Lewis, FL; Et. Al. “Robotics” Mechanical Engineering

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lewis, FL; Et. Al. “Robotics” Mechanical Engineering Lewis, F.L.; et. al. “Robotics” Mechanical Engineering Handbook Ed. Frank Kreith Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 1999 c 1999byCRCPressLLC Robotics Frank L. Lewis 14.1Introduction....................................................................14-2 University of Texas at Arlington 14.2Commercial Robot Manipulators...................................14-3 Commercial Robot Manipulators • Commercial Robot John M. Fitzgerald Controllers University of Texas at Arlington 14.3Robot Configurations...................................................14-15 Ian D. Walker Fundamentals and Design Issues • Manipulator Kinematics • Summary Rice University 14.4End Effectors and Tooling...........................................14-24 Mark R. Cutkosky A Taxonomy of Common End Effectors • End Effector Design Stanford University Issues • Summary Kok-Meng Lee 14.5Sensors and Actuators..................................................14-33 Tactile and Proximity Sensors • Force Sensors • Vision • Georgia Tech Actuators Ron Bailey 14.6Robot Programming Languages..................................14-48 University of Texas at Arlington Robot Control • System Control • Structures and Logic • Special Functions • Program Execution • Example Program • Frank L. Lewis Off-Line Programming and Simulation University of Texas at Arlington 14.7Robot Dynamics and Control......................................14-51 Chen Zhou Robot Dynamics and Properties • State Variable Representations and Computer Simulation • Cartesian Georgia Tech Dynamics and Actuator Dynamics • Computed-Torque (CT) John W. Priest Control and Feedback Linearization • Adaptive and Robust Control • Learning Control • Control of Flexible-Link and University of Texas at Arlington Flexible-Joint Robots • Force Control • Teleoperation G. T. Stevens, Jr. 14.8Planning and Intelligent Control..................................14-69 University of Texas at Arlington Path Planning • Error Detection and Recovery • Two-Arm Coordination • Workcell Control • Planning and Artifical John M. Fitzgerald Intelligence • Man-Machine Interface University of Texas at Arlington 14.9Design of Robotic Systems..........................................14-77 Kai Liu Workcell Design and Layout • Part-Feeding and Transfers University of Texas at Arlington 14.10Robot Manufacturing Applications..............................14-84 Product Design for Robot Automation • Economic Analysis • Assembly 14.11Industrial Material Handling and Process Applications of Robots...........................................................................14-90 Implementation of Manufacturing Process Robots • Industrial Applications of Process Robots 14.12Mobile, Flexible-Link, and Parallel-Link Robots.....14-102 Mobile Robots • Flexible-Link Robot Manipulators • Parallel- Link Robots © 1999 by CRC Press LLC 14-1 14-2 Section 14 14.1Introduction The word “robot” was introduced by the Czech playright Karel Capekˇ in his 1920 play Rossum’s Universal Robots. The word “robota” in Czech means simply “work.” In spite of such practical begin- nings, science fiction writers and early Hollywood movies have given us a romantic notion of robots. Thus, in the 1960s robots held out great promises for miraculously revolutionizing industry overnight. In fact, many of the more far-fetched expectations from robots have failed to materialize. For instance, in underwater assembly and oil mining, teleoperated robots are very difficult to manipulate and have largely been replaced or augmented by “smart” quick-fit couplings that simplify the assembly task. However, through good design practices and painstaking attention to detail, engineers have succeeded in applying robotic systems to a wide variety of industrial and manufacturing situations where the environment is structured or predictable. Today, through developments in computers and artificial intel- ligence techniques and often motivated by the space program, we are on the verge of another breakthrough in robotics that will afford some levels of autonomy in unstructured environments. On a practical level, robots are distinguished from other electromechanical motion equipment by their dexterous manipulation capability in that robots can work, position, and move tools and other objects with far greater dexterity than other machines found in the factory. Process robot systems are functional components with grippers, end effectors, sensors, and process equipment organized to perform a con- trolled sequence of tasks to execute a process — they require sophisticated control systems. The first successful commercial implementation of process robotics was in the U.S. automobile industry. The word “automation” was coined in the 1940s at Ford Motor Company, as a contraction of “automatic motivation.” By 1985 thousands of spot welding, machine loading, and material handling applications were working reliably. It is no longer possible to mass produce automobiles while meeting currently accepted quality and cost levels without using robots. By the beginning of 1995 there were over 25,000 robots in use in the U.S. automobile industry. More are applied to spot welding than any other process. For all applications and industries, the world’s stock of robots is expected to exceed 1,000,000 units by 1999. The single most important factor in robot technology development to date has been the use of microprocessor-based control. By 1975 microprocessor controllers for robots made programming and executing coordinated motion of complex multiple degrees-of-freedom (DOF) robots practical and reliable. The robot industry experienced rapid growth and humans were replaced in several manufacturing processes requiring tool and/or workpiece manipulation. As a result the immediate and cumulative dangers of exposure of workers to manipulation-related hazards once accepted as necessary costs have been removed. A distinguishing feature of robotics is its multidisciplinary nature — to successfully design robotic systems one must have a grasp of electrical, mechanical, industrial, and computer engineering, as well as economics and business practices. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a background in all these areas so that design for robotic applications may be confronted from a position of insight and confidence. The material covered here falls into two broad areas: function and analysis of the single robot, and design and analysis of robot-based systems and workcells. Section 14.2 presents the available configurations of commercial robot manipulators, with Section 14.3 providing a follow-on in mathematical terms of basic robot geometric issues. The next four sections provide particulars in end-effectors and tooling, sensors and actuators, robot programming languages, and dynamics and real-time control. Section 14.8 deals with planning and intelligent control. The next three sections cover the design of robotic systems for manufacturing and material handling. Specifically, Section 14.9 covers workcell layout and part feeding, Section 14.10 covers product design and economic analysis, and Section 14.11 deals with manufacturing and industrial processes. The final section deals with some special classes of robots including mobile robots, lightweight flexible arms, and the versatile parallel-link arms including the Stewart platform. © 1999 by CRC Press LLC Robotics 14-3 14.2 Commercial Robot Manipulators John M. Fitzgerald In the most active segments of the robot market, some end-users now buy robots in such large quantities (occasionally a single customer will order hundreds of robots at a time) that market prices are determined primarily by configuration and size category, not by brand. The robot has in this way become like an economic commodity. In just 30 years, the core industrial robotics industry has reached an important level of maturity, which is evidenced by consolidation and recent growth of robot companies. Robots are highly reliable, dependable, and technologically advanced factory equipment. There is a sound body of practical knowledge derived from a large and successful installed base. A strong foundation of theoretical robotics engineering knowledge promises to support continued technical growth. The majority of the world’s robots are supplied by established stable companies using well-established off-the-shelf component technologies. All commercial industrial robots have two physically separate basic elements: the manipulator arm and the controller. The basic architecture of all commercial robots is fundamentally the same. Among the major suppliers the vast majority of industrial robots uses digital servo-controlled electrical motor drives. All are serial link kinematic machines with no more than six axes (degrees of freedom). All are supplied with a proprietary controller. Virtually all robot applications require significant effort of trained skilled engineers and technicians to design and implement them. What makes each robot unique is how the components are put together to achieve performance that yields a competitive product. Clever design refinements compete for applications by pushing existing performance envelopes, or sometimes creating new ones. The most important considerations in the application of an industrial robot center on two issues: Manipulation and Integration. Commercial Robot Manipulators Manipulator Performance Characteristics The combined effects of kinematic structure, axis drive mechanism design, and real-time motion control determine the major manipulation performance characteristics: reach and dexterity, payload, quickness,
Recommended publications
  • Design of an End Effector Exchange Device for a Light Assembly Robot / Drew Landman Lehigh University
    Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve Theses and Dissertations 1984 Design of an end effector exchange device for a light assembly robot / Drew Landman Lehigh University Follow this and additional works at: https://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Landman, Drew, "Design of an end effector exchange device for a light assembly robot /" (1984). Theses and Dissertations. 4473. https://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd/4473 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DESIGN OF AN END EFFECTOR EXCHANGE DEVICE FOR A LIGHT ASSEMBLY ROBOT BY DREW LANDMAN A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Committee of Lehigh University in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering Lehigh University 1984 Thia thesis ia accepted and approved in partial fulfillment ot the requirements tor the degree ot Master of Science. (date)~· Professor in Charge Chairman of Department ii Thia thesis is accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. (date) Professor in Charge Chairman of Department ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The assistance and guidance ot Dr. Richard Roberts in developing this thesis is gratefully acknowledged. To Kathy, Dirk, and Laura:I am forever in debt to them tor their constant enthusiasm and support. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Certificate of Approval ii Acknowledgments iii Table of Contents iv Abstract 1 Chapter 1. survey of the State of the Art 2 in End Effector Technology Introduction 2 Section 1 End Effectors I.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Robot End-Effector Pose Estimation with Deep Network
    2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) October 25-29, 2020, Las Vegas, NV, USA (Virtual) Real-Time Robot End-Effector Pose Estimation with Deep Network Hu Cheng, Yingying Wang and Max Q.-H. Meng∗, Fellow, IEEE Abstract— In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm that estimates the pose of the robot end effector using depth vision. The input to our system is the segmented robot hand point cloud from a depth sensor. Then a neural network takes a point cloud as input and outputs the position and orientation of the robot end effector in the camera frame. The estimated pose can serve as the input of the controller of the robot to reach a specific pose in the camera frame. The training process of the neural network takes the simulated rendered point cloud generated from different poses of the robot hand mesh. At test time, one estimation of a single robot hand pose is reduced to 10ms on gpu and 14ms on cpu, which makes it suitable for close loop robot (a) (b) control system that requires to estimate hand pose in an online Fig. 1: (a) shows the repeatability of the robot arm, which is caused fashion. We design a robot hand pose estimation experiment to by mechanical imperfecions. (b) shows the misalignment between validate the effectiveness of our algorithm working in the real the pose of the end effector and the point cloud. situation. The platform we used includes a Kinova Jaco 2 robot arm and a Kinect v2 depth sensor. We describe all the processes that use vision to improve the accuracy of pose estimation of the robot end-effector.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling, Analysis, and Experiments on a Robot Arm with Force-Feedback Interaction Control
    MODELING, ANALYSIS, AND EXPERIMENTS ON A ROBOT ARM WITH FORCE-FEEDBACK INTERACTION CONTROL by SURAG BALAJEPALLI Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Science Electrical Engineering and Computer Science CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May, 2020 Modeling, Analysis, And Experiments On A Robot Arm With Force-Feedback Interaction Control Case Western Reserve University Case School of Graduate Studies We hereby approve the thesis1 of SURAG BALAJEPALLI for the degree of Master of Science Dr. Wyatt Newman Committee Chair, Adviser 03/05/2020 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Dr. Cenk Cavusoglu Committee Member 03/05/2020 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Dr. Gregory Lee Committee Member 03/05/2020 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 1We certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. Table of Contents List of Tables v List of Figures vi Abstract ix Chapter 1. Introduction1 Robot Force Control2 Compliant Motion6 Compliant motion behaviors8 Scope of this thesis9 Chapter 2. Stability of Interaction Controllers 12 Performance measure 14 Passivity 15 Robot modeling 21 Controller model 32 Passivity analysis 37 Simulation 39 Chapter 3. Passivity Analysis 40 Robot Model 40 Single link analysis 42 Two link model analysis 46 Coulomb friction analysis 63 iii Chapter 4. Experiments on compliant behaviors 75 The robot 75 Virtual attractor strategies 84 Chapter 5. Conclusions and future work 92 Future work 93 Appendix. Complete References 95
    [Show full text]
  • Design, Fabrication and Testing of 6 Dof Spot Welding Robotic Arm
    ISSN: 2455-2631 © April 2018 IJSDR | Volume 3, Issue 4 DESIGN, FABRICATION AND TESTING OF 6 DOF SPOT WELDING ROBOTIC ARM 1Shantanu K. Mahale, 2Ankush A. Mathur, 3Prashant A. Nandalwar, 4Nitish N. Shukla, 5Mr. Vivek S. Narnaware 1,2,3,4Final Year B.E. Mechanical Engineering Students, 5Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering, AET’s St. John College of Engineering &.Management (SJCEM), Vevoor, Palghar (E), Affiliated to University of Mumbai, Maharashtra 401404. ABSTRACT: In majority of the manufacturing and assembling industries, human labor is largely employed to do repetitive task, which usually requires precision and accuracy. It is unavoidable that humans will make mistakes while performing a task. Moreover, productivity will be lower as human have limited working hours and work slower as compared to machines. To overcome this human inefficiency, industrial robots are designed and built to accommodate the increasing demands for better productivity, product quality and precision in performing task. They are the future of industries, which are going to replace humans. This paper is focused on the project which aims at making a six-degree of freedom robotic arm for spot welding purpose. Here in this report all the points regarding designing, mathematical modeling, simulation, development of real model and fabrication has been covered. All the designed parts in the report are made in Solid Works Software. Also the transformer specifications and the electrodes, which is used for Spot Welding, are been discussed in this report. Arduino Programming is used for operating the robot in this project. The possible results, which would be achieved after completion of this project, are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • 6D Interaction Control with Aerial Robots: the Flying End-Effector
    6D interaction control with aerial robots: The flying end-effector paradigm Markus Ryll, Giuseppe Muscio, Francesco Pierri, Elisabetta Cataldi, Gianluca Antonelli, Fabrizio Caccavale, Davide Bicego, Antonio Franchi To cite this version: Markus Ryll, Giuseppe Muscio, Francesco Pierri, Elisabetta Cataldi, Gianluca Antonelli, et al.. 6D interaction control with aerial robots: The flying end-effector paradigm. The International Journal of Robotics Research, SAGE Publications, 2019, 38 (9), pp.1045-1062. 10.1177/0278364919856694. hal-02383394 HAL Id: hal-02383394 https://hal.laas.fr/hal-02383394 Submitted on 27 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accepted for The International Journal of Robotics Research 2019 6D Interaction Control with Aerial Preprint version, final version at Robots: The Flying End-Effector https://journals.sagepub.com/loi/ijra Paradigm Markus Ryll1, Giuseppe Muscio2, Francesco Pierri2, Elisabetta Cataldi3, Gianluca Antonelli3, Fabrizio Caccavale2, Davide Bicego1 and Antonio Franchi1 Abstract This paper presents a novel paradigm for physical interactive tasks in aerial robotics allowing to increase reliability and decrease weight and costs compared to state of the art approaches. By exploiting its tilted propeller actuation, the robot is able to control the full 6D pose (position and orientation independently) and to exert a full-wrench (force and torque independently) with a rigidly attached end-effector.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Structural Analysis of a Robotic Arm
    Master's Degree Thesis ISRN: BTH-AMT-EX--2016/D06--SE Design and Structural Analysis of a Robotic Arm Gurudu Rishank Reddy Venkata Krishna Prashanth Eranki Department of Mechanical Engineering Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona, Sweden 2016 Supervisors: R.V Jhansi Rao, Signode India Limited (SIG) Sharon Kao-Walter, BTH Design and Structural Analysis of a Robotic Arm Gurudu Rishank Reddy Venkata Krishna Prashanth Eranki Department of Mechanical Engineering Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona, Sweden 2016 Thesis submitted for completion of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering with emphasis on Structural Mechanics at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden. Abstract: Automation is creating revolution in the present industrial sector, as it reduces manpower and time of production. Our project mainly deals around the shearing operation, were the sheet is picked manually and placed on the belt for shearing which involves risk factor. Our challenge is designing of pick and place operator to carry the sheet from the stack and place it in the shearing machine for the feeding. We have gone through different research papers, articles and had observed the advanced technologies used in other industries for the similar operation. After related study we have achieved the design of a 3-jointed robotic arm were the base is fixed and the remaining joints move in vertical and horizontal directions. The end effector is also designed such that to lift the sheet we use suction cups were the sheet is uplifted with a certain pressure. Here we used Creo-Parametric for design and Autodesk-Inventor 2017 to simulate the designed model.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Roboticsrobotics Robotrobot Anatomyanatomy Andand Relatedrelated Attributesattributes
    UNITUNIT VV INDUSTRIALINDUSTRIAL ROBOTICSROBOTICS ROBOTROBOT ANATOMYANATOMY ANDAND RELATEDRELATED ATTRIBUTESATTRIBUTES •• The anatomy of industrial robots deals with the assembling of outer components of a robot such as wrist, arm and body. •• Before jumping into robot configurations, here are some of the key facts about robot anatomy. (a) Joints and Links (b) Common Robot Configurations 2 JOINTSJOINTS ANDAND LINKSLINKS •• The manipulator of an industrial robot consists of a series of joints and links. •• Robot anatomy deals with the study of different joints and links and other aspects of the manipulator's physical construction. •• A robotic joint provides relative motion between two links of the robot. •• Each joint, or axis, provides a certain degree-of-freedom (dof) of motion. •• In most of the cases, only one degree-of-freedom is associated with each joint. •• Robot's complexity can be classified according to the total number of degrees -of-freedom they possess. •• Each joint is connected to two links, an input link and an output link. 3 JOINTSJOINTS ANDAND LINKSLINKS •• A Joint provides controlled relative movement between the input link and output link. A robotic link is the rigid component of the robot manipulator. •• Most of the robots are mounted upon a stationary base, such as the floor. From this base, a joint-link numbering scheme may be recognized as shown in Figure. 4 JOINTSJOINTS ANDAND LINKSLINKS •• The robotic base and its connection to the first joint are termed as link-0. •• The first joint in the sequence is joint-1. •• Link-0 is the input link for joint-1, while the output link from joint-1 is link-1 which leads to joint-2.
    [Show full text]