Regional Health Integration to Enhance Services-North, Lango

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Health Integration to Enhance Services-North, Lango Regional Health Integration to Enhance Services-North, Lango LQAS Survey Report May 2019 The Lango sub-region 2019 Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) Survey was conducted by the district government teams with technical and financial support from the Regional Health Integration to Enhance Services (RHITES-N, Lango), a five-year program funded by USAID, and the SITES Project. Disclaimer This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the responsibility of John Snow, Inc. (JSI) and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Contact Address: Additional information about the survey may be obtained from SITES; Telephone: +256 312264872/3; Email: [email protected]; [email protected]. Additional information about the survey may also be obtained from RHITES-N, Lango Email: [email protected]; [email protected]. Regional Health Integration to Enhance Services-North, Lango | 2019 LQAS STUDY SURVEY REPORT 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FORWORD ............................................................................................................................................ 5 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background Information ......................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objectives of the 2019 Lango sub-region LQAS Survey .............................................................. 7 1.3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3.1 Survey Design and Implementation............................................................................................ 7 1.3.2 Survey questionnaires ................................................................................................................ 8 1.3.9 Survey Response Rates and Data Processing .......................................................................... 10 2. SURVEY RESULTS ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.1 HIV SERVICES ............................................................................................................................. 19 2.1.1 HIV Testing Services ................................................................................................................ 19 2.1.2 Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission (PMTCT) Program........................................... 20 2.1.3 Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision...................................................................................... 22 2.1.4 Comprehensive HIV Knowledge .............................................................................................. 22 2.1.5 Sexual Behavior: Multiple Sexual Partners and Condom Use ................................................. 23 2.1.6 Early Initiation of Sexual Behavior ............................................................................................ 25 2.1.7 Stigma for HIV .......................................................................................................................... 26 TB Knowledge ................................................................................................................................... 26 Knowledge of Viral Load (VL) Testing and benefits ............................................................................. 27 2.1.8 Family Planning ......................................................................................................................... 28 2.1.9 Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) ................................................................................ 31 2.1.10 Malaria .................................................................................................................................... 34 2.1.11 Child Health ........................................................................................................................... 38 2.1.12 Maternal Health ...................................................................................................................... 42 2.1.13 Nutrition................................................................................................................................. 45 3. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................... 47 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................................ 50 Appendix 1: Knowledge and HIV Practices by Region, District and Year of LQAS survey ............. 50 Appendix 2: Lango Sub-Region LQAS Survey 2018 Results (disaggregated by districts and sex) ... 53 Regional Health Integration to Enhance Services-North, Lango | 2019 LQAS STUDY SURVEY REPORT 2 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: HTS coverage in the Lango sub-region -------------------------------------------------------------- 20 Figure 2: Percentage of individuals who were tested for HIV and received their result as a couple -- 20 Figure 3: Percentage of mothers of children (0-11 months) who were counseled and received an HIV test during the last pregnancy and know their results. --------------------------------------------------------- 21 Figure 4: Percentage of mothers of children 0-11 months who were counselled for PMTCT services during the last pregnancy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21 Figure 5: Percentage of the male youth 15-24 years who are circumcised --------------------------------- 22 Figure 6: Percentage of individuals who both correctly identify ways of preventing the sexual transmission of HIV and reject major misconceptions about HIV transmission -------------------------- 23 Figure 7: Percentage of individuals who had sex with more than one sexual partner in the last 12 months ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23 Figure 8: Percentage of adults aged 15-49 who had more than one sexual partner in the past 12 months who report the use of a condom during their last intercourse ------------------------------------------------ 24 Figure 9: Percentage of individuals who had sexual intercourse with a non-marital or non-cohabiting sexual partner in last 12 months and used a condom at last higher risk sex------------------------------ 24 Figure 10: Percentage of youth who have had sexual intercourse before the age of 15 ---------------- 25 Figure 11: Proportion of youth 15-49 years who have had sexual intercourse before the age of 15 --- 25 Figure 12: Percentage of women and men aged 15-49 who report discriminatory attitudes towards people living with HIV --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 Figure 13: Percentage of individuals who know how TB is transmitted ------------------------------------ 26 Figure 14: Percentage of individuals who know the risk of not completing TB treatment ------------- 27 Figure 15: Knowledge about Viral Load Testing by district. -------------------------------------------------- 28 Figure 16: Viral Load Testing Knowledge by sex --------------------------------------------------------------- 28 Figure 17: Percentage of sexually active women age 15-49 years who are using any modern method of family planning-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 29 Figure 18: Percentage of sexually active women age 15-49 years who are using any modern method of family planning-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 29 Figure 19: Percentage of women 15-49 years who want to use a FP method in the last 12 months but cannot access it ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 30 Figure 20: Percentage of men and women 15-49 years who are satisfied with family planning services -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 Figure 21: Percentage households with latrine or toilet ------------------------------------------------------ 31 Figure 22: Percentage of individuals who wash their hands with soap after visiting the toilet --------- 32 Figure 23: percentage of individuals who wash their hands with soap after visiting the toilet, LQAS Survey 2019. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32 Figure 24: Percentage of households with safe water supply ------------------------------------------------ 33 Figure 25: Percentage of households with soap and water at a handwashing station commonly used by family members ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 33 Figure 26: percentage of households with soap and water at a hand washing station commonly used by family members in 2019 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 34 Figure 27: Percent of households in target areas practicing correct use of recommended household water treatment technologies -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recommended publications
  • Contract Farming, Smallholders and Commercialization of Agriculture in Uganda: the Case of Sorghum, Sunflower, and Rice Contract Farming Schemes
    Center of Evaluation for Global Action Working Paper Series Agriculture for Development Paper No. AfD-0907 Issued in July 2009 Contract Farming, Smallholders and Commercialization of Agriculture in Uganda: The Case of Sorghum, Sunflower, and Rice Contract Farming Schemes. Gabriel Elepu Imelda Nalukenge Makerere University This paper is posted at the eScholarship Repository, University of California. http://repositories.cdlib.org/cega/afd Copyright © 2009 by the author(s). Series Description: The CEGA AfD Working Paper series contains papers presented at the May 2009 Conference on “Agriculture for Development in Sub-Saharan Africa,” sponsored jointly by the African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) and CEGA. Recommended Citation: Elepu, Gabriel and Nalukenge, Imelda. (2009) Contract Farming, Smallholders and Commercialization of Agriculture in Uganda: The Case of Sorghum, Sunflower, and Rice Contract Farming Schemes. CEGA Working Paper Series No. AfD-0907. Center of Evaluation for Global Action. University of California, Berkeley. Contract Farming, Smallholders and Commercialization of Agriculture in Uganda: The Case of Sorghum, Sunflower, and Rice Contract Farming Schemes. Gabriel Elepu1∗ and Imelda Nalukenge2 1Lecturer in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Makerere University, Kampala. 2Lecturer (Deceased) in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Makerere University, Kampala. ABSTRACT: Contract farming has expanded in Uganda due to the promotional efforts of various actors: private, public, and/or international aid agencies. While motives for promoting contract farming may vary by actor, it is argued in this study that contract farming is crucial in the commercialization of smallholder agriculture and hence, poverty reduction in Uganda. However, smallholder farmers in Uganda have reportedly experienced some contractual problems when dealing with large agribusiness firms, resulting in them giving up contract farming.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security and Livelihoods Assessment Lango Sub-Region
    April 2011 Food Security and Livelihoods Assessment Lango Sub-region Uganda ACF USA, Food Security and Livelihoods Assessment, April 2011 Uganda TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 1. Background ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.1. Purpose of the survey ................................................................................................................................ 11 1.2. Methods of the survey ............................................................................................................................... 12 2. Findings of the survey ......................................................................................................................................... 13 2.1. Demographic information .......................................................................................................................... 13 2.2. Household Dietary diversity and food sources .......................................................................................... 19 2.3. Household expenditures ............................................................................................................................ 25 2.4. Income sources and household assets ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Regional Reconciliation in Northern Uganda
    Mapping Regional Reconciliation in Northern Uganda: A Case Study of the Acholi and Lango Sub-Regions Shilpi Shabdita Okwir Isaac Odiya Mapping Regional Reconciliation in Northern Uganda © 2015, Justice and Reconciliation Project, Gulu, Uganda All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of this publication should be made to: Justice and Reconciliation Project Plot 50 Lower Churchill Drive, Laroo Division P.O. Box 1216 Gulu, Uganda, East Africa [email protected] Layout by Lindsay McClain Opiyo Front cover photo by Shilpi Shabdita Printed by the Justice and Reconciliation Project, Gulu, Uganda This publication was supported by a grant from USAID SAFE Program. However, the opinions and viewpoints in the report is not that of USAID SAFE Program. ii Justice and Reconciliation Project Acknowledgements This report was made possible with a grant from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Supporting Access to Justice, Fostering Equity and Peace (SAFE) Program for the initiation of the year-long project titled, “Across Ethnic Boundaries: Promoting Regional Reconciliation in Acholi and Lango Sub-Regions,” for which the Justice and Reconciliation Project (JRP) gratefully acknowledges their support. We are deeply indebted to Boniface Ojok, Head of Office at JRP, for his inspirational leadership and sustained guidance in this initiative. Special thanks to the enumerators Abalo Joyce, Acan Grace, Nyeko Simon, Ojimo Tycoon, Akello Paska Oryema and Adur Patritia Julu for working tirelessly to administer the opinion survey and to collect data, which has formed the blueprint of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Otuke District Local Government
    CALL TO ACTION THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA NUTRITION CHALLENGES/ GAPS CALL FOR ACTION RESPONSIBLE Otuke District Nutrition coordination committee Otuke was also supported to conduct a Food GOVERNANCE AREA OFFICE (DNCC), seven (7) Sub counties and One Security and Nutrition Assessments (FSNA). OTUKE DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT Coordination and Weak coordination mechanisms of Partner mapping required to know who DNFP, CAO Town council trained on multi sectoral nutrition FSNA data was not available previously partnerships: nutrition actions at all levels. is where and doing what. DNCC/SNCC ADVOCACY BRIEF ON STRENGTHENING NUTRITION GOVERNANCE FOR MULTI-SECTORAL RESPONSE implementation for improved nutrition unavailable therefore this first FSNA data will members need to be oriented on their outcomes. be used as a baseline to compare progress roles and responsibilities in achievement of health, nutrition and WASH The district conducted quarterly DNCC meetings Establish joint planning and strategic indicators in subsequent FSNAs. Annual FSNAs and support supervision activities aimed at coordination mechanisms amongst will be conducted to assess annual progress. strengthening the accountability framework for partners in the district to reduce on Multisectoral nutrition actions implemented in The Otuke DNCC has been trained on nutrition duplication of resources and achieve sustainable results Otuke district. governance and supported to use reporting templates and monitoring tools previously Systems capacity Lack of clarity on nutrition sensitive Orientation
    [Show full text]
  • WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN
    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 eHEALTH MONTHLY BULLETIN Welcome to this 1st issue of the eHealth Bulletin, a production 2015 of the WHO Country Office. Disease October November December This monthly bulletin is intended to bridge the gap between the Cholera existing weekly and quarterly bulletins; focus on a one or two disease/event that featured prominently in a given month; pro- Typhoid fever mote data utilization and information sharing. Malaria This issue focuses on cholera, typhoid and malaria during the Source: Health Facility Outpatient Monthly Reports, Month of December 2015. Completeness of monthly reporting DHIS2, MoH for December 2015 was above 90% across all the four regions. Typhoid fever Distribution of Typhoid Fever During the month of December 2015, typhoid cases were reported by nearly all districts. Central region reported the highest number, with Kampala, Wakiso, Mubende and Luweero contributing to the bulk of these numbers. In the north, high numbers were reported by Gulu, Arua and Koti- do. Cholera Outbreaks of cholera were also reported by several districts, across the country. 1 Visit our website www.whouganda.org and follow us on World Health Organization, Uganda @WHOUganda WHO UGANDA eHEALTH BULLETIN February 2016 Typhoid District Cholera Kisoro District 12 Fever Kitgum District 4 169 Abim District 43 Koboko District 26 Adjumani District 5 Kole District Agago District 26 85 Kotido District 347 Alebtong District 1 Kumi District 6 502 Amolatar District 58 Kween District 45 Amudat District 11 Kyankwanzi District
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Status & Results
    The World Bank Report No: ISR13907 Implementation Status & Results Uganda Second Northern Uganda Social Action Fund Project (NUSAF2) (P111633) Operation Name: Second Northern Uganda Social Action Fund Project Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 8 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 03-May-2014 (NUSAF2) (P111633) Public Disclosure Authorized Country: Uganda Approval FY: 2009 Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Public Disclosure Copy Board Approval Date 28-May-2009 Original Closing Date 31-Aug-2014 Planned Mid Term Review Date 30-Jan-2012 Last Archived ISR Date 19-Nov-2013 Effectiveness Date 25-Nov-2009 Revised Closing Date 31-Aug-2014 Actual Mid Term Review Date 14-Jun-2013 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) To improve access of beneficiary households in Northern Uganda to income earning opportunities and better basic socio-economic services. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Livelihood Investment Support 60.00 Community Infrastructure Rehabilitation 30.00 Institutional Development 10.00 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Risk Rating Implementation Status Overview The NUSAF II project originally planned to finance 9750 (i.e. 8000 Household Income Support (HIS), 1000 Public Works (PW) and 750 Community Infrastructure Rehabilitation) sub projects in the five year of its implementation period. As of February 3, 2013 a total of 8,764 subprojects (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Programme Update
    EMERGENCY AND HUMANITARIAN ACTION, UGANDA APRIL 200 9 Monthly Programme Update Highlights ♦ Under surge capacity organised by IST/AFRO, supported cholera control in Zimbabwe and VHF training in Zambia. ♦ Continued supporting the second round of Polio supplemental immunization activities continued in northern Uganda, Karamoja and Kamapla with an achievement of over 100 % coverage ♦ Continued supporting Hepatitis E epidemic in Kitgum district ♦ Support to Dokolo district in sleeping sickness control 1. General Situation: Political, Social and Security ♦ Security situation in northern Ugandan districts continued being stable ♦ In Karamoja the security situation remained stable on the roads although raids and other criminal activities continue to be reported in many places of the region. ♦ Disarmament initiated by the government in Karamoja is ongoing 2. Programme Implementation a. Activities Emergency Health, Nutrition and HIV/AIDS Response Project (Sida) In Kitgum District the programme; ♦ Continued to provide technical support towards Hepatitis E interventions to support/ guide sub- county activities including supervision A who staff assists health workers arrange vaccines used for the 2nd round of mass Polio campaigns. of VHTs to enhance community mobilization and public health education. ♦ Finicailly supported VHTs and CBDs with incentives to enable them perform health education/promotion and inspection, establishing completed latrines and tracing for Hepatitis E patients. ♦ Techinically and logistically supported the Polio supplemental immunization. In Gulu and Amuru ♦ Technically and logistically supported Gulu and Amuru districts with the 2nd round of mass Polio campaigns In Pader District, WHO/HAC ♦ Continued to technically support the district health team to coordinate, supervise and monitor Hepatitis E epidemic control interventions by organizing weekly coordination meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Going To
    % Funding going to Funding Country Name KP‐led Timeline Partner Name Sub‐awardees SNU1 PSNU MER Structural Interventions Allocated Organizations HTS_TST Quarterly stigma & discrimination HTS_TST_NEG meetings; free mental services to HTS_TST_POS KP clients; access to legal services PrEP_CURR for KP PLHIV PrEP_ELIGIBLE Centro de Orientacion e PrEP_NEW Dominican Republic $ 1,000,000.00 88.4% MOSCTHA, Esperanza y Caridad, MODEMU Region 0 Distrito Nacional Investigacion Integral (COIN) PrEP_SCREEN TX_CURR TX_NEW TX_PVLS (D) TX_PVLS (N) TX_RTT Gonaives HTS_TST KP sensitization focusing on Artibonite Saint‐Marc HTS_TST_NEG stigma & discrimination, Nord Cap‐Haitien HTS_TST_POS understanding sexual orientation Croix‐des‐Bouquets KP_PREV & gender identity, and building Leogane PrEP_CURR clinical providers' competency to PrEP_CURR_VERIFY serve KP FY19Q4‐ KOURAJ, ACESH, AJCCDS, ANAPFEH, APLCH, CHAAPES, PrEP_ELIGIBLE Haiti $ 1,000,000.00 83.2% FOSREF FY21Q2 HERITAGE, ORAH, UPLCDS PrEP_NEW Ouest PrEP_NEW_VERIFY Port‐au‐Prince PrEP_SCREEN TX_CURR TX_CURR_VERIFY TX_NEW TX_NEW_VERIFY Bomu Hospital Affiliated Sites Mombasa County Mombasa County not specified HTS_TST Kitui County Kitui County HTS_TST_NEG CHS Naishi Machakos County Machakos County HTS_TST_POS Makueni County Makueni County KP_PREV CHS Tegemeza Plus Muranga County Muranga County PrEP_CURR EGPAF Timiza Homa Bay County Homa Bay County PrEP_CURR_VERIFY Embu County Embu County PrEP_ELIGIBLE Kirinyaga County Kirinyaga County HWWK Nairobi Eastern PrEP_NEW Tharaka Nithi County Tharaka Nithi County
    [Show full text]
  • Lira District HRV Profile.Indd
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA Lira District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profi le 2016 Lira District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profi le i ii Lira District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profi le CONTENTS Contents ..................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................. iv List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iv Acronyms.....................................................................................................................v Acknowledgment ....................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary...................................................................................................viii Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 Objectives ....................................................................................................................1 Methodology ................................................................................................................1 Brief overview of the district.........................................................................................4 Location and size.........................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • (4) of the Constitution Providing for Creation of New Counties
    AMMENDED MOTTON FOR RESOLUTTON OF PARLTAMENT UNDER ARTTCLE 179 (4) OF THE CONSTITUTION PROVIDING FOR CREATION OF NEW COUNTIES WHEREAS, Ariicle 179 (a) of the Constitution of the Republic of Ugondo (os omended) provides for the criterio for olterotion of boundories oflor creotion of Administrotive Units including new Counties; AND WHEREAS Section 7 (7) of the Locql Governments Act Cop. 243, (os omended) empowers Porlioment to opprove olternotion of Boundories of/or creotion of o new County; Honoroble Colleogues willTHUS, recoll thot on Tuesdoy 30rn June, 2020,1 moved o motion on the floor of Porlioment for creotion of I5 (Fitteen) Counties thot were opproved by Cobinet hoving received requests from the District Councils of; Kiboole, Kotokwi, Agogo, lsingiro, Kisoro, Nokoseke, Kibogo, Buhweju, Lomwo, Kokumiro, Nokopiripirit, Mubende, Kwonio, Tororo ond Jinjo to creote the following Counties: - l) Buyanja Eost County out of Buyanjo County in Kibaale Distric[ 2) Ngoriom Covnty out of Usuk County in Kotakwi; 3) Agago Wesf County out of Agogo County in Agogo District; 4) Bukonga Norfh County out of Bukongo County in lsingiro District; 5) Bukimbiri County out of Bufumbira County in Kisoro District; 6) Nokoseke Centrol County out of Nokoseke Norfh County in Nokoseke Disfricf 7) Kibogo Wesf County out of Kibogo Eost County in Kbogo District; B) Buhweju West County aut of Buhweju County in Buhweju District; 9) Palobek County out of Lamwo County in Lamwo District; lA)BugongoiziSouth County out of BugongoiziWest County in Kokumiro Districf; I l)Chekwi Eosf County out of Chekwi County in Nokopiripirit District; l2)Buweku/o Soufh County out of Buweku/o County in Mubende Disfricf, l3)Kwanio Norfh County out of Kwonio Counfy in Kwonio Dislricf l )West Budomo Central County out of Wesf Budomo County inTororo Districf; l5)Kogomo Norfh County out of Kogomo County in Jinjo Districf.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency and Humanitarian Action (EHA), Uganda Weekly Activity Report
    Emergency and Humanitarian Action (EHA), Uganda Weekly Activity Report I. General Situation a. Political, Social and Security; • DRC; Joint incursion on LRA base in Garamba by the armed forces from DRC, Sudan Week 11, and Uganda has ended. 1st bunch of Uganda soldiers have returned to Uganda. Report indicates that the incursion has succeeded in reducing the strength of LRA by 80%. • 9th to 15th March Acholi and Lango sub-region; the region is calm; population movement from IDP to 2009 village of origin is ongoing. • Karamoja sub-regio; Cattle raids by armed Karamojong worriers reported. The region is in security phase III. b. Main Events of Interest/Concern for Health • Mop up mass Polio immunization campaign was successfully conducted in Amuru district in epi-week 11 • Preparation for the first round of mass Polio immunization campaign is ongoing in 29 high risk districts in Uganda. II. Analysis and Health Consequences (Health Problems and Needs of Affected Population) Malaria: Lango; Lira district continues to report higher number of cases of clinical malaria in 2009 as compared to 2008. Apac district reports lower numbers of clinical malaria in 2009 as compared to 2008. See figure I below for details. Acholi, Kitgum and Pader districts continue to register low number of cases of clinical malaria in 2009 as compared to 2008. See figure II below. Highlights Polio immunization campaign was successfully conducted in Amuru district. Coverage of 150% was registered. Plans to conduct first round of Polio vaccination in 29 districts in Uganda from 23rd to 26th April is progressing well. Karamoja sub-regions; The number of cases of clinical malaria reported and the trend in 2009 is similar to that of 2008 for the same epi-week.
    [Show full text]
  • Lira District Local Government Councils' Scorecard FY 2018/19
    lirA DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT council SCORECARD assessment FY 2018/19 lira DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT council SCORECARD assessment FY 2018/19 L-R: Ms. Rose Gamwera, Secretary General ULGA; Mr. Ben Kumumanya, PS. MoLG and Dr. Arthur Bainomugisha, Executive Director ACODE in a group photo with award winners at the launch of the 8th Local Government Councils Scorecard Report FY 2018/19 at Hotel Africana in Kampala on 10th March 2020 with 89 parishes and 751 villages. By 1.0 Introduction 2020, Lira’s population is projected to be This brief was developed from the scorecard at 465,900; 230,400 male and 248,100 report titled, “The Local Government female (UBOS, 2018). Councils Scorecard FY 2018/19. The Next Big Steps: Consolidating Gains of Decentralisation and Repositioning the 1.2 The Local Government Councils Local Government Sector in Uganda”. Scorecard Initiative (LGCSCI) The brief provides key highlights of the The main building blocks in LGCSCI are performance of elected leaders and the principles and core responsibilities of Council of Lira District Local Government Local Governments as set out in Chapter during the FY2018/19. 11 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, the Local Governments Act (CAP 1.1 Brief about the district 243) under Section 10 (c), (d) and (e). The scorecard comprises of five parameters Lira district is located in the northern part based on the core responsibilities of of Uganda; bordered by Dokolo district in the local government Councils, District the south, Apac district and Kole district in Chairpersons, Speakers and Individual the west, Pader district and Otuke district Councillors.
    [Show full text]