Literature Cited
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 685 Literature Cited
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 686 Literature Cited
Agee, J.K. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest Rep. PSW-GTR-151. Visalia, CA: U.S. Department forests. Washington, DC: Island Press. 493 p. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region: 49-50. Agee, J.K. 1996. The influence of forest structure on fire behavior. 1996. Presentation at the 17th Annual Anderson, R.S.; Smith, S.J. 1994. Paleoclimatic Forest Vegetation Management Conference. Redding, interpretations of meadow sediment and pollen CA, January 16-18, 1996: 52-68. stratigraphies from California. Geology 22: 723-726. Agee, J.K.; Bahro, B.; Finney, M.A.; Omi, P.N.; Anthony, R.G.; Isaacs, F.B. 1981. Characteristics Sapsis, D.G.; Skinner, C.N.; van Wagtendonk, of bald eagle nest sites in Oregon. Report to Crown J.W.; Weatherspoon, C.P. 2000. The use of shaded Zellerbach fuel breaks in landscape fire management. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, College of Forest Corp. and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, contract Resources, Forest Ecology and Management. 13 p. No. 14-16-001-77028. 28 p. Agee, J.K.; Skinner, C.N. 2005. Basic principles of Anthony, R.G.; Knight, R.L.; Allen, G.T.; McClelland, forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecology and B.R.; Hodges, J.L. 1982. Habitat use by nesting Management 211: 83-96. and roosting bald eagles in the Pacific Northwest. Transactions of the North American Wildlife Natural Airola, D.A. 1988. A guide for the California wildlife Resources Conference 47: 332-342. habitat relationships system. Rancho Cordova, CA: California Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Arbaugh, M.; Miller, P.; Caroll, J.; Takemoto, B.; Investigations Lab. 74 p. Procter, T. 1998. Relationships of ozone exposure to pine injury in the Sierra Nevada and San Bernardino Allen, A.W. 1982. Habitat suitability index models: mountains of California. Environmental Pollution marten. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 101: 291-301. Service, FWS/OBS-82/10.11. Asher, J. 1995. Proliferation of invasive alien plants Altig, R.; Dumas, P.C. 1972. Rana aurora Baird and on western federal lands: an explosion in slow motion. Girard, red-legged frog. In: Catalogue of American In: Alien plant invasions: increasing deterioration of amphibians and reptiles: 106.1-160.4. rangeland ecosystem health. Symposium Proceedings. BLM/OR/WA/PT-95/048+1792: 5-9. American Ornithologists’ Union. 1957. Check-list of North American birds. 5th ed. Washington, DC. 691 p. Association for Fire Ecology. 2006. The San Diego declaration on climate change and fire management. Anderson, B. 1987. Species management guide Third International Fire Ecology and Management for Clarkia springvillensis Vasek. Porterville, CA: Congress, November 13-17, 2006. 5 p. Sequoia National Forest, Tule River Ranger District. 10 p. Association of Partners for Public Lands [APPL]. 2004. APPL strategic planning process; categories of Anderson, M.K.; Moratto, M.J. 1996. Native driving forces for data gathering. Wheaton, MD. 35 p. American land use practices and ecological impacts. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project: final report to Atwater, B.F.; Adam, D.P.; Bradbury, J.P.; Forester, congress, vol. II, assessments and scientific basis for R.M.; Mark, R.K.; Lettis, W.R.; Fischer, G.R.; management options, ch. 9. Davis, CA: University Gobalet, K.W.; Robinson, S.W. 1986. A fan dam of California, Centers for Water and Wildlands for Tulare Lake, California, and implications for Resources: 1-20. the Wisconsin glacial history of the Sierra Nevada. Geological Society of America Bulletin 97: 97–109. Anderson, R.S. 1994. Paleohistory of a giant sequoia grove: the record from Long Meadow, Bagley, M.J.; Gall, G.A.E.; May, B. 1999. Genetic Sequoia National Park. In: Aune, P., tech. coord., analysis of 1998 golden trout collections. Final report Proceedings of the symposium on giant sequoias: to the California Department of Fish and Game, their place in the ecosystem and society. Gen. Tech. Threatened Trout Committee. Sacramento, CA. 22 p.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 687 Literature Cited
Bagne, K.E.; Purcell, K.L. 2009. Response of two Beck, T.W. 1985. Interim direction for management terrestrial salamander species to spring burning in the of great gray owl. Sonora, CA: U.S. Department Sierra Nevada, California. Res. Note. RMRS-RN-41. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Stanislaus National Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest. 24 p. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 10 p. Beck, T.W.; Gould, G.I., Jr. 1992. Background and the current management situation for the California Barbour, M.G.; Major, J., eds. 1990. Terrestrial spotted owl. In: Verner, J.; McKelvey, K.S.; Noon, vegetation of California. Special publication no. 9. B.R.; Gutiérrez, R.J.; Gould, G.I., Jr.; Beck, T.W., eds. Sacramento, CA: California Native Plant Society The California spotted owl: a technical assessment of (CNPS). its current status. PSW-GTR-133. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Barbour, R.W.; Davis, W.H. 1969. Bats of America. Southwest Research Station: 37-54. Lexington, KY: University Press. 286 p. Beck, T.W.; Winter, _. 2000. Survey protocol for the Barr, C.B. 1991. The distribution, habitat, and status great gray owl in the Sierra Nevada of California. of the valley elderberry longhorn beetle Desmocerus On file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest californicus dimorphus. Sacramento, CA: U.S. Fish Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Vallejo, CA. 38 p. and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Field Office. 134 p. Beier P.; Drennan, J.E. 1997. Forest structure and prey Barrows, C.W. 1980. Feeding ecology of the spotted abundance in foraging areas of northern goshawks. owl in California. Raptor Research 14: 73-78. Ecological Applications 7: 564-571. Barry, S. 1999. A study of the California red-legged Belsky, _.; Blumenthal, D.M. 1997. Effects of frog (Rana aurora draytonii) of Butte County, livestock grazing on stand dynamics and soils in California. Sacramento, CA: Par Environmental upland forests of the interior west. Conservation Services, Inc. 16 p. biology, vol. 11, No. 2. 13 p. Bartolome, J.W.; Stroud, M.C.; Heady, H.F. 1978. Bent, A.C. 1942. Life histories of North American Influence of natural mulch on forage production on flycatchers, larks, swallows and their allies. differing California annual range sites. 5 p. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution, U.S. Bartolome, J.W. 1987. California annual grassland National Museum Bulletin 179: 1-155. and oak savannah. 3 p. Bergs, N.H.; Azuma, D.L. 2008. Erosion recovery Bartolome, J.W.; Frost, W.E.; McDougald, N.K.; after wildfire and other disturbances in the southern Connor, M. California guidelines for residual dry Sierra Nevada. Riverside, CA: U.S. Department matter (RDM) management on coastal and foothill of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest annual rangelands. Rangeland monitoring series, Research Station. publication 8092. 8 p. Beschta, R.L. 1990. Effects of fire on water quantity Basey, H.E.; Sinclear, D.A. 1980. Amphibians and and quality. In: Walstead, J.D.; Radosevich, S.R.; reptiles. In: Verner, J.; Boss, A.S., tech. coords. Sandberg, D.V., eds. Natural and prescribed fire in California wildlife and their habitats: western Sierra Pacific Northwest forests. Corvallis, OR: Oregon Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-37. Berkeley, State University Press. CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Betz, C.J.; Cordell, H.K.; Green, G.T. 2009. A 13-74. preliminary look at the 2008 NSRE youth module. Bean, L.J.; Lawton, H.W. 1993. Explanations for the Athens, GA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest rise of cultural complexity in native California with Service, Southern Research Station. 28 p. comments on proto-agriculture and agriculture. In: Binkley, D.; Brown, T.C. 1993. Forest practices Blackburn, T.C.; Anderson, M.K., eds. Before the as sources of pollution in North America. Water wilderness. Ramona, CA: Ballena Press: 27-54. Resources Bulletin 29: 729-740.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 688 Literature Cited
Bisson, P.A.; Bilby, R.E.; Bryant, M.D.; Dollof, California Department of Fish and Game, 1416 Ninth C.A.; Grette, G.B.; House, R.A.; Murphy, M.L.; St., Sacramento, CA 95814. 2 p. Koski, K.V.; Sedell, J.R. 1987. Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest: past, Blank, R.; Chambers, J.; Linnerooth, A. 1998. present, and future. In: Salo, E.O.; Cundy, T.W., Influence of fall prescribed fire on nutrient levels in eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery riparian soils of central Nevada. In: Potts, D., ed. interactions. Contribution no. 57. Seattle, WA: Proceedings AWRA specialty conference, Rangeland University Institute of Forest Resources. Management and Water Resources, May 27-29, 1998. Missoula, MT: University of Montana: 235-241. Biswell, H.H. 1989. Prescribed burning in California wildlands vegetation management. Berkeley, CA: Blate, G.M.; Joyce, L.A.; Littell, J.S.; McNulty, S.G.; University of California Press. 255 p. Millar, C.I.; Moser, S.C.; Neilson, R.P.; O’Halloran, K.; Peterson, D.L. 2009. Adapting to climate change Blackburn, T.C.; Anderson, M.K., eds. 1993. Before in United States national forests. Unasylva 231/232 the wilderness: environmental management by Native (60): 57-62. Californians. Menlo Park, CA: Ballena Press. 476 p. Blumenthal, D.L.; Smith, T.B.; Lehrman, D.E.; Blakesley, J.A. 2003. Ecology of the California Rasmussen, R.A.; Whitten, G.Z.; Baxter, R.A. 1985. spotted owl: breeding dispersal and associations with Southern San Joaquin valley ozone study, final report. forest stand characteristics in northern California. Unpublished report prepared for Western Oil and Unpublished dissertation. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado Gas Association by Sonoma Tech Inc. and Systems State University. 60 p. Application Inc., 727 W. Seventh Street, Los Angeles, CA 09917. Blakesley, J.A.; Noon, B.R. 1999. Demographic parameters of the California spotted owl on the Boal, C.W.; Mannan, R.W. 1994. Northern goshawk Lassen National Forest; preliminary results (1990- diets in ponderosa pine forests on the Kaibab plateau. 1998). Unpublished report on file at: U.S. Department Studies in Avian Biology 16: 97-102. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Redwood Sciences Laboratory, Bolsinger, C.L. 1988. The hardwoods of California’s Arcata, CA. timberlands, woodlands and savannas. Research Bulletin PNW-RB-148. Portland, OR: U.S. Bland, J.D. 1993. Forest grouse and mountain quail Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific investigations: a final report for work completed Northwest Research Station.148 p. during the summer of 1992. Unpublished report on file at: California Department of Fish and Game, Bolster, B.C. 1998. Western red-bat, Lasiurus Wildlife Management Division, 1416 Ninth St., blossevillii. In: Ecology, conservation and Sacramento, CA 95814. management of western bat species: bat species accounts. Unpublished document distributed at the Bland, J.D. 1997. Biogeography and conservation Western Bat Working Group Meeting, February 9-13, of blue grouse Dendragapus obscurus in California. 1998, Reno, NV. 3 p. Wildlife Biology 3(3/4): 270. Bombay, H. 1999. Willow flycatcher demography Bland, J.D. 2002. Surveys of Mount Pinos blue grouse study annual report for 1998. Challenge cost share in Kern County, California, spring 2002. Unpublished agreement: USDA Forest Service and California State report on file at: California Department of Fish and University-Sacramento. Vallejo, CA: U.S. Department Game, Wildlife Management Division, 1416 Ninth of Agriculture, Forest Service, Region 5. St., Sacramento, CA 95814. Bond, M.L.; Lee, D.E.; Siegel, R.B.; Ward, J.P., Jr. Bland, J.D. 2006. Features of the forest canopy at 2009. Habitat use and selection by California spotted Sierra sooty grouse courtship sites, summer 2006. owls in a postfire landscape. Journal of Wildlife Unpublished report, contract no. S0680003, on file at: Management 73: 1116-1124.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 689 Literature Cited
Bonnicksen, T.M.; Stone, E.C. 1981. The Browning, M.R. 1993. Comments on the taxonomy of giant sequoia-mixed conifer forest community Empidonax traillii (willow flycatcher). Western Birds characterized through pattern analysis as a mosaic 24: 241-257. of aggregations. Forest Ecology and Management 3: 307-328. Bumgardner, _. Davis, CA: Northern California Herpetological Society: 47-52. Bonnicksen, T.M., Stone, E.C. 1982. Reconstruction of a presettlement giant sequoia-mixed conifer forest Burggren, _; [et al.], eds. [n.d.]. Environmental community using the aggregation approach. Ecology physiology of the amphibians. Chicago, IL: 63(4): 1134-1148. University of Chicago Press. Bouldin, J. 1999. Twentieth-century changes in Burnett, R.D.; Humple, D.L. 2003. Songbird forests of the Sierra Nevada, California. Doctoral monitoring in the lassen national forest: results from dissertation. Davis, CA: University of California. the 2002 field season with summaries of 6 years of data (1997-2002). PRBO Conservation Science Bradford, D.F. 1983. Winterkill, oxygen relations, Contribution Number 1069. 36 p. and energy metabolism of a submerged dormant amphibian Rana muscosa. Ecology 64(5): 1171-1183. Burnett, R.D.; Humple, D.L.; Gardali, T.; Rogner, M. 2005. Avian monitoring in Lassen National Forest, Bradford, D.F. 1984. Temperature modulation in a 2004 annual report. PRBO Conservation Science high elevation amphibian, Rana muscosa. Copeia Contribution No. 1242. 96 p. 1984(4): 966-976. Bury, R.B.; Balgooyen T.G. 1976. Temperature Brewer, W.H. [Farquhar, F.P., ed.] 1974. Up and selectivity in the legless lizard, Anniella pulchra. down California in 1860-1864, the journal of William Copeia. 1: 152-155. H. Brewer, professor of agriculture in the Sheffield Scientific School from 1864 to 1903. Berkeley, CA: Bush, G. 1992. Giant sequoia in national forests University of California Press. by the President of the United States of America. Proclamation 6457 of July 14, 1992. Brinson M.M.; Swift, B.L.; Plantico, R.C.; Barclay, J.S. 1981. Riparian ecosystems: their ecology and Buskirk, S.W.; Powell, R.A. 1994. Habitat ecology status. FWS/OBS-81/17. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish of fishers and American martens. In: Buskirk, and Wildlife Service, Biological Service Program. S.W.; Harestad, A.S.; Raphael, M.G.; Powell, 151 p. R.A., eds. Martens, sables, and fishers: biology and conservation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press: Brown, C. 2008. Summary of Pacific treefrog 283-296. (Pseudacris regilla) occupancy in the Sierra Nevada within the range of the mountain yellow-legged frog Buskirk, S.W.; Ruggiero, L.F. 1994. Marten. In: (Rana muscosa). Sierra Nevada amphibian monitoring Ruggiero, L.; Aubry, K.B.; Buskirk, S.; Lyon, L.; program draft assessment, January 18, 2008. Zielinski, W., tech. eds. 1994. The scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores: American marten, fisher, Brown, M.R. III; Elling, C.M. 1981. An historical lynx, and wolverine in the western United States. overview of redwood logging resources within the Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-254, Ft. Collins, CO: U.S. Hume Lake Ranger District, Sequoia National Forest, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky California. Porterville, CA: Sonoma State University Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 7-30. Academic Foundation, Inc. Butts, T.W. 1992. Wolverine (Gulo gulo) biology Brown, P.E.; Pierson, E.D. 1996. Natural history and management: a literature review and annotated and management of bats in California and Nevada. bibliography. Missoula, MT: U.S. Department of Materials prepared for conference sponsored by the Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Region. 106 p. Western Section of the Wildlife Society, November 13-15, 1996.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 690 Literature Cited
Bytnerowicz, A.; Fenn, M. 1996. Nitrogen deposition California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG]. in California forests: a review. Environmental 2000. California natural diversity database (CNDDB). Pollution 92: 127-146. California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG]. Bytnerowicz, A.; Tausz, M.; Alonso, R.; Jones, 2004a. Report of the 2004 game take hunter survey. D.; Johnson, R.; Grulke N. 2002. Summer-time 20 p. distribution of air pollutants in Sequoia National Park, California. Environmental Pollution 188: 187-203. California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG]. 2004b. Resident game bird hunting final Cablk, M.E.; Spaulding, S. 2002. Baseline and environmental document.182 p. initial monitoring assessment of Martes americana, the American marten, at Heavenly Ski Resort, Lake California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG] and Tahoe, California. South Lake Tahoe, CA: U.S. California Interagency Wildlife Task Group. 2005. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Lake California wildlife habitat relationships (CWHR), Tahoe Basin Management Unit. 87 p. version 8.0. Personal computer program. http://www. dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cwhr/cawildlife.asp. (3 January California Air Resources Board [CARB]. 1993. 2008). Assessment and mitigation of the impacts of transported pollutants on ozone concentrations California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG]. within California. Sacramento, CA: California 2007. Deer hunting final environmental document. Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources 80 p. Board. California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG]. California Air Resources Board [CARB]. 2001. Air 2009. Rarefind 3. California Natural Diversity basin criteria pollutant emission and air quality trends Database (CNDDB). Sacramento, CA. and forecasts. Almanac 2001, ch. 4. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG]. California Environmental Protection Agency, Air 2010. California’s threatened and endangered species: Resources Board. little Kern golden trout, Oncorhyncus mykiss whitei. California Air Resources Board [CARB]. http://www.dfg.ca.gov/fish/REsources/WildTrout/ 2006. Smoke management program. California WT_LKernGldDesc.asp. (2 February 2010). Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG]. Board. http://www.arb.ca.gov/smp/smp.htm. (10 2010. Date supplement to the California fish and December 2007). game commission regarding: recommended 2010 California Central Valley Regional Water Quality deer tag allocations (updated 2009 deer harvest and Control Board. 2004. Water quality control plan for population estimates). Sacramento, CA. 34 p. the Tulare Lake basin. Fresno, CA. Second edition. California Partners in Flight [CPIF]. 2002a. Black- 80 p. backed woodpecker PIF monitoring sites. http://www. California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG]. prbo.org/calpif/htmldocs/mapdocs/conifer/2002/ 1990. Sensitive plant status report for Clarkia bbwomap2002.html. springvillensis. Sacramento, CA. 3 p. California Partners in Flight [CPIF]. 2002b. Fox California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG]. sparrow PIF monitoring sites. http://www.prbo.org/ 1997. The status of rare, threatened, and endangered calpif/htmldocs/mapdocs/conifer/2002/fospmap2002. animals and plants of California. Annual report for html. 1996. Sacramento, CA. 34 p. California Partners in Flight [CPIF]. 2004. Yellow California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG]. warbler PIF monitoring sites. http://www.prbo. 1998. An assessment of mule and black-tailed deer org/calpif/htmldocs/mapdocs/riparian/2004/ habitats and populations in California. Report to the ywarmap2004.htm. Fish and Game Commission, February 1998. 57 p.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 691 Literature Cited
California State Parks. 1998. Public opinions and Chapman, K.; McGuiness, K.; Brigham, R.M. 1994. attitudes on outdoor recreation in California 1997; an Status of the pallid bat in British Columbia. Wildlife element of the California outdoor recreation planning working report number WR-61. Victoria, British program. Sacramento, CA. 72 p. Columbia, Canada: British Columbia Ministry of the Environment, Wildlife Branch. 35 p. California State Parks. 2002. California outdoor recreation plan 2002; an element of the California Chavez, D.J.; Winter, P.L.; Absher, J.D., eds. 2008. outdoor recreation planning program. Sacramento, Recreation visitor research: studies of diversity. CA. 78 p. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-210. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific California State Parks. 2003. Public opinions and Southwest Research Station. 216 p. attitudes on outdoor recreation in California 2002; an element of the California outdoor recreation plan. Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Fujita, E.M.; Lu, Z.; Sacramento, CA. 113 p. Lawson, D.R.; Ashbaugh, L.L. 1994. Temporal and
spatial variations of PM2.5 and PM10 aerosol in the California State Parks. 2009. California outdoor southern California air quality study. Atmospheric recreation plan 2008; an element of the California Environment 28(12): 2061-2080. outdoor recreation planning program. Sacramento, CA. 145 p. Christensen, D.P. 1984. The revised fishery management plan for the little Kern golden trout. Caprio, A.; Conover, C.; Keifer, M.; Lineback, P. Unpublished document on file at: California 1997. Fire management and GIS: a framework for Department of Fish and Game, Fresno, CA. 25 p. identifying and prioritizing fire planning needs. [Presentation]. Fire in California ecosystems: Cisneros, R.; Perez, M.A. 2007. A comparison integrating ecology, prevention, and management, of ozone exposure in Shaver Lake and Fresno, Nov. 17-20, San Diego, CA. California. Journal of Environmental Health 69(7): 38-44. CARB. See California Air Resources Board. City-data.com. 2009. Squaw Valley, California. http:// Caroll, J.; Miller, P.; Pronos, J. 2003. Historical www.city-data.com/city/Squaw-Valley-California. perspectives on ambient ozone and its effects on html. (15 October 2009). the Sierra Nevada. In: Bytnerowicz, A.; Aurbaugh, M.J.; Alonso, R., eds. Ozone air pollution in the City of Porterville. 2008. Community profile. http:// Sierra Nevada-distribution and effects on forests. www.chooseporterville.com. (14 October 2009). Developments in Environmental Science 2: 33-54. Claar, J.; Anderson, N.; Boyd, D.; Cherry, M.; Carter, S. 2001. Personal communications. Botanist, Conard, B.; Hompesch, R.; Miller, S.; Olson, G.; U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Bakersfield, CA. Ihsle Pac, H.; Waller, J.; Wittinger, T; Youmans, H. 1999. Carnivores. In: Joslin, G.; Youmans, H., coords. Castillo, E.D. 1978. The impact of Euroamerican Effects of recreation on Rocky Mountain wildlife: exploration and settlement. In: Heizer, R.F., ed., a review for Montana. Helena, MT: The Wildlife California, handbook of North American Indians, vol. Society, Montana Chapter, Committee of Effects of 8. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution: 6-15. Recreation and Wildlife: 7.1-7.63 CEQ. See Council on Environmental Quality. Clinton, W.J. 2000 (April 25). Establishment of the Chang, C.R. 1996. Ecosystem responses to fire Giant Sequoia National Monument by the President and variations in fire regimes. In: Sierra Nevada of the United States of America. Proclamation 7295 ecosystem project: final report to congress, vol. II, of April 15, 2000. Federal Register 65(80): 24095- assessments and scientific basis for management 24100. options, ch. 39. Davis, CA: University of California, Cole, D.N. 1993. Minimizing conflict between Centers for Water and Wildland Resources: 1071- recreation and nature conservation. In: Smith, 1100. D.S.; Hellmund, P.C., eds. Ecology of greenways:
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 692 Literature Cited design and function of linear conservation areas. Cordell, H.K.; Betz, C.J.; Green, G.T. 2009a. National Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press: kids survey; part I: how much time do kids spend 105-122. outdoors. Internet Research Information Series (IRIS). Athens, GA and Knoxville, TN: U.S. Department Collins, B.M.; Stephens, S.L. 2007. Managing natural of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research fires in Sierra Nevada wilderness areas. Frontiers in Station, University of Georgia, and University of Ecology and the Environment 5(10): 523-52. Tennessee. 7 p. Collins, B.M.; Everett, R.G.; Stephens, S.L. 2011. Cordell, H.K.; Betz, C.J.; Green, G.; Mou, S.; Joyce, Impacts of fire exclusion and recent managed fire on L. 2009b. Recreation demand trends—an update. forest structure in old growth Sierra Nevada mixed- Athens, GA and Ft. Collins, CO: U.S. Department conifer forests. Ecosphere 2(4): art 51. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Cook, S.F. 1978. Historical demography. In: Heizer, Station and Rocky Mountain Research Station and R.F., ed., California, handbook of North American University of Georgia. 68 p. Indians, vol. 8. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Cordell, H.K.; Green, G.T.; Betz, C.J. 2009c. Long- Institution: 91-98. term national trends in outdoor recreation activity Collins, B.M.; Kelly, M.; van Wagtendonk, J.W.; participation–1980 to now. Internet Research Stephens, S.L. 2007. Spatial patterns of large natural Information Series (IRIS). Athens, GA and Knoxville, fires in Sierra Nevada wilderness areas. Landscape TN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ecology 22: 545-557. Southern Research Station, University of Georgia, and University of Tennessee. 4 p. Committee of Scientists. 1999. Sustaining the people’s land; recommendations for stewardship Cordell, H.K.; Green, G.T.; Betz, C.J.; Fly, M.; of the national forest and grasslands into the next Stephens, B. 2004. Recreation statistics update. century. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Update report no. 2. Athens, GA and Knoxville, Agriculture. 187 p. TN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, University of Georgia, and Cordell, H.K. 1999. Outdoor recreation in American University of Tennessee. 6 p. life: a national assessment of demand and supply trends. Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishing. 449 p. Cordell, H.K.; [et al.]. 1999-2001 National survey on recreation and the environment. U.S. Department Cordell, H.K. 2004. Outdoor recreation for 21st of Agriculture, Forest Service, and the University of century America: a report to the nation: the national Tennessee, Knoxville, TN: 1-4. survey on recreation and the environment. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc. 293 p. Cordes, J.R. 2010. Management indicator species report of the Giant Sequoia National Monument draft Cordell, H.K. 2008. Pioneering recreation trends environmental impact statement. Porterville, CA: research, RWU-4953. [Presentation]. Athens, GA: Sequoia National Forest. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 52 p. Council on Environmental Quality [CEQ]. 1997. Environmental justice: guidance under the National Cordell, H.K. [n.d.]. NSRE: keeping ourselves Environmental Policy Act. Washington, DC. http:// informed about what the public values. [Presentation]. www.whitehouse.gov/CEQ/. (8 December 2009). Cordell, H.K.; Betz, C.J. 2009. National kids survey; Craighead, F.C. 1925. The Dendroctonus problems. part II: what do kids do outdoors. Internet Research Journal of Forestry 23: 340-354. Information Series (IRIS). Athens, GA and Knoxville, TN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Crano, W.; Quist, R.; Winter, P.L. 2008. Forest Southern Research Station, University of Georgia, and visitation, media consumption, and diverse publics: University of Tennessee. 5 p. lessons for outreach. In: Chavez, D.J.; Winter, P.L.;
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 693 Literature Cited
Absher, J.D., eds. Recreation visitor research: studies Deal, K. 2001. Fire effects to lithic artifacts. of diversity. PSW-GTR-210, chapter 15. Albany, [Presentation]. Cultural Resource and Protection and CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Fire Planning Course. Tucson, AZ. Pacific Southwest Research Station: 177-194. Dean Runyan Associates. 2000. Campers in Crano, W.; Quist, R.; Winter, P.L. [n.d.]. Getting the California: travel patterns and economic impacts. Forest Service’s message to all the people. On file Portland, OR. 77 p. at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 4955 Canyon DeBano, L.F.; Neary, D.G.; Ffolliott, P.F. 1998. Fire’s Crest Drive, Riverside, CA 92507. 60 p. effects on ecosystems. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 333 p. Cypher, E. 2000. Northern vernal pool ecosystem recovery plan. Draft (January 6), developed by the DeGraaf, R.M.; Geis, A.D.; Healy, P.A. 1991a. Bird Endangered Species Recovery Program through populations and habitat surveys in urban areas. California State University, Stanislaus Foundation. Landscape and Urban Planning 21: 181-188. Cypher, E. 2003. Personal communication. Research DeGraaf, R.M.; Scott, V.E.; Hamre, R.H.; Ernst, L.; ecologist, Endangered Species Recovery Program. Anderson, S.H. 1991b. Forest and rangeland birds California State University, Stanislaus. of the United States, natural history and habitat use. Agricultural Handbook 688. Washington, DC: U.S. Dark, S.J. 1997. A landscape-scale analysis of Department of Agriculture. mammalian carnivore distribution and habitat use by fisher. In: Harris, J.E.; Ogan, C.V., eds. Demetry, A.; Manley, J. 2001. Ecological restoration Mesocarnivores of northern California: biology, in a giant sequoia grove. In: Harmon, D., ed. Crossing management, and survey techniques, workshop boundaries in park management: proceedings manual. Arcata, CA: The Wildlife Society, California of the 11th conference on research and resource North Coast Chapter. 127 p. management in parks and on public lands. Hancock, MI: The George Wright Society. Davidson, C. 2004. Declining downwind: amphibian population declines in California and historical Despain, J. 2004 (July 26). Notes from verbal pesticide use. Ecological Applications 14: 1892–1902. communication. Davidson, C.; Benard, M.F.; Shaffer, H.B.; Parker, Detrich, P.J. 1981. Historic range of breeding bald J.M.; O’Leary, C.; Conlon, J.M.; Rollins-Smith, L.A. eagles in California. Unpublished manuscript, on file 2007. Effects of chytrid and carbaryl exposure on at: Redding, CA. 17 p. survival, growth and skin peptide defenses in foothill Detrich, P.J. 1982. Results of California winter bald yellow-legged frogs. Environmental Science and eagle survey-1982. Sacramento, CA: U.S. Department Technology 41: 1771-1776. of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 16 p. Davidson, C.; Shaffer, H.B. 1999. California red- Dewey, S.R.; Kennedy, P.L.; Stephens, R.M. legged declines associated with elevation and upwind 2003. Are dawn vocalization surveys effective for agriculture. [Abstract]. Society for Conservation monitoring goshawk nest area occupancy? Journal of Biology annual meetings, College Park, MD. Wildlife Management 67: 390-397. Davis, F.W.; Seo, C.; Zielinski, W.J. 2007. Regional Dilsaver, L.M.; Tweed W.C. 1990. Challenge of the variation in home-range scale habitat models for big trees. Three Rivers, CA: Sequoia Natural History fisher (Martes pennanti) in California. Ecological Association. 379 p. Applications 17: 2195-2213. DiTomaso, J.M.; Kyser, G.B.; Orloff, S.B.; Enloe, Daw, S.K.; DeStefano, S. 2001. Forest characteristics S.F.; Nader, G.A. 1999. New growth regulator of northern goshawk nest stands and post-fledging herbicide provides excellent control of yellow areas in Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management starthistle. California Agriculture 53: 2. 65(1): 59-65.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 694 Literature Cited
DiTomaso, J.M., Kyser, G.B.; Pitcairn, M. 2006. Springville Clarkia (Clarkia springvillensis Vasek) for Yellow starthistle management guide. Cal-IPC Southern California Edison’s lower Tule River project Publication 2006–03. area (FERC no. 372). Unpublished report on file at: Southern California Edison Company, 300 N. Lone Dreyfus, G.B; Schade, G.W.; Goldstein, A.H. 2002. Hill Ave., San Dimas, CA 91773. 17 p. Observational constraints on the contribution of isoprene oxidation to ozone production on the ECORP Consulting Inc. 2007. Tulare Lake basin western slope of the Sierra Nevada, California. hydrology and hydrography: a summary of the Journal of Geophysical Research 107(D19): 4365, movement of water and aquatic species. U.S. doi:10.1029/2001JDOO1490. Environmental Protection Agency, National Service Center for Environmental Publications. Document Drost, C.A.; Fellers, G.M. 1996. Collapse of a number 909R07002. 136 p. http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ regional frog fauna in the Yosemite area of the ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P1002E2I.txt. (14 May 2010). California Sierra Nevada, USA. Conservation Biology 10: 414-425. Elliot, W.W. 1882. History of Fresno County. San Francisco, CA: W.W. Elliot. Duane, T.P. 1996. Recreation in the Sierra. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project (SNEP): final report to Elsasser, A.B. 1960. The archaeology of the Sierra Congress, vol. II, assessments and scientific basis Nevada in California and Nevada. Reports of the for management options. Davis, CA: University University of of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources: 557-609. California Archaeological Survey, no. 51. Berkeley, CA: University of California Archaeological Survey. Dudley, T. 1998. Exotic plant invasions in California 93 p. EPA. See U.S. Environmental Protection riparian areas and wetlands. Fremontia 26(4): 24-29. Agency. Duellman, W.E.; Trueb, L. 1986. Biology of the Eriksen, C.H.; Belk, D. 1999. Fairy shrimps of amphibians. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 670 p. California’s puddles, pools, and playas. Eureka, CA: Mad River Press, Inc. 196 p. Duncan Furbearer Interagency Workgroup. 1989. Workgroup assembled to review the proposed Duncan Erman, D.C.; Erman, N.A. 1975. Macroinvertebrate timber sale, Tahoe National Forest, and formulate composition and production in some Sierra Nevada proposed management guidelines. minerotrophic peatlands. Ecology 56: 591-603. Dunne, T.; Leopold, L.B. 1978. Water in Erman, N.A. 1996. Status of aquatic invertebrates. environmental planning. New York, NY: W.H. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project: final report to Freeman and Company. 818 p. congress, vol. II, assessments and scientific basis for management options, ch. 35. Davis, CA: University Dwyer, J.F.; Chavez, D.J. 2005. The challenges of California, Centers for Water and Wildland of managing public lands in the wildland-urban Resources: 987-1008. interface. In: Vince, S.W.; Duryeal, M.L.; Macie, E.A.; Hermansen, L.A., eds. Forests at the wildland- Ewell, D.M.; Flocchini, R.G.; Myrup, L.O.; Cahill, urban interface: conservation and management. New T.A. 1989. Aerosol transport in the southern Sierra York, NY: CRC Press: 269-283. Nevada. Journal of Applied Meteorology 28: 112-125. EA Engineering. 1999. Valley elderberry longhorn Fang, M.; Zheng, M.; Wang, F.; To, K.L.; Jaafar, beetle habitat survey, lower Tule River project. FERC A.B.; Tong, S.L. 1999. The solvent-extractable no. 372. Concord, CA: Southern California Edison organic compounds in the Indonesia biomass burning Company. 19 p. aerosols–characterization studies. Atmospheric Environment 33: 783-795. EA Engineering, Science, and Technology; Stone, R.D. 1999. [Draft.] Results of field surveys for the Farquhar, F.P. 1924. Place names of the high Sierra. Sierra Club Bulletin 12(1): 47-51.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 695 Literature Cited
Farquhar, F.P. 1966. History of the Sierra Nevada. Fites-Kaufman, J.A. 2005. Evaluation of wildland use Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. fires on the Sequoia and Stanislaus national forests in 2003; effects in relation to historic regimes and Federal Cave Resources Protection Act of 1988. P.L. resource benefits. Porterville, CA: U.S. Department of 100-691. 104 Stat. 328. Agriculture, Sequoia National Forest. 61 p. Fellers, G.M.; Bradford, D.F.; Pratt, D.; Wood, L.L. Fites-Kaufman, J.; Bradley, A.F.; Merrill, A.G. 2006. 2007. Demise of repatriated populations of mountain Fire and plant interactions. In: Sugihara, N.G.; van yellow-legged frogs (Rana muscosa) in the Sierra Wagtendonk, J.W.; Shaffer, K.E.; Fites-Kaufman, J.; Nevada of California. Herpetology. Conservation Thode, A.E., eds. Fire in California’s ecosystems. Biology 2: 5-21. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 94-117. Fellers, G.M.; Pierson, E.D. 2002. Habitat use and Flett, M.A.; Sanders, S.D. 1987. Ecology of a Sierra foraging behavior of Townsend’s big-eared bat Nevada population of willow flycatchers. Western (Corynorhinus townsendii) in coastal California. Birds 18: 37-42. Journal of Mammalogy 83(1): 167-177. Forcella, F. 1992. Invasive weeds in the Northern Fellows, A. W.; Goulden M.L. 2008. Has fire Rocky Mountains. Western Wildlands 18(2): 2-5. suppression increased the amount of carbon stored in western U.S. forests? Geophysical Research Letters. Fowler, C. 1988. Habitat capability model for the doi:10.1029/2008GL033965. northern goshawk. Unpublished document on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Tahoe Fenn, M.E.; Baron, J.S.; Allen, E.B.; Ruth, H.M.; National Forest, Nevada City, CA. 21 p. Nydick, K.R.; Geiser, L.; Bowman, W.D.; Sickman, J.O.; Meixner, T.; Johnson, D.W.; Neitlich, P. 2003. Fowler, C.; Valentine, B.; Sanders, S.; Stafford, M. Ecological effects of nitrogen deposition in the 1991. Suitability index model: willow flycatcher western United States. BioScience 53: 404-420. (Empidonax traillii). Unpublished document on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Tahoe Fettig, C.J.; Klepzig, K.D.; Billings, R.F.; Munson, National Forest, Nevada City, CA. 15 p. A.S.; Nebeker, T.E.; Negrón, J.F.; Nowak, J.T. 2007. The effectiveness of vegetation management practices Frandsen, W.H.; Ryan, K.C. 1986. Soil moisture for prevention and control of bark beetle infestations reduces below ground heat flux and soil temperatures in coniferous forests of the western and southern under a burning fuel pile. Canadian Journal of Forest United States. Forest Ecology and Management 238: Research 16: 244-248. 24-53. Frank, G. 2008. Brief history of the Tule River Indian Field, C.B.; Daily, G.C.; Davis, F.W.; Gaines, Reservation: the struggle to stay on the land after S.; Matson, P.A.; Melack, J.; Miller, N.L. 1999. 1850. http://tuleriver.org/reservation/reservation_ Confronting climate change in California. Ecological after_1850.html. (5 September 2008). impacts on the Golden State. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists and Ecological Society of Franklin, A.B.; Anderson, D.R.; Gutiérrez, R.J.; America. Online at: www.ucsusa.org. Burnham, K.P. 2000. Climate, habitat quality, and fitness in northern spotted owl populations in Fitch, H.S. 1938. Rana boylii in Oregon. Copeia. northwestern California. Ecological Monographs 70: 1938(3): 148. 539-590. Fites-Kaufman, J.A. 1997. Historic landscape Franklin, J.; Fites-Kaufman, J. 1996. Assessment pattern and process: fire, vegetation and environment of late successional forests of the Sierra Nevada. interactions in the northern Sierra Nevada. Ph.D. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project: final report dissertation. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. to congress, assessments and scientific basis for management options, vol. II, ch. 21. Davis, CA:
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 696 Literature Cited
University of California, Centers for Water and Freeze, R.A.; Witherspoon, P.A. 1968. Theoretical Wildland Resources: 627-662. analysis of regional groundwater flow. 3. Quantitative interpretations. Water Resources Research, V4, # 3: Franklin, J.; Graber, D.; Johnson, K.N.; Fites- 581-590. Kaufmann, J.; Menning, K.; Parsons, D.; Sessions, J.; Spies, T.A.; Tappeiner, J.C.; Thornburgh, D.A. Fuller, K. 1995. Clarkia springvillensis field tour. 1997. Alternative approaches to conservation of late Notes on file at: U.S. Department of the Interior, successional forests in the Sierra Nevada and their Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, Room evaluation. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project: W-3605, Sacramento, CA 98525. 1 p. final report to congress, addendum ch. 3. Davis, CA: University of California, Centers for Water and Furnish, J. 2010. Progress report on monitoring of Wildland Resources: 53-70. aquatic management indicator species (MIS) in the Sierra Nevada province: 2009-2010 field seasons. 6 p. Frazier, J.; Carlson, A. 1991. Surface and ground water quality monitoring protocol for herbicide Gaines, W.L.; Singleton, P.H.; Ross, R.C. 2003. application. appendix G; Groveland conifer release Assessing the cumulative effects of linear recreation environmental assessment. Sonora, CA: U.S. routes on wildlife habitats on the Okanogan and Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Stanislaus Wenatchee national forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. National Forest. 111 p. PNW-GTR-586. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Frazier, J.W.; Roby, K.B.; Boberg, J.A.; Kenfield, Research Station. 79 p. K.; Reiner, J.B.; Azuma, D.L.; Furnish, J.L.; Staab, B.P.; Grant, S.L. 2005. Stream condition inventory Gall, G.A.E.; Busack, C.A.; Smith, R.C.; Gold, J.R.; technical guide. Vallejo, CA: U.S. Department of Kornblatt, B.J. 1976. Biochemical genetic variation Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest in populations of golden trout, Salmo aguabonita; Region. 111 p. evidence of the threatened little Kern River golden trout, S.a. whitei. Journal of Heredity 67: 330-335. Freel, M. 1991. A literature review for management of fisher and marten in California. Unpublished Gayton, A.H. 1930a. The ghost dance of 1870 in document, on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, south central California. Berkeley, CA: University of Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Vallejo, California Publications in American Archaeology and CA. 22 p. Ethnology 28: 57-82. Freeze, R.A. 1969. Groundwater flow system Gayton, A.H. 1930b. Yokuts-Mono chiefs and analysis. Ottawa, Canada: Inland Waters Branch, shamans. Berkeley, CA: University of California Canada Department of Energy, Mines and Resources. Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 115 p. 24: 361-420. Freeze, R.A.; Cherry, J.L. 1979. Groundwater. Gayton, A.H. 1948. Yokuts and western Mono Prentice Hall. 385 p. ethnography I: Tulare Lake, southern valley, and central foothill Yokuts. Berkeley, CA: University of Freeze, R.A.; Witherspoon, P.A. 1966. Theoritical California Anthropological Records 10(1 and 2). analysis of regional groundwater flow. 1. Analytical 301 p. and numerical solutions to the mathematical model. Water Resources Research, V2, #4: 641-656. Gayton, A.H.; Newman, S.S. 1940. Yokuts and western Mono myths. Berkeley, CA: University of Freeze, R.A.; Witherspoon, P.A. 1967. Theoritical California Anthropological Records 5: 1-110. analysis of regional groundwater flow. 2. The effect of water table configuration and subsurface permeability George, M.; Bartolome, J.; McDougald, N.; variation. Water Resources Research, V3, # 4: 623- Connor, M.; Vaughn, C.; Markegard, G. Annual 634. range forage production. Rangeland management
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 697 Literature Cited series, publication 8018. Davis, CA: University of Gold, J.R.; Gall, G.A.E. 1975c. The taxonomic California. 9 p. structure of six golden trout (Salmo aguabonita) populations from the Sierra Nevada, California. Gersonde, R.F.; O’Hara, K.L. 2005. Comparative tree California Academy of Sciences proceedings XL(10): growth efficiency in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer 243-263. forests. Forest Ecology and Management 219: 95-108. Goldberg, S.R.; Miller, C.M. 1985. Reproduction of Gertler, A.W.; Gillies, J.A.; Pierson, W.R. 2000. An the silvery legless lizard, Anniella pulchra pulchra assessment of the mobile source contribution to PM10 (Anniellidae) in southern California. Southwest and PM2.5 in the United States. Water, Air, and Soil Naturalist 30: 617-619. Pollution 123: 203-214. Golla, V. 2007. Linguistic prehistory. In: Jones, T.L.; Gifford, E.W. 1917. Tubatulabal and Kawaiisu kinship Klar, K.A., eds. California prehistory: colonization, terms. American Archaeology and Ethnology 12(6): culture, and complexity. Lanham, MD: AltaMira 219-248. Press: 71-82. Gill, A.M.; Allan, G. 2008. Large fires, fire effects, Gordon, W. 2007. Evolution of the disparate impact and the fire regime concept. International Journal of theory of Title VII: A hypothetical case study. Harvard Wildland Fire 17: 688-695. Journal of Legislation Vol. 44: 529. Girty, G.H. 1977. Multiple regional deformation and Goudie, A.S. 2006. Global warming and fluvial metamorphism of the Boyden Cave roof pendant, geomorphology. Geomorphology 79: 384-394. http:// central Sierra Nevada, California. M.A. thesis. Fresno, www.sciencedirect.com. CA: California State University. 82 p. Gould, G.J. 1977. Distribution of the spotted owl in Gobster, P.H. 1994. The aesthetic experience of California. Western Birds 8: 131-146. sustainable forest ecosystems. In: Covington, W.W.; Debano, L.F., tech. coords. Sustainable ecological Graber, D.M. 1996. Status of terrestrial vertebrates. systems: implementing an ecological approach to land In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project: final report to management; 1993 July 12-15; Flagstaff, AZ. Gen. congress, vol. II, assessments and scientific basis for Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-247. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. management options, ch. 25. Davis, CA: University Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 246- Resources: 709-726. 255. Graham, R.T. tech. ed. 2003. Hayman fire case Godfrey, W.E. 1986. The birds of Canada. Ottawa, study: summary. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department Canada: National Museums of Canada. 595 p. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Technical Report RMRS-GTR-115. Gold, J.R. 1975. Phenetics and genetics of high Guarin and Taylor, 2005 Sierran golden trout (Salmo aguabonita). Cal-Neva Wildlife 1975: 13-26. Graumlich, L.J. 1993. A 1000-year record of temperature and precipitation in the Sierra Nevada. Gold, J.R.; Gall, G.A.E. 1975a. Chromosome Quaternary Research 39: 249-255. cytology and polymorphism in the California high Sierra golden trout (Salmo aguabonita). Canadian Gray, A.N.; Zald, H.S.J.; North, M.; Kern, R.A. 2005. Journal of Genetics and Cytology 17: 41-53. Stand conditions associated with tree regeneration in Sierran mixed conifer-forests. Forest Science 51: Gold, J.R.; Gall, G.A.E. 1975b. Further record of little 198-210. Kern golden trout, Salmo aguabonita whitei, in the little Kern River basin, California. California Fish and Green, C. 1995. Habitat requirements of great gray Game 61: 248-250. owls in the central Sierra Nevada. M.S. thesis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources and Environment. 94 p.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 698 Literature Cited
Green, G.A.; Bombay, H.L.; Morrison, M.L. 2003. Rep. PSW-GTR-133. Albany, CA: U.S. Department Conservation assessment of the willow flycatcher in of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest the Sierra Nevada. Vallejo, CA: U.S. Department of Research Station: 79-98. Agriculture, Forest Service. 62 p. Gutiérrez, R.J.; Tempel, D.J.; Berigan, W. 2008. Griffith D.; Mankin W.; Coffey M.; Ward D.; Riebau Population ecology of the California spotted owl in A. 1991. FTIR remote sensing of biomass burning the central Sierra Nevada: annual results 2007. CR emissions of CO2, CO, CH4, CH2O, NO, NO2, NH3 Agreement: 06-CR-11052007-174. Vallejo, CA: and N2O. In: Levine, J., ed. Global biomass burning: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region. atmospheric, climatic and biospheric implications. 29 p. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 230-239. Gutiérrez, R.J.; Tempel, D.J.; Berigan, W. 2009. Grinnell, J.; Dixon, J.S.; Linsdale, J.M. 1937. Fur- Population ecology of the California spotted owl in bearing mammals of California: their natural history, the central Sierra Nevada: annual results 2008. CR systematic status, and relations to man. 2 vols. Agreement: 06-CR-11052007-174. Vallejo, CA: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 375 p. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region. 29 p. Grinnell, J.; Miller, A.H. 1944. The distribution of the birds of California. Pacific Coast Avifauna 27: 1-608. Gutiérrez, R.J.; Tempel, D.J.; Berigan, W. 2010. Population ecology of the California spotted owl in Grubb, T.G. 1976. A survey and analysis of bald eagle the central Sierra Nevada: annual results 2009. CR nesting in western Washington. Thesis. Seattle, WA: Agreement: 06-CR-11052007-174. Vallejo, CA: University of Washington. 87 p. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region. Gucinski, H.; Furniss, M.J.; Ziemer, R.R.; Brookes, 29 p. M.H., eds. 2000. Forest roads: a syntheses of scientific Halliday, W.R. 1962. Caves of California. In: information. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-509. Special report of the western speleological survey, in Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest cooperation with the National Spelological Society: Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 103 p. 58-68. Gunderson, D.R. 1968. Floodplain use related to Hanna, S.A. 2000. Mid-rotation response of loblolly stream morphology and fish populations. J. Wildlife pine to fertilization and vegetation control. Doctoral Management. 32(3): 507-514. dissertation. Auburn, AL: Auburn University. 249 p. Gutiérrez, R.J. 1994. Changes in distribution and Hanna, S.A. 2001. Forest health inspection report– abundance of spotted owls. Studies in Avian Biology San Jacinto Ranger District, San Bernardino National 15: 293-300. Forest. Gutierrez, R.J.; Franklin, A.B.; Lahaye, W.S. 1995. Hanna, S.A.; Allison, J. 2001. Forest health inspection Spotted owl (Strix occidentalis). In: Poole, A; Gill, F., report–Mountaintop Ranger District, San Bernardino eds. Birds of North America, no. 179. Philadelphia, National Forest. PA and Washington, DC: Academy of Natural Sciences and American Ornithologists’ Union. Hansen, R. 1992. The 6th annual population studies of Kaweah brodiaea (Briodiaea insignis) and Springville Gutiérrez, R.J.; Verner, J.; McKelvey, K.S.; Noon, clarkia (Clarkia springvillensis). Report for and on B.R.; Steger, G.N.; Call, D.R.; Lehaye, W.S.; file at: California Department of Fish and Game, Bingham, B.B.; Sensor, J.S. 1992. Habitat relations of Region 4, 1234 East Shaw Avenue, Fresno, CA the California spotted owl. In: Verner, J.; McKelvey, 93710-7802. 21 p. K.S.; Noon, B.R.; Gutiérrez, R.J.; Gould, G.I., Jr.; Beck, T.W., eds. The California spotted owl: a Hansen, R. 2001. Personal communication. Vice technical assessment of its current status. Gen. Tech. president, Sierra Los Tulares Land Trust, Visalia, CA.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 699 Literature Cited
Hansen, R.W. 2006. Summary of the biology and report. Logan, UT: Utah State University, Western current taxonomy of plethodontid salamanders (genus Center for Monitoring and Assessment of Fresh Water Batrachoseps) in the Sierra Nevada, California. Ecosystems. 23 p. Report prepared for P. Strand, fisheries program manager, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Hayes, C.; McDonnell, W.; Zenick, H. 1993. Service, Southern Sierra Province, Clovis, CA. 42 p. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ozone epidemiology research program: a strategy for Hargis, C.D.; Bissonette, J.A. 1995. The influence assessing the effects of ambient ozone exposure upon of forest fragmentation and prey availability on morbidity in exposed populations. Air and Waste 43: American marten populations: a multi-scale analysis. 950-954. Presented at the Second International Martes Symposium, University of Alberta, Edmonton Hayes, M.P.; Brown, C.; Green, G.A.; Macfarlane, D., Alberta, Canada, 12-16 August. tech. coords. 2009. Foothill yellow-legged frog draft conservation assessment. Foothill Yellow-legged Frog Hargis, C.D.; McCarthy, C.; Perloff, R.D. 1994. Home Working Group. ranges and habitats of northern goshawks in eastern California. Studies in Avian Biology 16: 66-74. Hayes, M.P.; Jennings, M.R. 1986. Decline of ranid frog species in western North America: are Harris, J.H. 1991. Effects of brood parasitism by bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) responsible? Journal of brown-headed cowbirds on willow flycatcher nesting Herpetology 20(4): 490-509. success along the Kern River, California. Western Birds 22: 13-26. Hayes, M.P.; Jennings, M.R. 1988. Habitat correlates of distribution of the California red-legged frog (Rana Harris, J.H.; Sanders, S.D.; Flett, M.A. 1987. Willow aurora draytonii) and the foothill yellow-legged flycatcher surveys in the Sierra Nevada. Western Birds frog (Rana boylii): implications for management. 18: 27-36. In: Szaro, R.C.; Severson, K.E.; Patton, D.R., tech. coords. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Harris, J.H.; Sanders, S.D.; Flett, M.A. 1988. The Management of Amphibians, Reptiles, and Small status and distribution of the willow flycatcher in the Mammals in North America. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM- Sierra Nevada: results of the survey. Administrative GTR-166. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest report 88-1. On file at: California Department of Fish Service: 144-158. and Game, Wildlife Management Division. 32 p. Hayes, M.P.; Tennant, M.R. 1986. Diet and feeding Harrison, R.M.; Yin, J.; Mark, D.; Stedman, J.; behavior of the California red-legged frog, Rana Appleby, R.S.; Booker, J.; Moorcroft, S. 2001. Studies aurora draytonii (Ranidae). The Southwestern of the particle (2.5-10 microm) component in UK Naturalist 30: 601-605. urban atmospheres. Atmospheric Environment 35: 3667-3679. Hayward, G.D. 1994. Conservation status of great gray owls in the United States. In: Flammulated, Harvey, H.T.; Shellhammer, H.S. 1991. Survivorship boreal, and great gray owls in the United States, a and growth of giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron technical conservation assessment. Laramie, WY: U.S. giganteum [Lindl.] Buchh.) seedlings after fire. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Madroño 38: 14-20. Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Harvey, H.T.; Shellhammer, H.S.; Stecker, R.E. Headwaters Economics. 2007. Home development 1980. Giant sequoia ecology. Washington, D.C.: U.S. on fire-prone lands west-wide summary. http:// Department of the Interior, National Park Service. www.headwaterseconomics.org/wildfire/#cht. (11 Hawkins, C.P. 2003. Development, evaluation, and September 2009). application of a RIVPACS-type predictive model Headwaters Economics. 2008a. Economic Profile for assessing the biological condition of streams in System Analyst (EPSA) profile for major sectors region 5 (California) national forests. Completion related to public lands in three-county study area.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 700 Literature Cited http://www.headwaterseconomics.org/sequoia/hdt_ occidentalis in the San Gabriel mountains of southern Major_Sectors.pdf. (17 September 2009). California. Unpublished dissertation. Pomona, CA: California State Polytechnic University. Headwaters Economics. 2008b. Economic Profile System Analyst (EPSA) profile of agriculture in 3 Heinemeyer, K.S. 1993. Temporal dynamics in county study area. http://www.headwaterseconomics. the movements, habitat use, activity, and spacing org/sequoia/hdt_Ag.pdf. (17 September 2009). of reintroduced fishers in northwestern Montana. Masters thesis. Missoula, MT: University of Montana. Headwaters Economics. 2008c. Economic Profile 158 p. System Analyst (EPSA) profile of the mining industry in 3 county study area. http://www. Helm, B.P. 1998. Biogeography of eight large headwaterseconomics.org/sequoia/hdt_Mining.pdf. branchiopods endemic to California. In: Witham, (17 September 2009). C.W.; Bauder, E.T.; Belk, D.; Ferren, W.R., Jr.; Ornduff, R., eds. Ecology, conservation and Headwaters Economics. 2008d. Economic Profile management of vernal pool ecosystems: proceedings System Analyst (EPSA) profile of the timber from a 1996 conference. Sacramento, CA: California industry in 3 county study area. http://www. Native Plant Society: 124-139. headwaterseconomics.org/sequoia/hdt_Timber.pdf. (17 September 2009). Helms, J.A.; Tappeiner, J.C. 1996. Silviculture in the Sierra. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project: Headwaters Economics. 2008e. Economic Profile final report to congress, assessments and scientific System Analyst (EPSA) profile of the travel basis for management options, vol II, ch. 15. Davis, and tourism in 3 county study area. http://www. CA: University of California, Centers for Water and headwaterseconomics.org/sequoia/hdt_Travel.pdf. (17 Wildland Resources: 439-493. September 2009). Hendrickson, J.R. 1954. Ecology and systematics of Headwaters Economics. 2008f. Economic salamanders of the genus Batrachoseps. University of Profile System (EPS) and the Economic Profile California Publications in Zoology 54: 1-46. System Community (EPSC). http://www. headwaterseconomics.org/sequoia.php. (11 September Hermit, _. 1996. Fire analysis–California spotted owl 2009). EIS: frequency of burning and severity of burning. Unpublished report on file at: U.S. Department Headwaters Economics. 2008g. A profile of the of Agriculture, Forest Service, Sierra Nevada environmental justice in three-county study area. Framework Project, 801 I Street, Sacramento, CA http://www.headwaterseconomics.org/sequoia/hdt_ 95814. 4 p. ej.pdf. (11 September 2009). Hickman, J.C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: higher Headwaters Economics. 2008h. Profiles for selected plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of towns near the forest (2000 census designated places). California Press. 1,400 p. http://www.headwaterseconomics.org/sequoia.php. (21 October 2009). Hill, E.; Bergstrom, J.; Cordell, H.K.; Bowker, J.M. 2009. Natural resource amenity service values and Heady, H.F. 1975. Rangeland management. New impacts in the U.S. Internet Research Information York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Series (IRIS). Athens, GA and Knoxville, TN: U.S. Heath, S.K.; Ballard, G. 2003. Bird species Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern composition, phenology, nesting substrate, and Research Station, University of Georgia, and productivity for the Owens Valley alluvial fan, eastern University of Tennessee. 73 p. Sierra Nevada, California, 1998-2002. Great Basin Hill, G.; Jones, G. 1999. Strategic management. Birds 6(1): 18-35. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Hedlund, C.D. 1996. Relative proportion of prey Hirsch, A.I.; Munger, J.W.; Jacob, D.; Horowitz, species in the diet of spotted owl Strix occidentalis L.W.; Goldstein, A.H. 1996. Seasonal variation of the
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 701 Literature Cited
ozone production efficiency per unit NOx at Harvard Sachelarescu, S.; Lolova, D.; Meliefste, K.; Uzunova, Forest, Massachusetts. Journal of Geophysical E.; Marinescu, C.; Volf, J.; De leeuw, F.; Van de Research 101(D7): 12659-12666. Wiel, H.; Fletcher, T.; Lebret, E.; Brunekref, B. 2001. PM10 and PM2.5 concentration in central and eastern Holland, D.C. 1991. A synopsis of the ecology Europe: results from the Cesar study. Atmospheric and status of the western pond turtle (Clemmys Environment 35: 2757-2771. marmorata) in 1991. Unpublished document, prepared for and on file at: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Howell, S.N.G.; Webb, S. 1995. A guide to the birds Service, National Ecology Research Center, San of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford: Simeon Field Station. 141 p. Oxford University Press. 851 p. Holland, D.C. 1994. The western pond turtle: habitat Hubbard, J.P. 1987. The status of the willow and history. Project Number 92-068. Final report flycatcher in New Mexico. Status report on file at: prepared for and on file at: U.S. Department of New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe, Energy, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, NM. 29 p. OR. Hudiburg, T.; Law, B.; Turner, D.P.; Campbell, J.; Holsinger, K.E. 1982. Letter to Rick York, California Donato, D.; Duane, M. 2009. Carbon dynamics of Native Plant Society. On file at: California Native Oregon and northern California forests and potential Plant Society, 2707 K Street, Suite 1, Sacramento, CA land-based carbon storage. Ecological Applications 95816. 1 p. 19: 163-180. Holsinger, K.E. 1985. A phenetic study of Clarkia Huff, M.H.; Smith, J.K. 2000. Wildland fire in unguiculata Lindley (Onagraceae) and its relatives. ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna, fire effects Systematic Botany 10: 155-165. on animal communities. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-42, Volume 1. Ogden, UT: USDA, Forest Holtsford, T. 1994. Personal communication. Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 1-8. Assistant Professor, University of Missouri, Columbia. Hughes, R.M.; Larsen, D.P. 1987. Ecoregions: an approach to surface water protection. Journal of the Holtsford, T.P.; Ellstrand, N.C. 1992. Genetic Water Pollution Control Federation 60: 486-493. and environmental variation in floral traits affecting outcrossing rate in Clarkia tembloriensis Hull, K.L. 2007. The Sierra Nevada: archaeology in (Onagraceae). Evolution 46: 216-225. the range of light. In: Jones, T.L.; Klar, K.A., eds. California prehistory: colonization, culture, and Hood, S.M.; Smith, S.L.; Cluck, D.R. 2010. complexity. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press: 177-190. Predicting mortality for five California conifers following wildfire. Forest Ecology and Management Hull, K.L.; Moratto, M.J.; McCarthy, H.; Roper, 232: 36-45. C.K.; Spaulding, W.G.; Hale, M.R.; Nilsson, E. 1999. Archeological synthesis and research design, Horne, S.; McFarland, J. 1993. Impacts of Yosemite National Park, California. Yosemite, CA.: livestock grazing on cultural resources: issue paper. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Unpublished document on file at: Los Padres National Service, Yosemite Research Center. Forest, 6755 Hollister Avenue, Suite 150, Goleta, CA 93117. 8 p. Hurteau, M.D.; Koch, G.W.; Hungate, B.A. 2008. Carbon protection and fire risk reduction: toward a Hornocker, M.G.; Hash, H.S. 1976. Ecology of full accounting of forest carbon offsets. Frontiers in the wolverine (Gulo gulo) in northwest Montana. Ecology and the Environment. 6, doi:10.1890/070187. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho, Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit. 16 p. Hurteau, M.D.; North, M. 2010. Carbon recovery rates following different wildfire risk mitigation Houthuijs, D.; Breugelmans, O.; Hoek, G.; Vaskovi, treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 260: E.; Mihalikova, E.; Pastuszka, J.S.; Jirik, V.; 930-937.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 702 Literature Cited
Husari, S.; Nichols, H.T.; Sugihara, N.G.; Stephens, P.R.; Kaufman, B.; McGurty, B.M., eds. Proceedings S.L. 2006. Fire and fuel management. In: Sugihara, of the conference on California herpetology. Special N.G.; van Wagtendonk, J.W.; Fites-Kaufman, J.; publication 1-143. Van Nuys, CA: Southwestern Shaffer, K.E.; Thode, A.E., eds. Fire in California’s Herpetologists Society: 61-72. ecosystems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 444-465. Jennings, M.R. 1996. Status of amphibians. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project: final report to Hutto, R.L. 1995. Composition of bird communities congress, vol. II, ch. 31, assessments and scientific following stand-replacement fires in northern Rocky basis for management options. Davis, CA: University Mountain (U.S.A.) conifer forests. Conservation of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Biology 9(5): 1041-1058. Resources: 921-944. Hutto, R.L.; Gallo, S.M. 2006. The effects of postfire Jennings, M.R.; Hayes, M.P. 1994. Amphibian and salvage logging on cavity-nesting birds. The Condor reptile species of special concern in California. 108: 817-831. Contract #8023, final report submitted to and on file at: California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova, CA. 255 p. 2001. Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the Jockusch, E.L.; Martínez-Solano, I.; Hansen, R.W.; third assessment report of the Intergovenmental Panel Wake, D.B. 2012. Morphological and molecular on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge diversification of slender salamanders (Caudata: University Press. Plethodontidae: Batrachoseps) in the southern Sierra Nevada of California with descriptions of two new International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). species. Zootaxa 3190: 1-30. 2007. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Johnson, J.R.; Stafford, T.W., Jr.; Ajie, H.O.; Morris, Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on D.P. 2002. Arlington Springs revisited. In: Browne, Climate Change. Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, D.; Mitchell,K.; Chaney, H., eds. Proceedings of the USA: Cambridge University Press. fifth California islands symposium. Santa Barbara, CA: U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Jackson, L.A. 2004. The mule men: a history of Management Service and the Santa Barbara Museum stock packing in the Sierra Nevada. Missoula, MT: of Natural History: 541–545. Mountain Press Publishing Company. 254 p. Johnston, H. 1966. They felled the redwoods: a saga Jackson, R.J. 1999. Heritage resources management of flumes and rails in the high Sierra. CA: Trans- module for rangeland management activities on Anglo Books. 160 p. national forests of the Sierra Nevada. Unpublished report by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Jones, F.L. 1950. A survey of the Sierra Nevada Service, Pacific Southwest Region, prepared for bighorn. Sierra Club Bulletin 35(6): 29-76. Sequoia National Forest. On file at: Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA Joslin, G.; Youmans, H., coords. Effects of recreation 93257. on Rocky Mountain wildlife: a review for Montana. Helena, MT: The Wildlife Society, Montana Chapter, James, K.; Absher, J. 2002. Effectiveness of visitor Committee on Effects of Recreation on Wildlife. information programs in Giant Sequoia National 307 p. Monument. RWU-4902 unpublished technical report, on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Jurek, R.M. 1988. Five-year status report, bald eagle. Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 4955 Unpublished report on file at: California Department Canyon Crest Drive, Riverside, CA 92507. 46 p. of Fish and Game, Wildlife Management Division, Sacramento, CA. 15 p. Jennings, M.R. 1988. Natural history and decline of native ranids in California. In: DeLisle, H.P.; Brown, Jurek, R.M. 2000. Bald eagles in California. On file at: California Department of Fish and Game, Habitat
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 703 Literature Cited
Conservation and Planning Branch. http://www.dfg. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/t_e_spp/bald_eagle/index. Research Station. html. Keeley, J. 1991. Seed germination and life history Jurek, R.M. 2010. Condor program monthly syndromes in the California chaparral. The Botanical status report 2009-10-31. http://www.dfg. Review 57(2): 81-116. ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/t_e_spp/condor/docs/ StatusReport-2009-12-31.pdf. (14 January 2010). Keeley, J.E. 2009. Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western Jurek, R.M. 2010. Condor program monthly status U.S. forests. Publication brief for resource managers. report 2009: 10-31. On file at: Western Ecological Research Center. Kaplan, R.; Kaplan, S. 1989. The experience of Keeley, J.E.; Aplet, G.H.; Christensen, N.L.; Conard, nature: a psychological perspective. New York, NY: S.G.; Johnson, E.A.; Omi, P.N.; Peterson, D.L.; Cambridge University Press. 240 p. Swetnam, T.W. 2009. Ecological foundations for fire management in North American forest and shrubland Kaplan-Henry, T. 2000. Determination of riparian ecosystems. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-779. ecotype, in defining potential zones of ecological Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest influence to giant sequoia ecology from proposed Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 92 p. management activities on the Sequoia National Forest. Unpublished report on file at: U.S. Department Keeley, J.E.; Franklin, J.; D’Antonio, C. 2011. Fire of Agriculture, Forest Service, Sequoia National and invasive plants on California landscapes. In: Forest, 1839 South Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA McKenzie, D.; Miller, C; Falk, D.A. (eds). The 93257. 63 p. landscape ecology of fire. Ecological Studies 213: 193-222. Springer, NY. Kaplan-Henry, T.A. 2007. A method to evaluate and classify riparian ecotypes. In: University of California Keeley, J.; Keeley, S. 1987. Role of fire in the water resources center report No. 109, ISBN-13: 978- germination of chaparral herbs and suffrutescents. 0-9788896-1-6, ISBN-10: 0-9788896-1-4, July 2007 Madrono 34(3): 240-249. Proceedings of the Watershed Management Council Tenth Biennial Conference: Watershed Management Keifer, M.; van Wagtendonk, J.W.; Buhler, M. 2006. on the Edge, Scarcity, Quality and Distribution, Long-term surface fuel accumulation in burned and November 15-19, 2004, San Diego, CA. unburned mixed-conifer forest of the central and southern Sierra Nevada, CA (USA). Fire Ecology 2: Kaplan-Henry, T.; Machado, B. 1991. Sequoia 53-71. National Forest cumulative watershed effects field guide. Porterville, CA: U.S. Department of Keister, G.P.; Anthony, R.C. 1983. Characteristics Agriculture, Forest Service, Sequoia National Forest. of bald eagle communal roosts in the Klamath 171 p. basin, Oregon and California. Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 1072-1079. Karr, J.R.; Fausch, K.D.; Angermeier, P.L.; Yant, P.R.; Schlosser, I.J. 1986. Assessing biological integrity in Kelly, R.; McCarthy, D.F. 2000. Effects of fire on running waters: a method and its rationale. Special rock art. Paper presented at the 27th Annual American Publication 5. Champaign, IL: Illinois Natural History Rock Art Research Association, Phoenix, AZ. 7 p. Survey. 27 p. Key, S.H. 1994. Letter to Joel Medlin, U.S. Kasischke, E.S.; Penner, J.E. 2004. Improving global Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, estimates of atmospheric emissions from biomass Sacramento, CA. 4 p. burning. Journal of Geophysical Research 109, Kilgore, B.M.; Biswell, H.H. 1971. Seedling D14S01. doi:10.1029/2004JD004972. germination following fire in a giant sequoia forest. Kaufmann, M.; Shlisky, A.; Marchand, P. 2005. Good California Agriculture 25: 8-10. fire, bad fire. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 704 Literature Cited
Kilgore, B.M.; Sando, R.W. 1975. Crown-fire Konno, E.S. 1986. Movements of the little Kern potential in a sequoia forest after prescribed burning. golden trout (Salmo aguabonita whitei). M.S. thesis. Forest Science 21: 83-87. Fresno, CA: California State University. 93 p. King, T. 2003. Places that count: traditional cultural Koopman, M. E.; Meis, K.; Corbett, J. 2011. properties in cultural resources management. Lanham, Integrated strategies for a vibrant and sustainable MD: Altamira Press. 335 p. Fresno County. ClimateWise Report. Ashland, OR: The Geos Institute. Online at: www.geosinstitute. Knapp, E.E.; Estes, B.L.; Skinner, C.N. 2009. org/images/stories/pdfs/Publications/ClimateWise/ Ecological effects of prescribed fire season: a FresnoClimateWiseFinal.pdf. literature review and synthesis for managers. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-244. Albany, CA: U.S. Kotliar, N.B.; Hejl, S.J.; Hutto, R.L.; Saab, V.A.; Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Melcher, C.P.; McFadzen, M.E. 2002. Effects of fire Southwest Research Station. 80 p. and post-fire salvage logging on avian communities in conifer-dominated forests of the western United Knapp, R.A. 2003. Habitat associations of two States. Studies in Avian Biology 25: 49-64. declining amphibian species in Yosemite National Park. Final report, contract #43-9AD6-1-3077. U.S. Kroeber, A.J. 1976 [1925]. Handbook of the Indians Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Sierra of California. Reprint. Bureau of American Ethnology Nevada Research Center. 44 p. Bulletin 78. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc. 995 p. Knapp, R.A.; Boiano, D.M.; Vredenburg, V.T. 2007. Removal of nonnative fish results in population Kunz, T.H.; Martin, R.A. 1982. Plecotus townsendii, expansion of a declining amphibian (mountain mammal, species no. 175. 6 p. yellow-legged frog, Rana muscosa). Biological Conservation 135: 11-20. Kupferberg, S.J. 1997. Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) invasion of a California river: the role of larval Knapp, R.A.; Matthews, K.R. 2000. Non-native fish competition. Ecology 78(6): 1736–1751. introductions and the decline of the mountain yellow- legged frog (Rana muscosa) from within protected Laake, R.J. 1990. Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) areas. Conservation Biology 14(2): 428-438. Lindl. ex Hildebr. White fir. In: Silvics of North America. Burns, R.M.; Honkala, B.H., eds. U.S. Knaus, B.J.; Cronn, R.; Liston, A.; Pilgrim, K.; Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Handbook Schwartz, M.K. 2011. Mitochondrial genome 654: 36-46. sequences illuminate maternal lineages of conservation concern in a rare carnivore. BMC Lahaye, W.S.; Gutierrez, R.J.; Akcakaya, H.R. 1994. Ecology 11:10. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472- Spotted owl metapopulation dynamics in southern 6785/11/10. California. Journal of Animal Ecology 63: 775-785. Kocis, S.M; English, D.B.K.; Zarnoch, S.J.; Arnold, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit. 2007. Lake R.; Warren, L.; Ruka, C. 2004. National visitor use Tahoe Basin management unit multi species inventory monitoring results: Sequoia National Forest, Region and monitoring: a foundation for comprehensive 5 report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of biological status and trend monitoring in the Lake Agriculture, Forest Service. 24 p. Tahoe basin. Draft report. Koelemeijer, R.B.A.; Homan, C.D.; Matthijsen, J. Larson, R.C. 1985. Giants of the southern Sierra: a 2006. Comparison of spatial and temporal variations brief history of the Sequoia National Forest. On file of aerosol optical thickness and particulate matter at: Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb over Europe. Atmospheric Environment 40: 5304- Street, Porterville, CA 93257. 5315. Lawler, J.J.; Safford, H.D.; Girvetz, E.H. 2011 (in press). Martens and fishers in a changing climate. P. __-__, in K. B. Aubry (ed). Biology and conservation
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 705 Literature Cited of martens, sables, and fishers: a new synthesis. economic utilization of wild ungulates. Cambridge, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. MA: Cambridge University Press: 54-74. LeFer, D. 1997. Effect of seasonality of burn, soil Lewis, H. 1993a. Clarkia. In: Hickman, J.C., ed. The moisture and temperature on chaparral vegetation in Jepson manual: higher plants of California. Berkeley, the Mendocino National Forest. San Francisco, CA: CA: University of California Press: 786-793. San Francisco State University. Lewis, H.T. 1993b. In retrospect. In: Blackburn, Lehman, R.N.; Craigie, D.E.; Collins, P.L.; Griffen, T.C.; Anderson, M.K., eds. Before the wilderness: R.S. An analysis of habitat requirements and site environmental management by native Californians. selection for nesting bald eagles in California. Report Menlo Park, CA: Ballena Press: 389-400. to U.S. Forest Service, No. 43-9158-9-1871. 96 p. Lewis, J.J. 2008. Oregonasellus and Bowmanasellus, Lehrman, D.E.; Smith, T.B.; Knuth, W.R.; Dorman, two new subterranean isopod genera from the western C.E. 1994. Meteorological analysis of the San United States (Crustacea: Isopoda: Asellidae). Joaquin valley air quality study, atmospheric utilities Subterranean Biology 6: 23-30. signature, predictions and experiments program (SJVAQS/AUSPEX). Santa Rosa, CA: Unpublished Liski, J.; Livesniemi, H.; Makela, A.; Westman, J. report prepared by Technical and Business Systems 1999. CO2 emissions from soil in response to climate Inc. for Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San warming are overestimated. Royal Swedish Academy Ramon, CA, and California Air Resources Board, of Sciences 28: 2: 171-174. Sacramento, CA. Lind, A.F.; Conway, L.; Sanders, H.; Strand, P.; Leopold, L.B. 1951. Rainfall frequency-an aspect Tharalson, T. 2003. Distribution, relative abundance, of climatic variation. Transactions, American and habitat of foothill yellow-legged frogs (Rana Geophysical Union 32(3): 347-357. boylii) on national forests in the southern Sierra Nevada mountains of California. Unpublished report Lewis, H.T. 1972. The role of fire in the domestication to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, of plants and animals in southwest Asia: a hypothesis. Pacific Southwest Region, Fish Habitat Relationship Man, New Series 7(2 June): 195-222. (FHR) Program. Lewis, H.T. 1973. Patterns of Indian burning in Littell, J.S.; Peterson, D.L.; Millar, C.I.; O’Halloran, California: ecology and ethnohistory. Ramona, CA: K.A. 2011. U.S. national forests adapt to climate Ballena Press. 101 p. change through science–management partnerships. Climate Change: 1-28. Lewis, H.T. 1980. Indian fires in spring: hunters and gatherers of the Canadian forest shaped their habitat Littlejohn, M.; Gramann, J. 2003. Sequoia and Kings with fire. Natural History 89: 76-78, 82-83. Canyon National Parks, visitor study, summer 2002. Visitor services project report 137. Moscow, ID: Lewis, H.T. 1985. Why Indians burned: specific University of Idaho, College of Natural Resources, versus general reasons. In: Lotan, J.E.; Kilgore, Park Studies Unit. 128 p. B.M.; Fischer, W.C.; Mutch, R.W., eds. Proceedings: Symposium and Workshop on Wilderness Fire. Liu, W.; Hopke, P.K.; Van Curen, R.A. 2003. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-182. Ogden, UT: Origins of fine aerosol mass in the western United U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, States using positive matrix factorization. Journal Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: of Geophysical Research. 108(D23): 4716. 75-80. doi:10.1029/2003JD003678. Lewis, H.T. 1989. Non-agricultural management of Loehner, J. 2004. Personal communication. Range plants and animals: alternative burning strategies in specialist, Tule River Ranger District, Sequoia northern Australia. In: Hudson, R.J.; Drew, K.R.; National Forest. Baskin, L.M., eds., Wildlife production systems:
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 706 Literature Cited
Lofroth, E.C.; Raley, C.M.; Higley, J.M.; Truex, R.L.; Maddox, D.M.; Mayfield, A. 1985. Yellow starthistle Yaeger, J.S.; Lewis, J.C.; Happe, P.J.; Finley, L.L.; infestations are on the increase. California Agriculture Naney, R.H.; Hale, L.J.; Krause, A.L.; Livingston, 39: 10-12. S.A.; Myers, A.M.; Brown, R.N. 2010. Conservation of fishers (Martes pennanti) in south-central British Man, G., ed. 2007. Major forest insect and disease Columbia. In: Western Washington, western Oregon, conditions in the United States. FS-919. Washington, and California, vol. 1, conservation assessment. DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau 68 p. of Land Management. Marshall, J.T. 1942. Food and habitat of the spotted Lowe, D.; Waltham, T. 1995. A dictionary of karst owl. Condor 44: 66-67. and caves. Cave studies series no. 6. British Cave Marshall, M.P.; Walt, H.J. 1984. Rio Abajo: prehistory Research Association. 40 p. and history of a Rio Grande province. Santa Fe, Lutz, J.A.; van Wagtendonk, J.W.; Franklin, J.F. 2009. NM: Historic Preservation Division. Cited in: U.S. Twentieth-century decline of large-diameter trees Army Corps of Engineers (1988). Site impacts in the in Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Forest Rio Abajo district central Rio Grande River valley, Ecology and Management 257.11: 2296-2307. New Mexico. In: Archaeological sites protection and preservation notebook technical notes ASPPN 1-7. Lux, L.; Rose, J.; Supernowicz, D.; Conners, P.; Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Brady, J.; Cutts, J.; Brandoff-Kerr, J. 2003. Strategy Experimental Station, Environmental Laboratory: 10. for inventory and historic evaluation of recreation residence tracts in the national forests of California Martin, D.L. 1992. Sierra Nevada anuran guide. San from 1906 to 1959. Unpublished manuscript on file Jose, CA: Canorus, LTD, Ecological Research Team. at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 28 p. Pacific Southwest Region, 1323 Club Drive, Vallejo, Martin, F. 1988. The second annual population CA. 129 p. studies of Kaweah brodiaea (Brodiaea insignis) and Lyon, L.J.; Brown, J.K.; Huff, M.H.; Smith, J.K. Springville clarkia (Clarkia springvillensis). Report to 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on and on file at: the California Department of Fish and fauna, introduction. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42, Game, Region 4, 1234 East Shaw Avenue, Fresno, CA Volume 1. Ogden, UT: USDA, Forest Service, Rocky 93710-7802. 14 p. Mountain Research Station: 1-8. Martin, F. 1989. The third annual population MacDonald, L.H. 2000. Evaluating and managing studies of Kaweah brodiaea (Brodiaea insignis) and cumulative effects: process and constraints. Springville clarkia (Clarkia springvillensis). Report to Environmental Management 26: 299-315. and on file at: the California Department of Fish and Game, Region 4, 1234 East Shaw Avenue, Fresno, CA Macfarlane, D. 1994. National forest system status 93710-7802. 15 p. information. In: Ruggerio, L.F.; Aubry, K.B.; Buskirk, S.W.; Lyon, L.J.; Zielinski, W.J., eds. The scientific Martin, F. 1990. The fourth annual population basis for conserving forest carnivores: American studies of Kaweah brodiaea (Brodiaea insignis) and marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine in the western Springville clarkia (Clarkia springvillensis). Report to United States. Gen.Tech. Rep. RM-254. Fort Collins, and on file at: the California Department of Fish and CO: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Game, Region 4, 1234 East Shaw Avenue, Fresno, CA Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment 93710-7802. 21 p. Station: 176-184. Martin, F. 1991. The fifth annual population studies of MacSwain, J.W.; Raven, P.H.; Thorpe, R.W. 1973. Kaweah brodiaea (Brodiaea insignis) and Springville Comparative behavior of bees and Onagraceae, clarkia (Clarkia springvillensis). Report to and on IV, Clarkia bees of the western U.S. University of file at: the California Department of Fish and Game, California Publications in Entomology 70: 1-80.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 707 Literature Cited
Region 4, 1234 East Shaw Avenue, Fresno, CA Clarkia springvillensis (Onagraceae). American 93710-7802. 17 p. Journal of Botany 85: 30-36. Mathews, R.A.; Burnett, J.L. 1965. Geologic map of McCue-Harvey, K.; Holtsford, T. 1994. Determining California, Fresno sheet. Scale 1:250,000. California the role of the seed bank in maintaining populations Division of Mines and Geology. of a California annual grassland through prolonged periods of drought. Sacramento, CA: California Mathewson, H.A.; Loffland, H.L.; Morrison, M.L. Department of Fish and Game. 16 p. 2006. Annual report and preliminary demographic analysis for willow flycatcher monitoring in the McDonald, P.M. 1969. Silvical characteristics of central Sierra Nevada. Agreement with Texas A&M California black oak (Quercus kelloggii Newb.). University and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest PSW-53. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Service, Pacific Southwest Region. 59 p. Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 20 p. Matthews, K.R.; Pope, K.L. 1999. A telemetric study of the movement patterns and habitat use of Rana McDowell, N.; Barnard, H.; Bond, B.; Hinckley, T. muscosa, mountain yellow-legged frog, in a high 2002. The relationship between tree height and leaf elevation basin in Kings Canyon National Park, area: sapwood area ratio. Oecologia. 132: 12-20. California. Journal of Herpetology 33(4): 615-624. McDowell, N.; Brooks, J.R.; Fitzgerald, S.A.; Bond, Mayer, K.E.; Laudenslayer, W.F., eds. 1988. A B.J. 2003. Carbon isotope discrimination and growth guide to wildlife habitats of California. Sacramento, response of old pinus ponderosa trees to stand density CA: California Department of Forestry and Fire reductions. Plant, Cell, and Environment 26: 1-14. Protection. 166 p. McGrath, M.T.; DeStefano, S.; Riggs, R.A.; Irwin, McAvoy, L.; McDonald, D.; Carlson, M. 2001. L.L.; Roloff, G.J. 2003. Spatially explicit influences American Indians: sense of place and contested on northern goshawk nesting habitat in the interior terrain. Final report. PSW-98-0010CA. Riverside, Pacific Northwest. Wildlife Monographs 154: 1-63. CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Wildland McGuire, K.; Garfinkle, A. 1980. Archaeological Recreation and Urban Cultures: 59. investigations in the southern Sierra Nevada: the Bear Mountain segment of the Pacific Crest Trail. McCreary, D.D.; Tecklin, J. 2005. Restoring native Bakersfield, CA: U.S. Department of the Interior, California oaks on grazed rangeland. U.S.Department Bureau of Land Management. 304 p. of Agriculture, Forest Service proceedings RMRS-P-35. McKelvey, K.S.; Busse, K.K. 1996. Twentieth century fire patterns on Forest Service lands. In: Sierra McCue, K. 1997a. The ecological genetics of rarity: a Nevada ecosystem project, final report to congress, study of genetic structure, inbreeding and seed bank assessments and scientific basis for management dynamics in a rare annual plant. PhD. dissertation. options, vol. II, ch. 41. Davis, CA: University of Columbia, MO: University of Missouri. California, Centers for Water Resources: 1119-1138. McCue, K. 1997b. Letter to Wayne White, U.S. McKelvey, K.S.; Johnston, J.T. 1992. Historical Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, perspectives on forests of the Sierra Nevada and Sacramento, CA. 4 p. the transverse ranges of southern California: forest conditions at the turn of the century. Gen. Tech. McCue, K.A.; Buckler, E.S.; Holtsford, T.P. 1996. Rep. PSW-GTR-133. Albany, CA: U.S. Department A hierarchical view of genetic structure in the rare of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest annual plant Clarkia springvillensis. Conservation Research Station: 225-246. Biology 10: 1425-1434. McKelvey, K.; Skinner, C.N.; Chang, C.; Erman, McCue, K.A.; Holtsford, T.P. 1998. Seed bank D.C.; Husari, S.J.; Parsons, D.J.; van Wagtendonk, influences on genetic diversity in the rare annual J.W.; Weatherspoon, C.P. 1996. An overview of fire
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 708 Literature Cited in the Sierra Nevada. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem Miller, J.D.; Safford, H.D.; Crimmins, M.; Thode, project: final report to congress, assessments and A.E. 2008. Quantitative evidence for increasing scientific management options, vol. II, ch. 37. Davis, forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and southern CA: University of California, Centers for Wildland Cascade mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Resources: 1033-1040. Ecosystems DOI: 10.1007/s10021-008-9201-9. Meigs, G.W.; Donato, D.C.; Campbell, J.L.; Martin, Minnesota IMPLAN Group, Inc. 2004 (February). J.G.; Law, B.E. 2009. Forest fire impacts on carbon IMPLAN professional, version 2. Stillwater, MN. uptake, storage, and emission: the role of burn severity in the eastern Cascades, Oregon. Ecosystems Mitchell, R. 2001. Personal communication. 12: 1246-1267. Administrator, Outdoor School of Science and Conservation, Tulare County Office of Education. Menke, J. 1992. Grazing and fire management for native perennial grass restoration in California Mitchell, S.R.; Harmon, M.E.; O’Connell, K.E.B. grasslands. Fremontia 20(20): 20-25. 2009. Forest fuel reduction alters fire severity and long-term carbon storage in three Pacific Northwest Merriam, K.E.; Keeley, J.E.; Beyers, J.L. 2006 ecosystems. Ecological Applications 19: 643-655. Fuel breaks affect nonnative species abundance in Californian plant communities. Ecological Mithun, M. 2004. The languages of native North Applications 16(2): 515-527. America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Met One Industries, Inc. 2008a. BAM 1020 particulate monitor operation manual BAM-1020- Mockler, R.J. 1999. Multinational strategic alliances. 9800 Rev G. 1600 NW Washington Blvd., Grant Pass, New York, NY: Wiley. OR: 1-90. Moghaddas, J.J.; Craggs, L. 2007. A fuel treatment Met One Industries, Inc. 2008b. E-BAM Particulate reduces fire severity and increases suppression Monitor Operation Manual E-BAM-9800 Rev L. efficiency in a mixed conifer forest. International 1600 NW Washington Blvd., Grant Pass, OR: 1-75. Journal of Wildland Fire 16: 673-678. Meyer, M.D.; Safford, H.D. 2011a. A summary of Moldenke, A. 1993. Denizens of the soil: small, but current trends and probable future trends in climate critical. Natural Resource News, Special Edition, and climate-driven processes in the Sequoia National August 1993. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. Forest and the neighboring Sierra Nevada. Vallejo, Moore, J.G.; Nokleberg, W.J. 1991. Geologic map CA: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region of the Tehipite dome quadrangle, Fresno County, Ecology Program. Online at: http://fsweb.r5.fs.fed.us/ California, U.S. Geological Survey map GQ-1676. program/ecology/. Moratto, M.J. 1972. Study of prehistory in the Meyer, M.D.; Safford, H.D. 2011b. Giant sequoia southern Sierra Nevada foothills, California. Ph.D. regeneration in groves exposed to wildfire and dissertation. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon. retention harvest. Fire Ecology 7(2): 2-16. 545 p. Meyers, T.J.; Swanson, S. 1992. Variation of stream Moratto, M.J. 1984. California archaeology. New stability with stream type and livestock bank damage York, NY: Academic Press. 757 p. in northern Nevada. Water Resources Bulletin AWRA 28(4): 743-754. Moratto, M.J. 1988. Archaeological excavations at site CA-FRE-1671, Fresno County, California: final Millar, C.I.; Stephenson, N.L.; Stephens, S.L. 2007. report. Report submitted to and on file at: Caltrans, Climate change and forests of the future: managing Sacramento, CA. in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 17: 2145-2151. Moratto, M.J. 1999. Cultural chronology 2: the Yosemite data. In: Hull, K.L.; Moratto, M.J., eds.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 709 Literature Cited
Archaeological synthesis and research design, options, ch. 33. Davis, CA: University of California, Yosemite National Park, California. Yosemite Centers for Water and Wildland Resources: 953-973. Research Center Publications in Anthropology 21. El Portal, CA: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Moyle, P.B.; Yoshiyama, R.M.; Williams, J.E.; Park Service: 121-204. Wikramanayake, E. 1996b. Fish species of special concern in California. Sacramento, CA: California Moriarty, K.M. 2009. American marten distributions Department of Fish and Game. over a 28 year period: relationships with landscape change in Sagehen Creek experimental forest. Thesis Moyle, P.B. 2007. Sierra meadows: historical impact, for master of science. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State current status and trends, and data gaps. Final report. University. 108 p. 82 p. Morris, D.; Walls, M. 2009. Climate change and Moyle, P.B.; Randall, P.J. 1996. Biotic integrity of outdoor recreation resources. Washington, DC: watersheds. In: Sierra nevada ecosystem project: Resources for the Future. 26 p. final report to congress, assessments and scientific basis for management options, vol II, ch. 34. Davis, Morrison, M.L.; Bombay, H.L.; Cain, J.W.; Taylor, CA: University of California, Centers for Water and D.E. 2000. 2000 Annual report and preliminary Wildland Resources: 975-985. http://ceres.ca.gov/ demographic analysis for willow flycatcher snep/pubs/web/PDF/VII_C34.pdf. monitoring in the central Sierra Nevada. Report prepared in partial fulfillment of contracts RFQ-17- Mullally, D.P.; Cunningham, J.D. 1956. Ecological 00-30 and RFQ-17-00-31 between California State relations of Rana muscosa at high elevations in the University, Sacramento, and U.S. Department of Sierra Nevada. Herpetologica 12(3): 189-198. Agriculture, Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest. Mullin, B. 1999. Paper presented at the California Moser, S.; Franco, G.; Pittiglio, S.; Chou, W.; Cayan, exotic pest plant council symposium on Montana’s D. 2009. The future is now: an update on climate noxious weed education and awareness program. change science impacts and response options for Sacramento, CA. California. California Climate Change Center Report Murphy, J.G.; Day, D.A.; Cleary, P.A.; Wooldridge, CEC-500-2008-071 (May 2009). Sacramento, CA: P.J.; Millet, D.B.; Goldstein, A.H.; Cohen, R.C. California Energy Commission. 2007. The weekend effect within and downwind of Moyle, P.B. 1976. Inland fishes of California. Sacramento-part 1: observations of ozone, nitrogen Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 405 p. oxides, and VOC reactivity. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 7: 5327-5339. Moyle, P.B. 1996. Status of aquatic habitats. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project: final report to Mutch, L.S.; Swetnam, T.W. 1995. Effects of congress, vol. II, assessments and scientific basis for fire severity and climate on ring-width growth of management options, ch. 32. Davis, CA: University giant sequoia after fire. In: Brown, J.K.; Mutch, of California, Centers for Water and Wildland R.W.; Spoon, C.W.; Wakimoto, R.H., tech. coords. Resources: 945-952. Proceedings: Symposium on fire in wilderness and park management. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Moyle, P.B.; Williams, J.E.; Wikramanayake, E.D. Agriculture, Forest Service. General Technical Report 1989. Fish species of special concern of California. INT-GTR-320: 241-246 Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game. 222 p. Naney, R.H.; Finley, L.L; Lofroth, E.C.; Happe, P.J.; Krause, A.L.; Raley, C.M.; Truex, R.L.; Hale, L.J.; Moyle, P.B.; Yoshiyama, R.M.; Knapp, R.A. 1996a. Higley, J.M.; Kosic, A.D.; Lewis, J.C.; Livingston, Status of fish and fisheries. In: Sierra Nevada S.A.; Macfarlane, D.C.; Myers, A.M.; Yaeger, J.S. ecosystem project: final report to congress, vol. II, 2012. Conservation of fishers Martes( pennanti) in assessments and scientific basis for management south-central British Columbia, western Washington,
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 710 Literature Cited western Oregon, and California–volume III: threat Noon, B.R.; Biles, C.M. 1990. Mathematical assessment. Denver, CO: USDI, Bureau of Land demography of spotted owls in the Pacific Northwest. Management. Journal of Wildlife Management 54: 18-27. Napton, L.K. 1983. Southern Sierra Nevada Noon, B.R.; McKelvey, K.S.; Lutz, D.W.; LaHaye, archaeology: cultural resource survey of 15 timber W.S.; Gutierrez, R.J.; Moen, C.A. 1992. Estimates sales on Sequoia National Forest, California. On of demographic parameters and rates of population file at: Hume Lake Ranger District, 35860 E. Kings change. In: Verner, J.; McKelvey, K.S.; Noon, B.R.; Canyon Road, Dunlap, CA 93621. Gutiérrez, J.R.; Gould, G.I., Jr.; Beck, T.W., eds. The California spotted owl: a technical assessment of National Association of Recreation Resource Planners its current status. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-133. [NARRP]. 2009. Principles of recreation resource Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest planning. Marienville, PA. 6 p. Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: 175-186. National Park Service. See U.S. Department of the North, M.; Chen, J.; Oakley, B.; Song, B.; Rudnicki, Interior [USDI], National Park Service. M.; Gray, A.; Innes, J. 2004. Forest stand structure National Parks Conservation Association. [n.d.]. and pattern in old-growth western hemlock/Douglas- National Parks family day fact sheet. http://www. fir and mixed-conifer forests. Forest Science 50: npca.org/familyday/NPFD09_Fact_Sheet.pdf. (21 299-311. October 2009). North, M.P.; Hurteau, H.D. 2011. High-severity NatureServe. 2007. NatureServe explorer: an online wildfire effects on carbon stocks and emissions in encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 6.2. fuels treated and untreated forest. Forest Ecology and Arlington, VA: NatureServe. http://www.natureserve. Management 261: 1115-1120. org/explorer. (2 January 2008). North, M.; Hurteau, M.; Innes, J. 2009. Fire NatureServe. 2009. NatureServe explorer: an online suppression and fuels treatment effects on mixed- encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. conifer carbon stocks and emissions. Ecological Arlington, VA: NatureServe. http://www.natureserve. Applications 19: 1385-1396. org/explorer. (20 January 2010). North, M.; Innes, J.; Zald, H. 2007. Comparison of Neill, W. 1983. The tamarisk invasion of desert thinning and prescribed fire restoration treatments to riparian areas. Educational Bulletin #83-4. On file Sierran mixed-conifer historic conditions. Canadian at: Education Foundation of the Desert Protective Journal of Forest Research 37: 331-342. Council, Inc., 3750 El Canto Drive, Spring Valley, CA North, M.; Kaplan-Henry, T.; Borchers, J.; Millar, 92077. J.; and Henry, T. 2002. Defining potential zones of Nero, R.W.; Copeland, H.W.R. 1981. High mortality ecological influence to giant sequoia ecology from of great gray owls in Manitoba, winter 1980-81. Blue proposed management activities on the Sequoia Jay 39: 158-165. National Forest. Unpublished report. On file at: Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb Newton, M.; Cole, E.C. 1987. A sustained yield Street, Porterville, CA 93257. 63 p. scheme for old-growth Douglas-fir. West. J. Appl. For. 2: 22–25. North, M.; Stine, P.; O’Hara, K.; Zielinski, W.; Stephens, S. 2009. An ecosystem management Nokleberg, W.J. 1983. Wallrocks of the central Sierra strategy for Sierran mixed-conifer forests. PSW- Nevada batholith, California: a collage of accreted GTR-220. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of tectono-stratigraphic terranes. U.S. Geological Survey Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Professional paper 1255. Washington, DC: U.S. Research Station. 49 p. Government Printing Office. North, M.; Stine, P.; O’Hara, K.; Zielinski, W.; Stephens, S. 2009. An ecosystem management
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 711 Literature Cited strategy for Sierran mixed-conifer forests. PSW- severity. In: Murphy, D.D.; Stine, P.A. (eds.). GTR-220, second printing. U.S. Department of Proceedings of the Sierra Nevada science symposium: Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest science for management and conservation. GTR- Research Station. 49 p. PSW-193. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Nydick, K.; Sydoriak, C. 2011a. The strategic Research Station: 87-92. framework for science in support of management in the southern Sierra Nevada, California. Park Science O’Neill, B. [n.d.]. Brian O’Neill’s 21 partnership 28 (1): 41-43. success factors. San Francisco, CA: Golden Gate National Parks. Nydick, K.; Sydoriak, C. 2011b. Alternative futures for fire management under a changing climate. Park Outdoor Foundation. 2008. Outdoor recreation Science 28 (1): 44-47. participation report 2008. Boulder, CO. 41 p. Ode, P.R.; Rehn, A.C.; May, J.T. 2005. A quantitative Outdoor Foundation. 2010. Outdoor recreation tool for assessing the integrity of southern coastal participation report 2010. Boulder, CO. 67 p. California streams. Environmental Management 35: 493-504. Pacheco, A. 1997. Fax to Ken Fuller, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, Ode, P.R. 2007. Standard operating procedure CA. 3 p. for collecting macroinvertebrate samples and associated physical and chemical data for ambient Panshin, A.J.; deZee, C. 1970. Textbook of wood bioassessments in California. California State Water technology. Vol 1. McGraw-Hill. Resources Control Board Surface Water Ambient Parker, P.L.; King, T.F. 1992. Guidelines for Monitoring Program (SWAMP) Bioassessment SOP evaluating and documenting traditional cultural 001. properties. National Park Service Bulletin 38. Odion, D.; Hanson, C.T. 2006. Fire severity in conifer Washington, DC. 22 p. forests of the Sierra Nevada: 1177-1189. Parker, T.; Rogers, C. 1988. Chaparral burns and O’Hara, K.L.; Gersonde, R.F. 2004. Stocking control management: influence of soil moisture at the time concepts in uneven-aged silviculture. Forestry 77(2): of a prescribed burn on the response of the native 131-143. vegetation from the seed bank. Report prepared for and on file at: the California Department of Fish and O’Hara, K.L.; Latham, P.A.; Hessburg, P.; Smith, Game, Endangered Plant Project. B.G. 1996. A structural classification for inland northwest vegetation. Western Journal of Applied Parkhurst, W.J.; Tanner, R.L.; Weatherford, F.P.; Forestry 11(3): 97-102. Valente, R.J.; Meagher, J.F. 1999. Historic PM2.5/ PM10 concentrations in the southeastern United O’Hara, K.L.; Valappil, N.I.; Nagel, L.M. 2003. States: potential implications of the revised particulate Stocking control procedures for multiaged ponderosa matter standard. Journal of the Air & Waste pine stands in the inland northwest. Western Journal Management Association 49: 1060-1067. of Applied Forestry 18(1): 5-14. Parsons, _.; Stohlgren, _. 1989. Effects of varying fire Olin, J.T. 2005. Stream character, aquatic habitat, and regimes on annual grasslands in the southern Sierra restoration plan for Big Meadows Creek, Sequoia Nevada of California. Madrono 36: 154-168. National Forest, Tulare County, California. Masters thesis. Fresno, CA: California State University, Pearson, T.R.H.; Brown, S.L.; Birdsey, R.A. 2007. Fresno. Measurement guidelines for the sequestration of forest carbon. Newton Square, PA: U.S. Department Omi, P.N.; Martinson, E.J. 2004. Effectiveness of of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research thinning and prescribed fire in reducing wildfire Station.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 712 Literature Cited
Peracca, G.G.; O’Hara, K.L. 2008. Effects of growing Report to the National Park Service, Denver Service space on growth for 20-year-old giant sequoia, Center, Denver, CO. 27 p. ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir in the Sierra Nevada. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 23(3): 156-165. Pierson, E.D.; Rainey, W.E. 1996. The importance of mines as roosting habitat for bats: Plecotus townsendii Peterson, D.L; Millar, C.I.; Joyce, L.A.; Furniss, M.J.; in California. Bat Research News 32: 83. Halofsky, J.E.; Neilson, R.P.; Morelli, T.L. 2011. Responding to climate change in national forests: a Pierson, E.D.; Rainey, W.E.; Chow L.S. 2006. Bat use guidebook for developing adaptation options. General of the giant sequoia groves in Yosemite National Park: Technical Report PNW-GTR-855. Portland, OR: U.S. a report to Save-the-Redwoods League. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Pierson, E.D.; Rainey, W.E.; Koontz, D.M. 1991. Bats Northwest Research Station. 109 p. and mines: experimental mitigation for Townsend’s Pfankuch, D.J. 1975. Stream reach inventory and big-eared bat at the McLaughlin Mine in California. channel stability evaluation. R1-75-002. Government In: Proceedings of Thorne Ecological Institute, Issues Printing Office #696-260/200. Washington, DC: U.S. and Technology in Management of Impacted Wildlife, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 26 p. April 8-10, 1991, Snowmass, CO: 313-342.
Phillips, A.R. 1948. Geographic variation in Pierson, E.D.; Rainey, W.E.; Miller, R.M. 1996. Empidonax traillii. Auk. 65: 507-514. Night roost sampling: a window on the forest bat community in northern California. In: Barclay, Phillips, G.H. 1993. Indians and intruders in central R.M.R.; Brigham, R.M., eds. Bats and forests California, 1769-1839. Norman, OK: University of symposium. Working paper 23: 1-292. Victoria, BC, Oklahoma Press. Canada: Ministry of Forests, Research Branch: 151- 163. Phillips, _.; McDougald, _.; Standiford, _.; McCreary, _.; Frost, _. 1996. Blue oak regeneration in southern Piirto, D.D. 1992. Giant sequoia insect, disease, Sierra Nevada foothills. In: Pillsbury, N.H.; Verner, and ecosystem interactions. In: Aune, P., ed. Giant J.; Tietje, W.D., tech. coord. 1997. Proceedings of a sequoias: their place in the ecosystem and society. symposium on oak woodlands: ecology, management, Visalia, CA: 82-89. and urban interface issues; 19-22 March 1996; San Luis Obispo, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-160. Piirto, D.D.; Rogers, R.R. 1999. An ecological Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest foundation for management of national forest giant Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 738 p. sequoia ecosystems. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, R5-EM- Phillips, G.H. 2004. Bringing them under subjection: TP-005. California’s Tejon Indian Reservation and beyond, 1852-1864. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Piirto, D.D.; Rogers, R.R. 2002. An ecological Press. 369 p. basis for managing giant sequoia ecosystems. Environmental Management 30(1): 110–128. Phillips, R.; Laritz, R.; Claire, E.; Moring, J. 1975. Some effects of gravel mixtures on emergence of Pitcairn, M.J.; O’Connell, R.A.; Gendron, J.M. 1998. coho salmon and steelhead trout fry. Trans. Amer. Yellow starthistle: survey of statewide distribution. Fish. Soc. 104(3): 461-466. In: Woods, D.M., ed. Biological control program annual summary, 1997. Sacramento, CA: California Philpott, W. 1997. Summaries of the life histories of Department of Food and Agriculture, Division of California bat species. White paper on file at: Sierra Plant Industry: 64-65. National Forest, Pineridge Ranger District, Prather, CA. 32 p. Platts, W.S. 1981. Livestock grazing and riparian/ stream ecosystems-an overview. In: Proc. Forum- Pierson, E.D.; Heady, P.A. 1996. Bat surveys of Giant Grazing and Riparian/Stream Ecosystems. Trout Forest village and vicinity, Sequoia National Park. Unlimited, Inc.: 39-45.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 713 Literature Cited
Poff, R. 1996. Effects of silvicultural practices Radojevic, M.; Hassan, H. 1998. Air quality in and wildfire on productivity of forest soils. In: Brunei Darussalam during the 1998 haze episode. Sierra Nevada ecosystem project: final report to Atmospheric Environment 30: 3651-3658. congress, vol.II, assessments and scientific basis for management options, ch. 16. Davis, CA: University Raine, R.M. 1987. Winter food habits and foraging of California, Centers for Water and Wildland behaviour of fishers Martes( pennanti) and martens Resources: 477-495. (Martes americana) in southeastern Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65: 745-747. Pope, K. 1999. Mountain yellow-legged frog habitat use and movement patterns in a high elevation Ramey, R.R. II. 1993. Evolutionary genetics and basin in Kings Canyon National Park. Unpublished systematics of American mountain sheep: implications MS thesis. San Luis Obispo, CA: California State for conservation. PhD dissertation. Ithaca, NY: Polytechnic University. 64 p. Cornell University. 251 p. Powell, R.A. 1979. Mustelid spacing patterns: Ramey, R.R. II. 1995. Mitochondrial DNA variation, variations on a theme by Mustela. Z Tierpsychol 50: population structure, and evolution of mountain 153–165. sheep in the southwestern United States and Mexico. Molecular Ecology 4: 429-439. Powell, R.A. 1993. The fisher: life history, ecology and behavior. 2nd ed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Randall, J. 1996. Weed control for the preservation of Minnesota Press. 237 p. biodiversity. Weed Technology 10: 370-383. Powers, B. 1981. Indian country of the Tubatulabal. Randall, J.; Rejmanek, M.; Hunter, J. 1998. Tucson, AZ: Western Lore Press. Characteristics of the exotic flora of California. Fremontia 26(4): 3-12. Powers, S. 1976 [1877]. Tribes of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 480 p. Raymond, C.L.; Peterson, D.L. 2005. Fuel treatments alter the effects of wildfire in a mixed-evergreen President’s Commission on Americans Outdoors. forest, Oregon, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest 1986. Report and recommendations to the President of Research 35: 2981-2995. the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 210 p. Reggelbrugge, J.C.; Conard, S.G. 1993. Modeling tree mortality following wildfire in Pinus ponderosa Purcell, K.L.; Mazzoni, A.K.; Mori, S.R.; forests of the central Sierra Nevada of California. Int. Boroski, B.B. 2009. Resting structures and resting J. Wildland Fire, 3: 139-148. habitat of fishers in the southern Sierra Nevada, California. Forest Ecol. Manage. Doi:10.1016/ Rehart, C.M.; Secrest W., Jr.; McFarland, J.R.; Laval, jforeco.2009.09.041. E. 2007. Celebrating the journey: 150 years of Fresno County and beyond. Quill Driver Books. 294 p. Querol, X.; Alastuey, A.; Moreno, T.; Viana, M.M.; Castillo, S.; Pey, J.; Rodríguez, S.; Artinano, B.; Rejmanek, M. 1999. Invasive plant species and Salvador, P.; Sanchez, M.; Garcia Dos Santos, S.; invasible ecosystems. In: Sandlund, O.T.; Schei, Herce Garraleta, M.D.; Fernandez-Patier, R.; Moreno- P.J.; Vilken, A. Invasive species and biodiversity Graue, S.; Negral, L.; Minguillon, M.C.; Monfort, management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer E.; Sanz, M.J.; Palomo-Marin, R.; Pinilla-Gil, E.; Academic Publishers. 452 p. Cuevas, E.; de la Rosa, J.; Sanchez de la Campa, A. Reid, L.M. 1993. Research and cumulative watershed 2007. Spatial and temporal variations in airborne effects. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-141. Albany, particulate matter (PM and PM ) across Spain 10 2.5 CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 1999-2005. Atmospheric Environment, doi:10.1016/j. Pacific Southwest Research Station. 118 p. atmosenv.2006.10.071.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 714 Literature Cited
Reisner, M. 1993. Cadillac desert: the American west On file at: San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Study and its disappearing water. New York, NY: Penguin Agency, California Air Resources Board, 1001 I Books Ltd. 582 p. Street, P.O. Box 2815, Sacramento, CA 95812. Remsen, J.V., Jr. 1978. Bird species of special Roberts, S.L.; van Wagtendonk, J.W.; Miles, A.K.; concern in California. Admin. rep. no. 78-1. On file Kelt, D.A. 2010. Effects of fire on spotted owl at: California Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife site occupancy in a late-successional forest. Biol. Management Branch, Sacramento, CA. 54 p. Conserv., doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.002. Resh, V.H.; Price, D.G. 1984. Sequential sampling: Roller, G. 2004. Young growth giant sequoia response a cost-effective approach for monitoring benthic to management strategies at Mountain Home State macroinvertebrates in environmental impact Forest. Master’s thesis. San Luis Obispo, CA: assessments. Environmental Management 8: 75-80. California Polytechnic State University. Resh, V.H.; Rosenberg, D.M. 1989. Spatial-temporal Roper Starch Worldwide. 2001. Outdoor recreation variability and the study of aquatic insects. Canadian in America; a report on the eighth national survey Entomologist 121: 41-963. in an annual series for the Recreation Roundtable. Washington, DC: American Recreation Coalition. RFP Evaluation Centers. 2009. Multi-criteria 13 p. decision-making (MCDM). Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Ribe, R.G. 2002. Is scenic beauty a proxy Catena 22: 169-199. for acceptable management? the influence of environmental attributes on landscape perceptions. Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied river morphology. Pagosa Environment and Behavior 34(6): 757-780. Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books. 376 p. Rich, T.D.; Beardmore, C.J.; Berlanga, H.; Blancher, Rothstein, S.I.; Verner, J.; Stevens, E. 1980. Range P.J.; Bradstreet, M.S.W.; Butcher, G.S.; Demarest, expansion and diurnal changes in dispersion of the D.W.; Dunn, E.H.; Hunter, W.C.; Iñigo-Elias, E.E.; brown-headed cowbird in the Sierra Nevada. Auk. 97: Kennedy, J.A.; Martell, A.M.; Panjabi, A.O.; Pashley, 253-267. D.N.; Rosenberg, K.V.; Rustay, C.M.; Wendt, J.S.; Will, T.C. 2004. Partners in flight North American Rothstein, S.L.; Verner, J.; Stevens, E. 1984. Radio- landbird conservation plan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Lab tracking confirms a unique diurnal pattern of spatial of Ornithology. 84 p. occurrence in the parasitic brown-headed cowbird. Ecology 65: 77-88. Ridgely, R.S. 1981. A guide to the birds of Panama. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 404 p. Ruggiero, L.; Aubry, K.B.; Buskirk, S.; Lyon, L.; Zielinski, W., tech. eds. 1994. The scientific basis for Ridgely, R.S.; Tudor, G. 1994. The birds of South conserving forest carnivores: American marten, fisher, America, vol. II, the suboscine passerines. Austin, lynx, and wolverine in the western United States. Gen. TX: University of Texas Press. 814 p. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-254. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Roberts, N.S.; Chavez, D.J.; Lara, B.M.; Sheffield, Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. E.A. 2009. Serving culturally diverse visitors to forests in California: a resource guide. Gen. Tech. Rundel, P.W. 1969. The distribution and ecology of Rep. PSW-GTR-222. Albany, CA: U.S. Department the giant sequoia ecosystem in the Sierra Nevada, of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest California. Thesis (Ph.D.). Durham, NC: Duke Research Station. 76 p. University. 204 p. Roberts, P.T.; Smith, T.B.; Lindsey, C.G.; Lehrman, Rundel, P.W. 1971. Community structure and stability D.E.; Knuth, W.R. 1990. Analysis of San Joaquin in the giant sequoia groves of the Sierra Nevada, valley air quality and meteorology, final report. California. American Midland Naturalist 85(2): 478- 492.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 715 Literature Cited
Rundel, P.W. 1972. Habitat restriction in giant San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District sequoia: the environmental control of grove [SJVAPCD]. 2009. Web site home page. http://www. boundaries. American Midland Naturalist 87(l): valleyair.org/. 81-99. Sartwell, C. 1971. Thinning ponderosa pine to prevent Ryan, K.C.; Amman, G.D. 1996. Bark beetle activity outbreaks of mountain pine beetle. In: Baumgartner, and delayed tree mortality in the greater Yellowstone D.M. (ed.), Precommercial thinning of coastal and area following the 1988 fires. In: Greenlee, J., ed. The intermountain forests in the Pacific Northwest. ecological implications of fire in greater Yellowstone: Pullman, OR: Washington State University: 41-52. proceedings of the second biennial conference on the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Yellowstone National Satterthwaite, J.L. 1994. The flume that carried Park, WY. Fairfield, WA: International Association of giant sequoia. In: History line, a newsletter of the Wildland Fire: 151-158. Forest Service history program. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 13-16. Ryan, K.C.; Peterson, D.L.; Reinhardt, E.D. 1988. Modeling long-term fire-caused mortality of Douglas- Sauer, J.R.; Hines, J.E.; Fallon, J. 2007. The North fir. For. Sci. 34: 190-199. American breeding bird survey, results and analysis 1966-2006. V.10.13.2007. Laurel, MD: U.S. Ryan, K.C.; Reinhardt, E.D. 1988. Predicting postfire Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research mortality of seven western conifers. Can. J. For. Res. Center. 18: 1291-1297. Sawyer, J.; Keeler-Wolf, T.; Evens, J.M. 1995. A Ryan, R.L. 2005. Social science to improve fuels manual of California vegetation. Second edition. management: a synthesis of research on aesthetics and Sacramento, CA: California Native Plant Society. fuels management. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-261. St. Paul, 1,300 p. MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 58 p. Schempf, P.F.; White, M. 1977. Status of six furbearer populations in the mountains of northern California. Saaty, T.L. 1992a. Decision making for leaders. Vallejo, CA: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. Service, Pacific Southwest Region. 51 p. Saaty, T.L. 1992b. Multicriteria decision making: Schneider, R.R.; Yodzis, P. 1994. Extinction dynamics the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS in the American marten (Martes americana). Publications. Conservation Biology 8(4): 1054-1068. Sanders, S.D.; Flett, M.A. 1989. Ecology of a Sierra Schnell, J.H. 1958. Nesting behavior and food habits Nevada population of willow flycatchers (Empidonax of goshawks in the Sierra Nevada of California. traillii), 1986-1987. Sacramento, CA: California Condor 60: 377-403. Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Management Division, Nongame Bird and Schoenig, S. 1999 (August 20). California Department Mammal Section. 27 p. of Food and Agriculture biologist. Personal communication with Joanna Clines at California Sanders, C.; Stewart, J. 2000. Summary, Clarkia Native Plant Society State Office, Sacramento, CA. springvillensis survey. Porterville, CA: Sequoia National Forest. 1 p. Schubert, G.H. (revised by Beetham, N.M.). 1962. Silvical characteristics of giant sequoia. Technical Sando, R.W. 1978. Natural fire regimes and fire Paper 20. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of management: foundations for direction. Western Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest Wildlands. 4(4): 35-44. and Range Experiment Station. 16 p. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Schubert, G.H. 1965. Incense-cedar (Libocedrus [SJVAPCD]. 1994. Ozone attainment demonstration decurrens Torr.). In: Silvics of forest trees of the plan. Fresno, CA.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 716 Literature Cited
United States. Fowells, H.A., comp. Washington, Seamans, M.E. 2005. Population biology of the D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agriculture California spotted owl in the central Sierra Nevada. Handbook 271: 243-247. Dissertation. University of Minnesota. 140 p. Schwandt, J.W.; Lockman, I.B.; Kliejunas, J.T.; Muir, Secure Rural Schools and Community Self- J.A. 2010. Current health issues and management Determination Act of 2000, 16 U.S.C. § 500. strategies for white pines in the western United States and Canada. Forest Pathology 40: 226-250. Sedgwick, J.A.; Iko, W.M. 1999. Costs of brown- headed cowbird parasitism to willow flycatchers. Schwartz, M.W.; Porter, D.J.; Randall, J.M.; Lyons, Studies in Avian Biology 18: 167-181. K.E. 1996. Impact of nonindigenous plants. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project: final report to congress, Serena, M. 1982. The status and distribution of the assessments and scientific management options, willow flycatcher Empidonax( traillii) in selected vol. II, ch. 47. Davis, CA: University of California, portions of the Sierra Nevada. Admin. rep. 82-5. On Centers for Water and Wildland Resources: 1203- file at: California Department of Fish and Game, 1226. Wildlife Management Branch. 28 p.
Schwilk, D.W.; Keeley, J.E.; Knapp, E.E.; McIver, Seymour, G.; Teclea, A. 2004. Impact of slash J.D.; Bailey, J.D.; Fettig, C.J.; Fiedler, C.E.; Harrod, pile size and burning on ponderosa pine forest soil R.J.; Moghaddas, J.J.; Outcalt, K.W.; Skinner, physical characteristics. Journal of the Arizona- C.N.; Stephens, S.L.; Waldrop, T.A.; Yaussy, D.A.; Nevada Academy of Science 37(2): 74–82. Youngblood, A. 2009. The national fire and fire Shair, F.H. 1987. Atmospheric tracer experiments surrogates study: effects of alternative fuel reduction aimed at characterizing upslope/downslope flows methods on forest vegetation structure and fuels. along the southwestern region of the Sierra Nevada Ecological Applications 19: 285-304. mountains. Prepared for California Air Resources Schwilk, D.W.; Knapp, E.E.; Ferrenberg, S.M.; Board by CalTech, 1201 East California Bouldevard, Keeley, J.E.; Caprio, A.C. 2006. Tree mortality from Pasadena, CA 91106. fire and bark beetles following early and late season Sheffield, E. 2005. Parks and recreation trends in prescribed fires in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer California 2002; an element of the California outdoor forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 232: 36-45. recreation plan. Sacramento, CA: California State Science Daily. 2010 (March 18). Prescribed burns Parks. 19 p. may help reduce U.S. carbon footprint. http://www. Sheffield, E. 2008. Trends, friends and gens sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100317121352. (generations). Unpublished presentation. On file htm. at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Science Review Team. 1998. Sierra Nevada science Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb review: a report of the science review team charged Street, Porterville, CA 93257. 35 p. to synthesize new information of rangewide urgency Sheley, R.L.; Manoukian, M.; Marks, G. 1999. to the national forests of the Sierra Nevada. Albany, Preventing noxious weed invasion. In: Sheley, R.L.; CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Petroff, J.K., eds. Biology and management of Pacific Southwest Research Station. 104 p. noxious rangeland weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon Scientific Advisory Board (SAB), The. 2003. Advice State University Press. 464 p. for the Secretary of Agriculture about management of Shellhammer, H.S.; Shellhammer, T.H. 2006. Giant the Giant Sequoia National Monument. Porterville, sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum [Taxodiaceae]) CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, seedling survival and growth in the first four decades Sequoia National Forest. 70 p. following managed fires. Madroño 53: 342-350.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 717 Literature Cited
Sherburne, S.S.; Bissonette, J.A. 1994. Marten U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, subnivean access point use: response to subnivean Pacific Southwest Research Station. prey levels. Journal of Wildlife Management 58: 400-405. Sierra Nevada Research Center. 2007b. Plumas Lassen study 2006 annual report. Davis, CA: U.S. Sherwin, R.E. 1998. Personal communication. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Department of Zoology and Monte L. Bean Life Southwest Research Station. 182 p. Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT. Sierra Nevada Research Center. 2008. Plumas Lassen study 2007 annual report. Davis, CA: USDA Forest Shevock, J.R. 1985. Letter to Rod Goss, California Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Sierra Department of Fish and Game, Fresno, CA. 2 p. Nevada Research Center. 310 p. http://www.fs.fed. us/psw/programs/snrc/forest_health/plas_annual_ Shevock, J. 1989. Sensitive plant species of Sequoia report_2007.pdf. National Forest and adjacent regions. Porterville, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Sierra Nevada Research Center. 2009. Plumas Lassen Sequoia National Forest. 3 p. study 2008 annual report. Davis, CA: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Sierra Shrestha, G.; Traina, S.J.; Swanston, C.J. 2010. Black Nevada Research Center. 223 p. http://www.fs.fed. carbon’s properties and role in the environment. us/psw/programs/snrc/forest_health/plas_annual_ Sustainability 2: 294-320. report_2008.pdf. Siegel, R.B.; DeSante, D.F. 1999. The draft avian Sierra Nevada Research Center. 2010. Plumas Lassen conservation plan for the Sierra Nevada bioregion: study 2009 annual report. Davis, CA: USDA Forest conservation priorities and strategies for safeguarding Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Sierra Sierra bird populations, version 1.0. Institute for Bird Nevada Research Center. 184 p. http://www.fs.fed. Populations report to California Partners in Flight. us/psw/programs/snrc/forest_health/plas_annual_ http://www.prbo.org/calpif/htmldocs/sierra.html. report_2009.pdf. Siegel, R.B.; Kaschube, D.R. 2007. Landbird Significant Cave Criteria (43 CFR Part 37.11(c)). monitoring results from the monitoring avian productivity and survivorship (MAPS) program in the Silverstein, M. 1978. Yokuts: introduction. In: Heizer, Sierra Nevada. Final report in fulfillment of Forest R.F., ed. California handbook of North American Service agreement no. 05-PA-11052007-141. Point Indians, vol. 8. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Reyes, CA: The Institute for Bird Populations. 33 p. Institution: 446–447. Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep Interagency Advisory Skinner, C.N.; Ritchie, M.W.; Hamilton, T.; Symons, Group [SNBSIAG]. 1997. A conservation strategy for J. 2004. Effects of prescribed fire and thinning on Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. Bishop, CA. wildfire severity. In: Cooper, S. (ed). Proceedings 25th annual vegetation management conference, Sierra Nevada Conservancy. 2009. Revised strategic January 2004. Redding, CA: University of California plan. http://www.sierranevada.ca.gov/docs/SNC_ Cooperative Forestry Extension: 80-91. Strategic_Plan_3-5-09.Pdf. (10 September 2009). Skinner, M.W.; Pavik, B.M., eds. 1994. Inventory of Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project [SNEP]. 1996. Final rare and endangered vascular plants of California. report to congress, vols. I-III. Davis, CA: University Special publication no. 1, 5th edition. Sacramento: of California, Centers for Water and Wildland California Native Plant Society. 338 p. Resources. 209 p. Slauson, K.M.; Zielinski, W.J.; Stone, K.D. 2008. Sierra Nevada Research Center. 2007a. California Characterizing the molecular variation among spotted owl module: 2006 annual report. Davis, CA: American marten (Martes americana) subspecies
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 718 Literature Cited from Oregon and California. Conservation Genetics Southern California Edison Company. 1998. Lower 10(5): 1337-1341. Tule River hydroelectric project (FERC project no. 372): application for new license for major project - Small, K.E. 2001 [1926]. Early history of Tulare existing dam. Draft, vol. 2 of 4, exhibit E. County, California. Reprint. Exeter, CA: Bear State Books. Southern Sierra Partnership. 2010. Framework for cooperative conservation and climate adaptation for Smith, A.R. 1964. Geologic map of California, the southern Sierra Nevada and Tehachapi mountains, Bakersfield sheet (1:250,000). California Division of California, USA. The Nature Conservancy, Audubon Mines and Geology. California, Sequoia Riverlands Trust, Sierra Business Smith, C.R. 1978. Tubatulabal. In: Heizer, R.F., ed. Council. Online at: http://databasin.org/connectivity- California handbook of North American Indians, vol. center/features/SSP. 8. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution: 437-445. Speir, R.F.G. 1978. Foothill Yokuts. In: Heizer, R.F., Smith, J.R. 1977. Aspects of the reproductive biology ed. California handbook of North American Indians, and behavior of the little Kern golden trout. M.A. vol. 8. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution: thesis. Fresno, CA: California State University. 148 p. 471–484. Smith, R.B.; Peery, M.Z.; Gutiérrez, R.J.; LaHaye, Spencer, W.D.; Rustigian, H.L.; Scheller, R.M.; W.S. 1999. The relationship between spotted owl Syphard, A.; Strittholt, J.; Ward, B. 2008. Baseline diet and reproductive success in the San Bernardino evaluation of fisher habitat and population status, and mountains, California. Wilson Bulletin 111(1): 22-29. effects of fires and fuels management on fishers in the southern Sierra Nevada. Unpublished report prepared Smith, S.; Cannon, P.; Fischer, L., eds. 2008. for and on file at: U.S. Forest Service, Pacific California forest pest conditions. California Forest Southwest Region. 133 p. Pest Council. 65 p. Spencer, W.; Rustigian-Romsos, H.; Strittholt, Smith, T.; Rizzo, D.; North, M. 2005. Patterns of J.; Scheller, R.; Zielinski, W.; Truex, R. 2010. mortality in an old-growth mixed-conifer forest of the Using occupancy and population models to assess southern Sierra Nevada, California. Forest Science habitat conservation opportunities for an isolated 51(3): 266-275. carnivore population. Biol. Conserv., doi:10.1016/j. biocon.2010.10.027. Smucker, K.M.; Hutto, R.L.; Steele, B.M. 2005. Changes in bird abundance after wildfire: importance Springville Chamber of Commerce. 2009. Home of fire severity and time since fire. Ecological page. http://www.springville.ca.us/. (21 October Applications 15(5): 1535-1549. 2009). Snyder, N.F.R.; Ramey, R.R.; Sibley, F.C. 1986. Nest- Squires, J.R.; Kennedy, P.L. 2006. Northern goshawk site biology of the California condor. The Condor 88: ecology: an assessment of current knowledge and 228-241. information needs for conservation and management. Studies in Avian Biology 31: 8-62. Snyder, S.A. 1993. Haliaeetus leucocephalus. In: Fire effects information system. [Online]. U.S. Stafford, M.D.; Valentine, B.E. 1985. A preliminary Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky report on the biology of the willow flycatcher in Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory the central Sierra Nevada. CAL-NEVA Wildlife (producer). http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/. (22 Transactions 1985: 66-77. January 2010). Stalmaster, M.V. 1976. Winter ecology and effects of Solomon, A.M. 2008. Forests and global climate human activity on bald eagles in the Nooksack River change. Compass 10: 1-2. valley, Washington. M.S. thesis. Bellingham, WA: Western Washington State College. 100 p.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 719 Literature Cited
Stalmaster, M.V.; Newman, J.R. 1978. Behavioral Stebbins, R.C. 1951. Amphibians of western North responses of wintering bald eagles to human activity. America. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University Journal of Wildlife Management 42(3): 506-513. of California Press. 539 p. Stark, N. 1968. The environmental tolerance of Stebbins, R.C. 1985. A field guide to western reptiles the seedling stage of Sequoiadendron giganteum. and amphibians. Second edition, revised. Boston, American Midland Naturalist 80: 84-95. MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. 336 p. State of California, State Water Resources Control Steenhof, K.; Bond, L.; Bates, K.K.; Leppert, L.L. Board; U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], 2002. Trends in midwinter counts of bald eagles Forest Service. 1981. Management agency agreement in the contiguous United States, 1986-2000. Bird between the State Water Resources Control Board, Populations 6: 21-32. State of California and the Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Steger, G.N.; Munton,T.E.; Eberlein, G.P.; Johnson, K.D. 1999. A study of spotted owl demographics in State Water Resources Control Board. 1975. the Sierra National Forest and Sequoia and Kings California water code. http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/ Canyon National Parks (annual progress report ). laws_regulations/. Fresno, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. Stebbins, J. 2001. Personal communications. President, Sierra Foothill Conservancy, Clovis, Stein, R.C. 1963. Isolating mechanisms between California; and Herbarium Curator, California State populations of Traill’s flycatchers. Proc. Amer. Philos. University, Fresno, CA. Soc. 107: 21-50. Stebbins, J. 2002. Personal communications. Steiner, A.L.; Tonse, S.; Cohen, R.C.; Goldstein, A.H.; President, Sierra Foothill Conservancy, Clovis, CA, Harley, R.A. 2007. Biogenic 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol and Herbarium Curator, California State University, increases regional ozone and HOx sources. Geophys. Fresno, California. Res. Lett., 34, L15806,doi:10.1029/2007GL030802. Stebbins, J.; Kirkpatrick, K.R. [n.d.]. Springville Steiner, A.L.; Cohen, R.C.; Harley, R.A.; Tonse, S.; Clarkia ecological reserve. Unpublished report to the Millet, D.B.; Schade, G.W.; Goldstein, A.H. 2008. California Department of Fish and Game, 1416 Ninth VOC reactivity in central California: comparing an air Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. 4 p. quality model to ground-based measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8: 351-368. Stebbins, J.C. 1991. Population status and management analysis of Clarkia springvillensis, Steinhart, P. 1990. California’s wild heritage: Fritillaria striata and Pseudobahia peirsonii in threatened and endangered animals in the golden the San Joaquin valley, California. Report to the state. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish California Department of Fish and Game, 1416 Ninth and Game and Sierra Club Books. 108 p. Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. 26 p. Stephens, S.J.; McGuire, C.; Sims, L. 2004. Stebbins, J.C. 1992. Botanical survey report, 700 acre Conservation assessment and strategy for the study area, Tulare County, California. Unpublished California golden trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss report to Ennis Development Corporation, 643 North aguabonita) Tulare County, CA. California Golden Westwood Street, Porterville, CA 93257. 24 p. Trout Working Group. 91 p. Stebbins, J.C.; Clark, W.A. 1992. Endangerment Stephens, S.L.; Dulitz, D.J.; Martin, R.E. 1999. Giant status of Clarkia springvillensis (Onagraceae), Tulare sequoia regeneration in group selection openings County, California. In: Williams, D.F.; Byrne, S.; in the southern Sierra Nevada. Forest Ecology and Rado,T.A., eds. Endangered and sensitive species of Management 120: 89-95. the San Joaquin valley, California. Sacramento, CA: California Energy Commission: 271-278. Stephens, S.L.; Finney, M.A. 2002. Prescribed fire mortality of Sierra Nevada mixed conifer tree species:
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 720 Literature Cited effects of crown damage and forest floor combustion. Stephenson, N.L. 1999. Reference conditions for For. Ecol. Manage.: 162, 261-271. giant sequoia forest restoration: structure, process, and precision. Ecological Applications 9: 1253-1265. Stephens, S.L.; Fule, P.Z. 2005. Western pine forests with continuing frequent fire regimes: possible Stewart, J. 2002. Personal communication. Springville reference sites for management. Journal of Forestry, liaison, California Native Plant Society, Alta Peak October/November: 357-362. Chapter, Springville, CA. Stephens, S.L.; Martin, R.E.; Clinton, N.E. 2007. Stiles, F.G.; Skutch, A.F. 1989. A guide to the birds of Prehistoric fire area and emissions from California’s Costa Rica. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. forests, woodlands, shrublands, and grasslands. Forest 511 p. Ecology and Management 251: 205-216. Stock, G.M.; Anderson, R.S.; Finkel, R.C. 2004. Stephens, S.L.; Millar, C.I.; Collins, B.M. 2010. Pace of landscape evolution in the Sierra Nevada, Operational approaches to managing forests of the California, revealed by cosmogenic dating of cave future in mediterranean regions within a context of sediments. Geology 32(3): 193-196. changing climates. Environmental Research Letters 5(2): 1-9. Storer, T. 1925. A synopsis of the amphibia of California. University of California Publications in Stephens, S.L.; Moghaddas, J.J. 2005. Silvicultural Zoology 27: 1-342. and reserve impacts on potential fire behavior and forest conservation: 25 years of experience from Strom, B.A. 2005. Pre-fire treatment effects and Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forests. Biological post-fire forest dynamics on the Rodeo-Chediski burn Conservation 25: 369-379. area, Arizona. Thesis. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University. Stephens, S.L.; Moghaddas, J.J.; Ediminster, C.; Fiedler, C.E.; Hasse, S.; Harrington, M.; Keeley, J.E.; Sugihara, N.G.; van Wagtendonk, J.; Fites-Kaufmann, McIver, J.D.; Metlen, K.; Skinner, C.N.; Youngblood, J. 2002. Fire in California ecosystems. Berkeley, CA: A. 2009. Fire and treatment effects on vegetation University of California Press. 596 p. structure, fuels and potential fire severity in six Sumner, L.; Dixon, J.S. 1953. Birds and mammals western U.S. forests. Ecological Applications 19: 305- of the Sierra Nevada. Berkeley, CA: University of 320. California Press. 484 p. Stephens, S.L; Ruth, L.W. 2005. Federal forest-fire Swetnam, T.W. 1993. Fire history and climate change policy in the United States. Ecological Applications in giant sequoia groves. Science 262: 885-889. 15: 532-542. Swetnam, T.W.; Baisan, C.H.; Caprio, A.C.; Brown, Stephenson, N.L. 1994. Long-term dynamics P.M.; Touchan, R.; Anderson, R.S.; Hallett, D.J. of giant sequoia populations: implications for 2009. Multi-millennial fire history of the giant forest, managing a pioneer species. In: Aune, P.S., tech. Sequoia National Park, California, USA. Fire Ecology coord., Proceedings of the symposium on giant 5(3): 120-150. doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0503120. sequoias: their place in the ecosystem and society. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Tappeiner, J.; McDonald, P. 1980. Preliminary Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. General recommendations for managing California black oak Technical Report PSW-151: 56-63. in the Sierra Nevada. In: Plumb, T.R., tech. coord. Proceedings of the symposium on the ecology, Stephenson, N.L. 1996. Ecology and management of management and utilization of California oaks, June giant sequoia groves. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem 26-28, 1979, Claremont, CA. Berkeley, CA: U.S. project (SNEP): final report to congress, vol. II, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific assessments and scientific basis for management Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. options. Davis, CA: University of California, Centers General Technical Report PSW-GTR-44: 107-111. for Water and Wildland Resources: 1431-1467.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 721 Literature Cited
Tarnay, L.; Gertler, R.R.; Blank, G.E.; Taylor, G.E., Tian, D.I;, Wang, Y.; Bergin, M.; Hu, Y.; Liu, Jr. 2001. Preliminary measurements of summer nitric Y.; Russell, A.G. 2008. Air quality impacts from acid and ammonia concentration in the Lake Tahoe prescribed forest fires under different management basin air-shed: implications for dry deposition of practices. Environmental Science and Technology atmospheric nitrogen. Environmental Pollution 113: 42: 8. 145-153. Tibor, D.P., ed. 2001. California Native Plant Tatum, L. 1998. Personal communication. Wildlife Society’s inventory of rare and endangered vascular biologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Mendocino plants of California. Sixth edition. Special publication National Forest, Supervisor’s Office. no. 1. Sacramento, CA: California Native Plant Society. 387 p. Taylor, D.M.; Littlefield, C.D. 1986. Willow flycatcher and yellow warbler response to cattle Tierney, P.; Rosegard, E.; Absher, J. 2002. Central grazing. American Birds 40: 1189-1173. and northern California outdoor recreation market analysis. RWU-4902 unpublished technical report. Theodoratus Cultural Research, Inc. and On file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Archaeological Consulting and Research Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 4955 Services Inc. 1984. Cultural resources overview Canyon Crest Drive, Riverside, CA 92507. 62 p. of the southern Sierra Nevada: an ethnographic, linguistic, archaeological and historical study of Timossi, I. 1990. California’s statewide habitat the Sierra National Forest, Sequoia National Forest relationships system. Computer database, June 1992 and Bakersfield District of the Bureau of Land version. California Department of Fish and Game. Management. Unpublished report prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Toth, J. 1962, A theory of groundwater motion in On file at: Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South small drainage basins in Central Alberta, Canada, Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA 93257. 672 p. Journal of Geophysical Research, V67: 4375-4387. Thomas, H.H.; Shellhammer, H.S.; Stecker, R.E. Tracer Technologies. 1992. Transport of acidic air 1980. Giant sequoia ecology. Washington, DC: U.S. pollutants to forests and alpine regions of the Sierra Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Nevada. Prepared for California Air Resources Board. Scientific Monograph Series 12. 182 p. On file at: Tracer Technologies, 970 Los Vallecitos Boulevard, San Marcos, CA 92069. Thompson, M.J. 1996. Winter foraging response of elk to spotted knapweed removal. Northwest Science Trent, A. 2006. Smoke particulate monitors: 2006 70(1): 10-19. update. Tech. Rep. 0625–2842–MTDC. Missoula, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Thomsen, C.D.; Williams, W.A.; Vayussieres, M.P.; Missoula Technology and Development Center: 1-18. Turner, CE.; Lanini, W.T. 1996. Yellow starthistle biology and control. Publication 21541. University Truex, R.L. 2009. Draft 2008 SNFPA Carnivore of California, Division of Agricultural and Natural Monitoring Accomplishment Report. Vallejo, CA: Resources. 19 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region. Thornberry, B.J. 1995. Diverse people with a common problem. In: Alien plant invasions: Tule River Indian Tribe. 2009. Enterprises. http:// increasing deterioration of rangeland ecosystem www.tulerivertribe-nsn.gov/enterprises. (15 October health, symposium proceedings. BLM/OR/WA/PT- 2009). 95/048+1792: 1-4. Tule River Indian Tribe. 2009. Home page. http:// Thrailkill, J.; Bias, M.A. 1989. Diets of breeding www.tulerivertribe-nsn.gov/index.php. (14 October and nonbreeding California spotted owls. Journal of 2009). Raptor Research 23: 39-41.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 722 Literature Cited
Tule River Indian Tribe. [n.d.]. History of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1989b. Vandalism Tule River band of Yokut Indians. http://www. to cultural resources of the Rocky Mountain West. tulerivertribe-nsn.gov/history. (18 February 2010). In: Archeological sites protection and preservation notebook technical notes ASPPN I-12. Vicksburg, Turner G.M.; Romme, W.H.; Gardner, R.H.; MS: Engineer Research and Development Center, O’Neill, R.V.; Kratz, T.K. 1993. A revised concept of Waterways Experimental Station, Environmental landscape equilibrium: disturbance and stability on Laboratory: 9. scaled landscapes. Landscape Ecology 8(3): 213-227. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1990. Impacts Tuskes, P.M.; Emmel, J.F. 1981. The life history and of domestic livestock grazing on archeological behavior of Euproserpinus euterpe (Sphingidae). resources. In: Archeological sites protection and Journal of the Lepidoptera Society 35: 27-33. preservation notebook technical notes ASPPN Tweed, W. 1972. Sequoia National Park concessions: I-15. Vicksburg: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways 1898-1926. Pacific Historian, Spring: 37-39. Experimental Station, Environmental Laboratory: 8. Ulev, E.D. 2007. Strix nebulosa. In: Fire effects U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1992. Off- information system [Online]. U.S. Department road vehicle impacts to archeological sites. In: of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Archeological Sites Protection and Preservation Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory Notebook Technical Notes ASPPN I-18. Vicksburg, (producer). http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/. MS: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Environmental Laboratory: 9. Underwood, E.C.; Viers, J.H.; Quinn, J.F.; North, M. In progress: Using topography to meet wildlife U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1996. Kaweah River and fuels treatment objectives in fire-suppressed Basin investigation, California, draft environmental landscapes. impact statement/report. http://www.spk.usace.army. mil/cespk-pd/kaweah/eis/eis.html. (04 February Unemployment Encyclopedia. 2009. Consequences 2010). of unemployment. http://family.jrank.org/pages/1724/ Unemployment-Consequences-Unemployment.html U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1999. Tule River Unemployment - Consequences Of Unemployment. (10 September 2009). http://www.spk.usace.army.mil/civ/tule/tuleeis.htm. (Accessed 2003). Unitt, P. 1987. Empidonax traillii extimus: an endangered subspecies. Western Birds 18(3): 137-162. United States Court of Appeals. 840 F. 2d 714 - Save the Yaak committee v. Jr Block R1. 12 p. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1988. Site impacts in the Rio Abajo district central Rio Grande River valley, U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA]. 1996. New Mexico. In: Archeological sites protection and Status of amphibians. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem preservation notebook technical notes ASPPN I-7. project: final report to congress, vol. II, assessments Vicksburg, MS: Engineer Research and Development and scientific basis for management options, ch. 31. Center, Waterways Experimental Station, Davis, CA: University of California, Centers for Environmental Laboratory: 10. Water and Wildland Resources: 921-944. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1989a. Effects of U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA]. 1997 forest fires and burn programs on archeological (December 15). Departmental Regulation 5600-2. resources. In: Archeological sites protection and Washington, DC. preservation notebook technical notes ASPPN I-8. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA]; State of Vicksburg, MS: Engineer Research and Development California. 1981. Management agency agreement Center, Waterways Experimental Station, between the State Water Resources Control Board, Environmental Laboratory: 6. State of California, and the Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 723 Literature Cited
U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 1974. National forest landscape management, Service. 1991b. Soil management handbook and vol. 2, ch. 1: the visual management system. Northern Region supplement, Forest Service Agriculture handbook number 462. Washington, DC. handbook [FSH] 2509.18. Missoula, MT. 45 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 1994. South Creek ecosystem analysis. Service. 1977. National forest landscape management, Porterville, CA: Sequoia National Forest. volume 2, chapter 4: roads. Agriculture handbook number 483. Washington, DC. 62 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 1995a. Forest Service manual [FSM] 2550, U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest soil management. Washington, DC. Service. 1980. National forest landscape management, vol. 2, ch. 5: timber. Agriculture handbook number U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest 559. Washington, DC. 220 p. Service. 1995b. Forest Service manual, [FSM] 2600, wildlife, fish and sensitive plant habitat management, U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest ch. 2670, threatened, endangered, and sensitive plants Service. 1988a. Sequoia National Forest land and and animals. Washington, DC. resource management plan. Porterville, CA: Sequoia National Forest. 225 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 1995c. Landscape aesthetics: a handbook for U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest scenery management. Agricultural handbook number Service. 1988b. Sequoia National Forest land and 701. Washington, DC. 205 p. resource management plan, final environmental impact statement. Porterville, CA: Sequoia National U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Forest. 225 p. Service. 1995d. Recommended scenery management system refinements. In: Landscape aesthetics: a U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest handbook for scenery management. Agricultural Service. 1990a. Forest Service handbook, R-5 FSH handbook number 701, appendix J, 08/30/2007 ph2 2609.25, threatened and endangered plants program. -final. Washington, DC. Unpublished report on file San Francisco, CA. at: Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA 93257. 33 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 1990b. Sequoia National Forest land U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest management plan settlement agreement (mediated Service. 1995e. Forest Service Handbook [FSH] settlement agreement - MSA). Porterville, CA: 2509.18, soil management handbook, R5 supplement Sequoia National Forest. 171 p. no. 2509.18-95-1. Vallejo, CA. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 1990c. Sequoia National Forest land Service. 1995f. General conformity to state management plan settlement agreement (mediated implementation plan. Vallejo, CA: Pacific Southwest settlement agreement - MSA), exhibit D - riparian Region, Air Resource Program. and wetlands standards and guidelines. 1st mediation draft amendments. Porterville, CA: Sequoia National U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Forest. Service. 1996a. Soil survey of Sequoia National Forest area, California. Vallejo, CA: Pacific Southwest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Region, National Cooperative Soil Survey. Service. 1991a. Implementation plan: Kings River Special Management Area; Kings, Kings South U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Fork, and Kings Middle Fork, wild and scenic rivers. Service. 1996b. Draft species management guide Clovis, CA and Porterville, CA: Sierra National for Clarkia springvillensis. Porterville, CA: Sequoia Forest and Sequoia National Forest. 84 p. National Forest, Tule River Ranger District. 15 p.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 724 Literature Cited
U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest capital improvement and maintenance. On file at: Service. 1997. Rangeland analysis and planning Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb guide. Interagency technical reference. Lake Isabella, Street, Porterville, CA 93257. 6 p. CA: Pacific Southwest Region. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2001b. Economic and social analysis Service. 1998a. Biological assessment for Clarkia handbook. FSH 1909.17. Washington, DC: 30-34. springvillensis: Coffee prescribed burn project. Porterville, CA: Sequoia National Forest, Tule River U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Ranger District. 14 p. Service. 2001c. Sierra Nevada forest plan amendment, vols. 1 to 6. Vallejo, CA: Pacific Southwest Region. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 1998b. Biological assessment for Clarkia U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest springvillensis: Rancheria, West Bear Creek, and Service. 2001d. Sierra Nevada forest plan amendment, Middle Tule allotments. Porterville, CA: Sequoia final environmental impact statement. Vallejo, CA: National Forest, Tule River Ranger District. 12 p. Pacific Southwest Region. 492 p.
U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 1998c. Draft species management guide Service. 2001e. Sierra Nevada forest plan amendment, for Calochortus westonii. Porterville, CA: Sequoia final environmental impact statement, record of National Forest. 23 p. decision. Vallejo, CA: Pacific Southwest Region. 55 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 1998d. Stemming the invasive tide: Forest Service. 2001f. Transportation atlas, records and Service strategy for noxious and nonnative plant analysis. Forest Service manual 7731.11. Washington, management. Washington, DC. 29 p. DC. 15 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 1999a. MULC Report; Peppermint and Service. 2001g. The built environment image guide Holby creeks in-channel evaluation in 1999. for the national forests and grasslands. FS-710. Porterville, CA: Sequoia National Forest. Washington, DC. 275 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest 1999b. Roads analysis: informing decisions about Service. 2003. Biological Assessment for Sierra management the national forest transportation system. Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Final SEIS. Vallejo, Misc. Rep. FS-643. Washington, DC. 222 p. CA: Pacific Southwest Region. http://www.fs.fed. us/r5/snfpa/final-seis/biological-documents/BA/ U.S. Department of Agriculture[USDA], Forest VI/B/4_2.htm [accessed November 9, 2011]. Service. 2000a. Forest Service manual [FSM] 2080, noxious weed management. Washington, DC: 1-4. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2004a. Business plan for the Sequoia U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest National Forest: a window of opportunity. Porterville, Service. 2000b. Water quality management for CA: Sequoia National Forest. 39 p. forest system lands in California–best management practices. Vallejo, CA: Pacific Southwest Region. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest 138 p. Service. 2004b. Forest Service manual [FSM] 2070b, native plant materials. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2000c. Landbird strategic plan. FS-648. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Washington, DC. 21 p. Service. 2004c. Partnership capacity assessment tool. Washington, DC: National Partnership Office. 23 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2001a. Sequoia National Forest road system:
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 725 Literature Cited
U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest accomplishment monitoring report for 2005. R5- Service. 2004d. Sequoia National Monument cave MR-000. Vallejo, CA: Pacific Southwest Region. inventory. Open-file report on file at: Sequoia 12 p. National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA 93257. 105 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2006c. Smoke particulate monitors: 2006 U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest update. Missoula, MT. Service. 2004e. Sierra Nevada forest plan amendment, final supplemental environmental impact statement. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Vallejo, CA: Pacific Southwest Region. Service, 2006d. Ecosystem restoration: a framework for restoring and maintaining the national forests and U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest grasslands. 24 p. Service. 2004f. Sierra Nevada forest plan amendment, final supplemental environment impact statement, U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest record of decision. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Service, 2006e. Draft (May 25, 2006): MIS analysis Region. 492 p. and documentation in project-level NEPA. Vallejo, CA: Pacific Southwest Region. 3 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2005a. Forest Service manual [FSM] 2070, U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest native plant materials. Washington, DC. Service. 2007a. Record of decision, Sierra Nevada forests management indicator species amendment. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Vallejo, CA: Pacific Southwest Region. 18 p. Service. 2005b. Los Angeles National Forest land management plan final environmental impact U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest statement. Arcadia, CA: Los Angeles National Forest: Service. 2007b. Sierra Nevada forest plan 275, 533. accomplishment monitoring report for 2006. Vallejo, CA: Pacific Southwest Region R5-MR-149. 12 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2005c. Partnership guide. Washington, U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest DC: National Partnership Office. Heep://www. Service. 2007c. Use of R5 soil management partnershipresourcecenter.org/resources/partnership- handbook, R5 Supplement No 2509.18-95-1. Vallejo, guide/. (21 December 2009). CA. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2005d. Sierra Nevada forest plan Service. 2007d. Technical guide to managing ground accomplishment monitoring report for 2004. R5- water resources, FS-881, Washington DC: 281. MR-026. Vallejo, CA: Pacific Southwest Region. 8 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2008a. Interpretive plan for the Sequoia Service. 2005e. Travel management; designated National Forest and Giant Sequoia National routes and areas for motor vehicle use; final rule. 36 Monument. On file at: Sequoia National Forest, 1839 CFR Parts 212, 251, 261, and 295. On file at: Sequoia South Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA 93257. 99 p. National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb Street, U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Porterville, CA 93257. 27 p. Service. 2008b. National visitor use monitoring, U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest 2002/2003: Sequoia National Forest. Natural resource Service. 2006a. Recreation site facility master information system, human dimensions–national planning: Sequoia National Forest niche market visitor use monitoring, version 1.2.2 (October 2008). data. On file at: Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Washington, DC. 65 p. Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA 93257. 44 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2008c. Recreation facility analysis: 5-year Service. 2006b. Sierra Nevada forest plan program of work and programmatic results of
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 726 Literature Cited implementation, Sequoia National Forest. On file accomplishment monitoring report for 2007. Vallejo, at: Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb CA: Pacific Southwest Region. http://www.fs.fed.us/ Street, Porterville, CA 93257. 25 p. r5/snfpa/monitoringreport2007/. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2008d. Sierra Nevada Forests bioregional Service. 2009e. Sequoia National Forest 1999 and management indicator species (MIS) report: life 2009 forest grove inventories. Porterville, CA. history and analysis of management indicator species of the 10 Sierra Nevada national forests. Vallejo, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Pacific Southwest Region. 128 p. Service. 2010a. Sierra Nevada forests bioregional management indicator species (MIS) report: life U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest history and analysis of management indicator species Service. 2008e. Sequoia National Forest road of the 10 Sierra Nevada national forests. Vallejo, CA: accomplishment report, 2004-2008. On file at: Pacific Southwest Region. 132 p. Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA 93257. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2010b. Sierra Nevada forest plan U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest accomplishment monitoring report for 2008. Vallejo, Service. 2008f. National visitor use monitoring CA: Pacific Southwest Region. http://www.fs.fed.us/ results, USDA Forest Service, national summary r5/snfpa/monitoringreport2008/. report. Washington, DC. 37 p. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2010c. Forest Service manual [FSM] 2020, Service. 2008g. Forest Service manual [FSM] 2070, ecological restoration and resilience. Washington, DC. vegetation ecology. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service. 2011. National roadmap for responding to Service. 2008h. Forest Service strategic framework climate change, FS-957b. Washington, D.C. for responding to climate change, version 1.0. (October 2008). Washington, DC. Online at: http:// U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest www.fs.fed.us/climatechange/advisor/products.html. Service. [n.d.]. FEAST economic analysis software. Fort Collins, CO: Ecosystem Management U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Coordination. Service. 2009a. Region 5 scenery management system implementation process, Pacific Southwest Region. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest draft update, 3/2009. Unpublished report available Service. [n.d.]. National survey on recreation and the at:Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb environment. http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/trends/Nsre/ Street, Porterville, CA 93257. 26 p. nsre2.html. (04 February 2010). U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Natural Service. 2009b. Secure Rural Schools Act, PL 110- Resources Conservation Service [NRCS]. 1996. Soil 343, FY 2008 payment and projected FY 2009-2011 survey—Sequoia National Forest, California, Pacific Forest Service Payments to States, July 20, 2009. Southwest Region. http://www.fs.fed.us/srs/. (20 July 2009). U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA]; U.S. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Department of the Interior [USDI]. 2009. Guidance Service. 2009c. Sequoia National Forest motorized for implementation of federal wildland fire travel management final environmental impact management policy. 20 p. statement. Porterville, CA: Sequoia National Forest. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest 882 p. Service; U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Bureau of Land Management [BLM]. 1997. An Service. 2009d. Sierra Nevada forest plan assessment of ecosystem components in the interior
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 727 Literature Cited
Columbia basin and portions of the Klamath and with critical habitat. Federal Register 45: 54803- Great basins. Vol. III, ch. 5., Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW- 52807. GTR-405. Portland OR: Pacific Northwest Research Station: 1499-1714. U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1984a. California condor U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest recovery plan. Portland, OR. 62 p. Service; U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 2008. Memorandum U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and of understanding between the U.S. Department of Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1984b. Recovery plan for Agriculture Forest Service and the U.S. Fish and the valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Portland, OR: Wildlife Service to promote the conservation of Endangered Species program. 62 p. migratory birds. FS Agreement #08-MU-1113-2400- U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and 264. Washington, DC. 13 p. Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1986. Recovery plan for U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest the Pacific bald eagle. Portland, OR. 163 p. Service, Forest History Society. 2010. http://www. U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and foresthistory.org/ASPNET/People/Greeley/Greeley. Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1993a. Endangered and aspx. (1 February 2010). threatened wildlife and plants; proposed rule to list U.S. Department of Commerce [USDC], U.S. the southwestern willow flycatcher as endangered Census Bureau [U.S. Census Bureau]. 2006. 2006 with critical habitat. Federal Register 58(140): 39495- American community survey. http://factfinder. 39522. census.gov/servlet/ADPGeoSearchByListServlet?ds_ U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_&_lang=en&_ and Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1993b. General ts=278608434968. (9 December 2009). compensation guidelines for the valley elderberry U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI]. 2009. longhorn beetle. Sacramento, CA: Sacramento Field Planning for special designations within the national Office. 7 p. system of public lands. IM 2009-215. 2 p. U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Bureau of Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1994a. Endangered and Land Management [BLM]. 1985. Environmental threatened wildlife and plants: notice of interagency impact statement, northwest area noxious weed cooperative policy for the ecosystem approach to the control program. Appendix C-1. Endangered Species Act. Federal Register 59(126): 34272-34273. U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Bureau of Land Management [BLM]. 1996. Results of 1995 U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and field surveys for proposed endangered or threatened Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1994b. Endangered and plants in the southern Sierra foothills. Internal report threatened wildlife and plants; proposed endangered on file at: Caliente Resource Area, Bakersfield, CA. status for the California red-legged frog. Federal 2 p. Register 59(22): 4888-4895. U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Bureau U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and of Land Management [BLM]. 1999. Biological Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1996a. Endangered and assessment: hart vegetation management program threatened wildlife and plants: determination of prescribed burn project, June 1999. Bakersfield, CA. threatened status for the California red-legged frog. 6 p. Federal Register 61(101): 25813-25833. U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1980. Listing the valley Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1996b. Recovery plan for elderberry longhorn beetle as a threatened species the California condor. Portland, OR. 62 p.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 728 Literature Cited
U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month finding for and Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1997. Final rule: a petition to list the west coast distinct population endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; segment of the fisher Martes( pennanti). Federal determination of endangered status of three plants Register 69: 18769-18792. and threatened status of five plants from vernal pools in the central valley of California. Federal Register U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and 62(58): 14338-14352. Wildlife Service. 2005. Recovery plan for vernal pool ecosystems of California and southern Oregon. U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and Portland, OR. 606 p. http://www.fws.gov/pacific/ Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1998a. Final rule: ecoservices/endangered/recovery/plans.html. endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of threatened status for four plants U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and from the foothills of the Sierra Nevada mountains in Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 2006. Endangered and California. Federal Register (63)177: 49022-49035. threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month finding for a petition to list the California spotted owl U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) as threatened or Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1998b. Listing for endangered. 50 CFR part 17. Federal Register Springville clarkia in endangered and threatened 71(100): 29886-29908. wildlife and plants; determination of threatened status for four plants from the foothills of the Sierra Nevada U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and mountains in California. Federal Register 63: 49022. Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 2009. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 90 day finding for U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and a petition to list the Tehachapi slender salamander Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1998c. Opuntia basilaris (Batrachoseps stebbinsi). Federal Register: April 22, var. Treleasei. In: Recovery plan for upland species of 2009, vol. 74, no. 76. the San Joaquin valley, California: 49-54. U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and and Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 2009. Federal Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1999. Final rule to list endangered and threatened species that occur in or the Sierra Nevada distinct population segment of may be affected by projects in the Sequoia National the California bighorn sheep as endangered. Federal Forest. http://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/spp_lists/ Register 65: 20-30. NFActionPage.cfm. 16 October 2009. U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], National Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 2002a. Draft recovery Park Service. 1995. How to apply the national register plan for 15 plants of the southern Sierra Nevada criteria for evaluation. National Park Service Bulletin foothills, California. Portland, OR: Region 1. 15. Washington, DC. 54 p. U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], National Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 2002b. Recovery plan Park Service. 1998. Cultural resource management for the California red-legged frog (Rana aurora guidelines. Director’s order (DO) 28. Washington, draytonii). Portland, OR. 173 p. DC. U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], National Park Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 2003. Endangered and Service. 2006. The guide to managing the National threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month finding for Park System. Washington, DC. a petition to list the California spotted owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis). Federal Register 68(31). U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], National Park Service. [n.d.] History of giant forest development. U.S. Department of the Interior [USDI], Fish and http://www.nps.gov/seki/historyculture/gfhistory.htm. Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 2004. Endangered and (10 February 2008).
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 729 Literature Cited
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. 1987. VanCuren R.A.; Cahill T. 2002. Asian aerosols in Nonpoint source controls and water quality standards: North America: frequency and concentration of fine memorandum. Washington, DC. 8 p. dust. Journal of Geophysical Research 107(D24): 4804. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. 1998a. Clean water action plan: news release. http://www. Van de Water, K.M.; Safford, H.D. 2011. A summary epa.gov/history/topics/cwa/03.htm. (05 January of fire frequency estimates for California vegetation 2010). before Euro-American settlement. Fire Ecology 7(3): 26-58. doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0703026. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. 1998b. Clean water action plan: restoring and protecting Van Wagner, T.J. 1996. Selected life-history and America’s waters. EPA 840-R-98-001. 89 p. http:// ecological aspects of a population of foothill yellow- nepis.epa.gov/EPA/html/Pubs/pubtitleOW.htm. (05 legged frogs (Rana boylii) from Clear Creek, Nevada January 2010). County, California. Master’s thesis. Chico, CA: California State University, Department of Biological U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. 1999. Sciences. 143 p. Air quality guide for ozone. http://www.epa.gov/ airnow/aqguide.pdf. (27 February 2002). van Wagtendonk, J.W.; Fites-Kaufman, J. 2006. Sierra Nevada bioregion. In: Sugihara, N.G.; van U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. 2000. Wagtendonk, J.W.; Fites-Kaufman, J.; Shaffer, K.E.; Air quality index, a guide to air quality and your Thode, A.E., eds. Fire in California’s ecosystems. health. http://www.epa.gov. (27 February 2002). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 264- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. 294. 2007. Climate change science--state of knowledge. Vasek, F.C. 1964a. The evolution of Clarkia http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/ unguiculata derivatives adapted to relatively xeric stateofknowledge.html. environments. Evolution 18: 26-42. U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution. Vasek, F.C. 1964b. Two new species related to 2009. Use of multi-criteria decision support for the Clarkia unguiculata. Madroño 17: 219-221. Giant Sequoia National Monument. Unpublished report on file at: Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Vasek, F.C. 1977. Phenotypic variation and adaptation Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA 93257. in Clarkia section Phaeostoma. Systematic Botany 2: 251-279. Vale, T.R. 1975. Ecology and environmental issues of the sierra redwood (Sequoiadendron giganteum), now Verner, J.; Boss, A.S. 1980. California wildlife and restricted to California. Environmental Conservation their habitats: western Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. 2(3): 179-188. Rep. PSW-GTR-37. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Valentine, B.E.; Roberts, T.A.; Boland, S.D.; Research Station. 439 p. Woodman, A.P. 1988. Livestock management and productivity of willow flycatchers in the central Sierra Verner, J.; McKelvey, K.S.; Noon, B.R.; Gutierrez, Nevada. Transactions of the Western Section of the R.J.; Gould, G.I., Jr.; Beck., T.W., tech. coords. 1992. Wildlife Society 24: 105-114. The California spotted owl: a technical assessment of its current status. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-133. VanCuren, R.A. 2003. Asian aerosols in North Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest America: extracting the chemical composition and Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 285 p. mass concentration of the Asian continental aerosol plume from long-term aerosol records in the western Verner, J.; Ritter, L. 1983. Current status of the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research brown-headed cowbird in the Sierra National Forest. 108(D20): 4623. Auk. 100: 335-368.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 730 Literature Cited
Vindum, J.V.; Koo, M.S. 2001. Amphibians and Wehausen, J.D.; Ramey, R.R., II. 1993. A reptiles of the Sequoia National Forest: the results morphometric reevaluation of the peninsular bighorn of CCS-00-CC-11051322-034, the 2000 California subpecies. Trans. Desert Bighorn Council 37: 1-10. Academy of Sciences survey. San Francisco, CA: California Academy of Sciences [CAS]. Wehausen, J.D.; Ramey, R.R., II. 2000. Cranial morphometric and evolutionary relationships in Voegelin, E. 1938. Tübatulabal ethnography. the northern range of Ovis canadensis. Journal of Anthropological Records 2(1). Berkeley, CA: Mammalogy 81(1): 145-161. University of California Press. Weir, R.D.; Corbould, F.B. 2010. Factors affecting Von Winterfelt, D.; Edwards, W. 1986. Decision landscape occupancy by fishers in north-central analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge British Columbia. Journal of Wildlife Management University Press. 74: 405-410. Ward, D.E. 1999. Smoke from wildland fires. In: Weixelman, D.A.; Cooper, D.J. 2009. Assessing Goh, K.T.; Schwela, D.; Goldammer, J.G.; Simpson, proper functioning condition for fen areas in the O., eds. Health guidelines for vegetation fire events. Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade ranges in Lima, Peru: World Health Organization: 70-85. California, a user guide. Gen. Tech. Rep. R5-TP-028. Vallejo, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Ward, D.E.; Hardy, C. 1991. Smoke emissions from Service, Pacific Southwest Region. 42 p. wildland fires. Environment International 17: 117-34. Westbrooks, R. 1998. Invasive plants, changing the Waring, R.H.; Schroeder, P.E.; Oren, R. 1982. landscape of America: fact book. Washington, DC: Application of the pipe model theory to predict Federal Interagency Committee for the Management canopy leaf area. Can J. For Res. 12: 556-560. of Noxious and Exotic Weeds (FICMNEW). 109 p. Weatherspoon, C.P. 1996. Fire-silviculture Westerling A.L.; Hidalgo H.G.; Cayan D.R.; Swetnam relationships in Sierra forests. In: Sierra Nevada T. 2006. Warming and earlier spring increases western ecosystem project: final report to congress, vol. II, U.S. forest wildfire activity. Science 10-11(26): assessments and scientific basis for management 1128834. options. Davis, CA: University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources: 1167-1176. Whitaker, D.; Shelby, B.; Manning, R.; Cole, D.; Haas, G. 2010. Capacity reconsidered; finding Webb, R.W. 1946. Geomorphology of the middle consensus and clarifying differences. Marienville, Kern basin, southern Sierra Nevada, California. PA: National Association of Recreation Resource Bulletin of the Geologic Society of America 57: 355- Planners, Capacity Work Group. 18 p. 382. White, J.S.; Barrett, W.B. 1979. A review of the Webster, K.M.; Halpern, C.B. 2010. Long-term wolverine in California with recommendations for vegetation responses to reintroduction and repeated management. San Francisco, CA: U.S. Department of use of fire in mixed-conifer forests of the Sierra Agriculture, Forest Service. 71 p. Nevada. Ecosphere 1: 1-27. Whitfield, M.J. 1990. Willow flycatcher reproductive Wehausen, J.D. 1979. Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep: response to brown-headed cowbird parasitism. an analysis of management alternatives. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Chico, CA: California State report on file at: Inyo National Forest, Supervisors University. 42 p. Office, Bishop, CA. Whitfield, M.J.; Enos, K.M.; Rowe, S.P. 1999. Wehausen, J.D. 1980. Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep: Is brown-headed cowbird trapping effective for history and population ecology. Ph.D. dissertation. managing populations of the endangered southwestern Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. 240 p. willow flycatcher? Studies in Avian Biology 18: 260–266.
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 731 Literature Cited
Whitfield, M.J.; Sogge, M.K. 1999. Rangewide Wilson, D.S.; Puettmann, K.J. 2007. Density impact of brown-headed cowbird parasitism on the management and biodiversity in young douglas-fir southwestern willow flycatcher Empidonax( traillii forests: challenges of managing across scales. Forest extimus). Studies in Avian Biology 18: 182-190. Ecology and Management 246 (2007): 123-134. WHO. See World Health Organization. Winter, J. 1999. Unpublished data. Wildlife consultant, Winter and Associates. Santa Rosa, CA. Wiedinmyer, C. 2010. Prescribed burns may help reduce U.S. carbon footprint. Science Daily. Winter, J. 2000. Unpublished data. Wildlife National Center for Atmospheric Research consultant, Winter and Associates. Santa Rosa, CA. (2010, March 18). http://www.sciencedaily.com/ releases/2010/03/100317121352.htm (July 7, 2010). Winter, P.L.; Skenderian, J.; Crano, W. 2008. Routes to communicating about outdoor recreation Wiedinmyer, C.; Hurteau, M.D. 2010. Prescribed fire with diverse publics: what we know about media. as a means of reducing forest carbon emissions in the In: Chavez, D.J.; Winter, P.L.; Absher, J.D., eds. western United States. Environ. Sci. Technol.: 44 (6): Recreation visitor research: studies of diversity. 1926-1932 DOI: 10.1021/es902455e. PSW-GTR-210, ch. 16. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Wiener, J.B. 2006. Think globally, act globally: the Research Station: 195-204. limits of local climate change policies. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 155: 101-119. Wise, E. 1987. Population studies of Kaweah brodiaea (Brodiaea insignis) and Springville clarkia (Clarkia Wiens, J.A.; Hayward, G.; Safford, H.D.; Giffen, C. springvillensis). Report to the California Department (eds). In press. Historical environmental variation in of Fish and Game, 1234 East Shaw Avenue, Fresno, conservation and natural resource management: past, CA 93710-7802. 13 p. present and future. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons. World Health Organization [WHO]. 2003. Health aspects of air pollution with particulate matter, ozone Wikipedia. 2009a. Kernville, California. http:// and nitrogen dioxide. Report on a WHO working en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernville,_CA. (15 October group. Bonn, Germany. 2009). Wright, A.A.; Wright, A.H. 1933. Handbook of frogs Wikipedia. 2009b. Lake Isabella, California. http:// and toads. In: The frogs and toads of the United States en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Isabella,_California. (15 and Canada, first edition. Ithaca, NY: Comstock October 2009). Publishing Associates. 231 p. Wikipedia. 2009c. Porterville, California. http:// Wright, K.E. 2008. Regional curves for the Kings en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porterville,_California. (14 and Kaweah rivers, CA. Unpublished senior thesis. October 2009). Chico, CA: California State University, Department of Wikipedia. 2009d. Wofford Heights, California. http:// Geology and Physical Sciences. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wofford_Heights,_California. York, R.A.; Battles, J.J.; Heald, R.C. 2003. Edge (15 October 2009). effects in mixed conifer group selection openings: tree Wiedinmyer C.; Neff J. 2007. Estimates of CO2 from height response to resource gradients. Forest Ecology fires in the United States: implications for carbon and Management 179: 107-121. management. Carbon Balance and Management 2(10) York, R.A.; Battles, J.J.; Eschtruth, A.K.; Schurr, F.G. doi:10.1186/1750-0680-2-10. 2009. Giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Williams, P.L.; Craig, D. 1988. Willow flycatcher. In: regeneration in experimental canopy gaps. Restoration Riparian bird conservation plan. California Partners in Ecology (in press) (doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X. 2009. Flight. 44 p. 00537).
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 732 Literature Cited
York, R.A.; Battles, J.J.; Eschtruth, A.K.; Schurr, F.G. Zald, H.; Gray, A.; North, M.; Kern, R. 2008. Initial 2011. Giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) regeneration responses to fire and thinning treatments regeneration in experimental canopy gaps. Restoration in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest, USA. Forest Ecology 19: 14-23. Ecology and Management 256: 168-179. York, R.A.; Fuchs, D.; Battles, J.J.; Stephens, S.L. Zeiner, D.C.; Laudenslayer, W.F., Jr.; Mayer, K.E., 2010. Radial growth responses to gap creation in eds. 1989. California’s wildlife, vol. 1: amphibians large, old Sequoiadendron giganteum. Applied and reptiles. Sacramento, CA: California Department Vegetation Science 13: 498-509. of Fish and Game. 272 p. York, R.A.; Heald, R.C.; Battles, J.J.; York, J.D. Zeiner, D.C.; Laudenslayer, W.F., Jr.; Mayer, K.E.; 2004. Group selection management in conifer forests: White, M., eds. 1990a. California’s wildlife, vol. 2: relationships between opening size and tree growth. birds. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 630-641. and Game. 732 p. York, R.A.; Stephenson, N.L.; Meyer, M.; Hanna, S.; Zeiner, D.C.; Laudenslayer, W.F., Jr.; Mayer, K.E.; Moody, T.; Caprio, T.; Battles, J. 2012. Giant sequoia. White, M., eds. 1990b. California’s wildlife, vol. 3: In: Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park Natural mammals. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Resources Condition Assessment Report. Washington, Fish and Game. 407 p. D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. NPS-SEKI-NRR-2012: Appendix 10, pp. Zielinski, W.J.; Duncan, N.P. 2004. Diets of sympatric 1-79. populations of American martens (Martes americana) and fishers (Martes pennanti) in California. Journal of Young, C.A.; Escobar-Arias, M.I.; Fernandes, M.; Mammalogy 85(3): 470-477. Joyce, B.; Kiparsky, M.; Mount, J.F.; Mehta, V.K.; Purkey, D.; Viers, J.H.; Yates, D. 2009. Modeling the Zielinski, W.J.; Kucera, T.E., eds. 1995. American hydrology of climate change in California’s Sierra marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine: survey methods Nevada for subwatershed scale adaptation. Journal for their detection. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-157. of the American Water resources Association 45(6): Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest 1409-1423. Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station.163 p. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/gtr- Young, R.; Norby, L. 2009. Geological monitoring. 157/. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America: 27-46. Zielinski, W.J.; Kucera, T.E.; Barrett, R H. 1995. The Zabel, C.J.; Steger, G.N.; McKelvey, K.S.; Eberlein, current distribution of the fisher Martes( pennanti) in G.P.; Noon, B.R.; Verner, J. 1992. Home range size California. California Fish and Game 81: 104–112. and habitat-use patterns of California spotted owls in the Sierra Nevada. In: Verner, J.; McKelvey, K.S.; Zielinski, W.J.; Truex, R.L.; Ogan, C.; Busse, K. Noon, B.R.; Gutiérrez, R.J.; Gould, G.I., Jr.; Beck, 1997. Detection surveys for fishers and American T.W., eds. The California spotted owl: a technical martens in California,1989-1994: summary and assessment of its current status. Gen. Tech. Rep. interpretations. In: Proulx, G.; Bryant, H.N.; PSW-GTR-133. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Woodard, P.M., eds. Martes: taxonomy, ecology, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: techniques, and management. Edmonton, Alberta, 149-164. Canada: Provincial Museum: 372–392. Zabik, J.M.; Seiber, J.N. 1993. Atmospheric transport Zimmerman, M.C. 1993. The use of the biotic index of organophosphate pesticides from California’s as an indication of water quality. In: Goldman, C.A.; central valley to the Sierra Nevada mountains. Journal Hauta, P.L.; O’Donnell, M.A.; Andrews, S.E.; van of Environmental Quality 22: 1. der Heiden, R., eds. Tested studies for laboratory teaching, vol. 5, proceedings of the 5th workshop/
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 733 Literature Cited conference of the Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE): 85-98. http://www.ableweb.org/ volumes/vol-5/6-zimmerman.pdf. (04 February 2010). Zweifel, R.G. 1955. Ecology, distribution, and systematics of frogs of the Rana boylii group. University of California Publications in Zoology 54: 207-292.
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 734 Map Packet
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 735 Map Packet
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 736 Map Packet
There is a supplementary map packet of large maps accompanying this document. This packet includes: 1. Alternative A 2. Alternatives B and F 3. Alternative C and D 4. Alternative E 5. Giant Sequoia Groves 6. Wildland Urban Intermix (Alternatives A, B, E, and F) 7. Wildland Urban Intermix (Alternative C) 8. Wildland Urban Intermix (Alternative D) 9. Fire Return Interval Departure 10. Motor Vehicle Use Maps (MVUMs)
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 737 Map Packet
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 738 Index
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 739 Index
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 740 Index
Numbers California spotted owl 15, 36, 42, 52, 56-57, 65, 2001 SNFPA 17, 20, 23, 34, 51, 53, 54-56, 60, 64, 73, 80, 92, 94, 95, 112, 143, 190, 191, 194, 196, 199, 67-70, 71, 73-76, 77-78, 81, 83-85, 87-88, 90-92, 94- 441, 442, 464-468, 493, 494, 499, 500, 503 96, 125, 145, 149, 152, 175, 178, 180, 221, 226, 230, Campgrounds 16, 25, 83, 87, 88, 119, 142, 144, 235, 293, 381, 383, 409, 411-413, 424, 441, 446, 448, 154, 274-275, 281, 283-286, 290-292, 298-303, 314, 451, 454-456, 459-462, 464-465, 468-469, 471-476, 375, 379-380, 554, 556-561, 563, 564, 567, 573 479-480, 483-485, 487, 489, 491, 500-502, 504, 516- Caves 24, 36, 56, 65-66, 75, 78, 82, 85, 88, 92, 96, 518, 524-525, 612, 623 97, 117-118, 136, 153, 266-270, 275, 285, 298, 300, 2004 SNFPA 23, 77-78, 84, 88, 92, 94, 96, 113, 302, 343, 388, 544-547 114, 152, 231, 441, 444, 451, 453-454, 459-460, 464, Chaparral 73, 101-102, 107, 159-161, 164-165, 484, 486-490, 516-518, 524-528, 539 178, 190-191, 201-202, 205, 212-214, 217-219, 226, 2007 SNF MIS 34, 51, 53, 64, 67, 492-493 450, 452, 493, 496, 506 A Climate change 40, 60, 63, 66, 100-101, 105, 114, 185, 187-190, 268, 290, 343, 385, 392, 424, 434-435, Adaptive management 28, 40, 53, 68-69, 99-100, 438-441, 443, 445, 507, 515, 551, 562 188, 383, 438 Clinton proclamation 11-13, 31, 33, 35, 36, 38, 40, Air quality 21, 28, 60, 68, 99, 108, 113-114, 150, 41-47, 51-53, 57, 60-61, 63, 64, 65-67, 69-73, 75-76, 181-187, 189, 236, 343, 384-385, 425-438, 439, 583- 77, 83, 90-91, 94, 97, 121, 125, 130, 140-142, 274, 584, 637 285, 370, 393, 408, 554, 639 Alternative A 12, 13, 20-27, 34, 51, 64-76, 149-156 Community protection 13, 14, 18, 42, 52, 77, 87, Alternative B 13, 20-27, 51, 77-82, 149-156 94, 143, 146, 343, 409 Alternative C 14, 20-27, 45, 52, 83-86, 149-156 Cultural resources 13, 26, 36, 46, 53, 64, 66, 75, Alternative D 14, 20-27, 52, 87-89, 108, 149-156 81, 85-86, 89, 93, 97, 99, 118-119, 121-122, 155, 276, 357-367, 390, 555, 556, 565, 584, 587-605, 606, 609, Alternative E 14, 20-27, 45, 52, 90-93, 132, 149- 637, 638 156 Cumulative watershed effects 74, 381, 387, 422, Alternative F 14, 20-27, 52, 94-98, 149-156 519, 524-526, 529-536, 543 American marten 15, 36, 42, 56, 65, 73, 92, 112, 143, 190-191, 194, 197, 199, 475-479, 493-494, 499- D 500, 503 Designated roads 18, 41-42, 26-27, 52, 63, 76, 77, Aquatic Management Strategy (AMS) 73, 74, 78, 81, 86, 89, 93, 94, 97, 124, 125, 128, 131, 146, 155- 92, 96, 112, 115, 454, 517, 518, 524, 526-528, 539 156, 274, 284-285, 370, 374-375, 554, 563, 625, 629, 633 B Desired conditions 14, 51-53, 60, 63, 76, 82, 86, Bald eagle 191, 194, 196, 461-462 89, 93, 97, 99-123, 141, 191, 342-343, 345, 393 Botanical resources 22, 28, 53, 99, 112-113, 151, Developed recreation 16, 18, 25, 27, 62, 81, 83-86, 200-220, 386, 503-510 87-88, 93, 97, 119-120, 123, 128, 131, 144, 146, 154, Bush proclamation 35, 51, 64-65, 67, 70, 125 156, 283, 311, 379, 558, 561, 567, 572, 581, 624, 625, 638 C Dispersed camping 18, 22, 26, 52, 77, 83, 85, 88, California condor 36, 42, 65, 73, 92, 112, 190, 94, 141, 146, 151, 155, 281-282, 287, 298-303, 305, 193, 194, 385, 447-450, 503 558, 561, 563, 573, 622 California legless lizard 195, 199, 490-492 Domes and spires 117, 270, 545-546
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 741 Index
E Groundwater 24, 28, 53, 99, 116, 153, 189, 266- Ecological restoration 11, 13-14, 33, 38, 42, 43-44, 268, 387-388, 522-523, 539-543, 544 51, 52, 57, 60-61, 63, 67, 69-71, 73, 77-78, 80, 83-85, H 87-88, 90-92, 94-96, 100, 105, 106-107, 109, 111, 115, 116, 119, 127, 131, 134, 140, 180, 383, 392, 408, Hardwoods 70, 71, 73, 80, 162, 400-401 439, 442, 516, 519, 552, 569, 617-618, 627 Human use 25, 28, 41, 52, 53, 60, 75, 81, 83, 84, Environmental justice 312, 314, 347-357, 389, 85, 87, 88, 93, 97, 99, 118-121, 128, 131, 142, 154, 390, 579, 580, 583-585 273-357, 389-390, 551-587 Hydrological resources 23, 24, 28, 74-78, 84, 88, F 92, 96, 99, 114-116, 152, 153, 231-266, 387, 519-539 Fire and fuels 20-21, 28, 43, 70-71, 77, 78, 83, 84, 87, 90, 91, 94, 95, 99, 100, 108-109, 111, 149, 173- I 181, 384, 408-424 Interior and canyon live oaks 101, 102, 160 Fire regime 43, 60, 102, 160, 161, 163, 166, 171, Invasive nonnative species 22, 28, 53, 99, 151, 173-175, 177-179, 189, 192, 394, 405, 409, 417, 424, 220-225, 510-516 429, 438, 444 Inventoried roadless area 15, 54-55, 57, 61, 64, Fire return interval departure (FRID) 72, 161, 76, 85, 90, 93, 127, 132, 141, 143, 411 177-179, 409, 417-418, 444 Issues 12-13, 16-19, 28, 31, 37, 38, 41-47, 51-52, Foothill yellow-legged frog 195, 198, 234, 485-487 77, 83, 87, 90, 94, 142, 143-147, 343-345, 566-567 Forest Plan 11, 14, 16, 23, 25, 34, 51-54, 64, 75-76, K 77, 83, 87-89, 90-93, 94-96, 113, 114, 138, 144, 152, 154, 516 Kings River Special Management Area (KRSMA) 15, 31, 34, 51, 53, 54, 55, 64-65, 75, 76, Freeman Creek Botanical Area 27, 70, 134-135, 81, 85, 88, 93, 97, 119, 128, 142, 143, 232, 242, 274, 156 278, 281, 284-285, 295, 301, 303, 375, 558, 625 Fuels reduction 13, 20-21, 42-43, 60, 70-71, 78, 80, 84, 87-88, 91-92, 95-96, 104, 107, 109, 111, 127, L 131, 140-141, 149-150, 175, 379, 380, 398, 409, 412- Land allocation 12, 15, 17, 34, 36, 44, 51, 53, 54- 424, 433, 443, 537, 577 59, 63, 65, 67, 71, 73, 77, 78, 80, 83, 84, 85, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 94, 95, 109, 112, 125, 126-130, 131, 132, G 142-143, 145, 413, 414, 416, 443 Gateway communities 75, 120, 292, 312, 328-340, Law enforcement 376, 561, 569, 591, 636, 637 568-569, 580-582, 586, 635 Little Kern golden trout (LKGT) 73, 92, 191, Geological resources 24, 28, 53, 75, 78, 85, 88, 92, 193, 194, 234, 249, 452-455 96, 99, 117, 153, 268-270, 388, 544-547 Little willow flycatcher 194, 196, 442, 459-461, Giant sequoia groves 11, 12, 15, 19, 28, 31, 33, 35, 503 36, 44, 53, 54-55, 57, 60, 61, 63, 64-66, 69-73, 77-78, 84, 87, 91, 94-95, 101-108, 125, 127, 134, 143, 147, M 160, 162-173, 175, 190, 231, 267-268, 283, 405-408, Managed wildfire 21, 43, 60-61, 71, 77-78, 83, 84, 414-417, 503, 524-525, 539-540 87-88, 90-92, 94, 96, 105-106, 111, 127, 131, 150, Giant sequoias 11, 13, 20, 31, 33, 44, 52, 55, 60, 174-175, 179-180, 379-380, 396, 408, 409-410, 412, 62, 66-67, 70, 77-78, 80, 84, 85, 87-88, 90, 91-92, 414-420, 422, 424, 439, 442, 444, 510, 544, 637, 638 94-96, 99, 100-101, 104-106, 108, 134, 149, 159-173, Management indicator species (MIS) 22, 28, 34, 180, 392-408, 409, 416 51, 53, 64, 67, 99, 151, 190, 194-195, 199, 233, 492- Great gray owl 15, 23, 36, 42, 56, 65, 73, 78, 84, 502 88, 92, 96, 112, 143, 152, 190, 194, 196, 441, 442, 462-464, 503, 517-518
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 742 Index
Mechanical treatments 18, 21, 24, 43, 44, 60-71, Purpose and need 12, 28, 31, 35-36, 38, 51, 52, 63, 78, 80, 83, 84, 87-88, 90, 92, 95-96, 105, 108, 111, 140-141 127, 131, 146, 150, 153, 171, 179, 379, 396-401, 403, 404-408, 410-416, 421, 433, 441, 515, 548-550 R Mediated Settlement Agreement (MSA) 14, 34, Range 23, 53, 73, 78, 84, 88, 92, 96, 99, 114, 152, 51, 52, 55, 64-76, 77-82, 83-86, 87-89, 90-93, 94-98, 226-230, 386-387, 516-518 413, 414, 416, 446, 517, 524, 525, 527, 528 Rare plant habitat 203-220 Migratory landbird conservation 192-193, 447 Recreation 12, 13, 16, 18, 22, 25, 27, 28, 35, 37-38, Mining 65, 67, 125, 274, 312, 317, 323-324, 326- 39, 41, 52, 53, 55, 62-63, 64-65, 75, 77, 81, 83-84, 327, 332, 333, 335, 337, 340, 358, 365, 388, 580, 598 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90-91, 93, 94, 97, 99, 100, 108, 118-121, 123-124, 125, 128-129, 131-132, 141-142, Mixed conifer 60, 101-104, 107, 159-173, 174, 143-144, 146, 151, 154, 156, 273-292, 374-376, 389- 178-179, 186, 189, 190, 343, 393, 400-401, 404-405, 390, 551-569, 627-636 408, 409, 415, 493-494 Recreation opportunity spectrum (ROS) 75, 81, Moses Wilderness 27, 93, 122, 132-133, 156, 593 85, 88, 97, 119, 283, 566, 571 Mountain yellow-legged frog 195, 198, 234, 487- Red fir 101, 103-104, 108, 160, 161-162, 164, 165, 489 190, 201-202, 404, 193-494 Multi-criteria decision support (MCDS) 38-39, Regeneration 13, 19, 20, 44, 46, 52, 55, 62, 66, 291-292, 340-347, 382, 554-555, 629 71-73, 77-78, 80, 83, 84, 85, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 94-96, N 100, 101-102, 105-106, 114, 143, 147, 149, 163-173, 345, 392-408, 415 Northern goshawk 36, 42, 52, 56, 65, 71, 73, 80, 92, 94, 95, 112, 190, 191, 194, 195-196, 441, 442, Relictual slender salamander 195, 198, 234, 482- 455-459, 503 485 Riparian conservation areas 56, 58, 61, 73, 74, 84, O 92, 112, 115, 411, 413, 441, 504, 525, 625 Objectives 12, 14, 31, 36, 51, 53-54, 63, 67, 76, 77, River basins 188, 231-266 78, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 88, 89, 92, 93, 94, 96, 97, 99- 124, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140-141 S Off-highway vehicle (OHV) 18, 26, 52, 64, 75-76, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 77, 81, 93, 94, 97, 124, 146, 155, 273-274, 278, 285, (SJVAPCD) 113, 181, 183, 186, 384-385, 426, 428, 303, 374-375, 554, 562, 625, 629, 632-633 433-434, 436, 583 P Scenery 25, 28, 53, 99, 119, 134, 154, 278, 281, 285, 286, 287, 290, 292-311, 554, 561, 562, 566, 569- Pacific fisher 13, 15, 36, 42, 46, 54-56, 65, 73, 92, 579 100, 112, 143, 194, 197-198, 479-482, 503 Scientific Advisory Board 13, 37-40, 45-46, 53, Paleontological resources 24, 28, 36, 53, 66, 67, 60-61, 63, 67, 381-382, 393, 395-396, 409, 442, 523, 99, 117-118, 153, 270, 388, 547 529, 552, 619, 628 Pallid bat 191, 194, 196-197, 468-470 Scientific study 28, 53, 66, 68, 69, 82, 97, 99-100, Prescribed burning 80, 108, 111, 113, 172, 174- 128, 131, 136, 383 175, 184, 189, 385, 397-401, 407, 424, 427, 429-431, Sensitive species 22, 28, 53, 74, 99, 112, 151, 190, 433-435, 442, 544, 550, 583-584, 637 195-199, 203-204, 236, 270, 386, 395, 439, 442-443, Proposed action 12, 13, 31, 36-38, 41, 45, 51, 53, 447, 455-492, 507-509 77-82 Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Public involvement 12, 31, 36-39, 291-292, 341, (SEKI) 13, 14, 45, 52, 83-86, 123, 141-142, 172, 382, 554-555, 587, 629 186, 400, 525, 545, 569, 639
Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 743 Index
Sequoia Monument Recreation Council Trails 16-17, 22, 25, 26-27, 28, 41-42, 53, 62-63, (SMRC) 81, 97, 340 64-65, 75-76, 81, 86, 89, 93, 97, 99, 123-124, 125, Socioeconomics 28, 53, 99, 311-357, 579-587 128-129, 131, 140, 144-145, 151, 154, 155-156, 273- 274, 275, 278, 283-284, 285-286, 291-292, 374-376, Soils 24, 25, 28, 53, 63, 64, 68, 75, 81, 85, 88, 92, 554, 555, 557, 562-563, 567, 568-569, 625, 627-636 96, 99, 118, 123, 140, 153-154, 270-273, 548-551 Transportation system 16, 26, 28, 53, 62, 99, 123- Southern Sierra Fisher Conservation Area 15, 22, 124, 141, 144, 155, 369-374, 392, 617-627 54, 55, 58, 73, 87, 92, 112, 127, 143, 151, 457 Travel and tourism 312, 317, 324-325 Southern Sierra Science Symposium 40, 46, 53 Tribal and Native American interests 26, 121, Southwestern pond turtle 191, 195, 198-199, 489- 155, 368-369, 390-391, 606-617 490, 503 Tribal Fuels Emphasis Treatment Area Special Areas 27, 31, 57, 70, 76, 82, 83, 86, 87, 89, (TFETA) 15, 17-19, 20, 22-23, 26, 44, 56, 58-59, 93, 97, 99, 132-139, 156 61, 63, 78-80, 84, 87, 91, 95-96, 109-111, 131, 143, Special forest products 126, 127, 130, 132, 392, 145-147, 149, 151-152, 155, 411, 413, 414, 416, 417, 637 419, 422, 441, 518, 577, 583, 584-585, 597, 599, 602, Special uses 88, 129, 132, 389-390, 564, 568, 634, 605, 612-613, 615 636 V SPECTRUM model 18-19, 21, 43, 44, 146-147, Valley elderberry longhorn beetle (VELB) 193- 150, 383, 396, 404, 406, 409, 410, 411, 419-422, 431- 194, 386, 450-452 432, 443-445, 447, 459, 462, 468, 479, 482, 502, 514, 550, 581 Vegetation, including giant sequoias 20, 77, 84, 87, 91, 94, 99, 100-108, 149, 159-173, 383-384, 392- Spotted owl 15, 17, 22, 36, 42, 46, 52, 56-57, 65, 408 71, 73, 80, 90-91, 92, 94, 95, 112, 120, 143, 145, 151, 190, 191, 194, 196, 199, 441, 442, 464-468, 493, 494, W 499-500, 503 Water quality 23, 60, 75, 152, 231-266, 387, 519- Standards and guidelines 12, 14, 17, 23, 24, 31, 539 34, 36, 53, 54, 57, 58, 59, 63, 64, 67-68, 69, 73-76, Watersheds 23-24, 43, 44, 56, 64, 73, 74, 77, 78, 77, 81, 82, 83-86, 87-89, 90, 92-93, 94, 96-98, 105, 95, 111, 115-116, 124, 152-153, 231-266, 519-539 112-113, 114, 115, 126, 127, 141, 145, 152, 153, 408, 424, 510, 516, 518, 539, 547, 551, 605 Western red bat 194, 197, 471-473 Strategies 12, 13-14, 31, 35, 36, 38, 41, 43, 44, 51- Wildland urban intermix (WUI) 15, 17-19, 20-22, 53, 60, 63, 67, 76, 77, 78, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 26, 42, 43, 54, 56, 58-59, 60, 61, 63, 70, 71, 77-78, 88, 89, 90, 93, 94, 96, 97, 99-124, 132, 134, 136, 138, 80, 83, 84, 85, 87, 88, 90, 91-92, 94, 95-96, 106, 140-142 108-109, 111, 131, 143, 145-147, 149-151, 155, 181, 312, 313, 319, 343-344, 379-380, 406, 409-422, 441, Streamside management zones (SMZs) 23, 74, 84, 494-495 112, 115, 152, 525, 528, 544 Wildlife and plant habitat 22, 28, 53, 73, 78, 83, Suitability 57, 125-132, 516 84, 87, 88, 92, 96, 99, 100, 112-113, 115, 151, 190- T 225, 385-386, 441-516 Threatened, endangered, and sensitive species 22, Wildlife habitat 17, 61, 64, 70, 87, 100-101, 112, 28, 53, 99, 151, 386 145, 190-200, 441-503 Townsend’s big-eared bat 197, 470-471 Windy Gulch Geological Area 24, 27, 77, 78, 82, 94, 96, 97, 117, 136-137, 153, 156, 545 Wolverine 194, 197, 473-475
Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Final Environmental Impact Statement 744