Making “Freemium” Work

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Making “Freemium” Work MARKETING ## DEFEND YOUR VISION COLUMN ## The key to effective RESEARCH ## STATEMENT ## Carter Roberts on mobile discounts In the afternoon, the Where did the strategy and climate moral slope gets graphical icons on change slipperier our tech gadgets come from? New Thinking, Research in Progress hbr.org STRATEGY Making “Freemium” Work Many start-ups fail to recognize the challenges of this popular business model. by Vineet Kumar ver the past decade “freemium”—a com- bination of “free” and “premium”—has Obecome the dominant business model among internet start-ups and smartphone app developers. Users get basic features at no cost and can access richer functionality for a subscription fee. If you’ve networked on LinkedIn, shared fles through Dropbox, watched TV shows through Hulu, or searched for a mate on Match, you’ve experienced the model firsthand. It works for B2B companies as well—examples include Box, Splunk, and Yammer. Several factors contribute to the appeal of a freemium strategy. Because free features are a potent marketing tool, the model allows a new venture to scale up and attract a user base ILLUSTRATION: SROOP SUNAR ILLUSTRATION: May 2014 Harvard Business Review 701 IDEA WATCH LATE ADOPTERS ARE MORE PRICE-SENSITIVE AND SEE LESS VALUE IN UPGRADING EARLY ADOPTERS ARE WILLING TO PAY FOR THE PREMIUM OFFERING without expending resources on costly ad campaigns or a traditional sales force. The monthly subscription fees typically NEW FEATURES ARE charged are proving to be a more sustain- INTRODUCED, DRIVING NEW CONVERSIONS able source of revenue than the advertising model prevalent among online frms in the early 2000s. Social networks are powerful SHARE OF word gets two gigabytes of cloud-based drivers: Many services ofer incentives for PREMIUM USERS storage free. If people run out of space, referring friends (which is more appealing they can pay $9.99 a month (or, alterna- when the product is free). And freemium THE LIFE CYCLE OF UPGRADES tively, $99 a year) for 100 GB of storage. The Freemium companies typically see the is more successful than 30-day free trials free version is adequate for basic docu- share of paid subscriptions (and therefore or other limited-term ofers, because cus- ments, but anyone who wants to back up cash flow) rise and fall and then rise again tomers have become wary of cumbersome photos or other media quickly hits the limit, in a predictable way over time. Those cancellation processes and fnd indefnite and the reasons to upgrade are obvious. that don’t account for this phenomenon free access more compelling. For many LinkedIn users, the advan- risk failure. But despite its popularity and clear tages of upgrading are murkier. I’ve used benefits, freemium is still poorly under- LinkedIn for several years to keep in touch stood. It has inherent challenges, as dem- with colleagues, and I routinely receive e- onstrated by the many start-ups that have mails urging me to upgrade—but the ongo- tried but failed to make it work. For several ing value of doing so is not apparent. (The years I have studied freemium models in company offers four premium subscrip- depth—by coauthoring (with my HBS col- tions, some aimed at specific customer leagues Bharat Anand, Sunil Gupta, and Fe- segments, such as recruiters or salespeople, lix Oberholzer-Gee) a case on the New York and most featuring deeper search function- Times’s paywall strategy (a variation of the rich, and it’s time to cut back. This kind of ality, better e-mail capability, and more vis- freemium model); conducting a deep dive tuning was evident at the New York Times ibility into who has viewed your profle.) into the user data of a storage and synchro- website. After years of unrestricted access, Although LinkedIn is successful—it was nization company; and coauthoring (with in 2011 the paper began limiting users to 20 one of the frst freemium companies to go my HBS colleagues Clarence Lee and Sunil free articles a month; people had to sub- public—it could probably monetize more Gupta) a working paper on how freemium scribe if they wanted to read more. Over users if the distinctions between its free companies can use referrals to spur usage subsequent months the company realized and paid oferings were clearer. and upgrades. Through this work I’ve come it was still giving away too much and was What is your target conversion up with six questions that start-ups consid- getting too few subscribers as a result, so in rate? Imagine that you’re the CEO of a free- ering a freemium model should ask. 2012 it cut the number of free monthly ar- mium start-up and you’re handed a report What should be free? Let’s say you’ve ticles to 10. Start-ups should expect to need showing your conversion rate (the percent- created a digital product that has 20 fea- similar tweaking to find the optimal bal- age of free users who have upgraded to a tures and you’ve chosen five that will be ance between trafc and paying customers. premium plan) for the most recent quarter. free to anyone who registers on your site. The balancing act can be tricky: Users may What fgure do you hope to see? Users who want the other 15 will have to revolt when asked to pay for things they are A rate of 1% is probably too low, espe- pay. How do you know whether you’ve accustomed to getting free. cially if you rely on subscription revenue made the right choices? And if you suspect Do customers fully understand the alone. (Some players, including the New that you haven’t, what should you do? premium offer? Communicating two sets York Times and LinkedIn, also collect on- Recall that one of the chief purposes of of benefts complicates your marketing ef- line ad revenue.) It signals either that too freemium is to attract new users. If you’re forts. If customers don’t clearly grasp what much of what you’re providing is free—giv- not succeeding with that goal, it probably they would gain by upgrading, you will ing users little reason to upgrade—or that means that your free oferings are not com- monetize fewer of them than you other- consumers don’t understand or value your pelling enough and you need to provide wise might. premium features. more or better features free. If you’re gen- Dropbox and LinkedIn are a study in But, less obviously, a very high conver- erating lots of traffic but few people are contrasts. The former has attracted 200 sion rate isn’t necessarily good. Remem- paying to upgrade, you may have the op- million users with a simple proposition: Ev- ber that one of the benefts of a freemium posite problem: Your free oferings are too eryone who enters a username and a pass- model is the ability to generate traffic. 702 Harvard Business Review May 2014 HBR.ORG Suppose that 50% of the users of your free early adopters of LinkedIn, because their of your free users, which takes two forms: product upgrade to premium. You might business depends on their ability to iden- Some of them become subscribers, and think that your model is working well; but tify and connect with professionals.) So some draw in new members who become perhaps your free product is not very com- over time, conversion rates typically dip subscribers. In our HBS working paper and pelling, which will limit your potential ac- as the user base expands to include people in ongoing research, we have found that a quisitions. All other things being equal, you who are more price-sensitive or who see free user is typically worth 15% to 25% as would do better to convert 5% of 2 million less value in the service. Although free- much as a premium subscriber, with sig- monthly visitors, for example, than to con- mium companies universally have a very nifcant value stemming from referrals. We vert 50% of 100,000 visitors. The best long- low marginal cost for each new user—oth- have also found that frms can increase the term strategy is generally to aim for a mod- erwise the model wouldn’t make sense— value of referrals by carefully managing erate conversion rate (in my research, I’ve those costs aren’t zero. At a minimum, free referral incentives and communications. If found that most companies’ range from 2% users put demands on server space and you’re considering a freemium model, pay to 5%) coupled with a high volume of traf- customer service. close attention to why and how satisfied fc. If you’re targeting a small market, you Companies that fail to understand these users might help your product go viral. should aim for a higher rate. realities may feel a cash crunch as the num- Are you committed to ongoing in- Are you prepared for the conver- ber of free users grows and the cost of ser- novation? It’s a mistake to see freemium sion life cycle? Let’s assume you’re at- vicing them therefore rises. This is often merely as a customer acquisition tool and tracting plenty of traffic and new users, the reason that companies launched with to drop the free version when new custom- and your conversion rate is 5%. You want to freemium models pivot away, converting ers stop coming in or when the upgrade forecast growth and revenue. Can you sim- to free time-limited trials or eliminating rate dives. Users who join late are typically ply draw a couple of straight lines, on the free offerings altogether.
Recommended publications
  • A Resource Guide for Transitioning Your Class Online
    A Resource Guide for Transitioning Your Class Online SPECIAL REPORT MAGNA PUBLICATIONS CONTENTS Education Initiatives: A Mashup of Emergency A Checklist for Moving Your Resources and Other Great Course Online 03 Tips 13 How Teaching Online Can Eight Steps for a Smoother Improve Your Face-to-Face Transition to Online Teaching 05 15 Classes Five Ways to Foster Seven Ways to Facilitate Creativity in Your Online Effective Online Discussions 07 Classroom 19 Online Discussions: Would Simple Animation for Your Changing the Environment Courses 09 23 Help? What Do Students Really Want from Online Instruc- 11 tors? Education Initiatives: A Mashup of Emergency Resources and Other Great Tips Faculty Focus n response to COVID-19, we’ve seen in- links to educational resources from all over the structors and universities from around the world. Iworld come together to compile numer- ous resources and lists. Although we’ve only 4. Mandy Berry: A Facebook Post on skimmed the surface, we believe the following Remote Teaching links provide insight on different perspectives A public Facebook post from Amanda Berry, that institutions and staff are currently go- an assistant professor of literature at American ing through. From transitioning to an online University. course to fostering a productive conversation with your students, these resources shed light 5. Resources for Disruptions on education initiatives we hope you find use- A list of resources compiled by Ollie Dreon ful during this time of uncertainty. on his blog pertaining to transitioning to online teaching and coping with education initiatives 1. Remote Teaching Strategies— during this time of disruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Digital Services Landscape for the Middle East
    Defining the Digital Services landscape for the Middle East Defining the Digital Services landscape for the Middle East 1 2 Contents Defining the Digital Services landscape for the Middle East 4 The Digital Services landscape 6 Consumer needs landscape Digital Services landscape Digital ecosystem Digital capital Digital Services Maturity Cycle: Middle East 24 Investing in Digital Services in the Middle East 26 Defining the Digital Services landscape for the Middle East 3 Defining the Digital Services landscape for the Middle East The Middle East is one of the fastest growing emerging markets in the world. As the region becomes more digitally connected, demand for Digital Services and technologies is also becoming more prominent. With the digital economy still in its infancy, it is unclear which global advances in Digital Services and technologies will be adopted by the Middle East and which require local development. In this context, identifying how, where and with whom to work with in this market can be very challenging. In our effort to broaden the discussion, we have prepared this report to define the Digital Services landscape for the Middle East, to help the region’s digital community in understanding and navigating through this complex and ever-changing space. Eng. Ayman Al Bannaw Today, we are witnessing an unprecedented change in the technology, media, and Chairman & CEO telecommunications industries. These changes, driven mainly by consumers, are taking Noortel place at a pace that is causing confusion, disruption and forcing convergence. This has created massive opportunities for Digital Services in the region, which has in turn led to certain industry players entering the space in an incoherent manner, for fear of losing their market share or missing the opportunities at hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Developer's Guide to the Galaxy
    Don’t Panic MOBILE DEVELOPER’S GUIDE TO THE GALAXY U PD A TE D & EX TE ND 12th ED EDITION published by: Services and Tools for All Mobile Platforms Enough Software GmbH + Co. KG Sögestrasse 70 28195 Bremen Germany www.enough.de Please send your feedback, questions or sponsorship requests to: [email protected] Follow us on Twitter: @enoughsoftware 12th Edition February 2013 This Developer Guide is licensed under the Creative Commons Some Rights Reserved License. Editors: Marco Tabor (Enough Software) Julian Harty Izabella Balce Art Direction and Design by Andrej Balaz (Enough Software) Mobile Developer’s Guide Contents I Prologue 1 The Galaxy of Mobile: An Introduction 1 Topology: Form Factors and Usage Patterns 2 Star Formation: Creating a Mobile Service 6 The Universe of Mobile Operating Systems 12 About Time and Space 12 Lost in Space 14 Conceptional Design For Mobile 14 Capturing The Idea 16 Designing User Experience 22 Android 22 The Ecosystem 24 Prerequisites 25 Implementation 28 Testing 30 Building 30 Signing 31 Distribution 32 Monetization 34 BlackBerry Java Apps 34 The Ecosystem 35 Prerequisites 36 Implementation 38 Testing 39 Signing 39 Distribution 40 Learn More 42 BlackBerry 10 42 The Ecosystem 43 Development 51 Testing 51 Signing 52 Distribution 54 iOS 54 The Ecosystem 55 Technology Overview 57 Testing & Debugging 59 Learn More 62 Java ME (J2ME) 62 The Ecosystem 63 Prerequisites 64 Implementation 67 Testing 68 Porting 70 Signing 71 Distribution 72 Learn More 4 75 Windows Phone 75 The Ecosystem 76 Implementation 82 Testing
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. the Freemium Business Model
    CHAPTER The Freemium Business Model 1 Commerce at a price point of $0 All business models are malleable thought structures, meant to be adapted and decisively employed to best achieve a specific product’s or service’s goals. This being understood, and for the purposes of this book, a broad and basic formal defi- nition of the freemium business model is described as follows: The freemium business model stipulates that a product’s basic functionality be given away for free, in an environment of very low or no marginal distribution and production costs that provides the potential for massive scale, with advanced func- tionality, premium access, and other product-specific benefits available for a fee. The freemium business model is an adaptation of a fairly common distribu- tion and monetization scheme used in software since the 1980s: the feature-limited software paradigm was when consumers saw most of the fundamental core com- ponents of a product released for free, with the product’s remaining functionality (such as saving progress or printing) becoming available only upon purchase, either in a one-time payment or through recurring subscription payments. The most basic point of difference between the freemium business model— freemium being a portmanteau of free and premium—and the feature-limited model is distribution: feature-limited software products were generally distributed on physical discs, whereas freemium products are almost exclusively distributed via the Internet. So the distribution speed and ultimate reach of feature-limited products were a function of the firm’s capacity to produce and ship tangible goods; no such restrictions limit the distribution of freemium products.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Secrets in Marketing and Value Creation
    Bentley University Scholars @ Bentley 2019 Dissertations and Theses 2019 The Use of Secrets in Marketing and Value Creation Ivan Fedorenko Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.bentley.edu/etd_2019 Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Marketing Commons, and the Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons @Copyright 2019 Ivan Fedorenko THE USE OF SECRETS IN MARKETING AND VALUE CREATION Ivan Fedorenko A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in Business 2019 Program Authorized to offer degree: Marketing ProQuest Number:13883650 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ProQuest 13883650 Published by ProQuest LLC ( 2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral degree at Bentley University, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of the dissertation is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for copying or reproduction of this dissertation may be referred to ProQuest Information and Learning Author Relations Team at (800) 521-0600 ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Your Saas Business
    Transforming your SaaS business A strategic guide for optimizing business performance kpmg.com/SaaS Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 Background: Evolution of an Industry 11 Business Model Dynamics: A New Way of Doing Business 18 Business Drivers: Optimizing Performance for Success 39 Leading Practices: Critical Steps for Achieving Success 44 Appendix: Strategic Drivers: Formulae and Examples Featured Industry Contributors 1 Mark Hawkins, CFO, Salesforce.com 2 Neil Williams, CFO, Intuit 2 Steve Cakebread, CFO, Yext 5 Mark Culhane, CFO, Lithium Technologies 5 Bob L. Corey, CFO, CallidusCloud 7 Ron Gill, CFO, NetSuite 8 Mark Garrett, CFO, Adobe 9 Kevin Bandy, Chief Digital Officer, Cisco 13 R. Scott Herren, CFO, Autodesk 15 Mike Kourey, CFO, Medallia 16 Matt Quinn, CTO and EVP Products & Technology, TIBCO 21 Clyde Hosein, CFO, RingCentral © 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Revolutionary changes in technologies have come in waves -- it brought us the mainframe, “the client-server and the cloud. From our experience, the cloud is exciting in that it enables us to help our customers connect with their customers in a whole new way. As the pioneer in Cloud SaaS offerings, we have witnessed disruption across industries and the globe as people embrace this dramatically improved technology. In 2015, the worldwide As a CFO, the big opportunity is how best to market for SaaS software support our respective companies in these application sales will be times of innovation and disruption, pivoting to new technology models and business models $33.4 billion in order to meet the modern day expectations with projections to grow and demands of customers and investors.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report 2020 Awards, Winners, Comments
    Independent Tests of Anti-Virus Software Summary Report 2020 Awards, winners, comments TEST PERIOD : 2020 LANGUAGE : ENGLISH LAST REVISION : 15TH JANUARY 2021 WWW.AV-COMPARATIVES.ORG Summary Report 2020 www.av-comparatives.org Content INTRODUCTION 3 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY 5 ANNUAL AWARDS 9 PRICING 16 USER EXPERIENCE REVIEW 18 AVAST FREE ANTIVIRUS 21 AVG ANTIVIRUS FREE 24 AVIRA ANTIVIRUS PRO 27 BITDEFENDER INTERNET SECURITY 30 ESET INTERNET SECURITY 34 F-SECURE SAFE 38 G DATA INTERNET SECURITY 41 K7 TOTAL SECURITY 45 KASPERSKY INTERNET SECURITY 48 MCAFEE TOTAL PROTECTION 52 MICROSOFT DEFENDER ANTIVIRUS 55 NORTONLIFELOCK NORTON 360 DELUXE 58 PANDA FREE ANTIVIRUS 61 TOTAL AV ANTIVIRUS PRO 64 TOTAL DEFENSE ESSENTIAL ANTI-VIRUS 67 TREND MICRO INTERNET SECURITY 70 VIPRE ADVANCED SECURITY 73 FEATURELIST COMES HERE 76 COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER 77 2 Summary Report 2020 www.av-comparatives.org Introduction About AV-Comparatives We are an independent test lab, providing rigorous testing of security software products. We were founded in 2004 and are based in Innsbruck, Austria. AV-Comparatives is an ISO 9001:2015 certified organisation. We received the TÜV Austria certificate for our management system for the scope: “Independent Tests of Anti-Virus Software”. http://www.av-comparatives.org/iso-certification/ AV-Comparatives is the first certified EICAR Trusted IT-Security Lab http://www.av-comparatives.org/eicar-trusted-lab/ At the end of every year, AV-Comparatives releases a Summary Report to comment on the various consumer anti-virus products tested over the course of the year, and to highlight the high-scoring products of the different tests that took place over the twelve months.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Commerce Business Models and Concepts
    CHAPTER 2 E-commerce Business Models and Concepts LEARNING OBJECTIVES After reading this chapter, you will be able to: ■■ Identify the key components of e-commerce business models. ■■ Describe the major B2C business models. ■■ Describe the major B2B business models. ■■ Understand key business concepts and strategies applicable to e-commerce. Tweet Tweet: Twitter’s Business Model witter, the social network phenomenon based on 140-character text mes- Tsages, continues in the long tradition of Internet developments that appear to spring out of nowhere and take the world by storm. Twitter provides a platform for users to express themselves by creating content and sharing it with followers, who sign up to receive “tweets.” Twitter began as a Web-based version of popular text messaging ser- vices provided by cell phone carriers. The basic idea was to marry short text messaging on cell phones with the Web © Kennedy Photography / Alamy and its ability to create social groups. You start by establishing a Twitter account online. By typing a short message called a tweet online or to a code on your cell phone (40404), you can tell your followers what you are doing, your location, or whatever else you might want to say. You are limited to 140 characters, but there is no installation required and no charge. Coming up with solid numbers for Twitter is not easy. By 2013, Twitter had an esti- mated 550 million registered users worldwide, although it is not clear how many continue to actively use the service after signing up. According to Twitter itself, it had 200 million “active” users worldwide as of July 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Gap Analysis”
    “The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 249025” “Gap Analysis” Deliverable number D3.2 D3.2_Mobile Game Arch_Gap Analysis-V.1.0 Version: 1.0 Last Update: 02/04/2013 Distribution Level: PU Distribution level PU = Public, RE = Restricted to a group of the specified Consortium, PP = Restricted to other program participants (including Commission Services), CO= Confidential, only for members of the Mobile GameArch Consortium (including the Commission Services) Partner Name Short Name Country JCP-CONSULT JCP FR European Game Developers Federation EGDF SW NCC SARL NCC FR NORDIC GAME RESOURCES AB NGR SW Abstract: This document seeks to identify the Gaps in the European mobile games content industry, in view to use these findings in the Recommendations paper, to be published in the last months of this project (June 2013). “The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 288632” Mobile Game Arch Page: 2 of 95 FP7 – ICT– GA 288632 Document Identity Title: Gap Analysis Subject: Report Number: File name: D3.2_Mobile Game Arch_Gap Analysis-v.1.0 Registration Date: 2013.04.02 Last Update: 2013.04.02 Revision History No. Version Edition Author(s) Date 1 0 0 Erik Robertson (NGR) 27.02.2013 Comments: Initial version 2 0 2 Kristaps Dobrajs (JCP-C) 29.03.2013 Comments: Formatting and editing 3 1 0 Kristaps Dobrajs, Jean-Charles Point
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Report of Anindya Ghose (Replacement Copy)Ag November 1, 2016
    PUBLIC Before the UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT ROYALTY JUDGES The Library of Congress In the Matter of Docket No. 16-CRB-0003-PR (2018-2022) DETERMINATION OF RATES AND TERMS FOR MAKING AND DISTRIBUTING PHONORECORDS (PHONORECORDS III) EXPERT REPORT OF ANINDYA GHOSE (REPLACEMENT COPY)AG NOVEMBER 1, 2016 PUBLIC Table of Contents I. Assignment ..........................................................................................................................1 II. Summary of Opinions ..........................................................................................................1 III. Qualifications .......................................................................................................................2 IV. Brief Background on Permanent Downloads, Ringtones, Interactive Streaming, and Locker Services, and On Related Industry Trends ..............................................................4 A. Permanent Downloads and Ringtones .....................................................................4 B. Interactive Streaming ...............................................................................................6 C. Locker Services ........................................................................................................7 D. Related Trends in the Digital Music Industry ..........................................................9 V. Current and Proposed Mechanical Royalty Rates For Permanent Downloads, Ringtones, Interactive Streaming, and Locker Services ....................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiation Factors Between Free and Premium Among Different Cloud Computing Services
    Differentiation factors between free and premium among different cloud computing services Author: Martijn Beltman University of Twente P.O. Box 217, 7500AE Enschede The Netherlands ABSTRACT: This paper tries to give more insight in the differentiation factors between free and premium versions for consumers among various cloud computing services. The design is a comparative case study by which Spotify, MBAM, LinkedIn, DropBox, Flickr and Skype are subjected to qualitative content analysis. The product of this essay is a taxonomy formed of literature, applied to the cases. The results show that the differentiation factors are different as well as the cases. Most of the cases have multiple differentiation factors (a mix) to go premium. The theoretical implications of this paper (due to limitations) shows the need for more research for a more complete understanding. Practical implications could be the rise in awareness in the decision to go premium for consumers. Supervisor: F. Wijnhoven Keywords Versioning, Freemium, Differentiation, Cloud computing services Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. 5th IBA Bachelor Thesis Conference, July 2nd, 2015, Enschede, The Netherlands. Copyright 2015, University of Twente, The Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social sciences. 1. INTRODUCTION (Shapiro & Varian, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Costly Freeware: a Systematic Analysis Of
    IET Information Security Research Article ISSN 1751-8709 Costly freeware: a systematic analysis of Received on 24th November 2017 Revised 3rd May 2018 abuse in download portals Accepted on 16th May 2018 doi: 10.1049/iet-ifs.2017.0585 www.ietdl.org Richard Rivera1,2 , Platon Kotzias1,2, Avinash Sudhodanan1, Juan Caballero1 1IMDEA Software Institute, Madrid, Spain 2Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Freeware is proprietary software that can be used free of charge. A popular vector for distributing freeware is download portals, i.e. websites that index, categorise, and host programs. Download portals can be abused to distribute potentially unwanted programs (PUP) and malware. The abuse can be due to PUP and malware authors uploading their ware, by benign freeware authors joining as affiliate publishers of pay-per-install (PPI) services and other affiliate programs, or by malicious download portal owners. The authors perform a systematic study of abuse in download portals. They build a platform to crawl download portals and apply it to download 191 K Windows freeware installers from 20 download portals. They analyse the collected installers and execute them in a sandbox to monitor their installation. They measure an overall ratio of PUP and malware between 8% (conservative estimate) and 26% (lax estimate). In 18 of the 20 download portals examined the amount of PUP and malware is below 9%. However, they also find two download portals exclusively used to distribute PPI downloaders. Finally, they detail different abusive behaviours that authors of undesirable programs use to distribute their programs through download portals.
    [Show full text]