Effects of Low Ph and Low Salinity Induced by Meltwater Inflow on The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effects of Low Ph and Low Salinity Induced by Meltwater Inflow on The Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Effects of Low pH and Low Salinity Induced by Meltwater Inflow on the Behavior and Physical Condition of the Antarctic Limpet, Nacella concinna Eunchong Sin 1, In-Young Ahn 1, Seojeong Park 2,3 and Taewon Kim 2,3,* 1 Division of Polar Ocean Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, 26 Songdomirae-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21990, Korea; [email protected] (E.S.); [email protected] (I.-Y.A.) 2 Department of Ocean Sciences, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea; [email protected] 3 Program in Biomedical Science and Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-32-860-7714 Received: 30 July 2020; Accepted: 16 October 2020; Published: 20 October 2020 Abstract: Seawater acidification and freshening in the intertidal zone of Marian Cove, Antarctica, which occurs by the freshwater inflow from snow fields and glaciers, could affect the physiology and behavior of intertidal marine organisms. In this study, we exposed Antarctic limpets, Nacella concinna, to two different pH (8.00 and 7.55) and salinity (34.0 and 27.0 psu) levels and measured their righting ability after being flipped over, mortality, condition factor, and shell dissolution. During the 35-day exposure, there was no significant difference in behavior and mortality between different treatments. However, the condition factor was negatively affected by low salinity. Both low pH and low salinity negatively influenced shell formation by decreasing the aragonite saturation state (Warg) and enhancing shell dissolution. Our results suggest that, though limpets can tolerate short-term low pH and salinity conditions, intrusions of meltwater accompanied by the glacial retreat may act as a serious threat to the population of N. concinna. Keywords: ocean acidification; glacial retreat; meltwater; Nacella concinna; Marian Cove; shell dissolution 1. Introduction Increasing atmospheric CO2 has induced ocean acidification with 0.1 unit reduction of pH over the last 200 years [1]. According to the climate change scenario RCP8.5 of 5th IPCC assessment, the global average surface pH is estimated to decline 0.3–0.32 by 2100 [2]. Moreover, the aragonite saturation state of the Southern Ocean is expected to become undersaturated by the year 2030, and no later than 2038, due to low seawater temperature of Southern Ocean [1,3,4]. In addition, aragonite undersaturation events are predicted to spread rapidly, affecting more than 70% of the Southern Ocean surface water this century [5]. Accordingly, marine calcifying organisms will have difficulty in maintaining calcium carbonate skeleton or shells. In addition to the increased atmospheric CO2, glacial meltwater input due to shrinking ice sheets likely aggravates the acidification [6]. The fresh meltwater has a lower Total Alkalinity (TA) and concentration of Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC) compared to seawater that contribute to carbonate undersaturation [7]. Therefore, the meltwater inflow could additionally reduce the pH in seawater. It was reported that freshwater dilution has facilitated low calcium carbonate saturation states in both the Amundsen Sea and Ross Sea [8]. The Western Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) is one of the regions on the earth where warming and glacial melting are proceeding quickly [9,10]. Recent studies revealed that the substantial reduction of marine-terminating glaciers in the WAP in recent years is the result of coastal-trapped waves and ocean J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 822; doi:10.3390/jmse8100822 www.mdpi.com/journal/jmse J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 14 J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 822 2 of 14 The Western Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) is one of the regions on the earth where warming and currents,glacial which melting induce are proceeding the warm quickly seawater [9,10]. inflow Recent [11, 12studies]. There revealed are few that studies the substantial that determine reduction the effect of marine-terminating glaciers in the WAP in recent years is the result of coastal-trapped waves and of meltwater inflow on Southern Ocean acidification on marine organisms. However, carbonate ion ocean currents, which induce the warm seawater inflow [11,12]. There are few studies that determine undersaturationthe effect of meltwater was found inflow to be on a directSouthern consequence Ocean acidification of the recent on marine extensive organisms. melting However, of sea ice in the Canadacarbonate Basin; ion undersaturation this phenomenon was found could to be aff aect direct both consequence the planktonic of the andrecent benthic extensive ecosystems melting [6]. In theof WAP,sea ice because in the Canada of the complex Basin; this coastline phenomenon and fast could glacial affect retreat, both the studyplanktonic of the and response benthic of the ecosystemecosystems to ocean [6]. In acidificationthe WAP, because and fresheningof the complex should coastline be addressed and fast glacial as an retreat, important the study issue. of the responseMarian of Cove, the ecosystem a small glacialto ocean fjord acidification (~4.5 km and long freshening and ~1.5 should km be wide) addressed is located as an inimportant King George Island,issue. the biggest island of the South Shetland Islands, which belongs to the WAP (Figure1). In Marian Cove, theMarian glacier Cove, has rapidlya small glacial retreated fjord around (~4.5 km 1.9 long km fromand ~1.5 1956 km to wide) 2017 [is13 located]. The glacierin King retreatGeorge occurs duringIsland, most the of biggest the summer island of months the South and Shetland is being Islands, accompanied which belongs by massive to the intrusionWAP (Figure of turbid1). In melt Marian Cove, the glacier has rapidly retreated around 1.9 km from 1956 to 2017 [13]. The glacier water [14]. Freshwater streams and ponds are also developed from the surrounding snow field in retreat occurs during most of the summer months and is being accompanied by massive intrusion of summer,turbid and melt a water substantial [14]. Freshwater amount streams of fresh and water ponds is introducedare also developed into the from cove. the surrounding The meltwater snow stream andfield pond in watersummer, of and Baton a substantial Peninsula amount and Weaver of fresh Peninsula, water is introduced between into which the cove. Marian The Covemeltwater is located, has relativelystream and lower pond pHwater ranges of Baton (meltwater: Peninsula <and4.38, We pondaver Peninsula, water: <5.00), between because which King Marian George CoveIsland is is a volcaniclocated, island has relatively [15]. As lower a result, pH ranges the surface (meltwater: water <4.38, in Marian pond water: Cove <5.00), has a because distinct King salinity George gradient alongIsland the distanceis a volcanic from island the glacier[15]. As duringa result,the the australsurface summerwater in Marian months Cove [16 ].has In a addition, distinct salinity the pH and salinitygradient of the along seawater the distance of Marian from the Cove glacier fluctuates during the depending austral summer on the months unexpected [16]. In weatheraddition, andthe tidal conditionspH and insalinity the austral of the seawater summer of (Supplementary Marian Cove fluctuates Materials depending Figure on S1). the This unexpected suggests weather that local and ocean acidificationtidal conditions has been in the driven austral rapidly summer by (Supplementary the meltwater Materials inflow from Figure both S1). the This tidewater suggests glacierthat local and the ocean acidification has been driven rapidly by the meltwater inflow from both the tidewater glacier snow fields, although their relative contribution was not quantified. and the snow fields, although their relative contribution was not quantified. (a) (c) e ov ANTARCTICA C ian ar M Sampling Barton Peninsula 59˚W 58˚W (b) site King Sejong 62˚S 62˚S Station King George Island 0 1km 62˚15’S 0 10km 58˚W 62˚15’S FigureFigure 1. Study 1. Study area: area: (a ()a) the the location location of King King George George Island Island (red (red square), square), (b) the (b) location the location of Marian of Marian CoveCove (red (red square), square), and and (c ()c the) the sampling sampling site (circle). (circle). TheThe retreat retreat of of marine-terminating marine-terminating glaciers, particularly particularly thos thosee grounded grounded on the on sea the floor sea floor (tidewater glaciers), has a profound influence on the nearshore coastal environment and inhabitants (tidewater glaciers), has a profound influence on the nearshore coastal environment and inhabitants [17]. [17]. Antarctic benthic communities can be significantly impacted by a series of physical processes Antarcticfollowing benthic glacier communities retreat, occurring can be significantlymostly during impacted the summer by a seasons series of (e.g., physical ice scouring, processes water following glaciercolumn retreat, stratification, occurring and mostly nearshore during turbidity) the [14,18–20]. summer seasonsNot only (e.g.,physical ice impacts, scouring, but also water large column stratification,variations in and the nearshore water chemistry, turbidity) can occur [14,18 because–20]. Not of meltwater only physical inflow impacts, (e.g., pH, but salinity, also large aragonite variations in thesaturation, water chemistry, metal level, can melting occur becausecirculation, of meltwaterDIC, and TA inflow changes) (e.g., [21–23]. pH, salinity, The Antarctic aragonite marine saturation, metal level, melting circulation, DIC, and TA changes) [21–23]. The Antarctic marine organisms inhabiting this area, particularly benthic fauna, are most likely vulnerable to climate changes, as they have low physiological flexibility, low growth rate, deferred maturity, and a constraining adaptation to short-term environmental changes [24–26]. Even pH and salinity are related, and these stressors J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 822 3 of 14 possibly occur at the same time due to the inflow of meltwater from glaciers and snow, in the polar research field, there are few studies that investigated the negative effect of the combined stressors of low pH and low salinity on Antarctic marine animals [7,27].
Recommended publications
  • Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes Introduction
    Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes Introduction Excess Foam High Effluent Suspended Solids High Effluent Soluble BOD or Ammonia Low effluent pH Introduction Review of the literature shows that the activated sludge process has experienced operational problems since its inception. Although they did not experience settling problems with their activated sludge, Ardern and Lockett (Ardern and Lockett, 1914a) did note increased turbidity and reduced nitrification with reduced temperatures. By the early 1920s continuous-flow systems were having to deal with the scourge of activated sludge, bulking (Ardem and Lockett, 1914b, Martin 1927) and effluent suspended solids problems. Martin (1927) also describes effluent quality problems due to toxic and/or high-organic- strength industrial wastes. Oxygen demanding materials would bleedthrough the process. More recently, Jenkins, Richard and Daigger (1993) discussed severe foaming problems in activated sludge systems. Experience shows that controlling the activated sludge process is still difficult for many plants in the United States. However, improved process control can be obtained by systematically looking at the problems and their potential causes. Once the cause is defined, control actions can be initiated to eliminate the problem. Problems associated with the activated sludge process can usually be related to four conditions (Schuyler, 1995). Any of these can occur by themselves or with any of the other conditions. The first is foam. So much foam can accumulate that it becomes a safety problem by spilling out onto walkways. It becomes a regulatory problem as it spills from clarifier surfaces into the effluent. The second, high effluent suspended solids, can be caused by many things. It is the most common problem found in activated sludge systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Industry Wastewater Treatment
    CHEMICAL INDUSTRY WASTEWATER TREATMENT Fayza A. Nasr\ Hala S. Doma\ Hisham S Abdel-Halim", Saber A. El-Shafai* * Water Pollution Research department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt "Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Abstract Treatment of chemical industrial wastewater from building and construction chemicals factory and plastic shoes manufacturing factory was investigated. The two factories discharge their wastewater into the public sewerage network. The results showed the wastewater discharged from the building and construction chemicals factory was highly contaminated with organic compounds. The average values of COD and BOD were 2912 and 150 mg02/l. Phenol concentration up to 0.3 mg/l was detected. Chemical treatment using lime aided with ferric chloride proved to be effective and produced an effluent characteristics in compliance with Egyptian permissible limits. With respect to the other factory, industrial wastewater was mixed with domestic wastewater in order to lower the organic load. The COD, BOD values after mixing reached 5239 and 2615 mg02/l. The average concentration of phenol was 0.5 mg/l. Biological treatment using activated sludge or rotating biological contactor (RBC) proved to be an effective treatment system in terms of producing an effluent characteristic within the permissible limits set by the law. Therefore, the characteristics of chemical industrial wastewater determine which treatment system to utilize. Based on laboratory results TESCE, Vol. 30, No.2 <@> December 2004 engineering design of each treatment system was developed and cost estimate prepared. Key words: chemical industry, wastewater, treatment, chemical, biological Introduction The chemical industry is of importance in terms of its impact on the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Wastewater Treatment Technologies Fitxategia
    INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES Image by Frauke Feind from Pixabay licensed under CC0 Estibaliz Saez de Camara Oleaga & Eduardo de la Torre Pascual Faculty of Engineering Bilbao (UPV/EHU) Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering Industrial Wastewaters (IWW) means the water or liquid that carries waste from industrial or processes, if it is distinct from domestic wastewater. Desalination plant “Rambla Morales desalination plant (Almería - Spain)” by David Martínez Vicente from Flickr licensed under CC BY 2.0 IWW may result from any process or activity of industry which uses water as a reactant or for transportation of heat or materials. 2 Characteristics of wastewater from industrial sources vary with the type and the size of the facility and the on-site treatment methods, if any. Because of this variation, it is often difficult to define typical operating conditions for industrial activities. Options available for the treatment of IWW are summarized briefly in next figure. To introduce in a logical order in the description of treatment techniques, the relationship between pollutants and respective typical treatment technology is taken as reference. 1. Removal of suspended solids and insoluble liquids 2. Removal of inorganic, non-biodegradable or poorly degradable soluble content 3. Removal of biodegradable soluble content 3 Range of wastewater treatments in relation to type of contaminants. Source: BREF http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/ 4 3.1. CLASSIFICATION OF INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENTS CLASSIFICATION OF EFFLUENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Osmosis Treatment, Rejection of Carbon Dioxide, And
    Evaluating the Impact of Reverse Osmosis Treatment on Finished Water Carbon Dioxide Concentration and pH WATERCON2012 March 21, 2012 Presented By: Jerry Phipps, P.E. Outline • Purpose • Background • Reverse Osmosis (RO) Fundamentals • Post-Treatment Processes • Pertinent Aquatic Chemistry • Case Studies • Conclusions and Recommendations • Questions Purpose • Review RO and carbonate chemistry fundamentals • Review data from full scale projects to determine change in carbon dioxide and pH from feed to permeate stream Background • The Reverse Osmosis (RO) process uses a semipermeable membrane to separate an influent stream into two streams, a purified permeate stream and a concentrated reject stream • Many references indicate that dissolved gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2) may pass through the membrane with no rejection • The combination of low alkalinity and high carbon dioxide results in an aggressive permeate stream with a lower pH than the influent stream Reverse Osmosis Membranes The most common RO membrane material today is aromatic polyamide, typically in the form of thin-film composites. They consist of a thin film of membrane, bonded to layers of other porous materials that are tightly wound to support and strengthen the membrane. Flow Recovery • Percent recovery is a key design parameter • Defined as permeate flow / influent flow • Recovery is limited by solubility products, Ksp • Typical value for groundwater is ~75%-85%, but varies with application • Example: Influent stream = 100 gpm, 75% recovery. Permeate stream = 75 gpm,
    [Show full text]
  • The Ph of Drinking Water
    The pH of drinking water The pH is a measure of the acidity or alkalinity. The water quality regulations specify that the pH of tap water should be between 6.5 and 9.5. What is pH and why do we test our Why has the pH of my water changed? water for it? If the problem only affects your property, the The pH is a numerical value used to indicate source is most likely your internal pipework and the degree to which water is acidic. pH plumbing. Possible sources include plumbed-in measurements range between 0 (strong acid) water filters or softeners, incorrectly installed and 14 (strong alkali), with 7 being neutral. The washing machines or dishwashers, incorrect water quality regulations specify that the pH fittings and taps supplied from storage tanks. of water at your tap should be between 6.5 If you have had plumbing work done recently and 9.5. Water leaving our treatment works then excessive use of solder or flux could be typically has a pH between 7 and 8, but this the cause. In this case the problem may lessen can change as it passes through the network of as water is used. Alternatively you may wish to reservoirs and water mains. consider changing the pipework or joints. We consume many different foods and beverages with a large range of pH. Your water quality For example, citrus fruits like oranges, lemons If you’re interested in finding out more about and limes are quite acidic (pH = 2.0 - 4.0). the quality of your drinking water, please visit Carbonated drinks such as cola have a pH unitedutilities.com/waterquality and enter your 4.0 to 4.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Your Watershed- What Is
    Understanding Your Watershed pH NR/WQ/2005-19 Nancy Mesner and John Geiger June 2005 (pr) What is pH? pH is a measurement of how acidic or how basic (alkaline) a solution is. When substances dissolve in water they produce charged molecules called ions. Acidic water contains extra hydrogen ions (H+) and basic water contains extra hydroxyl (OH-) ions. pH is measured on a scale of 0 to 14. Water that is neutral has a pH of 7. Acidic water has pH values less than 7, with 0 being the most acidic. Likewise, basic water has values greater than 7, with 14 being the most basic. A change of 1 unit on a pH scale represents a 10 fold change in the pH, so that water with pH of 6 is 10 times more acidic than water with a pH of 7, and water with a pH of 5 is 100 times more acidic than water with a pH of 7. You might expect rainwater to be neutral, but it is actually somewhat acidic. As rain drops fall through the atmosphere, they dissolve gaseous carbon dioxide, creating a weak acid. Pure rainfall has a pH of about 5.6. The figure below shows the pH of some common solutions. The pH of lakes and rivers in Utah typically falls between 6.5 and 9.0. Why is the pH of water important? Effects on animals and plants Most aquatic animals and plants have adapted to life in water with a specific pH and may suffer from even a slight change.
    [Show full text]
  • Ph in Drinking-Water
    WHO/SDE/WSH/07.01/1 pH in Drinking-water Revised background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality © World Health Organization 2007 This document may be freely reviewed, abstracted, reproduced and translated in part or in whole but not for sale or for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. Inquiries should be addressed to: [email protected]. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. The World Health Organization does not warrant that the information contained in this publication is complete and correct and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a result of its use. Preface One of the primary goals of WHO and its member states is that “all people, whatever their stage of development and their social and economic conditions, have the right to have access to an adequate supply of safe drinking water.” A major WHO function to achieve such goals is the responsibility “to propose regulations, and to make recommendations with respect to international health matters ....” The first WHO document dealing specifically with public drinking-water quality was published in 1958 as International Standards for Drinking-water.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeration, Ph Adjustment, and UF/MF Filtration for TSS Reduction of Produced Waters from Hayneville
    Aeration, pH Adjustment, and UF/MF Filtration for TSS Reduction of Produced Waters from Hayneville Research & Engineering - Environmental Solutions, Applied Research Tor H. Palmgren - Exploratory & Special Projects Manager James R. Fajt - Senior Scientist Alexander G. Danilov - ProACT Engineer Texas A&M University David Burnett, Director of Technology, GPRI 1 11/30/2013 Haynesville Shale Shale straddles Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas Copyright © 2013 PennWell Corporation. All rights reserved. 2 11/30/2013 Haynesville - General Characteristics • Depth: 10,500 to 13,600 ft. • Lateral reach about the same • Fracturing Pressure > 10,000 psi • Bottom Hole Temperature: 100 to 350 F • Fracturing fluids used: slick water, linear gel and cross linked • Water sources: rivers, bayous, ponds, lakes, wells, flow back and produced water Source: Chesapeake Energy 3 11/30/2013 Haynesville - Produced Waters Characteristics • Recycled water utilized per well fractured : 0-35% • Common water contaminants: TSS, Calcium Magnesium, Iron, Bacteria • Key treatment targets: TSS, Scale Forming Ions, Bacteria • This discussion will focus on TSS removal and fluid clarification via membrane filtration Source: Chesapeake Energy 4 11/30/2013 Four Common Membrane Processes Process Name Approximate Useful Particle Permeate Size Removed Microfiltration 0.5 - 50 µm Clarified water Ultrafiltration 0.2 µm Clarified water Nanofiltration 0.5 - 0.7 nm Softened water Reverse Osmosis 0.1 -1 nm Low salinity water 5 11/30/2013 Filters Used in this Study Filter Manufacturer Micron
    [Show full text]
  • Ph Neutralization English , PDF, 0.51MB
    FS-PRE-004 TECHNOLOGY FACT SHEETS FOR EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANTS ON TEXTILE INDUSTRY pH NEUTRALIZATION SERIES: PRE-TREATMENTS TITLE pH NEUTRALIZATION (FS-PRE-004) Last update December 2014 Last review pH NEUTRALIZATION FS-PRE-004 pH NEUTRALIZATION (FS-PRE-004) Date December 2014 Authors Pablo Ures Rodríguez Alfredo Jácome Burgos Joaquín Suárez López Revised by Last update Date Done by: Update main topics INDEX 1.INTRODUCTION 2.FUNDAMENTALS OF CHEMICAL NEUTRALIZATION 2.1. pH 2.2. Acidity and alkalinity 2.3. Buffer capacity 2.4. Commonly used chemicals 3.DESIGN AND OPERATION 3.1. Neutralizing system selection criteria 3.2. System design: batch or continuous 3.3. Design parameters 4.CONTROL OF PROCESS 5.SPECIFICATIONS FOR TEXTILE INDUSTRY EFFLUENT TREATMENT 5.1. Process water pre-treatment 5.2. Mill effluent pre-treatment 5.3. On the ETP treatment line 6.CONTROL PARAMETERS AND STRATEGIES 7.OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE TROUBLESHOOTING REFERENCES ANNEX 1.- COMMON REACTIVES ON NEUTRALIZATION PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS ANNEX 2.- GRAPHICAL DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS UNITS pH NEUTRALIZATION FS-PRE-004 Page 2 of 10 1. INTRODUCTION Many industrial wastes contain acidic or alkaline materials that require neutralization prior to discharge to receiving waters or prior to chemical or biological treatment. (Eckenfelder, 2000) Neutralization is the process of adjusting the pH of water through the addition of an acid or a base, depending on the target pH and process requirements. Most part of the effluents can be neutralized at a pH of 6 to 9 prior to discharge. In chemical industrial treatment, neutralization of excess alkalinity or acidity is often required.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquarius Salinity & Density Bead Activity
    Floating in a Salty Sea JPL Aquarius Workshop Background If there is one thing that just about everyone knows about the ocean, it’s that it is salty. The two most common elements in sea water, after oxygen and hydrogen, are sodium and chloride. Sodium and chloride combine to form what we know as table salt. If you allow the wind to dry your skin after swimming in the ocean, you will see a light coasting of salt that has been left behind when the water evaporated. Salinity is a measure of how much salt is in the water. Sea water salinity is expressed as a ratio of salt (in grams) to liter of water. In sea water there is typically close to 35 grams of dissolved salts in each liter. Scientists describe salinity using Practical Salinity Units (PSU) which defines salinity in terms of a conductivity ratio, so it is dimensionless. Salinity was formerly expressed in terms of parts per thousand or by weight (written as ppt or ‰). That is, a salinity of 35 ppt meant 35 grams of salt per 1,000 ml (1 liter) of sea-water. The normal range of open ocean salinity is between 32-37 grams per liter (32‰ - 37‰). Salinity affects density. Density is the mass per unit volume (mass/volume) of a substance. Salty waters are denser than fresh water at the same temperature. Both salt and temperature are important influences on density: density increases with increased salinity and decreases with increased temperature. As you might expect, in the ocean there are areas of high and low salinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Ph NEUTRAL TOILET CLEANER Page: 1 Compilation Date: 15/03/2016 Revision Date: 18/01/2021 Revision No: 10
    SAFETY DATA SHEET pH NEUTRAL TOILET CLEANER Page: 1 Compilation date: 15/03/2016 Revision date: 18/01/2021 Revision No: 10 Section 1: Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1. Product identifier Product name: ph NEUTRAL TOILET CLEANER Product code: CP-NETCL-1L 1.2. Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Use of substance / mixture: PC35: Washing and cleaning products (including solvent based products). 1.3. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Bothongo Hygiene Solutions (UK) Ltd Company name: Briary Barn, 1st floor Pury Hill Business Park Towcester Northamptonshire NN12 7LS United Kingdom Tel: 07979377639 Email: [email protected] 1.4. Emergency telephone number Emergency tel: 07979377639 (office hours only) Section 2: Hazards identification 2.1. Classification of the substance or mixture Classification under CLP: This product has no classification under CLP. 2.2. Label elements Label elements: Precautionary statements: P305+P351+P338: IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. 2.3. Other hazards PBT: This product is not identified as a PBT/vPvB substance. Section 3: Composition/information on ingredients [cont...] SAFETY DATA SHEET pH NEUTRAL TOILET CLEANER Page: 2 3.2. Mixtures Contains: Fragrance D'Limonene Non ionic surfactant (Alcohol Ethoxylate) 1,2-Benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one Zinc Pyrithione Sodium Laureth Sulphate (Anionic Surfactant) Section 4: First aid measures 4.1. Description of first aid measures Eye contact: Bathe the eye with running water for 15 minutes. Ingestion: Do not induce vomiting.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Salinity Standards
    Water quality standards Electrical conductivity is a measure of the saltiness of the water and is measured on a scale from 0 to 50,000 uS/cm. Electrical conductivity is measured in microsiemens per centimeter (uS/cm). Freshwater is usually between 0 and 1,500 uS/cm and typical sea water has a conductivity value of about 50,000 uS/cm. Low levels of salts are found naturally in waterways and are important for plants and animals to grow. When salts reach high levels in freshwater it can cause problems for aquatic ecosystems and complicated human uses. μS/cm Use 0 - 800 • Good drinking water for humans (provided there is no organic pollution and not too much suspended clay material) • Generally good for irrigation, though above 300μS/cm some care must be, particularly with overhead sprinklers, which may cause leaf, scorch on some salt sensitive plants. • Suitable for all livestock 800 - 2500 • Can be consumed by humans, although most would prefer water in the lower half of this range if available • When used for irrigation, requires special management including suitable soils, good drainage and consideration of salt tolerance of plants • Suitable for all livestock 2500 -10,000 • Not recommended for human consumption, although water up to 3000 μS/cm can be consumed • Not normally suitable for irrigation, although water up to 6000 μS/cm can be used on very salt tolerant crops with very special management techniques. Over 6000 μS/cm, occasional emergency may be possible with care • When used for drinking water by poultry and pigs, the salinity should be limited to about 6000 μS/cm.
    [Show full text]