DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Motion for a Resolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
En En Motion for a Resolution European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0156/2019 22.10.2019 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statements by the Council and the Commission pursuant to Rule 132(2) of the Rules of Procedure on opening accession negotiations with North Macedonia and Albania (2019/2883(RSP)) Anna Fotyga, Witold Jan Waszczykowski, Adam Bielan, Ryszard Czarnecki, Karol Karski, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Angel Dzhambazki on behalf of the ECR Group RE\1191196EN.docx PE643.322v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0156/2019 European Parliament resolution on opening accession negotiations with North Macedonia and Albania (2019/2883(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the European Council’s decisions of 16 December 2005 to grant North Macedonia (at that time: the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) and of 26-27 June 2014 to grant Albania the status of candidate for EU membership, – having regard to the Sofia Declaration of the EU-Western Balkans summit of 17 May 2018 and the Sofia Priority Agenda annexed thereto, – having regard to its previous resolutions on Albania and North Macedonia, – having regard to the protocol on the accession of North Macedonia to NATO, signed on 6 February 2019; – having regard to Rule 132(2) of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas EU enlargement continues to constitute a strategic investment in peace, democracy, prosperity, security and stability in Europe; B. whereas the Commission has recommended the opening of accession negotiations with Albania and North Macedonia, given the good progress achieved in the fulfilment of the key priorities; C. whereas Albania and North Macedonia have continued to make steady progress towards meeting the political criteria and the five key priorities for the opening of accession negotiations, as well as in consolidating democratic institutions and practices; D. whereas the Balkans region is strategically important for the EU; E. whereas, in the case of North Macedonia, the Prespa Agreement of 17 June 2018 on the settlement of differences and the establishment of a strategic partnership between the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Greece sent the much-needed positive signal for stability and reconciliation and opened the way for accession; F. whereas, at the European Council meeting of 17-18 October 2019, France, supported by the Netherlands and Denmark, effectively blocked the accession negotiations with Albania and North Macedonia on the basis that further reforms needed to be implemented by the two countries; G. whereas Albania has been a NATO member since 2009 and North Macedonia will soon become the 30th member of the Alliance; 1. Expresses its strong disappointment that the opening of accession negotiations with North Macedonia and Albania has been blocked, despite the fact that both countries have clearly fulfilled the criteria set by the Council; PE643.322v01-00 2/3 RE\1191196EN.docx EN 2. Believes that postponing this process despite the progress made by both countries is a strategic mistake which will have a detrimental effect on the reputation of the EU and may weaken the most potent soft power attribute the EU has at its disposal – the prospect of membership; 3. Underlines that stalling the accession of the Western Balkan countries may lead to destabilisation of the whole region and could slow down or even completely halt the implementation of pro-European reforms in other accession countries; 4. Is, moreover, concerned that a lack of progress in enlargement may also directly affect the security and wellbeing of the EU, as it may gradually push all Western Balkans countries towards third parties which are already trying to increase their influence in the region, including – but not limited to – Russia and China; 5. Is strongly committed to the policy of enlargement as one of the key priorities of the EU; 6. Reiterates that, pursuant to Article 49 TEU, any state in Europe may apply to become a member of the European Union provided that it adheres to the Copenhagen criteria and the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms and human and minority rights, and upholds the rule of law; 7. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of Albania, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Serbia. RE\1191196EN.docx 3/3 PE643.322v01-00 EN.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Deal – the Coordinators
    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version
    Next weekend in New Direction 10th Anniversary Dinner p.22 BORDEAUX p.20 ACRE Summer Gala Dinner p.23 Issue #8 | July 2019 A fortnightly Newspaper by the Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) | theconservative.online THE OFFICIAL OPPOSITION by Jan Zahradil MEP, President of ACRE For the next five years, we aim to serve as the peoples voice, acting as a counter balance between those who want a federal Europe, and those who want to destroy the Union. We will continue to defend the view that Europe works best when it does less, but it does it better. ith the elec- power handed to those who which would have create a in a position to act as the offi- comes as a result of keeping tion now out of want to use it to build a federal more business friendly Europe. cial opposition in the European power as close to the people as Spitzenkandidat the way, and the Europe. A coalition that will That would have put the sin- Parliament. We’ll hold this new possible. And we remain com- JAN ZAHRADIL political groups be led from the left, with any gle market, rather than social coalition to account, and ensure mitted to the view that our nowW establishing themselves, we voting majority dependent on policy, back at the centre of the that they do not use their new strength comes from a willing- Jan Zahradil was ACRE’s can- can now talk with some clarity the support of the Greens and European Union. That would majority to take power away ness to work together on issues didate for the Presidency of the about what the next five years the socialists.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiopodlasie.Pl Wygenerowano W Dniu 2021-09-25 10:49:22
    Radiopodlasie.pl Wygenerowano w dniu 2021-09-25 10:49:22 Kto wejdzie do PE? Karol Karski, Krzysztof Jurgiel, Adam Bielan, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Elżbieta Kruk i Beata Mazurek(PiS), Tomasz Frankowski, Jarosław Kalinowski i Krzysztof Hetman (KE)- najprawdopodobniej wejdą do Parlamentu Europejskiego. Wszyscy kandydowali w okręgach obejmujących nasz region. Prognozy są oparte na sondażu exit-poll, co oznacza, że nazwiska kandydatów, którzy obejmą mandaty, mogą się jeszcze zmienić. Prawdopodobne nazwiska europarlamentarzystów podaje Informacyjna Agencja Radiowa. Prawo i Sprawiedliwość zdobyło najwięcej, 42,4 procent głosów, w wyborach do Parlamentu Europejskiego - wynika z sondażu exit-poll zrealizowanego przez IPSOS dla telewizji TVP, Polsat i TVN. Drugie miejsce w badaniu prowadzonym dziś przed lokalami wyborczymi zajęła Koalicja Europejska - 39,1 procent. Jeśli wyniki sondażu potwierdzą się, do Parlamentu Europejskiego dostaną się także kandydaci Wiosny - 6,6 procent oraz Konfederacji - 6,1 procent. Pięcioprocentowego prgu nie przekroczyły komitety Kukiz'15 - 4,1 procent oraz Lewica Razem - 1,3 procent. Prognozowana frekwencja wyniosła 43 procent - wynika z sondażu exit-poll. Zgodnie z sondażem, Prawo i Sprawiedliwość wygrało w siedmiu okręgach (warmińsko-mazurskie z podlaskim, Mazowsze, Łódzkie, Lubelskie, Podkarpacie, Małopolska ze Świętokrzyskiem oraz Śląsk). W sześciu okręgach wygrała Koalicja Europejska (Pomorze, kujawsko-pomorskie, Warszawa, Wielkopolska, Dolny Śląsk z Opolszczyzną oraz Lubuskie z Zachodniopomorskim). Z prognozy podziału mandatów wynika, że przy takich wynikach, jakie przyniósł sondaż exit-poll, PiS miałby w Parlamencie Europejskim 24 mandaty, Koalicja Europejska - 22 mandaty, a Wiosna i Konfederacja - po trzy mandaty. Zgodnie z sondażem, w okręgu obejmującym Pomorze dwa mandaty zdobyła Koalicja Europejska (Magdalena Adamowicz oraz najprawdopodobniej Janusz Lewandowski), a jeden Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (najprawdopodobniej Anna Fotyga).
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • The Achilles Heel of Bulgaria's Far Right: the Linkage Between The
    Start Podcasts Fokus » sicherheitspolitik­blog.de Blog zur SicherheitspolitikBücher Über Uns English 18. Apr. 2016 von gast in Rechtsradikalismus Kommentare ( 0 ) The Achilles Heel of Bulgaria’s Far Right: the Linkage between the Extreme Right and the Patriotic Front This is the 14. article in our series Trouble on the Far­Right. For more information on the series, please click here. by Yordan Kutiyski Ever since Bulgaria’s admission to the European Union (EU) in 2007, the country’s domestically weak far right has managed to send its representatives to the European Parliament (EP). Prior to 2014, these MEPs remained largely isolated, retaining a non­affiliated status. Initially, Volen Siderov’s far right party Attack, the first of its kind in post­communist Bulgaria, won three seats in the legislative body in 2007. Formed in 2005, Attack quickly gained electoral support, conveying a strong xenophobic and anti­minority rhetoric combined with emphasis on Orthodox Christian values and opposition to globalization. No other Bulgarian party has previously sought to attract voters using such a strategy. Attack participated in the short­lived Identity, Tradition, Sovereignty group in the EP. Further efforts for constructing a lasting political grouping on the far right with the participation of Bulgarian parties remained futile, making their influence on debate­shaping and decision­making hardly possible. Winning a seat less in 2009, Attack remained outside of any recognized EP political group. The situation changed in 2014, however, when the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization – Bulgarian National Movement (IMRO­BNM) propelled Angel Dzhambazki to the EP and later to the soft Eurosceptic European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) group.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Impact on Roma
    Implications of COVID-19 pandemic on Roma and Travellers communities Country: Bulgaria Date: 15 June 2020 Contractor’s name: Project One / Center for the Study of Democracy DISCLAIMER: This document was commissioned under contract as background material for comparative analysis by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) for the project ‘Implications of COVID-19 pandemic on Roma and Travellers communities ‘. The information and views contained in the document do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA. The document is made publicly available for transparency and information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or legal opinion. 1 Contents 1 Specific implications of the general measures taken to stop the COVID- 19 pandemic on Roma and Travellers’ communities? ............................................ 3 1.1 Type of measures ................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Implications of measures .................................................................................. 5 1.3 Estimates of the scale of the impact ............................................................. 7 2 Specific measures to address the implications of the pandemic on Roma and Travellers ........................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Measures to tackle the spread of the virus specifically among Roma and Travellers communities ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria Covering the Period of January to December 2019
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION OF LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANS, AND INTERSEX PEOPLE IN BULGARIA COVERING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY TO DECEMBER 2019 BULGARIA BIAS-MOTIVATED SPEECH EDUCATION Anti-LGBT hate speech from political figures continued to be an Ultra-conservative forces continued their fight against LGBTI issue this year. Leading up to Sofia Pride, Deputy Prime Minister rights and gender equality in education. and Minister of Defense, Krasimir Karakachanov, leader of the ultra-nationalist VMRO-BND party, published hateful comments In February, loud criticism followed the release of the European on social media. The Ataka political party also made negative Commission’s SELFIE survey in schools for offering four gender remarks. Sofia Pride condemned the statements. options to students (‘male’, ‘female’, ‘other’, ‘prefer not to say’). During the municipal elections in October, the radical nationalist The Minister of Education promised to request the Commission to remove options other than ‘male’ and ‘female’ and vowed that candidate and current MEP Angel Dzhambazki (VMRO-BND), “gender ideology” will not be spread. was targeted by hate speech because of his perceived sexual orientation. Sofia Pride made a public statement against these A few days later, an STI prevention brochure with pictures of gay remarks. couples, approved by the Ministry of Health and distributed in schools, sparked strong backlash. The leaflets were mistakenly Dzhambazki (VMRO-BND), Volen Siderov (Ataka), and Nikolay with young children and then promptly withdrawn. Drenchev (Vazrajdane), all candidates for local elections in Sofia In April, the National Children’s Strategy 2019-2030, drafted by from ultra-nationalist parties, promised to ban Sofia Pride if a working group including civil society, faced harsh criticism and elected.
    [Show full text]
  • 23.11.2020 B9-0355/2020 } B9-0357/2020 } B9-0358/2020 } B9-0359/2020 } B9-0360/2020 } B9-0361/2020 } RC1/Am
    23.11.2020 B9-0355/2020 } B9-0357/2020 } B9-0358/2020 } B9-0359/2020 } B9-0360/2020 } B9-0361/2020 } RC1/Am. 4 Amendment 4 Emmanouil Fragkos, Angel Dzhambazki, Hermann Tertsch, Carlo Fidanza, Helmut Geuking, Derk Jan Eppink, Rob Rooken, Robert Roos on behalf of the ECR Group Joint motion for a resolution PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE, ECR, GUE/NGL Escalating tensions in Varosha following the illegal actions by Turkey and the urgent need for the resumption of talks Joint motion for a resolution Citation 11 Joint motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to core principles of – having regard to core principles of international law and the UN Charter, to international law and the UN Charter, to the High-Level Agreement of 1979 the High-Level Agreement of 1979 between the leaders of the two between the leaders of the two communities, and to the relevant communities, and to the relevant resolutions of the UN Security Council resolutions of the UN Security Council (UNSC) on Cyprus, including Resolutions (UNSC) on Cyprus, including Resolutions 550 (1984), 789 (1992) and 2537 (2020), 541 (1983), 550 (1984), 789 (1992) and 2537 (2020), Or. en AM\1219032EN.docx PE658.421v01-00 } PE658.423v01-00 } PE658.424v01-00 } PE658.425v01-00 } PE658.426v01-00 } PE658.427v01-00 } RC1 EN United in diversityEN 23.11.2020 B9-0355/2020 } B9-0357/2020 } B9-0358/2020 } B9-0359/2020 } B9-0360/2020 } B9-0361/2020 } RC1/Am. 5 Amendment 5 Emmanouil Fragkos, Angel Dzhambazki, Hermann Tertsch, Carlo Fidanza, Helmut Geuking, Derk Jan Eppink, Rob Rooken, Robert Roos on behalf of the ECR Group Joint motion for a resolution PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE, ECR, GUE/NGL Escalating tensions in Varosha following the illegal actions by Turkey and the urgent need for the resumption of talks Joint motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) Joint motion for a resolution Amendment 9a.
    [Show full text]
  • EP Elections 2014
    EP Elections 2014 Biographies of new MEPs Please find the biographies of all the new MEPs elected to the 8th European Parliamentary term. The information has been collated from published sources and, in many cases, subject to translation from the native language. We will be contacting all MEPs to add to their biographical information over the summer, which will all be available on Dods People EU in due course. EU Elections 2014 Source: European Parliament- 1 - EP Overview (13/06/2014) List of countries: Austria Germany Poland Belgium Greece Portugal Bulgaria Hungary Romania Croatia Ireland Slovakia Cyprus Italy Slovenia Czech Latvia Spain Republic Denmark Lithuania Sweden United Estonia Luxembourg Kingdom Finland Malta France Netherlands EU Elections 2014 - 2 - Austria o People's Party (ÖVP) > EPP o Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) > S&D o Freedom Party (FPÖ) > NI o The Greens (GRÜNE) > Greens/EFA o New Austria (NEOS) > ALDE People’s Party (ÖVP) Claudia Schmidt (ÖVP, Austria) 26 April 1963 (FEMALE) Political: Councils/Public Bodies Member, Municipal Council, City of Salzburg 1999-; Chair, Austrian People's Party (ÖVP) Parliamentary Group, Salzburg Municipal Council 2004-09; Member, responsible for construction and urban development, Salzburg city government, 2009- Party posts: ÖVP: Vice-President, Salzburg, Member of the Board, Salzburg, Political Interest: Disability (social affairs) Personal: Non-political Career: Disability support institution (Lebenshilfe) Salzburg: Manager for special needs education 1989-1996, Officer responsible for
    [Show full text]
  • 1.10.2020 A9-0162/134/Rev Amendment
    1.10.2020 A9-0162/134/rev Amendment 134/rev Anna Zalewska, Alexandr Vondra, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Beata Kempa, Grzegorz Tobiszowski, Beata Mazurek, Kosma Złotowski, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Andżelika Anna Możdżanowska, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Joanna Kopcińska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Angel Dzhambazki, Andrey Slabakov, Izabela-Helena Kloc, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Elżbieta Kruk, Beata Szydło, Witold Jan Waszczykowski on behalf of the ECR Group Report A9-0162/2020 Jytte Guteland European Climate Law (COM(2020)0080 – COM(2020)0563 – C9-0077/2020 – 2020/0036(COD)) Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (17) As announced in its Communication (17) As announced in its ‘The European Green Deal’, the Communication ‘The European Green Commission assessed the Union’s 2030 Deal’, the Commission assessed the target for greenhouse gas emission Union's 2030 target for greenhouse gas reduction, in its Communication “Stepping emission reduction, in its Communication up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition - "Stepping up Europe's 2030 climate Investing in a climate-neutral future for the ambition - Investing in a climate neutral benefit of our people”9, on the basis of a future for the benefit of our people"9, on comprehensive impact assessment and the basis of a comprehensive impact taking into account its analysis of the assessment and taking into account its integrated national energy and climate analysis of the integrated national energy plans submitted to the Commission in and climate plans submitted to the accordance with Regulation (EU) Commission in accordance with 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the of the Council10.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Joint Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting B8-0190/2017 } B8-0192/2017 } B8-0195/2017 } B8-0198/2017 } B8-0221/2017 } RC1 15.3.2017 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rules 135(5) and 123(4) of the Rules of Procedure replacing the motions by the following groups: Verts/ALE (B8-0190/2017) ECR (B8-0192/2017) S&D (B8-0195/2017) ALDE (B8-0198/2017) PPE (B8-0221/2017) on the Ukrainian prisoners in Russia and the situation in Crimea (2017/2596(RSP)) Cristian Dan Preda, Tunne Kelam, Tomáš Zdechovský, Jaromír Štětina, Marijana Petir, Jarosław Wałęsa, Pavel Svoboda, Ivan Štefanec, Milan Zver, Brian Hayes, David McAllister, Eduard Kukan, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, József Nagy, Mairead McGuinness, Michaela Šojdrová, Roberta Metsola, Romana Tomc, Patricija Šulin, Maurice Ponga, Sven Schulze, Csaba Sógor, Željana Zovko, Ivana Maletić, Stanislav Polčák, Deirdre Clune, Luděk Niedermayer, Giovanni La Via, Claude Rolin, Adam Szejnfeld, Lorenzo Cesa, Jiří Pospíšil, Dariusz Rosati, Sandra Kalniete, Dubravka Šuica, Jerzy Buzek, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Therese Comodini Cachia, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Krzysztof Hetman, RC\1120280EN.docx PE598.543v01-00 } PE598.545v01-00 } PE598.548v01-00 } PE598.551v01-00 } PE598.554v01-00 } RC1 EN United in diversity EN Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski, Andrey Kovatchev, Inese Vaidere, Anna Záborská, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Elmar Brok on behalf of the PPE Group Victor Boştinaru, Soraya Post, Marju Lauristin, Julie Ward on behalf of the S&D Group Charles Tannock, Karol Karski,
    [Show full text]
  • The Resolution of the Macedonian Name Dispute: A
    THE RESOLUTION OF THE MACEDONIAN NAME DISPUTE: A STUDY OF THE FACTORS THAT LED TO THE SIGNING OF THE PRESPA AGREEMENT Asen Voynov [email protected] S2247216 June 2019 Asen Voynov S2247216 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................2 List of Abbreviations...................................................................................................................3 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................4 1.1 Research Question .............................................................................................................5 1.2 Relevance ..........................................................................................................................6 2. Historical Context ...................................................................................................................8 2.1 The Birth of the Macedonian Question ...............................................................................8 2.2 The Birth of a Nation ....................................................................................................... 10 2.3 The Birth of the Name Dispute ........................................................................................ 11 3. Literature Review .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]