Humans and Animals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Question 1 - Religion and Animals. How we make use of animals. The different ways humans use animals. Task: try to come up with a wide and varied list of ways that humans use animals. (Ask around for ideas The rights and wrongs of that usage. from anyone near you) The status and rights animals (should) have. Write the list, we will come back to look at it. What the religions think about the use of animals. What rights do animals have? None at all. Humans We should treat the Some animals are superior to all animals we need deserve more other species so we with respect, but can respect than can do what we do what we want humans do. want with the others. Some animals All species are All animals should have equal – human, should be given more rights than animal, insect, more rights than others. bird, the lot. humans – they were here first. What do you think, where are you on the line? Any of these statements could appear on the exam paper. On the one hand some people would agree with this statement because . etc. etc. On the other hand some people would disagree with this statement because . etc. etc. I think that . .etc etc . because . etc. etc. (PWR) Yr11 Revision materials 2013 Page 1 of 17 Humans and animals Can you imagine a world without animals? Even those we ignore can do vital jobs - wild bees pollinate plants and trees making sure that they continue to produce foods for us to eat. Animals help us - pulling carts, for example. They give us companionship - have you got pets? They are part of our diet - we eat them. Parts of animals are used in clothing, and other types of manufacturing. They entertain us in zoos and circuses. We learn from them - in how they live and behave, as well as by experimenting on them. Birdsong and whale song can both soothe us when we feel tense. Many films and cartoons have animals as their focus and we take pleasure in that. We also overwork animals - causing their death. We experiment on them, taking them away from their natural environments and killing them during or after those experiments. We buy them as pets, then mistreat them. We hunt them in cruel ways, sometimes just for our own enjoyment, not because we need anything. If an animal is in the way of a human project, it has to move, or die. We eat animals, usually produced on farms that are more like factories and which treat the animals like products not as living beings. Every so often, we hear of animals that have killed humans or hurt them - like a shark attack, or a dog biting someone. Some species are dying out, so plans to build are sometimes affected by where those species live. If you have ever had a kitten, it's not so easy to litter-train at first! Not all of them like us - they bite and sting. And why on earth are there wasps?! What is the relationship between humans and animals - which side gets the best Are we different? deal? So what does make us different? Well, most humans think they are superior to animals. The fact that we eat animals, but kill an animal that eats a person, suggests that we think we are superior. We also make animals do things we'd never ask of a human - for example, the US marines now have dolphins that have been trained to seek and lay underwater mines. This suggests that we think they are less valuable than us. Humans use reason and logic to work things out; animals seem to behave more out of instinct. Our technology is more advanced than any used by animals. Our ways of communicating are more complicated. Some religions also believe that God gave humans dominion (power) over animals, which has been interpreted to mean 'do as you like', at times. Religions call animals 'sentient beings' - creatures that have senses and can feel pain. They are either created by God deliberately (Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Sikhism), or are beings in the cycle of rebirth (Buddhism and Hinduism). In all cases, they have value. No religion says we can't use animals, but they all say we should treat them with respect. Now you have thought about differences (PWR) Yr11 Revision materials 2013 Page 2 of 17 Introducing the elements of this topic This topic isn't just about how we use and treat animals. The examiner is going to ask you about specific ways we use and treat animals. He or she might ask you to describe or compare those ways, and to explain the issues caused by each. They will certainly want you to be able to write about a range of ways, and bring ideas from all of those into your exam answers - especially for the evaluative answers. So the next few pages are going to take each way that is listed in the course information, and make you think about it. The bits to learn Have a look at the uses of animals that the course mentions. Do you understand what each is about? Go through them, and write down, or discuss with your partner/group what you know. See if you can already say something for each of those bits to learn about each of the elements listed below. o Saving animals from extinction. o Hunting o Animals as companions. o Bull fighting. o Animals in sport. o The fur and ivory trades. o Transport and work animals. o Genetic modification of animals. o Farming animals o Cloning animals. o Zoos o Treatment of wildlife. What the religions say You already know that they think animals were either specially made by God, or are part of the same cycle of rebirth that humans are in. This gives them a special status. Even if we believe humans are better or superior, animals still have value. From that we can guess that if we abuse animals in how we use them or treat them, there might be a consequence. Well, let's look more closely at what the religions say. You can then apply their attitudes each time you meet an element. This is a really good way to reinforce the knowledge in your head, and so have a clear idea about their attitudes to animals overall. From the next few pages, choose the religion(s) you have studied, and make notes on their religious attitudes to animals. You need to note: 1. a list of points about the religion’s attitude (range of attitudes) to animals. (e.g. Christians think that animals were . ) 2. three teachings to use in the exam. (e.g. In the Bible it says that . ) 3. an explanation of how the teaching applies to the issue of animals today. (e.g. The bible says to eat the eggs / young but to leave the mother bird, so Christians think that it’s right to eat meat but the remaining population must be sustainable . .etc ) (PWR) Yr11 Revision materials 2013 Page 3 of 17 Christianity Christians believe that God gave humans dominion over the world and all in it. This gives them license to use it as they wish, bearing in mind that God wants them to look after the world (stewardship), and will expect it back in good condition on Judgement Day. Christianity teaches: God made the world and gave humans dominion over it (Genesis). 'Scientists must abandon laboratories and factories of death' (Pope John Paul II). Animals are a part of God's creation and as such deserve respect and protection (St Francis of Assisi). Jesus said that God cares about even the sparrows. The earth and everything in it is the Lord's (Bible). Christians believe that because all life was created by God, it should be protected and looked after. The developed world, which is mainly Christian, is the biggest consumer of meat, has many battery farms, sees hunting as a sport, and leads the world in using animals in medical research. At the same time, its zoos commonly protect endangered species, most families have pets, and animals are used as support for humans - police horses, guide dogs for the blind, and so on. Many Christians today choose to eat organic and free range meat, if they are not vegetarian. Many actively campaign against hunting as sport. Many agree only with the use of animals in medical experiments, and encourage research in methods that do not use animals. There is a dilemma. For many Christians, use of animals is acceptable if they have been looked after well - humane treatment is the key. On the Day of Judgement, they believe they will be called to account for their actions including how they treated animals, and if they fought or supported the systems that cause animals to suffer. Task: 1. produce a summary of Christian beliefs about animals. 2. add three to five teachings (some must be from the Bible) 3. explain how the teaching applies to animals (PWR) Yr11 Revision materials 2013 Page 4 of 17 Hinduism Respect for all life is central to Hinduism. All forms of life have the spark of the divine within them - the Ultimate Reality, Brahman. Most Hindus are vegetarians, and certain animals are considered very sacred in India, for example, cows and monkeys. The law of karma guides people's behaviour, so hurting animals would go against that. Hinduism teaches: Avoid harming other sentient beings or forms oflife (ahimsa). Hindu worship includes respect for all of nature, and many deities are linked to specific animals, for example, Shiva and the cobra.
Recommended publications
  • Bioethical Questions of Animals in Sport1

    Bioethical Questions of Animals in Sport1

    Preliminary communication UDK: 17:798/799 636.046:17 Bruno Ćurko (Croatia) Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split [email protected] BIOETHICAL QUESTIONS OF ANIMALS IN SPORT1 Abstract Animals are a part of sport industries, from the so-called traditions such as fox hunting and bullfighting, horse and dog racing, to the cruel examples of hare coursing, rodeo, and orangutan boxing (Thailand), to cock and dog fights. These are prominent examples of animal exploitation serving our human entertainment. In my presentation, I will try to identify some of the essential questions considering animal use in sports. Some of these questions are: Can we justify animal exploitation in the name of tradition? Can we take into consideration the well-being of sport animals before, during, and after their competitive career? How much could and should the imminent risk of animal stress, injuries, and fatalities prevent us from their exploitation in sports? If animals are ready to obey demands we set upon them, should we abuse them for our entertainment and sport? Keywords: animals, sports industry, cultural tradition, bioethics, entertainment 1 This paper is an elaborated adaptation of a lecture titled “Bioethical Questions of Animals in Sport”, presented at the conference “3rd Osijek days of bioethics” - Faculty of Education, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 11–12 November 2019. Pannoniana, vol. IV, no. I (2020): 143-153 Introduction When we think about animals in sport, we usually think about activities where people use animals in some competitions such as horse races, dog races, and other similar ones. But first, we need to research the definition of sport as it is.
  • The Use of Animals in Sports

    The Use of Animals in Sports

    Existence, Breeding, a,nd Rights: The Use of Animals in Sports Donald Scherer Bowling Green State University Against these lines of argument one frequently encounters a certain objection. It is argued that since the animals for fighting, hunting and racing exist only because they have been bred for such human uses, human beings are justified in so treating them. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate this line ofobjection, or to speak more precisely, to evaluate the two distinct objections implicit in this line. For the objection may be either that (l) the present uses of the animals are justified because they are better for the animals than the Standardly, philosophical arguments about the alternative, namely non-existence, or that quality of treatment human beings owe nonhuman animals! rest on two bases. Peter Singer is famous (2) breeding an animal for a purpose gives the for arguing from the capacity of animals to feel pain breeders (transferable) rights over what they to the conclusion that since almost none of the pain have bred. human beings cause animals is necessary, almost none of it is morally justifiable (Singer, 1989, pp. 78-79). I shall pursue these alternatives sequentially. Singer rests his case on the premise that who suffers pain does not affect the badness of the suffering, so The Value of Existence that, without strong justification, the infliction of pain is universally wrong (Ibid., pp. 77-78). Tom Regan is The strength ofthe first form ofthe objection rests on equally famous for his argument that the beliefs and a common intuition comparing the values of existence desires which normal one year-old mammals clearly and non-existence.
  • GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Focus on Hungary's Presidency

    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Focus on Hungary's Presidency

    WHITEHALL • WESTMINSTER • BELFAST • EDINBURGH • CARDIFF • EUROPE • INTERNATIONAL EUROPEAN EDITIONGOVERNMENT GAZETTE Focus on Hungary's Presidency November 2010 £10.00, €11.00 ISSN 2042-4167 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE November 2010 GOVERNMENT The Hungarian Foreign Minister sets out the aims and objectives of Hungary's EU Presidency Democracy Foreign Policy Redevelopment Environment Jerzy Buzek on Knut Fleckenstein Danuta Huebner Gunther its promotion discusses Brussels' outlines plans to Oettinger around the world relationship with redevelop central lays out his Russia and eastern Europe priorities Gov Gazette Nov Europe cover proof.indd 1 29/10/2010 12:57:35 Shrinking budgets but increasing service demands? Do you face the difficult challenge of maintaining or improving services while reducing costs? Atos Origin can help you ease the pressure on your staff, enabling them to focus on delivery. We do this by optimizing your existing infrastructure and processes to deliver greater efficiency, superior service and lower costs. Atos Origin. Helping you achieve more. For more information: www.atosorigin.com/achievemore [email protected] www.atosorigin.com ATE_Public&Health_Advert_10-10703.indd 1 10/28/2010 4:18:11 PM WHITEHALL • WESTMINSTER • BELFAST • EDINBURGH • CARDIFF • EUROPE • INTERNATIONAL EUROPEAN EDITIONG G Focus on Hungary's Presidency OVERNMENT AZETTE November 2010 £10.00, €11.00 ISSN 2042-4167 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Focus: Hungary's EU Presidency The Hungarian Foreign Minister sets out the aims and objectives of Hungary's EU Presidency
  • Anglo-American Blood Sports, 1776-1889: a Study of Changing Morals

    Anglo-American Blood Sports, 1776-1889: a Study of Changing Morals

    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1974 Anglo-American blood sports, 1776-1889: a study of changing morals. Jack William Berryman University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Berryman, Jack William, "Anglo-American blood sports, 1776-1889: a study of changing morals." (1974). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1326. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1326 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANGLO-AMERICAN BLOOD SPORTS, I776-I8891 A STUDY OF CHANGING MORALS A Thesis Presented By Jack William Berryman Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS April, 197^ Department of History » ii ANGLO-AMERICAN BLOOD SPORTS, 1776-1889 A STUDY OF CHANGING MORALS A Thesis By Jack V/illiam Berryman Approved as to style and content by« Professor Robert McNeal (Head of Department) Professor Leonard Richards (Member) ^ Professor Paul Boyer (I'/iember) Professor Mario DePillis (Chairman) April, 197^ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Upon concluding the following thesis, the many im- portant contributions of individuals other than myself loomed large in my mind. Without the assistance of others the project would never have been completed, I am greatly indebted to Professor Guy Lewis of the Department of Physical Education at the University of Massachusetts who first aroused my interest in studying sport history and continued to motivate me to seek the an- swers why.
  • 1 ANIMALS, SPORT, and the ENVIRONMENT Kass Gibson

    1 ANIMALS, SPORT, and the ENVIRONMENT Kass Gibson

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Plymouth Marjon University Repository ANIMALS, SPORT, AND THE ENVIRONMENT Kass Gibson 1 Purpose – To outline the multiple ways in which animals are inserted into sporting practices, outline historical and contemporary approaches to studying human-animal sporting practices, and advocate for the centring of sociological problems in human- animal research in sporting contexts and cultures and for considering such problems in relation to environmental issues. Design/methodology/approach -- In the first part of the chapter, conceptual differentiation of animals in the animal-sport complex is presented. Subsequently, studies of interspecies sport are reviewed with reference to the ‘animal turn’ in the literature. In the second part, a critique is presented relating to: i) the privileging of companion animals, especially dogs and horses, which overlooks the multiple ways animals are integrated into (multispecies) sport; ii) micro-sociological and insider ethnographies of companionship displacing of sociological problems in favour of relationship perspectives; and iii) the environment as absent from analysis. The conclusion offers implications for understanding multispecies sport and the environment. Findings -- I chart a general shift in emphasis and focus from animals as an ‘absent- presence’ in pursuit of sociological knowledge towards a clearly defined focus on interspecies sport as a field of research characterised by investigations of relationships with companion animals through the ‘animal turn.’ Research limitations/implications – The focus on companion species means other animals (i.e., non-companions) are understudied, big picture sociological questions are often side-lined, environmental concerns marginalised, and sociological understanding of the environment more generally is either ignored or reduced to a conduit of human-animal interactions.
  • MANIFESTO for ANIMALS General Election 2020

    MANIFESTO for ANIMALS General Election 2020

    THE IRISH SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS MANIFESTO for ANIMALS General Election 2020 MakeMake youryour votevote countcount forfor animalanimal welfarewelfare OurOur vision:vision: ToTo endend crueltycruelty toto animalsanimals inin IrelandIreland #GE2020#GE2020 #ISPCA#ISPCA WWW.ISPCA.IE MANIFESTO FOR ANIMALS Why you should vote in the general election Animal welfare is an important societal issue. With the General Election to be held on 8th February 2020, you will have an opportunity to vote for those candidates that support animal welfare. Your vote can make a difference. By asking candidates their views on key animal welfare issues you can gauge their support, raise the profile of these issues, and help to promote animal welfare through the course of the next government. We have listed below key animal welfare issues in Ireland today and have listed the actions we would like to see the next government take to continue the improvements to animal welfare achieved over the course of the previous government. The ISPCA cares about the welfare of all animals including pet animals, horses and donkeys, farm animals, wild animals and animals used in sport, entertainment and science. To find out more about the ISPCA please visit www.ispca.ie KEY ANIMAL WELFARE ISSUES Education Education is the key to improving animal welfare in Ireland. The ISPCA calls on the government to introduce an animal welfare module to National School Curriculum with a focus on responsible pet ownership and to give students an understanding of their moral and legal responsibilities to animals for which they are responsible. The impact of such education would be generational and will reduce the levels of suffering witnessed by the ISPCA.
  • Law Enforcement Takes Legal Action Angell to the Rescue

    Law Enforcement Takes Legal Action Angell to the Rescue

    SPRING/SUMMER 2010 MSPCA.ORG 350 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130 Non-profit Org. U.S. Postage PAID MSPCA/Angell The mission of the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals–Angell Animal Medical Center is to protect animals, relieve their suffering, advance their health and welfare, prevent cruelty, and work for a just and compassionate society. GOOD NEWS! ADOPTIONS UP EVEN IN DOWN ECONOMY ANGELL TO Please Will You Be Our Fan? Can You See into the Future? THE RESCUE Do you and your friends enjoy connecting with each You don’t need a crystal ball to know that animals will always need our OBSERVANT OWNERS, other on Facebook? If so, please become an official help. We’ve been helping them, with the support of friends like you, since 1868. VIGILANT VETS Fan of the MSPCA–Angell page. MSPCA at Nevins Farm has its own Facebook page too, as do Please, as you make your estate plans, consider a bequest to the our MSPCA Animal Action Team and The American MSPCA–Angell as a fitting continuation of your lifelong love for animals. And when you do, please let us know! We’d like to invite you Fondouk. All our pages are updated frequently and into our Circle of Friends and acknowledge your thoughtful concern for the LAW filled with interesting news about animals and the future of our organization. By providing for the animals in your own people who love them. It’s yet another important way future plans, you become an essential member of our Society.
  • Bienestar Animal En Las Corridas De Toros, Por El Simple Hecho De Causarle Lesiones Y Consecuentemente La Muerte

    Bienestar Animal En Las Corridas De Toros, Por El Simple Hecho De Causarle Lesiones Y Consecuentemente La Muerte

    BIENESTAR ANIMAL EN L A S CORRIDAS DE TOROS Procuraduría Ambiental y del Ordenamiento Territorial de la CDMX México, 2017 DIRECTORIO Procurador Miguel Angel Cancino Aguilar Subprocuradora Ambiental, de Protección y Bienestar a los Animales Leticia Mejía Hernández Sobprocurador de Ordenamiento Territorial Emigdio Roa Márquez Subprocurador de Asuntos Jurídicos Marco Antonio Esquivel López Coordinadora Técnica y de Sistemas Gabriela Ortiz Merino Coordinador de Participación Ciudadana y Difusión Francisco A. Calderón Córdova Coordinadora Administrativa Oralia Reséndiz Márquez CONTENIDO ANTECEDENTES EN PAOT .................................................................................................................. 1 RECONOCIMIENTOS DE HECHOS ......................................................................................................... 1 DERECHO COMPARADO ........................................................................................................................ 3 LAS CORRIDAS DE TOROS EN LA CIUDAD DE MÉXICO ....................................................................15 DICTAMEN JURÍDICO SOBRE LA PROHIBICIÓN DE LA TAUROMAQUIA Y LAS RESTRICCIONES LEGÍTIMAS A DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES ....................................................................................20 ANÁLISIS TÉCNICO RESPECTO A LA CRUELDAD Y MALTRATO DURANTE LAS CORRIDAS DE TOROS ...................................................................................................................................................37 POSTURA DE LA
  • Recovering the History of Cockfighting in Kentucky Joseph R

    Recovering the History of Cockfighting in Kentucky Joseph R

    The Kentucky Review Volume 13 | Number 3 Article 2 Winter 1997 Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Recovering the History of Cockfighting in Kentucky Joseph R. Jones University of Kentucky Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review Part of the United States History Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Jones, Joseph R. (1997) "Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Recovering the History of Cockfighting in Kentucky," The Kentucky Review: Vol. 13 : No. 3 , Article 2. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review/vol13/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Kentucky Libraries at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Kentucky Review by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Recovering the History of Cockfighting in Kentucky Joseph R. Jones For Charles P. Roland, eminent historian and keen observer of Southern life, and the ideal traveling companion A popular encyclopedia of sports from the 1940s1 has a short, clear, and blandly neutral article on cockfighting that describes it as the oldest known sport in which humans use animals. Asians pitted male partridges and quails for centuries before fighting chickens emigrated from India to both East and West. It is a universal amusement (says the encyclopedia), was common in the eastern United States in the late eighteenth century, and has maintained its popularity in America "down through all the generations, despite efforts of authorities to stamp it out.
  • Imaging Animals

    Imaging Animals

    This file is part of the following reference: Dover, Barbara Ann (2008) Interrogating reciprocal gaze: the animal and human in contemporary art. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/17278 PART ONE: PERSPECTIVES ON ANIMALS AND HUMANS 1 CHAPTER ONE – INTRODUCTION 1.1 Companion Animals: The Pet Phenomenon Recent pet industry research indicates significant changes in pet ownership in that Americans now own more pets than ever with the highest level recorded of 62 per cent of all households owning a pet. In 2003, Americans kept 65 million dogs as pets (Dillon, 2005) and approximately 78 million cats with 34 per cent of households owning at least one cat (HSUS, 2005). In 2008, in the United Kingdom, 43 per cent of households owned a pet with 22 percent of these homes owning a dog, a total population of seven and a quarter million dogs. With cat ownership increasing in the United Kingdom, the total population of cats is over seven million with 18 per cent of households owning a cat (PFMA, 2008). Pet ownership is even higher in Australia; one of the highest in the world, 64 per cent of the seven and a half million households in Australia own pets (Petnet, 2003) with four million dogs and two and a half million cats (ABC, 2007). Of these, 91 per cent of pet owners reported feeling very close to their pet (Petnet, 2003). Households spend more on their pets than on child care. ABC (2007) notes that “… what we are witnessing is the rise of the ‘fur family’” (ABC, 2007).
  • An Evaluation of Portuguese Societal Opinion Towards the Practice of Bullfighting

    An Evaluation of Portuguese Societal Opinion Towards the Practice of Bullfighting

    animals Article An Evaluation of Portuguese Societal Opinion towards the Practice of Bullfighting Francisco Javier Diéguez 1,* , Yara Zau 2, Inés Viegas 3, Sara Fragoso 4,5, Patricia V. Turner 6,7 and Gonçalo da Graça-Pereira 4,8 1 Departamento de Anatomía, Producción Animal y Ciencias Clínicas Veterinarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Universitario s/n, 27002 Lugo, Spain 2 MYPZ—Farma&Vet, Av. Joaquim Agostinho 8; Loja B, Santa Cruz, 2560-065 A-Dos-Cunhados—Torres Vedras, Portugal; [email protected] 3 ICAAM–Mediterranean Institute of Agronomical and Environmental Sciences, Institute for Advanced Research and Formation, Évora University, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal; [email protected] 4 Centro Para o Conhecimento Animal. Av. Bombeiros Voluntários de Algés 40A, 1495-143 Algés, Portugal; [email protected] (S.F.); [email protected] (G.d.G.-P.) 5 LabCAP—Instituto Superior de Estudos Interculturais e Transdisciplinares (ISEIT), Instituto Piaget de Almada, Avenida Jorge Peixinho, 30 Quinta da Arreinela, 2805-059 Almada, Portugal 6 Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada; [email protected] 7 Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA 01887, USA 8 Escola Superior Agraria de Elvas, Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre, Av. 14 de Janeiro 13, 7350-092 Elvas, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-9828-22400 Received: 29 July 2020; Accepted: 3 November 2020; Published: 7 November 2020 Simple Summary: Bullfighting is one of the most controversial topics in animal welfare and ethics in recent years. This activity is an issue at the forefront of many animal welfare organizations.
  • Exotic and Wild Animals for Public Display: an Unnecessary Entertainment

    Exotic and Wild Animals for Public Display: an Unnecessary Entertainment

    SUBMISSION102812 - (WSPA) EXOTIC AND WILD ANIMALS FOR PUBLIC DISPLAY: AN UNNECESSARY ENTERTAINMENT Appendix D World Society for the Protection of Animals 18 Heather Street, Parnell, Auckland June 2012 Page i SUBMISSION102812 - (WSPA) Table of Contents Overview ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose of paper .................................................................................................................................................. 1 WSPA’s proposals ................................................................................................................................................. 1 WSPA’s policy ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Circuses .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Ancient circuses .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Types of circus ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 The Barnum & Bailey / Moscow Circus type ...................................................................................................