DOCSLIB.ORG

The Scars of the Erasure Web.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Scars of the Erasure Web.Pdf Erasure_4a 10.1.11 20:29 Page 2 Project The Erased People of Slovenia – A Challenge for the Young Nation-State Head of the Project Neža Kogovšek Project Partners Peace Institute (coordinator) Amnesty International Slovenia Unione forense per la tutella dei diritti dell'uomo PIC - Legal Information Center of NGOs THE SCARS OF THE ERASURE A Contribution to the Critical Understanding of the Erasure of People from the Register of Permanent Residents of the Republic of Slovenia Authors Neža Kogovšek, Jelka Zorn, Sara Pistotnik, Uršula Lipovec Čebron, Veronika Bajt, Brankica Petković, Lana Zdravković Editors Neža Kogovšek, Brankica Petković Reviewers Prof. Dr. Dragan Petrovec, Doc. Dr. Peter Klepec Kršić Translation Olga Vuković Language Consultant Michelle Gadpaille Design KITCH Cover Page KITCH Layout Matej Hrček, Biro Stara Ljubljana, d.o.o. Printing Stane Peklaj, s.p. 500 copies, 1st edition © 2010, Peace Institute Publisher and Copyright Holder Peace Institute, Metelkova 6, 1000 Ljubljana The publication of this book has been made possible by Open Society Foundations CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 342.71(497.4)(082) 572.028(082) The SCARS of the erasure : a contribution to the critical understanding of the erasure of people from the register of permanent residents of the Republic of Slovenia / Neža Kogovšek ... [et al.] ; [editors Neža Kogovšek, Brankica Petković ; translation Olga Vuković]. - 1st ed. - Ljubljana : Peace Institute, 2010 ISBN 978-961-6455-61-9 1. Kogovšek, Neža 2. Kogovšek, Neža 253309184 Erasure_4a 10.1.11 20:29 Page 3 NEŽA KOGOVŠEK JELKA ZORN THE SCARS OF SARA PISTOTNIK URŠULA LIPOVEC ČEBRON THE VERONIKA BAJT ERASURE BRANKICA PETKOVIĆ A CONTRIBUTION TO THE CRITICAL LANA ZDRAVKOVIĆ UNDERSTANDING OF THE ERASURE OF PEOPLE FROM THE REGISTER OF PERMANENT RESIDENTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA Erasure_4a 10.1.11 20:29 Page 4 Erasure_4a 10.1.11 20:29 Page 5 The Erased People Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Erosion of Stereotypes and the Irreversible Road to Redressing Injustice Neža Kogovšek 9 Registered as Workers, Erased as non-Slovenes: The Transition Period from the Perspective of the Erased People Jelka Zorn 19 An erased person’s story You cannot fight the system alone 47 The Erasure as a Testing Ground for European Migration Policies, or Pardon Me, but Your Regulations Have Erased My Status Sara Pistotnik 53 An erased person’s story As if I were climbing Mount Everest 79 The Erasure as a Violation of Legally Protected Human Rights Neža Kogovšek 83 An erased person’s story I was lucky 145 Erased Rights, Invisible Diseases: An Analysis of the Health Consequences of the Erasure Uršula Lipovec Čebron 151 An erased person’s story I missed Slovenia, I was born there 191 More Than Administratively Created “Foreigners”: The Erased People and a Reflection of the Nationalist Construction of the Other in the Symbolic Idea about “Us” Veronika Bajt 195 An erased person’s story Citizenship for one kilo of potatoes 219 The Erased Language Brankica Petković 223 An erased person’s story It was the Bosnians who were erased, but damage was suffered by Slovenian children as well 251 The Struggle Against the Denial of Citizenship as a Paradigm of Emancipatory Politics Lana Zdravković 257 Erasure_4a 10.1.11 20:29 Page 6 Erasure_4a 10.1.11 20:29 Page 7 We dedicate this book to Aleksandar Todorović for his invaluable contribution to the struggle for the rights of the erased people. Erasure_4a 10.1.11 20:29 Page 8 Erasure_4a 10.1.11 20:29 Page 9 9 THE ERASED PEOPLE YESTERDAY, TODAY AND TOMORROW. EROSION OF STEREOTYPES AND THE IRREVERSIBLE ROAD TO REDRESSING INJUSTICE If seventeen years after the unlawful administrative erasure1 of 25,6712 people from the register of permanent residents of the Republic of Slovenia we examine their political, legal and social situation today, we can observe positive changes. The public and political attitude towards “immigrants” has indeed re- mained negative, while the nationalism we witnessed in the National Assembly during the years after Slovenia gained independence (Zorn 2007) is today more concealed. And yet, what gives hope is the fact that one part of the political elite has begun to use the discourse of human rights and refer to the state ruled by law when speaking about the erasure. This differs greatly from the discourses that prevailed in the past, when responsibility for the erasure was imputed to the erased people and when stereotypes and prejudices were spread to reinforce exclusion and to avoid the implementation of the Constitutional Court ruling.3 Among the examples of this change in discourse let us mention three speeches: 1 The erasure from the register of permanent residents implemented by the administrative bodies of the Republic of Slovenia was not based in law, as was established by the Constitutional Court. It mainly (but not only) affected people born in other republics of the former Yugoslavia who had Yugoslav citizenship and as a rule also the citizenship of ano - ther republic of the former Yugoslavia, but lived in the former Socialist Republic of Slovenia where they had permanent addresses. When Slovenia became an independent country, on 25 June 1991, the citizens of the former Socialist Re- public of Slovenia automatically became citizens of the new country, the Republic of Slovenia. According to Article 40 of the Citizenship of the Republic of Slovenia Act, all citizens of other republics of the former SFRY with permanent addresses in the Socialist Republic of Slovenia had the right to apply for Slovenian citizenship within six months from the date of independence. Those who did not obtain citizenship (because they failed to apply for whatever reason, or their application was refused or discarded or the procedure was terminated), lost permanent resident status. They were deprived of permanent resident status arbitrarily; local authorities implemented the measure in accordance with instructions from the Ministry of the Interior, at that time headed by Igor Bavčar and the State Secretary of the Interior, Slavko Debelak. With the loss of status, they also lost all economic and social rights tied to permanent resident status. The detailed description of the circumstances surrounding the erasure is beyond the scope of this book. For more on the erasure itself, see Dedić at al. 2003 and Lipovec Čebron and Zorn 2007. 2 This figure is the result of the internal examination of databases conducted in January 2009 by the Ministry of the Interior. 3 Constitutional Court Ruling No. U-I-284/94 dated 4 February 1999 and Ruling No. U-I-246/02 dated 3 April 2003. Erasure_4a 10.1.11 20:29 Page 10 10 THE SCARS OF THE ERASURE the first by the Minister of the Interior, Katarina Kresal, on 18 November 2008 in the National Assembly before the vote on her appointment, in which she high- lighted the settling of the status of erased people as one of the priorities during her term in office; second, her speech on 1 April 2009 in response to the inter- pellation concerning supplementary decisions issued to the erased people in accordance with the Constitutional Court ruling; and, finally, the speech by Prime Minister Borut Pahor on the same occasion. Public opinion surveys, too, indicate changes in the public attitude towards the erased people. In 2003, fifty percent of respondents gave an affirmative answer to the question: “Is the government obliged to observe the Constitu- tional Court ruling on the erased people?” In 2004, this percentage dropped to 46 percent; in 2006 it rose to 49 percent, further increasing to 55 percent in 2007 and reaching 71 percent in 2009.4 The public opinion survey conducted in December 2008 by Ninamedia5 agency as part of the Peace Institute project showed that nearly 86 percent of respondents thought that the Constitutional Court rulings should be unconditionally respected, while 71 percent thought that they should be respected in the case of the erased people, as well. Given that the opponents of the settling of this issue have repeatedly demanded a referendum concerning the rights of the erased people, one important finding of the Ninamedia survey is that almost 70 percent of respondents thought that it was not possible to decide on human rights by a referendum, and 72 percent of them held that the rights of the erased people could not be decided by a re- ferendum either. Repeated calls for a referendum should therefore be under- stood solely as a political tool exploited to create an impression that society is opposed to settling this issue. During recent years, it was also possible to en- counter the viewpoint, both among the public and in politics, that the erasure did not happen, but the findings of the survey show that this opinion is held by an insignificant minority – less then 3 percent of respondents. Stereotypes about and prejudices against the erased people have been gradually dying away. This conclusion is based, among other things, on the fact that only slightly more than one-third of respondents thought that the erased people were oppo- nents of sovereign Slovenia, while slightly less than 16 percent believed them to be national traitors. However, the more positive attitude on the part of both the political elites and society is not enough to rectify the injustices and eluci- date the circumstances surrounding the erasure, including the responsibility of those who endorsed this measure. The crucial step that should be taken by so- ciety is the establishment of an impartial investigation commission to officially examine the implementation and consequences of the erasure and the possi- bility of bringing to justice those responsible. Almost 76 percent of respondents in the Ninamedia survey support the establishment of such a commission and 4 The findings of the Politbarometer surveys conducted as part of the Slovenian Public Opinion surveys at the Faculty of Social Science are available at http://www.cjm.si/PB_rezultati (26 November 2009).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Facts-About-Slovenia-.Pdf
    Cover photo: Bohinj by Tomo Jeseničnik Facts about Slovenia 8th edition Publisher Government Communication Ofice Director Darijan Košir Editorial Board Matjaž Kek, Sabina Popovič, Albert Kos, Manja Kostevc, Valerija Mencej Contents Editors Simona Pavlič Možina, Polona Prešeren, MA ................................................................................................................................. Texts by: Dr Janko Prunk (History); Dr Jernej Pikalo (Political system); Ministry Slovenia at a glance 7 of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Defence, Ministry of the Environment and Spatial ................................................................................................................................. Planning, Government Communication Ofice (Slovenia in the world); Institute of History 11 Macroeconomic Analysis and Development (Marijana Bednaš, Matevž Hribernik, Rotija Kmet Zupančič, Luka Žakelj – Economy); Slovenian Tourist Board (Tourism Earliest traces 12 in Slovenia); Ministry of Education and Sport, Ministry of Higher Education, The Celtic kingdom and the Roman Empire 12 Science and Technology (Education, Science and research); Alenka Puhar (Society); The irst independent dutchy 13 Peter Kolšek (Culture); Marko Milosavljevič, Government Communication Ofice (Media); Dr Janez Bogataj, Darja Verbič (Regional diversity and creativity) Under the Franks and Christianity 13 600 years under the Habsburgs 14 Translation A time of revival 14 U.T.A. Prevajanje The Austro-Hungarian monarchy 15 Map of Slovenia The state of Slovenes,
    [Show full text]
  • The Far Right in Slovenia
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SOCIAL STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Far Right in Slovenia Master‟s thesis Bc. Lucie Chládková Supervisor: doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D. UČO: 333105 Field of Study: Security and Strategic Studies Matriculation Year: 2012 Brno 2014 Declaration of authorship of the thesis Hereby I confirm that this master‟s thesis “The Far Right in Slovenia” is an outcome of my own elaboration and work and I used only sources here mentioned. Brno, 10 May 2014 ……………………………………… Lucie Chládková 2 Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D., who supervised this thesis and contributed with a lot of valuable remarks and advice. I would like to also thank to all respondents from interviews for their help and information they shared with me. 3 Annotation This master‟s thesis deals with the far right in Slovenia after 1991 until today. The main aim of this case study is the description and analysis of far-right political parties, informal and formal organisations and subcultures. Special emphasis is put on the organisational structure of the far-right scene and on the ideological affiliation of individual far-right organisations. Keywords far right, Slovenia, political party, organisation, ideology, nationalism, extremism, Blood and Honour, patriotic, neo-Nazi, populism. 4 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 2. Methodology .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenia Gets Marijana Bednaš with Their Project on Vaccine Production
    politicsenvironment 15 culturebusinesssports 2008 Slovenia gets new centre-left government Marijana Bednaš (IMAD): Slovenia will be confronted with both stabilizing growth and inflation With their project on vaccine production, the Ljubljana students even beat Harvard ISSN 1854-0805 QuoteSoftHefortnight Borut Pahor /Prime Minister/: New measures to help business Portorož, 20 November - This government will take measures to alleviate the impact of the financial crisis, but it will shun blanket measures in favour of targeted incentives to help healthy companies. The government will not interfere with individual corporate decisions, but it takes a strong government to create appropriate conditions. Slovenia is a part of the developed world. It cannot provide very original responses to the challenges, but I think it is dangerous if it only waited for recipes offered by other countries. The government will not put out fires in individual companies but instead help healthy companies, especially exporters, with development incentives. The government will help struggling businesses, but "nobody should expect we will throw money into a bottomless bag. Slovenia must also be open to foreign investment. On the other hand, it is important that key financial institutions such as the bank NLB and insurer Zavarovalnica Triglav remain in domestic ownership. The state would tighten its belt, but not in technology spending. Incentives would be made available for companies hiring new workers. Workers who are laid off will be retrained for better-paid jobs. This is no time for passive social policy, we need to think about how to create more. Mitja Petkovšek / Slovenian gymnast /: I'm really happy Ljubljana, 19 November - Wow, I really didn't know that I was the first gymnast ever to score the perfect 1,000 points in World Cup rankings of the International Federation of Gymnastics (FIG).
    [Show full text]
  • The Slovenian Greens: from Early Success to Long-Term Failure
    0 8 THE SLOVENIAN GREENS: POLITIKA FROM EARLY SUCCESS TO LONG-TERM FAILURE SUCCESS TO LONG-TERM FAILURE LONG-TERM TO SUCCESS EARLY FROM THE GREENS: SLOVENIAN Danica Fink-Hafner POLITIKA Matej Knep Meta Novak 8 ii Published in book series Politika Simona Kustec Lipicer (ed.) Politične vsebine in volilna kampanja Alenka Krašovec (ed.) Volitve v Evropski parlament 2009 Tomaž Deželan Nasproti evropskemu federalizmu? Simona Kustec Lipicer, Samo Kropivnik,Tomaž Deželan in Alem Maksuti Volilni programi in stališča Drago Zajc, Samo Kropivnik, Simona Kustec Lipicer Od volilnih programov do koalicijskih pogodb Janko Prunk in Marjetka Rangus Sto let življenja slovenskih političnih strank: 1890–1990 Danica Fink-Hafner (ed.) The Development of Civil Society in the Countries on the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1980s The Slovenian Greens: From Early Success to Long-Term Failure Danica Fink-Hafner, Matej Knep, Meta Novak POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA Danica Fink-Hafner, Matej Knep, Meta Novak The Slovenian Greens: From Early Success to Long-Term Failure Book series: POLITIKA Editor: Alenka Krašovec Publisher: Faculty of Social Sciences, Ljubljana For the publisher: Hermina Kranjc Copyright © FDV 2015, Ljubljana. Peer review: Professor Bogomil Ferfila and Associate Professor Drago Zajc Language editing by Mark Gough Cover design by Janko Testen Layout by: Leon Beton The book was financially supported by the Slovenian Research Agency. Ljubljana, 2015 CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 329(497.4)(0.034.2) FINK-Hafner, Danica FINThe Slovenian Greens [Elektronski vir] : from early success to long-term failure / Danica Fink-Hafner, Matej Knep, Meta Novak.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenia by Damjan Lajh and Alenka Krašovec
    Slovenia by Damjan Lajh and Alenka Krašovec Capital: Ljubljana Population: 2.0 million GNI/capita: US$27,160 Source: The data above was provided by The World Bank, World Bank Indicators 2010. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 Electoral Process 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Civil Society 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Independent Media 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 Governance* 2.50 2.25 2.25 2.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic Governance n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Local Democratic Governance n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Judicial Framework and Independence 1.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 Corruption 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 Democracy Score 1.88 1.83 1.79 1.75 1.68 1.75 1.82 1.86 1.93 1.93 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenia by Damjan Lajh
    Slovenia by Damjan Lajh Capital: Ljubljana Population: 2.0 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$26,530 Source: The data above were provided by The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2012. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Electoral Process 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Civil Society 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Independent Media 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Governance* 2.25 2.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic Governance n/a n/a 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Local Democratic Governance n/a n/a 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Judicial Framework and Independence 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 Corruption 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.25 Democracy Score 1.79 1.75 1.68 1.75 1.82 1.86 1.93 1.93 1.93 1.89 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Close Result on Dr Matej Makaroviк: PM Janša:Return Of
    politicsenvironment 13 culturebusinesssports 2008 Close result on Slovenian parliamentary general elections Dr Matej MakaroviË: The Patria problem excluded, appropriate topics were at the forefront of the election campaign PM Janša: Return of Primorska to Slovenia provided it breathing space, reopened its window to the world and made it complete again ISSN 1854-0805 QuoTeSofThefortnight Borut Pahor /SD President/: We want to formalise our infor- mal cooperation in case we get the mandate Ljubljana, 24 September: We /The presidents of the Social Democrats (SD) Borut Pahor, Zares (Gregor GolobiË) and Liberal Democrats (LDS) (Katarina Kresal) - the trio expected to form a coalition with one other party/ want to formalise our informal cooperation in case we get the mandate. We have placed content above staffing solutions. I see Slovenia's biggest challenge in taking on success- fully the period of economic uncertainty lying ahead. I beieve that certain structural reforms will be necessary to secure this, pointing out that dialogue, including with those who will end up in the opposition, is needed to carry out these reforms. The three of us are all in favour of a lively and successful debates with those on the other side of the opposition-coalition divide, be- cause we cannot imagine success for Slovenia without this form of cooperation. Žiga Turk /Development Minister/: Grand coalition is the only way for Slovenia to implement the reforms it needs to in- crease its prosperity Ljubljana, 24 September: The Social Democrats (SD) won general elec- tion not because of their platform but because they managed to persuade people that they stood for a different style of govern- ance.
    [Show full text]
  • Content Tackling Cyber Threats Together It Is Time to Bridge the Divide
    Bled Strategic Times Official Gazette of the Bled Strategic Forum 10 – 11 September 2018 bledstrategicforum.org P bledstrategicforum N Bled Strategic Forum Bled Strategic Forum BledStrategicForum @BledStratForum, #BSF @BledStratForum [email protected] Content Security begins with trust by Thomas Greminger 3 An emotionally intelligent society by Katja Geršak 4 Towards inclusive growth – an easy goal to set, a complex path to plot by Christian Ketels 5 NATO: resilience, deterrence and defence in cyberspace by Antonio Missiroli 6 Cyberspace as a new battleground by Dobran Božič, Igor Kotnik, Marko Grobelnik, Gregor Lisjak 7 ICC: too important to falter by Fatou Bensouda 10 On the way to the rule of law in the international community by Ernest Petrič 12 Building bridges, making history by Nikola Dimitrov 14 Diplomacy in a new disguise? by Antje Herrberg 15 Tackling cyber threats It is Time to Bridge Real danger facing Europe comes from within together the Divide by Shada Islam 16 The cyber challenges arising from EU: not the only game in “We should use the overwhelming town anymore? our highly – digitalised society are global consensus on the impor- by Tobias Flessenkemper 17 here to stay. We can tackle them tance of fair and sustainable de- The global race for AI supremacy on the EU level, here is how velopment for all in order to en- by Reva Goujon 18 / By Sir Julian King, European Commissioner for the hance global cooperation, mutual From disruptive to enabling Security Union support and wide-ranging trust” by Iskren Krusteff 21 his year’s Bled Strategic Forum is all about “bridging the di- Thinking the Unthinkable vide” – focusing on the things we have in common rather / By Karl Erjavec, Host of the Bled Strategic Forum, than what divides us, something especially important in a by Nik Gowing 22 T Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of world which feels increasingly fraught and divided.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3: Macro Report June 05, 2006
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 3: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3: Macro Report June 05, 2006 Country: Slovenia Date of Election: 21 September 2008 Prepared by: Simona Kustec Lipicer Date of Preparation: 20 December 2011 NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [ X] Parliamentary/Legislative [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ ] Upper House [X ] Lower House [ ] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 3: Macro Report 2a. What was the party of the president prior to the most recent election? 2002-2007: Dr. Janez Drnovšek, as independent president (between 1992-2002 the president of the leading parliamentary and coalition party Liberal Democracy of Slovenia (LDS)); 2007-: Dr.
    [Show full text]