DOCSLIB.ORG

Utlook Iowa Deer Hunting 1963

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Utlook Iowa Deer Hunting 1963 December, 1963 Number 12 utlook Iowa Deer Hunting 1963 Tom Ba llard >U are one of Iowa's 12,000 shotgun deer hunters, you had better your weapons there is a tecord crop of whitetails to be hunted • ason. pects are \'cry good for another record deer har\'est. Last win­ ~ ost-season deer count was 23 per cent abo\'e that of 1962 and 50 per cent greater than the a\'erage since 1958. means one thing to you deer hunters- an estimated 33,200 deer sue this month. That figure makes a bag limit of "one" dl•cr ~!mple and easy to fill doesn't it? But, let's not kid ourscl\'<'S tsive Iowa whitetail isn't that easy to put in our sights. L gun hunters have found dtiving or still huntmg and stands to 'ductive methods for taldng their hm1t. The bO\\hunlers, and :>hotgunners as well, have been usmg the tree stand to advantage. La~t Year Be.,t Yet '62 gun season \\'as the best yet wtth 4,281 licensed hunters tak­ . nison home. The total deer kill was 5 703; this includes deer : by all methods gun, bow. licensed hunter and landowner. 1 1962 hunter-success ratio is another encouraging figure : 52 • 1t for licensed farmers and 41 per cent for urban hunters. That's · ~ pretty close to a 50:50 chance for getting venison into the this winter. Considering the warm weather and lack of snow .!cember, Iowa deer hunters did very well. tty by county populat10n estimates are much the same as last xcepting the general inct ease in herd size. Forty-one counties • ted as having a high deer population and only a dozen arc rcla­ • low. Top Fin• Counti e~ counties contmue to have the top deer herds: Allamakcc, :>htek and Clayton to the northeast, with P ottawattamie and 1 a on our western border. A total of 1,044 deer were taken from ive counties by hunters last year, nearly 25 per cent of the total 11 the state. • \ I, comprising 25 counties in the northwest to north central ~ s limited to two days of hunting December 14-15. Two days' 111 g pressure 1s deemed necessary to avoid any possibility of over­ , tg t his area of limtted deer range. ~' II counties will be open the 14th, 15th and 16th Nearly onc­ r >f the whitetails taken m 1962 were bagged on the third day, c t put that shotgun away Sunday evening, that old monarch \a,;ttll ' •phy rack may come strolling past your stand Monday. Di.,ea!>e tudy Itl Joperation wtth the Conservation Commtssion, the I owa Veteri­ t l edical Associat10n and the Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit ·king for the deer hunter's help in attempting a study of deer bl s. All you need do is drop the deer heart in the plastic bag that ~ ·ovided with your license, fill out the enclosed tag, tie the bag tll1e tag and take it to the nearest veterinarian withm 24 hour:-. I do the rest. Research, management, and hunter cooperation " een among the essenttals in achieving our past ten successful 11 •asons. ~ t ~orget to send in those report cards. They provtde valua.blc . a t10n that is used in the management programs for hunlmg h!<l, i to come. According to the 1962 report cards, 38.8 hours of ll.!u~ ~ were required for each deer bagged, the average hunter saw t '( deer during the season, and a slightly higher percentage of ~J ". killed their deer in the morning. h • ~ nng or evening, first day or third, Iowa deer hunters should I ' nother record-breaking deer season this month. Jim Shennan Photo, IOWA CONSERVATIONIST Pogo 90 1 w C bench and nve islands to be con­ Cooperate with Hunters a 0 n s e r vat; 0 n; s t 0 No December 1963 12 stntctcd. I• r om tlw 1()\Ht F a rm Burf>au ~pok t>.., m a n Vol . 22 J\ ppro\'OI was gn•en for t hl• rc­ J I Publ'\h d monthly bv tht' Stl'lte Conservoti.,'l "l'lwasant huntmg Sl 1son ,.,tarts on ~o,embet 9 and th1s pro\ lcasl' ol an l'aSPmenl on a lot Co'Tl'TIIssion E>~st 7th and Court Avenue. Des an exct>llent opporlumty to promote better relationships wtlh Mo l't'S low11 Address oil rr o I (s\Jbscriptions, on Blnl'lt Hnwlt Lake in Sac chonq of odd<ess, Form 3579 rnonuscripts, t County. urban cousins. rrc1 I tt'ms) •o street oddress obove. "If responsible huntl•rs ask permission to hunt on your lands t Subsc.r pt'o'l price: two veors at $1.00 Thl• Commission authorized s(' ond c oss postoge poid ot tht'm this opportunity 1f at all possible. If you'll cooperate wtth th De\ Moines, lowo fl'IH'lllg to hl' plaC'ed around the (No Rights Reserved) COJH'l'l'tc c·l'ipplcd d1ildn•n's tt·ail tht \ II worl< with you. 'S\11 e, there arc smm• citv hunters who violate the rules of g HAROLD E HUGHES Governor l<watl•d in l\lat•go Frankt•l \\'oods E B. SPEAKER, Director spot tsmanship. But you don't want to be judged as a farmer by JAMES R SHERM AN , Editor Slate Pari<. actions of a few irresponsible rural residents. Therefore. don't l.lt DENNIS L. REHDER. Monag'ng Editor Camping fl•cs of .. U)O for im­ TOM BALLARD CAR"' BUCKMAN"l all hunters by the actions of a few. JACK K P E N C b nq Ed t prm'l'<l eamp grounds on twenty­ "Il n11ght be an Pxtra bother for vou to allow some hunters to '' MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION six stall' pa rl<s wne estn hlishcd, eli on through the corn fields. But it you'll show the extra effort. the hun EARL E CIAR /I', CI>.J 'l N' beginning Apnl 1 1!161 with other SHERRY R. !=I::>HER, \ C:Jaorm~n- will thmk more highly of you as an individual and farmers as a g101 .Des Mo nt'S areas to C'hargl' 1s before. Cabin SpokuwHm ROBERT E BEEBE ... .. - Sio~.ox City This recent editorial in the points up the long-term tJ N. K KINNEY ldo Grove rates at Pitw Lakl' were estab­ toward good hunter-landowner relatwnships in Iowa. 1-fore and rr LAURENCE N NELSON Bellevue lished n t ~a5 . 00 a week and a ED WEINHEI MER . Greenfield 10\\.'IWS arc coming to realize that the farmer and the sport~man MIKE F. ZACK Meso'l C tv pricc of 25 C'l•nts a bundle was not in opposition. In tact, we count a great many farmers among CIRCULATION THIS ISSUE 52 ,000 l'Stuhlbhed for lin•woocl to be sold most enthusiastic hunters. Although not required by law, many f m st Ill p. rk!-. COMMISSION ers purcha:;e a hunting licen:;e each year. "I know I don't nel ( Ol Y l \ ( 0" " ' H \ ATIO~ license on my own lund," said one farmer during the recent phe MINUTES \ ( 1 n 1'1 n " opening-, "but, utter all, buying a license is just a part of huntmg \ Grundy C• n y received apprO\'­ me I always hn \'E.' one." D t•.., ' l oine'> nl for th<:> tu•quisttion of th·e acres It 1s mdCl'll commonplace in Iowa to find the farmer and the " OH ' lllbt'r .), 1963 ot land hy 2!)-yc_>al' lt·a~P at an man one and the same. F l ...., H .AXD GA'lE annual C'Ost of .. 1n pc_>r year called Appro\al \\as gi\'en to initiate the Com ad QUIUTY wh1ch will in­ acres of land suhjeC'l to thl' ap­ Animal Superstitio1 clude a one ncn• Jake to be used proval ot tht E ·ecutt\'e Council. condemnation proceedings on a BEAR ten-acre area of the ::vliami Lake for tishing with pil'nicking facili­ <·L"hH \ L Ever heard of a beat hug" stte in Monroe County. til'.S. The Commt swn 1 ppoin tPd six ular fiction has it that whr­ The Chief Fish and Game ga \'e Linn County rl'cci\'ccl appro\'al spcdal pohCl' ofliccn; from the bear attacks. it first seizes ill> a report on lhe status of Triboji fm· tlw :H•qutsilion of 162 acres ot tl ~taft and fmu· SJH'Cial police offi­ tim and squeezes him to death Beach on West Okoboji Lake. land at a total cost of ::;18,750, cei'S among Uw walct safely pa- a "bear hug," then devours The Comm1ssion met wilh Har­ located on the C'<>clat' Ri\·er one trol. But there is no evidencE' to old Kastor of Clear Lake to dis­ mile downstream from the l\ an­ Tra vl' l was a ppl'Ovecl for var- pol'l this at all. Bears ktll cuss lhe law concerning trappin~ hoe Bricl~c on Stale Highway ~o their front paws aided by r in muskrat houses and clarify an 1. This ar<'<l to he used fot boat ious stall members and commis­ sioners to Fergus l<,alls, Minne- and teeth. (A beat· is Jmo\\ Attorney General's opinion con­ launching, ri\·cr aecess, fishing. sot a: Pipestone, ~linnesota: a break the neck of a bison hull cerning such llapping picnicking, campin~ . nature study and hunlin~ . forestry meeting at Indianapolis. a single blow.) LA-..;O.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Commentary: Affectional Preference on Film: Giggle and Lib Joseph J
    Bridgewater Review Volume 1 | Issue 2 Article 9 Dec-1982 Cultural Commentary: Affectional Preference on Film: Giggle and Lib Joseph J. Liggera Bridgewater State College Recommended Citation Liggera, Joseph J. (1982). Cultural Commentary: Affectional Preference on Film: Giggle and Lib. Bridgewater Review, 1(2), 21-22. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/br_rev/vol1/iss2/9 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. CULTURAL COMMENTARY Affectional Preference on Film: Giggle and Lib omantic attachments on screen the romantic man whose passionate desire With the great artist abandoning R these days require at least a hint of is for a person unquestionably of the romantic love--Bergman has lately something kinky to draw the pop audience opposite sex. So straight are his lusts that announced that his next two films will be his which in the days of yesteryear thrilled to no one seemed to notice the dilemma posed last--leaving the field to an oddity like Allen Bogart and Bacall, but which now winks in Manhattan of a man in his mid-forties or television's "Love Boat", the pop knowingly at Julie Andrews in drag. having physical congress with a fifteen year audience, which never warmed to Bergman Something equally aberrant, in fact moreso, old. This year, A -Midsummer Night's Sex or his like anyway, might find solace in Blake more blatant and proselytizing, quickens Comedy renders two points of sexual Edwards, an intriguing director whose last the mental loins of the liberal film-going metaphysics for those still lost in memories three films and his wife's, Julie Andrews, mind; anything less denies the backbone of a gender-differentiated past, the first changing image in them illustrate a syn­ upon which liberal sentiments are oddly enough insisted upon by the women: if thesis of audience demands with a structured.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2011 OFFICIAL) ##&'!4#( ) MAGAZINE of BACKCOUNTRY%)/(.,3"/(
    #"$,$06/53: TM +063/"- Winter 2011 OFFICIAL) ##&'!4#() MAGAZINE OF BACKCOUNTRY%)/(.,3"/(.,-((!&,- HUNTERS AND ANGLERS "ACKCOUNTRYBANNERINDD !- BC Moose Hunt EAGLE POINT, OR POINT, EAGLE PERMIT NO. 09 NO. PERMIT U.S. POSTAGE PAID POSTAGE U.S. NON-PROFIT ORG. NON-PROFIT EXECUTIVE DIREctor’s NOTE By Jim Akenson and stepped up enforcement activities fo- BHA roars cusing on protecting habitat from abuse and overuse by off-highway vehicles. Colorado and Washington have been into 2011! focusing on their states wilderness and roadless area protection issues. s we enter 2011, I wonder how Throughout the West, BHA has be- the conservation efforts of today come a powerful voice for sportsmen pro- would score with our forefa- tecting the public lands and waterways Athers of a century ago. Would Theodore that support our outdoor traditions. As Roosevelt or Aldo Leopold say our ef- Executive Director Jim Akenson has set our membership expands, we are also ex- forts are on target? up BHA world headquarters in Joseph, panding our geographic scope, cultivat- I imagine they would be proud of Oregon, gateway to great backcountry. ing opportunities to protect wild places the current land protection status with a in the Appalachian states and hopefully fairly robust wilderness system, and the of John Gale from Colorado. John has someday the great swamps and bayous of general recovery of “huntable” wildlife been serving as a Co-Chair of the Colo- the Deep South. The list goes on and on populations across this country’s rural rado Chapter and he’ll continue that task – wherever there remains wild country landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Arizona Hunting Regulations
    Arizona Game and Fish Department 2020-2021 Arizona Hunting Regulations This publication includes the annual regulations for statewide hunting of deer, fall turkey, fall javelina, bighorn sheep, fall bison, fall bear, mountain lion, small game and other huntable wildlife. The hunt permit application deadline is Tuesday, June 9, 2020, at 11:59 p.m. Arizona time. Purchase Arizona hunting licenses and apply for the draw online at azgfd.gov. Report wildlife violations, call: 800-352-0700 Two other annual hunt draw booklets are published for the spring big game hunts and elk and pronghorn hunts. i Unforgettable Adventures. Feel-Good Savings. Heed the call of adventure with great insurance coverage. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on motorcycle insurance. geico.com | 1-800-442-9253 | Local Office Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states, in all GEICO companies, or in all situations. Motorcycle and ATV coverages are underwritten by GEICO Indemnity Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, DC 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2019 GEICO ii ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT — AZGFD.GOV AdPages2019.indd 4 4/20/2020 11:49:25 AM AdPages2019.indd 5 2020-2021 ARIZONA HUNTING4/20/2020 REGULATIONS 11:50:24 AM 1 Arizona Game and Fish Department Key Contacts MAIN NUMBER: 602-942-3000 Choose 1 for known extension or name Choose 2 for draw, bonus points, and hunting and fishing license information Choose 3 for watercraft Choose 4 for regional
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Deer in California
    HUNTING DEER IN CALIFORNIA We hope this guide will help deer hunters by encouraging a greater understanding of the various subspecies of mule deer found in California and explaining effective hunting techniques for various situations and conditions encountered throughout the state during general and special deer seasons. Second Edition August 2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME L. Ryan Broddrick, Director WILDLIFE PROGRAMS BRANCH David S. Zezulak, Ph.D., Chief Written by John Higley Technical Advisors: Don Koch; Eric Loft, Ph.D.; Terry M. Mansfield; Kenneth Mayer; Sonke Mastrup; Russell C. Mohr; David O. Smith; Thomas B. Stone Graphic Design and Layout: Lorna Bernard and Dana Lis Cover Photo: Steve Guill Funded by the Deer Herd Management Plan Implementation Program TABLE OF CON T EN T S INTRODUCT I ON ................................................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1: THE DEER OF CAL I FORN I A .........................................................................................................7 Columbian black-tailed deer ....................................................................................................................8 California mule deer ................................................................................................................................8 Rocky Mountain mule deer .....................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Pheasant Hunt
    YOUTH HUNTING OPPORTUNITIES Selected Wildlife TAKE A KID HUNTING Management Areas for the Pheasant Youth Pheasant Hunt Hunt: November 6, 2004 Saturday, Nov. 6, 2004 Guided Open Open The 2004 Take a Kid Hunting Pheasant Hunt WMA Morning After All will allow properly licensed hunters with a valid 1 pm Day youth license to hunt on one of nine stocked Whittingham X X Wildlife Management Areas (WMA) on Saturday Black River X X morning, Nov. 6, 2004. In a cooperative effort A proud hunter with his Flatbrook X between the Division of Fish and Wildlife and Youth Pheasant Hunt quarry. Clinton X X the NJ State Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs, Assunpink X X volunteer hunting mentors with trained bird dogs will guide youth hunters on a pheasant Colliers Mills X X hunt. This experience will increase the young hunters’ opportunity for harvesting a Glassboro X Millville X X pheasant in a setting which encourages responsible and safe hunting practices. Peaslee X X All participants must pre-register and be accompanied to the check-in by a parent or guardian. Parents or guardians are welcomed and encouraged to follow the hunters Guided: Pre-registration required. through the fields. All pre-registered hunters will receive an information packet. One Open—Afternoon: Any youth hunter with session will be offered, starting at 7 a.m. a valid youth hunting license accompanied Only 50 youth hunters will be allowed on each WMA during each session. If the by a licensed, non-shooting adult (aged number of applicants exceeds the number of slots available, a random drawing will be 21 or older), will be permitted to hunt on held to select participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Deer Plan Cover 09-18.Cdr
    Maryland White-tailed Deer Plan 2009-2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) currently garner more attention than any other wildlife species in Maryland. Wildlife-watchers, photographers and hunters contribute millions of dollars each year to the state’s economy while pursuing deer. At the same time, deer are responsible for Maryland’s farmers and other citizens sustaining millions of dollars worth of damage to crops, landscaping and vehicles. Managing the deer population to satisfy recreational interests, while at the same time reducing damage concerns, is a challenging and controversial process. White-tailed deer were plentiful in Maryland at the time of settlement in the 1600s. However, market- hunting and habitat destruction nearly extirpated deer from the state by 1900. The early 1900s through the 1960s was a period of population restoration and deer proliferated due to ideal habitat conditions and the protection of female deer from harvest. By the 1980s, management philosophies across much of the state changed from restoring deer to stabilizing and reducing deer numbers. Active management of deer is a necessity in Maryland today if we are to maintain population levels compatible with the varied interests of the citizens of the state. As an evolutionary prey species, deer exhibit a high fecundity rate, enabling them to rapidly increase in number. Presently, non-lethal management techniques (such as contraceptives) and non-hunting mortality (disease, injuries and predators) are not sufficient to maintain deer populations at satisfactory levels. The lethal control of deer via regulated hunting remains the most effective way to balance the deer population with environmental and cultural concerns on a landscape scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Bear Information Sheet
    Maine Chapter of The Wildlife Society Excellence In Wildlife Stewardship Through Science and Education The Maine Chapter of The Wildlife Society (MeTWS), established in 1976, is a local membership organization of The Wildlife Society, an international non-profit scientific and educational association dedicated to excellence in wildlife stewardship through science and education. The mission of MeTWS is to enhance the ability of wildlife professionals to conserve diversity, sustain productivity, and ensure responsible use of wildlife resources for the benefit of society. The membership of MeTWS includes approximately 120 wildlife professionals and other concerned individuals employed by government agencies, academic institutions, private firms, and non-governmental organizations, working to promote sound stewardship of wildlife resources throughout Maine. MAINE BLACK BEAR POPULATION INFORMATION April 16, 2004 Current Bear Status in Maine Black bears exist throughout the state with the exception of the extreme south-coastal region of the state. 23,000 bears are estimated to inhabit the state. Maine has the largest population of black bears of any state in the eastern U.S., and one of the largest populations within the lower-48. Regulated hunting and trapping are the primary methods used to manage the number of bears in the population. Black bears are an important component of the state’s ecosystem, and are valued by society, including hunters and non-hunters. Management History State legislature has the authority to enact laws to regulate bear populations, but practical aspects of implementing regulations were transferred to the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (MDIFW) in 1972. Bears were bountied from 1770-1957; considered a pest species until 1931 (no closed season); a short season was established and opened coincidentally with the deer season from 1931-1941; year-round open season was reinstituted from 1942-1965; season lengths and harvests have changed since 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • Elk Neck State Park Hunting 2020-2021 Rules, Regulations And
    Elk Neck State Park Hunting 2021-2022 Rules, Regulations and Policies 1. Bow hunters are required to wear fluorescent orange or daylight fluorescent pink during shotgun and muzzleloader seasons and Junior Hunt Day: a. October 21 – October 30, November 27 – December 11, December 18, 2021 – January 1, 2022 and January 7 – January 8, 2022. b. Junior Hunt Day: November 13, 2021. 2. All deer harvested count toward the state bag limits. 3. Shooting Hours a. ½ hour before sunrise to ½ hour after sunset. b. Hunters are permitted in the hunting areas 2 hours before sunrise and up to 2 hours after sunset. 4. Hunting is prohibited on Sundays. 5. Hunting is not permitted above or within 50 yards of a trail or road. 6. A DNR Managed Hunt Permit (MHP) and a Free Public Hunting Permit are required to hunt at Elk Neck State Park. Every hunter must have his or her own permit. These permits are NOT transferable. 7. All State and Federal hunting laws, as well as park regulations, will be strictly enforced. 8. Call ahead reservations through the Gwynnbrook Wildlife Office are required for the North East Beach Area. 9. Hunters (and non-hunting companions) must sign in and sign out at the sign-in box at each parking area EVERY time they enter or exit the hunting areas. 10. All harvested deer must be recorded at the sign-in box. 11. Park in designated areas only, as indicated by the hunting map. 12. Hunters are required to display their Free Public Hunting Permit on the dashboard of their vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Pronghorn Antelope Workshop 20:5-23
    SOUTH DAKOTA PRONGHORN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2019 – 2029 SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF GAME, FISH AND PARKS PIERRE, SOUTH DAKOTA WILDLIFE DIVISION REPORT draft May 2019 This document is for general, strategic guidance for the Division of Wildlife and serves to identify what we strive to accomplish related to Pronghorn Management. This process will emphasize working cooperatively with interested publics in both the planning process and the regular program activities related to pronghorn management. This plan will be utilized by Department staff on an annual basis and will be formally evaluated at least every 10 years. Plan updates and changes, however, may occur more frequently as needed. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This plan is a product of substantial discussion, debate, and input from many wildlife professionals. In addition, those comments and suggestions received from private landowners, hunters, and those who recognized the value of pronghorn and their associated habitats were also considered. Management Plan Coordinator – Andy Lindbloom, South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks (SDGFP). SDGFP Pronghorn Management Plan Team that assisted with plan writing, data review and analyses, critical reviews and/or edits to the South Dakota Pronghorn Management Plan, 2019 - 2029 – Nathan Baker, Chalis Bird, Paul Coughlin, Josh Delger, Jacquie Ermer, Steve Griffin, Trenton Haffley, Corey Huxoll, John Kanta, Keith Fisk, Tom Kirschenmann, Chad Lehman, Cindy Longmire, Stan Michals, Mark Norton, Tim Olson, Chad Switzer, and Lauren Wiechmann. Cover art was provided by Adam Oswald. All text and data contained within this document are subject to revision for corrections, updates, and data analyses. Recommended Citation: South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Communities Are Welcoming Hunters and Anglers
    Potential Costs of Losing Hunting and Trapping as Wildlife Management Methods Updated: May 25th, 2005 Produced by the Animal Use Issues Committee of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 444 North Capitol Street, NW Suite 725 Washington, DC 20001 (202) 624-7890 www.IAFWA.org i Acknowledgements This report was developed for the Animal Use Issues Committee of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (IAFWA). Funding was provided by the Wildlife Restoration Program through Multistate Conservation Grant DC M-35-O awarded to the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This report was authored by Rob Southwick, Ashley Woolley and Donna Leonard of Southwick Associates, Inc., Fernandina Beach, FL., and Sharon Rushton of Killingworth, CT. The project was conceived and championed by Bob Carmichael, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources, and guided in part by Bruce Taubert, Arizona Game and Fish Department; Gordon Robertson, American Sportfishing Association; Don MacLauchlan and Jen Mock, IAFWA; and Mike S. O’Brien, Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources. A special thank you goes to Rob Cahill, Fur Institute of Canada, for ensuring Canadian data and issues were a part of this report. Data was provided by many state, provincial, federal and private agencies and sources, with special mention to Martin Mendoza of the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). Stephanie Kenyon and Carol Wynne, Point to Point Communications, Leesburg, Va., provided invaluable editorial and strategic guidance. Reviews and expertise were provided by Alan Clark, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources; Buddy Baker, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources; Gordon Batchellor, New York Department of Environmental Conservation; and John Erb of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Antelope Mule Deer White-Tailed Deer Elk Bighorn Sheep
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Antelope Rattlesnake (745) - Areas 70-72 1 North Natrona (746) - Area 73 13 North Converse (748) - Areas 25, 26 17 Black Thunder (750) - Areas 4-9, 24, 27, 29 Mule Deer Cheyenne River (740) - Areas 7-14, 21 25 Black Hills (751) - Areas 1-6 29 North Converse (755) - Area 22 33 South Converse (756) - Area 65 36 Bates Hole - Hat Six (757) - Areas 66, 67 40 Rattlesnake (758) - Areas 88, 89 47 North Natrona (759) - Area 34 62 White-tailed Deer Black Hills (706) - Areas 1-6 67 Central (707) - Areas 7-15, 21, 22, 34, 65-67, 88, 89 71 Elk Black Hills (740) - Areas 1, 116, 117 75 Laramie Peak / Muddy Mountain (741) - Areas 7, 19 81 Rattlesnake (742) - Area 23 86 Pine Ridge (743) - Area 122 105 Bighorn Sheep Kouba Canyon (Non-herd unit) – Area 20 108 i 2019 - JCR Evaluation Form SPECIES: Pronghorn PERIOD: 6/1/2019 - 5/31/2020 HERD: PR745 - RATTLESNAKE HUNT AREAS: 70-72 PREPARED BY: HEATHER O'BRIEN 2014 - 2018 Average 2019 2020 Proposed Population: 10,769 10,315 9,965 Harvest: 499 1,110 1,340 Hunters: 518 1,126 1,400 Hunter Success: 96% 99% 96 % Active Licenses: 585 1,215 1,400 Active License Success: 85% 91% 96 % Recreation Days: 1,597 2,950 4,100 Days Per Animal: 3.2 2.7 3.1 Males per 100 Females 48 67 Juveniles per 100 Females 72 52 Population Objective (± 20%) : 12000 (9600 - 14400) Management Strategy: Special Percent population is above (+) or below (-) objective: -14.0% Number of years population has been + or - objective in recent trend: 3 Model Date: 04/06/2020 Proposed harvest rates (percent of pre-season estimate for each sex/age group): JCR Year Proposed Females year old: 10.9% 12.3% Males year old: 17.2% 27.5% Total: 10.6% 12.9% Proposed change in post-season population: -10.4% -9.2% 1 2020 HUNTING SEASONS RATTLESNAKE PRONGHORN HERD (PR745) Hunt Archery Dates Season Dates Type Quota Limitations Area Opens Closes Opens Closes 70 1 Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Social Studies Through Film
    Teaching Social Studies Through Film Written, Produced, and Directed by John Burkowski Jr. Xose Manuel Alvarino Social Studies Teacher Social Studies Teacher Miami-Dade County Miami-Dade County Academy for Advanced Academics at Hialeah Gardens Middle School Florida International University 11690 NW 92 Ave 11200 SW 8 St. Hialeah Gardens, FL 33018 VH130 Telephone: 305-817-0017 Miami, FL 33199 E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: 305-348-7043 E-mail: [email protected] For information concerning IMPACT II opportunities, Adapter and Disseminator grants, please contact: The Education Fund 305-892-5099, Ext. 18 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.educationfund.org - 1 - INTRODUCTION Students are entertained and acquire knowledge through images; Internet, television, and films are examples. Though the printed word is essential in learning, educators have been taking notice of the new visual and oratory stimuli and incorporated them into classroom teaching. The purpose of this idea packet is to further introduce teacher colleagues to this methodology and share a compilation of films which may be easily implemented in secondary social studies instruction. Though this project focuses in grades 6-12 social studies we believe that media should be infused into all K-12 subject areas, from language arts, math, and foreign languages, to science, the arts, physical education, and more. In this day and age, students have become accustomed to acquiring knowledge through mediums such as television and movies. Though books and text are essential in learning, teachers should take notice of the new visual stimuli. Films are familiar in the everyday lives of students.
    [Show full text]