Arxiv:1001.0543V2 [Quant-Ph] 10 Oct 2010
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Optimal reconstruction of the states in qutrits system Fei Yan,1 Ming Yang∗,1 and Zhuo-Liang Cao2 1Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Information Acquisition and Manipulation, Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Material Science, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, People's Republic of China 2Department of Physics & Electronic Engineering, Hefei Normal University, Hefei 230061, People's Republic of China Based on mutually unbiased measurements, an optimal tomographic scheme for the multiqutrit states is pre- sented explicitly. Because the reconstruction process of states based on mutually unbiased states is free of information waste, we refer to our scheme as the optimal scheme. By optimal we mean that the number of the required conditional operations reaches the minimum in this tomographic scheme for the states of qutrit systems. Special attention will be paid to how those different mutually unbiased measurements are realized; that is, how to decompose each transformation that connects each mutually unbiased basis with the standard computational basis. It is found that all those transformations can be decomposed into several basic implementable single- and two-qutrit unitary operations. For the three-qutrit system, there exist five different mutually unbiased-bases structures with different entanglement properties, so we introduce the concept of physical complexity to min- imize the number of nonlocal operations needed over the five different structures. This scheme is helpful for experimental scientists to realize the most economical reconstruction of quantum states in qutrit systems. PACS numbers: 03.65.Wj, 03.65.Ta, 03.65.Ud, 03.67.Mn I. INTRODUCTION is redundancy in these results in the previously used quantum tomography processes [12], which causes a resources waste. If we remove this redundancy completely, the reconstruction The quantum state of a system is a fundamental concept in process will become an optimal one. So, to design an opti- quantum mechanics, and a quantum state can be described by mal set of measurements for removing the redundancy is of a density matrix, which contains all the information one can fundamental significance in quantum information processing. obtain about that system. A main task for implementing quan- tum computation is to reconstruct the density matrix of an un- Mutually unbiased bases (MUBs) have been used in a va- known state, which is called quantum state reconstruction or riety of topics in quantum mechanics [13–36]. MUBs are de- quantum state tomography[1, 2]. The technique was first de- fined by the property that the squared overlapbetween a vector veloped by Stokes to determine the polarization state of a light in one basis and all basis vectors in the other bases are equal. beam [3]. Recently, Minimal qubit tomography process has That is to say the detection over a particular basis state does been proposed by Reh´aˇcekˇ et al, where only four measure- not give any informationabout the state if it is measured in an- ment probabilities are needed for fully determining a single other basis. Ivanovi´cfirst introduced the concept of MUBs to qubit state, rather than the six probabilities in the standard pro- the problem of quantum state determination [13], and proved cedure [4]. But the implementation of this tomography pro- the existence of such bases in the prime-dimension system by cess requires measurements of N-particle correlations[5].The an explicit construction. Then it has been shown by Wootters statistical reconstruction of biphotons states based on mu- and Fields that measurements in this special class of bases, i.e. tually complementary measurements has been proposed by mutually unbiased measurements (MUMs) provide a minimal Bogdanov et al[6, 7]. Ivanov et al proposed a method to as well as optimal way of complete specification of an un- determine an unknown mixed qutrit state from nine indepen- known density matrix [14]. They proved that the maximal dent fluorescence signals[8]. Moreva et al paid attention to numbers of MUBs is d +1 in prime-dimension system. This arXiv:1001.0543v2 [quant-ph] 10 Oct 2010 experimental problem of the realization of the optimal proto- result also applies to the prime-power-dimension system. col for polarization ququarts state tomography [9]. In 2009, MUBs play a special role in determining quantum states, Taguchi et al developed the single scan tomography of spatial such as it forms a minimal set of measurement bases and pro- three-dimensional (qutrits) state based on the effect of realis- vides an optimal way for determining a quantum state [13–16] tic measurement operators[10]. Allevi et al studied the imple- etc. Recently an optimal tomographic reconstruction scheme mentation of the reconstructionof the Wigner function and the was proposed by Klimov et al for the case of determining density matrix for coherent and thermal states by by switching a state of multiqubit quantum system based on MUMs in on/off single photon avalanche photodetectors[11]. trapped ions system [37]. However, the use of three-level In order to obtain the full information about the system we systems instead of two-level systems has been proven to be need to perform a series of measurements on a large num- securer against a symmetric attack on a quantum key distri- ber of identically prepared copies of the system. These mea- bution protocol with MUMs than the currently existing mea- surement results are not independent of each other, so there surement protocol [38, 39]. Quantum tomography in high di- mensional (qudit) systems has been proposed and the num- ber of required measurements is d2n 1 with d being the di- mension of the qudit system and n being− the number of the ∗[email protected] qudits [12]. This tomography process is not an optimal one, 2 and there is a big redundancy among the measurement results II. MUTUALLY UNBIASED BASES AND MUTUALLY there. To remove this redundancy, we will propose an optimal UNBIASED MEASUREMENTS tomography process for qutrits states. This optimal quantum tomography process is the MUBs-based qutrit states tomog- As shown by Wootters, Fields [14] and Klappenecker, raphy, and the number of required measurements is greatly R¨otteler [19], in finite field language, the first MUB in a reduced. A d-dimensional quantum system is represented by d = pn (p = 2)-dimensional quantum system is the standard a positive semidefinite Hermitian matrix ρ with unit trace in 0 6 (0) basis B given by the vector (a )l = δkl,k,l ̥pn , where d-dimensional Hilbert space, which is specified by d2 1 k ∈ − the superscript denotes the basis, k the vector in the basis, l the real parameters. A nondegenerate measurement performed on n component and ̥pn is the field with p elements. The other d such a system provides d 1 independent probabilities. So, in r (r) − MUBs are denoted by B which consists of vectors (ak )l general, one requires at least d +1 different orthogonal mea- 2 (r) T r(r·l +k·l) surements for fully determining an unknown ρ. For n-qutrit defined by[14]: (ak )l = (1/√d)ω ,r,k,l n p ∈ tomography it only needs 3 + 1 measurements. Through ̥pn , r = 0. Here ω = exp(2πi/p) and rθ = θ + θ + 2 6 n−1 T analysis, one can find that the tomography process for qubit θp + + θp . The set of mutually unbiased projec- system can not be generalized to qudit system case in a trivial ··· (r) (r) (r) tors can be given by Pk = ak ak . It is worth notic- way. The MUBs-based tomography process for qubit system (r) | ih | 0 ing that ak contains the computational basis B . Here proposed by Klimov et al can not be directly applied to qutrit (s) | (r) i T r(P P )=(1/d)(1 δsr +dδsrδjk). Then the measure- system [37]. This is because the entanglement feature of the j k − MUBs of qubits system is totally different from that of qutrits (r) (r) ment probabilities given by ωk = T r(Pk ρ) completely system. So, we will study the physical implementation of an determine the unknown density operator of a d-dimensional optimal tomographic scheme for the case of determining the d d−1 (r) (r) system [13]: ρ =Σr=0Σk=0ωk Pk I. states of multi-qutrit system based on the MUMs. For instance, in a qutrit system, there− are three MUBs be- side the computational basis B0 = 0 , 1 , 2 , in the fol- lowing form with ω = exp(2πi/3): {| i | i | i} From the experimental point of view, the physical complex- ity is a key point for the implementation of a scheme. Here, 1 (1) √ B : a0 = (1/ 3)( 0 + 1 + 2 ), for multi-qutrit quantum tomography, the physical complex- {| i | i | i | i a(1) = (1/√3)( 0 + ω 1 + ω∗ 2 ), ity mainly comes from the entanglement bases, i.e. the num- | 1 i | i | i | i ber of the two-qutrit conditional operation needed for the de- (1) √ ∗ a2 = (1/ 3)( 0 + ω 1 + ω 2 ) ; (1a) composition of these entangled bases. In addition, there ex- | i | i | i | i } ists many different MUBs with different entanglement prop- erties in multi-qutrit system. So the physical complexity of 2 (2) √ B : a0 = (1/ 3)(ω 0 + 1 + 2 ), the quantum tomography process here depends on the entan- {| i | i | i | i a(2) = (1/√3)( 0 + ω 1 + 2 ), glement structure of the MUBs used, and it becomes very im- | 1 i | i | i | i (2) portant to optimize the quantum tomography process over all a2 = (1/√3)( 0 + 1 + ω 2 ) ; (1b) the possible MUBs entanglement structures of the system. | i | i | i | i } B3 : a(3) = (1/√3)(ω∗ 0 + 1 + 2 ), {| 0 i | i | i | i This paper is arranged as follows.