DOCSLIB.ORG

AF J NOMINEE REPOR T U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AF J NOMINEE REPOR T U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Leonard Steven AFJ NOMINEE REPORT AFJ Grasz U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit WWW.AFJ.ORG CONTENTS Introduction, 1 Biography, 2 Legal and other views, 3 Reproductive Rights, 3 Rights of Fetuses, 4 Nebraska Family Alliance, 5 Litigation, 5 LGBTQ Equality, 6 Death Penalty, 8 Church and State, 9 Money and Politics, 9 Conclusion, 10 WWW.AFJ.ORG PAGE 1 vigorously against women’s reproductive rights. He defended Nebraska’s unconstitutional statute in Stenberg v. INTRODUCTION 8 Carhart, and sought to deny Medicaid coverage, as required by federal law, to On August 3, 2017, President Trump nominated a woman who sought to terminate her Leonard Steven “Steve” Grasz, a former Chief pregnancy because she had been raped.9 Deputy Attorney General of Nebraska, to serve as a federal judge on the Court of Appeals for Grasz has argued with equal enthusiasm the Eighth Circuit. Grasz is the President’s third against LGBTQ equality. In 2013, he nominee to that court, along with David Stras 1 proposed an Amendment to the Omaha and Ralph Erickson. Grasz is nominated to fill City Charter that would have allowed the seat of former Chief Judge William J. Riley, employers to discriminate against LGBTQ who took senior status on June 30, 2017. people in hiring.10 While Grasz was on the board, the Family Alliance opposed Grasz’s record is deeply concerning, particularly legislation to “[p]rohibit discrimination his opposition to the rights of women and the based upon sexual orientation and gender LGBTQ community. Alliance for Justice strongly identity” in the workplace by arguing that opposes Grasz’s nomination. the terms “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” describe “behaviors,” rather than Grasz’s nomination is in keeping with President “traits” like race.11 Trump’s promise to name candidates to the federal judiciary who are hostile to Roe v. 2 Among the most disturbing content in Wade. Notably, Grasz has compared the the Family Alliance’s written materials are “personhood” of fetuses to the civil rights of 3 articles supporting the cruel practice of Native and African Americans. Moreover, since conversion therapy.12 The Alliance has August 2015, Grasz has served on the Board of claimed that “[a] generation of children the Nebraska Family Alliance, and is currently 4 is being raised to believe in the social a director. The Family Alliance has celebrated construct of a gender spectrum, instead of the mass closings of clinics that offer women’s the biological reality of male and female. reproductive services,5 condemned Supreme 6 This is a trend that should be rejected Court decisions that protect women’s rights, at every level.”13 To that end, the Family and claimed that abortion rights “put[] women’s 7 Alliance also signed an amicus brief in lives at risk.” As an attorney, Grasz fought 8 Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914, 945–46 (2001). 1 David Stras, Alliance for Justice (May 12, 2017), https://www.afj.org/wp-content/up- 9 See Little Rock Family Planning Servs., P.A. v. Dalton, 60 F.3d 497 (8th Cir. 1995); loads/2017/08/AFJ-Report-David-Stras.pdf; Ralph Erickson, Alliance for Justice (July 24, 2017), see also Paul Hammel, Accusation Called ‘Unfounded’, Omaha World-Herald (Oct. 1, https://www.afj.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/AFJ-Erickson-Report.pdf. 1994). 2 See e.g., Dan Mangan, Trump: I’ll appoint Supreme Court justices to overturn Roe v. Wade 10 See Proposed Amendment to Omaha Charter Section 8, 8.02A: Religious Freedom abortion case, CNBC (Oct. 16, 2016), http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/19/trump-ill-appoint-supreme- and Rights of Conscience (2013); see also City of Omaha Charter Study Review Con- court-justices-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-abortion-case.html. vention, Testimony, 147–48 (Dec. 3, 2013). 3 See Steven Grasz, If Standing Bear Could Talk. Why There is No Constitutional Right to Kill 11 See Jake Bliss, Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Race: Are They Three of a Partially-Born Human Being, 33 Creighton L. Rev. 23, 28–29 (1999). a Kind?, Nebraska Family Alliance (April 7, 2017), https://nebraskafamilyalliance.org/ 4 Sen. Comm. On the Judiciary, 115th Cong., Leonard Steven Grasz: Questionnaire for Judicial sexual-orientation-gender-identity-race-three-kind/. Nominees, Financial Disclosure Report. 12 See Paul Weber, How Jayson Found Help for Unwanted Same-Sex Attraction, Ne- 5 Cheryl Sullenger, Pro-Life Victory: A Record 87 Abortion Clinics Closed in 2013, Nebraska braska Family Alliance (Aug. 4, 2017), https://nebraskafamilyalliance.org/jayson-coun- Family Alliance (Dec. 23, 2013), https://nebraskafamilyalliance.org/pro-life-victory-a-record-87- seling-same-sex-attraction/; see also Nate Grasz, Legislation Criminalizing Conversion abortion-clinics-closed-in-2013/. Therapy Sweeping the Nation, Nebraska Family Alliance (July 21, 2017), https:// 6 Al Risowski, What the Supreme Court’s Ruling on Texas HB2 Means for Nebraska, Nebras- nebraskafamilyalliance.org/legislation-criminalizing-conversion-therapy-sweeping-na- ka Family Alliance (June 27, 2016), https://nebraskafamilyalliance.org/what-the-supreme-courts- tion/. ruling-about-texas-hb2-means-for-nebraska/. 13 See School Defends Controversial “Transition Ceremony” in Kindergarten Class- 7 See Abortion Harms Women, Nebraska Family Alliance, https://nebraskafamilyalliance. room, Nebraska Family Alliance (August 29, 2017), https://nebraskafamilyalliance.org/ org/policy/life/abortion-harms-women/ (last visited Sept. 17, 2017). school-defends-controversial-transition-ceremony-kindergarten-classroom/. WWW.AFJ.ORG PAGE 2 Obergefell v. Hodges arguing that only the interest groups in the judicial selection parenting of “a mother and a father[,]” rather process: than a same-sex couple, “provides children with the optimal environment for their cognitive, Observers state that there are social, and emotional development from infancy a number of interest groups through adolescence.”14 with potentially disproportionate influence including the ACLU, On another front, Grasz has vigorously Planned Parenthood, the Nebraska advocated for the implementation of the death Association of Trial Attorneys, penalty in Nebraska, fighting to reinstate the Nebraska Defense Counsel the practice even after the state legislature Association, and the Nebraska State repealed capital punishment statutes.15 Bar Association itself. As with the political influence discussed above, Grasz has also displayed troubling views they say, the current system appears regarding separation of church and state, to foster disproportionate influence raising questions about whether he will properly from special interest groups on one enforce Supreme Court precedent on the issue. side of the political spectrum[.]17 Indeed, for someone who wants to be a Authoring a paper that opposes the federal judge, responsible for fairly applying involvement of special interest groups in Supreme Court precedent, it is worrying that judicial selection for the Federalist Society, Grasz has not only disagreed with Supreme a special interest group responsible Court jurisprudence but has questioned the for selecting lists of nominees for the Court’s legitimacy when it issues decisions President, is not only rank hypocrisy; he personally disagrees with. For example, it is highly telling.18 Grasz’s open in 2012, following National Federation of disparagement of the “disproportionate Independent Businesses v. Sebelius, Grasz influence” of groups that he perceives to claimed, “[t]he Roberts opinion has itself placed be on one side of the ideological spectrum the legitimacy of the court, as well as our raises questions about his ability to act as freedom as Americans, in great jeopardy.” He an impartial and unbiased jurist. said the Chief Justice (whom Grasz had publicly supported) “ushered in the ultimate transfer of Finally, it bears noting, Grasz’s nomination limitless power to the federal government.”16 continues President Trump’s disturbing trend of nominating overwhelmingly white, Moreover, Grasz, a member of the Federalist male nominees to the federal judiciary. Society Nebraska Lawyers Chapter Steering Following the retirement of Judge Diana Committee, in an article for the Federalist Murphy, who Trump nominated David Stras Society, lamented the influence of special to replace, Judge Jane Kelly remains the 14 Brief for Amicus Curiae Organizations and Scholars of Gender-Diverse Parenting in Support lone woman on the Eighth Circuit (she and of Respondents, Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 1320 at *12–13 (Apr. 2, 2015), https://nebraskafamilyalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Citizen-Link-Amicus-Brief.pdf. 17 L. Steven Grasz, Judicial Selection in Nebraska, The Federalist Society White 15 See Sen. Comm. On the Judiciary, 115th Cong., Leonard Steven Grasz: Questionnaire for Paper (May 8, 2012), https://www.fed-soc.org/publications/detail/judicial-selection-in-ne- Judicial Nominees, 47¬¬–48; see also Nebraskans for the Death Penalty, http://www.votere- braska. peal.com/. 18 See Melissa Maleske, Trump Says Federalist Society Will Pick His Judges For Him, 16 See Steve Grasz, Roberts jeopardized legitimacy of high court, Lincoln Journal Star (July Law 360 (June 14, 2016), https://www.law360.com/articles/806797/trump-says-federal- 10, 2012). ist-society-will-pick-his-judges-for-him. WWW.AFJ.ORG PAGE 3 Murphy were the only two female judges ever before the Supreme Court in Stenberg in the history of the Eighth Circuit). Last year, v. Carhart.21 Grasz also authored briefs Senate Republicans refused to consider the in multiple other Supreme Court, federal nomination of Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Court of Appeals, and State Supreme Puhl for the Eighth Circuit, despite bipartisan Court cases, and “researched and wrote support from her home-state senators and more than 80 published Attorney General the unanimous approval of the Judiciary Opinions as well as many unpublished Committee. Of the three vacancies on the Eight confidential opinions.”22 Circuit, President Trump has nominated white men to fill them all. In May 2002, Grasz left the Nebraska Attorney General’s Office and joined Husch Blackwell LLP in Omaha, where he has been Senior Counsel since 2013.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 29 LGBT Groups Oppose Confirmation of Leonard Steven Grasz
    December 11, 2017 To the Honorable Members of the United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 RE: 29 LGBT Groups Oppose Confirmation of Leonard Steven Grasz Dear Senator: We, the undersigned 29 national, state and local advocacy organizations, representing the interests of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people and everyone living with HIV, write to urge you to oppose the nomination of Leonard Steven Grasz to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. After a comprehensive review of his record, we have concluded that his views on civil rights issues are fundamentally at odds with the principles of equality, liberty, justice and dignity under the law, particularly with regard to LGBT Americans, and that he will not be able to overcome his personal beliefs when asked to administer fair and impartial justice. We are convinced that Mr. Grasz is demonstrably unqualified for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench. We strongly urge you to oppose his nomination. As outlined below, we have grave concerns about Mr. Grasz’s ability to serve as a fair and impartial judge due to his long history of targeting LGBT people. Although we will focus on the anti- LGBT aspects of Mr. Grasz’s record, it is important to emphasize that these are not concerns unique to the communities that we serve. The Senate should heed the warning of the American Bar Association (ABA) that Mr. Grasz is not qualified for an appointment on the federal bench because he is unable to put the law ahead of his personal beliefs and to administer fair and impartial justice to all litigants who might come before him.1 The ABA is non-partisan and non-ideological, so when the organization deems a judicial nominee ‘Not Qualified’ out of concerns about bias, it suggests that the nominee has failed to meet even basic requirements of fairness.
    [Show full text]
  • On Behalf of the Human Rights Campaign (HRC)
    November 29, 2017 Dear Senator: On behalf of the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), America’s largest civil rights organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) equality, we write to oppose the nomination of L. Steven Grasz to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Based on our review of his record, we believe Grasz does not possess the temperament required to be an impartial adjudicator. Impartial organizations that seek to preserve the integrity of our judicial system agree with our assessment. The American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary unanimously found Grasz to be “Not Qualified” to serve on the Eighth Circuit.1 The President and the Senate should ensure that only fair-minded individuals, committed to impartial judgments and policies based upon fact rather than ideology, serve our nation in the courts. Only nominees with exceptional intellectual ability, distinguished experience in law, and a temperament that would enable them to make decisions fairly and with an open mind should be confirmed for lifetime appointments to the bench. These attributes are vital to ensuring the future of our nation’s civil rights laws and guaranteeing that courts recognize LGBTQ people’s fundamental rights and basic equality. Throughout the course of his career in both the private and public sectors, Grasz has threatened the civil liberties of LGBTQ Americans. As a member of the City of Omaha Charter Review Convention and as Chief Deputy Attorney General of Nebraska, Grasz advocated for the removal of protections that benefited the LGBTQ community. Further, Grasz served on the Board of Directors of the Nebraska Family Alliance (NFA) since August 2015,2 an organization opposed to LGBTQ rights and recognition, claiming, “[a]dding sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classifications in the law is a troublesome—and unnecessary—proposal that inflicts 1 See Pamela A.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States in the Supreme Court of the United States
    NOS. 14-556, 14-562, 14-571, 14-574 In the Supreme Court of the United States JAMES OBERGEFELL, et al., Petitioners, v. RICHARD HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al., Respondents. --------------------------- VALERIA TANCO, et al., Petitioners, v. BILL HASLAM, GOVERNOR OF TENNESSEE, et al., Respondents. --------------------------- APRIL DEBOER, et al., Petitioners, v. RICK SNYDER, GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, et al., Respondents. --------------------------- GREGORY BOURKE, et al., Petitioners, v. STEVE BESHEAR, GOVERNOR OF KENTUCKY, et al., Respondents. On Writs of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE ORGANIZATIONS AND SCHOLARS OF GENDER-DIVERSE PARENTING IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS CECILIA M. WOOD EDWARD H. TRENT LAW OFFICE OF CECILIA M. WOOD Counsel of Record 919 Congress Ave. WIMBERLY LAWSON WRIGHT Suite 830 DAVES & JONES, PLLC Austin, TX 78701 550 W. Main Ave. (512) 708-8783 Suite 900 [email protected] Knoxville, TN 37902 (865) 546-1000 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae Becker Gallagher · Cincinnati, OH · Washington, D.C. · 800.890.5001 i QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex? 2. Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state? ii TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTIONS PRESENTED ................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................. iv INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ............... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT.................. 3 ARGUMENT ............................... 6 I. Compelling Evidence Shows that Children Benefit from the Unique Parenting Contributions of Both Men and Women, Providing a Rational and Compelling Basis for States to Continue to Exclusively Define Marriage as the Union of One Man and One Woman ................................
    [Show full text]
  • 20180531124951132 17-1492 Amicus Brief of Twenty-Seven Family Policy Organizations
    NO. 17-1492 In The Supreme Court of the United States REBEKAH GEE, SECRETARY, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HOSPITALS, Petitioner, v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GULF COAST, INC., ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit BRIEF OF TWENTY-SEVEN FAMILY POLICY ORGANIZATIONS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER David A. Cortman Kristen K. Waggoner ALLIANCE DEFENDING Kevin H. Theriot FREEDOM Counsel of Record 1000 Hurricane Shoals Rd. Denise M. Burke N.E., Ste. D-1100 Elissa M. Graves Lawrenceville, GA 30043 ALLIANCE DEFENDING (770) 339-0774 FREEDOM 15100 N. 90th Street Scottsdale, AZ 85260 (480) 444-0020 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ............................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE .......................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 2 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ...................................... 3 ARGUMENT .................................................................. 4 I. Failure to follow the scheme of remedies already provided in the Medicaid statute frustrates congressional intent to create a uniform administrative process for efficiency purposes. .............................................. 5 II. The Medicaid statute is undermined by the patchwork of remedies produced by a system of differing enforcement mechanisms. .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • July 30, 2018 Department of Health and Human Services Office Of
    July 30, 2018 Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health Office of Population Affairs [SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY] Re: Family Planning and the Protect Life Rule, ID: HHS-OS-2018-0008-0001 Family Policy Alliance is a national pro-family organization that partners with a network of over 40 state-based family policy groups. Together, we advance policy at state capitols, help elect statesmen who share our values, and equip churches and grassroots networks to advocate for family-centered policies across the country. We represent millions of Americans who believe public policy should reflect the truth that all life, from the moment of conception, is a gift from God. Protecting life honors God, and leads to the creation of stable, safe, and nurturing families. Thriving families are the building blocks of a prosperous society. For these reasons we are submitting this comment in strong support of HHS-OS-2018- 0008-0001, known as the Protect Life Rule. We applaud the Department’s commitment to honor the original and true intent of Congress to make family planning services available to all Americans through Title X of the Public Health Service Act.1 Title X Compliance and Support of Proposed § 59.13 Since the Nixon-era, this Department has interpreted Section 300a-6 (which prohibits funding programs where abortion is a method of family planning) to include a prohibition on funding methods of promoting, encouraging, and advocating abortion. According to the intent of Congress, abortion is not and can never be a part of true family planning.2 Family planning services “should help men, women, and adolescents make healthy and fully informed decisions about starting a family and determine the number and spacing of children.”3 1 TITLE X OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES ACT, 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]