HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN

The acid sands of marine origins and the Malmesbury shales of the Swartland meet at Hopefield. Here, the interplay of soil types and water permeability of these substrates as well as the climatic influence of the nearby Atlantic Ocean leads to unique habitats and many seasonal wetlands. Thus, the area has many interesting endemic and threatened plant taxa and it is no surprise that Hopefield is now renowned for its annual flower show which is run by a passionate and knowledgeable group of local volunteers (Maree and Vromans 2010).

OCTOBER 2019

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 1

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Compiled by Charl du Plessis & Sean Ranger FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Porterville

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 2

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

AUTHORISATION

The management authority assigned in terms of Section 38 (1) or (2) of the Act must, within 12 months of assignment submit a management plan of the Protected Area to the MEC for approval.

Recommended and approved by the Municipal Manager, Saldanha Bay Municipality.

Name Resolution Number Date

Municipal Manager Saldanha Municipality

……………………….

MEC Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Name Signature Date

Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Mr Anton Bredell PROVINCIAL MINISTER

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 3

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

i) Copyright and Disclaimer

Copyright in this information vests with FOOTPRINT Environmental Services (FES) and the unauthorised copying thereof or making of extracts thereof is illegal.

Any representation, statement opinion, or advice expressed or implied in this document is made in good faith on the basis that FES , its agents and employees are not liable (whether by reason of negliglence, lack of care or otherwise) to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking (as the case may be) action in respect of any representation, statement or advice referred to above.

Although the greatest care has been taken to ensure that all mapping data is up to date and spatially accurate, FES give no warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, utility or completeness of this data. Users of the data in this report assume all responsibility and risk for use of the data.

The User expressly acknowledges and agrees that use of the data and information contained in these pages is at the User's sole risk. The data and information contained in these pages are provided "as is" and no warranties are made that the data and information contained in these pages will meet your requirements, is complete or free from error. In no event shall FES be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, but not limited to, damages for loss of business profits, loss of business information, or other pecuniary loss) arising out of the use of, or inability to use, the data and information contained in this report.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 4

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

ii) Acknowledgements

The Saldanha Bay Municipality (SBM) expresses its thanks to all who participated in and who provided comment and input in the drafting and development of this management plan.

The Hopefield Private Nature Reserve (HPNR) Protected Area Management Plan (PAMP) was prepared by Cedarberg Conservation Services (t/a FOOTPRINT Environmental Services). Our thanks in particular to Nazeema Duarte from the SBM for her support.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 5

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

iii) Table of contents

i) Copyright and disclaimer 4

ii) Acknowledgements 5

iii) Table of contents 6

iv) List of tables 12

v) List of figures 12

vi) List of attachments 12

vii) Abbreviations 12

SECTION 1 : INTRODUCTION 15

1.1 The purpose of the plan 15

1.2 Structure of the plan 15

1.3 Adaptive management 18 SECTION 2 : OVERVIEW OF THE HOPEFIELD PRIVATE 19 NATURE RESERVE

2.1 Cultural heritage resources and landscape grading 20

2.2 Biophysical description 20

2.2.1 Climate 22

2.2.2 Geology, topography and soils 22

2.3 Biodiversity 23

2.3.1 Mammal fauna 23

2.3.2 Vegetation 24

2.3.3 Avifauna 26

2.3.4 Herpetofauna 27

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 6

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

2.3.5 Invertebrates 27

2.3.6 Fire regime 27

2.3.7 Alien Invasive Species 29

2.4 Socio-political Context 29

2.5 Local and Regional Planning Context 31

2.5.1 Regional Planning 31

2.5.2 Local Planning 32

SECTION 3 : LEGAL STATUS 36

3.1 Legal status 36

3.1.1 Name and legal designations 36

3.1.2 Contractual agreements 36

3.1.3 Location, extent and highest point 36

3.1.4 Municipal jurisdiction 37

SECTION 4 : POLICY FRAMEWORK 39

4.1 Financial 39

4.2 Biodiversity management 39

4.3 Safety and security 39

4.4 Resource use and community involvement 40

4.5 Cultural resource management 40

4.6 Neighbouring relationships 41

4.7 Baseline data, monitoring and research 41

4.8 Access 41

4.9 Administration support 42

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 7

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

4.10 METT Assessments 42

4.11 Internal Rules 43

4.12 Environmental Education and Awareness 43

4.13 Infrastructure management and maintenance 43

SECTION 5: CONSULTATION 44

5.1 Stakeholder Engagement Process 44

5.2 Establishment of a Protected Area Advisory Committee (PAAC) 45

Effective participation in the Protected Area Advisory Committee 5.3 45 (PAAC)

SECTION 6: PURPOSE and VISION 46

6.1 Key determining factors 46

6.1.1 Local connectivity 47

6.1.2 Vegetation 47

6.1.3 Other values 47

6.2 Management Intent 48

6.3 Purpose 48

6.4 Threats 49

6.5 Summary of management challenges 50

6.6 Vision 53

6.7 Goals and objectives 53

SECTION 7 – ZONING PLAN 62

Protected Area in the Context of Municipal Integrated 7.1 62 Development Planning

7.2 Protected Area Zonation 63

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 8

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

7.3 Protected Area Zone of Influence 64

SECTION 8 – ACCESS AND FACILITIES 66

8.1 Public Access and Management 66

8.2 Flight corridors 66

8.3 Administrative and other facilities 66

8.3.1 Roads 67

8.3.2. Buildings 67

8.3.3 Fences 67

8.3.4 Signage 67

8.4 Commercial Activities 67

8.5 Servitudes 68

SECTION 9 – EXPANSION STRATEGY 69

SECTION 10 – CONCEPT DEVELOPENT PLAN 70

SECTION 11 – STRATEGIC PLAN 71

11.1 Programme: Indigenous vegetation management 71

11.1.1 Project: Plant species list 71

11.1.2 Research and other scientific papers 72

11.2 Programme: Rare, Endangered and Endemic Plant species 72

11.2.1 Project: Map the distribution 72

11.3 Programme: Alien invasive species management 73

10.3.1 Project: Implement available management plan 73

11.4 Programme: Fire Management 74

11.4.1 Membership to the Greater Cederberg Fire Protection 74 Association

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 9

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

11.4.2 Project : Firebreaks 75

11.4.3 Project: Fire prevention 75

11.5 Programme: Terrestrial Fauna Species 76

11.5.1 Project: Species list 76

11.5.2 Project: Re-introduction of game species 76

11.5.3 Project: Research and other scientific papers 76

11.5.4 Project: Prevent impacts on terrestrial and marine species 77

11. 6 Programme: Restoration Ecology 77

11.6.1 Project: Map all disturbed areas 77

11.6.2 Project: Rehabilitation 78

11.7 Program: Cultural historical, archaeological and palaeontological 79 heritage

11.7.1 Project: Map and evaluate assets 79

11.8 Program: Baseline data collection 79

11.8.1 Project: Develop and implement a baseline data collection plan 80

11.9 Program: Monitoring 80

11.9.1 Project: Develop and implement a monitoring plan 80

11.10 Program: Research 80

11.10.1. Project: Promote research opportunities 80

11.11. Program: Roads 81

11.11.1. Project: Road Maintenance 81

11.12 Program: Fences and law enforcement 81

11.12.1 Project: Improve current state of fence 81

11.12.2 Project: Law Enforcement 82

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 10

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

11.13 Program: Development 83

11.13.1 Project: Development of facilities 83

11.13.2 Project: Development of the optimal staff organogram 83

11.13.3 Project: Staff development 83

SECTION 12 - COSTING PLAN 85

SECTION 13 - REFERENCES 87

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 11

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

List of Tables

Land and Resource use guidelines for Critical Biodiversity 34 1 Areas

2 Key deliverables, objectives and strategies 55

3 Zonation guidelines for HPNR 63

List of Figures

1 The Adaptive Management Cycle (CSIRO 2012) 18

2 Locality of Hopefield Private Nature Reserve 20

3 Geology and Topography 23

4 Vegetation Types 26

5 Hopefield Private Nature Reserve Critical Biodiversity Area. 33

6 Infrastructure 68

7 Fire break plan 74

iv) List of Attachments

1 PN 337 of the 7 th May o1982

2 Proposed Terms of Reference for the PAAC

3 Stakeholder Engagement Process

4 Environmental Authorisation by DEA&DP

5 Forms to complete for Baseline data and Monitoring

6 Costing Plan

7 Servitude registered within the PA

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 12

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

v) Abbreviations

APO Annual Plan of Operation

BSP Biodiversity Sector Plan

CBA Critical Biodiversity Area

CESA Critically Ecological Support Area

CESP Critical Ecological Support Areas

CREW Custodians for Rare and Endangered Wildflowers

CN CapeNature

ESA Ecological Support Areas

FES FOOTPRINT Environmental Services

GIS Geographic Information System

GCFR Greater Cape Floristic Region

CFR Cape Floristic Region

GCFPA Greater Cederberg Fire Protection Association

HIA Heritage Impact Assessment

HPNR Hopefield Private Nature Reserve

IDP Integrated Development Plan

MSA Municipal System Act (Act No.32 of 2000)

METT Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool

NEMBA National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act

NID Notice of Intent to Develop

PA Protected Area

PAAC Protected Area Advisory Committee

PAMP Protected Area Management Plan

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 13

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

PN Provincial Notice

SAHRA South African Heritage Resource Agency

SAPS South Africa Police Services

SBM Saldanha Bay Municipality

SPCA Society for the prevention of cruelty to animals

TOR Terms of Reference

Vu Vulnerable

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 14

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION

1.1 The purpose of the plan

The submission of a management plan (Hopefield Private Nature Reserve) by the Management Authority (Saldanha Bay Municipality), is a requirement in terms of Section 39 (2) of the National Environmental Management Protected Areas Act, 2003. The purpose of a management plan, in terms of this section of the Act, is to guide the development and management of the PA in such a way that it meets the purpose for which it was declared (Gowan & Mpongoma 2011).

1.2 Structure of the Plan

This PAMP is structured to adhere to the guidelines set for the development of a Management Plan for a Protected Area in terms of the National Environmental Protected Areas Act, Act 2003 (Gowan & Mpongoma 2011).

The plan itself is structured in the following way;

• Section 1 – Introduction

This section deals with the purpose, structure of this PAMP and adaptive management principles of the HPNR PAMP.

• Section 2 – Overview of the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve

This section provides a brief overview of the HPNR, the cultural heritage resources and landscape grading, biophysical description, biodiversity socio-political, local and regional planning.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 15

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

• Section 3 - Legal status

Section 3 provides a record of the legal status of the protected area, its description and location. This section deals with property and title deed information, it provides information on contractual agreements, locality, extent, topography, municipal jurisdiction and international, national and provincial listings.

• Section 4 – Policy framework

This section describes the policy framework of the Saldanha Bay Municipality that is relevant to the management and implementation of the HPNR PAMP. These policies will support the effective implementation of this PAMP by the SBM.

• Section 5 – Consultation

This section deals with the public participation process as well as the establishment of the Protected Areas Advisory Committee (PAAC) and the management of this committee. These to comply to Sections 39(3) and 41 (2)(e) of the Act.

• Section 6 - Purpose and the vision

This section describes the purpose and vision for HPNR and sets out the baseline on which the management plan is developed. It includes the key determining factors, management intent, purpose, threats, management challenges, vision, goals and objectives of HPNR. These to comply with Sections 17 and 23(2) of the Act.

• Section 7 – Zoning plan

This section describes various zonation’s for the PA and the activities which are allowed in the different zones. It notes the conservation objectives for each of these zones as well as the identification of the Protected Area Zone of Influence.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 16

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

• Section 8 – Access and facilities

The section provides information on the current access to HPNR, controls required for access and includes aspects related to access, administration and support to the PA, flight corridors, community use and servitudes, to ensure compliance to Section 41(2)(f), 46, 50 and 53(b) of the Act.

• Section 9 – Expansion strategy

This section deals with a potential expansion strategy. However, and with due consideration, the key recommendation is that for the duration of this plan the SBM should focus on building good relationships with surrounding landowners.

• Section 10 - Concept development plan

The concept development plan identified the immediate development needs for the PA. Importantly any further development may not affect the declaration purpose or any key determining factors of the PA. This to ensure compliance to Section 41(2)(c) of the Act.

• Section 11 – Strategic Plan

This section adheres to Section 41, 76, 43 of the Act and provides operational information for implementation over the next five (5) year planning period. This section deals with various programmes, projects, actions and assigns responsibilities to the SBM and additionally provides timelines for implementation.

• Section 12 - Costing plan

This section contains information on preparing budgets, the submission of budgets and securing additional funds.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 17

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

1.3 Adaptive Management for the HPNR

In the process of preparing and implementing this PAMP the guiding principles of adaptive management should be considered at all times. This is a structured, iterative process in which decisions are made using the best available information, with the aim of obtaining better information through monitoring of performance (See Figure 1 – Adaptive Management). In this way, decision making is aimed at achieving the best outcome based on current understanding, whilst accruing the information needed to improve future management. Adaptive management can lead to revision of a part or if necessary, the whole PAMP.

Figure 1. The adaptive management cycle (CSIRO 2012)

Adaptive management enables managers to: i) Learn through experience. ii) Take account of, and respond to, changing factors that affect the Protected Area. iii) Develop or refine management processes. iv) Adopt best practices and new innovations in biodiversity conservation management. v) Demonstrate that management is appropriate and effective.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 18

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 2 – OVERVIEW OF THE HOPEFIEL D PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

The Hopefield Private Nature Reserve (HPNR) was proclaimed under Section 12 (4) of the Nature and Environmental Conservation Ordinance, (Ordinance 19 of 1974) on the 7 th May 1982. The HPNR is therefore recognised as a nature reserve under the National Environmental Management Protected Areas Act (NEM:PAA) (Act No. 57 of 2003). See Attachment 1 – PN 337 of 1982.

Hopefield PNR is 1887,79 ha’s in size and is located on Farm 304, Hopefield. The reserve falls within the 3318AB quarter degree grid square, the centre of the reserve is located at 33.056275 S and 18.277203 E (Decimal Degrees).

(See Figure 2 -Locality of the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve).

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 19

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Figure 2 -Locality of the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve

2.1 Cultural heritage resources and landscape grading context

On a regional scale the Saldanha Bay Municipality falls within the West Coast Region which is one of the main regional cultural landscapes of the Western Cape, some of the others being the Swartland, Boland and Overberg. On a sub-regional scale, the West Coast Region consists of seven sub-regions that comprise of the Lagoon, Swartland, Wilderness, Berg River floodplain, Sandveld, Coastal edge and the Koppiesveld (O’Donoghue et al 2016).

Extremely rich Pliocene and Pleistocene fossil beds have been found at some 15km west to the PA, while important fossil remains from the middle to late Pleistocene occur at the adjacent property, Elandsfontein (SANParks 2013) The area, especially around Elandsfontein, is extremely rich in fossils, and

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 20

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019 abundant Late Cenozoic deposits of up to five million years in age in the Varswater formation have been found (SANParks 2013).

The earliest archaeological evidence along the West Coast comes from the Middle Stone Age (approximately 200 000 years ago to approximately 40 000 years ago).

Although palaeontological remains are not normally associated with very ancient rocks like the Cape Granite suite bedrock, such rocks (and some older Formation calcretes) may, nevertheless, provide features, such as holes and overhangs; used by sheltering animals. Bones of their prey were sometimes discarded and preserved in these contexts.

Fossils finds in the Langebaan Formation are normally mineralised bones that are moderately common and have local to high significance. Where this fossil layer extends under the sea it too has a local to high significance. The age of these fossil layers has been dated to three (3) million years ago (O’Donoghue et al 2016).

According to (O’Donoghue et al 2016) the HPNR has a high heritage significance in terms of scientific, social and aesthetic values, with a IIIA grading. Grade III can be defined as heritage resources that is conservation worthy and which needs heritage resource assessments. The specific grading of IIIA can be further defined as buildings and sites that have sufficient intrinsic significance to be regarded as local heritage resources; and are significant enough to warrant that any alteration is regulated. Such buildings and sites may be representative, being excellent examples of their kind, or may be rare. In either case, they should receive maximum protection at local level.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 21

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

2.2 Biophysical Description

2.2.1 Climate

The HPNR falls within the Mediterranean climate, receiving most rain during the cold and wet winter months. The annual rainfall is about 296 mm with the highest rainfall in June and the lowest during February. The average midday temperature for the area ranges from 12.9°C in July to 21.3°C in February. The region is the coldest during July when the mercury drops to an average of 12°C during the night.

Winds tend to be strong north-westerly in the winter and southerly in the summer. The average wind speed is 6.96 m/second.

2.2.2 Geology, topography and soil

The geology of the HPNR comprises of Quanternary quartz sand of the Springfontein Formation and Limestone and Calcrete of the Langebaan Formation.

Soils consist of Grey Regic sands that is dominant with limited pedological development. The soils are greyish, sandy and well drained. The depth of the soils is between >=750mm with <15%clay. Erodibility is high with an erodibility factor of 0.62. The highest point at the HPNR is 100m above sea level. See Figure 3 – Geology of HPNR

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 22

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Figure 3 – Geology and topography of the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve

2.3 Biodiversity

2.3.1 Mammalian fauna

Large mammals have been largely absent from fynbos for almost two centuries and we can only speculate about their impacts and effects on the vegetation. Fynbos however has evolved with animals and is reliant on them for fundamental processes such as pollination and dispersal.

Smaller mammals requiring smaller ranges are still found, including antelope species such as Grey Duiker (Sylvicapra grimmiaI ), Steenbuck ( Rhaphicerus campestris ) and Cape Grysbuck ( R. melanotis ).

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 23

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Smaller predators include African Wild Cat ( Felis lybica ), Caracal ( Felis caracal ), Cape Fox ( Vulpes chama ) and Small grey Mongoose ( Galerella pulverulenta ). The omnivorous Bat-eared Fox ( Otocyon megalotis ) is common throughout the area, particularly in agricultural lands.

2.3.2 Vegetation

The vegetation type present on the HPNR is Hopefield Sand Fynbos which is listed as a threatened ecosystem. The habitat on this property is also of very high conservation importance as it is one of few such large intact areas of Hopefield Sand Fynbos areas remaining that have not been heavily impacted and fragmented by development such as mining and linear infrastructure.

• Position and Features of the Landscape: Occurs on flat plains with deep acid sands and no outcropping bedrock. Underlain by shale, that is visible in places, notably along river banks. The very few rivers cutting through this landscape thus tend to support a thin band of Renosterveld type vegetation where shale has been exposed as a result of erosion. It reaches its northern most extent around Aurora, where composition of Proteaceae, Geraniaceae, and certain Asteraceae changes to reflect transition to more arid Sand Fynbos.

• Climate: Climate is not a major driver of this vegetation type. Typical winter rainfall area, with hot, dry, windy summers, and a high incidence of fog in autumn and winter.

• Vegetation structure : Medium to tall fire-prone shrubland. Restios and ericoid shrubs of various families dominate, but Proteaceae may be co-dominant in places. Scattered Thicket (Strandveld) elements, notably Gymnosporia buxifolia and Euclea tomentosa . Annuals abundant, especially after fire. Geophytes may be common, but most species shared with other Sand Fynbos systems.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 24

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

• Special species: Red Data listed Proteaceae in this area (north of the Berg River) includes Leucospermum rodolentum (widespread in west coast area), L. hypophyllocarpodendron ssp. canaliculatum (Aurora to Milnerton), Leucadendron foedum (mainly Hopefield area), Serruria decipiens ( to Melkbos), and Serruria fucifolia (Gifberg to Hopefield). Other rare/threatened or endemic species include Aspalathus albens, A. ternata , Lachnaea capitata, Lachnaea grandiflora , Phylica harveyi, Phylica thunbergiana, Metalasia adunca, Nemesia strumosa, Lampranthus explanatus, Relhania rotundifolia (often in clay lenses), Oxalis suavis (common but very local endemic around Hopefield), and Lepidium flexuosum (poorly known). Metalasia capitata shared with neighbouring Sand Fynbos types.

• Key areas requiring conservation: This vegetation type is very poorly conserved, with large areas transformed by agriculture and invaded by aliens. However, large intact areas still remain and these should be the focus of conservation efforts, especially where these include ecotonal elements (such as clay lenses and Renosterveld contact zones, and upland elements such as those found near Aurora), and where they border existing public or private conservation areas.

• Management Guidelines: Major pressures sources are agriculture (potatoes, rooibos, wheat) and alien invasive plants (mainly Acacia saligna and A. cyclops ). The removal of alien invaders should be regarded as a priority for this vegetation type. The carrying capacity of this vegetation type is low and the stocking of game reserves should be well controlled and closely monitored to prevent the degradation of this habitat. No further transformation of good quality examples of this vegetation type should be authorised, unless offset by significant conservation gains, in accordance with the latest regional guidelines for biodiversity offsets (Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning 2007). These guidelines suggest that for every 1ha of intact habitat lost at least 15ha of the same quality should be conserved.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 25

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

This PAMP provides the guidelines, actions and activities to be implemented to ensure long term conservation of the biological assets of the HPNR. The plan will further ensure management continuity by assigning management responsibilities and providing for scheduling and costing of actions and activities. The monitoring and auditing of all actions undertaken will be tracked by implementing the METT Assessment Process.

See figure 4 – Vegetation type at The Hopefield Private Nature Reserve.

Figure 4 – Vegetation types at the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve.

2.3.3 Avifauna

Fynbos areas do not have a particularly high diversity of birds (Cowling & Richardson, 1995); however the six species that are endemic to fynbos are in the area namely the Cape Rockjumper ( Chaetops frenatus ), Cape Sugarbird

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 26

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

(Promerops cafer ), Cape Siskin ( Serinus tottus ), Orange-breasted Sunbird (Nectarinia violacea ), Protea Canary ( Serinus leucopterus ) and Victorin’s Warbler (Bradypterus victorini ). Large striking birds include the White-necked Raven (Corvus albicollis ), Jackal Buzzard ( Buteo rufofuscus ) and the African Harrier ( Circus maurus ).

No formal baseline information has been generated to date for the PA and this will be a key activity to guide future management of the PA.

2.3.4 Herpetofauna

No detailed information on the herpetofauna species is available at the present time. However the following species would be expected to occur at the HPNR. Angulate Tortoise ( Cherisina angulata ), Striped Legless Skink ( Microacontias lineatus grayi ), Cape Cobra ( Naja nivea ), Puff Adder ( Bitis arietans ), Cross-marked Grass Snake (Psammophis crucifer ), Karoo Whip Snake ( Psammophis natastictus ), Mole Snake (Pseudoaspis cana ) and the Cuvier’s Blind Legless Skink ( Typhlosaurus caecus ).

2.3.5 Invertebrates

The focus on the CFR’s exceptionally high floristic diversity has somewhat overshadowed its faunal diversity and, as a consequence, there is a lack of information on insect species diversity within the CFR, although their functional significance is appreciated.

2.3.6 Fire regime

Fynbos is a fire driven ecosystem and requires fire to maintain its diversity, ecosystem processes and healthy plant and animal communities. Fynbos diversity is driven by fire frequency, - intensity, - season and the size of the fire (Cowling and Richardson 1995).

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 27

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

The influence of these factors may be described in the following way:

Fire frequency, this is the interval between subsequent fires. Fynbos, which is frequently burnt, shows a marked reduction in structure from tall scrubland to a low herbaceous scrubland. Frequent fires will lead to the irreversible loss of species, annuals dominate and there is a loss of diversity. On the other hand, long periods between fires also leads to a reduction in diversity and loss of species, as woody vegetation dominates and there is a significant build-up of dead plant material, referred to as senescence (no regeneration take place in this phase).

Fire Season, this refers to the season when a fire occurs. The effect of season varies vastly amongst different species and plant communities. Fires that normally occur in the dry summer or autumn (November to April) are considered to be "natural" in the fynbos environment.

Fire intensity, this is how hot the fire is burning. Fire intensity plays a large role in the plant community composition, e.g. high fire intensity could decrease the survival rate of sprouting species and could favour more fleshy larger seed species while lower intensity fires favouring graminoid and restoid herbs over woody elements. Above ground biomass varies from 10 tons/ha to 64 tons/ha in mature stands. Fires therefore generally have a high intensity.

Fire size. Regeneration of many fynbos species is dependent on the extent to which seeds are consumed by rodents, insects and other seed-eaters (granivores). Small burnt patches attract granivores, grazers and browsers from the surrounding unburnt veld, it is therefore important to ensure that burnt patches are of a reasonable size. The minimum size should be at least 25 ha to minimise the impacts of herbivores and granivores.

The effects of the fire regime on the vegetation types at Hopefield Private Nature Reserve and their respective structures and dynamics have to be fully understood before any crucial management decisions are taken. In a situation such as this where so little baseline information is available seeking specialist advice is a pre-requisite for any management related use of fire.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 28

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

2.3.6 Alien Invasive species

The only invasive species found on the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve were Scattered Rooikrans / Red Eye ( Acacia cyclops ) and Eucalyptus windrows are present on the northern boundary of the PA (Ranger and Du Plessis 2018).

Importantly the HPNR may, in future, be subjected to increased invasion by Invasive Alien Plants and / other ornamental plants resulting from illegal dumping of garden waste within the PA.

No faunal prohibited or listed species were noted or any sign of their presence at any of the sites during the field assessment. However, though not listed, stray dogs and domestic cats may impact on the indigenous wildlife populations if not managed pro- actively.

House Sparrows ( Passer domesticus ) and Common Starling ( Sturnus vulgaris ) are widespread in the entire area and provincially. Although they are both prohibited species, control measures need a National and Provincial Strategy as control at a Municipal or PA level is not feasible. These species are highly mobile and able to cover large distances and would therefore easily disperse back to the PA from surrounding areas (Ranger and Du Plessis 2018).

2.4 Socio-Political context

The Saldanha Bay Municipality covers an area of 2 015 km² (approximately 166 565,48 hectares) and has a coastline of 238km. In total 6.5% of the geographical land is urban and 93.5% rural land.

Overall the Saldanha Bay Municipality constitutes 6.4% of the entire West Coast geographical area, making it the smallest Local Municipal Area in the West Coast District. The domain of the SBM includes the towns of Hopefield, Langebaan, Saldanha, , , Paternoster and St Helenabaai. The

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 29

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019 administrative centre is the town of Vredenburg which is located approximately 25 km to the south east of the HPNR.

SBM has the second largest population of 111 173 (2011 Stats: 99 193) in the West Coast District according to the 2016 Community Survey conducted by Statistics South Africa. The forecasts of the Western Cape Department of Social Development are that the total population will gradually increase across the 5-year IDP planning cycle and is expected to reach 122 265 by 2023. This equates to an approximate 9.8 % growth in the 2017 base estimate (Saldanha Bay Municipality 2019).

The 2016 community results revealed a strong concentration of persons within the age category of 15-34 years at 40 696 in comparison to the 2011 statistics which reflected a total of 36 264.

The annual income for households living within the SBM, are divided into three categories (the proportion of people that fall within the low, middle and high income brackets). Poor households fall under the low income bracket, which ranges from no income to just under R50 000.00 annually (R4166.00 per month). An increase in living standards can be evidenced by a rising number of households entering the middle and high income brackets.

Most people are employed by the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Sector and employment is further supported by secondary sectors such as the manufacturing, construction, commercial services, government and community, social and the personal services sectors (Saldanha Bay Municipality 2017).

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 30

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

2.5 Regional and Local planning Context

2.5.1 Regional context

According to Maree and Vromans (2010), the five local municipalities within the West Coast District (Saldanha Bay, Bergrivier, Cederberg, Swartland and Matzikama) lie within two of South Africa’s internationally acclaimed biodiversity hotspots, namely, the Greater Cape Floristic Region (GCFR) and the Succulent Karoo.

The GCFR is one of only six Floristic Regions in the world, and is the only one largely confined to a single country (the Succulent Karoo component extends into southern Namibia). It is also by far the smallest floristic region, occupying only 0.2% of the world’s land surface, and supporting about 11500 plant species, over half of all the plant species in South Africa (on 12% of the land area). At least 70% of all the species in the Cape Region do not occur elsewhere, and many have very small home ranges (these are known as narrow endemics).

Less known is the fact that the CFR has high animal diversity including both vertebrates and invertebrates. This is particularly the case with reptile, amphibian and insect species which have a very rich diversity. Furthermore, the CFR is a priority area for freshwater fish endemic to the region and finally avian fauna endemic to South Africa.

Many of the lowland habitats are under pressure from agriculture, urbanisation and alien plants, and thus many of the range restricted species are also under severe threat of extinction, as habitat is reduced to extremely small fragments.

The HPNR is considered to be part of the West Strandveld Bioregion (Mucina & Rutherford 2006), which is part of the Fynbos Biome, located within what is now known as the Core Region of the Greater Cape Floristic Region (GCFR) (Manning & Goldblatt 2012).

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 31

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

2.5.2 Local planning (Biodiversity plans)

Biodiversity Sector Plans (BSP) provide a way forward in reconciling the conflict between exploitative resource use activities and the maintenance of natural systems. They provide the biodiversity information needed for landuse planning and decision- making and other multi-sectorial planning processes in the form of;

• Critical Biodiversity Areas Maps; • A Biodiversity Sector Plan Handbook, which includes a Biodiversity Profile for these municipalities, and land and resource-use guidelines; • GIS (Geographical Information Systems) shapefiles; and • Technical reports .

The BSP includes important spatial information in the following GIS shapefiles, Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBA) (terrestrial); Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBA) (aquatic) and their buffers, Ecological Support Areas (ESA) and Critical Ecological Support Areas (CESA) amongst others.

According to the Biodiversity Sector Plan for the Saldanha Bay, Bergrivier, Swartland, Cederberg and Matzikama Municipalities, the HPNR falls outside a Critical Biodiversity Area (CBA) (Maree & Vromans, 2010), however it must be noted here that for formally proclaimed protected areas the same principles apply. Thus the requirement is full adherence to the CBA guidelines within a PA of high conservation value. Figure 5: Hopefield Private Nature Reserve Critical Biodiversity Areas

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 32

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Figure 5 : Hopefield Private Nature Reserve a Critical Biodiversity Area.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 33

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBA’s) are those terrestrial (land) and aquatic (water) areas which must be safeguarded in their natural state as they are critical for conserving biodiversity pattern and maintaining ecosystem functioning. These areas include:

• Areas requiring safeguarding in order to meet National biodiversity thresholds; • Areas required to ensure the continued existence and functioning of species and ecosystems, including the delivery of ecosystem services; and/or • Special Habitats or locations where Species of Special Concern occur (Maree and Vromans 2010)

Desired management for a CBA, and in this case applicable to the HPNR is to maintain the natural land, rehabilitate degraded areas to natural or near natural and to manage the area in such a way as to prevent any further degradation.

Table 1, describes the land and resource use guidelines applicable for terrestrial CBA’s.

Table 1: Land and Resource use guidelines for terrestrial CBA’s. Land and resource Spatial Planning Category use guidelines matrix Conservation Yes

Agriculture: Intensive agriculture or high impact (includes No nuisance and space extensive agricultural enterprises) Agriculture: Extensive agriculture with low impact Restricted

Holiday accommodation Restricted

Rural housing (RH) – (Low Density RH: Consolidation of Restricted rural erven for conservation) Rural housing (On-Farm workers Settlement) No Tourist and recreational facilities – low impact: Lecture rooms, restrooms, restaurants, gift shops and outdoor Restricted recreation) Tourist and recreational facilities – high impact (golf , No polo, and housing eco-estates)

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 34

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Rural business (Place Bound) Restricted

Rural business (Non Place Bound) No

Rural industry NO No

Small holdings No

Community facilities and institutions No

Infrastructure installations Restricted

Existing settlements (Urban expansion) No

New settlements No

# Yes = encouraged; No = Discouraged and Restricted = Land-use possible under strict controls only in order to avoid impacts on biodiversity.

Table 1 : Land and Resource use guidelines for terrestrial CBA’s (Adapted from Maree & Vromans, 2010).

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 35

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 3 : LEGAL STATUS

3.1 Legal status

3.1.1 Name and legal designations

The Hopefield Private Nature Reserve (HPNR) was proclaimed under Section 12 (4) of the Nature and Environmental Conservation Ordinance, (Ordinance 19 of 1974) on the 7 th May 1982. The HPNR is therefore recognised as a Nature Reserve under the National Environmental Management Protected Areas Act (NEM:PAA) (Act No. 57 of 2003). See Attachment 1 – PN 337 of 1982.

3.1.2 Contractual agreements

No formal contractual agreements exist within the PA.

3.1.3 Location, extent and highest point

Hopefield PNR is 1887,79 ha’s in size and is located on Farm 304, Hopefield. The reserve falls within the 3318AB quarter degree grid square and the centre of the reserve is located at 33.056275S and 18.277203”E. (See Figure 2 - Locality of the HPNR)

The highest point of the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve is 100 m.a.s.l.

See Figure 3 – Geology and topography of the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 36

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

3.1.4 Municipal jurisdiction

The Hopefield Private Nature Reserve is situated within the West Coast District Municipality (WCDM) and within the Saldanha Bay Local Municipal area (SBM), which is the Local Authority. The municipal area extends over ±2015 km² and extends along 238 km of coastline.

In terms of the Municipal Systems Act (Act No.32 of 2000), local municipalities in South Africa are required to use integrated development planning to plan future development in their area. An Integrated Development Plan (IDP) is a 5-year strategic plan within which the municipal strategic and budget priorities are set.

An IDP is intended to be the principal strategic instrument that informs planning and development within a municipality with the aim of integrating and coordinating the work of local and other spheres of government, including how the environment will be managed and protected. Among the key components of an IDP are disaster management plans and a Spatial Development Framework (SDF). SDFs are essentially the spatial reflection of a municipal IDP. Local municipalities are responsible for producing and coordinating IDPs and SDFs, in consultation with stakeholders who can influence or be influenced by development and other changes in the area. All government departments working in an area are encouraged to refer to the IDP to ensure integration and alignment of work. As such IDPs and SDFs are tools for integrating social, economic and environmental issues and development within a municipality.

Since biodiversity is a fundamental component of sustainable development, SDFs and IDPs offer an opportunity to ensure that biodiversity priorities are incorporated into planning processes. In turn, the identification of biodiversity-related projects for the IDP can support local economic development and poverty alleviation.

The SBM SDF has incorporated statutory conservation areas (along with critical biodiversity areas, conservation priority zones, critical, irreplaceable and restorable biodiversity sites, public conservation areas and private conservation areas) in its Core 1 category, i.e. conservation worthy / dependent areas.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 37

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

The SBM IDPs and SDFs are updated every five years and must indicate the desired patterns of landuse for the municipality and provide strategic guidance regarding the location and form of development, as well as conservation, within the municipality. An improved integration of the PA into municipal planning frameworks presents an opportunity for protected area mainstreaming and incorporation of appropriate buffering mechanisms around protected areas. The current IDP is in effect from 2017 – 2022.

Land use management in the SB municipal area is guided by the:

• SDF which provides spatial directives for the type of development and where it can occur, and land use schemes (also known as zoning schemes) which provides use rights and development parameters thereof and the • The National Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, no 16 of 2013 (SPLUMA), the Western Cape Land Use Planning Act, No 3 of 2014 (LUPA), and; • The Saldanha Bay Municipality Land Use Planning By-law provides the legislative framework for the utilisation of the two instruments.

The SDF was approved in 2019 in terms of the Municipal System Act (Act No.32 of 2000). Since then significant legislative changes have occurred in the planning regime with the promulgation of the National Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, no 16 of 2013 (SPLUMA), the Western Cape Land Use Planning Act, No 3 of 2014 (LUPA) and the Saldanha Bay Municipality Land Use Planning By- law. This new legislation now gives the legal directive for the compilation of a SDF and has made provision for very specific measures according to which SDF’s should be drafted and greater clarity on the aspects they should address. As a core component of an IDP the SDF is linked to the cycle of the IDP and thus the compilation of a new SDF is required every five (5) years.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 38

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 4 : POLICY FRAMEWORK

All conservation management authorities are subjected to the Constitution for South Africa, National Legislation and various conservation strategies and action plans, while government priorities will take precedence. This section deals with the policy framework of the SBM, as the management authority to implement this PAMP.

4.1 Financial

Policy Statement - The PA Management will adhere to , and responsively manage the allocation of budget, revenue raising activities and expenditure; ensure good financial management supporting the achievement of the objectives of this plan; comply with the Public Finance Management Act (No.1 of 1999) and comply with the SBM financial policies and procedures.

In the management and control of the HPNR, the Saldanha Bay Municipality will plan, budget and audit the implementation of this plan and the expenditure of the allocated budget on an annual basis.

4.2 Biodiversity management

Policy Statement – The Saldanha Bay Municipality undertakes to manage and conserve the indigenous and endemic biodiversity in such a way that the character, ecological pattern and processes of the HPNR are maintained and protected in perpetuity.

4.3 Safety and Security

Policy Statement – The Saldanha Bay Municipality will at all times maintain access controls and where required apply law enforcement measures to prevent degradation to the important terrestrial values present on the PA.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 39

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

The SBM have a by-law in place for the management and enforcement of safety and security that applies to all open spaces under their jurisdiction.

4.4 Resource use and community involvement

Policy Statement – The SBM will promote the sustainable use of environmental resources and engage and include the community in the use and management of these resources.

In South Africa, it is entrenched practice to involve communities in the management of protected areas. This practice provides opportunity to engage and agree on a shared vision for the PA, making communities equal partners in the engagement process and providing for the alignment of conservation action objectives and achievable deliverables.

In terms of resource use the local community at Hopefield must engage with the PAAC to determine their natural resource requirements.

The Hopefield community, specifically the youth and the surrounding landowners and SANParks must be a key focus for engagement during the implementation of this PAMP. The Protected Area Advisory Committee (PAAC) must develop and maintain guidelines for the management of resource use and community engagement and involvement.

4.5 Cultural resource management

Policy Statement - The Saldanha Bay Municipality undertakes to manage and conserve the cultural historical, archaeological and paleontological heritage assets for the future generations in a manner that is fully aligned to National Legislation.

For monitoring, the condition of focal heritage values are indicators of management effectiveness through the METT-SA Assessment process.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 40

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

4.6 Neighbouring relationships

Policy Statement – The SBM undertakes to establish a formal inclusive community structure to advise and support the management of the PA.

The HPNR Protected Advisory (PAAC) will be the institutionalised structure to engage with in instances where conflict resolution is required and to resolve issues, provide support, guide and monitor implementation of this PAMP. See Attachment 2 – Terms of Reference for a PAAC.

4.7 Baseline data, monitoring and research

Policy Statement - The Saldanha Bay Mun icipality commit s to the continuous support of key role-players, partners and institutions in the collection of baseline data, facilitation of monitoring activities and the identification of research opportunities that could be used to improve the knowledge base and improve management effectiveness.

4.8 Access

Policy Statement – The SBM will at all times control access to the PA to ensure the conservation of Biodiversity and Heritage Values in perpetuity.

Access control is important to prevent environmental impacts that are associated with the over utilisation of resources and illegal activities that may fundamentally undermine the conservation values of the Protected Area.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 41

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

4.9 Administrative support

Policy Statement – The SBM undertakes to undertake integrated development planning to plan future development in their area in accordance with the Municipal Systems Act (Act No.32 of 2000).

An Integrated Development Plan (IDP) is a five-year strategic plan in which the municipal strategic and budget priorities are set. The SBM further supports the PA by providing management funding as part of their service delivery mandate. It is very important that the programmes and projects identified in the PAMP are incorporated and included in the IDP process.

4.10 Protected Area Management Effectiveness

Policy Statement – The SBM undertakes to track management effectiveness through the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) adopted by the National Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) and adapted to South African conditions (METT-SA) and report to the DEA in accordance with this assessment tool.

The IUCN defines management effectiveness evaluation as the assessment of how well a protected area is being managed – primarily the extent to which management is protecting values and achieving goals and objectives (Hockings et al. 2015)

The METT does not replace fine scale monitoring and evaluation of specifics; rather it is a strategic tool for the assessment of overall management effectiveness. NB this must not been seen as a performance audit of the PA Manager.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 42

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

4.11 Internal Rules

Policy Statement – The SBM undertakes to develop and implement PA rules in accordance with the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act (57/2003), as Amended in Act 31/2004, Section 52 and the Nature Conservation Ordinance and Provincial Notice (955/1975).

In terms of the above-mentioned Act, the management authority of a nature reserve may, in accordance with prescribed Norms and Standards, make rules for the proper administration of the area.

Rules made must be (1) consistent with the Act and the management plan for the area; (2) binding on all persons in the area, including visitors; and (3) may, as a condition for entry, provide for the imposition of fines for breaching of rules.

The internal rules for the proper administration of the PA are drafted in terms of Section 52 of the Act and Regulations for the Proper Administration of Special Nature Reserves, National Parks and World Heritage Sites (GNR 1061, GG28181).

4.12 Environmental Education and awareness

Policy Statement - The Saldanha Bay Municipality acknowledge s the importance of environmental interpretation and awareness and its contribution to the long-term protection of the HPNR and the biodiversity values and assets it contains. The SBM undertakes to improve environmental interpretation and undertake awareness raising on a continual basis.

4.13 Infrastructure maintenance and management

Policy Statement - The Saldanha Bay Municipality will develop, provide and maintain infrastructure that is needed for the effective management and protection of all assets.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 43

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 5 : CONSULTATION

5.1 Stakeholder Engagement Process

Participatory planning and management are needed to mainstream protected areas as natural solutions to emerging challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, disaster risk reduction, food and water security, providing benefits to human health, livelihoods and well-being. Therefor the integration of protected areas into the wider landscape is necessary and management must promote participation by relevant stakeholders. (CapeNature 2018).

Stakeholder engagement essentially takes place throughout the adaptive management cycle, however, at the outset of the planning process for the HPNR, the stakeholder analysis process identified key stakeholders.

Section 39(3) of the Act states that all persons who may be interested in, or affected by, the management plan are to be given the opportunity to comment on the management plan. Section 41(2)(e) requires that the management plan contains procedures for stakeholder participation including participation by the owner, and/or any local community or interested party.

A process of extensive public participation of the draft management plan was initiated by invitation to the public via the media, e-mail, post, telephone and personal invitation to register their interest. A stakeholder register, maintained by the FES lists registered interested and affected parties. The draft management plan was also placed at relevant libraries and on the SBM website, inviting written comment on the draft management plan for a period of 30 days.

Registered interested and affected parties were invited to a public meeting if needed and provided the opportunity to raise concerns and provide comment. Based on a summary report of the outcomes of the public meeting, as well as written comments and responses received, the management plan was amended where relevant, and feedback provided to registered interested and affected parties. See Appendix 3 - Stakeholder Engagement Process.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 44

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

5.2 Establishment of Protected Area Advisory Committee (PAAC)

A Protected Area Advisory committee (PAAC) must be establish to provide support and advice to the SBM in order to strengthen capacity, improve the knowledge base and ensure political support and buy in at strategic levels within the Saldanha Bay Municipality.

The PAAC could be comprised of representatives from the Saldanha Bay Municipality, West Coast District Municipality, West Coast Biosphere Reserve, CapeNature, SANParks, Dept. of Environmental Affairs & Development Planning, Elandsfontein, representatives from the Hopefield community as well as other Interested and Affected Parties that registered during the stakeholder engagement process. See Attachment 2– Proposed Terms of Reference for the PAAC.

5.3 Effective participation within the Protected Area Advisory Committee (PAAC)

Once the PAAC has been established the committee must actively engage and participate in addressing the management challenges of HPNR. The SBM must ensure that the following recommendations are implemented:

• Develop an annual action list for the PAAC • Monitor the success of implementation of these planned activities and the APO. • Adapt and change activities when needed.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 45

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 6 : PURPOSE and VISION

The purpose and vision for the HPNR stems from an understanding of the policy framework, values and key attributes, threats and contributing factors that have bearing on the ultimate condition of the environment that protected area management is working to achieve.

Here a deviation from the stakeholder engagement process followed by CapeNature “the Open Source methodology” has been followed. This was done as the PA in question is more akin to a Stewardship site than a complex of provincial PA’s for which the Open Source approach is more suited.

Consultation with CapeNature’s Stewardship Programme provided the reasons for the approach followed in this instance:

• The approach is lengthy (taking up to 18 months) and would be very expensive to run. • The HPNR, is too small to use this methodology – it works well in complexes of statutory protected areas managed as Provincial or National Parks i.e. areas that have extensive biodiversity and cultural historical data available and consist of multiple conservation estates over large landscapes; • The HPNR is isolated and cannot expand to include other areas under the management authority of the SBM; • The SBM has no capacity to engage in stewardship arrangements with neighbouring properties; • That the approach to this PAMP must rather focus on the identification of Management Programmes that are supported with the identification of projects and the implementation of actions. A high level strategic management approach is therefore impractical in this instance;

Please note however that some of the principles of this approach are discussed in the next section of the PAMP.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 46

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

6.1 Key determining factors

6.1.1 Local connectivity

Corridors link habitats, ecosystems or undeveloped areas and physically connect habitat patches. Small patches of surviving habitat can also serve as “stepping stones” that link fragmented ecosystems by ensuring that certain ecological processes are maintained within and between groups of habitat fragments.

According to SANParks (2013) the HPNR is situated within the West Coast National Park (WCNP) buffer area and therefore provides a critical contribution in the creation of a buffer around the WCNP. This buffer area will guide the assessment of future development that may have an influence or impact on the WCNP.

The HPNR is an important stepping stone to create a coastal inland corridor to the east. This falls within the SANParks expansion strategy which aims to expand the WCNP in an easterly direction to include more Endangered vegetation types. This corridor is important to buffer the ecosystem types from the impacts of climate change (both sea level rise, freshwater flooding and to allow for the movement of species) and to provide valuable ecosystem services. As a consequence, the long- term integrity and functioning of the HPNR is important as this is one of few remaining areas of Hopefield Sand Fynbos that has not been developed. It must be noted that the HPNR is already link with the WCNP to the southwest of Hopefield.

6.1.2 Vegetation Hopefield Sand Fynbos is listed as an Endangered vegetation type with a conservation target of 30%. Very small portions are currently protected within the WCNP while the HPNR and the Private Nature Reserve are contributing (2%) to the conservation target. Some (40%) of this vegetation type is already transformed by cultivation and grazing. Endemic taxa include the following; low shrubs Leucospermun tomentosum and Relhania rotundifolia, Herbs – Heliophila patens and Lepidium flexuosum as well as the Geophytic Herb, Oxalis suavis.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 47

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

See figure 4 – Vegetation type at the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve

6.1.3 Other key determining factors

The following factor are additional and very important key determining factors at HPNR.

• The PA is within the identified Buffer Area of the West Coast National Park;

6.2 Management intent and desire state

The HPNR will be managed primarily for the protection of the Endangered Hopefield Sand Fynbos vegetation type which is the only ecosystem type present within the boundaries of the PA. The desired state is to achieve the in-perpetuity protection of this vegetation / ecosystem type in a pristine condition.

6.3 Purpose

The purpose of the HPNR is the foundation on which all future actions are based in keeping with the Vision, Mission and Strategic Objectives of the SBM and objectives of the Act.

According to Section 17 of the Act, the primary purpose of declaring protected areas is: to protect ecologically viable areas representative of South Africa’s biological diversity and its natural landscapes and seascapes in a system of protected areas.

The HPNR can be declared for one or more of the following purposes:

• to protect ecologically viable areas, representative of South Africa’s biological diversity and its natural landscapes and seascapes in a system of protected areas; • to preserve the ecological integrity of those areas; • to conserve biodiversity in those areas;

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 48

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

• to protect areas representative of all ecosystems, habitats and species naturally occurring in South Africa; • to protect South Africa’s threatened or rare species; • to protect an area which is vulnerable or ecologically sensitive; • to assist in ensuring the sustained supply of environmental goods and services; • to provide for the sustainable use of natural and biological resources; • to create or augment destinations for nature-based tourism; • generally, to contribute to human, social, cultural, spiritual and economic development; or • to rehabilitate and restore degraded ecosystems and promote the recovery of endangered and vulnerable species.

The purpose of the HPNR is therefore to contribute to the protection of a viable area of Hopefield Sand Fynbos.

6.4 Threats

A number of threats have been identified that may impact on the ability of the HPNR to achieve its purpose, these include:

• Inappropriate fire regime (Medium): Too frequent or fires exceeding the ecological threshold may have far reaching ecological impacts and may cause impacts on the natural ecosystem;

• Illegal hunting and poaching (Medium): This impact has its origin in the neighbouring communities when people hunt within the PA and / or stray dogs gain access to the PA.

• Alien and invasive flora (Medium): Although infestation is currently at a very low level it may worsen if active management interventions to prevent new invasion, as noted above, are not sustained (Ranger and Du Plessis 2018).

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 49

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

• Unregulated utilisation of natural resources (Low): Harvesting and utilisation of natural resources without authorisation undermines appropriate resource management. Additionally, there is opportunity for improved environmental awareness and a management authority understanding of sustainable resource utilisation trends.

6.5 Summary of management challenges and opportunities

The following management challenges and opportunities are applicable to the HPNR;

Aspect of management Challenges and Opportunities

Management of indigenous plant Little is known of special, rare and endemic and animal species. species that occur on the HPNR and activities should be focused on baseline data collection to inform decision making and management.

Fire management. The vegetation type occurring on the site is prone to fire. The primary management activity would therefore be to prevent wildfires and to prevent damage to the surrounding smallholdings and infrastructure at the urban interface of Hopefield. The SBM is a member of the Greater Cederberg Fire Protection Association (GCFPA) an institution that promotes integrated fire management.

Invasive species management. The plan has been completed and requires funding for implementation.

Wildlife management. In this instance naturally occurring wildlife should not require management – it is important though that care is taken to

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 50

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

manage stray domestic animals and illegal hunting / poaching by visitors to the PA. Rehabilitation. There are various roads and sites that need rehabilitation after the completion of the well drilling project.

Erosion prevention and control. Soils are highly sensitive to erosion by wind and management should focus on

prevention of impacts. Monitoring and Baseline data Little or no Baseline data exists for the PA collection. and this should be a high priority management activity for implementation.

Biodiversity security. The local authority PA was proclaimed in 1982. The staff organogram needs

attention, staff need to be trained and partnerships established with other institutions or civil society organisations to enforce the laws. Sufficient funding should be secured to ensure that the entrance gate is operational at all times to control access.

Environmental awareness and Environmental awareness and education education. levels need to increase to ensure buy-in from politicians and the surrounding community. Legal compliance . The responsibility for legal compliance rests with the Management Authority (SBM) and the management challenge are to ensure available capacity within the organisation to comply with the legislative requirements.

Maintenance and development of Effective maintenance and development Infrastructure. programs are needed to keep the Protected Area safe, secured and operational to prevent the degradation of a sensitive

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 51

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

environment.

Administration. Effective and efficient administration systems are needed. Fill any vacant positions, train staff members, appoint service providers and ensure stakeholder involvement.

Costing of the PAMP. The SBM must use the APO provided as part of this PAMP to cost all management activities, ensure that management costs associated with the HPNR are incorporated in the IDP Process and with the assistance of the PAAC secure external funding.

Management effectiveness. Management effectiveness using the METT will be audited annually. The audit should feed back into the Management Plan and its associated activities. The Management Plan must be adapted based on the outcome of the audit process as needed.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 52

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

6.6 Vision

The HPNR provides an opportunity to strategically, and adaptively, manage a PA to;

• Provide for the protection of an under-represented vegetation type that is endangered. • Provide a building block in the landscape supporting the creation of a natural climate change corridor, • Manage possible impacts caused by alien invasive species and uncontrolled fires.

The vision for the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve therefor is … “to manage, conserve the natural assets and aesthetic values in a sustainable way for the benefit of current and future generations”.

6.7 Goals and objectives

Goals are underpinned by strategies, objectives and indicators and are fundamental for the assessment of protected area management effectiveness and the process of management.

These goals and objectives aim to maintain the healthy ecological infrastructure which supports life on earth and which provide climate change resilience. To reach these goals management needs to achieve the following objectives:

The following objectives have been identified for the PA;

• Objective 1: To protect representative areas, ecosystems, habitats and species that are occur naturally in the PA; • Objective 2: Maintain habitat integrity to secure ecological processes and linkages via the West Coast National Park inland corridor. • Objective 3: Rehabilitate and restore degraded areas; • Objective 4: Ensure the implementation of effective conservation management interventions to enhance biodiversity conservation and rehabilitation;

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 53

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

• Objective 5: Ensure that a functional administrative system exists that can contribute to the management effectiveness and stakeholder involvement; • Objective 6: Ensure the protection of historical, archaeological and paleontological resources and • Objective 7: Ensure that funding is available to implement the PAMP.

6.8 Key performance areas

These management objectives were derived from the vision and aims and are grouped into Key Performance Areas (KPA’s), the achievement of which must be obtained to support the management purpose for the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve.

Objectives are prioritised through the development of action plans which are set out in the Operational Management Framework.

Table 2 sets out the key performance areas, the objective for each key performance area and the key deliverables, required to realise the objectives.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 54

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Table 2 Key Deliverables, Objectives and Strategies for the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve Key Performance Areas Objective Strategies

BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT

FIRE MANAGEMENT

Reduction/Prevention Adhere to the National of the spread of Veld and Forest Fire Act. uncontrolled / wild fires.

Maintain partnerships to improve fire management i.e. Fire management - The Facilitate and forge Maintain membership vegetation type on the PA is partnerships to improve of the Greater Hopefield Sand Fynbos fire management. (Endangered) which is fire prone CederbergnFire and will burn at frequencies Protection between 12 and 15 years. Association. Reduce wildfires resulting from human negligence and Improve fire awareness. accidental fires that may be ignited by visitors to the PA.

ALIEN INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES MANAGEMENT

Enhance biodiversity All alien and invasive protection and species are already conservation. mapped. Invasive species management Ensure conservation of - Very scattered alien invasive species and ecological plant species occur on the PA. processes by Implement the While domestic pets (cats and maintaining and approved alien dogs) from the Hopefield may improving ecosystem invasive species impact on the PA. function. control programme.

Implement effective integrated alien invasive

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 55

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

control program.

WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT To enhance biodiversity Prevent the protection and introduction of Alien conservation. Invasive Species.

Implement a program to remove all domestic animals from the PA.

Wildlife management - In this Adhere to instance naturally occurring Ensure conservation of CapeNature policies wildlife should not require species and processes relating to the management. by maintaining and introduction and improving ecosystem translocation of function. species. Identify species that are poached on a regular basis.

Prevent poaching of wildlife.

EROSION PREVENTION AND CONTROL

Prevent erosion impacts. Rehabilitate damaged and impacted areas. Ensure the conservation of biodiversity. Prevent access to those areas to halt Erosion management – further degradation. Erosion, especially wind erosion can accelerate on recently Prevent and mitigate denuded areas after the soil erosion. establishment of the Hopefield borehole system. Institute a monitoring system to assess the Monitor the success of success of erosion control management strategies. interventions.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 56

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

REHABILITATION

Rehabilitation - Successful Ensure the conservation Prevent any impacts of biodiversity. rehabilitation of denuded areas that negatively after the construction of the influence the borehole system. This must rehabilitation process e.g. wind erosion. adhere to the DEA&DP approved Environmental Management Identify methods to be Programme. implemented that are Identify methods to fast able to fast track the track rehabilitation as rehabilitation and when needed. interventions.

Institute a monitoring and auditing system and process e.g. fixed point photos may be used to monitor Monitor and audit the rehabilitation success success of rehabilitation. over time.

MONITORING AND BASELINE DATA COLLECTION Collect and collate baseline and research data from adjacent areas if available.

Baseline data collection and Priority specimens monitoring – Baseline should be submitted information is needed to build an to CapeNature Improve the biodiversity inventory of biodiversity on the Scientific Services. PA and to determine further baseline knowledge of management interventions and Hopefield Private Nature Establish the HPNR activities. Projects should focus Reserve as a research site at on aspects such as species tertiary academic inventories and rehabilitation institutions. success. Ensure that Priority Specimens are included in the CapeNature Conservation

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 57

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Services Ecological Matrix.

BIODIVERSITY SECURITY

Enhance long term Implement biodiversity protection recommendations of and conservation. this plan to ensure the long-term protection Biodiversity security - The of biodiversity for the HPNR is recognised as a PA site. under the National Environmental Implement law Management Protected Areas Ensure conservation of enforcement activities. Act (NEM:PAA) (Act No. 57 of species and ecological 2003). processes by preventing The appropriate negative impacts and zoning should be illegal activities. allocated to these reserve in SBM Integrated Zoning Schemes.

Biodiversity Connectivity – Prevent any activities that may impact Maintain linkages to support the Maintain the corridor. movement of species along the connectivity within the coastal inland corridor. identified corridor.

Implement access control and prevent Access control and law Enhance long term illegal activities. enforcement – prevent illegal biodiversity protection Ensure funding is activities in the PA. and conservation. available for law enforcement activities.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 58

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Engage in Ensure conservation of partnerships with other institutions such species and ecological as SAPS and processes by preventing SANParks to ensure negative impacts and their participation in law enforcement illegal activities. within the PA as relevant.

PREVENT NEGATIVE IMPACTS CAUSED BY UNCONTROLLED ACCESS

ACCESS CONTROL, EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT

Various education and awareness Design and produce materials are signboards that inform the available – Establish public that they are formalised Control mechanisms - Effective entering a PA and this partnerships with access control mechanisms are sign must also showcase partners to obtain needed to prevent degradation of what is permitted in the and distribute the environment. It must be PA. available materials. noted here that no access gates are present, no fences exist and Design and erect site- no recreational opportunities are specific awareness Develop and erect allowed within the PA. Control signage at strategic awareness and should rather focus on a much points. education signs. softer approach to access control. Ensure that all law enforcement staff are Train, equip and trained, equipped and build capacity of law capacitated to enforce the enforcement officers. rules and regulations of the PA.

Ensure that law Law enforcement – Effective Enforce National Acts, enforcement officers law enforcement capacity is Municipal By-Laws and are capacitated to required to prevent any negative the general rules and enforce National impacts on the PA caused by regulations of the PA. Acts, By-laws and illegal activities. general rules and regulations of the

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 59

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

PA.

Ensure that law enforcement officers Enforce National Acts, are capacitated to Municipal By-Laws and enforce National the general rules and Acts, By-laws and regulations of the PA. general rules and regulations of the PA.

Complete the annual To implement effective METT assessment. management systems.

The auditing system To implement effective has informed management systems. management decision making.

INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT

Infrastructure management and maintenance - is required for effective biodiversity management and to prevent Ensure that budgets Maintain roads to prevent degradation of the PA and the are available for erosion. surrounding environment. maintenance. Maintenance of existing infrastructure (roads and well points is needed).

MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS

Ensure report back Management effectiveness - of the outcomes of will be audited annually and this Undertake METT management Management Plan and its Assessments. effectiveness audits associated activities must be adapted as required to PAAC and DEA.

Ensure that audit

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 60

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

recommendations feed into the adaptive management cycle

ADMINISTRATION

Filling of all vacant positions, training of staff, effective and efficient Ensure legal financial procurement, compliance with all partnerships and Administrative management - relevant legislation stakeholder engagement is required to support the and policies. implementation of the PAMP. are needed to support the implementation of the PAMP.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 61

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 7 – ZONING PLAN

7.1 Protected Area in the Context of Municipal Integrated Development planning

The HPNR is described in the SBM IDP (2019 – 2022), but no evidence of potential conflict development is noted in the IDP and SDF which may influence the PA. See regional and local planning in Section 2.5 and 6.1.1. It is very important that projects identified in this PAMP are included in the IDP.

7.2 Protected Area Zonation

Protected area zonation provides a standard framework of formal guidelines for conservation, access and use for particular areas and is underpinned by the sensitivity analysis.

Zonation goes beyond natural resource protection and must also provide for:

• Appropriate visitor experience; • Access and appropriate access management; • Environmental education and commercial activities that remain aligned with the protected area objectives and purpose.

The HPNR does not provide any visitor facilities and therefore the entire PA will be zoned as a “Species and Habitat Protection Zone”.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 62

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Table 3 – Zonation guidelines for the HPNR (Adapted from CapeNature 2018)

Zonation Description Activities allowed Applicable Category areas at HPNR Species and Areas for the None - only the The entire PA habitat protection protection of maintenance of the will fall within zone species or habitats boreholes, alien this zonation of special invasive plant category due to conservation clearing and the the PA concern. establishment of contribution to fire breaks. the national conservation targets of protecting the Endangered Hopefield Sand Fynbos – the PA is one of the largest areas that still are intact.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 63

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

7.3 Protected Area Zone of Influence

According to the Norms and Standards attached to the Act require that a Zone of Influence (ZOI) must be identified for each protected area and that such programmes must focus on the following;

• Encouraging the development and maintenance of good relations with neighbours, • Facilitate regular interaction between protected area management and neighbours, • that protected area staff regularly collaborate with partners, local communities and other organisations and • that neighbouring communities have relevant input into decisions relating to the protected area management (GG 382 of 31 March 2016).

The ZOI should thus facilitate integration and mainstreaming of conservation and sustainability in the surrounding land (Cape Nature 2018).

Thus, the ZOI provides a spatial scope of proactive engagement for any activities, developments, tourism and economic activity in the area that may require collaboration between SBM and its neighbours and stakeholders for management input and / or action.

The ZOI must include all proposed new developments that may have an impact on the HPNR, however as a commenting authority the Saldanha Bay Municipality must ensure that no developments that may affect or impact on the PA should be allowed.

Important to notice here as the HPNR falls within the West Coast National Park buffer zone – these are areas where land use changes could affect a National Park. The buffer zone, in combination with guidelines, will serve as a

• basis for identifying the focus areas in which park management and scientists should respond to EIA’s,

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 64

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

• helping to identify the sort of impacts that would be important at a particular site, and most importantly, • serving as the basis for integrating long term protection of a national park into the spatial development plans of municipalities (SDF/IDP) and other local authorities .

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 65

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 8 – ACCESS AND FACILITIES

The Hopefield Private Nature Reserve has no infrastructure except the recently approved Langebaan Road Aquifer Groundwater Infrastructure development project and the Elandsfontein access road (this is a registered servitude) See Attachment 7 – Registered Servitude). This project was a disaster management project (drought relief) and entailed the construction and the development of roads, boreholes (X10), pipelines and powerlines. See Attachment 4 : Environmental Authorisation (DEAP&DP REFERENCE: 3/5/R (2018/40).

8.1 Public Access and Management

Travelling from Malmesbury, the PA may be reached by turning off the R45 at the second turnoff into Hopefield. Follow Oak street, turning right at the Old Vredenburg Rd, turn left at the Skilpadbessie Rd, follow this dirt road to the edge of town. The PA will be on your right-hand side. No formal access gate is in place as this PA is not open for recreation purposes or access by the public.

8.2 Flight corridors

No registered flight corridors exist in the PA, however the military aircraft fly over the PA during training flights. These flight paths cannot be made public. South African Civil Aviation Authority provides rules regarding flights over PA, this includes a restriction of 2500 ft. above the highest point of the protected area.

8.3 Administrative and other facilities

No infrastructure exists on the PA (except as mentioned above relating to the development of the well field and associated infrastructure and the Elandsfontein access road a registered servitude See Attachment 7 . The SBM however have an administrative office in Hopefield. The operational support to the PA is delivered from the Vredenburg offices.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 66

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

8.3.1 Roads

Roads provide access to the boreholes for maintenance. The Elandsfontein access road is a registered servitude on the PA. Wind erosion may become a management problem in the future along these access routes. See Section 11 – Strategic Plan.

8.3.2 Buildings

No buildings are present in the PA. No buildings are planned, this is due to the sensitivity of the PA in terms of vegetation.

8.3.3 Fences

Fences are in place in some sections of the PA. This aspect of management requires attention. See Section 11 – Strategic Plan.

8.3.4 Signage

Signage is not present and needs to be designed and erected. Additional recommendations are contained in Section 11 – Strategic Plan. NB the signage should also focus on prohibited activities.

8.5 Servitudes

The access road to Elandsfontein is a registered servitude See Attachment 7 – Registered Servitude.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 67

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Figure 6 – Infrastructure at Hopefield Private Nature Reserve (Element Consulting Engineers)

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 68

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 9 – EXPANSION STRATEGY

As noted in this PAMP the HPNR is an important stepping stone in the SANParks inland corridor. Additionally the PA is included in the West Coast National Park Buffer Area.

Expansion is possible through the following properties:

• Farm 304/1 (317.71 ha) (the Hopefield Bombaan) - The property is owned by the Department of Public Works; • Consolidation of SBM properties around the HPNR – however this process needs community engagement and potentially the in-house capacity to manage stewardship agreements.

For the duration of this management plan it is recommended that the focus should be on building good relationships with neighbours through the PAAC. A solid collaborative base is essential before any negotiation for expansion is initiated. This is an important initiative but should be included for implementation after 2025.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 69

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 10 – CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

The concept development plan sets out the long-term plan for the development of the PA. Development should not negatively impact on the purpose of any of the determining factors of the PA and should take the conditions of the WCNP Buffer Areas into consideration (SANParks 2013).

No further development of the HPNR is envisaged by the SBM, the recent development of the boreholes was necessary for water security. This is sufficient and associated infrastructure must be maintained.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 70

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 11 : STRATEGIC PLAN

This section and the next section (costing) essentially provide a business plan for the following five years. This section deals with the operational management of the PA and all necessary operations are to be included here and should be specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and time bound (SMART) (Gowan and Mpongoma 2011).

The following guidelines were used to compile the strategic plan for the HPNR.

• The SBM policy statement supporting the implementation of each programme; • Identification of various projects; • Explanation for the need and desirability of each project; • Management recommendations and activities that should be implemented, and; • Provision of monitoring and baseline data collection measures in some instances.

Biodiversity management

11.1. PROGRAMME : INDIGENOUS VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 11.1.1.Project: Plant species list A comprehensive plant species list is necessary to make informative Explanation management decisions at the HPNR. Management Activities A baseline plant species assessment needs to be SBM Ongoing undertaken for the PA SBM and Use students, interested groups and volunteers to build other role- Ongoing on the initial study and information. players Submit new information to SANBI’s Threatened Species SBM Ongoing Programme. Develop and maintain a GIS based plant species SBM Ongoing

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 71

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019 database. Continuous updating of plant species Baseline data lists as more and more species are SBM Ongoing documented

11.1.2 Project: Research and other scientific papers As more relevant scientific papers are published for the PA, or areas adjacent to the HPNR, the SBM should source these papers to increase management capacity, the knowledge base and to Explanation implement new scientifically based management strategies. Similarly, botanical and other specialist studies / assessments undertaken during the EIA process in and around the PA can serve to increase baseline information. Management Activities Obtain relevant applicable scientific papers / reports for the PA, this should be co-ordinated with other SBM Ongoing stakeholders and interested parties wherever possible. Link the PA to research institutions and tertiary academic institutions to obtain new research papers. SBM Ongoing Ensure links with EIA review processes and information generation for the PA. Keep record of these papers/ reports at the office of the SBM Ongoing management authority.

11.2 PROGRAMME : RARE , ENDANGERED AND ENDEMIC PLANT SPECIES 11.2.1 Project: Map distribution Information on the locality of Rare, Endangered and Endemic Plant Explanation species is necessary to ensure effective management and monitoring of these populations. Management Activities Generate baseline information on any Rare, SBM Initially

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 72

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Endangered and Endemic plant species exist for the PA. Use students, interested groups and volunteers (CREW) SB M Ongoing to build on this initial identification and mapping. Expand to include other species of Conservation SB M Ongoing Concern. Maintain survey information on a GIS database for SBM Ongoing spatial reference. Print distribution maps to prevent impacts on plants, to SB M guide management interventions such as possible Ongoing impacts caused by visitors.

11.3 PROGRAMME : ALIEN INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT 11.3.1 Project: Fund and implement the available plan The presence of alien invasive species in the Western Cape is an ever-increasing threat and is posing one of the largest management challenges for Protected Areas. These species have a negative impact on indigenous species composition, changes in vegetation Explanation structure and changes the local fire regime. A comprehensive alien invasive plan, according to the Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 was compiled and approved by the Department of Environmental Affairs 2018 (Ranger and Du Plessis 2018).

Management Activities Implement recommendations of the plan (Ranger and Du SB M Once off Plessis 2018). Undertake follow up operations of cleared areas annually. SB M Annually

Ensure that no alien invasive plants are given the chance SB M Ongoing to establish. The existing alien invasive management plan will be the baseline Baseline data for alien invasive species management SBM Ongoing (Ranger and Du Plessis 2018).

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 73

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

11.4. PROGRAMME : FIRE MANAGEMENT 11.4.1 Project: Membership of the Greater Cederberg Fire Protection Association (GCFPA) The vegetation at the HPNR is fire prone. The fire frequency for this vegetation type is 12-15 years. Fires could start on adjacent municipal and privately-owned properties and will spread rapidly due to the vegetation age (>17 years).

Explanation To adhere to the National Veld and Forest Fire Act, Act 101,of 1998. Municipalities and or any state-owned land must join the local Fire Protection Association and adhere to their rules. The SBM is already a member of the GCFPA. The Act also prescribes that all landowners should have firebreaks, have trained staff with PPC & PPE and have adequate equipment. The SBM have a fire brigade services. Management Activities

Ensure that annual GCFPA membership fees are paid. SBM Once off

Adhere to the GCFPA rules and regulations SBM Ongoing Engage with the GCFPA and seek assistance from them for the use of their teams and to assist in integrated fire SBM Ongoing management activities. Ensure that the proposed firebreaks are established and SBM Ongoing maintained.

11.4.2 Project: Firebreaks Establish and maintain a firebreak system in adherence of the National Veld and Forest Fire Act, Act 101 of 1998, and to avoid the PA being burned by fires that start outside the PA or that can pose a threat to the Hopefield community. Additionally, effective awareness and a well capacitated Fire Brigade Service from the SBM will prevent disastrous fires.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 74

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Management Activities Adopt the fire break plan as suggested in this SBM management plan. See figure 7 – Fire break plan for Once off the HPNR.

Figure 7 - Fire break plan for the HPNR.

11.4.3 Project: Fire prevention As the PA is remote in terms of distance to the management authority, special care should be taken to prevent wildfires from Explanation starting within the PA and spreading to adjacent properties. Fires should be prevented through the implementation of various activities that focus on early detection and reporting. Management Activities

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 75

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Design, develop and erect fire awareness signs to inform SBM the visitors of the danger and consequences of fires as Once off well as the emergency number for the Fire Brigade Services. Undertake active law enforcement to enforce the rules SBM Ongoing and regulations to prevent fires from starting in the PA.

11.5 PROGRAM : TERRESTRIAL FAUNA SPECIES 11.5.1 Project: Species list A comprehensive terrestrial fauna species list is necessary to take Explanation informative management decisions at the HPNR – however no species-specific management interventions are currently foreseen. Management Activities A baseline study is needed to confirm the appended SBM species list. See Attachment 5 - Forms to complete Completed for Baseline data and Monitoring. Use students, interested groups and volunteers to build SBM Ongoing on this initial information. Develop and maintain a GIS based fauna species SBM Ongoing database.

11.5.2 Project : Re-introduction of game species Due to the size of the HPNR no re-introduction of game that Explanation historically occurred in the area will be done. Management Activities None

11.5.3 Project: Research and other scientific papers As more relevant scientific papers/reports are published for the Explanation PA, the SB Municipality should source these papers/ reports to increase management capacity, the knowledge base and to

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 76

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

implement new scientifically based management strategies. Management Activities

Obtain relevant papers/ reports. SBM Ongoing

Link to research institutions and tertiary academics SBM Ongoing institutions to obtain relevant research papers. Keep research papers in electronic and hard copies at SBM Ongoing the Municipal offices at Vredenburg.

11.5.4 Project: Prevent impacts on terrestrial species The HPNR is in close proximity of the urban area of Hopefield and Explanation the edge effect may impact on terrestrial species. Management Activities Erect signage to inform the public of the boundary of the SBM Ongoing PA. Don’t allow any domestic animals in the PA. SBM Ongoing

Ensure that law enforcement activities are undertaken. SBM Ongoing Engage with other stakeholders (e.g. the SPCA) to SBM Ongoing control stray domestic animals found in the PA. Monitor and report the presence of any domestic and SBM Ongoing stray animals (dogs and cats) on the PA. Map all illegal activities on a GIS system to build a SBM spatial picture of high-risk zones and to allocate Ongoing available law enforcement resources to those areas.

11.6 PROGRAM : RESTORATION ECOLOGY 11.6.1 Project: Map all disturbed areas

Explanation The existing denuded areas are evident after the construction of the borehole system. These must be rehabilitated. Management Activities

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 77

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Determine, identify, map and evaluate all impacted SBM areas. See Attachment 5 - Forms to complete for Annually Baseline data and Monitoring.

Establish fixed point monitoring sites at each site. SBM Once off

Ensure that all degraded areas are rehabilitated. SBM Ongoing

11.6.2 Project : Rehabilitation Disturbed areas can be rehabilitated once the maintenance needs Explanation for the boreholes have been determined. Management Activities Once the maintenance needs for the boreholes have SBM been determined – map and demarcate all the areas Once off that can be excluded as no-go areas. Initiate active rehabilitation of these sites – this to SBM Once off include demarcation and closure of these sites. Monitor the rehabilitation success. SBM Ongoing

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 78

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Cultural Historical, Archaeological and Paleontological Heritage Management

11.7 . PROGRAM : CULTURAL HISTORICAL , ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALAEONTOLOGICAL

HERITAGE 11.7.1 Project: Map and evaluate assets During the Heritage Impact Assessment study undertaken for the proposed boreholes and associated pipelines development - No

Explanation archaeological or palaeontological resources were identified during the foot survey, however, it is known that significant archaeological and palaeontological resources may be evident below the ground surface (CTS 2018). Management Activities

Results from the CTS report (2018) must be provided SBM Once off to the SBM.

Make the PA available for research and baseline SBM Ongoing studies for students in this field of expertise.

Maintain the GIS database with the assistance from SBM Ongoing institutions e.g. Heritage Western Cape (HWC).

Baseline Data Management, Monitoring and Research

11.8 PROGRAM : BASELINE DATA COLLECTION 11.8.1 Project : Develop and implement a baseline data collection plan Baseline data is important to inform management decisions. Guidelines on what information should be collected, the techniques Explanation to be used, and the frequency of such activities. This will inform management on the type of data to be collected. Management Activities Compile baseline data collection plan for the HPNR See Attachment 5 - Forms to complete for Baseline data SBM Once off and Monitoring.

Implement the plan according to the timeframes and SBM Ongoing

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 79

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019 techniques recommended.

11.9 PROGRAM : MONITORING 11.9.1 Project : Develop and implement a monitoring plan A monitoring plan is important to provide guidelines on what information should be collected, the techniques to be used, and the frequency of such activities. This will inform management on the Explanation type of data to be collected, to determine success of management activities and to identify change as soon as possible. See Attachment 5 - Forms to complete for Baseline data and Monitoring. Management Activities

Compile a monitoring plan for the HPNR. SBM Once off

11.10 PROGRAM : RESEARCH 11.10.1Project: Promote research opportunities The SBM should promote the availability of the HPNR as a research Explanation area; this will ensure that scientific knowledge base will continually improve over time. Management Activities

Identify possible research projects. SBM Ongoing

Communicate and market the availability of the HPNR SBM Ongoing as a research area to tertiary education institutions.

Compile research protocol. SBM Ongoing

Ensure that SBM receives all the published scientific SBM Ongoing papers and / or research findings. File these publications for audit purposes and SBM incorporate findings into management plan as Ongoing applicable.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 80

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Infrastructure Maintenance and Development

11.11 PROGRAM : ROADS

11.11.1. Project: Road Maintenance One access road provides access to boreholes while another Explanation runs on the southern boundary of the PA. Various roads provide access to the different boreholes and these must be maintained. Management activities

Maintain all access roads to prevent erosion caused by SBM Ongoing wind or driving within natural areas.

Roads that are not needed for maintenance of the SBM Ongoing boreholes should be closed for any vehicles.

11.12 PROGRAM : FENCING AND LAW ENFORCEMENT

11.12.1 Project: Improve current state of fence

The current fence is in need of urgent attention. The fence will

Explanation not prevent poaching and therefore an integrated approach to law enforcement must be implemented.

Management Activities

Determine and map the current state of all the external SBM Once off fences. Replace fences where needed with fences that will still SBM allow the movement of smaller species like Grysbok and Once off tortoises.

Conduct regular monitoring of the condition of fence and SBM Ongoing repair fence when needed.

Integrate the fencing with other security measures and SBM Ongoing law enforcement activities

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 81

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

11.12. 2 Project: Law enforcement Law enforcement is an important component of effective PA management especially when a small, sensitive terrestrial protected Explanation area is being managed. Without any effective and efficient law enforcement activities environmental impacts and degradation will accelerate over time. Management Activity Ensure that sufficient funds in the SBM budget are SBM approved to implement an integrated law enforcement Annually approach. Ensure that the Municipal organogram makes SBM provision for the appointment of law enforcement Annually officers.

Engage with other institutions that are responsible for SBM Annually law enforcement activities in the area e.g. SAPS. Develop a localised voluntary field ranger component SBM to assist with baseline data collection and a civil Ongoing society grouping can additionally assist with law enforcement. Schedule and implement regular law enforcement SBM activities by SBM officials and other law enforcement Ongoing partners. Develop a database where instances of Municipal SBM System Act (Act No.32 of 2003) illegal activities and transgressions can be recorded. Determine risk areas Ongoing and a means of prioritisation to ensure that available law enforcement can be aligned to these priority areas.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 82

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

11.13 PROGRAM : DEVELOPMENT

11.13.1 Project: Development of facilities Due to the status of the vegetation on the PA no development is Explanation intended. If development occurs within the timeframe of this PAMP then ensure adherence to the NEMA EIA Regulations. Management Activities Adhere to NEMA EIA Regulations. SBM Once off

11.13.2 Project : Development of the optimal staff organogram

Explanation Due to the sensitivity of the HPNR – it is important to ensure that adequate numbers of staff are appointed to implement this PAMP. Management

Engage in a formal process of determining if current staff SBM Once off capacity is adequate to implement this PAMP.

Evaluate outcomes of the capacity study. SBM Once off

Motivate if additional staff members are needed. SBM Once off

Develop Key Performance Areas for staff to be SBM Once off appointed.

Secure adequate funding to fill these vacancies. SBM Annually

Advertise and appoint staff that comply with the SBM Annually requirements for specific positions / jobs.

Employ and implement job performance appraisal SBM Annually processes.

11.13.3 Project : Staff development

Due to the sensitivity of the PA – it is important to ensure that staff involved in management are well trained and capacitated. Management

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 83

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Identify all training and development needs, this to SBM include basic PA management and law enforcement Annually skills.

Implement training and capacity building programmes so SBM Annually that staff are effective in their respective positions.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 84

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 12 : COSTING PLAN

According to Section 41(2)(d) of the Act, a management plan must at least contain – a programme that deals with the costing of the implementation of the plan. Costing is directly linked to management of the PA and must therefore reflect:

• Capital cost (conservation cost should be separated from tourism cost) and • Operational cost (again conservation and tourism cost must be separated)

As the HPNR is managed by the SBM and thus depends on government funding and income from rates and taxes it is extremely difficult to provide a precise costing plan. Furthermore, it should be noted here that other municipal service delivery programmes are often regarded as more important than the conservation of protected areas and natural systems and therefore innovative actions are needed to secure budgets to manage these areas.

To guide the SBM in securing the budgets for the effective conservation management of the HPNR the following guidelines are recommended for implementation;

• Develop an APO, a draft APO based on this plan is attached , (See Attachment 7 – Draft APO). • Incorporate projects and potential budgets identified in this PAMP in the IDP Process; • Link the HPNR to the creation of job opportunities – The PAMP identifies various projects that need urgent implementation (security, law enforcement, education, maintenance and rehabilitation services); • Link the HPNR to socio-economic development opportunities for the Hopefield community – a community already in desperate need of employment (contracting out certain services such as fence and road maintenance and alien invasive species management programmes); • SB Municipality and the HPNR PAAC must specifically link with donors, Government Departments, conservation agencies and sponsors to secure additional funding and resources for the management of the protected area,.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 85

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

However the SBM must ensure:

• A financial procurement process is in place to allow for the above mentioned guidelines; • That they secure a budget for these services.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 86

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

SECTION 13 : REFERENCES

CapeNature. 2019. Dassen Coastal Complex Protected Area Management Plan: 2019- 2029. Western Cape Nature Conservation Board, Cape Town.

Cowan G.I. & Mpongoma N. 2011. Guidelines for the development of a management plan for a protected area in terms of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act, 2003. Department of Environment Affairs, Pretoria.

CSIRO 2012. Management Strategy Evaluation. Marine and Atmospheric Research.

Cowling, RM, and Richardson, DM, 1995. Fynbos South Africa unique Floral Kingdom. Fernwood Press , Vlaeberg.

CTS (2018) Proposed development of boreholes and associated pipelines for the Langebaan Aquifer within the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve

Hockings M., Leverington F. & Cook C. 2015. Protected area management effectiveness. In: Worboys G.L., Lockwood M., Kothari A., Feary S. & Pulsford I. (Eds). Protected Area Governance and Management. ANU Press, Canberra

Maree, K.S. and Vromans, D.C., 2010. The Biodiversity Sector Plan for the Saldanha Bay, Bergrivier, Cederberg and Matzikama Municipalities: Supporting land-use planning and decision-making in Critical Biodiversity Areas and Ecological Support Areas. Produced by CapeNature as part of the C.A.P.E. Fine-scale Biodiversity Planning Project. Kirstenbosch.

Mucina, L. and Rutherford, M.C. (eds.) 2006. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.

PN 337 of 7 th May of 1982.

O’Donoghue, B., Kaplan J. & Wiltshire N., 2016. Saldanha Bay Municipality: Heritage Resource Survey.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 87

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN – OCTOBER 2019

Ranger, S.K and Du Plessis C.P, 2018. Invasive species monitoring, control and eradication plan for the Cape Columbine Nature Reserve for the Saldanha Bay Municipality.

Saldanha Bay Municipality, 2019. A 4th Generation Integrated Development Plan 2019 – 2024.

South African National Parks (2013) Approved Management Plan for the West Coast National Park 2013- 2023.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services Page 88

ATTACHMENT 1 PN 337 of 7th May 1982

ATTACHMENT 2 PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE PAAC TERMS OF REFENCE FOR A PAAC:

The management authority will establish a PAAC in terms of the draft Regulations for the Proper Administration for Nature Reserves (2009). The Hopefield Private Nature Reserve PAAC will be established to represent the interest of registered stakeholders. Procedure:

 The management authority will invite community organisations, NGO’s, residents of and neighbouring community.  Minimum requirements and other criteria:  Any membership of the PAAC must be based on a real interest demonstrated by the member in respect of HPNR. Composition: The management authority will appoint members in writing to the PAAC and should at least reflect the interest of the following groups:  West Coast District Municipality;  Elandsfontein  CapeNature  Neighbours  Owner  Any other affected/interested party

Term of office: Each member is expected to serve for a fixed two year period. Membership is voluntary and no remuneration will be provided to PAAC members.

Terms of Reference for PAAC`m,: The committee will be expected to:  Provide input into management decisions relating to the PA;  Act as a forum to provide advice on reserve issues; 3. Play a role in educating the community and various interest groups about the importance of preservation, protection and management of natural resources and the objectives of the PAMP that are intended to pursue these goals;  Monitor and evaluate progress on implementation of programmes in the reserve management plan; Make recommendations on how the management authority can improve programmes and policies; Promote involvement in decision-making around the management of natural and cultural heritage resources within the scope of the reserve management plan;  Promote the integration of conservation activities within the PA with those of surrounding areas;  Establish and maintain links between the management authority and other stakeholders. Functioning of the Advisory Committee: The committee will meet a minimum of once a year. At the first meeting a Chairperson and a secretary who will be required to take minutes of all matters discussed, will be elected. The committee will be expected to submit a copy of the minutes for each meeting and a full report, to the management authority and this should be kept on file.

______

ATTACHMENT 3 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

Western Cape, South Africa

The acid sands of marine origins and the Malmesbury shales of the Swartland meet at Hopefield. Here, the interplay of soil types and water permeability of these substrates as well as the climatic influence of the nearby Atlantic Ocean leads to unique habitats and many seasonal wetlands. Thus, the area has many interesting endemic and threatened plant taxa and it is no surprise that Hopefield is now renowned for its annual flower show which is run by a passionate and knowledgeable group of local volunteers (Maree and Vromans 2010)

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS REPORT

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

DATE: OCTOBER 2019

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 1

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NR HEADING PAGE

i) Copyright and Disclaimer 3

ii) Tables 4

iii) List of figures 4

iv) List of Appendixes 4

v) Abbreviations 5

1 BACKGROUND 6

2 THE PROCESS OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 9

3 INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES 11

3.1 Database of key stakeholders 11

4 NOTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS 11

4.1 Development of the communications material 11

4.2 Notifications sent via e-mail 12

4.3 Notification posted on the SBM Web-site 12

4.4 Notification in local newspaper 12

5 DRAFT PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN (DPAMP) 13

5.1 Availability of the Draft Plan 13

6 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES 13

6.1 Comments received (12th August 2019 – 11 th September 2019) 31

7 CONCLUSION AND KEY RECOMMENDATIONS 28

8 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT 28

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 2

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

i) Copyright and Disclaimer

Copyright in this information vests with FOOTPRINT Environmental Services (FES) and the unauthorised copying thereof or making of extracts thereof is illegal.

Any representation, statement opinion, or advice expressed or implied in this document is made in good faith on the basis that FES, its agents and employees are not liable (whether by reason of negligence, lack of care or otherwise) to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking (as the case may be) action in respect of any representation, statement or advice referred to above.

Although the greatest care has been taken to ensure that all mapping data is up to date and spatially accurate, FES gives no warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, utility or completeness of this data. Users of the data in this report assume all responsibility and risk for use of the data.

The User expressly acknowledges and agrees that use of the data and information contained in these pages is at the User's sole risk. The data and information contained in these pages are provided "as is" and no warranties are made that the data and information contained in these pages will meet your requirements, is complete or free from error. In no event shall FES be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, but not limited to, damages for loss of business profits, loss of business information, or other pecuniary loss) arising out of the use of, or inability to use, the data and information contained in this report.

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 3

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

ii) Tables

1 Description of activities completed for each phase 10

2 Comments and responses from stakeholders 14

iii) List of figures

1 Hopefield PNR - Locality Map 8

iv) List of Appendixes

1 Stakeholder database

2 Notification (English and Afrikaans)

3 Proof of notification sent via e-mail

4 Notification in local newspaper

5 Notifications at the public libraries

6 Comments and responses (12th August 2019 – 11 th September 2019)

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 4

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE v) Abbreviations

DPAMP Draft Protected Area Management Plan

FES FOOTPRINT Environmental Services

I&AP Interested and Affected Parties

HPNR Hopefield Private Nature Reserve

NEM:PAA National Environment: Protected Areas Act No. 57 of 2003

NGO Non-Governmental Organisation

PA Protected Area

PAAC Protected Area Advisory Committee

PAMP Protected Area Management Plan

PNR Private Nature Reserve

SANParks South African National Parks

SBM Saldanha Bay Municipality

SEP Stakeholder Engagement Process

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 5

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

1. BACKGROUND

The Hopefield Private Nature Reserve (HPNR) was proclaimed under Section 12 (4) of the Nature and Environmental Conservation Ordinance, (Ordinance 19 of 1974) on the 7 th May 1982. The HPNR is therefore recognised as a nature reserve under the National Environmental Management Protected Areas Act (NEM:PAA) (Act No. 57 of 2003).

Hopefield PNR is 1887,79 ha’s in size and is located on Farm 304, Hopefield. The reserve falls within the 3318AB quarter degree grid square, the centre of the reserve is located at 33.056275 S and 18.277203E (Decimal Degrees).

The vegetation type present on the HPNR is Hopefield Sand Fynbos which is listed as a threatened ecosystem (currently Vulnerable but rapidly declining and close to qualifying as Endangered in terms of the number of threatened species this habitat supports). The habitat on this property is also of very high conservation importance as it is one of few such large intact areas of Hopefield Sand Fynbos areas remaining that have not been heavily impacted and fragmented by development such as mining, agriculture and linear infrastructure.

(See Figure 1 -Locality of the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve).

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 6

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

Figure 1 - Locality of the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve

Cedarberg Conservation Services (t/a FOOTPRINT Environmental Services) (FES) was appointed by the SBM in July 2019 to manage the Stakeholder Engagement Process (SEP) for the HPNR. The SEP was initiated on the 12 th August 2019 and was concluded on the 11th September 2019, a total of 30 days.

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 7

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

2. THE PROCESS OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

The SBM has adapted the South African National Parks (SANParks), Stakeholder Engagement Process (SEP) in Developing Park Management Plans. Section 39(3) of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act, (Act No. 57 of 2003) states that when preparing a management plan for a protected area, the management authority concerned must consult municipalities, other organs of state, local communities and other affected parties which have an interest in the area. Section 41(2) (e) requires that the Management Plan contains procedures for public participation, including participation by the owner (if applicable), any local community or other interested party.

All stakeholders must register for the process. Additional individuals, wishing to participate in the process, must register as stakeholders and must be accommodated to ensure that the process is as inclusive as practically possible. Any persons having direct or indirect interest or rights in a PA may be considered a stakeholder.

The stakeholder process will facilitate the establishment of a representative Protected Area Advisory Committee and/or proposed Liaison Committees as applicable.

The stakeholder engagement process comprises of four distinct phases;

• Initiation of Stakeholder Engagement process;

• Receiving comments and inputs from Stakeholders

• Stakeholder Engagement Report. See Table 1. Table 1: Description of activities completed for each phase .

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 8

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

Phase Activities

Notifications were sent to I&AP’s, liaison with the public, advertisements placed in a local newspaper, the placement of the DPAMP at all the public libraries within the SBM (Vredenburg, St Initiate Helena Bay, Laingville, Saldana Bay and Langebaan) and the Stakeholder development and maintenance of the stakeholder database. The Engagement DPAMP was additionally available on the SBM web-site from the 7th August 2019 - https://sbm.gov.za/environmental/ . The notification of its availability for comment was also published in the Weslander on the 8th August 2019. The general public had the opportunity to provide comments, on Comments and the DPAMP, and inputs between the 12 th August 2019 and the Responses 11 th September 2019. Stakeholder The compilation of the Final Draft Stakeholder Engagement Engagement Report and its submission to the SBM. Report

Table 1: Description of activities completed for each phase

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services initiated the Stakeholder Engagement Process (SEP) by sending out notifications to stakeholders and advertising the process in the local newspaper. Officials from the SBM distributed all the hard copy DPAMPS by placing them at and the notifications at various locations within the local authority (Municipal offices and libraries).

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 9

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

3. INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES

3.1 Database of Interested and Affected Parties (I&AP)

Section 39(3) of the NEM:PAA, (Act No. 57 of 2003) states that when preparing a management plan for a protected area, the management authority concerned must consult municipalities, other organs of state, non-government organisations (NGO’s), local communities, neighbouring landowners and other affected parties which have an interest in the area. In accordance with this requirement, SBM provided a database of I&AP’s to the consultants. The database was maintained throughout the entire process and was updated throughout the commenting period. This included the persons or institutions that should be contacted to serve on the Protected Area Advisory Committee. See Appendix 1: Stakeholder database for the HPNR.

4. NOTIFICATION OF THE STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS

4.1 Development of communication material

FES developed a notification, in Afrikaans and English, that contained information relevant to the process including a brief background to the stakeholder engagement process, the availability of the draft management plan (locality and date), a link to download the Draft PAMP, https://sbm.gov.za/environmental/ , the timeframe for the completion of the process, the closing dates for registration and to provide comments (11 th September 2019) and the contact details where comments and inputs could be sent. See Appendix 2: Notification of the Stakeholder Engagement Process.

4.2 Notifications sent via e-mail

Notifications via e-mail were forwarded on the 8th August 2019 to, twenty seven (27) potential I&AP’s for the HPNR. In instances where e-mails “returned to sender”, the

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 10

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

I&AP’s were contacted via telephone, the notification re-sent to the correct e-mail address and the stakeholder database was updated accordingly. Appendix 3: Proof of notifications sent via e-mail.

4.3 Notification posted on the SBM website

The notification of the Stakeholder Engagement Process was advertised on the SBM website. This link was communicated with all notifications distributed to I&AP’s and was contained in the notification advertised in the local newspapers. The link to download the HPNR DPAMP was functional throughout the engagement process https://sbm.gov.za/environmental/ .

4.4 Notifications in local newspaper

A notification of the stakeholder engagement process was published in the Weslander on the 8th August 2019. The distribution area for this newspaper covers Vredenburg, Saldanha, Hopefield, Paternoster, Stompneus Bay, Velddrift, , Langebaan, Langebaan Way, Aurora, , Eland’s Bay, Porterville, , Lambert’s Bay and with a total circulation of 8 801.

These advertisements contained a brief summary of the designation and conservation status of the HPNR and information on the objective of the management plan, availability of the draft management plan, contact address for registration, and the closing date for registration and for I&AP’s to provide comments. Appendix 4: Notification of Stakeholder Engagement Process published in the local newspaper.

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 11

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

5. DRAFT PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN (DPAMP)

5.1 Availability of the Draft PAMP

Hard copies of the Draft HPNR PAMP were made available at the public libraries of Vredenburg, Saldanha, St Helena Bay, Paternoster, Laingville and Langebaan. All the DPAMP’s were delivered to these facilities between the 8th and the 12 th August 2019. See Attachment 5: Notifications at the libraries.

The DPAMP was also available on the SBM web-site and stakeholders could download the DPAMP at the following link - https://sbm.gov.za/environmental/ . This link remained live for the entire SEP which ended on the 11 th September 2019.

6. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

This section contains the comments and responses that were raised by the general public and government departments. These comments were received via e-mail, fax or post between the 12 th August 2019 and 11 th September 2019.

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 12

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

6.1 Comments received from the general public (12th August 2019 – 11 th September 2019)

Table 2 : Comments and responses from stakeholders. See Appendix 6. Appendix 6: Comments received.

Institution/Organisation Contact Person and Contact Comments Responses details Kropz Elandsfontein Dr Martin Carstens Before any issue may be addressed Although the site was initially proclaimed as a (Pty) Ltd 160 Sir Lowry Rd Woodstock in the DPAMP, the empowering private nature under the management of the 14 th August 2019 7915. legislative provisions of the SBM SBM the site is automatically recognised as a 082 9083344 must be determined. SBM and the nature reserve under the National Environmental [email protected] MEC are constrained by the principle Management Protected Areas Act (NEM:PAA). to not exercise powers and perform No declaration is therefore needed. The functions beyond conferred to them proclamation was done before the servitude was by law. SBM cannot rely on S 39(2) registered. of NEM:PAA, 2003 to Draft a management plan for a private nature reserve (PNA). The minister must first declare a protected area in terms of S 28 (1)(a) of the Act. Kropz Elandsfontein has a material FES obtained the servitude registration from the interest in Farm 304 Hopefield, the SBM and this will be included as an attachment entrance gate, some municipal water in the PAMP. supply infrastructure, pipeline and access road falls within a 18.5 meter servitude registered over Farm 304 in favour of Kropz. It may be prudent to meet to The stakeholder engagement process is a legal deliberate about the above matters requirement in terms of the NEM:PAA. Further before the commencement of a to this the process provides the opportunity for public participation and stakeholder stakeholders to raise comments and issues and engagement process. the responsibility will be for the SBM to establish a Protected Area Advisory Committee to address all issues related to the specific PA. Kropz Elandsfontein must become a member of the Hopefield PAAC. CapeNature Donny Malherbe Thank you for the opportunity to Noted.

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 13

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

20th September 2019 Conservation - Off comment on the draft management Reserve Ceder-Berg Landscape plans for both Cape Columbine and 022 9312900, 082 4555569 Hopefield PNR protected area [email protected] PO management plans. Box 26, Porterville, 6810

What have been noted is that no This will be added to the PAMP with a key mention of the Cape Columbine recommendation for the inclusion of the CCC in Conservancy (CCC) is made in the the PAAC. Cape Columbine PAMP. The conservancy already include most of the properties as identified as expansion areas for the Cape Columbine NR.

The rest of the Cape Columbine Noted. PAMP, as well as the Hopefield PNR PAMP has been drafted well and is supported from CapeNature. West Coast District D o r e t h a K o t z e The purpose of a PAMP is to ensure This is noted and this is the main reason why Municipality Town and Regional Planner that the protection, conservation and the SBM decided to draft the PAMP. The PAMP 10 th September 2019 PO Box 242 management of conservation areas has been drafted in accordance with the MOORREESBURG 7310 remains consistent with the guidelines provided by the DEA and in Tel: 022 433 8523 objectives of the NEM:PAA and the consultation with CapeNature to ensure purpose for which these areas were alignment with NEM:PAA and that its initially declared as Nature requirements in terms of a PAMP are met. Reserves. Sufficient budget must be allocated The SBM must ensure that the proposed budget by the Saldanha Bay Municipality to is incorporated in the Integrated Development ensure that the above mentioned is Process to secure and allocate a budget for the possible. effective management of the PA in accordance with the projects identified in the PAMP. It is important to recognise that conservation budgets are of low priority versus other social development needs and responsibilities of the municipality. It will be important for the SBM to secure other external grants and funding

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 14

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

streams to maximise the implementation impact of the PAMP’s. Consistent removal of alien The SBM have an approved Invasive Species vegetation and regular follow-ups Management, Control and Monitoring Plan must be undertaken in terms of available that was compiled in 2018. This National Environmental Management includes the PA’s and implementation is Biodiversity Act (NEMBA). currently underway. It is vital that sufficient funds be The SBM must ensure that the proposed budget allocated annually by the Saldanha is incorporated in the Integrated Development Bay Municipality to ensure effective Process to secure and allocate a budget for the implementation of the PAMP’s effective management of the PA in accordance with the projects identified in the PAMP. It is important to recognise that conservation budgets are of low priority versus other social development needs and responsibilities of the municipality. It will be important for the SBM to secure other external grants and funding streams to maximise the implementation impact of the PAMP’s. The appropriate zoning should be Both PA’s are recognised as Nature Reserve’s allocated to these reserves in SBM under the National Environmental Management Integrated Zoning Schemes. Protected Areas Act (NEM:PAA). This activity will be included in the PAMP’s. Saldanha Bay David Wright, 12 Main Road Rehabilitation after completion of the This is noted – the development was approved Municipality. Vredenburg, 7380 well drilling project mentioned but the by the MEC of the DEA&DP and includes an 022-701 6988 extent not indicated. approved Environmental Management 082 346 5656 Programme (EMP’r) for the planning, [email protected] construction and operational phases. The EMP’r is a legally binding document and the SBM must adhere to and meet all the requirements set. The implementation and adherence to the EMP’r was audited by various Environmental Control Reports. The PAMP provides general guidelines to support the EMP’r during the operational phase and will ensure that rehabilitation strategies are measured and audited.

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 15

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

Detailed Costing plan must be The SBM must ensure that the proposed budget compiled – No costing plan attached. is incorporated into the Integrated Development Process in order to secure and allocate the budget for the effective management of the PA’s. However, it is also important to recognise that conservation budgets are of low priority to other social needs and responsibilities and thus it will be important for the SBM to secure other external grants and funding streams to ensure the effective implementation of the PAMP’s. . Saldanha Bay Municipality needs to This is noted - please note that this is one of the conduct Airborne geophysics. The legislated requirements set by the NEM:PAA. 2500ft restriction is problematic. Wellfield expansion on completion of airborne geophysics will be investigated – including managed aquifer recharge.

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 16

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT: HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE

7. CONCLUSION AND KEY RECOMMENDATIONS

The entire stakeholder engagement process was completed over 30 days.

The invitations to participate in the process were sent out via, mail and / or faxes or by registered post to thirty four (34) potential stakeholders and notifications (English & Afrikaans). A notification was also placed on the SBM’s web-site and published in one local newspaper.

FOOTPRINT Environmental Services wishes to make the following recommendation in taking this report and the Draft Protected Area Management Plan forward.

• The updated stakeholder list provides updated contact details on key stakeholders with whom officials of the SBM may engage in future;

• The SBM should invite all Registered I&AP’s to serve as members to the PAAC to improve relationships and to ensure community buy in and support of the management of the HPNR.

• Amendments and actions recommended by stakeholders and FES must be included before the PAMP is presented to the Executive Committee of the SBM.

In conclusion a special thanks to all the SBM staff that assisted us in providing the draft stakeholders database, the DPAMP and general support through the entire stakeholder engagement process.

8. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT

The stakeholder engagement report was submitted to SBM on the 18 th October 2019

FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Page 17

APPENDIX 1 – LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS INITIALLY CONTACTED AND REGISTERED DURING THE STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS.

Initial Stakeholder Engagement Database

Protected Area Institution Representation Contact Number E-mail address Postal Address Town Postal code Charles Both West Coast District Municipality Malherbe 0827735991 [email protected] PO Box 242 Moorreesburg 7310 Both Cape West Coast Biosphere Reserve (CWCBR) Company Lizelle Koen 0716758355 [email protected] P.0 Box 283 Darling 7345 Both Department of Agriculture: Western Cape Jan Smit 0848626126 [email protected] P.O. Box 138 Moorreesburg 7310

Provincial Department Environmental Affairs & Development [email protected] Both Planning Melissa Naicker 0609845004 a P. Bag X9086 Cape Town 8001

Both CapeNature Donnie Malherbe 0229312900 [email protected] PO Box 26 Porterville 6810 Both Saldanha Bay Municipality - Municipal Manager Heinrich Mettler 0227017097 [email protected] P Bag X17 Vredenburg 7380

Both DEA&DP Biodiversity Albert Ackhurst 0214838364 [email protected] P. Bag X9086 Cape Town 8001 Miranda Hopefield Ward 7 Councillor Schrader 0827485580 [email protected] P Bag X17 Vredenburg 7380 Hopefield SANParks = West Coast National Park Pat Bopape 022 77 22144 [email protected] P.O. Box 25 Langebaan 7357 Hopefield JS Rabe PO Box 51 Darling 7345 Hopefield PA Olivier 6 Neptune Steet Saldanha 7395 LD & PW Hopefield Fortune 25 Blythwood Drive Plattekloof Glen 7460

Rainbow Farms Hopefield (Manager) PO Box 612 Worcester 6849 Hopefield JP Burnett PO Box 198 Springbok 8240 Hopefield JSG Strauss PO Box 77 Hopefield 7355 Hopefield NA & EL Boer Azalea Singel Singel 30 Belhar 7490 Hopefield Booysen Trust PO Box 295 Hopefield 7355

Hopefield AC&CC Barends Raglansstraat 27, Oakdale East Bellville 7550 Airforce Base - Langebaan Hopefield M. Matanda Weg Langebaanweg 7375 29 Sante FE Crecant, LA Hopefield EL&C Scullard Paloma Milnerton 7441 Hopefield PR Viljoen PO Box 159 Hopefield 7355 Kropz Elandsfontein (Pty) Ltd Martin Carstens 082 9083344 [email protected] 160 Sir Lowry Rd . Woodstock 7915 Hopefield Registered Interested and Affected Parties Institution Representation Contact Number E-mail address Postal Address Town Postal code West Coast District Doretha Kotze 022 433 8523 [email protected] PO Box 242 Moorreesburg 7310 Municipality CapeNature Donnie Malherbe 0229312900 [email protected] PO Box 26 Porterville 6810 Saldanha Bay Municipality David Wright 082 346 5656 [email protected] 12 Main Road Vredenburg 7380 Kropz Elandsfontein (Pty) 022-701 6988 082 9083344 [email protected] 160 Sir Lowry Rd . Woodstock 7915 Ltd

APPENDIX 2 –

NOTIFICATIONS BOTH IN ENGLISH AND AFRIKAANS.

7 August 2019

Dear Interested and Affected Party

NOTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS CAPE COLUMBINE AND THE HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLANS (PAMPS)

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA).

Background: The objective of the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve Management Plans, is to ensure that the protection, conservation and management of these conservation areas remains consistent with the objectives of the NEM: PAA and for the purpose for which they were declared. The NEM:PAA requires that a management plan must be compiled in consultation with stakeholders. All persons who may have direct and or indirect interest or rights in these conservation areas may be considered as a stakeholder and should participate in the process.

Availability of the Draft Management Plans: Draft copies of the Management Plans are available at all the public libraries in the Saldanha Bay Municipal area from the 12th August 2019. Electronic copies can also be downloaded from the Saldanha Bay Municipality website at the https://sbm.gov.za/environmental/.

Timeframes and the Process: As part of the process, Interested and Affected Parties will be given the opportunity to provide inputs and comments into the Draft PAMP. The closing date to register and to provide comments on the draft PAMPS will be from the 12th August 2019 – 11th September 2019. (Please complete the attached form – to register and to provide comments and inputs).

Correspondence: All inputs and comments must be communicated in writing and forwarded to FOOTPRINT.

Client: Saldanha Bay Municipality.

Consultant: FOOTPRINT Environmental Services.

Please, contact FOOTPRINT Environmental Services at any time should you require additional information in this regard.

K.S Ranger C.P du Plessis

REGISTRASIE DEELNAME DEUR BELANGHEBBENDES :

CAPE COLUMBINE EN HOPEFIELD PRIVAAT NATUURRESERVAAT BESTUURSPLANNE

Indien u enige kommentaar het en of wil registreer as ‘n Geïnteresseerde en Geaffekteerde Party, voltooi asseblief die vorm en stuur terug aan FOOTPRINT Environmental Services voor of op 11 September 2019.

Kontakbesonderhede: [email protected].; 086 608 8304 (faks) of Posbus 454, Porterville, 6810.

Kontakbesonderhede van persoon / instansie:

Titel en Naam

Adres

Tel en Faks

Sel

E-pos

Instansie

U KOMMENTAAR 1. Die volgende kwessies moet aangespreek word in die bestuursplan

2. Die volgende kommentaar word gelewer

3 Enige persoonlike, besigheid, finansiële of ander belange by die bestuursplan.

DANKIE VIR U DEELNAME Indien ekstra spasie verlang gebruik addisionele bladsy

REGISTRATION AS AN INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTY CAPE COLUMBINE AND HOPEFIELD PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE DRAFT PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLANS

Should you have any comments and/or would like to register as an Interested and Affected Party (“I&AP”) or provide comments on these Draft Protected Area Management Plans, please complete this form and return to FOOTPRINT Environmental Services before the 11th September 2019

Contact details: PO Box 454, Porterville, 6810; [email protected].; 086 608 8304 (fax)

Title and Name

Address

Tel and Fax)

Cell

E-Mail

YOUR COMMENTS

1. The following issues should be addressed in the DPAMP.

2. The following comments are made.

3. Any personal, business, financial or other interests regarding the implementation of this PAMP.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION

APPENDIX 3 –

PROOF OF NOTIFICATIONS SENT. Charl du Plessis

From: Duarte, Nazeema [[email protected]] Sent: 08 August 2019 11:04 To: Julies, Randile; Wright, David; Williams, Gavin; Martins, Ronnie Cc: Charl du Plessis Subject: FW: Stakeholder Enagement Process Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private Nature Reserve Attachments: Draft Hopefield PNR_PAMP-compressed(1).pdf; Draft PAMP_Cape Columbine PA_ August 2019 - Compress.pdf; Notification_PAMP_Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private NR_Stakeholder Engagement Process.pdf; Registrasie om kommentaar te lewer.pdf; Registration to provide comments.pdf

Good morning colleagues

Please see attached draft Protected Area Management Plans for your comment.

Nazeema

From: Charl du Plessis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 08 August 2019 9:55 AM To: Duarte, Nazeema ; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: 'Charl du Plessis' Subject: Stakeholder Enagement Process Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private Nature Reserve

Hi all key stakeholders.

We hope this mail finds you all well.

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA). This is applicable to the Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s;

Please find attached:

a) The Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s; b) A Notification to participate in the Stakeholder Engagement Process (Timeframes and to gain access to the PAMPS); c) Registration forms to be completed to engage in the process.

Please respond within the timeframes of the notification.

Regards

Charl du Plessis

0791724340

Righ t- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. click here to dow nlo… www.avast.com

Level 3 water restrictions from 1 July 2019. Use less than 100 litres per person per day! Email Disclaimer: "All views or opinions expressed in this electronic message and its attachments are the view of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Saldanha Bay Municipality (SBM). No employee of the SBM is entitled to conclude a binding contract on behalf of the SBM unless he/she is the accounting

1 officer of the SBM`, or his or her authorised representative. The information contained in this message and its attachments may be confidential or privileged and is for the use of the named recipient only, except where the sender specifically states otherwise. If you are not the intended recipient you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone." “S.M.A.R.T Future through Excellence...”

2 Charl du Plessis

From: Charl du Plessis [[email protected]] Sent: 08 August 2019 09:55 To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: 'Charl du Plessis' Subject: Stakeholder Enagement Process Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private Nature Reserve Attachments: Draft Hopefield PNR_PAMP-compressed(1).pdf; Draft PAMP_Cape Columbine PA_ August 2019 - Compress.pdf; Notification_PAMP_Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private NR_Stakeholder Engagement Process.pdf; Registrasie om kommentaar te lewer.pdf; Registration to provide comments.pdf

Hi all key stakeholders.

We hope this mail finds you all well.

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA). This is applicable to the Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s;

Please find attached:

a) The Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s; b) A Notification to participate in the Stakeholder Engagement Process (Timeframes and to gain access to the PAMPS); c) Registration forms to be completed to engage in the process.

Please respond within the timeframes of the notification.

Regards

Charl du Plessis

0791724340

Righ t- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. click here to dow nlo www.avast.com

1 Charl du Plessis

From: Charl du Plessis [[email protected]] Sent: 08 August 2019 09:51 To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; jarens678 @gmail.com; [email protected] Cc: 'Charl du Plessis' Subject: Stakeholder Enagement Process Cape Columbine and Hopefield nature reserve Attachments: Draft Hopefield PNR_PAMP-compressed(1).pdf; Draft PAMP_Cape Columbine PA_ August 2019 - Compress.pdf; Notification_PAMP_Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private NR_Stakeholder Engagement Process.pdf; Registrasie om kommentaar te lewer.pdf; Registration to provide comments.pdf

Hi all key stakeholders.

We hope this mail finds you all well.

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA). This is applicable to the Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s;

Please find attached:

a) The Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s; b) A Notification to participate in the Stakeholder Engagement Process (Timeframes and to gain access to the PAMPS); c) Registration forms to be completed to engage in the process.

Please respond within the timeframes of the notification.

Regards

Charl du Plessis

0791724340

Righ t- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. click here to dow nlo… www.avast.com

1 Charl du Plessis

From: Charl du Plessis [[email protected]] Sent: 08 August 2019 09:44 To: [email protected] Cc: 'Charl du Plessis' Subject: Stakeholder Engagement Process Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Nature Reserve Attachments: Draft Hopefield PNR_PAMP-compressed(1).pdf; Draft PAMP_Cape Columbine PA_ August 2019 - Compress.pdf; Notification_PAMP_Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private NR_Stakeholder Engagement Process.pdf; Registrasie om kommentaar te lewer.pdf; Registration to provide comments.pdf

Hi all key stakeholders.

We hope this mail finds you all well.

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA). This is applicable to the Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s;

Please find attached:

a) The Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s; b) A Notification to participate in the Stakeholder Engagement Process (Timeframes and to gain access to the PAMPS); c) Registration forms to be completed to engage in the process.

Please respond within the timeframes of the notification.

Regards

Charl du Plessis

0791724340

Righ t- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. click here to dow nlo www.avast.com

1 Charl du Plessis

From: Charl du Plessis [[email protected]] Sent: 08 August 2019 09:39 To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: 'Charl du Plessis' Subject: Stakeholder Engagement Process Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private Nature Attachments: Draft Hopefield PNR_PAMP-compressed(1).pdf; Draft PAMP_Cape Columbine PA_ August 2019 - Compress.pdf; Notification_PAMP_Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private NR_Stakeholder Engagement Process.pdf; Registrasie om kommentaar te lewer.pdf; Registration to provide comments.pdf

Hi all key stakeholders.

We hope this mail finds you all well.

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA). This is applicable to the Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s;

Please find attached:

a) The Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s; b) A Notification to participate in the Stakeholder Engagement Process (Timeframes and to gain access to the PAMPS); c) Registration forms to be completed to engage in the process.

Please respond within the timeframes of the notification.

Regards

Charl du Plessis

0791724340

Righ t- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. click here to dow nlo www.avast.com

1 Charl du Plessis

From: Charl du Plessis [[email protected]] Sent: 08 August 2019 09:32 To: [email protected] Cc: 'Charl du Plessis' Subject: Stakeholder Engagement Process - Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private Nature Reserve Attachments: Draft Hopefield PNR_PAMP-compressed(1).pdf; Draft PAMP_Cape Columbine PA_ August 2019 - Compress.pdf; Notification_PAMP_Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private NR_Stakeholder Engagement Process.pdf; Registrasie om kommentaar te lewer.pdf; Registration to provide comments.pdf

Hi all key stakeholders.

We hope this mail finds you all well.

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA). This is applicable to the Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s;

Please find attached:

a) The Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s; b) A Notification to participate in the Stakeholder Engagement Process (Timeframes and to gain access to the PAMPS); c) Registration forms to be completed to engage in the process.

Please respond within the timeframes of the notification.

Regards

Charl du Plessis

0791724340

Righ t- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. click here to dow nlo www.avast.com

1 Charl du Plessis

From: Charl du Plessis [[email protected]] Sent: 07 August 2019 18:27 To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Stakeholder Enagagement Process for the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield PNR Attachments: Draft Hopefield PNR_PAMP-compressed(1).pdf; Draft PAMP_Cape Columbine PA_ August 2019 - Compress.pdf; Notification_PAMP_Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private NR_Stakeholder Engagement Process.pdf; Registrasie om kommentaar te lewer.pdf; Registration to provide comments.pdf

Hi all key stakeholders.

We hope this mail finds you all well.

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA). This is applicable to the Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s;

Please find attached:

a) The Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s; b) A Notification to participate in the Stakeholder Engagement Process (Timeframes and to gain access to the PAMPS); c) Registration forms to be completed to engage in the process.

Please respond within the timeframes of the notification.

Regards

Charl du Plessis

0791724340

Righ t- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. click here to dow nlo… www.avast.com

1 Charl du Plessis

From: Charl du Plessis [[email protected]] Sent: 07 August 2019 17:52 To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Notification of stakeholder Enagagement Process Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve Attachments: Draft Hopefield PNR_PAMP-compressed(1).pdf; Draft PAMP_Cape Columbine PA_ August 2019 - Compress.pdf; Notification_PAMP_Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private NR_Stakeholder Engagement Process.pdf; Registrasie om kommentaar te lewer.pdf; Registration to provide comments.pdf

Hi all key stakeholders.

We hope this mail finds you all well.

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA). This is applicable to the Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s,

Please find attached:

a) The Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s; b) A Notification to participate in the Stakeholder Engagement Process (Timeframes and to gain access to the PAMPS); c) Registration forms to be completed to engage in the process.

Please respond within the timeframes of the notification.

Regards.

Charl du Plessis

0791724340

Righ t- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. click here to dow nlo www.avast.com

1 Charl du Plessis

From: Charl du Plessis [[email protected]] Sent: 08 August 2019 12:29 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: FW: Stakeholder Engagement Process Cape Columbine PA and Hopefield Private Nature Reserve Attachments: Draft Hopefield PNR_PAMP-compressed(1).pdf; Draft PAMP_Cape Columbine PA_ August 2019 - Compress.pdf; Notification_PAMP_Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private NR_Stakeholder Engagement Process.pdf; Registrasie om kommentaar te lewer.pdf; Registration to provide comments.pdf

George

Please find information for your inputs.

Regards

Charl

From: Charl du Plessis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 08 August 2019 12:17 PM To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: Stakeholder Engagement Process Cape Columbine PA and Hopefield Private Nature Reserve

Hi all key stakeholders.

We hope this mail finds you all well.

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA). This is applicable to the Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Ho pefield Private Nature Reserve’s;

Please find attached:

a) The Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s; b) A Notification to participate in the Stakeholder Engagement Process (Timeframes and to gain access to the PAMPS); c) Registration forms to be completed to engage in the process.

Please respond within the timeframes of the notification.

Regards

Charl du Plessis

0791724340

Righ t- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software . click here to dow nlo www.avast.com

1 Charl du Plessis

From: Charl du Plessis [[email protected]] Sent: 08 August 2019 12:17 To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Stakeholder Engagement Process Cape Columbine PA and Hopefield Private Nature Reserve Attachments: Draft Hopefield PNR_PAMP-compressed(1).pdf; Draft PAMP_Cape Columbine PA_ August 2019 - Compress.pdf; Notification_PAMP_Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private NR_Stakeholder Engagement Process.pdf; Registrasie om kommentaar te lewer.pdf; Registration to provide comments.pdf

Hi all key stakeholders.

We hope this mail finds you all well.

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA). This is applicable to the Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s;

Please find attached:

a) The Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s; b) A Notification to participate in the Stakeholder Engagement Process (Timeframes and to gain access to the PAMPS); c) Registration forms to be completed to engage in the process.

Please respond within the timeframes of the notification.

Regards

Charl du Plessis

0791724340

Righ t- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. click here to dow nlo… www.avast.com

1

APPENDIX 4 –

NOTIFICATION IN THE WESLANDER

APPENDIX 5 – NOTIFICATIONS AT PUBLIC SITES WITHIN THE SBM

DOMAIN.

APPENDIX 6 –

COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT Charl du Plessis

From: Donnie Malherbe [[email protected]] Sent: 20 September 2019 08:31 To: Charl du Plessis Cc: Callum Beattie Subject: RE: Stakeholder Enagagement Process for the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield PNR

Hi Charl

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft management plans for both Cape Columbine and Hopefield PNR protected area management plans.

What have been noted is that no mention of the Cape Columbine Conservancy is made in the Cape Columbine PAMP. The conservancy already include most of the properties as identified as expansion areas for the Cape Columbine NR.

The rest of the Cape Columbine PAMP, as well as the Hopefield PNR PAMP has been drafted well and is supported from CapeNature.

Regards Donny

Donny Malherbe Conservation - Off Reserve | Ceder-Berg Landscape

tel +27 22 9312900 | fax 086 528 9705 | cell +27 82 4555569 email [email protected] | postal PO Box 26, Porterville, 6810 physical 72 Voortrekker Road, Porterville, 6810 www.capenature.co.za

From: Charl du Plessis [mailto: [email protected] ] Sent: 07 August 2019 06:27 PM To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected] Subject: Stakeholder Enagagement Process for the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield PNR

Hi all key stakeholders.

We hope this mail finds you all well.

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA). This is applicable to the Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s;

Please find attached:

The Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s; A Notification to participate in the Stakeholder Engagement Process (Timeframes and to gain access to the PAMPS);

1 Registration forms to be completed to engage in the process.

Please respond within the timeframes of the notification.

Regards

Charl du Plessis

0791724340

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

Disclaimer: This electronic message and any attachments is intended for the addressee only and is confidential and privileged. If you have received this message in error please delete it and notify the sender. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorised use, copying or dissemination, is prohibited. CapeNature shall not be liable for the message if altered changed or falsified. Any unauthorized disclosure may be unlawful. CapeNature does not warrant that this message or any attachment is free of viruses. CapeNature accepts no liability or legal responsibility for any damages resulting directly or indirectly from accessing this electronic message or the attachment

2 Charl du Plessis

From: Duarte, Nazeema [[email protected]] Sent: 15 August 2019 14:28 To: Charl du Plessis Cc: 'Sean Ranger' Subject: FW: Stakeholder Engagement Process: Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private Nature Reserve Attachments: Draft Hopefield PNR_PAMP-compressed(1).pdf; Draft PAMP_Cape Columbine PA_ August 2019 - Compress.pdf; Notification_PAMP_Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private NR_Stakeholder Engagement Process.pdf; Registrasie om kommentaar te lewer.pdf; Registration to provide comments.pdf

I had it internally communicated

From: SBM Communications Sent: Thursday, 08 August 2019 11:36 AM To: All-CouncilEmployees Subject: Stakeholder Engagement Process: Cape Columbine and Hopefield Private Nature Reserve

Dear key stakeholders,

We hope this mail finds you all well.

Notice is hereby given of a stakeholder engagement process in terms of the Section 39(3) of The National Environment Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 (NEM: PAA). This is applicable to the Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s;

Please find attached:

a) The Draft PAMP’s for both the Cape Columbine and the Hopefield Private Nature Reserve’s; b) A Notification to participate in the Stakeholder Engagement Process (Timeframes and to gain access to the PAMPS); c) Registration forms to be completed to engage in the process.

Please respond within the timeframes of the notification.

Regards

Charl du Plessis 0791724340

Level 3 water restrictions from 1 July 2019. Use less than 100 litres per person per day! Email Disclaimer: "All views or opinions expressed in this electronic message and its attachments are the view of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Saldanha Bay Municipality (SBM). No employee of the SBM is entitled to conclude a binding contract on behalf of the SBM unless he/she is the accounting officer of the SBM`, or his or her authorised representative. The information contained in this message and its attachments may be confidential or privileged and is for the use of the named recipient only, except where the sender specifically states otherwise. If you are not the intended recipient you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone." “S.M.A.R.T Future through Excellence...”

1

ATTACHMENT 4 ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION

MINISTRY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

REFERENCE: 3/5/R (2018/40)

The Municipal Manager Saldanha Bay Municipality Private Bag X12 VREDENBURG 7380

Dear Dr Voges

APPROVAL IN TERMS OF THE APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION FOR THE WATER AUGMENTATION PROJECT WITHIN A PRIVATE NATURE RESERVE ON FARM 304, HOPEFIELD.

Correspondence dated 16 May 2018 and received from the Saldanha Bay Municipality on 22 May 2018 refers.

1. This letter serves as an approval in terms of the applicable environmental legislation to proceed with the water augmentation project within a private nature reserve on Farm 304, Hopefield. It is noted that the Municipality is the owner of the private nature reserve property.

2. Please note that all other relevant legislative approvals must be obtained from any other relevant competent authority.

3. You are reminded of Section 2 of the National Environmental Management Act (Act No. 107 of 1998, as amended (“NEMA”)), the mitigation hierarchy, and your general duty of care towards the environment in terms of Section 28(1) of the NEMA which states that: “Every person who causes, has caused or may cause significant pollution or degradation of the environment must take reasonable measures to prevent such pollution or degradation from occurring, continuing or recurring, or, in so far as such harm to the environment is authorised by law or cannot reasonably be avoided or stopped, to minimise and rectify such pollution or degradation of the environment.”

1 Dorp Street, Cape Town, 8001 Private Bag X9186, Cape Town, 8000 tel: +27 21 483 3915 fax: +27 21 483 6081 www.westerncape.gov.za

This Ministry reserves the right to revise or withdraw this approval or to request further information based on any information received.

Sincerely

A BREDELL MINISTER DATE: 08/06/2018

Copied to: Ms. N. Duarte [email protected]

Mr. G. Smith [email protected]

ATTACHMENT 5 FORMS TO BE COMPLETED FOR BASELINE STUDIES AND MONITORING INFORMATION FOR A PHOTO SITE

Should be completed with Site identification form.

Site number

Date of first survey YYYY MMMM DDDD

Density board placed on m

North

South Photo detail East

West

What time was the photo taken HH

General information

Adapted from van der Walt (1993) INFORMATION FOR A MONITORING SITE

Name of reserve

Site number Date of first record

GPS reading E S

Map number Altitude

Aspect Gradient

Position of the site (describe how the site can be found)

Staff that know the location of the site.

Objective of monitoring

Monitoring technique

Type of site and dimensions

History of the site Adapted from van der Walt (1993) INFORMATION FOR A PHOTO SITE

Should be completed with the site identification form.

Site number

Date of first survey YYYY MMMM DDDD

Density board placed on m

North

South Photo detail East

West

What time was the photo HH taken

General information

Adapted from van der Walt (1993)

GUIDELINES FOR FIX POINT PHOTOGRAPH SITES

Keep the following principles in mind when taking photo at specific monitoring sites

At circle monitoring sites - the centre of the circle should be used as the point from where the photo must be taken. Photo’s need to be taken up-hill, down hill and to both sides of the slope;

At square or rectangular monitoring sites - photos should be taken from each angle towards the middle of the site;

At transect and the the point survey technique – photo’s must be taken at the taken from the starting point in the direction of the survey line and from the end point back to the starting point;

Where a profile technique - is being used a photo should be taken at right angles to profile. Another photo needs to be taken over the length of the profile.

Place a vegetation density board in the middle of the site to evaluate plant density and vegetation height;

Fix point photograph monitoring

Identify a point in the landscape from where the object to be monitored is clearly visible (e.g. erosion gully).

Plant ʼn square tubing (50 mm) at the above mentioned point in such a manner that 200mm of the planted tube is above ground (place a cap over the tubing when not in use). Fix the buried end of the tubing in cement to ensure that it is not removed.

A portable camera platform that fits over the square tubing should be made. This needs to be 1.5m in height and should fit snugly over the buried tubing. Weld short pins at 90 degrees to the base of the platform tube as illustrated below. The function of the pins is to ensure that photos are taken in all compass directions at exactly at 900 each time (See figure 1 below).

Take photos in the middle of the day - to minimize the effect of shade.

Record keeping of photos is important and must include information on the: site, photo number, time of the day and climatic conditions.

Figure 1 : Graphic outline of fix point photo site (Coetzee 2007)

Special thanks to CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES – KEN COETZEE to use Figure 1 in the report. Adapted from GUIDELINES FOR WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT FOR THE SANDVELD AND CEDARBERG CORE CORRIDOR AREAS: 2007

INFORMATION FOR EROSION

Should be completed with Appendix 1 (Site identification).

Site number

Date of first survey YYYY MMMM DDDD

Density board placed m

Photo reference detail

Survey using a matrix of pens

Length of peg above Peg number Comments surface (mm)

Adapted from van der Walt (1993)

INFORMATION FOR EROSION

Should be completed with Site identification.

Site number

Date of first survey YYYY MMMM DDDD

Density board placed m

Photo reference detail

Survey using a matrix of pens

Length of peg above Peg number Comments surface (mm)

Adapted from van der Walt (1993) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY:

To be entered on ‘Specimen’ tab of Biodiversity Database Species name:______

Ref.: .

Det.: .

Det. Date: [DD/MM/YYYY]

To be entered on ‘Plant’ tab of Biodiversity Database ID Source 1 Uncertain 2 Cited in taxonomic literature 3 Identified by an expert 4 Double checked – Independently 5 Double checked – same person 6 Identification believed to be correct

To be entered on ‘Specimen’ tab of Biodiversity Database

IDPrecision DatePrecision LocalityPrecision 1 Family 1 Day 1 Nearest Second or better 2 Genus 2 Month 2 Nearest Minute 3 Species 3 Year 3 Nearest Quarter Degree 4 Subspecies 4 Decade 4 Nearest Degree 5 Variety 5 Century 5 Reserve Centroid 6 Unknown 6 Unknown 6 Unknown 7 Farm Centroid 8 Unable to locate 9 Urban Centroid 10 Reserve Compartment Centroid

Locality calculated IF TRUE: DDS ______DDE ______OR Latitude: [ | ] [ | ]’ [ | . ]” S Longitude: [ | ] [ | ]’ [ | . ]” E Locked Confidential Lodging Code: CNC Code: Owner: ______Encoder: ______YELLOW PLANT COLLECTING FORM

Collector name: Collector №: [ | | | | ] Date:[ | | ] day month year Field name: RecordType Minor locality: 1 Audio 2 Herbarium specimen 3 Heard Call Precise locality: 4 Literature 5 Observation Site/relevé №: 6 Photograph 7 Scat Grid Ref.: [ | | | | | ] 8 Specimen

COMPULSORY Latitude: [ | ] [ | ]’ [ | . ]” S Longitude: [ | ] [ | ]’ [ | . ]” E

HABITAT Altitude: [ | | | ]m Moisture Substrate Colour Soil Landscape 1 Coastal pool 1 amber 17 grey-white 33 purple-violet 1 Calcareous 1 Cliff base 18 Mountain slope 2 Free standing water 2 beige 18 grey-yellow 34 red 2 Clay 2 Cliff face 19 Outcrop 3 Mist / fog 3 black 19 indigo 35 red-brown 3 Humus-rich 3 Cliff top 20 Pan/depression 4 Moist / damp 4 blue 20 light grey 36 red-purple 4 Loamy 4 Coastal dune 21 Plain 5 Permanently waterlogged 5 blue-green 21 magenta 37 red-violet 5 Loamy sand 5 Dam 22 Plateau 6 Poorly drained 6 brown 22 maroon 38 rust 6 Saline 6 Desert dune 23 Pond/pool 7 Running water 7 cream 23 mauve 39 turquoise 7 Sandy 7 Donga/gulley/ditch 24 Ravine/kloof/gorge 8 Seasonally waterlogged 8 green 24 mustard 40 violet 8 Sandy clay 8 Dry river/streambed 25 Ridge 9 Tidal 9 green-white 25 none 41 violet-blue 9 Sandy loam 9 Estuary 26 River/stream 10 Well-drained 10 green-yellow 26 olive 42 white 10 Floodplain 27 River/streambank

11 grey 27 orange 43 yellow 11 Hill slope 28 Sandstone outcrop 12 grey-brown 28 orange-red 44 yellow-brown 12 Hilltop 29 Sea Substrate 13 grey-green 29 orange-white 45 yellow-green 13 Lagoon 30 Seepage area 1 Bare rock 14 grey-orange 30 orange-yellow 46 yellow-orange 14 Lake 31 Slope 2 Bark 15 grey-purple 31 pink 47 yellow-white 15 Littoral 32 Talus/scree 3 Calcrete 16 grey-red 32 purple 16 Marsh/swamp/wetland 33 Valley 4 Concretions 17 Mountain peak 34 Waterfall/rapids 5 Gravel Vegetation structure Disturbance Aspect Slope 6 Hardpan 7 In water 1 Closed Shrubland 1 Abandoned land 9 Heavily grazed 1 E 1 Gentle 8 Leaf 2 Closed Woodland 2 Alien vegetation 10 Plantation 2 N 2 Level 9 Leaf-litter 3 Desert 3 Burnt field 11 Planted pasture 3 NE 3 Moderate 10 Limestone 4 Forest 4 Bush cut 12 Railwayside 4 NW 4 Steep 11 River wall 5 Fynbos 5 Cultivated land 13 Recently burnt 5 S 5 Variable 12 Rocks 6 Grassland 6 Disturbed - other 14 Roadside 6 SE 6 Vertical

13 Roots 7 Karoo 7 Eroded 15 None 7 SW 14 Shells 8 Open Shrubland 8 Garden 8 Variable

15 Soil 9 Open Woodland 9 W

16 Stony soil/rocky 17 Termite mound Other habitat and vegetation notes:______18 Other

PLANT DESCRIPTION

Distribution Abundance Seasonality Life Duration Growth Form Life Form Flower Fruit Colour Flower Fruit Colour 1 Local 1 Abundant 1 Deciduous 1 Annual 1 Climber 1 Bryophyte 1 1 amber 25 25 none 2 Widespread 2 Common 2 Evergreen 2 Biennial 2 Erect 2 Climber 2 2 beige 26 26 olive 3 Unknown 3 Occasional 3 Semi- 3 Ephemeral 3 Prostrate 3 Dwarf shrub 3 3 black 27 27 orange 4 Rare deciduous 4 Perennial 4 Spreading 4 Epiphyte 4 4 blue 28 28 orange-red 4 Unknown 5 Unknown 5 Tussock 5 Geophyte 5 5 blue-green 29 29 orange-white 6 Unknown 6 Graminoid 6 6 brown 30 30 orange-yellow 7 Grass 7 7 cream 31 31 pink 8 Herb 8 8 green 32 32 purple Problem Status Plant height: [ | , | ] m 9 Hydrophyte 9 9 green-white 33 33 purple-violet 1 Exotic Weed 10 Lichen 10 10 green-yellow 34 34 red 2 Invasive exotic 11 Lithophyte 11 11 grey 35 35 red-brown 3 Non-spreading exotic 12 Parasite 12 12 grey-brown 36 36 red-purple 4 Ruderal exotic 13 Pteridophyte 13 13 grey-green 37 37 red-violet

14 Reed 14 14 grey-orange 38 38 rust Plant description & notes: 15 Saprophyte 15 15 grey-purple 39 39 turquoise 16 Scrambler 16 16 grey-red 40 40 violet 17 Shrub 17 17 grey-white 41 41 violet-blue

18 Succulent 18 18 grey-yellow 42 42 white 19 19 indigo 43 43 yellow 20 20 light grey 44 44 yellow-brown 21 21 magenta 45 45 yellow-green 22 22 maroon 46 46 yellow-orange

23 23 mauve 47 47 yellow-white 24 24 mustard

FOR ANIMALS FOUND DEAD

Cause of Death: Poison Power line electrocution Power line collision Road casualty Fence Fire

Disease Trapped Other:

COLLECTED SPECIMEN DETAILS

Specimen type: Egg(s) Larva(e) Adult/Juvenile Skeleton/Shell Skin Scat Tissue (incl. blood)

Specimen sent to: ______

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD(S) AUDIO RECORDING(S)

Name Location Name Location

LITERATURE RECORD

Reference:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY: To be entered on ‘Specimen’ tab of Biodiversity Database

IDPrecision DatePrecision LocalityPrecision 1 Family 1 Day 1 Nearest Second or better 2 Genus 2 Month 2 Nearest Minute 3 Species 3 Year 3 Nearest Quarter Degree 4 Subspecies 4 Decade 4 Nearest Degree 5 Variety 5 Century 5 Reserve Centroid 6 Unknown 6 Unknown 6 Unknown 7 Farm Centroid 8 Unable to locate 9 Urban Centroid 10 Reserve Compartment Centroid

Locality calculated IF TRUE: DDS ______DDE ______OR Latitude: [ | ] [ | ]’ [ | . ]” S Longitude: [ | ] [ | ]’ [ | . ]” E Locked Confidential Lodging Code:

Owner: ______Encoder: ______For official use only

WCNCB ANIMAL DATA FORM CNC Code:

Species: ______

Collector(s): Field No.:

Collection date: [DD/MM/YYYY] RecordType Audio recording Locality: Heard calling Literature

MPULSORY Observation Photograph CO Scat Specimen Latitude:  ’ ” S Longitude:  ’ ” E

Altitude: m Grid Ref.:

Substrate Colour HABITAT Soil Landscape amber grey-white purple-violet Calcareous Cliff base Mountain slope Moisture beige grey-yellow red Clay Cliff face Outcrop black indigo red-brown Coastal pool Humus-rich Cliff top Pan/depression blue light grey red-purple Free standing water Loamy Coastal dune Plain blue-green magenta red-violet Mist / fog Loamy sand Dam Plateau brown maroon rust Moist / damp Saline Desert dune Pond/pool cream mauve turquoise Permanently waterlogged Sandy Donga/gulley/ditch Ravine/kloof/gorge green mustard violet Poorly drained Sandy clay Dry river/streambed Ridge green-white none violet-blue Running water Sandy loam Estuary River/stream Seasonally waterlogged green-yellow olive white Floodplain River/streambank Tidal grey orange yellow Hill slope Sandstone outcrop Well-drained grey-brown orange-red yellow-brown Hilltop Sea

grey-green orange-white yellow-green Lagoon Seepage area grey-orange orange-yellow yellow-orange Lake Slope Substrate grey-purple pink yellow-white Littoral Talus/scree Bare rock grey-red purple Marsh/swamp/wetland Valley Bark Mountain peak Waterfall/rapids Calcrete Physiognomy Disturbance Aspect Slope Concretions Abandoned land Heavily grazed E Gentle Gravel Closed Shrubland Alien vegetation Plantation N Level Hardpan Closed Woodland Burnt field Planted pasture NE Moderate In water Desert Bush cut Railwayside NW Steep Leaf Forest Cultivated land Recently burnt S Variable Leaf-litter Fynbos Disturbed - other Roadside SE Vertical Limestone Grassland Eroded None SW River wall Karoo Garden Variable Rocks Open Shrubland W Roots Open Woodland Shells Habitat notes / Vegetation Type: Soil Stony soil/rocky Termite mound Other

NUMBER(S) Adults: Hatchlings: Skeletons: Sub-adults: Shells: Larvae: Juveniles: Skins: Calling: Eggs (or eggs per batch): Additional notes:

ATTACHMENT 6 COSTING PLAN

ATTACHMENT 7 –

SERVITUDE REGISTERED ON THE PA