Ancient Language Research A List of My Discoveries © David Grant Stewart, Sr. Also see my other site: 72languages.com Installment Nº1. One of the questions most frequently asked by Egyptologists: Why are the oldest pyramids different heights? All previously known measurements (i.e. those given in meters) are from the Encyclopedia Britannica, 15th edi- tion. The Egyptian measurements (all those given in cubits) and their significance are entirely my own. 1. The linear unit of measurement, called the cubit, used to build the early pyramids, was equal to 21.47454545 inches. As far as I know, this has not been known to anyone for thousands of years. 2. The height of the early pyramids represented the age of the pharaoh buried in it, to the nearest month. Ditto above comment. 3. Generally speaking, the higher the pyramid, the older it is. This is because all the great pyramids were built at a time when man's lifespan was being shortened each generation, as documented in Genesis. 4. The pharaoh called Khufu (Greek, Cheops) (pyramid 146.59 meters high = 3224.98 twelfths of a cubit) lived 3225 months or 268 years and 9 months. 5. The pharaoh called Khafre (pyramid 143.50 meters high = 3157.000000 twelfths of a cubit = 3157 months) lived 263 years and 1 month. 6. The pharaoh called Sneferu-a (pyramid 104 meters high = 2288.000000 twelfths of a cubit = 2288 months) lived 190 years and 8 months. 7. The pharaoh called Sneferu (pyramid 98 meters high = 2156.000000 twelfths of a cubit = 2156 months) lived 179 years and 8 months. 8. The pharaoh called Nefirirkare (pyramid 70 meters high = 1540.000000 twelfths of a cubit = 1540 months) lived 128 years and 4 months. 9. The pharaoh called Menkure (Menkaure, etc.) (pyramid 66.50 meters high = 1463.000000 twelfths of a cubit) lived 121 years and 11 months. 10. The king called Zoser (Djoser, Joser) (pyramid 60 meters high = 1320.000000 twelfths of a cubit) lived 110 years.

The reader may demonstrate for himself that all invariant early pyramid measurements, inside and out of the pyramids, are exact integers of 21.47454545 inches, or with very simple fractions as remainders. Installment Nº2. 11. Many years ago (1986) I discovered that the hieroglyphs for Zoser (Djoser, Joser) are misread. They should read Joseph. This is the same Joseph who was sold into Egypt by the Midianites. 12. I also knew from the Greek and Egyptian etymology of the word Pyramid, that it referred to the height of the structure, and not the structure itself. 13. And from a translation of the original hieroglyphs, I also knew that the significance of the height was the lifespan of the pharaoh or king buried in the structure. 14. The original language and those immediately descended from it used several writing systems simultane- ously. In this writing system, each character had several sounds and meanings. In later generations, each deriva- tive language inherited only one sound and one meaning, thus losing most of the power of expression. 15. One example of this is the root BEL which in all Romance languages means "beautiful" and in all Slavic languages means "white." The original language had both meanings. 16. Another example is the root MAL which in Romance languages means "bad, evil" and in the Slavic is "small, little, few." The original character had both meanings. 17. Yet another example is the simplified hieroglyph in Phoenician, P. The Greeks took its sound as R, the Lat- ins as P. The original hieroglyph carried both sounds simultaneously, but separated into levels or degrees gov- erned by certain logical rules which made ambiguity impossible. 18. It is this hieroglyph, represented in Egyptian as the mouth, having this characteristic, which should be read PH rather than R, as mentioned above. 19. Ask any Egyptologist what the word Pharaoh means and he will tell you "great house." This is a false ety- mology which did not arise until a thousand years later, and the PER AA they map this word onto actually re- fers to the pharaoh's estate, not to the pharaoh or any person at all. 20. Egyptologists will tell you that the oldest name for Egyptian rulers was ERPAT or ERPA and means heredi- tary king. This is partly right. The three hieroglyphs should be read PHA RA OH and should be translated (the hieroglyph called the mouth) as PHA = king, cognate with what Sumerologists call PA = the head, ruler, etc. as in PATESI. The second hieroglyph that looks like a small square should be in this case rendered RA and means "royal." The third hieroglyph, the outstretched hand, forearm, and part of the arm, should be rendered OH and means "blood" in this instance. Thus, what is incorrectly read as ERPA(T) should be read PHA RA OH, "king by royal blood." 21. The four hieroglyphs running down each side of the false door inside Joseph's tomb, which are commonly called his Horus name or something of the sort, and merely transliterated with no meaning, each have separate meanings. 22. The first character which is sometimes called an axe by Egyptologists, is correctly rendered NETER but may also be read in the opposite direction, as can many characters. In this sense it carries the idea of saving and is preserved in the German RETTEN, "to save." 23. The second character, the mouth, we already know, should be pronounced PHA and means "king." 24. The third character, usually represented by a guttural sound, should be transliterated HAMET and means The Land of Ham, i.e., Egypt. 25. The last character, which looks like several vertical lines, and is usually misread "BIT" should be rendered JOSEPH. 26. The correct translation of the four hieroglyphs is The King who saved Egypt, Joseph. 27. Notice that Joseph is not called a pharaoh, because as far as the Egyptians were concerned, although he was king, it was not by royal blood as they recognized it, since he was not even of their race, but he was rather what we would call a Viceroy. 28. The reason why the Egyptian records say the tomb has been vacant for thousands of years should be ob- vious - Moses brought his coffin out to be buried with his ancestors as he had requested. 29. And the reason why the tomb is precisely 110 Egyptian cubits should be obvious. 30. The well-known Egyptian "fairy tale" called The Tale of the Two Brothers is indeed a fairy tale the way it is translated. It is in fact the original Egyptian account of Joseph while in Potiphar's service when translated cor- rectly. 31. The hieroglyph for the servant, incorrectly read as Batau by some, is exactly the same as that in Joseph's pyramid, which should be translated Joseph. 32. The hieroglyphs transliterated SEN AA and translated "elder brother" are an idiomatic expression precisely equivalent to the Chinese characters (Hsien Sheng or similar transliteration) of the same meaning, and are not to be translated "first born" but rather "master." 33. The characters transliterated SEN SERIU and translated "younger brother" are an analogous idiom and should be translated "servant." 34. There are countless other ancient records which reveal a great deal of information which the world has not had for thousands of years because they have not been translated correctly. 35. The original language can only be translated correctly and completely by one who has a working knowledge of the 72 languages into which it was split up at the Tower of Babel, because each one retained vital parts which must be reassembled to restore the original matrix of sounds and meanings which each character had in the be- ginning. 36. Count them for yourself. They are listed in Genesis Chapter 10. 37. Back in 1987 I discovered that the so-called "Paut Khemennu" or Company of the Eight is in fact, Noah and his family. 38. NU is of course, Noah, and NUT his wife. 39. The others are more subtle but can be demonstrated: KEKU is SHEM. 40. HEHU is HAM. 41. And GEREKH is JAPHETH, each of the four with his female counterpart (wife) denoted by the same name, with a feminine suffix. 42. The boat is of course the Ark, 43. And the "primeval watery abyss of NU" is the Flood. 44. And the whole set of hieroglyphs is not a representation of the Egyptian notion of the Creation, but a simple and obvious representation of the Flood. 45. The hieroglyph of the beetle represents the body of Adam carried aboard the Ark. 46. The Gilgamesh epic, if it were translated correctly, would turn out to be an actual historical account of Noah. 47. Gilgamesh is not a proper name, nor is it read correctly. It was common practice to write a character in the opposite direction as a way of doing the equivalent of what we call capitalization for proper names. 58. The correct reading of Gilgamesh is Gilga-Shem. 59. The correct translation of Gilgamesh is "The father of Shem." 60. I have never seen or heard of a correct chronology of events of early world history. I will present one below as soon as time permits, from Adam down to Joshua, which is exactly correct. Installment Nº3 61. I should point out that the reason for the quorum of Seventy mentioned in the NT is based upon the 70 na- tions, kindreds, tongues, and peoples into which the world was divided after the Flood, as mentioned in Genesis 10. This is not my discovery, but was pointed out to me some 45 years ago by my mother’s sister, Ruth Pate Shinsel. 62. It should be obvious that the legend of the Septuagint - the translation of the Hebrew scriptures into Greek a few hundred years B.C. - was not at all done “by seventy scholars in seventy days” which is a ridiculous fabri- cation of an imaginative mind, but was rather called the Septuagint - “the Seventies Book” - because, having been translated into the lingua franca of the world at that time, it was to go to all peoples of the earth (70 of them) by the Seventy (the missionaries).

My plan was to do these installments in four parts -

1. List my discoveries over the last sixty years as they happened to come to mind, not in any particular order or according to any particular plan. 2. Go through all existing translations of all ancient records (“ancient” being defined for this purpose, as more than 3,000 years old) and correct them. 3. Translate all ancient records in my possession for which I am not aware of any existing translation (I have a stack several feet high of copies of Egyptian hieroglyphic, hieratic, and Sumerian cuneiform records collected from museums and private collections all over the world). 4. Write up a complete grammar and dictionary of the original language. The original language has the capabil- ity both to store and transfer more information than any modern language or all of them put together, and is far easier to learn than any language on the earth today because everything is mnemonic and precisely logical - like an elegant mathematical proof, once the principles are understood, it can be easily memorized, and if forgotten, derived.

One of my dear classmates brought up the subject of chronology, so for him I present this week the chronology of the Pentateuch below. I have never seen a correct chronology, so I present mine. I know that in time to come it will be proven as correct; it is not based on any speculation, theory, or conjecture, but on provable fact from my translations of ancient records. Typographical errors are of course possible, because I do my own typing.

63. Chronology of the Scriptures - Part I - © 2005 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

3853 Adam is born. 3723 Adam was 130 when Seth was born. 3618 Seth was 105 when Enos was born. 3528 Enos was 90 when Cainan was born. 3458 Cainan was 70 when Mahalaleel was born. 3393 Mahalaleel was 65 when Jared was born. 3231 Jared was 162 when Enoch was born. 3166 Enoch was 65 when Methuselah was born. Enoch founds a city called by his name, teaching his people “that law by which they may be sanctified and see the face” of Deity. 2979 Methuselah was 187 when Lamech was born. 2926 Adam at 927 years gave a speech at a conference and prophesied two great Floods: The Flood of Water in the early days of the world, and the Flood of Fire in the latter days of the world. Josephus records that the text of this speech was recorded on two pillars, one of brick and one of stone, to withstand the respective floods. 2923 Adam dies at 930. 2811 Seth dies at 912. 2801 Enoch and his city is translated at 430, giving rise to the saying “Zion is fled” (ZA ZI ON NA) 2797 Lamech is 182 when Noah is born. 2713 Enos dies at 905. 2618 Cainan dies at 910. 2563 Mahalaleel dies at 895. 2431 Jared dies at 962. 2347 Noah is 450 when Japheth is born. 2317 Noah is told about the flood 120 years before it happens. This is recorded on Sumerian tablets, in particu- lar the one which starts out “UD BA ZI UD SU DU LU GAL AM …” [And it came to pass that Noah, who was the king …] 2305 Noah is 492 when Shem is born. 2297 Noah is 500 when Ham is born. 2202 Lamech dies at 777. 2197 Methuselah dies at 969. 2197 Noah enters the ark on 10 May when he is 600. 2197 Noah is 600 when the flood comes on 17 May. 2197 It rains until 26 June. 2197 The ark comes to rest on 17 October. 2197 Water covers everything until 23 November. 2196 The tops of the mountains were seen on 1 January. 2196 Noah removed the covering from the ark on 1 April when he was 601 years old. 2196 The earth was dried on 27 May when Noah was 601 years old. 2195 Shem was 110 when Arphaxad was born, 2 years after the flood. 2160 Arphaxad was 35 when Salah was born. 2130 Salah was 30 when Eber was born. 2096 Eber was 34 when Peleg was born. 2066 Peleg was 30 when Reu was born. 2034 Reu was 32 when Serug was born. 2004 Serug was 30 when Nahor was born. Gen. 11:22 1975 Nahor was 29 when Terah was born. 1905 Terah was 70 when Abram was born. 1895 Sarah is born - she was 10 years younger than Abraham. 1857 Peleg died at 239. 1857 Nahor died at 148. 1847 Noah dies at 950. 1843 Abraham left Haran at age 62 and goes to Canaan. 1833 Abraham takes Hagar as a concubine after he had been in Canaan 10 years. 1830 Abraham enters Egypt on 6 April, at age 75. 1827 Reu dies at 239. 1819 Abraham is 86 when Ishmael is born. 1806 Abraham is 99 when his name is changed from Abram. 1806 Abraham is 99 and Ishmael is 13 when they are circumcised. 1805 Abraham is 100 when Isaac is born. 1805 Sarah is 90 when Isaac is born. 1804 Serug dies at 230. 1770 Terah dies at 205 1768 Sarah dies at 127. 1765 Isaac is 40 when he marries Rebecca. 1757 Arphaxad dies at 438 1745 Esau and Jacob are born. 1730 Abraham dies at 175. 1727 Salah dies at 433. 1695 Shem dies at 610. 1682 Ishmael dies at 137. 1668 Jacob goes to Haran to work for Laban at age 77. 1666 Eber dies at 464 when Jacob is 79. 1661 Jacob marries Leah and Rachael 7 years after going to work for Laban. He is now 84 years old. 1654 Joseph is born when Jacob is 91. 1644 Benjamin is born just outside of Bethlehem. His mother dies in childbearing. 1637 Joseph is sold into Egypt. 1636 Joseph is sent to prison. 1626 Joseph interprets the dreams of the butler and baker. 1625 Isaac dies at 180 and is buried by Jacob and Esau. 1624 Joseph becomes Neter Pha Hamet [the King or Viceroy who saved Egypt] at age 30. 1617 The famine begins in Egypt and last 7 years. 1615 Joseph reveals himself to his brothers at age 39. 1615 Israelites migrate to Egypt and live in Goshen. 1615 Jacob meets the pharaoh at age 130 (Jacob's) and blesses him. 1610 The famine ends. 1598 Jacob dies at 147. 1544 Joseph dies at 110 and his body is embalmed and placed in the ziggurat at Saqqarah, erronously called “Zoser” by scholars in our day. 1513 Pharoah dies and Melol begins to reign at age 20. 1480 Moses is born. Bathia, daughter of Melol, finds him at 3 months. 1440 Moses flees Egypt and goes to Midian. 1400 Moses leads the Israelites out of Egypt at age 80 on 6 April, 430 years after the dispensation of Abraham began by his entry into Egypt. 1399 The tabernacle is reared on 1 April. 1399 The passover is ordained to be on 14 April, but by the Hebrew lunar, not the Egyptian solar, calendar. 1399 Moses takes a poll of the Israelites on 1 May. 1399 Cloud taken up from tabernacle. Feast of booths (Succoth) instituted for 15-22 October each year. 1361 Aaron dies on Mount Hor on 1 August. 1360 Moses addresses Israelites on 1 February. 1360 Moses is translated. 49. All sightings of Noah’s Ark on Mount Ararat are false. 50. The Egyptian records - translated correctly - say that the Egyptians put the Ark on a sledge and brought it down and stored it in a warehouse in Egypt. 51. Once a year, the Ark was brought out and dragged through the streets of the city in a great festival celebrat- ing deliverance from the Flood by the Almighty through the medium of the Ark. 52. The “gopher” wood mentioned in Genesis, of which the Ark was made, is a transliteration, not a translation, of the original Egyptian word. 53. The wood of which the Ark was made is the ancestor of what we would call Douglas Fir. 54. It is for this reason that the ancient German tribes would cut down a fir tree “Tannenbaum” at the winter sol- stice and bring it into the house and decorate it - in commemoration of this tree saving the world from the Flood, and as a token that life goes on and the world will be relieved of its winter shroud with the spring thaw, just as the Flood waters also receded.

By request, I will next present below a Bible Dictionary, or Dictionary of the Scriptures, translating terms that, as far as I have been able to determine, have never previously been translated correctly. These will be given in the order they occur in the original text, rather than alphabetically, but you can always search for any given term using the search tool.

Installment Nº4.

I now present a list of translations of words, mostly proper nouns, occurring in Holy Writ, which, as far as I know, have never been translated, or never been translated correctly. They are given in the order in which they occur.

A Dictionary of the Scriptures: Bible Dictionary: Dictionary of the Old Testament.

55. Eden: I am indebted to Rabbi Joshua Seixas [pronounced SAY-shus], a Portuguese Jew, for the only correct transliteration of the Hebrew letter Ayin that I have ever seen [J. Seixas, Hebrew Grammar, 1834, p.p. 5-6]. I first saw his book some forty years ago back in the 1960s and immediately checked every Hebrew grammar in the BYU library -several dozen in seven languages going back to the 1500s, and none of them had the same sys- tem of transliteration as Rabbi Seixas, which I have proved to myself countless times over, is the only correct one, namely, GN at the beginning of a syllable, and NG and the ending of one. The correct transliteration of "Eden" is GNADEN. It means a place of grace, as any German scholar will immediately recognize, and Garden of the Lord, as any Hebrew scholar will immediately see [GAN ADON]. Cf. Isaiah 51:3. 56. Adam: a name applied to both the first man and his wife, as well as to the man alone when distinguished from his wife. It is composed of two expressions, each composed of two hieroglyphs. The two terms, AD AM, are precisely analogous to their Chinese equivalents, FU MU, and mean respectively, father-mother, or in other words, parents. 57. It is known to any Hebraist that "adam" is also used as a generic term for man, men, or all mankind. What is not commonly known is that the term is the same as the word commonly rendered "MADA" by semitic scholars and translated as "many" - once again, I repeat my observation that reversing the direction of the character was a common way of indicating a proper noun as we do with capitalization, and the character should be read ADAM. 58. The first term, AD, is written as the character for a hand, followed by a character meaning a creature. It forms a job description of all fathers: A. Provide-person. B. Protect-person. C. Possess-person (many civiliza- tions have been so primitive as to confine property ownership to males). D. Strong-person. 59. The second term, AM, written as the character for increase/decrease plus the character for grain or seed. It means: A. consume-grain, and B. multiply-seed. The first meaning is the common suffix in the original lan- guage for all land mammals, i.e. they all have mammary glands and are herbivores. As will be demonstrated in a much later installment, this is also written -OM. 60. Eve: This word, along with Jehovah, is precisely analogous to the Egyptian Isis and Iusir [Greek, Osiris] re- spectively. 61. Eve is written in the original language with characters analogous to our HVH except that in the original lan- guage, every character had a matrix of meanings. The character analogous to our H in this example meant a time or a season. Every Hebraist knows that the V was a mere copula, "and." The Egyptian Isis is of exactly the same meaning and is often represented as SEP SEN ("two times" or "twice" and has been taken by Egyptolo- gists as a direction to repeat the previous sentence or phrase. The correct translation of Eve and of Isis is "," a term for the first mother, and a generic term for all mothers. 62. Likewise, Jehovah and Iusir should be correctly translated as "the Appointer of times and seasons." 63. Cherubim: the warrior class of angels. This is preserved in the Arabic HARB as any Arabic scholar knows. 64. Shem: Sun, son, birth. Preserved in the Babylonian SHAMASH, sun, and the Egyptian MESH, birth. 65. Ham: Servant, death, star. Preserved in the Hebrew Met (death), Egyptian Ham (servant), etc. 66. Japheth: Stranger or foreigner, healing or marriage, moon. More obvious in its Egyptian form GEREKH which is preserved as the Hebrew word for "stranger" or "foreigner." An alternate reading is Oleah, an old word for the moon. Hebraists generally cite Jafa, "the fair one" which is an allusion to the moon. 67. The layman may find evidence that Sun, Moon, and Star are correct translations from the fact that the previ- ously cited Paut Khemmenu was thought to be the Egyptian mythology of the Creation because it mentioned the Sun, Moon, and Stars, which are in fact correct partial translations of these names, as already mentioned. 68. A complete translation of these names as understood by the ancients would indicate that the posterity of Shem were born in a covenant by which they would keep the law of chastity from birth and thereby receive an inheritance in a kingdom compared to the sun. 69. Japheth in full translation indicates a covenant by which they would keep the law of chastity from marriage and thereby receive an inheritance in a kingdom compared to the moon. 70. Ham in full translation indicates a covenant by which they would do no murder (death) and be responsible for their own sins until death, by which they would receive at least an inheritance in a kingdom compared to the stars. 71. Note that these covenants are alluded to in the New Testament "now ye are no longer strangers and foreign- ers …" and that it is made perfectly clear that what really matters is not what a man has covenanted that he would do, but what law he actually chooses to live by once he gets here (cf. the parable of the two sons being asked to go labor in the field). 72. Gopher: It has already been mentioned that this is a transliteration of the Egyptian hieroglyph (Käfer) which is represented by the beetle hieroglyph, and which any German scholar will immediately recognize as the word for beetle in present-day German, and which Egyptologists correctly translate as "creation" but should more ac- curately be translated as "the first creation, i.e. Adam" when applied to a person, and when applied to a wood or material, signified the wood of which the Ark was made, which was as already mentioned, the wood of the fir tree. 73. "I do set my bow in the cloud" (Gen. 9:13). Everyone knows this is the rainbow. I have heard attempts to ex- plain this by saying that the rainbow always existed and it was merely picked out as a token of the covenant. From my physics background, I suggest that rainbows are an attribute of solar radiation, and that there was at the time in question, a change in the nature of solar radiation, which created the rainbow. This explanation may be tested by attempting to create a rainbow with artificial lighting. See if you can do it.

Installment Nº5

78. It will now become evident to a thoughtful person that the token of the house of Shem is gold, representing the morning aurora heralding the birth of the sun. 79. Likewise, the token of the house of Japheth is frankincense, a healing balm. 80. By now the reader can fill in the third part and final part of the pattern with the embalming myrrh as the to- ken of the house of Ham. 81. The best commentary of the New Testament I have ever seen is Frederic Farrar’s (1831-1903) Life of Christ (1874). It is not so much that Farrar is unusually perceptive or insightful as that he is simply more honest than most scholars. He faithfully cites original sources whether he knows enough to agree with them or not. Immedi- ately when I started reading his book I began to recognize the source of information I had heard all my life, but for which he was never given adequate credit for citing. With his citations of the early church fathers concern- ing the “three wise men” combined with my own translations of ancient records, it became evident that what I had thought were mere fabrications of inventive minds - such as the very names of the magi, and so on - are documentable, provable, historical fact. There were three men, each one a rightful royal heir of the respective houses of Japheth, Shem, and Ham, who came to pay homage in behalf of all of us, to the Holy One of Israel. 82. There is a very foolish saying abroad that goes "There's no limit to how much good you can do if you don't care who gets the credit." I have always known that you never get the facts right, or get a correct understanding, unless you go to the source, and you can not go to the source unless you know what it is. I was pleased to find in the 9th edition of the Britannica I am reading, a confirmation of this fact by no less an authority than the great mathematical genius, James Clerk Maxwell, who, in a happy arrangement, wrote an ar- ticle on another world class genius, Michael Faraday: "The magnitude and originality of Faraday's achievement may be estimated by tracing the subsequent history of his discovery. As might be expected, it was at once made the subject of investigation by the whole scientific world, but some of the most experienced physicists were unable to avoid mistakes in stating, in what they con- ceived to be more scientific language than Faraday's the phenomena before them. Up to the present time [1875, citing back to 1841] the mathematicians who have rejected Faraday's method of stating his law as unworthy of the precision of their science have never succeeded in devising any essentially different formula which shall fully express the phenomena without introducing hypotheses about the mutual action of things which have no physical existence, such as elements of currents which flow out of nothing, then along a wire, and finally sink into nothing again. "After nearly half a century of labour of this kind, we may say that, though the practical applications of Fara- day's discovery have increased and are increasing in number and value every year, no exception to the statement of these laws as given by Faraday has been discovered, no new law has been added to them, and Faraday's origi- nal statement remains to this day the only one which asserts no more than can be verified by experiment, and the only one by which the theory of the phenomena can be expressed in a manner which is exactly and numeri- cally accurate, and at the same time within the range of elementary methods of exposition." [EB 9th edition vol. IX, p. 30]. 83. There is nothing more obvious than these two principles, which I have always believed to be correct, and at this late stage I may say that I know with a perfect knowledge that they are correct: In order to comprehend the laws of nature, we must live by the laws of nature's God over a long period of time, and we must in every case go to the source of any discovery, or we will never get it right. 84. Here’s another example: The greatest genius I have found in the last 150 years is Henry Ford, notwithstand- ing the abominable accounts of him in the encyclopedias, and I can say that no man knows him without having read his three books, My Life and Work (1921), Today and Tomorrow (1926), and Moving Forward (1931) in which he lays down all the correct principles of business, education, self improvement, research and develop- ment, and he even gets to the bottom of the cause and origin of wars and other self-inflicted calamities, etc. All of these books are currently available, but to our great discredit, not in America, but only from a London pub- lisher of "rare and mystical reprints." 85. There are many who suppose that plagiarism is not a big deal, but the truth is, such persons actually know less than nothing, and actually subtract from the fund of human knowledge. No man can plagiarize without gar- bling, and in seeking to hide the source of his thefts, he prevents those he claims to teach from learning the whole truth, or understanding the principle in question. This is especially true of translations. Nothing in the world is more difficult than translating what has never before been translated correctly, yet nothing is more quickly assumed to belong to everybody. 86. Genesis 9:27. “God shall enlarge Japheth …” Some forty years ago I discovered that this should be trans- lated “God shall make Japheth capable of being persuaded …” 87. Genesis 21:30 " …I have digged this well.” Independent Egyptian records, which we shall examine in future installments, state that Abraham had developed technology to determine the presence of water deep under- ground. 88. Gen. 35:7. The ancients used the language of Adam like we use Latin and Greek today, as a naming conven- tion. Although fragments are preserved in Hebrew, all of Jacob’s children’s names are in the original language. 89. The name Joseph, in complete translation, means: 1. The holy one. 2. One who is consecrated and set apart; separated. The posterity of Joseph have always been separated, usually on an island, from others. 3. The red one. 4. The western one. 5. The glorious one. At some future time I will give the complete translations of the other eleven names, each of which describes in detail the attributes of the respective tribes. 90. Gen. 37:3. “.. he made him a coat of many colours.” Some have speculated that this should be translated “long-sleeved.” A correct translation of the original terms describes a sleeveless tunic, or vest, such as forms part of the traditional dress of Scots today. 91. From other historical sources it may be demonstrated that the “many colours” were not a silly patchwork quilt, but a plaid or tartan on a red (“Joseph”) background. As Jacob understood from the Tower of Babel, each color represented a nation or tribe, a tradition preserved among all nations, and conspicuous in the Celtic tar- tans. Only royalty was entitled to wear all the colors, with progressively fewer colors being permitted according to the lower social status of one’s clan, another well-documented fact in early Irish law. By having such a coat made for his penultimate son, Jacob was effectively acknowledging a prophetic destiny of royalty for him, which was perfectly understood by his other sons; hence the unbounded jealousy of his brothers. Joseph’s coat was in fact the origin of what has been known for several hundred years as the royal Stewart tartan. It is no co- incidence that many Scots claim, and some can document, descent from Joseph of Egypt. 92. Gen. 37:28 “… and sold Joseph to the Ishmeelites for twenty pieces of silver …” This is a scribal error, which may be checked in other ancient records. It should read thirty pieces of silver, the price of a slave, and was recognized by the ancients as a type and a shadow of the betrayal of the Messiah. 93. Gen. 41:45. Zaphnath-paaneah does not mean anything in any language. This is a scribal error, untranslat- able as it stands. The correct transliteration is given by Josephus in Antiquities of the Jews. From his correct transliteration it is easy to translate the hieroglyphs as “the revealer of hidden things.” 94. Gen. 47:9 “… few and evil have been the days of the years of my life …” The first three words are a single Egyptian hieroglyph, the well-known sparrow, PW, the ancestor of the English word few, French peu, as well as, with the transformations already mentioned, the Slavic “mal” and Latin “mal” and English “small.” This is one of many indications that, no surprise, Moses translated his record into Hebrew from original accounts writ- ten in Egyptian hieroglyphics. 95. I have never been able to detect that anyone has been able to discover the correct original writing and ety- mology of the name Moses. The meaning has been handed to us on a silver platter, but how was it written? Some forty years ago I made a thorough search and was not able to discover any scholar able to write it. It is written with two Egyptian hieroglyphs - the three wavy lines representing “water” and pronounced “MU” writ- ten over the single hieroglyph for Isis - MU - ISIS. Everyone knows that it means delivered of the water, but now you can recognize it when you find it in the hieroglyphs. 96. Gen. 50:26. “… and he was put in a coffin in Egypt.:” I already mentioned that this coffin was placed in the tomb scholars call “Zoser’s”. And you know why it is precisely 110 Egyptian cubits high. And you know why the Egyptian records say that it has been vacant for thousands of years. Moses took the coffin with the Israelites for re-interment in the cave with Abraham. 97. It is obvious from a reading of Josephus, that the records from which the Bible was taken were more exten- sive in his day than have been handed down to us. Much of this missing information will be recovered by trans- lating additional, independent, ancient records, which we will do as time permits.

At this point, I see that I should not promise any longer to keep these installments to a single page as I had origi- nally hoped. From the feedback I have received, it seems to me that those who believe the Bible - and the Bible certainly does not need any help from me to prove its authenticity and authority - are generally very apprecia- tive of my meager contributions, and those who take offense at my discoveries are generally those who never did believe the Bible, by their own choice. It seems I am in good company with that grand old Book that, as my mother used to say, “fell apart holding us together.” I will impose upon your patience for one more contribution to this installment, made by my mother over half a century ago: “Family Bible

“Old Brother Higgins built a shelf For the Family Bible to rest itself. Lest a sticky finger or grimy thumb Might injure the delicate pages some, He cautioned his children to touch it not, And it rests there still with never a blot … (And the Higgins tribe are a careless lot.)

“His neighbor, Miggins, built a shelf. ‘Come, children,’ he said, ‘and help yourself.’ Now his book is old and ragged and worn, With some of the choicest pages torn Where children have fingered and thumbed and read; But of Miggins’ children I’ve heard it said That each carries a Bible in his head.” - Gleanings, (c) 1948, Ora Pate Stewart [1910-1990], Naylor Publishing Company, San Antonio, Texas, p. 4.

A List of My Discoveries © 2005 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº6 98. The most valuable part of the entire Old Testament is Exodus 20:3-17. Why? It has already been noted that it is necessary to abide by the laws of nature’s God in order to comprehend the laws of nature. The laws of na- ture must be the object of a lifetime of observation and experiment, yet the infinitely more valuable laws of God are handed to us on a silver platter. Other reasons why this is so valuable are cited below. 99. All temptation is based upon deception. 100. All of the holy commandments are based upon an Intelligence superior to man’s. 101. There is no upper limit to intelligence. 102. It is only by living the commandments over a long period of time that the intelligence upon which they are based can begin to be assimilated. Thomas Edison noted that no physics text, however thorough, could impart the knowledge gleaned by actually performing the experiment. Somehow, he said, even the most astute and careful writers would leave out some very basic information that could only be gleaned by performing the ex- periment. Henry Ford understood this and designed training which duplicated the experiments as a training tool. 103. Anyone can immediately note that the Ten Commandments are divided into three categories, and that both the categories and the members of these three sets are strictly prioritized. What is not noticed is that each one is based upon a higher level of intelligence than the previous one in each category. 104. No man can comprehend a commandment that he does not keep, any more than a physics student can com- prehend all that is to be understood from an experiment without actually performing it, claims to the contrary notwithstanding. 105. Not many people have a correct idea of intelligence. The historian Crowe had the insight and discernment to describe a ruler as having “imbecility, dissoluteness, ferocity, mutual hate, intellect never reaching higher than cunning, with a religion that was the fetishism of a savage rather than the creed of a rational being” [EB 9th ed., vol. 9, p. 84]. Any rational person may visit any prison in any country and immediately recognize the intellectual dregs of that country. For example, a person who does not keep the sixth commandment has his mind darkened to the point of being indistinguishable from idiocy. Such a person may seriously believe that the space program is nothing more than a government hoax, that a man was never placed on the moon, etc. 106. A person who keeps the sixth commandment is more intelligent than one who does not. A person who does not keep the seventh commandment typically believes in things which a rational being instantly recognizes as absurd - the notion that matter can be created out of nothing, that matter can take upon itself life and intelli- gence of its own accord by pure accident, notwithstanding the fact that such cannot be done under the most carefully controlled laboratory conditions. 107. Taking a view of the Holy Writ as a whole, in addition to the ancient Egyptian and Sumerian records, it is evident that there are three kingdoms of reward in the hereafter, call in the NT the Telestial, Terrestrial, and Celestial, representing respectively the glory (or light, or intelligence) of the stars, the moon, and the sun. What is not obvious is that each of these kingdoms has three internal divisions. Commandments seven, eight, and nine correspond to the lower, middle, and upper division of the Telestial. 108. Therefore we see that the Ten Commandments may be considered a graded set of experiments for us to perform strictly, while in mortality, so that we may rise to the intelligence upon which they are based, and the glory which their strict compliance confers upon us. 109. Expressed in another way, the Decalogue is a ladder with ten rungs by which we may aspire to rise to greater heights than unaided mortal intelligence can confer upon us. 110. All scriptures may be understood by translating them into the language of Adam, and when that grammar and dictionary is given here, all of these explanations will no longer be necessary, but will be obvious to any- one. 111. It may be truly said that those who do not conform their lives to the laws of nature’s God are idiots. The correlation is so great, in fact, that a lifetime of experience will confirm that unprincipled cunning is no match for ethical intellect. For this reason, it is a very, very bad idea to admit those who reject any responsibility for learning and abiding by the laws of nature’s God to teach us about the laws of His nature. For this reason, we have the absurd religion of organic evolution forced down our throats, even though all our physics proves em- phatically it not only is not so, but there is no possibility of it being so. It is for this reason that we have been commanded by such persons to accept their hypothesis of “black holes” in space - notwithstanding the fact that such entities are physically impossible, for the simple reason that although the gravitational force is one of the weakest in nature and can only approach a measurable magnitude when immense bodies of matter are brought together, while the internal forces of subatomic matter are by far - billions of times greater - than gravitational forces. Yet we are asked to believe that matter can be heaped up in piles so great as to overcome this powerful repulsion force which is responsible for our nuclear bombs. 112. In Einstein’s “e = mc squared” it is not matter that is converted into energy, neither indeed can it be. It is binding energy that is released. 113. Notwithstanding the excellency of intellect upon which the Ten Commandments are based, we see that a lifetime of strict compliance with them is not sufficient to rise above the intellectual level or glory of the Terres- trial Kingdom. How do we know this? In the NT we read that one who had done just this came to the Savior and asked what he lacked yet, as you may recall. He was told by the Master than he had not done his part in car- ing for the world’s poor, and that without that compliance, there is no admission in the Celestial Kingdom. In the OT and NT this is called the Law of Tithes and Consecration; that is, a man must care for the poor, and be willing to give his all for the cause of Right if it is so required. Interestingly, all of the signers of the American Declaration of Independence recognized the necessity of living up to this law, and fully complied with it. Noth- ing less would have secured the blessings of liberty for us, for which, we must be forever grateful to them and to the soldiers which to this day give “their last full measure of devotion” as Lincoln called it. 114. So great is this correlation that it reveals itself in the level of understanding of those who keep it. Near the end of my nine years in the intelligence community of the American Defense Department, I was attempting to explain a matter of national security to my division chief and his civilian assistant. The chief was a lieutenant colonel, and his deputy had a Ph.D. in physics. The colonel understood perfectly what I was saying, but the physicist did not get it at all. Afterwards, I poked my head into the colonel’s office and said, “Col. --, may I ask you a personal question?” “Go ahead.” “You pay tithing to your church, don’t you!” “I can’t afford not to.” “Do you know how I knew that? Because you understood perfectly what I was trying to say about our national secur- ity.” The darkened minds of those who do wrong is the cause of their own destruction. They believe things that are not so, and disbelieve things that are so. This is true of individuals as well as nations. This was portrayed quite well in the recent Episode Three of the popular Star Wars series. 115. Another example: A person who keeps the fourth commandment and all the others which are even more basic, over a long period of time begins to understand the commandment: why cycles have eternal attributes. Einstein spent his life trying to find a Universal Field Theory, namely, a set of mathematical equations which would be used to describe both subatomic phenomena and the behavior of planets and stars. He could not do it. Yet, Abraham succeeded in doing this not only quantitatively but qualitatively. The false science of numerology seeks to find attributes of numbers, which is absurd. Numbers do not and can not have attributes other than that of mere magnitude, and even then, have no meaning except when applied to time, space, and matter. Everyone knows that an atom of carbon differs from an atom of nitrogen essentially only in the fact that it has six protons in its nucleus instead of seven. But why? A person who has had long experience in executing a cycle of seven by keeping the Sabbath day holy begins to comprehend that this letting go of daily work every seventh day has a liberating, releasing, freeing effect upon his whole being. The great, grand secret that Abraham discovered is that a given cycle has the same attributes, whether through time or space. That is, a cycle of seven days has, in its sphere of time, the same attributes of a cycle of seven protons in the nucleus of the nitrogen atom. The attrib- utes of nitrogen in its compounds is to set free, to release, or to knock down a wall, whether the wall of a city with nitroglycerine or the wall of a cell with nitric acid, or the release of gases in a reaction with another sub- stance. He begins to comprehend that Joshua, in executing a cycle of seven around the city Jericho, was confer- ring upon those city walls the same attributes it would have as if someone had put nitric acid on its joints and ni- troglycerine on its stones. After completion of the requisite cycles, a high amplitude acoustical disturbance was sufficient to make the walls crumble. Likewise, the Syrian general was released from his leprosy by immersing himself seven times in the Jordan river as commanded. A person who faithfully keeps this commandment and all the subordinate ones begins to understand that all mortal life as we know it requires a cycle of three within a cycle of eight, that is, a cycle of solidity as possessed by lithium, within a cycle of purification necessary to sus- tain life, which we know as oxygen. He comprehends that the other seven planets of this system (Pluto was known by the ancients to be a dead, nonfunctioning planet, just as the body of Adam on Noah’s ark) all serve functions absolutely necessary to maintain life on this third planet. 116. Likewise, the Savior administered to Peter the sign of Jonah, which is, two or three witnesses, or a thing re- peated three times, as a prelude to His commandment to administer this same token to all the world. 117. Now it should be obvious why circumcision was administered at eight days, baptism at eight years, and why a great cycle of purification (i.e. times five) was administered to the Israelites leaving Egypt and was pre- served down to the time of the Italian city states with their quarantine of vessels from foreign ports to ensure that any disease would make itself manifest and run its course, thus preserving the port city from importing an epidemic. 118. In the original language, quorum, circle, cycle, council are all the same word, so that it is obvious that a quorum of three, twelve, or seventy, has, in its sphere, exactly the same attributes as an atom of three, twelve, or seventy, or a planetary, solar, or stellar system has in its sphere, or times have with their hours, weeks, months, and years. 119. Sixty is a cycle of perfection. It was for this reason that in every age of the world, the life span of man was some multiple of this number. Josephus mentions 600 years as the Great Year, sufficient time for man to reckon the hierarchy of the heavens. Moses was told that the life of man would be reduced to 120 years after the Flood. After the time of Joshua it was reduced to 72, where it remains to the present day. The logic here was that after completing a cycle of 12, the preparatory priesthood would be conferred upon young men, and then they would have a cycle of perfection to prepare to return to the presence of the Almighty. 120. It was also for this reason (see chronology above) that Abraham entered Egypt in the year 1830 BC - that number is the summation of a cycle of perfection, that is, the numbers 1+2+3 + … +58+59+60 = the integral of x, which is ½ x squared plus 1/x = 1,830. 121. Perceptive individuals will find a mirrored significance of this number, which, as far as I have been able to determine, no one has ever known until now, and be able to determine what is meant by the “meridian of time” as a designation of the advent of the Messiah in the flesh. 122. David and Solomon are a type of Elohim, or God the Father, and Jehovah, His Son. It is for this reason that the Messiah is called in the New Testament, “the Son of David” - not because of David the son of Jesse. The Savior tried to explain this to the Jews, but they did not get it. 123. I have found the name David in ancient records a thousand years before the time of King David, and have been able to translate it. It is composed of two hieroglyphs, one being an outstretched arm with a triangle in it, pronounced DA and having the significance of something having been given, or endowed, and the second, a circle with a dot in it, which in this instance should be pronounced HVID and means “white light” i.e. pure light. The name means “endowed with light [intelligence]” and is a title of the Father. The word HVID is pre- served in modern Danish, “white.” It seems almost sacrilege that I should also bear that name, but I plead as my defense that my parents did not have a clue as to what it meant, or to Whom it was originally assigned, and that if it could be worn by King David, perhaps I would not do it any more dishonor than he did. 124. King of Assyria: In the original it is MUSH RUSSHA and has been recognized by some scholars to be the “Red Dragon” mentioned in Revelations. This is true, but absolutely no help to Americans in the year 2005 AD. Remember what I said about how proper nouns are capitalized. The ASSHUR is indeed RUSSHA, or as we rec- ognize it, Russia. No, they are not in shambles, and never were, but if people want to believe something hard enough, it is surprising how little it takes to gull them into carnal security. All Asian analysts who know any- thing at all are now publicly acknowledging that even China could whip America in a pitched battle. Russia is far more capable. As I said, people who do not keep basic commandments are not capable of believing this. Yet every previous civilization has gone down exactly the same path. 125. Now let the doomsayers have a field day. But the whole purpose of the book of Isaiah is to comfort those who live through his prophecies with the assurance that when the Almighty is satisfied that the country has been sufficiently purged of its iniquity, the yoke of the King of Assyria will be broken off, never again to afflict His people. 126. I neglected to mention earlier that once the name Eden is correctly translated (GAN ADON, Garden of the Lord), any Hebraist will immediately recognize that it refers to an enclosed area, surrounded by a protective nat- ural or artificial wall, without which, you can not have a garden in a world of beasts of the field - cognate with the words guard, Slavic gorod, Old Church Slavonic grad, Saxon gard, gart, Middle English ward (= prison), etc. Eve should have known better than to listen to a serpent who was trespassing even to be there. Of course you know that “serpent” means any reptile, not just a snake. This one had legs, like a Tyrannosaurus.

A List of My Discoveries © 2005 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº7

127. Isaiah 65:20-22. Isaiah prophesies that in the last days our life span will gradually be increased till it reaches the age of a tree. But what is the age of a tree? The 100 years mentioned in verse 20 is a scribal error. Remember I said that all scriptures could be understood by translating them into the language of Adam? In that language, the hieroglyph for a tree is also a very specific number - 120. By the time the Messiah comes, the nor- mal lifespan will be 120 years. He will not come before that happens. 128. The knowledge base of those who keep the covenant of Ham is superstition. These people consult horo- scopes and take them seriously, carry good luck charms, consider some numbers and days lucky and others un- lucky, and so forth, none of which has any basis whatsoever in fact. 129. The knowledge base of those who keep the covenant of Japheth is credentials and consensus. This is far more sensible than that of the lower covenant, but these people go with the flow, which works well enough most of the time, but when the flow is downhill as it inevitably becomes, they likewise perish in the flood. 130. The knowledge base of those who keep the covenant of Shem is that of independent knowledge. Of course they respect the credentials of scholars and professionals, but they know a few things for themselves without needing anyone else’s permission. When a prophet comes and prophesies, as Jonah did to Nineveh, they believe him, respond, and are usually spared. 131. The last prophet of the OT prophesies that the genealogy bug will bite a lot of people in the last days, and that if this were not so, the earth would be utterly wasted (read: desolate) at His coming. What does this mean? I have not found anyone who understood exactly why genealogy is necessary. Sure, they quote scriptures that say we cannot be saved without our dead and vice-versa, but what exactly does that mean? I have not found any precise understanding on the subject anywhere except in the prophets themselves. The answer is simple enough: No one who ever lived on this planet ever has been, nor ever will be, resurrected until his genealogy is done back to Adam, and all necessary ordinances performed by or in behalf of his ancestors. Remember Jesus saying that no one can enter the Kingdom of Heaven (meaning Celestial) without baptism? And remember the NT talk- ing about baptisms being performed for the dead? Why would it be in our interest to see to this work? Remem- ber the Savior saying to Peter that He would delegate the sealing power to His representatives on earth? Why would that be necessary? For the simple reason that the resurrection is by the sealing line. Every person who ever lived or ever will live on the earth will be resurrected by the person he is sealed to. Only one Person who ever lived on the earth had that power within Himself, which He inherited from His Father. After His resurrec- tion, He raised up Adam [conveniently buried at the base of the cross, hence the name Golgotha, correctly trans- lated by a 19th century prophet as “the place of burial” not “the place of a skull”], who then raised up Eve, then Abel and Seth, and Seth raised up his sons, and so on. 132. The notion that vicarious work performed in behalf of the dead might not be accepted is absurd. “As in Adam, all die, even so, in Christ, shall ALL be made alive.” Sooner or later, everyone will know the truth. Sooner or later, everyone will accept the truth. Sooner or later, everyone will be resurrected. There will be no exceptions. 133. The Savior referred to some as sheep, some as dogs, and some as swine. What did He mean? Was this a ra- cial slur of some kind? No. In the language of Adam, the hieroglyphs for “sheep” mean “white garment crea- ture.” In the first degree, it is the animal we know as a sheep, which is generally white, and provides garments for us. 134. In the second degree, it is simply, “garment creature,” that is, the only creature who wears clothing, namely, man. 135. In the third degree, white garment creature refers to those mentioned in the OT: “Who are these all arrayed in white?” who have taken upon themselves the teachings of the Savior and agreed, by covenant, to keep them. These are they who keep the covenant of Shem. 136. In the fourth degree, it refers to those who are clothed with a white robe, having passed the Bar of Judg- ment. 137. The word “dog” in the language of Adam means “change of heart” or “another heart”. It refers to those who live by the covenant of Japheth and will inherit the Terrestrial Kingdom. 138. The word “swine” - you guessed it - refers to those who keep the covenant of Ham and will inherit the Tel- estial Kingdom. 139. The association in English of Ham with swine is not a coincidence. In the writings of Abraham, it is stated that Providence has overseen the course every language will take, and directed that course by prophecy and by promise to those who are born into it. Thus, it is likewise no coincidence that the wandering of the Israelites in the wilderness after rejecting the higher law and immediate entry into the Promised Land, comes down to us as the “wilderness of Sin” even though Hebraists may correctly point out that it is a short form of the Sinai moun- tains. 140. It is no coincidence that what we call the beatitudes - although any Latin scholar can correctly point out that this is an Anglicized version of the word “Beatus” - “Blessed” that each begins with - suggest to the Eng- lish conversant mind the idea of be-attitudes. But what does “blessed” mean, anyway? Here, and practically everywhere else in scriptures where the word is used, it is used in the sense of the Greek “Makarioi” which has been translated as “blessed” - but I have discovered that this word is the direct descendant from the ancient Egyptian word that occurs in the papyrus describing the Bar of Judgment (I will present a complete, correct translation of this section of the papyrus here later) - describing one who has passed the Bar of Judgment - “Maa Kheru” - literally, “true of voice” yet its inferential meaning has been haggled over by scholars for hun- dreds of years. It means exactly the same thing as “Blessed …” does in the Sermon on the Mount - namely, that by living up to the law stated, you will pass the Bar and will inherit the Celestial Kingdom. Every one of the be- atitudes is a way of saying that you will inherit the Celestial Kingdom if you live up to it. 141. Revelations chapter 18 refers to a nuclear attack on New York City. This will not be believed by persons not living up to the principles they should, but it will be obvious to the whole world when it happens. By the time it occurs, it will be quite just. They are the ones who financed and promoted the attack in the first place. They sought to bring the world under one government with themselves at the top, but how can it be a surprise that they are double-crossed? When in the history of the world was a monster ever created which remained sub- missive to its maker? They will suffer the same fate as the poor traitorous wizard in Lord of the Rings who was told by Gandolf that “Sauron does not share power.” Nor should this provide fodder for the doomsayers. Of course America must be destroyed when it hits its moral bottom, and the survivors will be brought into a “hard bondage:” as prophesied, but go back and read the prophets - this is a cleansing our own iniquities have made necessary, and when we are sufficiently cleansed, Providence will raise up a Gideon and a breach will be made in the lines of the foreign occupant and he will be driven to the sea and the survivors of his troops will be so few that “a child may count them.” I don’t know how long this foreign occupation may last, but the track record sug- gests that we may count on a quarantine (forty years). 142. Countless scholars have tried to translate Nephi but none has succeeded. It is not Hebrew. It means “the fire of My mouth” and is an allusion to one who destroys the enemies of the Lord’s people, specifically, to one who destroys captains of fifty of the enemy host, as mentioned in the first chapter of the second book of Kings. His father was given a similar name for the same reason, as anyone familiar with the Bible should know. 143. Likewise, “Liahona” is not Hebrew, and likewise, all attempts at translating it have failed, leaps of fancy notwithstanding. LI = a classifier of long, slender objects. A = the number 2. HO = the V made by birds in flight indicating a direction; that which points the way. NA = a stone or other hard object with writing on it. LIAHO- NA = a compass with two spindles, one of which points the direction and the other of which points to characters written inscribed around the periphery of the dial to spell out messages. 144. Ether has three meanings, one of which has been plagiarized on the Internet already, “prisoner.” The other two are “one who survives a battle” and “the last of a series.” 145. Omer means remote in time and space from the beloved homeland of Egypt. 146. Emer means return to the beloved homeland. 147. Shelem means a crown. 148. Zerin means “the ends of the earth.” It formed a boundary, beyond which no man could pass. 149. Ziff is platina in its naturally occurring form, alloyed with its five related refractory metals. 150. Curelom is what we call the baluchitherium. 151. Cumom is what we call the uintatherium. 152. Limhi’s flocks were not sheep. They were the ancestor of what we call today, alpacas, vicunas, guanacos, and llamas. 153. The Ammonites were the ancestors of the tribe we call Navajo. 154. The ancestry of the is documented all over the Internet in a little booklet I published about a quar- ter of a century ago. 155. There is only one Urim and Thummim. 156. Mosiah the Elder got the Urim and Thummim and the Breastplate of Judgment from the Mulekites. 157. I believe the sword of Laban was the same one used by Gideon. 158. Twelve such swords were made, for the preservation of the tribes of Israel through all generations of time. They are all identical. 159. You would not know what these swords looked like unless you had one in your own family ancestry. My grandmother’s maiden name was Sharp. She was descended from a Norman knight distinguished for valor on the battlefield, upon whom was conferred the title “Monsieur de l’Esharpe” - ‘My lord of the scarf”. The legend on the coat of arms reads “Ferio sed sano” which the heraldry professional incorrectly translated as “I carry but I heal.” It really means “I smite but I heal.” This legend is written in the language of Adam on the double edged blade of each of the swords. 160. The hilt of the sword is solid gold. It is a caduceus - a reptile - exactly like the one Moses raised up to heal all the Israelites who would look at it, who had been bitten by poisonous flying serpents. After the battle, this hilt would stop the bleeding of all those who looked at it. If this sounds absurd, it is no more absurd than the story we have in Numbers. 161. Now you know why the legend on the blade says what it does. 162. It is commonly known that “Excalibur” is the Norman French way of writing what was originally “Calibur- na” or, more correctly, KA LI BUR NA. I am not aware of anyone ever being able to translate that name. It is, again, in the language of Adam. KA = augmentative. LI = classifier of long slender objects (remember Liaho- na?). BUR = cavity. NA = a hard object, usually a rock. Kaliburna = the sword that came out of the cavity of a rock; the sword of humility. 163. King Arthur was a real person. 164. King Arthur did not die. He was translated, like John in the New Testament. 165. Priesthood keys on the earth remain forever unless they are removed. 166. Priesthood keys cannot be removed by death. Had all the Apostles been killed, the Seventy had all the keys necessary to reconstitute the Church. Had all the Seventies been killed, the Elders held this power collectively and could have reconstituted the church. 167. Because John was translated, after the other eleven apostles were killed, he and only he held the keys for conferring the priesthood upon others. When he withdrew from the people as he did when he was imprisoned at Patmos, no one had any right to perform any ordinance, not even baptism, let alone ordination of anyone to the priesthood. Anyone claiming priesthood authority must claim it through John, not Peter. It is a well established historical fact that John was the successor (survivor) of Peter and not the other way around. John had no succes- sor; hence the priesthood was taken from the earth. 168. At the close of every dispensation, someone was translated, thereby taking the keys away, and thereby ne- cessitating a restoration at some future time of those keys. 169. No one will be translated in this dispensation. By this simple mechanism, the keys will never again be tak- en from the earth. Nothing else is necessary. 170. All flora and fauna which ever existed upon the earth are still here and will be rediscovered in due time. This process has already begun, but is such an embarrassment to the proponents of organic evolution that they have refused to give such discoveries any press. In time, the sheer abundance of evidence will overwhelm them.

Now if I haven’t forgotten anything, next week we will begin correcting previously translated ancient records, which will provide information not previously known, and when that is done we will get on with translating an- cient records for which I know of no translation. When that is done I will finish with a complete grammar and dictionary of the language of Adam, by which you will have a perfect understanding of all Holy Writ and a lot of other things, and I will consider my work done.

171. I did forget something. What is the explanation for what astrophysicists call black holes, if what I said is true - that there is no such thing? There really are areas in space where the light from distant galaxies is bent, due to some huge gravitational power. These are giant stars unknown to astronomers, yet you can see one for yourself. On chart number 356-5 published by the Hansen Planetarium, Salt Lake City, Utah, copyright 1980 by the Royal Observatory, Edinburgh, you see the Horsehead Nebula in Orion, IC 434. The nebula classified in the New General Catalog as NGC 2024, at the seven o’clock position of Zeta orionis [the easternmost star in Or- ion’s belt] is in fact a giant star shielded by an interstellar cloud. It is this star which is described in the writings of Abraham as one of the governing stars. Astrophysicists may, if they care, examine the region and find out for themselves that it has all the attributes of what they have called black holes, but it is quite the opposite - a giant star, hence the powerful gravitational field, with a giant shield, hence the absence of visibility by the naked eye. 172. From the Egyptian records, I learned a quarter of a century ago that this is the abode of Osiris, or in other words, Jehovah. Any Egyptologist knows that Egyptians claim Osiris dwelt in Orion, which of course for a ficti- tious god is meaningless. But now you know what that means. 173. A few years ago a British scholar discovered that the great pyramids were arranged in a configuration du- plicating the constellation of Orion, with the Nile being in the position of the Milky Way. This is a very great discovery, but he did not know why this arrangement was chosen at such great expense. But now you do. 174. From the writings of Abraham I learned that all such giant stars have interstellar clouds to shield planets like ours from their powerful radiation, without which, planets like ours could not exist. 175. Oh, one more thing. Now you know how to calculate the length of a barge which is "the length of a tree" - you already know they used the language of Adam. Once you know their ancestry, as I mentioned above, you know what cubit to use and can calculate the exact length of their barges.

Without knowing what you now do, wouldn’t “the age of a tree” and “the length of a tree” seem a little bit ab- surd?

A List of My Discoveries

© 2005 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº8

176. In the language of Adam, the Godhead, i.e. the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, are respectively compared to the sun, moon, and stars. It is easy enough to comprehend the nature and identity of the first Two, but I never met or heard of anyone who understood the Holy Ghost, although I know the great prophets understood it per- fectly, although they did not, by any record I have been able to find, spell it out clearly in a way that everyone could understand it, in the languages in which their writings have been handed down to us. The Holy Ghost is not a certain individual, nor do we worship him, nor do we pray to him. It should be obvious from the eyewit- ness accounts that many spirits, all good or all bad, can abide in one mortal body, as we have many eyewitness accounts of both cases, but one spirit can only abide in one mortal body at a time. Therefore it is perfectly rea- sonable that the Holy Ghost should be compared to the stars of heaven - there are many of them. 177. The Holy Ghost is not a god in the sense that we think of it, but rather the messenger boy of the Godhead. Therefore the office of the Holy Ghost is not permanent, but rather a temporary assignment given to a good spi- rit. 178. The good spirits assigned to this office do not act in their own behalf nor in their own name (cf. “Why in- quirest thou after my name, seeing it is secret?”) but do exactly as they are commissioned, nothing more, and nothing less. These spirits may be either a KA or an AL BETH KA as explained below. They can not be any- thing else, nor can they be spirits assigned to another planet. 179. In order that this concept may be understood, we must first understand our own nature, which is known to many except for the translations, which I will cite here. These are not my discoveries, as I say, except for the translations. Our first form of existence is called KHU, intelligence, which is eternal, but has no estate and therefore no real agency. The possibility of agency is inseparable from estate or abode. Our second form of exis- tence was called KA, spirit, also known to many as the first estate, wherein we acquired our spirit bodies. This word is preserved in the Japanese KA-ERU, to change, where KA is the root meaning and -ERU is the verb in- finitive suffix, also analogous to the infinitive --R suffice of the Romance languages we know so well in the West. It is commonly known that the KA represents our completed personality - it grows to maturity and perfec- tion but never ages or deteriorates. Gender and all other attributes are perfectly defined at this stage, as is also commonly known. If you want to know what your KA looks like, get a picture of yourself at age 33 in prime health. 180. The KA, or spirit, can only be born of resurrected, immortal parents. 181. If either or both parents are mortal, the offspring will be mortal in the sense of having a physical body and being capable of dying. 182. If the male parent is immortal and the female mortal, the offspring will be capable of dying only by his choice, but will have power to live again. This is not a discovery because it is commonly known as being the case of Jesus Christ. 183. If the male parent is mortal and the female immortal, the offspring will be capable of living forever unless an irreversible choice is made to die, in which case the offspring will have no power to live again unless raised up by one who has that power. This likewise is not a discovery because it is known, or at least suspected, by many, as being the case of Adam. 184. Our third state of existence, just alluded to, is called BETH KA, which may be translated as body and spi- rit, second estate, and abode of change. This is the mortal state we are now in. BETH is the ancestor of the He- brew BETH meaning house, our words BODY, ABODE, ABIDE, etc., all related to the idea of a place of resi- dence. 185. Now I want to mention something here that is not commonly known, or at least, not by any source I have been able to find. Some believe that we chose our parents. This is true, not in some cases, but in all cases. What I have not been able to find anyone else knowing is that upon acquiring our second estate or mortal body, we were, exactly at that time, given additional talents and attributes that we did not previously have, and which we would not have had, had we chosen a different family. We knew this perfectly well at the time we made the choice, and however frustrated we may be in mortality, if the veil were taken from our minds and the knowl- edge restored to us that we had at the time we made the choice, we would make exactly the same choice, be- cause we are exactly the same individuals now that we were then. In fact, if we were given the chance in mortal- ity to alter the choice (as we sometimes ignorantly wish we could) it would not be anywhere near as good as the choice we already made. We all owe a debt of gratitude to our mortal parents for GIFTS we have acquired from them, which we did not earn, but were handed to us on a silver platter as part of our legacy of being born to them. We can only retain these gifts by honoring our parents to the maximum extent we are permitted to do so in mortality, and by developing those talents to the best of our ability during our second estate, and acquiring others as we are able to do so. (cf. the parable of the talents given in the New Testament). 186. Our fourth state of existence begins at the death of our mortal body, and is called AL BETH KA, which means without abode of change, or in other words, a spirit who has experienced mortality, and is now returned to his former state, equipped with the changes experienced in that mortality. 187. Our fifth and final state of existence is called AL KA BETH, which means without change of abode, and begins at the time of the resurrection, wherein our spirit returns to the place of interment of the mortal body, in the company of the person we are sealed to, generally husband or father, who has been resurrected and thereby holds the priesthood of resurrection (which is impossible to be held in mortality by those born of a mortal fa- ther), and by that power, commands the elements constituting our mortal frame to return from wherever they may be, from the four quarters of the earth, to clothe the spirit with its original physical body once again, with a bond that is eternal, by which means the body and spirit can never be separated again. 188. It is the combination of the priesthood of the sealing power, which can be held by men on earth, and the priesthood of resurrection, which can only be held under the conditions mentioned above, that the resurrection of all persons ever born on the earth takes place. There is no resurrection until both conditions are met. 189. Now this leads us to the question as to when the resurrection takes place. To answer this, we must first an- swer the question as to which member of the Godhead is responsible for this ordinance. The Father has already delegated this power to His Son, and the Holy Ghost is incapable of holding this power, being a spirit. It is the Son, Jesus Christ, or Jehovah, by Whom this ordinance is performed, and by those delegated by Him under the conditions mentioned above. This is commonly known, but what is not commonly known is, How many resur- rections are there? Remember that I said that all these things could be readily understood in the original lan- guage, and that in that language, Jesus or Jehovah is compared to the moon and its attributes. The moon is of a lesser light than the sun, (cf. John 14:28) and is divided up into phases whereby it wanes and waxes (emblem- atic of the Savior’s death and resurrection) and executes a cycle of 28 days or parts. Likewise, there are twenty- eight resurrections: each of the seven dispensations has four resurrections, the first three of glory corresponding to the three kingdoms of glory mentioned above, and the fourth corresponding to those who were a law unto themselves (deliberately shedding innocent blood) and therefore is a kingdom without glory, variously called outer darkness or perdition. Since each kingdom necessarily by its superior glory (light and truth, or in other words, intelligence and knowledge) administers to the one directly below it, it should be obvious that the first resurrection is the celestial through all dispensations, then the terrestrial through all dispensations, and so on.

All these things I have said are perfectly obvious from a correct knowledge of the original language, and, con- versely, it is impossible to translate the original language correctly without a knowledge of these simple things. Probably next week we will move on to a complete translation of the Bar of Judgment as written by Abraham as given in the Egyptian papyri of Hunefer, Ani, and so on, British Museum papyri Nº9901 and Nº10471, etc., if I remember correctly.

A List of My Discoveries

© 2005 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº9

190. The Urim and Thummim was taken from the Kingdom of Judah in about 588 B.C. 191. The Book of Judges was written some time after 588 B.C. We know this because at the time of its writing, there were no longer seers in Israel, simply meaning that the Urim and Thummim had been taken from them by that time. 192. The principle of proximity: The spirit assigned to act in the office of the Holy Ghost is generally the one having the most interest in the matter. For example, when a man receives a prompting to marry a certain girl, it is often the spirit of one of his own as yet unborn posterity who is assigned to deliver that message, acting in the office of the Holy Ghost. 193. The expression "clear as the moon and fair as the sun" is a scribal error. The correct expression as it occurs in the language of Adam is "clear as the sun and fair as the moon." 194. The Jaredites were black and did not hold the priesthood. I discovered this back in 1967 from an analysis of their names, but there is also abundant archeological and historical evidence to prove the point beyond dis- pute. See my little booklet "The Jaredites Were Black." 195. The average full grown male Jaredite was nine feet six inches tall. These are a part of the race of giants mentioned in Genesis and other ancient records. 196. The Liahona was a product of Jaredite technology. The Jaredites were familiar with the workings of cer- tain minerals which would emit a faint glow in the presence of the Holy Ghost, and with the technology used by Abraham to detect the presence of underground pools of water, and this technology was incorporated. You may recall that the Liahona pointed to the more fertile parts of the land, as yet unseen by the travelers, and you recall also that it would not work when there was any degree of disharmony with the Holy Ghost. The Israelites also used this in the Breastplate of Judgment and its ephod - the two stones on the shoulder of the priest would glow in the presence of the Holy Ghost. They were onyx stones. The Israelites never understood the technology, but the Jaredites did, as is evidenced by the Liahona. 197. The Liahona was delivered to the door of Lehi’s tent by Ether. 198. Ether was translated. 199. It is known to many that the most intelligent Person who ever lived on this earth was Jesus Christ, the Only Begotten and heir of His Father’s divinity. The second most intelligent person, albeit a distant second, was the translator of the book in which these terms occur, an ordinary man like you and me. 200. Gazelem should be transliterated Gazelam. 201. Gazelam means "the brilliant one." 202. Gazelam was the name of the translator of the book, in the First Estate. 203. Neither the Most Intelligent, nor the second most intelligent wrote hardly anything; virtually everything we have of their sayings comes to us from others who wrote it down. Nor did either of them live anywhere near a normal life span, because the world cannot abide such characters. The third most intelligent person who ever lived on this earth was Abraham, and it is from him that we must learn after exhausting the writings from the first two. Abraham knew this, and it was for this reason he entrusted all of his discoveries to the Egyptians as being the only nation on earth having enough stability to preserve his writings down to our day.

Below I present a few of my corrections of the translation of Osiris in the hall of double Maat (which should be translated, Jehovah at the Bar of Judgment).

204. The so-called Book of the Dead was written by Abraham. 205. The older Egyptologists, especially E.A. Wallis Budge, were better translators of Egyptian hieroglyphs than anything I have seen in the second half of the twentieth century. I will cite his translations [ The Papyrus of Ani, 1895, Trustees of the British Museum] and follow them by my own translations. 206. Plate III, Section 1, Hall of Judgment, p. 11: EAWB: My heart my mother, twice. DGS: My heart and might are as my mother Eve. 207. EAWB: My heart of my coming into being. DGS: My mind and strength are as my father Adam. 208. The jackal-headed escort: EAWB: Anubis. DGS: This has a triple meaning. First, it represents the escort who comes to pick us up at the moment of death. This is usually the person we are sealed to, or the person clos- est to us, who has preceded us in death. Often the dying person will cry out the name of this person, unseen to others present, as his last words. In the case of martyrs for the cause of Right and Truth, it is the Savior Himself. It is preserved in the Greek tradition of Kharron, the ferryman, and the Finnish legend of the Swan of Tuonela. 209. The second meaning is, the person who, having been resurrected himself, comes to perform the resurrec- tion of the deceased, which is always the person sealed to him, such as husband or father. 210. The third meaning is, the person who greets us upon arrival at the Bar of Judgment. 211. This person is represented in hieroglyphs by what is called by Egyptologists as INPU, although they gener- ally cite the Greek form of the word, Anubis. However, this is a proper noun, and by way of respect is written in the opposite direction, and the quail chick rendered U should be rendered M as already demonstrated earlier, and the square box hieroglyph rendered P should be rendered R, also as already demonstrated. The correct read- ing is MRNI, or more completely, MORONI. 212. The description of Moroni as given in the hieroglyphs is "He who stands upon his hill." This is commonly known, but the meaning of the hill is not. This has two meanings. 213. The first meaning of the word hill used as part of his title is the hill in upstate New York called Cumorah, or as modern scholars would read it, Qumorah. 214. The second meaning of the word hill as used here refers to what was called "the mountain of the Lord," or in other words, the pile of rocks constituting His temple. He was always placed atop such a sacred place, always facing east, awaiting the return of Osiris, or Jehovah as the rising sun. 215. The title of person bearing this hieroglyph is, The guardian of sacred records by which the world shall be judged. 216. The hieroglyphs at the top of this plate indicate that the Bar of Judgment is presided over by a Quorum or Council of Three, a Quorum or Council of Twelve, and a Quorum or Council of Seventy. Note that the first three hieroglyphs have crowns upon their heads; and the first seven have scepters in their hands, representing keys of the priesthood. 217. In some versions of this document there are twelve hieroglyphs on the top, and in others, fourteen. The fourteen are to be taken as raised one degree, that is, multiplied by five. 218. The left pan of the scales: EAWB, p. 255: the heart, emblematical of the conscience. DGS: The heart hier- oglyph represents the life and desires of the defendant. 219. The right pan of the scales: EAWB: weighed in the balance against the feather, emblematical of law. DGS: the feather hieroglyph is pronounced USHU MAAT and has five degrees: 1. The foundation of seeing by the light of right (i.e., conscience). 2. The foundation of seeing by the light of truth (i.e., the Holy Ghost). 3. The Book seen by three witnesses. 4. The Book seen by eight witnesses. 5. The sealing power, i.e., what is said, done, and written by those who hold the sealing power, including ordinances performed by us or in our behalf. 220. Said to one who passes the Bar: EAWB p. 17: Let there be given to him cakes and a coming forth in the presence of Osiris and a field abiding in Sekhet-hetepu. DGS: Let there be given to him the sacramental bread and wine in commemoration of the suffering and atonement of the Only Begotten Son, and a coming forth in the presence of Jehovah, and an eternal abode in the New Jerusalem. 221. Much more could be said of this section of the papyrus, but I want to move on to p. 60-61 where we have an extract from the Book of Enoch. Here, the major players and major events of each of the seven dispensations are cited by way of prophecy. I will give just one example. 222. EAWB: Hall the fifth. … Saith Osiris, scribe Ani, triumphant. DGS: Fifth dispensation. … Thus saith Je- hovah, the Lord God. 223. EAWB: I have brought thy jawbones into Restau. DGS: I shall bring Lehi into the land southward. 224. EAWB: I have brought for thee thy backbone into Heliopolis. DGS: And I shall bring Mulek into the land northward. 225: EAWB: gathering together his many fragments there. I have repulsed for thee… DGS: to gather together the many remnants of the houses of Joseph and of Mulek. 226. Mulek was not originally a proper name, but is merely the correct transliteration of the word for prince. In the original form of old Hebrew, A+A should always be rendered O or U. This is preserved in modern Scandi- navian. 227. What is meant by "?" It is nothing more or less than old Hebrew written using Egyptian Hieratic characters for brevity. 228. This explains why Arabic, which we would assume to be the descendant of ancient Egyptian hieratic, is nothing of the sort. It is Hebrew written in hieratic. "Reformed Egyptian" is nothing more nor less than an early form of what we know today as Arabic. 229. The Hindis are descended from the ancient Egyptians. 230. This explains the prevalence of the family name "Gupta" among them. 231. It also explains why the Devanagari script in which Hindi is written is nothing more than a modified Egyp- tian hieratic, rotated 90 degrees with a horizontal line over it. 232. The original logic behind the Roman alphabet we use today is based upon this chart:

A---E---I,J---O------U,V,W B---F---K-----P,Q,R---X C---G---L-----S------Y D---H---M,N---T------Z

233. The vowels originally were used to indicate degree: A = 1st, E = 2nd, and so on. 234. Changing the vowel, thereby changing the degree, was a way of indicating changes in tenses in the verb. This is preserved in the notion of strong verbs, cf. sing, sang, sung, ring, rang, rung, etc. 235. In nouns, it indicated the change in number. This is preserved in the German language, which is also evi- denced in Etruscan before it. 236. Letters grouped together in the above chart were originally represented by a single Phoenician simplified hieroglyph. 237. Doubling the vowel was also a way of shifting the degree and indicated also a shift in sound. This is pre- served in English: EE is pronounced like the nest vowel to the right of the chart, I, although we have been trained in English not to think like that, it is obvious to Europeans once it is explained to them because they are used to pronouncing I like we pronounce EE. 238. Note also the example OO = U in pronunciation, the next vowel to the right. 239. The AA shift to E is preserved in the German umlauted A which is then pronounced E. 240. I should point out something that should be obvious, but apparently not. There are no seers on the earth to- day, although a man may be sustained by his church or followers to be a seer - all that means is that, if and when the man acquires the Urim and Thummim, we give him our assent to act in that capacity. A seer is one who has and uses the Urim and Thummim, nothing more and nothing less, and it does not even require the priesthood, although a priest after the order of Aaron has a legal right to act in this capacity. But he still needs the Urim and Thummim to be a seer. Some have confused prophecy with seership. 241. There is no correlation between any church calling or position, and righteousness or intelligence or knowl- edge, nor indeed should there be. If a man is called of God to some office, we are duty bound to follow him in all that he says and does because he then becomes the Lord’s legal administrative officer and mouthpiece. But we have no right to demand that he know everything or that he be better than other men, other than to meet a ba- sic standard of righteousness characteristic of any follower of righteousness.

A List of My Discoveries

© 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº10

242. First, a couple of desultory items. When I was in high school, I figured out that the best place for storage of nuclear waste would be abandoned coal mines. The high concentration of carbon atoms in coal acts as a moder- ator of neutrons, absorbing them with Carbon 12 to become Carbon 14, exactly as graphite rods in a nuclear re- actor. This is a very simple idea - abandoned coal mines being in and of themselves dangerous and worth less than nothing for any other purpose. Yet I am not aware of anybody doing this. It is such a simple idea that I hope somebody somewhere is doing it. 243. Some thirty-three years ago I began restoring antique clocks, which I have been doing ever since. A very popular kind of early American clock was the OG, a weight driven rectangular wall clock which sold for about four dollars when new, about 1810 to about 1875. I have never been able to find anybody who had the foggiest notion what OG stood for, and even clock collectors would argue with me when I tried to enlighten them. It is an architectural term several hundred years old. It refers to the difference between the Eastern “onion domes” characterized by the Kremlin and Middle Eastern Architecture, the compound S-curve, as opposed to the simple Gothic arch curve. It simply means “Oriental Gothic” and refers to the compound S-curve which is the distin- guishing characteristic of OG clocks. 244. The resurrection and judgment are inseparably connected: immediately after the resurrection we are es- corted to the Bar. But there are already two preliminary judgments made: the first, when we die, is by our own conscience having a perfect memory of all our actions, good and bad, and condemning us for the bad. This is commonly known. It is also commonly known, because it is mentioned in the NT, that a sort of judgment is passed upon us by our own spirits at the time of resurrection, because we are resurrected as “bodies celestial, terrestrial, or terrestrial”. And I already mentioned that the resurrection is sequenced by kingdoms, starting from the top. The thing I did not mention is that, at the Bar of Judgment, all heirs to a celestial glory are judged by celestial beings, then the terrestrial resurrection and judgment takes place by those delegated to do so, then the telestial, then those who are not eligible for a kingdom of glory. The point here is that God does not personally judge everyone Himself, nor does He need to. A murderer will never see God; he will be judged by a person who is better than he is, and his judgment will be just. The Savior referenced this principle when he said that an- cient kingdoms would “rise up in judgment against this generation” because, wicked as they may have been, they were more righteous than those who rejected the Savior. 245. What does the name Lucifer mean? I have never met or heard of anybody who had the foggiest idea. Deri- vation from Latin is a false etymology supposed to mean “light bearer”. The word is not Latin. LU means a per- son or a man, as we have already demonstrated. CIFER is preserved in Arabic cifr, a number, ancestor of our word “cipher”, and at the same time, ancestor of the Hebrew “sepher”, a written account. LUCIFER means “man of the accounts” or in other words, he was the secretary-treasurer of the Godhead. Any student of ancient history knows that secretary-treasurer were the same office because records were often kept on precious materi- als. It is known to many that Lucifer seeks to carry out his rejected plan of forcing everyone’s obedience by set- ting up Communist states here on earth. It is for this reason that the ruler of such countries is always the Secre- tary General, never the “President”. 246. The word ZION is known to many to mean “pure in heart.” A complete translation is given below. Another meaning is “the land of pure water.” For a complete description, a translation of all of its meanings is necessary. 247. Another meaning is “the land of virtue.” 248. Yet another meaning is “the powers of heaven.” 249. Yet another meaning is a land where there are more women than men. 250. Whenever the word ZION is used by the Old Testament prophets, it refers to the United States of America, as opposed to Jerusalem, usually meaning of course the whole land of Israel. 251. More about the Bar of Judgment. From the writings of Abraham it is evident that the sectarian notion of the wicked burning forever in hell is false. There are two conditions known as hell. The first, is the searing con- science after death for things we did that were wrong that we failed to repent of. This is commonly known. The second occurs after the Bar of Judgment. If we fail the Bar, we have to go through a torment beyond the ca- pacity of the mortal body to bear (it would die instantly) but since we can not die after being resurrected, this torment is greater than anything we have ever experienced in our entire existence. This is the same torment the Savior endured in Gethsemane, which overloaded the capacity of His body to endure, to the point that blood came out of every pore. He could endure it because He had power over death; it would have killed any ordinary mortal instantly. But for those who have the commandments given to them, and willfully disobey them, and fail to make complete restitution and complete repentance, they will have to endure this same torment when they are resurrected and can no longer die themselves. This is known by many. 252. What is not known, so far as I can tell, is that even for the worst people who have ever lived on this earth, the Hitlers, the Stalins, the Herods and other mass murderers, although their torment is very great and their suf- fering very long, the time eventually comes when it has an end, and the Savior releases even them from their torment. Such characters are then given an estate like the one we now have, except that they can no longer die. For those who inherit this kingdom without glory (because they were a law unto themselves), their capacity to forget is restored to them, as it is with us in mortality, and they remain in this condition ever after. 253. Therefore we see that according to the incredible mercy of Providence, no one is ever shown the glory of a kingdom that is greater than the one he will eventually inherit. It is commonly known that that law by which our body is raised up to immortality will be forever binding upon us; that is, there is no possibility of progressing from a lower kingdom to a higher one, unless we have lived the highest law and inherit the highest glory, which is the only one which has no upper limit. It is also commonly known that the lowest part of the lowest kingdom of glory, the telestial, is far beyond the capacity of the mortal mind to comprehend. At the very least, it is a kingdom with no death, pain, or sickness, and one in which there is no sin and no forgetting, therefore the po- tential for learning is infinitely greater than it is here in mortality. Yet, it should never be lost sight of, that if we comprehended the consequence of sin, we would not do it, and therefore all temptation is based upon deception, as already mentioned. No sane person could ever be enticed to commit the least sin, let alone the serious ones, if he had the slightest inkling of how much suffering it will cost him. 254. It is commonly known that deathbed repentance, such as shown by Darth Vader in Episode 6 of Star Wars, is worthless for the sins he committed. It is absurd to suppose that a man can massacre innocent children (Epi- sode 3) and destroy the emperor as his dying act (Episode 6) and all of a sudden be redeemed and saved from a lifetime of treachery and murder. As a rule of thumb, we may ask, “What is the worst sin I ever committed that I have not completely repented of?” and that will give us an idea of how we will fare at the Bar of Judgment. For example, if we cheated a brother out of a part of his inheritance, and that was the worst sin we ever commit- ted, we can plan on inheriting the middle of the telestial kingdom. 255. A great many people do not understand that the mere fact of the existence of the atonement does not make it so that we do not have to pay for all of our sins, down to the last penny, with interest. The atonement is only good for sins we fully repented of. For any sin we commit and die before we fully repent, it is just as if there were no atonement at all relative to that sin. For this reason, procrastination of repentance is criminally stupid. 256. I don’t remember if I translated MAMMON, but I don’t think I did. It does not mean “wealth” or anything of the sort. It is a third person singular indefinite pronoun. It refers to whomever happens to be in power at the time. In modern English, about the closest rendition would be “bureaucrats.” “Ye cannot serve God and bureau- crats” - in other words, do not let those currently in positions of power or influence in your society determine your moral standards for you. We must, as good citizens, be subject to the powers that be, honoring every man in his station, obeying laws, etc., but for the exercise of our conscience, we are accountable only to our Maker. 257. Every head of every dispensation has had to execute a great cycle of purification, i.e., to fast (no food or drink of any kind) for forty days and forty nights as a part of his qualification for that position. Most of us, of course, could not survive such an ordeal, nor do we have to. 258. What does the word “AMEN” mean? I have heard lots of silly speculations, but I have never seen anything remotely close to an accurate translation, not anywhere. I see that in the modern Hebrew New Testament, the word is pressed into service to answer the equivalent of “Verily” in the King James version. The word is noth- ing more nor less than a period in the language of Adam. It simply means - this is the end of what has preceded. Period. A List of My Discoveries

© 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº11 259. A person’s name is entered into the Book of Life at the time he is baptized by one having the authority to do so. It is in fact that authority that makes this happen, and without that authority, it does not, and the baptism is of no avail. Little children and those who are mentally incompetent need not be entered into the Book - their mere appearance at the Bar of Judgment will be sufficient to gain them admission. This second observation is commonly known. 260. Any person able to translate ancient languages is also able to detect frauds. There are frauds on the Internet purporting to be translations of ancient records, but a person in the field can detect immediately that they are neither ancient records nor translations of anything. Generally the truth is free and lies cost money. The discov- eries I am sharing here are free; I have no agenda and I ask no recompense. 261. There has never in the history of the world been any unknown language recovered without a key of some kind. Linear B was not an unknown language; it was a known language in a previously unknown script. The claim that “any language can be translated by programming a computer to look for patterns” [Nibley] is in error. Something is always needed - a translation of some text, or the Urim and Thummim. Without these, an un- known language constitutes a perfect code that can never be broken by anyone. There are no exceptions, nor in- deed can be. 262. The major waterworks and network of canals in Egypt were built under the direction of Joseph while he was king, and are called by his name, in Arabic, to this day. 263. It is commonly known that Middle English nursery rhymes are actually descriptions of historical events, such as, for example, “ring around the rosies” being a description of the bubonic plague and its futile treatment. Some years ago I discovered that Humpty Dumpty is a description of King Richard III. This is so obvious that I am sure many others have figured it out, but I have never heard it anywhere. 264. It is commonly known that many of the Psalms are about the Messiah. It is not commonly known - by any- one as far as I can tell - that some of the Psalms are about other prophets. For example, Psalm XVIII is about Nephi. 265. The three hieroglyphs that often follow the name of a pharaoh are read backwards by Egyptologists and are not at all understood. They are an indication that the pharaoh is at some future time to receive his endow- ment by the proper authority (which the Egyptians never had, notwithstanding they went through the motions anyway). 266. The hieroglyph known to everyone as “ankh, meaning life” actually refers to the keys of the priesthood [which is why it is a representation of a key], again something the Egyptians never had, yet they imitated all the ordinances and recorded them anyway. 267. It does not seem to be known by anyone today that the Scheherezade of the Alf Layla wa Layla [thousand and one nights] is the same as the Esther of the Bible. The three years of cliffhanger stories were her ruse to gain favor with the king, a detail left out of the Bible.

A List of My Discoveries © 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº12

268. Whenever the expression “east wind” is used figuratively in scriptural prophecies, it means to be con- quered by a foreign power. 269. “All is well in Zion” - I’ve never heard of anybody understanding exactly what this means, nor really any- one who knew why it was bad to suppose all is well. This expression comes from the cry of the watchmen of the old North Italian city-states. After announcing the time, the cry “All is well” meant that a state of war does not exist, nor is it imminent. Remember that we already learned that “Zion” when used in scriptural prophecies generally refers to the United States of North America. The fault for us today is, that anyone who teaches or be- lieves “all is well in Zion” simply does not understand the OT prophecies in the least degree. The other two cries of the watchman provide insight as to the origin of a couple of our words in English. If the watchman spied the enemy, or received a report of the enemy, making preparations for war, then after announcing the time, his cry was “All’erta!” [to the ascent!] meaning that an attack was to be expected in the near future and that the watch on the city walls needed to be doubled immediately and that the frequency of reports needed to be doubled. This of course is the ancestor of our word “alert” indicating a state of watchfulness beyond the ordi- nary. When the enemy army was seen to be actually mobilized and about to march on the city, the cry of the watchman was “All’arme!” [to arms!] which was an appeal to every member of the militia, i.e. the combat-able citizenry, to put on his armor and grab his weapons and report to his local military commander ready for action. This is of course the ancestor of our word “alarm”. These additional etymologies are commonly known; I sim- ply include them here because they belong here to complete the picture. 270. Ever wonder why the Roman numeral for “five” is a V, which has nothing to do with Latin? The answer is that in the oldest language, the word for “five” was “Veh”. This is preserved in Finnish to this day, “viisi.” 271. A similar explanation holds for the Roman use of L for “fifty.” 272. In ancient records, the Holy Ghost is sometimes referred to by a name which means “the Lord of Fifty.” This is why it came upon the Apostles on the day of Pentecost. 273. The use of X for 10 in Latin comes from the early language character for 10, rotated 45 degrees [+]. 274. The Roman notion of subtraction on the left (IV, IX) and addition on the right (VI, XI) comes from the original language, rotated 90 degrees, wherein a line under denoted subtraction and a line over denoted multipli- cation. Even here, the Romans retained the line over a character as representing multiplication. 275. Our numbering notation which we call Arabic, is nothing of the sort. Its ancestry is: English < Arabic < Persian < Hindi < Egyptian. 276. Who built the sphinx? It was built by the grandson of Ham, the first pharaoh, Aha, called by Manetho, Menes, which is nothing more than a translation into Greek of the Egyptian word Aha. 277. When was the sphinx built? About 1695 B.C. 278. Why was the sphinx built? As a tribute to Shem, or Melchizedek, Aha’s great uncle. 279. What is the significance of the sphinx? It is a three dimensional hieroglyph. Translated, it means “man of holiness”. 280. The earliest “names of pharaohs” in rectangles found in the hieroglyphs such as “Neterkhebit” for “Zoser” are not names at all. They are statements of the most distinguished accomplishments of the king in question, as we already demonstrated for “Zoser” [Joseph], “the king who saved Egypt.” 281. Why do we say a blessing on food before eating it? In movies we often hear something like “for that which we are about to eat, make us truly grateful” which isn’t good for much. We often hear “bless this food that it will nourish and strengthen our bodies” which is good for nothing. We already made that choice when we chose the food, and there is no blessing that can make it more or less nourishing than it already is. We hear “and bless the hands that prepared it” which is a nice gesture, but again, that is not blessing the food nor does it do us or the food any good. Modern inspired men have counseled us “don’t eat unblessed food.” This is sound advice. Why? In the scriptures we read that inanimate objects can be blessed or cursed. Can devils and unclean spirits enter food and then use that as a path of entry into our bodies? Of course, just as surely as microbes can. Can devils or unclean spirits be blessed? No, they cannot. By pronouncing a blessing upon the food and drink we are about to ingest, in the name of the Lord, we cast out any devils which may be lurking in them, just as we read in the New Testament. This does not require any authority other than the name of Jesus Christ, since everyone has to eat and drink. He does this for anyone and everyone, merely for the asking. The blessing does not even have to be spoken aloud; it can be a silent prayer at a drinking fountain and last ten seconds. It can be done silently and unknown to a person sitting next to us, before putting a stick of gum in our mouth as we are driving down the road. Should we do this in all cases? The inspired man says we should. That is good enough for me. And after doing this for many years, I see why. 282. In the sacramental prayer, the bread and water are not only blessed, but it goes one step further - it is sanc- tified. What does that mean? We see that the blessing casts out any unclean spirits. It should be obvious that if an unclean spirit can infest food or drink, then a Holy Spirit can likewise reside therein (obviously not at the same time!). Does it require some kind of authority to invite the Holy Spirit to enter food or drink? It does, just as it requires authority to command a person to receive the Holy Ghost. It is all the same thing. So we see than anyone can ask a blessing upon food and drink and make it fit for consumption, from a spiritual standpoint, but to make it holy is an ordinance which requires the proper priesthood authority. After all, that’s what “sacra- ment” means - holy food and drink. This also embodies the reason why no one should take it unless he either is of an age or condition as not to need baptism, or has been baptized and had hands laid upon his head by those in authority for the reception of the Holy Ghost. And it also contains the explanation we are given in the NT as to the danger of receiving the sacrament if we are not worthy - it then has exactly the opposite effect of blessing and sanctifying the food and drink - because a Holy Spirit can not enter an unclean body, it leaves and is re- placed by a devil or unclean spirit and therefore we “eat/drink damnation to our souls.” The danger of this is ex- plained graphically in the NT, that many took sick and some slept [died] on this account. If we keep the com- mandments over a period of time, as mentioned earlier, it all becomes perfectly clear. 283. The Latin American celebration of “El Cinco de Mayo” is older than the battle of Pueblo in 1862, in which the Mexicans suffered great loss and it did not leave much to celebrate. It goes back, in fact, to 5 May 80 B.C., at which time an army of their ancestors [“Lamanites”] surprised a great city of white men [“Nephites”] in northern South America and annihilated them without the loss of a single soldier of their own army. This was the greatest military victory in their 2600 year history. This is recorded in Alma 16:1. Note that the date is con- sidered so important that it is mentioned twice in the same verse! 284. I do not consider this a significant discovery, since it is so obvious that many could have and should have figured it out, but the Nephite calendar is the same as the Jewish one of that period, namely, that the year began on 1 April. 285. The ancient inhabitants of this continent (north and south America) used the same map orientation as their Middle Eastern ancestors; namely, that they oriented all their maps so that south was at the top. Going north is always called “down” and going south “up”. 286. Was there anything significant about the date of Moroni’s appearance? I have never heard of anybody mentioning this, but there was something very significant about it. The night of 21 September would actually be, the way the ancients reckoned time, September 22nd [beginning at sundown]. And according to their reck- oning, it is the day the earth enters the Constellation of Libra. Any amateur etymologist knows that Libra means both a balance or scales, and a book. These two meanings are brought together in the hieroglyph of Jehovah at the Bar of Judgment, incorrectly or incompletely called by Egyptologists “Osiris and the Hall of Double Maat” wherein the Judgment is represented in hieroglyphs as scales in which the “Maat” hieroglyph is placed in the right scale pan, which I already translated as “the book seen by three witnesses” and “the book seen by eight witnesses” in the third and fourth degree, respectively. Exactly at the time the earth was entering the Constella- tion of Libra, a book by which the world would be judged was being brought forth by “the guardian of sacred records by which the world shall be judged” and “he who stands upon his hill” as explained earlier. As simple and obvious as this is, I am not aware of anyone ever having drawn this correlation.

A List of My Discoveries

© 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº13 287. A careless reading of the scriptures has led many to believe that the fall of man was necessary. The fine point of distinction is this: It was wrong for man to fall by taking the forbidden fruit. Had it been necessary, it is absurd to suppose that God would have forbidden it by way of commandment. Had it been necessary, it is ab- surd to suppose that Eve would have to be deceived - she would only have to be educated as to its necessity. But once Eve, being deceived, fell by eating the forbidden fruit, Adam had the choice of living forever in his paradise and letting Eve fend for herself, or taking the incredibly noble step of following Eve and sharing her fate so that what was left of the commandments - to replenish the earth - could still be kept, even at the cost of his own life, not knowing that he would ever live again, not having yet had the “Plan B” explained to him as to how he might ever recover from the fall. Once again: 1. It was wrong for man to fall. 2. Eve was deceived and fell. 3. At that point, Adam did what was then the right thing to do, even though it entailed what appeared to be terrible and irreparable consequences for himself. The fact that Eve exulted in her decision after it was ex- plained to her that a redemption was possible still did not and does not make it the best or even the right thing to do, however flattering that may be to us, her posterity. To suppose that she would not have had posterity in process of time had she not fallen is likewise absurd, amounting to God giving contradictory commandments. Had Adam and Eve both kept the initial commandment of abstaining from the forbidden fruit, it would have in process of time been possible for them to keep the additional commandment of replenishing the earth, but the time was not yet ripe. By choosing to fall after Eve had placed him in this impossible situation, Adam chose to keep the greater commandment by breaking the lesser, for which we rightly esteem him as a prince over all of us forever. 288. As far as blame on Eve goes, another very simple point which I have never heard anyone bring up is this: the Fall occurred before Adam and Eve had a knowledge of good and evil, as the record itself clearly states. How in the world, then, do we come up with the notion that either Adam or Eve sinned, when the very notion of sin was unknown to them? 289. The sixteen parts into which the body of Osiris was said by the Egyptians to been divided by “Set” are a representation of the sixteen grandsons of Noah into which the world’s population was divided in the first gen- eration after the Flood. 290. The so-called “Set” or “Seth” as called by Egyptologists should be read “Satan”. I do not know why they persist in ignoring the final N which is given in some of the hieroglyphs - perhaps because it seems to be left off in some spellings of his name. 291. Who are the “three Nephites”? Or is it possible to know who they were? They were Nephi, Timothy, and Jonas. How do we know this? First, find where it says that all of the twelve had died except the three who should tarry. Second, notice that Nephi the son of Nephi is still keeping the record! Third, notice that although the Bible says that Moses “died”, other ancient records (including the present one) confirm that Moses was in fact translated, so we have to conclude that “died” as in this instance was known perfectly well to the people in question to be a euphemism in the Bible. Fourth, we note to what extent the principle of proximity is used in these callings - that not only many of the Twelve mentioned in the NT are brothers, but likewise in this record. Fifth, we note that not only Nephi was translated, but also his father Nephi. These are all documentable, irrefut- able facts. Sixth, we can add that Alma the younger, Nephi’s second great grandfather, had likewise been trans- lated. Can I state with certainty that Alma’s second great grandson Nephi was translated? Yes, the record does not permit us to conclude otherwise. Do we know for sure that the names of the other two were Timothy and Jonas? No. This is not an ironclad certainty, but this is highly probable based on the considerations given, and in this way one of the three (Timothy) would have the uniquely valuable knowledge of what it is like to die. 292. I think I already stated that Zenos and Zenock were in Egypt, after Joseph but before Moses. They were both - you may insert some small ordinal number here - great grandsons of Joseph. How do I know? 3 Nephi 10:16. I don’t recall if I mentioned it, but I found both their names in Egyptian hieroglyphics. Both of their books still exist, and they are in hieroglyphics, but they are not as yet even recognized by any scholar I am aware of, much less translated correctly.

I need to update one thing I said in a previous installment. My oldest son pointed out that others have docu- mented, and in even greater detail, that Humpty Dumpty was indeed Richard III of England. So even though I came to this conclusion quite on my own, I can not claim it as a discovery, since was apparently known to others before me. On the other hand, this additional and more thorough documentation does prove that my cor- relation was correct.

You probably noticed on the Internet a few days ago a great deal of excitement about the fact that the constella- tion of Orion is a hotbed of creative star creation activity. The following day after I had seen the Hubble photo- graphs, my son also called them to my attention. If you have read all of these installments, you should know perfectly well why that area is “seething with activity” as the reporter called it. You can even see fairly dis- tinctly the arc of the giant star behind the nebula. This is the one Abraham called Flos Isis [which I translated as Light Mother]. I wonder how long it will be before astrophysicists wake up to the physical impossibility of the existence of black holes and start recognizing them for the shielded giant stars that they are, and the role they play in not only governing our universe, but begetting and engendering it.

A List of My Discoveries

© 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº14

293. The so-called “Book of Aker” inscribed on the north wall of the tomb of Ramses VI in the Valley of the Kings at Thebes seems to be the missing “Book of Jasher” mentioned in the Old Testament. It has long been known that the translation of the Hebrew manuscript in the British Museum is not very good, but the Egyptian version has no good translation at all. 294. I don’t think I mentioned these additional aspects of MAA KHERU [“true of voice”] pronounced upon good folks at the Bar of Judgment. In the first degree, it simply means that your voice is perfect for singing at all desired frequencies. So we see there really is something to the notion about “singing the praises of a just God with the heavenly hosts”. So don’t worry if you feel like you haven’t been gifted with a great singing voice in mortality. 295. In the second degree, it means that what you have spoken in the past is true. 296. In the third degree, it means that, having been true and faithful in mortality, and having passed the Bar, henceforth and forever after, the things you say shall come to pass, simply because you said them. The implica- tion here about the purity of your heart, the rationality of your mind, and the propriety of your spirit, is great, that you could be entrusted with such power. 297. I don’t remember if I explained the parable of the marketplace, but I don’t think I did. Since I have never heard a correct explanation, here goes: You recall the basic story - men are called by the Master from the mar- ketplace into His service at various periods during the day. At day’s end, they are all paid the same wage, both those who labored for Him all day, and those who were only called into His service at day’s end. What is the meaning of this, and how is it just? This does not refer to people joining His church, since this is something peo- ple can search out and choose for themselves. It refers to callings in His church, over which His followers have absolutely no control. In this parable, the Master assures us that there is no correlation whatsoever between call- ings and offices in His church, and one’s eternal reward. Every man is rewarded or punished according to his works, and in no case is any man rewarded or punished for something he did not have complete control over. A calling to a position of authority in His church buys us absolutely nothing at the Bar of Judgment. We are all judged by what we did with what we had to work with. This parable demonstrates the utter foolishness of aspir- ing to any position of authority in His church. A young man once told me “I want to be a bishop!” I said, “Why, Jeff?” “So I can teach the people.” My first thought was that he was a fool, wanting to inflict that on his family. My second thought was that he was utterly ignorant of the nature of church callings. A man called to a higher position is not necessarily more righteous, more intelligent, or more anything than a man in a lower position. My answer to this young man was, “Jeff, if people don’t believe the comments you make in Sunday School as an ordinary member, they will not believe you making the same comment even if you were the president of the church.” The difference is that any person in authority must be deferred to in all matters under his responsibil- ity, as a matter of order and propriety, and he will be held responsible for his conduct in that office, just as we will be held responsible for sustaining him in it. Why any sane person would aspire to that is a complete mys- tery to me.

I think I’m getting closer to my original intent, of keeping these down to a page. I’ll keep working at it.

A List of My Discoveries

© 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº15

298. A bishop’s wife once asked me why there is so much talk of “walking” in the scriptures as a reference to our behavior in this probationary state “walking uprightly”, “walking in all holiness”, “daily walk” and so on. The answer is that in the original language, the character for the second estate, mortality, is a pair of legs walk- ing. It is also means posterity. The serpent losing his legs was a hieroglyph representing Lucifer failing to keep his first estate, therefore he had no second estate, and therefore no posterity, since spirits can not have offspring. It is no surprise, then, that passing the Bar of Judgment is also called being “worthy to stand” as having kept one’s second estate. This also explains the ordinance of washing the feet, and it further explains the ordinance of shaking the dust off of the feet - both are three dimensional hieroglyphs representing being cleansed from the blood and sins of one’s generation in the Second Estate. 299. My 7-year old son once asked why the word “yea” occurs so much in scriptures. The answer is that in the old language there was a word which has no modern equivalent, which was an emphatic conjunction; that is, it meant that not only is the foregoing - what was just said - true, but what follows confirms what preceded. This ancient word was preserved in old Chinese, “ye” which still means “and” but anciently also added emphasis to what was said. It is also preserved in old Russian with archaic expressions such as “schi da kasha pischa nasha” where the word “da” used to be both emphatic and a conjunction, whereas today it has only the affirmative meaning, “yea” or “yes.” 300. Why is “adieu” used in the translation of an ancient Hebrew record? Because it is again an exact transla- tion of which there is no equivalent in modern English, but there is a French word which we borrow which means the same thing. The original word was the locative or directional case of the word “God”. Just as a way of saying “to Jerusalem” was “Yerushalaim-ah” using the directional case, so the single word “God”, Eloah, in its directional case, was ELOHA - “to God” - the exact equivalent of “adieu” and used in exactly the same way. 301. By the way. ELOHA is the direct ancestor of the Hebrew word “Aloha” and was originally only used as a farewell, but like the Italian “ciao” has been extended in its use for both greeting and parting. 302. While we’re on this subject, I should also point out that the Hawaiian word for “priest” - KAHUNA - is likewise a direct descent from the original Hebrew word for priest, COHEN. 303. Once while searching for a book in a Defense Department library, I found a Samoan grammar written in the mid-nineteenth century by a man named Pratt. He was a minister of a protestant church. In his preface, he admitted that he was led to produce this grammar because he was “struck by the similarity” of Samoan grammar with Hebrew grammar. 304. Here’s a discovery my mother shared with me half a century ago. It is commonly known that the plates of Nephi record a catastrophic event shaping the entire face of the South and North American continents - by my calculations, about five to eight o’clock, Mountain Standard Time, on the morning of 4 April 34 A.D, at which time it is apparent to me that Lake Bonneville was drained, the entire Rocky Mountain range formed, the Ama- zon Basin drained, and the Grand Canyon formed. In August of 1933, my mother, Ora Pate Stewart, having completed a one year mission in the Eastern States for her church, she stayed on another year to write scripts for radio programs in New York City. As part of her research, she stopped in to see Dr. Herbert J. Spinden, who had written several interesting books of his discoveries in Central and South America. Noting the finding of an- cient corn stubble, two thousand years old, and two thousand feet higher in the Andes Mountains than corn will grow, he declared this obvious fact: that either the Andes Mountains have risen a foot a year for the last two thousand years (a conjecture that modern observation easily refutes), or - two thousand years ago, there was a terrible cataclysm which caused the Andes Mountains to rise at least two thousand feet higher than they now are! 305. It is prophesied in the Hebrew records that in the last days, the sun will be darkened, and the moon will be “turned to blood.” What does this mean? This will be the result of nuclear fallout, for reasons which have al- ready been explained. 306. This is also the reason for the prophecy, “men’s hearts shall fail them.” 306. In the original language, as I said before, the Holy Ghost is called the “lord of fifty.” I did not mention that the number five is associated with fathers; that is, one of the translations for the word “father” is “five-person”. 307. The character for “five” in the original language, is represented in one of its four original writing systems as “V”. By rotating this character 45º, its value is increased ten times. This is why the Roman 5 is V and the Ro- man 50 is L. 308. In every case where proper nouns are transliterated from the plates of Nephi, the letters CH and CK each correspond to respective letters in the Semitic alphabet, both of which can be approximated in our language by a K sound. Thus, Chemish is pronounced Kemish, but the transliteration is correct. 309. In every other case where the letter C is used in its transliterations, it stands for the Semitic letter Qoph and today’s scholars would transliterate it as a Q, but the C is actually more correct, and in all instances should be pronounced K. Thus Amlici is pronounced in English AM LICK EYE, never AM LEE SEE. 310. Whenever the word “wind” is used figuratively in scriptures, it refers to public opinion. 311. Whenever the word “rain” is used figuratively in scriptures, it refers to war. This was remarkably illus- trated on Thursday 4 December, 1941, when the Japanese imperial government sent this message to all of its foreign diplomatic posts: HIGASHI NO KAZE, AMI, which means, “East Wind, Rain!” This code message was sent to announce that all efforts toward negotiation and appeasement of the United States had failed, and that a state of war now existed between Japan and the U.S. 312. Whenever the word “foundation” is used figuratively in scriptures, it refers to a person’s knowledge base. By knowledge base, I mean the standards and criteria by which a person accepts a statement to be true. 313. When the scriptures mention a building built in the air, it means it has no basis in right or truth, i.e., a knowledge basis does not exist to justify its existence. 314. An inspired dream is always given in the language of Adam. Three dimensional hieroglyphs are used. Jo- seph merely translated Pharoah’s dream. Vestigial cognate words can easily be found in modern languages for all of the hieroglyphs used. 315. For example ANO in Portuguese means a year; in Spanish it means a mule as representative of cattle. Therefore Joseph knew that seven cows (middle English “kine”, just as sow, singular, swine, plural) stood for seven years. The hieroglyph for river also meant time; this is preserved in the Slavic “reka”, river, “rok” a peri- od of time. 316. Likewise, the “ears” of grain are preserved in Danish “aar” (pronounced “ohr”) and German Ohr (ear) and in our own English “(y)ear”. This does not deny Joseph’s inspiration in interpreting the dream; quite the con- trary, it confirms it. 317. Likewise, MENE, MENE, TEKEL U PHARSIN is in the language of Adam and illustrates the iterative na- ture of the language. 318. I will cite only one example: In the first degree, it means, a time, times, and half a time, or in other words, three and a half times, which in this instance, meant periods of five years. Belshazzer had reigned 17½ years, therefore, Daniel knew that his time was up. The rest of the translation goes on in like manner to say that the kingdom would be smitten by the sword and so on. This will all be obvious once the original language is under- stood. 319. Each generation is fundamentally different from every other one. Our generation, for example, is much more safety conscious than the previous one, which did things that would make our skin curl. I remember stand- ing on the front seat of Margaret Utinsky’s car when I was two years old in 1947. I would never permit a child to do that. The previous generation was racist; the present one is not. We would not tolerate having our fellow citizens rounded up and put into concentration camps just because they had Japanese ancestry. On the other hand, a vast amount of information is lost when each person dies, not to mention his entire generation. 320. By the way, Margaret Utinsky was a great woman - not at all the sleazeball she is portrayed in the recent movie. She risked her life repeatedly to smuggle in food and medicines to our boys in Japanese concentration camps in the Philippines. She was always faithful to her husband Charles, who died in the camp despite all her efforts, which cost her many beatings at the hands of the occupation forces. Charles was a Canadian descended from Ukrainians. She was of Irish ancestry, my nursemaid and my mother’s best friend. 321. This may be known to some medical people, but I discovered for myself that a very strong emotional stim- ulus can literally overpower physical infirmities. Until Margaret Utinsky died in a nursing home in Southern California, my mother and I would go visit her. She gradually lost all of her faculties. The last time I ever saw her, she could no longer speak nor control her bodily functions. Mom and I took her for a ride around her famil- iar Long Beach where she had taught my sister how to operate a day care center. I tried some Russian and Fili- pino phrases she had taught me over the years, but could not get any response out of her. When I helped her out of the car in front of her nursing home and she saw that we were about to leave, she said “Wait a minute!” 323. In an inspired dream, a kiss signifies marriage. 324. By way of example, forty years ago when I was in Brazil, I had a dream which, when I awoke from it, star- tled me because it seemed so real. In the dream, I was back at my university in the student center. A girl I had known as a freshman came up to me. She was crying, saying, “I’m sorry!” and she kissed me. The kiss was very sweet. I understood that the dream meant that if I married the girl, it would be a very happy marriage, but there would be no children. Several decades later, I regained contact with the girl. She had been married for a long time, but had no natural children. I do not know why I was given the dream, because I don’t recall ever consid- ering marrying the girl, although she was very nice. 325. When the word “tower” is used figuratively in the scriptures, it refers to early warning defense. Specifi- cally, as used in D&C 101:43-58, it refers to SDI, the Strategic Defense Initiative that Reagan tried to build. 326. What is meant by the “redemption of Zion?” It means driving the Russian and Latin American occupation forces out of the United States by force of arms. 327. Before the event mentioned in item Nº124, the Lord’s Church will be purged by force of arms of those who do not belong to His Church. I think this is known to inspired men and it is in fact stated plainly in the scriptures; it was known to the apostle Peter and others. Neither is this to be feared, nor is it imminent. 328. SDI will be built immediately after Zion is redeemed. The United States will never again, from that time forward till the final prophesied battle at the end of the last millennium, suffer a successful enemy attack nor lose a war.

A List of My Discoveries

© 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº16

329. The Savior was conceived on July 4th. It is for that reason that our nation was conceived (not born till the Constitution was ratified) likewise on that day. Finally, it is for that reason that His house was ordered to begin construction on that day (cf. D&C 115:10). Little wonder we should celebrate with fireworks. 330. Here are some translation comparisons, so that you may judge for yourself. From the “Book of the Dead”: Budge, Gardiner, Faulkner, et al.: The book was written by “unknown scribes ca. 1250 B.C.E.” Stewart: The original book was written by Abraham, 1830 B.C. and entrusted to and copied by scribes for a thousand years, who were of the hereditary scribes and embalmers caste. The first thing the defendant says when he goes before the Bar of Judgment: E.A. Wallis Budge, Keeper of Egyptian Antiquities at the British Museum, and responsible for most of its prized acquisitions in this department, 1895: My heart, my mother, twice. Sir Alan Gardiner, “the dean of Egyptologists” [Nibley et al.] 1927, 1950, 1957, 1964, 1966, 1969, 1973: O my heart of my mother! O my heart of my mother! Dr. Raymond Faulkner, 1972, “one of the best [translations] available today”, [op. cit.]: O my heart which I had from my mother! O my heart which I had from my mother! Stewart: My heart and might are as my mother Eve. The second thing the defendant says: Budge: My heart of my coming into being. Gardiner: O my heart of my different ages (lit.: my coming into being). Faulkner: O my heart of my different ages! Stewart: My mind and strength are as my father Adam. Explanation: Notice the cowpathing here. Gardiner takes Budge, word for word. Faulkner takes Gardiner, word for word. The hieroglyph for “heart” in the first instance is the traditional jar, “IB”; in the second instance, it is the head and forepaws of a lion, HATI, yet, scholars translate these different hieroglyphs indiscriminately as “heart.” In the first instance, the first hieroglyph represents heart and might; in the second, mind and strength. The beetle hieroglyph, translated by scholars as “coming into being” or some similar variant, in fact refers to the “first cre- ation or creature”, namely, Adam, similar to the Akkadian cuneiform “adammu” which is generally translated by scholars as “creatures” or “cattle.” Our first parents, Adam and Eve, are paragons of virtue and excellence, which, Abraham tells us, if we emulate, we will pass the Bar of Judgment. The idea expressed is that we have served the Lord with all of our heart, might [which are primarily feminine virtues], mind, and strength [which are primarily masculine virtues, exactly as the scriptures have admonished us to do. I already explained that the hieroglyph for “Eve” is universally mistranslated as “twice” or “two times” or the previous phrase is repeated, because it literally means “times and seasons”, universally misread as “a time and a time”. The cause of the misreading is that in the first instance, it should be read in the first degree as “time” or “times” and in the second, it should be translated in the second degree as “season” or “seasons.” The same goes for the hieroglyphs IB and HATI. Here are some more that I have mentioned previously, but I have added Faulkner as an update, he being highly esteemed in the field. When one passes the Bar of Judgment: Budge: Let there be given to him cakes, and a coming forth in the presence of Osiris, and a field abiding in Se- khet - Hetepu. Faulkner: Let there be given to him the offerings which are issued in the presence of Osiris, and may a grant of land be established in the Field of Offerings. Stewart: Let there be given to him the sacramental bread and wine of the Passover in commemoration of the suf- fering and atonement of the Only Begotten Son, and a coming forth in the presence of Jehovah, and an eternal estate in the New Jerusalem. Notice that Budge in 1895 is closer to the mark than Faulkner in 1972. Although Budge for some inexplicable reason ignores the hieroglyph after “cakes” normally translated as “beer” or “ale”, Faulkner ignores both hiero- glyphs and covers the whole concept with “offerings”. He does give us the courtesy of attempting to translate Sekhet - Hetepu. Explanation: Sekhet is a tract of land given as an estate for one’s abode, corresponding to the ancient Hebrew Jeru or Iru, from the Akkadian cuneiform ALU [lit. “many people”], generic word for city or place of abode of many people. Hetepu, generally associated with a peace offering, is the Egyptian equivalent of Shiloam, origi- nally Shalaim, peace. Sekhet-Hetepu should be translated “Jerusalem.” The M hieroglyph preceding it in this in- stance denotes something new. In the case of Jews, this character is omitted, because they will inherit the Old Jerusalem. The hieroglyph SENNU or SENNI is the ancestor of the Greek and Hebrew words for Passover, Atonement, and so on. The Greek word retained the idea of suffering; the Hebrew, that of being passed over; the original contained both, in addition to the concept of the Only Begotten, SENN = SEM = MES(H), born, son, preserved in Danish SEN, son. Later in Abraham’s record, he cites an extract from the Book of Enoch, wherein the major events of each of the seven dispensations are prophesied. Budge: Hall the Fifth. … Saith Osiris, scribe Ani triumphant, I have brought [thy] jawbones into Restau, I have brought for thee [thy] backbone into Heliopolis, gathering together his many fragments there. I have repulsed for thee … Faulkner: The fifth gate: … Words spoken by the Osiris Ani, the vindicated, when arriving at the gate: ‘I have brought to you the jaws which are in Rosetjau. I have brought to you the backbones. I have united his many parts thereby. I have repulsed for you …’ Stewart: Fifth Dispensation: Thus saith the Lord God: Verily, I shall bring Lehi into the Land Southward and Mulek to shine forth into the Land Northward, to gather together there the many remnants of the houses of Jo- seph and Mulek. Explanation: Budge is again closer to the mark in every instance. The hieroglyph translated by Budge as “hall” and Faulkner as “gate” is an arm extended with the hand open; it means something given or dispensed. The hier- oglyphs translated as jaw(bone) are in fact dual, indicating that out of Lehi came two distinct races of Lehites. The hieroglyphs both translate and transliterate the name “Lehi” which everyone knows means “jawbone”. RES as any Egyptologist should know, means “south” and is the ancestor of the Spanish SUR (reversing the direc- tion) and SUL; TAU is land, again known to any Egyptologist. The hieroglyphs transliterated as Khesefi “I have repulsed” should be transliterated Josephi - the Josephites, descendents of Joseph, and so on. I think I al- ready mentioned in a previous installment that the original hieroglyphs contain an additional N which shifts the verb “bring” (IN) to the next degree, which in the case of verbs, changes it from “an action received” to “an ac- tion to be received” as explained by the man who translated the plates of Nephi, or in other words, from past tense to future tense as we think of it - “I shall bring,” not “I have brought.” The Fifth Dispensation was the time between Moses and the Savior, i.e. between April 6, 1400 B.C. and April 6, 34 A.D. Lehi flourished in 600 B.C., as we see, right in the middle of the Fifth Dispensation. In our Internet search engine world, references are perhaps becoming superfluous, but here they are: The Egyptian Book of the Dead: papyrus of Ani, British Museum papyrus, E.A. Wallis Budge, 1895, Trustees of the British Museum, 1967 reprint by Dover Publications, NYC. The Egyptian Book of the Dead: based on Budge’s 1890 publication of the papyrus of Ani acquired by the Brit- ish Museum in 1888, translation by Dr. Raymond O. Faulkner, 1972, revised & reprinted 1998, Chronicle Books, San Francisco. Egyptian Grammar, Sir Alan Gardiner, editions 1927-1973 etc., Griffith Institute, London. Beginning of chapter 30B of the Book of the Dead as found on heart scarabs, from the papyrus of Nu in the British Museum, p. 268. 331. Resuming the subject we were on before the references, I believe that each dispensation began on April 6th, the anniversary of the Savior’s birth. 332. Thus, the angel appeared to Adam on 6 April and explained to him the plan of salvation, which he then be- gan to explain to his posterity. 333. Enoch began to preach the gospel of translation and started to build a Zion society on 6 April, 3166 B.C. 334. Noah began to preach the gospel of repentance and started building the Ark after the angel appeared to him on 6 April 2317 B.C. 335. In the original cuneiform clay tablet describing the Flood, the way I translate it, it states that when the waters had fully covered the earth, Noah pronounced a baptismal prayer upon the earth, pronouncing it baptized by the authority he possessed, in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. I already said that the dispensation of the gospel of Abraham began when Abraham entered Egypt at age 75 on 6 April 1830 B.C. What we call the “Book of the Dead” is a very small part of what he taught the Egyptians, knowing that they would preserve his teachings down through the millennia, although they have yet to be trans- lated correctly. 336. And the Bible records that Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt and began their tutelage under the Law of Moses on 6 April 1440 B.C. - the Bible states that it was 430 years to the day from when the Israelites first en- tered Egypt (meaning Abraham). And I already explained to you in a previous installment the significance of the number 1830 - it is the summa- tion of a Cycle of Perfection, and you also know from what I said earlier, what is meant by “the fulness of times” as well as “the meridian of (His own) time.”

A List of My Discoveries

© 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº17

337. Many people have the notion that the Second Coming (or, for our Jewish friends, the coming of the Mes- siah) is imminent and could happen any day. I can state with perfect certitude that it will not occur in your life- time or mine, nor in your children’s. These are in approximately sequential order. 338. Nº1. The standards for serving on a mission must be raised further still to a standard of absolute moral pu- rity. Steps have been taken in that direction, but we are not there. 339. Nº2. The missionary force must reach 144,000 as prophesied by John. 340. Nº3. The missionaries, instead of being elders, must all be high priests. 342. I should point out here that the notion of having the name of God written on their foreheads is figurative. I could explain this further, but this is as far as I want to take this point. Suffice it to say that we don’t make marks on our bodies; all such markings and body piercings are a sign of the followers of Satan, those who have “come out in open rebellion against God”. I don’t mean to offend ladies with pierced ears, but go back and read the Law of Moses. Pierced ears are a mark of slavery, even if only to fashion. 343. Nº4. An event will occur which I will keep to myself, but it signals the beginning of the cleanup of the world, beginning with His Church. Nº5. The Lord’s Church will be physically persecuted and attacked by all nations, which will force the recall of all missionaries. 344. Nº6. After the Church has been physically purged by those who have professed it but not kept its laws, the attack will be broken off by a surprise attack on the United States and the State of Israel. This has already been mentioned in a previous installment, and it is prophesied by practically all of the Old Testament prophets. 345. Nº7. Nobody on earth is able to read what is called “Facsimile Nº2” notwithstanding some claiming they can. As it stands, it is not Egyptian hieroglyphic or anything else. The characters need to be corrected. The orig- inal translator knew all this but kept it to himself. It is a higher endowment than has been received in this dis- pensation. It contains the keys of knowledge necessary for the redemption of Zion. It will be restored, then translated, and finally administered in the solemn assembly mentioned by Joel. 346. Nº8. After these two nations have been sufficiently purged of their iniquity, the Lord will raise up a Gi- deon who, with a small band will make a breach in the occupation forces’ defenses and those who were forced into exile will drive the invader to the sea. As I already said, at this time the so-called “strategic defense initiative” attempted by Ronald Reagan but pre- vented by Congress by massive budget cuts in March 1987, will be built, making America invincible to any fur- ther attack. 347. Nº9. The rest of the nations will be purged for generations by wars among themselves. This is represented by the flail in the left hand of “Osiris” driving those who would not hear the missionaries by the voice of the Good Shepherd, now driven by adversity to flee to “Zion” or the liberated United States. 348. Nº10. It will be during this period that those who do not understand the scriptures will abandon hope and say that the Lord delays His coming till the end of the Millennium. 349. Nº11. People will quit eating meat in any form. It is premature to attempt to live up to this principle right now, because of events Nº5 and Nº6 and Nº9 which will entail starvation for millions both here and abroad. It will not be a time to be picky about what we eat, and many weakened and depraved souls will stoop to cannibal- ism. It is primarily for these two events that home storage is a good idea. I want to say something about home storage, an idea which has been around for at least seventy years. My pa- rents kept cans of wheat till the cans rusted away and the wheat was never used except on a very small scale (my Dad ate boiled wheat each morning). They died without ever having to rely upon it. It may seem to some that this was a useless gesture. It was not. The thousands and tens of thousands of people who obeyed this vital principle yet never drew upon it, bolstered the market for such commodities so that such provisions continued to be available long after normal market forces ceased to produce any demand. All of America’s surplus wheat has now been given to our enemies, free of charge. It is still possible to buy wheat right now, but this will not continue - it will quietly go away without any whimper of notice. Any American with an ounce of intelligence ought to go out right now and buy at least three hundred pounds for every member of his family, put it in dry storage and forget about it. It is the best life insurance in the world. Three hundred pounds of wheat will keep an adult in good health for one year. If you can afford it, you should buy more so that you can take care of you neighbors too when the time comes. The urgency is not that the need is imminent. The urgency is that the op- portunity is ephemeral. In plain terms, when the need becomes apparent to everyone, the remedy will not be available to anyone. 350. Nº12. Pacification of the animals. After several generations of abstaining from animal slaughter, their fear of and enmity toward man will be abated, and vice versa. 351. Nº13. Massive discoveries of flora and fauna thought to be extinct. This process has in fact already begun on a small scale with discoveries in Tibet and Indonesia, etc. 352. Nº14. The language of Adam will be restored and will displace all other languages. One peculiar trait of this languages is that it is possible both to understand animals and to communicate with them. 353. Nº15. When the rest of the nations are sufficiently purged, initially a highway will be built for their return overland. Then the continents themselves will shift back into their original positions as one solid land mass as they were in the days of Peleg. These things are clearly stated in the scriptures; the missing knowledge is when. 354. Nº16. The laws of Zion will be in force upon this continent, including return of real estate to the original owners every fifty years, and so on. This and these other individual events are known to many, but I have never seen them all sequenced like they should be. 355. Nº17. The baloney taught in schools about organic evolution, ridiculous age of the earth, etc. will all be re- placed by the truth. Then the Savior will come at a time of His Father’s choosing. False Messiahs should never fool anyone, be- cause the scriptures state plainly that when He comes, it will be known to everyone on the earth simultaneously. The fact that many will be fooled is nothing more than a testimony that few bother to read the scriptures, much less understand them. 356. Now I will tell you what will be the sign of the commencement of all these events being set in motion. Re- member I told you that there were no rainbows before the Flood? And remember that I told you that rainbows are created by the nature of solar radiation, which changed after the Flood to create rainbows after every rain- storm? Here is the great secret: The appearance of the rainbow was a sign of the passing of the first Flood, of water. The disappearance of the rainbow is the sign of the advent of the second Flood, of fire. When a year comes in which there are no more rainbows seen, then you will know with a perfect knowledge that the great and long and last cleanup of the earth is about to begin with the event mentioned above as paragraph 343, item Nº4. Just as a change in solar radiation signals the advent of a thunderstorm, so the change that causes the rain- bow to disappear signals the advent of a firestorm that will sweep the earth, not a chemical fire, but a nuclear one, which I have already explained in sufficient detail. And now you have some powerful tools for understand- ing the scriptures, especially the otherwise inscrutable Old Testament prophets, almost every one of whom talked about these very events. Also Matthew 24. 357. One of the things we say at the Bar of Judgment is in Abraham’s record, SAMI EM MAAT IBI, incor- rectly translated by scholars as “I have feasted upon right and truth. My heart!” which should be translated as “My heart has feasted upon right and truth.” The hieroglyph for “right and truth” is the same that we know as USHU MAAT in the scales and has those same five meanings in this case also. In plain terms, we will have to account whether we “feasted” (i.e. made it a daily habit) upon the words of the Lord’s anointed and upon the Book seen by three (and eight) witnesses. I should point out here that a guy can listen to all scripture twice in a year for the time he is standing in the bathroom (shaving, showering, dressing, etc.). Girls could get through it even more times (makeup, hair dressing, etc.). 358. The word SAMI in the previous item is preserved in the Russian word SEM, with the same meaning - EM = I eat; SEM = I feast upon, devour, eat up ravenously. 359. It is known to many that Mary the mother of the Savior was the most beautiful woman who ever lived on the earth, and that Eve was the second most beautiful. It is also known to many that Adam and his son Seth were the handsomest men that ever lived on the planet. The Egyptian records state that the wife of Joseph, son of Jacob, was the most beautiful woman on the planet in her generation, both in face and figure. I have been asked about the origin of things like mules and ligers. The answer is simple: Every physical being is created in the exact likeness of its spirit. This is commonly known, but it has powerful implications that have not been explored, which I will mention below, both by way of translations and genetics. 360. It is known to any scholar of ancient languages that there are three numbers - singular, dual, and plural. In Semitic languages the dual is -AIM (Hebrew) or -AIN (Chaldaic and Arabic). This is preserved in our word “twain” for example. The plural in those same respective languages is -IM or -IN. All this is commonly known. What I am not aware of anyone ever knowing or mentioning is that there is also a “dual plural” denoted by -EIM. Thus we have: EL or ELOAH = God. ELOHIM = Gods or gods. ELOHAIM = Gods, one male and one female; heavenly parents. ELOHEIM = dual plural, one God with many Wives. I may offend some people here, but it is genetically impossible, to generate all the ethnic diversity on this planet from only two parents. Some time ago it occurred to me that our Heavenly Father must have as many wives (for populating this planet) as there are nations mentioned in Genesis Chapter 10, in fact, the laws of genetics require it. The statement that after the flood the whole world was divided into seventy nations is equivalent to saying that the people born after that time were descended from seventy different mothers in the First Estate, or in other words, the spirit world that provided the pattern for this physical or mortal world we now inhabit. 361. I want to make it clear that of course we all descended from Adam and Eve, without any outside help, and we all descended from Noah and his three sons and their respective wives. But even here, Ham’s mother was not the same as that as that of Japheth and Shem. Ham was a Negro (his mother was a Negro) - his name means Negro (“black”). Any Egyptologist will tell you that the name of Egypt in Egyptian means “the Black Land” and tell you that it refers to the dark soil. This is half truth and half baloney. Every land that grows anything has black soil. I think I mentioned earlier that the name of Egypt in Egyptian means “The Land of Ham”. Yes, it al- so means Black, but that is a description of Ham and not the ground he walks on, which is the same as the ground we all walk on and sprang forth from. Now if we see the necessity to introduce a different mother here to provide the continuity of racial diversity, why should it be a surprise if the seventy nations mentioned in Gen- esis 10 were the offspring in the First Estate of seventy different mothers? The surprise would be if they were not! It is in fact, impossible that they were not. 362. “The elements are eternal.” What is meant by “element” in this verse? Chemical elements? No. It means the subatomic particles of which atoms are composed. We can take apart atoms (nuclear fission) and we can put them together (nuclear fusion) but we can not create nor destroy matter; we can only liberate binding energy. This can be inferred from what I said previously, but I want to make it unmistakably clear. 363. Space itself has no attributes except that of extension in three dimensions - but the dual particle and wave nature of subatomic particles traveling through space are a result of the interaction of the traveling particle, and the raw subatomic matter which is distributed uniformly throughout all space. This fact, and the fact that “there is no such thing as immaterial matter” make the “ether” theory of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century not only superfluous, but a bit ridiculous. 364. Every language in the world has its own built-in value system, its own built-in intelligence, and its own built-in set of interests and disinterests, and reflects the attributes of the people who use it. For example, Ger- man is very good for describing how to build a machine. Portuguese is very good for describing the sounds of walking through the selva. Russian is very good for describing the quality in time of a verb - for example, whether the action is done only once or briefly, or whether it is a habitual, ongoing action, and so on. 365. The original language is so powerful that in having something described to you, it can actually overpower your senses as if you were actually experiencing it. No modern language comes close to this power. 366. It is for this reason that we read ancient accounts which seem to us unimaginable - a rebel chief has his en- tire army wiped out, but then, by using language of a power which no language on earth today approaches, he his able to excite commiseration in the hearts of his captors to the point that he is set at liberty!

A List of My Discoveries

© 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº18

After writing this installment, I do not like it. It seems to harp on things that are too trivial even to be men- tioned. I don’t like being preachy, and it seems preachy. I will post it anyway, reluctantly, because there will be rhubarbs if I don’t. But next week I want to get back to ancient language translations.

Last week I listed events which must precede the Second Coming, but I don’t believe I said anything about a time frame. There are always people who are willing to believe that major events can happen very quickly, not- withstanding our own human performance may be so sluggish as to discredit any such notions. In this install- ment I will demonstrate why the Second Coming can not possibly come next week, next month, next year, or even the next decade. 367. One of the events I failed to mention which must happen, is that all ancient records must be translated cor- rectly. This event must occur before item Nº14 because it is a prerequisite. If I have anything to say about it, it will happen much sooner. 368.Many, if not most, of the ancient records thought to be lost are right under our noses, but have either not been translated, or the translations are so far from correct that the apparent resemblance to the original record is either faint or nonexistent. The so-called Book of the Dead is the most obvious example, but there are countless others - the so-called Tale of Two Brothers, I already mentioned; the Metternich Stele, which contains the ac- count of Eve finding the dying body of Abel, the Ziudsudu tablet, which contains the original account of Noah and the Flood, not to mention Gilgamesh, whose very name is mistranslated, and so on. 369. The great, grand prerequisite for the Second Coming is that we must be prepared to receive Him. This fact is known to many, yet anyone having this inkling must also know how far off we are from this achievement. When will the Savior come again? In about two hundred years from now. I can hear in my mind some shrieking “No man knows the day nor the hour!” yet these are the same who will be deceived by the false messiahs who come in the next few and many years ahead. Search the scriptures - they testify that the righteous, who have tak- en the Holy Spirit for their Guide, will not be deceived, nor will they be surprised at the general time frame be- cause they will know and expect it. 370. In his farewell address, Washington counseled us to “Let time and experience be the judge of all things.” He was talking about the radical political notions which he knew would be ever present in the minds of gullible novices. Yet there is no more gullible notion than that the Savior will come soon, other than that He will not come at all. The purpose of every Dispensation has been to prepare a people to enter the presence of the Al- mighty by administering His laws to them and persuading them to live up to them. Here we see a remarkable pattern, which I will show you. Every Zion society has either achieved its goal by diligent obedience, or self destructed, within six cycles of perfection, i.e. approximately 360 years. 371. After Jesus rose from the grave and taught those in Jerusalem, He visited all of the dispersed tribes of Isra- el. This is known to many. He visited South America. This is known to many. He visited Polynesia. This is known to many. He visited southern Scotland. This is the basis of the Arthurian “legend.” He visited Japan. This is known to some. He visited Afghanistan. Afghanistan is the largest stronghold of the tribe of Benjamin. This is why the forces of evil have tried to destroy them, and this is why the forces of evil have failed to so do, and ever will. 372. The Savior visited many other places. In each one, He instituted the laws of a Zion society. None existed after a period of six cycles of perfection, i.e. 360 years from the time of His appearance. 373. I should also add that in each one, He administered the sign of Jonah; that is, He taught them for three days. It is known to any psychologist or educational mentor that three days of intensive instruction is, psycho- logically and emotionally, equivalent to a lifetime of training. Back when I was a boy scout working on my cy- cling merit badge, the merit badge pamphlet made the interesting observation, based on long experience, that on a long, cross-country bike hike, those who would not continue would generally quit on the third day, and that those who lasted three days would generally endure the entire thirty or sixty day journey. 374. There was no magic or miracle in Enoch’s Zion society being taken up into heaven. It was entirely the re- sult of superior knowledge based upon superior intelligence. Intelligence comes in only one way, and that is I = L x T, where I = intelligence, L = the laws of nature and of nature’s God, and T = time. Enoch and his people demonstrated that this can be done in six cycles of perfection, i.e. you recall that his society was perfected in 365 years. 375. The head of the Seventh Dispensation was the second most intelligent person who ever lived on the earth, second only to the Messiah Himself. It is for this simple fact that he could have led his followers to becoming a Zion society in one cycle of perfection! But people wanted to be big shots. There were those who stole his dis- coveries and paraded them as their own, such as John E. Page and others. President Hinckley documents that “even the Twelve thought they did not need him” but after he was gone, only then, only too late, did they begin to realize what they had lost. In my opinion, this was the greatest single tragedy in the entire history of the world. His brilliance was utterly wasted on us, and just as Moses offered our ancestors the high road - they turned up their snouts at the higher law and chose the long, lower road - so did those of the Seventh Dispensa- tion, and we are stuck with six cycles instead of one. So instead of 1890, we now are working toward 2195 as the approximate amount of time it will take us. 376. Let’s see how we compare with the City of Enoch. They had the Language of Adam to begin with; we do not have it at all, nor is there even any willingness to receive it except among a mere handful of people. Setting aside our a priori arrogance that prompts us to assume by the faulty Darwinian algorithm of history that we are more intelligent than our ancestors, let us consider what they did. Did you know that the City of Zion was lifted up by sheer intelligence and knowledge, into orbit around this planet - all of the real estate, their gardens, their cows and pastures - were lifted up into orbit with a self contained environment - until it reached escape velocity of over twenty thousand miles an hour and then was piloted toward the constellation of Orion, specifically to the giant star called by the Egyptians Flos Isis? Did you know that this is why those left behind, after the Flood, came up with the foolish notion of building a tower to reach them, because they could still see them in orbit? Do you really think that any such intelligence exists upon the earth today, when our astrophysicists suppose that at the precise location of Flos Isis there is a “black hole” because it is shrouded with an interstellar cloud shield- ing us from its deadly radiation? I trow not! 377. But there is hope. You know that no civilization progresses faster than the most intelligent individual in each field of endeavor. You also know that the intelligence that guided the City of Enoch to Orion was inferior to the top three intelligences we already mentioned, simply because he was not among them. It is recorded in the Egyptian Hieroglyphs - Abraham wrote an encyclopedia covering every phase of human knowledge! Forty- two volumes! I acquired a copy from the library of Johns Hopkins University thanks to their copy machines at a dime a page, some fifteen years ago. Enoch never had this, because it was written a thousand years later. Imag- ine having the third most intelligent person who ever lived on the earth sharing with us his knowledge gained over a period of one hundred and seventy-five years!We have inspired men who guide us in the right way. Had we upheld them as we ought, we’d have reached our goal over a century ago. Can we say that we follow them today? Do we encourage our wives to work? Do we limit our families? [“Those who limit their families are not living up to their covenants” - Washburn] Do we “feast” upon the Book seen by three/eight witnesses for half an hour a day? [Benson]. Do we keep an honest fast without rationalizing the sacrament out of existence and claim we are still fasting [Tuttle]? Our science and technology have made much progress. They would progress much faster if we would believe the ancient eye witness accounts and quit setting them aside, supposing that anything beyond our experience simply could not be so. Once again, our knowledge and intelligence can increase only by seeking out and abid- ing by the laws of nature and of nature’s God, over time. We seem to be backsliding, though, and it seems that only a major cleanup by outside forces will set us back on track.

A List of My Discoveries

© 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº19

This week’s installment will be on the Origin of Nations, based on research I did after returning from Europe in the summer of 1971.

378. A person of European descent has about 130 generations back to Adam. I know this because my own ge- nealogy has been traced back to Clodius II, King of the West Franks, born about 50 B.C. 379. In the last two thousand years, there are seventy generations, with an average age of the father of 28 years 6 months at the time of the birth of the son. From there it is possible to use the NT and OT to determine the number of generations back to the beginning. 380. Abraham was born in 1905 BC. as I stated in the timetable. Adam was born in 3853 B.C. With these fig- ures we can calculate an average father to son age of 47 years and 4 months from Abraham to the time of Christ. 381. We have about eighteen generations from Adam to Abraham, over a period of 1948 years, so we have an average age of the father of 108 years and 3 months at the time the son was born during this period. Taking Genesis 10 as our text, I will list each nation as it was in the beginning four thousand years ago, as it was in the meridian of time two thousand years ago, and as it is today. Josephus Flavius is our reliable source for two thousand years ago; my own researches are the source of information as to where they are today. 382. Gomer is the ancestor of the Galatians or Gauls. Gomer is the ancestor of all those who speak English and French today. The Welsh name of Wales means the descendants of Gomer (Cymraeg). 383. Magog is the ancestor of what was first called Assyria, but a thousand years later were called by the Greeks Scythians, who are today the Russians in particular and the Slavs in general. 384. The Assyrian first person singular pronoun suffixed to its verbs is exactly the same as the first person pro- noun in Russian today - YA. 385. Just as there were three Scythian tribes anciently, so there are three Russias today. Slavic tradition itself claims ancestry from three brothers, Rus, Lech [= po-Lech, Polish], Czech. 386. The totem of the Russians was the bear, and since the people of the totem must never utter that name, therefore there is no word in Russian for bear, but rather the circumlocution of “the honey eater” - MEDVED. 387. The hieroglyph for Assyria in its own language was three grains of wheat, triticum, corresponding to the three Russias today - hard red winter wheat, white wheat, and little wheat. 388. As do the three major types of bears - the red (brown) bear of great Russia based in Moscow, the little (black) bear representing little Russia based in Kiev, and the white (polar) bear for white Russia based in Minsk. 389. Scotland was founded by 300 Russian men escaping from the turmoils of their homeland in a ship. They sailed to Eyre and requested 300 girls for their wives, which was granted, and this became the root stock of the Scottish nation, the origin of its name (Scut-land, Scyth-land) and the name of its language, called Sith in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. This also explains why Scotland and Russia have the same patron saint, Andrew. Many Scottish words and expressions go straight back to Assyrian cuneiform and earlier - “to boot”, “lad”, “lass” and so on. 390. Thus we see that the difference between the Scots and the English is this: The English have Roman ances- try, accounting for their general shortness of stature, while the Scots have Russian ancestry. Other admixtures - Celts, Danes, Saxons, Normans, etc., are the same for both countries. We will discuss this more below as we de- scribe national traits and note the differences. 391. Madai, the ancestor of the Medes, is the father of the Chinese. Media is the Roman way of saying the name of China in their own language, Chung Gwo, “middle kingdom”. The original meaning of Chung Gwo, how- ever, was “inside the walls” as distinguished from foreigners, “Wai Gwo”, outside the walls. The Chinese in turn are the major ancestors of the Japanese, Koreans, and Southeast Asians, as can easily be demonstrated by both language and heredity traits. 392. Most of the languages derived historically from Chinese come from Cantonese, not Mandarin, just as most Chinese in America today are of Cantonese ancestry. This tribe historically has definitely been the most adven- turous, seeking out new lands. 393. Javan was the ancestor of the four ancient Greek tribes; in fact, his own name was applied to IONIA, where as in Hebrew and Old Latin I = J and O = U, V. His son Elisha gave his name to Grecia proper, HELLAS which is still the name used today. It is commonly known that Dodanim D conversion wasis the ancestral name of the isle of Rhodes. The R preserved in Etruscan and is the origin of the trilled R in most European lan- guages today. 394. The Etruscans gave their name to modern-day Germans, called by the D conversion] and by theItalians TEDESCO [note again the Etruscan R Danes, TYSK The Romans, on the other hand, referred to them by the name of their Greek tribe, Alemani, which is preserved in all Romance languages. This latter fact is commonly known. Also, the Etruscan language forms the plural the same way the German and Scandinavian languages do - by shifting the infixed vowel. 395. The Germanic tribes - Germans Dutch, Scandinavians, Belgians, and Franks - are all descended from Javan through ancient Greek tribes. The French Revolution was essentially a genocidal war of the peasant Gauls ris- ing up against the ruling Franks. Architecture in France today shows its dual ancestry with the stone and brick houses of the Franks and the plaster and mud houses of the Gauls. Of course you know that the Normans were not French at all, but invading and occupying Norwegians, who spent two centuries in France before moving on to England and Scotland, as my own genealogical record attests. 396. Tubal is the ancestor of the Iberians, as Josephus says; today the ancestor of all those who speak Spanish and Portuguese. The ancient records say the women of Tubal were the most beautiful in the world, as they are still today. 397. I think it is known to some that a tribe of Iberians migrated up into the land north of Scythia. Their country was called SIBERIA [= S = from, IBERIA, in Russian.]. It was from this influx of immigrants that the Russian language acquired its so-called “ye-glide”. Where the Portuguese will say “EH”, the Spanish will say “YEH”; where the rest of the Indo-European languages will say “EH” the Russians say “YEH”, for example, NE in French, NYE in Russian. Portuguese, “-mento”, Spanish, “-miento” and so on. 398. Meshech was ancestor of the Cappadocians, today I believe, India. India is in fact a mixture of two major races, so-called Aryan stock from Meschech of Japheth, but also for the most part, Indians themselves are de- scended from ancient emigrants from Egypt, hence their physical appearance and the prevalence of the name “Gupta” from AEGUPTA, Egypt. 399. Tiras is the ancestor of the Thracians, which in turn I believe are the ancestor of what we call the Ural-Al- taic peoples, namely the Turks, Hungarians, and Finns. The Mongols are a mixture of Tiras and Madai, which explains their physical appearance from the latter stock, and their language affinity from the former. 400. Everyone knows the ancestry of Ham because it is so obviously preserved in the names of the countries even today. Cush is the founder of Ethiopia and his name is the name of their own country in that language; Mizraim everyone knows is Egypt, even to the point of being a dual, which we talked about earlier, signifying both Upper and Lower Egypt, although in their own language it was called HAMET, the land of Ham, as we al- so already discussed. Phut is the founding father of Libya, still called that today; and Canaan was the ancestor of the Philistim through Casluhim, preserved in the name in use today, Palestine. All this is commonly known. The Jaredites were a group of giants culled out from all four of these tribes of Ham. 401. It is suspected by some that the aboriginal Australians are descended from the ancient Hamitic tribes of Africa. Based on ancient writings found there, in addition to hereditary and cultural considerations, I believe this is correct. There is reason to believe their boomerang is based on a technology known to the ancient Egyp- tians. 402. The children of Shem were scattered to the four winds, as everyone knows. I was going to say earlier that almost every nation is a mixture of two major tribes with a lot of little admixtures, but nowhere is that more ap- parent that with the house of Shem. Elam was the ancestor of the Persians, who are an admixture of the Israelite tribe of Benjamin from neighboring Afghanistan. 403. Asshur of course founded Assyria, which received a heavy admixture from Magog to become the Russians as we know them today. This explains why Russian syntax is so similar to Hebrew. YEST U VAS being the Russian equivalent to the Hebrew YESH LEHA - do you have? 404. Arphaxad was the founding father of Chaldea. His own name, written in his own language, Chaldean cu- neiform, means “Chaldean” as is obvious to any scholar of ancient Chaldean cuneiform. 405. I suppose my own ancestry is just like that of any other person of European descent - it goes back to early 1700s New England, then a hundred years in North Ireland, then across the water to Scotland for half of a mil- lennium, then across the water to Normandy for two hundred years, then eight hundred years earlier to the founding fathers of every nation in Europe - Scotland, England, France, Norway, Denmark Sweden, Germany, Switzerland, Finland, northern Spain and northern Italy, back to the Roman emperors - just as my ancestry comes from all of those areas two thousand years ago, so does yours if you are of European descent. The proba- bility is about 100% that you, like me, are descended from Charlemagne, and the ancient kings and emperors of Europe. There is even an old King Cole [Coel] in my line who reigned in England about 500 A.D. - a real, his- torical person, and your and my ancestor. 406. Now let’s look at national traits. Scots, like Russians, tend to be analytical. Scots are engineers, organizers of societies, economists, and translators. All of the principles in the Declaration of Independence came from Scotland. The idea of universal education and universal suffrage were first manifest in Scotland (cf. How the Scots Invented the Modern World, and How the Scots Made America.). 407. English tend to be schoolteachers, painters, managers. 408. Welsh are musicians. You can recognize a Welsh surname - the typical Welsh name is a Norman first name with an S on the end: Roberts, Williams, Davis, Jones, Evans, etc. 409. Irish and Portuguese tend to be innkeepers and pub operators. The Irish are typically cast as policemen, but in fact can be found everywhere in business. 410. Germans are philosophers and electricians and wood carvers and chemists and orchestral and keyboard musicians. German engineering is characterized by complexity. The world’s first practical internal combustion engine was built by a German. The diesel engine was also a German invention after seeing the principle demon- strated in an English science fair. A typical German girl knows how to play the piano, makes her own clothes, draperies, rugs, quilts, and - a generation ago - even made her husband’s suits. Typically she did all the cloth work in the house that he built - he even made the mechanism for the door latch, carved out of wood, and built all the furniture in the house. 411. Italians are mechanics and stonecutters. Italian engineering has the characteristic of depending upon a very high precision adjustment, or it won’t work at all. 412. Greeks are shippers and sailors and divers and fishermen, as they have been for three thousand years. 413. Dutch are shopkeepers and bakers and businessmen. Dutch girls take pride in the tidiness and cleanliness of their quarters, so much so that they do not want their husband’s help in the kitchen. 414. Danish pastry has a worldwide reputation. 415. Russians are soldiers and mathematicians. Russians whose surname ends in -off, -ov, -ef, -eff are Musco- vite Russians and have an admixture of Mongol ancestry. Russian manufacture has size as its chief characteris- tic. The biggest gun ever built, the biggest anything, is generally Russian. Russians consider the head of their enemies to be their greatest threat, so they always decapitate the head of their enemy’s government when they conquer them. Russians prefer collective responsibility to individual responsibility. Russian military strategy and tactics are diametrically opposite in every respect to those of the West, and are understood by very few Westerners. Just before WWII, Stalin purged his entire military organization, essentially decapitating it of its finest officers, yet they still managed to defeat the highly industrialized and skillful Germans. The world has never seen the Russians rise up to their full stature in combat. When they do, it will be too late. 416. Hungarians are mathematicians and logicians. 417. Poles are pianists and physicists. All of the Russians whose surnames end in -ski, -sky are originally of Polish descent. 418. Jews are violinists, comedians, performers, bankers. 419. Belgians are chemical workers in textiles. 420. French are painters and chemists and textile workers. French philosophers take inductive leaps where Ger- mans must have every little detail proven and never assume anything. They are the finest cooks in the world. 421. Japanese are gardeners and farmers, better than any in the world. They are also known for the ability to copy, cheapen, and mass produce anything. 422. Chinese are businessmen. The Chinese word for “business” is buy-sell, which is quite apt. Even at this early stage of only a few decades of capital and technology infusion from the West, the Chinese are quite capa- ble of taking over the world. The only thing the Chinese fear is the Russians. And vice versa. 423. Swedes are steelworkers and refiners and submarine builders. The world’s first submarine was built by a Swede. 424. Norwegians are sailors and fishermen and boat builders. 425. The Swiss of course are legendary for making the world’s most precise machinery. 426. The American Indian is mostly descended from the house of Judah, with a heavy admixture of the house of Joseph. This is known to many. He generally considers the soldiers of his enemy to be of no worth and will gen- erally save alive only the officers of a captured enemy. Our pioneer ancestors quickly learned that in order to have any hope of negotiating a peace with them, they had to be unarmed. Two remarkable traits of the Ameri- can Indian were a strict keeping of an oath, and compassion for the unarmed. Few races in the world have such a devotion to that principle as the American Indian. He considers it more honorable to die than to break an oath.

A List of My Discoveries

© 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº20

This installment is mostly devoted to answering questions. 427. Isaiah 11:1 and 10. Verse 1: Who is the Rod? The "rod" is a prophet the Lord will raise up after Zion is re- deemed. He will have a similar genealogy to . He is referred to in D&C 85:7. The fact that the Church will not be completely cleaned up even then is alluded to in the following verse, 85:8. 428. Who is the Stem of Jesse? The Stem is the Savior, as explained in the D&C. Who is the branch? He's also called the Branch. This is the explanation of the remark in the NT that He would be called a "Nazarene." In He- brew the word "Branch" (NAZARI) is the same as Nazarene. Something I tried to explain to McConkie some forty years ago but he never responded to my letter, being, I suppose, understandably too busy. McConkie had quoted that NT verse as an example of missing scripture in the OT. It is not missing; it is simply lost in transla- tion into English. 429. Whose "roots" are being referred to? Verse 10: Who is the root of Jesse? The root is Joseph Smith. "His rest shall be glorious" is a play on his name - a partial translation of "Joseph" is "glorious." 430. "Shiloh" does not mean "he to whom it belongs" which is a very bad translation mapping modern Israeli Hebrew onto the Hebrew of 700 B.C. It is a singular short form of "shiloam" and refers to the Messiah as the Man of Peace, as the type of David and Solomon being symbolic as the Father and the Son. 431. A few remarks about ancient technology. Neither gunpowder nor karate (jiu-jitsu, tae kwan do, judo, etc.) was invented by the Orientals. Both technologies were invented by and inherited from Abraham. It is commonly known that the former was brought to Europe by Marco Polo, along with the knowledge of ice cream, spaghetti, and paper used as currency. 432. These discoveries and others enabled Abraham to defeat the armies of five kings with a little over 300 men he had trained and equipped, as recorded in Genesis. 433. The Nephites rose to a level of technology equal to what Europe had attained by 1750, with the exception of the two technologies mentioned above, which they did not have. For example, the Nephites had rediscovered in part the planetary system which was completely known to the antediluvians, to the point that Noah knew per- fectly well that the Ark was a symbol of the solar system, with Adam’s body corresponding to the dead planet, aptly named Pluto in our day. 434. Job had a knowledge of astronomy which was completely lost after the Assyrian attack on Jerusalem in the late 8th century B.C. My younger brother Wendell discovered some years ago that Job was the son of Issachar. This would make him contemporary with Joseph, which we already knew. The alternate rendering of Jashub which occurs twice is a scribal error, which any Hebraist can easily discern once it is pointed out to him.

Now let’s look at the geography of the , as requested.

Jaredite geography:

435. The Jaredites landed near what we call Los Angeles, and built their capitol (the city of Moron) there, and called the land of Moron what we call Southern California. 436. The land called by the Nephites, Desolation, was what we call Mexico and Central America. 437. What we call Lake Bonneville, actually an inland sea, was still in place during the entire Jaredite residence in North America. 438. The Grand Canyon did not exist during the Jaredite period, ca. 2000 B.C. - 600 B.C. 439. The settlement of King Omer in Ablom was precisely at what we call Boston. This should be obvious to anyone. 440. The Valley of Gilgal was in NW Wyoming. 441. The so-called Medicine Wheel in NW Wyoming was made by the Jaredites. 442. This is why it was called the valley of Gilgal. As I mentioned earlier, "gilgal" means "great circle" [not "circle of stones" as erroneously reported in the Bible Dictionary, although circles of stones were also called that, as we see in this case] and in the language of Adam refers to the Milky Way as well as to the circle made in the form of a trench around ancient sacrificial altars. The trench was filled with water, which, when the sacri- fice was performed, turned red with the blood. This is a prophetic allusion to the Milky Way being "turned to blood" in the last days, as already explained. Facsimile Nº2 contains the same prophecy, with greater detail when it is translated completely. 443. Ether’s cave, where he hid out for over a dozen years, was in the hills overlooking the Valley of Gilgal in NW Wyoming. Some of his writing is on the walls of the caves. 444. It is commonly known that the Jaredites are approximately what we call Olmecs, and that two Jaredite cities are located at San Lorenzo and La Venta. 445. The plains of Heshlon appear to be the northern part of what we call the Great Plains. 446. The waters of Ripliancum were what we call the Great Lakes. This should be obvious to anyone. 447. The wilderness of Akish appears to be what we call the Pacific Northwest. 448. The plains of Agosh appear to be the southern part of the Great Plains. 449. The place Ogath may have been approximately what we call the state of Georgia. 450. The valley of Corihor, the valley of Shurr, and the hill Comnor all appear to be approximately in the state of Pennsylvania. 451. The entire Jaredite civilization was confined, except for hunting trips, to North America. This should be obvious to anyone. 452. A Jaredite king was found buried in Illinois, as attested by the so-called Kinderhook plates. I should note here that the so-called claim of forgery of the plates some years afterwards was itself a fraudulent aftermarket production. The substantiation of the forgery is claimed to be proven by the fact that the plates were chemically etched. The claimants conveniently overlook the fact that it was plainly stated in the contemporary historical re- cord that the plates were etched by the translator in order to read the characters more clearly.

Nephite geography:

A great deal of contention has been caused by an individual some half century ago who came up with a theory that the entire Nephite civilization was born, lived, and died on the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. This theory neces- sitated the invention of two Cumorahs and other contrivances which have no basis in historical fact nor does it account for any the archeological remains in the northern part of South America; nevertheless this theory has been widely copied and disseminated to the point that the First Presidency has had to issue a statement asking people not to waste valuable Sunday School class time speculating about BofM geography.

Another fundamental error is one of orientation. Both the Nephites and Jaredites, as did most ancient civiliza- tions, considered the South Pole to be the top of the world, and oriented all their maps and directions with north at the bottom, exactly contrary to modern civilization. For this reason, whenever "up" is mentioned in the old re- cords, it generally means "southward" and "down" as "northward." The only exception to this on the plates of Nephi is immediately after leaving Jerusalem and going down to the Red Sea, which was a drop in elevation.

My advice is to check out what I have said here. If it checks out, fine. If not, it is not worth arguing about. There are people who love to stir up contention and it is far better to leave such in ignorance.

Relics of Jaredite civilization will be hard to find in Los Angeles because, as some historians note, the area has been almost continuously inhabited for thousands of years. 453. Most of the Amazon Basin was under water at the time of the Nephites. If this is correct, we should not ex- pect to find any archeological remains in this area. I am not aware of any. 454. The Rocky Mountain range did not exist before 34 A.D. nor did the Grand Canyon, and Lake Bonneville was not drained until that time. The water line can still be seen in parts of Utah and Colorado, especially for ex- ample on the high plains (11,000 feet) around Fairplay, Colorado. 455. The river Sidon, a major river running north-south, appears to be the Rio de la Plata, but it also appears to have been longer before 34 A.D. than it was afterward, with the central part of the continent buckling upward in the area of Mato Grosso. It is obvious that the geological fault line creating the Andes Mountains has a NE branch right in that area. 456. The city of Nephi seems to be about where Lima, Peru is now located. There should be remains of a foun- dation of a structure having exactly the dimensions of Solomon’s temple. 457. The city of Zarahemla was approximately one thousand miles north of the city of Nephi. 458. The land Bountiful appears to correspond to what we call Venezuela and northern Colombia. 459. The land of Zarahemla appears to correspond to the southern counterpart of Bountiful. 460. Charles Lindbergh discovered that undersea features could be seen from an airplane which could not be seen from a ship. After discussing the matter with my father, he said that cities ought to be visible off the east coast of northern South America, which he then overflew and confirmed two dozen times over. These cities ought to be the object of archeological expeditions, because they will exhibit Nephite civilization exactly as it existed at the beginning of the year 34 A.D., the largest of these being perhaps the city of Moroni. The shallow bench off the NE coast of Brazil, from Fortaleza northward to Trinidad, should yield all of these. The ravages of the sea are benign compared to the human destruction caused to the chain of Nephite cities from the site of Pan- ama City on up through Mexico and the NE United States, all of which were burned by the pursuing armies.

A List of My Discoveries

© 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº21

In this installment we will finish up Jaredite geography, make a few transitional remarks, and outline future translations of ancient records in my possession, starting with the most recent:

461. The Jaredite land of Nehor was approximately what is now the state of Illinois but covering a much larger area on both sides of the river. 462. The Jaredite city of Nehor was in the area of Saint Louis but on the east side of the Mississippi River, where the Cahokia mound site is today. 463. Many of the artifacts found in mounds in the state of Illinois are not American Indian, but Jaredite. In many cases, it is easy to tell the difference, because the Indians never achieved the high state of perfection in stone carving that is inherent to all Jaredite work. 464. Another easy way to distinguish Jaredite archaeological finds from Indian ones is the simple fact that the Jaredites were 50% larger in stature. 465. The body of the king found buried in a mound at Kinderhook, Pike County, Illinois, on 23 April 1843, was that of the Jaredite King Shule. 466. The two characters in the lower right corner of the second Kinderhook plate are the name of the king whose body accompanied these plates, SHULE. 467. All legitimate Jaredite kings were descended from the first pharaoh of Egypt, called Menes by Manetho and AHA in the hieroglyphs. I think I mentioned earlier that Menes is the Greek translation of Aha.

I should mention some things here I failed to explain earlier.

468. In the Ark, only baby animals were taken, for space considerations. This has been figured out by some, and should be obvious to anyone. 469. There was a glowing stone at each end of the Ark to provide light. It will be obvious to anyone that this is where Mahonri got the idea for his eight barges - a historical solution to his problem, which he could not fail to miss. 470. In the Ark, there was a division lengthwise of all quarters of man and beast. This is preserved in the Chi- nese character for the number eight, which also means division. 471. In the Ark, all the males were on the right side, and all the females on the left side. 472. A strict rule of non-cohabitation was in effect all the while in the Ark. 473. Ham was a righteous man, as were his brothers, but he committed two sins which brought a spiritual, not a temporal, curse upon him and his posterity. 474. It was a well known tradition among the ancients that the firstborn had special privileges, including the right of government over his siblings. What is not commonly known is that the firstborn in a new land also had special privileges. 475. It was for this reason that Ham cohabited with his wife while still on the Ark, so that his offspring would be the firstborn in the post-Diluvian world and thereby have the first rights of government over the others. 476. The other transgression that Ham committed was not just to "see" his father’s nakedness, but he stole Adam’s garment that was upon Noah when he (Noah) was in a drunken sleep. This was the protective garment of the priesthood given to Adam in the Garden of Eden. My mother’s sister, Ruth Shinsel Pate, discovered this and told me about it some fifty years ago. 477. Ruth also told me that it was this garment that enabled Nimrod to become a "mighty hunter." 478. The garment was made from the shed skin of a tyrannosaurus at a time when there was no death in the world, and had both spiritual and physical protective powers. It was essentially a lightweight suit of armor worn under the outer clothing. 479. The name Canaan as used in Genesis 9 does not refer to Noah’s son, but to his ancestor. Canaan was the generic term for all descendents of Ham, just as "Afro" or "African" is the generic term for all Negroes, regard- less of more recent origin. 480. Ham’s scheme backfired - he had no sons. The word "sons" as used in Genesis for Ham’s immediate poste- rity should be translated "children" - the original language has both meanings. Ham had only daughters, and therefore there was a complete disconnect from the priesthood. All of the names of Ham’s "sons" are in fact names of races through the female line. For example, Mizraim is not a person, but refers to the dual (remember the grammatical dual?) kingdom of Upper and Lower Egypt with Aha or Menes, the son of Egyptus, the daugh- ter of Ham, being the first PHA RA OAH, King by Royal Blood as already explained. Nevertheless, these two transgressions aside, Ham was a noble and great man and the father of several of the world’s greatest civiliza- tions both in the Old World and in the New World. 481. I think I already mentioned that the Jaredites were descended from all of the posterity of Ham, but the le- gitimate kings were only descended from Aha.

A few desultory remarks by way of transition.

482. In Judges 15:19, keeping in mind that the word Lehi is a place name and also means jawbone, how do you think the word "jaw" should be translated? If you guessed that is should have been left untranslated as the name of the place, Lehi, you are correct. Samson found a spring in Lehi. Water did not come running out of a dry jaw- bone. See what a difference just a little knowledge of language, and common sense, can make in our under- standing of scripture? 483. The Savior was a Nazarite. For this reason, all paintings of him depicting Him with a stubbly beard are in- correct. He never cut any part of His hair. 484. The atheist Thomas Hardy in Return of the Native was also duped by the mindless folk etymology of the name Allred, applying it to the dyer or reddleman, having become permanently all red from his trade. The name in fact goes back in well documented genealogies to Aldridge, Aldred, Eldred, etc., and has nothing to do with dyeing sheepskins. 485. The famous author Sir Walter Scott was likewise fooled in Ivanhoe by the simplistic folk etymology of the name Unrede applied to Ethelred - "the unready" and he obligingly portrays him as the bungler to be expected with such a surname. The name is in fact Saxon and means "without counsel" and does not refer to some stub- born fool who rejects advice, but is a claim to literal descent from Aaron, the brother of Moses, who by Leviti- cal birthright has a legal entitlement to be a common judge in Israel, without counselors. The name "Ethelred" does not mean "good counsel" but "Ethel" is the late Saxon equivalent to the German "Edel" and refers to a higher source than common or vulgar advisors. The "Un" in "Unrede" is the late Saxon equivalent of the Ger- man "ohne," "without" and does not mean "no" or "not" as some speculate.

486. The word "blog" has been bandied about on the Internet during the past year or so as a label for a person's views posted on the Internet. What does it mean, or does it mean anything at all? To a Frenchman, "blog" is the Americanized pronunciation of "blague." The French use this word in the same way we use "malarkey," "baloney," "hooey," and other words describing something that has no basis in fact. Whether or not it is a contraction of "weblog" as claimed by some, this is how it strikes French ears.

487. I don't believe I mentioned it here, but I believe Noah's Ark still exists, hidden under the sands of Egypt, and can be found by a suitable expedition. For the next installment, among other things, I will provide a reliable metric for determining how close the Old Testament we have is to its original version.

A List of My Discoveries

© 2006 David Grant Stewart, Sr.

Installment Nº22

In this installment, as promised, I will provide a metric whereby the accuracy of transcription and translation of the Old Testament may be assessed. This seems so simple, though, that surely others must have also noted this similarity, so I am adding to it something that I do not think is known to anyone else, yet I explained in a pre- vious installment - namely, that Psalm 18 is a prophetic description of the man called Nephi in the Book of Mor- mon. I have put everything together here for your convenience, so you can judge everything for yourself and es- tablish your own conclusions. 488. First, the promised internal metric in the Old Testament: It turns out that Psalm 18 is repeated identically in 2 Samuel. Any differences are due to scribal error or translation differences. 489. Which is the more accurate? Let’s ask another question - which is older, the second book of Samuel, or the book of Psalms? Psalms is older. How do I know? Consider this: 1 Samuel 9:9 9 (Beforetime in Israel, when a man went to enquire of God, thus he spake, Come, and let us go to the seer: for [he that is] now [called] a Prophet was beforetime called a Seer.) In a previous installment, I shared my discovery that the Urim and Thummim were taken from Jerusalem at the time of its fall under the siege of the army of Nebuchadnezzer, about 588 B.C. The books of Samuel were writ- ten after this time as you can see. The book of Psalms was written about one thousand B.C. 490. Now, for your amusement, you have several tools below. First, Psalm 18. Then the version of Psalm 18 re- corded in the 2nd book of Samuel. From these two you may assess the degree of transcription and translation variance in two manuscripts half a millennium apart. Finally, there are inserted the references in the Book of Nephi which allow you to judge for yourself what prophet the psalmist is referring to - it certainly is not himself (King David) which you can tell by the repeated claims that he has clean hands and has never broken a serious commandment - a claim which does apply in fact, to Nephi. I hope you find this interesting.

Psalms 18:1 And he said, I will love thee, O LORD, my strength. Psalms 18:2 2 The LORD [is] my rock, and my fortress, and my deliverer; my God, my strength, in whom I will trust; my buckler, and the horn of my salvation, [and] my high tower. 2 Samuel 22:2 2 And he said, The LORD [is] my rock, and my fortress, and my deliverer; 2 Samuel 22:3 3 The God of my rock; in him will I trust: [he is] my shield, and the horn of my salvation, my high tower, and my refuge, my saviour; thou savest me from violence. 2 Nephi 4:30 30 Rejoice, O my heart, and cry unto the Lord, and say: O Lord, I will praise thee forever; yea, my soul will rejoice in thee, my God, and the rock of my salvation. 2 Nephi 4:31 31 O Lord, wilt thou redeem my soul? Wilt thou deliver me out of the hands of mine enemies? Wilt thou make me that I may shake at the appearance of sin?

Psalms 18:3 3 I will call upon the LORD, [who is worthy] to be praised: so shall I be saved from mine enemies. 2 Samuel 22:4 4 I will call on the LORD, [who is] worthy to be praised: so shall I be saved from mine enemies. Psalms 18:4 4 The sorrows of death compassed me, and the floods of ungodly men made me afraid. 2 Samuel 22:5 5 When the waves of death compassed me, the floods of ungodly men made me afraid;

Psalms 18:5 5 The sorrows of hell compassed me about: the snares of death prevented me. 2 Samuel 22:6 6 The sorrows of hell compassed me about; the snares of death prevented me;

Psalms 18:6 6 In my distress I called upon the LORD, and cried unto my God: he heard my voice out of his temple, and my cry came before him, [even] into his ears. 2 Samuel 22:7 7 In my distress I called upon the LORD, and cried to my God: and he did hear my voice out of his temple, and my cry [did enter] into his ears.

Psalms 18:7 7 Then the earth shook and trembled; the foundations also of the hills moved and were shaken, because he was wroth. 2 Samuel 22:8 8 Then the earth shook and trembled; the foundations of heaven moved and shook, because he was wroth.

Psalms 18:8 8 There went up a smoke out of his nostrils, and fire out of his mouth devoured: coals were kindled by it. 2 Samuel 22:9 9 There went up a smoke out of his nostrils, and fire out of his mouth devoured: coals were kindled by it.

Psalms 18:9 9 He bowed the heavens also, and came down: and darkness [was] under his feet. Samuel 22:10 10 He bowed the heavens also, and came down; and darkness [was] under his feet.

Psalms 18:10 10 And he rode upon a cherub, and did fly: yea, he did fly upon the wings of the wind. 2 Samuel 22:11 11 And he rode upon a cherub, and did fly: and he was seen upon the wings of the wind. [I should note here that in old manuscripts, the word for spirit is often used interchangeably with the word wind - for example, Latin “spiritus” may be translated either way - a “spiritus lentus” as any Latin scholar knows, is a direction for a light breathing or aspiration in pronouncing a word.] 2 Nephi 4:25 25 And upon the wings of his Spirit hath my body been carried away upon exceedingly high mountains. And mine eyes have beheld great things, yea, even too great for man; therefore I was bidden that I should not write them.

Psalms 18:11 11 He made darkness his secret place; his pavilion round about him [were] dark waters [and] thick clouds of the skies. 2 Samuel 22:12 12 And he made darkness pavilions round about him, dark waters, [and] thick clouds of the skies.

Psalms 18:12 12 At the brightness [that was] before him his thick clouds passed, hail [stones] and coals of fire. 2 Samuel 22:13 13 Through the brightness before him were coals of fire kindled.

Psalms 18:13 13 The LORD also thundered in the heavens, and the Highest gave his voice; hail [stones] and coals of fire. 2 Samuel 22:14 14 The LORD thundered from heaven, and the most High uttered his voice. 1 Nephi 16:39 39 And it came to pass that the Lord was with us, yea, even the voice of the Lord came and did speak many words unto them, and did chasten them exceedingly; and after they were chastened by the voice of the Lord they did turn away their anger, and did repent of their sins, insomuch that the Lord did bless us again with food, that we did not perish. Psalms 18:14 14 Yea, he sent out his arrows, and scattered them; and he shot out lightnings, and discomfited them. 2 Samuel 22:15 15 And he sent out arrows, and scattered them; lightning, and discomfited them.

Psalms 18:15 15 Then the channels of waters were seen, and the foundations of the world were discovered at thy rebuke, O LORD, at the blast of the breath of thy nostrils. 2 Samuel 22:16 16 And the channels of the sea appeared, the foundations of the world were discovered, at the rebuking of the LORD, at the blast of the breath of his nostrils.

Psalms 18:16 16 He sent from above, he took me, he drew me out of many waters. 2 Samuel 22:17 17 He sent from above, he took me; he drew me out of many waters; 2 Nephi 4:20

Email: [email protected]