government. video tribute to her decades of progressive activism. 6,201: That’s the total number of votes those 14 seats were won by. Of all the areas that Harper has cut, very few things make me 9.4 million: That’s the number of eligible Canadian voters who as angry as his treatment of our veterans. It’s one thing to send didn’t vote in 2011. our men and women in the armed forces off to war — whether we 1: That's how many elections we are from an NDP government.
  • Nanos Survey

    Nanos Survey

    Canadians interested in debates – see Mulcair as likely winner National survey released June 10th, 2015 Project 2015-678 NANOS SURVEY NANOS SURVEY Canadians interested in federal leaders’ > debate – place Mulcair as likely winner Canadians are interested in watching a federal leaders’ debate prior to the start of the official federal election campaign. Thomas Mulcair is the favorite to win the hypothetical debate. • Public’s interest in a federal leaders’ debate – When asked about their level of interest in a political debate taking place prior to the start of the election campaign, the majority of Canadians answered positively, with 47% interested and 24% somewhat interested in the possibility. • Likely winner of the debate – Of the current federal political party leaders, thirty-seven percent (37%) of Canadians believe Thomas Mulcair would be most likely to win a federal leaders’ debate, followed by Stephen Harper (26%), and Justin Trudeau (16%). Canadians believe Elizabeth May and Mario Beaulieu were least likely to win a federal leaders debate ( 5% and 0.3% respectively). NANOS SURVEY 2 Interest in Federal Leaders Debate Source: CTV News/Nanos Research, RDD dual frame hybrid telephone and online random survey, May 24th to 28th, 2015, n=1000, accurate 3.1 percentage points plus or minus, 19 times out of 20. Unsure Net Score Interested/ 1% Subgroups Somewhat interested +42.7 Not interested 20% Atlantic (n=100) 70.4% Quebec (n=250) 68.2% Ontario (n=300) 72.3% Somewhat not Prairies (n=200) 70.5% interested Interested British Columbia (n=150)
  • A Layman's Guide to the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict

    A Layman's Guide to the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict

    CJPME’s Vote 2019 Elections Guide « Vote 2019 » Guide électoral de CJPMO A Guide to Canadian Federal Parties’ Positions on the Middle East Guide sur la position des partis fédéraux canadiens à propos du Moyen-Orient Assembled by Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East Préparé par Canadiens pour la justice et la paix au Moyen-Orient September, 2019 / septembre 2019 © Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East Preface Préface Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East Canadiens pour la paix et la justice au Moyen-Orient (CJPME) is pleased to provide the present guide on (CJPMO) est heureuse de vous présenter ce guide Canadian Federal parties’ positions on the Middle électoral portant sur les positions adoptées par les East. While much has happened since the last partis fédéraux canadiens sur le Moyen-Orient. Canadian Federal elections in 2015, CJPME has Beaucoup d’eau a coulé sous les ponts depuis les élections fédérales de 2015, ce qui n’a pas empêché done its best to evaluate and qualify each party’s CJPMO d’établir 13 enjeux clés relativement au response to thirteen core Middle East issues. Moyen-Orient et d’évaluer les positions prônées par chacun des partis vis-à-vis de ceux-ci. CJPME is a grassroots, secular, non-partisan organization working to empower Canadians of all CJPMO est une organisation de terrain non-partisane backgrounds to promote justice, development and et séculière visant à donner aux Canadiens de tous peace in the Middle East. We provide this horizons les moyens de promouvoir la justice, le document so that you – a Canadian citizen or développement et la paix au Moyen-Orient.
  • Core 1..72 Committee (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25)

    Core 1..72 Committee (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25)

    Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs PROC Ï NUMBER 110 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 42nd PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Tuesday, June 5, 2018 Chair The Honourable Larry Bagnell 1 Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Tuesday, June 5, 2018 We've also started a new program that's all about news literacy and “mis-, dis-, and mal-information”, which relates a bit to what's in this Ï (1000) bill. That's something that I might bring up later. [English] It's a privilege to be here. I can't say that I object to much—or The Chair (Hon. Larry Bagnell (Yukon, Lib.)): Good morning, maybe anything—in the proposed bill. I'm really comfortable giving everyone. Welcome to the 110th meeting of the Standing Committee more time to Duff, who might have some more specific points. There on Procedure and House Affairs. Today we continue our study on are some things I can comment on around the preregistration, and Bill C-76, an act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other acts maybe a little bit around the foreign interference, with what we've and to make certain consequential amendments. learned over the last few months, and then on another couple of small points. We are pleased to be joined today by Taylor Gunn, president and chief election officer of CIVIX, and Duff Conacher, co-founder of Democracy Watch. I'm happy to give up my time to Duff or to end short so that you guys can have a break and plan for your next session.
  • New Federal Health Minister: Cabinet Shuffle Recap By: Grant Burns, Public Affairs and Communications Manager

    New Federal Health Minister: Cabinet Shuffle Recap By: Grant Burns, Public Affairs and Communications Manager

    Be in the Know with OBIO… New Federal Health Minister: Cabinet Shuffle Recap By: Grant Burns, Public Affairs and Communications Manager As part of a federal cabinet shuffle announced on Monday, August 28, Canada’s Minister of Health is now Ginette Petitpas Taylor, Member of Parliament from the riding of Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe in New Brunswick. In total, six MPs had their portfolios changed, addressing two issues for the federal government: 1. The Ministry of Indigenous & Northern Affairs was split in two: the previous Minister of Health, Jane Philpott, will now take over the new Ministry of Indigenous Services and Carolyn Bennett will remain responsible for the Ministry of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs. To replace Minister Philpott at Health, it is noteworthy that Ginette Petitpas Taylor was promoted from outside cabinet, where she had been serving as Parliamentary Secretary to Minster of Finance. 2. To fill the vacancy in the Ministry of Public Services & Procurement caused by Min Judy Foote stepping down last week, Carla Qualtrough was promoted from the Ministry of Sport & Persons with Disabilities. To replace her, Kent Hehr was moved out of the Ministry of Veterans Affairs and he was replaced by Seamus O’Regan, who had been the Associate Minister, National Defence. Name New Portfolio Previous Portfolio Notes Ginette Petitpas Taylor, MP Health Parliamentary Secretary, Finance Jane Philpott, MP Indigenous Services Health Carolyn Bennett, MP Crown-Indigenous Relations Indigenous Relations & Northern Affairs Carla Qualtrough, MP Public Services and Procurement Sport and Persons with Disabilities To replace Min Judy Foote who stepped down last week Seamus O'Regan, MP Veterans Affairs National Defence (Associate Minister) Kent Hehr, MP Sport and Persons with Disabilities Veterans Affairs Background Minister Petitpas Taylor has a bachelor’s degree in social work from the Université de Moncton and prior to her election, she was the coordinator for the Victim's Services Program of the local detachment of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
  • Fraser Watershed Initiative

    Fraser Watershed Initiative

    FEBRUARY 2019 SITELINESLandscape Architecture in British Columbia Fraser Watershed Initiative Fraser Watershed Restoration Conference 2019 I Reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples and Mother Earth I A Global Game Changer: What Restoration Means to Canada and the World I Restoring Terrestrial Habitat I Post-fire restoration and the need to address the risk from the next disturbance I The Heart of the Fraser I Protecting the Lower Fraser River I LACF Update 450–355 Burrard St. Vancouver, BC V6C 2G8 T 604.682.5610 TF 855.682.5610 (Canada and US) E [email protected] I [email protected] W www.bcsla.org I www.sitelines.org PRESIDENT Stephen Vincent PRESIDENT ELECT Yolanda Leung PAST PRESIDENT Scott Watson REGISTRAR Jacqueline Lowe TREASURER Wai-Sue Louie DIRECTORS Debra Barnes Teri Cantin Katherine Dunster Illarion Gallant Liane McKenna Jordan McAuley The Fraser Canyon, Photo: cmh2315fl, Flickr Donna Rodman CSLA Representative Katherine Dunster BC Interior Chapter Chair Teri Cantin Vancouver Island Chapter Chair Illarion Gallant DIRECTORS (non-voting) BCSLA Intern/Associate Representative TBA FRASER WATERSHED Initiative By Justine Nelson, Coordinator University of BC Representative Susan Herrington Fraser Watershed Initiative BCSLA Student Representative Alix Tier Executive Director, BCSLA (Hon.) Tara Culham The Fraser Watershed Initiative (FWI) is a multi-year effort Sitelines is published six times per year; February, April, June, August, October, and November to restore the Fraser River, its tributaries and the land, by the British Columbia Society of Landscape Architects and is mailed to all BCSLA members, wildlife and people in this vast area. registered landscape architects, associates and affiliates. The editorial deadline is the 8th and is the longest remaining free-flowing river on the Pacific Coast of advertising is the 16th day of the intervening The Fraser River months.
  • The Process of Electoral Reform in Canada: Democratic and Constitutional Constraints

    The Process of Electoral Reform in Canada: Democratic and Constitutional Constraints

    TSpace Research Repository tspace.library.utoronto.ca The Process of Electoral Reform in Canada: Democratic and Constitutional Constraints Yasmin Dawood Version Post-print/accepted manuscript Citation Dawood, Yasmin, The Process of Electoral Reform in Canada: (published version) Democratic and Constitutional Constraints (July 15, 2016). Supreme Court Law Review, Forthcoming. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2831198 Publisher’s Statement Dawood, Yasmin, The Process of Electoral Reform in Canada: Democratic and Constitutional Constraints (July 15, 2016). Supreme Court Law Review, Forthcoming. Copyright © [2016]. Reprinted by permission of the Supreme Court Law Review. How to cite TSpace items Always cite the published version, so the author(s) will receive recognition through services that track citation counts, e.g. Scopus. If you need to cite the page number of the author manuscript from TSpace because you cannot access the published version, then cite the TSpace version in addition to the published version using the permanent URI (handle) found on the record page. This article was made openly accessible by U of T Faculty. Please tell us how this access benefits you. Your story matters. THE PROCESS OF ELECTORAL REFORM IN CANADA: DEMOCRATIC AND CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS Yasmin Dawood* Supreme Court Law Review (forthcoming 2016) ABSTRACT This Article considers the process by which electoral reform ought to take place, focusing in particular on the democratic and constitutional constraints that bear on electoral reform. It outlines a number of possible process options—including a citizens’ assembly, a commission, a referendum, and a parliamentary committee—and it argues that although no single mechanism is mandated, the process must visibly follow the norms of political neutrality, consultation, and deliberation in order for the proposed reform to be democratically legitimate.