Morphological and Vocal Variation Among Subspecies of the Black-Faced Sheathbill ’

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Morphological and Vocal Variation Among Subspecies of the Black-Faced Sheathbill ’ 818 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ashi Matsudo, David Nobel, and Charles Francis for R. GOLDIZEN.1994. Parentage analysis of multi- providing blood samples. S. C. Lougheed, C. J. Oliar- male social groups of Tasmanian Native Hens nyk and three anonymousreviewers provided helpful (Tribonyx mortierii): genetic evidence for monog- comments on the manuscript. amy and polyandry. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35: 363-371. LITERATURE CITED GYLLENSTEN,U. B., AND H. A. ERLICH. 1988. Gener- ation of single-strandedDNA by the polymerase BROOKE, M. DE L., AND N. B. DAVIES. 1987. Recent chain reaction and its application to direct se- changesin host usage by cuckoos Cuculus cano- quencing of the HLA-DQ-A locus. Proc. Natl. rus in Britain. J. Anim. Ecol. 56:873-883. Acad. Sci. 85:7652-7656. BROOKE,M. DE L., AND N. B. DAVIES. 1988. Egg mim- MORITZ,C., T E. DOWLING,AND W. M. BROWN.1987. icry by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in rel%on to Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: rele- discriminationbv hosts. Nature 335:630-632. vance for population biology and systematics. CABOT,E. 1990. Thi eyeball sequenceeditor, version Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:269-292. 1.09d.Dept. Biology,Univ. Rochester,Rochester, NY MOUM, T, AND S. JOHANSEN.1992. The mitochondrial DESJARDINS,R., AND P MORAIS. 1990. Sequenceand NADH dehydrogenasesubunit 6 (ND6) gene in gene organization in the chicken mitochondrial murres: relevance to phylogenetic and population genome: a novel gene order in higher vertebrates. studiesamong birds. Genome 35:903-906. J. Mol. Biol. 212:599-634. MOUM, T., S. JOHANSEN,K. E. ERIKSTAD,AND J. E EDWARDS,S. V. 1993. Mitochondrial gene genealogy PIA~T. 1994. Phylogeny and evolution of the auks and gene flow among island and mainland popu- (subfamily Alcinae) based on mitochondrialDNA lations of a sedentarysongbird, the Grey-crowned sequences.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91:7912-7916. Babbler (Pomatostromus temporalis). Evolution QUINN,T. W., AND A. C. WILSON. 1993. Sequenceevo- 47:1118-1137. lution in and around the mitochondrial control re- EDWARDS,S. V., I? ARCTANDER,AND A. C. WILSON. gion in birds. J. Mol. Evol. 37:417-425. 1991. Mitochondrial resolution of a deep branch SANGER,E S., S. NICKLEN,AND A. R. COULSON.1977. in the genealogical tree for perching birds. Proc. Sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors. R. Sot. Lond. B. 243:99-107. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 7415463-5467. GIBBS, H. L., M. DE L. BROOKE,AND N. B. DAVIES. SLATER.l?. F?SLATER. AND R. SLATER.1994. The Slat- 1996. Analysis of genetic differentiation of host er field guide to Australian birds. Lansdowne, races of the Common Cuckoo Cuculus canorus Sydney. using mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA vari- WOOD,T C., AND C. KRAJEWSKI.1996. Mitochondrial ation. Proc. R. Sot. Lond. B 263:89-96. DNA sequencevariation among the subspeciesof GIBBS,H. L., A. W. GOLDIZEN,C. BULLOUGH,AND A. SarusCrane (Grus antigone). Auk 113:655-663. The Condor 99:818-825 0 The CooperOmlthological Society 1997 MORPHOLOGICAL AND VOCAL VARIATION AMONG SUBSPECIES OF THE BLACK-FACED SHEATHBILL ’ JOELBRIED AND PIERRE JOUVENTIN Centre National de la Recherche Scientique,’ Centre dEtudes’ Biologiques de Chiz& 79360 Beauvoir sur Niort, France, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The Black-faced Sheathbill (Chionis mi- and Kerguelen-Heard) on geographic and morpholog- nor) is a sedentary and polytypic species. Four allo- ical criteria. In the eastern group (Kerguelen-Heard), patric subspeciesare known, each breeding on one ar- corresponding to higher latitudes, sheathbills were chipelago in the Southern Indian Ocean. To evaluate larger and heavier, following Bergmann’s Rule. The the degree of isolation of these four subspecies,mor- sheathbills from Iles Kerguelen also had a lower- phometricsand vocalizationsof adult birds of Iles Ker- pitched voice than those from Iles Crozet, consistent guelen and Crozet were compared with those of the with their larger body size. Moreover, the birds from other localities (Prince Edward and Heard Islands). the southernmostlocality (Heard Island) had a shorter Two groupswere distinguished(Prince Edward-Crozet culmen, consistentwith Allen’s Rule, but longer tarsi and deeper sheaths.Within the western group (Prince Edward-Crozet), and at Iles Kerguelen, there also was ’ ’ Received 8 July 1996. Accepted 13 March 1997. variability on a microgeographicalscale. Differences SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 819 Kerguoelen Crozet ;:a Prince Edward He&d \ ANTARCTICA FIGURE 1. Breeding range of the Black-faced Sheathbill in the SouthernIndian Ocean. Island namesindicated in bold. between subspeciesof Black-faced Sheathbill there- may be achieved by combining morphological and fore could be due not only to environmentalcorrelates ethological studies. of latitude, but also to possible genetic drift. The four subspecies are allopatric and do not differ in their METHODS breeding scheduleor in their general behavior and diet, Field work was conductedat Iles Kerguelen (48”27’- suggestingthat differentiation may be recent and main- 5o”S, 68”37’-70”35’E) in late December 1992, and at ly due to geographicalisolation. Ile de la Possessionin the eastern part of the Crozet archipelago(45”50 ’-46”3O’S, 50”-53”21’E) in Novem- Key words: speciation, reproductive isolation, ber 1994. Adult Black-faced Sheathbills were caught morphometrics,vocalizations, Chionis minor, Black- using a shepherd’s hook. We identified them as adults faced Sheathbill. becausethey were ringed, and known to have bred in the past or to be at least 3 years old, which is the The biological speciesconcept (Mayr 1970) considers minimum age of first breeding (Burger 1980a, Jouven- speciesas groupsof naturalpopulations capable of in- tin et al. 1996). Measurements (wing length, tarsus terbreedingand separatedfrom other similar groupsby length, culmen length, culmen width, and sheath mechanisms of reproductive isolation, such as geo- depth) were taken for each individual, following Bur- graphical, morphometrical,coloration, behavioral, and ger (1980b). Black-faced Sheathbills are sexually di- phenological. However, variability within the range of morphic with males larger than females (Burger a given species also can occur. Thus, geographical 1980b). Therefore, birds were sexed from size and bill variations in body size and coloration are well docu- shape index (i), the latter defined as follows (Warham mented in seabirds,particularly in Procellariiforms or 1972, Burger 198Ob): in the White-tailed Tropicbird Phaethon lepturus (de1 i = culmen length X culmen width Hoyo et al. 1992). Geographicalreproductive isolation X sheath depth X 0.1 also seems to play a major role in the Black-faced Sheathbill Chionis minor. Four subspeciesusually are Morphometrics of birds from Iles Kerguelen were recognized from body size, leg coloration and carun- comparedwith those from Prince Edward Islands (data cles, each subspeciesbreeding on a remote archipelago from Marion Island, A. E. Burger, pers. comm.) and in the Southern Indian Ocean (Marchant and Higgins Be de la Possession,using univariate statistics(Krus- 1993): C. m. marionensisat Prince Edward Islands, C. kal-Wallis H-tests and multiple comparisonpairwise z- m. crozettensisat Iles Crozet, C. m. minor at Iles Ker- tests; Scherrer 1984). We obtained the length of the guelen, and C. m. nasicornisat Heard Island (Fig. 1). appendagesrelative to individual body size by dividing Black-faced Sheathbills are sedentary and have never tarsusand culmen length by wing length (see Aldrich been recorded on the nearestcontinent or more than a and James 1991). However, wing length varies in the few kilometers offshore, becauseof their poor flying course of the year due to molt or abrasionof the outer abilities (Verheyden and Jouventin 1991). primaries. We measuredwing length during the austral This paper provides new and more accurate infor- spring and assumedthat the abrasionstage of the outer mation about biometry of Chionis minor than previ- primaries was similar in both Iles Crozet and Kergue- ously available. New insight into the speciation of len, which allowed us to compare these two localities Chionis minor and the role of reproductive isolation only. Multivariate analyseswere conducted using the 820 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS SAS statisticalpackage (SAS Institute 1988); variables tarsi were significantly longer on Iles Crozet (Mann- were not transformed.A principal componentanalysis Whitney U-test, z = 3.69, P < 0.001, see Table 1). on correlation matrix between the variablesused (Dig- For Iles Kerguelen birds, measurementsfrom skins by and Kempton 1987) was conducted, using the were significantly smaller than those obtained from PRINCOMP procedure. Discriminant analyses also live birds (Mann-Whitney U-test, all P < O.OOl), ex- were performed by running a stepwise analysis in or- cept for culmen length and sheathdepth (sheath depth der to determine the two most discriminantparameters was significantly higher for skins in females: Mann- (STEPDISC procedure), before subsequentuse in the Whitney u-test, z = 2.39, P < 0.02). Kerguelen spec- discriminant function analysis (nonparametricmethod imens had a longer culmen than those from Heard Is- of the DISCRIM procedure using uniform kernel and land (at least for males, Mann-Whitney U-test, U = a posteriori cross-validationtechniques for estimating 14.5, rz, = 9, n, = 10, P < 0.01). Conversely, the latter error rates in classification). tended to have longer tarsi and deeper sheathsthan the Data from skins of birds from Heard Island and Iles former, althoughdifferences were not significant,prob- Kerguelen
Recommended publications
  • Recommended English Names
    86 BIRDS OF THE WORLD: RECOMMENDED ENGLISH NAMES Gill, F.B. & Wright, M. 2006. Princeton, NJ, and London, UK: Princeton University Press. 259 pp. with CD containing Microsoft Excel spreadsheets of species lists. Soft cover. ISBN 0691128278. US$20. Birds are among the few taxa for which non-scientific vernacular In addition to competing English names, the IOC committee had names are extensively used in scientific communication as well to deal with ongoing taxonomic shuffling too. It isn’t clear how as in the burgeoning birding community. Consequently, there is a they reached consensus here, but some recent splits are recognized need to have some consistency in the names used around the world. (e.g. Nazca Booby, Vega Gull, the various sub-Antarctic shags), and The International Ornithological Congress (IOC) sought to reach others are not (e.g. the suggested splits of Wandering, Yellow-nosed consensus in vernacular names for commonly used languages. and other albatrosses). As the editors reiterate, this compilation is a Standardized names have been published for French (Devillers work in progress, and future versions will undoubtedly address the and Ouellet 1993) and Spanish (Bernis 1995). The goal of Birds changing taxonomic landscape. of the World: Recommended English Names is to promote a set of unique English names for the extant bird species of the world. Led Everyone who peruses these lists will be disappointed to see some old originally by the now-late Burt Monroe, and then Frank Gill and favourites voted out and will find fault with some decisions (I think I Minturn Wright, an IOC committee and regional subcommittees hear the rumble of European dissent over their guillemots and divers).
    [Show full text]
  • UNEP/CBD/RW/EBSA/SIO/1/4 26 June 2013
    CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/RW/EBSA/SIO/1/4 26 June 2013 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH SOUTHERN INDIAN OCEAN REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO FACILITATE THE DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS Flic en Flac, Mauritius, 31 July to 3 August 2012 REPORT OF THE SOUTHERN INDIAN OCEAN REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO FACILITATE THE DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS1 INTRODUCTION 1. In paragraph 36 of decision X/29, the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 10) requested the Executive Secretary to work with Parties and other Governments as well as competent organizations and regional initiatives, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), regional seas conventions and action plans, and, where appropriate, regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs), with regard to fisheries management, to organize, including the setting of terms of reference, a series of regional workshops, with a primary objective to facilitate the description of ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs) through the application of scientific criteria in annex I of decision IX/20, and other relevant compatible and complementary nationally and intergovernmentally agreed scientific criteria, as well as the scientific guidance on the identification of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction, which meet the scientific criteria in annex I to decision IX/20. 2. In the same decision (paragraph 41), the Conference of the Parties requested that the Executive Secretary make available the scientific and technical data and information and results collated through the workshops referred to above to participating Parties, other Governments, intergovernmental agencies and the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) for their use according to their competencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 4 Appendices
    Part 4 Appendices HEARD ISLAND AND MCDONALD ISLANDS MARINE RESERVE 139 Appendix 1. Proclamation of Heard Island and McDonald Islands Marine Reserve 140 MANAGEMENT PLAN HEARD ISLAND AND MCDONALD ISLANDS MARINE RESERVE 141 142 MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix 2. Native Fauna of the HIMI Marine Reserve Listed Under the EPBC Act Scientific Name Common Name Birds recorded as breeding Aptenodytes patagonicus king penguin S Catharacta lonnbergi subantarctic skua S Daption capense cape petrel S Diomeda exulans wandering albatross V S M B J A Diomeda melanophrys black–browed albatross S M B A Eudyptes chrysocome southern rockhopper penguin S Eudyptes chrysolophus macaroni penguin S Larus dominicanus kelp gull S Macronectes giganteus southern giant petrel E S M B A Oceanites oceanicus Wilson’s storm petrel S M J Pachyptila crassirostris fulmar prion S Pachyptila desolata Antarctic prion S Pelecanoides georgicus South Georgian diving petrel S Pelecanoides urinatrix common diving petrel S Phalacrocorax atriceps (e) Heard Island cormorant V S Phoebetria palpebrata light mantled sooty albatross S M B A Pygoscelis papua gentoo penguin S Sterna vittata Antarctic tern V S Non–breeding birds Catharacta maccormicki south polar skua S M J Diomedea epomophora southern royal albatross V S M B A Fregetta grallaria white–bellied storm petrel S Fregetta tropica black–bellied storm petrel S Fulmarus glacialoides southern fulmar S Garrodia nereis grey–backed storm petrel S Halobaena caerulea blue petrel V S Macronectes halli northern giant petrel V S M B A Pachyptila belcheri
    [Show full text]
  • Snowy Sheathbills and What You Really Need to Know
    Snowy Sheathbills and what you really need to know Reprinted from British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, No. 2, December 1963, p. 53-71 THE SHEATHBILL, Chionis alba (Gmelin), AT SIGNY ISLAND, SOUTH ORKNEY ISLANDS By N. V. Jones ABSTRACT. A study of the sheathbill, Chionis alba (Gmelin), was carried out at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, between April 1961 and April 1962. The general characteristics of the species and the annual population cycle have been investigated. Breeding birds return to the island early in October, form pairs early in November, and establish territories later in November. There is a high level of fidelity to a previous year's mate and considerable nest-site tenacity. Nests are concentrated around penguin (Pygoscelis adetiae and P. antarctica) colonies, the closer association being with the latter species. Both sexes participate in nest construction, incubation and the care of the chick. Egg-laying begins in early December, but full incubation starts only when clutches, which number from one to four, are complete. The normal incubation period is 30 days. Chicks are fed largely on "krill", obtained by disturbing penguins which are feeding their own young, and the sheathbill's life cycle is suitably coincident with that of the penguins. Chicks fledge when 50 to 60 days old and at this stage they become shore feeders. Chicks and adults disperse from the island in about mid-May, and there is evidence of a rather loose northward migration in winter. No definite predators are known. A number of parasites have been recorded. THIS paper describes work done on the sheathbill at Signy Island (lat.
    [Show full text]
  • Penguin Island ANTARCTIC TREATY Penguin Island Visitor Site Guide 62˚06’S, 57˚54’W - Eastern King George Island
    Penguin Island ANTARCTIC TREATY Penguin Island visitor site guide 62˚06’S, 57˚54’W - Eastern King George Island Key features King George Is. - Dormant volcanic cone Ferraz Station Turret Point - Southern Giant Petrels Admiralty Bay Elephant Is. Maxwell Bay PENGUIN ISLAND Marsh/frei Stations Great Wall Station - Chinstrap Penguins Bellingshausen Station Arctowski Station Artigas Station Jubany Station King Sejong Station - Vegetation Potter Cove Aitcho Islands Nelson Is. - Whale bones Robert Is. Mitchell Cove Greenwich Is. Robert Point Fort Point Half Moon Is. Yankee Harbour Description Livingston Is. TOPOGRAPHY This oval island is 1.6km long. The site’s prominent geological feature is the 170m high cone of Deacon Hannah Point Bransfield Strait Peak, the northernSnow face Is. of which slopes gently down to the landing beach. Most of the island is surrounded by low cliffs, and thereTelefon is a crater lake in the northeast. Bay Pendulum Cove Gourdin Is. FAUNA Confirmed breeders: ChinstrapDeception penguin Is. Pygoscelis( Baily Head antarctica), Adélie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae), southern giant petrel (MacronectesVapour Col giganteus), Antarctic tern (Sterna vittata), kelp gull (Larus Cape Whaler's Bay Dubouzet dominicanus), and skuas (Catharacta spp.). Likely breeders: Snowy sheathbill (Chionis alba) B.and O'higgins Wilson’s Station storm petrel (Oceanites oceanicus). Regular roosting: blue-eyed shags (AstrPhalacrocoraxolabe atriceps). RegularlyCape Hope Legoupil haul out: Southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) and Weddell seals (IslandLeptonychotes weddellii). Bay a FLORA Deschampsia antarctica, Colobanthus quitensis, Xanthoria elegans, moss species, Caloplaca and otherinsul crustose lichen species, and large swards of the fruticose lichen Usnea antarctica. Pen inity Northwest (Nw) Tr Subarea Bone Bay Visitor Impact Tower Is.
    [Show full text]
  • SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae
    SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does not include Alcidae CREATED BY AZA CHARADRIIFORMES TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Charadriiformes Taxon Advisory Group. (2014). Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: October 2013 Authors and Significant Contributors: Aimee Greenebaum: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Vice Chair, Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Alex Waier: Milwaukee County Zoo, USA Carol Hendrickson: Birmingham Zoo, USA Cindy Pinger: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Chair, Birmingham Zoo, USA CJ McCarty: Oregon Coast Aquarium, USA Heidi Cline: Alaska SeaLife Center, USA Jamie Ries: Central Park Zoo, USA Joe Barkowski: Sedgwick County Zoo, USA Kim Wanders: Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Mary Carlson: Charadriiformes Program Advisor, Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Perry: Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Crook-Martin: Buttonwood Park Zoo, USA Shana R. Lavin, Ph.D.,Wildlife Nutrition Fellow University of Florida, Dept. of Animal Sciences , Walt Disney World Animal Programs Dr. Stephanie McCain: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Veterinarian Advisor, DVM, Birmingham Zoo, USA Phil King: Assiniboine Park Zoo, Canada Reviewers: Dr. Mike Murray (Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA) John C. Anderson (Seattle Aquarium volunteer) Kristina Neuman (Point Blue Conservation Science) Sarah Saunders (Conservation Biology Graduate Program,University of Minnesota) AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seaman, MS, Animal Care Manual Editing Consultant Candice Dorsey, PhD, Director of Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Vice President, Conservation & Science Cover Photo Credits: Jeff Pribble Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management.
    [Show full text]
  • Attempting to See One Member of Each of the World's Bird Families Has
    Attempting to see one member of each of the world’s bird families has become an increasingly popular pursuit among birders. Given that we share that aim, the two of us got together and designed what we believe is the most efficient strategy to pursue this goal. Editor’s note: Generally, the scientific names for families (e.g., Vireonidae) are capital- ized, while the English names for families (e.g., vireos) are not. In this article, however, the English names of families are capitalized for ease of recognition. The ampersand (&) is used only within the name of a family (e.g., Guans, Chachalacas, & Curassows). 8 Birder’s Guide to Listing & Taxonomy | October 2016 Sam Keith Woods Ecuador Quito, [email protected] Barnes Hualien, Taiwan [email protected] here are 234 extant bird families recognized by the eBird/ Clements checklist (2015, version 2015), which is the offi- T cial taxonomy for world lists submitted to ABA’s Listing Cen- tral. The other major taxonomic authority, the IOC World Bird List (version 5.1, 2015), lists 238 families (for differences, see Appendix 1 in the expanded online edition). While these totals may appear daunting, increasing numbers of birders are managing to see them all. In reality, save for the considerable time and money required, finding a single member of each family is mostly straightforward. In general, where family totals or family names are mentioned below, we use the eBird/Clements taxonomy unless otherwise stated. Family Feuds: How do world regions compare? In descending order, the number of bird families supported by con- tinental region are: Asia (125 Clements/124 IOC), Africa (122 Clem- ents/126 IOC), Australasia (110 Clements/112 IOC), North America (103 Clements/IOC), South America (93 Clements/94 IOC), Europe (73 Clements/74 IOC ), and Antarctica (7 Clements/IOC).
    [Show full text]
  • ACAP Colony Database Analysis
    AC5 Doc 33 Agenda item 8.3 Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels Fifth Meeting of Advisory Committee Mar del Plata, Argentina, 13 – 17 April 2010 ________________________________________________________________ ACAP Internationally Important Breeding Areas Author: BirdLife International „This paper is presented for consideration by ACAP and may contain unpublished data, analyses, and/or conclusions subject to change. Data in this paper shall not be cited or used for purposes other than the work of the ACAP Secretariat, ACAP Advisory Committee or their subsidiary Working Groups without the permission of the original data holders.‟ AC5 Doc 33 Agenda item 8.3 ACAP Internationally Important Breeding Sites: IBA analysis of the ACAP colony database Paper submitted to AC5 Uthgra Sasso Hotel, Mar del Plata, Argentina 13-17 April 2010 BirdLife International Feb 2010 AC5 Doc 33 Agenda item 8.3 Recommended citation: BirdLife International (2010) ACAP Internationally Important Breeding Sites: IBA analysis of the ACAP colony database. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. Compiled by B. Lascelles, BirdLife International Secretariat and BirdLife Global Seabird Programme, Cambridge, UK Acknowledgements Thanks to Richard Phillips and Wieslawa Misiak for assistance in extracting the relevant information from the ACAP colony database, and to Lincoln Fishpool for comments on the draft of this document. Abstract This paper provides information on the breeding sites for ACAP-listed species that are known to hold ≥1% of the global population of the species in question. Information on the breeding site locations and populations present at each site were taken from the ACAP colony database. Information on the global populations of ACAP-listed species was taken from the BirdLife World Bird Database.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Trends of Penguins in the French Southern Territories
    Author's personal copy Polar Biology (2020) 43:835–850 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-020-02691-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Population trends of penguins in the French Southern Territories Christophe Barbraud1 · Karine Delord1 · Charles A. Bost1 · Adrien Chaigne2 · Cédric Marteau2 · Henri Weimerskirch1 Received: 31 July 2019 / Revised: 21 April 2020 / Accepted: 29 May 2020 / Published online: 3 June 2020 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Penguins are important top consumers in marine food webs and are one of the most threatened bird families, especially by climate change and food web alterations by marine fsheries. Yet, long-term population trends are lacking or are uncertain for many populations. Seven species of penguins breeding at the French Southern Territories in the southern Indian Ocean on the Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul–Amsterdam archipelagos and in Terre Adélie/Adelie Land, Antarctica are monitored regularly. This monitoring started in the early 1950s and most populations have been surveyed during the past four years, allowing assessments of population trends. King penguins increased at nearly all breeding sites within the Crozet and Ker- guelen archipelagos. Emperor penguins have decreased at Terre Adélie/Adelie Land, with a partial recovery of the colony during the 2010s. Gentoo penguin populations at Crozet and Kerguelen are highly variable but stable. Adélie penguins have been increasing in Terre Adélie/Adelie Land. The trends in eastern rockhopper penguins vary between colonies and archipelagos. Northern rockhopper penguins have continuously decreased in numbers at Amsterdam Island, but appear to have increased at the nearby Saint-Paul Island. Macaroni penguins have frst increased and then stabilized since the 2000s at Kerguelen and are stable at the Crozet Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 23 June 2014 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Hodgson, D.A. and Graham, A.G.C. and Roberts, S.J. and Bentley, M.J. and O¡ Cofaigh, C. and Verleyen, E. and Vyverman, W. and Jomelli, V. and Favier, V. and Brunstein, D. and Verfaillie, D. and Colhoun, E.A. and Saunders, K.M. and Selkirk, P.M. and Mackintosh, A. and Hedding, D.W. and Nel, W. and Hall, K. and McGlone, M.S. and Van der Putten, N. and Dickens, W.A. and Smith, J.A. (2014) 'Terrestrial and submarine evidence for the extent and timing of the Last Glacial Maximum and the onset of deglaciation on the maritime-Antarctic and sub-Antarctic islands.', Quaternary science reviews., 100 . pp. 137-158. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.12.001 Publisher's copyright statement: c 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Banding Manual, Vol. II
    MTAB 51 July 26, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO : All Banders FROM : Chief, Bird Banding Laboratory Office of Migratory Bird Management Laurel, Maryland 20708 SUBJECT : I. Tabulation of encounters 2. Computer-generated banding schedules 3. Requests for permit revisions 4. Request to not band certain birds 5. BBL slide file needs 6. Permit inactivation 7. A new bride 8. Inland Bird Banding Association meeting I. A tabulation of 1981 banding totals and 1977 banding and recovery totals of species is enclosed. These data are provided primarily to aid in research planning. We may be able to revise this report next year and ask now for suggestions from banders about what data would be most useful to them. 2. Banders may computer-produce banding schedules for the BBL. Any computer- or mini computer-generated schedules (with or without cards or tape) must be BBL-approved in advance of actual schedule submission to the BBL. 3. Please inform all subpermittees that any request for auxiliary marking authorization or changes in permits must come from the master bander. We want requests in writing, please. When requesting permits for a new subpermittee, please furnish the name of the person. We do not send out application forms with the applicant's name blank. 4. Banders are reminded not to use U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service bands on resident game birds (Sp. No. 288 through 31 1.0). Do not band parakeets, rock doves and vultures, or unidentifiable migratory birds such as Empidonax flycatchers, and certain warblers, gulls, and ducks. 5. We would appreciate slides of auxiliary markers from various projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Ecology of Pale-Faced Sheathbills In
    J. Field Ornithol., 67(2):292-299 FORAGING ECOLOGY OF PAl.E-FACED SHF•THBILLS IN COLONIES OF SOUTHERN EI.EPHANT SEALS AT KING GEORGE ISLAND, ANTARCTICA MA•co F^VERO Laboratorio de Vertebrados Departamentode Biologia Facultad de ClenciasExactas y Naturales Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata Funes3250 (7600) Mar delPlata, Argentina. Abstract.-•The Pale-facedSheathbill (Chionis alba) is an opportunisticpredator-scavenger. During spring in Antarcticait foraged in coloniesof southern elephant seals,obtaining placentas,pup carcasses,milk from nursing cows,blood, and feces.Afterbirths and pup carcassesconstituted the bulk of the food consumed.Daily consumptionestimates averaged 67 g/bird for placentaand 11 g/bird for pup carcasses,which are 54% and 26% of daily energyrequirements, respectively. Sheathbills spent 86% of the day foragingor displaying and 14% restingor preening.Actively feeding birds spent38% of the time searchingfor food, 20% feeding,23% resting,14% on comfortactivities, and 3% in agonisticbehaviors. LA ECOLOG•A DE LA ALIMENTACION DE LA CHIONIS ALBA EN LOS HARENES DE ELEFANTES MARINOS EN LA ISLA KING GEORGE, ANTARCTICA Sinopsis.--La Paloma Antfirtica (Chionis alba) es una especie oportunista depredadora y carrofiera.Durante la primavera antfirticase alimenta frecuentementeen los hateries de elefante marino obteniendo placentas,carcasas de crias muertas,leche de hembras,sangre y deyecclones.Las placentasy crlasmuertas constituyeron lo masimportante en la dieta de la especie.Las estimaclonesdiarias de consumopot avepromediaron 67 g de placentay 11 g de tejido extra/dode carcasas,lo que represent6un 54 y un 26% respectivamentede los requerimientosenergtticos diarios de la especie.Las palomasantfirticas utilizaron el 86% del dla alimentfindoseo interactuandocon otros individuosy el 14% de d/a reposandoo acicalfindose.Los individuosque se encontraronactivamente alimentfindose emplearon un 38% del tiempoen la bfisquedade alimento,20% tomandoalimento, 23% reposando,14% en actividadesde confort y un 3% en comportamientosde agresitn.
    [Show full text]