A Historical Approach to Scorpion Studies with Special Reference to the 20Th and 21St Centuries Wilson R Lourenço
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Lourenço Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases 2014, 20:8 http://www.jvat.org/content/20/1/8 REVIEW Open Access A historical approach to scorpion studies with special reference to the 20th and 21st centuries Wilson R Lourenço Abstract This work provides historical context about scorpion studies from the end of the 19th century to the present day. The content is mainly addressed to non-zoologists, working in research fields that embrace scorpion biology, notably to those working with venoms and toxins. The historical aspects described include academic professional scholars who worked on scorpion classification and general distribution patterns; and to a lesser extent, on studies of ecology and natural history. The aim is not to provide an exhaustive description of all scholars who in one way or another became involved with scorpions, but rather of those who greatly contributed during a given period to the research of these organisms. No critical analysis of the work of previous researchers is undertaken, but some comments are proposed to bring clarification on ‘who’s who’. Since a global consensus in relation to classification and/or distribution patterns has not been reached among modern experts, these different approaches are also presented without judgment. Consequently, distinct approaches remain open for discussion. Keywords: Scorpion studies, Historical approach, 20th century, 21st century, Taxonomy, Biology Introduction included six families and 64 genera, remained almost From the very beginning of this article one question may unchanged for several decades. be asked: Why limit the historical description to the The basic idea in this article is to bring some historical period from the final years of the 19th century through information about the activities of academic-professional the present? Two main reasons may justify this selected scholars who worked on scorpion classification and bio- period. First, the end of the 19th century marked the be- geography and to a lesser extent the biology and ecology ginning of the decline of the ‘golden age’ of scorpion of scorpions from the end of the 19th century to the studies and equally saw the publication of the first global present day. However, no attempt has been made to monograph about scorpions, Das Tierreich by Kraepelin bring an exhaustive description of all scholars who in [1]. Second, this period also corresponds to the one way or another became involved in scorpion re- emergence of interest in the venom of scorpions and search. Comments are limited to those whose results was marked by the beginning of antivenom therapy greatly contributed to the research of these organisms. [2,3]. Since this article is primarily addressed to non- In the same manner, critical analysis of the work per- zoologists, especially those working on scorpion venoms formed by previous researchers is avoided herein, but and toxins, the choice of this period seems relevant. some comments are proposed to clarify ‘who’swho’ The monograph published by Kraepelin [1] was the in the field of scorpion studies. Since a global con- first complete survey of the world’s scorpion fauna. Prior sensus in relation to classification and/or distribution to this contribution, other authors attempted to patterns does not exist among modern experts, these synthesize a compendium of all the known fauna, such different approaches are also discussed without judge- as Koch [4] who cited four families and 11 genera, and ment. Consequently, distinct approaches remain open Peters [5] who listed four families and 19 genera. Part of for discussion. For more general details refer to the classification by Kraepelin in Das Tierreich [1], which Lourenço [6]. Correspondence: [email protected] Département Systématique et Evolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, UMR7205, CP 053, 57 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France © 2014 Lourenço; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Lourenço Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases 2014, 20:8 Page 2 of 9 http://www.jvat.org/content/20/1/8 1899 – 1914: the publication of Krapelin’s Das Tierreich known for their description of the infamous Brazilian and the decline of the golden age scorpion Tityus serrulatus. The year 1899 was marked by the publication of Kraepelin’s Although the activities of European scholars had started Das Tierreich, which announced the start of a decline in to decline, a number of authors were still contributing what can be called the golden age for scorpion studies [7]. to scorpion studies, such as: A. S. Hirst in the United This period which started around the turn of the 20th cen- Kingdom, L. Berland, L. Fage, H. Foley, P. Pallary tury, was marked by numerous contributions to the know- and E. Sergent in France, L. di Caporiacco in Italy, ledge of scorpion taxonomy and biogeography. L. Giltay in Belgium, J. Hadzi in the former Yugoslavia, Major contributions to the classification of scorpions B. P. Franganillo in Spain, E. Schenkel and A. Monard in have been proposed by authors such as Peters [5], Switzerland, C. F. Roewer in Germany and F. Werner in Thorell [8], Simon [9,10], Kraepelin [1,11], and Pocock Austria. J. Vellard, a French arachnologist working in [12,13]. Thorell published until 1894 and died in 1901. South America, contributed two remarkably detailed pub- Simon published papers in the early 20th century, but lications in 1932 and 1934 as described by Lourenço [36]. from 1910 until his death in 1924, his work focused Finnegan [37], from the United Kingdom, was the first other zoological groups. Kraepelin had numerous publi- lady researcher to describe a new scorpion genus [38]. cations during the first decade of the 20th century, and As already mentioned by Bonnet [7], the period that died in 1915. Pocock retired from arachnology in 1903 followed the golden age had less impact on arachnologi- and assumed other responsibilities as director of the cal studies than had the previous decades. The quality of Zoological Garden of London. It is assumed that his de- the results was in many cases ‘poor’ and a rather conser- parture was due to personal problems he faced in the vative classification prevailed, so no significant changes British Museum of Natural History. Before his death in took place in the general classification of scorpions dur- 1947, he returned to research but only focused on other ing this time. zoological groups. A number of less conspicuous contri- butions were also published by several authors during 1945 – 1965: a slower pace in scorpion studies and a new this period, such as those by Banks [14], Pavesi [15] and emerging period Penther [16]. Preceding the publication by Kraepelin [1], The period of scorpion research between World War I some pioneering publications, escaping from the trad- and II is often considered less significant than research itional external morpho-anatomical approaches, were conducted during the golden age. Nevertheless, it was produced by Laurie [17,18]. These publications dealt precisely in the very last years of this epoch that some with the reproductive anatomy of female scorpions. highly esteemed scorpion researchers started to emerge. The work of Mello-Leitão in Brazil [39], continued 1918 – 1938: the period between the World War I and during the war, and lasted until his death in 1948. Mean- World War II while, he published the impressive monograph about Although the beginning of the 20th century featured the South American scorpions. In the United States, H. L. retirement of several golden-age authors, it also saw the Stahnke started to publish in 1940 and his activities emergence of a group of scorpion researchers whose lasted until the 1980s. R. F. Lawrence from South Africa studies would continue until just before World War II. began his studies in the 1920s, and these continued until Among the most conspicuous was Bialynitskii-Birula the 1960s. [19,20] who published from 1896 to 1937, including It was, however, in France that a young biologist, M. some notable articles, and Borelli [21,22], with contribu- Vachon [40], was introduced to scorpion classification tions from 1899 to 1934. Furthermore, additional pio- just before World War II. Today, it is globally accepted neering work was conducted [18]. The most significant by most biologists that Vachon was one of the most in- works are those produced by Pavlovsky [23,24] regarding novative and influential scorpiologists of the 20th cen- the internal male genitalia. This author published mainly tury. After the conclusion of his biological studies in the from 1916 to 1934. University of Dijon, Vachon came to Paris where he ob- This interwar period was also marked by a diminution tained his Doctor’s Science degree in 1938. Surprisingly, in the European research hegemony that had dominated however, the subject of his doctoral thesis was the repro- during the 19th century, and by the appearance of stu- ductive biology of pseudoscorpions rather than scor- dents in several regions of the world. For example, Baerg pions or taxonomy. Shortly after getting his degree, [25], Banks [26] and Chamberlin [27] in the United Vachon integrated the Laboratory of Worms and Crusta- States, Hoffmann [28,29] in Mexico, Hewitt [30] in ceans, then directed by Professor Louis Fage, in the Na- South Africa, Glauert [31] in Australia, Takashima [32] tional Museum of Natural History in Paris. Once he in Japan, Mello-Campos [33], Mello-Leitão [34] and Lutz became assistant professor in the Museum, L.