DOCSLIB.ORG

The U.S. Food and Tobacco Manufacturing Industries: Market Structure, Structural Change, and Economic Perfornnance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The U.S. Food and Tobacco Manufacturing Industries: Market Structure, Structural Change, and Economic Perfornnance The U.S. Food and Tobacco Manufacturing Industries: Market Structure, Structural Change, and Economic Perfornnance John M. Connor United States Economics. Agricultural Department of Statistics, and Economic Agriculture Cooperatives Service Report No. 4 51 THE U.S. FOOD AND TOBACCO MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES: MARKET STRUCTURE, STRUCTURAL CHANGE, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE. By John M. Connor, National Economics Division; Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 451. ABSTRACT The major conclusions the National Commission on Food Marketing made in 1966 about trends in the industrial organization of the U.S. food manufacturing industries are still valid. Company numbers are declining, average market concentration is among the highest in the manufacturing sector and is rising, product diversification has risen, food advertising has more than doubled, and the profitability of very large firms has remained higher than that of smaller firms. Foreign investment is substantial and rapidly growing, most food media advertising is on TV, profit rates have risen by over 50 percent in the last 25 years, and the monopoly overcharge on processed foods is about 10 percent. Keywords: competition, food manufacturing, tobacco manufacturing. Industrial organization, market structure, performance, monopoly, oligopoly, conglomerate firms The names of proprietary firms and brand names are used in this publication to report facts on available data. The Department neither guarantees nor warrants these names and products and implies no approval of the products to the exclusion of others which may also be suitable. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is indebted to Loys L. Mather for his help as co-author of the Directory of the 200 Largest U.S. Food and Tobacco Processing Firms 1975, from which much of the data on the roles of the largest companies were derived.* The collecting and coding tasks for those data were performed by three research assistants at the University of Wisconsin at Madison—Juan Morelll, Miguel Carriquiry, and Michael Pratzel. Charles Handy, Bruce Marlon, Gerald Grlnnell, and Russell Parker generously provided constructive criticism of early drafts of this report. The report was typed by Judith Peterson, Angela Moore, Karen Robinson, and Frances Yates. Tom Houser is thanked for his generous assistance with the programming that produced many of the tables. Debra Ritter edited the report. This report is published by ESCS in cooperation with the core research unit of NC-117, a North Central Regional Project on the "Organization and Control of the U.S. Food Production and Distribution System," University of Wisconsin. *See reference 16, page 73. Washington, D.C. 20250 March 1980 CONTENTS Page SUMMARY iv INTRODUCTION 1 Importance of the Processed Foods and Tobacco Industries • 2 Brief History of the Processed Foods and Tobacco Industries 7 INDUSTRY STRUCTURE TRENDS 8 Decl ine in Company Numbers ••••••... 9 Increasing Merger Activity 10 Increasing Concentration • • 10 Increasing Firm Diversification 14 Increasing Product Differentiation 24 INDUSTRY PERFORMANCE TRENDS 32 Increasing Profitability 32 Growth Rates 34 Labor Productivity •.. • 37 Prices 38 THE 200 LARGEST FOOD AND TOBACCO PROCESSING FIRMS 38 Data Sources on the Largest Companies 39 Size and Industry Characteristics 41 Diversification 48 Ownership Characteristics .. • • 52 Advertising ••..••.... 56 Research and Development . • • • • 63 Profitability 66 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE DATA SOURCES 68 PUBLIC POLICY IMPLICATIONS 71 REFERENCES 73 APPENDIX .—Supplementary Tables and List of the 200 Largest U.S. Food and Tobacco Processing Companies, 1975 77 iii SUMMARY The 50 largest food manufacturing firms' share of that industry's total assets rose from 42 percent in 1963 to 63.7 percent in 1978, and could rise to 100 percent by the year 2000. This report confirms long-term structural trends in the food and tobacco manufacturing industries, as first identified by the National Commission on Food Marketing in its 1966 study. These trends, which reinforce the market power of the largest firms, include: . The number of firms is declining by about 3 percent per year, . The numbers of mergers, industry concentration, product diversification into and out of industries, and product differentiation are all increasing. The profitability of firms with assets over $100 million was higher than for smaller firms in most years. •Other trends identified by this report were: . Foreign investment in U.S. food and tobacco manufacturing firms is large ($1.8 billion in 1975) and is rising rapidly; investment by U.S. firms abroad ($4.7 billion) is rising less rapidly. TV advertising of food products accounts for over 50 percent of all media advertising, and is increasing. Profit rates for food and tobacco industries exceeded the rates for the rest of manufacturing for the first time during the early seventies. Wliolesale prices of food products are elevated an average of 10 percent by the oligopolistic structure of food manufacturing. • The 200 largest food and tobacco manufacturing firms account for two-thirds of industry sales, over four-fifths of industry assets, four-fifths of all media advertising, and over 96 percent of all research and development. iv The U.S. Food and Tobacco Manufacturing Industries: Market Structure, Structural Change, and Economic Performance John M. Connor * INTRODUCTION It has been 15 years since the National Commission of Food Marketing (NCFM) issued its final report and a series of oft-quoted technical studies on the industrial organization of several food subsectors and industries. This present report updates some of the data and examines the validity of some of the major conclusions of Technical Study No. 8 of that series, The Structure of Food Manufacturing. This report, like the ÑGFM study, focuses on those elements of industry structure t-hat affect ecoipmic performance: firm numbers and distribution, product and geographic diven^fication, and product differentiation. The structure of many of the food manufacturing industries has changed significantly since the early sixties. These changes were brought about by the enormous merger wave of the late sixties, the appearance of highly diverse conglomerate firms, and an acceleration in the multinat^ional investments of food firms. Thus, this report will examine changes in food industry organization during 1950-75, but especially the latter half oí that period, using data from two majo-r sources. The first group of sources is data collected by the Bureau of the Census, the Internal Revenue Service (1RS), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and other govern- ment ^Lgen'cies. The publication of the 1972 Census of Manufacturers, some parts of which'i^^re-5tily released in late 1977, is one occasion for this report. The second major data source is the Directory of the 200 Largest U.S. Food and Tobacco Processing Firms 1975 (16). This directory relied on published and purchased data to identify those companies, both domestic and foreign-owned, with the greatest sales of food and tobacco products processed in the United States in 1975. Because market structure data taÈe so long to generate, 1975 was chosen as the terminal year for this study to main- tain comparability among sources. By drawing on such a diverse set of data sources, this report assesses the particular strengths and limitations of the various sources and the extent to which they may complement one another. Focusing on the largest companies, the report examines how the structure and performance of many food industries are dominated by the operations of their leading firms. The report will also be useful to policymakers considering public policy options dealing with nodes of market power in the food system. * John M. Connor is an agricultural economist with ESCS and at the time the manuscript was completed was Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics c€ the Universi*€-y of Wisconsin at I^dison. Table 1—Selected indicators of the importance of the U.S. and tobacco manufacturing industries, 1975 [ The 51 four-digit SIC food and tobacco manufacturing Indus tries Indicators of 'Proportion of total U.S.* Proportion of importance manufacturing 'total United States Percent Value of shipments 17.3 — Value added 11.7 3.A Civilian employment 8.7 1.7 Capital investmenti.'^ 9-5 2.4 Energy consumption-2/ 7.4 Value of U.S. farm output utilized 68.0 Personal consumption expenditures 21.1 — = Not applicable. l^/ For manufacturing this item includes all capital expenditures involving new plant capacity, permanent additions or alterations, and new machinery or equipment; for the united States, this item is defined as total nonresidential, fixed, private investment. 1/ Energy consumption data is for 1974. Sources: (18, 25, 29). .Importance of the Processed Foods and Tobacco Industries The food and tobacco manufacturing industries account for a large portion of total manufacturing output. They purchase large amounts of raw agricultural products and other inputs, and receive a considerable share of household consumption expenditures (table !)• One way that the size of these industries was measured used data on value of shipments collected annually by the Bureau of Census (25). 1/ Values of shipments are defined as *'...the received or receivable net selling values, f.o,b. plant, after discounts and allowances, and excluding freight charges and excise taxes. However, in a few industries where large
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Description of the Tobacco Market, Manufacturing of Cigarettes and the Market of Related Non-Tobacco Products
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 21 December 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION 18068/12 Interinstitutional File: ADD 3 2012/0366 (COD) SAN 337 MI 850 FISC 206 CODEC 3117 COVER NOTE from: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 20 December 2012 to: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No Cion doc.: SWD(2012) 452 final (Part 3) Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentat ion and sale of tobacco and related products (Text with EEA relevance) Delegations will find attached Commission document SWD(2012) 452 final (Part 3). ________________________ Encl.: SWD(2012) 452 final (Part 3) 18068/12 ADD 3 JS/ic 1 DG B 4B EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.12.2012 SWD(2012) 452 final Part 3 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products (Text with EEA relevance) {COM(2012) 788 final} {SWD(2012) 453 final} EN EN A.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE TOBACCO MARKET, MANUFACTURING OF CIGARETTES AND THE MARKET OF RELATED NON-TOBACCO PRODUCTS A.2.1. The tobacco market .................................................................................................. 1 A.2.1.1. Tobacco products .............................................................................................. 1 A.2.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Monograph 21. the Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control
    Monograph 21: The Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control Section 6 Economic and Other Implications of Tobacco Control Chapter 15 Employment Impact of Tobacco Control 543 Chapter 15 Employment Impact of Tobacco Control Adoption and implementation of effective tobacco control policy interventions are often influenced by concerns over the potential employment impact of such policies. This chapter examines employment issues and discusses the following: . An overview of current tobacco-related employment, including employment in tobacco growing, manufacturing, wholesale and retail sales, and tobacco- expenditure-induced employment . Trends in tobacco-related employment including the shift toward low- and middle- income countries . Impact of globalization, increased workforce productivity, and new technologies on tobacco-related employment . Impact of tobacco control policies on overall employment and how this impact varies based on the type of tobacco economy in specific countries. Econometric studies show that in most countries tobacco control policies would have an overall neutral or positive effect on overall employment. In the few countries that depend heavily on tobacco exporting, global implementation of effective tobacco control policies would produce a gradual decline in employment. Around the world, employment in tobacco manufacturing has decreased primarily because of improvements in manufacturing technology, allowing more tobacco products to be manufactured by fewer workers, and by the shift from state-owned to private ownership,
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Oregon's Retail Environment
    ASSESSING OREGON’S RETAIL ENVIRONMENT SHINING LIGHT ON TOBACCO INDUSTRY TACTICS If we thought the tobacco industry didn’t advertise anymore, it’s time to think again. This assessment shines light on how the industry spends over $100 million to promote its products in Oregon stores and to hook the next generation. DID YOU KNOW THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY SPENDS OVER $100 MILLION EACH YEAR *1 IN OREGON? Tobacco products are front and center, where people — including kids — will see them every day. To gauge what tobacco retail marketing looks like across the state, local health department staf and volunteers visited nearly 2,000 Oregon tobacco retailers in 2018. Data provide striking information about how the tobacco industry pushes its deadly products across Oregon. The fndings are clear: The tobacco industry is aggressively marketing to people in Oregon, and especially targets youth, communities of color and people living with lower incomes. This report outlines fndings from the retail assessment and explores ways Oregon communities can reduce tobacco marketing, help people who smoke quit, and keep youth from starting — and ultimately save thousands of Oregon lives each year. * This amount does not include spending on advertising and marketing of e-cigarettes, for which statewide data is not yet available. When added in, this number climbs even higher. THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY SPENDS BILLIONS TO RECRUIT NEW CUSTOMERS. Every year, the tobacco industry spends E-cigarette companies rapidly increased their more than $8.6 billion nationally on tobacco retail advertising from $6.4 million to $115 advertising.2 When TV and billboard advertising million nationally between 2011 and 2014 for tobacco was restricted (in 1971 and 1998, alone.4 Advertising restrictions do not apply to respectively),3 the tobacco industry shifted its e-cigarettes.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Tobacco, Health, & the Environment
    September 2019 COMMERCIAL TOBACCO, HEALTH, & THE ENVIRONMENT The Problems September 2019 This synopsis is provided for educational purposes only and is not to be construed as a legal opinion or as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Laws cited are current as of September 2019. The Public Health Law Center provides legal information and education about tobacco and health, but does not provide legal representation. Readers with questions about the application of the law to specific facts are encouraged to consult legal counsel familiar with the laws of their jurisdictions. Suggested citation: Thomas Hexum and Hudson Kingston, Public Health Law Center, Commercial Tobacco, Health, & the Environment: The Problems (2019). This publication was made possible by the financial support of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Cover photo by Karen Mason. Copyright © 2019 Public Health Law Center @PHealthLawCtr publichealthlawcenter youtube.com/PublicHealthLawCenterSaintPaul www.publichealthlawcenter.org Commercial Tobacco, Health, & the Environment September 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 TOBACCO GROWING AND CURING 5 Deforestation 5 Food and Water Security 7 Pesticide Usage 7 Farm Worker Conditions 8 TOBACCO MANUFACTURING 9 Resource Usage 10 Industrial Waste and Emissions 11 TRANSPORTATION OF TOBACCO 11 TOBACCO CONSUMPTION 12 Secondhand Smoke 12 Thirdhand Smoke 13 Cigarette Lighting 15 TOBACCO PRODUCT WASTE 15 Cigarette Waste Toxicity 15 Litter Prevalence 17 Electronic Cigarettes and Heated Products 18 CONCLUSION 19 ENDNOTES
    [Show full text]
  • Food Beverages and Tobacco.Vp
    Sectors Rural Policy Briefs International Labour Office o n a t i l o p a Food, drink and N o i l u i G / tobacco industry O A F driving rural © employment and development The Food and Drink sector provides safe, high quality, healthy and affordable food to millions of people worldwide. Together with the tobacco industry, the sector is a large source of manufacturing output and employment. However, it faces a confluence of challenges such as climate change, changes in food supply and demand, imbalances in the governance of food production systems, food price volatility and food security. Addressing decent work deficits contributes to tackling these issues and to broader development goals. Facts and figures Food and Drink < The food and drink (FD) industry accounted for 4 per < The FD industry purchases up to 80 percent of cent of world GDP in 2005.1 agricultural products, contributing to rural livelihoods. < While the FD industry is declining in developed < Developing and emerging economies are the main countries, it is significantly increasing in emerging and source of growth in world food demand and in the trade developing economies. Between 2000 and 2008, it of food products. grew in Brazil and China by 68 and 178 percent < Food consumption is increasingly diverse and moving respectively.2 away from staple foods, especially in emerging < Despite rapid expansion of the FD industry in economies. At the same time, nearly one billion people developing and emerging economies, global remain food insecure. employment grew at a slower pace than in past Tobacco decades, from an estimated 20 million in 2002 to 22 < 3 Nearly 1.2 million workers operate in the tobacco million workers in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • TOBACCO INDUSTRY TACTICS Public Health Policy Change Webinar Series
    Public Health Policy Change Series KNOWING THE ENEMY: TOBACCO INDUSTRY TACTICS Public Health Policy Change Webinar Series • Providing substantive public health policy knowledge, competencies & research in an interactive format • Covering public health policy topics surrounding Tobacco, Obesity, School and Worksite Wellness, and more • Monthly from 12:00 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. Central Time • Visit http://publichealthlawcenter.org/ for more information The legal information and assistance provided in this webinar does not constitute legal advice or legal representation. Upcoming Webinars in the Series Paid Sick Leave Laws Thursday, February 21, 12: p.m. – 1:30 p.m. CST Visit www.publichealthlawcenter.org for more information. How to Use Webex If you can hear us through your computer, you do not need to dial into the call. Just adjust your computer speakers as needed. If you need technical assistance, call Webex Technical Support at 1-866-863-3904. All participants are muted. Type a question into the Q & A panel for our panelists to answer. Send your questions in at any time. This webinar is being recorded. If you arrive late, miss details or would like to share it, we will send you a link to this recording after the session has ended. Today’s Agenda • Introduction (Desmond Jenson) • Tobacco Industry Interference: Then and Now (Bronson Frick) • Tobacco Industry Tactics: Building Credibility and Undermining Tobacco Control (Patricia McDaniel, PhD) • Q&A/Feedback from you (moderated by Desmond Jenson) The legal information and assistance provided in this webinar does not constitute legal advice or legal representation. U.S. v. Philip Morris “Defendants attempted to and, at times, did prevent/stop ongoing research, hide existing research, and destroy sensitive documents in order to protect their public positions on smoking and health, avoid or limit liability for smoking and health related claims in litigation, and prevent regulatory limitations on the cigarette industry” U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco and the Economy: Farms, Jobs, and Communities, by H
    Tobacco and the Economy: Farms, Jobs, and Communities, By H. Frederick Gale, Jr., Linda Foreman, and Thomas Capehart, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report No. 789. Abstract Public health policies intended to reduce the incidence of smoking-related disease adversely affect thousands of tobacco farmers, manufacturers, and other businesses that produce, distribute, and sell tobacco products. This report assesses the likely impacts of declining tobacco demand, and identifies the types of workers, farms, businesses, and communities that are most vulnerable to loss of tobacco income and jobs. The dollar impact on the farm sector of a reduction in cigarette demand will be smaller than that experienced by manufacturing, wholesale, retail, and transportation businesses, but tobacco farms and their communities may have the most difficulty adjusting. Many tobacco farmers lack good alternatives to tobacco, and they have tobacco-specific equipment, buildings, and experience. Most com- munities will make the transition to a smaller tobacco industry with little difficulty, because tobacco accounts for a small share of the local economy. However, a num- ber of counties depend on tobacco for a significant share of local income. Acknowledgments The authors received helpful comments on the manuscript from Will Snell and Ron Hustedde of the University of Kentucky, Wayne Purcell of Virginia Tech, Blake Brown of North Carolina State University, and Jim Johnson of the Economic Research Service. Valuable insight and information were also obtained from William Mezger of the Virginia Employment Commission, John Knapp of the University of Virginia, Chris Beacham of the North Carolina Rural Development Center, and Gerry Cohn of the Rural Advancement Foundation International.
    [Show full text]
  • STUDENT COMMERCIAL TOBACCO USE in SCHOOLS Alternative Measures
    MINNESOTA October 2019 STUDENT COMMERCIAL TOBACCO USE IN SCHOOLS Alternative Measures School policies regulating the use and possession of commercial tobacco products,1 including electronic delivery devices (e.g., e-cigarettes, vaping devices, JUUL, Suorin), often contain punitive measures for student violations. This publication provides sample language and ideas for evidence-based solutions and information as to why these alternative measures may be more effective than suspension and expulsion at addressing student tobacco use and nicotine addiction as part of a school’s Commercial Tobacco-Free Policy. I. The tobacco industry has historically and continues to target youth to maintain profits, especially in and around schools.2 Schools should consider these predatory tactics when creating or modifying a policy to address youth possession and use of commercial tobacco in schools. When considering how to effectively address youth use and possession of commercial tobacco products in schools, it is important to understand how pervasive the industry’s targeting of youth and young adults with these highly addictive products has been for several decades. Overwhelming evidence, including the www.publichealthlawcenter.org October 2019 tobacco industry’s own documents, shows that from the 1950s to the present the tobacco industry intentionally and strategically studied and marketed commercial tobacco products to youth in order to recruit “replacement smokers” to stay in business.3 In 1981, a Philip Morris representative said, “[t]oday’s teenager is tomorrow’s potential regular customer.”4 The tobacco industry knows that “the overwhelming majority of smokers first begin to smoke while still in their teens.”5 Well-documented examples of the tobacco industry’s unethical efforts to capture the youth market are school “education programs,” which were promoted and distributed to schools in the 1980s and 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tobacco Industry & the Black Community: the Targeting Of
    TOBACCO June 2021 INDUSTRY THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY & THE BLACK COMMUNITY The Targeting of African Americans Big Tobacco, including more recent players like Juul Labs, has a sordid and lengthy history of targeting and exploiting Black, Indigenous, and other historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups, youth, the LGBTQ+ community, women, and others for corporate gain. The tobacco industry does this through sophisticated marketing tactics to lure new consumers to its deadly products and keep them hooked. An additional, lesser known tactic, one that the industry uses to whitewash its This factsheet is intended to raise awareness reputation, safeguard its regulatory influence of this form of the industry’s manipulation and power, manipulate messaging, and gain and abuse of targeted, at-risk populations. It public support is to make hefty contributions to describes the tobacco industry’s use of front culturally-relevant organizations, newspapers, groups, distortion, and corporate giving to mask magazines, and events of targeted communities. disreputable corporate conduct and highlights The tobacco industry is notorious for making recent examples of the way the industry exploits corporate donations to numerous organizations the African American community to maintain and causes championed by the very populations political access and shape policies that serve its it preys upon for profit. corporate interests. www.publichealthlawcenter.org June 2021 Corporate Malfeasance Since their inception, tobacco companies have used their vast resources
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of the Tobacco Product Manufacturing to Poland's
    THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TOBACCO PRODUCT MANUFACTURING TO POLAND’S ECONOMY The Significance of the Tobacco Product Manufacturing to Poland’s Economy | 03 © CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw 2018 Graphic design: Michałowski Studio & Wróbel Studio Illustrations on the cover: iStock, SlobodanMiljevic i Reuters, FLASH90 Translation: Nathaniel Espino EAN: 9788371786686 Publisher: CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research Al. Jana Pawła II 61/212 01-031 Warsaw Poland tel.: +48 222 062 900 [email protected] www.case-research.eu 04 | CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research CASE CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research is an independent, non-profit research institute founded on the idea that research-based policy-making is vital for the economic welfare of societies. Established in Warsaw in 1991, CASE today is recognized as the top think tank in Central and Eastern Europe and is one of the most highly regarded think tanks internationally. CASE carries out policy-oriented research and development assis- tance projects, specializing in the areas of growth and trade, fiscal policy, labor/ social policy/demography, and innovation/energy/climate. Drawing on an experi- enced in-house staff, a network of fellows, and a database of approximately 1,000 experts, CASE provides rigorous quantitative and qualitative analyses, innovative methodologies, and sound recommendations. The Significance of the Tobacco Product Manufacturing to Poland’s Economy | 05 AUTHORS Grzegorz Poniatowski Director of Fiscal Policy Studies [email protected] CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research Krzysztof Głowacki Economist [email protected] CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research 06 | CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research INFORMATION ICONS In order to facilitate quick retrieval of the most important information, the report uses five types of icons.
    [Show full text]
  • List Of: Government Series RG 36-2 Approved Applications for Liquor Licences
    List of: Government Series RG 36-2 Approved applications for liquor licences Reference File Item Title and Physical Description Date Ordering Information Code Code RG 36-2 Aberdeen Hotel, Essex [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Aberfoyle Mill Steak House and Tavern, Puslinch [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Abruzzo Restaurant Tavern, Hamilton [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Academy Tavern, Toronto [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Acadian Anchor Hotel, Cornwall [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Acadian House, Toronto [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Acadian Tavern, Pembroke [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Ace Restaurant Tavern, Espanola [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Acropole Restaurant, Toronto [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Adams Rib Tavern, Toronto [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Adanac Hotel, Fort William [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Aero Tavern, Hamilton [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Aero - Quay, Toronto International Airport [between To view, order RG 36-2, in 1 file of textual records 1934 and container B121748 1978] RG 36-2 Aime's Fine Food Tavern, Longueuil Twsp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Daily Egyptian, December 01, 1983
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC December 1983 Daily Egyptian 1983 12-1-1983 The aiD ly Egyptian, December 01, 1983 Daily Egyptian Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/de_December1983 Volume 69, Issue 68 Recommended Citation , . "The aiD ly Egyptian, December 01, 1983." (Dec 1983). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Daily Egyptian 1983 at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in December 1983 by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bill revives Civil Rights 'Daily 'Egyptian Commission WASHINGTON lAP) President Rp.agan revived the Thursday. December I. 1983. Vol. 69. No.68 Southern Illinois University U.S. Commission on Civil Rights on Wednesday after waiting until Virtually the last moment to sign legislati(Jll reducing his power to influence Weather, distal Ice called factors the panel. Reagan named the com­ mission's last chairman, Clarence M. Pt'ndieton, to serve on the reconstituted panel and said outgoing staff director Pilot gives opinions on flight Linda Chavez should resume Ih' John Rac'in" her position, although her ap­ Staff Writer pointment is subject to con­ currence by the full com­ Capt. Curtis Welge. Air mission. Illinois' chief pilot, testified Technically, the commission Wednesday that - if he had been e .• died at midnight Tuesday. The at the controls -- he might have bill signed by Reagan revives it, pmceeded with Flight 710 but with greater congressional despite the plane's faulty - and less presidential - generator. control over its makeup. Flight 710 ended in a crash in The 218 C:lreer employees of which the three-member crew the commission.
    [Show full text]