Permittee Information

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (510) 215-4382

September 5, 2018

Bruce H. Wolfe, Executive Officer California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400 Oakland, CA 94612

Dear Mr. Wolfe:

Enclosed is the 2017-18 Annual Report for the City of El Cerrito, which is required by and in accordance with Provision C.17 in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number CAS612008 issued by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board.

I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.

Sincerely,

Yvetteh Ortiz Public Works Director/City Engineer

Enclosure

2017-18 Annual Report for the City of El Cerrito

CITY HALL 10890 San Pablo Avenue, El Cerrito, CA 94530 FAX (510) 233-5401 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Table of Contents

Section Page

Section 1 – Permittee Information ...... 1-1 Section 2 – Provision C.2 Municipal Operations ...... 2-1 Section 3 – Provision C.3 New Development and Redevelopment ...... 3-1 Section 4 – Provision C.4 Industrial and Commercial Site Controls ...... 4-1 Section 5 – Provision C.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination ...... 5-1 Section 6 – Provision C.6 Construction Site Controls ...... 6-1 Section 7 – Provision C.7 Public Information and Outreach ...... 7-1 Section 9 – Provision C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Controls ...... 9-1 Section 10 – Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction ...... 10-1 Section 11 – Provision C.11 Mercury Controls ...... 11-1 Section 12 – Provision C.12 PCBs Controls ...... 12-1 Section 13 – Provision C.13 Copper Controls ...... 13-1 Section 15 – Provision C.15 Exempted and Conditionally Exempted Discharges ...... 15-1

FY 17-18 AR Form i-1 9/30/18 FY 2017 - 2018 Annual Report Permittee Information Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 1 – Permittee Information SECTION I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Background Information Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito Population: 25,515 (2017, U.S. Census Bureau) NPDES Permit No.: CAS612008 Order Number: R2-2015-0049 Reporting Time Period (month/year): July 2017 through June 2018 Name of the Responsible Authority: Yvetteh Ortiz Title: Public Works Director/ City Engineer Mailing Address: 10890 San Pablo Avenue City: El Cerrito Zip Code: 94530 County: Contra Costa Telephone Number: 510-215-4382 Fax Number: 510-233-5401 E-mail Address: [email protected] Name of the Designated Stormwater Will Provost Title: Management Analyst II Management Program Contact (if (Stormwater Program Coordinator) different from above): Department: Public Works Mailing Address: 10890 San Pablo Avenue City: El Cerrito Zip Code: 94530 County: Contra Costa Telephone Number: 510-525-7622 Fax Number: 510-559-7101 E-mail Address: [email protected]

FY 17-18 AR Form 1-1 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.2 – Municipal Operations Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 2 - Provision C.2 Reporting Municipal Operations

Program Highlights and Evaluation Highlight/summarize activities for reporting year: Summary: El Cerrito continues successful implementation of clean water BMPs in accordance with current MRP provisions. Staff and contractors continued all C.2 permit provisions, including the cleaning and maintenance of the existing 122 Full Trash Capture devices installed through 2017-18, spill response and clean-up, monthly Corp Yard Inspections, and IPM policy implementation. Representatives from the City of El Cerrito continue to serve on the CCCWP’s Municipal Operations Committee as a non-voting member, while also formally participating on other Regional committees. Please refer to the C.2 Municipal Operations section of the Countywide Program's FY 17-18 Annual Report for a description of activities implemented at the countywide and/or regional level.

C.2.a. ►Street and Road Repair and Maintenance

Place a Y in the boxes next to activities where applicable BMPs were implemented. If not applicable, type NA in the box and provide an explanation in the comments section below. Place an N in the boxes next to activities where applicable BMPs were not implemented for one or more of these activities during the reporting fiscal year, then in the comments section below provide an explanation of when BMPs were not implemented and the corrective actions taken. Control of debris and waste materials during road and parking lot installation, repaving or repair maintenance activities from polluting Y stormwater Control of concrete slurry and wastewater, asphalt, pavement cutting, and other street and road maintenance materials and wastewater Y from discharging to storm drains from work sites. Sweeping and/or vacuuming and other dry methods to remove debris, concrete, or sediment residues from work sites upon completion of Y work. Comments: None.

FY 17-18 AR Form 2-1 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.2 – Municipal Operations Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.2.b. ►Sidewalk/Plaza Maintenance and Pavement Washing Place a Y in the boxes next to activities where applicable BMPs were implemented. If not applicable, type NA in the box and provide an explanation in the comments section below. Place an N in the boxes next to activities where applicable BMPs were not implemented for one or more of these activities during the reporting fiscal year, then in the comments section below provide an explanation of when BMPs were not implemented and the corrective actions taken. Control of wash water from pavement washing, mobile cleaning, pressure wash operations at parking lots, garages, trash areas, gas station Y fueling areas, and sidewalk and plaza cleaning activities from polluting stormwater Y Implementation of the BASMAA Mobile Surface Cleaner Program BMPs Comments: None.

C.2.c. ►Bridge and Structure Maintenance and Graffiti Removal Place a Y in the boxes next to activities where applicable BMPs were implemented. If not applicable, type NA in the box and provide an explanation in the comments section below. Place an N in the boxes next to activities where applicable BMPs were not implemented for one or more of these activities during the reporting fiscal year, then in the comments section below provide an explanation of when BMPs were not implemented and the corrective actions taken. NA Control of discharges from bridge and structural maintenance activities directly over water or into storm drains Y Control of discharges from graffiti removal activities Y Proper disposal for wastes generated from bridge and structure maintenance and graffiti removal activities Y Implementation of the BASMAA Mobile Surface Cleaner Program BMPs for graffiti removal Employee training on proper capture and disposal methods for wastes generated from bridge and structural maintenance and graffiti Y removal activities. Contract specifications requiring proper capture and disposal methods for wastes generated from bridge and structural maintenance and Y graffiti removal activities. Comments: None.

FY 17-18 AR Form 2-2 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.2 – Municipal Operations Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.2.e. ►Rural Public Works Construction and Maintenance Does your municipality own/maintain rural1 roads: Yes X No If your answer is No then skip to C.2.f. Place a Y in the boxes next to activities where applicable BMPs were implemented. If not applicable, type NA in the box and provide an explanation in the comments section below. Place an N in the boxes next to activities where applicable BMPs were not implemented for one or more of these activities during the reporting fiscal year, then in the comments section below provide an explanation of when BMPs were not implemented and the corrective actions taken.

Control of road-related erosion and sediment transport from road design, construction, maintenance, and repairs in rural areas

Identification and prioritization of rural road maintenance based on soil erosion potential, slope steepness, and stream habitat resources

No impact to creek functions including migratory fish passage during construction of roads and culverts

Inspection of rural roads for structural integrity and prevention of impact on water quality

Maintenance of rural roads adjacent to streams and riparian habitat to reduce erosion, replace damaging shotgun culverts and excessive erosion Re-grading of unpaved rural roads to slope outward where consistent with road engineering safety standards, and installation of water bars as appropriate Inclusion of measures to reduce erosion, provide fish passage, and maintain natural stream geomorphology when replacing culverts or design of new culverts or bridge crossings Comments including listing increased maintenance in priority areas:

1Rural means any watershed or portion thereof that is developed with large lot home-sites, such as one acre or larger, or with primarily agricultural, grazing or open space uses.

FY 17-18 AR Form 2-3 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.2 – Municipal Operations Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.2.f. ►Corporation Yard BMP Implementation Place an X in the boxes below that apply to your corporations yard(s): We do not have a corporation yard Our corporation yard is a filed NOI facility and regulated by the California State Industrial Stormwater NPDES General Permit X We have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the Corporation Yard(s) Place an X in the boxes below next to implemented SWPPP BMPs to indicate that these BMPs were implemented in applicable instances. If not applicable, type NA in the box. If one or more of the BMPs were not adequately implemented during the reporting fiscal year then indicate so and explain in the comments section below: X Control of pollutant discharges to storm drains such as wash waters from cleaning vehicles and equipment Routine inspection prior to the rainy seasons of corporation yard(s) to ensure non-stormwater discharges have not entered the storm drain X system X Containment of all vehicle and equipment wash areas through plumbing to sanitary or another collection method Use of dry cleanup methods when cleaning debris and spills from corporation yard(s) or collection of all wash water and disposing of wash X water to sanitary or other location where it does not impact surface or groundwater when wet cleanup methods are used X Cover and/or berm outdoor storage areas containing waste pollutants Comments: The City’s Corporation Yard is thoroughly inspected monthly throughout the year by staff for SWPPP compliance. An outside inspection was completed by the West County Wastewater District in April of 2017, and an additional inspection has been scheduled for September of 2018. Below is a general description of BMPs used on site:

• General Housekeeping and Grounds Maintenance – Grounds are regularly inspected and cleaned for debris and automotive fluids. When staining of ground is observed in the Corporation Yard dry cleaning methods are used to remove leaking automotive fluids.

• Storm Drain Inlets – Storm drain inlets are directly connected to the storm drain system. In 2016, an approved Full Trash Capture Device was installed on the Public Works Corporation Yard single drain inlet (DI), which replaced the filter fabric and straw waddles that were used previously at that location since FY 13-14.

• Vehicle and Equipment maintenance – No vehicle equipment washing takes place on-site at the Corporation Yard. In the event that vehicles or equipment are undergoing minor maintenance, BMPs are used to prevent fluids from contaminating stormwater.

• Solid Waste and Green Debris Storage – There are solid waste and green waste debris boxes located at the recycling facility across the street. During periods of rain, the storage containers are closed to prevent rainwater from becoming contaminated. These activities are covered by the Recycling and Environmental Resource Center’s SWPPP. Only a small amount of waste and recycling is stored at the Corporation Yard.

FY 17-18 AR Form 2-4 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.2 – Municipal Operations Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

• Storage of Hazardous Material – The only herbicide used by City staff is Roundup for weed control. Small amounts are stored in a secure tool room in the Corporation Yard building. All other hazardous materials such as paint are also stored in a secured building. Empty containers that once contained hazardous materials are recycled, reclaimed or returned to the distributor in a timely and appropriate manner, or otherwise appropriately disposed of to ensure no hazardous material enters the waste stream.

• Pesticides – To avoid spillage, equipment such as pumps and funnels are used when mixing or transferring pesticides from a large container to a smaller one. Transferring of pesticides is done over a containment area when possible (tray, bucket, etc.). Pesticides are generally transferred from supplier containers to a secondary container using a funnel. Spill clean-up equipment is kept nearby when transfers are occurring at the Corporation Yard and when work is being performed in the field.

• Catch Basin Sludge and Street Sweeping Spoils – Street sweeping spoils and catch basin sludge are taken directly to a disposal site, outside of the Corporation Yard.

• Fueling Vehicles and equipment – Vehicles are fueled at other locations and no bulk fuel is stored on site. When small amounts of fuel are dispensed on-site, additional BMPs are used to minimize the chance of stormwater pollution.

• Spill Clean-Up – Spill clean-up equipment is maintained in workers vehicles and the Corporation Yard building. Equipment is also stored on all vehicles that transport hazardous substances to a job site.

• Parking Lot Cleaning – Parking lots may accumulate vehicle leaks such as oil, antifreeze and solid nonhazardous debris. Weekly inspections are done to ensure the area is clean, and to clean up leaks and debris using dry methods,

• Off-Site Work and Spill Response – All off-site workers are to use caution to prevent storm drain pollution at job sites. During catch basin cleaning crews schedule work so that any wash water recovered by the vacuum truck can be hauled away. If field decanting is necessary, crews will pretreat discharge water by running it through gravel bags prior to discharge. Outdoor areas are swept of debris before leaving a worksite. Clean-up equipment for spills is kept in all vehicles.

• Hazardous Waste Storage – The hazardous waste storage area is in the covered vehicle area in the west yard. The area is for storage of abandoned waste picked up along maintained roadways and for identified hazardous paint related wastes and pesticides generated onsite. Hazardous waste shipments occur as needed by in-house staff or a contracted hazardous waste transporter. All containers stored in the hazardous waste storage area are stored in an intact and leak proof container. No materials are left around the outside of this area.

• Training: Staff are educated on stormwater BMPs as part of an annual training and regular safety meetings, including proper fueling, spill prevention and cleanup procedures.

FY 17-18 AR Form 2-5 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.2 – Municipal Operations Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

If you have a corporation yard(s) that is not an NOI facility, complete the following table for inspection results for your corporation yard(s) or attach a summary including the following information: Date and Description of Follow-up and/or Corp Yard Activities w/ site- Inspection Corrective Corporation Yard Name specific SWPPP BMPs Date2 Inspection Findings/Results Actions City of El Cerrito Activities at the El Cerrito Corp Monthly During monthly inspections in FY17/18, the Corp. Yard N/A Public Works Yard include: site was determined to be in clean and good Maintenance Yard. • General condition with the BMPs outlined above in place, and (7550 Schmidt Lane) housekeeping in compliance with C.2.f requirements. • No vehicle or equipment washing • Minor vehicle/equipment maintenance & repair • Fuel dispensing to small equipment • Outdoor material storage • Minor outdoor waste/recycling storage • Municipal vehicle and heavy equipment parking • Employee parking • FTCD Maintenance

See site specific BMPs above.

2 Minimum inspection frequency is once a year during September.

FY 17-18 AR Form 2-6 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 3 - Provision C.3 Reporting New Development and Redevelopment

C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting Fill in attached table C.3.b.iv.(2) or attach your own table including the same information.

Please see Table C.3.b.iv.(2).

C.3.e.iv. ►Alternative or In-Lieu Compliance with Provision C.3.c. Is your agency choosing to require 100% LID treatment onsite for all Regulated Projects and not allow alternative Yes No X compliance under Provision C.3.e.? Comments (optional): None.

C.3.e.v ► Special Projects Reporting 1. In FY 2017-18, has your agency received, but not yet granted final discretionary approval of, a development Yes No permit application for a project that has been identified as a potential Special Project based on criteria listed in X MRP Provision C.3.e.ii(2) for any of the three categories of Special Projects (Categories A, B or C)? 2. In FY 2017-18, has your agency granted final discretionary approval to a Special Project? If yes, include the Yes No X project in both the C.3.b.iv.(2) Table, and the C.3.e.v. Table. If you answered “Yes” to either question, 1) Complete Table C.3.e.v. 2) Attach narrative discussion of 100% LID Feasibility or Infeasibility for each project.

Please refer to Table C.3.e.v and the associated narrative section below.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-1 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.h.v.(2) ► Reporting Newly Installed Stormwater Treatment Systems and HM Controls (Optional) On an annual basis, before the wet season, provide a list of newly installed (installed within the reporting year) stormwater treatment systems and HM controls to the local mosquito and vector control agency and the Water Board. The list shall include the facility locations and a description of the stormwater treatment measures and HM controls installed. No new stormwater treatment systems were installed within the City of El Cerrito in FY 2017-18.

C.3.h.v.(3)(a) –(c) and (f) ► Installed Stormwater Treatment Systems Operation and Maintenance Verification Inspection Program Reporting Site Inspections Data Number/Percentage Total number of Regulated Projects (including offsite projects, and Regional Projects) in your agency’s database 5 or tabular format at the end of the previous fiscal year (FY16-17)

Total number of Regulated Projects (including offsite projects, and Regional Projects) in your agency’s database 5 or tabular format at the end of the reporting period (FY 17-18)

Total number of Regulated Projects (including offsite projects, and Regional Projects) for which O&M verification 4 inspections were conducted during the reporting period (FY 17-18)

Percentage of the total number of Regulated Projects (including offsite projects, and Regional Projects) inspected 80%3 during the reporting period (FY 17-18)

3 Based on the number of Regulated Projects in the database or tabular format at the end of the previous fiscal year, per MRP Provision C.3.h.ii.(6)(b).

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-2 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.h.v.(3)(d)-(e) ► Installed Stormwater Treatment Systems Operation and Maintenance Verification Inspection Program Reporting Provide a discussion of the inspection findings for the year and any common problems encountered with various types of treatment systems and/or HM controls. This discussion should include a general comparison to the inspection findings from the previous year. Summary: The City has five (5) regulated projects with installed stormwater treatment facilities which are mostly bio-retention facilities and one vault- based system. In general, the most common follow-up measures include keeping track of and properly documenting inspections after storm events to confirm facilities are draining well and that vegetation is alive.

Provide a discussion of the effectiveness of the O&M Program and any proposed changes to improve the O&M Program (e.g., changes in prioritization plan or frequency of O&M inspections, other changes to improve effectiveness program). Summary: The O&M Program is functioning effectively for El Cerrito. Annually, we remind (via email) responsible parties of the requirement to conduct an annual inspection in September and submit their annual checklist to the City within 30 days of the inspection to ensure proper functioning of facilities during the rainy season. By early September of each year, the City will continue to remind responsible parties of the requirement to conduct an annual inspection. The City follows up on these inspections with a verification inspection. As an increasingly diverse range of facilities are built, the City will have to reevaluate how many sites and facilities will be inspected by City staff and/or consultants.

C.3.h.v.(4)► Enforcement Response Plan Does your agency have an Enforcement Response Plan for all O&M inspections of stormwater treatment Yes No X measures? If No, explain: Not Applicable.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-3 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.i. ►Required Site Design Measures for Small Projects and Detached Single Family Home Projects On an annual basis, discuss the implementation of the requirements of Provision C.3.i, including ordinance revisions, permit conditions, development of standard specifications and/or guidance materials, and staff training. Summary: BASMAA prepared standard specifications in four fact sheets regarding the site design measures listed in Provision C.3.i, as a resource for Permittees. The City of El Cerrito has modified local ordinances, policies, procedures, as well as forms and checklists, to require all applicable projects approved after December 1, 2012 to implement at least one of the site design measures listed in Provision C.3.i. We are using the following Program and BASMAA products for C.3.i implementation: • BASMAA’s site design fact sheets • The countywide program’s checklist • C.3.i guidance provided by the countywide program

The Contra Costa Clean Water Program adopted a December 1, 2012 addendum to the Stormwater C.3 Guidebook, 6th Edition. The addendum, “Preparing a Stormwater Control Plan for a Small Land Development Project,” includes step-by-step instructions, a project data form, and standard specifications for runoff reduction measures. The City of El Cerrito’s stormwater ordinance requires that applications for development approvals for projects subject to the permit’s new development requirements include a Stormwater Control Plan meeting the criteria in the most recent version of the Stormwater C.3 Guidebook.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-4 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.j.i.(5)(d) ► Green Infrastructure Outreach On an annual basis, provide a summary of your agency’s outreach and education efforts pertaining to Green Infrastructure planning and implementation. Summary: The City of El Cerrito completed internal and external outreach (including staff orientation, staff reports, and information items provided to elected officials) as follows: • City Staff (Public Works and Community Development) met together for the development of the Green Infrastructure Plan on July 12, 2017, January 23, 2018, and April 11, 2018. • Staff provided a report and presentation to City Council on April 3, 2018 giving an overall update regarding the City’s Clean Water Program and outlining the City's intended process to develop a Green Infrastructure Plan. City Staff reported to City Council and the public, on the elements of a Green Infrastructure Plan and staff relayed how the City will develop and implement a Green Infrastructure Plan by September 2019 in accordance with the requirements of MRP 2.0, articulating that it will prioritize potential Green Infrastructure Projects to be built for the incremental reduction of stormwater pollutants. • On June 28, 2018, City Staff presented an update on the Green Infrastructure Plan at a public meeting being held for the Storm Drain Master Plan. • The City continued to coordinate with the San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP) on implementation of the San Pablo Avenue Green Stormwater Spine Project. This demonstration project will implement green infrastructure such as permeable walkway surfaces, bioretention, and flow-through planters at select sites along San Pablo Avenue within El Cerrito, as well as, Oakland, Emeryville, Berkeley, Albany, Richmond, and San Pablo. In El Cerrito there is one site, which is a bio-retention facility.

City Staff also attended the following related trainings: • 2017 Annual Public Works Conference, Richmond, CA - 11/8/17 to 11/9/17 o Green Infrastructure Sessions and Workshops • 2017 California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Annual Conference - 9/25/17 to 9/27/17 o Green Infrastructure Sessions and Workshops • Mapistry's Industrial Stormwater Summit - 9/14/17 to 9/15/17 o Attended sessions on stormwater BMP's

Please refer to the Countywide Program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for a summary of outreach efforts implemented at the Countywide level.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-5 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.j.ii.(2) ► Early Implementation of Green Infrastructure Projects On an annual basis, submit a list of green infrastructure projects, public and private, that are already planned for implementation during the permit term and infrastructure projects planned for implementation during the permit term that have potential for green infrastructure measures. Include the following information: • A summary of planning or implementation status for each public and private green infrastructure project that is not also a Regulated Project as defined in Provision C.3.b.ii. (see C.3.j.ii.(2) Table B - Planned Green Infrastructure Projects). • A summary of how each public infrastructure project with green infrastructure potential will include green infrastructure measures to the maximum extent practicable during the permit term. For any public infrastructure project where implementation of green infrastructure measures is not practicable, submit a brief description of the project and the reasons green infrastructure measures were impracticable to implement (see C.3.j.ii.(2) Table A - Public Projects Reviewed for Green Infrastructure). Background Information: Describe how this provision is being implemented by your agency, including the process used by your agency to identify projects with potential for green infrastructure, if applicable. The City used the process identified in the BASMAA May 6, 2016 document, “Guidance for Identifying Green Infrastructure Potential in Municipal Capital Improvement Projects”.

Summary of Planning or Implementation Status of Identified Projects:

See attached Tables C.3.j.ii.(2)-A and C.3.j.ii.(2)-B for the required information.

C.3.j.iii.(2) ► Participate in Processes to Promote Green Infrastructure On an annual basis, report on the goals and outcomes during the reporting year of work undertaken to participate in processes to promote green infrastructure. On June 6, 2017, the El Cerrito City Council approved of a Staff recommendation to send a letter in support of Senate Bill 231: Local Government: Fees and Charges. The new law, which allows cities to fund stormwater projects in the same manner as other public works utilities, such as water or sanitary sewer projects, under Proposition 218, was seen as a critical step toward helping El Cerrito and other municipalities raise funds for green infrastructure projects.

In FY17-18, El Cerrito City Staff also served on the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) for the Contra Costa County Stormwater Resources Plan (SWRP)and regularly attended meetings of the CCCWP's Development Committee as a non-voting member.

Please refer to Countywide Program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for a summary of efforts conducted to help regional, State, and federal agencies plan, design and fund incorporation of green infrastructure measures into local infrastructure projects, including transportation projects.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-6 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.j.iv.(2) ► Tracking and Reporting Progress On an annual basis, report progress on development and implementation of methods to track and report implementation of green infrastructure measures and provide reasonable assurance that wasteload allocations for TMDLs are being met. Please refer to the Countywide Program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for a summary of methods being developed to track and report implementation of green infrastructure measures.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-7 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting Table (part 1) – Projects Approved During the Fiscal Year Reporting Period

Total Total Total Pre- Total Post- Total Area of Total New Replaced Project Project Project Site Land Impervious Impervious Impervious Impervious Project Name Project Location4, Street Phase Project Type & Area Disturbed Surface Surface Area Surface Surface Project No. Address Name of Developer No.5 Description6 Project Watershed7 (Acres) (Acres) Area (ft2)8 (ft2)9 Area10(ft2) Area11(ft2) Private Projects Avenue Lofts 10167 San Pablo Ave Mc Nevin 2-Joe N/A-not The original site SF Bay-Cerrito Creek 0.26 0.26 0 8,301 11,230 8,301 Decredico being consists of a paved Watershed construct parking lot with an ed in existing 850 sq-ft phases building. The project will remove all the paved surface and build a multi-family residential building. The Proposed 8-story building will contain 81 residential units. 6 units will be affordable. There is 1 level below grade that will serve as a parking garage. Branagh 10300 San Pablo Ave Branagh N/A-not Project includes 2 SF Bay-Cerrito Creek 0.57 0.57 228 15,454 23,825 15,682 Development Development being residential buildings Watershed Triplet 1 constru with 31 cted in condominium phases townhomes, private drives, and parking.

4Include cross streets 5If a project is being constructed in phases, indicate the phase number and use a separate row entry for each phase. If not, enter “NA”. 6Project Type is the type of development (i.e., new and/or redevelopment). Example descriptions of development are: 5-story office building, residential with 160 single-family homes with five 4-story buildings to contain 200 condominiums, 100 unit 2-story shopping mall, mixed use retail and residential development (apartments), industrial warehouse. 7State the watershed(s) in which the Regulated Project is located. Downstream watershed(s) may be included, but this is optional. 8All impervious surfaces added to any area of the site that was previously existing pervious surface. 9All impervious surfaces added to any area of the site that was previously existing impervious surface. 10For redevelopment projects, state the pre-project impervious surface area. 11For redevelopment projects, state the post-project impervious surface area.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-8 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting Table (part 1) – Projects Approved During the Fiscal Year Reporting Period

Branagh 10290 San Pablo Avenue Branagh N/A not Project includes 1 SF Bay-Cerrito Creek 0.29 0.29 425 6,002 11,768 6,427 Development Development being residential building Watershed Triplet 3 constru with 14 new cted in condominium phases townhomes, private drives, and parking.

San Pablo 10963 San Pablo Avenue Studio KDA N/A-not The project includes SF Bay-Cerrito Creek 0.42 0.42 0 12,368 16,477 12,368 Apartments being a new 5-story mixed Watershed constru use building with cted in new 50 residential phases units on the upper floors and commercial space on the first floor. There is also a parking lot garage and private walkways.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-9 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting Table (part 1) – Projects Approved During the Fiscal Year Reporting Period

Total Total Total Pre- Total Post- Total Area of Total New Replaced Project Project Project Site Land Impervious Impervious Impervious Impervious Project Name Project Location4, Street Phase Project Type & Area Disturbed Surface Surface Area Surface Surface Project No. Address Name of Developer No.5 Description6 Project Watershed7 (Acres) (Acres) Area (ft2)8 (ft2)9 Area10(ft2) Area11(ft2) Mayfair 11600/11690 San Pablo Holliday/ Bridge N/A-not The existing site SF Bay-Cerrito Creek 1.57 1.57 0 60,343 65,141 60,343 Apartments Avenue (two applicants) being consist of a vacant Watershed constru parking lot which cted in takes up most of the phases site. The project includes 2 new mixed-use buildings with a total of 223 Dwelling Units, including 67 units of affordable housing. There will also be 178 parking spaces and 23,303 sq-ft of open space. Village at Town 10810 San Pablo Avenue Trachtenberg N/A-not The proposed new SF Bay-Cerrito Creek 0.71 0.71 978 27,214 27,214 28,192 Center (PL16-0119) Architects being building is going to Watershed constru be located in the cted in existing concrete phases paved parking lot in the existing Village at town Center Apartments. The project includes a new three-story, 32 residential unit Development. Public Projects No C3 Public N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Projects Comments: No additional comments.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-10 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting Table (part 2) – Projects Approved During the Fiscal Year Reporting Period (private projects) Type of Application Application Operation & Deemed Final Maintenance Hydraulic Alternative Alternative Project Name Complete Approval Treatment Systems Responsibility Sizing Compliance Certification Project No. Date12 Date13 Source Control Measures14 Site Design Measures15 Approved16 Mechanism17 Criteria18 Measures19/20 21 HM Controls22/23 Private Projects Avenue Lofts November June 2018 On site inlets marked with The project will treat 81% of 4 ground level O&M 2c N/A N/A Not required as 2017 stenciling; pest resistant the site stormwater in four bioretention areas; Agreement project is less than plants; Integrated pest bioretention areas. As a multi- LID planters; one acre. In management information story building, there is integrating green addition, it would to new residents; Interior sufficient head to drain to LID roof to self-treat. satisfy Option 1 - floor drain within will drain planters. In addition, the project will not to a separator before amount of runoff is reduced increase discharge to sewer; trash by integrating a green roof to impervious area enclosure to be covered self-treat. and will not and plumbed to sewer increase efficiency of drainage collection and conveyance.

12For private projects, state project application deemed complete date. If the project did not go through discretionary review, report the building permit issuance date. 13 For private projects, state project application final discretionary approval date. If the project did not go through discretionary review, report the building permit issuance date. 14List source control measures approved for the project. Examples include: properly designed trash storage areas; storm drain stenciling or signage; efficient landscape irrigation systems; etc. 15List site design measures approved for the project. Examples include: minimize impervious surfaces; conserve natural areas, including existing trees or other vegetation, and soils; construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces, etc. 16List all approved stormwater treatment system(s) to be installed onsite or at a joint stormwater treatment facility (e.g., flow through planter, bioretention facility, infiltration basin, etc.). 17List the legal mechanism(s) (e.g., O&M agreement with private landowner; O&M agreement with homeowners’ association; O&M by public entity, etc…) that have been or will be used to assign responsibility for the maintenance of the post-construction stormwater treatment systems. 18See Provision C.3.d.i. “Numeric Sizing Criteria for Stormwater Treatment Systems” for list of hydraulic sizing design criteria. Enter the corresponding provision number of the appropriate criterion (i.e., 1.a., 1.b., 2.a., 2.b., 2.c., or 3). 19For Alternative Compliance at an offsite location in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(1), on a separate page, give a discussion of the alternative compliance site including the information specified in Provision C.3.b.v.(1)(m)(i) for the offsite project. 20For Alternative Compliance by paying in-lieu fees in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(2), on a separate page, provide the information specified in Provision C.3.b.v.(1)(m)(ii) for the Regional Project. 21Note whether a third party was used to certify the project design complies with Provision C.3.d. 22If HM control is not required, state why not. 23If HM control is required, state control method used (e.g., method to design and size device(s) or method(s) used to meet the HM Standard, and description of device(s) or method(s) used, such as detention basin(s), biodetention unit(s), regional detention basin, or in-stream control).

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-11 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting Table (part 2) – Projects Approved During the Fiscal Year Reporting Period (private projects) Type of Application Application Operation & Deemed Final Maintenance Hydraulic Alternative Alternative Project Name Complete Approval Treatment Systems Responsibility Sizing Compliance Certification Project No. Date12 Date13 Source Control Measures14 Site Design Measures15 Approved16 Mechanism17 Criteria18 Measures19/20 21 HM Controls22/23 Branagh October October Mark Inlets with stenciling; A combination of pervious 3 Bioretention O & M 2c N/A N/A Not required as Development 2016 2017 Discourage on-site car pavers and LID treatment facilities; pervious Agreement project is less than Triplet 1 washing and enforced by measures with new driveway and LID one acre. In HOA CC&R’s; Integrated bioretention will be utilized to treatment addition, it would Pest Management treat storm runoff. satisfy Option 1 - Information to new home project will not owners and HOA increase operators; pest resistant impervious area plants; street and sidewalk sweeping; Trash/recyclable plumbed to sewer

Branagh October October Mark Inlets with stenciling; A combination of pervious 2 Bioretention O&M 2c N/A N/A Not required as Development 2016 2017 Discourage on-site car pavers and LID treatment facilities; pervious Agreement project is less than Triplet 2 washing and enforced by measures with new driveway and LID one acre. In HOA CC&R’s; Integrated bioretention will be utilized to treatment addition, it would Pest Management treat storm runoff. measures. satisfy Option 1 - Information to new home project will not owners and HOA increase operators; pest resistant impervious area plants; street and sidewalk sweeping; Trash/recyclable plumbed to sewer

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-12 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

San Pablo June 29, May 2018 Mark Inlets with stenciling; A combination of pervious 1 bioretention O&M 2c N/A N/A Not required as Apartments 2017 Parking Garage floor drains pavers and LID treatment planter on the 2nd agreement project is less than plumbed to sanitary sewer; measures with new floor roof deck and one acre. In pest resistant plants; follow bioretention will be utilized to 2 ground floor addition, it would permanent source treat storm runoff. New bioretention satisfy Option 1 - controls. bioretention facility area. planters project will not increase impervious area Mayfair December August Mark Inlets with stenciling; Special Project: Treatment of 4 ground floor O&M 2c N/A N/A Project will not Apartments 2016 2018 Parking Garage floor drains 20% of the runoff will be bioretention areas, Agreement increase plumbed to sanitary sewer; treated by IMP, the other 80% In addition each impervious area pest resistant plants; follow will be treated by non-LID IMP. building will have its permanent source own non-LID controls; street and treatment systems sidewalk sweeping. (media filters)

Village at Septembe April 2018 Mark Inlets with stenciling; 100% of stormwater runoff will Two Imp facilities O&M 2c N/A N/A Not required as Town Center r 2016 All dumpsters will be be treated by on-site flow- are proposed for Agreement project is less than marked with Do not dump the project site.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-13 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-14 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting Table (part 2) – Projects Approved During the Fiscal Year Reporting Period (public projects) Alternative Project Name Approval Date Construction Source Control Site Design Treatment Systems Operation & Maintenance Hydraulic Compliance Alternative HM Project No. Date24 Scheduled to Begin Measures25 Measures26 Approved27 Responsibility Mechanism28 Sizing Criteria29 Measures30/31 Certification32 Controls33/34 Public Projects No C3 Public N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Projects Comments: No additional comments.

24For public projects, enter the plans and specifications approval date. 25List source control measures approved for the project. Examples include: properly designed trash storage areas; storm drain stenciling or signage; efficient landscape irrigation systems; etc. 26List site design measures approved for the project. Examples include: minimize impervious surfaces; conserve natural areas, including existing trees or other vegetation, and soils; construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces, etc. 27List all approved stormwater treatment system(s) to be installed onsite or at a joint stormwater treatment facility (e.g., flow through planter, bioretention facility, infiltration basin, etc.). 28List the legal mechanism(s) (e.g., maintenance plan for O&M by public entity, etc.) that have been or will be used to assign responsibility for the maintenance of the post-construction stormwater treatment systems. 29See Provision C.3.d.i. “Numeric Sizing Criteria for Stormwater Treatment Systems” for list of hydraulic sizing design criteria. Enter the corresponding provision number of the appropriate criterion (i.e., 1.a., 1.b., 2.a., 2.b., 2.c., or 3). 30For Alternative Compliance at an offsite location in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(1), on a separate page, give a discussion of the alternative compliance site including the information specified in Provision C.3.b.v.(1)(m)(i) for the offsite project. 31For Alternative Compliance by paying in-lieu fees in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(2), on a separate page, provide the information specified in Provision C.3.b.v.(1)(m)(ii) for the Regional Project. 32Note whether a third party was used to certify the project design complies with Provision C.3.d. 33If HM control is not required, state why not. 34If HM control is required, state control method used (e.g., method to design and size device(s) or method(s) used to meet the HM Standard, and description of device(s) or method(s) used, such as detention basin(s), biodetention unit(s), regional detention basin, or in-stream control).

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-15 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.h.v.(2). ►Table of Newly Installed35 Stormwater Treatment Systems and Hydromodification Management (HM) Controls (Optional) Fill in table below or attach your own table including the same information. Type of 36 Party Responsible Treatment/HM Name of Facility Address of Facility For Maintenance Control(s) NO STORMWATER TREATEMENT N/A N/A N/A SYSTEMS WERE INSTALLED IN FY 2017-18

35 “Newly Installed” includes those facilities for which the final installation inspection was performed during this reporting year. 36State the responsible operator for installed stormwater treatment systems and HM controls.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-16 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.e.v.Special Projects Reporting Table Reporting Period – July 1 2017 - June 30, 2018

Project Permittee Address Application Status38 Description39 Site Gross Density Special LID List of LID List of Non- Name & No. Submittal Total Density FAR Project Treatment Stormwater LID Date37 Acre DU/Acre Category40 Reduction Treatment Stormwater age Credit Systems42 Treatment Available41 Systems43 Category A: Category Indicate Indicate Category B: A: each type each type Category C: Category of LID of non-LID Location: B: treatment treatment Density: Category system system and Parking: C: and % of % of total Location: total runoff runoff Density: treated. treated. Parking: Indicate whether minimum design criteria met or certificatio n received

37Date that a planning application for the Special Project was submitted. 38 Indicate whether final discretionary approval is still pending or has been granted, and provide the date or version of the project plans upon which reporting is based. 39Type of project (commercial, mixed-use, residential), number of floors, number of units, type of parking, and other relevant information. 40 For each applicable Special Project Category, list the specific criteria applied to determine applicability. For each non-applicable Special Project Category, indicate n/a. 41For each applicable Special Project Category, state the maximum total LID Treatment Reduction Credit available. For Category C Special Projects also list the individual Location, Density, and Minimized Surface Parking Credits available. 42: List all LID stormwater treatment systems proposed. For each type, indicate the percentage of the total amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Special Project’s drainage area. 43List all non-LID stormwater treatment systems proposed. For each type of non-LID treatment system, indicate: (1) the percentage of the total amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Special Project's drainage area, and (2) whether the treatment system either meets minimum design criteria published by a government agency or received certification issued by a government agency, and reference the applicable criteria or certification.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-17 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

1) Avenue City of El 10167 First Project 81 0.26 311 N/A Category A: Category The 19% of the Lofts – Mc Cerrito San submitted has residential Lot Line to A: 100% project will drainage is Nevin 2 Pablo 1/16/2017; been units in an 8- Lot line, LID Credit treat 81% treated 10167 San Avenue re- approv story Impervious of the using a Pablo submittal ed by building. 6 area < ½ Category site’s media filter Avenue 11/7/2017; Plannin units will be acres; transit B: N/A stormwate located in (PL17-0006) Approved g and is affordable. oriented r in four the 6/6/18 going Parking with high Category ground undergrou through undergroun density 311 C: level nd garage. Building d. du/acre; N/A bioretentio Review zero parking n areas. surface. Category B: N/A Category C: N/A 2) Branagh City of El 10300 Approved Project 31 new 0.57 54 2.27 Category A: Category The N/A Developm Cerrito San on has residential N/A A: N/A project will ent triplet 1 Pablo 10/18/2017 been units in 2 Category B: Category treat 100% 10300 San Avenue approv buildings N/A B: N/A of the Pablo ed by Category C: Category site’s Avenue Plannin Location: ½ C: stormwate (PL16-0139) g and is mile Location: r in three going Density: 54 25% bioretentio through du/acre Density: n facilities Building Parking: 0 10% and Review Surface Parking: pervious Parking 20% driveways

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-18 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

3) Branagh City of El 10192 Approved Project 1 residential 0.42 42 1.53 Category A: Category The N/A Developm Cerrito San on has building N/A A: N/A project will ent triplet 2 Pablo 8/2/2017 been with 21 Category B: Category treat 100% at 10192 Avenue approv condominiu N/A B: N/A of the San Pablo ed by m Category C: Category site’s Avenue Plannin townhomes, Location: ½ C: stormwate (PL16-0137) g and is private mile Location: r in two (2) going drives and Density: 42 25% Bioretentio through parking. du/acre Density: n facilities; Building Parking: 10% pervious Review Zero Surface Parking: driveway Parking 20% and LID treatment measures.

4) Branagh City of El 10290 Approved Project 1 residential 0.29 48 2.26 Category A: Category The N/A Developm Cerrito San on has building N/A A: N/A project will ent triplet 3 Pablo 8/2/2017 been with 14 Category B: Category treat 100% at 10290 Avenue approv condominiu N/A B: N/A of the San Pablo ed by m Category C: Category site’s Ave (PL16- Plannin townhomes, Location: ½ C: stormwate 0136) g and is private mile Location: r in two (2) going drives and Density: 48 25% Bioretentio through parking. du/acre Density: n facilities; Building Parking: 10% pervious Review Zero Surface Parking: driveway Parking 20% and LID treatment measures.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-19 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

5) San City of El 10963 6/29/2017; Project 5-story 0.42 119 N/A Category A: Category The N/A Pablo Cerrito San Approved has mixed use N/A A: N/A project will Apartment Pablo on 5/2/18 been space with Category B: Category treat 100% s – 10963 Avenue approv 50 N/A B: N/A of the San Pablo ed by residential Category C: Category site’s Ave plannin units, Location: C: stormwate (formerly g and is commercial within PDA Location: r in One Playland) going space, and Density: 119 25% (1) (PL17-0084) through parking DU/acre Density: bioretentio Building garage 36 Parking: 30% n planter Review parking Zero Surface Parking: on the 2nd spaces Parking 20% floor roof 50% Rule deck and applies 2 ground floor bioretentio n planters

6) Mayfair City of El 11600/1 12/20/2016; Project 233 dwelling 1.57 148 N/A Category A: Category 20% LID 80% Non- Properties – Cerrito 1690 San re- has units N/A A: N/A treated in LID – Each 11600/1169 Pablo submitted been including 67 Category B: Category Four (4) building will 0 San Avenue 2/16/2017; approv units of N/A B: 100% ground have its Pablo Ave re- ed by affordable Category C: Category floor own non- (PL16-0168 submitted plannin housing, Location: ¼ C: bioretentio LID 4/25/2017; g and is commercial mile Location: n areas. treatment Approved going space, 178 Density: 148 50% systems on 8/2/18 through vehicle du/acre Density: (media Building parking Parking: 30% filters) Review spaces and Zero Surface Parking: 23,303 SF Parking. 20% open 50% Rule space. applicable.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-20 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

7) San City of El 11615/ 10/14/2015; Approv New 116 0.79 N/A 2.0 Category A: Category 95% - 5%- Pablo Cerrito 11645 real is room Hotel N/A A: N/A Bioretentio Incomplete /Cutting San submitted pending A parking Category B: Category n Facilities – not Hotel Pablo 9/20/2016; ; plans garage in N/A B: enough Avenue re- submitte the Category C: N/A information submitted d basement, Location: Category has been 5/16/2017; 5/16/20 with retail within 1/4 C: submitted Redesignin 17 were space and mile Location: g not with 98 Density: FAR 50% approv parking 2.0 Density: ed; spaces Parking: 10% Plans Zero (all Parking: are garage 20% under parking) redesig ning

8) McNevin City of El 10135 1/26/2016; Approv New six- 0.5 146 N/A Category A: Category 100% LID – N/A North Site - Cerrito San Re- al is story mixed- N/A A: 23 Flow- 10135 San Pablo submitted pending use building Category B: N/A Through Pablo Avenue 4/12/2017; ; plans with 72 N/A Category Planters Avenue submitte residential Category C: B: d units, four Location: N/A 4/12/20 ground-floor within ½ Category 17 commercial mile C: spaces and Density:146 Location: rooftop du/acre 25% public open Parking: Density: space. Zero (all 30% garage Parking: parking) 20%

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-21 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

9) Village City of El 10810 9/12/2016; Approv Two new 1.51 26 N/A Category A: Category 100% LID – N/A at Town Cerrito San Approved al is three-story N/A A: N/A 2 Bio- Center – Pablo 4/27/2017 ; pending buildings, Category B: Category retention 10810 San Avenue until containing N/A B: N/A areas Pablo storm 40 dwelling Category C: Category Avenue water units, 33 Location: C: (PL16-0119) control surface within PDA Location: plans parking Density: 26 25% are spaces du/acre Density: more Parking: at N/A complet grade Parking: e; plans N/A submitte d 4/27/20 17

10) Baxter City of El 11965 3/1/2017 Applica 146 unit 0.5 292 N/A Category A: Category Incomplet Incomplete Creek Cerrito San tion is multi- N/A A: N/A e – not – not Apartment Pablo INCOM residential Category B: Category enough enough s 11965 San Avenue PLETE – building N/A B: N/A informatio information Pablo Ave No with 10% of Category C: Category n submitted (former Stormw units being Location: C: submitted Taco Bell) ater affordable. 1/2 mile Location: (PL17-0028) Control 75 parking Density: 292 25% Plan spaces du/acre Density: submitte undergroun Parking: 30% d; re- d Zero Surface Parking: submitte Parking 20% d plans 6/26/20 17

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-22 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

11)Kearney City of El 921 10/16/17 Approv The 0.31 233 3.76 Category A: Category 82% of the 18% Non Street lofts Cerrito Kearney al is proposed 5- Impervious A: 100% site’s storm LID is St pending story area ,0.5 Category water will treated until building will acre B: N/A be using storm contain 72 Downtown Category treaded in media filter water new District; 0 C:N/A five (5) located in control residential surface ground the plans Units. There Parking.85% level undergrou are is a below site bioretentio nd garage more grade level coverage n areas. complet serving as Category B: e parking N/A garage Category C: N/A

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-23 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Special Projects Narrative

1) Avenue Lofts – 10167 San Pablo Avenue Project has been approved in June 2018. The existing site used to be an old car dealership with a paved parking lot that covered the entire site with an existing building of approximately 850 sq-ft. The proposed development will be a multi-family residential project with a building footprint of 7,695 sq-ft. The proposed 6-story building will contain 81 residential units. There is 1 level below grade that will serve as a parking garage to the building. This is a special project that is transit oriented with high density, the development qualifies for use of non-LID measures to treat 100% of stormwater. However, this project proposes 81% of the site’s stormwater to be treated in four ground level bioretention’s areas. As a multi-story building, there is sufficient hydraulic head to drain to the LID planters. In addition, the amount of runoff is reduced by integrating a green roof to self-treat. The other 19% of the drainage is treated using a media filter located in the underground garage. Runoff to the implemented IMP’s will be collected from portions of the rooftop and roof decks of the building and routed down to the four bioretention planters at grade. All bioretention areas will be collected in a subsurface perforated pipe, then piped through the side to sidewalk cross drains that outfall onto San Pablo Ave.

2) Branagh Development – 10300 San Pablo Avenue Project has been approved in October 2017. The proposed improvements to the existing 0.57-acre site include 2 residential buildings with 31 condominium townhomes, private drives, and parking. The stormwater Control Report proposes 100% LID. The proposed project will be divided into 3 drainage management areas. All DMAs will drain into bio-retention areas adjacent to the buildings. All roof drainage, concrete, landscaping and pervious pavers will drain to LID treatment facilities.

3) Branagh Development – 10192 San Pablo Avenue Project has been approved in October 2017. The Stormwater Control Report proposes 100% LID. The submittal proposed improvements to the existing 0.42-acre site include 1 residential building with a three-story multi-family residential development with 21 condominium townhomes, private drives, and parking site. A combination of pervious pavers and LID treatment measures will be utilized to treat stormwater runoff. The drive aisle within the project will consist of pervious pavers with a 6” underdrain to convey runoff from the northeast portion of the site to the bioretention facility located along the southwest edge of the site. Treated water will be conveyed off-site with a new 12” storm drain pipe which will tie into the existing 24” storm drain along San Pablo Avenue.

4) Branagh Development – 10290 San Pablo Avenue Project has been approved in October of 2017. Stormwater Control Report proposes 100% LID. The proposed improvements to the existing 0.29 acres will replace an existing two-story office building and parking lot currently on the site. The proposed Project consists of a three-story multi-family residential development with 14 dwelling units and will provide six surface parking spaces, eight individual garage spaces, and one accessible space, for a total of 15 parking spaces. A combination of pervious pavers and LID treatment measures will be utilized to treat stormwater runoff. The drive aisle within the project will consist of pervious pavers with a 6” underdrain to convey runoff from the northeast portion of the site to the bioretention facility located along the northeast edge of the site. The northeast bioretention facility will also treat minimal roof drainage from the southern portion of Building 1. The majority of the roof drainage along with hardscape and landscape areas will be treated by the bioretention facility adjacent to the northwestern edge

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-24 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito of Building 1. Treated water from the bioretention facilities will also be conveyed off-site with new 12” storm drain pipes which will then tie into the existing 24” storm drain lines along San Pablo Avenue.

5) San Pablo Apartments – 10963 San Pablo Avenue Project has been approved in May 2018. The Stormwater Control Report proposes 100% LID Treatment. All runoff from the site will be treated by Integrated Management Practices (IMP). Runoff to the implemented IMPs will be collected from portions of the rooftop and roof decks of the building and routed down to one bioretention planter on the second-floor roof deck and two ground floor bioretention planters. All bioretention areas will be collected in a subsurface perforated pipe, then piped through the site to sidewalk cross drains that outfall onto Jefferson Avenue.

6) Mayfair Properties – 11600/11690 San Pablo Avenue The project will occupy approximately 1.57 acres of what is now a vacant and unused parking lot. The existing site consists of a vacant asphalt parking lot which takes up the majority of the site. There is grass that covers approximately 3,300 square feet of the site and a large area of composite concrete and asphalt that makes up approximately 14,500 of the rest of the site. This project qualifies as a Special project per the Contra Costa County Clean Water Program C.3 Guidebook, table 4-14, including Categories B and C, which allow for 100% LID Credit, because it is located in the Uptown District of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (Transit-Oriented, Higher-Intensity Mixed Use Zoning). It is located across the street from the El Cerrito del Norte BART Station. Treatment of 20% of the runoff from the site will be treated by Integrated Management Practices. The other 80% of runoff from the site will be treated by non- LID treatment systems. Implemented IMPs for the proposed project will treat each of the two new buildings separately. Each building will also have its own non-LID system (media filter) to treat a portion of the runoff. Runoff to the implemented IMPs will be collected from portions of the rooftops of each building and routed down to four ground floor bioretention areas. All bioretention areas will be collected in a subsurface perforated pipe, and then piped through the site to an existing 36-inch storm drain line located on Cutting Boulevard adjacent to the site. One limitation of this project is the extensive amount of proposed at-grade impervious surface that must be treated. The intent is to drain the runoff from these areas through a Contech media filter to the existing 36-inch storm drain line located to the south on Cutting Boulevard. Because the area around the perimeter of the building is narrow and difficult to treat, this portion of the site will remain untreated. For one building, the untreated area amounts to 6% and the other building 4% of the total surface area. Since the post-project impervious surface area is less than the pre-project impervious surface area, there is no requirement to manage in-runoff peak flows and durations.

7) San Pablo/Cutting Hotel– 11645 San Pablo Avenue The proposed Hotel will be located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Cutting Blvd and San Pablo Ave. The parcel is zoned Transit Oriented High-Density Mixed Use. The project is going through redesigning and the Stormwater Control Plan Report remains incomplete. The proposed stormwater control plan site is proposing 95% LID. Because the site is located across the street from BART, it is a transit-oriented class C Special Project, and only 50% of the site is required to be LID. The submitted project feasibility assessment states that the project will be divided into 9 drainage management areas and treated through 4 bio-retention planters. The Stormwater Control Plans however are still incomplete and the feasibility or infeasibility of 95% LID treatment, onsite and offsite, will be evaluated before final discretionary approval.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-25 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

8) McNevin Site – 10135 San Pablo Ave The project approval with 100% LID treatment onsite is pending and under review. The majority of the site’s impervious area is the roof of the proposed building. Runoff will be directed to flow-through planters which will be located on lower roof areas. Vegetated planters to be installed will provide filtration and increase the time of concentration. Flow-through planters are proposed to treat runoff from the new structure. The driveway and parking area are in the sub-surface garage so there is no treatment required. Green roofs are also a major part of the proposed treatment plan. The project will be divided into 21 DMAs which will drain into 21 flow- through planters. The feasibility or infeasibility of 100% LID treatment, onsite and offsite, will be evaluated before final discretionary approval.

9) Village at Town Center – 10810 San Pablo Avenue The project has been approved on April 2018. The Project Site is located adjacent to the existing Village at Town Center Apartments at 10810 San Pablo Avenue; between San Pablo Avenue & Kearney Street, northwest of Schmidt Lane. The area of the subject parcel is 62,060 square feet, 1.42 acres. The footprint of the proposed building is located in the existing parking lot of the subject parcel. All existing buildings on the subject parcel are to remain. The approximate area of new construction is 28,660 square feet. Some of the existing parking spaces will be reconfigured as part of the new project. The project consists of new three-story buildings, containing 40 dwelling units, 33 surface parking spaces. The project proposes 100% LID in two (2) Imp facilities. Both are in-ground vegetated flow- through Planter Bioswales.

10) Baxter Creek Apartments – 11965 San Pablo Avenue As of June 2018, the Stormwater Control Report is incomplete. The project will occupy approximately 0.42 acres of what is now a one- story commercial Building. Treatment of all runoff from the site will be treated by Integrated Management Practices (IMP). Runoff to the implemented IMPs will be collected from portions of the rooftop and roof decks and two ground floor bioretention planters. All bioretention areas will be collected in a subsurface perforated pipe, and then piped through the site to sidewalk cross drains to outfall onto the street. The feasibility or infeasibility of 100% LID treatment however is pending and will be evaluated before final approval

11) Kearney Street Lofts-921 Kearney Street The project consists of a multi-family residential development on 921 Kearney. There is one level below grade that will serve as a parking garage to the building. The proposed development will be a multi-family residential project, occupying an area of 10,000 sq.- ft. The proposed 5-story building will contain 72 residential units. There is one level below grade that will serve as a parking garage to the building. As a special project that is a transit oriented with high density, the development qualifies for use of non-LID measures to treat 100% of the stormwaters. However, this project proposes 82% of the site stormwaters to be treated in five ground level bioretention areas. As a multi-story building, there is sufficient hydraulic head to drain to the LID planters. The other 18% of the drainage is treated using a media filter located in the underground garage. Runoff to the implemented IMPs will be collected from portions of the rooftop of the building and routed down to the five bioretention planters at grade. All bioretention areas will be collected in a subsurface perforated pipe, then piped through the site sidewalk cross drains onto adjacent properties to the west and south of the site, making its way to storm drain inlets at west corner of Kearney Street and Waldo Ave. The feasibility or infeasibility of this proposed treatment however is pending and will be evaluated before final approval.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-26 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.j.ii.(2) ► Table A - Public Projects Reviewed for Green Infrastructure

Project Name and Project Description Status45 GI Description of GI Measures Location44 Included?46 Considered and/or Proposed or Why GI is Impracticable to Implement47 Centennial /Fairmont Park Upgrade a portion of park Under Construction Yes Disperse runoff from Impervious surface onto Improvements, Phase 1, with new, more accessible adjacent vegetated area and use of new Eureka Avenue and Liberty paths; enhanced gathering pervious surface under playing structures Street spaces; improved children's play area; and improved landscaping and amenities

Ohlone Greenway Impr - Hill Construction of a new Under Design (95%) Yes Disperse runoff from Impervious surface onto to Blake, Safeway Path – pedestrian side path adjacent vegetated area. Phase 1

Del Norte TOD Complete Construction of new and Planning TBD Prelim concept design prepared as part of Streets Improvements enhanced bicycle and Contra Costa Watersheds Stormwater pedestrian facilities to Resource Plan effort. Project as funded does regional transit at El Cerrito not include green infrastructure del Norte BART Station and improvements. Four potentially feasible TOD, bus and vehicle locations for bioretention that could be circulation improvements, included in the project were identified based and streetscape elements on the proposed street modifications, specifically, bioretention facilities in new curb bulb-outs and traffic channelization islands. Practicality of implementation is pending further assessment of feasibility, incremental cost, and availability of funding.

44 List each public project that is going through your agency’s process for identifying projects with green infrastructure potential. 45 Indicate status of project, such as: beginning design, under design (or X% design), projected completion date, completed final design date, etc. 46 Enter “Yes” if project will include GI measures, “No” if GI measures are impracticable to implement, or “TBD” if this has not yet been determined. 47 Provide a summary of how each public infrastructure project with green infrastructure potential will include green infrastructure measures to the maximum extent practicable during the permit term. If review of the project indicates that implementation of green infrastructure measures is not practicable, provide the reasons why green infrastructure measures are impracticable to implement.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-27 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Eureka Ave and Lexington Rehabilitate the roadway Under Prelim Design TBD Additional landscaped areas to reduce Ave Improvements pavement; reconstruct impervious surface in sidewalk areas and sections of sidewalk, curb, potential for bioretention facilities will be and gutter and storm drain considered as design progresses. Practicality facilities; install new and of implementation is pending further modified curb ramps; install assessment of feasibility, incremental cost, new traffic signing and and availability of funding. pavement markings; and remove and replace several street trees as necessary to address deficiencies in the sidewalk Central Ave and Carlson Rehabilitate the roadway Under Prelim Design TBD Additional landscaped areas to reduce Blvd Pavement pavement; install traffic impervious surface in sidewalk areas and Rehabilitation signing, pavement markings potential for bioretention facilities will be and signs to enhance considered as design progresses. Practicality crosswalks and bike lanes, of implementation is pending further including a new Class II bike assessment of feasibility, incremental cost, lane on one block of Central and availability of funding. (Carlson to San Pablo); replace vehicle signal loop detection; and make minor utility adjustments to grade

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-28 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.3.j.ii.(2) ► Table B - Planned and/or Completed Green Infrastructure Projects Project Name and Project Description Planning or Green Infrastructure Measures Included Location48 Implementation Status San Pablo Avenue Green Bio-retention facility on east Redesign Bio-retention facility Stormwater Spine Project side of San Pablo Avenue south of Moeser in El Cerrito, as part of a regional project being implemented by the San Francisco Estuary Partnership Program. Designed to capture street run-off. Ohlone Greenway Rain Rain garden and park Complete (2015) Bio-retention facility Gardens (Fairmount) located along a major active transportation trail and corridor. The rain gardens collect water drained from a number of nearby streets. San Pablo Avenue Bio-retention facilities on east Complete (2010) Bio-retention facility Rain Gardens at Madison side of San Pablo Avenue at and at Eureka Madison Avenue and at Eureka Avenue.

48 List each planned (and expected to be funded) public and private green infrastructure project that is not also a Regulated Project as defined in Provision C.3.b.ii. Note that funding for green infrastructure components may be anticipated but is not guaranteed to be available or sufficient.

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-29 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.4 – Industrial and Commercial Site Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 4 – Provision C.4 Industrial and Commercial Site Controls

Program Highlights and Evaluation Highlight/summarize activities for reporting year: Summary: In FY 2017/18 West County Wastewater District (WCWD) performed forty (40) inspections or re-inspections of various business types across the City of El Cerrito, with seven (7) follow-up or enforcement follow-up inspections. There were three (3) written notices issued and no (0) Notices of Violation. WCWD distributed CCCWP outreach materials to businesses, including “Trash BMPs for Businesses” brochures, “Stormwater BMPs for Restaurants”, and “Water Pollution Prevention” posters for Restaurants.

In FY17-18, El Cerrito City Staff regularly attended the Countywide Program's Municipal Operations Committee as a non-voting member. Maintenance, Recycling, and Environmental Staff and Contractors also completed a SWPPP training on September 21, 2017.

For a description of activities of the countywide program please refer to the C.4. Industrial and Commercial Site Controls section of the countywide Program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report (if applicable) for a description of activities of the countywide program and/or the BASMAA Municipal Operations Committee.

C.4.b.iii ► Potential Facilities List (i.e., List of All Facilities Requiring Stormwater Inspections) List below or attach your list of industrial and commercial facilities in your Inspection Plan to inspect that could reasonably be considered to cause or contribute to pollution of stormwater runoff. See Attachment C.4.b.iii Potential Facilities List.

C.4.d.iii.(2)(a) & (c) ►Facility Inspections Fill out the following table or attach a summary of the following information. Indicate your reporting methodology below. X Permittee reports multiple discrete potential and actual discharges as one enforcement action. Permittee reports the total number of discrete potential and actual discharges on each site. Number Total number of inspections conducted (C.4.d.iii.(2)(a)) 47 Violations, enforcement actions, or discreet number of potential and actual discharges resolved within 10 working 3 days or otherwise deemed resolved in a longer but still timely manner (C.4.d.iii.(2)(c)) Comments: Sites inspected in violation are noted in the inspection reports and in a written notice (Warning Notice or Violation Notice), if applicable. The

FY 17-18 AR Form 4-1 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.4 – Industrial and Commercial Site Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

WCWD inspector emails the notification to the El Cerrito Project Cleanwater Program Coordinator within one business day. Violation inspections are listed in the inspection summary reports (received by the Clean Water Program Manager) under the “Enforcement” column as “WN” or “NOV”. Later when the follow-up inspection is conducted the” Inspection Type” column will indicate “Enforcement F/U” and will be noted as “Corrected” or not. After receiving Warning Notices, all properties have corrected the violations.

C.4.d.iii.(2)(b) ►Frequency and Type of Enforcement Conducted Fill out the following table or attach a summary of the following information. Enforcement Action Number of Enforcement Actions Taken (as listed in ERP)49 Level 1 Verbal Warning/Warning notice/education for exposure due to BMP deficiency 3 Level 2 Notice of Violation due to clear evidence of recent, but not current, discharge 0 Level 3 Formal Enforcement (Administrative Penalties, Cost Recovery) 0 Level 4 Legal Action and/or referral to State and Federal Agencies 0 Total 3

C.4.d.iii.(2)(d) ► Frequency of Potential and Actual Non-stormwater Discharges by Business Category Fill out the following table or attach a summary of the following information. Number of Actual Number of Potential Business Category50 Discharges Discharges Food Service 0 2 Grocery Store 0 0 Laundry-Comm. 0 0 Property Management 0 0 Property Owner / Golf Course 0 1 Vehicle Service 0 0

49Agencies to list specific enforcement actions as defined in their ERPs. 50List your Program’s standard business categories.

FY 17-18 AR Form 4-2 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.4 – Industrial and Commercial Site Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.4.d.iii.(2)(e) ►Non-Filers List below or attach a list of the facilities required to have coverage under the Industrial General Permit but have not filed for coverage: No industries were identified as non-filers during this fiscal year. WCWD conducts inspections for El Cerrito under an interagency service agreement. WCWD reviews the operations of the businesses inspected to determine if they may be subject to the General Industrial Permit standards and if so, determine if the business filed a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the SWRCB. If a non-filer is identified, WCWD informs the business of the requirement to file a NOI. If the business does not file a NOI, WCWD will notify El Cerrito of this status so that appropriate referral to the RWQCB is made. WCWD did not notify the City of El Cerrito of any non-filers during the reporting period.

C.4.e.iii ►Staff Training Summary No. of Percent of Industrial/ Industrial/ Percent of Commercial Commercial No. of IDDE IDDE Site Site Inspectors Inspectors Training Inspectors in Inspectors in in in Training Name Dates Topics Covered Attendance Attendance Attendance Attendance Commercial/ 5/3/18 • Outline available through CCCWP WCWD-2 WCWD-100 N/A N/A Industrial Stormwater Inspection Training Workshop (Contra Costa County)

WEFTEC 4/11/18- • Inspections WCWD-1 WCWD-50 N/A N/A (Chicago, IL) 4/13/18 • Enforcement • Education/Outreach • Stormwater BMPs

SWPPP Industrial 9/21/2018 • Stormwater BMPs El Cerrito – 3 El Cerrito - 50 N/A N/A Training

Comments: No additional comments.

FY 17-18 AR Form 4-3 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.5 – Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 5 – Provision C.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination

Program Highlights and Evaluation Highlight/summarize activities for reporting year: Provide background information, highlights, trends, etc. Summary: The City received reports of fifteen (15) illicit discharges during the 2017/18 reporting period. However, discharges by the potable water provider (EBMUD) are generally not reported to the City and therefore are not necessarily reflected in this report. Please refer to the C.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination section of the countywide program's FY 17-18 Annual Report for a description of activities conducted at the countywide and regional level. In FY 17-18, a City representative also regularly attended and participated in meetings of the countywide program’s Municipal Operations Committee.

C.5.c.iii ►Complaint and Spill Response Phone Number Summary of any changes made during FY 17-18: No changes since last reporting year.

C.5.d.iii.(1), (2), (3) ►Spill and Discharge Complaint Tracking Spill and Discharge Complaint Tracking (fill out the following table or include an attachment of the following information) Number Discharges reported (C.5.d.iii.(1)) 15 Discharges reaching storm drains and/or receiving waters (C.5.d.iii.(2)) 14 Discharges resolved in a timely manner (C.5.d.iii.(3)) 15 Comments: The City of El Cerrito’s Public Works staff responds to reports of spills and discharges as soon as possible by containing spills and vacuuming or diverting spills away from the MS4 to a permeable landscape. Staff investigates the complaint as soon as Public Works is notified of a potential illicit discharge. In cases where the complaint is received after business hours, staff is dispatched as an emergency through the El Cerrito Police Department, at which time the after-hours crew responds, contains or diverts and investigates. City staff tracks whether the potential pollutant entered the storm drain system (drain inlet DI) and/or receiving waters on the complaint log. When staff does not witness pollutants entering the storm drain system, they make their best effort to determine whether pollutants did or did not enter the storm drain system by inspecting the potentially affected drain inlets. In many cases, it is unknown if pollutants reached the storm drain system; it is assumed in these cases that the discharge did enter the storm drain and are listed as having done so.

FY 17-18 AR Form 5-1 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.6 – Construction Site Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 6 – Provision C.6 Construction Site Controls

C.6.e.iii.(3)(a), (b), (c), (d) ►Site/Inspection Totals Number of active Hillside Number of High Priority Number of sites disturbing ≥ 1 acre Total number of storm water runoff quality Sites (sites disturbing < 1 Sites (sites disturbing < 1 of soil inspections conducted (include only Hillside Sites, acre of soil requiring storm acre of soil requiring storm (C.6.e.iii.3.b) High Priority Sites and sites disturbing 1 acre or water runoff quality water runoff quality more) inspection) (C.6.e.iii.3.a) inspection) (C.6.e.iii. 3.c) (C.6.e.iii. 3.d)

7 9 3 97 (sites with a grading (one of them on hillside area) permit) Comments: The larger than (1) acre sites were the PG&E-El Cerrito G Substation ongoing project, and two (2) multi-unit housing development (801 Bates and Creekside Development). We considered construction sites that involved more than 50 CY of earthwork, and therefore had active Grading & Transportation Permits, as High-Priority Sites. For the most part, these sites tend to overlap with Hillside Sites that disturb 5,000 sf or more. A formal pre-rainy season inspection was conducted at all twelve (12) sites in addition to monthly in-person inspections documented with the Contra Costa Clean Water Construction Site Inspection Reports. Some of these sites also were not active the entire fiscal year. Drive-by inspections also occurred on an intermittent basis.

FY 17-18 AR Form 6-1 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.6 – Construction Site Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.6.e.iii.(3)(e) ►Construction Related Storm Water Enforcement Actions Enforcement Action Number Enforcement Actions Issued (as listed in ERP)51 Level 152 Verbal Warnings 5 Level 2 No action on Level 2 0 Level 3 No action on Level 3 0 Level 4 No action on Level 4 0 Total 5

C.6.e.iii.(3)(f), ►Illicit Discharges Number Number of illicit discharges, actual and those inferred through evidence at hillside sites, high priority sites and sites that 0 disturb 1 acre or more of land (C.6.e.iii. 3.f)

C.6.e.iii.(3)(g) ► Corrective Actions Indicate your reporting methodology below. X Permittee reports multiple discrete potential and actual discharges as one enforcement action. Permittee reports the total number of discrete potential and actual discharges on each site. Number Enforcement actions or discrete potential and actual discharges fully corrected within 10 business days after 5 violations are discovered or otherwise considered corrected in a timely period (C.6.e.iii. .3.g) Comments: The enforcement actions were all level 1- Verbal Warnings. The City requested corrections for sweeping, maintenance of BMP’s, covering of stockpiles, stabilizing downhill, installation of silt fence, construction entrance, protecting storm drains and general housekeeping. These were sufficiently addressed in a timely manner.

51Agencies should list the specific enforcement actions as defined in their ERPs. 52For example, Enforcement Level 1 may be Verbal Warning.

FY 17-18 AR Form 6-2 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.6 – Construction Site Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.6.e.iii.(4) ►Evaluation of Inspection Data Describe your evaluation of the tracking data and data summaries and provide information on the evaluation results (e.g., data trends, typical BMP performance issues, comparisons to previous years, etc.). Description: Prior to rainy season, letters were sent to contractors as a reminder to install erosion and sediment control measures. Throughout the rainy season, contractors were verbally warned of the several BMPs that need to be up kept, such as maintaining protected areas on-site, covering stockpiles, maintaining fencing and construction entrances, and protecting drain inlets in the Public ROW. The contractors responded within the time frame given and prior to any need for written warnings. Routine monthly site visits attributed to the compliance of contractors on these sites.

C.6.e.iii.(4) ►Evaluation of Inspection Program Effectiveness Describe what appear to be your program’s strengths and weaknesses, and identify needed improvements, including education and outreach. Description: The City has been successfully implementing its inspection program, completing trainings and outreach, and effectively tracking and documenting the inspections. Some improvements could still be made to increase the ease at which inspection data are aggregated by Staff and reported.

1) The City uses the Contra Costa Clean Water Program Forms during Inspections and they are a very useful tracking tool. The tracking of these inspections is collected on an excel spreadsheet for each year. 2) The inspectors receive training by attending the provision C.6 workshops. 3) In FY 2017-2018, El Cerrito City Staff also regularly attended the CCCWP Development Committee as a non-voting member.

Refer to the C.6 Construction Site Control section of CCCWP’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for a description of activities at the countywide or regional level.

C.6.f.iii ►Staff Training Summary No. of Inspectors Training Name Training Dates Topics Covered in Attendance Northern California APWA Public Works 11/8/2017- • Cleanwater program 2 Conference 11/9/2017 • BMP Inspection • Green Infrastructure CCCWP Construction Inspections Workshop 4/17/2018 • Cleanwater program 2 • Construction BMP Inspection CCCWP Provision C.3 Storm water Compliance 4/24/2018 Stormwater C.3 guidebook -7th edition 2 Workshop

FY 17-18 AR Form 6-3 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.7 – Public Information and Outreach Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 7 – Provision C.7. Public Information and Outreach

C.7.b.i.1 ►Outreach Campaign Summarize outreach campaign. Include details such as messages, creative developed, and outreach media used. The detailed outreach campaign report may be included as an attachment. If outreach campaign is being done by participation in a countywide or regional program, refer to the separate countywide or regional Annual Report. Summary: The City of El Cerrito has supplemented regional outreach efforts by publishing a number of articles in municipal publications, conducting outreach at local events, and supporting cleanup events and work parties throughout the City. The City also directly funds educational programs in El Cerrito schools through the Kids for the Bay program.

Greener El Cerrito Print Newsletter (sent to every property address as garbage bill insert): • Fall 2017 – Article "Household Hazardous Waste Collected at Recycling Center on Tuesdays" • Fall 2017 – Article "Help Keep our Waterways Clean!" • Fall 2017 (Commercial Edition) – Article "Avoid Problems from Fats, Oil, and Grease (FOG)"

Green Happenings City Environmental E-Newsletter (Sent out monthly to 1,000+ recipients) • Regular promotion of upcoming events, cleanups, work parties, and City environmental news, policies, and programs. • July 2017 – Article on Household Hazardous Waste • August 2017 – Article on Coastal Cleanup Week • November 2017 – Article on Preparing for the Rainy Season and Stormwater Tips • May 2018 – Article "Street Sweep Program Keeps the Bay Clean"

News & Views Citywide Print Newsletter (Sent to all El Cerrito properties) • Fall 2017 – Article "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain"

Green Teams (City Environmental Quality Committee supported Work Parties) • September 23, 2017 – Cerrito Creek Cleanup with Friends of Five Creeks • November 12, 2017 – Northern Entryway Cleanup • January 28, 2018 – Creekside Park Cleanup • February 17, 2018 – Madera Broom Pull • March 4, 2018 – El Cerrito Plaza and BART Cleanup • May 26, 2018 – Northern Entryways Cleanup

FY 17-18 AR Form 7-1 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.7 – Public Information and Outreach Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Events/Outreach • July 4, 2018 – Festival and Tabling Outreach • September 12, 2017 – Watershed Project Presentation at Environmental Quality Committee Meeting • September 16, 2018 – El Cerrito Centennial Parade and Tabling • March 27, 2018 – Butterfly Pollinator Workshop at City Hall • April 21, 2018 – Earth Day Work Parties and Tabling Outreach • May 6, 2018 – Regional "Bringing Back the Natives" event • May 20, 2018 – Bike to Work Day Tabling Outreach • June 28, 2018 – Storm Drain Master Plan Public Meeting and Green Infrastructure Presentation • Monthly – Baxter Creek Monthly Work Parties coordinated by Public Works Staff

Refer to Section 7 in the Countywide Program's FY 17/18 Annual Report for a summary of activities related to the planning and development of an Outreach Campaign on the regional level.

C.7.c. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Education No changes were made to the contact information or contact protocol from last year.

FY 17-18 AR Form 7-2 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.7 – Public Information and Outreach Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.7.d ►Public Outreach and Citizen Involvement Events Describe general approach to event selection. Provide a list of outreach materials and giveaways distributed. Use the following table for reporting and evaluating public outreach events

The City of El Cerrito takes every opportunity to engage with residents and business owners on stormwater issues. This is done through the publications listed above, by hosting and supporting events, and by providing outreach materials at other City events throughout the year. Outreach materials primarily consist of materials generated by the Countywide program in this year and in past years, as well as articles and information that City staff has produced for newsletters or web content.

Event Details Description (messages, audience) Evaluation of Effectiveness Provide event name, date, and location. Identify type of event (e.g., school fair, Provide general staff feedback on the event Indicate if event is local, countywide or regional. creek clean-up, storm drain stenciling, (e.g., success at reaching a broad spectrum of Indicate if event is public outreach or citizen farmers market etc.), type of audience the community, well attended, good involvement. (school children, gardeners, homeowners opportunity to talk to gardeners etc.). Provide etc.) and outreach messages (e.g., other details such as: Enviroscape presentation, pesticides, • Success at reaching a broad spectrum stormwater awareness) of the community • Number of participants compared to previous years. • Post-event effectiveness assessment/evaluation results • Quantity/volume of materials cleaned up, and comparisons to previous efforts Butterfly Pollinator Workshop The City's Environmental Quality Committee This first of its kind event attracted nearly 100 El Cerrito City Hall hosted a workshop for residents on how to people, demonstrating great interest in the March 27, 2018 support bees, butterflies, and other intersection of gardening, IPM, pollinators, and A local event to promote resident best practices pollinators in their own backyards. This stormwater. in their homes and gardens. lecture and workshop took place at the El Cerrito City Hall and was well received by the nearly 100 members of the public that attended. The message was aimed at gardeners and interested parties that want to support local pollinator populations.

FY 17-18 AR Form 7-3 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.7 – Public Information and Outreach Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Storm Drain Master Plan Public Meeting The City's Storm Drain Master Plan (SDMP) The event provided the City with quality El Cerrito City Hall consultant and City Staff presented feedback on how to incorporate resident June 28, 2018 updates from the development of the actions into both plans. For example, identifying A local event to engage residents and SDMP, how it will support and integrate with actions residents themselves can take (e.g. stakeholders in the City's development of a the City's Green Infrastructure Plan, and rainwater harvesting) to reduce flood risk and Storm Drain Master Plan. how the City intends to prioritize improve water quality. improvements. “Bringing Back the Natives” Garden Tours – The tour promotes the use of native plants El Cerrito continues to directly support Bringing May 6, 2018. This program receives financial in landscaping, water and resource Back the Natives and gardens are often support from the City of El Cerrito through both conservation, alternatives to pesticide and located in El Cerrito. See the CCCWP FY 17-18 the CCCWP and through direct City funding. fertilizer use, composting and attracting Annual Report for a full description of the event beneficial wildlife. and an evaluation of its effectiveness. Through the Countywide Program, El Cerrito An outreach program at retail stores to Fact sheets are displayed strategically in supported the “Our Water Our World” retail store promote Integrated Pest Management and pesticide aisles of hardware stores and tabling and outreach events that educate users least toxic pesticide alternatives. The nurseries. See the CCCWP FY 17-18 Annual of pesticides about low toxicity alternatives. program emphasizes the connection of Report for a full description of the event/activity pesticide use with water quality. and an evaluation of effectiveness. Baxter Creek Monthly Work Day- Occurs on the Public Works staff leads monthly creek A dedicated corps of five volunteers has 1st Saturday of most months (10 months). clean-up and invasive plant removal work participated in this event since 2012. They are This is a local event to promote resident with a focus on clean water; staff and joined intermittently by other volunteers of stewardship of El Cerrito creeks. volunteers discuss clean water issues and varying levels of commitment. Staff and BMPs. volunteers removed a conservative average of 70 gallons of trash litter per month from an approximately 700 foot length of creek.

Cerrito Creek Work Days and Educational Events included creek clean ups, removing These cleanups and educational events, Events. Friends of Five Creeks co-hosted three (3) litter and invasive plants, and educational organized largely by a non-governmental events at Cerrito Creek in the 2017/18 reporting hikes around Cerrito Creek and the organization, Friends of Five Creeks, make a period: adjacent Albany Hill. direct impact on improving the health of Cerrito • July 20, 2017 - Cerrito Creek Hike and Creek and other areas around the City, while Restoration also educating residents on the importance of • Sept. 23, 2017 – Cerrito Creek Cleanup our local watersheds. • Nov. 16, 2017 – Hike on Albany Hill and along Cerrito Creek

FY 17-18 AR Form 7-4 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.7 – Public Information and Outreach Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

City of El Cerrito, Citywide Events Outreach materials from the CCCWP were The 4th of July Festival continues to be one of • Annual 4th of July Festival, 07/04/17 provided to residents at the City’s Public the City’s most successful and widely attended • Bike to Work Day 2018, 5/20/2018 Works booth. events, enabling Public Works staff to reach a • El Cerrito Centennial Event, 9/16/17 large audience. Bike to Work Day and the Centennial Parade were also great opportunities for the Public Works department to connect with different members of the community. In total, staff made contact with approximately 500 participants. Coastal Clean-up Day at Cerrito Creek Cerrito Creek Clean-up and On-Land Over 40 volunteers participated and removed 9/23/2017. Clean-up in vicinity of Cerrito Creek. trash and debris from Cerrito Creek. The California Coastal Commission categorization, measurement and reporting protocol was followed through collaboration with The Watershed Project and City staff. The City’s Environmental Quality Committee, the City of Albany, Friends of Five Creeks and other community members participated. Annual El Cerrito Earth Day Celebration on April Litter removal work-parties, Cerrito creek Approximately 300 volunteers participated in 21, 2018. clean-up, and other work parties. work parties city-wide, with some focused on litter collection including removal of cigarette butts from City parks and streets. El Cerrito Green Teams conduct bimonthly On- Remove litter from public rights of way, Average 6 participants per clean up event; a Land Clean-ups at various high trash generating landscapes and creeks. conservative average of 150 gallons of trash locations throughout the City. These local litter litter removed per occurrence, total 750 gallons removal events are led by volunteer “Green in 2017/18. Teams”, supported by the City. The 2017/18 cleanup work day dates were: • September 23, 2017 – Cerrito Creek Cleanup • November 12, 2017 – Northern Entryway Cleanup • January 28, 2018 – Creekside Park Cleanup • March 4, 2018 – El Cerrito Plaza and BART Cleanup • May 26, 2018 – Northern Entryways Cleanup

FY 17-18 AR Form 7-5 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.7 – Public Information and Outreach Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Refer to the CCCWP’s FY 17-18 Annual Report, Section 7 Public Information and Outreach for a full description of the regional events and activities undertaken on behalf of the City of El Cerrito and other permittees.

FY 17-18 AR Form 7-6 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.7 – Public Information and Outreach Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.7.e. ►Watershed Stewardship Collaborative Efforts Summarize watershed stewardship collaborative efforts and/or refer to a regional report that provides details. Describe the level of effort and support given (e.g., funding only, active participation etc.). State efforts undertaken and the results of these efforts. If this activity is done regionally refer to a regional report.

Evaluate effectiveness by describing the following: • Efforts undertaken • Major accomplishments

Summary: El Cerrito participated through the Contra Costa County Clean Water Program in the Contra Costa Watershed Forum, the Green Business Program, and the CCCleanWater.org Community Calendar. El Cerrito directly supports the County Green Business program as a dues paying member. In addition, the City also works with local volunteer groups and non-profits to host litter removal and creek clean-up events.

These include:

• El Cerrito Environmental Quality Committee’s (EQC) Green Team bi-monthly on-land clean-ups average removal of at least 150 gallons of trash each occurrence. • Friends of Five Creeks hosted clean-ups removing an average of 30 gallons of trash for each occurrence. • Monthly Baxter Creek work days with ad-hoc volunteer group perform monthly creek clean-ups on ~700 linear feet of creek since 2012, averaging at least 70 gallons of trash removed each occurrence. This event is advertised on the CCCWP’s website and the City website. • Coastal Clean-up Day on September 23, 2017 was one of the most well attended of El Cerrito’s Coastal Clean-up events during the last several years, thanks in large part to collaboration with the Watershed Project.

Refer to the CCCWP’s FY 17-18 Annual Report section C.7 Public Information and Outreach section for a full description of the countywide and regional efforts, as well as an evaluation of effectiveness.

FY 17-18 AR Form 7-7 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.7 – Public Information and Outreach Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.7.f. ►School-Age Children Outreach Summarize school-age children outreach programs implemented. A detailed report may be included as an attachment. Use the following table for reporting school-age children outreach efforts. Number of Students/Teachers Program Details Focus & Short Description reached Evaluation of Effectiveness Watershed Action Program- In FY17/18, El Cerrito continued its Two classes of fourth Kids for the Bay visited two classes in El Cerrito Kids for the Bay, Environmental direct financial support of this in- and fifth grade in FY17/18, reaching 66 students and two Education Through Action. school, water quality outreach students and their teachers. Students in El Cerrito studied ocean Fairmont Elementary School program that includes lessons on the teachers from acidification, completed experiments, and (A Local El Cerrito activity) watershed, estuary and bay models, Fairmont Elementary conducted a trash clean-up during their field the storm drain system, marine debris, School, including 66 trip to the Berkeley Marina, removing 93 harmful pesticides, water students and 2 gallons of trash from the San Francisco Bay conservation and an on-land clean- teachers. watershed. As a result of the program, El up activity with parents and teachers Cerrito students are able to have a positive around the school campus and and fun experience while learning about how neighborhood. to protect watersheds and sharing the information with their parents and friends!

See attachment C.7.f El Cerrito School Age Children Outreach: Kids for the Bay Watershed Action Report 2017/18. Please also refer to the C.7 Section of the countywide program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for a description of School-age Children Outreach efforts conducted at the countywide level.

FY 17-18 AR Form 7-8 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.9 – Pesticides Toxicity Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 9 – Provision C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Controls

C.9.a. ►Implement IPM Policy or Ordinance Is your municipality implementing its IPM Policy/Ordinance and Standard Operating Procedures? X Yes No

If no, explain: Not applicable.

Report implementation of IPM BMPs by showing trends in quantities and types of pesticides used, and suggest reasons for increases in use of pesticides that threaten water quality, specifically organophosphates, pyrethroids, carbamates fipronil, indoxacarb, diuron, and diamides. A separate report can be attached as evidence of your implementation.

Trends in Quantities and Types of Pesticide Active Ingredients Used53 54 Pesticide Category and Specific Pesticide Active Ingredient Amount Used FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 FY 18-19 FY 19-20 FY 20-21 Organophosphates 0 0 0 Active Ingredient Chlorpyrifos 0 0 0 Active Ingredient Diazinon 0 0 0 Active Ingredient Malathion 0 0 0 Pyrethroids (see footnote #57 for list of active ingredients) 0 0 0 Active Ingredient Type X 0 0 0 Active Ingredient Type Y 0 0 0 Carbamates 0 0 0 Active Ingredient Carbaryl 0 0 0 Active Ingredient Aldicarb 0 0 0 Fipronil 0 0 0

53Includes all municipal structural and landscape pesticide usage by employees and contractors. 54Weight or volume of the active ingredient, using same units for the product each year. Please specify units used. The active ingredients in any pesticide are listed on the label. The list of active ingredients that need to be reported in the pyrethroids class includes: metofluthrin, bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, beta-cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, esfenvalerate, lambdacyhalothrin, and permethrin.

FY 17-18 AR Form 9-1 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.9 – Pesticides Toxicity Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Indoxacarb Reporting 0 0 not required in FY 15-16 Diuron Reporting 0 0 not required in FY 15-16 Diamides Reporting 0 0 not required in FY 15-16 Active Ingredient Chlorantraniliprole 0 0 Active Ingredient Cyantraniliprole 0 0

IPM Tactics and Strategies Used:

For rodent control, the City employs building exclusion methods, snap traps, and owl nesting boxes at City facilities.

For weed control the City uses sheet mulches, arbor mulch, hand weeding, mowing and, as a last resort, reduced-risk herbicides selectively applied to targeted weeds.

C.9.b ►Train Municipal Employees Enter the number of employees that applied or used pesticides (including herbicides) within the scope of their duties this reporting 0 year. Enter the number of these employees who received training on your IPM policy and IPM standard operating procedures within this 1 reporting year. Enter the percentage of municipal employees who apply pesticides who have received training in the IPM policy and IPM standard 0 operating procedures within this reporting year. Type of Training: Department of Pesticide Regulations eligible CEUs: The City IPM coordinator maintains a Qualified Applicators License with CEU subject matter that emphasizes IPM strategies, he also meets periodically with a regional IPM Coordinators group which includes the UC Extension IPM advisor.

Bay Friendly Qualified: Both City of El Cerrito Public Works (7 staff members) and the City’s Landscape Contractors (Rubicon and New Image) have Bay Friendly Qualified staff who service the City of El Cerrito landscapes.

FY 17-18 AR Form 9-2 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.9 – Pesticides Toxicity Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.9.c ►Require Contractors to Implement IPM Did your municipality contract with any pesticide service provider in the reporting year, for either X Yes No landscaping or structural pest control? If yes, did your municipality evaluate the contractor’s list of pesticides and amounts of active ingredients X Yes No, used? If your municipality contracted with any pesticide service provider, briefly describe how contractor compliance with IPM Policy/Ordinance and SOPs was monitored. The City is in contract with an Eco-Wise Certified structural Pest Control Operator who uses the lowest toxicity, reduced risk traps and baits after excluding points of egress in the buildings being serviced. Applications of reduced risk pesticides are made only after monitoring indicates that tolerance thresholds have been exceeded. All treatments were reviewed prior to application.

All landscape maintenance contractors must read and sign a document, acknowledging receipt of the City’s IPM policy. All pesticide application performed on City properties must first be approved by the City of El Cerrito IPM Coordinator. The IPM Coordinator reviews pesticide alternatives with contractor prior to pesticide application approval. City landscape contractors and pest control operators sign an IPM agreement that requiring adherence to the IPM Decision Making Steps and to consult with the City IPM Coordinator before making pesticide applications and to report to the City all pesticides used in the City of El Cerrito.

Alternative pest control methods required by the City of contractors include, but are not limited to pest exclusion, baits, traps, mowing, hand removal, sheet mulching and mulching. If your agency did not evaluate the contractor’s list of pesticides and amounts of active ingredients used, provide an explanation. N/A

C.9.d ►Interface with County Agricultural Commissioners Did your municipality communicate with the County Agricultural Commissioner to: (a) get input and assistance on Yes X No urban pest management practices and use of pesticides or (b) inform them of water quality issues related to pesticides

FY 17-18 AR Form 9-3 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.9 – Pesticides Toxicity Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

If yes, summarize the communication. If no, explain. The City’s IPM coordinator participates in regional IPM Coordinators group meetings that include the U.C. Extension IPM Advisor, Andrew Sutherland where he receives input and assistance on urban pest management practices. The City did not communicate directly with the County Agricultural Commissioners in this reporting year as there were no pesticide related water quality issues. Did your municipality report any observed or citizen-reported violations of pesticide regulations (e.g., illegal handling Yes No and applications of pesticides) associated with stormwater management, particularly the California Department of X

Pesticide Regulation (DPR) surface water protection regulations for outdoor, nonagricultural use of pyrethroid pesticides by any person performing pest control for hire. If yes, provide a summary of improper pesticide usage reported to the County Agricultural Commissioner and follow-up actions taken to correct any violations. A separate report can be attached as your summary. Not applicable.

C.9.e.ii (1) ►Public Outreach: Point of Purchase Provide a summary of public outreach at point of purchase, and any measurable awareness and behavior changes resulting from outreach (here or in a separate report); OR reference a report of a regional effort for public outreach in which your agency participates. Summary: See the C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Control section of the Countywide Program's FY 17-18 Annual Report for information on point of purchase public outreach conducted countywide and regionally.

C.9.e.ii (2) ►Public Outreach: Pest Control Contracting Outreach Provide a summary of outreach to residents who use or contract for structural pest control and landscape professionals); AND/OR reference a report of a regional effort for outreach to residents who hire pest control and landscape professionals in which your agency participates. Summary: See the C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Control section of the Countywide Program's FY 17-18 Annual Report for information on point of purchase public outreach conducted countywide and regionally.

C.9.e.ii.(3) ►Public Outreach: Pest Control Operators Provide a summary of public outreach to pest control operators and landscapers and reduced pesticide use (here or in a separate report); AND/OR reference a report of a regional effort for outreach to pest control operators and landscapers in which your agency participates. Summary: See the C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Control section of the Countywide Program's FY 17-18 Annual Report for a summary of our participation in and contributions towards countywide and regional public outreach to pest control operators and landscapers to reduce pesticide use.

FY 17-18 AR Form 9-4 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.9 – Pesticides Toxicity Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.9.f ►Track and Participate in Relevant Regulatory Processes Summarize participation efforts, information submitted, and how regulatory actions were affected; AND/OR reference a regional report that summarizes regional participation efforts, information submitted, and how regulatory actions were affected. Summary: During FY 17-18, El Cerrito participated in the regulatory processes related to pesticides through contributions to the countywide Program, BASMAA and CASQA. For additional information, see the Regional Report submitted by BASMAA on behalf of all MRP Permittees

FY 17-18 AR Form 9-5 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 10 - Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction

C.10.a.i ► Trash Load Reduction Summary For population-based Permittees, provide the overall trash reduction percentage achieved to-date within the jurisdictional area of your municipality that generates problematic trash levels (i.e., Very High, High or Moderate trash generation). Base the reduction percentage on the information presented in C.10.b i-iv and C.10.e.i-ii. Provide a discussion of the calculation used to produce the reduction percentage Trash Load Reductions Percent Trash Reduction in All Trash Management Areas (TMAs) due to Trash Full Capture Systems (as reported C.10.b.i) 65.0% Percent Trash Reduction in all TMAs due to Control Measures Other than Trash Full Capture Systems (as reported in C.10.b.ii)55 0.0% Percent Trash Reduction due to Jurisdictional-wide Source Control Actions (as reported in C.10.b.iv)1 9.5% Subtotal for Above Actions 74.5% Trash Offsets (Optional) Offset Associated with Additional Creek and Shoreline Cleanups (as reported in C.10.e.i) 10% Offset Associated with Direct Trash Discharges (as reported in C.10.e.ii) 0%

Total (Jurisdictional-wide) % Trash Load Reduction through FY 2017-18 84.5%

Discussion of Trash Load Reduction Calculation: El Cerrito has reached an estimated 84.5 % trash load reduction due to the following actions: • Installation of 122 Full Trash Capture Devices (FTCDs) in High Trash Generation Areas. • Robust, repeated Creek-clean-up activities at three locations removed 12.9 cubic yards of trash litter from creeks in 2017-18, which translates to 15.5% reduction with the approved formula. El Cerrito is claiming 10%, the maximum allowable. (See sections C.10.b.ii and C.10.e below for details.) • Weekly litter and illegal dumping removal in public areas by City Maintenance workers and contractors. • Business and community compliance with El Cerrito’s 2014 Single Use Plastic Bag Ordinance and Expanded Polystyrene Food Service Ware Ordinance. Outside of these actions, the City is also making other efforts to reduce litter. El Cerrito Municipal Code 8-06, also known as the El Cerrito Smoking Pollution Protection Ordinance, was adopted in 2014 to prevent smoke pollution and cigarette butt litter. The Ordinance prohibits indoor smoking and outdoor smoking in all public places throughout the City, including sidewalks and recreation areas. The City has performed outreach to businesses and multi-family housing units and has posted “Smoke Free El Cerrito” signs on all business district and major arterial streets. The efficacy of this ordinance is still unknown, and therefore it has not been included in trash load reduction estimates. However, it is likely that this ordinance is reducing the number of littered cigarette butts in the City of El Cerrito.

55 See Appendix 10-1 for changes between 2009 and FY 17-18 in trash generation by TMA as a result of Full Capture Systems and Other Measures.

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-1 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.10.a.ii.b ► Trash Generation Area Management - Identification of

Private Drainages >10,000 ft2 State (Y/N) if your agency completed Permit Provision C.10.a.ii.b. If Yes, attach a map (or other record) or provide a website link to a map (or other record) of the location of lands >10,000 ft2 (in Very High, High, and Moderate trash generation areas) that are plumbed directly to the Permittee’s storm drain systems, including trash control status of these areas. If No, provide explanation of why the provision was not completed and the estimated date when the provision will be completed.

Did your agency complete Permit Provision C.10.a.ii.b? X Yes No NA

If No, provide explanation and estimated completion date: NA

Description of the process used to identify applicable areas and their trash control status:

To satisfy this requirement, an initial screening was conducted to identify applicable lands using Contra Costa Clean Water Program's ArcGIS on line application. As part of the screening process, lands under full trash capture, non-jurisdictional, or classified as low-trash generating were excluded. Single family homes were also excluded since they did not meet the required criteria. Remaining contiguous lands that were greater than 10,000 square feet were identified as potential Private Lands Drainage Areas (PLDAs).

Desktop analyses of the potential PLDAs were then conducted. Potential PLDAs were excluded if, through the desktop analyses, these lands were identified as having less than 10,000 square feet of applicable area once building footprints were deducted or no private storm drain inlets are on site. Potential PLDAs were also excluded based on certain other factors such as the identified lands are open space or, in very few particular cases, the lands have a low trash generation rate as based on results of recent assessments. Once the desktop analyses were completed, preliminary PLDAs were created from all remaining potential PLDAs. In rare circumstances, preliminary PLDAs were also created from areas that the initial screening had failed to identify.

For FY 2018/19, it is anticipated that preliminary PLDAs will be visually assessed to confirm or correct trash generation rates and the location of private storm drain inlets will be mapped. All preliminary PLDAs that still satisfy the criteria once the field analyses are completed will be designated as PLDAs. Appropriate follow up action will be taken such as outreach to applicable property owners and status will be tracked.

Please see attachments 10-1 and 10-2 for more information.

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-2 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.10.a.iii ► Mandatory Trash Full Capture Systems Provide the following: 1) Total number and types of full capture systems (publicly and privately-owned) installed prior to FY 17-18, during FY 17-18, and to-date, including inlet-based and large flow-through or end-of-pipe systems, and qualifying low impact development (LID) required by permit provision C.3. 2) Total land area (acres) treated by full capture systems for population-based Permittees and total number of systems for non-population- based Permittees compared to the total required by the permit.

Areas Treated Type of System # of Systems (Acres)

Installed Prior to FY 17-18 Connector Pipe screens/Filters 83 167 LID Facilities 9 11

Installed in FY 17-18 Connector Pipe screens/Filters 30 47

Total for all Systems Installed To-date 122 222

Treatment Acreage Required by Permit (Population-based Permittees) 32

Total # of Systems Required by Permit (Non-population-based Permittees) NA

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-3 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.10.b.i ► Trash Reduction - Full Capture Systems Provide the following: 1) Jurisdictional-wide trash reduction in FY 17-18 attributable to trash full capture systems implemented in each TMA; 2) The total number of full capture systems installed to-date in your jurisdiction; 3) The percentage of systems in FY 17-18 that exhibited significant plugged/blinded screens or were >50% full when inspected or maintained; 4) A narrative summary of any maintenance issues and the corrective actions taken to avoid future full capture system performance issues; and 5) A certification that each full capture system is operated and maintained to meet the full capture system requirements in the permit.

Total # of Full % of Systems Exhibiting Jurisdiction-wide TMA Capture Plugged/Blinded Screens Summary of Maintenance Issues and Corrective Actions Reduction (%) Systems or >50% full in FY 17-18 1 0.2 2 9.4

3 37.9 4 5.0 No plugged systems = 0% The City continues to monitor maintenance reports for device 122 Eighteen (18) units >50% defects and for greater than 50% capacity reached; repairs and 5 10.9 full = 15% service frequency increase will be made to assure full trash 6 0.8 capture. Two devices that were previously reported as damaged or defective were removed and replaced in August 7 0.5 2017.

8 0.4 9 0.0 10 NA Total 65.0 Certification Statement: The City of El Cerrito certifies that a full capture system maintenance and operation program is currently being implemented to maintain all applicable systems in manner that meets the full capture system requirements included in the Permit.

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-4 9/30/18

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.10.b.ii ► Trash Reduction – Other Trash Management Actions (PART A) Provide a summary of trash control actions other than full capture systems or jurisdictional source controls that were implemented within each TMA, including the types of actions, levels and areal extent of implementation, and whether actions are new, including initiation date. TMA Summary of Trash Control Actions Other than Full Capture Systems

1 Creek and On-Land clean-ups increased frequency and participation since January 2012. Staff removes litter weekly from the 650’ length of daylighted Cerrito Creek banks and pathways adjacent to El Cerrito Plaza (shopping center) averaging 30 gallons/week. Volunteer led clean-ups occur at least three times annually resulting in average 35 gallons of litter removed during each event (105 total). Quarterly Green Team Volunteer litter removal averages 150 dry gallons trash litter each occurrence rotating through TMA’s 1, 2 and 3. 2 Improved Trash Bin management: 8 new waste receptacles were added in 2017/18 on the Ohlone Greenway to the 25 receptacles that were installed along San Pablo Avenue in 2010. All are serviced at least 2X weekly or more frequently as needed. On-Land Clean-ups: Contracted staff removed litter 1x weekly from San Pablo Avenue in 2016/17 yielding contractor estimated 18,000 gallons of trash litter collected for the year between TMA 2 and TMA 3. Quarterly Green Team Volunteer litter removal average 150 dry gallons trash litter each occurrence rotating through TMA’s 1, 2 and 3. Increased outreach to residents and businesses with information about street sweeping schedules since 2013/14. 3 Creek and On-Land Clean-ups: 10 Monthly Baxter Creek Gateway Park clean-ups in 16/17 resulting in 700 dry gallons litter removed. Quarterly Green Team Volunteer litter removal average 150 dry gallons trash litter each occurrence rotating through TMA’s 1, 2 and 3. Contracted staff removed litter 1x weekly from San Pablo Avenue in 2016/17 yielding contractor estimated 18,000 gallons of trash litter collected for the year between TMA 2 and TMA 3. Improved Trash Bin management: 25 new waste receptacles were installed along San Pablo Avenue in 2010 and are serviced 2X weekly or more frequently as needed. Increased outreach to residents and businesses with information about street sweeping routes since 13/14. 4 Increased outreach to residents and businesses with information on the City’s newsletter, garbage bill inserts, Recreation brochure, and website conveying the message “only rain down the drain” and the street sweeping schedules since 2013/14. 5 Improved Trash Bin Management: 8 new waste receptacles were added in 2017/18 on the Ohlone Greenway to the 25 receptacles that were installed along San Pablo Avenue in 2010. All are serviced at least 2X weekly or more frequently as needed. Increased outreach to residents and businesses with information on the City’s newsletter, garbage bill inserts, Recreation brochure, and website conveying the message “only rain down the drain” and the street sweeping schedules since 2013/14. 6 Creek and On-Land clean-ups at lower Cerrito Creek and neighboring streets increased frequency, clean-up area and volunteer participation quarterly since 2012. Increased outreach to residents and businesses with information on the City’s newsletter, garbage bill inserts, Recreation brochure, and website conveying the message “only rain down the drain” and the street sweeping schedules since 2013/14. 8 Improved Trash Bin Management: increased frequency in container management since 2012 serviced at least twice weekly or more as needed. 9 Outreach to schools to assure compliance within their jurisdictional property. 10 Increased outreach to residents and businesses with information on the City’s newsletter, garbage bill inserts, Recreation brochure, and website conveying the message “only rain down the drain” and the street sweeping schedules since 2013/14.

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-5 9/30/18

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Summary of Trash Control Measures Other than Full Capture Devices: • Street Sweeping: Include a description of any enhancements or new actions implemented after the MRP 1.0 effective date (i.e., December 2009). Identify portions of the TMA where enhanced street sweeping (i.e., increased sweeping frequency) and parking enforcement above 2009 levels was implemented. • On-land Cleanup: Include a description of on-land cleanup activities that began after the MRP 1.0 effective date (i.e., December 2009) and continued into FY 17-18, including any enhancements or new actions implemented in FY 17-18. Describe if these actions are Permittee or volunteer-led. • Partial Capture Devices: Provide a description of devices installed after the MRP 1.0 effective date (i.e., December 2009). Describe the level of maintenance conducted per device types. • Storm Drain Inlet Cleaning: Describe storm drain inlet maintenance activities implemented after the MRP 1.0 effective date (i.e., December 2009) and continued in FY 17-18, including any enhancements or new maintenance activities implemented in FY 17-18. For new/enhanced actions, include the number of inlets where enhanced maintenance occurred, and the increased frequency of maintenance. • Uncovered Loads: Describe activities designed to reduce trash from uncovered loads that began after the MRP 1.0 effective date (i.e., December 2009) and continued in FY 17-18, including any enhancements or new actions implemented in FY 17-18. Describe the types of actions implemented including new or redirected enforcement efforts to increase the focus towards new or enhanced actions. • Anti-littering and illegal dumping enforcement activities: Describe anti-littering and illegal dumping enforcement activities began after to the MRP 1.0 effective date (i.e., December 2009) and continued in FY 17-18, and any enhancements or new actions implemented in FY 17- 18. Include any new or redirected enforcement efforts to increase the focus towards new or enhanced actions. Describe the number of citations or other correction actions accomplished this year and compare with previous years. Indicate how anti-littering and illegal dumping enforcement records are kept, and how they may be retrieved for audit. • Improved Trash Bin/Container Management: Describe activities designed to improve trash bin/container management that began after the MRP1.0 effective date (i.e., December 2009) and continued in FY 17-18, and any enhancements or new actions implemented in FY 17-18. Include any new or redirected efforts to increase the focus towards these new or enhanced actions. • Other Types of Actions: Describe activities designed after the MRP effective date (i.e., December 2009) and continued in FY 17-18, and any enhancements or new (post December 2009 effective date) actions implemented in FY 17-18.

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-6 9/30/18

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.10.b.ii ► Trash Reduction – Other Trash Management Actions (PART B) Provide the following: 1) A summary of the on-land visual assessments in each TMA (or control measure area), including the street miles or acres available for assessment (i.e., those associated with VH, H, or M trash generation areas not treated by full capture systems), the street miles or acres assessed, the % of available street miles or acres assessed, and the average number of assessments conducted per site within the TMA; and 2) Percent jurisdictional-wide trash reduction in FY 17-18 attributable to trash management actions other than full capture systems implemented in each TMA; OR 3) Indicate that no on-land visual assessments were performed. El Cerrito did not perform visual assessments for Trash Reduction Credit in 2017-18. El Cerrito has reached an 84.5% trash reduction through the installation of FTCDs , clean-ups and product bans. The City will employ on land visual If no on-land visual assessments were performed, check here X assessments at some point in the future as required for permit compliance. and state why: *TMAs with asterisks are entirely comprised of low generating area, under full trash capture, or non- jurisdictional and assessments are not required. Summary of On-land Visual Assessments TMA ID Total Street Miles56 or % of Available Street Jurisdictional-wide or (as applicable) Acres Available for Street Miles or Acres Avg. # of Assessments Miles or Acres Reduction (%) Control Measure Area Assessment Assessed Conducted at Each Site Assessed 1 0.10 0.0 0 0 0.0 2 0.18 0.0 0 0 0.0 3 1.04 0.0 0 0 0.0 4* 0.00 NA NA NA 0.0 5 0.18 0.0 0 0 0.0 6 0.59 0.0 0 0 0.0 7 0.93 0.0 0 0 0.0 8 0.01 0.0 0 0 0.0 9 0.48 0.0 0 0 0.0 10 0.01 0.0 0 0 0.0 Total 3.52 0.0 0 0 0.0

56 Linear feet are defined as the street length and do not include street median curbs.

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-7 9/30/18

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.10.b.iv ► Trash Reduction – Source Controls Provide a description of each jurisdictional-wide trash source control action implemented to-date. For each control action, identify the trash reduction evaluation method(s) used to demonstrate on-going reductions, summarize the results of the evaluation(s), and estimate the associated reduction of trash within your jurisdictional area. Note: There is a maximum of 10% total credit for source controls. Summary of Source Control Summary Description & Evaluation/Enforcement Method(s) Evaluation/Enforcement % Reduction Action Dominant Trash Sources and Types Targeted Results To-date Single-use Plastic El Cerrito’s Single-Use Bag Ordinance went El Cerrito assesses the Implementation of the 5.4% Bag Ordinance into effect on January 1, 2014. It banned effectiveness of the Single-Use Ordinance to date indicates the use of single-use plastic bags by all Bag Ordinance based on the that a minimum of 90% of retailers and required a minimum charge of number of businesses that are affected businesses are in $0.05 on all single-use paper or reusable reported and/or observed to be compliance with the bags. The minimum charge was increased non-compliant the Ordinance. Ordinance. Per the by ordinance to $0.10 on January 1, 2016. This reporting-based Environmental Impact Report The purpose of the Ordinance is to reduce enforcement strategy was conducted by RecycleMore the prevalence of all types of single-use approved by the City Council at the Single-Use Bag Ordinance bags (paper or plastic) distributed in El the time the Ordinance was would reduce single-use plastic Cerrito, and therefore also reduce their adopted, and the public and bags by 95%; staff is proposing presence as litter in City streets, gutters, businesses are educated about a more moderate 75% storm drains, creeks and waterways. the enforcement strategy via reduction for this reporting The full Ordinance and other details can multiple newsletter outlets on a period. Based on a maximum be found online at www.el- regular basis, the latest being trash reduction of 8% from a cerrito/bagsandfoam.org through the January 2016 single-use bag ordinance like El garbage bill insert and a Cerrito’s, the 75% anticipated Commercial garbage bill insert in single use bag reduction, and March 2017. As of July 1, 2017, no the City’s minimum 90% El Cerrito retailers subject to the assumed compliance rate, El terms of the Ordinance were Cerrito calculates a 5.4% (8% x reported to be non-Compliant 75% x 90%) trash load reduction with the Ordinance. Additionally, attributable to the site visits performed by El Cerrito implementation of the Single- staff and the solid waste Use Bag Ordinance. contractor East Bay Sanitary have indicated that there are no businesses out of compliance with the Ordinance.

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-8 9/30/18

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.10.b.iv ► Trash Reduction – Source Controls Provide a description of each jurisdictional-wide trash source control action implemented to-date. For each control action, identify the trash reduction evaluation method(s) used to demonstrate on-going reductions, summarize the results of the evaluation(s), and estimate the associated reduction of trash within your jurisdictional area. Note: There is a maximum of 10% total credit for source controls. Polystyrene El Cerrito’s Food Ware Ordinance went into El Cerrito is assessing the Implementation of the 4.1% Food Service effect on January 1, 2014. It banned the effectiveness of the Food Ware Ordinance to date indicates Ware use of expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam Ordinance based on the number that a minimum of 90% of Ordinance or foodware from use by all food service of businesses that are reported affected businesses are in Policy businesses. The purpose of the Ordinance is and/or observed to be non- compliance with the to eliminate the use of EPS food ware, and compliant the Ordinance. Ordinance. Because the therefore also reduce the presence of EPS This reporting-based Ordinance affects all providers as litter on City streets, gutters, storm drains, enforcement strategy was of prepared food in El Cerrito, creeks and waterways. approved by the City Council at the City anticipates that the The full Ordinance and other details can the time the Ordinance was Ordinance will reduce EPS be found online at www.el- adopted, and the public was foam foodware litter by a cerrito/bagsandfoam.org educated about the minimum of 75%, assuming full enforcement strategy via compliance. Based on a multiple newsletter outlets maximum trash reduction of 6% between September 2013 and from a food ware ordinance Spring 2014. like El Cerrito’s, the 75% As of July 1, 2017, only three of minimum anticipated EPS food more than 60 El Cerrito food ware reduction predicted by service businesses subject to the the City, and the City’s terms of the Ordinance have minimum 90% compliance rate, been reported to be non- El Cerrito calculates a 4.05% Compliant with the Ordinance. (6% x 75% x 90%) trash load Additionally, regular site visits reduction attributable to the performed by El Cerrito staff and implementation of the Food solid waste contractor East Bay Ware Ordinance. Sanitary have not indicated that any other businesses are non- compliant with the Ordinance.

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-9 9/30/18

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.10.b.v ► Trash Reduction – Receiving Water Monitoring Report on the progress of developing and testing your agency’s trash receiving water monitoring program.

Guidance: Please refer to the C.10.b.v Section of the Contra Costa County Clean Water Program FY 17-18 Annual Report.

C.10.c ► Trash Hot Spot Cleanups Provide the FY 17-18 cleanup date and volume of trash removed during each MRP-required Trash Hot Spot cleanup during each fiscal year listed. Indicate whether the site was a new site in FY 17-18. New Site in FY 17-18 Volume of Trash Removed (cubic yards) Trash Hot Spot FY 17-18 Cleanup Date(s) (Y/N) FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 Cerrito Creek- 300 feet N 9/21/2017 .43 Cubic .23 Cubic .40 Cubic .20 Cubic .18 Cubic below the Adams Street Yards Yards Yards Yards Yards MS4 outfall pipes: 37.898x122.302

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-10 9/30/18

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.10.d ►Long-Term Trash Load Reduction Plan Provide descriptions of significant revisions made to your Long-term Trash Load Reduction Plan submitted to the Water Board in February 2014. Describe significant changes made to primary or secondary trash management areas (TMA), baseline trash generation maps, control measures, or time schedules identified in your plan. Indicate whether your baseline trash generation map was revised and if so what information was collected to support the revision. If your baseline trash generation map was revised, attach it to your Annual Report. Associated Description of Significant Revision TMA Summary: The City made no new changes to its Long-Term Trash Plan in 2017/18. However, previously, due to Permit changes, the City revised its strategy in implementing its Long-Term Trash Plan with On-Land Cleanups, based on revisions in eligibility criteria for Trash Load Reduction Credit. And, in 2015/16, El Cerrito modified the 2009 Baseline Trash Generation Rates in seven (7) Trash Management Areas based on the results of On-Land Visual Assessments at random locations in targeted TMAs over the course of six months. These on-land assessments were conducted by an independent contractor. Additionally, the City has continued the incremental installation of more Full Trash Capture Devices (FTCDs) in order to meet the trash reduction goals of the permit. Please see revised TGR map attachment C.10.d Long-Term Trash Load Reduction Plan Map. No other changes have been made to date. The Trash Generation Rate in TMA 1 was previously (2015/16) changed from High to Medium after verification of conditions 1 during three separate Visual Trash Assessments conducted at random locations in the TMA over the course of six months. This TMA is mostly one large privately owned commercial development. The City also verified that in addition to the street sweeping and litter policing that is contracted multiple times per week in this TMA by the property owner, there are Full Trash Capture Devices covering more than 90% of the drain inlets on the property. Certain areas of TMA 3 with High Trash Generation rates were previously (2015/16) changed to Medium after verification of 3 conditions during three separate Visual Trash Assessments conducted at random locations in the TMA over the course of six months. Trash Generation Rates were previously (2015/16) changed in TMA 4 from High to Medium and low based on verification of 4 conditions during three separate Visual Trash Assessments conducted at random locations in the TMA over the course of six months. Certain areas of TMA 5 with High Trash Generation rates were previously (2015/16) changed to Medium after verification of 5 conditions during three separate Visual Trash Assessments conducted at random locations in the TMA over the course of six months. Visual Assessments conducted at random locations in the TMA over the course of six months verified lower actual Trash 6, 7 Generation Rates in TMAs 6 and 7, previously (2015/16) changing some areas from Medium to Low. TMA 8, El Cerrito City Parks, also received Visual Trash Assessments conducted at random locations in the TMA over the course of 8 six months and were previously (2015/16) changed from Medium to Low.

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-11 9/30/18

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.10.e. ► Trash Reduction Offsets (Optional) Provide a summary description of each offset program implemented, the volume of trash removed, and the offset claimed in FY 17-18. Also, for additional creek and shoreline cleanups, describe the number and frequency of cleanups conducted, and the locations and cleanup dates. For direct discharge control programs approved by the Water Board Executive Officer, also describe the results of the assessments conducted in receiving waters to demonstrate the effectiveness of the control program. Include an Appendix that provides the calculations and data used to determine the trash reduction offset. Volume of Trash (CY) Offset Offset Program Summary Description of Actions and Assessment Results Removed/Controlled (% Jurisdiction-wide in FY 17-18 Reduction) 11 Cubic Yards 10% Additional Creek and Shoreline Cleanups A. 10 Monthly Baxter Creek Gateway Park volunteer clean-ups in 17/18 (Max 10% Offset) resulting in 700 gallons litter removed (first Saturdays) B. 48 Weekly City Staff Creek Clean-ups on 650’ of Cerrito Creek at El Cerrito Plaza in 17/18 resulting in 1440 gallons removed (average 30 gallons /week) C. 3 Lower Cerrito Creek Volunteer Clean-ups 105 gallons (35 gallons each) Using the formula: 1 % Reduction Offset (Volume) = (12AVH(2009) + 4AH(2009) + AM(2009)) OF The City of El Cerrito has calculated an offset of 15.5% based on the formula. Community involvement and consistency at the City level continue to show commitment to meet or exceed Permit requirements for the benefit of the greater community. The City of El Cerrito, in line with current Permit allowances, is claiming a 10% reduction for these efforts for FY 2017-18. None. 0 0 Direct Trash Discharge Controls (Max 15% Offset)

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-12 9/30/18

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Trash Load Reduction Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Appendix 10-1. Baseline trash generation and areas addressed by full capture systems and other control measures in Fiscal Year 17-18.

Trash Generation (Acres) in FY 17-18 Jurisdiction-wide 2009 Baseline Trash Generation Trash Generation (Acres) in FY 17-18 After Jurisdiction- Jurisdiction- wide After Accounting for Full Capture Systems and wide Reduction via Full (Acres) Accounting for Full Capture Systems TMA Reduction via Other Control Measures Reduction via Capture AND Full Capture Other Control Other Control L M H VH Total L M H VH Total Systems (%) L M H VH Total Measures (%) Measures (%) 1 0 32 0 0 32 1 31 0 0 32 0.2 1 31 0 0 32 0.0 0.2 2 6 19 14 0 39 29 7 3 0 39 9.4 29 7 3 0 39 0.0 9.4 3 10 66 64 0 140 93 30 17 0 140 37.9 93 30 17 0 140 0.0 37.5 4 15 10 5 0 30 30 0 0 0 30 5.0 30 0 0 0 30 0.0 5.0 5 4 25 11 0 40 36 4 0 0 40 10.9 36 4 0 0 40 0.0 10.9

6 65 20 0 0 85 69 16 0 0 85 0.8 69 16 0 0 85 0.0 0.8

7 25 27 0 0 53 28 25 0 0 53 0.5 28 25 0 0 53 0.0 0.5

8 34 3 0 0 37 37 1 0 0 37 0.4 37 1 0 0 37 0.0 0.4

9 6 8 0 0 14 6 8 0 0 14 0.0 6 8 0 0 14 0.0 0.0

10 1770 0 0 0 1771 1770 0 0 0 1771 NA 1,770 0 0 0 1,771 NA 0.NA

Totals 1936 212 93 0 2242 2100 121 21 0 2242 65.0 2,100 121 21 0 2,242 0.0 65.0

Note: “NA” indicates that the TMA has no moderate, high or very high trash generating areas (i.e., all low trash generation and/or non-jurisdictional) and therefore no additional trash control measures are needed.

FY 17-18 AR Form 10-13 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.11 – Mercury Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 11 - Provision C.11 Mercury Controls

C.11.a ► Implement Control Measures to Achieve Mercury Load Reductions C.11.b ► Assess Mercury Load Reductions from Stormwater See the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report for updated information on: • Documentation of mercury control measures implemented in our agency’s jurisdictional area for which load reductions will be reported and the associated management areas; • A description of how the BASMAA Interim Accounting Methodology57 was used to calculate the mercury load reduced by each control measure implemented in our agency’s jurisdictional area and the calculation results (i.e., the estimated mercury load reduced by each control measure); • Supporting data and information necessary to substantiate the load reduction estimates; and • For Executive Officer approval, any refinements, if necessary, to the measurement and estimation methodologies to assess mercury load reductions in the subsequent permit.

C.11.c ► Plan and Implement Green Infrastructure to Reduce Mercury Loads See the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report for information on the quantitative relationship between green infrastructure implementation and mercury load reductions, including all data used and a full description of models and model inputs relied on to establish this relationship.

57BASMAA 2017. Interim Accounting Methodology for TMDL Loads Reduced, Version 1.0. Prepared for BASMAA by Geosyntec Consultants and EOA, Inc., September 19, 2016.

FY 17-18 AR Form 11-1 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.11 – Mercury Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.11.e ► Implement a Risk Reduction Program Summary: All facilitation, organization, and collection of mercury containing devices in El Cerrito are coordinated by the West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management Authority (RecycleMore – www.recyclemore.com). Through the efforts managed by RecycleMore, El Cerrito’s residents and businesses are able to drop off mercury containing devices at the Richmond Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Facility located at 101 Pittsburg Ave., Richmond, Wednesday thru Saturday from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. In addition, starting June 20, 2017 the City and RecycleMore implemented a one day per week Household Hazardous Waste drop-off service at the El Cerrito Recycling Center, servicing 916 customers in the first 6 months and collecting 44 tons of HHW over that time period. Residents are also able to drop off mercury-containing lamps and bulbs at the El Cerrito Recycling + Environmental Resources Center (RERC) at 7501 Schmidt Lane, El Cerrito, daily from 9 am to 5 p.m. These items are collected from the RERC by the Richmond HHW Facility. Senior and disabled residents are able to have their mercury containing devices collected from their individual residents by contacting the HHW facility and making an appointment. Please refer to the FY 17/18 CCCWP Annual Report for an estimate of the mass of mercury collected through collection and recycling efforts in the Countywide Program area, including the Richmond HHW facility. El Cerrito promotes collection of mercury containing devices at the HHW Facility, at the RERC, and at individual residences (for seniors and disabled) on its website (www.ecrecycling.org), via printed brochures available at the RERC and online, and through daily customer service interactions at the RERC. RecycleMore also promotes these services on its website, via printed brochures, and at events. The CCCWP’s website promotes these efforts and provides information to residents for the collection and recycling of thermometers, thermostats, switches and bulbs at their nearest household hazardous waste facility. A summary of Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision are included in the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report and/or a BASMAA regional report and include the Countywide Program's support of the Fish Risk Reduction Program for Mercury and PCBs.

FY 17-18 AR Form 11-2 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.12 – PCBs Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 12 - Provision C.12 PCBs Controls

C.12.a ► Implement Control Measures to Achieve PCBs Load Reductions C.12.b ► Assess PCBs Load Reductions from Stormwater See the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report for: • Documentation of PCBs control measures implemented in our agency’s jurisdictional area for which load reductions will be reported and the associated management areas; • A description of how the BASMAA Interim Accounting Methodology58 was used to calculate the PCBs load reduced by each control measure implemented in our agency’s jurisdictional area and the calculation results (i.e., the estimated PCBs load reduced by each control measure); • Supporting data and information necessary to substantiate the load reduction estimates; and • For Executive Officer approval, any refinements, if necessary, to the measurement and estimation methodologies to assess PCBs load reductions in the subsequent permit.

C.12.c ► Plan and Implement Green Infrastructure to Reduce PCBs Loads See the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report for information on the quantitative relationship between green infrastructure implementation and PCBs load reductions, including all data used and a full description of models and model inputs relied on to establish this relationship.

C.12.e ► Evaluate PCBs Presence in Caulks/Sealants Used in Storm Drain or Roadway Infrastructure in Public Rights-of-Way A summary of Countywide and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision is included in the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report.

58BASMAA 2017. Interim Accounting Methodology for TMDL Loads Reduced, Version 1.0. Prepared for BASMAA by Geosyntec Consultants and EOA, Inc., September 19, 2016.

FY 17-18 AR Form 12-1 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.12 – PCBs Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

C.12.f ►Manage PCB-Containing Materials and Wastes During Building Demolition Activities So That PCBs Do Not Enter Municipal Storm Drains A summary of Countywide Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision is included in the C.12 PCBs Controls section of Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report.

Does your agency plan to seek exemption from this requirement? Yes X No

Not applicable.

C.12.g.►Fate and Transport Study of PCBs: Urban Runoff Impact on San Francisco Bay Margins

A summary of Countywide Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision are included in the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report.

C.12.h ►Implement a Risk Reduction Program

The CCCWP’s accounting methods in the Annual Report only include projects that have been completed after FY 13/14. As a result, a number of successful early projects in the City of El Cerrito are not included in that accounting. Two completed projects are referenced in C.3.j.ii.(2) Table B of this report. In addition, the City is continuing coordination with the San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP) on implementation of the San Pablo Avenue Green Stormwater Spine Project. This demonstration project along the length of San Pablo Avenue in multiple cities will include the addition of a bio-retention facility in El Cerrito south of Moeser Lane. Construction is anticipated by 2018 or early 2019. A summary of Countywide Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision are included in the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report and/or a BASMAA regional report and include the Countywide Program's support of the Fish Risk Reduction Program for Mercury and PCBs.

FY 17-18 AR Form 12-2 9/30/18 FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.13 – Copper Controls Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 13 - Provision C.13 Copper Controls

C.13.a.iii.(3) ►Manage Waste Generated from Cleaning and Treating of Copper Architectural Features Provide summaries of permitting and enforcement activities to manage waste generated from cleaning and treating of copper architectural features, including copper roofs, during construction and post-construction. Summary: In FY17/18, the City of El Cerrito did not receive any building permit applications that include the use of architectural copper. In the past, City Staff have worked with the Countywide Program's Municipal Operations Committee to develop a BMPs handout for architectural copper which has been distributed to El Cerrito’s Building and Planning Staff to be used in guiding building permit applications that include the use of architectural copper.

C.13.b.iii.(3) ►Manage Discharges from Pools, Spas, and Fountains that Contain Copper-Based Chemicals Provide summaries of any enforcement activities related to copper-containing discharges from pools, spas, and fountains. Summary: The El Cerrito Planning Department is not aware of any pools, spas, or fountains that use copper in any form. The El Cerrito Community Pool does not use copper in any form as the quality of the EBMUD supplied water and the other treatment methods do not require its use.

C.13.c.iii ►Industrial Sources Copper Reduction Results Based upon inspection activities conducted under Provision C.4, highlight copper reduction results achieved among the facilities identified as potential users or sources of copper, facilities inspected, and BMPs addressed. Summary: No such facilities are known to exist in El Cerrito. The City contracts for commercial and industrial facilities inspections with West County Wastewater District (WCWD) whose staff is trained to recognize equipment, devices or procedures that could be sources of copper. As part of their routine inspection, they look for any evidence of improper maintenance of such devices and to inquire with facility operators regarding their handling and disposal methods.

FY 17-18 AR Form 13-1 9/30/18

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.15 – Exempted and Conditionally Exempted Discharges Permittee Name: City of El Cerrito

Section 15 -Provision C.15 Exempted and Conditionally Exempted Discharges

C.15.b.vi.(2) ► Irrigation Water, Landscape Irrigation, and Lawn or Garden Watering Provide implementation summaries of the required BMPs to promote measures that minimize runoff and pollutant loading from excess irrigation. Generally, the categories are: • Promote conservation programs • Promote outreach for less toxic pest control and landscape management • Promote use of drought tolerant and native vegetation • Promote outreach messages to encourage appropriate watering/irrigation practices • Implement Illicit Discharge Enforcement Response Plan for ongoing, large volume landscape irrigation runoff. Summary: The City of El Cerrito employs Bay Friendly Landscape maintenances practices in the care and maintenance of all City Parks and facilities. In FY 17/18, the City continued to conserve irrigation water and to prioritize repairs to irrigation system leaks. In March 2018, the City also hosted a workshop how homeowner’s can support bees and pollinators in their own backyards.

Through the CCCWP, the City promoted and implemented several programs and measures to minimize pollutant loading from excess irrigation including, but not limited to:

• Stormwater C.3 Guidebook adopted by ordinance, which promotes to land development professionals landscaping designed to: 1) minimize irrigation and runoff; 2) promote infiltration of runoff where appropriate; and, 3) minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides using pest- resistant plants that are suited to site conditions (e.g., soil and climate). • Green Business Program, which promotes to businesses a variety of measures such as using drought tolerant plantings, mulching, carefully monitoring irrigation schedules and needs, and implementing Integrated Pest Management. • The City of El Cerrito’s Urban Greening Plan, adopted December 2015, contain recommended planting palettes for native, near native, climate appropriate, draught tolerant plants to help guide developers of new properties. • Our Water Our World (OWOW) Program, which promotes to consumers at the point of purchase less toxic alternatives to combating lawn and garden pests.

FY 17-18 AR Form 15-1 9/30/18 Attachment C.4.b.iii Potential Facilities List FY 18-19

Name Address City Program Category Blue Moon Saloon 9937 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Bar Only Cerrito Printing, Inc. 1600 Kearney Street El Cerrito Commercial El Cerrito Heating & Sheet Metal 1518 Kearney Street El Cerrito Commercial Rialto Cinemas 10070 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Commercial West Coast Autometrics 10200 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Commercial D'Arcy Harty Construction spoils yard 1718 Eastshore Blvd El Cerrito Contractor Clean Xpress of El Cerrito LLC 10628 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Dry Cleaner Flamingo Cleaners & Tailor 10408 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Dry Cleaner Great American Dry Cleaner 215 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Dry Cleaner Happy Cleaners & Laundry 7509 Fairmount Ave El Cerrito Dry Cleaner Huey's Laundry & Dry Cleaning 10148 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Dry Cleaner Ok Cleaners & Laundry 6109 Potrero Ave El Cerrito Dry Cleaner Tower Cleaners 7533 Fairmount Ave El Cerrito Dry Cleaner El Cerrito Corporation Yard 7500 Schmidt Lane El Cerrito Fleet Operations USPS Postal Annex 11245 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Fleet Operations A Taste of Ethiopia 11740 San Pablo Ave B El Cerrito Food Service AK Food Corner operating at Del Norte 6400 Cutting Blvd El Cerrito Food Service All Star Donuts 3070 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Food Service Armadillo Pizza 10180 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Atcha Thai Bistro 10558 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Bale Vietnamese Deli 10174 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Banana Leaf Thai 11880 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Barney Mc Bear's Social Club (formerly The Sky Lounge) 10458 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Baskin Robbins Ice Cream #2003 10598 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Best Burritos 10390 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Brasil Bistro 11866 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Burger King #6021 6021 Central Ave El Cerrito Food Service Cafe N!ne 11100 San Pablo Ave 105 El Cerrito Food Service Chef's Chinese Food 233 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Food Service Chipotle Mexican Grill 9901 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Church's Chicken #185 11575 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Denny's 11344 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Donut Time 10740 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service El Cerrito Plaza BART Snack Bar 6699 Fairmount Ave El Cerrito Food Service El Mono Peruvian 10264 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Elevation 66 Brewing Company 10082 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Fat Apple's 7525 Fairmount Ave El Cerrito Food Service Gangnam Tofu 11740 San Pablo Ave C El Cerrito Food Service Goody Donuts 10963 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Happy Garden Restaurant 11265 San Pablo Ave A El Cerrito Food Service Hawaiian BBQ 9935 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service HK Home Kitchen 10140 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service IHOP El Cerrito 11511 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Jack In The Box 5920 Cutting Blvd El Cerrito Food Service Katana-Ya Ramen 10546 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service L&l Hawaiian BBQ 11575 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Larb Thai 10166 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Little Caesar's Pizza 11299 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service McDonald's 11821 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Mel-o-dee Club 240 El Cerrito Circle El Cerrito Food Service MOD Pizza 5040 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Food Service Mountain Mike's Pizza 10750 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Nation's Foods, Inc. 1437 Kearney Street El Cerrito Food Service Nations Giant Hamburgers #21 6060 Central Ave El Cerrito Food Service Nation's Hamburgers #1 11090 San Pablo Ave 200 El Cerrito Food Service Nong Thon Vietnamese 10086 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Noodles Fresh 10042 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Panda Express 5020 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Food Service Peete's Coffee & Tea 9895 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Pizza Roma 10616 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Quickly 3080 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Food Service Raphael's Shutter Café 10064 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Red Onion Restaurant 11900 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Romano's Macaroni Grill 8000 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Food Service Rubios Fresh Mexican Grill 5010 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Food Service Sasa Kitchen 10350 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Starbucks #11861 11861 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Starbucks #3090 3090 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Food Service Strings Italian Café 11720 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Subway Sandwiches 10398 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Subway Sandwiches 11430 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Taco Bell 11965 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Taqueria Salva-mex 11252 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Tashi Delek 11224 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service The Junket 235 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Food Service Uncle Wong's Restaurant 11760 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Vietnam Grille 10386 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Wienerschnitzel 11101 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Food Service Wing Stop 340 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Food Service Yammy Sushi 195 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Food Service Best Gas And Car Wash 10602 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Gas Station Chevron Station #1750 11319 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Gas Station Super Stop Valero 11687 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Gas Station Mira Vista Golf & Country Club 7901 Cutting Blvd El Cerrito Golf Course Giovanni's Market 1600 Liberty Street El Cerrito Grocery Store Grocery Outlet 12020 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Grocery Store Hasanna Oriental Foods 10028 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Grocery Store Lucky's 1000 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Grocery Store Safeway Store #2940 11450 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Grocery Store Trader Joe's 225 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Grocery Store Yao-Ya San 10566 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Grocery Store Shields Nursing Center 3230 Carlson Blvd El Cerrito Healthcare A New Concept Laundromat 11940 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Laundry-Com. El Cerrito Construction 2320 Mono Ave El Cerrito Manufacturing Olivero Plumbing Company, Inc. 11360 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Manufacturing The Floor Doctor 1241 Richmond Street El Cerrito Manufacturing El Cerrito Community Center 7007 Moeser Lane El Cerrito Pool 11965 San Pablo Ave, LLC 11965 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt Alty Bay Area 2 10252 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt Bank of the West Plaza 11100 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt Cerrito Galleria 10370-98 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt Colliers International 11500 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt Del Norte Center 11299 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt El Cerrito Plaza 160 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt former Rob's Automotive 10192 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt Former Union 76 Station 11615 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt Jay Vee Center 10544 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt Legacy Partnership Group 9895 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt Melgards Mall 10734-50 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt Moeser Lane Shopping Center 10680 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt Peppermint Tree Plaza 10158 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt TNB Properties 11858 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Mngt Triple Net Investments LLC (forrner OSH Store) 1711 Eastshore Blvd El Cerrito Property Mngt Peter Hansen 10069 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Owner Richard Tuck 10963-79 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Property Owner El Cerrito Recycling Center 7501 Schmidt Lane El Cerrito Recyling Replanet 1000 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Recyling Barnes & Noble 6050 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Retail Bed, Bath & Beyond 6000 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Retail CVS Drugs 10650 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Retail CVS Drugs 670 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Retail Daiso Japanese 7000 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito Retail Ifshin Violins 6420 Fairmount Ave El Cerrito Retail Marshall's Dept Store 10794 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Retail O'Reilly Auto Parts 10680 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Retail O'Reilly Auto Parts 9989 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Retail Pastime Ace Hardware 10057 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Retail Pic N Pac Liquors 10012 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Retail Well Grounded Tea & Coffee 6925 Stockton Ave El Cerrito Retail PG&E Substation 7140 Schmidt Ave El Cerrito Utility Auto Import Sales 11280 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Sales Steve's Auto Care Sales 11820 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Sales 10-Minute Speed Oil Change 10175 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Service European Auto Center 10269 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Service Fairmount Auto Service 6525 Fairmount Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Service Foreign Auto Clinic 6315 Stockton Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Service Hi-tech Car Audio 10538 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Service Honda Of El Cerrito 11755 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Service Jesus Auto 3501 Carlson Blvd El Cerrito Vehicle Service Marty's Motor 10929 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Service Pennzoil Speed Oil 10175 San Pablo Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Service Plaza Auto Service 6801 Fairmount Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Service Pro Mechanizx 11847 San Pablo Ave B El Cerrito Vehicle Service R & R Auto & Towing Service 6700 Fairmount Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Service R C Imports 6501 Fairmount Ave El Cerrito Vehicle Service Smog Depot 11847 San Pablo Ave A El Cerrito Vehicle Service Steve's Union 76 Service 3160 Carlson Blvd El Cerrito Vehicle Service El Cerrito Steel Products 1424 Kearney Street El Cerrito Warehouse A Project of Earth Island Institute 1771 Alcatraz Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94703 Tel: (510) 985‐1602 • Fax: (510) 547‐4259 [email protected] • www.kidsforthebay.org Mandi Billinge, Executive Director/Founder

July 5th, 2018

Will Provost Clean Water Program Coordinator City of El Cerrito 10890 San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito, CA 94530

Dear Will,

Please find enclosed a final report for KIDS for the BAY’s Watershed Action Program in the City of El Cerrito. I have also included:

 Photo documents of our students during the Action Projects and Field Trips (Please note these photographs are for internal use only, as some families have requested their child’s photographs not be released to the general public)  Student thank-you letters

KIDS for the BAY successfully delivered the Watershed Action Program (WAP) to twenty-eight third, fourth, and fifth grade classes throughout Contra Costa and Alameda Counties in the 2017-18 school year reaching 827 students and 28 teachers. Two classes in El Cerrito engaged in exciting Classroom Lessons, an empowering Action Project, and a Field Trip to the Berkeley Marina. This final report highlights how the WAP has inspired and empowered teachers, students and their families, and positively impacted the school and the watershed.

We are very proud to report that El Cerrito students removed a total of 93 gallons of trash from their school and Field Trip habitats. Altogether WAP students removed a total of 878 gallons of trash from the San Francisco Bay watershed!

Thank you for your support for our work, and I hope you will enjoy reviewing the enclosed report and supporting materials. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. We look forward to continuing our partnership with the City of El Cerrito and delivering the Watershed Action Program in the 2018-19 school year.

Sincerely,

Mandi Billinge Executive Director [email protected]

WATERSHED ACTION PROGRAM FINAL REPORT

PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EL CERRITO

KIDS for the BAY 1771 Alcatraz Avenue Berkeley, CA 94703 INTRODUCTION

KIDS for the BAY (KftB) successfully delivered the Watershed Action Program (WAP) to two classes in El Cerrito reaching sixty-six students and two teachers during the 2017- 2018 school year. The program concluded in May 2018 and we are pleased to report that teachers, students and their families learned about, engaged with, and took action to improve the health of their watershed.

Sarah Chang’s fifth grade class and Marlowe Kim’s fourth grade class at Harding Elementary School completed four Classroom Lessons, an Action Project and a Field Trip to the Berkeley Marina.

The Interim Report submitted in April 2018 provided details on the Classroom Lessons completed earlier this school year. In this report you will find details and highlights from the Action Projects and Field Trip in written descriptions, quotes from teachers and students, and photo documents.

SUMMARY OF THE 2017-2018 ACTION PROJECT

Action Projects are an integral component of the Watershed Action Program (WAP) that provide students with the opportunity to use the knowledge they gained during Classroom Lessons to take action to protect their local watershed. KftB Instructors work with teachers and students to choose and implement an Action Project, which ensures that each project is appropriate for the school’s location and the community’s needs.

Ocean Acidification The fourth and fifth grade students at Harding Elementary decided to learn about the harmful effects that fossil fuels and more specifically carbon dioxide pose to the health of their watershed. Students were excited to put on their imaginary lab coats and conduct real science experiments in order to learn the causes and effects of ocean acidification and how they can take action to reduce their carbon footprints.

Fossil Fuels and Carbon Dioxide Before the students began the experiments, they discussed three very important questions: What are fossil fuels? What is carbon dioxide? How do they affect our oceans? KftB Instructor Cynthia DeLeon showed the class some images and asked the students to describe them. Hazel pointed to one of the pictures and said, “These machines are pumping something out of the ground.” Gus described one of the other images. “People are driving cars in heavy traffic.” Ms. Cynthia asked the students if they had heard of the term fossil fuels. “Yes, they come from fossils in the ground,” shared Olivia. Many students were surprised to learn that fossil fuels, such as oil and petroleum, are formed from the remains of living organisms like dinosaurs and are now used by humans for many modern conveniences such as cars and electricity.

Final Report, City of El Cerrito, July 2018 Page 1 Then the class went on to answer the question “What is carbon dioxide?” Most of the students had not heard of it before. Ms. Cynthia explained that carbon dioxide is a gas released from fossil fuels, as well as humans and other animals. To demonstrate this point, Ms. Cynthia had every student take a deep breath and hold it for a few seconds as she explained that they just breathed in oxygen. As the students exhaled, Ms. Cynthia explained that they are breathing out carbon dioxide. “Now oceans,” said Ms. Cynthia, “They do the opposite. They absorb carbon dioxide. Oceans will later release some of this carbon dioxide, but nowhere close to the amount that they absorb. All this carbon dioxide causes the pH in the water to decrease, making the oceans more acidic.”

pH Scale Next Ms. Cynthia introduced a large poster of a labeled pH scale. The students were interested to see that many things they use on a daily basis have a certain number and color on the scale. Students got to explore acidity by tasting lemons. They compared their observations about acidic lemons to basic parsley. “Lemons are sour and if you eat too much, you’re stomach hurts,” shared Nathan. “That’s right,” said Ms. Cynthia. “Too much acid in the stomach can make the stomach upset because its pH is not balanced. And right now, it’s like the ocean has an upset stomach.”

Tiny Oceans Experiment To test the theory of oceans acidifying, students conducted an experiment using water, bromothymol blue chemical, and lemon juice. Students worked together in teams of four to complete the experiment. Before beginning the experiment, students were asked to make predictions as to what would happen to the tiny ocean when something as acidic as lemon juice is added. “I think it is going to become acidic and change color,” predicted David. “I think it is going to turn from blue to green just like the pH scale,” shared Solomon. Now it was time to test these predictions.

The first student measured 50ml of water and placed it in a beaker. The second student used a pipette to place 6 ml of bromothymol blue into the water. The third student squeezed half a lemon into a cup and the fourth student, using a pipette, added one drop of lemon juice at a time, while the rest of the team observed the changes to the water. “Wow, its turning green,” exclaimed Amy. “It turned yellow after we added 6 drops just like my group predicted,” said Olivia. Ms. Cynthia asked the class, “So what does this tell us?” The class concluded that lemon juice reduces the pH of the water, making it more acidic. “In real life, is lemon juice acidifying our oceans?” asked Ms. Cynthia. The class shook their heads and all at once exclaimed, “Carbon dioxide is!”

Shelled Organism Experiment The students discussed how this rise in carbon dioxide and decrease in pH affects the marine animals and food chains. The student listed all the shelled organisms they could think of including: crabs, shrimp, turtles, coral, and zooplankton. Ms. Cynthia then asked the class, “What do you think happens to these animals’ shells when they are living in water with higher acidity?” The students pondered this question. One student named Kiera shared, “I think it would make them sick.” Another student named Sharon asked, “Does it give them upset stomach too?” Ms. Cynthia explained, “In all their shells, there

Final Report, City of El Cerrito, July 2018 Page 2 is something called calcium carbonate. Calcium carbonate helps animals build their shells nice and strong. When the water is more acidic, there is less Calcium Carbonate. Ms. Cynthia compared it to humans building a house. “It’s like trying to build a house, but not having enough wood. What would happen if you built it out of cardboard instead?” Nathan answered, “It wouldn’t be strong enough. It would break really fast.”

In the Shelled Organism Experiment, students tested to see what happens to calcium carbonate when it’s added to four different liquids with four different pH levels. Calcium carbonate is represented in the form of chalk and the four liquids are regular water, fizzy water, soapy water, and Sprite. First students tested the pH of the four liquids using pH strips. With the pH of the liquids in mind, the students hypothesized which liquid will dissolve the calcium carbonate first, second, third and fourth. Then, the students dropped the chalk into each liquid and observed what happened. “The chalk is bubbling and dissolving in the sprite,” observed David. “It’s also bubbling in the fizzy water,” added Solomon. Ms. Cynthia asked the students to compare their predictions to what they saw occurring in their cups. “Our group thought that the sprite would dissolve the chalk first and it did. Our prediction was correct!” exclaimed Alden.

Ms. Cynthia asked the class, “What do our results mean for the shelled organisms?” Alden answered, “It means that their shells are dissolving too.” The students were asked how this phenomenon will affect the shelled organisms. Olivia responded, “The animals won’t have their shells to protect them and they won’t be healthy or safe. They may die.” The rest of his peers nodded their heads in agreement. “Yes and if this happens, how are the other animals in the ocean affected?” Ms. Cynthia then displayed a poster depicting a marine food pyramid. Looking at the images on the poster, students remembered the food chain discussion from Lesson Two. “The other animals in the food chain won’t have enough to eat, like whales, sharks and humans,” said Nathan.

Carbon Reduction and Taking Action Students were upset by the thought of shelled organisms being harmed and food chains being disrupted. “I feel terrible that these animals do not get to have strong shells to live happy lives,” said Kiera. However, the students were excited and eager to take action to slow down this occurrence and help protect their watershed!

Students constructed a list of activities that use fossil fuels and therefore increase the amount of carbon dioxide in the air and oceans. Some of these activities included: electronics, transportation, plastic, and electricity. To take action and reduce their carbon footprint, students will monitor these activities in the classroom and at home. “I am going to go home and share what we learned today with my family and we are going to practice reducing our use of fossil fuels,” shared Marta. “I am going to turn off all the lights in my house!” added Paloma. “I am excited to take action because it is going to help the oceans and the animals!” exclaimed Jadeh.

Final Report, City of El Cerrito, July 2018 Page 3 SUMMARY OF THE 2017-2018 FIELD TRIP

Field Trips are an essential culminating element of the WAP. Students have the opportunity to connect their Classroom Lesson and Action Project learning experiences with a creek, bay, or delta habitat near their school. Students make a personal connection with a local natural environment and generate a deeper understanding of how watersheds link open spaces to their own school and neighborhoods. Students develop an increased responsibility for their environment.

Field Trip to Berkeley Marina Rocky Shore Investigation “Today, we are going to become science explorers,” said Ms. Cynthia. “To begin, we are going to explore the rocky shore and investigate some of the animals that live in this special habitat.” Before heading down to the shore, the students learned about rocky shore animals including green shore crabs, acorn barnacles, and beach hoppers. Ms. Cynthia demonstrated to the class how to gently hold a crab by forming what she called a “crab cave” with her two hands.

At the rocky shore, students were excited to explore every rock and investigate every crab, acorn barnacle, and beach hopper they found. Cameron moved aside some hanging seaweed and found a family of crabs hiding behind it. "It's like their own little cave!" he exclaimed."I've never held a crab before!" exclaimed Nasir. Nasir, as well as many other students got to hold a crab for the first time. Another student named Keira shared, “At first I thought it would pinch me, but as I was holding it, I think it was pretty cool. It reminded me how fragile they actually are.” The students loved observing the crabs and how they moved. "It's so different that they move sideways. I don't know any other animal that does that," said Lewis as he tried to pick up a green shore crab. Students carefully and gently returned each crab to its home after meeting it briefly.

Belly Biology Next students ventured over to a boating dock for belly biology. The students were intrigued by the term “belly biology” and excited to see what it involved. For many students, this was their first time exploring a dock. Italo excitedly shared, “These boats might come from far away because the bay is connected to the Pacific Ocean, which connects to so many places.” The students walked to a section of the dock free of boats and were asked to lie on their bellies and look at the marine life living under the dock. “Wow, who would’ve thought that there was so much life right under our feet, I’ll be looking at docks differently now,” shared Olivia. As students observed sea squirts and blue mussels under the dock, Ms. Cynthia took four students at a time to show them a buoy with several blue mussels, sea squirts, and skeleton shrimp attached to it. "Everything on this buoy is alive, but it all looks like plants and mud at first," observed Xavier.

Final Report, City of El Cerrito, July 2018 Page 4 Trash Clean-up After a picnic lunch, students conducted a trash clean-up to take care of the animals and habitat they had enjoyed all morning. “I like doing these clean-ups because they help our environment and all the marine animals,” shared Jadeh. Ms. Cynthia agreed and asked the class to remind her where the trash they picked up would go. “It goes to the landfill,” said Alden. Ms. Cynthia asked the class what they can do to reduce the amount of trash in landfills and watersheds. “We can use the Five Rs!” exclaimed Marta. “Yes, my family and I use reusable water bottles now,” shared Jadeh.

Reflections At the end of the day David shared, “I cannot wait to tell my dad what we did and saw today! I hope to come back and show him the crabs on the rocky shore and the sea squirts on the dock.”

In an overall reflection of her experience with the program, Ms. Marlowe said “My students now see themselves as scientists and see their role in environmental change.” Ms. Chang also said, “Thank you for this engaging and hands-on experience, letting students be scientists in the classroom and outdoors.”

Final Report, City of El Cerrito, July 2018 Page 5 Watershed Acon Program City of El Cerrito Acon Project and Field Trip Highlights 2017‐2018 School Year

Photo Document, City of El Cerrito, July 2018 Page 1 Acon Project Ocean Acidiﬁcaon

The fourth and fih grade students at Harding Elementary School learned about the harmful effects that fossil fuels and more specifically carbon dioxide pose to the health of their watershed. Students conducted two hands‐on science experiments to learn the causes and effects of ocean acidificaon. Aerwards, the students discussed ways in which they will take acon in their daily lives to slow down this phenomenon. Marta shared, “I am going to go home and share what we learned today with my family and we are going to pracce reducing our use of fossil fuels.”

Photo Document, City of El Cerrito, July 2018 Page 2 Field Trip Berkeley Marina

At the rocky shore, students were excited to explore every rock and invesgate every green shore crab, acorn barnacle, and beach hopper they found. One student named Keira shared aer holding a crab, “At ﬁrst I thought it would pinch me, but as I was holding it, I think it was prey cool. It reminded me how fragile they actually are.”

Photo Document, City of El Cerrito, July 2018 Page 3

Attachment C.10 – Offset Calculation for 2017/2018 Annual Report

El Cerrito- FY 2017/2018

1% Reduction Offset (Volume) = (12*VH Acre2009 + M Acres2009 )* OF

Formula = 212 + (4 x 93) = 584

Offset Factor = 7.5 x 0.033 = 0.2475

To claim 1% reduction, you must collect 144.54 gallons

In FY 2017/2018, El Cerrito collected 2245 gallons = 11 cubic yards

(202 gallons = 1 cubic yard)

2245 / 144.54 = 15.53 %

M N E I E M L V Z K A I A E R U T S A L E Z N S VE E L R W SIERRA A S P T E E V I T V N O E R A A N A G P V Y ON A E L T E T IN M S E U L K O IA C T R V Z C V I N A E T O A A L U E M R U A L S L V Q N M O M A S L E A O L E U A S E D S N T E V G H O R A O T O C E S H U N L M R M A E L A L M A R A E A A N I V S V M N B V P A O T S E N P O E T S N T A L A T V B O D E T V L T H R

Y A O N E I I Y Z C S A E N L L H A T U W T A M V C B W V U E O I E A

L O R N

S S D

A E O T A S

N V S I E E V R E N S T S A E V

C V A D D L S A

R V C T A I

A O A N Y E T S A W M E

T P R R T Z S C T I I D

O F S S M A M S I

I V N

L R J

N D A EL MONTE A V VE 3

A A

R O 4 RAY AVE

R S A

I E

S W ZARA ST V U

A A Q i T l P A A d M Y CL T ALTA VISTA DR c A I S E a W F I R F V t F L CHARLE V AY E S ST Z W E T IT E N A NIM AV E C 0 L U E T V EL D A 8 L T r A V L

E W I D e S Y E N O A P O A e N M D U R R A R O k M M C O C I B R H M VA AVE E M A SIL O A A H O D L M R A R N S A A R A V L S B V U O L S S A E T T R G E S T V T S O 9 H O E P S L O H N T M I V T N K I A S E S 4 S T V R S T A T 4 T

U B A A T A T E R

L R H V R R A R E L E E B TT

E I D A G VE V R A E H E r T A AL e ET VA T t R S T V A x A BAR a OIN DO P S R A P E S E B V L

TT of I R A V V E E A ib V D r A

T B

U N W R Y O I

T E S I M L V S A S A E S N H O E V A E V A T N N D A A E 4 I 8 V H 4 A N R T P S A A V H O A A L S V S A J I E L S VE E B R ITAS A A A M I N A E LAGU P Y H R S L H 8 N L C D O S T I A O S A A 6 W M U N A T 4 A A Y V A T V N E O R N E T E IND AV D ROSAL T S R S L T N A EV V IN AVE NEVIN AVE T E rib LUD r WIG AVE LA of Trib of Baxte G W T POINSETT AVE UN il S I d TA ca H S t A T PRATHER AVE V 5 E H

E 4 ALTA PUN A MAC T TA AVE V D R A O S N AL T D V A T V S

E N I A S T

S P

A O S R I S N

H V

T P D I E

T A H

R H S VD

R L 5 T B S A U L G A I N O I 4 S T

O E T R T U

R C D R D JO M A N RDAN S L AVE V

A E T E A N A

O A G

T C C M C E

P T M T E

P BISSEL A V L AVE S

R B A S FERN ST P T L A R Y A G O L D D T V H LA T L U A K S L C S E S S A T

O V A E A E L V B N E Y B N D AVE A VIEW E W D S L

M B T R B E S C I L M S B L I U V A A E D E

V P

H D R M C

R P I R HIGHLAN A A D AVE L I T A C

E V A C

H V

A A I A N M S LO V N

A N T O E R Y T V C A I I O E S F

T A T L N S V V A E

IO A P

I H E R O R K 8 Z D A W 0 G AT C E N Y F TO AV A N G W E N I E C E Y V Y U T A T O L R N A Q ALPAIS CT U S O P N TAM D L S FLORIDA AVE N CO T R B H O T R A C T A F V W T V A A E C IR I 5 IL VI E IL

4 E P W D W D O C S H R A D A J R T U P D R T E R K N R V D L E E C S B R T B R A T A T T W WE E O S R I N I R LL L O L V N E S RD O D

A I H N N E G W E V A T Y A A AY S W 6 V E DR R S H T N U 4 E LIA DERA CIR E C T T L S JU MA M S D T S P M N IS O A I R Y E T R S M C E D V P O L

M N U A A WALL U

AVE WALL A 3 T H R

VE A W S P M B K

O E S KENILWORTH ST A L C M V D D ADERA N O G J E CT R I

T U E N A R T D W T L

A A A R V I S

M A

E G

C N H P J R U D T TAFT AVE T REE N C 7 CE CT C R SNOWDON AVE HILLSIDE NATURAL AREA T 9 E 4 T

I T E O S S R V N N V A A L W A T V E M R E T E N R O K E R P A KN ID B T M J E A A

S A M T P OVEREND AVE N R S GLEN MAWR AVE H E N

T H A E T 0 C T V Y T 5 L

9 D E H S C IN 4 E

S T E T V R D

S A S O B

N AM V H T R S L IS T C D H T CUT 5 TING BLVD A IR 4 CUTTING B S R A D LVD D E L L E O E R R S I UG D B O G T L T E L K O C A R I E S V E E N D S N H W T R R O V R A C C A E G L W G W A R T S A N T O G O E N Y L R E R S O S A S R E S N C H N D

S R ESCUELA CT CA Y T U L B I STILLA AVE E T R R B E T Y r E L A S Y E L i T S b R V B

G C R R A T D S I M T C o D V T E K f E R

C A E N O

E B N PLAZA WAY N LA M H A a

P A C T E O P x Z H t Y E L R e FALL AVE A G M r V C L C E T N A T S V A I P I S T S R E K L L K K R T N IL I A A B L L C B E H B P E E U I B FA R T V LL AVE B Y U T L T OOD P R Y C H Y DW T D WIL N B L E KE T STATE CT STATE AVE S L E V T R N T T C X E EN E I K N R W E G S ERNEST T AVE T T T T O S E D N S E R BER S 49TH ST V UN K AVE A T A O T O r D V R M S e E R E E R t L T x

H T a M PO B T S VICTOR AVE f 5 S T o 4 D T

S ib

D r

BE H 2 LL CT H ERSHEY T CT V

L R

7 R D

S B

D 4 RE R ID C A T GORDON E O S AVE K V B

R L E E R I N U L

O B A A L N E

E R N H R Y A E N R L D S T L E V T 8 I L T E D E P Y K T V OTRER Y O G O S E AVE I P S N B R E L A S CO T G N A H E T T I R C L 4 D A C L O N T R T P r S C 7 OTRER E L e N T O O S V t A T S E A C 10 x D C

Y ARNO CT O X a A R D H V L P H R B R E I f A T N E E T R o

T T S 9 O G b L R S SC 5 i H S L 4 OOL ST P T r K

A 5 T I V O E

S E H P N 9 R G T T L E S A V A S H CY 6 A CT A PRESS AV V Y S T ING H E 5 S J K V E Y A L C T D E E 7 S LA E N O N R CYPRE V T 4 SS AVE G A IE C T S I L T E D S A T T C S P N C N R G CYPR E O S O H L E ESS AVE D T R E R V L T A W B L A T E A V TE O RL R N W R C T S I R O O N A E E R L C D H B E T T D P D R E C D L T T L R N E R R N 6 I E N C K I K S C U 5 L E H C D T E LN V ER N CREELY AV S M T OES E S E M S CARLOS AVE O LN I T H ER N N T LN ES G S S C ER MO D BURN OES T T M O S 8 C 3 RL N A T E R B R C A C I C R D A V T O E A FALLON AV B E S F E R N MADISON AVE N R A A T I A T T O L IS V A T R V S V E R L S K E S L A R E V O T R H A A V A PA R A E D T C H IL E S W L N L S E I T L T O N

A R V M L C R G L 6 E S K B I D T S N L A E 5 N T O L a T A N R E A T N A FLEMING C D AVE S S x R W B E R B JEFFE R D I t RSON AVE E E L S N e P LN K B V C R G r T T T D O T I O M T N T r S ID R N O C S A M G e K H R N H

r t C C S E S D D e x T C L A e 6 R T k L a T R 5 HI

R S G E B N L LA H GATELY AVE N P M LA S E D C N f ALAME O T D H DA AVE W B o Y IE LV

T R D T L V W

5 S I V A S L B E E b A 5 T E S I B L i E W r H L V A P S R L Y S T A N T T O

7 T H C E O N Y S R T A 5 T S E N S D M R BAYVIEW AVE S L V H E L R S A T BAYVIEW AVE T R E E E KE E N E N G NILW A S V L ORT E E O C N H DR D T MO T L O E T K I N A E C N T S V V H T A O R T E IG T D A K S K R C E N R HL E S O E A R V A H W S A H M N B T R D T A R IG

T A P A D E H V 6 L R A P L T T S S A E 5 R V R A W N S S N D E R D T H A O T S N D A C B A T S I H L C D T V R T E 9 W N 7

L R D H D A A V O

5 M R 9 E T L E M

A A 5 8 L

7 S R C R M S R I T 5 S S 8 P E E A A O R E V R E C S T T T S A C A A E D R T D N D R N S D V E H A S S T S A S R H A I S T IG C L I T E E S O J A H R T V L O R W M L AN PO A A G K P D ALV D E A L IN I D R R D V B R I E T NC R

T E O S

r N i R E RD KE b H T L N T P Y E M SI T V Y N S S A G

M 9 o W A A S T S C E N O 5 M T A f F N L N

T T A A T V R E S H O D B R A L V

0 S E N E D A 1 C T I L C 8 a L B R H E 5 A A I A B E I U x R R E W G D S t L A E R BAL H S S T R o L R e N A t P O S S T T DR i G OD U r N T Y O P 5 I T r H M T P A RW B S C r T O E 6 E C e A N L A O T A E V T R V D S N T N C R R A H I f A O K T D C o H D L N A M O H A S W A R N O b S S S C M S i A T L P r A N R H E A O C A T I E O T V C N B V Y N S N A IL O N O S E U A M T O E D N C A A M R P W R E S K CT N L Y O L TON A E R S T A NG C C T M A ARLI M V T S W Y E L B V I A M D S K P A E E V A L A S T R R N E Y E A I T L I P A I N M O T R S S S O Y E L T O A E T O P S E E C N N V S A T L N S M A X H T T V I E E D 5 I N E M B N A I 1 I V G A L O O S E R G U T V T G I A N B P G H I T E W O S E L T O E E V N L T Y R T M E D I

O A V Y U L E R A W A B O D S o O R N S t A R T N ri K R A N S S r R T W I E O

A e E A Y O D T A K C R O A f U T V o N S V H E W S b B C E E L E C i E T r R A AV D T T E F L R V M V S O O A R O A A E S H E D M K A N T V U A E S L R C N

V A A P U K 6 E E C

E I E E W R N V I

S V E

A A O

T I N T C A R O C S T V A E A N K B O K V D D L A E C R T N O A R B A T A N M Y C E I S L I W A E R O A

V S H S R A W N E Y T S A A S T A N A Y S

U S U N L D E O

A E R V P S A C V R L L N A R E A D D M U A K A E P E L G I C V N S E A A R O I V E U R L A R B E R R S R E E U E C T L V E B V T O T O A A D S SU N E A R O O A RROL D S M T A T R U A L L V K WELLESLEY O M C B AVE T C E TO S r P S E ib E K E R S o I V VE E A N A A V M U f S A B T DR B G A Z KA V SUNSE a S M U C E A O N U R R I S x L C A EU R o N E te P P A t E S R L W r L T S E i N T N V E T A A L A r C I A E S S C A 2 r O D N N O M S A e D T E T N T L R F N V V A A U R O P C A S I C B L R f N A L I L L 6 Y D L A V o A A A E D R A AV R V G E L A b E E V N E B A i E O A T S r O M G O D T eek V S IN E T Cr H T V A R ito E A N A err K rk C E N U O o H T th F R N S Nor E S J E T VE I O M V A T 5 A A A N R K L 8 A C E O A S A R C 0 Q S U LIN V A E SUSAN AVE F U 9 E N W I N M Y R N S A I A A T T C S D P E H R R N H O A M D N E O B O E V T V S S A W S A I O U R E G N T 8 T IA I O N V IN T B V R K E 0 M L A C D E N Y E E U E I V F L S BE PR A O L V W C X S A ER N E L C LY V I V O Y T C T A N S L T G O A E IN N G T T S Y R N E T D U R T H F O VE O W E A N E V LN N I A O V C A A IN A M L V T A D A A S V E D R N E W R A LO E S D L R P I A L M E E W V N E O L A V Y Y O R E A B A N V E W L E A K V O S E C R R O O O A X T J E R R D N N AV E E A L M R M S A V A 6 O R D T R N A E A E VE C C L A B A K T S E E N V T U D A S O R r S M ET T AIR RD VE E i T F O A FL b TF O N RA SN VA o ST E f R T F S O D O C LV D C B A T e R S E IA O A L r E B D IL I A C V M S L V 5 B r S A N U E A N O i O T L A E A t N O R T OY N R N C S o V V B A A VE T A E I E L L R Y M R C E V IL Y P R LEXINGTON RD A U Y CU N A V W E T P I O A O A T A E S S V M E R Y M L G L R T A F I O S O O C L L O N Y V O E A T N S C T A V A E N C H E O S R V O S A M A A I D C L E E R H D R A A O V B R V L A I A V E I V D S O B V R T A LLEY N R E E 9 V M VA L T S A E N U E E R D H Y O E B J N S E R A A R D N T R A T V D L K Y S A E E E E O A R D R G N A E L V A Y C T CR S S S V P O E D L C C FT A T E R I E L A Y D N R P V R E E A O E L R R H E A E D S I T V T T R T K A B S O O E A E O R G C N E L M L IE P T D O M D S AVE B E P N L B N T YN A R O SA A L G R N I N Z D IN A A T V G L M I A E R E P V A

W T C E A A S D T 2 VE A A A W A V D T M E E S E rito 6 N VI M f Cer E K o S A Trib ASS O LA L A S 1 E RAMP T H 9 T

J ELC-01 E A V C C A err E U ito C T VE T Z re A N T ek S A Z WARD AVE LI E A I A C S IS C L I N I S V I S B T T E V A O

O E R B V I R E T V A U

L 5 N A T 8 S A C K E E T 0 S V E

A L F N E F I L N

P A W N

A A O I K Y E S V T S R O A E N L

P I C V

I S E E E 5 S N 8 S 0 VE T N A F HTO W BRIG Y THOU SAND OAKS BLVD

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community EL CERRITO Full Trash Capture and Trash Management Area Map

Trash Generation Category Creek/Shoreline Hotspot Streets Low 2 Trash Management Area Agency Boundary Medium Full-Capture Location Creeks Information contained on these maps is for the sole High Parcel Boundary Full Trash Capture purpose of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program. Very High Non-Jurisdicational (Dot color = Generation Category) 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Miles Accuracy of the data is not guaranteed. Map Created By CCCWP GIS 8/24/2018 Provision C.10.a.ii.b. Private Lands Drainage Area Map CITY OF EL CERRITO Trash Control Status Summary Acres Agency Boundary Prepared by Potential PLDA Screening Area 178 Preliminary PLDAs Potential PLDA Under Evaluation 4 Excluded PLDA Potential PLDA Excluded to Date 51 Preliminary PLDA Within Screening Area 74 Potential PLDA Under Evaluation Preliminary PLDA Outside Screening Area 0

Date: 8/20/2018 0 0.125 0.25 0.5Miles M N E I E M L V Z K A I A E R U T S A L E Z N S VE E L R W SIERRA A S P T E E V I T V N O E R A A N A G P V Y ON A E L T E T IN M S E U L K O IA C T R V Z C V I N A E T O A A L U E M R U A L S L V Q N M O M A S L E A O L E U A S E D S N T E V G H O R A O T O C E S H U N L M R M A E L A L M A R A E A A N I V S V M N B V P A O T S E N P O E T S N T A L A T V B O D E T V L T H R

Y A O N E I I Y Z C S A E N L L H A T U W T A M V C B W V U E O I E A

L O R N

S S D

A E O T A S

N V S I E E V R E N S T S A E V

C V A D D L S A

R V C T A I

A O A N Y E T S A W M E

T P R R T Z S C T I I D

O F S S M A M S I

I V N

L R J

N D A EL MONTE A V VE 3

A A

R O 4 RAY AVE

R S A

I E

S W ZARA ST V U

A A Q i T l P A A d M Y CL T ALTA VISTA DR c A I S E a W F I R F V t F L CHARLE V AY E S ST Z W E T IT E N A NIM AV E C 0 L U E T V EL D A 8 L T r A V L

U B A A T A T E R

L R H V R R A R E L E E B TT

E I D A G VE V R A E H E r T A AL e ET VA T t R S T V A x A BAR a OIN DO P S R A P E S E B V L

TT of I R A V V E E A ib V D r A

T B

U N W R Y O I

E 4 ALTA PUN A MAC T TA AVE V D R A O S N AL T D V A T V S

E N I A S T

S P

A O S R I S N

H V

T P D I E

T A H

R H S VD

R L 5 T B S A U L G A I N O I 4 S T

O E T R T U

R C D R D JO M A N RDAN S L AVE V

A E T E A N A

O A G

T C C M C E

P T M T E

P BISSEL A V L AVE S

R B A S FERN ST P T L A R Y A G O L D D T V H LA T L U A K S L C S E S S A T

O V A E A E L V B N E Y B N D AVE A VIEW E W D S L

M B T R B E S C I L M S B L I U V A A E D E

V P

H D R M C

R P I R HIGHLAN A A D AVE L I T A C

E V A C

H V

A A I A N M S LO V N

A N T O E R Y T V C A I I O E S F

T A T L N S V V A E

IO A P

I H E R O R K 8 Z D A W 0 G AT C E N Y F TO AV A N G W E N I E C E Y V Y U T A T O L R N A Q ALPAIS CT U S O P N TAM D L S FLORIDA AVE N CO T R B H O T R A C T A F V W T V A A E C IR I 5 IL VI E IL

4 E P W D W D O C S H R A D A J R T U P D R T E R K N R V D L E E C S B R T B R A T A T T W WE E O S R I N I R LL L O L V N E S RD O D

A I H N N E G W E V A T Y A A AY S W 6 V E DR R S H T N U 4 E LIA DERA CIR E C T T L S JU MA M S D T S P M N IS O A I R Y E T R S M C E D V P O L

M N U A A WALL U

AVE WALL A 3 T H R

VE A W S P M B K

O E S KENILWORTH ST A L C M V D D ADERA N O G J E CT R I

T U E N A R T D W T L

A A A R V I S

M A

E G

C N H P J R U D T TAFT AVE T REE N C 7 CE CT C R SNOWDON AVE HILLSIDE NATURAL AREA T 9 E 4 T

I T E O S S R V N N V A A L W A T V E M R E T E N R O K E R P A KN ID B T M J E A A

S A M T P OVEREND AVE N R S GLEN MAWR AVE H E N

T H A E T 0 C T V Y T 5 L

9 D E H S C IN 4 E

S T E T V R D

S A S O B

S R ESCUELA CT CA Y T U L B I STILLA AVE E T R R B E T Y r E L A S Y E L i T S b R V B

G C R R A T D S I M T C o D V T E K f E R

C A E N O

E B N PLAZA WAY N LA M H A a

H T a M PO B T S VICTOR AVE f 5 S T o 4 D T

S ib

D r

BE H 2 LL CT H ERSHEY T CT V

L R

7 R D

S B

D 4 RE R ID C A T GORDON E O S AVE K V B

R L E E R I N U L

O B A A L N E

Y ARNO CT O X a A R D H V L P H R B R E I f A T N E E T R o

T T S 9 O G b L R S SC 5 i H S L 4 OOL ST P T r K

A 5 T I V O E

r t C C S E S D D e x T C L A e 6 R T k L a T R 5 HI

R S G E B N L LA H GATELY AVE N P M LA S E D C N f ALAME O T D H DA AVE W B o Y IE LV

T R D T L V W

5 S I V A S L B E E b A 5 T E S I B L i E W r H L V A P S R L Y S T A N T T O

T A P A D E H V 6 L R A P L T T S S A E 5 R V R A W N S S N D E R D T H A O T S N D A C B A T S I H L C D T V R T E 9 W N 7

L R D H D A A V O

5 M R 9 E T L E M

A A 5 8 L

T E O S

r N i R E RD KE b H T L N T P Y E M SI T V Y N S S A G

M 9 o W A A S T S C E N O 5 M T A f F N L N

T T A A T V R E S H O D B R A L V

O A V Y U L E R A W A B O D S o O R N S t A R T N ri K R A N S S r R T W I E O

A e E A Y O D T A K C R O A f U T V o N S V H E W S b B C E E L E C i E T r R A AV D T T E F L R V M V S O O A R O A A E S H E D M K A N T V U A E S L R C N

V A A P U K 6 E E C

E I E E W R N V I

S V E

A A O

T I N T C A R O C S T V A E A N K B O K V D D L A E C R T N O A R B A T A N M Y C E I S L I W A E R O A

V S H S R A W N E Y T S A A S T A N A Y S

U S U N L D E O

W T C E A A S D T 2 VE A A A W A V D T M E E S E rito 6 N VI M f Cer E K o S A Trib ASS O LA L A S 1 E RAMP T H 9 T

J E A V C C A err E U ELC-01 ito C T VE T Z re A N T ek S A Z WARD AVE LI E A I A C S IS C L I N I S V I S B T T E V A O

O E R B V I R E T V A U

L 5 N A T 8 S A C K E E T 0 S V E

A L F N E F I L N

P A W N

A A O I K Y E S V T S R O A E N L

P I C V

I S E E E 5 S N 8 S 0 VE T N A F HTO W BRIG Y THOU SAND OAKS BLVD

Streets Trash Generation Category Creek/Shoreline Hotspot Low Agency Boundary 2 Trash Management Area Medium Creeks Full-Capture Location High Parcel Boundary Information contained on these maps is for the sole Full Trash Capture Very High purpose of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program. Non-Jurisdicational (Dot color = Generation Category) 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Miles Accuracy of the data is not guaranteed. Map Created By CCCWP GIS 8/22/2016