Societas Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Societas Ethica 2011 Proposal Enhancement for All?: A Feminist Ethical Analysis of the Discourses and Practices of Democratic Transhumanism In the past few years, democratic transhumanism has emerged as the primary voice working toward mainstreaming the transhumanist movement in popular discourse. Through the work of groups like the World Transhumanist Association (recently rebranded Humanity Plus) and the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, democratic transhumanism has worked to blend transhumanist ideals with progressive democratic values. They have begun to distance themselves from libertarian and other transhumanists, claiming the mantle of “technoprogressivism.” Technoprogressives are seeking to position themselves as a “middle way” (http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/biopolitics) between technoutopianisms (including libertarian transhumanism, extropianism, and other technopositive movements) and technoconservatisms (including both left and right bioconservatism and neo-Luddism). The posing of this middle way frames the discussion as a movement standing between uncritical acceptance and uncritical rejection of emerging technologies. Technoprogressives claim the ground between uncritical stances, though they advocate strongly for the development and use of human enhancement technologies, provided there is universal and uncoerced access to those technologies. Democratic transhumanists emphasize the importance of the development and availability of technologies to expand human capabilities and related transformations. They support both public and private funding of technology development, as well as individual rights to access and utilize those technologies. They acknowledge that there are both potential positive and negative impacts of emerging technologies and seek to develop the former while mitigating against the impacts of the latter. The technoprogressive movement emphasizes the narrative of scientific progress and many of the values of secular progressive politics generally, including democratic government, ethical and religious pluralism, and political and ethical pragmatism. They tend to also focus on the constructive possibilities of a free market system to enact these progressive ideals. Democratic transhumanists value the “well-being of all sentience” (http://humanityplus.org/learn/transhumanist-declaration/), and in the pursuit of this goal urge massive investment of funds into technology development. While many of the progressive values held by democratic transhumanists would be shared by feminists, some of the underlying assumptions held by transhumanists would be subject to criticism by feminists: the nature of human beings and the goals of enhancement technology, the effects of an unregulated free market system, the possibilities of technology to alleviate human problems and issues of political will to effect that alleviation, and some practical issues of race, class, gender, and colonialism. This paper will analyze some of the key points of both agreement and distinction between feminist reflection and transhumanist discourse. Some constructive possibilities for a “feminist technorealism” will be proposed that may avoid some of the ethically problematic aspects of contemporary transhumanist discourse and advocacy while upholding the shared progressive and democratic values of the two movements. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Citizen Cyborg.” Citizen a Groundbreaking Work of Social Commentary, Citizen Cyborg Artificial Intelligence, Nanotechnology, and Genetic Engineering —DR
hughes (continued from front flap) $26.95 US ADVANCE PRAISE FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE NANOTECHNOLOGY GENETIC ENGINEERING MEDICAL ETHICS INVITRO FERTILIZATION STEM-CELL RESEARCH $37.95 CAN citizen LIFE EXTENSION GENETIC PATENTS HUMAN GENETIC ENGINEERING CLONING SEX SELECTION ASSISTED SUICIDE UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE human genetic engineering, sex selection, drugs, and assisted In the next fifty years, life spans will extend well beyond a century. suicide—and concludes with a concrete political agenda for pro- cyborg Our senses and cognition will be enhanced. We will have greater technology progressives, including expanding and deepening control over our emotions and memory. Our bodies and brains “A challenging and provocative look at the intersection of human self-modification and human rights, reforming genetic patent laws, and providing SOCIETIES MUST RESPOND TO THE REDESIGNED HUMAN OF FUTURE WHY DEMOCRATIC will be surrounded by and merged with computer power. The limits political governance. Everyone wondering how society will be able to handle the coming citizen everyone with healthcare and a basic guaranteed income. of the human body will be transcended, as technologies such as possibilities of A.I. and genomics should read Citizen Cyborg.” citizen A groundbreaking work of social commentary, Citizen Cyborg artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, and genetic engineering —DR. GREGORY STOCK, author of Redesigning Humans illuminates the technologies that are pushing the boundaries of converge and accelerate. With them, we will redesign ourselves and humanness—and the debate that may determine the future of the our children into varieties of posthumanity. “A powerful indictment of the anti-rationalist attitudes that are dominating our national human race itself.
[Show full text]
The Value of Technological Idealisations to Future Ethical Thinking 81-83
1 The Value of Technological Idealisations to Future Ethical Thinking By Adam Kelly A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington 2016 Year of Submission 2 3 Acknowledgements My work in this thesis owes much credit to my sole supervisor Nick Agar and fellow student Johnny McDonald. I would like to thank Nick for his encouragement, guidance and criticism. I would like to thank Nick and Johnny both for many enjoyable discussions, some of which were even related to this thesis. 4 Abstract This thesis focuses on what I have called “technological idealisations”, and how they are valuable to many current and future ethical debates. Technological idealisations refer to a methodology of using technology thought experiments to contribute to ethical debates. I do not claim this to be a new idea, and in fact will go on to give many examples of technological idealisation that already exist in the philosophical literature. The term describes the purposeful effort to collate these examples into a specific methodological framework; one which gives a particular kind of evidence which can ignore concerns of practicality and critically focus on the theoretical issues in a given debate. In order to explore this idea I will first be looking at past, better known, examples of idealisations to facilitate understanding of my own. I will look at Rawlsian ideal theory as a template for my own idealisations, as well as to explain how they can be valuable in contributing to debates (in Rawls’ case political and in my case ethical).
[Show full text]
Sustainable Development, Technological Singularity and Ethics
European Research Studies Journal Volume XXI, Issue 4, 2018 pp. 714- 725 Sustainable Development, Technological Singularity and Ethics Vyacheslav Mantatov1, Vitaly Tutubalin2 Abstract: The development of modern convergent technologies opens the prospect of a new technological order. Its image as a “technological singularity”, i.e. such “transhuman” stage of scientific and technical progress, on which the superintelligence will be practically implemented, seems to be quite realistic. The determination of the basic philosophical coordinates of this future reality in the movement along the path of sustainable development of mankind is the most important task of modern science. The article is devoted to the study of the basic ontological, epistemological and moral aspects in the reception of the coming technological singularity. The method of this study is integrating dialectical and system approach. The authors come to the conclusion: the technological singularity in the form of a “computronium” (superintelligence) opens up broad prospects for the sustainable development of mankind in the cosmic dimension. This superintelligence will become an ally of man in the process of cosmic evolution. Keywords: Technological Singularity, Superintelligence, Convergent Technologies, Cosmocentrism, Human and Universe JEL code: Q01, Q56. 1East Siberia State University of Technology and Management, Ulan-Ude, Russia [email protected] 2East Siberia State University of Technology and Management, Ulan-Ude, Russia, [email protected] V. Mantatov, V. Tutubalin 715 1. Introduction Intelligence organizes the world by organizing itself. J. Piaget Technological singularity is defined as a certain moment or stage in the development of mankind, when scientific and technological progress will become so fast and complex that it will be unpredictable.
[Show full text]
Extropy Institute
ISSN 1057-1035 Issue #14 (vol.7, no.1) 1st Quarter 1995 $4.95 1 EXTROPY #14 (7:1) First Quarter 1995 EXTROPY: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought is a journal of ideas, dedicated to discussing and developing themes in the follow- ing areas: • Transhumanism and futurist philosophy • Life extension, immortalism and cryonics • Smart drugs (nootropics) and intelligence increase technologies • Machine intelligence, personality uploading, and Artificial life • Nanocomputers and nanotechnology • Memetics (ideas as viruses) ExtropyExtropy InstituteInstitute • Experimental free communities in space, on the oceans, and within computer networks • Effective thinking and information filtering EXTROPY (ISSN 1057-1035) is published approx. quarterly by • Self-transformative psychology Extropy Institute (ExI), an educational tax-exempt corporation, • Spontaneous orders (free markets, neural 13428 Maxella Avenue, #273, Marina Del Rey, CA 90292. Phone: networks, evolutionary processes, etc) (310) 398-0375. • Digital economy (privacy technologies, E-mail to: [email protected] digital money and electronic markets) or: [email protected] • Rational, market-based environmentalism Copyright ©1994 by Extropy Institute and the respective writers. • Probing the ultimate limits of physics Distributed by Armadillo, Los Angeles, CA; Desert Moon Periodicals, Sante Fe, NM; Fine Print, Austin, TX; Inland, East Haven, CT; IPD, Solana Beach, CA; Small Changes, Seattle, WA; Ubiquity, Brooklyn, NY; & Tower EDITORIAL TEAM Magazines, W. Sacramento, CA; and in the UK by Counter Productions, London, UK. EDITOR: Max More, MA, Extropy Institute Writers: Contact the editor for submission details. ART DIRECTOR: Nancie Clark SUBSCRIPTIONS (4 issues): Communications: Russell E. Whitaker, Taos Mountain Soft- USA: $18 ware Canada and Mexico*: $22 Overseas*: $32 (air); $24 (surface) Computing, Simon D.
[Show full text]
Historical Thinking and the Human: Introduction
Journal of the Philosophy of History 14 (2020) 285–309 brill.com/jph Historical Thinking and the Human: Introduction Marek Tamm Professor of Cultural History, School of Humanities, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia [email protected] Zoltán Boldizsár Simon Assistant Professor, Institute for History, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands Research Fellow, Faculty of History, Philosophy and Theology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany [email protected] Abstract In recent years the age-old question “what is the human?” has acquired a new acute- ness and novel dimensions. In introducing the special issue on “Historical Thinking and the Human”, this article argues that there are two main trends behind the con- temporary “crisis of human”: ecological transformations (related to human-induced climate change and planetary environmental challenges), and technological ones (including advancements in human enhancement, biotechnology and artificial intel- ligence). After discussing the respective anthropocenic and technoscientific redefini- tions of the human, the paper theorizes three elements in an emerging new historicity of the human: first, the move from a fixed category to a dynamic and indeterminate concept, considering the human as a lifeform in movement; second, the extent to which the human is conceived of in its relational dependence on various non-human agents, organic and non-organic; and third, the reconceptualization of the human not as one but as many, to comprehend that we cannot speak of human individuality in the classical biological sense. In the final part, the article addresses the consequences of the redefinition of the human for historical thinking. It makes the case for the need to elaborate a new notion of history – captured by the phrase “more-than-human his- tory”, and attuned to an emerging planetary regime of historicity in which historical thinking becomes able to affirm multiple temporalities: digital, technoscientific, socio- cultural, human, biological and anthropocenic.
[Show full text]
Humanity's Capability of Transcendence Through Artificial
California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Capstone Projects and Master's Theses Spring 5-2016 Humanity’s Capability of Transcendence through Artificial Intelligence Zena McCartney California State University, Monterey Bay Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation McCartney, Zena, "Humanity’s Capability of Transcendence through Artificial Intelligence" (2016). Capstone Projects and Master's Theses. 529. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes/529 This Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capstone Projects and Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. Unless otherwise indicated, this project was conducted as practicum not subject to IRB review but conducted in keeping with applicable regulatory guidance for training purposes. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Humanity’s Capability of Transcendence through Artificial Intelligence What does it mean to be a human in a technological society? Source: Cazy89. Artificial Intelligence. Cruz, Alejandro. Flickr Commons. WikiMedia Project. Web. 28 December 2008. Digital Image. Senior Capstone Practical and Professional Ethics Research Essay David Reichard Division of Humanities and Communication Spring 2016 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................2
[Show full text]
A NORMATIVE FRAMEWORK for ANALYZING HUMAN ENHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGIES by Michael Joseph Gentzel a Dissertation Submitted to John Ho
A NORMATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING HUMAN ENHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGIES by Michael Joseph Gentzel A dissertation submitted to John Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland July, 2015 A NORMATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING HUMAN ENHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGIES Abstract of the Dissertation Due to the explosion of biotechnological advancements, there is a growing body of literature in philosophy concerning the moral and social issues surrounding biotechnical means of enhancing human capacities. A common trend has been to view enhancement as a homogenous category, and to either advocate for it or demonize it. This dissertation advances a moderate view, which suggests that human enhancement should not be normatively analyzed as a single and unified topic; rather, particular categories of enhancement ought to be normatively evaluated based on their own merits and demerits. In doing this, I suggest that concerns about harm to others have not received adequate attention. Addressing the diversity of human enhancements and their potential to create harm to others should play a more prominent role in evaluating specific forms of biotechnology used for human enhancement. This dissertation has two main divisions: a theoretical section and an applied section. In the first section, I develop an interpretation of Joel Feinberg’s conception of harm along with his version of the harm principle. According to this model of harm, A harms B when A unjustly damages B’s interests. The harm principle holds that the prevention of harm to others or the risk of harm to others is always reason in favor of legislation that limits individual liberty.
[Show full text]
1 Moderate Bioconservatism and Moral Enhancement Karim Jebari
Moderate bioconservatism and moral enhancement Karim Jebari Doktorand i Praktisk Filosofi Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan Abstract: Moral enhancement, an instance of human enhancement, consists in the aim to alter a person’s dispositions, emotions or behavior in order to make that person more moral. I will argue that moral enhancement could be carried out in three different ways. The first strategy, favored by prominent defenders of moral enhancement is emotional enhancement. The second strategy, well known from science fiction is behavioral enhancement. I will argue that only the third strategy, enhancement of empathy, is a plausible alternative. This conclusion should be, I argue, welcomed even by those skeptical to human enhancement in general. Keywords: Human enhancement, moral enhancement, bioconservatism, bioethics, medical ethics, neuroethics, virtue, empathy, Introduction In Secular Humanism, a notion that has become widespread, the idea of moral improvement is central. According to the declaration of the Secular Humanist Association’s tenet 5: “Moral Education: We believe that moral development should be cultivated in children and young adults. […] Accordingly, we support moral education in the schools that is designed to develop an appreciation for moral virtues, intelligence, and the building of character.”1 The Holy See also has a positive approach to moral improvement as it pertains to the cultivation of virtues. “A virtue is an habitual and firm disposition to do the good. It allows the person not only to perform good acts, but to give the best of himself. The virtuous person tends toward the good with all his sensory and spiritual powers; he pursues the good and chooses it in concrete actions.
[Show full text]
Transhumanism
T ranshumanism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=T ranshum... Transhumanism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia See also: Outline of transhumanism Transhumanism is an international Part of Ideology series on intellectual and cultural movement supporting Transhumanism the use of science and technology to improve human mental and physical characteristics Ideologies and capacities. The movement regards aspects Abolitionism of the human condition, such as disability, Democratic transhumanism suffering, disease, aging, and involuntary Extropianism death as unnecessary and undesirable. Immortalism Transhumanists look to biotechnologies and Libertarian transhumanism other emerging technologies for these Postgenderism purposes. Dangers, as well as benefits, are Singularitarianism also of concern to the transhumanist Technogaianism [1] movement. Related articles The term "transhumanism" is symbolized by Transhumanism in fiction H+ or h+ and is often used as a synonym for Transhumanist art "human enhancement".[2] Although the first known use of the term dates from 1957, the Organizations contemporary meaning is a product of the 1980s when futurists in the United States Applied Foresight Network Alcor Life Extension Foundation began to organize what has since grown into American Cryonics Society the transhumanist movement. Transhumanist Cryonics Institute thinkers predict that human beings may Foresight Institute eventually be able to transform themselves Humanity+ into beings with such greatly expanded Immortality Institute abilities as to merit the label "posthuman".[1] Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Transhumanism is therefore sometimes Transhumanism Portal · referred to as "posthumanism" or a form of transformational activism influenced by posthumanist ideals.[3] The transhumanist vision of a transformed future humanity has attracted many supporters and detractors from a wide range of perspectives.
[Show full text]
Winter 1991/92 1 Extropy #8
COVER EXTROPY #8 1 WINTER 1991/92 Editor: Max More EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Communications: Russell E. Whitaker Computing, Simon! D. Levy, MSc, Linguistics Dept., University of Connecti- Linguistics: cut; Haskins Laboratories Cryonics: R. Michael Perry, Ph.D; Vice President, Society for Venturism Law, Politics: Tom W. Bell, MA, University of Chicago Law School Memetics: H. Keith Henson Nanotechnology: J. Storrs Hall, Rutgers University, Laboratory for Computer Science Research Philosophy, Politics: Max More, MA, Philosophy Dept., University of Southern California Physics: Prof. Gregory Benford, Physics Dept., University of California, Irvine Science: David Krieger, MLS, RAND Transhumanities: Mark Plus, MS EXTROPY: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought is a journal of ideas, dedicated to discussing and developing themes in the following areas: • Transhumanism and futurist philosophy • life extension, immortalism and cryonics • artificial intelligence (AI) and uploading • smart drugs (nootropics) and intelligence increase technologies • nanotechnology • memetics • space habitation • spontaneous orders (free markets, neural networks, evolutionary processes, etc) • science fiction • extropic psychology • speculative eschatology • artificial life • futurist morality • electronic communications and reviews of media on these topics. Edited by Max More. Subscriptions and letters can be sent to EXTROPY, P.O. Box 77243, Los Angeles, CA 90007-0243. Phone: (213) 746-5571. E-mail to: [email protected] EXTROPY is published twice a year. Checks payable to “EXTROPY”. Subscriptions will start with the current issue in print unless you specify otherwise. [Sub rates valid until May 5 1992.] Subscriptions: USA: $8/year. 5-years: $37.50 10 years: $73 Lifetime: $200 Canada and Mexico: $9/year. Overseas: $12/year (air). [Traveller’s checks preferred; or cash at your own risk.] Institutions: USA, Canada, Mexico: $18/year.
[Show full text]
A Critical Review of the Ethical and Legal Issues in Human Germline Gene Editing: Considering Human Rights and a Call for an African Perspective
This open-access article is distributed under ARTICLE Creative Commons licence CC-BY-NC 4.0. A critical review of the ethical and legal issues in human germline gene editing: Considering human rights and a call for an African perspective B Shozi, LLB, LLM African Health Research Flagship, School of Law, College of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa Corresponding author: B Shozi ([email protected]) In the wake of the advent of genome editing technology CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeat (CRISPR)- associated protein 9), there has been a global debate around the implications of manipulating the human genome. While CRISPR-based germline gene editing is new, the debate about the ethics of gene editing is not – for several decades now, scholars have debated the ethics of making heritable changes to the human genome. The arguments that have been raised both for and against the use of genetic technologies in human reproduction reiterate much of the arguments made in the pre-CRISPR debate. As such, it is instructive for South Africa to reflect on these arguments now, in considering our position on the regulation of the use of this novel biotechnology. There are two dominant schools of thought in this area, bioliberalism and bioconservatism. Bioconservatives raise concerns about the risks of genetic manipulation, and argue that it ought to be limited or prohibited to avert these risks to human health and human nature. Bioliberal scholars are more open to the prospect of genetic manipulation, because of its potential utility. In this article, I conclude that in liberal democracies such as our own, bioliberal arguments ought to be seriously considered when formulating policy on human genome editing because of the extent to which they resonate with our Constitutional values and human rights.
[Show full text]
Between Bioconservatism and Transhumanism: in Search of a Third Way
Ethics in Progress (ISSN 2084-9257). Vol. 6 (2015). No. 2. 153-163. doi:10.14746/eip.2015.2.9 Between Bioconservatism and transhumanism: In search of a third way Filip Bardziński (Adam Mickiewicz University) Review of the book by R. Cole-Turner (ed.) Transhumanism and Transcendence: Christian Hope in an Age of Technological Enhancement. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 208. Introduction Transhumanism is undoubtedly one of the most important – and most controversial – intellectual movements of the early 21st century. It’s reception of the development of biological and computational sciences, as well as the hopeful perspectives it offers, proves how universally important for all humanity are such topics as individual perfection, cultural development, and relations between progress in science and their social reception and application. However, the transhumanist perspective on how to benefit from new technologies (i.e., life extension, enhancing human capabilities, etc.) remains highly controversial, as far as to be called the modern world’s most dangerous idea by Francis Fukuyama: “The environmental movement has taught us humility and respect for the integrity of nonhuman nature. We need a similar humility concerning our human nature. If we do not develop it soon, we may unwittingly invite the transhumanists to deface humanity with their genetic bulldozers and psychotropic shopping malls” (Fukuyama 2009). Most transhumanists disagree with Fukuyama voice, stating that “the only real danger posed by transhumanism, it seems, is that people on both the left and the right may find it much more attractive than the reactionary bioconservatism proffered by Fukuyama or Leon Kass” (Bostrom 2004).
[Show full text]