Actdetector: Detecting Daily Activities Using Smartwatches

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Actdetector: Detecting Daily Activities Using Smartwatches ActDetector: Detecting Daily Activities Using Smartwatches Xiao Sun, Li Qiu, Yibo Wu and Guohong Cao Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA xxs118, [email protected], [email protected], gcao @cse.psu.edu f g Abstract—Detecting daily activities is helpful for health care As a popular research area with potential applications in and clinical medicine. In this paper, we present ActDetector, a health care, activity detection has been studied in previous smartwatch based application which detects 8 common daily works [6]–[12]. Radio based systems have been proposed in activities, including sitting, walking, running, going upstairs, going downstairs, eating, driving and sitting in a vehicle. By [6]–[10] to detect human activities by using radar or Channel leveraging the built-in sensors on smartwatch, a multi-level State Information (CSI). However, these systems rely on the classification system is proposed which considers both detection wireless devices installed indoor, which makes them unsuitable accuracy and energy efficiency. ActDetector is designed to work for detecting activities outdoor. In [11], nodes with motion unobtrusively, no matter on which wrist the smartwatch is worn. sensors are placed at different parts of the body and data from We have implemented ActDetector on Sony Smartwatch 3 and evaluated its performance in real experiments involving 12 users. all these sensor nodes were collected for activity detection. Experimental results show that ActDetector is energy efficient Although the system can work both indoor and outdoor, it is and can detect the daily activities with high accuracy. not practical for daily monitoring since users have to wear multiple sensor nodes on their wrists or ankles. Smartphone I. INTRODUCTION based approaches are proposed in [12], [13], where inertial Activities such as sitting, walking or eating, reflect routine sensors equipped on the smartphone are exploited for activity movements in our daily lives. Monitoring these daily activi- detection. However, in these approaches, to achieve more ties provides helpful information for health care and clinical accurate detection, the smartphone has to be placed at a fixed medicine. For example, in [1], by analyzing the walking data position with respect to the body, which is inconvenient for of patients with stroke, researchers evaluated the efficacy of users. Some simple activities such as walking or running can a task-oriented intervention in stroke rehabilitation, and in be detected by commercial wrist-worn devices like Fitbit or [2], eating activity was monitored to help people with obesity Jawbone. However, to use these devices, users have to set assess dietary intake and establish healthy eating habits. Even the preferred wrist (i.e., the wrist on which the device is for people in good health, maintaining activity dairies for worn) manually and these devices cannot detect complicated over an extended period of time plays an important role activities such as eating or driving. in improving their fitness. For example, by detecting and Different from the aforementioned works, ActDetector is recording activities like sitting and walking, daily physical implemented on smartwatch to detect 8 common daily ac- activities can be checked to help decide if more physical tivities. Several practical issues are considered in developing exercises are needed or not. ActDetector to meet the specific requirements of smartwatch, The rapid development of wearable technologies such as such as sensing capabilities and resource constraints of smart- smartphones and smartwatches, has opened up opportunities watch, and different wearing habits of smartwatch users. The for smart health [3]–[5], and it is possible to detect and accelerometer and gyroscope data is collected and a multi-level record a user’s health related daily activities unobtrusively classification system is designed for activity detection. First, a by using wearable devices. Since smartwatch is integrated few time-domain features are extracted from the accelerometer with motion sensors (e.g., accelerometer, gyroscope, etc.) and data to detect the predominant activity sitting. Then, the re- worn by a user on his/her wrist most of the time, we can maining activities are classified into two categories, depending collect motion related sensor data from the smartwatch to on whether they are activities with repeated patterns or not. detect daily activities through analysis of wrist movement Lastly, more time-domain and frequency-domain features are patterns. In this paper, we present a smartwatch based system extracted and different classifiers are trained to identify each called ActDetector, which leverages two widely equipped daily activity. ActDetector is designed to work unobtrusively motion sensors, accelerometer and gyroscope, to detect 8 daily and robustly, and it functions no matter on which wrist the activities, including sitting, walking, running, going upstairs, smartwatch is worn. We have implemented ActDetector on going downstairs, eating, driving, and sitting in a vehicle. Act- Sony Smartwatch 3 and evaluated its performance in real Detector is designed to record these activities in an unobtrusive experiments involving 12 users. Experimental results show that way without interrupting users’ normal smartwatch wearing ActDetector is energy efficient and can detect daily activities and usage patterns. with high accuracy. Preferred Wrist Detection r a t Moving average filter Wrist down detection Left/right wrist e ) a t 15 l walking i 2 d f r s e s t wrist down a e running p 10 - m wrist up o w r o No Yes upstairs l e l Frames and Sitting Repeated pattern r e Feature interaction with smartwatch e c windows detection detection 5 d c downstairs r extraction A o - t d s s n r eating i s 0 a o Magnitude (m/s w F e s o N Daily Activity Y e d driving 0 5 10 15 20 25 n m Detection i Classifier a Time (s) w r sitting F vehicle Fig. 2: The magnitude of the total acceleration Sensor Data Collection Gyroscope data when starting an app on smartwatch. Fig. 1: The architecture of ActDetector. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section II are different under most circumstances. Therefore, ActDetec- discusses the design considerations. Section III presents the tor should be able to detect the daily activities no matter on system architecture and illustrates the design details of each which wrist the smartwatch is worn. component. The implementation of ActDetector on Android Wear based smartwatch is presented in Section IV. We eval- III. SYSTEM DESIGN uate the performance of our system in Section V. Section VI In this section, we present the design of ActDetector. As reviews the related work and Section VII concludes the paper. shown in Figure 1, there are three main components in Act- Detector. The sensor data is sampled from the accelerometer II. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS and gyroscope for processing. By using the accelerometer data, ActDetector is designed to unobtrusively detect and record a light weight scheme is designed to detect on which wrist the a user’s daily activities using off-the-shelf smartwatches. To user wears the smartwatch. Based on the detected result, the achieve this goal, the following design issues should be corresponding classifiers are chosen and a group of features considered. are extracted from sensor data to identify each daily activity. First, the system should use sensors which are commonly The design details of each component are described as follows. built in different types of smartwatches. A lot of smartwatch manufacturers (e.g., Sony, LG, Apple, Samsung, Huawei) have A. Sensor Data Collection released their smartwatches recently. Depending on the brand In ActDetector, accelerometer data and gyroscope data are and the device version, these smartwatches are equipped with collected and analyzed to detect daily activities. Once Act- different kinds of sensors. For example, the LG G Watch R is Detector is started, the accelerometer data is sampled with a equipped with barometer, which can be used to measure the sampling rate of 60 Hz. Since gyroscope consumes much more floors a user climbs, and the Samsung Gear S2 3G is equipped power than accelerometer, the angular velocity is sampled with with GPS, which can be used to track a user’s movement. a sampling rate of 100 Hz only when an activity with non- However, these two sensors are not supported by many other repeated pattern is detected (details in Section III-C). The smartwatches. To make ActDetector device independent, it accelerometer on the smartwatch measures all the accelera- should only use sensors which are commonly equipped on tions that affect the device, which also include the gravity. different types of smartwatches. However, in ActDetector, to detect a user’s daily activities, Second, the system must be lightweight. ActDetector is we are only interested in the acceleration which is associated implemented on smartwatch to continuously detect and record with the movement of the smartwatch. Therefore, a low-pass the common activities occurred in user’s daily life. However, filter is applied to subtract the gravity components along X, compared to other mobile devices like smartphone, smartwatch Y and Z axis from the raw accelerometer data. For simplicity, usually has much less computing resources and power. To in the remainder of this paper, we use acceleration to denote monitor user’s daily activities for hours or even days, a large the filtered acceleration without the effect of gravity. amount of sensor data needs to be collected and processed on smartwatch. Therefore, ActDetector must be lightweight. B. Preferred Wrist Detection Third, to make ActDetector work unobtrusively and robust- When a user performs a certain daily activity (e.g., walking, ly, users’ wearing habits should be considered when designing running, etc.), the movement of his/her wrist follows some the system. Although most users wear smartwatches on their patterns. By collecting accelerometer data from the wrist- wrists, different users have different preferences.
Recommended publications
  • A Survey of Smartwatch Platforms from a Developer's Perspective
    Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Technical Library School of Computing and Information Systems 2015 A Survey of Smartwatch Platforms from a Developer’s Perspective Ehsan Valizadeh Grand Valley State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cistechlib ScholarWorks Citation Valizadeh, Ehsan, "A Survey of Smartwatch Platforms from a Developer’s Perspective" (2015). Technical Library. 207. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cistechlib/207 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Computing and Information Systems at ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Library by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Survey of Smartwatch Platforms from a Developer’s Perspective By Ehsan Valizadeh April, 2015 A Survey of Smartwatch Platforms from a Developer’s Perspective By Ehsan Valizadeh A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Information Systems At Grand Valley State University April, 2015 ________________________________________________________________ Dr. Jonathan Engelsma April 23, 2015 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 6 WHAT IS A SMARTWATCH
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1809.10387V1 [Cs.CR] 27 Sep 2018 IEEE TRANSACTIONS on SUSTAINABLE COMPUTING, VOL
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE COMPUTING, VOL. X, NO. X, MONTH YEAR 0 This work has been accepted in IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing. DOI: 10.1109/TSUSC.2018.2808455 URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8299447&isnumber=7742329 IEEE Copyright Notice: c 2018 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. arXiv:1809.10387v1 [cs.CR] 27 Sep 2018 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE COMPUTING, VOL. X, NO. X, MONTH YEAR 1 Identification of Wearable Devices with Bluetooth Hidayet Aksu, A. Selcuk Uluagac, Senior Member, IEEE, and Elizabeth S. Bentley Abstract With wearable devices such as smartwatches on the rise in the consumer electronics market, securing these wearables is vital. However, the current security mechanisms only focus on validating the user not the device itself. Indeed, wearables can be (1) unauthorized wearable devices with correct credentials accessing valuable systems and networks, (2) passive insiders or outsider wearable devices, or (3) information-leaking wearables devices. Fingerprinting via machine learning can provide necessary cyber threat intelligence to address all these cyber attacks. In this work, we introduce a wearable fingerprinting technique focusing on Bluetooth classic protocol, which is a common protocol used by the wearables and other IoT devices. Specifically, we propose a non-intrusive wearable device identification framework which utilizes 20 different Machine Learning (ML) algorithms in the training phase of the classification process and selects the best performing algorithm for the testing phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Smartwatch Security Research TREND MICRO | 2015 Smartwatch Security Research
    Smartwatch Security Research TREND MICRO | 2015 Smartwatch Security Research Overview This report commissioned by Trend Micro in partnership with First Base Technologies reveals the security flaws of six popular smartwatches. The research involved stress testing these devices for physical protection, data connections and information stored to provide definitive results on which ones pose the biggest risk with regards to data loss and data theft. Summary of Findings • Physical device protection is poor, with only the Apple Watch having a lockout facility based on a timeout. The Apple Watch is also the only device which allowed a wipe of the device after a set number of failed login attempts. • All the smartwatches had local copies of data which could be accessed through the watch interface when taken out of range of the paired smartphone. If a watch were stolen, any data already synced to the watch would be accessible. The Apple Watch allowed access to more personal data than the Android or Pebble devices. • All of the smartwatches we tested were using Bluetooth encryption and TLS over WiFi (for WiFi enabled devices), so consideration has obviously been given to the security of data in transit. • Android phones can use ‘trusted’ Bluetooth devices (such as smartwatches) for authentication. This means that the smartphone will not lock if it is connected to a trusted smartwatch. Were the phone and watch stolen together, the thief would have full access to both devices. • Currently smartwatches do not allow the same level of interaction as a smartphone; however it is only a matter of time before they do.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobius Smatwatches.Key
    Разработка для Smart Watches: Apple WatchKit, Android Wear и TizenOS Agenda History Tizen for Wearable Apple Watch Android Wear QA History First Smart Watches Samsung SPH-WP10 1999 IBM Linux Watch 2000 Microsoft SPOT 2003 IBM Linux Watches Today Tizen for Wearable • Display: 360x380; 320x320 • Hardware: 512MB, 4GB, 1Ghz dual-core • Sensors • Accelerometer • Gyroscope • Compass (optional) • Heart Rate monitor (optional) • Ambient Light (optional) • UV (optional) • Barometer (optional) • Camera (optional) • Input • Touch • Microphone • Connectivity: BLE • Devices: Samsung Gear 2, Gear S, Gear, Gear Neo • Compatibility: Samsung smartphones Tizen: Samsung Gear S Tizen for Wearable: Development Tizen for Wearable: Development Tizen IDE Tizen Emulator Apple Watch • Display: 390x312; 340x272 • Hardware: 256M, 1 (2)Gb; Apple S 1 • Sensors: • Accelerometer • Gyroscope • Heart Rate monitor • Barometer • Input • digital crown • force touch • touch • microphone • Compatibility: iOS 8.2 • Devices: 24 types Apple Watch Apple Watch Kit Apple Watch kit: Watch Sim Android Wear • Display: Round; Rect • 320x290; 320x320, 280x280 • Hardware: 512MB, 4GB, 1Ghz (TIOMAP, Qualcomm) • Sensors • Accelerometer • Gyroscope (optional) • Compass (optional) • Heart Rate monitor (optional) • Ambient Light (optional) • UV (optional) • Barometer (optional) • GPS (optional) • Input • Touch • Microphone • Connectivity: BLE • Devices: Moto 360, LG G Watch, Gear Live, ZenWatch, Sony Smartwatch 3, LG G Watch R • Compatibility: Android 4.3 Android Wear Android Wear IDE Android
    [Show full text]
  • A Predictive Fingerstroke-Level Model for Smartwatch Interaction
    Multimodal Technologies and Interaction Article A Predictive Fingerstroke-Level Model for Smartwatch Interaction Shiroq Al-Megren ID Information Technology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh 12371, Saudi Arabia; [email protected]; Tel.: +966-11-805-7839 Received: 24 May 2018; Accepted: 25 June 2018; Published: 2 July 2018 Abstract: The keystroke-level model (KLM) is commonly used to predict the time it will take an expert user to accomplish a task without errors when using an interactive system. The KLM was initially intended to predict interactions in conventional set-ups, i.e., mouse and keyboard interactions. However, it has since been adapted to predict interactions with smartphones, in-vehicle information systems, and natural user interfaces. The simplicity of the KLM and its extensions, along with their resource- and time-saving capabilities, has driven their adoption. In recent years, the popularity of smartwatches has grown, introducing new design challenges due to the small touch screens and bimanual interactions involved, which make current extensions to the KLM unsuitable for modelling smartwatches. Therefore, it is necessary to study these interfaces and interactions. This paper reports on three studies performed to modify the original KLM and its extensions for smartwatch interaction. First, an observational study was conducted to characterise smartwatch interactions. Second, the unit times for the observed interactions were derived through another study, in which the times required to perform the relevant physical actions were measured. Finally, a third study was carried out to validate the model for interactions with the Apple Watch and Samsung Gear S3. The results show that the new model can accurately predict the performance of smartwatch users with a percentage error of 12.07%; a value that falls below the acceptable percentage dictated by the original KLM ~21%.
    [Show full text]
  • Miniatured Inertial Motion and Position Tracking and Visualization Systems Using Android Wear Platform
    MINIATURED INERTIAL MOTION AND POSITION TRACKING AND VISUALIZATION SYSTEMS USING ANDROID WEAR PLATFORM A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science By DHRUVKUMAR NAVINCHANDRA PATEL B.E., Gujarat Technological University, 2014 2016 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL January 6th, 2017 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Dhruvkumar Navinchandra Patel ENTITLED Miniatured Inertial Motion and Position Tracking and Visualization Systems Using Android Wear Platform BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science. _____________________________________ Yong Pei, Ph.D. Thesis Director _____________________________________ Mateen M. Rizki, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Computer Science and Engineering Committee on Final Examination _____________________________________ Yong Pei, Ph.D. _____________________________________ Mateen M. Rizki, Ph.D. _____________________________________ Paul Bender, Ph.D. _____________________________________ Robert E.W. Fyffe, Ph.D. Vice President for Research and Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Patel, Dhruvkumar Navinchandra. M.S. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Wright State University, 2016. Miniatured Inertial Motion and Position Tracking and Visualization Systems Using Android Wear Platform. In this thesis, we have designed and developed a motion tracking and visualization system using the latest motion tracking sensory technologies. It is one
    [Show full text]
  • Smartwatch Specs Comparison Chart
    Smartwatch Specs Comparison Chart Apple Watch Pebble Time Pebble Steel Alcatel One Touch Moto 360 LG G Watch R Sony Smartwatch Asus ZenWatch Huawei Watch Samsung Gear S Watch 3 Smartphone iPhone 5 and Newer Android OS 4.1+ Android OS 4.1+ iOS 7+ Android 4.3+ Android 4.3+ Android 4.3+ Android 4.3+ Android 4.3+ Android 4.3+ iPhone 4, 4s, 5, 5s, iPhone 4, 4s, 5, 5s, Android 4.3+ Compatibility and 5c, iOS 6 and and 5c, iOS 6 and iOS7 iOS7 Price in USD $349+ $299 $149 - $180 $149 $249.99 $299 $200 $199 $349 - 399 $299 $149 (w/ contract) May 2015 June 2015 June 2015 Availability Display Type Screen Size 38mm: 1.5” 1.25” 1.25” 1.22” 1.56” 1.3” 1.6” 1.64” 1.4” 2” 42mm: 1.65” 38mm: 340x272 (290 ppi) 144 x 168 pixel 144 x 168 pixel 204 x 204 Pixel 258 320x290 pixel 320x320 pixel 320 x 320 pixel 269 320x320 400x400 Pixel 480 x 360 Pixel 300 Screen Resolution 42mm: 390x312 (302 ppi) ppi 205 ppi 245 ppi ppi 278ppi 286 ppi ppi Sport: Ion-X Glass Gorilla 3 Gorilla Corning Glass Gorilla 3 Gorilla 3 Gorilla 3 Gorilla 3 Sapphire Gorilla 3 Glass Type Watch: Sapphire Edition: Sapphire 205mah Approx 18 hrs 150 mah 130 mah 210 mah 320 mah 410 mah 420 mah 370 mah 300 mah 300 mah Battery Up to 72 hrs on Battery Reserve Mode Wireless Magnetic Charger Magnetic Charger Intergrated USB Wireless Qi Magnetic Charger Micro USB Magnetic Charger Magnetic Charger Charging Cradle Charging inside watch band Hear Rate Sensors Pulse Oximeter 3-Axis Accelerome- 3-Axis Accelerome- Hear Rate Monitor Hear Rate Monitor Heart Rate Monitor Ambient light Heart Rate monitor Heart
    [Show full text]
  • Bedienungsanleitung Sony Smartwatch 3
    Bedienungsanleitung SmartWatch 3 SWR50 Inhaltsverzeichnis Erste Schritte..................................................................................4 Einführung...........................................................................................4 Überblick.............................................................................................4 Laden.................................................................................................4 Ein- und Ausschalten..........................................................................5 Einrichten der SmartWatch 3...............................................................5 Aneignen der Grundlagen..............................................................8 Verwenden des Touchscreens............................................................8 Ab- und Einblenden des Bildschirms...................................................8 Startbildschirm....................................................................................9 Karten.................................................................................................9 Status-Symbole anzeigen..................................................................10 Grundlegende Einstellungen........................................................12 Zugreifen auf Einstellungen................................................................12 Bildschirmeinstellungen.....................................................................12 Flugzeugmodus................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Op E N So U R C E Yea R B O O K 2 0
    OPEN SOURCE YEARBOOK 2016 ..... ........ .... ... .. .... .. .. ... .. OPENSOURCE.COM Opensource.com publishes stories about creating, adopting, and sharing open source solutions. Visit Opensource.com to learn more about how the open source way is improving technologies, education, business, government, health, law, entertainment, humanitarian efforts, and more. Submit a story idea: https://opensource.com/story Email us: [email protected] Chat with us in Freenode IRC: #opensource.com . OPEN SOURCE YEARBOOK 2016 . OPENSOURCE.COM 3 ...... ........ .. .. .. ... .... AUTOGRAPHS . ... .. .... .. .. ... .. ........ ...... ........ .. .. .. ... .... AUTOGRAPHS . ... .. .... .. .. ... .. ........ OPENSOURCE.COM...... ........ .. .. .. ... .... ........ WRITE FOR US ..... .. .. .. ... .... 7 big reasons to contribute to Opensource.com: Career benefits: “I probably would not have gotten my most recent job if it had not been for my articles on 1 Opensource.com.” Raise awareness: “The platform and publicity that is available through Opensource.com is extremely 2 valuable.” Grow your network: “I met a lot of interesting people after that, boosted my blog stats immediately, and 3 even got some business offers!” Contribute back to open source communities: “Writing for Opensource.com has allowed me to give 4 back to a community of users and developers from whom I have truly benefited for many years.” Receive free, professional editing services: “The team helps me, through feedback, on improving my 5 writing skills.” We’re loveable: “I love the Opensource.com team. I have known some of them for years and they are 6 good people.” 7 Writing for us is easy: “I couldn't have been more pleased with my writing experience.” Email us to learn more or to share your feedback about writing for us: https://opensource.com/story Visit our Participate page to more about joining in the Opensource.com community: https://opensource.com/participate Find our editorial team, moderators, authors, and readers on Freenode IRC at #opensource.com: https://opensource.com/irc .
    [Show full text]
  • Sniffing Your Smartwatch Passwords Via Deep Sequence Learning
    152 Snoopy: Sniffing Your Smartwatch Passwords via Deep Sequence Learning CHRIS XIAOXUAN LU, University of Oxford, UK BOWEN DU and HONGKAI WEN∗, University of Warwick, USA SEN WANG, Heriot-Watt University, UK ANDREW MARKHAM and IVAN MARTINOVIC, University of Oxford, UK YIRAN SHEN, Harbin Engineering University, China NIKI TRIGONI, University of Oxford, UK Demand for smartwatches has taken off in recent years with new models which can run independently from smartphones and provide more useful features, becoming first-class mobile platforms. One can access online banking or even make payments on a smartwatch without a paired phone. This makes smartwatches more attractive and vulnerable to malicious attacks, which to date have been largely overlooked. In this paper, we demonstrate Snoopy, a password extraction and inference system which is able to accurately infer passwords entered on Android/Apple watches within 20 attempts, just by eavesdropping on motion sensors. Snoopy uses a uniform framework to extract the segments of motion data when passwords are entered, and uses novel deep neural networks to infer the actual passwords. We evaluate the proposed Snoopy system in the real-world with data from 362 participants and show that our system offers a ∼ 3-fold improvement in the accuracy of inferring passwords compared to the state-of-the-art, without consuming excessive energy or computational resources. We also show that Snoopy is very resilient to user and device heterogeneity: it can be trained on crowd-sourced motion data (e.g. via Amazon Mechanical Turk), and then used to attack passwords from a new user, even if they are wearing a different model.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Chart Microsoft Band – Kevin Martin Sony Smartwatch 3
    What Wearable Device Do I Buy and Why? PC Retreat 2015 What Do You Want in a Smartwatch? • Fitness Tracking • Phone notifications • Tell time • Long battery life • Style What Wearable Device • Affordability Do I Buy and Why? • More? Kevin Martin, Jonathan Lewis, Parag Joshi Comparison Chart Microsoft Band –Kevin Martin Motorola Apple Pebble Fitbit Sony Microsoft • Windows 8.1, iOS 7.1+, Android 4.3+ Moto 360 Watch Classic Charge HR SmartWatch 3 Band • Battery Life: 2 days Operating Windows Vista+, Windows 8.1+, Android 2.3+ Mac OS X 10.6+, System Android 4.3+ iOS 8+ Android 4.1+ Android 4.1+ iOS • Screen Size: 11mm x 33mm iOS 5+ iOS 6+, Android Syncs With 7.1 4.1+ • Wireless Connectivity: Bluetooth Battery Life 1.5 days 1 day 7 days 5 days 2 days 2 days Screen Size 1.56 inches 1.32 inches 1.26 inches .83 inches 1.6 inches 11mm x 33mm • Splash proof Wireless Bluetooth and Bluetooth Bluetooth and Bluetooth, NFC Bluetooth Bluetooth Connectivity WiFi and WiFi USB cable and WiFi • Built‐in fitness tracking, heart rate monitor and GPS Waterproof? Up to 30m No Up to 50m No Up to 1.5m No • Virtual keyboard Fitness Built‐in + HR + Built‐in + HR + UV + Built‐in + HR Built‐in With app Built‐in Tracking? Sleep Tracking GPS • Notifications: Alarm, Calendar Reminder, E‐mail, Facebook, Incoming Notifications? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Call, Missed Call, Text Message, Timer, Twitter, and Weather Starting Price $300 $350 $100 $150 $180 $160 • Starting at $160 with $40 rebate Sony SmartWatch 3 – Jonathan Lewis Apple Watch – Parag Joshi • iOS 8+ • Android
    [Show full text]
  • Samsung Products (Wholesale and Retail)
    PRICE LIST FOR SAMSUNG PRODUCTS (WHOLESALE AND RETAIL) Samsung S-Series Wholesale Retail Price Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 256GB 8GB $700 $1,100 Samsung Galaxy Note 20 256GB 8GB $600 $950 Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB 12GB $600 $950 Samsung Galaxy S20+ 28GB 8GB $550 $850 Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB 8GB $500 $800 Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 5G 256GB $600 $950 Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 256GB $550 $850 Samsung Galaxy Note10 5G 256GB $500 $800 Samsung Galaxy Note10 256GB $450 $750 Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 128GB $500 $850 Samsung Galaxy S10+ 128GB $350 $600 Samsung Galaxy S10 128GB $260 $440 Samsung Galaxy Note 9 128GB $300 $500 Samsung Galaxy Note 8 64GB $280 $450 Samsung Galaxy S9 64GB $250 $420 Samsung Galaxy S8+ 64GB $220 $400 Samsung Galaxy S8 64GB $200 $350 Samsung Galaxy Note 7 64GB $180 $300 Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 64GB $180 $300 Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB $150 $280 Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge + 64GB $120 $250 Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Unlocked 64GB $110 $230 Samsung Galaxy S6 Unlocked 64GB $100 $200 Samsung A-Series Wholesale Retail Price Samsung Galaxy A70s 128GB $350 $550 Samsung Galaxy A20s 64GB $90 $150 Samsung Galaxy A30s 128GB $220 $400 Samsung Galaxy A50s 128GB $230 $430 Samsung Galaxy A90 5G 128GB $230 $430 Samsung Galaxy A90 128GB $250 $450 Samsung Galaxy A10s 64GB $100 $200 Samsung Galaxy A80 64GB $150 $250 Samsung Galaxy A70 64GB $120 $170 Samsung Galaxy A60 64GB $90 $150 Samsung Galaxy A50 128GB $120 $170 Samsung Galaxy A40 64GB $210 $380 Samsung Galaxy A30 64GB $70 $120 Samsung Galaxy A20e 64GB $170 $270 Samsung Galaxy A20 64GB $60 $100 Samsung
    [Show full text]