<<

ELSEVIER Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 149 (1999) vii±viii

Preface as an environmental science

Geology is the study of the history of the Earth 1992; Aronson and Precht, 1997). Moreover, without and its . , of course, is no differ- the ability to reconstruct an undisturbed system in ent, and neither is taphonomy: taphonomists reg- the historical record, studying the effects of anthro- ularly infer taphonomic pathways and histories of pogenic disturbance has little meaning. biogenic particles. Taphonomy, paleontology, and The surface mixed layer or Taphonomically Ac- are, then, historical sciences. tive Zone (TAZ) of sediment acts as a low pass Geology, paleontology, and taphonomy are also ®lter, primarily through bioturbation and dissolution, `environmental' sciences because their practitioners that damps high frequency signals before their incor- study ancient settings and their modern analogs. But poration into the historical record. Typically, time- unlike, say, physicists, chemists, or most ecologists, averaging of assemblages results from sedi- who often employ a reductionist approach over very mentation rates that are too slow to prevent mixing short time scales (geologically speaking), Earth sci- of ecological signals into accumulations of longer entists deal with processes that typically occur over duration and lower temporal resolution. Although time scales much longer than those observable over viewed negatively by most workers, time-averaging one or a few human generations. The rates of these is actually an advantage, since short-term noise is processes may be so imperceptible that the environ- damped (Behrensmeyer and Kidwell, 1985). For ex- ment appears constant to us, when in fact it is chang- ample, modern macroinvertebrate death assemblages ing. It is this perspective on time that is arguably from soft-bottom habitats are comparable to repeated the most valuable contribution that the Earth sci- (and expensive!) biological surveys in assessing the ences have made to mankind's view of itself and its `long-term' dynamics (hundreds of years) of bio- surroundings, and makes paleontology so eminently logical communities (Peterson, 1977; Kidwell and suitable to confront the environmental problems that Bosence, 1991; Kidwell and Flessa, 1995). now face society (Frodeman, 1995; Martin, 1998, But natural systems also evolve,sotheyhavea 1999). history, and any so-called laws derived from human Until recently, the fortunes of paleontology, es- observation and experimentation are constrained by pecially micropaleontology, have been tied, like an the rules, the boundary conditions or context, of his- umbilical cord, to the fortunes of oil. Over the last tory. For example, although many calcareous hard- decade, however, the applied Earth sciences have parts dissolve according to the laws of chemistry and moved from an emphasis on resource exploration physics, they may in fact have different histories: and exploitation toward one of resource conserva- shells of different taxa may be degraded by differ- tion and management. In this respect, paleontology ent pathways in the same taphofacies because of holds a tremendous advantage over in that differences in size, mineralogy, and microstructure. most ecologic studies are of too short a duration to Thus, the dynamics of shell input and loss must be assess the long-term (time-averaged) impact of en- evaluated for speci®c settings and taxa before further vironmental perturbations (natural or anthropogenic) generalizations regarding taphonomy are assumed, on biological communities (Martin, 1991, 1995); the which, unfortunately, has all too often been the case only recourse is the fossil record (e.g., Jackson, (Martin, 1998, 1999). How would differences in

0031-0182/99/$ ± see front matter  1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S0031-0182(98)00187-4 viii Preface / Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 149 (1999) vii±viii taphonomic histories (e.g., shell input, sedimenta- References tion rate, tectonic setting) affect the paleoenviron- mental interpretation of ancient environments if one Aronson, R.B., Precht, W.F., 1997. Stasis, biological disturbance, and community structure of a coral reef. Paleobiol- were attempting to compare pre-anthropogenic pris- ogy 23, 326±346. tine systems with modern disturbed ones, especially Behrensmeyer, A.K., Kidwell, S.M., 1985. Taphonomy's contri- when the pre-anthropogenic (historical) record is to butions to . Paleobiology 11, 105±119. be used as a yardstick for measuring anthropogenic Frodeman, R., 1995. Geological reasoning: Geology as an in- disturbance? To ignore history is to ignore a whole terpretive and historical science. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 107, 960±968. untapped ®eld of paleontology that will make pa- Jackson, J.B.C., 1992. Pleistocene perspectives on coral reef leontologists employable. To be sure, assessment of community structure. Am. Zool. 32, 719±731. taphonomic histories is a daunting task that has only Kidwell, S.M., Bosence, D.W.J., 1991. Taphonomy and time- just begun and many of the current approaches to averaging of marine shelly faunas. In: Allison, P.A., Briggs, modeling will require extensive testing and revision, D.E.G. (Eds.), Taphonomy: Releasing the Data Locked in the Fossil Record. (Topics in .) Plenum, New York, but we have only to learn from the process. Precise NY, pp. 116±209. understanding of taphonomic processes and ®lters Kidwell, S.M., Flessa, K.W., 1995. The quality of the fossil bears strongly on the future of paleontology. record: Populations, species, and communities. Annu. Rev. This volume grew out of a Cushman Foundation Ecol. Syst. 26, 269±299. Symposium entitled ªTaphonomy of : Martin, R.E., 1991. Beyond : Micropaleontology in transition? Palaios 6, 437±438. Paleoenvironmental Analysis and Environmental As- Martin, R.E., 1995. The once and future profession of micropa- sessmentº at the 1995 Geological Society of America leontology. J. Foraminiferal Res. 25, 372±373. Annual Meeting in New Orleans that was designed Martin, R.E., 1998. One Long Experiment: Scale and Process in to consider the issues discussed above. Consider- Earth History. Columbia Univ., New York. ing the great advances made in taphonomic research Martin, R.E., 1999. Taphonomy: A Process Approach. Cam- bridge Univ. Press (in press). in all areas of paleontology we decided to broaden Peterson, C.H., 1977. The paleoecological signi®cance of unde- the scope of coverage for this theme issue to in- tected short-term temporal variability. J. Paleontol. 51, 976± clude other disciplines in the ®eld of taphonomy. 981. The investigations range from those on invertebrate microfossils to plants and in a broad range of environments, all demonstrating the utility of taphonomy in paleoenvironmental interpretation.

RONALD E. MARTIN SUSAN T. GOLDSTEIN R. TIMOTHY PATTERSON (Editors)