DOCSLIB.ORG

The Paradigm That Changed the Work Place : Annals of the STSD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Paradigm That Changed the Work Place : Annals of the STSD The paradigm that changed the work place : annals of the STSD Citation for published version (APA): Eijnatten, van, F. M. (1992). The paradigm that changed the work place : annals of the STSD. (TU Eindhoven. Fac. TBDK, Vakgroep T&A : monografie; Vol. 010). Eindhoven University of Technology. Document status and date: Published: 01/01/1992 Document Version: Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement: www.tue.nl/taverne Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at: [email protected] providing details and we will investigate your claim. Download date: 04. Oct. 2021 The Paradigm that Changed the Work. Place Annals of STSD DR. FRANS M. VAN EIJNA TTEN Associate Professor at the Graduate School of Industrial Engineering and Management Science Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands Manuscript Draft BDK/T&AOIO This manuscript contains a broad outline of the history of the Socio-Technical Systems Design paradigm from 1951 up until the present time (1992). An effort is made to cover the wide range of ideas and elaborations in this field, using original papers and sources of different kinds. The author has expressly avoided to produce yet another review along established lines, but rather to give a personal and additional contribution to this subject area, which is based on the literature. The manuscript is a synthesis of more than 10 years of researching the paradigm by the author, and resulted from editing, compiling and expansion of earlier (unpublished) papers, discussions with colleagues and some field work in industry. This monograph, designed as an anthology of Socio-Technical Systems Design, is not only specifying concepts, methods and projects, but is also explaining the epistemological and methodological foundations of the paradigm. And last but not least, sound and constructive criticism is presented, which is as much as possible corrected for pre-judgements or 'second source' myths, and is solidly based on facts and analyses of the paradigm. © August 1992 The Paradigm that Changed the Work Place Annals of STSD Dr. Frans M. van Eijnatten Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands Manuscript/Draft © August 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Abstract 0 1 STSD: A Personal Reconstruction 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Some Initial Statements to Explore the Field of STSD 2 1.3 Chapters' Outline 3 2 STSD: Towards Some Root Definitions of the Paradigm 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 STSD: Brief Characteristics of Content 5 2.3 STSD Message: Goals, Mission and Metaphor 8 2.4 STSD Research: Some Methodological Considerations 9 2.5 STSD Images: Milestones and Development Trajectories 11 3 STSD: Initial Formulations of the Paradigm 16 3.1 Introduction 16 3.2 The Pioneering Role of Tavistock 17 3.2.1 Ken Bamforth's Re-Discovery of a Work Tradition 17 3.2.2 Action Research as the Mere Context of Discovery 19 3.2.3 Latent STSD and the Spreading and Adoption of an Open-Systems View 21 3.2.4 STSD-Specific Concept Development to Support the Next Phase 23 3.3 Classical STSD 26 3.3.1 The Inspiration of the Norwegian Industrial Democracy Programme 26 3.3.2 The Spreading of Industrial Democracy: Idiom versus Replica 28 3.3.3 The Methodical Approach towards Industrial Democracy 29 3.3.4 An Outline of Basic Concepts in Classical STSD 31 3.3.5 An Impression of Projects as Reported in the Literature 36 4 STSD: Modern Variants of the Paradigm 38 4.1 Introduction 38 4.2 Variant A: Participative Design 39 4.2.1 The Australian Solution to the Problem of Diffusion 39 4.2.2 PO and the Educational Approach towards Learning 43 4.2.3 Further Spreading of the Diffusion Model 47 4.3 Variant B: Integral Organizational Renewal 49 4.3.1 The Dutch Solution to the Problem of Integral Design 49 4.3.2 lOR and the Balance Model Based on Social Interaction 52 4.3.3 The Participative Process of Organizational Renewal of the Firm 56 page Annals of STSD - F.M. van Eijnatten - Draft - August 1992 ii Continuation of Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 4.4 Variant C: Democratic Dialogue 59 4.4.1 The Scandinavian Solution to the Problem of Diffusion 59 4.4.2 The Concept of Democratic Dialogue and the Theory of Integrating 61 Language and Practice 4.4.3 The DD Trajectory: Creating Scope by Engaging in a Broad Ecological Process 63 4.5 Modem STSD in North America 67 5 Epistemological and Methodological Foundations of the STSD-Paradigm 70 5.1 Introduction 71 5.2 Scientific-Philosophical Points and the Nature of Explanatory Diagrams 75 5.3 The Problem of the 'Openness' of Systems and Von Bertalanffy's Leap 78 5.4 The Development of Systems Concepts and its Influence on STSD Modelling 78 5.5 STSD Methods and the Evolution of Models for Analysis and Design 84 5.6 STSD Practice and the Controversy on Design Content versus Process 96 6 A Critical Evaluation of the STSD Paradigm 98 6.1 Introduction 98 6.2 Constructive Criticism versus Widespread Pre-Judgements and Knowledge Gaps 99 6.3 Further analysis of the STSD Paradigm 102 6.3.1 A Systematic Comparison of Development Tracks and Variants 102 6.3.2 A Tentative Classification of STSD Approaches 111 6.4 Starting the Debate 114 6.4.1 Methodological Renewal of the STSD Paradigm 114 6.4.2 Degree of Elaboration in Terms of an (Open) Systems Approach 116 6.4.3 A Further Examination of Basic Concepts and Theory Formation 120 6.4.4 Some Closer Look at the Diversity of Socio-technical Methods 126 6.4.5 A Concise Critique of STSD Practice 127 7 The Future of the Socio-Technical Systems Design Paradigm 133 8. References This theoretical study, which was also made possible through a contribution of the Dutch Research Stimulation Programme TAO (Technology, Work and Organization), Industrial Sector, is dedicated to Eric Trist, the nestor of STSD. The author would like to extend special thanks to Fred Emery, Hans van Beinum, Friso den Hertog, Oguz Baburoglu, Bjorn Gustavsen and Ulbo de Sitter for their useful suggestions and additions to earlier versions and variants of this monograph. Correspondence address: Eindhoven University of Technology Graduate School of Industrial Engineering and Management Science Department of Technology and Work aU. Dr. Frans M. van Eijnatten Paviljoen U-10, T&A P.O. Box 513 5600 MB EINDHOVEN (NETHERLANDS) Phone: (31) 40472469/472493 Fax: (31) 40 451275 Draft © August 1992 by the author The Paradigm that Changed the Work Place Annals of STSD Dr. Frans M. van Eijnatten Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands Abstract This monograph contains an anthology of the Socio-Technical Systems Design (STSD) paradigm, documenting the period from 1951 until 1992. The study is designed as an historic account. It presents a shaded picture of the plural­ istic development of different approaches, carefully reconstructed on the basis of the available literature, and where possible corrected for distortions caused by information from secondary sources. An effort is made to cover the wide range of ideas and elaborations in this field, using original papers and sources of dif­ ferent kinds. The author has expressly avoided to produce yet another review along established lines, but rather to give a personal and additional contribution to this subject area. After introducing some root definitions to explore the field, the actual reconstruction starts with a detailed portrayal of the well-known initial formu­ lations of the paradigm, dearly demonstrating the pioneering role of Tavistock. Next, the first Norwegian Industrial Democracy programme marks the period of what is called Classical STSD. Additionally there is a broad discussion of four modern variants: Participative Design, Integral Organizational Renewal, De­ mocratic Dialogue and North American consultancy. This study is not only specifying concepts, methods and projects, but also is explaining the main epistemological and methodological foundations. And last but not least, sound and constructive criticism is presented which is solidly based on facts and analyses on the STSD paradigm. An attempt is made to present a (further) introduction into the substantial and specialised domain of Socio­ Technical Systems Design.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Son of Lamoraal Ulbo De Sitter, a Judge, and Catharine Theodore Wilhelmine Bertling
    558 BIOGRAPHIES v.i WiLLEM DE SITTER viT 1872-1934 De Sitter was bom on 6 May 1872 in Sneek (province of Friesland), the son of Lamoraal Ulbo de Sitter, a judge, and Catharine Theodore Wilhelmine Bertling. His father became presiding judge of the court in Arnhem, and that is where De Sitter attended gymna­ sium. At the University of Groniiigen he first studied mathematics and physics and then switched to astronomy under Jacobus Kapteyn. De Sitter spent two years observing and studying under David Gill at the Cape Obsen'atory, the obseivatory with which Kapteyn was co­ operating on the Cape Photographic Durchmusterung. De Sitter participated in the program to make precise measurements of the positions of the Galilean moons of Jupiter, using a heliometer. In 1901 he received his doctorate under Kapteyn on a dissertation on Jupiter's satellites: Discussion of Heliometer Observations of Jupiter's Satel­ lites. De Sitter remained at Groningen as an assistant to Kapteyn in the astronomical laboratory, until 1909, when he was appointed to the chair of astronomy at the University of Leiden. In 1919 he be­ came director of the Leiden Observatory. He remained in these posts until his death in 1934. De Sitter's work was highly mathematical. With his work on Jupi­ ter's satellites, De Sitter pursued the new methods of celestial me­ chanics of Poincare and Tisserand. His earlier heliometer meas­ urements were later supplemented by photographic measurements made at the Cape, Johannesburg, Pulkowa, Greenwich, and Leiden. De Sitter's final results on this subject were published as 'New Math­ ematical Theory of Jupiter's Satellites' in 1925.
    [Show full text]
  • Levensbericht L.U. De Sitter, In: Jaarboek, 1980, Amsterdam, Pp
    Huygens Institute - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) Citation: Zwart, H.J., Levensbericht L.U. de Sitter, in: Jaarboek, 1980, Amsterdam, pp. 180-183 This PDF was made on 24 September 2010, from the 'Digital Library' of the Dutch History of Science Web Center (www.dwc.knaw.nl) > 'Digital Library > Proceedings of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), http://www.digitallibrary.nl' - 1 - LAMORAAL ULBO DE SITTER 180 - 2 - Levensbericht van Lamoraal Ulbo de Sitter (6 maart 1902-12 mei 1980) door U.J. Zwart L.U. de Sitter werd in Groningen geboren als zoon van de vermaarde astronoom W. de Sitter. Komende uit een familie die voornamelijk juristen telde, hebben vader en zoon De Sitter zich gewijd aan de natuurwetenschappen. Waar de ene, Willem de Sitter, zich met de studie van het heelal heeft bezig gehouden, bleef voor zijn zoon, zoals hij mij eens vertelde, nog slechts de aarde over als studie object. Dit object heeft hij met veel succes in zijn loopbaan bestudeerd. Na zijn eindexamen H.B.S. te Leiden studeerde De Sitter eerst 2 jaar geologie in Zwitserland om in 1921 naar Leiden terug te keren om daar zijn studie voort te zetten bij K. Martin en B.G. Escher. Samen met zijn twee jaargenoten, Umbgrove en Kuenen, vormde hij een trio dat later de Nederlandse geologen en het buitenland op diverse gebieden in de geologie grote faam zou verschaffen. In 1925 promoveerde hij op een voornamelijk petrografisch proefschrift over de porfieren van het Lugano gebied. Zijn eerste betrekking bij de B.P.M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dutch IOR Approach to Organizational Design: an Alternative to Business Process Re-Engineering?
    Hum an Relations, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1998 The Dutch IOR Approach to Organizational Design: An Alternative to Business Process Re-engineering? Frans M. van Eijnatten 1,3 and Ad H. van der Zwaan 2 This paper presents the current Dutch sociotechnical design approach to integral organizational re ne wal in a conte xtual way. Both its de sign theory and intervention processes are reviewe d and some aggregated empirical evidence is presented. Next, the paper compares the ideas developed in the Dutch approach to those presented in its Ame rican, Scandinavian, and Australian counterparts. It is concluded that, at a meta-level, they all share the ideal of participative democracy, while at the conce ptual level, these distinctive approaches appear quite incompatible. Notwithstanding substantial diversity, it is presumed these approaches can be seen as local manife stations of a single sociotechnical paradigm. K EY WOR DS: integral approach to organizational design; sociotechnical systems; participative democracy. INTRODUCTION The very roots of the Socio-Technical Systems Design (STSD) paradigm are meticulously reconstructed in the second volume of The social engagement of social science: A Tavistock anthology (1993). Although its title sugge sts a retrospect, the book—edited by the late Eric Trist, Hugh Murray, and Beulah Trist—is also about the present state of sociotechnical systems design. Re- viewing this voluminous piece of work, Scarbrough (1995) started to question the vitality of STSD in this day and age. This urged Emery (1995) to com- ment on him rather critically, forwarding a graph of yearly output of publi- 1Faculty of Technology Manage ment, Graduate School of Business Engineering and Tech- nology Application (BETA), Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Willem De Sitter
    Springer Biographies Willem de Sitter Einstein’s Friend and Opponent JAN GUICHELAAR Springer Biographies More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/13617 Jan Guichelaar Willem de Sitter Einstein’s Friend and Opponent 123 Jan Guichelaar Amsterdam, The Netherlands This book draws, in part, on the author’s earlier work in Dutch: “De Sitter, Een alternatief voor Einsteins heelalmodel”, Veen Magazines, Amsterdam, 2009. [De Sitter, An alternative for Einstein’s model of the universe]. ISSN 2365-0613 ISSN 2365-0621 (electronic) Springer Biographies ISBN 978-3-319-98336-3 ISBN 978-3-319-98337-0 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98337-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018951902 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
    [Show full text]