The Work of Yorkshire Forward

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Work of Yorkshire Forward House of Commons Yorkshire and the Humber Regional Committee The Work of Yorkshire Forward First Report of Session 2009–10 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 4 March 2010 HC 75 [incorporating HC 1034–i–ii, Session 2008–09] Published on 16 March 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Yorkshire and the Humber Regional Committee The Yorkshire and the Humber Regional Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine regional strategies and the work of regional bodies. Current membership Mr Eric Illsley MP (Labour, Barnsley Central) (Chairman) Mr Clive Betts MP (Labour, Sheffield, Attercliffe) Mr Ian Cawsey MP (Labour, Brigg & Goole) Shona McIsaac MP (Labour, Cleethorpes) Austin Mitchell MP (Labour, Great Grimsby) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/yorkshire.cfm. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Dr Sarah Thatcher (Clerk), Ian Thomson (Inquiry Manager), Rebecca Bentall-Lynch (NAO Adviser), Emma Sawyer (Senior Committee Assistant), Ian Blair (Committee Assistant) and Anna Browning (Committee Assistant). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Yorkshire and Humber Regional Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 0654; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] The Work of Yorkshire Forward 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 Background to the Committee 5 Our Inquiry 5 2 Role of Yorkshire Forward 7 The region 7 Role of Yorkshire Forward 7 Additional responsibilities 10 3 Regional Economic Strategy 13 Partnership Working 14 4 Sub-National Review 16 Single Regional Strategy 17 New ways of working 18 5 Targets and Performance 20 6 Yorkshire Forward’s Budget 23 Regional Development Agency Budgets 23 Budget Decreases 24 Devolution of Budgets 26 7 Current Economic Climate 28 Role of the Regional Minister 31 Emerging from the downturn 33 Skills and Innovation 35 Skills Strategies 36 Train to Gain 36 Restructuring of skills delivery 39 Innovation 39 8 Yorkshire Forward’s Board and Accountability 42 Regional Development Agencies’ Boards 42 Accountability 45 9 The Future 47 Conclusions and recommendations 49 2 The work of Yorkshire Forward Formal Minutes 53 Witnesses 54 List of written evidence 55 The Work of Yorkshire Forward 3 Summary Our inquiry has focused on the work of Yorkshire Forward, its use of resources (forecast to be around £360 million in 2009–10) and how the regional strategies it has developed benefit the region’s population of over 5 million, especially in the current economic climate. Yorkshire Forward was created in 1999 to “drive and co-ordinate economic development and regeneration and to improve the region’s relative competitiveness and reduce imbalances within and between regions.” During our inquiry we heard concerns that the role of Yorkshire Forward may not be widely understood by the general public. While recognising the efforts Yorkshire Forward has made to increase awareness and understanding of its role, we have found that there remains a poor level of understanding of its work, particularly in terms of benefits and achievements, among the general public. It is important that Yorkshire Forward continues to work to develop this understanding and for the public to have an input into its work. Yorkshire Forward has led the development of three Regional Economic Strategies (RESs). The most recent, published in July 2006, sets out a vision for the region to be a “great place to live, work and do business that fully benefits from a prosperous and sustainable economy.” Although it is developed by Yorkshire Forward, it is important that the RES is owned by the region and we commend Yorkshire Forward on the consultative and collaborative approach it took when developing the current RES. It is important that full account is taken of the region’s diversity in terms of population, economy, geography and towns and cities in the development of regional strategies. Yorkshire Forward will need to ensure that this is reflected in the new Integrated Regional Strategy, but this should not mean that sub-regional concerns are put ahead of a balanced approach to the interests of the region as a whole. The move to an Integrated Regional Strategy, as envisioned by the Sub-National Review, will mean new ways of working for Yorkshire Forward, local authorities and other regional stakeholders. We congratulate Local Government Yorkshire and Humber and Yorkshire Forward for the way they have anticipated this by establishing a Joint Regional Board and four Thematic Boards. However, it is important that Yorkshire Forward’s new responsibilities in respect of transport, housing and planning do not detract Yorkshire Forward from its original core economic focus. Its role in coordinating the development of an Integrated Regional Strategy should enhance rather than detract from this core role. We are concerned about the impact of budget cuts and a reduction in funding on the work of Yorkshire Forward in the region. Yorkshire Forward has incurred a 23.9% reduction in total financial resources for 2010–11 and we recommend that its budget is not decreased further. We welcome the conclusions of the National Audit Office and Pricewaterhouse Coopers reports which positively endorse the work of Yorkshire Forward and its benefits for the regional economy. We are not convinced that the case has, so far, been made for the further devolution of funding from Regional Development Agencies to individual local authorities. We support 4 The Work of Yorkshire Forward the call for Yorkshire Forward and local authorities to work together more collaboratively and flexibly. However, we think it appropriate that there should be an assessment of the Leeds City Region pilot to establish the effectiveness of devolving further funding and powers to sub-regional level, but this should not be to the detriment of smaller local authorities in the region. We commend the Government Office for Yorkshire and the Humber, Yorkshire Forward and regional stakeholders for their proactive and collaborative response to the economic downturn. The creation of the Economic Delivery Group was a useful tool in the region’s response and was helpful in avoiding duplication of effort between stakeholders. We also praise Yorkshire Forward for revising its Corporate Plan to prioritise battling the economic downturn. However, it is important that short-term actions do not impede the long-term prospects of the region. We recommend that Yorkshire Forward continually reassesses its spending priorities, given the current economic climate, and make changes accordingly in consultation with the Government Office and other regional partners. The Government, for its part, must ensure that Regional Development Agencies have sufficient resources to carry out their remit. We are particularly concerned that counter-recessionary spending should be funded by Government and should not be at the expense of existing projects, otherwise this may damage the prospects of the region’s recovery from recession. Looking to the future, it is important that the Government continually considers the next steps for RDAs in terms of ways of working (such as city regions and collaboration between RDAs) and whether one regional model is appropriate for all regions. However, we agree with regional stakeholders that Yorkshire Forward has been beneficial to the region and that it is important to retain its regional outlook, especially on economic and business issues. The Work of Yorkshire Forward 5 1 Introduction Background to the Committee 1. The Government proposed the establishment of Regional Committees in its Green Paper, The Governance of Britain, in July 2007.1 Following its publication, the House of Commons Modernisation Committee undertook an inquiry into regional accountability. The Committee concluded that there was “clear evidence of an accountability gap at regional level”, and that although Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) and other bodies were accountable to Ministers, “many of their activities in the regions were not subject to regular, robust scrutiny”. To resolve this accountability gap, the Committee proposed the establishment of a “system of regional grand and select committees […] There should be one grand and one select committee for each of the administrative regions in England.”2 2. The House of Commons agreed to the establishment of eight regional select committees in November 2008.3 Our remit is to “examine regional strategies and the work of regional bodies” in Yorkshire and the Humber.4 Our membership was appointed on 3 March 2009. Only Labour members were appointed to the Committee, as other political parties have declined to participate in regional select committees. However, we have attempted to carry out our work in a non-partisan manner. Our Inquiry 3. We decided that our first inquiry should focus on the “work of Yorkshire Forward”, the Regional Development Agency for Yorkshire and the
Recommended publications
  • Yorkshire Forward: Annual Report and Accounts 2010/11
    Y Yorkshire Forward: Annual Report and Accounts 2010/11 HC 1386 £20.50 Yorkshire Forward Annual Report and Accounts 2010/11 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Sections 15 (2) and 17 (3) of the Regional Development Agencies Act 1998. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 18 July 2011 HC 1386 London: The Stationery Office £20.50 © Yorkshire Forward Copyright (2011) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and Agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context The material must be acknowledged as Yorkshire Forward copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. This publication is also for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk ISBN: 9780102972214 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID: 2432218 07/11 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Contents of Annual Report 1. Introduction from our Chair 2. Introduction from our Chief Executive 3. Management commentary 3.1 Delivery – April to August 2010 3.1.1 Economic and Integrated Strategy 3.1.2 Our corporate objectives 3.1.3 Case studies by policy product range 3.2 Closure and Transition – September 2010 to March 2011 3.2.1 The Context 3.2.2 Governance of the closure and transition process 3.2.3 The Workstreams 3.2.4 Workforce Modelling
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Innovation Monitor Plus 2016
    30 May 2016 Regional Innovation Monitor Plus 2016 Regional Innovation Report Yorkshire and the Humber (Advanced Materials) To the European Commission Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Directorate-General Directorate F – Innovation and Advanced Manufacturing www.technopolis-group.com Regional Innovation Monitor Plus 2016 Regional Innovation Report Yorkshire and the Humber (Advanced Materials) technopolis |group| in cooperation with Dr Peter Kolarz, Technopolis Group Xavier Potau, Technopolis Group Martin Wain, Technopolis Group Dr Anoushka Davé, Technopolis Group Table of Contents Executive Summary 2! 1. Advanced Manufacturing: Advanced Materials 6! 1.1 Overview of performance and trends 6! 1.2 Business sector perspective 8! 1.3 Scientific research potential 10! 1.4 Role of intermediary institutions 13! 1.5 Developing skills for the future 13! 1.6 Major investment projects 15! 1.7 International cooperation 16! 1.8 Policy support and delivery mechanisms 18! 1.9 Good practice case - Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre (AMRC) 18! 1.10 Leveraging the existing potential 22! 2. Regional Innovation Performance Trends, Governance and Instruments 25! 2.1 Recent trends in innovation performance and identified challenges 25! 2.2 Institutional framework and set-up 27! 2.3 Regional innovation policy mix 31! 2.4 Appraisal of regional innovation policies 37! 2.5 Policy good practice 39! 2.6 Possible future orientations and opportunities 41! Appendix A Bibliography 44! Appendix B Stakeholders consulted 45! Appendix C Economic indicators for the region 46! Table of Figures Figure 1 Percentage of 25-64 year olds with tertiary qualifications .............................. 25! Figure 2 Total R&D personnel and researchers (Percentage of active population) ....
    [Show full text]
  • Support to Businesses from Regional Development Agencies
    House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee Support to Businesses from Regional Development Agencies Fifth Report of Session 2003–04 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 11 May 2004 HC 118 Published on 9 June 2004 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £23.00 The Trade and Industry Committee The Trade and Industry Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Trade and Industry. Current membership Mr Martin O’Neill MP (Labour, Ochil) (Chairman) Mr Roger Berry MP (Labour, Kingswood) Richard Burden MP (Labour, Birmingham Northfield) Mr Michael Clapham MP (Labour, Barnsley West and Penistone) Mr Jonathan Djanogly MP (Conservative, Huntingdon) Mr Nigel Evans MP (Conservative, Ribble Valley) Mr Lindsay Hoyle MP (Labour, Chorley) Mr Andrew Lansley MP (Conservative, Cambridgeshire South) Judy Mallaber MP (Labour, Amber Valley) Linda Perham MP (Labour, Ilford North) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/trade_and_industry.cfm. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Elizabeth Flood (Clerk), David Lees (Second Clerk), Philip Larkin (Committee Specialist), Grahame Allen (Inquiry Manager), Clare Genis (Committee Assistant) and Sandra Thomas (Secretary).
    [Show full text]
  • Cemoccasional Paper Series
    CEM OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES THE FUTURE OF RDAs An information paper by Gethin Edwards - The College of Estate Management IP 3/10 June 2010 THE FUTURE OF RDAs An information paper by Gethin Edwards - The College of Estate Management Introduction The future of England’s Regional Development Based on the analysis of a questionnaire sent Agencies (RDAs) was a hot topic of debate in the to approximately 2,000 of the College of Estate year leading up to the 2010 general election. In Management’s (CEM) current and former students, 1999 and 2000, nine RDAs were set up by the this paper presents the property sector’s view then Labour government, charged with driving on the future of regional governance in England. economic development in their regions. In 2009, The next section provides a background to the the PricewaterhouseCoopers evaluation of the establishment and responsibilities of RDAs, and organisations reported that every £1 that they charts the political debate surrounding their future had spent had added £4.50 to regional gross in the lead-up to, and since, the May 2010 general value added. Several business groups have also election. Section 3 then summarises the results recently expressed their support for the agencies. of the CEM Research questionnaire, identifying a However, in the lead up to the election, the Labour strong preference for an assessment of RDAs on a party remained the only major party committed to region-by-region basis. the RDAs’ continued existence. Both the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives proposed to at least consider the option of abolishing some, if not all, RDAs, on grounds of local democratic accountability and potential financial savings; and since being elected to government have stated their intention to replace many, if not all, RDAs 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Forward Annual Report and Accounts 2011/12 HC 319, Session
    sa5Y Yorkshire Forward: Annual Report and Accounts 2011/12 HC 319 £21.25 Yorkshire Forward Annual Report and Accounts 2011/12 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Sections 15 (2) and 17 (3) of Part 1, of the Regional Development Agencies Act 1998. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 27 June 2012 HC 319 London: The Stationery Office £21.25 © Yorkshire Forward Copyright (2012) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and Agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Yorkshire Forward copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any queries regarding this publication should be sent to the Department for Business Innovation & Skills, Enquiry Unit, 1 Victoria Street, SW1H 0ET. This publication is also for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk and also available on BIS web site at www.bis.gov.uk/ ISBN: 9780102976342 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID:2484183 06/12 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Contents of Annual Report 1. Introduction from our Chair 2. Introduction from our Chief Executive 3. Management commentary 3.1 Closure and Transition Progress 3.2 Corporate Information 3.2.1 Yorkshire Forward’s Board Contents of Annual Accounts - Business Activities and Performance - Directors’ Report - Remuneration Report - Governance Statement - Certificate and Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of Parliament and Yorkshire Forward - Financial Statements and Notes to the accounts - Annex A – Chair’s and Board member’s register of interest 1 1 Introduction from our Chair I have now completed my first full year as Chair of Yorkshire Forward, during which time the organisation has been fully focussed on its closure.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Yorkshire Forward and Proposals for Local Enterprise Partnerships
    Economic and City Development Overview 28 th September 2010 and Scrutiny Committee Report of the Director of City Strategy Future of Yorkshire Forward and Proposals for Local Enterprise Partnerships Summary This report appraises the Overview and Scrutiny Committee of the likely future of Regional Development Agencies and proposals involving the City of York to establish Local Enterprise Partnerships. INTRODUCTION 1. This paper brings the Overview and Scrutiny Committee up to date with progress on Local Enterprise Partnerships and also the proposed Regional Growth Fund. Members will already be aware of the intention of the Coalition Government to wind up the Regional Development Agencies. It explains the decision for York to join both a Leeds City Region and a York/ North Yorkshire outline bids for Local Enterprise Partnership status. It seeks comments and views on how York should position itself within the emerging Partnerships and how the Regional Growth Fund could best benefit York. YORKSHIRE FORWARD 2. The attached note sets out background information on the investment by Yorkshire Forward in York in recent years. In the current year, Yorkshire Forward has been asked to find cuts in expenditure totalling some £45 million across the region. The outcome of the proposals for York is as follows: • Key Account Management – a proposal for the City of York Council working with other local authorities in North Yorkshire, taking this activity over from york-england.com, was at an advanced stage of negotiation. This has now been included in the programme of cutbacks. • York Central – cut of £40k in the current year, as part of a forecast budget of £125,000 for York Central in 2010/11.
    [Show full text]
  • (OSP50) Regional Development Agencies 1999-2012
    Operation Selection Policy OSP 50 Records of the Regional Development Agencies 1999 - 2012 © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence or email [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information, you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available for download at nationalarchives.gov.uk. OSP 50 Records of the Regional Development Agencies 1999 - 2012 Document Authority The National Archives Acquisition and Disposition policy statements published in 2000 (revised and updated in 2007 as the Acquisition and Disposition Strategy) announced the intention of developing, in consultation with departments, operational selection policies (OSPs) across government. These policies would apply the collection themes described in the policy to the records of individual departments and agencies. OSPs are intended to be working tools for those involved in the selection of public records. Therefore this policy may be reviewed and revised in the light of comments received from the users of records or from archive professionals, the department’s experience of using the policy, or as a result of newly discovered information. This policy is a presentation version of an Appraisal Report. Appraisal Reports have been developed to implement The National Archives’ Appraisal Policy published in August 2004. They are designed to provide structured information about the responsibilities, work and records of an organisation so that appraisers can identify records of potential historical value.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Development Agencies and Physical Regeneration: Can Rdas Actually Deliver the Urban Renaissance?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Northumbria Research Link Regional Development Agencies and Physical Regeneration: Can RDAs Actually Deliver The Urban Renaissance? PAUL GREENHALGH AND KEITH SHAW Introduction The ‘urban renaissance’, as espoused by the Urban Task Force, seeks to encourage people to move back into towns and cities by creating the quality of life and vitality that will make living in urban areas desirable once more. To counter the pervasive culture of anti-urbanism and the legacy of decades of sub-urbanisation and car-based planning, the Task Force’s report, Towards An Urban Renaissance (DETR, 1998), sets out a blueprint for the development of cities as places where people want to live. To bring people back from the suburbs and to breath life into decaying inner cities, the report sets out a vision for the ‘sustainable regeneration of our towns and cities through making them compact, multi-centered, live/work, socially-mixed, well designed, connected and environmentally sustainable. It puts on the agenda the need to upgrade the existing urban fabric, and to use the derelict and brownfield land in our cities before encroaching on the countryside’ (Rogers, 2002) Crucial to this new vision – and arguably the greatest challenge – is the need to create an urban environment in which the new city dwellers can live, work and play. Paul Greenhalgh, School of the Built Environment, and Keith Shaw, Sustainable Cities Research Institute, Northumbria University, Newcastle NE 1 8ST. Email: [email protected]; [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Forward Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10 HC
    Yorkshire Forward Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10 HC 139 £27.25 Yorkshire Forward Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Sections 15 (2) and 17 (3) of the Regional Development Agencies Act 1998. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 19 July 2010 HC 139 London: The Stationery Office £27.25 © Yorkshire Forward Copyright (2010) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Yorkshire Forward copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. ISBN: 9780102967524 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID: 2375358 07/10 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Contents 1. Introduction from our Chair 2. Introduction from our Chief Executive 3. Management commentary 3.1 How we work 3.1.1 A new economic strategy for Yorkshire & Humber 3.1.2 Our corporate objectives 3.1.3 Our policy product ranges 3.1.4 Our geographic programmes 3.1.5 Our cross-cutting themes 3.1.6 Our core values 3.1.7 Managing the Yorkshire & Humber Competitive and Employment Programme 2007-13 (ERDF) 3.2 The Recession and the Yorkshire and Humber region 3.2.1 The recession 3.2.2 Our response to the recession
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Supplementary Review of Regional Development Agencies
    June 2010 Independent Supplementary Reviews of the Regional Development Agencies Summary Report Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. We apply our unique perspective of public audit to help Parliament and government drive lasting improvement in public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending on behalf of Parliament. The Comptroller and Auditor General, Amyas Morse, is an Officer of the House of Commons. He is the head of the National Audit Office which employs some 900 staff. He and the National Audit Office are totally independent of Government. He certifies the accounts of all Government departments and a wide range of other public sector bodies; and he has statutory authority to report to Parliament on the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which departments and other bodies have used their resources. Our work leads to savings and other efficiency gains worth many millions of pounds: £890 million in 2009-10. Contents Summary 4 Preface 4 Part One: Effectiveness of Prioritisation 5 Areas of Review 5 Informed investment decisions which take account of the impact and deliverability of interventions. 6 Working closely with stakeholders to identify alternative funding sources 7 A shared vision and programme of aligned activity between partners 7 A strong evidence base based on relevant and timely information to inform decision making 8 Part Two: Improvement Planning 10 Areas of Review 10 External challenge and validation 10 Responding to staff and stakeholder views 11 Effective approach to implementing
    [Show full text]
  • Office Locations Study
    Office Locations Study Advantage West Midlands October 2007 www.gvagrimley.co.uk Advantage West Midlands Office Locations Study CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................................1 2. POLICY REVIEW......................................................................................................8 3. LITERATURE REVIEW ..........................................................................................27 4. REGIONAL MARKETS - BIRMINGHAM ...............................................................42 5. REGIONAL MARKETS – THE BLACK COUNTRY ..............................................53 6. REGIONAL MARKETS - COVENTRY ...................................................................63 7. REGIONAL MARKETS - WARWICK.....................................................................69 8. REGIONAL MARKETS - WORCESTER................................................................73 9. REGIONAL MARKETS - STAFFORD ...................................................................79 10. REGIONAL MARKETS - TELFORD AND WREKIN .............................................83 11. REGIONAL MARKETS – STOKE-ON-TRENT......................................................85 12. OCCUPIER SEARCH PATTERNS ........................................................................88 13. REGIONAL MARKETS - CONCLUSIONS ............................................................94 14. DEVELOPER THOUGHTS.....................................................................................97
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Into Biobusiness Faye Jones
    Getting into biobusiness Faye Jones Finding help and GENERAL BUSINESS RESOURCES England technology and expertise through the formation of FUNDING spin-out companies, licensing, consultancy, training, design advice to transform UK Government Offices in the English regions www.government-offices.gov.uk/GO/default.asp and development projects, contract research, testing and Research Councils a great concept evaluation, and problem solving. Department for Trade and Industry – DTI for Business Research Councils UK support the further development Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) into money-making www.dti.gov.uk/for_business.html of research ideas and technology transfer. Many have www.rdauk.org/rdauk Office of Science and Technology (OST) reality can be The DTI is involved in many initiatives to encourage successful www.ost.gov.uk/enterprise/knowledge/ dedicated sections on their websites containing valuable daunting. Yet there start-ups and the DTI for Business website is the best initial port RDAs aim to promote economic development and index.htm information on knowledge/technology transfer, intellectual of call for finding out about setting up a new enterprise. It also regeneration in the regions. They operate as non- property and funding schemes. are many websites Includes information about knowledge/technology transfer provides links to numerous other relevant websites. departmental public bodies. They provide funding towards and other resources regional regeneration activities in conjunction with other and how the Government supports it. Knowledge Transfer Partnerships Other useful DTI-linked sites: with information and regional partners. Each RDA has its own website which can OST Science Enterprise Challenge www.ktponline.org.uk guidance for aspiring Business Link be reached through the main RDA website (address above).
    [Show full text]