Cp-Violation and Einstein's Locality Reconsidered

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cp-Violation and Einstein's Locality Reconsidered ""'^^^ IC/88/208 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS CP-VIOLATION AND EINSTEIN'S LOCALITY RECONSIDERED GianCarlo Ghirardi INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION 1988 MIRAMARE-TRIESTE IC/88/208 International Atomic Energy Agency 1.INTRODUCTION and The idea, which has been repeatedly put forward in the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization past^1), that the collapse of the wave function in experiments of the EPR-type should allow f aster-than-light communication, INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS has recently given rise to a renewed debate in connection with a proposal, whose novelty, in the authors' opinion^2', derives from considering CP-violating interactions which imply the occurrence of linear superpositions of non-orthogonal states. In spite of the fact that sound criticisms about the CP-VIOLATION AND EINSTEIN'S LOCALITY RECONSIDERED arguments discussed in ref.(2) have been presented'3) and that the conclusions drawn by the authors have been proved to be unappropriate by a rigorous discussion of the physical aspects GianCarlo Ghirardi of the considered process in two recent papers'4'5', the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy, authors of ref,(2) have stressed once again'**) their previous and claims. Ref.(6) pretends to give an answer to the above quoted Dipartimento di Fistca Teorica, Universita di Trieste, Trieste, Italy. criticisms to ref.{2),and strongly suggests that the problem is still open and deserves, at least, further investigation. In our opinion, ref.(6) contains various statements and exhibits a way of reasoning which could give rise to serious ABSTRACT misunderstandings. As we have stated some years ago'7), in discussing analogous problems: "any critical reconsideration A critical reconsideration of the arguments put forward by A. Datta, D. Home of the conceptual foundations of generally accepted and A. Raychaudhuri in two recent papers is presented. All crucial points of their analysis theoretical schemes for the decryption of natural phenomena, are examined and it is shown that their conclusions are not appropriate. to be useful, must be carried out with great logical rigour". It seems therefore appropriate to reconsider the arguments of refs. (2) and (6), to make more precise the exact terms of the problem under discussion. MIRAMARE - TRIESTE August 1988 Submitted for publication. -2- correspond to situations in which one can claim that the 2. THE ROLE OF CP-VIOLATION particle has "spin up" in a given direction (x or y, Refs.<2) and (6) make continuous reference to the peculiar respectively). character of CP-violating interactions, giving rise to linear ii. <*|T> | 0, so eq.(3) represents a linear superposition of superpositions of factorized states of a composite system in non-orthogonal states. which the states of the component subsystems are iii.|»> and |T> are the two linearly independent non-orthogonal. (non-orthogonal) eigenstates of the non-hermitian It has to be stressed that, as it stands, this statement operator is meaningless since any state of a composite system can be written as a linear combination of orthogonal or non-orthogonal states of the constituents systems, provided ^1 the two set of states span the same manifolds. As a simple belonging to the eigenvalues +1 and -1, respectively. example one could consider the singlet spin state, which arises naturally in various decay processes: The arguments of refs.(2) and (6) are based precisely on the consideration of an expression of type (3). It is evident \S> =( 12,-z that if one chooses such an expression and assumes that a measurement procedure, involving only particle 1 and allowing If one introduces the two states j *> and I T> , which are the to detect whether this particle is in state |*> or IT> , can be eigenstates, belonging to the eigenvalue +1, of ax and o-y, devised and, moreover, one postulates that this measurement respectively: reduces state (3) either to |(t>1>|TJ> or to IT1^ I »2>. one would be facing the same problem and could draw the same conclusions as those in refs.(2) and (6). The fact that ref.(2) deals essentially with non-hermitian operators has been nicely illustrated and criticized in a recent paper'e^. one immediately sees that state (1) can be written as: Our conclusion of this sketchy analysis is then: The occurrence of CP-violating interactions is totally irrelevant \S> = -[(l+i)//2] {l*^ & |T2> - |T»> Q |»2>), (3) for the subsequent arguments developed in refs.(2) and (6). where the upper indices denote the particle to which the 3. THE ROLE OF THE ORTHOGONALITY OF THE PROJECTIONS states refer. Another point which is repeatedly stressed by the authors We stress the following facts: is that all previous proofs of the impossibility of i. I*> and IT> have a clear physical meaning, since they superluminal communication rely heavily on the assumption of a reduction mechanism based on the use of orthogonal projections. This statement, too, can give rise to misunderstandings if it is not made precise. In fact, as can be easily seen, it is not the orthogonal nature of the projection operators used in the standard formalism which plays the key role in the impossibility proofs, but the -3- -4- fundamental fact that they are operators acting only in the responsibJe of the apparent non-local effect. Hilbert space of one (the measured one) of the two systems of the composite system. In fact, quite in general'4>s) even if 4. POSSIBLE PHYSICAL PROCESSES AFFECTING A CONSTITUENT OF one considers a completely arbitrary, trace-preserving map of A COMPOSITE SYSTEM the statistical operator p(l,2) of the composite system At this stage, one is naturally led to raise a fundamental question: what do the authors of ref.{6) want to prove? They seem to think that they have made plausible that the basic => P(l,2)= (5) postulates of quantum mechanics, i.e., Schrodinger's evolution and wave packet reduction, could conflict with Einstein's locality. where the bounded operators Ak and Bk act only on the Hilbert space H^1' of system Sj, and are such that The real issue is whether one can, by exerting some physical action on system S,, influence the results of EtBiJ1) Ai,**) = 1, (6) perspective measurements on the far apart system S2, Such a question to have any physical meaning and to allow some then, due to the possibility of cycling operators acting on rigorous conclusions to be drawn, must be tackled by making the Hilbert space on which one is taking the partial trace: precise what kind of action is actually taking place on system St. Different attitudes can be taken. We list below all the natural ones. Tr< = Tr< (7} A. Suppose that system Sj is made to interact with some This means that no physical effect is induced on system S2 by the process ( 5) . device D, the Sj-D interaction being described as a standard On the other hand, even if use is made of orthogonal Schrodinger evolution governed by a Hamiltonian H(1,D) acting projections acting not only on H'1) but on ti(*,2\= Hl'lx H'2' in the Hilbert space tf<'>(x) ff(D), Then, starting from a state then any mapping (10) P(l,2) =» P(l,2)=Ek Pk(l,2) Pk(l,2) (8) where the states with apices denote arbitrary states of the implies in general that subsystems Si and S2, arid |D> describes the initial state of the device D, one gets by evolution: Tr< O P( 1 ,2) if Trl * > P<1 ,2) (9) |Y\t>=a|x2>[U<l,D) Q (11) i.e. it gives rise to a modification of the physics of system In eq.(ll) U(1,D) is the unitary operator describing the S2. It has to be stressed that the only physical meaning which evolution of Sj+D. can be reasonably given to processes like (8( is that both In such a case, as it has been proved some time ago'9', the physical results concerning S are not influenced by the systems Sx and S2 are simultaneously affected by the 2 measurement, so that the measurement itself is the unique interaction of St with D. This is obvious and follows again -5- -6- from the possibility of cycling operators under the trace Ak P Ak + (121 taken on the Hilbert space on which they act. with EkAk+Ak=l> *s not' as stated in ref.(6) "an abstract B. Suppose that one wants to explore also the consequences argument based on the first representation theorem", but a of assuming that the interaction of S and D is not accounted t precise and rigorous general result. As proved in refs.(4) and by the Hamiltonian evolution, but is described by the (5), in the case of a composite system, eq.(12) entails again postulate of wave packet reduction, in terms of orthogonal that, if the operators A^ act only on the Hilbert space of projection operators acting only on system 5t. This case system St, then no detectable effects are induced on S2 and, deserves a separate consideration in view of the difficulties conversely, if the physics of S2 is changed by the process, of accounting for wave packet reduction by the linear then the operators A^ must necessarily act on tf(''@ tf'2'. evolution of the theory, so that one can take the wave packet Anybody willing to give a physical meaning whatsoever to reduction as a basic independent postulate of quantum process (12), on the basis of the argument presented now, mechanics. As well known 19>10), and explicitly admitted by would be compelled to conclude that, if the physical the authors of ref.(6), also in this case no instantaneous predictions for S2 are changed, then one is actually dealing effect at a distance occurs.
Recommended publications
  • Lecture Notes in Physics
    Lecture Notes in Physics Editorial Board R. Beig, Wien, Austria J. Ehlers, Potsdam, Germany U. Frisch, Nice, France K. Hepp, Zurich,¨ Switzerland W. Hillebrandt, Garching, Germany D. Imboden, Zurich,¨ Switzerland R. L. Jaffe, Cambridge, MA, USA R. Kippenhahn, Gottingen,¨ Germany R. Lipowsky, Golm, Germany H. v. Lohneysen,¨ Karlsruhe, Germany I. Ojima, Kyoto, Japan H. A. Weidenmuller,¨ Heidelberg, Germany J. Wess, Munchen,¨ Germany J. Zittartz, Koln,¨ Germany 3 Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo Editorial Policy The series Lecture Notes in Physics (LNP), founded in 1969, reports new developments in physics research and teaching -- quickly, informally but with a high quality. Manuscripts to be considered for publication are topical volumes consisting of a limited number of contributions, carefully edited and closely related to each other. Each contribution should contain at least partly original and previously unpublished material, be written in a clear, pedagogical style and aimed at a broader readership, especially graduate students and nonspecialist researchers wishing to familiarize themselves with the topic concerned. For this reason, traditional proceedings cannot be considered for this series though volumes to appear in this series are often based on material presented at conferences, workshops and schools (in exceptional cases the original papers and/or those not included in the printed book may be added on an accompanying CD ROM, together with the abstracts of posters and other material suitable for publication, e.g. large tables, colour pictures, program codes, etc.). Acceptance Aprojectcanonlybeacceptedtentativelyforpublication,byboththeeditorialboardandthe publisher, following thorough examination of the material submitted. The book proposal sent to the publisher should consist at least of a preliminary table of contents outlining the structureofthebooktogetherwithabstractsofallcontributionstobeincluded.
    [Show full text]
  • Vavilov-Cherenkov and Synchrotron Radiation Fundamental Theories of Physics
    Vavilov-Cherenkov and Synchrotron Radiation Fundamental Theories of Physics An International Book Series on The Fundamental Theories of Physics: Their Clarification, Development and Application Editor: ALWYN VAN DER MERWE, University of Denver, U.S.A. Editorial Advisory Board: GIANCARLO GHIRARDI, University of Trieste, Italy LAWRENCE P. HORWITZ, Tel-Aviv University, Israel BRIAN D. JOSEPHSON, University of Cambridge, U.K. CLIVE KILMISTER, University of London, U.K. PEKKA J. LAHTI, University of Turku, Finland ASHER PERES, Israel Institute of Technology, Israel EDUARD PRUGOVECKI, University of Toronto, Canada FRANCO SELLERI, Università di Bara, Italy TONY SUDBURY, University of York, U.K. HANS-JÜRGEN TREDER, Zentralinstitut für Astrophysik der Akademie der Wissenschaften, Germany Volume 142 Vavilov-Cherenkov and Synchrotron Radiation Foundations and Applications by G.N. Afanasiev Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS NEW YORK, BOSTON, DORDRECHT, LONDON, MOSCOW eBook ISBN: 1-4020-2411-8 Print ISBN: 1-4020-2410-X ©2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. Print ©2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht All rights reserved No part of this eBook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording, or otherwise, without written consent from the Publisher Created in the United States of America Visit Springer's eBookstore at: http://ebooks.springerlink.com and the Springer Global Website Online at: http://www.springeronline.com CONTENTS PREFACE xi 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 THE TAMM PROBLEM IN THE VAVILOV-CHERENKOV RADIATION THEORY 15 2.1 Vavilov-Cherenkov radiation in a finite region of space . 15 2.1.1 Mathematicalpreliminaries.............
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Giancarlo Ghirardi
    International Journal of Quantum Foundations 5 (2019) 1 - 10 Original Paper From No-signaling to Spontaneous Localization Theories: Remembering GianCarlo Ghirardi Valia Allori Department of Philosophy, Northern Illinois University. Zulauf Hall 915, DeKalb, IL 60115. USA E-mail: [email protected] Received: 30 October 2018 / Accepted: 15 December 2018 / Published online: 30 December 2018 1. Life and Achievements GianCarlo Ghirardi passed away on June 1st, 201. He would have turned 83 on October 28, 2018. He was without any doubt one of the most prominent theoretical physicists working on the foundation and the philosophy of quantum mechanics. He was born and raised in Milan, where he earned his Ph.D. in theoretical physics in 1959. After four years he moved to Trieste, where he later became Full Professor. He has been director of the department of theoretical physics there and he was president of “Consorzio per la Fisica”, also in Trieste. Moreover, he contributed to found and to develop the Italian Society for the Foundation of Physics, and he actively contributed to the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, first as a researcher, then as a professor, and finally as the head of its Associateships and Federation Scheme. Among the honors he received, one can count the “Sigillo d'argento” from the province of Trieste, awarded in 2014, for his research and teaching activities, for his devotion in promoting physics, and for his dissemination activity. Moreover, just recently he received the 'Spirit of Salam Award' for supporting scientists from developing countries. In his life, he wrote more than 200 scholarly articles and two books: “Symmetry Principles in Quantum Physics”, together with Luciano Fonda (Fonda and Ghirardi 1970), and “Un'occhiata alle carte di Dio” (Ghirardi 1997), which has sold 20,000 copies and later was translated by Princeton University Press under the title “Sneaking a Look at God's Cards” (Ghirardi 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Xavier Calmet Editor Quantum Aspects of Black Holes Fundamental Theories of Physics
    Fundamental Theories of Physics 178 Xavier Calmet Editor Quantum Aspects of Black Holes Fundamental Theories of Physics Volume 178 Series editors Henk van Beijeren Philippe Blanchard Paul Busch Bob Coecke Dennis Dieks Detlef Dürr Roman Frigg Christopher Fuchs Giancarlo Ghirardi Domenico J.W. Giulini Gregg Jaeger Claus Kiefer Nicolaas P. Landsman Christian Maes Hermann Nicolai Vesselin Petkov Alwyn van der Merwe Rainer Verch R.F. Werner Christian Wuthrich More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/6001 Xavier Calmet Editor Quantum Aspects of Black Holes 123 Editor Xavier Calmet Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Sussex Brighton UK ISBN 978-3-319-10851-3 ISBN 978-3-319-10852-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-10852-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2014951685 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Physics
    IC/85/235 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS SOME CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON THE PRESENT EPISTEMOLOGICAL AND SCIENTIFIC DEBATE ON QUANTUM MECHANICS GianCarlo Ghirardi INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION 1985 MIRAMARE TRIESTE 1. INTRODUCTORY COM3THERATIONS Tnlf^national Atomic Energy Agency and In view of the fact that the debate on the epistemolopi^-;! ."'.nd conceptual implications cf quantum theory is often vitiated, in our iiitions Educational L ::ienti f"ic and Cultural Organization opinion, by gross misunderstradings, we consider it appropriate to focus on some methodological principles which must be kept in mind in order to guarantee the necessary level of rigor of such a discussion. IITERNATlODlAL CEHTHE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS The occurrence of misunderstandings on this matter is not surprising if one takes into account the conceptual difficulties that the formalism presents, on which the critical debate is still alive, and which have not yet been fully clarified. One can mention that, already in the early stages of the development of the theory, even eminent scientists SOME ClilTICAL CONSIDERATIONS OH THE PRESENT EPI31EM0L0GICAL have been unable to fully appreciate^ the crucial points and the subtle AND SCIENTIFIC DEBATE ON QUANTUM MECHANICS * implications of the deep analysis of Einstein-Podolsky and Rosen^(EPR). We want to stress strongly the necessity of logical rigor and clarity in carrying on the debate. This can be guaranteed only if the terms that
    [Show full text]
  • Gerard 'T Hooft
    Fundamental Theories of Physics 185 Gerard ’t Hooft The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Fundamental Theories of Physics Volume 185 Series Editors Henk van Beijeren, Utrecht, The Netherlands Philippe Blanchard, Bielefeld, Germany Paul Busch, York, United Kingdom Bob Coecke, Oxford, United Kingdom Dennis Dieks, Utrecht, The Netherlands Bianca Dittrich, Waterloo, Canada Detlef Dürr, München, Germany Ruth Durrer, Genève, Switzerland Roman Frigg, London, United Kingdom Christopher Fuchs, Boston, USA Giancarlo Ghirardi, Trieste, Italy Domenico J.W. Giulini, Bremen, Germany Gregg Jaeger, Boston, USA Claus Kiefer, Köln, Germany Nicolaas P. Landsman, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Christian Maes, Leuven, Belgium Mio Murao, Tokyo, Japan Hermann Nicolai, Potsdam, Germany Vesselin Petkov, Montreal, Canada Laura Ruetsche, Ann Arbor, USA Mairi Sakellariadou, London, United Kingdom Alwyn van der Merwe, Denver, USA Rainer Verch, Leipzig, Germany Reinhard Werner, Hannover, Germany Christian Wüthrich, Geneva, Switzerland Lai-Sang Young, New York City, USA The international monograph series “Fundamental Theories of Physics” aims to stretch the boundaries of mainstream physics by clarifying and developing the the- oretical and conceptual framework of physics and by applying it to a wide range of interdisciplinary scientific fields. Original contributions in well-established fields such as Quantum Physics, Relativity Theory, Cosmology, Quantum Field Theory, Statistical Mechanics and Nonlinear Dynamics are welcome. The series also pro- vides a forum for non-conventional approaches to these fields. Publications should present new and promising ideas, with prospects for their further development, and carefully show how they connect to conventional views of the topic. Although the aim of this series is to go beyond established mainstream physics, a high profile and open-minded Editorial Board will evaluate all contributions carefully to ensure a high scientific standard.
    [Show full text]
  • My Life with Giancarlo Ghirardi, a Great Friend, a Great Teacher and a Great Physicist
    My life with GianCarlo Ghirardi, a great friend, a great teacher and a great physicist. Francesco de Stefano Liceo Scientifico “Giovanni Marinelli” Udine – Italy Abstract. In these shorts notes, I wish to remember my relationship with GianCarlo Ghirardi, who was my supervisor in my master degree in Physics at the University of Trieste and then he became a very deep and close friend. I don’t want to describe in details his scientific steps in the world of modern Physics: many others will make better than me. I want only to share which was my relationship with him as a teacher, a man and expecially as a deep friend, for more than 40 years. A great teacher. In Italy we say “Molti sono gli insegnanti, pochi i maestri” (that means, “many are the teachers, but few the masters”). GianCarlo was not simply the best teacher I had met in my life, but he was really “a master”. I learned from him Quantum Mechanics (QM), the highest physical theory of the history of science. And I had the great luck to learn it directly from a physicist who has given very important and deep contributions to the conceptual foundations of QM. But which is the difference between a teacher and a master? I think that a teacher is someone who tries to transmit the culture about a specific field (Physics, Literature, Philosophy,…) and, of course, tries to make this in his best way. Doing this, he can be a great, good or bad teacher. A master is first of all a great teacher, but this is not sufficient: he/she is a teacher who makes this activity with love, trying to transmit to his/her students his/her own passion and who “walks together” the students, respecting their rythms, their own way and time to grow up.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Svozil Determinism, Randomness and Uncaused Events
    Fundamental Theories of Physics 192 Karl Svozil Physical (A)Causality Determinism, Randomness and Uncaused Events Fundamental Theories of Physics Volume 192 Series editors Henk van Beijeren, Utrecht, The Netherlands Philippe Blanchard, Bielefeld, Germany Paul Busch, York, United Kingdom Bob Coecke, Oxford, United Kingdom Dennis Dieks, Utrecht, The Netherlands Bianca Dittrich, Waterloo, Canada Detlef Dürr, München, Germany Ruth Durrer, Genève, Switzerland Roman Frigg, London, United Kingdom Christopher Fuchs, Boston, USA Giancarlo Ghirardi, Trieste, Italy Domenico J. W. Giulini, Bremen, Germany Gregg Jaeger, Boston, USA Claus Kiefer, Köln, Germany Nicolaas P. Landsman, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Christian Maes, Leuven, Belgium Mio Murao, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan Hermann Nicolai, Potsdam, Germany Vesselin Petkov, Montreal, Canada Laura Ruetsche, Ann Arbor, USA Mairi Sakellariadou, London, UK Alwyn van der Merwe, Denver, USA Rainer Verch, Leipzig, Germany Reinhard F. Werner, Hannover, Germany Christian Wüthrich, Geneva, Switzerland Lai-Sang Young, New York City, USA The international monograph series “Fundamental Theories of Physics” aims to stretch the boundaries of mainstream physics by clarifying and developing the theoretical and conceptual framework of physics and by applying it to a wide range of interdisciplinary scientific fields. Original contributions in well-established fields such as Quantum Physics, Relativity Theory, Cosmology, Quantum Field Theory, Statistical Mechanics and Nonlinear Dynamics are welcome. The series also provides a forum for non-conventional approaches to these fields. Publications should present new and promising ideas, with prospects for their further development, and carefully show how they connect to conventional views of the topic. Although the aim of this series is to go beyond established mainstream physics, a high profile and open-minded Editorial Board will evaluate all contributions carefully to ensure a high scientific standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Giulio Chiribella Robert W. Spekkens Editors Quantum Theory: Informational Foundations and Foils Fundamental Theories of Physics
    Fundamental Theories of Physics 181 Giulio Chiribella Robert W. Spekkens Editors Quantum Theory: Informational Foundations and Foils Fundamental Theories of Physics Volume 181 Series editors Henk van Beijeren Philippe Blanchard Paul Busch Bob Coecke Dennis Dieks Detlef Dürr Roman Frigg Christopher Fuchs Giancarlo Ghirardi Domenico J.W. Giulini Gregg Jaeger Claus Kiefer Nicolaas P. Landsman Christian Maes Hermann Nicolai Vesselin Petkov Alwyn van der Merwe Rainer Verch R.F. Werner Christian Wuthrich The international monograph series “Fundamental Theories of Physics” aims to stretch the boundaries of mainstream physics by clarifying and developing the theoretical and conceptual framework of physics and by applying it to a wide range of interdisciplinary scientific fields. Original contributions in well-established fields such as Quantum Physics, Relativity Theory, Cosmology, Quantum Field Theory, Statistical Mechanics and Nonlinear Dynamics are welcome. The series also provides a forum for non-conventional approaches to these fields. Publications should present new and promising ideas, with prospects for their further development, and carefully show how they connect to conventional views of the topic. Although the aim of this series is to go beyond established mainstream physics, a high profile and open-minded Editorial Board will evaluate all contributions carefully to ensure a high scientific standard. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/6001 Giulio Chiribella • Robert W. Spekkens Editors Quantum Theory: Informational
    [Show full text]
  • Introductory Remarks at the Meeting Honoring Professor GC. Ghirardi
    Introductory remarks at the meeting honoring Professor GC. Ghirardi K.R. Sreenivasan, Director ICTP I regret that a conflict has made it impossible for me to be at this meeting honoring Professor Ghirardi. It goes without saying that I am unable to make, in person, the introductory remarks as Professor Weber had asked. Instead, my colleague Professor Seif Randjbar-Daemi has agreed to read the text of my remarks. I am thankful to him for this favor. For several hundred years during which Trieste was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, to the zero-th order, its science was dwarfed by Vienna. The city came to Italy only after the First World War and began the task of integrating itself in its new home. The University of Trieste was created in late thirties. Those were Mussolini’s times. Immediately after the Second World War, the city was placed under international protectorate, and was returned to Italy almost exactly fifty years ago. This complex and checkered history of the city had made it difficult for the University of Trieste to take off quickly. A little over forty years ago, the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, or ICTP as we call it, was created by Professor Salam and a few Italian scientists, chief among whom is Professor Budinich. Soon after ICTP was created, the Centre and the Department of Theoretical Physics at the University became very close. In fact, even today, they share this building for their work. The synergy between the two institutions allowed theoretical physics as a whole to thrive in Trieste.
    [Show full text]
  • Angelo Bassi Cv
    ANGELO BASSI CV General data Name: Angelo Bassi Birth date: 27 May 1973. Address: Department of Physics, University of Trieste, Strada Costiera 11, 34151 Miramare-Trieste (Italy). Phone: + 39 040 2240 315 Fax: + 39 040 224 601 Email: [email protected] Web: www.qmts.it Education 2006-present: Researcher at the Department of Physics, University of Trieste. 2004-2006: Marie-Curie Fellow at the Mathematics Institute of the L.M.U., Munich (Germany) 2001-2004: Postdoctoral Fellow at the Abdus Salam ICTP, Trieste. 1999-2001: Ph.D. in Physics, University of Trieste. 1998: Master degree in Physics, University of Trieste (110/110 cum laude). Research activity Foundations of quantum mechanics; models of spontaneous wave function collapse; decoherence and open quantum systems. Publications Author of 60+ publications on international journals, proceedings excluded (see annex I). Among them: 1 Science, 1 Nat. Physics, 5 PRL, 3 Nat. Sci. Rept., 3 EPL, 1 Rev. Mod. Phys., 1 Phys. Rept. Referee activity Review Panel Member for COST (nominated by Italian Minister for University and Research). Referee for the APS and IOP journals. Referee for MIUR (Italian Minister for University and Research) for the American NSF. Teaching activity • Academic years 2003/2004, 2006/2007 and 2008/2009: "Stochastic Processes and Stochastic Differential Equations" for Ph.D. students at the Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Trieste. • Academic years 2007/08 - 2010/11: "General Relativity" for graduate students at the Department of Physics, University of Trieste. • Academic year 2011/12: "New Frontiers in Quantum Mechanics" for graduate students at the Department of Physics, University of Trieste.
    [Show full text]
  • International Centre for Theoretical Physics
    IC/91/336 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS BEYOND CONVENTIONAL QUANTUM MECHANICS GianCarlo Ghirardi INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION MIRAMARE-TRIESTE " "T T' IC/91/336 International Atomic Energy Agency and United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS 1. INTRODUCTION We review some recent attempts to overcome the conceptual difficulties which one encounters when trying to interpret quantum mechanics as giving a complete, objective and unified description of natural phenomena. Concerning the above specifications, we recall BEYOND CONVENTIONAL QUANTUM MECHANICS • that the completeness requirement amounts to pretend that the state vector represents the most accurate possible characterization of the state of a physical system and demands to disregard the eventuality that extra (possibly hidden) parameters are necessary. The lerm objective refers to the refusal of attributing a peculiar role to the observer and to the act of observation, while the term unified refers to the requirement that all physical processes, the GianCarlo Ghirardi microscopic and the macroscopic ones, as well as the micro-macro interactions which International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy characterize !he measurement processes, are governed by the same basic dynamics holding and for the "elementary constituents" of physical systems. The specification "beyond Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. conventional" appearing in the title refers to the fact that the attempts considered , while requiring, as already stated, that the wave function gives a complete description of physical systems, plainly accept thatO) "Schrddinyer's equation is not always right" * and correspondingly are based on a modification of the linear and deterministic evolution law which is characteristic of the standard formulation of quantum mechanics.
    [Show full text]