DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impact of Urban Groundwater Upon Surface Water Quality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Impact of Urban Groundwater Upon Surface Water Quality THE IMPACT OF URBAN GROUNDWATER UPON SURFACE WATER QUALITY: BIRMINGHAM – RIVER TAME STUDY, UK. by PAUL AUSTIN ELLIS A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Hydrogeology Group School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Birmingham December 2002 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT A field-based research study has been undertaken on the River Tame within the industrial city of Birmingham, UK, to understand better the influence of urban groundwater discharge on surface-water quality. The 8 km study reach receives ~6% of its total baseflow (60% of which is groundwater) from the underlying Triassic Sandstone aquifer and flood-plain sediments. An integrated set of surface water and groundwater flow, head and physical/chemical data was collected from installed riverbed piezometers and existing monitoring across the aquifer. Field data and supporting computer modelling indicated the convergence of groundwater flows from the sandstone/drift deposits and variable discharge to the river (0.06 to 10.7 m3d-1m-1, mean 3.6 m3d-1m-1), much of which occurred through the riverbanks. Significant heterogeneity was also observed in groundwater quality along and across the river channel. Key contaminants detected were copper, nickel, sulphate, nitrate, chlorinated solvents, e.g. trichloroethene, and their biodegradation products. Groundwater contaminant concentrations were generally lower than expected and ascribed to dilution and natural attenuation within the aquifer and riverbed. High concentration plumes were detected, but their effect was localised due to substantial dilution within the overlying water column of the river. Estimated contaminant fluxes were not found to reduce significantly the present surface water quality, which is poor (>30% is pipe-end discharge). Comparative studies elsewhere and further elucidation of heterogeneity and natural attenuation controls are recommended. To my wife Yumi and sons Max Leo and Ben ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisors Dr Mike Rivett and Professor Rae Mackay for their advice and enthusiasm during the project. Also my thanks to Dr Rob Ward and Dr Bob Harris at the Environment Agency for the assistance and support they have given during my research. The Environment Agency National Groundwater and Contaminated Land Centre and the School of Earth Sciences, Birmingham University jointly provided the funding for the work. Thanks to Professor Geoff Williams and Julian Trick at the British Geological Survey for the loan of equipment and discussions on piezometer design. For their hard toil in the field, splashing about with the rats in the glorious River Tame, thanks go to James Dowell, John Henstock, Tom Singleton, Amelia Moylett, Chris Fuller, Steve Littler, and Kevin Shepherd. For general advice and assistance I am grateful to Dr Richard Greswell, Roger Livsey, Jane Harris, Mick Riley and Professor John Tellam. Thanks to Nassir Al Amri and Phil Blum for fruitful discussions and being good office mates. To my mother and father thanks for your support over the years and for actually reading the thesis. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project outline...............................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Aim and objectives .......................................................................................................................................2 1.3 Approach and thesis layout...........................................................................................................................3 CHAPTER 2. A REVIEW OF GROUNDWATER/SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS................ 6 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................6 2.1.1 Groundwater flow to rivers...................................................................................................................6 2.1.2 The groundwater/surface water interface..............................................................................................9 2.1.3 Groundwater contamination................................................................................................................11 2.2 International Case Studies ..........................................................................................................................16 2.2.1 Water Quality Studies .........................................................................................................................17 2.2.2 Flow Studies........................................................................................................................................18 2.2.3 Combined Quality and Flow Studies ..................................................................................................19 2.3 UK Case Studies.........................................................................................................................................20 2.3.1 UK Legislation....................................................................................................................................22 2.4 Monitoring methods....................................................................................................................................22 2.5 Modelling methods .....................................................................................................................................23 2.6 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................25 CHAPTER 3 STUDY SETTING.......................................................................................................... 26 3.1 Historical Background................................................................................................................................26 3.2 Land use......................................................................................................................................................29 3.3 Hydrology of the River Tame.....................................................................................................................30 3.4 The Geology of the Tame Catchment.........................................................................................................34 3.4.1 Solid Geology .....................................................................................................................................38 3.4.2 Superficial Drift Deposits ...................................................................................................................39 3.4.3 Structure..............................................................................................................................................41 3.5 Regional Hydrogeology..............................................................................................................................41 3.6 Hydrochemistry and Contamination of the Birmingham Aquifer ..............................................................47 3.6.1 Inorganic Contamination.....................................................................................................................52 3.6.2 Organic Contamination.......................................................................................................................54 3.7 Summary.....................................................................................................................................................55 CHAPTER 4 MONITORING NETWORKS AND METHODS .......................................................... 57 4.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................................58 4.2 Archive data................................................................................................................................................65 4.3 Surface water flow gauging. .......................................................................................................................67 4.3.1 River discharge measurements............................................................................................................67 4.3.2 River cross sectional discharge calculation.........................................................................................69 4.4 Surface water quality sampling...................................................................................................................70 4.5 Groundwater quality sampling....................................................................................................................70 4.5.1 Riverbed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • River Rea Aqueduct 6 Heath Watermill 7 Milk Street 8 109–110
    This guided walk explores an often- forgotten corner of Birmingham, Digbeth, charting its transformation from open fields to being one of Britain's industrial powerhouses. Once on the outskirts of a rural market town surrounded by orchards and water meadows, Digbeth developed into a slum in the 19th century with the highest population density the city has ever seen. Today the area is changing again as work gets underway for the new HS2 rail network. Time 1 of hour walk MOLA Headland Start your journey at St Bartholomew's Infrastructure exploring Chapel, follow the map to explore the Birmingham's heritage for HS2 area's lesser-known historical delights. 1 6 St Bartholomew's Chapel River Rea Aqueduct St Bartholomew’s was built in 1749 as The River Rea has long been used as a the chapel of ease for St-Martin-in-the- source of power for watermills rather than Bullring and could seat 1800 people. a transport route, it was straightened and Heavily damaged by bombing in World narrowed through the city to increase its War Two it was pulled down in 1943. The power. This aqueduct was designed to Clayton Hotel now stands on the site of safely carry the canal over the river. the chapel. 7 2 Heath Watermill Curzon Street Station It's hard to imagine that most of this land was undeveloped water meadows in the Built in 1838 it was the end of the London Middles Ages, with a broad river winding to Birmingham Railway and the Grand through it. The Heath watermill was Junction Railway which ran to Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF995, Job 6
    The Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country _____________________________________________________________ The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background December 2005 Protecting Wildlife for the Future The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 The Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country gratefully acknowledges support from English Nature, Dudley MBC, Sandwell MBC, Walsall MBC and Wolverhampton City Council. This Report was compiled by: Dr Ellen Pisolkar MSc IEEM The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 3. SITES 4 3.1 Introduction 4 3.2 Birmingham 3.2.1 Edgbaston Reservoir 5 3.2.2 Moseley Bog 11 3.2.3 Queslett Quarry 17 3.2.4 Spaghetti Junction 22 3.2.5 Swanshurst Park 26 3.3 Dudley 3.3.1 Castle Hill 30 3.3.2 Doulton’s Claypit/Saltwells Wood 34 3.3.3 Fens Pools 44 3.4 Sandwell 3.4.1 Darby’s Hill Rd and Darby’s Hill Quarry 50 3.4.2 Sandwell Valley 54 3.4.3 Sheepwash Urban Park 63 3.5 Walsall 3.5.1 Moorcroft Wood 71 3.5.2 Reedswood Park 76 3.5 3 Rough Wood 81 3.6 Wolverhampton 3.6.1 Northycote Farm 85 3.6.2 Smestow Valley LNR (Valley Park) 90 3.6.3 West Park 97 4. HABITATS 101 The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 4.1 Introduction 101 4.2 Heathland 103 4.3 Canals 105 4.4 Rivers and Streams 110 4.5 Waterbodies 115 4.6 Grassland 119 4.7 Woodland 123 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Environmental Management Plan Birmingham City Council
    High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Local Environmental Management Plan Birmingham City Council December 2017 www.gov.uk/hs2 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/hs2 A report prepared by Lang O'Rourke and Mace on behalf of HS2 Ltd. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2017, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. This information is licensed under the Open Government Licence v2.0. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ version/2 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre.
    [Show full text]
  • Northfield Constituency Environmental Forum
    Northfield Constituency Environmental Forum Minutes Meeting Held: New Frankley in Birmingham Parish Council Office, Friday 12 th August 2016, 2pm Present: Penny Moore (Chair), Cllr Ian Cruise (Longbridge Ward), Cllr Randal Brew (Northfield Ward), Cllr Brett O’Reilly (Northfield Ward), Roland Kedge (Rea Valley Conservation Group), David Beardsmore (Lickey Hills Ranger Hub), Linda Coates (Frankley Street Champions/ New Frankley in Birmingham Parish Council), Geoff Skidmore (Rea Valley Conservation Group), Natasha Murray (Environment Agency), Sarah Royal (BOSF) Apologies: Graham Andrews (Secretary), Amanda Cadman (Treasurer/ Vice Chair) Sue Amey (Constituency Parks Manager), Maggie Sweet (The Fields Millennium Green), Clive Sweet (The Fields Millennium Green), Daniel Bryson-Peart (The Friends of Manor Farm Park), Chris Blythe (BCV), Jill Harvey (Lickey Hills Society), Cllr Peter Griffiths, Cllr Carol Griffiths, Bruce Pitt (Frankley Street Champions/ New Frankley in Birmingham Parish Council), Cllr Debbie Clancy, Cllr Julie Johnson, Amy Watson (ExtraCare retirement village), Carol Cooper (Severn Trent), Matt Andrews (LPAP) Meeting started 2.10pm Welcome Penny welcomed everyone to the meeting and accepted apologies. Minutes: The minutes of the last meeting were accepted by all as a true record. Matters Arising: None Financial Report There was no change to finances; however Roland had now ordered the plaque for the Great Stone and is due to collect it from Derbyshire. The group will be supporting the plaque with a donation towards the £350 cost. Natasha Murray (Environment Agency) Natasha kindly came along from the EA to give the forum an update on the River Rea. Natasha said at present the River Rea was classified as moderate and the aim was to raise it one level to good.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Lines and Sons: Rediscovering Birmingham's
    SAMUEL LINES AND SONS: REDISCOVERING BIRMINGHAM’S ARTISTIC DYNASTY 1794 – 1898 THROUGH WORKS ON PAPER AT THE ROYAL BIRMINGHAM SOCIETY OF ARTISTS VOLUME II: CATALOGUE by CONNIE WAN A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History of Art College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham June 2012 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. CONTENTS VOLUME II: CATALOGUE Introductory Note page 1 Catalogue Abbreviations page 8 Catalogue The Lines Family: A Catalogue of Drawings at the page 9 Royal Birmingham Society of Artists Appendix 1: List of Works exhibited by the Lines Family at the Birmingham page 99 Society of Arts, Birmingham Society of Artists and Royal Birmingham Society of Artists 1827-1886 Appendix 2: Extract from ‘Fine Arts, Letter XIX’, Worcester Herald, July 12th, 1834 page 164 Appendix 3: Transcription of Henry Harris Lines’s Exhibition Ledger Book page 166 Worcester City Art Gallery and Museum [WOSMG:2006:22:77]
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Wye Catchment Management Plan Consultation Report
    N SLA- Ij/S 5 2 UPPER WYE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT N.R.A - Welsh Region REGIONAL TECHNICAL (PLANNING) Reference No : RTP017 LIBRARY COPY - DO NOT REMOVE RECYCLED PAPER A)£A V\I^GS 52- n a t io n a l RIVERS AUTHORITY . .WELSH REGION ____ - - - UPPER WYE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT National Rivers Authority - Welsh Region South East Area Rivers House St Mellons Business Park St Mellons Cardiff CF3 OLT June 1993 UPPER WYE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT CONTENTS PAGE No. FOREWORD iv MISSION STATEMENT OF THE NRA v THE NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY vi 1.0 CONCEPT OF THE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 2.0 THE UPPER WYE CATCHMENT 4 2.1 Catchment Description 5 2.2 Data collection Within the Catchment 7 2.3 Key Details 8 3.0 CATCHMENT USES 9 3.1 Introduction 10 DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE 3.2 Development 11 3.3 Flood Defence - 14 3.4 Forestry 17 3.5 Farming 19 CONSERVATION AND FISHERIES 3.6 Conservation - Ecology 20 3.7 Conservation - Landscape and Archaeology 24 3.8 Fisheries Ecosystem 26 3.9 Angling and Commercial Fishing 29 ABSTRACTIONS 3.10 Abstraction for Potable Water Supply - Groundwater 31 3.11 Abstraction for Potable Water Supply - Surface Water 34 3.12 Agricultural Abstraction 37 3.13 Livestock Watering 40 3.14 Industrial and Commercial Abstraction 41 3.15 Water Power 43 DISCHARGES AND POLLUTION CONTROL 3.16 Sewage and Trade Discharges 45 3.17 Waste Disposal to Land 47 AMENITY, NAVIGATION AND WATER SPORTS 3.18 Amenity 48 3.19 Navigation and Boating 50 3.20 Immersion Sports 52 4.0 CATCHMENT TARGETS 53 4T Introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • South Worcestershire Councils Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    South Worcestershire Councils Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report August 2019 www.jbaconsulting.com South Worcestershire Councils This page is intentionally left blank 2018s1367 - South Worcestershire Councils - Level 1 SFRA Final Report v1.0.docx ii JBA Project Manager Joanne Chillingworth The Library St Philips Courtyard Church Hill Coleshill Warwickshire B46 3AD Revision history Revision Ref/Date Amendments Issued to Draft Report v1.0/ Draft Report Angie Matthews December 2018 (Senior Planning Officer) Draft Report v2.0/May Addition of cumulative impact Angie Matthews 2019 assessment, updated report layout (Senior Planning Officer) Final Report v1.0/August Addressed stakeholder comments Angie Matthews 2019 (Senior Planning Officer) Contract This report describes work commissioned by the South Worcestershire Councils (Wychavon District Council, Malvern Hills District Council and Worcester City Council), by an email dated 12th October 2018 from Wychavon District Council. Lucy Finch of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................. Lucy Finch BSc Analyst Reviewed by .................................. Joanne Chillingworth BSc MSc MCIWEM C.WEM Principal Analyst Hannah Coogan BSc MCIWEM C.WEM Technical Director Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for the South Worcestershire Councils (Malvern Hills District Council, Wychavon District Council and Worcester City Council). JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Agency Midlands Region
    Environment Agency Midlands Region E n v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y En v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE SOUTHERN REGION Guildbourne House. Chatsworth Road, W orthing, West Sussex BN1 1 1LD John Fitzsimons Regional Flood Defence Manager Environment Agency Sapphire East 550 Streetsbrook Road Solihull B91 1QT Tel 0121 711 2324 Fax 0121 711 5824 1 ISBN 185705 568 3 ©Environment Agency All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Environment Agency. Cover: Shrewsbury Flooding J9 Copyright: Shropshire Star HO-4/OI -150-A l r AGENCY 070604 Report October/Novembcr 2000 cS7\ - ^ CONTENTS Chapter 1 Executive Summary 1 Chapter 2 Event Management 2 Chapter 3 Flood Forecasting 4 3.1 Weather Forecast Accuracy and Timeliness 4 3.2 Agency Telemetry, Outstation & System Performance 7 3.3 Ability of Agency to Predict Levels Using Current Models 8 3.4 Issues Arising 9 3.5 Recommendations 9 Chapter 4 Flood Warning 18 4.1 Trigger/Threshold Levels for Warnings 18 4.2 Warnings Issued & Lead Times against Target Lead Times_18 _ _____ ____4.3-Number of Properties Receiving Warnings 33 4.4 Effectiveness of Flood Warning Dissemination Methods 38 4.5 Issues Arising ’ 40 4.6 Recommendations 40 Chapter 5 Event Impact 42 5.1 Introduction 42 5.2 Event Hydrology 42 5.3 Properties & Infrastructure Affected by Flooding 51 5.4 Issues and Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment
    Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region A RIVER CATCHMENT AREAS En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury. Bristol BS32 4UD W EISH NRA Cardiff Bristol Severn-Trent Region Boundary Catchment Boundaries Adjacent NRA Regions 1. Upper Severn 2. Lower Severn 3. Avon 4. Soar 5. Lower Trent 6. Derwent 7. Upper Trent 8. Tame - National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region* FLOODING SURVEY JUNE 1990 SECTION 136(1) WATER ACT 1989 (Supersedes Section 2 4 (5 ) W a te r A c t 1973 Land Drainage Survey dated January 1986) RIVER TAME CATCHMENT AND WEST MIDLANDS Environment Agency FLOOD DEFENCE DEPARTMENT Information Centre NATONAL RIVERS AUTHORrTY SEVERN-TRENT REGION Head Office SAPPHIRE EAST Class N o 550 STREETSBROOK ROAD SOLIHULL cession No W MIDLANDS B91 1QT ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 0 9 9 8 0 6 CONTENTS Contents List of Tables List of Associated Reports List of Appendices References G1ossary of Terms Preface CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY 1.1 Introducti on 1.2 Coding System 1.3 Priority Categories 1.4 Summary of Problem Evaluations 1.5 Summary by Priority Category 1.6 Identification of Problems and their Evaluation CHAPTER 2 THE SURVEY Z.l Introduction 2.2 Purposes of Survey 2.3 Extent of Survey 2.4 Procedure 2.5 Hydrological Criteria 2.6 Hydraulic Criteria 2.7 Land Potential Category 2.8 Improvement Costs 2.9 Benefit Assessment 2.10 Test Discount Rate 2.11 Benefit/Cost Ratios 2.12 Priority Category 2.13 Inflation Factors
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management Annual Report – March 2019
    Birmingham City Council Flood Risk Management Annual Report – March 2019 Flood Risk Management Annual Report Report of the Assistant Director Highways and Infrastructure - March 2019 1. Introduction A scrutiny review of Flood Risk Management and Response was published in June 2010. This set out 12 recommendations which were completed in 2010. In June 2010, The Flood and Water Management Act 2010 passed into law conveying new responsibilities and making Birmingham City Council a Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA). This report highlights progress in addressing these statutory responsibilities and provides an update on other flood risk management related issues. This report also provides an update into areas for improvement identified in the review of the May 2018 flooding conducted by members of the Sustainability & Transport O&S Committee on 19th July 2018. 2. Flood and Water Management Act Duties The following work has been undertaken to fulfil the LLFA duties under the Flood and Water Management Act. 2.1 Local Flood Risk Management Strategy The Local Flood Risk Management Strategy for Birmingham, October 2017 continues set out the objectives for managing local flood risk and the measures proposed to achieve those objectives. 2.2 Cooperation with other Flood Risk Management Authorities The LLFA continues to cooperate extensively with other risk management authorities (RMAs) at various levels as established in the 3 tiered flood risk management governance structure. 2.2.1 Strategic Flood Risk Management Board The Strategic Board last met in December 2017 and due to the loss of a number of Flood Risk Management staff it was not possible to convene a meeting during 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Windsor Street Gasworks ...Through the Years Contents
    Windsor Street Gasworks ...through the years Contents 02 Introduction 03 Early history 05 Leading the world 08 Further growth 10 Gasholder No.12 11 Social activities 12 Diversification 14 The war years 15 Today This publication is adapted with permission from “A History of the Gas Industry in Birmingham” by Professor Russell Thomas. Russell Thomas has a keen interest in the gas industry. He has been working on former gasworks sites since 1997, a subject he has grown to find fascinating. Russell works as a technical director for the International Engineering Consultancy WSP, advising on former industrial sites, with a special focus on former gasworks. “A History of the Gas Industry in Birmingham” can be downloaded from nationalgrid.com/windsorstreet Windsor Street Gasworks | 2021 01 Introduction For over 130 years, the Windsor Street Gasworks soon became a common feature gasholders have dominated the Aston in the heart of the city, with sites at Gas Street, skyline in Birmingham. They are steeped Fazeley Street, Adderley Street and Swan Village. in industrial history, providing a link to However, by the 1840s there was a growing call the pioneering age of gas. However, for them to be located out of the city along the times change, bringing new innovations River Rea. to produce and store fuel. Consequently, the Birmingham Gas Light After being unused for years, the three gasholders and Coke Company constructed a gasworks are now set to be dismantled. This will be the first at Windsor Street and the Birmingham and step towards returning the unused land back to Staffordshire Gas Light Company built their beneficial use.
    [Show full text]
  • Herefordshire News Sheet
    CONTENTS PROGRAMME JANUARY-DECEMBER 1994....................................................................... 3 EDITORIAL ........................................................................................................................... 4 MISCELLANY ....................................................................................................................... 5 NOTES ................................................................................................................................. 7 MARTYRDOM OF KING EDMUND .................................................................................... 10 HALESOWEN CASTLE ...................................................................................................... 10 LOCAL HISTORY SOCIETIES AND WEA 16TH ANNUAL DAY SCHOOL ......................... 11 INVESTIGATION IN THE PARISHES OF KENTCHURCH AND ROWLESTONE ............... 12 NEWS FROM THE COUNTY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICE ........................................... 13 FIFTH ANNUAL SHINDIG................................................................................................... 14 FIVE CASTLES IN CLUN LORDSHIP ................................................................................ 17 SOME NOTES ON SWYDD WYNOGION AND TEMPSITER ............................................. 27 CLUN LORDSHIP IN THE 14TH C ....................................................................................... 28 A MOTTE AND BAILEY AND AN ANCIENT CHURCH SITE AT ABERLLYNFI .................. 29 WOOLHOPE CLUB ANNUAL
    [Show full text]