Counter-Terrorism International Conference 2007
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
To the Committee Secretary
To the Committee Secretary Standing Committee on Communications, Information Technology and the Arts House of Representatives Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Australia Submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Community Broadcasting Inquiry from Melbourne Community Television Consortium (MCTC), C31 Melbourne and Geelong Section 1 – Introduction 1.1 Introductory Remarks We are grateful for the opportunity to discuss several of the issues faced by C31 in Melbourne that fall within the terms of reference of this inquiry. C31 is a community television broadcaster that transmits to the area of Greater Melbourne and Geelong, providing local communities and community groups with access to airspace and training programs. C31 a vehicle for under represented community groups to share their voice with their own communities and the general public. Our aim at C31 is to provide Melbournians with a station that provides access, promotes diversity, engages with a local audience and provides high quality programming. This submission is intended to be read as an adjunct to the CBAA general and television submissions to the current inquiry. C31 Melbourne and Geelong participated in, and fully endorses the CBAA submissions to the current inquiry. C31 Melbourne and Geelong is also represented on the ‘Community Spectrum Taskforce’, and participated in and endorses the CST submission as the first step towards expanded civil use of BSB spectrum in addition to the current community broadcasting licensees. 1.2 Summary Section 2 of this submission looks at the role of MCTC in Melbourne, and reviews C31’s current broadcast range and limitations. -
Melbourne Tv Guide Sbs
Melbourne tv guide sbs Continue National Public Television Network in Australia SBSCountryAustraliaBroadcast areaNationwideNetworkSBS TelevisionSloganA World DifferenceHeadquartersArtarmon, New South WalesProgrammingLanguage (s)EnglishPicture format1080i (HDTV) (selected channels only; reduced to 16:9 576i for SDTV)OwnershipOwnerSpecial Broadcasting ServiceSister channelsSBS HDSBS VicelandSBS World MoviesSBS FoodNITVHistoryLanched24 1980; 39 years ago (1980-10-24)Former namesSBS Ethnic TV (1979)Experimental multicultural television - MTV2 (1980)Channel 0/28 (1980)Network 0-28 (1983-1985)SBS TV (1985-2009)SBS ONE (June 12 20 4 July 2015)LinksWebsitewww.sbs.com.auAccessacenceTerlestorDVB-T7Freeview SBS (virtual)03Freeview SBS HD (virtual)30CableFoxtel/Optus (virtual)104TransACT (virtual)3SatelliteFoxtel (virtual)104VAST (virtual)3 SBS is the national public television network in Australia. Established on October 24, 1980, it is the responsibility of SBS's television division and is available nationally. In 2018, SBS's share of the audience was 7.9%. History Origins SBS began test broadcasts in April 1979 as SBS Ethnic Television when it showed various foreign language programs on ABV-2 Melbourne and ABN-2 Sydney on Sunday mornings. Full-time transmission began at 6.30 p.m. on 24 October 1980 (United Nations Day) as channel 0/28. At the time, SBS was broadcasting on UHF Channel 28 and VHF Channel 0. Bruce Gyngell, who introduced television to Australia back in 1956, was tasked with introducing the first batch of programs on the new station. The first program shown was a documentary about multiculturalism entitled Who are we? which was organized, produced and directed by renowned Australian journalist Peter Luck. When the show starts during the night, the opening ad will be as follows with Fanfare for the common man Aaron Copeland playing in the background: Welcome to Channel 0/28 multicultural television, Sydney and Melbourne. -
Living Spirit’: Muslim Women and Human Rights Forum – the Right to Participate in Social Change
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission REPORT on the Muslim Women’s Project 2006 A dialogue on human rights and responsibilities December 2006 © Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, 2008 ISBN: 978-1-921449-01-7 1 Acknowledgements The Commission would like to thank the Islamic Women’s Welfare Council of Victoria, our principal partner and collaborator in developing the forum. The project was officially supported by the Federation of Ethnic Communities’ Council of Australia, the Equal Opportunity Commission Victoria, the Ethnic Communities’ Council of Victoria, the Islamic Council of Victoria, the Islamic Girls’ and Women's Group, the Centre for Multicultural Youth Issues, the Victorian Immigrant and Refugee Women’s Coalition and Goulburn Ovens Institute of TAFE. The support of all of these organisations was vital to the overall success of the forum. 2 Contents Glossary of abbreviations Foreword 1. What is the purpose of this report? 2. What is the Muslim Women’s Project? 3. What is the background to the project? 3.1 What were the aims of the project? 3.2 What did the project consist of? 3.2.1 Consultations 3.2.2 Audit 3.2.3 Forum 4. ‘Living Spirit’: Muslim Women and Human Rights Forum – the right to participate in social change 4.1 Background to the Living Spirit Forum 4.2 Aim of the Living Spirit Forum 4.3 Participants 4.4 Living Spirit Forum overview 4.5 Evaluation of the Living Spirit Forum 5. What were the issues identified throughout the project that affect Muslim Australian women and what were some of the suggested -
Young Muslims of Australia: Anatomy of a Multicultural Success Story
Joshua M. Roose Young Muslims of Australia: anatomy of a multicultural success story MULTICULTURALISM IN EUROPE, as a state policy based on mutual respect and recognition of difference, is currently under siege. In the past year alone, the leaders of Britain, Germany and the Netherlands have publicly declared the failure of multicultural policies. In June 2011 the Dutch government declared that the Netherlands ‘steps away from the model of a multicultural society’,1 whilst speaking in February 2011 the British Prime Minister David Cameron declared that multiculturalism had ‘failed’ to provide a national vision to which Muslims would want to belong.2 In October 2010 Angela Merkel commented that Germany’s attempts to create a multicultural society had ‘utterly failed’.3 Even the former French President, leader of a decidedly non-multiculturalist society, had gleefully stuck the boot in, publicly condemning the policy.4 These leaders from the right of the political spectrum have asserted that multiculturalism has not encouraged the integration of migrants, specifically ‘Muslim’ migrants. Australian Multiculturalism Multiculturalism in Europe and Muslims are clearly seen as ‘joined at the proverbial hip’,5 and attacks upon both have dramatically increased in the past decade in the context of the ‘war on terror’ and ‘home-grown terrorism’. This has been the case across western contexts. In the past decade multiculturalism in Australia has faced significant challenges, primarily through efforts to reorient it towards an integrationist model. Under the conservative Howard government, the federal Department of Multicultural Affairs was changed in January 2007 to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC) and a citizenship ‘pledge’ was introduced. -
NEMBC EB Spring 2005
THE ETHNIC BROADCASTER Journal of the National Ethnic and Multicultural Broadcasters’ Council Spring 2005 Inside: Funding Update AERTP Lives 2005 NEMBC Conference McDonald’s Radio Likely to Incite Hatred Giving New Horizons to our Mind and much more Multiculturalism - A Core Australian Value Ethnic broadcasters are gravely concerned about the questioning of The Ethnic Broadcaster multiculturalism in high places, questioning that goes so far as considering abandoning the policy. They are also concerned at the Spring 2005 selective, if not racist, redefinitions of Australian values, following the tragic and indefensible London terrorist attacks. Some politicians and commentators attacked multiculturalism as dividing the people and the nation, suggesting that it can – and Contents some accuse that it does - harbor hotheads or threats to Australia’s national security and cohesion. 3 Training News They have called for unprecedented measures – many of which have been adopted by 5 Targeted Funding the Government – far in excess of what may be required to meet legitimate concerns of terrorist attacks in Australia. These include detaining and tagging people on Review suspicion, policing what happens in schools, and what people wear. They extend to how people exercise their democratic rights of free speech, free association, and 6 Many Languages, socio-political and religious beliefs. Many Voices Australian citizenship will be harder and take longer to obtain and it can be revoked in 7 AERTP Lives certain circumstances. Add to this statements, by Treasurer Costello and Education Minister Nelson that those, “Who do not like Australia can pack up and go!” One can 8 McDonald’s Radio see accusations of terrorism pointing more threateningly to migrants and non- Australian born citizens and in the first place to Muslims. -
Final Thesis, September 26
For God’s Sake! Rethinking Secularism in Australia Melanie Brown A public religion: Muslims praying on the street outside Lakemba mosque, Western Sydney 1 This work is substantially my own, and where any part of this work is not my own, I have indicated this by acknowledging the source of that part or those parts of the work. Signed: _______________ Date: 11/10/2011 Honours dissertation Department of Government and International Relations The University of Sydney Word Count: 19793 Student ID: 307193926 2 ABSTRACT This dissertation proposes a new way of thinking about Muslims, religion and politics in Australia. It critically engages those commentators, academics and politicians who in recent years have used the language of ‘secularism’ to denounce publicly what they see as a major social and political threat posed by Australia’s growing Muslim population. The worn-out nineteenth-century ideology of secularism they draw upon presupposes the irrational primitivism of religion and fails to recognise present-day counter-trends. It should be rejected. This dissertation calls for a radical rethinking of the appropriate relations between religion and politics in a democratic society like Australia. It suggests that the principle of ‘religious secularity’ might be the answer: a new twenty-first century secularism which has room for the public flourishing of religions at the level of society, but maintains the independence of the state from religion. The dissertation shows, contrary to common perceptions, and despite the resilience of their highly visible and public religiosity, that Australia’s large Muslim communities overwhelmingly support the autonomy of state institutions from religious influence, and that they are important protagonists of the new secularism. -
THIRD QUARTER Report Reporting Period 01/07/2014–30/09/2014
THIRD QUARTER REPOrt REPORTING PERIOD 01/07/2014–30/09/2014 ░ su.rmit.edu.au ░ facebook.com/RUSUpage ░ twitter.com/RMITSU ░ youtube.com/RUSUonline ░ President’s Report It’s been a quarter of steady improvement for the Student Union between July and September this year. We had a number of new students join our volunteer program off the back of second semester orientation events with a total of over 2,200 hours of volunteering completed in the three month period. Membership also continues to James climb to our annual target, helped Michelmore along by the reintroduction of a university-wide mail-out which will continue in 2015. Six new student clubs were also welcomed to RUSU this quarter, with eight more working to affiliate before the end of 2014. Financially, the organisation is on track with the annual budget heading in to the final quarter of 2014 with a 2015 funding arrangement almost finalised. This quarter saw the annual celebration of democracy at RMIT that is the RUSU elections. 75 candidates from 3 distinct teams vied for the support of their peers in a hotly contested election. A notable increase in student engagement and voter turnout was witnessed this year, particularly at the Brunswick and Bundoora campuses. Increased engagement at these outer campuses demonstrates the success of specific programs and initiatives aimed at improving campus life for these students. All told, almost 3,500 students participated in the week long elections, re-affirming the student union’s authority and mandate for representing the students of RMIT in 2015. Our third quarter also played host to a number of exciting events including a Carnivale Party, a postgrad ball, the inaugural RUSU pub crawl, a terrarium workshop, a volunteer camp and more.