DOCSLIB.ORG

Cynthia M. Basile Kirk W. Larson Clark D. Mccreedy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION REGIONAL FORESTER SENSITIVE SPECIES HOOSIER NATIONAL FOREST LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION DECEMBER 6, 2005 PREPARED BY: /s/ Cynthia M. Basile Cynthia M. Basile Wildlife Biologist Tell City Ranger District PREPARED BY: /s/ Kirk W. Larson Kirk W. Larson Forest Botanist Brownstown Ranger District PREPARED BY: /s/ Clark D. McCreedy Clark D. McCreedy Wildlife Biologist Tell City Ranger District i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. List of Tables 1 II. List of Figures 5 III. Introduction 7 IV. Explanation of Biological Evaluation Terminology 7 V. Project Area Description 8 Cultural Context 8 Overview 9 Historic Forest Condition and Disturbance Regimes 11 Ecological Land Types 12 Ecological Sections – Historic Composition and Disturbance Regimes 12 Forest Composition – Indiana, Ecological Sections, and the Hoosier National Forest 14 VI. Hoosier National Forest Land Management Areas 20 Management Areas Suitable for Timber Harvest 20 Management Areas Suitable for Limited Management 22 Protected Management Areas 24 VII. Proposed Management Action and Alternative Descriptions 24 Alternative 1 25 Alternative 2 28 Alternative 3 31 Alternative 4 35 Alternative 5 37 VIII. Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species Standards and Guidelines 40 IX. Species Viability Evaluation Analysis Tiered to Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species 40 X. Project Effects Analyses, Determinations, Recommendations 53 Terrestrial and Karst-Associated Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species 53 Cliff Communities 68 Mesic Forest Communities 71 Dry Forest Species 74 Barrens Communities 77 Open Lands Communities 84 Wetland Communities 88 Cave/Karst Communities 92 Wide-ranging Species 108 Aquatic Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species 111 River Habitats 111 Pond Habitats 123 Plant Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species 126 ii Cliff Communities 128 Mesic Forest Communities 135 Dry Forest Species 144 Barrens Communities 151 Wetland Communities 157 Ponds Communities 160 XI. Literature Cited 186 iii I. List of Tables Table 1. National Forest System Lands within each of the Indiana Counties Encompassing the Hoosier National Forest. Table 2. Forest Types and Age Class Distribution of Forest Community Types on the Hoosier National Forest. Table 3. Number of Live Trees by Species Group and Diameter Size Class (DBH, diameter at breast height in inches) Across the Hoosier National Forest. Table 4. Approximate acreages, and Predominant Land Use, of Management Areas (MAs) as Proposed within the Revised Hoosier National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Alternative 1). Table 5. Approximate Acreages, and Predominant Land Use, of Management Areas (MAs) as Proposed within the Revised Hoosier National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Alternative 2). Table 6. Approximate Acreages, and Predominant Land Use, of Management Areas (MAs) as Proposed within the Revised Hoosier National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Alternative 3). Table 7. Approximate Acreages, and Predominant Land Use, of Management Areas (MAs) as Proposed within the Revised Hoosier National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Alternative 4). Table 8. Approximate Acreages, and Predominant Land Use, of Management Areas (MAs) as Proposed within the Revised Hoosier National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Alternative 5). Table 9. Focal Species Examined by the Species Viability Evaluation Process. Table 10. Focal Species Examined by the Species Viability Evaluation Process and their Habitat Association. Table 11. Habitat Suitability Index Value Created for each Focal Plant Species. Table 12. Determination of the the Risk to Viability for each SVE Species at Year 150. Table 13. Percent of Forest in Mature Hardwoods (80+ YEARS OLD) At 50 and 150 Years. Table 14. Acres of Vegetative Treatment for the first 10 Years. Table 15. Change in Acres of Oak-Hickory over Time Ten Years. Table 16. Approximate Acres of Pine Present On the Hoosier. Table 17. Acres of Barrens After the Next 10 Years. Table 18. Percentage of Suitable Management Areas Maintained as Openings. Table 19. Forest Service Local Road Development For the Next 10 Years. 1 Table 20. RFSS Animal Species within Cliff Communities. Table 21. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Cliff Communities Animal Group. Table 22. RFSS Animal Species within Mesic Forest Communities. Table 23. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Mesic Forest Communities Animal Group. Table 24. RFSS Animal Species within Dry Forest Communities. Table 25. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Dry Forest Communities Animal Group. Table 26. RFSS Animal Species within Barrens Communities. Table 27. Acres of Barrens After the Next 10 Years. Table 28. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Barrens Communities Animal Group. Table 29. RFSS Animal Species within Open Lands Communities. Table 30. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Open Lands Communities Animal Group. Table 31. RFSS Animal Species within Wetlands Communities. Table 32. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Wetlands Communities Animal Group. Table 33. RFSS Animal Species within Cave/Karst Communities. Table 34. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Cave/Karst Communities Animal Group. Table 35. RFSS Animal Species that Use Wide-ranging Habitats. Table 36. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Wide-ranging Species Animal Group. Table 37. RFSS Animal Species within Rivers and Streams. Table 38. The Number of Road and Trail Crossings per Watershed 2 Table 39. Fifth-level Watersheds Containing NFS Lands. Table 40. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Rivers Animal Group. Table 41. RFSS Animal Species within Ponds. Table 42. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Ponds Animal Group. Table 43. RFSS Plant Element Occurrence per Management Area. Table 44. RFSS Plant Species within Cliff Communities Table 45. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Cliff Communities Plant Group. Table 46. RFSS Plant Species within Mesic Forest Communities Plant Group. Table 47. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Mesic Forest Communities Plant Group. Table 48. RFSS Plant Species within Dry Forest Communities Plant Group. Table 49. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Dry Forest Communities Plant Group. Table 50. RFSS Plant Species within Barrens Communities. Table 51. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Barrens Communities Plant Group. Table 52. RFSS Plant Species within Wetlands Communities. Table 53. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Wetlands Communities Plant Group. Table 54. RFSS Plant Species within Ponds Communities. Table 55. Effects Summary and Determination of RFSS Ponds Communities Plant Group. Table 56. Distribution, Habitat, and Project Area Occurrence of Regional Forester’s Sensitive Animal Species on the Hoosier National Forest. Table 57. Summary of Potential Effects on Terrestrial and Aquatic Animals Designated as Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species on the Hoosier National Forest. 3 Table 58. Distribution and Habitat of Plants Designated as Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species on the Hoosier National Forest. Table 59. Summary of Potential Effects on Plants Designated as Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species on the Hoosier National Forest. 4 II. List of Figures Figure 1. Hoosier National Forest Vicinity Map. Figure 2. Ecological Subsections for the Hoosier National Forest. Figure 3. Forest Coverage Found on the Hoosier National Forest. Figure 4. Management Areas as Proposed under Alternative 1. Figure 5. Management Areas as Proposed under Alternative 2. Figure 6. Management Areas as Proposed under Alternative 3. Figure 7. Management Areas as proposed under Alternative 4. Figure 8. Management Areas as proposed under Alternative 5. Figure 9. Relationship of the Karst, Wide-ranging, Ponds, Wetlands, and River Species Viability Evaluation Animal Species to the Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species. Figure 10. Relationship of the Dry Forest, Mesic Forest, Open Land, and Barrens Species Viability Evaluation Animal Species to the Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species. Figure 11. Relationship of the Species Viability Evaluation Plant Species to the Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species. Figure 12. The Amount of Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the Cerulean Warbler at Year 0, 10, 50, and 150. Figure 13. The Amount of Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the Wood Thrush at Year 0, 10, 50, and 150. Figure 14. The Amount of Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the Worm-eating Warbler at Year 0, 10, 50, and 150. Figure 15. The Amount of Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the Henslow’s Sparrow at Year 0, 10, 50, and 150. Figure 16. The Amount of Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the Yellow-breasted Chat at Year 0, 10, 50, and 150. Figure 17. The Amount of Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the Ruffed Grouse at Year 0, 10, 50, and 150. Figure 18. The Amount of Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the Northern Bobwhite at Year 0, 10, 50, and 150. Figure 19. The Amount of Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the American Woodcock at Year 0, 10, 50, and 150. 5 Figure 20. The Amount of Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the Indiana Bat at Year 0, 10, 50, and 150. Figure 21. The Amount of Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the Spotted Salamander at Year 0, 10, 50, and 150. Figure 22. The Amount of Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the Northern River Otter at Year 0, 10, 50, and 150. Figure 23. The Amount of potential Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the Indiana Crayfish at Year 0, 10, 50, and 150. Figure 24. The Amount of Suitable Habitat (HSI >0.50) for the Northern Cavefish
Recommended publications
  • Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida

    Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida

    Comparative functional morphology of attachment devices in Arachnida Vergleichende Funktionsmorphologie der Haftstrukturen bei Spinnentieren (Arthropoda: Arachnida) DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Jonas Otto Wolff geboren am 20. September 1986 in Bergen auf Rügen Kiel, den 2. Juni 2015 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Stanislav N. Gorb _ Zweiter Gutachter: Dr. Dirk Brandis _ Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. Juli 2015 _ Zum Druck genehmigt: 17. Juli 2015 _ gez. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang J. Duschl, Dekan Acknowledgements I owe Prof. Stanislav Gorb a great debt of gratitude. He taught me all skills to get a researcher and gave me all freedom to follow my ideas. I am very thankful for the opportunity to work in an active, fruitful and friendly research environment, with an interdisciplinary team and excellent laboratory equipment. I like to express my gratitude to Esther Appel, Joachim Oesert and Dr. Jan Michels for their kind and enthusiastic support on microscopy techniques. I thank Dr. Thomas Kleinteich and Dr. Jana Willkommen for their guidance on the µCt. For the fruitful discussions and numerous information on physical questions I like to thank Dr. Lars Heepe. I thank Dr. Clemens Schaber for his collaboration and great ideas on how to measure the adhesive forces of the tiny glue droplets of harvestmen. I thank Angela Veenendaal and Bettina Sattler for their kind help on administration issues. Especially I thank my students Ingo Grawe, Fabienne Frost, Marina Wirth and André Karstedt for their commitment and input of ideas.
  • The Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment: Indiana Forestry and Wildlife

    The Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment: Indiana Forestry and Wildlife

    FNR-500-W AGEXTENSIONRICULTURE Author Compiled by Andy Meier, Purdue Hardwood The Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment: Ecosystem Experiment Project Coordinator Indiana Forestry and Wildlife Many of Indiana’s forests, especially in Many woodland bats can be found roosting in the southern part of the state, have been the exfoliating bark of shagbark hickories and dominated by oak and hickory trees for hunting for insects at night in the relatively thousands of years. In recent decades, however, open area beneath the main canopy in oak- forest researchers and managers in the East- hickory forests. Central United States have recognized that these tree species are not replacing themselves Human communities are dependent on these with new seedlings. Instead, another group of trees, too. Thousands of families eat dinner trees, most notably sugar maple, red maple, every night on oak tables or store their dishes and American beech, now make up the in hickory cabinets. Many other families in majority of the forest understory (Figure 1). As Indiana are supported by jobs producing those a result, Indiana’s forests are poised to change oak tables and hickory cabinets. Others enjoy dramatically in the future as a new group of recreation in forests with tall trees and open species comes to dominate the forest. This views that are characteristic of our oak-hickory change will impact the entire ecosystem by forests. But without young oak and hickory altering the habitat available to wildlife that trees in Indiana’s forests to replace the ones depends on our forests. we have now, the forest of the future, and the wildlife that lives there, may be very different.
  • Arachnid Types in the Zoological Museum, Moscow State University. I

    Arachnid Types in the Zoological Museum, Moscow State University. I

    Arthropoda Selecta 25(3): 327–334 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2016 Arachnid types in the Zoological Museum, Moscow State University. I. Opiliones (Arachnida) Òèïû ïàóêîîáðàçíûõ â Çîîëîãè÷åñêîì ìóçåå ÌÃÓ. I. Opiliones (Arachnida) Kirill G. Mikhailov Ê.Ã. Ìèõàéëîâ Zoological Museum MGU, Bolshaya Nikitskaya Str. 2, Moscow 125009 Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Зоологический музей МГУ, ул. Большая Никитская, 2, Москва 125009 Россия. KEY WORDS: arachnids, harvestmen, museum collections, types, holotypes, paratypes. КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: паукообразные, сенокосцы, музейные коллекции, типы, голотипы, паратипы. ABSTRACT: A list is provided of 19 holotypes pod types, as well as most of the crustacean types have and 92 paratypes belonging to 25 species of Opiliones. never enjoyed published catalogues. They represent 14 genera and 5 families (Ischyropsali- Traditionally, the following handwritten informa- dae, Nemastomatidae, Phalangiidae, Sabaconidae, tion sources are accepted in the Museum, at least so Trogulidae) and are kept in the Zoological Museum of since the 1930’s: (1) department acquisition book (Fig. the Moscow State University. Other repositories hous- 1), (2) numerous inventory books on diverse inverte- ing the remaining types of the respective species are brate groups (see Fig. 2 for Opiliones), and (3) type listed as well. cards (Fig. 3). Regrettably, only a small part of this information has been digitalized. РЕЗЮМЕ: Представлен список 19 голотипов и This paper starts a series of lists/catalogues of arach- 92 паратипов, относящихся к 25 видам сенокосцев nid types kept at the Museum. The arachnid collection (Opiliones). Они принадлежат к 14 родам и 5 семей- considered was founded in the 1860’s and presently ствам (Ischyropsalidae, Nemastomatidae, Phalangiidae, contains more than 200,000 specimens of arachnids Sabaconidae, Trogulidae) и хранятся в Зоологичес- alone, Acari excluded [Mikhailov, 2016].
  • Ant-Like Flower Beetles (Coleoptera: Anthicidae) of the Uk, Ireland and Channel Isles

    Ant-Like Flower Beetles (Coleoptera: Anthicidae) of the Uk, Ireland and Channel Isles

    BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 23: 2010 99 ANT-LIKE FLOWER BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: ANTHICIDAE) OF THE UK, IRELAND AND CHANNEL ISLES DMITRY TELNOV Stopinu novads, Darza iela 10, LV-2130, Dzidrinas, Latvia; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Anthicidae or ant-like flower beetles of the UK, Ireland and Channel Isles are reviewed. A species list, identification key, short diagnoses and illustrations of all taxa are given. Brief information on known ecological preferences of species is given. Key words: identification, distribution, key, United Kingdom, Ireland, fauna, ecology. INTRODUCTION Anthicidae are a cosmopolitan family of small to medium-sized, fast-moving beetles of the superfamily Tenebrionoidea. Anthicidae are represented in the World fauna by approximately 100 genera, and about 3500 species (Chandler, 2010). Only a few species are known from the fossil record. The last revision of the British Anthicidae was published by F. D. Buck (1954) in the well-known series Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects. Since then, there have been numerous nomenclatural changes within Anthicidae, and some additional species (introduced) have been recorded from the UK, making Buck’s key out of date. During 2004 and 2005 a total of 3356 specimens of Anthicidae from the UK and Ireland were examined by the author, mainly from the collections of The Natural History Museum (London), Oxford University Museum of Natural History and National Museum of Ireland. Additional data for more than 2100 specimens were received from other British museums and private collections between 2005 and 2007. A new key and short diagnoses for the genera are presented, as well as data on habitats and general distribution of species.
  • The Leafhoppers of Minnesota

    The Leafhoppers of Minnesota

    Technical Bulletin 155 June 1942 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Accepted for publication June 19, 1942 CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 3 Sources of material 4 Systematic treatment 4 Eurymelinae 6 Macropsinae 12 Agalliinae 22 Bythoscopinae 25 Penthimiinae 26 Gyponinae 26 Ledrinae 31 Amblycephalinae 31 Evacanthinae 37 Aphrodinae 38 Dorydiinae 40 Jassinae 43 Athysaninae 43 Balcluthinae 120 Cicadellinae 122 Literature cited 163 Plates 171 Index of plant names 190 Index of leafhopper names 190 2M-6-42 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota John T. Medler INTRODUCTION HIS bulletin attempts to present as accurate and complete a T guide to the leafhoppers of Minnesota as possible within the limits of the material available for study. It is realized that cer- tain groups could not be treated completely because of the lack of available material. Nevertheless, it is hoped that in its present form this treatise will serve as a convenient and useful manual for the systematic and economic worker concerned with the forms of the upper Mississippi Valley. In all cases a reference to the original description of the species and genus is given. Keys are included for the separation of species, genera, and supergeneric groups. In addition to the keys a brief diagnostic description of the important characters of each species is given. Extended descriptions or long lists of references have been omitted since citations to this literature are available from other sources if ac- tually needed (Van Duzee, 1917).
  • The Indiana State Trails · Greenways & Bikeways Plan

    The Indiana State Trails · Greenways & Bikeways Plan

    THE INDIANA STATE TRAILS · GREENWAYS & BIKEWAYS PLAN STATE OF INDIANA Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR Governor State House, Second Floor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Dear Trail Enthusiasts: With great excitement, I welcome you to travel the path down our state’s latest comprehensive trails plan. Not since our state park system was created has the state undertaken an outdoor initiative of this potential scope. This initiative will soon begin uniting our state’s disconnected routes and place every Hoosier within 15 minutes of a trail. The whole will be much greater than the sum of its parts and will benefit Hoosiers from all walks of life. We doubled state funding from $10 million to $20 million annually to take advan- tage of this unique network of opportunities, and at first glance this is a recreation initiative, but we intend it to be much more. Our trails plan will encourage healthy habits in Hoosiers, boost tourism and enhance Indiana’s ability to attract new investment and jobs. Our trail investments can deliver. As Hoosiers enjoy our new trails, they will be hiking, walking, and rid- ing over miles of new high-speed telecommunications and utility conduits. Access to outdoor recreation also ranks among the features potential companies seek for their employees when locating a business. Real success will require the help of local communities, businesses, and private philanthropies. Let’s join together as we create something that will be the envy of the nation! Sincerely, Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. HOOSIERS ON THE MOVE THE
  • New Records of Cleopomiarus Distinctus Boheman, 1845 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and Stricticollis Tobias Marseul, 1879 (Coleoptera, Anthicidae) from Norway

    New Records of Cleopomiarus Distinctus Boheman, 1845 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and Stricticollis Tobias Marseul, 1879 (Coleoptera, Anthicidae) from Norway

    © Norwegian Journal of Entomology. 14 December 2018 New records of Cleopomiarus distinctus Boheman, 1845 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and Stricticollis tobias Marseul, 1879 (Coleoptera, Anthicidae) from Norway MARI STEINERT, MARKUS A. K. SYDENHAM, KATRINE ELDEGARD & STEIN R. MOE Steinert, M., Sydenham, M.A.K., Eldegard, K. & Moe, S.R. 2018. New records of Cleopomiarus distinctus Boheman, 1845 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and Stricticollis tobias Marseul, 1879 (Coleoptera, Anthicidae) from Norway. Norwegian Journal of Entomology 65, 175–182. Two new beetle species for Norway were recorded from field surveys in power-line clearings located in predominantly forested areas in Southeastern Norway; Cleopomiarus distinctus Boheman, 1845 (Curculionidae), and Stricticollis tobias Marseul, 1879 (Anthicidae). A total of 81 specimens of the weevil C. distinctus, were found across four sites in Buskerud over the course of three years (2013–2015). C. distinctus has never been recorded in Scandinavia previously. Three specimens of the ant-like flower beetle S. tobias, were found at two sites in Hedmark in 2015. S. tobias has a wide distribution in other Nordic countries and has been recognized as a “doorstep-species” to Norway from Sweden. The biology of the two species are presented and the potential distribution of the species are discussed. Key words: Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Cleoponmiarus distinctus, Anthicidae, Stricticollis tobias, Southeastern Norway, New records, Power-line clearings. Mari Steinert *, Markus A. K. Sydenham, Katrine Eldegard & Stein R. Moe. Faculty of environmental sciences and natural resource management, The Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432-Ås, Norway. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], katrine.eldegard@nmbu. no, [email protected] * Corresponding author.
  • Wisconsin Entomoloqical Society Newsletter

    Wisconsin Entomoloqical Society Newsletter

    Wisconsin Entomoloqical Society Newsletter Volwne 44, Number 3 October 2017 Stanley W. Szczytko (1949-2017) Szczytko was a longtime member of the Port Superior Marina in Bayfield, Wisconsin, [Editor's note - I am indebted to Dreux J. from which he often sailed with friends and Watermolen, Wisconsin Department of family. A memorial service for Szczytko Natural Resources, for sharing most of the was held on September 7 at the Sentry following information with us.] World Grand Hall. A memorial scholarship is being created in his name at UWSP. Dr. Stanley W. Szczytko, a stonefly expert from the University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point (UWSP), died as a result of a sailing The Harvestmen or Daddy Long-legs of accident on Lake Superior on August 30. He Wisconsin was 68 years old. Szczytko had retired from UWSP in 2013, after attaining the title of By Dreux J. Watermolen Professor of Water Resources. He taught in Dreux. [email protected] the College of Natural Resources (CNR) from 1979 to 2012. ln 1984, he was named Introduction the intern program coordinator and in 1989 the UWSP Water Resources Coordinator. The harvestmen or daddy long-legs During his tenure, Szczytko trained many (Arachnida: Opiliones) have been the young entomologists and future water subject of minimal study in Wisconsin. Levi resources specialists. He also helped to and Levi ( 1952), tangential to their work on establish the CNR's Aquatic Biomonitoring spiders (Araneae), published a preliminary Laboratory in 1985. checklist of fourteen species of harvestmen found in the state along with a key to their Szczytko, a native of New Jersey, had genera.
  • The Leafhoppers, Or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae-Balcluthinae)

    The Leafhoppers, Or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae-Balcluthinae)

    BULLETIN of the ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY HARLOW B. MILLS, Chief The Leafhoppers, or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae-Balcluthinae) D. M. DELONG PriDted by Authority of the STATE OF ILLINOIS DWIGHT H. GREEN, Govtrnor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION FRANK G. THOMPSON, Dirtctor STATE t) F I 1. I, I N O I S DwiGiiT H. CiREES', Governor PEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION ANi:) EDUCATION Frank G. Thompson, Director \^ ^- \' N A T U R A L HISTORY S U R E I ) I 1 S I O N Hari.o\\ B. Mii.i.s, (-liicf \ olumc 24 BULI^K TIN Article 2 The Leafhoppers, or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae— Balcluthinae) ]). M. 1)1 f,c)Nc; Priulid hy Jul/iority of the Stall- of Illinois URBANA, ILLINOIS June 194S STATE OF ILLINOIS DwiGHT H. Green, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Frank G. Thompson, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION Frank G. Thompson, Chairman A. E. Emerson, Ph.D., Rio/oxv George D. Stoddard, Ph.D., Litt.D., L.H.D., L. H Tiffany, Ph.D., Forestry LL.D., President of the Ihiivcrsily nj Illinois l' R. Howson, B.S.C.E., C.E., Walter H. Newhoi'isk, Ph.D., Geology Engineering Roger Adams, Ph.D., D.Sc, Chemistry NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION Urbana, Illinois Scientific and Technical Staff H.^Ri.ow B. Mills, Ph.D., Chief Bessie B. Henderson, M.S., Assistant to the Chief Section of Economic Entomology Section of Forestry Entomologist George C. Decker, Ph.D., WiLLET N. Wandell, M.F., Forester and and Head Head M.S., Entomologist J.
  • American Arachnological Society

    American Arachnological Society

    American Arachnological Society The Opilionid Genera Sabacon and Tomicomerus in America (Opiliones, Troguloidea, Ischyropsalidae) Author(s): William A. Shear Source: Journal of Arachnology, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Jan., 1975), pp. 5-29 Published by: American Arachnological Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3705252 Accessed: 14/10/2008 18:44 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aas. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Arachnological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Arachnology. http://www.jstor.org Shear, W.A.
  • DNR Firewood Sales

    DNR Firewood Sales

    Indiana Establishments with Indiana Department of Natural Resources Compliance Agreements Division of Entomology and Plant Pathology 402 West Washington Street, Room W290 DNRP - Firewood Sales Indianapolis, Indiana 46240-2739 (317) 232-4120 County Business Phone Agreement Number Expires Allen Busy Beaver Lumber 260-637-3183 DNRP (FS)-02 21 VB 26 3/8/2022 Allen A&C Seasoned Firewood 260-705-0694 DNRP (FS)-02 21 VB 29 3/18/2022 Allen Michael Henry 260-433-7306 DNRP (FS)-02 21 VB 34 3/23/2022 Allen Tiffany D. Hilty 260-433-0596 DNRP (FS)-02 21 VB 39 3/23/2022 Allen John Orth's Tree Service 260-413-5727 DNRP (FS)-02 20 VB 40 12/16/2021 Allen Blessed Bundles 260-418-2634 DNRP (FS)-02 21 VB 41 3/27/2022 Allen Blind Dog Enterprises LLC 260-750-8540 DNRP (FS)-02 21 VB 42 3/25/2022 Brown Designscape Horticultural Services 812-988-8900 DNRP (FS)-07 21 KC 20 3/1/2022 Brown Yellowwood State Forest 812-988-7945 DNRP (FS)-07 21 KC 48 2/1/2022 Brown Hidden Valley Farms 812-988-6284 DNRP (FS)-07 21 KC 49 5/1/2022 Brown Luke Robertson 812-345-0310 DNRP (FS)-07 21 KC 50 3/1/2022 Brown Eaton Family Wood and Tree Service 812-340-5292 DNRP (FS)-07 21 KC 55 5/1/2022 Clark Wood Doctor 812-989-3994 DNRP (FS)-10 21 EBB 9 3/22/2022 Clay Bruce's Bait Shop 812-665-9505 DNRP (FS)-11 21 KC 10 3/1/2022 Clay Dewey's Enterprises DNRP (FS)-11 21 KC 13 3/1/2022 Clinton HELL'N ELLEN'S BUNDLED FIRE 317-946-9809 DNRP (FS)-12 21 RH 3 4/9/2022 Clinton KNL Firewood 765-419-4895 DNRP (FS)-12 21 RH 4 5/4/2022 Crawford Larimore Electric, Inc.dba/Larimore Wood 812-972-4857 DNRP (FS)-13 21 AR 10 4/16/2022 Crawford Dennis R.
  • The Hoosier- Shawnee Ecological Assessment Area

    The Hoosier- Shawnee Ecological Assessment Area

    United States Department of Agriculture The Hoosier- Forest Service Shawnee Ecological North Central Assessment Research Station General Frank R. Thompson, III, Editor Technical Report NC-244 Thompson, Frank R., III, ed 2004. The Hoosier-Shawnee Ecological Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-244. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 267 p. This report is a scientific assessment of the characteristic composition, structure, and processes of ecosystems in the southern one-third of Illinois and Indiana and a small part of western Kentucky. It includes chapters on ecological sections and soils, water resources, forest, plants and communities, aquatic animals, terrestrial animals, forest diseases and pests, and exotic animals. The information presented provides a context for land and resource management planning on the Hoosier and Shawnee National Forests. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Key Words: crayfish, current conditions, communities, exotics, fish, forests, Hoosier National Forest, mussels, plants, Shawnee National Forest, soils, water resources, wildlife. Cover photograph: Camel Rock in Garden of the Gods Recreation Area, with Shawnee Hills and Garden of the Gods Wilderness in the back- ground, Shawnee National Forest, Illinois. Contents Preface....................................................................................................................... II North Central Research Station USDA Forest Service Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................