Droplet Radiator Systems for Spacecraft Thermal Control

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

10 . SPACECRAFJ T VOL1 . 23NO , Droplet Radiator Systems for Spacecraft Thermal Control Robert T. Taussig* Spectra Technology, Incorporated,^Bellevue, Washington and MattickT. A. J University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Liquid-droplet radiators (LDRs) can be as much as 5 to 10 times lighter than advanced heat pipe radiators. They are virtually immune to puncture, stow in a small volume, and are easily deployed. Systems studies show that they optimize in the 10- to 100-MW size for liquid lithium, tin, and aluminum and at several hundred kilowatts for NaK and vacuum oils. Larger radiators can be constructed from modules of these sizes. Power systems reoptimize lighmase R th tr sLD lowe d operatfo K 0 r10 rejec t ea t hea5 o t temperature3 e b y ma d san times lighter than those using conventional radiators. Recent collector tests have revealed a splash-free regime of operation promising high collection efficiencies testR spacn si LD . e shoul feasible d b neae th rn ei future . Nomenclature Introduction A = radiator sheet area (one side) MALL liquid droplets offe vera r y lightweigh rejeco t y ttwa Ar = radiator aspect ratio aste heat from space power systems becaus theif eo r high Bon= d numbe o f rotatinB o r g collector film surface area per unit mass. Lightweight radiators will become c = droplet liquid specific heat a necessity as the need for higher powers in space increases. C = evaporation rate function Missionundew no re consideratiosar n that will require rejec- d = separation distance between adjacent droplet tio f megawattno f wasto s e continuoua hea n o t s basisd an , streams future missions may need to reject hundreds to thousands of E3 = elliptic integral megawatts. The very feasibility of such missions is brought in- Froude= Fnumber f rotatino r g collector film doubo t t because conventional radiatoro heavo to to d e yan sar lengt= f radiatoho Lr r sheet difficult to deploy or assemble in space. drople= tm sheee t evaporation ratunir epe t area Liquid-droplet radiators (LDRs) have been investigatea y db thy = droplet sheet mass flow rate numbe authorsf ro havd 1"an 5 numbee a distinctivf ro e advan- M - total mass of droplet sheet radiator tage thin si s context: mas= f dropletso M ffligh n i s t 1) The radiating surface is invulnerable to puncture by P, Pr = radiated thermal power small particles and by directed energy weapons. r = droplet radius 2) They are lightweight because very little fluid mass is re- Re = Reynolds number of rotating collector film quired for a given radiating area and armoring against punc- drople= t shee s t thickness t requiredturno s ei . T0 = radiator inlet temperature 3) They can be deployed easily by using a mast that expands radiato= rT joutle t temperature to its full length in orbit. Te = effective mean radiator temperature 4) They can be stowed in a small volume, such as a canister ^peak = Peak thermal cycle temperature of liquid and a collapsible structure. drople= t velocitu y 5) The operatn ylona ca r gfo e perio f timdo - e oveap n a r ur = radial flow velocity of rotating collector film propriate temperature interval where evaporative losses are Ue = tip velocity of rotating collector minimal. w = droplet sheet width at droplet generator Droplet radiators are still in the conceptual stage of develop- We = relative droplet Weber number ment. Initial experiments exploring the formation of droplets, evaporate= 18d mass fraction splashing in simulated zero-G conditions, and radiative cool- e0 = intrinsic emissivity of droplet liquid ing from selected droplet materials have been carried outd an , t> €sheet = mean hemispherical emissivity of droplet sheet an investigation of droplet collector technology, described X = separation distance between droplets in a single below, has recently been completed. Preliminary systems stream analysis of the droplet radiator has accompanied these in- drople= t liquip d mass density vestigation guido st experimentae eth l endeavor modeo t d slan 2 pa = droplet sheet area density (kg/m ) the performance (e.g., total system weight, peak power, a = Stefan-Boltzmann constant radiator effectiveness) of various configurations. The systems T> Tmeashee= tn optical dept f dropleho t sheet model include majose eacth f hro radiator components, such optica= l dept70 droplef ho t shee t dropleta t generator as pumps, nozzle arrays, collectors structured an , s thae ar t radiato= rT Llifetim e needed to operate this type of radiator. A description of the angula= r velocitco f rotatinyo g collector systems model and a summary of the major conclusions of that analysis are discussed here. Presented as Paper 84-1797 at the AIAA 19th Thermophysics Con- ference, Snowmass , JunCO ,e 25-28, 1984; submitted Oct , 19841 . ; ConcepR LD e tTh revision received April 1, 1985. Copyright © American Institute of Mattick and Hertzberg have described the basic radiator Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 1985. All rights reserved. 1 2 * Directo f Energo r y Technology. Member AIAA. physics of the liquid-droplet radiator. ' In their model the tFormerly Mathematical Sciences Northwest, Inc. droplets form a thin sheet with variable optical thickness, ^Research Associate Professor, Aeronautics & Astronautics. dependin droplee th n go t number density, droplet sized an , JAN.-FEB. 1986 RADIATOR SYSTEM SPACECRAFR SFO T THERMAL CONTROL 11 sheet thickness. The radiative transfer equation was solved LDR Systems Model assuming isotropic scattering and a constant temperature from preliminarA y systems mode triangulaa f o l r liquid droplet top to bottom of the sheet. The only temperature variation sheet radiator has been developed which incorporates in- considered was in the direction of the droplet velocity due to dividual models of each of the major components and radiative coolin collectore routn gth e o et . Figur showe1 sa calculates self-consistentl liquie yth d flow rate, pressured an , triangular droplet sheet radiator wit rotatinha g collectot a r component mass at each station in the system. As a conse- the focal point. quence e componenth , t sized operatinan s g conditione ar s extreme th t A dropleew limilo f o tt densit vera r yy(o thi n matched throughout the system. sheet), the droplets radiate their heat independently of each initiae Th l radiator configuratio majod an n r components other; this is the lightest-weight version of the droplet radiator showe ar Fign ni heae . 3Th .t exchange t beeno ns incorha r - but als largese oth arean i tr hig Fo .h droplet densities- op e th , porate modee th n di l sinc t dependei specifie th n so c mission tical thickness increases and radiation from the droplets near powed an r system used. the center of the sheet is occluded by neighboring droplets so e tharadiativth t e effectivenes f o individuas l droplets Droplet Sheet Model .decreases. However equivalene th , t emissivit droplee th f yo t The main assumptions underlying the droplet sheet calcula- sheet increases so that the required sheet area decreases. For tion thae sar t 1) materia loss li t primarily through evaporation optical depths much greate poina , r 5 diminishinf tha tr o o n4 g aimind an g inaccuracies radiatoe th ) 2 ; r retains s 100it f %o return s reachei s d wher e sheeeth t becomes heavier without load capacit givea r yfo n lifetime Tliquie L th (years) ) d3 d an ; real gain in emissivity. The optical depth r is defined as droplet temperatur collectoe th t ea vers i r y clos freezingo et . T=irr2S/(d2\). In the case of liquid metal droplets, the sheet The input parameter e totaar s l radiated powe r pea(o r k emissivit largee b n ry ca tha intrinsie nth c material emissivity temperature), droplet material properties (i.e., density, sur- (i.e., infraree 0. 0.1o 1th t near-infrared n 5i an d d spectrum) face tension, viscosity, specific heat, and intrinsic emissivity), because radiation from the interior droplets escapes via multi- optica le sheetth dept f ,o h sheet aspect ratio (i.e.,= ple reflections from neighboring droplets case f th oils eo n I ., width/length), radiator lifetime, aiming accuracy, droplet the droplet emissivity is already high (i.e., 0.5 to 0.85) so that radius, and number of radiators operating in parallel. If the even though radiation fro interioe mth occludeds ri sheee th , t total power radiated and number of parallel radiators are in- higa stils h lha effectiv e intrinsiemissivite th o t e c yemissivdu - put data, a separate calculation must be made of the peak droplee th itf yo t material. (inlet) temperatur e dropletsth f e evaporatioo e Th . n rate basiconcepe R Th cLD tformatio e relieth n so f uniforno m depend radiatoe th n so r temperature opticae th n o l deptd san h droplets using technolog printerst y je relate k in o d.t Uniform- sheete o th f- 2E :1 m3[ (ee= 0f)]C( 7^,7^), wher factoe eth n i r itf dropleyo t sizvelocitied ean s ensures equal cooling during square brackets represent e reabsorptioth s f evaporateo n d droplet travel. Although droplet e outeth rn e o sedgth f o e material by neighboring droplets in the sheet. The factor sheet will cool faster than inside e thosth preliminar r n eo ou , y r( 0C , 7\) increases rapidly with temperatur dependd ean n so calculations indicate that this effec modests i t . Analysie th f so the droplet material chosen.8 Each liquid can be used only electric charge induce droplete space th th n do y e sb plasm a over a specific range of peak temperatures before evaporation and by solar photon bombardment show that deflection of severely limits the lifetime of the radiator.
Recommended publications
  • Project Final Report

    Project Final Report

    PROJECT FINAL REPORT Grant Agreement number: 313096 Project acronym: MEGAHIT Project title: Megawatt Highly Efficient Technologies for Space Power and Propulsion Systems for Long-duration Exploration Missions Funding Scheme: FP7 Space Period covered: from 1/3/2013 to 31/08/2014 Name of the scientific representative of the project's co-ordinator, Title and Organisation: Jean-Claude Worms, Head of Science Support Office European Science Foundation Tel:++33 (0)3 88 76 88 Fax: ++33 (03) 88 71 00 E-mail: [email protected] Project websiteError! Bookmark not defined. address: www.megahit-eu.org 1 Final publishable summary report 1.1 Executive Summary A significant number of exploration missions require nuclear propulsion for which power sources are essential and enabling key assets. Associated technological developments however require important financial efforts that can probably only take place in the frame of an international collaboration, sharing the efforts as this has been the case for the International Space Station. MEGAHIT, funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, is a supporting action aiming at building a European roadmap for Megawatt level nuclear electric propulsion, in preparation of the Horizon 2020 programme. MEGAHIT is driven by a consortium that is coordinated by the European Science Foundation and that includes CNES, DLR, Keldysh Research Center, the National Nuclear Laboratory from U.K. and Thales Alenia Space Italia. The consortium favoured an open and participative approach in order that all interested stakeholders - research centers, agencies and industry- within consortium or not, could establish common research objectives and initiate research alliances.
  • Conceptual Design of Liquid Droplet Radiator Shuttle-Attached Experiment

    Conceptual Design of Liquid Droplet Radiator Shuttle-Attached Experiment

    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19900002490 2020-03-20T00:48:02+00:00Z View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NASA Technical Reports Server NASA Contract Report 185165 Conceptual Design of Liquid Droplet Radiator Shuttle-Attached Experiment Technical Requirements Document Shlomo L. Pfeiffer Grumman Space Systems Bethpage, New York October 1989 Prepared for Lewis Research Center Under Contract NAS3-25357 NgO-llo06 (,NASA-CR-I_SI65) CnNCEPTUAL nESIGN OF LIQUID nROPL_T RADIATnR _HU TTL_-ATTACHED EXPERIMENT TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS O rlCUMENT uncl as _!_ ::_ (r.ru_an Aerospace Corp.) 31 p CSCL I0_ 63/20 02q_OlI • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ....... .i.................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Objectives of the Experiment ................................................................... 3 2.2 Potential Missions ...................................................................................... 5 3.0 Payload Accommodation ...................................................................................... 6 3.1 Crew Involvement ...................................................................................... 8 4.0 Experiment Definition ............................................................................................ 9 5.0 Conclusions ...........................................................................................................
  • Lightweight Solar Power Constellation Solving the Space Solar Power Puzzle

    Lightweight Solar Power Constellation Solving the Space Solar Power Puzzle

    Lightweight Solar Power Constellation Solving the Space Solar Power Puzzle Members Sam Albert1, [email protected] 1 Noah Marquand ,​ [email protected] ​ 1 Jacob Nunez-Kearny ,​ [email protected] ​ 1 Michael Thompson ,​ [email protected] ​ Mentor Denis Curtin2 1 Purdue University, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Undergraduate Student 2 Society of Satellite Professionals International 1 Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………...........2 Introduction to Space-Based Solar Power…………………………………………….………..3 Technical Requirements…………………………………………………………………............4 Array Structure………………………………………………………………………….……….5 Hub and Spoke…………………………………………………………….………............5 Constellation……………………………………………………………..………………..7 Benefits of Multi-Satellite Structure………………………………..……………………..8 Solar Energy Collection………………………………………………….….……………….....10 Lightweight Deployable Mirror………………………………….….…………………...10 Concentrated Solar Energy Cell……………………………….……..…………………..12 Orbital Design…………………………………………………………………...……………...14 Time Exposed to Sunlight……………………………………………...………………...14 Ground Track Management……………………………………………...……………....15 Design Choice…………………………………………………………………………....15 Future Technology Improvements……………………………………………………….15 Power Transmission…………………………………………………………..………………...17 Background of Wireless Power Transmission…………………………………..……….17 System Design…………………………………………………………..…………….…18 DC-to-RF Power Conversion…………………………………………..………………...18 Microwave Array Antenna Transmission………………………………..………………19 Rectenna RF-to-DC Power Collection
  • Energy, Power, and Transport

    Energy, Power, and Transport

    Frontispiece Advanced Lunar Base In this panorama of an advanced lunar base, the main habitation modules in the background to the right are shown being covered by lunar soil for radiation protection. The modules on the far right are reactors in which lunar soil is being processed to provide oxygen. Each reactor is heated by a solar mirror. The vehicle near them is collecting liquid oxygen from the reactor complex and will transport it to the launch pad in the background, where a tanker is just lifting off. The mining pits are shown just behind the foreground figure on the left. The geologists in the foreground are looking for richer ores to mine. Artist: Dennis Davidson NASA SP-509, vol. 2 Space Resources Energy, Power, and Transport Editors Mary Fae McKay, David S. McKay, and Michael B. Duke Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas 1992 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Program Washington, DC 1992 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN 0-16-038062-6 Technical papers derived from a NASA-ASEE summer study held at the California Space Institute in 1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Space resources : energy, power, and transport / editors, Mary Fae McKay, David S. McKay, and Michael B. Duke. x, 174 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.—(NASA SP ; 509 : vol. 2) 1. Outer space—Exploration—United States. 2. Natural resources. 3. Space industrialization—United States. I. McKay, Mary Fae. II. McKay, David S. III. Duke, Michael B.
  • NASA Technical Memorandum 4555

    NASA Technical Memorandum 4555

    NASA Technical Memorandum 4555 June 1994 Review of Advanced Radiator Technologies for Spacecraft Power Systems and Space Thermal Control Albert J. Juhasz and George P. Peterson National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Technical Memorandum 4555 1994 Review of Advanced Radiator Technologies for Spacecraft Power Systems and Space Thermal Control Albert J. Juhasz Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio and George P. Peterson Texas A&M University College Station, Texas National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Management Scientific and Technical Information Program Trade names or manufacturers' names are used in this report for identification only. This usage does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. REVIEW OF ADVANCED RADIATOR TECHNOLOGIES FOR SPACECRAFT POWER SYSTEMS AND SPACE THERMAL CONTROL Albert J. Juhasz Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio and George P. Peterson Texas A&M University College Station, Texas Summary Introduction The thermal management of manned spacecraft traditionally The traditional means for rejecting heat from manned space- has relied primarily on pumped, single-phase liquid systems to craft are heat-rejection systems composed of single-phase fluid collect, transport, and reject heat via single-phase radiators. loops (Peterson 1987). These single-phase fluid loops use a Although these systems have performed with excellent reliabil- mechanically pumped coolant to transfer heat from the habita- ity, evolving space platforms and space-based power systems tion portion of the spacecraft to the radiators where it is rejected will require lighter, more flexible thermal management sys- to the space environment. Although these systems have per- tems because of the long mission duration, large quantities formed with excellent reliability in the past, evolving space of power system cycle reject heat, and variety of payloads platforms and space-based power systems will require more involved.
  • I -'°' Ilit Reradiatedenergy A,E,O.T4

    6 Radiators D. G. Gilmore* Introduction Spacecraft waste heat is ultimately rejected to space by radiator surfaces. Radia- tors occur in several different forms, such as spacecraft structural panels, fiat-plate radiators mounted to the side of the spacecraft, and panels deployed after the spacecraft is on orbit. Whatever the configuration, all radiators reject heat by infrared (IR) radiation from their surfaces. The radiating power depends on the surface's emittance and temperature. The radiator must reject both the spacecraft waste heat plus any radiant-heat loads from the environment or other spacecraft surfaces that are absorbed by the radiator, as shown in Fig. 6.1. Most radiators are therefore given surface finishes with high IR emittance (e > 0.8) to maximize heat rejection and low solar absorptance (ix < 0.2) to limit heat loads from the sun. Typ- ical finishes, discussed in more detail in Chapter 4, include quartz mirrors, sil- vered or aluminized Teflon, and white paint. Surface finish determines e~, ~ii] j Environmental heat loads i-,, iiiii:.ir . ~ A,o~,(solar + albedo) i AoEo(IR) I -'°' ilit Reradiatedenergy A,E,o.T4 Environmental loads +T_,Q~nt = Reradiated energy (Steady state) Fig. 6.1. (Fig. 4.1, reproduced here for your convenience.) Radiator energy balance. Environmental loads + ~Qint - reradiated energy (steady state, no external blockage). *The Aerospace Corporation, E1 Segundo, California. 207 208 Radiators The radiating power of a radiator is a strong function of temperature. The total heat leaving a radiator surface is given by the simple expression 0_. = AF-,oT 4 (6.1) where A is surface area, E is emittance, and ~ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.669 x 10 -8 W/m2.K4), and T is absolute temperature (K).
  • 2019-88 ADA119243.Pdf

    2019-88 ADA119243.Pdf

    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com AD-A119 243 R AND 0 ASSOCIATES ARLINGTON VA F/G 10/2 ~RESEARCH NEEDS: PRIME-POWER FOR HIGH ENERGY SPACE SYSTEMS.(U) F4962082-C-0008 eL JUN 82 P J TURCHI UNCLASSIFIED AFOSR-TR-82-0717 NL tow- RESEARCH NEEDS: PRIME-POWER I~ FOR HIGH ENERGY SPACE SYSTEMS JUNE 1982 I I Submitted to: AIR FORCE OFFICE OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH I AFOSR/NP Bolling AFB Washigton, D. C. 20332 LAU m R1401 & DWilson ASSOCIATES Boulevard . 'psuits 500 Arlington, Virginia 22209 r 1401 WILSON BOULEVARD 0 ARLINGTON, VA 0 TELEPHONE: (703)522-5400 Appwowd to public release.| 82 09 13 199 UNMAIMFED SEUIYCLASSIFICATION OF TIA*S PACE PAGE READ INSTRUCTIONS REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAEUEFORE COMPLETING FORM I. R~Ib~rnR8 .0 17 OOVT ACESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER 14. TITLE ("nd Subtitle) S. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED RESEARCH NEEDS: Prime-Power for High Final Report Energy Space Systems 26 OCT B1-11 JUlL R2 G. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBERI,) 1. AUTHOR($) S. CONTRACI OR GRANT NUMBER(*) Dr. Peter J. Turchi F49620-82-C-Q008 9. PERFORMING ORGANI1ZATION NAME AND ADORESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT. TASK R & DAssocatesAREA & WVOR~kUNIT NUMBERS 1401 Wilson Blvd.
  • NASA Technical Memorandum 4555

    NASA Technical Memorandum 4555

    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19940032314 2020-06-16T10:53:31+00:00Z NASA Technical Memorandum 4555 June 1994 Review of Advanced Radiator Technologies for Spacecraft Power Systems and Space Thermal Control Albert J. Juhasz and George P. Peterson National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Technical Memorandum 4555 1994 Review of Advanced Radiator Technologies for Spacecraft Power Systems and Space Thermal Control Albert J. Juhasz Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio and George P. Peterson Texas A&M University College Station, Texas National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Management Scientific and Technical Information Program Trade names or manufacturers' names are used in this report for identification only. This usage does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. REVIEW OF ADVANCED RADIATOR TECHNOLOGIES FOR SPACECRAFT POWER SYSTEMS AND SPACE THERMAL CONTROL Albert J. Juhasz Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio and George P. Peterson Texas A&M University College Station, Texas Summary Introduction The thermal management of manned spacecraft traditionally The traditional means for rejecting heat from manned space- has relied primarily on pumped, single-phase liquid systems to craft are heat-rejection systems composed of single-phase fluid collect, transport, and reject heat via single-phase radiators. loops (Peterson 1987). These single-phase fluid loops use a Although these systems have performed with excellent reliabil- mechanically pumped coolant to transfer heat from the habita- ity, evolving space platforms and space-based power systems tion portion of the spacecraft to the radiators where it is rejected will require lighter, more flexible thermal management sys- to the space environment.
  • Space Resources

    Space Resources

    NASA SP-509, vol. 2 Space Resources Energy, Power, and Transport Editors Mary Fae McKay, David S. McKay, and Michael B. Duke Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas I 1992 - 1/\5-1\ Natio.nal Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Program N Washington. DC 1992 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN 0-16-038062-6 /' i - = Technical papers derived from a NASA-ASEE summer study held at the California Space Institute in 1984. - ~ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data I Space resources : energy, power, and transport I editors, Mary Fae McKay, David S. McKay, and Michael B. Duke. x, 174 p. : ill. ; 28 cm. - (NASA SP ; 509 : vol. 2) 1. Outer space-Explort'l11ori UniteQ_ States. 2. Natural resources. 3. Space ]OQLl~!rfolt;zatfon:..:_United States. I. McKay, Mary Fae. II. McKay, David S. Ill. Duke, Michael B. i IV. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Program. V. Series. I TL789.8.U5S595 1992 92-4468 333. 7'0999-dc20 Preface Space resources must be used to by the California Space Institute support life on the Moon and and the Lyndon B. Johnson Space exploration of Mars. Just as the Center, under the direction of pioneers applied the tools they the Office of Aeronautics and brought with them to resources they Space Technology (OAST) at found along the way rather than NASA Headquarters. The study trying to haul all their needs over participants-(Jisted in the a long supply line, so too must addendum) included a group of space travelers apply their high 18 university teachers and technology tools to local resources.
  • Prospects for Nuclear Electric Propulsion Using Closed-Cycle Magnetohydrodynamic Energy Conversion

    Prospects for Nuclear Electric Propulsion Using Closed-Cycle Magnetohydrodynamic Energy Conversion

    NASA/TP--2001-211274 Prospects For Nuclear Electric Propulsion Using Closed-Cycle Magnetohydrodynamic Energy Conversion R.J. Litchford, L.J. Bitteker, and J.E. Jones Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama October 2001 The NASA STI Program Office...in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected the advancement of aeronautics and space papers from scientific and technical conferences, science. The NASA Scientific and Technical symposia, seminars, or other meetings sponsored Information (STI) Program Office plays a key or cosponsored by NASA. part in helping NASA maintain this important role. SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, technical, or historical information from NASA programs, The NASA STI Program Office is operated by projects, and mission, often concerned with Langley Research Center, the lead center for subjects having substantial public interest. NASA's scientific and technical information. The NASA STI Program Office provides access to the TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. NASA STI Database, the largest collection of English-language translations of foreign scientific aeronautical and space science STI in the world. The and technical material pertinent to NASA's Program Office is also NASA's institutional mission. mechanism for disseminating the results of its research and development activities. These results Specialized services that complement the STI are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report Program Office's diverse offerings include creating Series, which includes the following report types: custom thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results...even TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of providing videos. completed research or a major significant phase of research that present the results of NASA For more information about the NASA STI Program programs and include extensive data or Office, see the following: theoretical analysis.
  • Megawatt Class Nuclear Space Power Systems (MCNSPS) Conceptual Design and Evaluation Report

    Megawatt Class Nuclear Space Power Systems (MCNSPS) Conceptual Design and Evaluation Report

    c. T NASA Contractor Report 179614 SPI-25- 1 Megawatt Class Nuclear Space Power Systems (MCNSPS) Conceptual Design and Evaluation Report Volume 11-Technologies I: Reactors, Heat Transport, Integration Issues J.R. Wetch, et al. Space Power, Inc. San Jose, California September 1988 Prepared for Lewis Research Center Under Contract NAS3-23867 National Aeronautics and Space Administration (hASI-CP-1790 14-Wcl-2) BE6AhATP CLASS Bas-225 E 1 bT'CLEAH SPACE ECLEB SYSlEES1 (kCkSES) CCkCEETUAL tE1S1Cb BIC EBALLC'I3CI CEECBP. YCLUAE 2, IECkL<LCGIEE 1: 6E&CPC6LSI IfEAT Unc las 9RAblSE06T, ILlEdBAlICb ISISCE: 3inal Report 63/44 0 1900% SPI-25-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME-PAGE 1.0 Abstract ........................... 1-1 1.1 Objectives ...................... 1-2 1.2 Performance Requirements ............... 1-3 1.3 StudyGoals ..................... 1-3 1.4 Systems Considered for MCNSPS ............. 1-3 1.5 Study Results ..................... 1-5 2.0 Conclusions ......................... 1-10 2.1 Study Concept ..................... 1-10 2.2 Application ...................... 1-13 2.3 Technology Status ................... 1-14 2.4 Candidate Technologies ................ 1-15 2.5 Study Results ..................... 1-16 2.6 Critical Technology Development Requirements ..... 1-22 3.0 Introduction and Background ................. 1-28 4.0 Technologies Considered ................... 11-1 4.1 MCNSPS Objectives ................... 11-1 4.2 Candidate Systems ................... 11-2 4.3 Heat Rejection .................... 11-15 4.4 Space Power Reactors and Fuel ............. 11-75 4.5 Power Conversion Systems ............... 111-1 5.0 Concepts Selection ...................... IV-1 5.1 Selection Criteria and Screening for Preferred Systems ................ IV-1 5.2 Evaluation and Selection ............... IV-3 5.3 System Configuration ................
  • Megawatt System Based on a Tungsten CERMET Reactor

    Megawatt System Based on a Tungsten CERMET Reactor

    INL/CON-10-20348 PREPRINT A Conceptual Multi- Megawatt System Based on a Tungsten CERMET Reactor Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2011 Jonathan A. Webb Brian J. Gross February 2011 This is a preprint of a paper intended for publication in a journal or proceedings. Since changes may be made before publication, this preprint should not be cited or reproduced without permission of the author. This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for any third party’s use, or the results of such use, of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned rights. The views expressed in this paper are not necessarily those of the United States Government or the sponsoring agency. Proceedings of Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2011 Albuquerque, NM, February 7-10, 2011 Paper 3275 A Conceptual Multi-Megawatt System Based on a Tungsten CERMET Reactor Jonathan A. Webb1 and Brian J. Gross 1Center for Space Nuclear Research, P.O. Box 1625, 1765 N. Yellowstone Hwy, Idaho Falls, ID 83415 (208)526-4538; [email protected] Abstract. A conceptual reactor system to support Multi-Megawatt Nuclear Electric Propulsion is investigated within this paper. The reactor system consists of a helium cooled Tungsten-UN fission core, surrounded by a beryllium neutron reflector and 13 B4C control drums coupled to a high temperature Brayton power conversion system.