DOCSLIB.ORG

Update #62 Latest State by State Impact of Coronavirus On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Update #62 Latest State by State Impact of Coronavirus On MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS COUNCIL OF STATE EXECUTIVES FR: RICH JULIANO, GENERAL COUNSEL RE: STATE-BY-STATE COMPILATION – EFFECT OF CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC ON TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS (EDITION #62) DATE: JULY 27, 2020 – PM ARTBA is closely monitoring the status of transportation construction projects across the country in light of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. We are consulting with our affiliated chapters and members on a continual basis. Several chapters have shared the status reports they have made to their members, and are allowing us to excerpt them in this document. The information below also reflects reports made through our Council of State Executives, as well as direct contacts and news stories. Several public agencies have provided updates to ARTBA directly. As is noted a number of times, ARTBA’s affiliates have remained in close contact with their respective governors and/or state departments of transportation since this crisis developed. We have highlighted all content added or revised since the previous edition of this memo. Please note this is a current snapshot of project status at the state level. You are welcome to pass along any items of interest to me at [email protected], which we will utilize for the next edition of this report. Best wishes to everyone, and thank you for your participation in and support of ARTBA at this important time. NOTE: ARTBA President & CEO Dave Bauer wrote an op ed piece, “Yes, this is the ideal time to be fixing roads,” appearing in the Washington Examiner (4/7). The content is based largely on information provided on our members, chapters and state DOTs for this report. It can be found here: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/yes-this-is-the-ideal-time-to-be- fixing-roads. © 2020 – American Road & Transportation Builders Association 1 New in this Edition Material from these states… Connecticut: Governor Lamont Statement on Workers’ Compensation Illinois: Latest Multi-Year Plan Continues Multi-Billion Transportation Spending Trend Indiana: A $240M reconstruction of the North Split may begin this winter. New York: Coalition of Associations Sends Letter to Empire State Development Regarding Funding and Payment on Projects North Dakota: Operation Prairie Dog funds delayed for state infrastructure projects Tennessee: Update on gas tax revenues Virginia: VDOT Launches New Website Supporting I-81 Corridor Improvements Wisconsin: Governor Orders $250 Million in Spending Cuts; Transportation Programs Not Affected Current Highlights Transportation construction projects are moving forward in every state. Nearly every governor issuing a “stay at home” order has also implicitly or explicitly designated public works construction as an “essential” or “critical” line of business, allowing projects to remain open. Some of the state executive orders have referenced the federal Guidance on the Essential Critical Infrastructure Workforce, issued by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). CISA issued its “3.1” version of the guidance on Tuesday 5/19 (see below). Contractors are implementing COVID-19 safeguards as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control, their respective public health agencies, and others. Several state DOTs and/or industry groups/coalitions have issued guidance in this area. Several state DOTs are working with industry on accelerating projects by taking advantage of lower traffic volumes. States are now quantifying actual and projected transportation-related revenue losses from the pandemic. Some, such as North Carolina, Missouri, Kentucky and Pennsylvania, have announced reductions in their construction programs. State DOTs are increasingly implementing processes using electronic documents, to avoid the need for handling hard copies of forms, tickets and the like. Many state DOTs have put office employees on telework status. Generally, field staff are considered “essential,” which helps enable projects to continue. © 2020 – American Road & Transportation Builders Association 2 Table of Contents Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) .............................................................. 5 Alabama .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Alaska ............................................................................................................................................ 16 Arizona .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Arkansas ........................................................................................................................................ 27 California ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Colorado ........................................................................................................................................ 47 Connecticut ................................................................................................................................... 57 Delaware ....................................................................................................................................... 71 District of Columbia ...................................................................................................................... 74 Florida ........................................................................................................................................... 77 Georgia .......................................................................................................................................... 88 Hawaii ........................................................................................................................................... 94 Idaho ............................................................................................................................................. 97 Illinois ............................................................................................................................................ 99 Indiana ........................................................................................................................................ 112 Iowa ............................................................................................................................................. 117 Kansas ......................................................................................................................................... 121 Kentucky...................................................................................................................................... 122 Louisiana ..................................................................................................................................... 131 Maine .......................................................................................................................................... 134 Maryland ..................................................................................................................................... 143 Massachusetts ............................................................................................................................ 149 Michigan ..................................................................................................................................... 165 Minnesota ................................................................................................................................... 187 Mississippi ................................................................................................................................... 192 Missouri ...................................................................................................................................... 198 Montana...................................................................................................................................... 212 Nebraska ..................................................................................................................................... 216 © 2020 – American Road & Transportation Builders Association 3 Table of Contents Nevada ........................................................................................................................................ 219 New Hampshire .......................................................................................................................... 222 New Jersey .................................................................................................................................. 226 New Mexico ................................................................................................................................ 238 New York ..................................................................................................................................... 239 North Carolina ............................................................................................................................. 267 North Dakota .............................................................................................................................. 278 Ohio ............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exhibit a to the Contract CMS5882960
    Exhibit A to the Contract CMS5882960 Customer Name Utility Account # Utility Service Address Billing Address 1 E Governors Hwy, Ss Governors State University 1047127007 COMED Stuenkel University Park, IL 60484 1 University Parkway, IL 60484-0975 2225 W Harrison St 1102 EASTPORT PLAZA Illinois Medical District 0103160158 COMED Unit B Chicago, IL Commission DR , COLLINSVILLE IL 60612 62234 2225 W Harrison St 1102 EASTPORT PLAZA Illinois Medical District 6915065062 COMED Unit 1 Chicago, IL Commission DR , COLLINSVILLE IL 60612 62234 2225 W Harrison St Illinois Medical District 0903038031 COMED Unit 200 Chicago, IL 1102 EASTPORT PLAZA Commission 60612 DR , COLLINSVILLE IL 62234 2255 W Harrison St 1102 EASTPORT PLAZA Illinois Medical District 2075052043 COMED Bldg, North And South Commission DR , COLLINSVILLE IL Chicago, IL 60612 62234 601 S Leavitt St 1102 EASTPORT PLAZA Illinois Medical District 3411125028 COMED Commission Chicago, IL 60612 DR , COLLINSVILLE IL 62234 2100 W Harrison St 1102 EASTPORT PLAZA Illinois Medical District 0699583018 COMED Commission Chicago, IL 60612 DR , COLLINSVILLE IL 62234 600 S Hoyne Ave 1102 EASTPORT PLAZA Illinois Medical District 5134316023 COMED Commission Chicago, IL 60612 DR , COLLINSVILLE IL 62234 2225 W Harrison St 1102 EASTPORT PLAZA Illinois Medical District 8481008000 COMED Commission Bldg Chicago, IL 60612 DR , COLLINSVILLE IL 62234 3234 J DAVID JONES Ameren(CILCO) PKWY UNIT LIGHT ILL DEPT OF TRANS State of Illinois 0926423210 Zone II SPRINGFIELD, IL OPERA SECT , 126 E ASH 62707 ST , SPRINGFIELD
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Suspended Where Possible for July 4
    State of Illinois JB Pritzker, Governor Illinois Department of Transportation Omer Osman, Acting Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: July 1, 2020 Paul Wappel 217.685.0082 Maria Castaneda 312.447.1919 Construction suspended where possible for July 4 Non-emergency closures called off, but motorists should still expect work zones SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Department of Transportation announced today that lanes that have been closed for construction will reopen, where possible, for the Fourth of July holiday to minimize travel disruption. Non-emergency closures will be suspended from 3 p.m. July 2 to 11:59 p.m. July 5. The following lane closures will remain in place during the holiday weekend. Work zone speed limits will remain in effect where posted. Please buckle up, put your phone down and drive sober. District 1 City of Chicago: • The following ramps in the Jane Byrne Interchange work zone will remain closed: • o Inbound Kennedy (Interstate 90/94) Expressway exit to inbound Ida B. Wells Drive. o Outbound Dan Ryan Expressway exit to Taylor Street and Roosevelt Road. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive entrance from Canal Street. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Dan Ryan. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Kennedy. o Inbound Eisenhower Expressway (Interstate -290) to outbound Kennedy; detour with U-turn posted. o Inbound Eisenhower; lane reductions continue. o Inbound Ida B. Wells Drive; lane reductions continue. • Outbound Kennedy exit at Canfield Road; closed. • Westbound Bryn Mawr Avenue between Harlem and Oriole avenues; lane reductions continue. • Westbound Higgins Avenue between Oriole and Canfield avenues; lane reductions continue.
    [Show full text]
  • General Guidelines
    CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDIES Illinois Center for Transportation Series No. 15-004 UILU-ENG-2015-2004 ISSN: 0197-9191 REAL-TIME INFORMATION DISSEMINATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ILLINOIS PER NEW FEDERAL RULE Prepared By Ryan Fries Pouya Yousefzadehfard Karzan Bahaaldin Antoun Fadoul Karna Ghale Md Atiquzzaman Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Mashrur Chowdhury Clemson, South Carolina Scott Petersen Erik Minge SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Research Report No. FHWA-ICT-15-004 A report of the findings of ICT-R27-119 Real-Time Information Dissemination Requirements for Illinois per New Federal Rule Illinois Center for Transportation February 2015 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-ICT-15-004 N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date February 2015 Real-Time Information Dissemination Requirements for Illinois per New Federal Rule 6. Performing Organization Code N/A 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Fries, R., Yousefzadehfard, P., Bahaaldin, K., Fadoul, A., Ghale. K., ICT-15-004 Atiquzzaman, M., Chowdhury, M.A., Petersen, S., and Minge, E. UILU-ENG-2015-2004 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Department of Civil Engineering N/A Southern Illinois University Edwardsville 11. Contract or Grant No. Edwardsville, IL 62026 R27-119 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Bureau of Materials and Physical Research N/A Illinois Department of Transportation 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 126 East Ash St. N/A Springfield, IL 62704 15. Supplementary Notes None. 16. Abstract Travelers on U.S. freeways could now be better-informed than ever before, because of a new federal legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • [Picture of 79Th Street Bus] [Picture of a CTA Employee Wearing
    [BOOK FRONT COVER] Public Transit: An Essential Key to Recovery [Picture of 79th Street Bus] [Picture of a CTA employee wearing a mask] [2 different pictures of CTA employees performing COVID-19 related sanitation on a bus and train] President’s 2021 Budget Recommendations [CTA Logo] [BACK PAGE OF FRONT COVER] Chicago Transit Board and CTA President The governing arm of the CTA is the Chicago Transit Board, consisting of seven board members, one of which is currently vacant. The Mayor of Chicago appoints four board members, subject to the approval of the City Council and the Governor of Illinois. The Governor appoints three board members, subject to the approval of the State Senate and the Mayor of Chicago. CTA's day-to-day operations are directed by the President. Arabel Alva Rosales, Vice Chair Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Judge Gloria Chevere, Board Member Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Kevin Irvine, Board Member Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Dr. L. Bernard Jakes, Board Member Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Rev. Johnny L. Miller, Board Member Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Alejandro Silva, Board Member Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Chicago Transit Authority Dorval Carter Jr., President TABLE OF CONTENTS System Map: page 1 President’s Letter: page 4 Organizational Chart: page 6 Executive Summary: page 8 Strategic Goals: page 26 Operating Budget Schedule: page 28 2020 Operating Budget Forecast: page 32 2021 Proposed Operating Budget: page 36 2022-2023 Two-Year Financial Plan: page
    [Show full text]
  • Madison County Board
    MADISON COUNTY BOARD STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS COUNTY OF MADISON ) Proceedings of the County Board of Madison County, Illinois, as the recessed session of said Board held at the Nelson "Nellie" Hagnauer County Board Room in the Administration Building in the City of Edwardsville, in the County and State aforesaid on said Wednesday, November 19, 2014, and held for the transaction of general business. WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2014 5:00 PM EVENING SESSION The Board met pursuant to recess taken October 15, 2014. * * * * * * * * * * The meeting was called to order by Alan J. Dunstan, Chairman of the Board. The Pledge of Allegiance was said by all members of the Board. The Roll Call was called by Debra Ming-Mendoza, County Clerk, showing the following members present: PRESENT: Messers. Alons, Asadorian, Brazier, Burris, Ms. Ciampoli, Davis, Ms. Dalton, Dodd, Ms. Glasper, Goggin, Ms. Gorman, Ms. Hawkins, Holliday, Ms. Kuhn, Madison, Malone, Maxwell, McRae, Meyer, Minner, Ms. Novacich, Petrillo, Robertson, Ms. Roosevelt, Semanisin, Ms. Tracy, Trucano and Walters. ABSENT: Adler. * * * * * * * * * * Ms. Hawkins moved, seconded by Ms. Glasper, to approve the minutes of the October 15, 2014 meeting. MOTION CARRIED * * * * * * * * * * The following letter was received and placed on file: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION November 1, 2013 The Honorable Brant Walker Mayor of the City of Alton 101 East Third Street Alton, IL 62002 1 Dear Mayor Walker: In accordance with your resolution dated July 10, 2014, we find no objection to making use of IL 100 on Saturday, November 29, 2014, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Illinois
    State of Illinois Illinois Department of Transportation District 1 – Urban Interstate Resurfacing Milling and resurfacing on Interstate 290 from Sacramento Boulevard to Interstate 90/94 in Chicago. District 2 – Rural 4 Lane Bridge Rehabilitation Miscellaneous repairs on the structure carrying Interstate 80 over the Mississippi River. District 6 – Rural 2 Lane Concrete pavement on County Highway 10 east of Elkhart. District 6 – Urban Streetscape Streetscape reconstruction that includes new concrete pavers, sidewalks, lighting, planting beds and traffic signals on Capitol Avenue between 5th Street and 7th Street in Springfield. District 8 – Urban Pedestrian Bridge Construction Construction of a 3-span pedestrian bridge, sidewalk, lighting, landscaping, sewer and retaining walls for the city of Alton over US 67 at Riverfront Park. Printed by authority of the State of Illinois, 0445-11, 01/11, 500 FY 2012-2017 Proposed Highway Improvement Program Spring 2011 Published by the Illinois Department of Transportation Springfield, Illinois 62764 Printed by authority of State of Illinois, April 2011, 275 copies. This document is printed on recycled paper. This document is available on-line at www.dot.il.gov/opp/publications.html. CONTENTS Page Program Development Process ................................... 1 Seeking Public Involvement – Outreach Meetings ....... 3 Executive Summary ..................................................... 5 Department of Transportation District Map ................. 21 Public Review and Comment Form ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2021 Persevering and Progressing During the Pandemic MAASTO a LETTER from 2021 the PRESIDENT
    MAASTO Mid America Association of State Transportation Officials ANNUAL REPORT 2021 Persevering and progressing during the pandemic MAASTO A LETTER FROM 2021 THE PRESIDENT 2020 was a year that tested our society on every level, including our transportation system. The COVID-19 pandemic, and its impacts on the behavior of drivers and consumers, created both unprecedented challenges and opportunities. The calls for social justice and an end to oppression caused us to renew our focus on the way our organizations and our transportation projects affect issues of diversity, equity and inclusion. And as we scrambled to meet the demands of the present, we were keenly aware of the need to plan for the future of transportation, with the promise of new technologies that will transform our mobility options in profound ways. It was a year in which the value of MAASTO to its member transportation agencies and the people they serve was especially evident. When the pandemic hit, MAASTO provided the perfect platform for transportation leaders in the Midwest to compare notes on the emerging situation and share best practices for maintaining our transportation system and responding to the crisis. MAASTO established an Equity and Inclusion Committee to help us learn from each other, both on creating a more equitable workplace and to understand and promote positive outcomes for communities. And we continued to prepare for the advent of Connected and Autonomous Vehicle (CAV) technology, establishing a CAV committee and conducting the second annual MAASTO CAV Summit in October. All the Midwestern states are facing similar challenges to understand how the transportation role of state government will be affected – from changes to laws and regulations to ensuring that this new technology benefits everyone in our states.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Conservation Best Practices
    Summary of Conservation Best Practices December, 2012 Executive Summary and Introduction Executive Summary There are two items that this summary The two case studies included in this Conservation is one tool of an overall highlights and that are the most applicable summary highlight the concept of creating green infrastructure regional strategy. to the RPSD. They are: conservation connections. The Arlington This Summary of Conservation Best Wetlands case study highlights a success Practices is a concise review of recent 1. Conservation and green infrastructure story of acquiring and restoring wetlands trends in conservation and green strategies should focus on creating in the American Bottoms as part of a infrastructure, lessons learned from connections. connected system. The Community HeartLands Conservancy’s work in Conservation Corridors case study conservation, and a look at case studies 2. Conservation and green infrastructure highlights obstacles and perception issues regarding conservation and green strategies will vary based on scale and associated with creating corridors and infrastructure. Finally, recommendations context. There is not a “one size fits all” linkages in existing developed areas. for conservation and green infrastructure approach. will be discussed with an emphasis on the Through two rounds of community process for developing a green planning area meetings as part of the infrastructure / conservation strategy RPSD, attendees have strongly expressed plan. their desire to have open space, clean water, clean air, connections to nature, This Summary of Conservation Best and solutions for localized stormwater Practices is not intended to be an all flooding. Regional and community inclusive guide of conservation and green investments in conservation through a infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • On to 2050 Regionally Significant Projects Benefits Report
    ON TO 2050 REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS BENEFITS REPORT Draft for public comment Draft ON TO 2050 Regionally Significant Projects Benefits Report June 2018 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Process ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Definition change from previous plans .............................................................................................. 4 Solicitation of projects............................................................................................................................ 5 Evaluation framework ......................................................................................................................... 14 Project evaluation ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Project cost estimates ........................................................................................................................... 14 Capital costs ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Operating costs ................................................................................................................................. 15 Cost summary for projects .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monroe County Manufacturing & Logistics Overview
    MONROE COUNTY MANUFACTURING AND LOGISTICS INDUSTRY OVERVIEW COUNTY OVERVIEW Monroe County, Illinois, sits in the southern portion of the St. Louis region -- a vital transportation hub and home to all four major modes of transportation including road, rail, water and air. The county lies just east of the Mississippi River and south of the St. Louis metropolitan area, among lush rolling hills dotted with numerous picturesque communities that are home to growing populations and thriving businesses. These communities include the towns of Columbia, Waterloo (county seat), Valmeyer and Hecker, as well as other smaller villages such as Maeystown and Fults. Featuring the safest municipalities in the state, it has been one of the fastest growing counties in the bi-state area, seeing its population increase nearly 20% between 2000 and 2010, before posting a more modest increase of another 4% (32,431 to 33,739) between 2010 and 2017 (U.S. Census). Monroe County also is home to approximately 3,000 businesses of many different types, from manufacturing and light industrial, to technology, professional services, warehouse and distribution, retail, and corporate headquarters. Since 2016, economic development in the county has been guided by the Monroe County IL Economic Development Corporation (MCILEDC), which aligns the efforts of public and private leaders to move the economy forward in the county and other opportunity areas in adjacent Randolph and St. Clair Counties. Its governing Board is made up of 30 business and government leaders dedicated to continuing to grow a more diversified local economy, a broader tax base and an enhanced quality of life for the region.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Budget Recommendations CTA FY20 Budget Chicago Transit Board and CTA President
    CREATING OPPORTUNITIES: Investing in Transit President’s 2020 Budget Recommendations CTA FY20 Budget Chicago Transit Board and CTA President Chicago Transit Board Terry Peterson, Chairman Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Arabel Alva Rosales, Vice Chairman Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Judge Gloria Chevere Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Kevin Irvine Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Rev. Dr. L. Bernard Jakes Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Rev. Johnny L. Miller Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Alejandro Silva Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Chicago Transit Authority Dorval R. Carter Jr., President CTA FY20 Budget Table of Contents Letter from the President ................................................................................................. 1 CTA Organizational Chart ................................................................................................. 5 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 7 Strategic Goals .................................................................................................................... 23 2014‐2022 Operating Budget Schedule ......................................................................... 25 2019 Operating Budget Performance ............................................................................ 29 President’s 2020 Proposed Operating Budget ............................................................. 37 President’s 2021‐2022 Proposed
    [Show full text]
  • L L L L R R R Table of Contents R List of Exhibits Ii R 1
    f r REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY r Engineering support Services for strategic Plan and Capital Investment Plan Implementation Task 6A Report Interstate Transfer Program May 13, 1988 Prepared by PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QUADE & DOUGLAS, INC. Chicago, Illinois l l l L r r r Table of Contents r List of Exhibits ii r 1. Background of Assignment 1 2 . Overview of Interstate Transfer Program 1 3. Conduct of Task 3 4. Content of and Issues Affecting Chicago's IST-Transit Program 3 5 . Conclusions 11 6. Exhibits 13 l l l l l i r r I LIST OF EXHIBITS r Letter Source Title r A UMTA Letter 4/20/88, Ettinger to Williams re IST Program B IDOT Original IST Program Allocations c IDOT Revised IST Program Allocations D PBQD List of Documents Reviewed E PBQD List of Meetings held and persons contacted F IDOT Transfer 2 Project List, Federal Obligations through March 31, 1988 G DPW Description of Subway Renovation Program (As Revised May 1985) H DPW Quarterly Progress Report No. 16, Jackson Park Transit Improvement . Project, January 1988, Page 12 I IDOT Letter 2/29/88, Wheeler to Williams re Howard/Dan Ryan Rescoping Proposal J RTA Memorandum 1/27/88, Gaudette to Johnson and Hankett re SWT fleet requirement K UMTA Attachment 4 to UMTA - City of Chicago Grant Agreement, Amendment 03, Projec t IL-23-9020, July 28, 1986. (Cost Escalation) l l l L L ii 1. Background of Assignment r The April 20, 1988 letter from UMTA (Joel P. Ettinger - Area 5 Director) to Chicago DPW (David s.
    [Show full text]