DOCSLIB.ORG

PM LAIFM B My Ro

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PM LAIFM B My Ro k m w e P m l a i f m B m y r o ©if 'MMmmss mBsmmme l Andrew W. Sheppard Department of Pure and Applied Biology Imperial College Silwood Park Ascot, Berkshire. Submitted as the requirement for a Doctorate of Philosophy at the University of London. Abstract: This field based research project was designed to study the influence of insect herbivores on the population dynamics of Heracleum sphondvlium subsp. sphondvlium, and to conduct field manipulation experiments to test interspecific competition theory in the structuring of different insect herbivore guilds. The action of insects on H. sphondvlium populations of different densities was established in three ways. First, three populations were monitored. Second, artificial damage treatments were applied to flowering plants, and the seeds produced used in germination experiments. Third, a factorial-design experiment was conducted incorporating different herbivore loads. Basal stem diameter (BSD) was correlated with seed number and mean seed weight. After stem formation any defoliation (artificial) above 50%, reduced the seed number. Mean seed weight, for a particular BSD, decreased only when defoliation approached 100%, Seed production after defloration of primary umbels occurred largely on normally unreproductive lower secondary umbels, and was not completely compensatory. Complete plant destruction by insects was a rare occurrence; the plants affected showed no recovery in the same season. Germination and survival were greatest in damp meadow conditions. Heavy seeds (1° umbel) germinated later, but survived better than light seeds (2° umbel) in the dense sward. Detailed insect population observations produced positive correlations that demonstrated spatial co-occurrence to be the norm for most herbivores. On average, 40-50% of the specialist herbivores were found at any one site and these were mostly temporally separated. The insect addition/removal experiments to detect asymmetric interspeeific competition between Phaedon tumidulus (Germar). (Col.: Chryscmelidae, leaf-chewer) and Depressaria pastinacella. (Dupcnchel), (Lep.: Oecophoridae, flower/seed feeder) showed an interaction. Moth oviposition was enhanced on beetle-damaged, low density plants, but was reduced on such plants at high density. Density dependent larval mortality compensated for the egg distribution differences. There was no evidence to support interspecific competition, resource limitation or spatially density dependent parasitism for either herbivore. ’ Table of Contents. Abstract........... 2 List of Tables. 7 List of Figures 9 1. Introduction............................................ -.............................................10 1.1 The Project..........................................................................................10 1.1.1 Why hogweed?...................................................................................11 1.1.2 The use of field experiments......................................................12 1.2 Population Dynamics of Plants and their Insect Herbivores....... 13 1.3 The Action of Insects on Forbs.......................................................14 1.4 Plant-Herbivore Dynamics.................................................................. 23 1.5 The Importance of Interspecific Competition...............................28 1.5.1 What is competition?.................................................................... 28 1.5.2 A brief history of competition...............................................31 1.5.3 Herbivore competition: hypotheses and re v ie w s...................32 1.5.4 Testing for interspecific competition......................................35 1.5.5 Competition within insect herbivore guilds.............................40 1.5.6 Competition between insect herbivore guilds........................... 44 2. The Biology and Natural History of Heracleum sohondvlium and its Insect Herbivores..................................... 46 2.1 The Biology of Hogweed................................................................... 46 2.1.1 Plant description......................................................................... 46 2.1.2 Biology and life history dynamics........................................... 4? 2.1.3 Floral biology and pollination................................. ............... 52 2.1.4 Habitat....................................... ..................................... ........... 56 2.1.5 Geographical and altitudinal distribution.......----........ 60 2.1.6 Plant chemistry.............. ................. .......................................... 61 2.1.7 Han and vertebrate herbivores..................................... .......... 63 2.1.8 Hogweed herbivores, parasites, pathogens & saprophytes..... 65 2.2 The Herbivores of Hogweed......................... ................................ 71 2.2.1 The leaf chewers.......... ............................................................... l & 2.2.1.1 Phaedon tumidu-lus (Coleoptera: Chryscmel idae) ................ 2.2.1.2 Lioohloeus tessulatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)........... 74 2.2.1.3 Eoermenia chaerophvllei la (Lepidoptera: Epermenidae).... 76 3 2.2.2 The leaf miners.............................................. .............................79 2.2.2.1 Eulela heraclei (Diptera: Tephrltidae).............................. 79 2.2.2.2 Phvtomvza spondvlii (Diptera: Agromyzidae)....................... 82 2.2.2.3 Phvtomvza heracleana (Diptera: Agromyzidae)..................... 83 2.2.3 The leaf rollers---- ! ...................................................................85 2.2.3.1 Agonopterix heracleana (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae).........85 2.2.4 The gall formers...........................................................................86 2.2.4.1 Macrolabis heraclei (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae)................8 6 2.2.4.2 Continarina nicolavi (Diptera: Cecidomyi idae)..................87 2.2.4.3 Lasioptera carophi la (Diptera: Cecidomy i idae)..................88 2.2.5 The sap suckers............................................................................88 2.2.5.1 Evsarcoris fabric! (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)....................88 2.2.5.2 Polvcoris baccarum (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)....................89 2.2.5.3 Cercopis vulnerata (Homoptera: Cercopidae)....................... 89 2.2.5.4 Phi 1 aenus spumaris (Homoptera: Cercopidae)..................... 89 2.2.5.5 Euptervx aurata (Homoptera: Cicadel 1 idae).........................90 2.2.5.6 Cavariella pastinacae (Homoptera: Aphidae)......................91 2.2.5.7 Dvsaphis 1 auberti (Homoptera: Aphidae).............................. 91 2.2.6 The stem borers........................................... 92 2.2.6.1 Melanaqromvza angeliciphaga (Diptera: Agromyzidae).........92 2.2.7 The flower/seed feeders............... ....94 2.2.7.1 Depressaria pastinaceila (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae)....94 2.2.7.2 Cvdia aurana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)...........................96 2.2.7.3 Liriomvza 1 utea (Diptera: Agromyzidae).............................. 98 2.2.8 The root borers............................................................................98 2.2.8.1 Chei losia paoana (Diptera: Syrphidae)................................99 2.2.8.2 Cheilosia illustrata (Diptera: Syrphidae).............. .....100 3. The Influence of Insect Herbivores on the Population Biology of Hogweed.................... 101 3.1 Introduction................... 101 3.2 Methods....................................................... ..................................................................... 104 3.2.1 Hogweed population studies........................................................10,4 3.2.2 Growth and development of plants of a known weight.............105 3.2.3 Defoliation and defloration experiments..............................106 3.2.3.1 Defoliation experiment 1982..........................................106 3.2.3.2 Defol iation experiment 1983................................. i ............ 107 3.2.3.3 Defloration experiment................................ ........ : ........ ..107 3.2.4 Germination experiments............................................... 108 4 3.2.5 Insect damage and plant density experiment.......................... I l l 3.3 Resul ts ............................................................................................... 117 3.3.1 Hogweed population studies........................................................117 3.3.2 Weighed plants............................................................................. 125 3.3.3 Defoliation and defloration...................................................... 12? 3.3.3.1 Defoliation experiments.................................... 12? 3.3.3.2 Defloration experiment..........................................................133 3.3.4 Germination experiments............................................................. 136 3.3.5 Factorial experiment of the effect of plant density and insect damage levels on plant reproduction...................14? 3.4 Discussion..........................................................................................158 4. The Population Dynamics of some Hogweed Insect Herbivores and Studies of the Competitive Interactions between them.......... 168 4.1 Introduction................................... 168 4.2 Methods............................................................................................... 173 4.2.1 Monitoring the hogweed herbivore community...........................173 4.2.2 Insect culturing and studies of population parameters......
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Apiaceae) - Beds, Old Cambs, Hunts, Northants and Peterborough
    CHECKLIST OF UMBELLIFERS (APIACEAE) - BEDS, OLD CAMBS, HUNTS, NORTHANTS AND PETERBOROUGH Scientific name Common Name Beds old Cambs Hunts Northants and P'boro Aegopodium podagraria Ground-elder common common common common Aethusa cynapium Fool's Parsley common common common common Ammi majus Bullwort very rare rare very rare very rare Ammi visnaga Toothpick-plant very rare very rare Anethum graveolens Dill very rare rare very rare Angelica archangelica Garden Angelica very rare very rare Angelica sylvestris Wild Angelica common frequent frequent common Anthriscus caucalis Bur Chervil occasional frequent occasional occasional Anthriscus cerefolium Garden Chervil extinct extinct extinct very rare Anthriscus sylvestris Cow Parsley common common common common Apium graveolens Wild Celery rare occasional very rare native ssp. Apium inundatum Lesser Marshwort very rare or extinct very rare extinct very rare Apium nodiflorum Fool's Water-cress common common common common Astrantia major Astrantia extinct very rare Berula erecta Lesser Water-parsnip occasional frequent occasional occasional x Beruladium procurrens Fool's Water-cress x Lesser very rare Water-parsnip Bunium bulbocastanum Great Pignut occasional very rare Bupleurum rotundifolium Thorow-wax extinct extinct extinct extinct Bupleurum subovatum False Thorow-wax very rare very rare very rare Bupleurum tenuissimum Slender Hare's-ear very rare extinct very rare or extinct Carum carvi Caraway very rare very rare very rare extinct Chaerophyllum temulum Rough Chervil common common common common Cicuta virosa Cowbane extinct extinct Conium maculatum Hemlock common common common common Conopodium majus Pignut frequent occasional occasional frequent Coriandrum sativum Coriander rare occasional very rare very rare Daucus carota Wild Carrot common common common common Eryngium campestre Field Eryngo very rare, prob.
    [Show full text]
  • T1)E Bedford,1)Ire Naturaii,T 45
    T1)e Bedford,1)ire NaturaIi,t 45 Journal for the year 1990 Bedfordshire Natural History Society 1991 'ISSN 0951 8959 I BEDFORDSHffiE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY 1991 Chairman: Mr D. Anderson, 88 Eastmoor Park, Harpenden, Herts ALS 1BP Honorary Secretary: Mr M.C. Williams, 2 Ive! Close, Barton-le-Clay, Bedford MK4S 4NT Honorary Treasurer: MrJ.D. Burchmore, 91 Sundon Road, Harlington, Dunstable, Beds LUS 6LW Honorary Editor (Bedfordshire Naturalist): Mr C.R. Boon, 7 Duck End Lane, Maulden, Bedford MK4S 2DL Honorary Membership Secretary: Mrs M.]. Sheridan, 28 Chestnut Hill, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, Beds LU7 7TR Honorary Scientific Committee Secretary: Miss R.A. Brind, 46 Mallard Hill, Bedford MK41 7QS Council (in addition to the above): Dr A. Aldhous MrS. Cham DrP. Hyman DrD. Allen MsJ. Childs Dr P. Madgett MrC. Baker Mr W. Drayton MrP. Soper Honorary Editor (Muntjac): Ms C. Aldridge, 9 Cowper Court, Markyate, Herts AL3 8HR Committees appointed by Council: Finance: Mr]. Burchmore (Sec.), MrD. Anderson, Miss R. Brind, Mrs M. Sheridan, Mr P. Wilkinson, Mr M. Williams. Scientific: Miss R. Brind (Sec.), Mr C. Boon, Dr G. Bellamy, Mr S. Cham, Miss A. Day, DrP. Hyman, MrJ. Knowles, MrD. Kramer, DrB. Nau, MrE. Newman, Mr A. Outen, MrP. Trodd. Development: Mrs A. Adams (Sec.), MrJ. Adams (Chairman), Ms C. Aldridge (Deputy Chairman), Mrs B. Chandler, Mr M. Chandler, Ms]. Childs, Mr A. Dickens, MrsJ. Dickens, Mr P. Soper. Programme: MrJ. Adams, Mr C. Baker, MrD. Green, MrD. Rands, Mrs M. Sheridan. Trustees (appointed under Rule 13): Mr M. Chandler, Mr D. Green, Mrs B.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Biology Island Biology
    IIssllaanndd bbiioollooggyy Allan Sørensen Allan Timmermann, Ana Maria Martín González Camilla Hansen Camille Kruch Dorte Jensen Eva Grøndahl, Franziska Petra Popko, Grete Fogtmann Jensen, Gudny Asgeirsdottir, Hubertus Heinicke, Jan Nikkelborg, Janne Thirstrup, Karin T. Clausen, Karina Mikkelsen, Katrine Meisner, Kent Olsen, Kristina Boros, Linn Kathrin Øverland, Lucía de la Guardia, Marie S. Hoelgaard, Melissa Wetter Mikkel Sørensen, Morten Ravn Knudsen, Pedro Finamore, Petr Klimes, Rasmus Højer Jensen, Tenna Boye Tine Biedenweg AARHUS UNIVERSITY 2005/ESSAYS IN EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY Teachers: Bodil K. Ehlers, Tanja Ingversen, Dave Parker, MIchael Warrer Larsen, Yoko L. Dupont & Jens M. Olesen 1 C o n t e n t s Atlantic Ocean Islands Faroe Islands Kent Olsen 4 Shetland Islands Janne Thirstrup 10 Svalbard Linn Kathrin Øverland 14 Greenland Eva Grøndahl 18 Azores Tenna Boye 22 St. Helena Pedro Finamore 25 Falkland Islands Kristina Boros 29 Cape Verde Islands Allan Sørensen 32 Tristan da Cunha Rasmus Højer Jensen 36 Mediterranean Islands Corsica Camille Kruch 39 Cyprus Tine Biedenweg 42 Indian Ocean Islands Socotra Mikkel Sørensen 47 Zanzibar Karina Mikkelsen 50 Maldives Allan Timmermann 54 Krakatau Camilla Hansen 57 Bali and Lombok Grete Fogtmann Jensen 61 Pacific Islands New Guinea Lucía de la Guardia 66 2 Solomon Islands Karin T. Clausen 70 New Caledonia Franziska Petra Popko 74 Samoa Morten Ravn Knudsen 77 Tasmania Jan Nikkelborg 81 Fiji Melissa Wetter 84 New Zealand Marie S. Hoelgaard 87 Pitcairn Katrine Meisner 91 Juan Fernandéz Islands Gudny Asgeirsdottir 95 Hawaiian Islands Petr Klimes 97 Galápagos Islands Dorthe Jensen 102 Caribbean Islands Cuba Hubertus Heinicke 107 Dominica Ana Maria Martin Gonzalez 110 Essay localities 3 The Faroe Islands Kent Olsen Introduction The Faroe Islands is a treeless archipelago situated in the heart of the warm North Atlantic Current on the Wyville Thompson Ridge between 61°20’ and 62°24’ N and between 6°15’ and 7°41’ W.
    [Show full text]
  • See Full Species List
    County Wildlife Action Name of Site: Billingford Common Surveyors: Lusie Ambler Ann Foreman Nick Lingwood Vicky Rusby Ian Tart Becky Whatley Dates of Surveys 09/04/17, 06/05/17, 19/05/17, 11/06/17, 23/07/17, 12/08/17, 09/09/17 Plus additional casual visits Scientific Name Common Name Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 Comp 4 Comp 5 DAFOR Comment/Location Achillea millefolium Yarrow 1 2 4 O Aegopodium podagraria Ground Elder 3 4 O Agrimonia eupatoria Agrimony 1 R Agrostis canina Velvet Bent 5 R Agrostis capillaris Common Bent 1 5 F Agrostis gigantea Black Bent 5 R Alliaria petiolata Garlic Mustard 2 5 O Alnus glutinosa Alder 3 R Alopecurus myosuroides Black-grass 1 R Alopecurus pratensis Meadow Foxtail 1 2 LA Angelica sylvestris Wild Angelica 1 2 3 4 O Anisantha sterilis Barren Brome 1 4 LF Anthriscus sylvestris Cowparsley 1 2 LF Aphanes agg Parsley Piert agg 1 R Apium nodiflorum Fool's Watercress 2 R In ditch Arabidopsis thaliana Thale Cress 2 R Arctium lappa Greater Burdock 2 O Arctium minus Lesser Burdock 1 4 O Arenaria serpyllifolia Thyme-leaved sandwort 1 R Aria praecox Early Hair-grass 1 R Armoracia rusticana Horseradish 1 O Large patches Arrhenatherum elatius False Oat-grass 1 2 LD/LA Artemisia vulgaris Mugwort 1 2 4 LF Arum maculatum Lords and Ladies 3 5 R Ballota nigra Black Horehound 1 4 R Barberea sp Cress sp 2 R In ditch Bellis perennis Daisy 2 R Berula erecta Lesser Water Parsnip 4 R Riverside Betula pendula Silver Birch 1 R Saplings Bromus sterilis Barren Brome 1 R Calystegia sepium Hedge Bindweed 2 4 O Capsella bursa-pastoris Shepherd's
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Biological Sciences Research (ABSR), volume 4 2nd International Conference on Biomedical and Biological Engineering 2017 (BBE 2017) Ultrastructure and Self-cleaning Function of Moth (Notodontidae) and Butterfly (Lycaenidae) Wings Yan FANG, Gang SUN*, Jing-shi YIN, Wan-xing WANG and Yu-qian WANG School of Life Science, Changchun Normal University, Changchun 130032, China *Corresponding author Keywords: Ultrastructure, Self-cleaning, Wettability, Moth, Butterfly, Biomaterial. Abstract. The microstructure, hydrophobicity, adhesion and chemical composition of the butterfly and moth wing surfaces were investigated by a scanning electron microscope (SEM), a contact angle meter, and a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR). Using ground calcium carbonate (heavy CaCO3 ) as contaminating particle, the self-cleaning performance of the wing surface was evaluated. The wing surfaces, composed of naturally hydrophobic material (chitin, protein, fat, etc.), possess complicated hierarchical micro/nano structures. According to the large contact angle (CA, 148.3~156.2° for butterfly, 150.4~154.7° for moth) and small sliding angle (SA, 1~3° for butterfly, 1~4° for moth), the wing surface is of low adhesion and superhydrophobicity. The removal rate of contaminating particle from the wing surface is averagely 88.0% (butterfly wing) and 87.7% (moth wing). There is a good positive correlation ( R 2 =0.8385 for butterfly, 0.8155 for moth) between particle removal rate and roughness index of the wing surface. The coupling effect of material element and structural element contributes to the outstanding superhydrophobicity and self-cleaning performance of the wing surface. The wings of flying insect can be potentially used as templates for biomimetic preparation of biomedical interfacial material with multi-functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Preparation and Clearance Environmental Statement Volume 3
    Site Preparation and Clearance Environmental Statement Volume 3 – Appendix 14-06 Consultancy Report: A Baseline Assessment of the Bryophytes of Key Habitats within the Wylfa NPS Site © Horizon Nuclear Power Wylfa Limited Environmental Statement Volume 3 – Appendix 14-06 Wylfa Newydd Project Site Preparation and Clearance [This page is intentionally blank] © Horizon Nuclear Power Wylfa Limited Wylfa Newydd Project Consultancy Report: A Baseline Assessment of the Bryophytes of Key Habitats within the Wylfa Study Area November 2014 Mark Jackson Document Number: 60PO8007/TER/REP/004 Horizon Ref: WN03.01.01-S5-PAC-REP-00010 Document Date: December 2015 Version: 3 Document control sheet BPP 04 F8 version 16 Oct 2013 Project: Wylfa Newydd Project Client: Horizon Nuclear Power Ltd. Project Number: 60PO8007 Document A baseline assessment of the bryophytes of key areas within the Title: Wylfa study area Ref. No: 60PO8007/TER/REP/004 Originated by Checked by Reviewed by NAME NAME NAME ORIGINAL Mark Jackson Jonathan Jackson Adrian Hutchings NAME INITIALS Approved by As Project Manager I confirm that the above document(s) have been subjected to Rob Bromley Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue DATE 12/12/14 Document status: Final REVISION NAME NAME NAME 2 Mark Jackson Jonathan Jackson Nick Clark NAME INITIALS Approved by As Project Manager I confirm that the above document(s) have been subjected to Rob Bromley Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue DATE 16/10/15 Document status: Final REVISION NAME NAME NAME 3 Suzanne Jenkins Jonathan Jackson NAME INITIALS Approved by As Project Manager I confirm that the above document(s) have been subjected to Rob Bromley Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue DATE 16/12/15 Document status: Final Jacobs U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Tag Der Artenvielfalt 2007 Neu
    Tag der Artenvielfalt am 19.05.2007 am Handtuch Handtuch Brombeerhang Wissenschaftlich Deutsch Wissenschaftlich Deutsch Wirbeltiere Vögel Turdus merula Amsel Motacilla alba Bachstelze Parus caeruleus Blaumeise Fringilla coelebs Buchfink Garrulus glandarius Eichelhäher Emberiza citrinelle Goldammer Emberiza citrinelle Goldammer Picus viridis Grünspecht Prunella modularis Heckenbraunelle Sitta europaea Kleiber Parus major Kohlmeise Buteo buteo Mäusebussard Buteo buteo Mäusebussard Apus apus Mauersegler Sylvia atricapilla Mönchsgrasmücke Sylvia atricapilla Mönchsgrasmücke Lanius collurio Neuntöter Turdus philomelos Singdrossel Sturnus vulgaris Star Troglodytes troglodytes Zaunkönig Phylloscopus collybita Zilpzalp Phylloscopus collybita Zilpzalp Reptilien Lacerta agilis Zauneidechse Lacerta agilis Zauneidechse Amphibien Rana esculenta Wasserfrosch Gliedertiere Käfer Tag der Artenvielfalt am 19.05.2007 am Handtuch Chrysomelidae spec. ...Blattkäfer Chrysomelidae spec.(cf. Melasoma) ...Blattkäfer Halyzia sedecimguttata 16-Fleckiger Marienkäfer Coccinella septempunctata 7-Punkt Marienkäfer (+ Larven) Coccinella septempunctata 7-Punkt Marienkäfer (+ Larven) Smaragdina cyanea Blauer Langbeinblattkäfer Cantharis fusca Brauner Fliegenkäfer Phyllopertha horticola Gartenlaubkäfer (Junikäfer) Grüner Scheinbockkäfer, Grüner Scheinbockkäfer, Oedemera nobilis Blaugrüner Schenkelkäfer Oedemera nobilis Blaugrüner Schenkelkäfer Anthaxia nitidula Zierlicher Prachtkäfer Schmetterlinge (Kleines) Wiesenvögelchen Coenympha pamphilus Kleiner Heufalter Euclidia
    [Show full text]
  • Descarcă La Suprafaţă Sub Forma Izvoarelor (Culver, 1995)
    https://biblioteca-digitala.ro MUZEUL ŢĂRII CRIŞURILOR NYMPHAEA FOLIA NATURAE BIHARIAE XL Editura Muzeului Ţării Crişurilor Oradea 2013 https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Orice corespondenţă se va adresa: Toute correspondence sera envoyée à l’adresse: Please send any mail to the Richten Sie bitte jedwelche following adress: Korrespondenz an die Addresse: MUZEUL ŢĂRII CRIŞURILOR RO-410464 Oradea, B-dul Dacia nr. 1-3 ROMÂNIA Redactor şef al publicațiilor M.T.C. Editor-in-chief of M.T.C. publications Prof. Univ. Dr. AUREL CHIRIAC Colegiu de redacţie Editorial board ADRIAN GAGIU ERIKA POSMOŞANU Dr. MÁRTON VENCZEL, redactor responsabil Comisia de referenţi Advisory board Prof. Dr. J. E. MCPERSON, Southern Illinois Univ. at Carbondale, USA Prof. Dr. VLAD CODREA, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca Prof. Dr. MASSIMO OLMI, Universita degli Studi della Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy Dr. MIKLÓS SZEKERES Institute of Plant Biology, Szeged Lector Dr. IOAN SÎRBU Universitatea „Lucian Blaga”,Sibiu Prof. Dr. VASILE ŞOLDEA, Universitatea Oradea Prof. Univ. Dr. DAN COGÂLNICEANU, Universitatea Ovidius, Constanţa Lector Univ. Dr. IOAN GHIRA, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca Prof. Univ. Dr. IOAN MĂHĂRA, Universitatea Oradea GABRIELA ANDREI, Muzeul Naţional de Ist. Naturală “Grigora Antipa”, Bucureşti Fondator Founded by Dr. SEVER DUMITRAŞCU, 1973 ISSN 0253-4649 https://biblioteca-digitala.ro CUPRINS CONTENT Paleontologie Paleontology ERIKA POSMOŞANU: Taphonomic analysis of the Middle Triassic marine vertebrate assemblages from Lugaşu de Sus and Peștiș (Bihor,
    [Show full text]
  • The Trouble with Butterflies Author(S): White, R
    https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ The Journal of research on the lepidoptera. Arcadia, Calif.Lepidoptera Research Foundation https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/129988 v.25 (1986-1987): https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/238256 Article/Chapter Title: The Trouble with Butterflies Author(s): White, R. Page(s): Page 207, Page 208, Page 209, Page 210, Page 211, Page 212 Holding Institution: Harvard University, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Ernst Mayr Library Sponsored by: Harvard University, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Ernst Mayr Library Generated 17 May 2019 2:48 PM https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/pdf4/093844000238256 This page intentionally left blank. RO-4-129 The following text is generated from uncorrected OCR. [Begin Page: Page 207] Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 25 ( 3 ): 207 - 212 , 1986 ( 87 ) The Trouble with Butterflies Raymond R. White Biology S-56, City College of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94112 The existence in this and other journals documents that of the vast diversity of insects available, the butterflies is a group of animals very frequently studied. Butterflies are disproportionately the subject of notes, articles, and books. Virtually all butterfly books aimed at general audiences, if they say anything to justify themselves, state the case in very modest terms. Authors too numerous to cite mention the captivat¬ ing sight of colorful butterflies on the wing. Many professional biologists doing scientific research with butterflies can refer back to childhood interest in catching and collecting these animals. Research scientists among us, however, often make the claim that butterflies are better suited for scientific research purposes than are most other organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgian Journal of Entomology 92: 1–21 ISSN: 2295-0214
    Belgian Journal of Entomology 92: 1–21 ISSN: 2295-0214 www.srbe-kbve.be urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7F779AD8-8098-4EF0-AC9C-B58094E48668 Belgian Journal of Entomology Distribution, adult phenology and life history traits of potential insect vectors of Xylella fastidiosa in Belgium Séverine HASBROUCQ, Noemi CASARIN, Ewelina CZWIENCZEK, Claude BRAGARD & Jean-Claude GRÉGOIRE Spatial Ecology Laboratory, Université libre de Bruxelles, Av. F.D. Roosevelt, 50 - CP 160/12 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] (corresponding author) Published: Brussels, April 22, 2020 HASBROUCQ S. et al. Insect vectors of Xylella fastidiosa in Belgium Citation: HASBROUCQ S., CASARIN N., CZWIENCZEK E., BRAGARD C. & GRÉGOIRE J.-C., 2020. - Distribution, adult phenology and life history traits of potential insect vectors of Xylella fastidiosa in Belgium. Belgian Journal of Entomology, 92: 1–21. ISSN: 1374-5514 (Print Edition) ISSN: 2295-0214 (Online Edition) The Belgian Journal of Entomology is published by the Royal Belgian Society of Entomology, a non-profit association established on April 9, 1855. Head office: Vautier street 29, B-1000 Brussels. The publications of the Society are partly sponsored by the University Foundation of Belgium. In compliance with Article 8.6 of the ICZN, printed versions of all papers are deposited in the following libraries: - Royal Library of Belgium, Boulevard de l’Empereur 4, B-1000 Brussels. - Library of the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautier street 29, B-1000 Brussels. - American Museum of Natural History Library, Central Park West at 79th street, New York, NY 10024-5192, USA. - Central library of the Museum national d’Histoire naturelle, rue Geoffroy SaintHilaire 38, F- 75005 Paris, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 2005 Band/Volume: 28 Autor(en)/Author(s): Budashkin Yuri I., Gaedike Reinhard Artikel/Article: Faunistics of the Epermeniidae from the former USSR (Epermeniidae) 123-138 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Notalepid. 28 (2): 123-138 123 Faunistics of the Epermeniidae from the former USSR (Epermeniidae) ^ YURIJ 1. BUDASHKIN ^ & REINHARD GaEDIKE ' Kurortnoje Biostantzija 98 / 99, Feodosija, Ukraine; e-mail: [email protected] ^ Florusstraße 5, D-53225 Bonn, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. 26 species of Epermeniidae are recorded from the territory of the former USSR. Two of them (Epermenia wockeella und E. vartianae) are recorded for the first time. New distributional data for 1 1 species and new life history data for 5 species are given. The genitalia of the male of E. wockeella and female of E. vartianae are described and illustrated for the first time. Zusammenfassung. Es werden 26 Epermeniidae-Arten für das Gebiet der ehemaligen UdSSR nach- gewiesen, zwei von ihnen {Epermenia wockeella und E. vartianae) sind Erstnachweise. Für 11 Arten werden Neufunde und für 5 Arten neue Angaben zur Lebensweise gemacht. Die Genitalien der Männchen von E. wockeella und der Weibchen von E. vartianae werden erstmals beschrieben und abgebildet. Key words. Lepidoptera, Epermeniidae, former USSR, Epermenia wockeella, E. vartianae. Introduction The family Epermeniidae is the only representative of the superfamily Epermenioidea (sensu Kristensen 1999). The phylogenetic relationships with the other superfamilies of the Apoditrysia are still unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • NACHRICHTENBLATT Der Bayerischen Entomologen
    © Münchner Ent. Ges., Download from The BHL http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.biologiezentrum.at £(?i£> B21407E NACHRICHTENBLATT der Bayerischen Entomologen Herausgegeben von der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft Schriftleitung: Dr. Franz Bachmaier, 8 München 19, Schloß Nymphenburg Nordflügel (Eingang Maria-Ward-Straße) Postscheckkonto der Münchner Entomolog. Gesellschaft: München Nr. 315 69 Der Bezugspreis ist im Mitgliedsbeitrag enthalten 17. Jahrgang 15. Februar 1968 Nr. 1 Inhalt: U. Roesler: Das neue systematische Verzeichnis der deut- schen Phycitinae (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). S. 1. — K. Gauckler: Der Berliner Prachtkäfer und seine Verwandten in der Frankenalb. Beiträge zur Zoogeographie und Ökologie von Dicerca berolinensis Herbst (Coleo- ptera, Buprestidae). S. 10. — H. F r e u d e : Heinrich E. Wichmann t- S. 14. — G. Vollrath: Kleine Mitteilung 121: Lucasia (Procris) sub- solana Stgr. in Nordost-Bayern (Lep., Zygaenidae). S. 15. — Aus der Münch- ner Entomologischen Gesellschaft. S. 16. Das neue systematische Verzeichnis der deutschen Phycitinae (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) Von Ulrich Roesler Da demnächst einige Lokalfaunen mit Microlepidopteren in Deutschland aufgestellt und publiziert werden sollen, und ich schon wiederholt gebeten wurde, die bei meinen monographischen Unter- suchungen an Phycitinen gewonnenen Erkenntnisse hinsichtlich der neuen Systematik zu veröffentlichen, komme ich hiermit dem Wun- sche nach und bringe nachstehend ein Verzeichnis der deutschen Ar- ten, soweit sie bisher nachgewiesen werden konnten. Einige wichtige Neumeldungen oder Besonderheiten werden in die Liste mit ein- gefügt. Genitalabbildungen werden hier nicht dargestellt, da sie be- reits von Hannemann (1964) in gut erkennbarer Form publiziert worden sind. Die in Klammern gebrachten Arten hinter den Gat- tungsnamen stellen die Generotypen dar, und die Arten wurden un- ter den ihnen folgenden Gattungen beschrieben.
    [Show full text]