Assessment of Risks with Underground Workings at Abandoned Legacy Mines- Northern PROJECT CLEANS Patty Ogilvie-Evans, B.Sc., P.Geo. David Sanscartier, PhD, P.Eng.

1 Copyright © SRC 2016 Project CLEANS (Cleanup of Abandoned Northern Sites)

 SRC manages the project on behalf of the province (Ministry of Economy)  Project CLEANS initiated the program in 2006  GOAL of Project CLEANS is to transfer 37 sites to ICP  37 abandoned cold-war era mine sites • Two mill sites with unconsolidated tailing - Gunnar Mine (mine and mill) 1955 – 1963 - Lorado Mill (mill only) 1957 – 1960 • 35 Satellite mine sites (without tailings) are located near (two sites near LaRonge)

2 Copyright © SRC 2016 3 Copyright © SRC 2016 CLEANS Abandoned Mine Sites

 Legacy cold-war uranium mines and uranium exploration sites  Ore from these legacy mines was processed at Lorado and/or Eldorado mills  Abandoned with little to no clean-up  Gunnar Tailings and Gunnar Other Aspects ongoing  Since 2006, SRC has initiated remediation at 19 of 35 satellite sites • Remediation complete at eight sites • Remediation on-going at nine sites • Desktop Risk Assessments of underground workings on two sites • Assessment initiated at remaining 14 sites

4 Copyright © SRC 2016 Abandoned Legacy Uranium Sites

After

Sk. Provincial Archives Before

Cayzor Athabasca Mines Ltd.

Sk. Provincial Archives 5 Copyright © SRC 2016 Abandoned Legacy Sites: A little bit of everything

6 Copyright © SRC 2016 Underground Hazards at Legacy Abandoned Mines Horizontal openings Vertical openings

Thin Crown Pillars

Golder and Associates Ltd. 7 Copyright © SRC 2016 Multi Step Approach

COLLECT REVIEW MATCH SMAD Surface Plans Surface - Maps, reports, U/G plans discoveries to clippings historical MINE PLANS documents

2D/3D- Desktop Risk Assessments ArcGIS GEOREFERENCE Use to Aide & Field Documents and surface plans visualization for Investigations OPENINGS/ CROWN PILLARS

8 Copyright © SRC 2016 Environmental Data Management System for Site Remediation: Data Flow

Historical Data GIS & MECON QA/QC Geodatabase Web GIS MOE Lab Data 3D Models Consultants Field Data Reporting Stakeholders

Import Processing Transfer Storage Analysis Publishing Access

9 Copyright © SRC 2016 Into the Past ….

Trick to understanding these sites TODAY is to look into the PAST. CHALLENGES:  Limited or non-existence records  Mines range from late 1940-50’s to 1970’s  Incomplete documents  Un-validated records or source So starts the beginning of the puzzle...

10 Copyright © SRC 2016 How to describe looking into the legacy sites?

It’s a PUZZLE where you have:  Only a FEW pieces of the puzzle  Pieces that have been mixed up with others  Some of the pieces have been lost forever

www.presentermedia.com

11 Copyright © SRC 2016 Collection of Historical Information

You look at ANYTHING that can help you find the missing pieces!  SMAD files (Saskatchewan Mineral Assessment Database)  SMDI index (Saskatchewan Mineral Database Index)  Newspaper articles/archival photos  Provincial archives  Aerial photos (historical)  Historical documents and mine plans www.presentermedia.com

12 Copyright © SRC 2016 13 Copyright © SRC 2016 Build the Story…

Find more pieces to the puzzle…  This is where we start making the story for the legacy site  Was there exploration? How many raises to surface?  Helps us build our remediation plan

ANSWER AS MANY QUESTIONS AS POSSIBLE

14 Copyright © SRC 2016 Case Study: Cinch/Cenex Mine Site

 Abandoned mine located approximately 2.5 km southwest of Uranium City  Two main operations were in production on this site 1) Lake Cinch Mines Ltd. 1954 - 1960 2) Cenex Mines Ltd. 1978 - 1979  Two different locations on the site

So what was the story ?? www.presentermedia.com

15 Copyright © SRC 2016 Building the Site Puzzle

Georeferenced historical documents to 2D allows: Analysis of underground trace to surface View where historical buildings were located View historical site infrastructure View historical site roads/trails Plan sampling areas (soil contamination, Gamma, etc.) View underground projections while walking on surface to walk for disturbances/subsidence

16 Copyright © SRC 2016 Confidential and Copyright © SRC 2014 Field Investigations The picture now becomes clearer…  Field investigation lets you use the information you have gathered to assist in confirming what actually is there  Georeferenced 2D overlays developed guide field surveys  Aids finding things (open raises, adits, trenches otherwise

potentially missed during a www.presentermedia.com routine site visit walk).

18 Copyright © SRC 2016 Finding the pieces leads to DISCOVERY!

With all the puzzle pieces removed (or most of them), discoveries can be made!

Adit at Nicholson Mines Raise at N.L Eagle Mine

19 Copyright © SRC 2016 Assessments Using the Data

 Using data to provide Consultants with information to conduct underground risk assessments

Golder and Associates Ltd.

20 Copyright © SRC 2016 Balancing Benefit/Risk/Costs

Due to remote locations, we MUST look at the balancing of costly field investigations with • Benefits • Risks • Costs Overall project GOALS

21 Copyright © SRC 2016 From 2D analysis TO 3D visualization

To help with the visualization and search for openings, crown pillar issues and other structural integrities to consider on sites

22 Copyright © SRC 2016 Utilization of Information

Use information to build 3D models

Gunnar Mine 3D

23 Copyright © SRC 2016 Gunnar Mine 3D projection

24 Copyright © SRC 2016 Uses for 2D analysis and 3D projection

Clear picture of site aspects Assist in locating potential hazards Openings to surface Thin crown pillars Augment field investigations Strong tool for stakeholder www.presentermedia.com engagements

25 Copyright © SRC 2016 Conclusion

26 Copyright © SRC 2016 Thank you! Questions?

Copyright © SRC 2016